Abstract

Analysis of APC mutations in colonic and duodenal tumours from familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients has shown that the site of the first hit, the germline mutation, can predict the type and position of the somatic mutation or ‘second hit’. The two APC mutations are selected on the basis of a ‘just right’ level of beta-catenin signalling in intestinal tumours achieved through retention of some of the seven 20-amino-acid beta-catenin degradation repeats. Desmoids are a life threatening extra-colonic manifestation in FAP patients. These aggressive tumours of mesenchymal origin are, at present, poorly characterized in terms of mutational APC spectra. We have investigated somatic mutations in the largest cohort of FAP-associated desmoids to date, and combined our results with previously published data. Somatic mutations were found to occur non-randomly and the position of the germline mutation shown to be a major determinant of the somatic mutation, a characteristic shared with intestinal tumours from FAP patients. In contrast to colonic polyps, loss of heterozygosity in desmoids involved deletion rather than mitotic recombination. While tumours from the colorectum and upper gastrointestinal tract usually retain one to two and three to four beta-catenin degradation repeats, respectively, most desmoids preferentially retain two repeats ( P < 0.001, χ2 test). In addition, most desmoids with two APC hits (87%, 26/30) had one mutated allele with no 20-amino acid repeats ( P < 0.001). This feature, unique among FAP tumours, indicates that a mutation deleting all repeats from one allele may be an important component in maintaining appropriate levels of beta-catenin signalling levels in desmoid tumour cells.

INTRODUCTION

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal, dominantly inherited, Mendelian cancer syndrome caused by germline mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli ( APC ) gene, which encodes a large multifunctional protein. FAP is characterized by the development of hundreds or thousands of colorectal polyps, which almost inevitably progress to colorectal cancer unless prophylactic colectomy is undertaken. Following surgery, the mortality of patients with FAP remains in excess of the general population, due to extra-colonic manifestations such as upper gastrointestinal polyps and desmoid tumours ( 1 ).

Desmoid tumours are poorly understood, frequently aggressive tumours of mesenchymal origin, which arise in musculoaponeurotic structures. Intra-abdominal desmoids often appear to be surgically induced—typically by prophylactic colectomy—but can arise in the absence of surgery ( 2 ). The incidence of desmoids in FAP has been estimated to be around 850 times that of the general population and 10–25% of FAP patients will develop at least one desmoid within their lifetime ( 3–6 ). A number of independent predictors of increased desmoid risk have been identified, including female gender, a family history of desmoids and a germline mutation distal to codon 1399 ( 7 , 8 ).

APC is a tumour suppressor gene, and consistent with Knudson's two-hit hypothesis, both alleles are mutated in FAP-associated intestinal tumours: one in the germline and the other in the soma ( 9–12 ). Somatic APC mutations, principally protein truncating changes and loss of heterozygosity (LOH), have been reported in both colonic and duodenal polyps. These mutations occur non-randomly ( 13 , 14 ). In colonic polyps, truncating mutations tend to cluster in a segment of the APC gene known as the mutation cluster region (MCR), which lies between codons 1250 and 1450 ( 13 ). A similar MCR has been identified in the duodenum between codons 1400 and 1580 ( 14 ). LOH is the most likely second hit in colonic polyps from those patients with a germline mutation between the first and second 20-amino acid beta-catenin degradation repeats (20-AARs) of APC , close to 1300; LOH usually occurs by mitotic recombination, with no decrease in copy number. Other FAP patients generally have a truncating mutation as the second hit ( 13 ). It has been suggested that there needs to be a ‘just right’ level of beta-catenin signalling that results from the two APC mutations ( 15 ). In fact, the incipient colorectal tumour can tolerate some variation in its genotype, but most acquire mutant proteins that between them encode two, or less often one, 20-AARs.

Extra-colonic tumours in FAP show similar associations, but different regions of the APC gene are involved. Tumours taken from the upper gastrointestinal tract of FAP patients with germline APC mutations after codon 1400 tend to show allelic loss, whereas tumours from other patients have truncating mutations after codon 1400 as the somatic mutation ( 14 ). A ‘first hit–second hit’ association at APC has also been found in sporadic colorectal tumours ( 13 ). Overall, it appears that APC mutations are selected for their ability to produce an optimal level of beta-catenin activation in the intestinal tumour cell ( 16 ).

