Abstract

Chronic musculoskeletal pain constitutes a large socioeconomic challenge, and preventive measures with documented effects are warranted. The authors’ aim in this study was to prospectively investigate the association between physical exercise, body mass index (BMI), and risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders. The study comprised data on approximately 30,000 women and men in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (Norway) who reported no pain or physical impairment at baseline in 1984–1986. Occurrence of chronic musculoskeletal pain was assessed at follow-up in 1995–1997. A generalized linear model was used to calculate adjusted risk ratios. For both females and males, hours of physical exercise per week were linearly and inversely associated with risk of chronic pain in the low back (women: P-trend = 0.02; men: P-trend < 0.001) and neck/shoulders (women: P-trend = 0.002; men: P-trend < 0.001). Obese women and men had an approximately 20% increased risk of chronic pain in both the low back and the neck/shoulders. Exercising for 1 or more hours per week compensated, to some extent, for the adverse effect of high BMI on risk of chronic pain. The authors conclude that physical inactivity and high BMI are associated with an increased risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders in the general adult population.

Chronic musculoskeletal pain in the low back and neck/shoulders is a common cause of reduced quality of life, sick leave, and disability in Western industrialized countries, and the problem is expected to grow with the aging population (1–4). The negative consequences, for both the individual and society, highlight the importance of identifying primary preventive measures that are easily accessible for the general population.

Promotion of regular physical exercise and prevention of obesity are initiatives assumed to reduce the incidence of musculoskeletal pain (2). For example, obesity has been associated with increased prevalence of low back pain in several cross-sectional studies (5). A few prospective cohort studies have shown that exercise may reduce the risk of musculoskeletal pain (6–8), while other studies have found moderate or no associations (9). This inconsistency may be due to methodological limitations, such as small study samples and inclusion of persons with musculoskeletal pain at baseline.

Few studies have investigated the combined effect of exercise and excess body mass on future risk of chronic musculoskeletal pain. A recent study showed that overweight and obesity increased the risk of widespread chronic musculoskeletal pain (i.e., fibromyalgia) during an 11-year follow-up period, whereas physical exercise could compensate for this adverse effect to some extent (10). Whether physical exercise and excess body mass have a similar effect on risk of localized chronic pain in the low back or neck/shoulders is unknown.

Our primary aim in the current study was to investigate the association between physical exercise, body mass index (BMI), and risk of chronic musculoskeletal pain in the low back and neck/shoulders in a large unselected population of women and men without musculoskeletal pain or any physical impairment at baseline. We hypothesized 1) that an inverse relation exists between physical exercise and risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders and 2) that physical exercise can compensate for the adverse effect of excess body mass on risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

In Nord-Trøndelag County, Norway, all inhabitants aged 20 years or older were invited to participate in 2 waves of a large health survey (the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT)), the first in 1984–1986 (HUNT 1) and the second in 1995–1997 (HUNT 2). Among 87,285 eligible persons, 77,216 (89%) accepted the invitation to participate in HUNT 1, filled in a questionnaire, and underwent a clinical examination. At the examination, body mass and height were measured, and the participants were given a second questionnaire to complete at home and return in a prestamped envelope. During HUNT 2 in 1995–1997, 94,187 persons were invited to participate, and 66,215 (70%) accepted the invitation. The procedures were similar to those described for HUNT 1, although both the questionnaires and the clinical examination were more comprehensive. More detailed information about selection procedures, participation, and questionnaires used in the HUNT Study can be found at http://www.hunt.ntnu.no.

For the purpose of the present study, we selected all 24,357 women and 21,568 men who had participated in both surveys. We excluded 4,085 women and 3,446 men without baseline information on hours of physical exercise per week, 167 women and 113 men without data on musculoskeletal pain, and 13 women without information on weight. Moreover, we excluded 1,527 women and 1,528 men who reported being physically impaired at baseline because of a movement disorder or who had no information on this variable. To obtain a study sample of persons without musculoskeletal pain at baseline (i.e., at the time of HUNT 1), we excluded participants who reported that the pain had lasted for 10 years or more (1,613 women and 1,016 men with low back pain; 2,802 women and 1,669 men with neck/shoulder pain). Thus, the prospective analyses of chronic low back pain were based on 16,952 women and 15,465 men, while prospective analyses of chronic pain in the neck/shoulders were based on 15,763 women and 14,812 men. There was no difference in mean BMI (24.9 (standard deviation, 3.7) vs. 27.7 (standard deviation, 3.6)) or distribution of physical activity (39.4% inactive vs. 39.6% inactive) between the total population and the study sample, indicating no selection bias. The study was approved by the Regional Committee for Ethics in Medical Research and carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study variables

Physical exercise.

At baseline (HUNT 1), the participants were asked to complete a questionnaire that included questions on frequency, duration, and intensity of leisure-time physical exercise (i.e., walking, skiing, swimming, or other sports) per week. The frequency question had 5 response options (0, <1, 1, 2–3, or ≥4 times per week; coded 1–5). Participants who reported no activity or less than 1 exercise session per week were classified as inactive. Participants who reported exercising once a week or more often were also asked about the average duration of activity per session (<15, 15–30, 31–60, or >60 minutes; coded 1–4) and the average exercise intensity (no sweating or heavy breathing (i.e., low), sweating and/or heavy breathing (i.e., moderate), or nearly exhausted (i.e., vigorous); coded 1–3). In the analysis, moderate and vigorous activity were combined, resulting in a dichotomous variable of low-intensity activity versus moderate- or vigorous-intensity activity.

Based on information on frequency and duration, we calculated the average number of hours spent in physical exercise per week. The response option “2–3 times per week” was counted as 2.5 times per week, and “≥4 times per week” was counted as 5 times per week. The response option “<15 minutes” was counted as 10 minutes, “15–30 minutes” was counted as 25 minutes, “31–60 minutes” was counted as 45 minutes, and “>60 minutes” was counted as 75 minutes.

Body mass index.

