- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Thomas M Winkelmüller, Frederickson Entila, Shajahan Anver, Anna Piasecka, Baoxing Song, Eik Dahms, Hitoshi Sakakibara, Xiangchao Gan, Karolina Kułak, Aneta Sawikowska, Paweł Krajewski, Miltos Tsiantis, Ruben Garrido-Oter, Kenji Fukushima, Paul Schulze-Lefert, Stefan Laurent, Paweł Bednarek, Kenichi Tsuda, Gene expression evolution in pattern-triggered immunity within Arabidopsis thaliana and across Brassicaceae species, The Plant Cell, Volume 33, Issue 6, June 2021, Pages 1863–1887, https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koab073
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Plants recognize surrounding microbes by sensing microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) to activate pattern-triggered immunity (PTI). Despite their significance for microbial control, the evolution of PTI responses remains largely uncharacterized. Here, by employing comparative transcriptomics of six Arabidopsis thaliana accessions and three additional Brassicaceae species to investigate PTI responses, we identified a set of genes that commonly respond to the MAMP flg22 and genes that exhibit species-specific expression signatures. Variation in flg22-triggered transcriptome responses across Brassicaceae species was incongruent with their phylogeny, while expression changes were strongly conserved within A. thaliana. We found the enrichment of WRKY transcription factor binding sites in the 5′-regulatory regions of conserved and species-specific responsive genes, linking the emergence of WRKY-binding sites with the evolution of gene expression patterns during PTI. Our findings advance our understanding of the evolution of the transcriptome during biotic stress.
Introduction
The evolution of biological traits is determined both by variation in coding sequence and gene expression (Necsulea and Kaessmann, 2014; Das Gupta and Tsiantis, 2018). However, our understanding of gene expression variation remains fragmented. The conservation of gene expression patterns over millions of years across species points to the general importance of such expression patterns and indicates an evolutionary constraint (Cardoso-Moreira et al., 2019). Conversely, diversified gene expression patterns across different species may reflect neutral or adaptive evolution (Harrison et al., 2012). The immanent noise in expression data makes it difficult to disentangle environmental and genetic effects on gene expression variation; therefore, detecting gene expression variation caused by genetic effects requires comparisons to be performed under the same experimental conditions (Voelckel et al., 2017).
In previous comparative transcriptome studies in plants, it was noted that variation in gene expression between or within species was substantially enriched for stress-responsive genes, which suggests that changes in stress-responsive gene expression may play an important role in adaptation to the environment (Koenig et al., 2013; Voelckel et al., 2017; Groen et al., 2020). Despite this notion, little is known about how stress-induced transcriptomic changes evolved in plants. To date, few studies comparing expression variation within and across species in unified experimental setups have been performed, especially for plants.
In recent years, several close and distant relatives of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, belonging to the Brassicaceae family, have been subjected to genome sequencing and used as model systems to study the evolution of various biological traits. For instance, a comparison of the hairy bittercress (Cardamine hirsuta) genome with that of A. thaliana increased our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that mediate the evolution of leaf shapes and pod shattering (Vlad et al., 2014; Gan et al., 2016; Das Gupta and Tsiantis, 2018). The genome sequences of other Brassicaceae species including pink shepherd’s-purse (Capsella rubella) and saltwater cress (Eutrema salsugineum) have been used to analyze the mechanisms underlying selfing and abiotic stress-tolerance, respectively (Wu et al., 2012; Slotte et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2013). The availability of rich genomic resources, the broad phylogenetic representations, and the feasibility of growing these Brassicaceae species under the same experimental conditions make them excellent systems for comparative genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics analyses.
In nature, plants are surrounded by microbes that could potentially be beneficial or pathogenic (Fitzpatrick et al., 2020). To properly respond to the presence of these microbes, plants have evolved cell-surface localized pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that sense conserved microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), leading to the activation of pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) (Albert et al., 2020; Zhou and Zhang, 2020). The two best-characterized MAMPs are the bacteria-derived oligopeptides flg22 and elf18, which are sensed by their corresponding leucine-rich repeat PRRs FLAGELLIN SENSING 2 (FLS2) and EF-TU RECEPTOR (EFR), respectively, in A. thaliana. Treating plants with flg22 or elf18 elicits a set of temporally coordinated responses including rapid MAP kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation, genome-wide transcriptional reprogramming, and phytohormone and secondary metabolite production, followed by inhibition of plant growth and increased resistance against pathogens (Albert et al., 2020). Although PTI has been extensively scrutinized in the context of plant–pathogen interactions, it was also recently implicated in the assembly of the plant microbiota, a set of microbes with taxonomically defined structure and composition that colonize the healthy plant (Hacquard et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2020). Thus, PTI serves as the key mechanism that allows plants to adapt to different environments characterized by different microbial communities.
Despite the significance of PTI for plant adaptation to the environment, our understanding of PTI evolution is limited to the evolution of PRRs. For instance, genomes of many plant lineages including members of Brassicaceae, Solanaceae, and Poaceae contain FLS2, whereas EFR appears to be restricted to Brassicaceae (Boutrot and Zipfel, 2017). However, the conservation of PTI responses among different species and how PTI responses evolve remains poorly understood. Here, we took a comparative transcriptomic and metabolomic approach using A. thaliana (six accessions), C. rubella, C. hirsuta, and E. salsugineum in a unified experimental setup with multiple time points to address the evolution of flg22-triggered responses in plants.
Results
The tested Brassicaceae plants respond to the MAMP flg22
Based on our analysis using TIMETREE (see the “Methods” section), the Brassicaceae species C. rubella, C. hirsuta, and E. salsugineum diverged from A. thaliana ∼9, 17, and 26 million years ago (Mya), respectively (Figure 1, A). We first investigated whether flg22 treatment induces rapid phosphorylation of MPK3 and MPK6, a typical early event in PTI, in these four Brassicaceae plants. Although a previous report indicates that protein extracts from C. hirsuta, including those from the Oxford accession (Gan et al., 2016), do not bind to flg22 (implying that C. hirsuta does not sense flg22) (Vetter et al., 2012), we observed a clear phosphorylation of the MAPKs MPK3 and MPK6 upon flg22 treatment in all tested Brassicaceae plants, including the Oxford accession of C. hirsuta, which was absent in the A. thaliana fls2 mutant (Figure 1, B). We also observed induction of the transcription factor (TF) gene WRKY29, a widely used immune marker in A. thaliana (Asai et al., 2002), in all tested species at 1, 9, and 24 h after flg22 application (Figure 1, C). Thus, all four tested Brassicaceae species sense flg22 to trigger typical early PTI responses, as observed in A. thaliana.
PTI activation reduces plant growth, a late PTI response detectable days after MAMP perception, which is another common measure of PTI outputs in A. thaliana (Gómez-Gómez et al., 1999). With the exception of the fls2 mutant, chronic flg22 exposure reduced seedling growth in all tested species, but the extent of flg22-triggered growth reduction varied and was significantly weaker in E. salsugineum compared with the other three species (Figure 1, D).
Another PTI output is enhanced pathogen resistance induced by pre-treating plants with a MAMP. For example, flg22 pre-treatment reduces proliferation of the foliar bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto DC3000) in A. thaliana leaves (Zipfel et al., 2004; Tsuda et al., 2008). We found that flg22 pre-treatment reduced bacterial proliferation in A. thaliana and C. rubella (Figure 1, E). In contrast, Pto DC3000 growth was only slightly reduced in C. hirsuta and was not altered in E. salsugineum by flg22 treatment (Figure 1, E). Thus, the robust induction of early PTI responses by flg22 observed in all tested Brassicaceae does not necessarily lead to heightened immunity against this bacterial pathogen (Figure 1, B and C). We noticed that the Pto DC3000 titer was much lower in E. salsugineum compared with the other species (Figure 1, E) and speculated that type III effector(s) from Pto DC3000 may be recognized in E. salsugineum, triggering ETI and masking the flg22-triggered PTI effect. However, flg22 pre-treatment followed by inoculation with a Pto DC3000 mutant strain lacking the functional type III secretion system (Pto hrcC) led to reduced bacterial growth in A. thaliana but not in E. salsugineum (Supplemental Figure S1). Thus, flg22 pre-treatment was ineffective against this bacterial pathogen in E. salsugineum. In summary, while flg22 triggers typical PTI responses in all tested Brassicaceae plants, the physiological consequences, such as plant growth inhibition and bacterial resistance, vary across species.
Flg22 triggers extensive transcriptional reprogramming in all tested Brassicaceae species
To study the evolution of transcriptomic changes during PTI responses, we generated RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data for early (1 h), intermediate (9 h), and late (24 h) transcriptome responses after flg22 or mock treatment of the four Brassicaceae species (Figure 2, A). In total, this dataset comprised 72 samples with 33.3 million 100-bp strand-specific reads per sample on average. The RNA-seq reads were mapped to their corresponding genomes, and normalized and log2-transformed count data were used for statistical analysis using a linear model (see the “Methods” section).