Combining the data from three studies ( 8 , 13 , 17 ) suggested that somatic truncating mutations distal to codon 1400 occurred in those desmoids with a germline mutation proximal to codon 1400 and, in contrast, allelic loss was found in lesions when the patient's germline mutation was distal to codon 1449. In order to extend these observations and so determine whether an association between first and second hits does exist in FAP-associated desmoids, we have undertaken the largest analysis to date of somatic APC mutations arising in these tumours.

RESULTS

Somatic mutations were identified in 19/23 tumours (83%): truncating somatic mutations in 63% (12/19), allelic loss in 32% (6/19) and exonic deletion in 5% (1/19) of desmoids investigated. LOH was identified in six tumours using microsatellite markers; MLPA analysis was successful in four of these desmoids (only DNA from paraffin embedded tissue was available for the other two-data not shown), identifying the mechanism of loss as deletion rather than mitotic recombination.

Both germline and somatic mutations were identified in a total of 17 tumours (Ds1-17; Table  1 ). Most tumours (78%, 7/9) from patients with a germline mutation proximal to codon 1400, had somatic frameshift truncating mutation distal to 1400 and, in comparison, no desmoids from patients with germline mutations distal to 1400 displayed such truncating mutations ((0/8) P = 0.002, Fisher's exact test). The majority of desmoids from the latter group of patients displayed allelic loss as second hit (6/8) compared to none of the desmoids from patients with germline mutations proximal to 1400 (0/9; P = 0.002, Fisher's exact test).

Table 1.

Germline and somatic mutations in FAP-associated desmoid tumours

Patient IDGermline mutationSomatic mutation20-aa repeats intact in germline/somatic (% of total intact out of 14 possible 20-aa repeats)
AA change a Nucleotide change a AA change a Nucleotide change a
Ds1Q1242X3724C > T1516 FS4548 del1 bp0/2 (14)
Ds2T.gene.delMLPA(T.gene.del)1454 FS4360del35 bp0/2 (14)
Ds31484 FS4450del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds41484 FS4450del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds5R1450X4348C > T1080 FS3240 del 5 bp2/0 (14)
Ds6R1450X4348C >TLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds7DelEx8-15aMLPA(delEx8-15a)1542 FS4624del180 bp0/3 (21)
Ds8451 FS1351del11 bp1282 FS3843del1 bp0/1 (7)
Ds9451 FS1351del11 bp1357 FS4070 del1 bp0/1 (7)
Ds10Q1228X3682C > T1878 FS5632del31 bp0/4 (29)
Ds11Del Ex7-15MLPA(delEx7-15)1483 FS4447 del 4 bp0/2 (14)
Ds12Q237X706C > T1472 FS4416del1 bp0/2 (14)
Ds13I1557X4671 del2 bpLOHLOH3/0 (21)
Ds14769 FS2307 del1 bp1490X4469 C > T0/2 (14)
Ds152310 FS6929 ins1 bp783FS2348 del1 bp7/0 (50)
Ds161940 FS5819 del5 bpLOHLOH5/NK (NK)
Ds17L1488X4463 ins1 bpLOHLOH2/NK (NK)
PLK126K848X2541A > T1458 FS4373del10 bp0/2 (14)
PLK591061 FS3244del4 bp1581 FS4742del8 bp0/3 (21)
P51061 FS3244del5 bp1472FS4415del14 bp0/2 (14)
GD13#61bY1075X3223T > A1461FS4415del4 bp0/2 (14)
P2D1084X3250G > A1542FS4625del1 bp0/3 (21)
PLK561105FS3313del1 bp1461FS4382del2 bp0/2 (14)
PLK111S1110X3329C > G1426FS4276ins82 bp0/2 (14)
P12Q1228X3682C > T1859FS5575del31 bp0/5 (36)
PLK1241309FS3925del5 bpV1452X5355del1 bp1/ 2 (21)
GD-11#631309FS3925del5 bp1551FS4652del4 bp1/3 (29)
P10E1397X4189G > T1543FS4628del1 bp1/3 (29)
P71461FS4382del2 bp1483FS4448del6bpins2 bp2/2 (29)
P8.11462FS4384del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
P8.21462FS4384del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
PLK421462FS4384del4 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Patient IDGermline mutationSomatic mutation20-aa repeats intact in germline/somatic (% of total intact out of 14 possible 20-aa repeats)
AA change a Nucleotide change a AA change a Nucleotide change a
Ds1Q1242X3724C > T1516 FS4548 del1 bp0/2 (14)
Ds2T.gene.delMLPA(T.gene.del)1454 FS4360del35 bp0/2 (14)
Ds31484 FS4450del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds41484 FS4450del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds5R1450X4348C > T1080 FS3240 del 5 bp2/0 (14)
Ds6R1450X4348C >TLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds7DelEx8-15aMLPA(delEx8-15a)1542 FS4624del180 bp0/3 (21)
Ds8451 FS1351del11 bp1282 FS3843del1 bp0/1 (7)
Ds9451 FS1351del11 bp1357 FS4070 del1 bp0/1 (7)
Ds10Q1228X3682C > T1878 FS5632del31 bp0/4 (29)
Ds11Del Ex7-15MLPA(delEx7-15)1483 FS4447 del 4 bp0/2 (14)
Ds12Q237X706C > T1472 FS4416del1 bp0/2 (14)
Ds13I1557X4671 del2 bpLOHLOH3/0 (21)
Ds14769 FS2307 del1 bp1490X4469 C > T0/2 (14)
Ds152310 FS6929 ins1 bp783FS2348 del1 bp7/0 (50)
Ds161940 FS5819 del5 bpLOHLOH5/NK (NK)
Ds17L1488X4463 ins1 bpLOHLOH2/NK (NK)
PLK126K848X2541A > T1458 FS4373del10 bp0/2 (14)
PLK591061 FS3244del4 bp1581 FS4742del8 bp0/3 (21)
P51061 FS3244del5 bp1472FS4415del14 bp0/2 (14)
GD13#61bY1075X3223T > A1461FS4415del4 bp0/2 (14)
P2D1084X3250G > A1542FS4625del1 bp0/3 (21)
PLK561105FS3313del1 bp1461FS4382del2 bp0/2 (14)
PLK111S1110X3329C > G1426FS4276ins82 bp0/2 (14)
P12Q1228X3682C > T1859FS5575del31 bp0/5 (36)
PLK1241309FS3925del5 bpV1452X5355del1 bp1/ 2 (21)
GD-11#631309FS3925del5 bp1551FS4652del4 bp1/3 (29)
P10E1397X4189G > T1543FS4628del1 bp1/3 (29)
P71461FS4382del2 bp1483FS4448del6bpins2 bp2/2 (29)
P8.11462FS4384del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
P8.21462FS4384del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
PLK421462FS4384del4 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)