Standardized measurements of body height (to the nearest centimeter) and body weight (to the nearest half kilogram) obtained at the baseline examination in HUNT 1 were used to calculate BMI as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m2). Participants were then classified into one of 4 BMI groups according to the cutpoints suggested by the World Health Organization (11): underweight (BMI <18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9), or obese (BMI ≥30.0).

Chronic musculoskeletal pain.

The questions about musculoskeletal symptoms were adopted from the Standardized Nordic Questionnaire (12). On the first questionnaire in HUNT 2, the participants were asked, “During the last year, have you had pain and/or stiffness in your muscles and limbs that lasted for at least 3 consecutive months?” Response options were “yes” and “no.” If answering yes, the participants were asked to indicate the affected body area(s). In the statistical analyses, chronic pain in the neck, chronic pain in the shoulders, and chronic pain in the upper back were combined to indicate chronic pain in the neck/shoulders, whereas chronic low back pain was analyzed separately.

Statistical analyses

A generalized linear model for the binomial family (log link) was used to estimate risk ratios for chronic musculoskeletal pain in the low back and neck/shoulders. Participants who reported different levels of physical exercise at baseline were compared with the reference group of physically inactive participants. The risk ratio for chronic musculoskeletal pain between categories of BMI was estimated in similar models. The precision of the estimated risk ratios was assessed using 95% confidence intervals, and tests for trends across categories of physical exercise and BMI were conducted by treating the categories as an ordinal variable in the regression model. All analyses were stratified by gender.

The basic models were adjusted for age in 10-year categories (20–29, 30–39, …, 60–69, or ≥70 years). In additional multivariable analyses, we adjusted for occupation (manual, nonmanual, farmer/fisher, nonworker, or unknown) and smoking (never smoker, former smoker, current smoker, or unknown). In addition, BMI (<18.5, 18.5–24.9, 25.0–29.9, or ≥30.0) and frequency of physical exercise (inactive, 1 times/week, 2–3 times/week, or ≥4 times/week) were mutually adjusted for in the full models.

Additionally, we conducted a stratified analysis to examine whether exercise intensity modified the association between hours of exercise and risk of pain and included a product term for intensity × hours of exercise in the regression model to formally evaluate the statistical interaction using a likelihood ratio test. The combined effect of BMI (i.e., normal weight, overweight, or obese) and exercise (i.e., inactive vs. ≥1 hour/week) was also assessed, using participants with normal weight who exercised for 1 hour or more per week as the reference group. The effect of exercise within each BMI category was estimated in subsequent stratified analysis.

All statistical tests were 2-sided, and all statistical analyses were performed using Stata for Windows, version 10.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas).

RESULTS

Table 1 and Table 2 present the characteristics of the study population according to physical exercise and BMI at baseline, respectively. At follow-up, 1,824 (11%) women and 1,490 (10%) men reported chronic low back pain, whereas 3,317 (21%) women and 2,567 (17%) men reported chronic pain in the neck/shoulders.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population According to Level of Physical Exercise, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, 1984–1997

Characteristic Women
 
Men
 
Inactive
 
Active (≥1 Hour/Week)
 
Inactive
 
Active (≥1 Hour/Week)
 
No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) 
No. and % of participants 10,733 63  6,219 37  9,613 62  5,852 38  
Age, years   43.2 (13.8)   45.9 (14.6)   43.1 (13.3)   45.2 (14.6) 
Body mass indexa   24.4 (4.2)   24.5 (3.8)   25.2 (3.1)   24.9 (2.8) 
Overweight or obeseb 4,080 38  2,287 37  4,755 44  2,568 50  
Manual worker 1,756 16  957 15  3,506 37  1,954 33  
Current smoker 3,796 35  1,609 26  3,638 39  1,401 24  
Characteristic Women
 
Men
 
Inactive
 
Active (≥1 Hour/Week)
 
Inactive
 
Active (≥1 Hour/Week)
 
No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) 
No. and % of participants 10,733 63  6,219 37  9,613 62  5,852 38  
Age, years   43.2 (13.8)   45.9 (14.6)   43.1 (13.3)   45.2 (14.6) 
Body mass indexa   24.4 (4.2)   24.5 (3.8)   25.2 (3.1)   24.9 (2.8) 
Overweight or obeseb 4,080 38  2,287 37  4,755 44  2,568 50  
Manual worker 1,756 16  957 15  3,506 37  1,954 33  
Current smoker 3,796 35  1,609 26  3,638 39  1,401 24  

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

a

Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

b

Body mass index ≥25.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population According to Level of Physical Exercise, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, 1984–1997

Characteristic Women
 
Men
 
Inactive
 
Active (≥1 Hour/Week)
 
Inactive
 
Active (≥1 Hour/Week)
 
No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) 
No. and % of participants 10,733 63  6,219 37  9,613 62  5,852 38  
Age, years   43.2 (13.8)   45.9 (14.6)   43.1 (13.3)   45.2 (14.6) 
Body mass indexa   24.4 (4.2)   24.5 (3.8)   25.2 (3.1)   24.9 (2.8) 
Overweight or obeseb 4,080 38  2,287 37  4,755 44  2,568 50  
Manual worker 1,756 16  957 15  3,506 37  1,954 33  
Current smoker 3,796 35  1,609 26  3,638 39  1,401 24  
Characteristic Women
 
Men
 
Inactive
 
Active (≥1 Hour/Week)
 
Inactive
 
Active (≥1 Hour/Week)
 
No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) 
No. and % of participants 10,733 63  6,219 37  9,613 62  5,852 38  
Age, years   43.2 (13.8)   45.9 (14.6)   43.1 (13.3)   45.2 (14.6) 
Body mass indexa   24.4 (4.2)   24.5 (3.8)   25.2 (3.1)   24.9 (2.8) 
Overweight or obeseb 4,080 38  2,287 37  4,755 44  2,568 50  
Manual worker 1,756 16  957 15  3,506 37  1,954 33  
Current smoker 3,796 35  1,609 26  3,638 39  1,401 24  

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

a

Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

b

Body mass index ≥25.

Table 2.

