Abstract

Background and Aims

The widely accepted paradigm that the modern genetic structure of plant species in the northern hemisphere has been largely determined by recolonization from refugia after the last glacial maximum fails to explain the presence of cold-tolerant species at intermediate latitudes. Another generally accepted paradigm is that mountain ridges act as important barriers causing genetic isolation of species, but this too has been challenged in recent studies. The aims of the work reported here were to determine the genetic diversity and distribution patterns of extant natural populations of an endangered cool temperate species, Faxinus mandshurica, and to examine whether these two paradigms are appropriate when applied to this species over a wide geographical scale.

Methods

1435 adult individuals were sampled from 30 natural populations across the main and central range of the species, covering major mountain ranges across North-east China (NEC). Genetic variation was estimated based on nine polymorphic nuclear microsatellite loci. Phylogeographical analyses were employed using various approaches, including Bayesian clustering, spatial analysis of molecular variance, Monmonier's algorithm, neighbor-joining trees, principal co-ordinate analysis and isolation by distance.

Key Results

Genetic diversity within populations was relatively high, and no significant recent bottlenecks were detected in any of the populations. A significant negative correlation between intra-population genetic diversity and latitude was identified. In contrast, genetic differentiation among all the populations examined was extremely low and no clear geographic genetic structure was identified, with the exception of one distinct population.

Conclusions

The modern genetic structure in this species can be explained by extensive gene flow, an absence of mountains acting as barriers, and the presence of a wide refuge across NEC rather than multiple small refugia. Intra-population genetic variation along latitudes is probably associated with the systematically northward shifts of forest biomes in eastern China during the mid-Holocene. To determine important genetic patterns and identify resources for conservation, however, it will be necessary to examine differentially inherited genetic markers exposed to selection pressures (e.g. chloroplast DNA) and to investigate different generations.

INTRODUCTION

The modern genetic structure of many plant species has been shaped by climatic fluctuations during the Quaternary (e.g. Comes and Kadereit, 1998; Hewitt, 2000). The identification and characterization of areas where refugia were located during the last glacial maximum [LGM, about 18000 BP (14C); e.g. Willis et al., 2000; Petit et al., 2003] are especially relevant to population genetics since they are informative when setting priorities for conservation and management of genetic resources (e.g. Hampe and Petit, 2005). However, the simple paradigm that plant species recolonized after the LGM from several southern refugia in Europe has been challenged in several recent studies (e.g. Lascoux et al., 2004; Maliouchenko et al., 2007), partly because many cold-tolerant species were able to survive the LGM at intermediate latitudes. Moreover, recent findings indicate that the modern genetic diversity of plant species was shaped not only as a result of the LGM, but over multiple interglacial episodes (Heuertz et al., 2006; Magri et al., 2006).

Migratory movements are not only a function of geographic distance (Wright, 1943) and historical events (Petit et al., 2003), but are also influenced by the presence of barriers (Dupanloup et al., 2002). Specifically, genetic barriers, i.e. areas with abrupt genetic changes (Barbujani et al., 1989), are increasingly considered to influence genetic differentiation and spatial structure of species at a broad geographic scale (Manni et al., 2004) and/or landscape scale (Manel et al., 2003). Generally, ridges of mountains or maintain ranges are assumed to act as genetic barriers, causing the isolation of genetic lineages of plant species (Taberlet et al., 1998). However, some recent studies have shown that mountain ridges do not act as barriers in this way (e.g. Magri et al., 2006).

North-east China (NEC) is a megadiversity area with complex topography (China EPA, 1998; Xu et al., 1999); however, there is no evidence to suggest that NEC was divided into multiple refugia during the LGM (Ren et al., 1979). Unfortunately, there is limited fossil pollen data for NEC from the LGM (Yu et al., 2000). In contrast, biome reconstructions, which are supported by sufficient fossil pollen data and modern pollen taxa, imply that forests expanded systemically northwards in NEC during the mid-Holocene (about 6000 BP, 14C; (Yu et al., 1998, 2000; Member of China Quaternary Pollen Data Base, 2000). However, to date, there are no genetic data relating to a single species that can link its current genetic distribution to the historical biomes that have been reconstructed in NEC.

Fraxinus mandshurica (Manchurian ash) is a wind-pollinated, wind-dispersed, dioecious, cold-tolerant tree species (Wu, 1980; Kong, 2004; Kong et al., 2008). It is widely but discontinuously distributed across NEC, part of North-west China, the Russian Far East, northern Japan and North Korea. Of these areas, NEC is the species' main and central range. It is a most important broadleaved timber tree and a key species under the climax forest community in NEC (Wang, 1983). As a result of over-exploitation and deforestation (to meet the increasing need for timber for the economic development of China during the past 50 years) the species is becoming increasingly threatened. Consequently, it has been designated as an endangered species (Fu, 1992) and a national priority protected plant (Chinese Ministry of Forestry, 1999) in China. Since tree species that have suffered from widespread deforestation and over-exploitation have become the focus of conservation concerns (e.g. Newton et al., 1999), numerous studies aimed at conserving existing individuals and restoring populations of F. mandshurica have been conducted (e.g. Wang, 2001; Xie, 2005). Assessment of the population genetics of an endangered species is essential for biological conservation (O'Brien, 1994); however, to date, no attempts have been made to understand the population genetics of F. mandshurica in NEC.

The general objective of this study was to obtain an understing of the genetic diversity and spatial structure of extant natural populations of F. mandshurica across NEC, focusing especially on the relationships between current genetic diversity and the historical geographic distribution of F. mandshurica in NEC. We also examined whether mountain ridges in NEC act as genetic barriers causing the isolation of genetic lineages of F. mandshurica. The results should assist in the conservation and management of the genetic resources of F. mandshurica in NEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling and study sites

During the mid-summer of 2006, when leaves were fully expanded, leaf samples from 1435 adult Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr. individuals from 30 natural populations were collected. Samples covered the species' entire current distribution in North-east China (NEC), including the major mountain ranges: the Xiaoxing'anling Mountains (X); Wandashan Mountains (W); Laoyeling Mountains (L); Zhangguangcailing Mountains (Z); and Changbaishan Mountains (C; Fig. 1). All individuals sampled within each population were widely spaced, separated by at least 30 m, to avoid collecting close relatives. Spatial co-ordinates (latitude, longitude and altitude) of each population were recorded using a hand-held GPS (e-Trex Venture, Garmin Co. Ltd.). Diameter at breast height and height of each individual, along with the forest type of each sampled stand and its dominant tree species were recorded (Table 1). All the sampled individuals were older than about 50 years, according to stand records from the Local Forestry Bureaus in NEC.

Fig. 1.

Geographic locations of the 30 natural populations of Fraxinus mandshurica, focusing on major five mountain ranges across three Provinces in North-east China.

Table 1.

List of the sampling sites of 30 natural populations of Fraxinus mandshurica in North-east China

