Abstract

Background

High input costs and environmental pressures to reduce nitrogen use in agriculture have increased the competitive advantage of legume crops. The symbiotic relationship that legumes form with nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria in root nodules is central to this advantage.

Scope

Understanding how legume plants maintain control of nodulation to balance the nitrogen gains with their energy needs and developmental costs will assist in increasing their productivity and relative advantage. For this reason, the regulation of nodulation has been extensively studied since the first mutants exhibiting increased nodulation were isolated almost three decades ago.

Conclusions

Nodulation is regulated primarily via a systemic mechanism known as the autoregulation of nodulation (AON), which is controlled by a CLAVATA1-like receptor kinase. Multiple components sharing homology with the CLAVATA signalling pathway that maintains control of the shoot apical meristem in arabidopsis have now been identified in AON. This includes the recent identification of several CLE peptides capable of activating nodule inhibition responses, a low molecular weight shoot signal and a role for CLAVATA2 in AON. Efforts are now being focused on directly identifying the interactions of these components and to identify the form that long-distance transport molecules take.

INTRODUCTION

Nitrogen is a component of many biological molecules, making its availability critical to sustained plant growth and reproduction. Atmospheric nitrogen gas is plentiful but is unavailable to most organisms. Many legumes overcome this limitation by initiating a symbiotic relationship with soil bacteria, collectively referred to as rhizobia. These rhizobia are capable of biological nitrogen fixation where atmospheric nitrogen (N2) is fixed by the nitrogenase enzyme complex of the endocytotic bacteria when they reside inside legume organs called nodules. Nodules provide the rhizobia with an energy source from photoassimilates (as malate; Udvardi et al., 1988) while maintaining the low oxygen environment required for efficient nitrogen fixation. The process of nodule formation and subsequent nitrogen fixation is balanced with the plant's own energy requirements in a process termed autoregulation of nodulation (AON; see Caetano-Anollés and Gresshoff, 1991; Ferguson et al., 2010). Nodulation is also regulated in response to nitrogen availability in the soil (Carroll et al., 1985; Ferguson and Mathesius, 2003).

This review highlights significant progress that has recently been made in the identification of new genes and factors controlling nodulation. Further understanding of the mechanisms that allow plants to balance nitrogen resources with their energy demands may enable nitrogen use optimization in important legume crops, including the most widely grown soybean. Significant agricultural, economic and environmental benefits stand to be gained by further reducing nitrogen fertilizer inputs while maintaining or improving legume yields.

AUTOREGULATION OF NODULATION

Nodulation occurs in a distinct pattern where nodules form in the region having susceptible root hairs at the time of inoculation [zone of nodulation (ZON); Bhuvaneswari et al., 1981; Calvert et al., 1984]. AON causes a nodulation phenotype where the majority of nodules form near the crown of the root system. It is unclear which stage of nodule development AON inhibits, although approach grafting in Pisum sativum indicated that the onset of AON is triggered before extensive cell divisions are observed (Li et al., 2009). This supports anatomical observations in soybean where a significant reduction of nodule development stages occurs along the root (Mathews et al., 1989) and split-root experiments where inoculation is delayed by 3–4 d (Kosslak and Bohlool, 1984; Olsson et al., 1989). It has been proposed that AON reduces the speed of cortical cell divisions to restrict nodulation at the early stages when these cell divisions are occurring (Mathews et al., 1989).

The precise nature and co-ordination of these regulatory cues remain to be elucidated; however, the maintenance of autoregulation in spontaneous nodulation mutants indicates that a bacterial-derived signal is not the elicitor of AON and that it is not entirely dependent on nitrogen fixation in the nodule (Caetano-Anollés et al., 1990; Tirichine et al., 2006, 2007). The precise onset of AON is also not known, although experimental evidence suggests that AON is effective as early as 4 d after inoculation (Kosslak and Bohlool, 1984; Olsson et al., 1989; Suzuki et al., 2008).

Studies using grafting and split-root techniques have shown that AON is induced systemically by a graft-transmissible signal and is controlled by the shoot (Delves et al., 1986, 1992). These experiments led to a model where a root-derived nodulation signal is the cue (Q) for the onset of AON. Subsequently, a shoot-derived inhibitor (SDI) is transported back down to the roots where it regulates further nodulation events (Fig. 1D–H).

Fig. 1.

A working model of root and shoot mechanisms in autoregulation of nodulation (AON). Legumes regulate nodulation in response to pre-existing infections and soil nitrogen levels. Nitrate induces the production of a nitrate-induced CLE peptide (NIC1; A) that acts locally in the root via the AON receptor kinase, NARK (B; or its orthologues in other species), to inhibit nodule progression (C). NARK may act in concert with other components to perceive NIC1. Rhizobia-induced CLE peptides (RICs) are induced at several stages of nodule development and may be transported via the xylem (D) to the shoot. In the shoot, NARK and possibly also CLV2, KLV and CRN are required for the perception of these putative ligands (E). Two kinase-associated protein phosphatases (KAPP1/2) are phosphorylated by NARK and in turn dephosphorylate the NARK kinase (F). An equilibrium of phosphorylation between these components may be required preceding the production of the shoot-derived inhibitor (SDI; G). SDI is transported via the phloem to the roots where it inhibits further nodule progression and cell divisions (H). A compound similar to SDI may also be involved in the nitrate pathway that acts locally to inhibit the progression of nodule formation (C).

Fig. 1.