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population According to Body Mass Indexa, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, 1984–1997

Characteristic Women
 
Men
 
Normal Weight (BMI 18.5–24.9)
 
Overweight (BMI 25–29.9)
 
Obese (BMI ≥30)
 
Normal Weight (BMI 18.5–24.9)
 
Overweight (BMI 25–29.9)
 
Obese (BMI ≥30)
 
No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) 
No. and % of participants 10,257 61  4,706 28  1,661 10  8,093 52  6,362 41  961  
Age, years   40.5 (12.8)   50.0 (13.9)   52.6 (13.4)   41.2 (13.7)   46.7 (13.4)   48.5 (13.1) 
Inactive 6,418 64  2,961 63  1,119 67  4,820 60  4,081 64  674 70  
Manual worker 1,669 16  757 16  248 15  2,902 36  2,222 35  316 33  
Current smoker 3,755 37  1,127 24  318 19  2,865 35  1,897 30  256 27  
Characteristic Women
 
Men
 
Normal Weight (BMI 18.5–24.9)
 
Overweight (BMI 25–29.9)
 
Obese (BMI ≥30)
 
Normal Weight (BMI 18.5–24.9)
 
Overweight (BMI 25–29.9)
 
Obese (BMI ≥30)
 
No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) 
No. and % of participants 10,257 61  4,706 28  1,661 10  8,093 52  6,362 41  961  
Age, years   40.5 (12.8)   50.0 (13.9)   52.6 (13.4)   41.2 (13.7)   46.7 (13.4)   48.5 (13.1) 
Inactive 6,418 64  2,961 63  1,119 67  4,820 60  4,081 64  674 70  
Manual worker 1,669 16  757 16  248 15  2,902 36  2,222 35  316 33  
Current smoker 3,755 37  1,127 24  318 19  2,865 35  1,897 30  256 27  

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation.

a

Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

Table 2.

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population According to Body Mass Indexa, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, 1984–1997

Characteristic Women
 
Men
 
Normal Weight (BMI 18.5–24.9)
 
Overweight (BMI 25–29.9)
 
Obese (BMI ≥30)
 
Normal Weight (BMI 18.5–24.9)
 
Overweight (BMI 25–29.9)
 
Obese (BMI ≥30)
 
No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) 
No. and % of participants 10,257 61  4,706 28  1,661 10  8,093 52  6,362 41  961  
Age, years   40.5 (12.8)   50.0 (13.9)   52.6 (13.4)   41.2 (13.7)   46.7 (13.4)   48.5 (13.1) 
Inactive 6,418 64  2,961 63  1,119 67  4,820 60  4,081 64  674 70  
Manual worker 1,669 16  757 16  248 15  2,902 36  2,222 35  316 33  
Current smoker 3,755 37  1,127 24  318 19  2,865 35  1,897 30  256 27  
Characteristic Women
 
Men
 
Normal Weight (BMI 18.5–24.9)
 
Overweight (BMI 25–29.9)
 
Obese (BMI ≥30)
 
Normal Weight (BMI 18.5–24.9)
 
Overweight (BMI 25–29.9)
 
Obese (BMI ≥30)
 
No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) 
No. and % of participants 10,257 61  4,706 28  1,661 10  8,093 52  6,362 41  961  
Age, years   40.5 (12.8)   50.0 (13.9)   52.6 (13.4)   41.2 (13.7)   46.7 (13.4)   48.5 (13.1) 
Inactive 6,418 64  2,961 63  1,119 67  4,820 60  4,081 64  674 70  
Manual worker 1,669 16  757 16  248 15  2,902 36  2,222 35  316 33  
Current smoker 3,755 37  1,127 24  318 19  2,865 35  1,897 30  256 27  

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation.

a

Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

Table 3 shows that hours of leisure-time physical exercise per week were inversely associated with risk of chronic pain in the low back (P-trend = 0.02 in women and P-trend < 0.001 in men) and the neck/shoulders (P-trend = 0.002 in women and P-trend < 0.001 in men). Women who exercised for 1.0–1.9 hours per week had an adjusted risk ratio for low back pain of 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74, 0.95) in comparison with inactive women, and the corresponding risk ratio for men was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.00). The risk ratio was further reduced among men who exercised for ≥2.0 hours per week (risk ratio = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.88). The associations between exercise and neck/shoulder pain followed a pattern similar to that for low back pain. Women and men who exercised for 1.0–1.9 hours per week had adjusted risk ratios of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.95) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.97), respectively, compared with inactive women and men. Increasing the amount of exercise to ≥2.0 hours per week further reduced the risk ratio for neck/shoulder pain in men (risk ratio = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72, 0.91).

Table 3.

Risk Ratio for Chronic Pain in the Neck/Shoulders and Low Back at 11-Year Follow-up According to Hours of Physical Exercise per Week at Baseline, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, 1984–1997

Gender and Category of Exercise, hours/week Pain in the Low Back
 
Pain in the Neck/Shoulders
 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjusteda RR 95% CI P-Trend No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjusteda RR 95% CI P-Trend 
Women           
    Inactiveb 6,408 741 1.00   5,915 1,338 1.00   
    <1 4,774 494 0.90 0.81, 1.01  4,456 928 0.95 0.88, 1.02  
    1–1.9 3,802 361 0.84 0.74, 0.95  3,565 661 0.87 0.80, 0.95  
    ≥2 1,968 196 0.92 0.79, 1.07 0.02 1,827 335 0.91 0.81, 1.01 0.002 
Men           
    Inactiveb 6,478 690 1.00   6,188 1,189 1.00   
    <1 3,338 314 0.91 0.80, 1.03  3,228 556 0.93 0.85, 1.02  
    1–1.9 3,303 299 0.88 0.77, 1.00  3,150 493 0.88 0.80, 0.97  
    ≥2 2,346 173 0.75 0.64, 0.88 <0.001 2,246 306 0.81 0.72, 0.91 <0.001 
Gender and Category of Exercise, hours/week Pain in the Low Back
 