CodeNameLongitude (E)Latitude (N)Altitude (m)DBH (cm)Height (m)Forest type (dominant species)
X1Jianxin129 °28′48 °42′200–31021·90 ± 7·6119·0 ± 7·1MPC (Picea koraiensis)
X2Shuiyuan130 °00′48 °12′990–110024·63 ± 7·7523·0 ± 5·6DBF (Betula platyphyla, Populus davidiana)
X3Pingshan129 °15′48 °01′900–91036·71 ± 5·5223·9 ± 3·1MPC (Picea koraiensis)
X4Chaoyang128 °50′47 °52′350–40030·80 ± 5·6822·3 ± 3·3MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X5Cuiluanhe128 °33′47 °44′160–24031·33 ± 6·8523·3 ± 3·2MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X6Meixi129 °05′47 °35′840–87025·86 ± 8·4125·4 ± 6·6MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X7Jinshantun129 °41′47 °26′480–52032·42 ± 5·5023·5 ± 4·1MPC (Pinus koraiensis), DBF (B. platyphyla)
X8Dailing129 °04′47 °00′850–93031·16 ± 16·4520·2 ± 3·0MPC (Pinus koraiensis), DBF (B. platyphyla)
W1Dongfanghong133 °07′46 °13′800–82033·77 ± 3·8723·3 ± 4·1MPC (Larix gmelinii), DBF (Populus spp.)
W2Yanggang132 °14′45 °49′680–82024·94 ± 5·7120·4 ± 3·1MPC (L. gmelinii), DBF (Populus spp)
L1Shuangyashan131 °02′46 °33′100–11028·95 ± 5·4420·1 ± 2·5DBF (Phellodendron amurense)
L2Boli130 °24′45 °42′300–42037·18 ± 4·6623·8 ± 0·8DBF (P.davidiana, Juglans mandshurica)
L3Bamiantong130 °49′44 °44′500–56032·59 ± 6·8820·8 ± 2·1DBF (J. mandshurica, P. davidiana)
L4Muling128 °58′44 °31′500–58033·05 ± 5·9621·8 ± 1·0DBF (B. platyphyla, Tilia amurensis)
Z1Laoyeling127 °34′45 °25′350–45030·75 ± 12·1718·0 ± 4·1MFS (Pinus koraiensis, J. mandshurica)
Z2Laoshan127 °32′45 °21′320–48029·72 ± 9·8124·9 ± 4·4DBF (Fraxinus mandshurica)
Z3Hufeng128 °57′44 °55′400–48036·44 ± 7·5928·3 ± 3·3DBF (F. mandshurica)
Z4Daguokuigang127 °12′44 °55′520–60016·82 ± 7·0316·1 ± 5·2DBF (Populus spp., J. mandshurica)
Z5Datudingzi127 °09′44 °54′500–60018·32 ± 7·2017·1 ± 6·0DBF (F. mandshurica, J. mandshurica)
C1Hongshi127 °02′43 °50′320–40026·78 ± 10·9421·0 ± 4·5DBF (Quercus mongolica, J. mandshurica)
C2Jiaohe127 °08′43 °48′500–60033·92 ± 5·1922·0 ± 1·6DBF (J. mandshurica, Ulmus spp.)
C3Wangqing129 °32′43 °47′250–32030·97 ± 3·8222·8 ± 2·3DBF (J. mandshurica, Ulmus spp.)
C4Dunhua127 °59′43 °21′440–46024·01 ± 6·3520·6 ± 2·9DBF (B. platyphyla, Q. mongolica)
C5Fengman127 °20′42 °56′320–38024·45 ± 5·2816·1 ± 3·0DBF (J. mandshurica, B. platyphyla)
C6Fusong127 °33′42 °50′420–48020·94 ± 6·6519·1 ± 3·0DBF (J. mandshurica, B. platyphyla)
C7Lushuihe127 °37′42 °43′700–80019·41 ± 4·4312·9 ± 2·1MFS (Larix olgensis, Picea koraiensis)
C8Jiguanshan126 °13′42 °16′300–50034·70 ± 7·1123·9 ± 2·6MFS (L. olgensis, Picea koraiensis)
C9Qingyuan124 °55′42 °06′560–62024·34 ± 6·5820·7 ± 2·7DBF (Betula spp., Ulmus spp)
C10Laotudingzi125 °01′41 °18′100–15023·29 ± 4·2221·3 ± 4·5MFS (L. olgensis, B. platyphyla)
C11Baishilazi124 °47′40 °43′300–50039·23 ± 7·7223·4 ± 5·0MFS (L. olgensis, B. platyphyla)
CodeNameLongitude (E)Latitude (N)Altitude (m)DBH (cm)Height (m)Forest type (dominant species)
X1Jianxin129 °28′48 °42′200–31021·90 ± 7·6119·0 ± 7·1MPC (Picea koraiensis)
X2Shuiyuan130 °00′48 °12′990–110024·63 ± 7·7523·0 ± 5·6DBF (Betula platyphyla, Populus davidiana)
X3Pingshan129 °15′48 °01′900–91036·71 ± 5·5223·9 ± 3·1MPC (Picea koraiensis)
X4Chaoyang128 °50′47 °52′350–40030·80 ± 5·6822·3 ± 3·3MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X5Cuiluanhe128 °33′47 °44′160–24031·33 ± 6·8523·3 ± 3·2MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X6Meixi129 °05′47 °35′840–87025·86 ± 8·4125·4 ± 6·6MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X7Jinshantun129 °41′47 °26′480–52032·42 ± 5·5023·5 ± 4·1MPC (Pinus koraiensis), DBF (B. platyphyla)
X8Dailing129 °04′47 °00′850–93031·16 ± 16·4520·2 ± 3·0MPC (Pinus koraiensis), DBF (B. platyphyla)
W1Dongfanghong133 °07′46 °13′800–82033·77 ± 3·8723·3 ± 4·1MPC (Larix gmelinii), DBF (Populus spp.)
W2Yanggang132 °14′45 °49′680–82024·94 ± 5·7120·4 ± 3·1MPC (L. gmelinii), DBF (Populus spp)
L1Shuangyashan131 °02′46 °33′100–11028·95 ± 5·4420·1 ± 2·5DBF (Phellodendron amurense)
L2Boli130 °24′45 °42′300–42037·18 ± 4·6623·8 ± 0·8DBF (P.davidiana, Juglans mandshurica)
L3Bamiantong130 °49′44 °44′500–56032·59 ± 6·8820·8 ± 2·1DBF (J. mandshurica, P. davidiana)
L4Muling128 °58′44 °31′500–58033·05 ± 5·9621·8 ± 1·0DBF (B. platyphyla, Tilia amurensis)
Z1Laoyeling127 °34′45 °25′350–45030·75 ± 12·1718·0 ± 4·1MFS (Pinus koraiensis, J. mandshurica)
Z2Laoshan127 °32′45 °21′320–48029·72 ± 9·8124·9 ± 4·4DBF (Fraxinus mandshurica)
Z3Hufeng128 °57′44 °55′400–48036·44 ± 7·5928·3 ± 3·3DBF (F. mandshurica)
Z4Daguokuigang127 °12′44 °55′520–60016·82 ± 7·0316·1 ± 5·2DBF (Populus spp., J. mandshurica)
Z5Datudingzi127 °09′44 °54′500–60018·32 ± 7·2017·1 ± 6·0DBF (F. mandshurica, J. mandshurica)
C1Hongshi127 °02′43 °50′320–40026·78 ± 10·9421·0 ± 4·5DBF (Quercus mongolica, J. mandshurica)
C2Jiaohe127 °08′43 °48′500–60033·92 ± 5·1922·0 ± 1·6DBF (J. mandshurica, Ulmus spp.)
C3Wangqing129 °32′43 °47′250–32030·97 ± 3·8222·8 ± 2·3DBF (J. mandshurica, Ulmus spp.)
C4Dunhua127 °59′43 °21′440–46024·01 ± 6·3520·6 ± 2·9DBF (B. platyphyla, Q. mongolica)
C5Fengman127 °20′42 °56′320–38024·45 ± 5·2816·1 ± 3·0DBF (J. mandshurica, B. platyphyla)
C6Fusong127 °33′42 °50′420–48020·94 ± 6·6519·1 ± 3·0DBF (J. mandshurica, B. platyphyla)
C7Lushuihe127 °37′42 °43′700–80019·41 ± 4·4312·9 ± 2·1MFS (Larix olgensis, Picea koraiensis)
C8Jiguanshan126 °13′42 °16′300–50034·70 ± 7·1123·9 ± 2·6MFS (L. olgensis, Picea koraiensis)
C9Qingyuan124 °55′42 °06′560–62024·34 ± 6·5820·7 ± 2·7DBF (Betula spp., Ulmus spp)
C10Laotudingzi125 °01′41 °18′100–15023·29 ± 4·2221·3 ± 4·5MFS (L. olgensis, B. platyphyla)
C11Baishilazi124 °47′40 °43′300–50039·23 ± 7·7223·4 ± 5·0MFS (L. olgensis, B. platyphyla)

Altitude is the range occupied by individuals within each population; DBH (diameter at breast height) and height are the mean ± s.d. Forest types for the stands sampled were classified as deciduous broadleaved forests (DBF), mixed forest stands with deciduous broadleaved and conifer species (MFS), or mixed stands with planted conifer species (MPC).

Table 1.

List of the sampling sites of 30 natural populations of Fraxinus mandshurica in North-east China

