1-20 of 10076
Sort by
Journal Article
Brooke F Beech and others
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, acae030, https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae030
Published: 13 April 2024
Image
Published: 13 April 2024
Fig. 1 Flow of participants (study 1).
Journal Article
Laura Monetta and others
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, acae029, https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae029
Published: 13 April 2024
Journal Article
Marialaura Di Tella and others
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, acae031, https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae031
Published: 13 April 2024
Image
Published: 13 April 2024
Fig. 2 Flow of participants (study 2).
Image
Published: 13 April 2024
Fig. 3 Flow of participants (study 3).
Image
Published: 13 April 2024
Fig. 1 Initial brain 18 F-FDG-PET (March 24, 2022).
Image
Published: 09 April 2024
Figure 1 Flowchart of participant exclusions.
Journal Article
Justin E Karr and others
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, acae027, https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae027
Published: 09 April 2024
Image
Published: 06 April 2024
Fig. 1 Flowchart of the participants’ selection process.
Journal Article
Martin Čihák and others
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, acae028, https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae028
Published: 06 April 2024
Image
Published: 06 April 2024
Fig. 2 Receiver operating characteristic curves of Model 1 and Model 2.
Journal Article
Veera Tikkanen and others
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, acae026, https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae026
Published: 05 April 2024
Image
Published: 05 April 2024
Fig. 1 The Flexible Attention Test (FAT) subtasks (mean scores with 95% confidence intervals) for early-onset dementia (EOD), mild cognitive impairment-neurological (MCI-n), mild cognitive impairment-other (MCI-o), and subjective cognitive decline (SCD) patients.
Journal Article
Fabienne I M van Vliet and others
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, acae025, https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae025
Published: 03 April 2024
Image
Published: 03 April 2024
Fig. 2 Flow of participants through the study. Note : Index test: GET; criterion standard: 2PVTs.
Image
Published: 03 April 2024
Fig. 1 Groningen Effort Test. Note : Example item of the GET, authors: A.B.M. Fuermaier, L. Tucha, J. Koerts, S. Aschenbrenner, and O. Tucha ( Schuhfried, 2013 ).
Image
Published: 03 April 2024
Frequency of performance validity measured by criterion of 2PVTs (ASTM and TOMM) and measured by separate PVTs. Notes : ASTM: Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test; TOMM: Test of Memory Malingering; GET: Groningen Effort Test; 2PVTs: failure on both PVTs TOMM and ASTM. * indicates p -value < 0.05; *
Image
Published: 03 April 2024
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve indicating diagnostic accuracy of the GET index and GET error rate in identifying invalid performance relative to the criterion of 2PVTs.
Journal Article
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, acae033, https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae033
Published: 01 April 2024