A working model of root and shoot mechanisms in autoregulation of nodulation (AON). Legumes regulate nodulation in response to pre-existing infections and soil nitrogen levels. Nitrate induces the production of a nitrate-induced CLE peptide (NIC1; A) that acts locally in the root via the AON receptor kinase, NARK (B; or its orthologues in other species), to inhibit nodule progression (C). NARK may act in concert with other components to perceive NIC1. Rhizobia-induced CLE peptides (RICs) are induced at several stages of nodule development and may be transported via the xylem (D) to the shoot. In the shoot, NARK and possibly also CLV2, KLV and CRN are required for the perception of these putative ligands (E). Two kinase-associated protein phosphatases (KAPP1/2) are phosphorylated by NARK and in turn dephosphorylate the NARK kinase (F). An equilibrium of phosphorylation between these components may be required preceding the production of the shoot-derived inhibitor (SDI; G). SDI is transported via the phloem to the roots where it inhibits further nodule progression and cell divisions (H). A compound similar to SDI may also be involved in the nitrate pathway that acts locally to inhibit the progression of nodule formation (C).

In addition to the systemic AON mechanism where plants regulate nodulation in response to existing infection events, legumes also regulate nodulation in response to environmental nitrogen availability. This may represent a means of preferentially obtaining nitrogen from sources that are energetically favourable relative to the energy costs of nodulation. Nodulation tolerant to high soil nitrate levels has been used as a screening method to identify nodule regulation mutants (e.g. nod3, Jacobsen and Feenstra, 1984; nts, Carroll et al., 1985). The nts mutants of soybean exhibit a supernodulation phenotype in both high and low nitrate conditions, indicating that the AON and nitrate regulation pathways share genetic components (Day et al., 1986). Evidence exists for both local and systemic regulatory mechanisms functioning in response to nitrate, and it is likely that multiple mechanisms are acting in concert (Hinson, 1975; Cho and Harper, 1991; Okamoto et al., 2009; Jeudy et al., 2010; Reid et al., 2011).

ROOT-DEPENDENT COMPONENTS OF AON

Autoregulation of nodulation can be divided into root- and shoot-dependent components (Fig. 1). The former components are likely to include factors involved in the response to initial cell divisions that lead to the induction of Q. A second class of root-dependent components are those which act downstream of shoot signalling to perceive the SDI signal and/or that inhibit further nodule progression.

Several mutants have been isolated that exhibit an increased nodulation phenotype, known as hyper- or supernodulation (see Table 1). Those functioning in the root include rdh1 (Ishikawa et al., 2008), rdn1 (Schnabel et al., 2011), nod3 (Jacobsen and Feenstra, 1984), too much love (Magori et al., 2009), plenty (Yoshida et al., 2010), efd-1 (Vernié et al., 2008), astray (Nishimura et al., 2002b) and sickle (Penmetsa et al., 2008). Each of these mutants forms an overabundance of nodules, though some differences are noted in their pattern and extent of nodulation. In addition, not all of these factors function directly in the AON pathway.

Table 1.

Genes/mutants and products involved in legume regulation of nodule number

Gene/mutant Gene product Site of production Site of action Comments References 
GmNARK; GsNARK; LjHAR1; MtSUNN; PsSYM29 LRR-RK Shoot/root Shoot/root Acts in shoot (AON) and root (NO3 inhibition) (LRR-RK) Sagan and Duc (1996); Krusell et al. (2002); Men et al. (2002); Nishimura et al. (2002a); Searle et al. (2003); Schnabel et al. (2005) 
GmNIC1 CLE Root Root NO3 induced (CLE pre-propeptide) Reid et al. (2011) 
GmRIC1/2; LjCLE-RS1/2; MtCLE12/13 CLE Root Probably the shoot Rhizobia-induced (CLE prepropeptide) Okamoto et al. (2009); Mortier et al. (2010); Reid et al. (2011); Lim et al. (2011) 
LjASTRAY bZIP TF  Root Also acts in photomorphogenesis (transcription factor) Nishimura et al. (2002b) 
LjCLV2; PsSYM28 CLV2 Shoot/root Shoot/root? May interact with other AON LRR RKs (truncated LRR-receptor protein) Sagan and Duc (1996); Krusell et al. (2011) 
LjETR1 ETR1 Shoot/root Shoot/root Ethylene receptor (two-component receptor) Gresshoff et al. (2009); Lohar et al. (2009) 
LjKLV LRR-RK Shoot/root? Shoot/root? May interact with other AON LRR RKs Oka-Kira et al. (2005) 
LjPLENTY Unknown Root Root Hypernodulation phenotype Yoshida et al. (2010) 
LjRDH1 Unknown Root Root  Ishikawa et al. (2008) 
LjTML Unknown Root Root  Magori et al. (2009) 
MtEFD AP2-EREBP TF Root Root Positively regulates CK levels (transcription factor) Vernié et al. (2008) 
MtLSS Unknown Shoot/root? Shoot/root? Possible epigenetic factor of MtSUNN Schnabel et al. (2010) 
MtSKL EIN2 Root Root \ethylene response factor Penmetsa and Cook (1997); Penmetsa et al. (2008) 
PsNOD1 and 2 Unknown    Gelin and Blixt (1964) 
PsNOD3; MtRDN1 RDN1 Root Root Affects CLE synthesis and/or transport Jacobsen and Feenstra (1984); Engvild (1987); Novák et al. (1997); Li et al. (2009); Schnabel et al. (2011) 
PsNOD4 and 5 Unknown  Shoot  Sidorova and Shumnyi (1998, 2003
PsNOD6 Unknown  Shoot  Sidorova and Shumnyi (1998) 
Gene/mutant Gene product Site of production Site of action Comments References 
GmNARK; GsNARK; LjHAR1; MtSUNN; PsSYM29 LRR-RK Shoot/root Shoot/root Acts in shoot (AON) and root (NO3 inhibition) (LRR-RK) Sagan and Duc (1996); Krusell et al. (2002); Men et al. (2002); Nishimura et al. (2002a); Searle et al. (2003); Schnabel et al. (2005) 
GmNIC1 CLE Root Root NO3 induced (CLE pre-propeptide) Reid et al. (2011) 
GmRIC1/2; LjCLE-RS1/2; MtCLE12/13 CLE Root Probably the shoot Rhizobia-induced (CLE prepropeptide) Okamoto et al. (2009); Mortier et al. (2010); Reid et al. (2011); Lim et al. (2011) 
LjASTRAY bZIP TF  Root Also acts in photomorphogenesis (transcription factor) Nishimura et al. (2002b) 
LjCLV2; PsSYM28 CLV2 Shoot/root Shoot/root? May interact with other AON LRR RKs (truncated LRR-receptor protein) Sagan and Duc (1996); Krusell et al. (2011) 
LjETR1 ETR1 Shoot/root Shoot/root Ethylene receptor (two-component receptor) Gresshoff et al. (2009); Lohar et al. (2009) 
LjKLV LRR-RK Shoot/root? Shoot/root? May interact with other AON LRR RKs Oka-Kira et al. (2005) 
LjPLENTY Unknown Root Root Hypernodulation phenotype Yoshida et al. (2010) 
LjRDH1 Unknown Root Root  Ishikawa et al. (2008) 
LjTML Unknown Root Root  Magori et al. (2009) 
MtEFD AP2-EREBP TF Root Root Positively regulates CK levels (transcription factor) Vernié et al. (2008) 
MtLSS Unknown Shoot/root? Shoot/root? Possible epigenetic factor of MtSUNN Schnabel et al. (2010) 
MtSKL EIN2 Root Root \ethylene response factor Penmetsa and Cook (1997); Penmetsa et al. (2008) 
PsNOD1 and 2 Unknown    Gelin and Blixt (1964) 
PsNOD3; MtRDN1 RDN1 Root Root Affects CLE synthesis and/or transport Jacobsen and Feenstra (1984); Engvild (1987); Novák et al. (1997); Li et al. (2009); Schnabel et al. (2011) 
PsNOD4 and 5 Unknown  Shoot  Sidorova and Shumnyi (1998, 2003
PsNOD6 Unknown  Shoot  Sidorova and Shumnyi (1998) 