We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) upon flg22 treatment compared with the mock samples based on an adjusted P-value ˂0.01 and a minimum fold-change of two for each species at each time point. We observed massive transcriptional reprogramming in all species, with 4,349, 4,964, 4,038, and 2,861 DEGs in A. thaliana (Ath), C. rubella (Cru), C. hirsuta (Chi), and E. salsugineum (Esa), respectively (Figure 2, B). The number of upregulated genes at 1 h was comparable among species, while the number of downregulated genes at 1 h was more variable, with approximately three times as many downregulated genes in C. rubella as in E. salsugineum. Interestingly, the number of DEGs at later time-points differed markedly among these species: the expression of ∼2,000 genes was altered in A. thaliana and C. rubella, whereas only 300–500 genes were differentially regulated in C. hirsuta and E. salsugineum at 24 h after flg22 treatment (Figure 2, B).
To compare the expression changes of individual genes among species, we used Best Reciprocal BLAST to detect 1:1 orthologs between A. thaliana and the other Brassicaceae species. Subsequently, we only selected genes showing a 1:1 orthologous relationship between A. thaliana and each of the Brassicaceae species, resulting in a set of 17,856 orthologous genes (Supplemental Data Set S1). Of the 6,106 genes that were differentially expressed during at least one time point in at least one of the species, 868 DEGs (14.2%) were shared among all Brassicaceae species (Figure 2, C andSupplemental Figure S2, A–C). These 868 DEGs represent a core set of flg22-responsive genes in these Brassicaceae species, as their responses to flg22 were maintained over 26 million years of evolution. We also found that a substantial number of DEGs were species-specific (Figure 2, C). The specific up- or down-regulation of 460–1,102 DEGs suggests substantial diversification of flg22-triggered transcriptional responses during Brassicaceae evolution. Comparisons between A. thaliana and each of the species revealed that approximately one-third of flg22-induced transcriptional changes (35.5% with C. rubella, 35.6% with C. hirsuta, and 31.7% with E. salsugineum) were shared between A. thaliana and each of the respective species (Figure 2, D). Taken together, flg22 triggers overlapping but distinct, massive transcriptional reprogramming in these Brassicaceae species.
The interpretation of comparative transcriptomics data in its current form is limited to orthologous genes. However, a portion of the transcriptomes that do not show 1:1 orthology may include genes that had uniquely emerged in certain species due to gene duplication events and functional innovations that could potentially contribute to or even drive modifications in the transcriptome landscape. To address this notion, we compared the fraction of DEGs and the magnitude of expression changes between 1:1 orthologs and non 1:1 orthologs. We found that the fraction of DEGs between the two groups was similar. A slightly higher proportion of genes that were responsive to flg22 treatment at 1 h were 1:1 orthologs, and there were no profound differences among these Brassicaceae species (Supplemental Figure S2, D). Also, the magnitude of expression changes between 1:1 orthologs and non 1:1 orthologs was similar (Supplemental Figure S2, E). Therefore, we focused on 1:1 orthologs for further analysis, as our major aim was to compare gene expression variation among these Brassicaceae species.
Conserved flg22-responsive genes during Brassicaceae evolution
Next, we examined the expression dynamics of the 868 shared DEGs (Figure 3, A andSupplemental Data Set S2). These shared DEGs exhibit similar expression patterns among all four species: genes induced in one species were also induced in the other species. Comparisons with publicly available datasets revealed that these shared genes are commonly responsive to MAMPs (flg22 and elf18) and damage-associated molecular patterns (oligogalacturonides [OGs] and Pep2) in A. thaliana (Figure 3, A). Many well-known genes involved in different aspects of plant immunity were among the conserved flg22-responsive genes, such as genes involved in MAMP perception (CERK1, BAK1, BIK1, and SOBIR1), reactive oxygen species production (RBOHD), MAPK cascades (MKK4 and MPK3), salicylic acid (SA) signaling (CBP60G, NPR1, and NPR3), and immune-related TFs (WRKY13/33/40/62, ERF6/104, and MYB51/122) (Figure 3, B). In addition, a large number of genes, i.e. ∼50% of the top 25 induced genes, whose high induction by flg22 was conserved among all tested Brassicaceae, were either functionally unannotated or were not previously associated with immunity (Figure 3, B; red boxes). Thus, many genes with potentially important and conserved functions in plant immunity remain to be characterized. Taken together, our data define a core set of genes with conserved flg22 responsiveness over 26 million years of Brassicaceae evolution, suggesting that the regulation of these genes might be broadly relevant for plant–bacterial interactions.
Differences in flg22-triggered transcriptomic responses among Brassicaceae species
While in general, a similar number of genes were differentially expressed after flg22 treatment in the tested Brassicaceae plants, there were substantial differences in temporal dynamics. For instance, transcriptional reprogramming was more transient in E. salsugineum compared with A. thaliana, and C. rubella showed a peculiar pattern characterized by a decrease in the number of DEGs at 9 h and an increase at 24 h (Supplemental Figure S3, A). Rapid and sustained transcriptional responses were previously associated with effective bacterial resistance (Lu et al., 2009; Tsuda et al., 2013; Mine et al., 2018). Thus, the lack of flg22-triggered growth restriction of Pto DC3000 in E. salsugineum (Figure 1, E andSupplemental Figure S1) might be explained by the transient nature of the transcriptional response in this species. To gain insights into the biological processes associated with this expression pattern, we extracted genes that were induced at 1 h in both A. thaliana and E. salsugineum and were induced at 24 h in A. thaliana but not in E. salsugineum (Supplemental Figure S3, B). By investigating publicly available gene expression datasets, we found that most of these genes were induced by SA in A. thaliana (Supplemental Figure S3, C). Consistent with this analysis, flg22 treatment increased SA levels in A. thaliana but not in E. salsugineum (Supplemental Figure S3, D). These results suggest that activated SA signaling is responsible for sustained transcriptional reprogramming in A. thaliana. However, flg22-induced transcriptome responses were comparable between wild-type A. thaliana Col-0 and a mutant in SID2, an SA biosynthesis gene responsible for increased SA accumulation in response to flg22 (Supplemental Figure S3, E–H; Hillmer et al., 2017). Thus, SA accumulation alone does not explain the distinct temporal dynamics of transcriptional reprogramming in these Brassicaceae plants.
A considerable number of genes were only differentially expressed in one of the Brassicaceae species (Figure 2, C). To understand the degree of specificity in gene expression patterns in these Brassicaceae plants, we clustered and visualized the expression changes of all 6,106 DEGs (Supplemental Figure S4). This analysis revealed that although most of the DEGs showed similar expression patterns, four gene clusters exhibited species-specific signatures (Figure 3, C, Supplemental Figure S4, and Supplemental Data Set S3). These four clusters contained 1,086 genes, representing ∼18% of all DEGs. Although gene ontology (GO) term analysis of the shared DEGs revealed a strong enrichment of defense-associated biological processes including immune/defense response, response to bacterium, and response to ethylene/SA/JA stimulus, there was almost a complete lack of GO term enrichment within the four gene clusters showing species-specific expression signatures (Figure 3, D andSupplemental Data Set S4). Perhaps genes showing species-specific patterns may be involved in a collection of biological processes, or perhaps GO analysis is inherently biased toward functional validation and association in A. thaliana.
Transcriptomic responses to flg22 are highly conserved among genetically and geographically diverse A. thaliana accessions
The observed differences in gene expression patterns point to diversification processes that might have occurred along the evolutionary trajectory of Brassicaceae plants. Alternatively, such variation in transcriptome responses can arise within a single species. To address this question, we analyzed the variation in flg22 responses among A. thaliana accessions. First, we tested the responsiveness of 24 A. thaliana accessions to flg22 using a MAPK phosphorylation assay. Flg22 treatment-induced MAPK phosphorylation in all accessions except Cvi-0, which lacks a functional FLS2 receptor, therefore representing a natural negative control (Dunning et al., 2007; Figure 4, A). To avoid underestimating the diversity in flg22 responses within A. thaliana, we selected 12 out of the 24 accessions that belong to distinct genetic groups (based on admixture groups from 1001genomes.org) and are geographically distributed over the United States, Europe, and Asia (Figure 4, B). We found that the expression of the early immune marker gene PROPEP3 was induced in all 12 accessions at 1 h after flg22 treatment (Figure 4, C). We generated and analyzed the transcriptomes of five of these 12 accessions at 1 h after flg22 or mock treatment using RNA-seq. Importantly, these accessions were collected from geographically distant regions, were genetically diverse, and showed variable growth phenotypes (Figure 4, B and D). We mapped the RNA-seq reads to the A. thaliana Col-0 reference genome and used the same set of 17,856 1:1 orthologous genes that we used in the comparison between Brassicaceae species to avoid overestimating conservation attributable to the larger number of shared genes among A. thaliana accessions.