Pain in the Neck/Shoulders
 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjusteda RR 95% CI P-Trend No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjusteda RR 95% CI P-Trend 
Women           
    Inactiveb 6,408 741 1.00   5,915 1,338 1.00   
    <1 4,774 494 0.90 0.81, 1.01  4,456 928 0.95 0.88, 1.02  
    1–1.9 3,802 361 0.84 0.74, 0.95  3,565 661 0.87 0.80, 0.95  
    ≥2 1,968 196 0.92 0.79, 1.07 0.02 1,827 335 0.91 0.81, 1.01 0.002 
Men           
    Inactiveb 6,478 690 1.00   6,188 1,189 1.00   
    <1 3,338 314 0.91 0.80, 1.03  3,228 556 0.93 0.85, 1.02  
    1–1.9 3,303 299 0.88 0.77, 1.00  3,150 493 0.88 0.80, 0.97  
    ≥2 2,346 173 0.75 0.64, 0.88 <0.001 2,246 306 0.81 0.72, 0.91 <0.001 

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio.

a

Adjusted for age (20–29, 30–39, …, or ≥70 years), body mass index (continuous), smoking (never smoker, former smoker, current smoker, or unknown), and occupation (manual, nonmanual, farmer/fisher, nonworker, or unknown).

b

Less than 1 exercise session per week.

Table 3.

Risk Ratio for Chronic Pain in the Neck/Shoulders and Low Back at 11-Year Follow-up According to Hours of Physical Exercise per Week at Baseline, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, 1984–1997

Gender and Category of Exercise, hours/week Pain in the Low Back
 
Pain in the Neck/Shoulders
 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjusteda RR 95% CI P-Trend No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjusteda RR 95% CI P-Trend 
Women           
    Inactiveb 6,408 741 1.00   5,915 1,338 1.00   
    <1 4,774 494 0.90 0.81, 1.01  4,456 928 0.95 0.88, 1.02  
    1–1.9 3,802 361 0.84 0.74, 0.95  3,565 661 0.87 0.80, 0.95  
    ≥2 1,968 196 0.92 0.79, 1.07 0.02 1,827 335 0.91 0.81, 1.01 0.002 
Men           
    Inactiveb 6,478 690 1.00   6,188 1,189 1.00   
    <1 3,338 314 0.91 0.80, 1.03  3,228 556 0.93 0.85, 1.02  
    1–1.9 3,303 299 0.88 0.77, 1.00  3,150 493 0.88 0.80, 0.97  
    ≥2 2,346 173 0.75 0.64, 0.88 <0.001 2,246 306 0.81 0.72, 0.91 <0.001 
Gender and Category of Exercise, hours/week Pain in the Low Back
 
Pain in the Neck/Shoulders
 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjusteda RR 95% CI P-Trend No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjusteda RR 95% CI P-Trend 
Women           
    Inactiveb 6,408 741 1.00   5,915 1,338 1.00   
    <1 4,774 494 0.90 0.81, 1.01  4,456 928 0.95 0.88, 1.02  
    1–1.9 3,802 361 0.84 0.74, 0.95  3,565 661 0.87 0.80, 0.95  
    ≥2 1,968 196 0.92 0.79, 1.07 0.02 1,827 335 0.91 0.81, 1.01 0.002 
Men           
    Inactiveb 6,478 690 1.00   6,188 1,189 1.00   
    <1 3,338 314 0.91 0.80, 1.03  3,228 556 0.93 0.85, 1.02  
    1–1.9 3,303 299 0.88 0.77, 1.00  3,150 493 0.88 0.80, 0.97  
    ≥2 2,346 173 0.75 0.64, 0.88 <0.001 2,246 306 0.81 0.72, 0.91 <0.001 

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio.

a

Adjusted for age (20–29, 30–39, …, or ≥70 years), body mass index (continuous), smoking (never smoker, former smoker, current smoker, or unknown), and occupation (manual, nonmanual, farmer/fisher, nonworker, or unknown).

b

Less than 1 exercise session per week.

The effect of exercise intensity was assessed in stratified analyses (data not shown). Overall, the inverse associations between hours per week of exercise and risk of pain in the low back and neck/shoulders were largely similar among those who reported that their usual exercise intensity was moderate or vigorous and those who reported that their usual exercise intensity was low (i.e., the mean difference between adjusted risk ratios was less than 3% for low back pain and less than 6% for neck/shoulder pain). Accordingly, none of the interaction terms were significant (P values from likelihood ratio tests among women and men were 0.09 and 0.79, respectively, for low back pain and 0.41 and 0.11, respectively, for neck/shoulder pain).

Table 4 shows that BMI was consistently and positively associated with risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders among women (P-trend < 0.001 and P-trend = 0.002, respectively) and with risk of neck/shoulder pain in men (P-trend < 0.001). Women who were obese had an adjusted risk ratio of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.41) for low back pain and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.33) for neck/shoulder pain, compared with women with normal weight. The corresponding risk ratios among men were 1.21 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.46) and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.41).

Table 4.

Risk Ratio for Chronic Pain in the Neck/Shoulders and Low Back at 11-Year Follow-up According to Body Mass Index at Baseline, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, 1984–1997

Gender and BMIa Categoryb Pain in the Low Back
 
Pain in the Neck/Shoulders
 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedc RR 95% CI P-Trend No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedc RR 95% CI P-Trend 
Women           
    Underweight 318 31 0.94 0.67, 1.32  298 65 1.00 0.81, 1.25  
    Normal weight 10,267 1,056 1.00   9,564 1,976 1.00   
    Overweight 4,706 522 1.18 1.06, 1.30  4,381 902 1.12 1.04, 1.21  
    Obesity 1,661 183 1.21 1.04, 1.41 <0.001 1,520 319 1.19 1.07, 1.33 0.002 
Men           
    Underweight 49 1.08 0.47, 2.47  49 0.75 0.35, 1.58  
    Normal weight 8,093 764 1.00   7,787 1,258 1.00   
    Overweight 6,362 601 1.03 0.93, 1,14  6,071 1,100 1.12 1.04, 1.21  
    Obesity 961 106 1.21 0.99, 1.46 0.13 905 180 1.22 1.06, 1.41 <0.001 
Gender and BMIa Categoryb Pain in the Low Back
 