CodeNameLongitude (E)Latitude (N)Altitude (m)DBH (cm)Height (m)Forest type (dominant species)
X1Jianxin129 °28′48 °42′200–31021·90 ± 7·6119·0 ± 7·1MPC (Picea koraiensis)
X2Shuiyuan130 °00′48 °12′990–110024·63 ± 7·7523·0 ± 5·6DBF (Betula platyphyla, Populus davidiana)
X3Pingshan129 °15′48 °01′900–91036·71 ± 5·5223·9 ± 3·1MPC (Picea koraiensis)
X4Chaoyang128 °50′47 °52′350–40030·80 ± 5·6822·3 ± 3·3MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X5Cuiluanhe128 °33′47 °44′160–24031·33 ± 6·8523·3 ± 3·2MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X6Meixi129 °05′47 °35′840–87025·86 ± 8·4125·4 ± 6·6MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X7Jinshantun129 °41′47 °26′480–52032·42 ± 5·5023·5 ± 4·1MPC (Pinus koraiensis), DBF (B. platyphyla)
X8Dailing129 °04′47 °00′850–93031·16 ± 16·4520·2 ± 3·0MPC (Pinus koraiensis), DBF (B. platyphyla)
W1Dongfanghong133 °07′46 °13′800–82033·77 ± 3·8723·3 ± 4·1MPC (Larix gmelinii), DBF (Populus spp.)
W2Yanggang132 °14′45 °49′680–82024·94 ± 5·7120·4 ± 3·1MPC (L. gmelinii), DBF (Populus spp)
L1Shuangyashan131 °02′46 °33′100–11028·95 ± 5·4420·1 ± 2·5DBF (Phellodendron amurense)
L2Boli130 °24′45 °42′300–42037·18 ± 4·6623·8 ± 0·8DBF (P.davidiana, Juglans mandshurica)
L3Bamiantong130 °49′44 °44′500–56032·59 ± 6·8820·8 ± 2·1DBF (J. mandshurica, P. davidiana)
L4Muling128 °58′44 °31′500–58033·05 ± 5·9621·8 ± 1·0DBF (B. platyphyla, Tilia amurensis)
Z1Laoyeling127 °34′45 °25′350–45030·75 ± 12·1718·0 ± 4·1MFS (Pinus koraiensis, J. mandshurica)
Z2Laoshan127 °32′45 °21′320–48029·72 ± 9·8124·9 ± 4·4DBF (Fraxinus mandshurica)
Z3Hufeng128 °57′44 °55′400–48036·44 ± 7·5928·3 ± 3·3DBF (F. mandshurica)
Z4Daguokuigang127 °12′44 °55′520–60016·82 ± 7·0316·1 ± 5·2DBF (Populus spp., J. mandshurica)
Z5Datudingzi127 °09′44 °54′500–60018·32 ± 7·2017·1 ± 6·0DBF (F. mandshurica, J. mandshurica)
C1Hongshi127 °02′43 °50′320–40026·78 ± 10·9421·0 ± 4·5DBF (Quercus mongolica, J. mandshurica)
C2Jiaohe127 °08′43 °48′500–60033·92 ± 5·1922·0 ± 1·6DBF (J. mandshurica, Ulmus spp.)
C3Wangqing129 °32′43 °47′250–32030·97 ± 3·8222·8 ± 2·3DBF (J. mandshurica, Ulmus spp.)
C4Dunhua127 °59′43 °21′440–46024·01 ± 6·3520·6 ± 2·9DBF (B. platyphyla, Q. mongolica)
C5Fengman127 °20′42 °56′320–38024·45 ± 5·2816·1 ± 3·0DBF (J. mandshurica, B. platyphyla)
C6Fusong127 °33′42 °50′420–48020·94 ± 6·6519·1 ± 3·0DBF (J. mandshurica, B. platyphyla)
C7Lushuihe127 °37′42 °43′700–80019·41 ± 4·4312·9 ± 2·1MFS (Larix olgensis, Picea koraiensis)
C8Jiguanshan126 °13′42 °16′300–50034·70 ± 7·1123·9 ± 2·6MFS (L. olgensis, Picea koraiensis)
C9Qingyuan124 °55′42 °06′560–62024·34 ± 6·5820·7 ± 2·7DBF (Betula spp., Ulmus spp)
C10Laotudingzi125 °01′41 °18′100–15023·29 ± 4·2221·3 ± 4·5MFS (L. olgensis, B. platyphyla)
C11Baishilazi124 °47′40 °43′300–50039·23 ± 7·7223·4 ± 5·0MFS (L. olgensis, B. platyphyla)
CodeNameLongitude (E)Latitude (N)Altitude (m)DBH (cm)Height (m)Forest type (dominant species)
X1Jianxin129 °28′48 °42′200–31021·90 ± 7·6119·0 ± 7·1MPC (Picea koraiensis)
X2Shuiyuan130 °00′48 °12′990–110024·63 ± 7·7523·0 ± 5·6DBF (Betula platyphyla, Populus davidiana)
X3Pingshan129 °15′48 °01′900–91036·71 ± 5·5223·9 ± 3·1MPC (Picea koraiensis)
X4Chaoyang128 °50′47 °52′350–40030·80 ± 5·6822·3 ± 3·3MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X5Cuiluanhe128 °33′47 °44′160–24031·33 ± 6·8523·3 ± 3·2MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X6Meixi129 °05′47 °35′840–87025·86 ± 8·4125·4 ± 6·6MPC (Pinus koraiensis)
X7Jinshantun129 °41′47 °26′480–52032·42 ± 5·5023·5 ± 4·1MPC (Pinus koraiensis), DBF (B. platyphyla)
X8Dailing129 °04′47 °00′850–93031·16 ± 16·4520·2 ± 3·0MPC (Pinus koraiensis), DBF (B. platyphyla)
W1Dongfanghong133 °07′46 °13′800–82033·77 ± 3·8723·3 ± 4·1MPC (Larix gmelinii), DBF (Populus spp.)
W2Yanggang132 °14′45 °49′680–82024·94 ± 5·7120·4 ± 3·1MPC (L. gmelinii), DBF (Populus spp)
L1Shuangyashan131 °02′46 °33′100–11028·95 ± 5·4420·1 ± 2·5DBF (Phellodendron amurense)
L2Boli130 °24′45 °42′300–42037·18 ± 4·6623·8 ± 0·8DBF (P.davidiana, Juglans mandshurica)
L3Bamiantong130 °49′44 °44′500–56032·59 ± 6·8820·8 ± 2·1DBF (J. mandshurica, P. davidiana)
L4Muling128 °58′44 °31′500–58033·05 ± 5·9621·8 ± 1·0DBF (B. platyphyla, Tilia amurensis)
Z1Laoyeling127 °34′45 °25′350–45030·75 ± 12·1718·0 ± 4·1MFS (Pinus koraiensis, J. mandshurica)
Z2Laoshan127 °32′45 °21′320–48029·72 ± 9·8124·9 ± 4·4DBF (Fraxinus mandshurica)
Z3Hufeng128 °57′44 °55′400–48036·44 ± 7·5928·3 ± 3·3DBF (F. mandshurica)
Z4Daguokuigang127 °12′44 °55′520–60016·82 ± 7·0316·1 ± 5·2DBF (Populus spp., J. mandshurica)
Z5Datudingzi127 °09′44 °54′500–60018·32 ± 7·2017·1 ± 6·0DBF (F. mandshurica, J. mandshurica)
C1Hongshi127 °02′43 °50′320–40026·78 ± 10·9421·0 ± 4·5DBF (Quercus mongolica, J. mandshurica)
C2Jiaohe127 °08′43 °48′500–60033·92 ± 5·1922·0 ± 1·6DBF (J. mandshurica, Ulmus spp.)
C3Wangqing129 °32′43 °47′250–32030·97 ± 3·8222·8 ± 2·3DBF (J. mandshurica, Ulmus spp.)
C4Dunhua127 °59′43 °21′440–46024·01 ± 6·3520·6 ± 2·9DBF (B. platyphyla, Q. mongolica)
C5Fengman127 °20′42 °56′320–38024·45 ± 5·2816·1 ± 3·0DBF (J. mandshurica, B. platyphyla)
C6Fusong127 °33′42 °50′420–48020·94 ± 6·6519·1 ± 3·0DBF (J. mandshurica, B. platyphyla)
C7Lushuihe127 °37′42 °43′700–80019·41 ± 4·4312·9 ± 2·1MFS (Larix olgensis, Picea koraiensis)
C8Jiguanshan126 °13′42 °16′300–50034·70 ± 7·1123·9 ± 2·6MFS (L. olgensis, Picea koraiensis)
C9Qingyuan124 °55′42 °06′560–62024·34 ± 6·5820·7 ± 2·7DBF (Betula spp., Ulmus spp)
C10Laotudingzi125 °01′41 °18′100–15023·29 ± 4·2221·3 ± 4·5MFS (L. olgensis, B. platyphyla)
C11Baishilazi124 °47′40 °43′300–50039·23 ± 7·7223·4 ± 5·0MFS (L. olgensis, B. platyphyla)

Altitude is the range occupied by individuals within each population; DBH (diameter at breast height) and height are the mean ± s.d. Forest types for the stands sampled were classified as deciduous broadleaved forests (DBF), mixed forest stands with deciduous broadleaved and conifer species (MFS), or mixed stands with planted conifer species (MPC).

DNA extraction and genotype

All the samples were stored in silica gel at room temperature until DNA extraction. Total DNA was extracted by the modified CTAB method (Lian et al., 2003). Four pairs of novel nuclear SSR loci specifically for F. mandshurica, i.e. fm04, fm06, fm13 and fm14 (S. Goto and C. Lian, the University of Tokyo, Japan, unpubl. res.) were originally used in this study. In addition, an attempt was made to use nuclear SSR loci from European Fraxinus species. Of these, only five, namely M2-30 (Brachet et al., 1999), FEMSATL-4, FEMSATL-16 and FEMSATL-19 (Lefort et al., 1999) and FR16 (Verdú et al., 2006), were sufficiently stable and polymorphic. Therefore, nine loci were used in this study and these were classified into two mixture groups: G1 (fm04, fm06, fm13, fm14 and FR16) and G2 (M2-30, FEMSATL-4, FEMSATL-16 and FEMSATL-19) due to their different temperature requirements during PCR. For primer mixtures for G1 and G2, each pair of primers was dissolved in TE buffer with 2 µm except in the case of fm06, FEM-SATL4 and M2-30 where 4 µm was used. The PCR reaction mixtures (5·0 µL in total) contained 1·0 µL of 5 µm template DNA, 2·5 µL of Multiplex MM buffer (QIAGEN Multiplex PCR Master Mix), 1·0 µL of H2O (RNase-free water) and 0·5 µL of primer mixture G1 or G2, respectively. The PCR thermal profile for G1 was: 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, annealing temperature of 56 °C for 90 s, and 72 °C for 60 s in sequence, with a final elongation at 60 °C for 30 min. For G2 the profile was: 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, annealing temperature of 52 °C for 90 s, and 72 °C for 90 s in sequence, with a final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. The thermal profiles were achieved using a PCR thermal cycler (TAKARA PCR thermal Cycler TP-600). All PCR products were analysed and aligned using automated fluorescent scanning detection with an ABI 3100 sequencer.

Data analysis

Genetic diversity within populations

Allelic diversity statistics, i.e. the total number of detected alleles (NA), the range of allele sizes (RAS), the allelic richness based on a minimum population size of 43 diploid individuals (86 gene copies; AS), the average of expected heterozygosity (He), the total gene diversity (HT) and Wright's inbreeding coefficient (FIS), were calculated for all individuals at each locus and multilocus estimate using the FSTAT 2·9·3·2 software (FSTAT; Goudet, 2001).

