Abstract

An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that an increased inclusion rate of fiber decreases the contribution of DE and ME from hindgut fermentation. Twenty ileal-cannulated pigs (BW: 30.64 ± 2.09 kg) were allotted to a replicated 10 × 4 incomplete Latin Square design with 10 diets and 4 26-d periods. A basal diet based on corn and soybean meal (SBM) and a corn-SBM diet with 30% corn starch were formulated. Six additional diets were formulated by replacing 15 or 30% corn starch by 15 or 30% corn germ meal (CGM), sugar beet pulp (SBP), or wheat middlings (WM), and 2 diets were formulated by including 15 or 30% canola meal (CM) in a diet containing corn, SBM, and 30% corn starch. Effects of adding 15 or 30% of each fiber source to the corn starch diet were analyzed using orthogonal polynomial contrasts. Two-independent-sample t-tests were used to compare inclusion rates within each ingredient. Results indicated that concentration of ME (kcal/kg) linearly decreased (P < 0.001) from 3,420 kcal/kg in the corn starch diet to 3,348 and 3,305, 3,290 and 3,221, 3,316 and 3,125 and 3,310 and 3,213 kcal/kg as 15 or 30% CM, CGM, SBP, or WM was added to the diet. However, inclusion rate did not affect DE and ME of the ingredients (Table 1). This indicates that DE and ME in ingredients were independent of inclusion rates and utilization of energy from test ingredients was equally efficient in diets with 30% inclusion compared with diets with 15% inclusion. In conclusion, fiber had a negative effect on DE and ME in the diet, but inclusion rate does not affect calculated values for DE and ME in feed ingredients with relatively high concentration of fiber indicating that the microbial capacity for fermentation of fiber in pigs is not overwhelmed by inclusion of 30% high-fiber ingredients in the diets.

Table 1. Concentration of DE and ME in canola meal, corn germ meal, sugar beet pulp, and wheat middlings

Item, kcal/kg DMInclusion rateSEMP-value
15%30%
Digestible EnergyCanola meal3,2573,5171980.218
Corn germ meal3,2543,3141650.722
Sugar beet pulp3,0272,8391970.357
Wheat middlings3,1813,3191980.495
Metabolizable EnergyCanola meal3,2353,3771670.410
Corn germ meal3,0243,2901820.165
Sugar beet pulp3,0322,7291900.136
Wheat middlings3,1973,2441980.817
Item, kcal/kg DMInclusion rateSEMP-value
15%30%
Digestible EnergyCanola meal3,2573,5171980.218
Corn germ meal3,2543,3141650.722
Sugar beet pulp3,0272,8391970.357
Wheat middlings3,1813,3191980.495
Metabolizable EnergyCanola meal3,2353,3771670.410
Corn germ meal3,0243,2901820.165
Sugar beet pulp3,0322,7291900.136
Wheat middlings3,1973,2441980.817

Table 1. Concentration of DE and ME in canola meal, corn germ meal, sugar beet pulp, and wheat middlings

Item, kcal/kg DMInclusion rateSEMP-value
15%30%
Digestible EnergyCanola meal3,2573,5171980.218
Corn germ meal3,2543,3141650.722
Sugar beet pulp3,0272,8391970.357
Wheat middlings3,1813,3191980.495
Metabolizable EnergyCanola meal3,2353,3771670.410
Corn germ meal3,0243,2901820.165
Sugar beet pulp3,0322,7291900.136
Wheat middlings3,1973,2441980.817
Item, kcal/kg DMInclusion rateSEMP-value
15%30%
Digestible EnergyCanola meal3,2573,5171980.218
Corn germ meal3,2543,3141650.722
Sugar beet pulp3,0272,8391970.357
Wheat middlings3,1813,3191980.495
Metabolizable EnergyCanola meal3,2353,3771670.410
Corn germ meal3,0243,2901820.165
Sugar beet pulp3,0322,7291900.136
Wheat middlings3,1973,2441980.817

This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)
You do not currently have access to this article.