Pain in the Neck/Shoulders
 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedc RR 95% CI P-Trend No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedc RR 95% CI P-Trend 
Women           
    Underweight 318 31 0.94 0.67, 1.32  298 65 1.00 0.81, 1.25  
    Normal weight 10,267 1,056 1.00   9,564 1,976 1.00   
    Overweight 4,706 522 1.18 1.06, 1.30  4,381 902 1.12 1.04, 1.21  
    Obesity 1,661 183 1.21 1.04, 1.41 <0.001 1,520 319 1.19 1.07, 1.33 0.002 
Men           
    Underweight 49 1.08 0.47, 2.47  49 0.75 0.35, 1.58  
    Normal weight 8,093 764 1.00   7,787 1,258 1.00   
    Overweight 6,362 601 1.03 0.93, 1,14  6,071 1,100 1.12 1.04, 1.21  
    Obesity 961 106 1.21 0.99, 1.46 0.13 905 180 1.22 1.06, 1.41 <0.001 

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio.

a

Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

b

According to the World Health Organization cutpoints: underweight (BMI <18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥30.0).

c

Adjusted for age (20–29, 30–39, …, or ≥70 years), frequency of physical exercise (inactive, <1 hour/week, 1–1.9 hours/week, or ≥2 hours/week), smoking (never smoker, former smoker, current smoker, or unknown), and occupation (manual, nonmanual, farmer/fisher, nonworker, or unknown).

Table 4.

Risk Ratio for Chronic Pain in the Neck/Shoulders and Low Back at 11-Year Follow-up According to Body Mass Index at Baseline, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, 1984–1997

Gender and BMIa Categoryb Pain in the Low Back
 
Pain in the Neck/Shoulders
 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedc RR 95% CI P-Trend No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedc RR 95% CI P-Trend 
Women           
    Underweight 318 31 0.94 0.67, 1.32  298 65 1.00 0.81, 1.25  
    Normal weight 10,267 1,056 1.00   9,564 1,976 1.00   
    Overweight 4,706 522 1.18 1.06, 1.30  4,381 902 1.12 1.04, 1.21  
    Obesity 1,661 183 1.21 1.04, 1.41 <0.001 1,520 319 1.19 1.07, 1.33 0.002 
Men           
    Underweight 49 1.08 0.47, 2.47  49 0.75 0.35, 1.58  
    Normal weight 8,093 764 1.00   7,787 1,258 1.00   
    Overweight 6,362 601 1.03 0.93, 1,14  6,071 1,100 1.12 1.04, 1.21  
    Obesity 961 106 1.21 0.99, 1.46 0.13 905 180 1.22 1.06, 1.41 <0.001 
Gender and BMIa Categoryb Pain in the Low Back
 
Pain in the Neck/Shoulders
 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedc RR 95% CI P-Trend No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedc RR 95% CI P-Trend 
Women           
    Underweight 318 31 0.94 0.67, 1.32  298 65 1.00 0.81, 1.25  
    Normal weight 10,267 1,056 1.00   9,564 1,976 1.00   
    Overweight 4,706 522 1.18 1.06, 1.30  4,381 902 1.12 1.04, 1.21  
    Obesity 1,661 183 1.21 1.04, 1.41 <0.001 1,520 319 1.19 1.07, 1.33 0.002 
Men           
    Underweight 49 1.08 0.47, 2.47  49 0.75 0.35, 1.58  
    Normal weight 8,093 764 1.00   7,787 1,258 1.00   
    Overweight 6,362 601 1.03 0.93, 1,14  6,071 1,100 1.12 1.04, 1.21  
    Obesity 961 106 1.21 0.99, 1.46 0.13 905 180 1.22 1.06, 1.41 <0.001 

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio.

a

Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

b

According to the World Health Organization cutpoints: underweight (BMI <18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥30.0).

c

Adjusted for age (20–29, 30–39, …, or ≥70 years), frequency of physical exercise (inactive, <1 hour/week, 1–1.9 hours/week, or ≥2 hours/week), smoking (never smoker, former smoker, current smoker, or unknown), and occupation (manual, nonmanual, farmer/fisher, nonworker, or unknown).

Table 5 shows the combined effect of physical exercise and BMI on risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders. The overall results indicated that, irrespective of their baseline BMI, women and men who reported exercising for ≥1 hour per week had a lower risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders than those who reported being inactive. Compared with the reference group of normal-weight women who exercised for ≥1 hour per week, women who were obese and inactive had a risk ratio of 1.41 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.77) for low back pain, whereas those who were obese and exercised for ≥1 hour per week had a risk ratio of 1.16 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.56). Correspondingly, the risk ratio was 1.50 (95% CI: 1.16, 1.95) for low back pain in obese and inactive men and 1.16 (95% CI: 0.78, 1.73) in obese men who exercised for ≥1 hour per week. Similar effects of exercise were seen among those who were classified as overweight and in analysis of neck/shoulder pain.

Table 5.

Risk Ratio for Chronic Pain in the Neck/Shoulders and Low Back at 11-Year Follow-up According to the Combined Effect of Physical Exercise and Body Mass Index at Baseline, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, 1984–1997

Pain Location, Gender, and BMIa Categoryb Activec
 
Inactived
 
P Valuee 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedf RR 95% CI No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedf RR 95% CI 
Low back          
    Women          
        Normal weight 3,241 331 1.00  3,288 419 1.17 1.02, 1.35 <0.001 
        Overweight 1,453 173 1.26 1.05, 1.50 1,592 216 1.36 1.15, 1.60 0.10 
        Obesity 440 47 1.16 0.87, 1.56 652 89 1.41 1.13, 1.77 0.06 
    Men          
        Normal weight 2,906 266 1.00  2,861 327 1.17 1.00, 1.37 0.02 
        Overweight 2,017 181 1.04 0.87, 1.25 2,467 298 1.28 1.09, 1.50 0.05 
        Obesity 244 24 1.16 0.78, 1.73 434 61 1.50 1.16, 1.95 0.13 
Neck/shoulders          
    Women          
        Normal weight 2,708 636 1.00  2,661 767 1.09 0.99, 1.20 0.03 
        Overweight 1,260 254 0.99 0.86, 1.13 1,272 401 1.31 1.17, 1.46 <0.001 
        Obesity 358 95 1.28 1.05, 1.55 537 134 1.15 0.97, 1.36 0.83 
    Men          
        Normal weight 2,624 422 1.00  2,505 553 1.19 1.05, 1.34 <0.001 
        Overweight 1,757 331 1.15 1.01, 1.32 2,101 529 1.34 1.19, 1.51 0.01 
        Obesity 206 44 1.28 0.96, 1.69 367 104 1.49 1.23, 1.81 0.30 
Pain Location, Gender, and BMIa Categoryb Activec
 
