Abstract

Background and Aims

The ability for salt removal at the leaf sheath level is considered to be one of the major mechanisms associated with salt tolerance in rice. Thus, understanding the genetic control of the salt removal capacity in leaf sheaths will help improve the molecular breeding of salt-tolerant rice varieties and speed up future varietal development to increase productivity in salt-affected areas. We report a genome-wide association study (GWAS) conducted to find single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with salt removal in leaf sheaths of rice.

Methods

In this study, 296 accessions of a rice (Oryza sativa) diversity panel were used to identify salt removal-related traits and conduct GWAS using 36 901 SNPs. The sheath:blade ratio of Na+ and Cl concentrations was used to determine the salt removal ability in leaf sheaths. Candidate genes were further narrowed via Gene Ontology and RNA-seq analysis to those whose putative function was likely to be associated with salt transport and were up-regulated in response to salt stress.

Key results

For the association signals of the Na+ sheath:blade ratio, significant SNPs were found only in the indica sub-population on chromosome 5. Within candidate genes found in the GWAS study, five genes were upregulated and eight genes were downregulated in the internal leaf sheath tissues in the presence of salt stress.

Conclusions

These GWAS data imply that rice accessions in the indica variety group are the main source of genes and alleles associated with Na+ removal in leaf sheaths of rice under salt stress.

INTRODUCTION

Rice (Oryza sativa L.), which is cultivated in 114 countries and eaten by 3 billion people across the globe, is one of the least salt-tolerant species among major cereal crops (Bouman et al., 2007; Munns and Tester, 2008; Virmani and llyas-Ahmed, 2008). Rice is susceptible to salt stress with a low threshold electrical conductivity of 3 dS m–1, equivalent to 30 mm NaCl (Maas and Hoffman, 1977; Lutts et al., 1995; Pitman and Läuchli, 2002). Saline soil, carrying mostly Na+ and Cl ions, is a severe abiotic stress commonly affecting rice plants (Lutts et al., 1995), and elevated salt is harmful to the main metabolic processes in all developmental stages of rice, which significantly limits rice productivity worldwide (Garcia et al., 1997; Zeng and Shannon, 2000; Tester and Davenport, 2003; Munns and Tester, 2008; Horie et al., 2012; Todaka et al., 2012). The world population is estimated to reach 9 billion people by 2050, so improving salt tolerance in rice crops is a major solution to increase productivity and maintain global food supply (Turral et al., 2011). Therefore, it is necessary to enhance our current understanding of the genetic mechanisms of salt tolerance to develop more salt-tolerant rice varieties through breeding programmes to maximize rice yield in salt-affected areas.

Over time, salt stress increases concentrations of Na+ and Cl to toxic levels and causes premature leaf senescence, stunting and death of rice seedlings (Munns, 2002; Tester and Davenport, 2003; Horie et al., 2012; Todaka et al., 2012). Hence, the removal of Na+ and Cl from leaves is crucial for rice salt tolerance. In rice, the maintenance of low Na+ and Cl concentrations in active photosynthetic tissues, especially leaf blades, has been shown to increase salt tolerance in rice (Zhu, 2003; Pardo et al., 2006; Munns and Tester, 2008; Zhang et al., 2016).

There are two stages of the removal of Na+ and Cl in rice plants to decrease transport to the leaf blade (Ren et al., 2005; Shi et al., 2013). For the first stage of salt removal, known as ‘salt removal by the root’, Na+ is unloaded from xylem vessels to xylem parenchyma cells mediated by OsHKT1;5 (Ren et al., 2005), whereas removal of Cl from the xylem vessels may be controlled by Cl-permeable NPF2.4 and SLAC1 proteins (Li et al., 2016; Qiu et al., 2016). The second stage of salt removal is the removal of Na+ and Cl in the leaf sheath (Cotsaftis et al., 2012; Kobayashi et al., 2017; Neang et al., 2019). In the rice leaf sheath, Na+ and Cl are preferentially removed from xylem vessels and then transported to the fundamental parenchyma cells (Neang et al., 2019). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that Na+-selective HKT1 transporter proteins such as OsHKT1;5 in rice (Kobayashi et al., 2017) and TmHKT1;4 in durum wheat (Lindsay et al., 2004; James et al., 2006) unload Na+ from xylem vessels into xylem parenchyma cells in the leaf sheath, whereas there are no reports on Cl transporters excluding Cl in the leaf sheath.

The ability to remove Na+ and Cl in the leaf sheath is evaluated by comparing the concentrations of Na+ and Cl in leaf sheaths and leaf blades, expressed as a ratio of Na+ and Cl concentration between leaf sheaths and leaf blades (James et al., 2006, 2011; Neang et al., 2019). In addition, there is a genotypic variation of the Na+ sheath:blade ratio between salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive rice genotypes (Neang et al., 2019), which suggests corresponding genes/proteins associated with the variation of Na+ removal ability in the leaf sheath of rice. However, the complete understanding of the genetic control of Na+ and Cl removal ability in leaf sheaths is still obscure.

