- Split View
-
Views
-
CiteCitation
H.E. Eliahou, I. Avinoach, M. Shahmurov, C. Shahar, A. Ben-David, Z. Matas, R. Zimlichman; K001: Advantage of angiotensin-ii receptor antagonists over calcium channel blockers in experimental chronic renal failure-prevention of mesangial hypertrophy in glomeruli, American Journal of Hypertension, Volume 13, Issue S2, 1 April 2000, Pages 281A, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7061(00)01032-3
Download citation file:
© 2018 Oxford University Press
Close -
Share
Abstract
Calcium channel blockers and ACE Receptor Inhibitors in experimental chronic renal failure were compared. Male WKY rats underwent 5/6ths nephrectomy (Nx). After 1 month, they were treated with either Verapamil (375 mg/500 ml drinking water) or Losartan (L) (90 mg/500 ml drinking water) for 2 months. The following parameters were measured 1 month after Nx (Pre-Rx) and 2 months after treatment (Post-Rx). N = 7 in each group. (See Table)
| Pre-Rx | Post-Rx | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic BP ± SEM | |||
| Untreated | 144 ± 6.9 | — | |
| Losartan | 147.14 ± 10.8 | 112 ± 4.97} | |
| Verapamil | 155 ± 5.8 | 118 ± 4.9} | p = NS |
| 24 Hr UrProt ± SEM | |||
| Losartan | 12.26 ± 2.33 | 18.48 ± 2.19 | |
| Verapamil | 7.27 ± 2.73 | 32.27 ± 10.3 | p = 0.0484 |
| Total Antioxidants (mmol/L) | |||
| Untreated | 2.87 ± 0.61* | ||
| Losartan | 4.405 ± 0.96 | ||
| Verapamil | 4.44 ± 0.64 | ||
| Delta % 24 Hr Ccr ± SEM (Between Pre & Post Rx) | |||
| Losartan | 48.34 ± 21.3 | p = 0.0387 | |
| Verapamil | 4.74 ± 7.02 | p = NS | |
| Pre-Rx | Post-Rx | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic BP ± SEM | |||
| Untreated | 144 ± 6.9 | — | |
| Losartan | 147.14 ± 10.8 | 112 ± 4.97} | |
| Verapamil | 155 ± 5.8 | 118 ± 4.9} | p = NS |
| 24 Hr UrProt ± SEM | |||
| Losartan | 12.26 ± 2.33 | 18.48 ± 2.19 | |
| Verapamil | 7.27 ± 2.73 | 32.27 ± 10.3 | p = 0.0484 |
| Total Antioxidants (mmol/L) | |||
| Untreated | 2.87 ± 0.61* | ||
| Losartan | 4.405 ± 0.96 | ||
| Verapamil | 4.44 ± 0.64 | ||
| Delta % 24 Hr Ccr ± SEM (Between Pre & Post Rx) | |||
| Losartan | 48.34 ± 21.3 | p = 0.0387 | |
| Verapamil | 4.74 ± 7.02 | p = NS | |
| Pre-Rx | Post-Rx | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic BP ± SEM | |||
| Untreated | 144 ± 6.9 | — | |
| Losartan | 147.14 ± 10.8 | 112 ± 4.97} | |
| Verapamil | 155 ± 5.8 | 118 ± 4.9} | p = NS |
| 24 Hr UrProt ± SEM | |||
| Losartan | 12.26 ± 2.33 | 18.48 ± 2.19 | |
| Verapamil | 7.27 ± 2.73 | 32.27 ± 10.3 | p = 0.0484 |
| Total Antioxidants (mmol/L) | |||
| Untreated | 2.87 ± 0.61* | ||
| Losartan | 4.405 ± 0.96 | ||
| Verapamil | 4.44 ± 0.64 | ||
| Delta % 24 Hr Ccr ± SEM (Between Pre & Post Rx) | |||
| Losartan | 48.34 ± 21.3 | p = 0.0387 | |
| Verapamil | 4.74 ± 7.02 | p = NS | |
| Pre-Rx | Post-Rx | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic BP ± SEM | |||
| Untreated | 144 ± 6.9 | — | |
| Losartan | 147.14 ± 10.8 | 112 ± 4.97} | |
| Verapamil | 155 ± 5.8 | 118 ± 4.9} | p = NS |
| 24 Hr UrProt ± SEM | |||
| Losartan | 12.26 ± 2.33 | 18.48 ± 2.19 | |
| Verapamil | 7.27 ± 2.73 | 32.27 ± 10.3 | p = 0.0484 |
| Total Antioxidants (mmol/L) | |||
| Untreated | 2.87 ± 0.61* | ||
| Losartan | 4.405 ± 0.96 | ||
| Verapamil | 4.44 ± 0.64 | ||
| Delta % 24 Hr Ccr ± SEM (Between Pre & Post Rx) | |||
| Losartan | 48.34 ± 21.3 | p = 0.0387 | |
| Verapamil | 4.74 ± 7.02 | p = NS | |
There was no mesangial hypertrophy in glomeruli of the L group despite its presence in all rats in Verapamil group. The L group had a smaller % of glomeruli involved in sclerosis, and significantly less arteriolar wall thickening in the L group.
Therapy with Ag-II Receptor Antagonist L for 8 weeks totally prevented mesangial hypertrophy in glomeruli and greatly reduced glomerular sclerosis.