a AA and nucleotide positions cal from transcription start site (ATG).

Mutations are recorded by site and type: del, deletion; FS, frameshift; LOH, allelic loss. NK, not known as mechanism of LOH not established. Ds numbers were given to St Mark's samples, other codes relate to desmoids referred to in literature Δ ( 8 , 13 , 16 ).

Table 1.

Germline and somatic mutations in FAP-associated desmoid tumours

Patient IDGermline mutationSomatic mutation20-aa repeats intact in germline/somatic (% of total intact out of 14 possible 20-aa repeats)
AA change a Nucleotide change a AA change a Nucleotide change a
Ds1Q1242X3724C > T1516 FS4548 del1 bp0/2 (14)
Ds2T.gene.delMLPA(T.gene.del)1454 FS4360del35 bp0/2 (14)
Ds31484 FS4450del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds41484 FS4450del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds5R1450X4348C > T1080 FS3240 del 5 bp2/0 (14)
Ds6R1450X4348C >TLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds7DelEx8-15aMLPA(delEx8-15a)1542 FS4624del180 bp0/3 (21)
Ds8451 FS1351del11 bp1282 FS3843del1 bp0/1 (7)
Ds9451 FS1351del11 bp1357 FS4070 del1 bp0/1 (7)
Ds10Q1228X3682C > T1878 FS5632del31 bp0/4 (29)
Ds11Del Ex7-15MLPA(delEx7-15)1483 FS4447 del 4 bp0/2 (14)
Ds12Q237X706C > T1472 FS4416del1 bp0/2 (14)
Ds13I1557X4671 del2 bpLOHLOH3/0 (21)
Ds14769 FS2307 del1 bp1490X4469 C > T0/2 (14)
Ds152310 FS6929 ins1 bp783FS2348 del1 bp7/0 (50)
Ds161940 FS5819 del5 bpLOHLOH5/NK (NK)
Ds17L1488X4463 ins1 bpLOHLOH2/NK (NK)
PLK126K848X2541A > T1458 FS4373del10 bp0/2 (14)
PLK591061 FS3244del4 bp1581 FS4742del8 bp0/3 (21)
P51061 FS3244del5 bp1472FS4415del14 bp0/2 (14)
GD13#61bY1075X3223T > A1461FS4415del4 bp0/2 (14)
P2D1084X3250G > A1542FS4625del1 bp0/3 (21)
PLK561105FS3313del1 bp1461FS4382del2 bp0/2 (14)
PLK111S1110X3329C > G1426FS4276ins82 bp0/2 (14)
P12Q1228X3682C > T1859FS5575del31 bp0/5 (36)
PLK1241309FS3925del5 bpV1452X5355del1 bp1/ 2 (21)
GD-11#631309FS3925del5 bp1551FS4652del4 bp1/3 (29)
P10E1397X4189G > T1543FS4628del1 bp1/3 (29)
P71461FS4382del2 bp1483FS4448del6bpins2 bp2/2 (29)
P8.11462FS4384del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
P8.21462FS4384del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
PLK421462FS4384del4 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Patient IDGermline mutationSomatic mutation20-aa repeats intact in germline/somatic (% of total intact out of 14 possible 20-aa repeats)
AA change a Nucleotide change a AA change a Nucleotide change a
Ds1Q1242X3724C > T1516 FS4548 del1 bp0/2 (14)
Ds2T.gene.delMLPA(T.gene.del)1454 FS4360del35 bp0/2 (14)
Ds31484 FS4450del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds41484 FS4450del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds5R1450X4348C > T1080 FS3240 del 5 bp2/0 (14)
Ds6R1450X4348C >TLOHLOH2/0 (14)
Ds7DelEx8-15aMLPA(delEx8-15a)1542 FS4624del180 bp0/3 (21)
Ds8451 FS1351del11 bp1282 FS3843del1 bp0/1 (7)
Ds9451 FS1351del11 bp1357 FS4070 del1 bp0/1 (7)
Ds10Q1228X3682C > T1878 FS5632del31 bp0/4 (29)
Ds11Del Ex7-15MLPA(delEx7-15)1483 FS4447 del 4 bp0/2 (14)
Ds12Q237X706C > T1472 FS4416del1 bp0/2 (14)
Ds13I1557X4671 del2 bpLOHLOH3/0 (21)
Ds14769 FS2307 del1 bp1490X4469 C > T0/2 (14)
Ds152310 FS6929 ins1 bp783FS2348 del1 bp7/0 (50)
Ds161940 FS5819 del5 bpLOHLOH5/NK (NK)
Ds17L1488X4463 ins1 bpLOHLOH2/NK (NK)
PLK126K848X2541A > T1458 FS4373del10 bp0/2 (14)
PLK591061 FS3244del4 bp1581 FS4742del8 bp0/3 (21)
P51061 FS3244del5 bp1472FS4415del14 bp0/2 (14)
GD13#61bY1075X3223T > A1461FS4415del4 bp0/2 (14)
P2D1084X3250G > A1542FS4625del1 bp0/3 (21)
PLK561105FS3313del1 bp1461FS4382del2 bp0/2 (14)
PLK111S1110X3329C > G1426FS4276ins82 bp0/2 (14)
P12Q1228X3682C > T1859FS5575del31 bp0/5 (36)
PLK1241309FS3925del5 bpV1452X5355del1 bp1/ 2 (21)
GD-11#631309FS3925del5 bp1551FS4652del4 bp1/3 (29)
P10E1397X4189G > T1543FS4628del1 bp1/3 (29)
P71461FS4382del2 bp1483FS4448del6bpins2 bp2/2 (29)
P8.11462FS4384del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
P8.21462FS4384del2 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)
PLK421462FS4384del4 bpLOHLOH2/0 (14)

a AA and nucleotide positions cal from transcription start site (ATG).

Mutations are recorded by site and type: del, deletion; FS, frameshift; LOH, allelic loss. NK, not known as mechanism of LOH not established. Ds numbers were given to St Mark's samples, other codes relate to desmoids referred to in literature Δ ( 8 , 13 , 16 ).