The transcriptome responses of the selected A. thaliana accessions to 1 h-flg22 treatment were similar in magnitude to those of other Brassicaceae species and the A. thaliana Col-0 accession (4,964–2,861 DEGs), ranging from 4,372 (Kon) to 2,443 (Kn-0) DEGs (Figure 4, E). However, the overlap of DEGs among the five A. thaliana accessions was greater than that of the four Brassicaceae species, as 1,232 DEGs (26% of the total) were shared among these five accessions, while 764 DEGs (15.7% of the total at 1 h) were shared among the four Brassicaceae species (Figure 4, F andSupplemental Figure S2). Consistent with these findings, the expression patterns of all 4,733 DEGs (differentially expressed in at least one accession) were highly conserved among the five accessions, and we did not find accession-specific expression clusters with the same clustering threshold used in the interspecies comparisons (Figure 4, G andSupplemental Data Set S5). Mapping the RNA-seq reads to the Col-0 reference genome could potentially bias the analysis toward similar expression patterns among A. thaliana accessions. To test for this possibility, we generated SNP-corrected genomes for each accession and re-mapped the RNA-seq reads from A. thaliana accessions to their own genomes. These two mapping procedures yielded comparable results (Supplemental Figure S5). Therefore, we used the initial mapping procedure to the Col-0 reference genome for the following analyses.
We speculated that the high similarity in flg22-induced transcriptional reprogramming observed in the A. thaliana accessions would lead to similar effects on flg22-triggered immunity against Pto DC3000. Indeed, flg22 significantly reduced Pto DC3000 titers in all accessions, although the bacterial growth under mock conditions differed among accessions, with lower bacterial titers in Gy-0 and Kon and higher titers in No-0 compared with Col-0 (Figure 4, H). Taken together, these results indicate that the within-species variation of early flg22-induced gene expression changes is smaller than the between-species variation, despite the wide global distribution of A. thaliana.
Inter-species variation in transcriptome responses to flg22 exceeds intra-species variation and is incongruent with the phylogeny
To directly compare variation in transcriptome responses to flg22 across the Brassicaceae species and within A. thaliana, we re-analyzed the data from all 1 h samples together. We normalized the data, identified the DEGs, and clustered the log2 expression changes of all 5,961 DEGs together. Similar to the previous analyses, the heatmap revealed gene clusters with species-specific signatures for each species but not a single gene cluster with A. thaliana accession-specific signatures (Figure 5, A and B andSupplemental Data Set S6). Wrongly assigned orthologous pairs could lead to spurious identification of species-specific expression patterns. Defining true orthologous genes between different species is challenging, especially for gene families with many homologous genes. We reasoned that if the identification of genes with species-specific expression signatures resulted from the incorrect assignment of orthologs, the species-specific gene clusters should be associated with larger gene families compared with other gene clusters. However, we did not observe such a relationship (Supplemental Figure S6, A). Therefore, the incorrect assignment of orthologous gene pairs unlikely explains the majority of the species-specific gene expression patterns. Another possibility is that distinct expression changes for genes showing species-specific patterns might be caused by differences in the basal expression level (in mock) among different Brassicaceae plants. Nevertheless, we did not find any consistent patterns in the basal expression levels of genes that would explain species-specific induction by flg22 (Supplemental Figure S6, B). Thus, inter-species variation in transcriptome responses to flg22 among the selected Brassicaceae species clearly exceeds intra-species variation among A. thaliana accessions.
To provide statistical support for this conclusion, we determined the number of genes that responded differently to flg22 among the Brassicaceae plants including A. thaliana Col-0 or among the five A. thaliana accessions. We detected 1,992 DEGs in the inter-species comparison and only 131 DEGs in the comparison among A. thaliana accessions (Figure 5, C). Of these 131 genes, only the Can-0 accession harbored one gene that responded differently compared with all other accessions. Among Brassicaceae plants, a considerable number of genes were specifically differentially expressed in only one of the species (Figure 5, D).
The observed divergent gene expression patterns between different species together with the low variation within species could have been shaped by neutral evolution or lineage-specific non-neutral evolution, such as stabilizing selection and adaptive evolution. If the transcriptome variation among Brassicaceae species was caused by stochastic processes and was thus selectively neutral, such variation should correlate with the phylogenetic distance between the species (Broadley et al., 2008). To test this possibility, we performed a hierarchical clustering of the log2 fold changes of all 1:1 orthologs, including both DEGs and non DEGs, at 1 h after flg22 treatment. Species-specific clades were successfully recovered with high support (bootstrap value = 100), and the relationship among the species-specific clades did not concur with the species phylogeny (Figure 5, E). These results suggest that species-specific transcriptome responses to flg22 reflect non-neutral processes during Brassicaceae evolution.
To further explore this possibility, we performed multi-optima phylogenetic Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) modeling (Hansen, 1997) for each ortholog using log2 fold changes as trait values to be fit. The hierarchical clustering results could be strongly affected by genes with large expression variation between species, potentially providing a distorted view of the evolution of gene expression. However, because multi-optima phylogenetic OU modeling is a gene-by-gene analysis in which each gene contributes to the overall patterns equally, the results are expected to be robust against biases from a small number of genes with large effects. In these models, the strength of neutral drift and the pull toward the estimated theoretical optimum were taken into account with parameters σ2 and α, respectively. Potentially adaptive changes were searched as regime shifts of the theoretical optimum by the phylogenetic LASSO algorithm with a phylogeny-aware information criterion (pBIC) (Khabbazian et al., 2016). We note that the necessarily limited number of species that were sampled in this study might inflate false positives. The regime shifts were detected in 3,136 out of 5,961 orthologous genes, suggesting frequent evolutionary changes in flg22-triggered transcriptional responses that could potentially be selectively driven (Supplemental Figure S7). Notably, the four species-specific clusters (Figure 5, A) showed the highest shift frequencies in the branches connected to the corresponding species compared with the others (Supplemental Figure S7). These results suggest that these clusters are enriched in a group of genes that could have evolved through the non-neutral switching of selective regimes in addition to neutral drift and/or stabilizing selection.
The conservation of gene induction across six A. thaliana accessions (Figure 5, A and B; Cluster 1) suggests that the observed species-specific expression signatures in Brassicaceae species might represent novel inventions in the respective species. To test this idea, we measured changes in the expression of selected genes showing species-specific expression signatures in different accessions or sister species of C. rubella, C. hirsuta, and E. salsugineum by RT-qPCR. For this, we selected grand shepherd’s-purse (Capsella grandiflora; Cgr, a sister species of C. rubella), two additional C. hirsuta accessions (Wa and GR2), and one additional E. salsugineum accession (YT). We selected PR4, CYP79B2, and NAC32 as C. rubella-specific genes. PR4 and NAC32 were specifically induced in both C. rubella and C. grandiflora, while CYP79B2 was induced in these two species as well as A. thaliana Col-0 (Figure 6). The two C. hirsuta-specific genes RAC7 and AT3G60966 (as there is no common name for AT3G60966, we used the A. thaliana gene code) were specifically induced in all three C. hirsuta accessions, with the exception of AT3G60966, which was also induced in C. grandiflora. All three E. salsugineum-specific genes (APK4, bZip TF, and CYP77A4) were induced only in E. salsugineum accessions (Figure 6). Together, these findings demonstrate that the specific patterns of gene expression observed in each of the tested Brassicaceae are conserved features in the respective species or lineage.
WRKY TFs are central for flg22-triggered gene induction and may be responsible for the emergence of species-specific gene induction
Changes in gene transcription are often mediated by the binding of specific TFs to 5′-regulatory regions (Baxter et al., 2012). However, our understanding of how gene expression is regulated during PTI, whether gene regulatory mechanisms differ in different species, and how a given species acquires a new mode of gene regulation is far from complete. Together with genomic resources, we reasoned that our datasets, which revealed both conserved and diversified gene expression patterns in the Brassicaceae species, may provide valuable insights into these questions. To this end, we searched the 5′-regulatory regions (500 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site) of the genes in each of the 15 gene clusters (Figure 5) for known TF-binding motifs in each Brassicaceae species. Our analysis revealed that multiple motifs, which are typically bound by WRKY TFs, are highly enriched in the 5′-regulatory regions of genes in common flg22-induced clusters such as Clusters 2, 5, 13, and 14 (Figure 7, A andSupplemental Figure S8). In A. thaliana, WRKY TFs are known to regulate transcriptional reprogramming during plant immunity, including responses to flg22 (Tsuda and Somssich, 2015; Birkenbihl et al., 2017). Also, the WRKY gene family has significantly expanded in land plants, which was likely required for adaptation to the terrestrial environment (One Thousand Plant Transcriptomes Initiative, 2019). Our results suggest that transcriptional induction mediated by WRKY TFs is a conserved mechanism in response to flg22 across these Brassicaceae species. In addition, the 5′-gene regulatory regions of flg22-induced expression clusters in A. thaliana, C. rubella, and C. hirsuta (Clusters 13, 6, and 14, respectively) were significantly enriched for CAMTA TF-binding motifs (Supplemental Data Set S7), which play an important role in early immune transcriptional reprogramming (Jacob et al., 2018).
