Abstract

Background and Aims

Sapindaceae is one of 16 angiosperm families whose seeds have physical dormancy (PY). However, the extent and nature of PY within this family is poorly known. The primary aims of this study were: (1) to evaluate seed characteristics and determine presence (or not) of PY within nine genera of Australian Sapindaceae; and (2) to compare the frequency of PY across the phylogenetic tree within Australian Sapindaceae.

Methods

Viability, imbibition and seed characteristics were assessed for 14 taxa from nine genera of Sapindaceae. For five species of Dodonaea, optimal conditions for germination and dormancy break were evaluated. An in situ burial experiment was performed on D. hackettiana seeds to identify the factor(s) responsible for overcoming PY. Classes of dormancy and of non-dormancy for 26 genera of Sapindaceae were mapped onto a phylogenetic tree for the family.

Key Results

Mean seed viability across all taxa was 69·7 %. Embryos were fully developed and folded (seven genera) or bent (two genera); no endosperm was present. Seeds of all five Dodonaea spp. and of Distichostemon hispidulus had PY. Hot-water treatment released PY in these six species. Optimal germination temperature for seeds of the four Dodonaea spp. that germinated was 15–20 °C. Following 5 months burial in soil, 36·4 % of D. hackettiana seeds had lost PY and germinated by the beginning of the winter wet season (May). Laboratory and field data indicate that dormancy was broken by warm, moist temperatures (≥50 °C) during summer.

Conclusions

PY occurs infrequently in genera of Sapindaceae native to Australia. Seeds of Dodonaea and Distichostemon had PY, whereas those of the other seven genera did not. Seeds of these two genera and of Diplopeltis (a previous study) are the only three of the 20 native Australian genera of Sapindaceae for which germination has been studied that have PY; all three belong to subfamily Dodonaeoideae.

INTRODUCTION

Dormancy is defined as the inability of seeds to germinate when exposed to conditions (e.g. moisture, temperature and light) that are otherwise favourable for germination once the seeds become non-dormant. It is common in seeds of species that grow in environments in which conditions are unfavourable for successful plant establishment immediately following seed dispersal. Five classes of seed dormancy are now recognized (Nikolaeva, 1977; Baskin and Baskin, 1998, 2004). Seeds with physiological dormancy (PD) have a water-permeable seed coat, a fully developed embryo, and a physiological inhibiting mechanism that prevents radicle emergence. Morphological dormancy (MD) is due to an underdeveloped embryo that needs time to grow (= dormancy period) before the seed can germinate, and morphophysiological dormancy (MPD) to an underdeveloped embryo that is physiologically dormant. Physical dormancy (PY) is caused by a water-impermeable seed or fruit coat, and combinational dormancy (PY + PD) by a water-impermeable seed or fruit coat and a physiologically dormant embryo. The embryo is fully developed in seeds with PY and in those with (PY + PD).

PY is known to occur in seeds of one monocot and 15 eudicot families of angiosperms, and it is not known to occur in seeds of gymnosperms (J. Baskin et al., 2000, 2006). However, in most of these families other classes of dormancy also can be found, in addition to PY and/or (PY + PD). One of these families is the Sapindaceae. In this family, relatively little is known about the prevalence of PY. For example, PY or (PY + PD) has been documented for species in only five genera (Koelreuteria, Diplopeltis, Dodonaea, Sapindus and Cardiospermum: Johnston et al., 1979; Munson, 1984; Park and Rehman, 1999; Rehman and Park, 2000; Baskin et al., 2004; Turner et al., 2006a), while seeds of several other species, including Acer spp., Aesculus hippocastanum, Arytera littoralis, Euphoria logan, Diploglottis diphyllostegia and Sapindus mukorossi, have been shown to have PD or to be non-dormant (Nikolaeva, 1969; Ng, 1978; Chin et al., 1984; Hopkins and Graham, 1987; Negi and Todaria, 1993; Finch-Savage et al., 1998; Steadman and Pritchard, 2004). Thus, of the approximately 133 Sapindaceae genera worldwide (Harrington et al., 2005), class of dormancy has been tentatively determined for seeds in less than 10 % of them (Baskin and Baskin, unpubl. database, 1998).

The Sapindaceae is a large predominantly subtropical–tropical family, with several common genera found in temperate regions as well, including the maples (Acer spp.) and horse chestnuts (Aesculus spp.; Harrington et al., 2005; Simpson, 2006). About 2000 species are currently known, many of which are cultivated for fruit production, e.g. Litchi chinensis (lychee); for horticultural purposes, e.g. Acer spp. (maples) or timber (Edwards and Gadek, 2001; Harrington et al., 2005; Krupnick and Kress, 2005; Simpson, 2006). A recent revision of Sapindaceae based on parsimony and Bayesian analysis of plastid matK and rbcL DNA sequences identified four sub-families: Sapindoideae, Dodonaeoideae, Hippocastanoideae and Xanthoceroideae; representatives of only the first two clades are native to Australia. By far the largest subfamily in Australia is Sapindoideae, with at least 23 genera, while the much smaller Dodonaeoideae has at least five genera (Harrington et al., 2005). Within the Australian flora, there are an estimated 150 species of Sapindaceae. Dodonaea (hop bushes) is the largest genus with approx. 70 species, primarily associated with more arid parts of the continent (Reynolds, 1985; Marchant et al., 1987). Several taxa of Australian Sapindaceae, including Alectryon, Cupaniopsis, Diploglottis, Harpullia and Jagera (Reynolds, 1985), have horticulture value, and eight species (Cupaniopsis shirleyana, C. tomentella, Diploglottis campbellii, Dodonaea procumbens, D. rupicola, D. subglandulifera, Toechima pterocarpum and Toechima sp. East Alligator River) are currently nationally listed as threatened (Department of Environment and Water Resources, 2007). The easiest and most economical way to propagate threatened and horticulturally significant Sapindaceae taxa is through seed propagation. Yet given the prominence of Sapindaceae in Australia, remarkably little is currently known about seed dormancy-breaking and germination requirements of Australian members of this family, making seed-based propagation methods for many Sapindaceae species problematic. Therefore, knowing which Australian genera are likely to possess seed dormancy will improve propagation and restoration outcomes for these and related species.

A key question tied to dormancy and germination in Australian Sapindaceae is the prevalence of PY, a condition that has already been demonstrated for seeds of two Australian genera in the family (Baskin et al., 2004; Turner et al., 2006a). Therefore, given the limited knowledge concerning seed dormancy amongst species of Sapindaceae in Australia, we hypothesized that water impermeability of the seed coat (PY) will be prevalent amongst species in the two clades of Sapindaceae that occur in Australia. The aims of this study were: (1) to estimate percentage seed viability and describe seed morphology and embryo type for 14 taxa of Sapindaceae native to Australia; (2) to determine which of these species have water-impermeable seed coats; (3) to test the effects of hot-water treatment and application of dry heat on dormancy-break in seeds of Dodonaea spp.; (4) to evaluate the effect of incubation temperature on germination of seeds of Dodonaea spp. following hot-water treatment; (5) to identify the factor(s) responsible for natural dormancy-break in buried seeds of Dodonaea hackettiana; and (6) to investigate phylogenetic origins of PY in the two subfamilies of Sapindaceae native to Australia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Species selection and seed sources

Seeds of 14 species from nine genera (Alectryon connatus F. Muell., Allophylus cobbe (L.) Blume, Atalaya hemiglauca F. Muell., Cupaniopsis anacardioides A. Rich., C. parvifolia Bailey, Distichostemon hispidulus Endl., Ganophyllum falcatum Blume, Harpullia pendula Planchon ex F. Muell., Synima cordierorum F. Muell., Dodonaea aptera Miq., D. hackettiana W. Fitzg., D. petiolaris F. Muell., D. ptarmicaefolia Turcz. and D. stenozyga F. Muell.) representing the two subfamilies of Sapindaceae native to Australia were selected for this study. Fresh fruits and seeds were collected from the Daintree River, North Queensland (A. cobbe, S. cordierorum and G. falcatum) and Mt Annan Botanic Garden, New South Wales (H. pendula), depulped (A. cobbe, S. cordierorum and G. falcatum) in January, February and May 2007 and sent via express mail to Kings Park. Seeds from Alectryon connatus and Cupaniopsis parvifolia were supplied by the Brisbane Botanic Gardens, Queensland. These were collected fresh in January 2007 and stored at 5 °C until provided for this study. Atalaya hemiglauca and C. anacardioides seeds were purchased from commercial seed suppliers and were collected several years ago and stored at 5 °C until purchased for this study. Seeds from all five Dodonaea spp. and Distichostemon hispidulus were provided by the Seed Technology Centre, Kings Park and Botanic Garden. Seeds of the six species were collected in 1984 (D. petiolaris), 1986 (D. ptarmicaefolia and D. stenozyga), 1992 (D. hispidulus), 1999 (one accession of D. hackettiana), 2003 (D. aptera) and December 2006 (one accession of D. hackettiana). Following collection, they were stored at −18 °C until used in this study.

Seed viability

Seeds were initially evaluated for seed fill using a Faxitron X-ray machine. Unless otherwise stated, four replicates of 100 randomly selected seeds were X-rayed and the images were visually assessed to detect empty seeds or degraded embryos. Following initial X-ray screening, embryo quality was quickly assessed on several seeds from each accession, based on presence or absence of a white, fully formed embryo (Turner et al., 2005). Only seeds that appeared full and intact and possessed a turgid embryo were considered to be viable and used in further tests.

Embryo classification

Seeds were bisected longitudinally and the embryo observed and photographed to determine embryo type (Martin, 1946). Seeds of Alectryon connatus, Allophylus cobbe, Atalaya hemiglauca, Cupaniopsis anacardioides, C. parvifolia, Ganophyllum falcatum, Harpullia pendula and Synima cordierorum were bisected prior to hydration. Seeds of the other six species have a hard, water-impermeable coat and thus were bisected after they had been hot-water treated and imbibed for at least 24 h.

Seed length and mass

For each study species, three replicates of 20 seeds were measured using a binocular microscope equipped with an ocular micrometer. From these data, mean seed length (± s.e.) was calculated. Measurements were also recorded for species with indehiscent fruits (i.e. Allophylus cobbe, Atalaya hemiglauca, Ganophyllum falcatum), both with the endocarp intact and removed. To calculate mean seed mass, three replicates of 20 seeds were weighed to the nearest 0·1 mg using a microbalance. From these data, mean seed mass (± s.e.) was calculated. Masses were also determined for species with indehiscent fruits, both with and without the endocarp removed.

Seed moisture content

Three replicates of 20 seeds each of 11 of the 14 species were initially weighed (to the nearest 0·1 mg) using a microbalance, then placed in an oven at 103 °C for 17 h. Upon removal, seeds were immediately reweighed, and then seed moisture content was determined gravimetrically (gH2O g−1 d. wt; ISTA, 1999). Seed moisture content was not determined for A. conatus, C. anacardioides and D. hispidulus due to insufficient quantities of seeds.