The total number of 20-AARs remaining in desmoid cells after the first and second hit was established for the St Mark's cohort of 15 samples (Ds1–15) and for a combined set of 30 tumours which included a further 15 desmoids where the germline and somatic mutations have been reported previously in the literature (summarized in Table  2 ) ( 13 ). Tumours with LOH as the somatic mutation were included only if the mechanism of LOH—deletion or mitotic recombination—was known; allelic loss by deletion was considered to remove all beta-catenin degradation repeats. As with the St Mark's samples, interdependence between the first hit and second hit was found to be significant (St Mark's P = 0.01; Combined, P < 0.001; Fisher's exact test). The majority of desmoids with two APC hits (26/30) were found to have one mutated allele with zero 20-AARs ( P < 0.001, Fisher's exact test) and most null alleles were contributed by the germline (17/26) rather than the soma (9/26), although this was of borderline significance ( P = 0.05, Fisher's exact test).

Table 2.

The number of β-catenin degradation repeats retained following germline and somatic APC mutation

Germline mutant allele repeatsSomatic mutant allele repeats
01234
0021032
100120
270100
310000
710000
Germline mutant allele repeatsSomatic mutant allele repeats
01234
0021032
100120
270100
310000
710000

A total of 30 desmoids were analysed, 15 from St Mark's and 15 from literature ( 8 , 13 , 16 ).

Table 2.

The number of β-catenin degradation repeats retained following germline and somatic APC mutation

Germline mutant allele repeatsSomatic mutant allele repeats
01234
0021032
100120
270100
310000
710000
Germline mutant allele repeatsSomatic mutant allele repeats
01234
0021032
100120
270100
310000
710000

A total of 30 desmoids were analysed, 15 from St Mark's and 15 from literature ( 8 , 13 , 16 ).

We now examined whether the number of 20-AARs left intact after germline and somatic mutation arose by chance or were determined by factors intrinsic to cell survival and proliferation. For any given germline mutation, the number of 20-AARs left intact by the somatic mutation was not uniformly distributed ( P < 0.001, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). Hence, the position of the somatic mutation was not determined by chance. To investigate this further, the observed and expected number (calculated by assuming a uniform distribution of somatic mutations) of retained repeats were compared using the combined data set and found to be highly significant ( χ2 with four degrees of freedom = 58.967; P < 0.0001, chi-squared goodness of fit test; Table  3 ). Ungrouped data shows that, overall, by far the biggest contribution was for a sum equal to two repeats ((O-E) 2 /E = 52.071; Table  3 ); retention of two beta-catenin degradation repeats was observed much more frequently than would be expected by chance.

Table 3.

Total number of 20-AARs retained in FAP-associated desmoid tumours

Sum of repeats retainedObservedExpectedObservedExpected(O-E) (2)/E
002.12524.6251.490
122.5
2173.5173.552.071
353.6251121.8755.406
> 3618.25
Sum of repeats retainedObservedExpectedObservedExpected(O-E) (2)/E
002.12524.6251.490
122.5
2173.5173.552.071
353.6251121.8755.406
> 3618.25

Values given are the number of desmoids with a given total of retained repeats, figures are observed and expected. χ2 on four degrees of freedom = 58.967 ( P < 0.001).

Table 3.

Total number of 20-AARs retained in FAP-associated desmoid tumours

Sum of repeats retainedObservedExpectedObservedExpected(O-E) (2)/E
002.12524.6251.490
122.5
2173.5173.552.071
353.6251121.8755.406
> 3618.25
Sum of repeats retainedObservedExpectedObservedExpected(O-E) (2)/E
002.12524.6251.490
122.5
2173.5173.552.071
353.6251121.8755.406
> 3618.25

Values given are the number of desmoids with a given total of retained repeats, figures are observed and expected. χ2 on four degrees of freedom = 58.967 ( P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The present study represents the largest analysis of mutation arising in a single series of FAP-associated desmoids to date. We have identified a relationship between the first (germline) and second (somatic) hit in desmoids, as has been previously demonstrated for both upper and lower gastrointestinal tract tumours in FAP. Desmoids from patients with a germline mutation proximal to codon 1400 are more likely to have a truncating somatic mutation distal to codon 1400, whereas desmoids carrying a germline mutation distal to 1400 are more likely to have LOH as their second hit. Importantly, desmoids from two patients (Ds5 and Ds15) had relatively 5′ truncating somatic mutations that gave the same outcome as LOH, namely that, in most cases, the two 20-AARs left intact were contributed by the germline mutation. These observations, and a subsequent analysis of the number of 20-AARs retained by cells after both hits in a combined series of 30 desmoids, suggests that the most important aspect to the first hit–second hit relationship is likely to be maintenance of appropriate levels of beta-catenin protein. Curiously, the majority of desmoids (26/30) have one allele with zero 20-AARs ( P < 0.001, Fisher's exact test), a feature that appears very different from intestinal polyps. Overall, our data demonstrated that mutations are selected to ensure that two to three repeats in total are left intact between the two mutant alleles, with retention of two repeats by far the most common outcome of genetic mutation.