Within each population, the significance of deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) at each locus and multilocus estimate was tested based on 5400 randomizations at the nominal level (5 %). In addition, tests of linkage disequilibrium (LD) for pairwise-loci within each population and all the populations combined were examined by applying an adjusted sequential Bonferroni correction (Rice, 1989), based on 21 600 permutations at the nominal level (5 %). Both tests were performed using the FSTAT software.

In order to understand whether genetic variation within populations is correlated with geographical gradients, Pearson correlations between statistics of variation (AS and He) and geographic co-ordinates (latitude and longitude) for each population were analysed. Stepwise regression analysis of AS and He in relation to the two independent variables (latitude and longitude) were further assessed separately. Both analyses were conducted using SPSS 13·0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., 2004).

In addition, in order to evaluate whether the sampled populations have experienced recent bottlenecks, Wilcoxon's sign-rank test (Piry et al., 1999) under the infinite allele model (IAM) and the stepwise mutation model (SMM) was each performed using BOTTLENECK 1·2·02 software (Cornuet and Luikart, 1996).

Genetic differentiation between populations

Genetic differentiation between populations was determined using Weir and Cockerham's FST (1984). The significance of FST was tested for the 95 % and 99 % confidence intervals based on 1000 permutations. The significance of FST at each locus was tested using the log-likelihood (G) -based exact test (Goudet et al., 1996). Pairwise-FST was also evaluated and its significance was tested by applying the adjusted sequential Bonferroni correction based on 8700 permutations. All estimates of FST and their tests of significance were performed using the FSTAT software.

Patterns of population genetic structure

The geographical structure of the genetic variation in nuclear DNA of F. mandshurica was investigated extensively using various approaches. First, the Bayesian approach that clusters ‘unclassified’ individuals into inferred clusters (Pritchard et al., 2000) was implemented using STRUCTURE 2·2 software (Pritchard et al., 2007). A total of 10 000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo iterations, after a burn-in period of 10 000 iterations, using all the individuals, were run ten times for each number of genetic clusters (K, ranging from 1 to 13) from the admixture model. Both the correlated allele frequencies model and the independent allele frequency model were tested in this study. Second, the spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA) algorithm, based on a simulated annealing procedure, was used to define clusters (groups) of populations that are geographically homogeneous and maximally differentiated from each other (Dupanloup et al., 2002). The program (SAMOVA 1·0) was run for 1000 iterations for each number of clusters (K, ranging from 2 to 13). For each K, the configuration producing the maximum values of FCT, the proportion of total genetic variance due to differentiation between clusters of populations, was retained as the best grouping of populations based on IAM and SMM. Third, barriers analysis (Manni et al., 2004) based on Monmonier's (1973) algorithm, was used to directly identify genetic barriers between populations. All the barriers were calculated using the Barriers 2·2 software (Manni and Guérard, 2004) with significance tested by means of 1000 bootstrap matrices of DA (Nei et al., 1983) that were computed using Microsatellite Analyzer (MSA) 4·05 software (Dieringer and Schlötterer, 2003). Fourth, neighbor-joining (NJ) tree analysis and principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA), based on DA with 1000 bootstraps, were performed using POPULATION 1·2·28 software (Langella, 2002) and GENALEX 6 software (Peakall and Smouse, 2006), respectively. Fifth, to test for isolation by distance (IBD; Wright, 1943), we examined the association between the matrix of the natural logarithm of geographic distance and pairwise population differentiation [FST/(1 – FST)] (Rousset, 1997) using the Mantel test (Mantel, 1967) with 9999 random permutations among all the sampled populations; the values were estimated using GENALEX 6 software.

RESULTS

Genetic diversity within populations

All the allelic diversity statistics within populations were very variable for each locus (Table 2): NA from 4 (fm06) to 49 (FEMSATL4 and FEMSATL19); AS from 2·945 (fm06) to 23·968 (fm14); He from 0·064 (fm13) to 0·939 (fm14); and HT from 0·065 (fm13) to 0·947 (fm14).

Table 2.

Genetic characteristics of nine SSR loci for all sampled individuals from the 30 natural populations of Fraxinus mandshurica

LocusRAS (bp)NAASHeHTFISF*ST
fm0474–1523610·1250·6950·699–0·0170·005
fm06107–11542·9450·1450·1460·0430·008
fm1377–111133·3290·0640·0650·0240·005
fm14152–2253723·9680·9390·9470·0650·009
M2-30200–2863416·0740·7070·7120·0330·007
FEMSATL4164–2694922·6680·8650·8740·0050·011
FEMSATL16189–226186·5230·5020·5060·0690·008
FEMSATL19174–2964914·8540·5720·5790·1480·012
FR16192–261307·4320·5850·604−0·0050·032
LocusRAS (bp)NAASHeHTFISF*ST
fm0474–1523610·1250·6950·699–0·0170·005
fm06107–11542·9450·1450·1460·0430·008
fm1377–111133·3290·0640·0650·0240·005
fm14152–2253723·9680·9390·9470·0650·009
M2-30200–2863416·0740·7070·7120·0330·007
FEMSATL4164–2694922·6680·8650·8740·0050·011
FEMSATL16189–226186·5230·5020·5060·0690·008
FEMSATL19174–2964914·8540·5720·5790·1480·012
FR16192–261307·4320·5850·604−0·0050·032

RAS, range of allele sizes; NA, total number of detected alleles; AS, allele richness based on the minimum population size of 43 diploid individuals (86 gene copies); He, average expected heterozygosity; HT, total gene diversity; FIS, Wright's inbreeding coefficient, where 5400 randomizations were used to test for departure from Hardy–Weinberg genotypic proportions – values were not significant at any locus at the nominal level (5 %); FST, genetic differentiation based on allele identity, where * indicates significant differentiation at each locus (P < 0·05) according to the log-likelihood (G) -based exact test (Goudet et al., 1996).

Table 2.

Genetic characteristics of nine SSR loci for all sampled individuals from the 30 natural populations of Fraxinus mandshurica

LocusRAS (bp)NAASHeHTFISF*ST
fm0474–1523610·1250·6950·699–0·0170·005
fm06107–11542·9450·1450·1460·0430·008
fm1377–111133·3290·0640·0650·0240·005
fm14152–2253723·9680·9390·9470·0650·009
M2-30200–2863416·0740·7070·7120·0330·007
FEMSATL4164–2694922·6680·8650·8740·0050·011
FEMSATL16189–226186·5230·5020·5060·0690·008
FEMSATL19174–2964914·8540·5720·5790·1480·012
FR16192–261307·4320·5850·604−0·0050·032
LocusRAS (bp)NAASHeHTFISF*ST
fm0474–1523610·1250·6950·699–0·0170·005
fm06107–11542·9450·1450·1460·0430·008
fm1377–111133·3290·0640·0650·0240·005
fm14152–2253723·9680·9390·9470·0650·009
M2-30200–2863416·0740·7070·7120·0330·007
FEMSATL4164–2694922·6680·8650·8740·0050·011
FEMSATL16189–226186·5230·5020·5060·0690·008
FEMSATL19174–2964914·8540·5720·5790·1480·012
FR16192–261307·4320·5850·604−0·0050·032

RAS, range of allele sizes; NA, total number of detected alleles; AS, allele richness based on the minimum population size of 43 diploid individuals (86 gene copies); He, average expected heterozygosity; HT, total gene diversity; FIS, Wright's inbreeding coefficient, where 5400 randomizations were used to test for departure from Hardy–Weinberg genotypic proportions – values were not significant at any locus at the nominal level (5 %); FST, genetic differentiation based on allele identity, where * indicates significant differentiation at each locus (P < 0·05) according to the log-likelihood (G) -based exact test (Goudet et al., 1996).

At the mutilocus estimates (Table 3), total NA was 270, and AS and He were 11·063 ± 7·053 and 0·564 ± 0·284, respectively. In contrast to the other populations, the population located in the most northerly part of the Xiaoxing'anling Mountains (Jianxin) displayed distinct characteristics with respect to its intra-population genetic diversity; it had the lowest values of NA, AS and He.

Table 3.

Statistics of genetic diversity for the 30 natural populations of Fraxnius mandshurica at the multilocus estimates