Approach grafting indicated that PsNOD3, the homologue of MtRDN1, may function prior to the shoot responses, possibly in the production or transmission of the root-derived signal (Li et al., 2009). In contrast, TOO MUCH LOVE inhibits nodulation locally and may act downstream of the shoot components, possibly as a receptor for the SDI signal or in a related function (Magori et al., 2009).

CLE PEPTIDES IN AON

The first genes to be identified in AON were those encoding a group of orthologous leucine-rich repeat (LRR) receptor kinases similar to CLAVATA1 (CLV1; Clark et al., 1997) in arabidopsis (LjHAR1, Krusell et al., 2002; Nishimura et al., 2002a; PsSYM29, Krusell et al., 2002; GmNARK, Searle et al., 2003; Men et al., 2002; and MtSUNN, Schnabel et al., 2005). Mutations in these genes reduce the plant's ability to regulate nodule numbers and, in all cases tested, nodulation is tolerant to otherwise inhibitory high nitrate conditions.

The similarity of these AON receptor kinases to CLV1 prompted searches for ligands related to the CLV3 peptide, the ligand of CLV1 (Fletcher et al., 1999; Kondo et al., 2006, 2008; Oelkers et al., 2008; Ogawa et al., 2008). CLE peptides responding to inoculation were identified which can systemically reduce nodule numbers in Lotus japonicus (Okamoto et al., 2009). Related peptides with AON receptor-dependent activity have since been identified in Medicago truncatula (Mortier et al., 2010; Saur et al., 2011) and Glycine max (Reid et al., 2011; Mortier et al., 2011; Lim et al., 2011). The expression of these CLE peptide-encoding genes suggests they are induced in response to inoculation and the onset of nodule development. However, the peptides themselves have yet to be directly detected in planta and they have not been confirmed to move long distances as is expected if they are perceived in the shoot. Some of these CLE peptide-encoding genes (LjCLE-RS2 and GmNIC1) were also found to be responsive to nitrate, highlighting the mechanistic and functional similarities between AON and the nitrate regulation of nodulation. GmNIC1 differed from the other CLE peptides so far identified as it functions locally via NARK to regulate nodulation (Fig. 1A–C) and does not appear to be induced by the rhizobia.

There appears to be some functional divergence between the inoculation-responsive CLE peptides as the timing of their induction was found to be variable. The expression of LjCLE-RS1/2, MtCLE13 and GmRIC1 is induced early in response to inoculation, whereas GmRIC2, MtCLE12 and MtCLE13 were persistent later when mature nodules were present. Li and associates (2009) showed that AON activation requires signalling at several nodule developmental stages, indicating that multiple signals may be required for activation and maintenance.

The secondary structure of CLE pre-propeptides can be characterized by the presence of a 5′ signal peptide which is likely to be required for the cellular export and localization properties of the peptide (Meng et al., 2010). CLE peptides also possess a 12–13 amino acid motif deemed to represent the final active peptide which is cleaved from close to the 3′ end of the initial protein (Oelkers et al., 2008). Outside of the signal peptide and the CLE motif there appears to be little sequence conservation within CLE proteins. However, the CLE peptides capable of regulating nodulation share some common features outside of these more general CLE characteristics (Okamoto et al., 2009; Mortier et al., 2010; Reid et al., 2011). Within the signal peptide region, a well-conserved motif was identified, although apart from the predicted export role the exact function of this remains obscure. Several of these CLE peptides also possess a 5–7 amino acid conserved extension beyond the 3′ CLE motif. CLE peptides require processing to generate the final product and several protease cleavage events may be required (Ni and Clark, 2006; Ni et al., 2011). The extracellular fluid of legumes has been demonstrated to possess factors with proteolytic activity capable of producing biologically active CLE peptides (Djordjevic et al., 2011). The activity of CLE peptides has also been shown to be dependent on post-translational modifications, including hydroxylation of proline residues and glycosylation of key residues (Kondo et al., 2006; Ohyama et al., 2009). In arabidopsis, CLV3 and CLE2 (which share a similar CLE domain sequence to the nodulation CLE peptides) were identified with three β-1,2-linked arabinose moieties bound to Hyp7 of the 13 amino acid CLE peptide (Ohyama et al., 2009).