The ability of the APC protein to target beta-catenin for degradation is dependent on the number of intact 20-AARs and, hence, the number of repeats is a crucial determinant of the selective advantage conferred by the mutant APC protein in tumours. Models describing the loss of beta-catenin degradation repeats in tumours taken from the colorectum and upper gastrointestinal tract of FAP patients propose that, in general, one to two repeats and three to four repeats, respectively, are left intact ( 14 , 16 ). However, there are still a few exceptions indicating that variation in the efficiency of beta-catenin degradation is tolerable. In the case of the desmoids studied here, there are two desmoid tumours (Ds15 and P12) where after the first and second hits seven and five 20-AARs are left intact, respectively. This figure is much greater than two to three repeats seen in most other desmoids. It is possible that these tumours have a third APC hit as observed in some colonic polyps in FAP ( 18 ). The APC protein also contains SAMP (Ser-Ala-Met-Pro) motifs that are important in the regulation of beta-catenin. Conductin and axin both associate with beta-catenin and GSK3β and interact with APC polypeptides containing a SAMP motif, and most truncating somatic mutations are associated with the loss of all three SAMP motifs. Unusually, tumours Ds15 and Ds10 have retained SAMP motifs (2 and 3, respectively) again, raising the possibility of an, as yet, unidentified third hit.

In previous studies of colonic tumours in FAP, LOH generally occurred by mitotic recombination rather than deletion. The mechanism of allelic loss has not been studied in FAP associated desmoid tumours. A total of six desmoids were found to show LOH using microsatellite markers; four of these were successfully analysed by MLPA and a deletion event observed in each case. This might reflect an important difference between colonic and desmoid tumours or, more likely, that the mechanism is selected for based on conserving an optimal number of 20-AARs; LOH by deletion leaves no intact repeats whereas LOH by mitotic recombination leaves an equal number of repeats.

Overall, our data supports the current opinion that beta-catenin dysregulation is a fundamental component in the development of FAP associated tumours. Desmoids arise, therefore, following biallelic APC mutation, with one change usually occurring distal to the second beta-catenin binding/degradation repeat of the gene (3′ to codon 1399). The apparent differences between the number of repeats retained by colorectal and upper gastrointestinal polyps, and by desmoid cells, would suggest that tumour site and/or origin of tumour cell plays a role in selecting appropriate beta-catenin levels. We have suggested that because families with germline mutations in this region already have the requisite change, they are more likely to develop desmoids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DNA was extracted from 23 samples of desmoid tumours (21 fresh frozen, 2 paraffin embedded) from 17 patients (males 47%, 8/17; females 53%, 9/17) with FAP at St Mark's Hospital. All patients had colonic polyposis and a family history of desmoid disease was know for 24% (4/17; Ds1, 5, 6, 14), 41% (7/17) did not have any history and 35% (6/17) were unknown. No patients matched the description provided where desmoids are the main clinical symptoms ( 19 , 20 ). Matched blood was available for 65% (11/17) of patients providing desmoid tissue samples. DNA extraction from fresh frozen material was performed using the Qiagen Tissue Extraction Kit (Hilden, Germany) while DNA extracted from blood and paraffin used standard laboratory protocols.