Imbibition

Imbibition tests were done to determine whether seeds were permeable or impermeable to water. These tests were carried out under ambient room conditions (∼23 °C). For each study species, seeds were initially X-rayed to select only filled seeds. From these filled seeds, three replicates of 10–20 seeds each were weighed (to the nearest 0·1 mg), moistened for 5 min in 90-mm Petri dishes lined with irrigated seed germination papers, blotted dry and reweighed (time 0). All replicates were reweighed after 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48, 72, 96, 144 and 192 h; and depending on the species up to 22 d, i.e. until there was no further increase in mass or until seeds within a replicate had begun to germinate. Percentage increase in seed mass was calculated using the following formula (Turner et al., 2006a):
where Wi and Wd = mass of imbibed and dry seeds, respectively.

An insufficient number of seeds of Cupaniopsis anacardioides and Alectryon connatus were available to do imbibition tests. For the other 12 species, one (Distichostemon hispidulus only) or three replicates of 10–20 seeds each were gently scarified using a scalpel to penetrate the testa or endocarp and water uptake was evaluated as described above. An imbibition ratio (average maximum mass increase of control seeds/average maximum mass increase of scarified seeds) was calculated for all species in which non-treated and scarified seeds were imbibed.

For selected taxa identified as having PY (based on observations made in this study as well as from previous published reports) control seeds were dissected following completion of the imbibition test to determine whether seeds were hydrated. Both testa and embryo of hydrated seeds were soft, and seeds were filled with liquid. On the other hand, non-hydrated seeds had an intact hard and dry testa and dry embryo with no visible evidence of free water within the seed.

An additional imbibition test was conducted on seeds of D. hispidulus and on those of the five Dodonaea species using hot-water scarification, a treatment that has been shown to overcome PY in seeds of the two Sapindaceous species Dodonaea viscosa (Baskin et al., 2004) and Diplopeltis huegelii (Turner et al., 2006a). Seeds were sealed in nylon mesh bags and dipped into near-boiling (88–92 °C) water for 30 s (all species) or 2·5 min (D. petiolaris only) prior to the imbibition test. The same imbibition protocol was followed as outlined above for control seeds.

Seed dormancy-break and germination

The effects of hot-water treatment and incubation temperature were evaluated on all five Dodonaea species. Non-treated (control) seeds were firstly surface-sterilized in 2 % (w/v) calcium hypochlorite [Ca(OCl)2] solution for 30 min (10 min with vacuum + 10 min normal + 10 min with vacuum), rinsed three times in sterile distilled water and plated onto 0·8 % (w/v) water agar plates in 90-mm Petri dishes. Treated seeds (hot-water treatment) were dipped in hot water (88–92 °C) for 30 s, removed and surface-sterilized, and plated onto water agar plates as previously described. Each treatment consisted of three replicates of 25 seeds each. Seeds were incubated in constant darkness (except when they were checked for germination in room light) at 15, 20 and 25 °C (D. petiolaris incubated only at 20 °C due to limited seed numbers). Seeds were initially scored for germination (radicle emergence) after 4 d and then daily for 19 d (23 d total) to provide cumulative germination, maximum germination and a germination rate index (GRI) calculated from the following formula (Maguire, 1962):
where i is the germination count-day, Gi the percentage of seeds germinated at time i and Gi−1 the percentage of seeds germinated the previous count-day.

The effect of hot-water treatments and dry alternating temperatures on breaking PY was determined by dipping D. aptera, D. hackettiana, D. ptarmicaefolia and D. stenozyga seeds in water at 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 or 100 °C for 30 s or by exposing them dry to eight daily temperature cycles of 15/50 °C (12/12 h cycles). For D. hackettiana only, seeds were exposed to 1 h of dry heat at constant temperatures of 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 or 100 °C. Following treatment, seeds were surface-sterilized and plated onto 0·8 % water agar and incubated in darkness at 20 °C. Three replicates of 25 seeds were used for all treatments and for the control. Seeds were considered germinated upon radicle emergence, and germination was scored only after 3 weeks.

Seed burial experiment

Soil temperature, rainfall and seed germinability for D. hackettiana were monitored in the field to determine if PY is broken during the first summer. One-hundred-and-fifty seeds collected fresh in December 2006 from Kings Park were placed in each of three 75 µm nylon mesh bags that allowed water penetration but excluded soil and other particles. These bags were placed into three separate trays with drainage holes and buried at a depth of 20–30 mm at three sites (replicates) in natural bushland sites in Kings Park, Perth, Western Australia (in areas where D. hackettiana naturally occurs). After seeds were buried, plastic mesh was secured over the top of the soil to prevent disturbance by animals. Bags containing the seeds were buried in January 2007 and retrieved in May 2007.

Prior to burial, seed fill and germination were assessed by X-ray analysis (as described previously) followed by placing three non-treated (control) replicates of 25 seeds and three hot-water-treated (88–92 °C for 2 min) replicates onto 0·8 % water agar and incubating them at 15 °C. One bag of seeds was removed from each of the three sites on May 23, 2007 and the number of germinated seeds counted. All remaining whole seeds were counted and X-rayed to determine the number that was filled and to select filled seeds for a germination test. Three replicates of 25 filled seeds each were dipped into hot water (88–92 °C) for 2 min, surface-sterilized (as described above), plated onto 0·8 % water agar and incubated at 15 °C. Three replicates of non-treated seeds served as the control. Final germination was scored after 3 weeks.

A calibrated Tinytag Plus 2 data logger placed 10 mm below the soil surface adjacent to the bags of seeds recorded temperatures at 1-h intervals. Daily rainfall data for January–May 2007 was obtained from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology weather station located within 7 km of Kings Park (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Daily maximum and minimum temperatures (°C recorded at 10 mm soil depth) and daily rainfall (mm) from 31 January through to 23 May 2007.

Construction of a phylogenetic tree of Australian Sapindaceae

A phylogenetic tree was constructed for all but three Australian Sapindaceae genera based on Harrington et al. (2005). Cossina, Dictyoneura and Heterodendrum were not included in the tree due to a lack of phylogenetic detail about these genera. Class of dormancy (sensuBaskin and Baskin, 2004) were assigned to each genus included in the tree, except Lepidopetalum, Tristiropsis and Rhysotoechia, based on information in the present study and on that reported from the literature (Johnston et al., 1979; Munson, 1984; Nicholson and Nicholson, 1991a,b; 1992; 1994; 2000; 2004; Negi and Todaria, 1993; Rehman and Park, 2000; Woods, 2003; Baskin et al., 2004; Turner et al., 2006a; C. Baskin, pers com).

Statistical analysis

Imbibition (maximum seed mass), seed hydration, germination percentage and GRI were analysed by one-way ANOVA using Minitab® version 11. Prior to analysis, percentage data were arcsine-transformed, but non-transformed data appear in all figures. Hartley's test was performed on all data sets to ensure that treatment variances were not significantly different prior to ANOVA. For experiments in which more than two treatments were assessed, Fisher's least-significant-difference test was used to determine significant differences (P < 0·05) between individual treatments.

RESULTS

Seed viability

Seed viability was highly variable. Percentage viability (mean ± s.e.) of Cupaniopsis anacardioides and Alectryon connatus seeds was 3·0 ± 0·7 % and 9·0 ± 0·9 %, respectively, and that of the other 12 species ranged from approx. 40 % (Dodonaea ptarmicaefolia) to approx. 99 % (D. stenozyga; Table 1). Seed viability for D. hackettiana was 58·50 ± 2·60 % (1999 accession) and 98·7 ± 0·7 % (2006 accession). Average seed viability across all taxa was 69·7 ± 0·9 %.

Table 1.