Inactived
 
P Valuee 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedf RR 95% CI No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedf RR 95% CI 
Low back          
    Women          
        Normal weight 3,241 331 1.00  3,288 419 1.17 1.02, 1.35 <0.001 
        Overweight 1,453 173 1.26 1.05, 1.50 1,592 216 1.36 1.15, 1.60 0.10 
        Obesity 440 47 1.16 0.87, 1.56 652 89 1.41 1.13, 1.77 0.06 
    Men          
        Normal weight 2,906 266 1.00  2,861 327 1.17 1.00, 1.37 0.02 
        Overweight 2,017 181 1.04 0.87, 1.25 2,467 298 1.28 1.09, 1.50 0.05 
        Obesity 244 24 1.16 0.78, 1.73 434 61 1.50 1.16, 1.95 0.13 
Neck/shoulders          
    Women          
        Normal weight 2,708 636 1.00  2,661 767 1.09 0.99, 1.20 0.03 
        Overweight 1,260 254 0.99 0.86, 1.13 1,272 401 1.31 1.17, 1.46 <0.001 
        Obesity 358 95 1.28 1.05, 1.55 537 134 1.15 0.97, 1.36 0.83 
    Men          
        Normal weight 2,624 422 1.00  2,505 553 1.19 1.05, 1.34 <0.001 
        Overweight 1,757 331 1.15 1.01, 1.32 2,101 529 1.34 1.19, 1.51 0.01 
        Obesity 206 44 1.28 0.96, 1.69 367 104 1.49 1.23, 1.81 0.30 

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio.

a

Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

b

According to the World Health Organization cutpoints: normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥30.0).

c

1 or more hours of physical exercise per week.

d

Less than 1 physical exercise session per week.

e

P value comparing active and inactive persons within each BMI category.

f

Adjusted for age (20–29, 30–39, …, or ≥70 years), smoking (never smoker, former smoker, current smoker, or unknown), and occupation (manual, nonmanual, farmer/fisher, nonworker, or unknown).

Table 5.

Risk Ratio for Chronic Pain in the Neck/Shoulders and Low Back at 11-Year Follow-up According to the Combined Effect of Physical Exercise and Body Mass Index at Baseline, Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, 1984–1997

Pain Location, Gender, and BMIa Categoryb Activec
 
Inactived
 
P Valuee 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedf RR 95% CI No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedf RR 95% CI 
Low back          
    Women          
        Normal weight 3,241 331 1.00  3,288 419 1.17 1.02, 1.35 <0.001 
        Overweight 1,453 173 1.26 1.05, 1.50 1,592 216 1.36 1.15, 1.60 0.10 
        Obesity 440 47 1.16 0.87, 1.56 652 89 1.41 1.13, 1.77 0.06 
    Men          
        Normal weight 2,906 266 1.00  2,861 327 1.17 1.00, 1.37 0.02 
        Overweight 2,017 181 1.04 0.87, 1.25 2,467 298 1.28 1.09, 1.50 0.05 
        Obesity 244 24 1.16 0.78, 1.73 434 61 1.50 1.16, 1.95 0.13 
Neck/shoulders          
    Women          
        Normal weight 2,708 636 1.00  2,661 767 1.09 0.99, 1.20 0.03 
        Overweight 1,260 254 0.99 0.86, 1.13 1,272 401 1.31 1.17, 1.46 <0.001 
        Obesity 358 95 1.28 1.05, 1.55 537 134 1.15 0.97, 1.36 0.83 
    Men          
        Normal weight 2,624 422 1.00  2,505 553 1.19 1.05, 1.34 <0.001 
        Overweight 1,757 331 1.15 1.01, 1.32 2,101 529 1.34 1.19, 1.51 0.01 
        Obesity 206 44 1.28 0.96, 1.69 367 104 1.49 1.23, 1.81 0.30 
Pain Location, Gender, and BMIa Categoryb Activec
 
Inactived
 
P Valuee 
No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedf RR 95% CI No. of Persons No. of Cases Multivariate-Adjustedf RR 95% CI 
Low back          
    Women          
        Normal weight 3,241 331 1.00  3,288 419 1.17 1.02, 1.35 <0.001 
        Overweight 1,453 173 1.26 1.05, 1.50 1,592 216 1.36 1.15, 1.60 0.10 
        Obesity 440 47 1.16 0.87, 1.56 652 89 1.41 1.13, 1.77 0.06 
    Men          
        Normal weight 2,906 266 1.00  2,861 327 1.17 1.00, 1.37 0.02 
        Overweight 2,017 181 1.04 0.87, 1.25 2,467 298 1.28 1.09, 1.50 0.05 
        Obesity 244 24 1.16 0.78, 1.73 434 61 1.50 1.16, 1.95 0.13 
Neck/shoulders          
    Women          
        Normal weight 2,708 636 1.00  2,661 767 1.09 0.99, 1.20 0.03 
        Overweight 1,260 254 0.99 0.86, 1.13 1,272 401 1.31 1.17, 1.46 <0.001 
        Obesity 358 95 1.28 1.05, 1.55 537 134 1.15 0.97, 1.36 0.83 
    Men          
        Normal weight 2,624 422 1.00  2,505 553 1.19 1.05, 1.34 <0.001 
        Overweight 1,757 331 1.15 1.01, 1.32 2,101 529 1.34 1.19, 1.51 0.01 
        Obesity 206 44 1.28 0.96, 1.69 367 104 1.49 1.23, 1.81 0.30 

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio.

a

Weight (kg)/height (m)2.

b

According to the World Health Organization cutpoints: normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥30.0).

c

1 or more hours of physical exercise per week.

d

Less than 1 physical exercise session per week.

e

P value comparing active and inactive persons within each BMI category.

f

Adjusted for age (20–29, 30–39, …, or ≥70 years), smoking (never smoker, former smoker, current smoker, or unknown), and occupation (manual, nonmanual, farmer/fisher, nonworker, or unknown).