Polymorphic microsatellite markers (D5S346, D5S82, D5S1965 and D5S421) that map close to the APC gene were used to assess allelic loss, and loss was scored as given in Crabtree et al . ( 16 ). Detection of copy number changes was performed using Multiplication Ligation-Probe Amplification (MLPA; MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) according to manufacturer's instructions. Products were analysed using the Applied Biosystems PRISM™ 3100 DNA sequencer and the Applied Biosystems Genotyper software (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

APC coding sequence mutations were identified using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) analysis. Heteroduplex analyses were carried out on an automated dHPLC instrument (WAVE, Transgenomic CA, USA). For samples not yielding sufficient product on PCR for dHPLC, fluorescence–single stranded conformational polypmorphisms analysis (SSCP) was performed using the ABI3100 system as described previously ( 14 ). Data were analysed using ABI Genescan and Genotyper software. Segments of exon 15 encompassing the MCR (codons 935–1773) and those samples displaying abnormal profiles by dHPLC or SSCP were bidirectionally sequenced using the BigDye Terminator sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions on an ABI Prism 3100 instrument. Details of primers and PCR conditions used in dHPLC, SSCP and sequencing supplied on request.

Mutation data were analysed in Stata 8.2 (Stata statistical software release 8.0; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). Fisher's exact test was used to test for significance in 2 × 2 table; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to examine whether distribution of somatic mutations differed significantly from a uniform distribution. Observed and expected distributions were compared using a χ2 goodness of fit test.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank the staff of St Mark's Polyposis registry.

Conflict of Interest statement : None declared.