Characteristics of seeds 14 Sapindaceae species

SpeciesHabitatDispersal unitSeed length (mm ± s.e.)Seed sourceSeed weight (mg ± s.e.)'Moisture content (% ± s.e.)Viability (% ± s.e.)Embryo typeMaximum mass increase, fresh weight basis (imbibition; % ± s.e.)Maximum mass increase (imbibition), scarified seeds/diaspores (% ± s.e.)Imbibition ratio (max. mass increase, control/max. mass increase, scarified)
Alectryon connatusLight rainforestSeed with thin pericarp4·422 ± 0·004Collected in Feb 200730·77 ± 0·60Insufficient seeds9·00 ± 0·91Folded46·5 ± 6·2 (96 h)Insufficient seedsNA
Allophylus cobbeSemi-deciduous vine forest, strand forest, edge of mangroveIndehiscent single locule drupaceous to nearly dry fruitD: 8·368 ± 0·024Collected in Feb 2007D: 74·80 ± 1·015·25 ± 0·1094·50 ± 0·29FoldedD: 59·4 ± 0·7 (552 h)D: 69·0 ± 0·2 (552 h)0·86
S: 5·768 ± 0·023S: 51·81 ± 0·59
Atalaya hemiglaucaDry open mixed forest, desertIndehiscent samaraD: 38·333 ± 0·109Commercial seed supplierD: 142·90 ± 3·787·60 ± 5·0676·50 ± 2·02FoldedD: 115·7 ± 1·2 (96 h)*D: 94·8 ± 2·4 (72 d)*0·82
S: 5·823 ± 0·039S: 81·95 ± 2·58
Cupaniopsis anacardioidesRiverine forest, hilly scrub, rocky beachesSeed mostly enclosed by aril9·630 ± 0·130Commercial seed supplier158·60 ± 8·70Insufficient seeds3·00 ± 0·71Folded37·0 ± 1·5 (192 h)Insufficient seedsNA
Cupaniopsis parvifoliaDry rainforestSeed mostly enclosed by aril9·563 ± 0·047Collected in Feb 2007146·41 ± 4·8027·15 ± 0·8176·33 ± 3·67Folded30·0 ± 1·5 (432 h)*44·00 ± 4·2 (144 h)*0·68
Distichostemon hispidulusSandplains, sandstone rocks, rocky hills and plateausArillate seed3·462 ± 0·063Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)12·73 ± 0·53Insufficient seeds89·72 ± 4·73Bent3·0 (72 h)79·4 (72 h)0·04
Dodonaea apteraCoastal limestone cliffs, open eucalypt woodlandArillate seed3·065 ± 0·017Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)9·81 ± 0·155·133 ± 0·2390·50 ± 0·96Bent19·1 ± 0·5 (144 h)95·9 ± 0·7 (48 h)*0·20
Dodonaea hackettianaLimestone soils in open eucalypt forestArillate seed2·494 ± 0·012Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)3·70 ± 0·057·98 ± 0·1358·50 ± 2·60Bent32·9 ± 9·7 (144 h)101·1 ± 1·4 (72 h)*0·32
Dodonaea petiolarisRocky hills, gibber plains, in arid and semi-arid environmentsExarillate seed3·343 ± 0·018Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)18·35 ± 0·327·98 ± 0·1991·50 ± 0·87Bent35·0 ± 5·4 (96 h)85·0 ± 1·0 (192 h)0·41
Dodonaea ptarmicaefoliaSandy or granitic loams in mallee scrubArillate seed3·042 ± 0·050Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)6·00 ± 0·219·02 ± 0·2740·75 ± 2·87Bent16·6 ± 6·5 (96 h)88·7 ± 3·0 (144 h)0·19
Dodonaea stenozygaSemi-arid, mallee scrub, open eucalypt forestArillate seed2·135 ± 0·033Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)1·65 ± 0·0211·18 ± 1·7699·25 ± 0·25Bent15·3 ± 1·8 (96 h)73·9 ± 8·3 (72 h)*0·21
Ganophyllum falcatumMonsoon forest, edge of rainforest and mangrovesDrupaceous fruit with indehiscent endocarpD: 13·377 ± 0·055Collected in Jan 2007D: 212·35 ± 2·6813·42 ± 0·8096·75 ± 0·95FoldedD: 44·0 ± 2·3 (192 h)D: 34·0 ± 0·7 (72 h)1·29
S: 10·383 ± 0·152S: 144·61 ± 1·09
Harpullia pendulaDry rainforest on basaltExarillate seed11·513 ± 0·047Collected in May 2007681·34 ± 25·3985·85 ± 2·0673·00 ± 5·74Folded11·5 ± 2·2 (144 h)*20·6 ± 1·2 (144 h)*0·56
Synima cordierorumWell developed rainforestArillate seed11·098 ± 0·044Collected in Jan 2007221·22 ± 1·2092·73 ± 2·9979·00 ± 1·91Folded18·8 ± 2·4 (48 h)22·4 ± 0·5 (72 h)0·84
SpeciesHabitatDispersal unitSeed length (mm ± s.e.)Seed sourceSeed weight (mg ± s.e.)'Moisture content (% ± s.e.)Viability (% ± s.e.)Embryo typeMaximum mass increase, fresh weight basis (imbibition; % ± s.e.)Maximum mass increase (imbibition), scarified seeds/diaspores (% ± s.e.)Imbibition ratio (max. mass increase, control/max. mass increase, scarified)
Alectryon connatusLight rainforestSeed with thin pericarp4·422 ± 0·004Collected in Feb 200730·77 ± 0·60Insufficient seeds9·00 ± 0·91Folded46·5 ± 6·2 (96 h)Insufficient seedsNA
Allophylus cobbeSemi-deciduous vine forest, strand forest, edge of mangroveIndehiscent single locule drupaceous to nearly dry fruitD: 8·368 ± 0·024Collected in Feb 2007D: 74·80 ± 1·015·25 ± 0·1094·50 ± 0·29FoldedD: 59·4 ± 0·7 (552 h)D: 69·0 ± 0·2 (552 h)0·86
S: 5·768 ± 0·023S: 51·81 ± 0·59
Atalaya hemiglaucaDry open mixed forest, desertIndehiscent samaraD: 38·333 ± 0·109Commercial seed supplierD: 142·90 ± 3·787·60 ± 5·0676·50 ± 2·02FoldedD: 115·7 ± 1·2 (96 h)*D: 94·8 ± 2·4 (72 d)*0·82
S: 5·823 ± 0·039S: 81·95 ± 2·58
Cupaniopsis anacardioidesRiverine forest, hilly scrub, rocky beachesSeed mostly enclosed by aril9·630 ± 0·130Commercial seed supplier158·60 ± 8·70Insufficient seeds3·00 ± 0·71Folded37·0 ± 1·5 (192 h)Insufficient seedsNA
Cupaniopsis parvifoliaDry rainforestSeed mostly enclosed by aril9·563 ± 0·047Collected in Feb 2007146·41 ± 4·8027·15 ± 0·8176·33 ± 3·67Folded30·0 ± 1·5 (432 h)*44·00 ± 4·2 (144 h)*0·68
Distichostemon hispidulusSandplains, sandstone rocks, rocky hills and plateausArillate seed3·462 ± 0·063Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)12·73 ± 0·53Insufficient seeds89·72 ± 4·73Bent3·0 (72 h)79·4 (72 h)0·04
Dodonaea apteraCoastal limestone cliffs, open eucalypt woodlandArillate seed3·065 ± 0·017Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)9·81 ± 0·155·133 ± 0·2390·50 ± 0·96Bent19·1 ± 0·5 (144 h)95·9 ± 0·7 (48 h)*0·20
Dodonaea hackettianaLimestone soils in open eucalypt forestArillate seed2·494 ± 0·012Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)3·70 ± 0·057·98 ± 0·1358·50 ± 2·60Bent32·9 ± 9·7 (144 h)101·1 ± 1·4 (72 h)*0·32
Dodonaea petiolarisRocky hills, gibber plains, in arid and semi-arid environmentsExarillate seed3·343 ± 0·018Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)18·35 ± 0·327·98 ± 0·1991·50 ± 0·87Bent35·0 ± 5·4 (96 h)85·0 ± 1·0 (192 h)0·41
Dodonaea ptarmicaefoliaSandy or granitic loams in mallee scrubArillate seed3·042 ± 0·050Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)6·00 ± 0·219·02 ± 0·2740·75 ± 2·87Bent16·6 ± 6·5 (96 h)88·7 ± 3·0 (144 h)0·19
Dodonaea stenozygaSemi-arid, mallee scrub, open eucalypt forestArillate seed2·135 ± 0·033Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)1·65 ± 0·0211·18 ± 1·7699·25 ± 0·25Bent15·3 ± 1·8 (96 h)73·9 ± 8·3 (72 h)*0·21
Ganophyllum falcatumMonsoon forest, edge of rainforest and mangrovesDrupaceous fruit with indehiscent endocarpD: 13·377 ± 0·055Collected in Jan 2007D: 212·35 ± 2·6813·42 ± 0·8096·75 ± 0·95FoldedD: 44·0 ± 2·3 (192 h)D: 34·0 ± 0·7 (72 h)1·29
S: 10·383 ± 0·152S: 144·61 ± 1·09
Harpullia pendulaDry rainforest on basaltExarillate seed11·513 ± 0·047Collected in May 2007681·34 ± 25·3985·85 ± 2·0673·00 ± 5·74Folded11·5 ± 2·2 (144 h)*20·6 ± 1·2 (144 h)*0·56
Synima cordierorumWell developed rainforestArillate seed11·098 ± 0·044Collected in Jan 2007221·22 ± 1·2092·73 ± 2·9979·00 ± 1·91Folded18·8 ± 2·4 (48 h)22·4 ± 0·5 (72 h)0·84

D = diaspore (endocarp plus true seed); S = seed only (endocarp artificially removed).

* Germination occurred.

Table 1.