Due to the systemic signalling requirement in AON, it is presumed that long-distance transport of the Q signal is required, probably via the xylem (Fig. 1D). Efforts have therefore been undertaken to characterize the protein and metabolite components of the xylem sap of legume plants. The soybean xylem sap proteome identified several protein components, although none of these differed between plants with or without nodules (Djordjevic et al., 2007). There were, however, changes observed in the xylem sap proteome of inoculated soybeans at the seedling stage, though a distinct role for these changes in nodulation was not identified (Subramanian et al., 2009).

SHOOT-DEPENDENT COMPONENTS IN AON

The secondary structure of NARK includes an N-terminal signal peptide and an extracellular LRR domain, which is the proposed binding site for Q. Transmembrane and intracellular kinase domains are also key features of NARK and are essential for membrane localization, protein–protein interactions and downstream phosphorylation and signalling events. Supernodulation phenotypes result from mutations in NARK in either the LRR or kinase domains, indicating that both are required for AON signalling and/or stabilizing the signalling complex (Searle et al., 2003). Modelling of the NARK LRR domain indicates that it may form a boomerang shape that acts to perceive the AON ligand (Reid et al., 2011). Two known missense mutants in soybean, nod4 and nod3-7, display severe supernodulation phenotypes resembling those of deletion (Men et al., 2002) and nonsense (Carroll et al., 1985; Searle et al., 2003) mutants despite having only single amino acid substitutions within the proposed ligand-binding site (Reid et al., 2011).

Mutants that affect the expression or localization of the AON receptor might also be predicted to cause supernodulation phenotypes. Shoot-controlled nodule regulation is lost in the lss (like-SUNN supernodulator) mutant in M. truncatula (Schnabel et al., 2010). The LSS locus maps in a region close to the SUNN gene; however, sequencing of SUNN and the surrounding regions indicates that there is no mutation within the 20 kbp SUNN region. SUNN expression is greatly reduced in lss and epigenetic factors may be responsible for loss of SUNN activity.

As mentioned above, NARK and its orthologues share a high degree of similarity with CLV1 in arabidopsis (75 % amino acid similarity; Searle et al., 2003), which is required for maintenance of the shoot apical meristem (SAM). Several protein interactions which may be relevant to the activity of NARK in AON have been reported with CLV1, including CLAVATA2 (CLV2; Jeong et al., 1999) and CORYNE (CRN; Muller et al., 2008). CLV2 is a receptor-like protein that lacks an intracellular kinase domain, whereas CRN is a kinase-like protein that lacks an extracellular LRR domain. CRN appears to lack effective kinase activity and may be required as a structural component in a CLV1 complex or for facilitating the inclusion of other components including CLV2 in a receptor complex (Nimchuck et al., 2011).

Additional shoot-controlled supernodulation mutants have recently been genetically characterized and represent further components associated with the CLV signalling pathway (Fig. 1B, E). The shoot-dependent supernodulation mutant sym28 in pea and LjCLV2 in L. japonicus are the orthologues of AtCLV2 (Krusell et al., 2011). Experiments to determine if CLV2 forms a heterodimer complex with HAR1 in a similar manner to the CLV2–CLV1 complex in the SAM were unable to establish an interaction. KLAVIER (KLV) is a receptor-like kinase similar to RPK2/TOAD2 in arabidopsis which is required for CLV3-dependent meristem regulation (Kinoshita et al., 2010; Miyazawa et al., 2010). KLV was shown to form homo- or heterodimer complexes with itself and HAR1, respectively, suggesting that a receptor complex may be required for the perception of Q (Miyazawa et al., 2010). This work serves to highlight the extent to which nodule regulation activity utilizes the machinery of SAM regulation. Further investigation of CLV signalling components which may function in AON will be of interest, including whether a CRN-like protein plays a role in AON.

TRANSMISSION OF AON SIGNALLING IN THE LEAF

Knowledge of signal transduction mechanisms acting downstream of CLV in arabidopsis has assisted in the identification of homologous elements in AON. Two kinase-associated protein phosphatases (KAPP1/2) were identified in soybean that are phosphorylated by NARK in vitro and subsequently dephosphorylate the NARK kinase (Miyahara et al., 2008). This may indicate that a sufficient equilibrium of phosphorylation states between NARK and KAPP1/2 must exist before a downstream AON response is generated (Fig. 1F).

In arabidopsis, the primary function of CLV signalling activity in the SAM is the restriction of WUSCHEL (WUS) production. This acts to maintain an appropriate balance between differentiated and undifferentiated cells via a constant feedback between WUS and CLV3 (Schoof et al., 2000). WUS-related homeobox (WOX) genes have been identified in other CLE peptide/LRR receptor systems including the regulation of vascular differentiation (Hirakawa et al., 2010; Ji et al., 2010) and in the root apical meristem (Kamiya et al., 2003; Sarkar et al., 2007). Likewise, a WOX component may be involved in AON signalling, though this remains to be determined.

To identify components of AON acting downstream of NARK in the leaf, transcriptional profiling using Affymetrix GeneChips or subtractive hybridization techniques has been undertaken in soybean (Seo et al., 2007; Kinkema and Gresshoff, 2008). Both of these studies identified components of the jasmonic acid (JA) biosynthesis or response pathways being regulated following rhizobia inoculation. Foliar application of methyl jasmonate in L. japonicus inhibited nodulation in both wild-type and har1 plants, further indicating that JA may play a role in nodule regulation (Nakagawa and Kawaguchi, 2006).

The identification of additional nodule regulation mutants through candidate gene selection in TILLING populations or through screening of traditional mutant populations may be useful for identifying further downstream components of AON.