Interestingly, we found that WRKY TFs are associated with the 5′-regulatory regions of genes showing species-specific induction only in the species that are highly flg22-responsive. For instance, in Clusters 1, 3, and 10, WRKY TF-binding motifs were only enriched in 5′-regulatory regions of flg22-induced genes in A. thaliana, C. rubella, and E. salsugineum, respectively (Figure 7, B). In addition, in the C. rubella-specific expression cluster (Cluster 7), AHL TF-motifs were enriched only in C. rubella 5′-regulatory regions (Figure 7, B). AHL TFs have been associated with plant developmental processes, but some AHL TFs are involved in MAMP-induced gene expression (Lou et al., 2014; Mine et al., 2018). These results suggest that in these Brassicaceae plants, the emergence of cis-regulatory sequences that are bound by specific TFs (such as WRKY TFs) facilitated the evolution of distinct gene induction patterns.
Variation in coding sequences shows no strong correlation with transcriptome variation
Previous studies reported a positive correlation between gene expression and coding sequence evolution and suggested that similar selective forces might have acted on both modes of evolution (Khaitovich et al., 2005; Slotte et al., 2011; Hunt et al., 2013; Hodgins et al., 2016), although it should be noted that in some studies, this correlation was organ-dependent or not detected at all (Tirosh and Barkai, 2008; Whittle et al., 2014). Thus, the relationship between gene expression and coding sequence evolution appears to be species- or condition-dependent. Therefore, we asked whether the variation in basal or flg22-triggered expression changes is correlated with variation in amino acid (AA) sequences among the tested Brassicaceae species. We compared the standard deviation divided by the mean of the expression levels in mock-treated RNA-seq samples (1 h) of A. thaliana Col-0 and other Brassicaceae plants with the mean AA sequence identities between A. thaliana Col-0 and each of the other species. We found no correlation between the variation in AA sequence and basal gene expression (Figure 8, A). Similarly, we compared flg22-induced expression changes of all expressed genes or DEGs (1 h) with AA sequence identities and found no correlation (Figure 8, B and C). Finally, we tested whether pairwise differences in flg22-induced expression changes between A. thaliana and individual Brassicaceae species were linked to AA sequence diversification. Again, we did not find any strong correlation (Figure 8, D–I). We also tested for synonymous or non-synonymous polymorphism (dN/dS) and did not find any strong correlation (Supplemental Figure S9). Thus, variation in gene expression at both the basal level and in response to flg22 does not correlate with variation in AA sequences or dN/dS, suggesting that different selective forces influence gene expression and coding sequence evolution in these Brassicaceae species.
Purifying selection may have acted on the regulatory regions of conserved flg22-responsive genes across Brassicaceae species
To test whether genes displaying a specific response in A. thaliana (Cluster 1) may have been subjected to recent adaptive pressures, we compared their patterns of polymorphism and divergence at upstream and coding regions with other gene clusters displaying no A. thaliana-specific expression (Clusters 2, 5, 7, and 9). If recent and recurrent regulatory adaptive mutations in A. thaliana were the ultimate cause of the expression specificity observed in Cluster 1, we should observe an elevated divergence between A. thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata at regulatory regions compared with the other clusters and potentially a distribution of allele frequencies skewed toward higher frequency classes compared with neutral expectations (Nielsen, 2005). Instead, our results indicate that the genetic variation observed in genes with A. thaliana-specific responses is overall in line with the variation observed in other clusters regardless of species-specificity (Supplemental Figure S10). However, Cluster 5 (highly induced in all species) showed the lowest genetic divergence in its upstream regions (the first 100 bp upstream of the gene), while the neutral synonymous variation for the same cluster was the highest (Supplemental Figure S10). This suggests that this lower divergence at upstream regions is not the result of lower mutation rates but rather the result of stronger purifying selection acting on the regulatory regions of those genes with conserved expression patterns in this cluster.
Differences in metabolome profiles in response to flg22 among the Brassicaceae species
Some genes showing species-specific expression patterns were associated with GO terms connected to secondary metabolism (Supplemental Data Set S8). This prompted us to investigate whether flg22 treatment differentially affects the metabolite profiles of Brassicaceae plants. In unbiased HPLC–MS analysis, we detected various differentially accumulating metabolites (DAMs; q-value <0.05, minimum fold change of 1.5) in response to flg22 among the four Brassicaceae plants (Figure 9, A). Interestingly, most flg22-induced changes in metabolite accumulation were species-specific, and only 19 out of 360 DAM signals were commonly affected by flg22 in all tested Brassicaceae species, indicating a strong diversification of the native metabolome and its reprogramming in response to flg22 (Figure 9, B). This notion was further supported by the clustering of log2 fold changes for all DAMs, which showed only a limited number of overlaps between metabolome alterations, as well as by principal component analysis (Figure 9, C and D).
Discussion
Our comparison of transcriptome responses within A. thaliana accessions and among four Brassicaceae species revealed fundamental features of transcriptome evolution: we identified conserved core genes and species-specific responsive genes across Brassicaceae plants during flg22-induced PTI. A core set of responsive genes conserved across Brassicaceae likely reflect important gene regulatory processes in PTI, whereas each species evolved its specific responses for species-specific arms. Our unified experimental setup for all transcriptome comparisons has allowed us to detect gene expression variation among these species.
We have shown that transcriptome responses to flg22 are remarkably conserved within A. thaliana. A previous study found that variation in the expression of stress-responsive genes accounted for the majority of divergence in expression among A. thaliana accessions (Kawakatsu et al., 2016), and many studies have described the strong plasticity of immune-responsive gene expression in the face of other environmental perturbations such as abiotic stress (Singh et al., 2014; Ueno et al., 2015; Coolen et al., 2016; Berens et al., 2019). Since the A. thaliana accessions that we examined were collected from habitats with distinct climatic conditions (such as the Canary Islands and Lithuania) and have diverse genetic backgrounds, these highly conserved early transcriptome responses to flg22 were surprising. This finding indicates that short-term evolution in divergent environments did not introduce major variation in early transcriptional responses during PTI.
We found that the expression changes of large numbers of genes are conserved among different Brassicaceae species during flg22-induced PTI. Many of these genes have not been previously characterized or linked to plant defense. Thus, our dataset provides the basis and rationale for future studies. In addition, the conservation of transcriptome responses to flg22 over 26 million years of Brassicaceae evolution suggests the functional importance of these as-yet-uncharacterized genes. Many studies have demonstrated the importance of TFs that regulate the expression of specific genes during PTI (Birkenbihl et al., 2017; Jacob et al., 2018). However, the lack of a method to efficiently and specifically block transcriptional reprogramming during PTI means that it remains obscure whether genome-wide transcriptional reprogramming during PTI is required for plant defense against pathogens and/or for adaptation to their environments. The evolutionary constraint feature in the transcriptome responses strongly suggests that the massive transcriptional reprogramming during PTI is advantageous for Brassicaceae plants in nature.
While all tested Brassicaceae species deployed rapid, massive transcriptional reprogramming as well as MAPK activation, they exhibited different PTI outputs. For instance, in C. hirsuta and E. salsugineum, the flg22-elicited transcriptional response was not associated with flg22-induced resistance against Pto DC3000. This seems counterintuitive for species not benefitting from costly transcriptional reprogramming. Maintaining transcriptional reprogramming during PTI is analogous to the retention of susceptible alleles for Rps2, a resistance gene for the pathogen virulence effector AvrRpt2 (MacQueen et al., 2016). One possible explanation is that susceptible Rps2 alleles encode recognition specificities for pathogen effectors that have yet to be identified (MacQueen et al., 2016). Similarly, transcriptional reprogramming induced by flg22 may be associated with effective resistance against different bacterial pathogens or the control of plant microbiota in C. hirsuta and E. salsugineum (Hacquard et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2020). Understanding how diversity in PTI responses across plant species is linked to plant adaptation would be crucial for comprehending the role of PTI.
In addition to conserved transcriptome responses, each of the tested Brassicaceae species exhibited species/lineage-specific expression signatures during flg22-induced PTI. We have shown that species-specific expression patterns are conserved among multiple accessions or sister species in the respective species. Moreover, variation in transcriptome responses during flg22-induced PTI was incongruent with the Brassicaceae phylogeny, which is inconsistent with the notion that variation was caused solely by genetic drift. Thus, some of the species-specific expression signatures observed in this study during flg22-induced PTI may be selectively driven expression shifts.
We have also shown that interspecific differences are larger than intraspecific variations in the early transcriptome response during PTI. This expression divergence could be explained by variation in the expression and function of TFs and/or variation in cis-regulatory elements in 5′-gene regulatory regions that coincide in a lineage-specific manner. It has been thought that most intraspecific variations could be attributed to cis-associated differences that are tightly constrained by linkage disequilibrium, while interspecific differences largely occur because trans-associated alterations are a larger mutational target (Signor and Nuzhdin, 2018). However, disentangling the contributions of trans- and cis-components of transcriptional control remains challenging. A recent study revealed that transcriptome variation is disposed to strong selection pressure in perturbed environments, in particular, genes with expression stochasticity and plasticity (Groen et al., 2020). In line with the important role of WRKY TFs in gene induction during immunity (Tsuda and Somssich, 2015; Birkenbihl et al., 2017), we have revealed that WRKY-TF binding motifs are highly enriched in the 5′-gene regulatory sequences of species in which the genes are induced. This suggests that some specific gains of TF-binding motifs in the 5′-gene regulatory regions account for the evolution of some species-specific flg22-responsive expression changes. It is also possible that duplicated genes could be responsible for species-specific differences that we may have missed in this study, as we entirely omitted lineage-specific duplicates. However, this would not introduce a very serious bias, as a large proportion of genes in the genomes (17,856) were successfully analyzed in this study.