Characteristics of seeds 14 Sapindaceae species

SpeciesHabitatDispersal unitSeed length (mm ± s.e.)Seed sourceSeed weight (mg ± s.e.)'Moisture content (% ± s.e.)Viability (% ± s.e.)Embryo typeMaximum mass increase, fresh weight basis (imbibition; % ± s.e.)Maximum mass increase (imbibition), scarified seeds/diaspores (% ± s.e.)Imbibition ratio (max. mass increase, control/max. mass increase, scarified)
Alectryon connatusLight rainforestSeed with thin pericarp4·422 ± 0·004Collected in Feb 200730·77 ± 0·60Insufficient seeds9·00 ± 0·91Folded46·5 ± 6·2 (96 h)Insufficient seedsNA
Allophylus cobbeSemi-deciduous vine forest, strand forest, edge of mangroveIndehiscent single locule drupaceous to nearly dry fruitD: 8·368 ± 0·024Collected in Feb 2007D: 74·80 ± 1·015·25 ± 0·1094·50 ± 0·29FoldedD: 59·4 ± 0·7 (552 h)D: 69·0 ± 0·2 (552 h)0·86
S: 5·768 ± 0·023S: 51·81 ± 0·59
Atalaya hemiglaucaDry open mixed forest, desertIndehiscent samaraD: 38·333 ± 0·109Commercial seed supplierD: 142·90 ± 3·787·60 ± 5·0676·50 ± 2·02FoldedD: 115·7 ± 1·2 (96 h)*D: 94·8 ± 2·4 (72 d)*0·82
S: 5·823 ± 0·039S: 81·95 ± 2·58
Cupaniopsis anacardioidesRiverine forest, hilly scrub, rocky beachesSeed mostly enclosed by aril9·630 ± 0·130Commercial seed supplier158·60 ± 8·70Insufficient seeds3·00 ± 0·71Folded37·0 ± 1·5 (192 h)Insufficient seedsNA
Cupaniopsis parvifoliaDry rainforestSeed mostly enclosed by aril9·563 ± 0·047Collected in Feb 2007146·41 ± 4·8027·15 ± 0·8176·33 ± 3·67Folded30·0 ± 1·5 (432 h)*44·00 ± 4·2 (144 h)*0·68
Distichostemon hispidulusSandplains, sandstone rocks, rocky hills and plateausArillate seed3·462 ± 0·063Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)12·73 ± 0·53Insufficient seeds89·72 ± 4·73Bent3·0 (72 h)79·4 (72 h)0·04
Dodonaea apteraCoastal limestone cliffs, open eucalypt woodlandArillate seed3·065 ± 0·017Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)9·81 ± 0·155·133 ± 0·2390·50 ± 0·96Bent19·1 ± 0·5 (144 h)95·9 ± 0·7 (48 h)*0·20
Dodonaea hackettianaLimestone soils in open eucalypt forestArillate seed2·494 ± 0·012Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)3·70 ± 0·057·98 ± 0·1358·50 ± 2·60Bent32·9 ± 9·7 (144 h)101·1 ± 1·4 (72 h)*0·32
Dodonaea petiolarisRocky hills, gibber plains, in arid and semi-arid environmentsExarillate seed3·343 ± 0·018Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)18·35 ± 0·327·98 ± 0·1991·50 ± 0·87Bent35·0 ± 5·4 (96 h)85·0 ± 1·0 (192 h)0·41
Dodonaea ptarmicaefoliaSandy or granitic loams in mallee scrubArillate seed3·042 ± 0·050Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)6·00 ± 0·219·02 ± 0·2740·75 ± 2·87Bent16·6 ± 6·5 (96 h)88·7 ± 3·0 (144 h)0·19
Dodonaea stenozygaSemi-arid, mallee scrub, open eucalypt forestArillate seed2·135 ± 0·033Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)1·65 ± 0·0211·18 ± 1·7699·25 ± 0·25Bent15·3 ± 1·8 (96 h)73·9 ± 8·3 (72 h)*0·21
Ganophyllum falcatumMonsoon forest, edge of rainforest and mangrovesDrupaceous fruit with indehiscent endocarpD: 13·377 ± 0·055Collected in Jan 2007D: 212·35 ± 2·6813·42 ± 0·8096·75 ± 0·95FoldedD: 44·0 ± 2·3 (192 h)D: 34·0 ± 0·7 (72 h)1·29
S: 10·383 ± 0·152S: 144·61 ± 1·09
Harpullia pendulaDry rainforest on basaltExarillate seed11·513 ± 0·047Collected in May 2007681·34 ± 25·3985·85 ± 2·0673·00 ± 5·74Folded11·5 ± 2·2 (144 h)*20·6 ± 1·2 (144 h)*0·56
Synima cordierorumWell developed rainforestArillate seed11·098 ± 0·044Collected in Jan 2007221·22 ± 1·2092·73 ± 2·9979·00 ± 1·91Folded18·8 ± 2·4 (48 h)22·4 ± 0·5 (72 h)0·84
SpeciesHabitatDispersal unitSeed length (mm ± s.e.)Seed sourceSeed weight (mg ± s.e.)'Moisture content (% ± s.e.)Viability (% ± s.e.)Embryo typeMaximum mass increase, fresh weight basis (imbibition; % ± s.e.)Maximum mass increase (imbibition), scarified seeds/diaspores (% ± s.e.)Imbibition ratio (max. mass increase, control/max. mass increase, scarified)
Alectryon connatusLight rainforestSeed with thin pericarp4·422 ± 0·004Collected in Feb 200730·77 ± 0·60Insufficient seeds9·00 ± 0·91Folded46·5 ± 6·2 (96 h)Insufficient seedsNA
Allophylus cobbeSemi-deciduous vine forest, strand forest, edge of mangroveIndehiscent single locule drupaceous to nearly dry fruitD: 8·368 ± 0·024Collected in Feb 2007D: 74·80 ± 1·015·25 ± 0·1094·50 ± 0·29FoldedD: 59·4 ± 0·7 (552 h)D: 69·0 ± 0·2 (552 h)0·86
S: 5·768 ± 0·023S: 51·81 ± 0·59
Atalaya hemiglaucaDry open mixed forest, desertIndehiscent samaraD: 38·333 ± 0·109Commercial seed supplierD: 142·90 ± 3·787·60 ± 5·0676·50 ± 2·02FoldedD: 115·7 ± 1·2 (96 h)*D: 94·8 ± 2·4 (72 d)*0·82
S: 5·823 ± 0·039S: 81·95 ± 2·58
Cupaniopsis anacardioidesRiverine forest, hilly scrub, rocky beachesSeed mostly enclosed by aril9·630 ± 0·130Commercial seed supplier158·60 ± 8·70Insufficient seeds3·00 ± 0·71Folded37·0 ± 1·5 (192 h)Insufficient seedsNA
Cupaniopsis parvifoliaDry rainforestSeed mostly enclosed by aril9·563 ± 0·047Collected in Feb 2007146·41 ± 4·8027·15 ± 0·8176·33 ± 3·67Folded30·0 ± 1·5 (432 h)*44·00 ± 4·2 (144 h)*0·68
Distichostemon hispidulusSandplains, sandstone rocks, rocky hills and plateausArillate seed3·462 ± 0·063Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)12·73 ± 0·53Insufficient seeds89·72 ± 4·73Bent3·0 (72 h)79·4 (72 h)0·04
Dodonaea apteraCoastal limestone cliffs, open eucalypt woodlandArillate seed3·065 ± 0·017Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)9·81 ± 0·155·133 ± 0·2390·50 ± 0·96Bent19·1 ± 0·5 (144 h)95·9 ± 0·7 (48 h)*0·20
Dodonaea hackettianaLimestone soils in open eucalypt forestArillate seed2·494 ± 0·012Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)3·70 ± 0·057·98 ± 0·1358·50 ± 2·60Bent32·9 ± 9·7 (144 h)101·1 ± 1·4 (72 h)*0·32
Dodonaea petiolarisRocky hills, gibber plains, in arid and semi-arid environmentsExarillate seed3·343 ± 0·018Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)18·35 ± 0·327·98 ± 0·1991·50 ± 0·87Bent35·0 ± 5·4 (96 h)85·0 ± 1·0 (192 h)0·41
Dodonaea ptarmicaefoliaSandy or granitic loams in mallee scrubArillate seed3·042 ± 0·050Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)6·00 ± 0·219·02 ± 0·2740·75 ± 2·87Bent16·6 ± 6·5 (96 h)88·7 ± 3·0 (144 h)0·19
Dodonaea stenozygaSemi-arid, mallee scrub, open eucalypt forestArillate seed2·135 ± 0·033Seed Technology Centre (KPBG)1·65 ± 0·0211·18 ± 1·7699·25 ± 0·25Bent15·3 ± 1·8 (96 h)73·9 ± 8·3 (72 h)*0·21
Ganophyllum falcatumMonsoon forest, edge of rainforest and mangrovesDrupaceous fruit with indehiscent endocarpD: 13·377 ± 0·055Collected in Jan 2007D: 212·35 ± 2·6813·42 ± 0·8096·75 ± 0·95FoldedD: 44·0 ± 2·3 (192 h)D: 34·0 ± 0·7 (72 h)1·29
S: 10·383 ± 0·152S: 144·61 ± 1·09
Harpullia pendulaDry rainforest on basaltExarillate seed11·513 ± 0·047Collected in May 2007681·34 ± 25·3985·85 ± 2·0673·00 ± 5·74Folded11·5 ± 2·2 (144 h)*20·6 ± 1·2 (144 h)*0·56
Synima cordierorumWell developed rainforestArillate seed11·098 ± 0·044Collected in Jan 2007221·22 ± 1·2092·73 ± 2·9979·00 ± 1·91Folded18·8 ± 2·4 (48 h)22·4 ± 0·5 (72 h)0·84

D = diaspore (endocarp plus true seed); S = seed only (endocarp artificially removed).

* Germination occurred.

Embryo classification

Six of the 14 study species have bent (coiled) embryos and the other eight folded embryos (Table 1).

Seed length and mass

Seed length ranged from 2·14 ± 0·03 mm (D. stenozyga) to 11·51 ± 0·04 mm (Harpullia pendula). Length of seeds with endocarp intact ranged from 8·37 ± 0·02 mm (Allophylus cobbe) to 38·33 ± 0·11 mm (Atalaya hemiglauca). Seed mass ranged from 1·65 ± 0·02 mg (D. stenozyga) to 681·34 ± 25·39 mg (H. pendula), and seed plus endocarp mass from 74·80 ± 1·01 mg (Allophylus cobbe) to 212·35 ± 2·68 mg (Ganophyllum falcatum; Table 1).

Seed moisture content

Moisture content of seeds at the start of experimentation ranged from 5·13 ± 0·23 % for Dodonaea aptera to 85·85 ± 2·06 % for H. pendula and 92·73 ± 2·99 % for Synima cordierorum (Table 1).

Imbibition

Percentage increase in seed mass for non-treated (control) seeds ranged from 3·0 % (Distichostemon hispidulus) to 58·5 ± 5·8 % (Alectryon connatus) and for scarified seeds from 30·9 ± 1·7 % (Cupaniopsis parvifolia) to 101·1 ± 1·4 % (Dodonaea hackettiana). The difference in mass between control and scarified seeds was significant for all species except Synima cordierorum (Table 1). R2 for maximum mass increase of control versus scarified seeds was 0·905 for non-PY species and 0·584 for PY species (Fig. 2). Seeds of the six species with PY (D. hispidulus, D. aptera, D. hackettiana, D. petiolaris, D. ptarmicaefolia and D. stenozyga) had imbibition ratios of 0·04 to 0·41, whereas the six species that did not have PY (A. cobbe, A. hemiglauca, C. parvifolia, G. falcatum, H. pendula and Synima cordierorum) had imbibition ratios of 0·56 to 1·29 (Table 1). Imbibition ratios >0·0 for seeds with PY was due to water uptake by a portion of seeds in the samples (see Fig. 4).

Fig. 2.

Scatterplot and linear regression comparing percentage mass increase for control and scarified seeds of 12 Sapindaceae taxa (Table 1). Species with PY (circles: Distichostemon hispidulus, Dodonaea aptera, D. hackettiana, D. petiolaris, D. stenozyga, D. ptarmicaefolia) had very low percentage mass increase in control seeds and very high percentage mass increases in nicked seeds. In comparison, non-PY taxa (squares: Allophylus cobbe, Atalaya hemiglauca, Cupaniopsis parvifolia, Ganophyllum falcatum, Harpullia pendula, Synima cordierorum) have higher percentage mass increases in control seeds and lower relative percentage mass increases following scarification. Except for D. hispidulus (one sample), all points are derived from the average of three replicates (Table 1).

Hot-water treatment of seeds of all species with PY (D. hispidulus, Dodonaea spp.) resulted in an increase in seed mass (P < 0·05) that ranged from 61·3 ± 5·0 % (D. petiolaris) to 104·0 ± 2·0 % (D. aptera; Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Imbibition (% mass increase ± s.e.) of non-treated (control), scarified and hot-water-treated [88–92 °C for 30 s or 2·5 min (D. petiolaris only)] seeds. One (Distichostemon hispidulus) to three replicates (all Dodonaea spp.) of 20 seeds were used for each experimental treatment. Different letters denote significant differences in maximum mass increase within each species (P < 0·05).

Hot-water-treated seeds from all five Dodonaea spp. imbibed more water than control seeds (P < 0·05; Fig. 4). For the five species, the lowest percentage of non-treated (control) seeds that imbibed was for D. hackettiana (11·3 ± 6·7 %), while the highest percentage was for those of D. petiolaris (33·3 ± 6·0 %;Fig. 4). Dodonaea petiolaris had the lowest number of seeds that imbibed following 2·5-min hot-water treatment (75·0 ± 2·9 %), although this was higher than the 58·0 ± 4·4 % of the seeds of this species that imbibed following 30-s hot water treatment (data not shown). More than 80 % of the seeds of each of the other four Dodonaea spp. had imbibed 72 to 144 h (P < 0·05) following hot-water (30 s) treatment (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Percentage (± s.e.) of seeds that imbibed following no treatment (control) or hot-water (88–92 °C) treatment for 2·5 min (D. petiolaris only) or for 30 sec (all other Dodonaea spp.) and then incubated at room temperature on irrigated germination papers for 72 − 144 h. Different letters denote significant differences within a species (P < 0·05).

Seed dormancy-break and germination

The difference in germination percentage between control and hot-water-treated seeds was significant in four (D. aptera, D. hackettiana, D. ptarmicaefolia and D. stenozyga) of the five Dodonaea spp. evaluated for germination responses (P < 0·05; Fig. 5). No germination was observed in D. petiolaris seeds (data not shown). Germination of non-treated seeds was 0–8 % for D. aptera, D. hackettiana and D. ptarmicaefolia at all three incubation temperatures, and 22–37 % for D. stenozyga (Fig. 5). Hot-water-treated seeds of D. stenozyga germinated to 80–90 %, with no significant difference (P >0·05) between the three temperatures. All other species germinated to significantly higher percentages at 15 °C and 20 °C (68 − 100 %) than at 25 °C (0–25 %; P < 0·05; Fig. 5). Days to first germination was fastest for Dodonaea ptarmicaefolia seeds treated with hot water and incubated at 20 °C (5·7 ± 0·7 d). Germination had begun by day 16 in seeds of the four hot-water-treated Dodonaea spp. that germinated (Table 2), and maximum germination for all species was attained by day 23. Germination rate was fastest for D. aptera seeds (GRI = 9·7 ± 0·3) after hot-water treatment and incubation at 15 °C (P < 0·05). Seeds of D. aptera and D. hackettiana germinated most rapidly at 15 °C (P < 0·05), while those of D. ptarmicaefolia and D. stenozyga did so at 20 °C, although the GRIs for hot-water-treated seeds of D. ptarmicaefolia and D. stenozyga were not significantly higher than those at several other incubation temperatures (Table 2).