SDI AND EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY IT

Shoot-derived inhibitor is produced in the shoot following the perception of Q (Fig. 1G). Phloem transport of the SDI signal from the shoot to the root would appear to be the most probable mechanism based on the timing and direction of its response. It is then predicted to be perceived in the root, where it acts to prevent cell divisions required for nodule development (Fig. 1H). A bioassay approach has been exploited to characterize the nature of SDI partially through petiole feeding of plant extracts into the phloem of intact plants (Lin et al., 2010, 2011). Using this technique, leaf extracts from wild-type plants inhibited nodulation in hypernodulating nts mutants that are unable to produce SDI. Various pre-treatments of the leaf extract showed that SDI is probably a small, heat-stable molecule that is not a protein or RNA. The inhibitory capacity of the leaf extracts was also dependent on NARK and on nod factor signalling (Lin et al., 2010, 2011). The petiole feeding bioassay technique has also been exploited to show that nitrogen fixation in nodules may be systemically regulated through phloem transport of the amino acid asparagine (Sulieman et al., 2010).

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

Plants maintain appropriate growth and development via constant feedback to environmental and internal conditions. The regulation of nodulation in legumes is one such system, where systemic signalling ensures a balance between nodule formation and energy requirements. Knowing the identity of both the root- and shoot-derived mobile signals in AON would be of immense value to the field. The identification of CLE peptides capable of nodule regulation and a role for CLV2 and KLV in AON have emphasized the similarities that exist between AON and other CLE peptide ligand–receptor systems, particularly that of the CLAVATA signalling pathway in the SAM. Ongoing research on AON will draw on these similarities and will in turn contribute to the better understanding of other environmental and developmental regulation responses occurring in the plant. The decreasing cost and increased availability of high-throughput sequencing technology continue to drive discoveries in plant genetics. Moreover, the recent sequencing of the soybean, L. japonicus and M. truncatula genomes means that three largely complete legume genomes are now publicly available (Young et al., 2005; Sato et al., 2008; Schmutz et al., 2010). These resources will considerably support future advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying nodule regulation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the University of Queensland and the Australian Research Council through a Centre of Excellence grant. Additional support was provided to D.E.R. by an Australian Government DIISR Australian Postgraduate Award. We thank Meng-Han Lin, Alina Tollenaere, Dongxue Li and Alvin van Niekerk for continued support.

LITERATURE CITED

Bhuvaneswari
TV
Bhagwat
AA
Bauer
WD
Transient susceptibility of root cells in four common legumes to nodulation by Rhizobia
Plant Physiology
 , 
1981
, vol. 
68
 (pg. 
1144
-
1149
)
Caetano-Anolles
G
Gresshoff
P
Plant genetic control of nodulation
Annual Review of Microbiology
 , 
1991
, vol. 
45
 (pg. 
345
-
382
)
Caetano-Anollés
G
Joshi
PA
Gresshoff
PM
Spontaneous nodules induce feedback suppression of nodulation in alfalfa
Planta
 , 
1990
, vol. 
183
 (pg. 
77
-
82
)
Calvert
H
Pence
M
Pierce
M
Malik
N
Bauer
W
Anatomical analysis of the development and distribution of Rhizobium infections in soybean roots
Canadian Journal of Botany
 , 
1984
, vol. 
62
 (pg. 
2375
-
2384
)
Carroll
BJ
McNeil
DL
Gresshoff
PM
Isolation and properties of soybean [Glycine max (L) MERR] mutants that nodulate in the presence of high nitrate concentrations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA
 , 
1985
, vol. 
82
 (pg. 
4162
-
4166
)
Cho
M-J
Harper
JE
Effect of localized nitrate application on isoflavonoid concentration and nodulation in split-root systems of wild-type and nodulation-mutant soybean plants
Plant Physiology
 , 
1991
, vol. 
95
 (pg. 
1106
-
1112
)
Clark
SE
Williams
RW
Meyerowitz
EM
The CLAVATA1 gene encodes a putative receptor kinase that controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis
Cell
 , 
1997
, vol. 
89
 (pg. 
575
-
585
)
Day
DA
Lambers
H
Bateman
J
Carroll
BJ
Gresshoff
PM
Growth comparisons of a supernodulating soybean (Glycine max) mutant and its wild-type parent
Physiologia Plantarum
 , 
1986
, vol. 
68
 (pg. 
375
-
382
)
Delves
AC
Mathews
A
Day
DA
Carter
AS
Carroll
BJ
Gresshoff
PM
Regulation of the soybean–Rhizobium nodule symbiosis by shoot and root factors
Plant Physiology
 , 
1986
, vol. 
82
 (pg. 
588
-
590
)
Delves
A
Higgins
A
Gresshoff
P
Shoot apex removal does not alter autoregulation of nodulation in soybean
Plant, Cell and Environment
 , 
1992
, vol. 
15
 (pg. 
249
-
254
)
Djordjevic
MA
Oakes
M
Li
DX
Hwang
CH
Hocart
CH
Gresshoff
PM
The Glycine max xylem sap and apoplast proteome
Journal of Proteome Research
 , 
2007
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
3771
-
3779
)
Djordjevic
MA
Oakes
M
Wong
CE
, et al.  . 
Border sequences of Medicago truncatula CLE36 are specifically cleaved by endoproteases common to the extracellular fluids of Medicago and soybean
Journal of Experimental Botany
 , 
2011
 