PopulationNONAAS (mean ± s.d.)He (mean ± s.d.)FIS (mean ± s.d.)
X1, Jianxin48646·817 ± 4·9180·477 ± 0·2900·049 ± 0·320
X2, Shuiyuan48939·949 ± 6·8250·549 ± 0·3020·056 ± 0·082
X3, Pingshan4810611·274 ± 6·9030·550 ± 0·2840·058 ± 0·113
X4, Chaoyang4811612·304 ± 7·3300·561 ± 0·2880·035 ± 0·122
X5, Cuiluanhe489710·290 ± 6·4910·504 ± 0·2960·081 ± 0·307
X6, Meixi489710·290 ± 7·0130·553 ± 0·2760·108 ± 0·095
X7, Jinshantun489710·419 ± 6·8310·560 ± 0·2780·026 ± 0·086
X8, Dailing48939·884 ± 6·2230·539 ± 0·277–0·005 ± 0·043
W1, Dongfanghong4810210·828 ± 7·2650·542 ± 0·290·039 ± 0·083
W2, Yanggang489910·580 ± 7·3470·555 ± 0·284–0·015 ± 0·046
L1, Shuangyashan4810110·790 ± 6·1890·559 ± 0·2760·048 ± 0·108
L2, Boli48879·299 ± 6·2760·573 ± 0·2670·046 ± 0·104
L3, Bamiantong489610·327 ± 6·3860·574 ± 0·2950·070 ± 0·144
L4, Muling4810411·161 ± 6·9410·587 ± 0·2810·022 ± 0·079
Z1, Laoyeling4811312·017 ± 7·4750·580 ± 0·2950·075 ± 0·073
Z2, Laoshan4810811·549 ± 7·1710·569 ± 0·3130·020 ± 0·054
Z3, Hufeng4811111·838 ± 7·0710·572 ± 0·2750·013 ± 0·050
Z4, Daguokuigang4810010·647 ± 6·4070·560 ± 0·2960·040 ± 0·101
Z5, Datudingzi4811512·221 ± 7·3790·576 ± 0·2660·035 ± 0·081
C1, Hongshi4811612·464 ± 7·1300·600 ± 0·2760·050 ± 0·084
C2, Jiaohe4310711·889 ± 6·3670·590 ± 0·2700·027 ± 0·103
C3, Wangqing4810310·964 ± 7·3840·554 ± 0·2990·056 ± 0·085
C4, Dunhua4811011·778 ± 7·4840·582 ± 0·2940·002 ± 0·059
C5, Fengman4811312·037 ± 6·8250·566 ± 0·2820·023 ± 0·083
C6, Fusong4812012·636 ± 7·7300·588 ± 0·2950·064 ± 0·101
C7, Lushuihe4810310·999 ± 7·4140·550 ± 0·3070·049 ± 0·081
C8, Jiguanshan4811712·436 ± 8·3990·581 ± 0·2890·048 ± 0·118
C9, Qingyuan4811612·416 ± 6·8190·602 ± 0·2690·004 ± 0·052
C10, Laotudingzi489910·631 ± 6·6460·557 ± 0·2890·057 ± 0·149
C11, Baishilazi4810411·168 ± 7·1590·605 ± 0·262-0·010 ± 0·121
Overall143527011·063 ± 7·0530·564 ± 0·2840·041 ± 0·128
PopulationNONAAS (mean ± s.d.)He (mean ± s.d.)FIS (mean ± s.d.)
X1, Jianxin48646·817 ± 4·9180·477 ± 0·2900·049 ± 0·320
X2, Shuiyuan48939·949 ± 6·8250·549 ± 0·3020·056 ± 0·082
X3, Pingshan4810611·274 ± 6·9030·550 ± 0·2840·058 ± 0·113
X4, Chaoyang4811612·304 ± 7·3300·561 ± 0·2880·035 ± 0·122
X5, Cuiluanhe489710·290 ± 6·4910·504 ± 0·2960·081 ± 0·307
X6, Meixi489710·290 ± 7·0130·553 ± 0·2760·108 ± 0·095
X7, Jinshantun489710·419 ± 6·8310·560 ± 0·2780·026 ± 0·086
X8, Dailing48939·884 ± 6·2230·539 ± 0·277–0·005 ± 0·043
W1, Dongfanghong4810210·828 ± 7·2650·542 ± 0·290·039 ± 0·083
W2, Yanggang489910·580 ± 7·3470·555 ± 0·284–0·015 ± 0·046
L1, Shuangyashan4810110·790 ± 6·1890·559 ± 0·2760·048 ± 0·108
L2, Boli48879·299 ± 6·2760·573 ± 0·2670·046 ± 0·104
L3, Bamiantong489610·327 ± 6·3860·574 ± 0·2950·070 ± 0·144
L4, Muling4810411·161 ± 6·9410·587 ± 0·2810·022 ± 0·079
Z1, Laoyeling4811312·017 ± 7·4750·580 ± 0·2950·075 ± 0·073
Z2, Laoshan4810811·549 ± 7·1710·569 ± 0·3130·020 ± 0·054
Z3, Hufeng4811111·838 ± 7·0710·572 ± 0·2750·013 ± 0·050
Z4, Daguokuigang4810010·647 ± 6·4070·560 ± 0·2960·040 ± 0·101
Z5, Datudingzi4811512·221 ± 7·3790·576 ± 0·2660·035 ± 0·081
C1, Hongshi4811612·464 ± 7·1300·600 ± 0·2760·050 ± 0·084
C2, Jiaohe4310711·889 ± 6·3670·590 ± 0·2700·027 ± 0·103
C3, Wangqing4810310·964 ± 7·3840·554 ± 0·2990·056 ± 0·085
C4, Dunhua4811011·778 ± 7·4840·582 ± 0·2940·002 ± 0·059
C5, Fengman4811312·037 ± 6·8250·566 ± 0·2820·023 ± 0·083
C6, Fusong4812012·636 ± 7·7300·588 ± 0·2950·064 ± 0·101
C7, Lushuihe4810310·999 ± 7·4140·550 ± 0·3070·049 ± 0·081
C8, Jiguanshan4811712·436 ± 8·3990·581 ± 0·2890·048 ± 0·118
C9, Qingyuan4811612·416 ± 6·8190·602 ± 0·2690·004 ± 0·052
C10, Laotudingzi489910·631 ± 6·6460·557 ± 0·2890·057 ± 0·149
C11, Baishilazi4810411·168 ± 7·1590·605 ± 0·262-0·010 ± 0·121
Overall143527011·063 ± 7·0530·564 ± 0·2840·041 ± 0·128

NO, number of individuals of the genotype per population; NA, total number of detected alleles; AS, allelic richness based on the minimum population size of 43 diploid individuals (86 gene copies); He, expected heterozygosity; FIS, Wright's inbreeding coefficient, showing no significant deviations from zero at the multilocus estimates based on 5400 randomizations (P > 0·05).

Table 3.

Statistics of genetic diversity for the 30 natural populations of Fraxnius mandshurica at the multilocus estimates

PopulationNONAAS (mean ± s.d.)He (mean ± s.d.)FIS (mean ± s.d.)
X1, Jianxin48646·817 ± 4·9180·477 ± 0·2900·049 ± 0·320
X2, Shuiyuan48939·949 ± 6·8250·549 ± 0·3020·056 ± 0·082
X3, Pingshan4810611·274 ± 6·9030·550 ± 0·2840·058 ± 0·113
X4, Chaoyang4811612·304 ± 7·3300·561 ± 0·2880·035 ± 0·122
X5, Cuiluanhe489710·290 ± 6·4910·504 ± 0·2960·081 ± 0·307
X6, Meixi489710·290 ± 7·0130·553 ± 0·2760·108 ± 0·095
X7, Jinshantun489710·419 ± 6·8310·560 ± 0·2780·026 ± 0·086
X8, Dailing48939·884 ± 6·2230·539 ± 0·277–0·005 ± 0·043
W1, Dongfanghong4810210·828 ± 7·2650·542 ± 0·290·039 ± 0·083
W2, Yanggang489910·580 ± 7·3470·555 ± 0·284–0·015 ± 0·046
L1, Shuangyashan4810110·790 ± 6·1890·559 ± 0·2760·048 ± 0·108
L2, Boli48879·299 ± 6·2760·573 ± 0·2670·046 ± 0·104
L3, Bamiantong489610·327 ± 6·3860·574 ± 0·2950·070 ± 0·144
L4, Muling4810411·161 ± 6·9410·587 ± 0·2810·022 ± 0·079
Z1, Laoyeling4811312·017 ± 7·4750·580 ± 0·2950·075 ± 0·073
Z2, Laoshan4810811·549 ± 7·1710·569 ± 0·3130·020 ± 0·054
Z3, Hufeng4811111·838 ± 7·0710·572 ± 0·2750·013 ± 0·050
Z4, Daguokuigang4810010·647 ± 6·4070·560 ± 0·2960·040 ± 0·101
Z5, Datudingzi4811512·221 ± 7·3790·576 ± 0·2660·035 ± 0·081
C1, Hongshi4811612·464 ± 7·1300·600 ± 0·2760·050 ± 0·084
C2, Jiaohe4310711·889 ± 6·3670·590 ± 0·2700·027 ± 0·103
C3, Wangqing4810310·964 ± 7·3840·554 ± 0·2990·056 ± 0·085
C4, Dunhua4811011·778 ± 7·4840·582 ± 0·2940·002 ± 0·059
C5, Fengman4811312·037 ± 6·8250·566 ± 0·2820·023 ± 0·083
C6, Fusong4812012·636 ± 7·7300·588 ± 0·2950·064 ± 0·101
C7, Lushuihe4810310·999 ± 7·4140·550 ± 0·3070·049 ± 0·081
C8, Jiguanshan4811712·436 ± 8·3990·581 ± 0·2890·048 ± 0·118
C9, Qingyuan4811612·416 ± 6·8190·602 ± 0·2690·004 ± 0·052
C10, Laotudingzi489910·631 ± 6·6460·557 ± 0·2890·057 ± 0·149
C11, Baishilazi4810411·168 ± 7·1590·605 ± 0·262-0·010 ± 0·121
Overall143527011·063 ± 7·0530·564 ± 0·2840·041 ± 0·128
PopulationNONAAS (mean ± s.d.)He (mean ± s.d.)FIS (mean ± s.d.)
X1, Jianxin48646·817 ± 4·9180·477 ± 0·2900·049 ± 0·320
X2, Shuiyuan48939·949 ± 6·8250·549 ± 0·3020·056 ± 0·082
X3, Pingshan4810611·274 ± 6·9030·550 ± 0·2840·058 ± 0·113
X4, Chaoyang4811612·304 ± 7·3300·561 ± 0·2880·035 ± 0·122
X5, Cuiluanhe489710·290 ± 6·4910·504 ± 0·2960·081 ± 0·307
X6, Meixi489710·290 ± 7·0130·553 ± 0·2760·108 ± 0·095
X7, Jinshantun489710·419 ± 6·8310·560 ± 0·2780·026 ± 0·086
X8, Dailing48939·884 ± 6·2230·539 ± 0·277–0·005 ± 0·043
W1, Dongfanghong4810210·828 ± 7·2650·542 ± 0·290·039 ± 0·083
W2, Yanggang489910·580 ± 7·3470·555 ± 0·284–0·015 ± 0·046
L1, Shuangyashan4810110·790 ± 6·1890·559 ± 0·2760·048 ± 0·108
L2, Boli48879·299 ± 6·2760·573 ± 0·2670·046 ± 0·104
L3, Bamiantong489610·327 ± 6·3860·574 ± 0·2950·070 ± 0·144
L4, Muling4810411·161 ± 6·9410·587 ± 0·2810·022 ± 0·079
Z1, Laoyeling4811312·017 ± 7·4750·580 ± 0·2950·075 ± 0·073
Z2, Laoshan4810811·549 ± 7·1710·569 ± 0·3130·020 ± 0·054
Z3, Hufeng4811111·838 ± 7·0710·572 ± 0·2750·013 ± 0·050
Z4, Daguokuigang4810010·647 ± 6·4070·560 ± 0·2960·040 ± 0·101
Z5, Datudingzi4811512·221 ± 7·3790·576 ± 0·2660·035 ± 0·081
C1, Hongshi4811612·464 ± 7·1300·600 ± 0·2760·050 ± 0·084
C2, Jiaohe4310711·889 ± 6·3670·590 ± 0·2700·027 ± 0·103
C3, Wangqing4810310·964 ± 7·3840·554 ± 0·2990·056 ± 0·085
C4, Dunhua4811011·778 ± 7·4840·582 ± 0·2940·002 ± 0·059
C5, Fengman4811312·037 ± 6·8250·566 ± 0·2820·023 ± 0·083
C6, Fusong4812012·636 ± 7·7300·588 ± 0·2950·064 ± 0·101
C7, Lushuihe4810310·999 ± 7·4140·550 ± 0·3070·049 ± 0·081
C8, Jiguanshan4811712·436 ± 8·3990·581 ± 0·2890·048 ± 0·118
C9, Qingyuan4811612·416 ± 6·8190·602 ± 0·2690·004 ± 0·052
C10, Laotudingzi489910·631 ± 6·6460·557 ± 0·2890·057 ± 0·149
C11, Baishilazi4810411·168 ± 7·1590·605 ± 0·262-0·010 ± 0·121
Overall143527011·063 ± 7·0530·564 ± 0·2840·041 ± 0·128