DISCUSSION

The main finding in the present study was a consistently lower risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders associated with a relatively small amount of physical exercise per week. The reductions in risk were of similar magnitude among women and men. Independently of physical exercise, persons classified as overweight and obese had a higher risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders than persons classified as normal weight. Physical exercise could compensate, to some extent, for the adverse effect of excess body mass on risk of chronic pain in both the low back and neck/shoulders.

Musculoskeletal pain is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical advice in Western societies (13, 14). Pain in the neck/shoulders and pain in the low back constitute the majority of all musculoskeletal disorders (4), and in the Netherlands the total economic cost of low back pain alone has been estimated as 1.7% of the gross national product (15). Thus, just a small reduction in the incidence of chronic low back pain would have a profound economic impact. Importantly, the current study indicates that a relatively small amount of physical exercise (i.e., 1–1.9 hours/week) lowers the risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders. Increasing numbers of hours of exercise per week were associated with a further reduction in risk among men. However, analyses of high-intensity versus low-intensity exercise showed no major differences in the estimated risk ratios. If these results reflect a true causal association, they could potentially be of great value for public health. Accumulating 1−2 hours of low- to moderate-intensity physical exercise during a week should be manageable for most people.

Several cross-sectional studies have shown a relatively strong association between obesity and the prevalence of chronic pain in the neck, shoulders, and low back, especially among women (5, 16, 17). However, the cross-sectional design of these studies prevents inference about causality, and results from a few prospective studies have shown somewhat conflicting results; a Finnish study found no association between body mass at baseline and future risk of low back pain (18), whereas a larger and more recent study found that obesity at age 23 years increased the risk of low back pain among women 10 years later (19). Excess body weight has also been associated with increased 1-year incidence of neck and shoulder complaints in occupation-based cohorts (20−22). Unlike previous studies, our study focused on chronic musculoskeletal pain in the general adult population. Overweight and obesity were associated with an increased risk of chronic pain in the neck/shoulders and low back among both women and men, although the result for low back pain among men was marginally nonsignificant. Thus, the current findings add novel information concerning the effect of excess body weight as a modifiable risk factor for chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders in the general adult population.

The relation between high BMI and risk of chronic musculoskeletal pain underlines the importance of promoting preventive measures aimed at reducing the incidence of overweight and obesity. Of particular concern is the recent increase in overweight and obesity among adolescents and young adults, with a strong carryover effect into adulthood (23). Thus, preventive initiatives should focus on promoting healthy nutrition and regular physical exercise among both children and adolescents and adults. However, the findings of the current study indicate that overweight and obese women and men who exercise regularly have a consistently lower risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders than those who are inactive. Among overweight and obese men, exercising for 1 hour or more per week was associated with a >20% reduction in the risk of chronic pain in both the low back and the neck/shoulders compared with being inactive. A similar but less consistent effect was found among women.

The exact physiologic mechanisms underlying the contrasting effects of excess body mass and physical exercise on risk of chronic musculoskeletal pain are unclear. One possible explanation may be that obesity induces chronic low-grade systemic inflammation (24, 25), while exercise has an opposite effect by promoting a reduction in inflammatory factors (26). Several cross-sectional studies have shown a positive association between obesity and serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor α (for review, see Das (25)). Recent evidence indicates that interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor α may be involved in the progression of chronic pain (27, 28) and that the serum level of these cytokines predicts pain intensity in chronic pain patients (29). However, further studies are needed to elucidate the exact mechanism.

The strengths of the current study are the large and unselected population, the prospective design, the standardized measurement of height and weight, the exclusion of persons with pain and physical impairments at baseline, and the possibility of adjusting for several potentially confounding factors. The questions on chronic musculoskeletal pain used in HUNT 2 have acceptable reliability and validity (12, 30), and the physical exercise questionnaire used in HUNT 1 has been validated against measured maximal oxygen uptake in a random sample of men and found to perform well, with a correlation coefficient of 0.48 (31). A limitation of the study is that information on exercise and BMI was obtained only at baseline, and changes occurring during the follow-up period could not be taken into account.

In conclusion, this prospective population-based study showed that men and women who reported exercising for 1 hour or more per week had a lower risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders than inactive persons. Conversely, overweight and obesity were associated with increased risk of chronic pain in both the low back and neck/shoulders. Physical exercise may compensate to some extent for the adverse effect of excess body mass on risk of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Community-based initiatives aimed at reducing the incidence of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders should include the promotion of regular physical exercise and maintenance of normal body weight.

Abbreviations

    Abbreviations
     
  • BMI

    body mass index

  •  
  • CI

    confidence interval

  •  
  • HUNT

    Nord-Trøndelag Health Study

Author affiliations: Department of Human Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (Tom Ivar Lund Nilsen, Paul J. Mork); and National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark (Andreas Holtermann).