REFERENCES

1
Nugent
K.P.
Spigelman
A.D.
Phillips
R.K.
Life expectancy after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis
Dis. Colon Rectum
1993
, vol. 
36
 (pg. 
1059
-
1062
)
2
Clark
S.K.
Neale
K.F.
Landgrebe
J.C.
Phillips
R.K.S.
Desmoid tumours complicating familial adenomatous polyposis
Br. J. Surg.
1999
, vol. 
86
 (pg. 
1185
-
1189
)
3
Lofti
A.M.
Dozois
R.R.
Gordon
H.
Weiland
L.H.
Carryer
P.W.
Hurt
R.D.
Mesenteric fibromatosis complicating familial adenomatous polyposis: predisposing factors and results of treatment
Int. J. Colorectal Dis.
1989
, vol. 
4
 (pg. 
30
-
36
)
4
Heinimann
K.
Mullhaupt
B.
Weber
W.
Attenhofer
M.
Scott
R.J.
Fried
M.
Martinoli
S.
Muller
H.J.
Dobbie
Z.
Phenotypic differences in familial adenomatous polyposis based on apc gene mutation status
Gut
1998
, vol. 
43
 (pg. 
675
-
679
)
5
Bertario
L.
Russo
A.
Sala
P.
Eboli
M.
Giarola
M.
D'Amico
F.
Gismondi
V.
Varesco
L.
Pierotti
M.A.
Radice
P.
Genotype and phenotype factors as determinants of desmoid tumors in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis
Int. J. Cancer
2001
, vol. 
95
 (pg. 
102
-
107
)
6
Friedl
W.
Caspari
R.
Sengteller
M.
Uhlhaas
S.
Lamberti
C.
Jungck
M.
Kadmon
M.
Wolf
M.
Fahnenstich
J.
Gebert
J.
, et al. 
Can APC mutation analysis contribute to therapeutic decisions in familial adenomatous polyposis? Experience from 680 FAP families
Gut
2001
, vol. 
48
 (pg. 
515
-
521
)
7
Sturt
N.J.
Gallagher
M.C.
Bassett
P.
Philp
C.R.
Neale
K.F.
Tomlinson
I.P.
Silver
A.R.
Phillips
R.K.
Evidence for genetic predisposition to desmoid tumours in familial adenomatous polyposis independent of the germline APC mutation
Gut
2004
, vol. 
53
 (pg. 
1832
-
1836
)
8
Palmirotta
R.
Curia
M.C.
Esposito
D.L.
Valanzano
R.
Messerini
L.
Ficari
F.
Brandi
M.L.
Tonelli
F.
Mariani-Costantini
R.
Battista
P.
, et al. 
Novel mutations and inactivation of both alleles of the APC gene in desmoid tumors
Hum. Mol. Genet.
1995
, vol. 
4
 (pg. 
1979
-
1981
)
9
Knudson
A.G.
Jr.
Hereditary cancer, oncogenes, and antioncogenes
Cancer Res.
1985
, vol. 
45
 (pg. 
1437
-
1443
)
10
Miyoshi
Y.
Nagase
H.
Ando
H.
Horii
A.
Ichii
S.
Nakatsuru
S.
Aoki
T.
Miki
Y.
Mori
T.
Nakamura
Y.
Somatic mutations of the APC gene in colorectal tumors: mutation cluster region in the APC gene
Hum. Mol. Genet.
1992
, vol. 
1
 (pg. 
229
-
233
)
11
Powell
S.M.
Zilz
N.
Beazer-Barclay
Y.
Bryan
T.M.
Hamilton
S.R.
Thibodeau
S.N.
Vogelstein
B.
Kinzler
K.W.
APC mutations occur early during colorectal tumorigenesis
Nature
1992
, vol. 
359
 (pg. 
235
-
237
)
12
Miyaki
M.
Konishi
M.
Kikuchi-Yanoshita
R.
Enomoto
M.
Igari
T.
Tanaka
K.
Muraoka
M.
Takahashi
H.
Amada
Y.
Fukayama
M.
, et al. 