Whether gene expression evolution correlates with coding sequence evolution remains a contentious topic (Tirosh and Barkai, 2008). Some studies found a positive correlation between gene expression and coding sequence evolution and argued that similar selection pressures act on both modes of evolution (Hunt et al., 2013; Whittle et al., 2014). In contrast, others have concluded that gene expression evolution may provide additional evolutionary capacity if the sequence of the respective gene is under evolutionary constraint (Shapiro et al., 2004; Harrison et al., 2012; Dean et al., 2015). In this scenario, gene expression variation would not be correlated with coding sequence evolution (Tirosh and Barkai, 2008; Renaut et al., 2012; Uebbing et al., 2016). In the current study, we found almost no correlation between variation in basal gene expression or flg22-induced gene expression changes and variation in their AA sequences and dN/dS. The connection between gene expression and coding sequence variation might depend on the species and growth conditions (Whittle et al., 2014). Further studies, especially in the plant field, are needed to better define the relationship between these two modes of evolution.
Methods
Plant materials
Plant materials used in this study are described in Tables 1–3.
Species . | Accession . | Abbreviation . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | Col-0 | Ath | Kenichi Tsuda lab |
C. rubella | N22697 | Cru | Slotte et al. (2013) |
C. grandiflora | Unknown | Cgr | Slotte et al. (2013) |
C. hirsuta | Oxford | Chi | Hay and Tsiantis (2006) |
C. hirsuta | Wa | Wa | Cartolano et al. (2015) |
C. hirsuta | GR2 | GR2 | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
E. salsugineum | Shandong | Esa | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
E. salsugineum | Yukon | YT | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
Species . | Accession . | Abbreviation . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | Col-0 | Ath | Kenichi Tsuda lab |
C. rubella | N22697 | Cru | Slotte et al. (2013) |
C. grandiflora | Unknown | Cgr | Slotte et al. (2013) |
C. hirsuta | Oxford | Chi | Hay and Tsiantis (2006) |
C. hirsuta | Wa | Wa | Cartolano et al. (2015) |
C. hirsuta | GR2 | GR2 | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
E. salsugineum | Shandong | Esa | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
E. salsugineum | Yukon | YT | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
Bold entries indicate species used for RNA-seq and metabolome analyses.
Species . | Accession . | Abbreviation . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | Col-0 | Ath | Kenichi Tsuda lab |
C. rubella | N22697 | Cru | Slotte et al. (2013) |
C. grandiflora | Unknown | Cgr | Slotte et al. (2013) |
C. hirsuta | Oxford | Chi | Hay and Tsiantis (2006) |
C. hirsuta | Wa | Wa | Cartolano et al. (2015) |
C. hirsuta | GR2 | GR2 | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
E. salsugineum | Shandong | Esa | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
E. salsugineum | Yukon | YT | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
Species . | Accession . | Abbreviation . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | Col-0 | Ath | Kenichi Tsuda lab |
C. rubella | N22697 | Cru | Slotte et al. (2013) |
C. grandiflora | Unknown | Cgr | Slotte et al. (2013) |
C. hirsuta | Oxford | Chi | Hay and Tsiantis (2006) |
C. hirsuta | Wa | Wa | Cartolano et al. (2015) |
C. hirsuta | GR2 | GR2 | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
E. salsugineum | Shandong | Esa | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
E. salsugineum | Yukon | YT | Miltos Tsiantis lab |
Bold entries indicate species used for RNA-seq and metabolome analyses.
Bold entries indicate accessions used for RNA-seq. aAdmixture group (1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016).
Bold entries indicate accessions used for RNA-seq. aAdmixture group (1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016).
Species . | Mutant allele . | Locus . | Source . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | sid2-2 | AT1G74710 | Tsuda et al. (2008) |
A. thaliana | fls2 (SAIL_691C4) | AT5G46330 | Zipfel et al. (2004) |
Species . | Mutant allele . | Locus . | Source . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | sid2-2 | AT1G74710 | Tsuda et al. (2008) |
A. thaliana | fls2 (SAIL_691C4) | AT5G46330 | Zipfel et al. (2004) |
Species . | Mutant allele . | Locus . | Source . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | sid2-2 | AT1G74710 | Tsuda et al. (2008) |
A. thaliana | fls2 (SAIL_691C4) | AT5G46330 | Zipfel et al. (2004) |
Species . | Mutant allele . | Locus . | Source . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | sid2-2 | AT1G74710 | Tsuda et al. (2008) |
A. thaliana | fls2 (SAIL_691C4) | AT5G46330 | Zipfel et al. (2004) |
Plant growth
Seeds were sterilized by vortexing in 70% ethanol for 5 min, followed by 6% NaClO for 10 min, washed five times with sterile water, and stratified in sterile water at 4°C for 5–7 days. Sterilized seeds were grown on half Murashige and Skoog (MS) Agar (2.45 g/L M&S+Vitamins+MES (Duchefa, , Haarlem, Netherlands), 1% sucrose, 0.5% plant agar, pH 5.8) plates in a Percival plant growth chamber (CU-36LX5D, Percival, USA) at 22°C with 10 h of light (white fluorescent lamps) for 11 days if not stated otherwise. Eleven-day-old seedlings were transferred to liquid half MS Medium (2.45 g/L M&S + Vitamins + MES (Duchefa), 1% sucrose) 1 day before flg22 treatment. Alternatively, 12-day-old seedlings were transferred to soil (Stender, Schermbeck, Germany) and grown at 23°C/20°C under a 10/14 h (light/dark) cycle and 60% relative humidity. Soil-grown plants were transferred to another chamber at 22°C with a 12 h photoperiod and 60% relative humidity 3 days before bacterial inoculation.
Flg22 treatment
Eleven-day-old seedlings were transferred from half MS Agar to 24-well plates, each containing 1.6 mL of half MS Medium, for 24 h prior to treatment. If not otherwise stated, 5–10 seedlings per sample were transferred to each well. For the flg22 treatment, 800 µL of 3 µM flg22 (EZBiolab Inc., Carmel, IN, USA) solution was added to the medium containing the seedlings, resulting in a final concentration of 1 µM flg22. Seedlings were harvested in liquid nitrogen at the indicated time points, and three wells were combined into one biological sample. The samples were stored at −80°C until use.
Seedling growth inhibition assay
Seven-day-old seedlings grown on half MS Agar were transferred to 1.6 mL of half MS Medium with or without 1 µM flg22 and grown for another 12 days under these conditions. The fresh weight of 12 pooled seedlings was then measured. The experiment was carried out three independent times, and statistical analysis was performed with log2-transformed fresh weight values.
Bacterial growth assay
To prepare bacterial inoculum, P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto DC3000) or the T3SS deficient Pto DC3000 mutant Pto hrcC (Tsuda et al., 2008) was grown on NYGA agar (2% glycerol, 0.5% Bacto Peptone, 0.3% yeast extract, and 1% Bacto Agar, pH 7.0) plates containing 25 µg/mL rifampicin for 3 days at 28°C. The bacterial strains were transferred to liquid NYGA medium containing 25 µg/mL rifampicin and incubated overnight at 28°C with shaking at 200 rpm to a final OD600 between 0.8 and 1. The bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm and washed twice with sterile 5 mM MgSO4 before dilution to an OD600 of 0.0002 (Pto DC3000) or 0.001 (Pto hrcC).
Four to five-week-old plants were used. Two leaves per plant were infiltrated with 1 µM flg22 or sterile water (mock) using a needleless syringe. One day later, leaves treated with flg22 or mock solution were infiltrated in the early afternoon with the bacterial suspension. Two days after bacterial infiltration, two leaf disks (0.565 cm2) per sample from two leaves were crushed in 400 µL sterile MgSO4 using a Retsch mixer mill. Dilution series were made and streaked on NYGA agar plates containing 25 µg/mL rifampicin. The plates were incubated for 2 days at 28°C before colony forming units were counted.
Alternatively, bacterial growth was quantified using a qPCR-based method as previously described (Ross and Somssich, 2016). In brief, DNA was extracted from bacteria-infiltrated leaves using a FastDNA Spin Kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA). Extracted DNA was quantified and adjusted to 8.75 µg/µL to achieve a final concentration of 35 µg DNA in a qPCR. Bacterial DNA was quantified using the expression levels of the Pto DC3000-specific oprF gene relative to plant ACTIN2 (ACT2) DNA. ΔCt values were calculated by subtracting the Ct value of the target gene from that of ACT2. These ΔCt values were considered to be log2 values and used for statistical analysis. The primers used are listed in Supplemental Data Set S9.