The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) is a collaboration between the HUNT Research Centre (Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), the Nord-Trøndelag County Council, and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

References

1.
Badley
EM
Rasooly
I
Webster
GK
Relative importance of musculoskeletal disorders as a cause of chronic health problems, disability, and health care utilization: findings from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey
J Rheumatol
1994
, vol. 
21
 
3
(pg. 
505
-
514
)
2.
Brooks
PM
The burden of musculoskeletal disease—a global perspective
Clin Rheumatol
2006
, vol. 
25
 
6
(pg. 
778
-
781
)
3.
Woolf
AD
Pfleger
B
Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions
Bull World Health Organ
2003
, vol. 
81
 
9
(pg. 
646
-
656
)
4.
Picavet
HS
Schouten
JS
Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC3-study
Pain
2003
, vol. 
102
 
1-2
(pg. 
167
-
178
)
5.
Shiri
R
Karppinen
J
Leino-Arjas
P
, et al. 
The association between obesity and low back pain: a meta-analysis
Am J Epidemiol
2010
, vol. 
171
 
2
(pg. 
135
-
154
)
6.
Linton
SJ
van Tulder
MW
Preventive interventions for back and neck pain problems: what is the evidence?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2001
, vol. 
26
 
7
(pg. 
778
-
787
)
7.
van den Heuvel
SG
Heinrich
J
Jans
MP
, et al. 
The effect of physical activity in leisure time on neck and upper limb symptoms
Prev Med
2005
, vol. 
41
 
1
(pg. 
260
-
267
)
8.
Holth
HS
Werpen
HK
Zwart
JA
, et al. 
Physical inactivity is associated with chronic musculoskeletal complaints 11 years later: results from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
2008
, vol. 
9
 pg. 
159
  
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-159
9.
Hildebrandt
VH
Bongers
PM
Dul
J
, et al. 
The relationship between leisure time, physical activities and musculoskeletal symptoms and disability in worker populations
Int Arch Occup Environ Health
2000
, vol. 
73
 
8
(pg. 
507
-
518
)
10.
Mork
PJ
Vasseljen
O
Nilsen
TI
Association between physical exercise, body mass index, and risk of fibromyalgia: longitudinal data from the Norwegian Nord-Trøndelag Health Study
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
2010
, vol. 
62
 
5
(pg. 
611
-
617
)
11.
World Health Organization
Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. (WHO Technical Report Series no. 854)
1995
Geneva, Switzerland
World Health Organization
12.
Kuorinka
I
Jonsson
B
Kilbom
A
, et al. 
Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms
Appl Ergon
1987
, vol. 
18
 
3
(pg. 
233
-
237
)
13.
Crombie
IK
Croft
PR
Linton
SJ
, et al. 
Epidemiology of Pain
1999
Seattle, WA
IASP Press
14.
Weevers
HJ
van der Beek
AJ
Anema
JR
, et al. 
Work-related disease in general practice: a systematic review
Fam Pract
2005
, vol. 
22
 
2
(pg. 
197
-
204
)
15.
van Tulder
MW
Koes
BW
Bouter
LM
A cost-of-illness study of back pain in the Netherlands
Pain
1995
, vol. 
62
 
2
(pg. 
233
-
240
)
16.
Rechardt
M
Shiri
R
Karppinen
J
, et al. 
Lifestyle and metabolic factors in relation to shoulder pain and rotator cuff tendinitis: a population-based study
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
2010
, vol. 
11
 pg. 
165
  
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-165
17.
Webb
R
Brammah
T
Lunt
M
, et al. 
Prevalence and predictors of intense, chronic, and disabling neck and back pain in the UK general population
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2003
, vol. 
28
 
11
(pg. 
1195
-
1202
)
18.
Aro
S
Leino
P
Overweight and musculoskeletal morbidity: a ten-year follow-up
Int J Obes
1985
, vol. 
9
 
4
(pg. 
267
-
275
)
19.
Lake
JK
Power
C
Cole
TJ
Back pain and obesity in the 1958 British birth cohort: cause or effect?
J Clin Epidemiol
2000
, vol. 
53
 
3
(pg. 
245
-
250
)
20.
Luime
JJ
Kuiper
JI
Koes
BW
, et al. 
Work-related risk factors for the incidence and recurrence of shoulder and neck complaints among nursing-home and elderly-care workers
Scand J Work Environ Health
2004
, vol. 
30
 
4
(pg. 
279
-
286
)
21.
Miranda
H
Viikari-Juntura
E
Martikainen
R
, et al. 
A prospective study of work related factors and physical exercise as predictors of shoulder pain
Occup Environ Med
2001
, vol. 
58
 
8
(pg. 
528
-
534
)
22.
Viikari-Juntura
E
Shiri
R
Solovieva
S
, et al. 
Risk factors of atherosclerosis and shoulder pain—is there an association? A systematic review
Eur J Pain
2008
, vol. 
12
 
4
(pg. 
412
-
426
)
23.
Gordon-Larsen
P
The
NS
Adair
LS
Longitudinal trends in obesity in the United States from adolescence to the third decade of life
Obesity (Silver Spring)
2010
, vol. 
18
 
9
(pg. 
1801
-
1804
)
24.
Roytblat
L
Rachinsky
M
Fisher
A
, et al. 
Raised interleukin-6 levels in obese patients
Obes Res.
2000
, vol. 
8
 
9
(pg. 
673
-
675
)
25.
Das
UN
Is obesity an inflammatory condition?
Nutrition
2001
, vol. 
17
 
11-12
(pg. 
953
-
966
)
26.
Das
UN
Anti-inflammatory nature of exercise
Nutrition
2004
, vol. 
20
 
3
(pg. 
323
-
326
)
27.
Dina
OA
Green
PG
Levine
JD
Role of interleukin-6 in chronic muscle hyperalgesic priming
Neuroscience
2008
, vol. 
152
 
2
(pg. 
521
-
525
)
28.
Darnall
BD
Aickin
M
Zwickey
H
Pilot study of inflammatory responses following a negative imaginal focus in persons with chronic pain: analysis by sex/gender
Gend Med
2010
, vol. 
7
 
3
(pg. 
247
-
260
)
29.
Koch
A
Zacharowski
K
Boehm
O
, et al. 
Nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokines correlate with pain intensity in chronic pain patients
Inflamm Res.
2007
, vol. 
56
 
1
(pg. 
32
-
37
)
30.
Palmer
K
Smith
G
Kellingray
S
, et al. 
Repeatability and validity of an upper limb and neck discomfort questionnaire: the utility of the standardized Nordic questionnaire
Occup Med (Lond)
1999
, vol. 
49
 
3
(pg. 
171
-
175
)
31.
Kurtze
N
Rangul
V
Hustvedt
BE
, et al. 
Reliability and validity of self-reported physical activity in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study: HUNT 1
Scand J Public Health
2008
, vol. 
36
 
1
(pg. 
52
-
61
)