Summary

Medicine is both a science and an art, and is plagued by uncertainty. The skills-based side of medicine is best represented by apprenticeship, which has a continuous but not linear history up to the present. In the early modern period apprenticeship was an essential albeit flexible institution involving most regular practitioners. Medical reform after 1800 performed a sleight of hand whereby apprenticeship was preserved in a liberal occupation at the same time as it was discredited by a climate of laissez faire owing much to the influence of Adam Smith. To achieve this, a privatised form of apprenticeship which had become the norm in the eighteenth century was transformed by a countervailing ethos deriving from classical humanism, which idealised the one-to-one relationship between senior and junior. This made it possible to divest apprenticeship of the associations which educated middle-class practitioners found most repellent, including poverty, servitude, trade and low status.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
You do not currently have access to this article.