MAPK phosphorylation assay
The MAPK phosphorylation assay was performed as previously described (Tsuda et al., 2009). In short, 12-day-old seedlings were treated with 1 µM flg22 or mock for 15 min, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and ground with four metal beads in a Retsch MM 400 mixing mill (Retsch, Haan, Germany). Then, 150 µL of MAPK extraction buffer (50 mM Tris–HCL [pH 7.5], 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT, 10 mM NaF, 50 mM β-glycerolphosphate, 10% glycerol, complete proteinase inhibitor and PhosSTOP phosphatase inhibitor [both from Roche, Germany]) was added to the sample, and protein was extracted by centrifugation (4°C, 12,000 rpm). Protein concentration was determined using a Coomassie Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and 25 µg of protein was separated by SDS-PAGE for 1 h at 100 V. MAPK phosphorylation was detected via immunoblotting using an antiphospho-p44/42 MAPK antibody (dilution 1:5,000 in TBST; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) as primary and HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000 in TBST; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as secondary antibody. Luminescence was detected using SuperSignal West Femto Chemiluminescent Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and RT-qPCR
Seedling samples were ground in 2-mL reaction tubes with four metal beads using a Retsch MM 400 mixing mill (Retsch). RNA was extracted using peqGOLD TriFast with an additional DNA digestion step using DNAse I (Roche). The RNA was precipitated overnight at 4°C in 100% ethanol containing 115 mM Na–Ac (pH 5.2; Sigma–Aldrich, Munich, Germany) to further clean up and increase RNA yield. RNA quality and quantity were determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Subsequently, cDNA was synthesized from 4 µg DNase-treated total RNA using Superscript II or IV Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was performed on a CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) using EvaGreen (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA). The target gene was quantified relative to the expression of ACT2 from A. thaliana or other Brassicaceae plants. ΔCt values were calculated by subtracting the Ct value of the target gene from that of ACT2. These ΔCt values were considered to be log2 values and were further used for statistical analysis. Primers used are listed in Supplemental Data Set S9.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis for the seedling growth inhibition assay, bacterial growth assay, and RT-qPCR was performed using a mixed linear model with the function lmer implemented in the lme4 package within the R environment. To meet the assumptions of the mixed linear model, we log-transformed the raw data, when needed. The following model was fit to the data with GY denoting the genotype:treatment interaction effect; R the biological replicate effect; and ɛ the residual. The P-values calculated in two-tailed t tests were corrected for multiple hypothesis testing using the q-value package when samples were compared with each other in a given figure panel.
RNA-seq
RNA-seq experiments were independently performed three times. In each experiment, mock and flg22 treatments were conducted side by side. These three biological replicates were used for RNA-seq experiments. RNA quality was checked with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer or Caliper LabChip GX device. PolyA enrichment and library preparation were performed with a NEBNext Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Libraries were quantified by fluorometry, immobilized, and processed onto a flow cell with a cBot (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and subjected to sequencing-by-synthesis with HiSeq version 3 chemistry. Library construction and RNA sequencing were performed by the Max Planck-Genome-center Cologne (http://mpgc.mpipz.mpg.de/home/) with a single 100 bp (A. thaliana Col-0, C. rubella, C. hirsuta, and E. salsugineum) or 150 bp reads (all other A. thaliana accessions) using the Illumina HiSeq2500 or HiSeq3000 platform, respectively. After quality control, sequencing reads were mapped to respective reference genomes (Table 4) using TopHat2 (version 2.1.1) with default parameters, except for the parameters described in Table 5. The resulting bam files were used to count the number of reads per gene using HtSeq (version 0.6.0) software with default parameters. To exclude biases caused by mapping sequence reads of different A. thaliana accessions to the Col-0 genome, we created mapping genome files for each A. thaliana accession by correcting the Col-0 reference genome with SNP data available for these accessions. We downloaded the variants table for each accession from the website of the 1001 Genomes Project (intersection_snp_short_indel_vcf version 3.1 dataset). The pseudo-genome sequence of each accession was inferred by replacing the reference allele with the corresponding alternative allele using the pseudogeno function implemented in GEAN software. We created general feature format files by projecting the coordinates of the TAIR10 gene annotations onto the coordinates of each accession with the gffCoordinateLiftOver function of GEAN (Song et al., 2019). With these files, we performed a second mapping as described above.
Species . | Reference genome . | Publication . | Source . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | TAIR 10 | Lamesch et al. (2012) | Phytozome 10 |
Ath accessions | SNP corrected TAIR10 | This study | |
C. rubella | Version 1.0 | Slotte et al. (2013) | Phytozome 10 |
C. hirsute | Version 1.0 | Gan et al. (2016) | http://chi.mpipz.mpg.de/ |
E. salsugineum | Version 1.0 | Yang et al. (2013) | Phytozome 10 |
Species . | Reference genome . | Publication . | Source . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | TAIR 10 | Lamesch et al. (2012) | Phytozome 10 |
Ath accessions | SNP corrected TAIR10 | This study | |
C. rubella | Version 1.0 | Slotte et al. (2013) | Phytozome 10 |
C. hirsute | Version 1.0 | Gan et al. (2016) | http://chi.mpipz.mpg.de/ |
E. salsugineum | Version 1.0 | Yang et al. (2013) | Phytozome 10 |
Species . | Reference genome . | Publication . | Source . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | TAIR 10 | Lamesch et al. (2012) | Phytozome 10 |
Ath accessions | SNP corrected TAIR10 | This study | |
C. rubella | Version 1.0 | Slotte et al. (2013) | Phytozome 10 |
C. hirsute | Version 1.0 | Gan et al. (2016) | http://chi.mpipz.mpg.de/ |
E. salsugineum | Version 1.0 | Yang et al. (2013) | Phytozome 10 |
Species . | Reference genome . | Publication . | Source . |
---|---|---|---|
A. thaliana | TAIR 10 | Lamesch et al. (2012) | Phytozome 10 |
Ath accessions | SNP corrected TAIR10 | This study | |
C. rubella | Version 1.0 | Slotte et al. (2013) | Phytozome 10 |
C. hirsute | Version 1.0 | Gan et al. (2016) | http://chi.mpipz.mpg.de/ |
E. salsugineum | Version 1.0 | Yang et al. (2013) | Phytozome 10 |
TopHat2 parameter . | Value . |
---|---|
−-read mismatches | 10 |
−- read-gap-length | 10 |
−- read-edit-dist | 20 |
−-min-anchor-length | 5 |
−-splice-mismatches | 2 |
−-min-intron-length | 30 |
−-max-intron-length | 1,000 |
−-max-insertion-length | 20 |
−-max-deletion-length | 20 |
−-max-multihits | 10 |
−-segment-mismatches | 3 |
−-min-coverage-intron | 30 |
−-max-coverage-intron | 10,000 |
−-library-type | fr-firstrand |
−-b2 | Very sensitive |
TopHat2 parameter . | Value . |
---|---|
−-read mismatches | 10 |
−- read-gap-length | 10 |
−- read-edit-dist | 20 |
−-min-anchor-length | 5 |
−-splice-mismatches | 2 |
−-min-intron-length | 30 |
−-max-intron-length | 1,000 |
−-max-insertion-length | 20 |
−-max-deletion-length | 20 |
−-max-multihits | 10 |
−-segment-mismatches | 3 |
−-min-coverage-intron | 30 |
−-max-coverage-intron | 10,000 |
−-library-type | fr-firstrand |
−-b2 | Very sensitive |
TopHat2 parameter . | Value . |
---|---|
−-read mismatches | 10 |
−- read-gap-length | 10 |
−- read-edit-dist | 20 |
−-min-anchor-length | 5 |
−-splice-mismatches | 2 |
−-min-intron-length | 30 |
−-max-intron-length | 1,000 |
−-max-insertion-length | 20 |
−-max-deletion-length | 20 |
−-max-multihits | 10 |
−-segment-mismatches | 3 |
−-min-coverage-intron | 30 |
−-max-coverage-intron | 10,000 |
−-library-type | fr-firstrand |
−-b2 | Very sensitive |
TopHat2 parameter . | Value . |
---|---|
−-read mismatches | 10 |
−- read-gap-length | 10 |
−- read-edit-dist | 20 |
−-min-anchor-length | 5 |
−-splice-mismatches | 2 |
−-min-intron-length | 30 |
−-max-intron-length | 1,000 |
−-max-insertion-length | 20 |
−-max-deletion-length | 20 |
−-max-multihits | 10 |
−-segment-mismatches | 3 |
−-min-coverage-intron | 30 |
−-max-coverage-intron | 10,000 |
−-library-type | fr-firstrand |
−-b2 | Very sensitive |
The read counts determined by HTSeq were analyzed in the R environment (version 3.3.1) using the edgeR (version 3.14.0) and limma (version 3.28.14) packages. Genes expressed at low levels were excluded from analysis by filtering out genes with a mean read count ˂10 counts per sample. Read counts then were normalized using TMM normalization embedded in the edge R package, and the data were log2-transformed using the voom function within the limma package to yield log2 counts per million. For individual analysis of Brassicaceae species and A. thaliana accession data, a linear model was fit to each gene using the lmFit function of limma with the following equation: , where S denotes log2 expression value, GY represents the genotype:treatment interaction and random factors, R indicates biological replicate, and ɛ represents residual. For the combined analysis of Brassicaceae species and A. thaliana accession data, the replicate effect was removed from the linear model, resulting in the following terms: , where S denotes log2 expression value, GY represents genotype:treatment interaction, and ɛ represents residual. For variance shrinkage of calculated P-values, the eBayes function of limma was used. The resulting P-values were corrected for multiple testing by calculating the false discovery rate (FDR; or q-value) using the q-value (version 2.4.2) package.