Fig. 5.

Percentage germination (± s.e.) of control and hot-water-treated seeds of four Dodonaea spp. after incubation for 23 d at three different temperatures. For each treatment combination, three replicates of 25 seeds were used. Different letters denote significant differences within each temperature and each species (P < 0·05).

Table 2.

Germination characteristics for four Dodonaea species derived from daily monitoring. Seeds of all four species were incubated at three temperatures (15, 20 and 25 °C) with a sub-sample also placed in hot water (88–92 °C) prior to incubation. There were three replications of 25 seeds for each treatment combination

TreatmentGermination temperature (°C)Average number of days to first germination (± s.e.)Average number of days to 50 % germination (± s.e.)Average number of days to max germination (± s.e.)Average germination rate index (± s.e.)*
Dodonaea aptera
Control15 °C13·0 ± 013·0 ± 013·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW15 °C7·3 ± 0·310·7 ± 0·714·7 ± 1·59·7 ± 0·3d
Control20 °C10·0 ± 010·0 ± 010·0 ± 00·3 ± 0·3a
HW20 °C7·0 ± 0·612·0 ± 0·018·3 ± 0·38·8 ± 0·1c
Control25 °CNANANA0·0 ± 0·0a
HW25 °C16·0 ± 0·618·0 ± 1·022·3 ± 0·71·4 ± 0·3b
Dodonaea hackettiana
Control15 °C17·0 ± 3·319·0 ± 1·620·0 ± 1·60·4 ± 0·2a
HW15 °C11·7 ± 1·317·0 ± 0·021·3 ± 1·24·9 ± 0·4c
Control20 °C19·3 ± 1·220·3 ± 1·820·3 ± 1·80·4 ± 0·1a
HW20 °C14·0 ± 2·018·7 ± 0·721·0 ± 1·03·8 ± 0·6b
Control25 °C19·0 ± 019·0 ± 019·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW25 °CNANANA0·0 ± 0·0a
Dodonaea ptarmicaefolia
Control15 °C16·7 ± 2·317·7 ± 1·318·3 ± 0·70·5 ± 0·3ab
HW15 °C6·0 ± 0·013·0 ± 1·021·3 ± 0·36·4 ± 0·3c
Control20 °C9·5 ± 0·49·5 ± 0·416·5 ± 3·70·6 ± 0·6ab
HW20 °C5·7 ± 0·710·3 ± 0·919·3 ± 0·96·6 ± 0·6c
Control25 °C21·0 ± 021·0 ± 021·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW25 °C10·3 ± 1·315·3 ± 1·219·3 ± 3·21·7 ± 0·6b
Dodonaea stenzyga
Control15 °C7·3 ± 0·310·0 ± 1·216·7 ± 2·62·3 ± 0·4a
HW15 °C7·3 ± 0·311·3 ± 0·719·3 ± 1·88·1 ± 0·9b
Control20 °C6·0 ± 0·67·7 ± 0·317·3 ± 3·22·9 ± 0·1a
HW20 °C6·7 ± 0·310·0 ± 0·021·7 ± 0·99·2 ± 0·1b
Control25 °C6·3 ± 0·310·3 ± 2·423·0 ± 0·03·2 ± 0·2a
HW25 °C6·7 ± 0·311·7 ± 0·919·7 ± 1·97·5 ± 0·9b
TreatmentGermination temperature (°C)Average number of days to first germination (± s.e.)Average number of days to 50 % germination (± s.e.)Average number of days to max germination (± s.e.)Average germination rate index (± s.e.)*
Dodonaea aptera
Control15 °C13·0 ± 013·0 ± 013·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW15 °C7·3 ± 0·310·7 ± 0·714·7 ± 1·59·7 ± 0·3d
Control20 °C10·0 ± 010·0 ± 010·0 ± 00·3 ± 0·3a
HW20 °C7·0 ± 0·612·0 ± 0·018·3 ± 0·38·8 ± 0·1c
Control25 °CNANANA0·0 ± 0·0a
HW25 °C16·0 ± 0·618·0 ± 1·022·3 ± 0·71·4 ± 0·3b
Dodonaea hackettiana
Control15 °C17·0 ± 3·319·0 ± 1·620·0 ± 1·60·4 ± 0·2a
HW15 °C11·7 ± 1·317·0 ± 0·021·3 ± 1·24·9 ± 0·4c
Control20 °C19·3 ± 1·220·3 ± 1·820·3 ± 1·80·4 ± 0·1a
HW20 °C14·0 ± 2·018·7 ± 0·721·0 ± 1·03·8 ± 0·6b
Control25 °C19·0 ± 019·0 ± 019·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW25 °CNANANA0·0 ± 0·0a
Dodonaea ptarmicaefolia
Control15 °C16·7 ± 2·317·7 ± 1·318·3 ± 0·70·5 ± 0·3ab
HW15 °C6·0 ± 0·013·0 ± 1·021·3 ± 0·36·4 ± 0·3c
Control20 °C9·5 ± 0·49·5 ± 0·416·5 ± 3·70·6 ± 0·6ab
HW20 °C5·7 ± 0·710·3 ± 0·919·3 ± 0·96·6 ± 0·6c
Control25 °C21·0 ± 021·0 ± 021·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW25 °C10·3 ± 1·315·3 ± 1·219·3 ± 3·21·7 ± 0·6b
Dodonaea stenzyga
Control15 °C7·3 ± 0·310·0 ± 1·216·7 ± 2·62·3 ± 0·4a
HW15 °C7·3 ± 0·311·3 ± 0·719·3 ± 1·88·1 ± 0·9b
Control20 °C6·0 ± 0·67·7 ± 0·317·3 ± 3·22·9 ± 0·1a
HW20 °C6·7 ± 0·310·0 ± 0·021·7 ± 0·99·2 ± 0·1b
Control25 °C6·3 ± 0·310·3 ± 2·423·0 ± 0·03·2 ± 0·2a
HW25 °C6·7 ± 0·311·7 ± 0·919·7 ± 1·97·5 ± 0·9b

* Different letters denote significant differences across treatments within each species (P < 0·05).

Table 2.

Germination characteristics for four Dodonaea species derived from daily monitoring. Seeds of all four species were incubated at three temperatures (15, 20 and 25 °C) with a sub-sample also placed in hot water (88–92 °C) prior to incubation. There were three replications of 25 seeds for each treatment combination

TreatmentGermination temperature (°C)Average number of days to first germination (± s.e.)Average number of days to 50 % germination (± s.e.)Average number of days to max germination (± s.e.)Average germination rate index (± s.e.)*
Dodonaea aptera
Control15 °C13·0 ± 013·0 ± 013·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW15 °C7·3 ± 0·310·7 ± 0·714·7 ± 1·59·7 ± 0·3d
Control20 °C10·0 ± 010·0 ± 010·0 ± 00·3 ± 0·3a
HW20 °C7·0 ± 0·612·0 ± 0·018·3 ± 0·38·8 ± 0·1c
Control25 °CNANANA0·0 ± 0·0a
HW25 °C16·0 ± 0·618·0 ± 1·022·3 ± 0·71·4 ± 0·3b
Dodonaea hackettiana
Control15 °C17·0 ± 3·319·0 ± 1·620·0 ± 1·60·4 ± 0·2a
HW15 °C11·7 ± 1·317·0 ± 0·021·3 ± 1·24·9 ± 0·4c
Control20 °C19·3 ± 1·220·3 ± 1·820·3 ± 1·80·4 ± 0·1a
HW20 °C14·0 ± 2·018·7 ± 0·721·0 ± 1·03·8 ± 0·6b
Control25 °C19·0 ± 019·0 ± 019·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW25 °CNANANA0·0 ± 0·0a
Dodonaea ptarmicaefolia
Control15 °C16·7 ± 2·317·7 ± 1·318·3 ± 0·70·5 ± 0·3ab
HW15 °C6·0 ± 0·013·0 ± 1·021·3 ± 0·36·4 ± 0·3c
Control20 °C9·5 ± 0·49·5 ± 0·416·5 ± 3·70·6 ± 0·6ab
HW20 °C5·7 ± 0·710·3 ± 0·919·3 ± 0·96·6 ± 0·6c
Control25 °C21·0 ± 021·0 ± 021·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW25 °C10·3 ± 1·315·3 ± 1·219·3 ± 3·21·7 ± 0·6b
Dodonaea stenzyga
Control15 °C7·3 ± 0·310·0 ± 1·216·7 ± 2·62·3 ± 0·4a
HW15 °C7·3 ± 0·311·3 ± 0·719·3 ± 1·88·1 ± 0·9b
Control20 °C6·0 ± 0·67·7 ± 0·317·3 ± 3·22·9 ± 0·1a
HW20 °C6·7 ± 0·310·0 ± 0·021·7 ± 0·99·2 ± 0·1b
Control25 °C6·3 ± 0·310·3 ± 2·423·0 ± 0·03·2 ± 0·2a
HW25 °C6·7 ± 0·311·7 ± 0·919·7 ± 1·97·5 ± 0·9b
TreatmentGermination temperature (°C)Average number of days to first germination (± s.e.)Average number of days to 50 % germination (± s.e.)Average number of days to max germination (± s.e.)Average germination rate index (± s.e.)*
Dodonaea aptera
Control15 °C13·0 ± 013·0 ± 013·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW15 °C7·3 ± 0·310·7 ± 0·714·7 ± 1·59·7 ± 0·3d
Control20 °C10·0 ± 010·0 ± 010·0 ± 00·3 ± 0·3a
HW20 °C7·0 ± 0·612·0 ± 0·018·3 ± 0·38·8 ± 0·1c
Control25 °CNANANA0·0 ± 0·0a
HW25 °C16·0 ± 0·618·0 ± 1·022·3 ± 0·71·4 ± 0·3b
Dodonaea hackettiana
Control15 °C17·0 ± 3·319·0 ± 1·620·0 ± 1·60·4 ± 0·2a
HW15 °C11·7 ± 1·317·0 ± 0·021·3 ± 1·24·9 ± 0·4c
Control20 °C19·3 ± 1·220·3 ± 1·820·3 ± 1·80·4 ± 0·1a
HW20 °C14·0 ± 2·018·7 ± 0·721·0 ± 1·03·8 ± 0·6b
Control25 °C19·0 ± 019·0 ± 019·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW25 °CNANANA0·0 ± 0·0a
Dodonaea ptarmicaefolia
Control15 °C16·7 ± 2·317·7 ± 1·318·3 ± 0·70·5 ± 0·3ab
HW15 °C6·0 ± 0·013·0 ± 1·021·3 ± 0·36·4 ± 0·3c
Control20 °C9·5 ± 0·49·5 ± 0·416·5 ± 3·70·6 ± 0·6ab
HW20 °C5·7 ± 0·710·3 ± 0·919·3 ± 0·96·6 ± 0·6c
Control25 °C21·0 ± 021·0 ± 021·0 ± 00·1 ± 0·1a
HW25 °C10·3 ± 1·315·3 ± 1·219·3 ± 3·21·7 ± 0·6b
Dodonaea stenzyga
Control15 °C7·3 ± 0·310·0 ± 1·216·7 ± 2·62·3 ± 0·4a
HW15 °C7·3 ± 0·311·3 ± 0·719·3 ± 1·88·1 ± 0·9b
Control20 °C6·0 ± 0·67·7 ± 0·317·3 ± 3·22·9 ± 0·1a
HW20 °C6·7 ± 0·310·0 ± 0·021·7 ± 0·99·2 ± 0·1b
Control25 °C6·3 ± 0·310·3 ± 2·423·0 ± 0·03·2 ± 0·2a
HW25 °C6·7 ± 0·311·7 ± 0·919·7 ± 1·97·5 ± 0·9b

* Different letters denote significant differences across treatments within each species (P < 0·05).