NO, number of individuals of the genotype per population; NA, total number of detected alleles; AS, allelic richness based on the minimum population size of 43 diploid individuals (86 gene copies); He, expected heterozygosity; FIS, Wright's inbreeding coefficient, showing no significant deviations from zero at the multilocus estimates based on 5400 randomizations (P > 0·05).

Wright's inbreeding coefficient within populations (FIS) showed no significant deviation from zero at any of the loci (P > 0·05; Table 2) or multilocus estimates (FIS = 0·041 ± 0·128, P > 0·05; Table 3), suggesting that the HWE was adhered to in each population. Tests of genotypic LD between pariwise-loci also showed no significant deviation from zero (P > 0·05). In addition, based on Wilcoxon's sign-rank test, there was no significant excess of heterozygosity in any of the populations studied under the IAM (P > 0·05) and SMM (P > 0·05).

Pearson correlation analysis showed that intra-population genetic diversity statistics (AS and He) were significantly negatively correlated to latitude (R = –0·642, P < 0·001 and R = –0·618, P < 0·001; Fig. 2A, B). In contrast, although AS displayed a significant correlation with longitude (R = –0·471, P < 0·05), He did not (P > 0·05). Furthermore, stepwise regression analysis of AS dependent on latitude and longitude showed that only latitude significantly contributed to the stepwise regression equation (R2 = 0·292, F = 11·567, P < 0·001), whereas the longitude was excluded. Stepwise regression analysis using He as the dependent variable on latitude and longitude produced a similar result, with only latitude contributing significantly to the stepwise regression equation (R2 = 0·382, F= 17·326, P < 0·001).

Fig. 2.

Pearson correlation analysis showing that (A) the allele richness (AS) was significantly correlated with latitude (R = –0·642, P < 0·001), and (B) that the expected heterozygosity (He) was also significantly correlated with latitude (R = –0·618, P < 0·001).

Genetic differentiation between populations

Although population differentiation was significant at each locus (P < 0·05; Table 2), the average FST value at multilocus estimates was 0·010, ranging from 0·007 to 0·018 and from 0·007 to 0·021 for confidence intervals of 95 % and 99 %, respectively. This indicates that the population genetic differentiation was extremely low. Furthermore, about 40 % of the pairwise-FST values were significant (P < 0·05), and the greatest values were between Jianxin and all the other populations.

Patterns of population genetic structure

The Bayesian clustering approach did not allow us to clearly identify genetic structure. Log-likelihood of the multilocus genotypic data [ln(X/K)] progressively declined as the number of assumed genetic clusters (K) increased from 1 to 13. This suggests that the optimal value of K is 1 (data not shown). The SAMOVA found no difference between IAM and SMM. As revealed by SAMOVA based on SMM, the optimal number of groups of populations (K) was two, because FCT values decreased progressively as K was increased from 2 to 13 and reached a maximum at K = 2 (Fig. 3A). In this case, only the Jinxin population maximally differentiated from the others, while the rest clustered together and there was no clear genetic differentiation. Similarly, the first significant barrier, based on Monmonier's algorithm, maximally differentiated Jianxin from all the others (Fig. 3B). When the potential second, third, etc. barriers were attempted in Monmonier's algorithm, they showed no significance between mountain ridges. The NJ tree and PCoA also illustrated unclear clusters among all the sampled populations, with the exception of the Jinxin population, which was maximally differentiated from the rest (data not shown).

Fig. 3.

(A) Fixation indexes (F) as a function of the user-defined number of groups of populations (K) for 30 natural populations of Fraxinus mandshurica using SAMOVA based on the stepwise mutation model (SMM) in terms of 1000 iterations. FCT, FST and FSC represent genetic differentiation between groups of populations, between populations overall, and between populations within groups, respectively. (B), Barrier analysis based on Monmonier's algorithm and significance tested by means of 1000 bootstrap matrices of DA (Nei et al., 1983). The first significant barriers (95 %) confirmed that there was only one distinct population: Jianxin (X1) was maximally differentiated from all the others.

At the level of NEC, no significant pattern of IBD based on the Mantel permutation test was apparent among the 30 populations (R2 = 0·017, P >0·05; Fig. 4A). However, a weak but significant trend for IBD was observed among the 29 populations when Jianxin was excluded (R2 = 0·048, P < 0·001; Fig. 4B).

Fig. 4.

(A) Isolation by distance (IBD) analysis based on the Mantel test (Mantel, 1967) with 9999 random permutations indicated no significant differences between the 30 Fraxinus mandshurica natural populations (R2 = 0·017, P > 0·05); (B) The same data with X1 excluded: there is a weak but significant relationship between the remaining 29 populations (R2 = 0·048, P < 0·001).

DISCUSSION

Intra-population genetic diversity and associated geographical patterns

The genetic diversity within populations of F. mandshurica in North-east China (NEC) is relatively high, although it is slightly lower than the previous findings for F. mandshurica var. japonica in northern Japan (Goto et al., 2006) and findings from the closely related species F. excelsior in Europe (e.g. Heuertz et al., 2001, 2003, 2004b; Morand et al., 2002; FRAXIGEN, 2005) determined on the basis of a number of shared microsatellite loci. There was no evidence to indicate that the expected heterozygosity (He) was significantly greater than the expected equilibrium gene diversity (HEQ) based on Wilcoxon's sign-rank test under two models (IAM and SMM). Thus, there was no evidence of recent bottlenecks associated with any of the natural populations. This is probably because all the sampled populations were established too many generations ago to have experienced recent bottlenecks, as suggested by Amos and Balmford (2001).

In contrast, intra-population genetic diversity significantly decreased as latitude increased (Fig. 2); this was robustly supported by stepwise regression analysis. The tendency for genetic variation to decline along latitudinal gradients is probably the result of biome change during the mid-Holocene (Yu et al., 1998, 2000; Member of China Quaternary Pollen Data Base, 2000). Based on a set of 113 sites of fossil pollen taxa dated to 6000 BP (14C) including Fraxinus species, Yu et al. (1998) hypothesized that the forest biomes of eastern China had systemically expanded northwards during the mid-Holocene. Cool temperate forests in NEC were rapidly shifted about 4° northward as a result of both higher temperate and humidity during this historical episode (Yu et al., 2000). As a result, genetic diversity may have gradually decreased during the one-dimensional (northward) colonization process (e.g. Austerlitz et al., 2000).

Population structure

Extremely low levels of FST throughout NEC were identified, indicating that the effective migration rate per generation was high and that historical gene exchange between populations occurred extensively. This is supported by previous studies using molecular-based pollen flow analysis (Heuertz et al., 2003; Bacles et al., 2005; Goto et al., 2006), which detected extensive gene dispersal in ash species. Specifically, Bacles et al. (2005) demonstrated that the extensive pollen flow was sufficient to counteract the genetic drift that would be expected in severely reduced F. excelsior populations.