Normalization and determination of DEGs were performed separately for each Brassicaceae species and each A. thaliana accession. To compare expression changes mediated by flg22 between Brassicaceae plants, we used Best Reciprocal BLAST to identify genes that show a 1:1 ortholog with a corresponding A. thaliana gene and only kept the genes with 1:1 orthologs in every Brassicaceae species. Genes with a one-directional best hit relationship were not included in these analyses. This resulted in a set of 17,856 1:1 ortholog genes. We restricted the analysis of A. thaliana accessions to the same set of 17,856 genes to enable a direct comparison of results obtained from Brassicaceae and A. thaliana accession analysis. To directly compare Brassicaceae plants with A. thaliana accessions, we further normalized and determined DEGs for all 1-h samples together using the set of 17,856 orthologous genes. This approach enabled us to compare basal expression levels between Brassicaceae and A. thaliana accessions.
The R packages and software used for further analysis of the sequencing data are listed in Table 6. Heatmaps and k-mean clustering of DEGs were generated using the Genesis software with default parameters.
Software/package . | Version . | Citation . | Use . |
---|---|---|---|
AME | 4.12.0 | McLeay and Bailey (2010) | TF motif enrichment |
BinGO | 3.0.3 | Maere et al. (2005) | GO enrichment |
Clustal Omega | 1.2.4 | Sievers et al. (2011) | Multiple sequence alignment |
Cytoscape | 3.3.0 | Shannon et al. (2003) | Run BinGO |
EdgeR | 3.14.0 | Robinson et al. (2010) | Analysing DEGs |
Genevestigator | Hruz et al. (2008) | Public transcriptome data | |
Genesis | 1.7.7 | Sturn et al. (2002) | Heatmaps, clustering |
Htseq | 0.6.0 | Anders et al. (2015) | Count RNA-seq reads |
limma | 3.28.14 | Ritchie et al. (2015) | Analyzing DEGs |
MixOmics | 6.0 | Rohart et al. (2017) | PCA |
TopHat | 2.1.1 | Trapnell et al. (2009) | Map RNA-seq reads |
VennDiagram | 1.6.17 | Chen and Boutros (2011) | Venn diagrams |
Software/package . | Version . | Citation . | Use . |
---|---|---|---|
AME | 4.12.0 | McLeay and Bailey (2010) | TF motif enrichment |
BinGO | 3.0.3 | Maere et al. (2005) | GO enrichment |
Clustal Omega | 1.2.4 | Sievers et al. (2011) | Multiple sequence alignment |
Cytoscape | 3.3.0 | Shannon et al. (2003) | Run BinGO |
EdgeR | 3.14.0 | Robinson et al. (2010) | Analysing DEGs |
Genevestigator | Hruz et al. (2008) | Public transcriptome data | |
Genesis | 1.7.7 | Sturn et al. (2002) | Heatmaps, clustering |
Htseq | 0.6.0 | Anders et al. (2015) | Count RNA-seq reads |
limma | 3.28.14 | Ritchie et al. (2015) | Analyzing DEGs |
MixOmics | 6.0 | Rohart et al. (2017) | PCA |
TopHat | 2.1.1 | Trapnell et al. (2009) | Map RNA-seq reads |
VennDiagram | 1.6.17 | Chen and Boutros (2011) | Venn diagrams |
Software/package . | Version . | Citation . | Use . |
---|---|---|---|
AME | 4.12.0 | McLeay and Bailey (2010) | TF motif enrichment |
BinGO | 3.0.3 | Maere et al. (2005) | GO enrichment |
Clustal Omega | 1.2.4 | Sievers et al. (2011) | Multiple sequence alignment |
Cytoscape | 3.3.0 | Shannon et al. (2003) | Run BinGO |
EdgeR | 3.14.0 | Robinson et al. (2010) | Analysing DEGs |
Genevestigator | Hruz et al. (2008) | Public transcriptome data | |
Genesis | 1.7.7 | Sturn et al. (2002) | Heatmaps, clustering |
Htseq | 0.6.0 | Anders et al. (2015) | Count RNA-seq reads |
limma | 3.28.14 | Ritchie et al. (2015) | Analyzing DEGs |
MixOmics | 6.0 | Rohart et al. (2017) | PCA |
TopHat | 2.1.1 | Trapnell et al. (2009) | Map RNA-seq reads |
VennDiagram | 1.6.17 | Chen and Boutros (2011) | Venn diagrams |
Software/package . | Version . | Citation . | Use . |
---|---|---|---|
AME | 4.12.0 | McLeay and Bailey (2010) | TF motif enrichment |
BinGO | 3.0.3 | Maere et al. (2005) | GO enrichment |
Clustal Omega | 1.2.4 | Sievers et al. (2011) | Multiple sequence alignment |
Cytoscape | 3.3.0 | Shannon et al. (2003) | Run BinGO |
EdgeR | 3.14.0 | Robinson et al. (2010) | Analysing DEGs |
Genevestigator | Hruz et al. (2008) | Public transcriptome data | |
Genesis | 1.7.7 | Sturn et al. (2002) | Heatmaps, clustering |
Htseq | 0.6.0 | Anders et al. (2015) | Count RNA-seq reads |
limma | 3.28.14 | Ritchie et al. (2015) | Analyzing DEGs |
MixOmics | 6.0 | Rohart et al. (2017) | PCA |
TopHat | 2.1.1 | Trapnell et al. (2009) | Map RNA-seq reads |
VennDiagram | 1.6.17 | Chen and Boutros (2011) | Venn diagrams |
The expression clusters of DEGs determined for the combined RNA-seq analysis of A. thaliana accessions together with Brassicaceae species were investigated for enrichment of GO terms corresponding to biological processes using the BinGO plugin within the Cytoscape environment. GO term enrichment was calculated using a hypergeometric test, followed by Benjamini and Hochberg FDR correction implemented in the BinGO plugin. The whole genome annotation was used as a background.
Known TF motifs enriched in individual expression clusters of DEGs determined in the combined RNA-seq analysis of A. thaliana accessions together with Brassicaceae species were identified using the AME tool within the MEME suite. For this purpose, 5′-gene regulatory regions (500 bp upstream of the transcription start site) were extracted for each tested Brassicaceae species. Enrichment of TF motifs was determined in each of the 15 k-means clusters for all tested Brassicaceae species using the 5′-regulatory regions of all expressed genes with clear 1:1 orthologs (16,100 genes) as a background. Known TF motifs were retrieved from the JASPAR CORE (2018) plants database that is implemented in AME.
To compare AA sequence conservation with expression variation, all AA sequences of expressed genes with 1:1 orthologs in all species were extracted for each Brassicaceae species. The sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega and percent identity matrices were extracted. The AA sequence identity output of Clustal Omega was used to calculate the mean AA identity across C. rubella, C. hirsuta, and E. salsugineum compared with A. thaliana as a proxy of sequence conservation. The mean AA sequence identities were subsequently plotted against the SD/mean of flg22-expression changes across all four Brassicaceae species, which served as a proxy for expression variation among the tested Brassicaceae species. Similarly, the mean AA sequence identity was also plotted against the SD/mean of the normalized expression value in control samples. In addition, pairwise AA sequence identities between A. thaliana and each Brassicaceae species were plotted against the absolute difference in flg22-induced expression changes between the compared species. This analysis was performed for all expressed genes or only for DEGs.
To calculate the dN, dS, and dN/dS ratios for DEGs, we aligned the AA sequences of each of orthogroup using MUSCLE with a maximum-likelihood approach (Edgar, 2004) and translated this alignment into the corresponding codon alignment with PAL2NAL (Suyama et al., 2006), also removing stop codons and gaps. The resulting codon alignments were used for pairwise dN, dS, and dN/dS rate calculations using the codeml tool from PAML (Yang, 2007). Software and packages used in this study are described in Table 6.
Phylogenetic analysis
Various dates have been reported for the divergence of Brassicaceae species (Franzke et al., 2016). For instance, Beilstein et al. (2010) dated the Brassicaceae crown node age to 54 Mya, whereas more recent publications dated this event 31–37 Mya (Edger et al., 2015; Hohmann et al., 2015; Franzke et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2016). Therefore, in this study, we used TIMETREE (www.timetree.org), which synthesizes divergence times based on the available literature to estimate the timescale of Brassicaceae species evolution (Hedges et al., 2015). Phylogenetic trees were retrieved from timetree.org based on divergence time estimates from 15 studies (Koch et al., 2000; Heenan et al., 2002; Parkinson et al., 2005; Franzke et al., 2009; Yue et al., 2009; Beilstein et al., 2010; Couvreur et al., 2010; Mandáková et al., 2010; Arakaki et al., 2011; Hermant et al., 2012; Naumann et al., 2013; Artyukova et al., 2014; Vanneste et al., 2014; Hohmann et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2016).