Germination percentage of seeds of D. aptera, D. hackettiana and D. stenozyga subjected to different wet heat treatments was highest for those exposed to 100 °C (boiling) water for 30 s (P < 0·05), but for D. ptarmicaefolia seeds germination was highest for seeds exposed to 90 °C (Fig. 6). Seeds of D. aptera and D. hackettiana exposed dry to cycling temperatures (15/50 °C) for 8 d or to wet heat of 20–60 °C germinated to significantly lower percentages (P < 0·05) than those exposed to wet heat of 70 °C or higher. A transition in germination percentage was observed at 50 °C for D. hackettiana (37·3 ± 10·9 %) and at 60 °C for D. aptera (26·7 ± 3·5 %; P < 0·05; Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Effects of wet (20 − 100 °C) or dry (control, 15/50 °C) heat on dormancy-break and subsequently percentage germination (± s.e.) in four Dodonaea spp. For each treatment combination, three replicates of 25 seeds were used. All seeds were incubated in darkness at 20 °C. Seeds were evaluated once for germination, after 3 weeks. Different letters denote significant differences within each species (P < 0·05).

Dry heat up to 70 °C for 1 h was ineffective in breaking dormancy for seeds of D. hackettiana, producing <10 % germination (P < 0·05). However, dry heat at temperatures >80 °C resulted in higher germination (74·7 ± 1·3 %; Table 3).

Table 3.

Effects of wet and dry heat on dormancy-break and subsequent germination (% ± s.e.) of seeds of Dodonaea hackettiana. For each temperature, seeds were exposed to water for 30 s or to dry heat for 1 h. There were three replicates of 25 seeds for each treatment.

Treatment type20 °C30 °C40 °C50 °C60 °C70 °C80 °C90 °C100 °C
Water5·3 (±1·3)a2·7 (±1·3)a6·7 (±4·8)a37·3 (±10·9)b65·3 (±6·7)bc88·0 (±6·1)def78·7 (±15·7)cde86·7 (±7·1)def94·7 (±3·5)ef
Dry heat6·7 (±1·3)a12·0 (±6·1)a9·3 (±1·3)a2·7 (±1·3)a1·3 (±1·3)a9·3 (±1·3)a74·7 (±1·3)cd98·7 (±1·3)f93·3 (±3·5)ef
Treatment type20 °C30 °C40 °C50 °C60 °C70 °C80 °C90 °C100 °C
Water5·3 (±1·3)a2·7 (±1·3)a6·7 (±4·8)a37·3 (±10·9)b65·3 (±6·7)bc88·0 (±6·1)def78·7 (±15·7)cde86·7 (±7·1)def94·7 (±3·5)ef
Dry heat6·7 (±1·3)a12·0 (±6·1)a9·3 (±1·3)a2·7 (±1·3)a1·3 (±1·3)a9·3 (±1·3)a74·7 (±1·3)cd98·7 (±1·3)f93·3 (±3·5)ef

Different letters denote significant differences when compared across all treatments (P <0·05).

Table 3.

Effects of wet and dry heat on dormancy-break and subsequent germination (% ± s.e.) of seeds of Dodonaea hackettiana. For each temperature, seeds were exposed to water for 30 s or to dry heat for 1 h. There were three replicates of 25 seeds for each treatment.

Treatment type20 °C30 °C40 °C50 °C60 °C70 °C80 °C90 °C100 °C
Water5·3 (±1·3)a2·7 (±1·3)a6·7 (±4·8)a37·3 (±10·9)b65·3 (±6·7)bc88·0 (±6·1)def78·7 (±15·7)cde86·7 (±7·1)def94·7 (±3·5)ef
Dry heat6·7 (±1·3)a12·0 (±6·1)a9·3 (±1·3)a2·7 (±1·3)a1·3 (±1·3)a9·3 (±1·3)a74·7 (±1·3)cd98·7 (±1·3)f93·3 (±3·5)ef
Treatment type20 °C30 °C40 °C50 °C60 °C70 °C80 °C90 °C100 °C
Water5·3 (±1·3)a2·7 (±1·3)a6·7 (±4·8)a37·3 (±10·9)b65·3 (±6·7)bc88·0 (±6·1)def78·7 (±15·7)cde86·7 (±7·1)def94·7 (±3·5)ef
Dry heat6·7 (±1·3)a12·0 (±6·1)a9·3 (±1·3)a2·7 (±1·3)a1·3 (±1·3)a9·3 (±1·3)a74·7 (±1·3)cd98·7 (±1·3)f93·3 (±3·5)ef

Different letters denote significant differences when compared across all treatments (P <0·05).

Seed burial experiment

Prior to burial, D. hackettiana seeds produced <6 % germination when non-treated, while hot-water treatment enabled 91 % of seeds to germinate (P < 0·05). During burial, 36·4 ± 12·3 % of seeds germinated. The seeds remaining after burial in soil for 4 months were unable to germinate when removed from bags and incubated at 15 °C, and hot-water treatment enabled germination to >90 % (P < 0·05).

Soil temperatures during burial ranged from 62 °C on 7 February to 7·7 °C on 22 May (Fig. 1). Four rainfall events of 1·8–5·2 mm occurred during late-summer and early autumn (Fig. 1). On at least one of these occasions, soil temperatures within 24 h of precipitation increased to over 50 °C for periods of 3 h.

Construction of a phylogenetic tree of Australian Sapindaceae

The three genera of Australian Sapindaceae with PY (Dodonaea, Diplopeltis and Distichostemon) are in subfamily Dodonaeoideae, and they are sister genera within this subfamily (Fig. 7). Interestingly, the next most-related taxa to these three genera are Harpullia and Ganophyllum, both of which were shown in this study not to possess PY (Fig. 7). Indeed, based on this analysis, the other three genera where PY has been reported, i.e. Sapindus, Koelreuteria and Cardiospermum, belong to the subfamily Sapindoideae and are neither closely related to each other or to Diplopeltis, Dodonaea or Distichostemon. Embryo morphology was very similar between Diplopeltis, Dodonaea and Distichostemon [all had bent (coiled) embryos] with all other taxa evaluated possessing folded embryos. In comparison, only seeds from Koelreuteria have been shown to possess bent embryos, with seeds from Cardiospermum and Sapindus having folded embryos similar to the non-PY species evaluated in this study (Watson and Dallwitz, 1992 onwards). Taxa with non-dormant seeds, or PD, are scattered right across the phylogenetic tree with representative genera found extensively within both subfamilies.

Fig. 7.

Phylogenetic tree for all but three genera of Australian Sapindaceae plus Koelreuteria, Cardiospermum and Sapindus (adapted from Harrington et al., 2005), showing the proposed relatedness of Australian Sapindaceae genera and their placement within the two subfamilies Sapindoideae and Dodonaeoideae. The relative length of each branch reflects taxonomic relatedness. Genera with an asterisk (*) were evaluated for dormancy in this study. Dormancy classification (ND, non-dormant; PY, physical dormancy; PD, physiological dormancy; PY + PD, combinational dormancy) is based on: 1, Nicholson and Nicholson (1992); 2, Nicholson and Nicholson (1991a); 3, Nicholson and Nicholson (1991b); 4, Nicholson and Nicholson (1994); 5, Nicholson and Nicholson (2000); 6, Nicholson and Nicholson (2004); 7, Johnston et al. (1979); 8, Rehman and Park (2000); 9, Turner et al. (2006a); 10, Baskin et al. (2004); 11, C. Baskin (pers. com); 12, Woods (2003); 13, Munson (1984); 14, Negi and Todaria (1993). The three Australian genera Cossina, Dictyoneura and Heterodendrum have not been placed on this tree due to lack of taxonomic information about them.

DISCUSSION

Non-treated seeds from Alectryon connatus, Allophylus cobbe, Atalaya hemiglauca, Cupaniopsis anacardioides, C. parvifolia, Ganophyllum falcatum and Synima cordierorum imbibed water readily, and thus they do not have PY. Other reports on the germination characteristics of Sapindaceae supports our results that Ganophyllum, Alectryon, Cupanopsis and Harpullia do not have PY since fresh (non-treated) seeds in several species in each of these genera germinate readily (Nicholson and Nicholson, 1991a, b, 1992, 1994, 2000, 2004). On the other hand, the seed coats of Distichostemon hispidulus, Dodonaea aptera, D. hackettiana, D. petiolaris, D. ptarmicaefolia and D. stenozyga were water impermeable, and thus these seeds have PY. PY has previously been reported for seeds of D. viscosa from Hawaii (Baskin et al., 2004).

Based on results presented in this study and on those of others (Johnston et al., 1979; Munson, 1984; Rehman and Park, 2000; Baskin et al., 2004; Turner et al., 2006a; C. Baskin and J. Baskin, unpubl. database), occurrence of PY within Sapindaceae appears to be relatively rare. However, given the limited number of Sapindaceae species for which dormancy and germination have been evaluated these conclusions should be viewed with some caution. Nevertheless, based on available evidence within the Australian flora the only three genera that have been confirmed to have at least one species with a water-impermeable seed coat are Diplopeltis (Turner et al., 2006a), Dodonaea (Baskin et al., 2004; this study) and Distichostemon (this study).