in press.
Engvild
KC
Nodulation and nitrogen fixation mutants of pea, Pisum sativum
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
 , 
1987
, vol. 
74
 (pg. 
711
-
713
)
Ferguson
BJ
Mathesius
U
Signaling interactions during nodule development
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
 , 
2003
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
47
-
72
)
Ferguson
BJ
Indrasumunar
A
Hayashi
S
, et al.  . 
Molecular analysis of legume nodule development and autoregulation
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
 , 
2010
, vol. 
52
 (pg. 
61
-
76
)
Fletcher
JC
Brand
U
Running
MP
Simon
R
Meyerowitz
EM
Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot meristems
Science
 , 
1999
, vol. 
283
 (pg. 
1911
-
1914
)
Gelin
O
Blixt
S
Root nodulation in peas
Agricultural and Horticultural Genetics
 , 
1964
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
149
-
159
)
Gresshoff
PM
Lohar
D
Chan
PK
, et al.  . 
Genetic analysis of ethylene regulation of legume nodulation
Plant Signaling and Behaviour
 , 
2009
, vol. 
4
 (pg. 
818
-
823
)
Hinson
K
Nodulation responses from nitrogen applied to soybean half-root systems
Agronomy Journal
 , 
1975
, vol. 
67
 (pg. 
799
-
804
)
Hirakawa
Y
Kondo
Y
Fukuda
H
TDIF peptide signalling regulates vascular stem cell proliferation via the WOX4 homeobox gene in Arabidopsis
The Plant Cell
 , 
2010
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
2618
-
2629
)
Ishikawa
K
Yokota
K
Li
YY
, et al.  . 
Isolation of a novel root-determined hypernodulation mutant rdh1 of Lotus japonicus
Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
 , 
2008
, vol. 
54
 (pg. 
259
-
263
)
Jacobsen
E
Feenstra
WJ
A new pea mutant with efficient nodulation in the presence of nitrate
Plant Science Letters
 , 
1984
, vol. 
33
 (pg. 
337
-
344
)
Jeong
S
Trotochaud
A
Clark
S
The Arabidopsis CLAVATA2 gene encodes a receptor-like protein required for the stability of the CLAVATA1 receptor-like kinase
The Plant Cell
 , 
1999
, vol. 
11
 (pg. 
1925
-
1934
)
Jeudy
C
Ruffel
S
Freixes
S
, et al.  . 
Adaptation of Medicago truncatula to nitrogen limitation is modulated via local and systemic nodule developmental responses
New Phytologist
 , 
2010
, vol. 
185
 (pg. 
817
-
828
)
Ji
J
Strable
J
Shimizu
R
Koenig
D
Sinha
N
Scanlon
MJ
WOX4 promotes procambial development
Plant Physiology
 , 
2010
, vol. 
152
 (pg. 
1346
-
1356
)
Kamiya
N
Nagasaki
H
Morikami
A
Sato
Y
Matsuoka
M
Isolation and characterization of a rice WUSCHEL-type homeobox gene that is specifically expressed in the central cells of a quiescent center in the root apical meristem
The Plant Journal
 , 
2003
, vol. 
35
 (pg. 
429
-
441
)
Kinkema
M
Gresshoff
PM
Investigation of downstream signals of the soybean autoregulation of nodulation receptor kinase GmNARK
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions
 , 
2008
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
1337
-
1348
)
Kinoshita
A
Betsuyaku
S
Osakabe
Y
, et al.  . 
RPK2 is an essential receptor-like kinase that transmits the CLV3 signal in Arabidopsis
Development
 , 
2010
, vol. 
137
 (pg. 
3911
-
3920
)
Kondo
T
Sawa
S
Kinoshita
A
Mizuno
S
Kakimoto
T
Fukuda
H
Sakagami
Y
A plant peptide encoded by CLV3 identified by in situ MALDI-TOF MS analysis
Science
 , 
2006
, vol. 
313
 (pg. 
845
-
848
)
Kondo
T
Nakamura
T
Yokomine
K
Sakagami
Y
Dual assay for MCLV3 activity reveals structure–activity relationship of CLE peptides
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
 , 
2008
, vol. 
377
 (pg. 
312
-
316
)
Kosslak
RM
Bohlool
BB
Suppression of nodule development of one side of a split-root system of soybeans caused by prior inoculation of the other side
Plant Physiology
 , 
1984
, vol. 
75
 (pg. 
125
-
130
)
Krusell
L
Madsen
LH
Sato
S
, et al.  . 
Shoot control of root development and nodulation is mediated by a receptor-like kinase
Nature
 , 
2002
, vol. 
420
 (pg. 
422
-
426
)
Krusell
L
Sato
N
Fukuhara
I
, et al.  . 
The Clavata2 genes of pea and Lotus japonicus affect autoregulation of nodulation
The Plant Journal
 , 
2011
, vol. 
65
 (pg. 
861
-
871
)
Li
D
Kinkema
M
Gresshoff
PM
Autoregulation of nodulation (AON) in Pisum sativum (pea) involves signalling events associated with both nodule primordia development and nitrogen fixation
Journal of Plant Physiology
 , 
2009
, vol. 
166
 (pg. 
955
-
967
)
Lim
CW
Lee
YW
Hwang
CH
Soybean nodule-enhanced CLE peptides in roots act as signals in GmNARK-mediated nodulation suppression
Plant and Cell Physiology
 , 
2011
 