Genevestigator analysis
The following datasets were used for Genevestigator analysis: AT-00106 (Pto DC3000); AT-00110 (ABA or MeJA); AT-00113 (SA); AT-00147 (B. cinerea); AT-00253 (flg22 or OG); AT-00493 (hypoxia); AT-00553 (Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis); AT-00560 (drought); AT-00597 (Pep2 and elf18); AT-00645 (heat stress).
SA analysis
SA levels were analyzed as described previously with an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/Q-Exactive system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using an ODS column (AQUITY UPLC BEH C18, 1.7 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) (Kojima et al., 2009; Kojima and Sakakibara, 2012; Yasuda et al., 2016).
Secondary metabolite extraction, acquisition, and processing of data
Control and flg22-treated seedlings were collected and extracted as described before (Bednarek et al., 2011). The extracts were subjected to LC–MS analyses performed using the Acquity UPLC system (Waters) attached to a micrOToF-Q mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Hamburg, Germany). Chromatographic separations were carried out on a BEH C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm, 1.7 µm particle size) at 22°C with a mobile phase flow rate of 0.35 mL/min. The elution was conducted using water containing 0.1% formic acid (Sigma–Aldrich, Munich, Germany) (Solvent A) and acetonitrile (VWR Chemicals, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France) containing 1.9% of water and 0.1% of formic acid (Solvent B) in the following gradient: 0–10 min from 0% to 25% B, 10–15 min to 30% B, 20–24 min maintained at 100% B, and up to 24.5 min the system was returned to starting conditions and re-equilibrated for 8 min. The spectrometer was calibrated with sodium formate salt clusters prior to each analysis. MS was operated using the following settings: ion source voltage of −4.5or 4.5 kV, nebulization of nitrogen at a pressure of 1.2 bar and a gas flow rate of 8 L/min. Ion source temperature was 220°C. The spectra were scanned in positive and negative ion mode at a range of 50–1000 m/z at a resolution >15,000 FWHM (full width at half maximum). Data acquisition was supervised by HyStar version 3.2 software (Bruker Daltonics).
The LC–MS data were converted to mzXML format by MSConvert version: 3.0.11781 tool available in Proteowizard software prior to further processing by MZmine version 2.31 software (Pluskal et al., 2010). Data from each experiment were processed separately for negative and positive ionization. In first step, lists of masses were generated by the mass detector module in each scan in the raw data files. Chromatograms for each mass detected continuously over the scans were then built using a chromatogram builder algorithm. These chromatograms were deconvoluted by the deconvolution module using the wavelets algorithm based on Bioconductor’s XCMS package for R (Tautenhahn et al., 2008). An isotopic peaks grouper was used for isotope elimination followed by adduct and complex searching. Deviation of retention times between peak lists was reduced by a retention time normalizer. Such transformed peaks were aligned in all samples through a match score by a join aligner module. The resulting peaks list was completed by supplemental peak detection with a peak finder algorithm prior to missing value imputation (gap filling). The generated data table was subsequently exported in csv format for further statistical analysis.
Observations equal to zero (below the detection level) were substituted by half of the minimum non-zero observation for each metabolite. The observations were then transformed by log2(103×). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done with experiment as a block (random effects) and treatment, species as two fixed factors; analysis was done together for positive and negative ionization. A species was determined to be a DAM if it met all three conditions: (1) treatment effect or interaction treatment × species was significant with q-value <0.05 (FDR, Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995), (2) individual tests for each species P < 0.05 (significant test for the difference between treatment and control was done for each species), and (3) |fold change|>1.5, where fold change is flg22 treatment/control. Statistical analysis was performed in Genstat version 19. Visualizations including barplot, PCA, heatmap, and Venn diagram were created in R.
Intra specific variation
Analyses of intra specific variation in A. thaliana were conducted using a subset of the accessions from the 1001 Genome Project (1001 Genomes Consortium, 2016). To minimize the potentially confounding effects of demography and admixture, we only selected accessions from the non-relict Iberian ancestry group with ˂5% admixture from other groups (http://1001genomes.github.io/admixture-map/), which led to a sample of 45 accessions. Genomic regions for genes and upstream regions were identified using the REST API of the Ensembl database (https://rest.ensembl.org/). For each gene, the longest available transcript was used. Genetic divergence between A. thaliana and A. lyrata was calculated using the genome-wide pairwise alignment available on Ensembl Plant (LastZ) and also accessed through their REST API server. The code used for interacting with the REST APIs and calculating summary statistics of polymorphism and divergence data is written in R for this study and is made publicly available here: https://gitlab.mpcdf.mpg.de/slaurent/mk_dfe.git.
To determine whether mean genetic divergence between A. thaliana and A. lyrata was significant (Supplemental Figure S10) across clusters, we performed a one-way ANOVA with gene expression clustering as the grouping factor. We used the anova_test function from the rstatix package; the R code implementing this function is publicly available in the following repository: https://gitlab.mpcdf.mpg.de/slaurent/mk_dfe.git in the folder anova_figureS9.
Hierarchical clustering
RNA-seq mapped read counts of 1:1 orthologs were subjected to TMM normalization after removing low-expression orthologs (average count of <10 reads). A pairwise distance matrix (1 – Pearson’s correlation coefficient) was obtained from log2 fold changes of CPM values. A dendrogram was generated with the R package “pvclust” with default settings. The same analysis was performed using log2 fold changes of DAMs for metabolomic comparison.
OU modeling
OU modeling was performed using the R package “l1ou” (Khabbazian et al., 2016) with the following parameters: max.nShifts = 1, criterion = pBIC, root.model = OUfixedRoot, rescale = FALSE, and alpha.upper = 0.053. The upper limit of α estimates was calculated by the find_grid_alpha function in the R package “PhylogeneticEM” (Bastide et al., 2018).
Accession numbers
The RNA-seq data used in this study were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus database (accession no. GSE115991).
Supplemental data
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
Supplemental Figure S1 Effects of flg22 on Pto hrcC growth in Brassicaceae species.
Supplemental Figure S2 Overlap of DEGs at each time point.
Supplemental Figure S3 SID2-dependent SA accumulation is not required for sustained transcriptome responses in A. thaliana.
Supplemental Figure S4 Heatmap for all DEGs in Brassicaceae species after flg22 treatment.
Supplemental Figure S5 Comparison of two different mapping approaches for A. thaliana accession RNA-seq reads.
Supplemental Figure S6 Gene family size and basal gene expression levels do not explain species-specific expression signatures.
Supplemental Figure S7 Multi-optima phylogenetic OU modeling of log2 fold changes of 1:1 orthologs in Figure 5, A.
Supplemental Figure S8 Enrichment of TF-motifs within the 5′-regulatory regions of DEG clusters.
Supplemental Figure S9 Gene expression variation does not correlate with dN/dS variation.
Supplemental Figure S10 Genetic divergence between A. thaliana and A. lyrata for upstream, synonymous, and non-synonymous sites.
Supplemental Data Set S1. RNA-seq read counts for 1:1 orthologs in all the samples used in this study.
Supplemental Data Set S2. Expression changes (log2) of DEGs in Figure 3, A.
Supplemental Data Set S3. Expression changes (log2) of DEGs in Figure 3, C.
Supplemental Data Set S4. GO analysis of DEGs in Figure 3, D.
Supplemental Data Set S5. Expression changes (log2) of DEGs in Figure 4, G.
Supplemental Data Set S6. Expression changes (log2) of DEGs in Figure 5, A.
Supplemental Data Set S7. Enrichment analysis of known TF-binding motifs in the 5′-regulatory regions of genes in shared and species-specific clusters.
Supplemental Data Set S8. GO analysis of gene clusters in Figure 5, A.
Supplemental Data Set S9. Primers used in this study.
T.M.W., S.A., P.S.L., P.B., and K.T. designed the research. T.M.W., F.E., S.A., A.P., and K.K. performed the research. H.S., X.G., M.T., and R.G.-O. contributed new reagent/analytic tools. T.M.W., S.A., F.E., A.P., B.S., E.D., A.S., K.F., S.L., P.B., and K.T. analyzed the data. T.M.W., F.E., and K.T. wrote the paper with input from all authors.
The author responsible for the distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (https://academic.oup.com/plcell) is Kenichi Tsuda (tsuda@mail.hzau.edu.cn).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mikiko Kojima (RIKEN CSRS) for hormone analysis, the Max-Planck Genome Centre for sequencing support, and Neysan Donnelly and Tsuda lab members for critical comments on the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Program No. 2662020ZKPY009) (to K.T.), the Huazhong Agricultural University Scientific & Technological Self-innovation Foundation (to K.T.), the Max Planck Society, a German Research Foundation grant (DECRyPT/SPP2125) (to K.T.), IMPRS Cologne (T.M.W), National Science Center OPUS (UMO-2015/17/B/NZ1/00871) (to P.B.), and PRELUDIUM (UMO-2013/09/N/NZ2/02080) (to K.K.) grants.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
References
One Thousand Plant Transcriptomes Initiative. (
1001 Genomes Consortium. (
Author notes
Senior author.
Thomas M Winkelmüller, Frederickson Entila and Shajahan Anver authors contributed equally.