For the five Sapindaceae genera previously reported to have water-impermeable seed coats, PY was confirmed in three of them, Diplopeltis, Dodonaea and Cardiospermum, by imbibition experiments (Johnston et al., 1979; Baskin et al., 2004; Turner et al., 2006a). For each of these three genera, water impermeability vs. water permeability was evaluated for only one species (Diplopeltis huegelii, Dodonaea viscosa and Cardiospermum halicacabum). For the other two genera Koelreuteria (K. paniculata) and Sapindus (S. mukorossi, S. drummondi, S. trifolatus and S. saponaria), PY is inferred through indirect assessment, since seeds that were mechanically or acid-scarified germinated to significantly higher percentages than non-treated seeds (Munson, 1984; Brahmam et al., 1996; Rehman and Park, 2000; Sautu et al., 2006). Thus, the presence of PY still needs confirmation in species in these two genera with an imbibition test since seeds with PD may also be stimulated to germinate following mechanical scarification (C. Baskin et al., 2006). Interestingly, neither seeds of Koelreuteria bipinnata (Fan and Wang, 2000) nor those of K. henryi (Yang et al., 2000; J.-C. Yang, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taiwan, pers. comm.) seem to be dormant. Seeds of K. bipinnata germinated up to 88 % (apparently without any pre-treatment) and those K. henryi to 98 % (no pre-treatment).

In seeds of the four Dodonaea species for which dormancy-break was evaluated in the present study, optimal water temperature for breaking PY was 90 − 100 °C. However, for the two more coastal species (D. aptera and D. hackettiana) germination (and hence PY loss) was significantly improved after exposure of D. hackettiana seeds to water at 50 °C (37 % germination) and of D. aptera seeds to water at 60 °C (27 % germination); non-treated seeds of D. hackettiana and D. aptera germinated to 11 % and 1 %, respectively. On the other hand, seeds of D. hackettiana required exposure to ≥80 °C dry constant temperatures to germinate to high percentages. Thus, <10 % of the seeds of this species germinated after exposure to 70 °C dry, whereas 75–93 % germinated after exposure to 80, 90 or 100 °C dry heat.

Thirty-seven percent of the seeds of D. hackettiana retrieved from in situ buried bags had germinated by late May, compared to the <5 % germination for seeds in the same seed lot prior to seed burial (non-treated control seeds). Temperatures during the time of burial (Jan–May 2007) did not rise above 62 °C, which is nearly 20 °C lower than the 80 °C dry heat exposure required to break PY in a high percentage of seeds of this species under laboratory conditions. However, rainfall data indicate that at least on two occasions 2–5 mm of rain fell during summer and that within 24 h of rainfall temperatures rose to >50 °C for at least 3 h. Interestingly, germination in the field (36 %) was very similar to that (37 %) of seeds exposed to water at 50 °C for 30 s. However, whether sufficient moisture was still present within the topsoil when temperatures increased to this level is not known. Nevertheless, Turner et al. (2006b) found that in situ buried (non-PY) seeds of Acanthocarpus preissii were partially hydrated (20–60 %) for at least 6 h when soil temperatures were between 40–55 °C. This suggests that hydrated soils at temperatures similar to those required under laboratory conditions for alleviation of PY in some D. hackettiana seeds may occur naturally, particularly where soils are directly exposed to solar radiation.

In other species with PY, the water gap opens after exposure to specific soil conditions such as temperature extremes (including fire), wetting and drying cycles, or warm moist conditions (Egley and Paul, 1981; Baskin and Baskin, 1998; Jayasuriya et al., 2007), although in most cases remarkably little appears to be known about the exact factors that overcome PY naturally. For example, PY in Ipomoea lacunosa seeds was effectively broken during moist incubation at 35/20 °C or at constant 35 °C on wet sand, whilst dry incubation at 35 °C was ineffective (Jayasuriya et al., 2007). Likewise, for the PY-dormant seeds of Acacia sylvestris, Dodonaea triquetra and Kennedia rubicunda intensity and duration of fire were key factors influencing seedling recruitment and post-fire species' abundance (Floyd, 1966). Indeed, for D. triquetra seeds moist incubation on sand at 55 °C for at least 200 min resulted in partial removal of PY, although temperatures ≥60 °C were far more effective.

For the four Dodonaea species that germinated in our study, germination percentages were highest (68 − 100 %) when seeds were incubated at 15 °C, although for D. stenzozyga germination at 25 °C was 80 %. The differing germination responses may reflect differences in geographical distribution and therefore in the climatic and seasonal conditions that initiate germination in nature. For example, D. stenozyga occurs over a broad geographical range from southern Western Australia to western Victoria in semi-arid mallee scrub and in open eucalypt woodland (Reynolds, 1985); thus, this species is likely to experience a broad range of temperature and moisture conditions. In comparison, Dodonaea aptera is restricted to the coastal region of south-west Western Australia, and D. stenozyga occurs along parts of the south coast of Western Australia, extending inland towards Kalgoolie. Dodonaea hackettiana has the most restricted distribution and is found only within the immediate Perth region (Reynolds, 1985). Germination optima usually correspond to temperatures that coincide with the annual period of reliable rainfall where a species occurs naturally, and most species studied from southern Western Australia exhibit a summer-drought-avoiding germination strategy and have germination temperature optima between 10–20 °C (Bellairs and Bell, 1990; Bell and Bellairs, 1992; Bell, 1994; Bell et al., 1995).

Harrington et al. (2005) recently proposed division of the Sapindaceae into four subfamilies: Sapindoideae (including Koelreuteria and Ungnadia); Hippocastanoideae (including Aceraceae and Hippocastanaceae, plus Handeliodendron); Dodonaeoideae; and the monotypic Xanthoceroideae. Based on modification of this tree for all but three Australian Sapindaceae genera, Australian taxa occur within the two subfamilies Sapindoideae and Dodonaeoideae (Fig. 7). Taxa in this study whose seeds have PY (Dodonaea spp. and Distichostemon hispidulus) and Diplopeltis huegelii (Turner et al., 2006a) are in subfamily Dodonaeoideae and are more closely related to one another than to any other Sapindaceae genera. Interestingly, seeds of the other two genera (Ganophyllum and Harpullia) investigated in this study that belong to this subfamily did not have water-impermeable seed coats. In particular, Harpullia, which is the next most-related genus to Diplopeltis, Dodonaea and Distichostemon, also appears to show some indications of seed recalcitrance (desiccation sensitive), based on high moisture content of freshly mature seeds and large seed size (Table 1), a seed trait that has been demonstrated in several other Sapindaceae taxa (Flynn et al., 2006).

All other species evaluated in this study belong to subfamily Sapindoideae, with no species exhibiting PY. The other three genera in which PY has been reported, Koelreuteria, Cardiospermum and Sapindus (Johnston et al., 1979; Munson, 1984; Rehman and Park, 2000), belong to subfamily Sapindoideae and so are not closely related to Dodonaea, Diplopeltis or Distichostemon; they appear to be only distantly related to each other as well (Fig. 7).

Additionally, there appears to be no pattern for the occurrence of PD and non- dormant seeds across the phylogenetic tree, with both states occurring in the two Australian subfamilies and most major phylogenetic branches (Fig. 7). PD is the most common type of dormancy amongst the angiosperms that is likely to have been the ancestral state for most angiosperm groups (Baskin and Baskin, 1998), and its regular occurrence amongst the various branches of the phylogenetic tree is to be expected. Production of seeds that are non-dormant is likely to reflect regular seed shedding into environments that are immediately conducive to germination. The fact that there is no discernable trend in either trait within the phylogenetic tree is therefore not surprising. Indeed, there is only a weak relationship between embryo morphology and the occurrence of PY as well with four (Koelreuteria, Diplopeltis, Dodonaea, and Distichostemon) of the six reported species with PY having bent (spirally coiled) embryos. The other two PY taxa (Cardiospermum and Sapindus) both appear to possess folded embryos, which were found to be the embryo type for all non-PY taxa in this study (Watson and Dallwitz, 1992 onwards) Interestingly, Koelreuteria, Diplopeltis, Dodonaea and Distichostemon are all more closely related to one another than to any other known PY taxa, and until the recent Sapindaceae revision Koelreuteria was placed in the Dodonaeoideae with Diplopeltis, Dodonaea and Distichostemon (Harrington et al., 2005).

Corner (1976) suggested that the seeds of Dodonaea spp. seem to be one of the more primitive seed types in the Sapindaceae. Seeds of Distichostemon and Diplopeltis have very similar features to those of Dodonaea, such as spirally coiled embryos, arillate structures and black/brown testa. Thus, these primitive traits appear to be prevalent in these genera as well. Corner (1976) also proposed that spirally coiled cotyledons, such as those in Dodonaea, Distichostemon and Diplopeltus huegelii, may represent the original sapindaceous embryo type and that thick or more-or-less transverse cotyledenous embryos observed in all the other genera in our study are the derived state.

Based on the results presented in this study it is likely that around 50 % of the Sapindaceae taxa found within Australia have seeds with PY, accounting for around 80 species of Dodonaea, Diplopeltis and Distichostemon. All the PY species tested appear to respond readily to hot-water treatment, making this an easy and straightforward method for breaking PY in these and related species for the production of plants for restoration and horticulture. Additionally, all but one Dodonaea species (the exception being D. petiolaris) germinated easily over a range of temperatures. Thus, germination following PY removal is not likely to be a significant issue, and propagation of other Dodonaea species should be relatively straightforward. The reason for the poor germination response for Dodonaea petiolaris is currently unknown, although several other Sapindaceae are known to have combination dormancy (PY + PD). Thus, it is possible that these seeds require stratification or dry after-ripening to become germinable, as shown for K. paniculata and D. huegelii (Park and Rehman, 1999; Turner et al., 2006a). For the other taxa evaluated in this study PY is not present, so seed imbibition is not an issue for these species. However, there are some indications that PD may be present in some species or even recalcitrance (Flynn et al., 2006), so for propagation and conservation purposes these seed attributes need to be considered when planning seed-storage strategies and germination trials as these will influence the selection of seed-storage conditions, and PD-breaking treatments and the germination environment.

With the limited number of taxa investigated here, more research is required in this diverse family before firm conclusions can be reached regarding definitive phylogenetic relationships and origin of dormancy states. However, our findings raise several key questions. (1) Was non-dormancy the ancestral state in Sapindaceae and PY subsequently arose separately in both subfamilies? (2) Alternatively, was PY the ancestral state in Sapindaceae and non-dormant taxa have developed the non-PY state independently? (3) Has PY been misreported in Koelreuteria, Cardiospermum and Sapindus, and would investigation of seed-coat anatomy, including the water gap (if present), within these genera provide clearer answers about type(s) of dormancy in these genera? (4) Is there any relationship between embryo morphology and PY, since it appears that Koelreuteria may also have coiled embryos (Watson and Dallwitz, 1992)? (5) If indeed Koelreuteria seeds do have spirally coiled embryos, then how does this correlate with Corner's (1976) proposal that spirally coiled cotyledons represent the original Sapindaceous embryo type?