Although there is intra-population genetic diversity along latitudinal gradients, probably as a result of population expansion during the mid-Holocene, a report by China EPA (1998) suggested that wide refugia, rather than multiple small ones, existed across NEC during the last glacial maximum (LGM); these probably facilitated the retention of a high level of biodiversity for many native species. In this study, although the sampled populations were separated by up to 1000 km, only one admixed structure was detected using STRUCTURE analysis. The results suggest that the populations examined may be considered to be a single lineage; the extremely low FST value supports this suggestion. One possible explanation for the weak genetic structure exhibited by this species in NEC is that it occupied a wide range without separate refugia in the past. Similar results have been obtained in previous studies on widely distributed tree species (F. excelsior, Heuertz et al., 2004b; Betula maximowicsziana, Tsuda and Ide, 2005). In both these studies, although several clusters were detected using STRUCTURE analysis over the whole species' range, further sub-structures could not be identified at the regional level, leading to the assumption that the species were dominated by a single lineage. The presence of a more homogeneous population and the survival of F. mandshurica in intermediate or higher latitudes in NEC are in accordance with recent findings relating to the phylogeography of other cold-tolerant tree species (e.g. Petit et al., 2003; Palmé et al., 2003; Lascoux et al., 2004; Maliouchenko et al., 2007). For example, Petit et al. (2003) investigated the variation of maternally inherited chloroplast DNA of 22 widespread European tree and shrub species and found that the species characterized by more boreal distributions exhibited low or medium levels of population differentiation, compared with other species. Palmé et al. (2003) found extremely low population differentiation and lack of phylogeographical structure in chloroplast DNA variation of the cold-tolerant tree species Salix caprea.

All approaches using SAMOVA, Monmonier's algorithm, PCoA, NJ trees and IBD showed that the Jianxin population is divergent and isolated from the other populations. Considering the location of this population, this is not the result of geographical distance. Although the exact explanations are as yet unknown, a potential factor to account for the distinct genetic pattern in Jianxin might be the extremely low winter temperatures in this area; Zhao et al. (1991) analysed factors limiting the northern distribution of F. mandshurica associated with low winter temperatures, and demonstrated that the Jianxin area was a physiological stress zone for this species. Wang et al. (1994) further found that within the physiological stress zone in this area, normal metabolism of F. mandshurica was disrupted and numerous seedlings and young saplings could not survive because of damage caused by the extremely low temperatures. Therefore, genetic diversity within the Jianxin population might have been dramatically reduced when severe selection occurred because of the extreme temperature conditions. Even though some long-distance gene flow into this area may have been possible, establishment of immigrant gene resources might also have been restricted.

Although this study was conducted across five mountain ranges, no clear effect of the ridges of the mountains acting as significant barriers was detected; this was shown by the lack of genetic structure. Similar conclusions have been drawn for Fagus sylvatica across Europe on the basis of fossil and neutral molecular data (Magri et al., 2006), as mentioned above. In contrast, previous studies have shown that mountain ridges have acted as significant barriers, causing the isolation of genetic lineages of plant species (e.g. Pinus banksiana in the USA, Godbout et al., 2005; Populus cathayana in China, Lu et al., 2006). Thus, whether mountain ridges act as effective barriers to gene flow and migration or not will vary according to the species involved and its mode of dispersal; the topography of the ridge will also influence the effect, as reviewed by Ohsawa and Ide (2008).

Conclusions and implications for conservation

This study has produced original data on the population genetics of F. mandshurica in its main and central range (NEC). These should be useful for various aspects of the conservation and management of sustainable populations of this endangered and national-priority protected species. Since it has a relatively high level of genetic variation within populations, but an extremely low level of differentiation among populations, it may not be necessary to take major steps to conserve genetic diversity in NEC. In contrast, the distinct population in Jianxin, exhibiting the lowest diversity and greatest differentiation from the other populations, requires priority conservation measures in order to avoid it becoming eradicated in its native habitat (e.g. management units; Moritz, 1994). The extremely low differentiation between populations across NEC can be attributed to extensive gene flow; this indicates that over this area the species constitutes a continuous genetic resource. In order to identify the most important genetic patterns and genetic resources for conservation, however, it is essential to examine both differentially inherited genetic markers exposed to selection pressures (e.g. chloroplast DNA; Heuertz et al., 2004a) and to investigate different generations. The modern genetic structure of natural populations of F. mandshurica is unknown on the margins of its distribution (outside NEC). It also remains unclear whether this overall genetic pattern is unique to F. mandshurica or whether it occurs in other native tree species in NEC.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We particularly thank Dr S. Goto for his considerate help in the presentation of the four novel nuclear loci, and Mr J. Cong for his contribution to the field work. We are very grateful to Mr T. Ohsawa, Dr J. Palitha, the handling editor Professor A. Buerkle, and two anonymous referees for their helpful recommendations on earlier versions of the manuscript. This study was partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (19380082) and partly by the Special Funding for Distinguished Researchers by the Northeast Forestry University.

LITERATURE CITED

Amos
W
Balmford
A
When does conservation genetics matter?
Heredity
2001
, vol. 
87
 (pg. 
257
-
265
)
Austerlitz
F
Mariette
S
Machon
N
Gouyon
PH
Godelle
B
Effects of colonization processes on genetic diversity: differences between annual plants and tree species
Genetics
2000
, vol. 
154
 (pg. 
1309
-
1321
)
Bacles
CFE
Burczyk
J
Lowe
AJ
Ennos
RA
Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L
Evolution
2005
, vol. 
59
 (pg. 
979
-
990
)
Barbujani
G
Oden
NL
Sokal
RR
Detecting regions of abrupt change in maps of biological variables
Systematic Zoology
1989
, vol. 
38
 (pg. 
376
-
389
)
Brachet
S
Jubier
MF
Richard
M
Jung-Muller
B
Frascaria-Lacoste
N
Rapid identification of microsatellite loci using 5′ anchored PCR in the common ash Fraxinus excelsior
Molecular Ecology
1999
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
160
-
163
)
China EPA
Chinese country study on biological diversity
1998
Beijing
China Environmental Science Press
 
(in Chinese)
Chinese Ministry of Forestry
List of wild plants under national priority protection
1999
 
Comes
HP
Kadereit
JW
The effects of Quaternary climatic changes on plant distribution and evolution
Trends in Plant Science
1998
, vol. 
3
 (pg. 
432
-
438
)
Cornuet
JM
Luikart
G
Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data
Genetics
1996
, vol. 
144
 (pg. 
2001
-
2014
)
Dieringer
D
Schlötterer
C
Microsatellite analyser (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets
Molecular Ecology Notes
2003
, vol. 
3
 (pg. 
167
-
169
)
Dupanloup
I
Schneider
S
Excoffier
L
A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations
Molecular Ecology
2002
, vol. 
11
 (pg. 
2571
-
2581
)
FRAXIGEN
Ash species in Europe: biological characteristics and practical guidelines for sustainable use
2005
Oxford
Oxford Forestry Institute, University of Oxford
Fu
LG
China plant red data book: rare and endangered plants
1992
, vol. 
vol. 1
 
Beijing
Chinese Science Press
Godbout
J
Jaramillo-Correa
JP
Beaulieu
J
Bousquet
J
A mitochondrial DNA minisatellite reveals the postglacial history of jack pine (Pinus banksiana), a broad-range North American conifer
Molecular Ecology
2005
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
3497
-
3512
)
Goto
S
Shimatani
K
Yoshimaru
H
Takahashi
Y
Fat-tailed gene flow in the dioecious canopy tree species Fraxinus mandshurica var. japonica revealed by microsatellites
Molecular Ecology
2006
, vol. 
15
 (pg. 
2985
-
2996
)
Goudet
J
FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices
2001
 
Goudet
J
Raymond
M
de-Meeus
T
Rousset
F
Testing differentiation in diploid populations
Genetics
1996
, vol. 
144
 (pg. 
1933
-
1940
)
Hampe
A
Petit
RJ
Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters
Ecology Letters
2005
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
461
-
467
)
Heuertz
M
Hausman
F
Tsvetkov
I
Frascaria-Lacoste
N
Vekemans
X
Assessment of genetic structure within and among Bulgarian populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.)
Molecular Ecology
2001
, vol. 
10
 (pg. 
1615
-
1623
)
Heuertz
M
Vekemans
X
Hausman
JF
Palada
M
Hardy
OJ
Estimating seed vs. pollen dispersal from spatial genetic structure in the common ash
Molecular Ecology
2003
, vol. 
12
 (pg. 
2483
-
2495
)
Heuertz
M
Fineschi
S
Anzidei
M
Pastorelli
R
Salvini
D
Paule
L
, et al. 
Chloroplast DNA variation and postglacial recolonisation of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in Europe
Molecular Ecology
2004
, vol. 
a 13
 (pg. 
3437
-
3452
)
Heuertz
M
Hausman
JF
Hardy
OJ
Vendramin
GG
Frascaria-Lacosite
N
Vekemans
X
Nuclear microsatellites reveal contrasting patterns of genetic structure between western and southeastern European populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.)
Evolution
2004
, vol. 
b 58
 (pg. 
976
-
988
)
Heuertz
M
De Paoli
E
Källman
T
Larsson
H
Jurman
I
Morgante
M
Lascoux M Gyllenstrand
N
Multilocus patterns of nucleotide diversity, linkage disequilibrium and demographic history of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst)
Genetics
2006
, vol. 
174
 (pg. 
2095
-
2105
)
Hewitt
G
The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages
Nature
2000
, vol. 
405
 (pg. 
907
-
913
)
Kong
D-M
Somatic embryogenesis and development of somatic and zygotic embryos of
2004
Harbin, China
Northeast Forestry University
 