in press. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcr091
Lin
Y-H
Ferguson
BJ
Kereszt
A
Gresshoff
PM
Suppression of hypernodulation in soybean by a leaf-extracted, NARK- and Nod factor-dependent low molecular mass fraction
New Phytologist
 , 
2010
, vol. 
185
 (pg. 
1074
-
1086
)
Lin
Y-H
Lin
M-H
Gresshoff
PM
Ferguson
BJ
An efficient petiole-feeding bioassay for introducing aqueous solutions into dicotyledonous plants
Nature Protocols
 , 
2011
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
36
-
45
)
Lohar
D
Stiller
J
Kam
J
Stacey
G
Gresshoff
PM
Ethylene insensitivity conferred by a mutated Arabidopsis ethylene receptor gene alters nodulation in transgenic Lotus japonicus
Annals of Botany
 , 
2009
, vol. 
104
 (pg. 
277
-
285
)
Magori
S
Oka-Kira
E
Shibata
S
, et al.  . 
TOO MUCH LOVE, a root regulator associated with the long-distance control of nodulation in Lotus japonicus
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions
 , 
2009
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
259
-
268
)
Mathews
A
Carroll
BJ
Gresshoff
PM
Development of Bradyrhizobium infections in supernodulating and non-nodulating mutants of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merrill)
Protoplasma
 , 
1989
, vol. 
150
 (pg. 
40
-
47
)
Men
AE
Laniya
TS
Searle
IR
, et al.  . 
Fast neutron mutagenesis of soybean (Glycine soja L.) produces a supernodulating mutant containing a large deletion in linkage group H
Genome Letters
 , 
2002
, vol. 
1
 (pg. 
147
-
155
)
Meng
L
Ruth
KC
Fletcher
JC
Feldman
L
The roles of different CLE domains in Arabidopsis CLE polypeptide activity and functional specificity
Molecular Plant
 , 
2010
, vol. 
3
 (pg. 
760
-
772
)
Miyahara
A
Hirani
TA
Oakes
M
, et al.  . 
Soybean nodule autoregulation receptor kinase phosphorylates two kinase-associated protein phosphatases in vitro
Journal of Biological Chemistry
 , 
2008
, vol. 
283
 (pg. 
25381
-
91
)
Miyazawa
H
Oka-Kira
E
, et al.  . 
The receptor-like kinase KLAVIER mediates systemic regulation of nodulation and non-symbiotic shoot development in Lotus japonicus
Development
 , 
2010
, vol. 
137
 (pg. 
4317
-
4325
)
Mortier
V
Den Herder
G
Whitford
R
, et al.  . 
CLE peptides control Medicago truncatula nodulation locally and systemically
Plant Physiology
 , 
2010
, vol. 
153
 (pg. 
222
-
237
)
Mortier
V
Fenta
B
Martens
C
Rombauts
S
Holsters
M
Kunert
K
Goormachtig
S
Search for nodulation-related CLE genes in the genome of Glycine max
Journal of Experimental Botany
 , 
2011
, vol. 
62
 (pg. 
2571
-
2583
)
Muller
R
Bleckmann
A
Simon
R
The receptor kinase CORYNE of Arabidopsis transmits the stem cell-limiting signal CLAVATA3 independently of CLAVATA1
The Plant Cell
 , 
2008
, vol. 
20
 (pg. 
934
-
946
)
Nakagawa
T
Kawaguchi
M
Shoot-applied MeJA suppresses root nodulation in Lotus japonicus
Plant and Cell Physiology
 , 
2006
, vol. 
47
 (pg. 
176
-
180
)
Ni
J
Clark
SE
Evidence for functional conservation, sufficiency, and proteolytic processing of the CLAVATA3 CLE domain
Plant Physiology
 , 
2006
, vol. 
140
 (pg. 
726
-
733
)
Ni
J
Guo
Y
Jin
H
Hartsell
J
Clark
S
Characterization of a CLE processing activity
Plant Molecular Biology
 , 
2011
, vol. 
75
 (pg. 
67
-
75
)
Nimchuk
ZL
Tarr
PT
Meyerowitz
EM
An evolutionarily conserved pseudokinase mediates stem cell production in plants
The Plant Cell
 , 
2011
, vol. 
23
 (pg. 
851
-
854
)
Nishimura
R
Hayashi
M
Wu
GJ
, et al.  . 
HAR1 mediates systemic regulation of symbiotic organ development
Nature
 , 
2002
, vol. 
420
 (pg. 
426
-
429
)
Nishimura
R
Ohmori
M
Fujita
H
Kawaguchi
M
A Lotus basic leucine zipper protein with a RING-finger motif negatively regulates the developmental program of nodulation
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA
 , 
2002
, vol. 
99
 (pg. 
15206
-
15210
)
Novak
K
Skrdleta
V
Kropacova
M
Lisa
L
Nemcova
M
Interaction of two genes controlling symbiotic nodule number in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Symbiosis
 , 
1997
, vol. 
23
 (pg. 
43
-
62
)
Oelkers
K
Goffard
N
Weiller
GF
Gresshoff
PM
Mathesius
U
Frickey
T
Bioinformatic analysis of the CLE signaling peptide family
BMC Plant Biology
 , 
2008
, vol. 
8
 pg. 
1
 
Ogawa
M
Shinohara
H
Sakagami
Y
Matsubayashi
Y
Arabidopsis CLV3 peptide directly binds CLV1 ectodomain
Science
 , 
2008
, vol. 
319
 pg. 
294
 