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported under the Australian Research Council's Linkage Projects funding scheme (project number LP0669589). The authors also thank the following people and organizations who kindly provided seeds for this project: Amelia Martin and Cathy Offord (Mt Annan Botanic Garden), Phillip Boyle (Brisbane Botanic Garden), Allen Sheather (Wild Wings seed suppliers) and Bob Elkins and Luke Sweedman (Seed Technology Centre, Kings Park and Botanic Garden). Finally, we thank Matt Barrett and Russell Barrett for help in interpreting published Sapindaceae phylogenies.

LITERATURE CITED

Baskin
CC
Baskin
JM
Seeds: ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination
1998
San Diego, CA
Academic Press
Baskin
CC
Thompson
K
Baskin
JM
Mistakes in germination ecology and how to avoid them
Seed Science Research
2006
, vol. 
16
 (pg. 
165
-
168
)
Baskin
JM
Baskin
CC
A classification system for seed dormancy
Seed Science Research
2004
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
1
-
16
)
Baskin
JM
Baskin
CC
Li
X
Taxonomy, ecology, and evolution of physical dormancy in seeds
Plant Species Biology
2000
, vol. 
15
 (pg. 
139
-
152
)
Baskin
JM
Davis
BH
Baskin
CC
Gleason
SM
Cordell
S
Physical dormancy in seeds of Dodonaea viscosa (Sapindales, Sapindaceae) from Hawaii
Seed Science Research
2004
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
81
-
90
)
Baskin
JM
Baskin
CC
Dixon
KW
Physical dormancy in the endemic Australian genus Stylobasium, a first report for the family Surianaceae (Fabales)
Seed Science Research
2006
, vol. 
16
 (pg. 
229
-
232
)
Bell
DT
Interaction of fire, temperature and light in the germination response of 16 species from the Eucalyptus marginata forest of south-west Western Australia
Australian Journal of Botany
1994
, vol. 
42
 (pg. 
501
-
509
)
Bell
DT
Bellairs
SM
Effects of temperature on the germination of selected Australian native species used in the rehabilitation of bauxite mining disturbance in Western Australia
Seed Science and Technology
1992
, vol. 
20
 (pg. 
47
-
55
)
Bell
DT
Rockich
DP
McChesney
CJ
Plummer
JA
Effects of temperature, light and gibberellic acid on the germination of seeds of 43 species native to Western Australia
Journal of Vegetation Science
1995
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
797
-
806
)
Bellairs
SM
Bell
DT
Temperature effects on the seed germination of ten kwongan species of Eneabba, Western Australia
Australian Journal of Botany
1990
, vol. 
38
 (pg. 
451
-
458
)
Brahmam
M
Sree
A
Saxena
C
Effect of pre-sowing treatments on the seed germination of Sapindus mukorossi Gaertn. and Sapindus trifoliatus L. (Sapindaceae)
Advances in Plant Sciences
1996
, vol. 
9
 (pg. 
137
-
142
)
Chin
HF
Hor
YL
Mohd Lassim
MB
Identification of recalcitrant seeds
Seed Science and Technology
1984
, vol. 
9
 (pg. 
411
-
422
)
Corner
EJH
The seeds of dicotyledons, vols 1 and 2
1976
Cambridge, UK
Cambridge University Press
Department of Environment and Water Resources
All Australian threatened species
2007
Accessed on 20/11/07 
Edwards
KJ
Gadek
PA
Evolution and biogeography of Alectryon (Sapindaceae)
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
2001
, vol. 
20
 (pg. 
14
-
26
)
Egley
GH
Paul
RN
Morphological observations on the early imbibition of water by Sida spinosa (Malvaceae) seeds
American Journal of Botany
1981
, vol. 
68
 (pg. 
1056
-
1065
)
Fan
HB
Wang
YH
Effect of simulated acid rain on germination, foliar damage, chlorophyll contents and seedling growth of five hardwood species growing in China
Forest Ecology and Management
2000
, vol. 
126
 (pg. 
321
-
329
)
Finch-Savage
WE
Bergervoet
JHW
Bino
RJ
Clay
HA
Groot
SPC
Nuclear replication activity during seed development, dormancy breakage and germination in three tree species: Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.), sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and cherry (Prunus avium L.)
Annals of Botany
1998
, vol. 
81
 (pg. 
519
-
526
)
Floyd
AG
Effect of fire upon weed seeds in the wet sclerophyll forests of northern New South Wales
Australian Journal of Botany
1966
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
243
-
256
)
Flynn
S
Turner
RM
Stuppy
WH
Seed information database
2006
 
release 7·0, Oct. 2006. http://www.kew.org/data/sid. Accessed on 20/02/08
Harrington
MG
Edwards
KJ
Johnson
SA
Chase
MW
Gadek
PA
Phylogenetic inference in Sapindaceae sensu lato using plastid matK and rbcL DNA sequences
Systematic Botany
2005
, vol. 
30
 (pg. 
366
-
382
)
Hopkins
MS
Graham
AW
The viability of seeds of rainforest after experimental soil burials under tropical wet lowland forest in north-eastern Australia
Australian Journal of Ecology
1987
, vol. 
12
 (pg. 
97
-
108
)
ISTA (International Seed Testing Association)
International rules for seed testing
Seed Science and Technology
1999
, vol. 
27
 
Supplement
pg. 
333
 
Jayasuriya
KMGG
Baskin
JM
Geneve
RL
Baskin
CC
Morphology and anatomy of physical dormancy in Ipomoea lacunosa: identification of the water gap in seeds of Convolvulaceae (Solanales)
Annals of Botany
2007
, vol. 
100
 (pg. 
13
-
22
)
Johnston
SK
Murray
DS
Williams
JC
Germination and emergence of ballonvine (Cardiospermum halicacabum)
Weed Science
1979
, vol. 
27
 (pg. 
73
-
76
)
Krupnick
GA
Kress
WJ
Plant conservation: a natural history approach
2005
Chicago, IL
University of Chicago Press
Maguire
JD
Speed of germination – aid in the selection and evaluation for seedling emergence and vigour
Crop Science
1962
, vol. 
2
 (pg. 
176
-
177
)
Marchant
NG
Wheeler
JR
Rye
BL
Bennett
M
Lander
NS
McFarlane
TD
Flora of the Perth region. Part one
1987
Perth, Australia
Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Agriculture
Martin
AC
The comparative internal morphology of seeds
The American Midland Naturalist
1946
, vol. 
36
 (pg. 
513
-
660
)
Munson
RH
Germination of western soapberry as affected by scarification and stratification
HortScience
1984
, vol. 
19
 (pg. 
712
-
713
)
Negi
AK
Todaria
NP
Improvement of germination of some Himalayan tree seeds by temperature treatment
Seed Science and Technology
1993
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
675
-
678
)
Ng
FSP
Tomlinson
PB
Zimmermann
MH
Strategies of establishment of Malaysian forest trees
Tropical trees as living systems
1978
Cambridge, UK
Cambridge University Press
(pg. 
129
-
162
)
Nicholson
N
Nicholson
H
Australian rainforest plants II
1991
a 2nd edn
The Channon, NSW, Australia
Terania Rainforest Nursery
Nicholson
N
Nicholson
H
Australian rainforest plants III
1991
b
The Channon, NSW, Australia
Terania Rainforest Nursery
Nicholson
N
Nicholson
H
Australian rainforest plants
1992
4th edn
Lismore NSW, Australia
N. & H. Nicholson
Nicholson
N
Nicholson
H
Australian rainforest plants IV
1994
2nd edn
The Channon, NSW, Australia
Terania Rainforest Publishing
Nicholson
N
Nicholson
H
Australian rainforest plants V
2000
The Channon, NSW, Australia
Terania Rainforest Publishing
Nicholson
N
Nicholson
H
Australian rainforest plants VI
2004
The Channon, NSW, Australia
Terania Rainforest Publishing
Nikolaeva
MG
Shapiro
Z.
Physiology of deep dormancy in seeds
1969
Washington, DC, USA
National Science foundation
 
Leningrad, Russia: Izdatel'stvo ‘Nauka’. Translated from Russian by
Nikolaeva
MG
Khan
AA
Factors controlling the seed dormancy pattern
The physiology and biochemistry of seed dormancy and germination
1977
Amsterdam
North-Holland
(pg. 
51
-
74
)
Park
I-H
Rehman
S
Studies on seed dormancy: seeds maturation in relation to dormancy in goldenraintree (Koelreuteria paniculata Laxm.)
Acta Horticulturae
1999
, vol. 
504
 (pg. 
199
-
207
)
Rehman
S
Park
I
Effect of scarification, GA and chilling on the germination of goldenrain-tree (Koelreuteria paniculata Laxm.) seeds
Scientia Horticulturae
2000
, vol. 
85
 (pg. 
319
-
324
)
Reynolds
S
Flora of Australia, Volume 25: Melianthaceae to Sapindaceae
1985
Canberra, Australia
Australian Government Printing Service
Sautu
A
Baskin
JM
Baskin
CC
Condit
R
Studies on the seed biology of 100 native species of trees in a seasonal moist tropical forest, Panama, Central America
Forest Ecology and Management
2006
, vol. 
234
 (pg. 
245
-
263
)
Simpson
MG
Plant systematics
2006
Sydney, Australia
Elsevier Academic Press
Steadman
KJ
Pritchard
HW
Germination of Aesculus hippocastanum seeds following cold-induced dormancy loss can be described in relation to a temperature-dependent reduction in base temperature (Tb) and thermal time
New Phytologist
2004
, vol. 
161
 (pg. 
415
-
425
)
Turner
SR
Merritt
DJ
Baskin
CC
Dixon
KW
Baskin
JM
Physical dormancy in seeds of six genera of Australian Rhamnaceae
Seed Science Research
2005
, vol. 
15
 (pg. 
51
-
58
)
Turner
SR
Merritt
DJ
Baskin
JM
Baskin
CC
Dixon
KW
Combinational dormancy in seeds of the Western Australian endemic species Diplopeltis huegelii (Sapindaceae)
Australian Journal of Botany
2006
, vol. 
a 54
 (pg. 
565
-
570
)
Turner
SR
Merritt
DJ
Ridley
EC
Commander
LE
Baskin
JM
Baskin
CC
Dixon
KW
Ecophysiology of seed dormancy in the Australian endemic species Acanthocarpus preissii (Dasypogonaceae)
Annals of Botany
2006
, vol. 
b 98
 (pg. 
1137
-
1144
)
Watson
L
Dallwitz
MJ
The families of flowering plants: descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval
1992
 
onwards. Version 1/6/07. http://delta-intkey.com. Accessed on 22/11/07
Woods
K
Direct seeding for forest restoration on abandoned agricultural land in northern Thailand
Journal of Tropical Forest Science
2003
, vol. 
16
 (pg. 
248
-
259
)
Yang
J-C
Chen
YH
Lin
TP
Seed storage behavior of Gordonia axillaris (Boxb.) Dietr., Pistacia chinensis Bunge, and Koelreuteria henryi Drummer
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science
2000
, vol. 
15
 (pg. 
91
-
104
(in Chinese with English abstract and captions to figures and tables)