Characteristics of somatic mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene in colorectal tumors
Cancer Res.
1994
, vol. 
54
 (pg. 
3011
-
3020
)
13
Lamlum
H.
Ilyas
M.
Rowan
A.
Clark
S.
Johnson
V.
Bell
J.
Frayling
I.
Efstathiou
J.
Pack
K.
Payne
S.
, et al. 
The type of somatic mutation at APC in familial adenomatous polyposis is determined by the site of the germline mutation: a new facet to Knudson's ‘two-hit’ hypothesis
Nat. Med.
1999
, vol. 
5
 (pg. 
1071
-
1075
)
14
Groves
C.
Lamlum
H.
Crabtree
M.
Williamson
J.
Taylor
C.
Bass
S.
Cuthbert-Heavens
D.
Hodgson
S.
Phillips
R.
Tomlinson
I.
Mutation cluster region, association between germline and somatic mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation in upper gastrointestinal familial adenomatous polyposis
Am. J. Pathol.
2002
, vol. 
160
 (pg. 
2055
-
2061
)
15
Albuquerque
C.
Breukel
C.
van der Luijt
R.
Fidalgo
P.
Lage
P.
Slors
F.J.
Leitao
C.N.
Fodde
R.
Smits
R.
The ‘just-right’ signaling model: APC somatic mutations are selected based on a specific level of activation of the beta-catenin signaling cascade
Hum. Mol. Genet.
2002
, vol. 
11
 (pg. 
1549
-
1560
)
16
Crabtree
M.
Sieber
O.M.
Lipton
L.
Hodgson
S.V.
Lamlum
H.
Thomas
H.J.
Neale
K.
Phillips
R.K.
Heinimann
K.
Tomlinson
I.P.
Refining the relation between ‘first hits’ and ‘second hits’ at the APC locus: the ‘loose fit’ model and evidence for differences in somatic mutation spectra among patients
Oncogene
2003
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
4257
-
4265
)
17
Miyaki
M.
Konishi
M.
Kikuchi-Yanoshita
R.
Enomoto
M.
Tanaka
K.
Takahashi
H.
Muraoka
M.
Mori
T.
Konishi
F.
Iwama
T.
Coexistence of somatic and germ-line mutations of APC gene in desmoid tumors from patients with familial adenomatous polyposis
Cancer Res.
1993
, vol. 
53
 (pg. 
5079
-
5082
)
18
Sieber
O.
Segditsas
S.
Knudsen
A.
Zhang
J.
Luz
J.
Rowan
A.
Spain
S.
Thirlwell
C.
Howarth
K.
Jaeger
E.
, et al. 
Disease severity and genetic pathways in attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis vary greatly, but depend on the site of the germline mutation
Gut
2006
, vol. 
55
 (pg. 
1440
-
1448
)
19
Eccles
D.M.
van der Luijt
R.
Breukel
C.
Bullman
H.
Bunyan
D.
Fisher
A.
Barber
J.
du Boulay
C.
Primrose
J.
Burn
J.
Fodde
R.
Hereditary desmoid disease due to a frameshift mutation at codon 1924 of the APC gene
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
1996
, vol. 
59
 (pg. 
1193
-
1201
)
20
Scott
R.J.
Froggatt
N.J.
Trembath
R.C.
Evans
D.G.
Hodgson
S.V.
Maher
E.R.
Familial infiltrative fibromatosis (desmoid tumours) (MIM135290) caused by a recurrent 3′ APC gene mutation
Hum. Mol. Genet.
1996
, vol. 
5
 (pg. 
1921
-
1924
)