Ohyama
K
Shinohara
H
Ogawa-Ohnishi
M
Matsubayashi
Y
A glycopeptide regulating stem cell fate in Arabidopsis thaliana
Nature Chemical Biology
 , 
2009
, vol. 
5
 (pg. 
578
-
580
)
Oka-Kira
E
Tateno
K
Miura
K
, et al.  . 
klavier (klv), a novel hypernodulation mutant of Lotus japonicus affected in vascular tissue organization and floral induction
The Plant Journal
 , 
2005
, vol. 
44
 (pg. 
505
-
515
)
Okamoto
S
Ohnishi
E
Sato
S
, et al.  . 
Nod factor, nitrate-induced CLE genes that drive systemic regulation of nodulation
Plant and Cell Physiology
 , 
2009
, vol. 
50
 (pg. 
67
-
77
)
Olsson
J
Nakao
P
Bohlool
B
Gresshoff
PM
Lack of systemic suppression of nodulation in split root systems of supernodulating soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) mutants
Plant Physiology
 , 
1989
, vol. 
90
 (pg. 
1347
-
1352
)
Penmetsa
RV
Cook
DR
A legume ethylene-insensitive mutant hyperinfected by its rhizobial symbiont
Science
 , 
1997
, vol. 
275
 (pg. 
527
-
30
)
Penmetsa
RV
Uribe
P
Anderson
J
, et al.  . 
The Medicago truncatula ortholog of Arabidopsis EIN2, sickle, is a negative regulator of symbiotic and pathogenic microbial associations
The Plant Journal
 , 
2008
, vol. 
55
 (pg. 
580
-
595
)
Reid
DE
Ferguson
BJ
Gresshoff
PM
Inoculation- and nitrate-induced CLE peptides of soybean control NARK-dependent nodule formation
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions
 , 
2011
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
606
-
618
)
Sagan
M
Duc
G
Sym28 and Sym29, two new genes involved in regulation of nodulation in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Symbiosis
 , 
1996
, vol. 
20
 (pg. 
229
-
245
)
Sarkar
AK
Luijten
M
Miyashima
S
, et al.  . 
Conserved factors regulate signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana shoot and root stem cell organizers
Nature
 , 
2007
, vol. 
446
 (pg. 
811
-
814
)
Sato
S
Nakamura
Y
Kaneko
T
, et al.  . 
Genome structure of the legume
Lotus japonicus. DNA Research
 , 
2008
, vol. 
15
 (pg. 
227
-
239
)
Saur
IML
Oakes
M
Djordjevic
MA
Imin
N
Crosstalk between the nodulation signaling pathway and the autoregulation of nodulation in Medicago truncatula
New Phytologist
 , 
2011
, vol. 
190
 (pg. 
865
-
874
)
Schmutz
J
Cannon
SB
Schlueter
J
, et al.  . 
Genome sequence of the paleopolyploid soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)
Nature
 , 
2010
, vol. 
463
 (pg. 
178
-
183
)
Schnabel
E
Journet
E-P
Carvalho-Niebel
Fd
Duc
G
Frugoli
J
The Medicago truncatula SUNN gene encodes a CLV1-like leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase that regulates nodule number and root length
Plant Molecular Biology
 , 
2005
, vol. 
58
 (pg. 
809
-
822
)
Schnabel
E
Mukherjee
A
Smith
L
Kassaw
T
Long
S
Frugoli
JA
The lss supernodulation mutant of Medicago truncatula reduces expression of the SUNN gene
Plant Physiology
 , 
2010
, vol. 
154
 (pg. 
1390
-
1402
)
Schnabel
E
Kassaw
T
Smith
L
Marsh
J
Oldroyd
GE
Long
SR
Frugoli
J
ROOT DETERMINED NODULATION 1 regulates nodule number in M. truncatula and defines a highly conserved, uncharacterized plant gene family
Plant Physiology
 , 
2011
 
in press. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.178756
Schoof
H
Lenhard
M
Haecker
A
Mayer
KFX
Jürgens
G
Laux
T
The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems is maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes
Cell
 , 
2000
, vol. 
100
 (pg. 
635
-
644
)
Searle
IR
Men
AE
Laniya
TS
, et al.  . 
Long-distance signaling in nodulation directed by a CLAVATA1-like receptor kinase
Science
 , 
2003
, vol. 
299
 (pg. 
109
-
112
)
Seo
HS
Li
J
Lee
S-Y
, et al.  . 
The hypernodulating nts mutation induces jasmonate synthetic pathway in soybean leaves
Molecules and Cells
 , 
2007
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
185
-
193
)
Sidorova
K
Shumnyi
V
Analysis of pea (Pisum sativum L.) supernodulating mutants
Russian Journal of Genetics
 , 
1998
, vol. 
34
 (pg. 
1233
-
1235
)
Sidorova
KK
Shumnyi
VK
A collection of symbiotic mutants in pea (Pisum sativum L.): creation and genetic study
Russian Journal of Genetics
 , 
2003
, vol. 
39
 (pg. 
406
-
413
)
Subramanian
S
Cho
U-H
Keyes
C
Yu
O
Distinct changes in soybean xylem sap proteome in response to pathogenic and symbiotic microbe interactions
BMC Plant Biology
 , 
2009
, vol. 
9
 pg. 
119
 
Sulieman
S
Fischinger
S
Gresshoff
PM
Schulze
J
Asparagine as a major factor in the N-feedback regulation of N2 fixation in Medicago truncatula
Physiologia Plantarum
 , 
2010
, vol. 
140
 (pg. 
21
-
31
)
Suzuki
A
Hara
H
Kinoue
T
, et al.  . 
Split-root study of autoregulation of nodulation in the model legume Lotus japonicus
Journal of Plant Research
 , 
2008
, vol. 
121
 (pg. 
245
-
249
)
Tirichine
Ll
Imaizumi-Anraku
H
Yoshida
S
, et al.  . 
Deregulation of a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase leads to spontaneous nodule development
Nature
 , 
2006
, vol. 
441
 (pg. 
1153
-
1156
)
Tirichine
L
Sandal
N
Madsen
LH
Radutoiu
S
Albrektsen
AS
Sato
S
Asamizu
E
Tabata
S
Stougaard
J
A gain-of-function mutation in a cytokinin receptor triggers spontaneous root nodule organogenesis
Science
 , 
2007
, vol. 
315
 (pg. 
104
-
107
)
Udvardi
MK
Price
GD
Gresshoff
PM
Day
DA
A dicarboxylate transporter on the peribacteroid membrane of soybean nodules
FEBS Letters
 , 
1988
, vol. 
231
 (pg. 
36
-
40
)
Vernié
T
Moreau
S
de Billy
F
, et al.  . 
EFD is an ERF transcription factor involved in the control of nodule number and differentiation in Medicago truncatula
The Plant Cell
 , 
2008
, vol. 
20
 (pg. 
2696
-
2713
)
Yoshida
C
Funayama-Noguchi
S
Kawaguchi
M
plenty, a novel hypernodulation mutant in Lotus japonicus.
Plant and Cell Physiology
 , 
2010
, vol. 
51
 (pg. 
1425
-
1435
)
Young
ND
Cannon
SB
Sato
S
, et al.  . 
Sequencing the genespaces of Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus
Plant Physiology
 , 
2005
, vol. 
137
 (pg. 
1174
-
1181
)

Comments

0 Comments