- Split View
-
Views
-
CiteCitation
Isidro López, FIDAP Study Group, Raúl Fernandez, FIDAP Study Group, Pilar Rodrıéguez-Ledo, FIDAP Study Group, Jesús Garrido, FIDAP Study Group; P-514: From guidelines to clinical practice: reaching objectives in blood pressure control, American Journal of Hypertension, Volume 15, Issue S3, 1 April 2002, Pages 218A–219A, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7061(02)02865-0
Download citation file:
© 2018 Oxford University Press
Close -
Share
Abstract
1: To study the feasibility of reaching the blood pressure (BP) levels recommended by the WHO Guidelines in the daily clinical practice. 2: To assess the effect of such BP control on the individual absolute cardiovascular (CV) risk.
Prospective study in the Primary Care setting. Sixty five consecutive, not controlled hypertensive patients classified at baseline according to the WHO CV-risk categories were enrolled. One-year treatment with the Verapamil SR 180 mg/Trandolapril 2 mg (VT) fixed combination was initiated and titration up to 360/4 mg/day when needed, was established.
The first 6 months follow-up data are available. Mean age (SD) 61.8(9.8) years. 28 patients (42%) males and 38 (58%) females. Mean BP values (SD), mmHg, were: Baseline SBP/DBP: 169(18)/95(8); Month 6 SBP/DBP: 137(12)/81(8), p<0.0005 in both. Mean differences (CI95%) were, SBP: 32(27–36); DBP: 14(12–17).
A “new category” in the WHO risk table was created for patients with BP below 140/90 after treatment (left column, Grade X). Regarding the CV risk evolution, a clear left sifting was observed (p<0.0005, marginal homogeneity test) mainly due to the BP decrease (Table 1).
| Grade X | Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No other CVRF | 0-0 | 0-0 low risk | 0-0 med risk | 0-0 high risk |
| 1-2 CVRF | 0-12 | 2-1 med risk | 3-2 med risk | 4-0 v. high risk |
| 3 CVRF or TOD or diabetes | 0-34 | 9-7 high risk | 21-3 high risk | 19-0 v. high risk |
| ACC | 0-3 | 3-3 v. high risk | 3-0 v. high risk | 1-0 v. high risk |
| Grade X | Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No other CVRF | 0-0 | 0-0 low risk | 0-0 med risk | 0-0 high risk |
| 1-2 CVRF | 0-12 | 2-1 med risk | 3-2 med risk | 4-0 v. high risk |
| 3 CVRF or TOD or diabetes | 0-34 | 9-7 high risk | 21-3 high risk | 19-0 v. high risk |
| ACC | 0-3 | 3-3 v. high risk | 3-0 v. high risk | 1-0 v. high risk |
| Grade X | Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No other CVRF | 0-0 | 0-0 low risk | 0-0 med risk | 0-0 high risk |
| 1-2 CVRF | 0-12 | 2-1 med risk | 3-2 med risk | 4-0 v. high risk |
| 3 CVRF or TOD or diabetes | 0-34 | 9-7 high risk | 21-3 high risk | 19-0 v. high risk |
| ACC | 0-3 | 3-3 v. high risk | 3-0 v. high risk | 1-0 v. high risk |
| Grade X | Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No other CVRF | 0-0 | 0-0 low risk | 0-0 med risk | 0-0 high risk |
| 1-2 CVRF | 0-12 | 2-1 med risk | 3-2 med risk | 4-0 v. high risk |
| 3 CVRF or TOD or diabetes | 0-34 | 9-7 high risk | 21-3 high risk | 19-0 v. high risk |
| ACC | 0-3 | 3-3 v. high risk | 3-0 v. high risk | 1-0 v. high risk |
1: BP control, as recommended by the WHO Guidelines, can be attained in the daily clinical practice in the Primary Care setting. 2: It is possible to reduce substantially the absolute CV risk of hypertensive patients just by BP control.