Fraxinus mandshurica. Ph.D thesis (in Chinese with English abstract)
Kong
D-M
Shen
H-L
Lv
J-H
The anatomic observation of the development of female flower, megasporegensis and the development of embryo of Fraxinus mandshurica
Bulletin of Botanical Research
2008
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
387
-
391
)
Langella
O
Population 1·2·28. Logiciel de génétique des populations
2002
 
Laboratoire Populations, génétique et évolution, CNRS UPR 9034, Gif-sur-Yvette. http://www.pge.cnrs-gif.fr/bioinfo/populations/index.php
Lascoux
M
Palmé
AE
Cheddadi
R
Latta
R
Impact of the ice ages on the genetic structure of trees and shrubs
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B
2004
, vol. 
359
 (pg. 
197
-
207
)
Lefort
F
Brachet
S
Frascaria-Lacoste
N
Edwards
KJ
Douglas
GC
Identification and characterisation of microsatellite loci in ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and their conservation in the olive family (Oleaceae)
Molecular Ecology
1999
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
1088
-
1091
)
Lian
C
Oishi
R
Miyashita
N
Nara
K
Nakaya
H
Wu
B
Zhou
Z
Hogetsu
T
Genetic structure and reproduction dynamics of Salix reinii during primary succession on Mount Fuji, as revealed by nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite analysis
Molecular Ecology
2003
, vol. 
12
 (pg. 
609
-
618
)
Lu
Z-X
Wang
Y-H
Peng
Y-H
Korpelainen
H
Li
C-Y
Genetic diversity of Populus cathayana Rehd. populations in southwestern China revealed by ISSR markers
Plant Science
2006
, vol. 
170
 (pg. 
407
-
412
)
Magri
D
Vendramin
GG
Comps
B
Dupanloup
I
Geburek
T
Gömöry
D
, et al. 
A new scenario for the Quaternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences
New Phytologist
2006
, vol. 
171
 (pg. 
199
-
221
)
Maliouchenko
O
Palmé
AE
Buonamici
A
Vendramin
GG
Lascoux
M
Comparative phylogeography and population structure of European Betula species, with particular focus on B. pendula and B. pubescens. Journal of Biogeography
2007
, vol. 
34
 (pg. 
1601
-
1610
)
Manel
S
Schwartz
MK
Luikart
G
Taberlet
P
Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics
Trends in Ecology and Evolution
2003
, vol. 
18
 (pg. 
189
-
197
)
Manni
F
Guérard
E
Barriervs. 2·2
2004
 
Manni
F
Guérard
E
Heyer
E
Geographic patterns of (genetic, morphologic, linguistic) variation: how barriers can be detected by using Monmonier's algorithm
Human Biology
2004
, vol. 
76
 (pg. 
173
-
190
)
Mantel
NA
The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach
Cancer Research
1967
, vol. 
27
 (pg. 
209
-
220
)
Member of China Quaternary Pollen Data Base
Pollen-based biome reconstruction at Middle Holocene (6 ka BP) and Last Glacial Maximum (18 ka BP) in China
Acta Botanical Sinica
2000
, vol. 
42
 (pg. 
1201
-
1209
)
Monmonier
M
Maximum-difference barriers: an alternative numerical regionalization method
Geographical Analysis
1973
, vol. 
3
 (pg. 
245
-
261
)
Morand
M-E
Brachet
S
Rossignol
P
Dufour
J
Frascaria-Lacoste
N
A generalized heterozygote deficiency assessed with microsatellites in French common ash populations
Molecular Ecology
2002
, vol. 
11
 (pg. 
377
-
385
)
Moritz
C
Defining ‘Evolutionarily Significant Units’ for conservation
Trends in Ecology and Evolution
1994
, vol. 
9
 (pg. 
373
-
375
)
Nei
M
Tajima
F
Tateno
Y
Accuracy of estimated phylogenic trees from molecular data
Journal of Molecular Evolution
1983
, vol. 
19
 (pg. 
153
-
170
)
Newton
AC
Allnutt
TR
Gillies
ACM
Lowe
AJ
Ennos
RA
Molecular phylogeography, intraspecific variation and the conservation of tree species
Trends in Ecology and Evolution
1999
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
140
-
145
)
O'Brien
SJ
Genetic and phylogenetic analyses of endangered species
Annual Review of Genetics
1994
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
467
-
489
)
Ohsawa
T
Ide
Y
Global patterns of genetic variation in plant species along vertical and horizontal gradients on mountains
Global Ecology and Biogeography
2008
, vol. 
17
 (pg. 
152
-
163
)
Palmé
AE
Semerikov
V
Lascoux
M
Absence of geographical structure of chloroplast DNA in sallow, Salix caprea L
Heredity
2003
, vol. 
91
 (pg. 
465
-
471
)
Peakall
R
Smouse
PE
GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research
Molecular Ecology Notes
2006
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
288
-
295
Petit
RJ
Aguinagalde
I
de Beaulieu
JL
Bittkau
C
Brewer
S
Cheddadi
R
, et al. 
Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity
Science
2003
, vol. 
300
 (pg. 
1563
-
1565
)
Piry
S
Luikart
G
Cornuet
JM
BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data
Journal of Heredity
1999
, vol. 
90
 (pg. 
502
-
503
)
Pritchard
JK
Stephens
M
Donnelly
P
Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data
Genetics
2000
, vol. 
155
 (pg. 
945
-
959
)
Pritchard
JK
Wen
XQ
Falush
D
STRUCTURE (version 2·2)
2007
Chicago, IL
University of Chicago
 
Ren
ME
Yang
RZ
Bao
HS
Elements of the physical geography of China
1979
Beijing
Chinese Commercial Press
 
(in Chinese)
Rice
WR
Analyzing tables of statistical tests
Evolution
1989
, vol. 
43
 (pg. 
223
-
225
)
Rousset
F
Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance
Genetics
1997
, vol. 
145
 (pg. 
1219
-
1228
)
SPSS Inc
SPSS for Windows, Release 13·0, September 1, 2004
2004
Chicago, IL
SPSS Inc
Taberlet
P
Fumagalli
L
Wust-Saucy
AG
Cosson
JF
Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonization route in Europe
Molecular Ecology
1998
, vol. 
7
 (pg. 
453
-
464
)
Tsuda
Y
Ide
Y
Wide-range analysis of genetic structure of Betula maximowicziana, a long-lived pioneer tree species and noble hardwood in the cool temperate zone of Japan
Molecular Ecology
2005
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
3929
-
3941
)
Verdú
M
González-Martínez
SC
Montilla
AI
Mateu
I
Pannell
JR
Ovule discounting in an outcrossing, cryptically dioecious tree
Evolution
2006
, vol. 
60
 (pg. 
2056
-
2063
)
Wang
J-G
Optional selection and design of the geography provenance for Fraxinus manshurica Rupr
2001
Harbin, China
Northeast Forestry University
 
M.D. thesis (in Chinese with English abstract)
Wang
Y-H
Cai
Y-X
Mu
C-L
Study on ecology of Fraxinus mandshurica. Journal of Northeast Forestry University
1994
, vol. 
1
 (pg. 
10
-
14
(in Chinese with English abstract)
Wang
Z
Further study plan of Changbaishan Mountain forest ecosystem localized study. Study of forest ecosystem
1983
, vol. 
vol. 3
 
Beijing
Chinese Forestry Publishing House
 
(in Chinese)
Weir
BS
Cockerham
CC
Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure
Evolution
1984
, vol. 
38
 (pg. 
1358
-
1370
)
Willis
KJ
Rudner
E
Sümegi
P
The full glacial forests of central and southeastern Europe
Quaternary Research
2000
, vol. 
53
 (pg. 
203
-
213
)
Wright
S
Isolation by distance
Genetics
1943
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
114
-
138
)
Wu
Z-Y
Vegetation of China
1980
Beijing
Chinese Science Press
 
(in Chinese)
Xie
Y-H
Analysis of genetic diversity and selection of the geography provenance for Fraxinus manshurica Rupr. in Northeast of China
2005
Harbin, China
Northeast Forestry University
 
M.D. thesis (in Chinese with English abstract)
Xu
H-G
Wang
S-Q
Xue
D-Y
Biodiversity conservation in China: legislation, plans and measures
Biodiversity and Conservation
1999
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
819
-
837
)
Yu
G
Prentice
IC
Harrison
SP
Sun
X
Pollen-based biome reconstructions for China at 0 ka and 6 ka
Journal of Biogeography
1998
, vol. 
25
 (pg. 
1055
-
1069
)
Yu
G
Chen
X
Ni
J
Cheddadi
R
Guiot
J
Han
H
, et al. 
Palaeovegetation of China: a pollen data-based synthesis for the mid-Holocene and last glacial maximum
Journal of Biogeography
2000
, vol. 
27
 (pg. 
635
-
664
)
Zhao
G-Y
Tian
X-J
Wu
Z-H
Analysis and discussion on the north distributing limitation of Amur corktree, Manchurian walnut and Manchurian ash
Journal of Northeast Forestry University
1991
, vol. 
S1
 (pg. 
290
-
295
(in Chinese with English abstract)