To understand the molecular mechanism of salt tolerance in rice, a quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping approach has been used for rice. A number of QTLs have been identified in relation to rice salt tolerance traits (Koyama et al., 2001; Lin et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2007; Mohammadi-Nejad et al., 2008; Sabouri and Sabouri, 2008; Ammar et al., 2009; Pandit et al., 2010; Thomson et al., 2010; Islam et al., 2011; Cheng et al., 2012; Hu et al., 2012; Ghomi et al., 2013; Mohammadi et al., 2013; Hossain et al., 2015; Tiwari et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2020; Jahan et al., 2020). Among many QTLs that have been identified in the rice genome, Saltol and SKC1 on chromosome 1 are well-characterized QTLs, that are known to regulate the shoot Na+:K+ ratio under salt stress (Bonilla et al., 2002; Lin et al., 2004; Thomson et al., 2010).

To date, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified important loci controlling variation in salt tolerance among rice germplasms, which offers larger mapping resolution and the ability to evaluate greater allelic diversity compared with the QTL method (Yu and Buckler, 2006; Myles et al., 2009; Pandit et al., 2010; Negrão et al., 2011). Regarding salt tolerance mechanisms, the application of GWAS revealed a large number of SNPs and candidate genes associated with rice salt tolerance-related traits such as stress susceptibility indices of the vigour index, germination time, Na+ and K+ contents, net photosynthetic rate, grain yield, yield components, seedling length ratio, and fresh and dry weight ratios in different growth stages from germination to flowering stages under saline conditions (Shi et al., 2017; Patishtan et al., 2018; Lekklar et al., 2019, An et al., 2020). However, neither QTLs nor GWAS have been applied for the analysis of genetic sources of salt removal ability in leaf sheaths, which is determined by the sheath:blade ratio of the Na+ and Cl concentration.

In the current study, we performed GWAS for salt removal ability in leaf sheath using the sheath:blade ratio of Na+ and Cl under salt stress conditions and 36 901 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 296 accessions of a rice diversity panel. The rice panel consists of indica, aus, tropical japonica, temperate japonica, aromatic and admixed sub-populations (Zhao et al., 2011). The aim of this study was to conduct GWAS to find associated SNPs and candidate genes responsible for salt removal ability in rice leaf sheaths. To narrow down the candidate genes, we hypothesized that the genes associated with the salt removal ability in the leaf sheath may be upregulated by salt treatment and we selected genes whose expression levels were altered by salinity. Additionally, we determined Na+ and Cl concentrations in leaf blades and the standard evaluation score (SES), an indicator of salt tolerance, to evaluate the contribution of salt removal ability in leaf sheath to lowering Na+ and Cl in the leaf blade and whole-plant salt tolerance at the seedling stage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant materials and growth conditions

We used a rice diversity panel that consisted of 296 varieties (Supplementary data Table S1), which were collected from many countries, representing all the major rice-growing countries across the world (Zhao et al., 2011). The rice panel is composed of six major sub-populations of rice: 70 indica, 49 aus, 61 temperate japonica, 61 tropical japonica, 11 aromatic and 44 highly admixed accessions. For check varieties, FL 478 was used as a salt-tolerant check and NSIC Rc 222 was used as a salt-sensitive check. These rice accessions were requested from the International Rice Gene Bank at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), in the Philippines. Plant cultivation was conducted in a greenhouse at the IRRI using a randomized complete block design with three replications. Seeds were incubated for 5 d at 50 °C to break dormancy. Seeds were then placed in Petri dishes with moistened filter paper and incubated at 30 °C for 48 h to germinate. Pre-germinated seeds were sown onto holes (two seeds per hole) on a Styrofoam seedling float, suspended on distilled water in 10 L plastic trays for 3 d. Each plastic tray had 96 holes, with four holes used for one variety. Twenty-two varieties and two check varieties were grown per tray using 14 plastic trays per replicate except for the final tray which had ten varieties and two check varieties (Supplementary data Fig. S1). The floats were then transferred to Yoshida hydroponic solution (Yoshida et al. 1976) and plants were further grown until the sixth leaves of each variety were fully expanded. After the complete development of the sixth leaves, NaCl was added to the culture solution to bring its electrical conductivity (EC) to 12 dS m–1 (approx. 100 mm NaCl) using an EC meter (HI-9835, Hanna Instruments) and plants were grown for a further 7 d. The pH of the culture solution was adjusted daily to pH 5.0 by adding either KOH or HCl (Yoshida et al., 1976), and the solution was renewed every 7 d.

Phenotype data analyses

Seven days after the initiation of salt treatment, the sixth leaves of all rice accessions (two plants per variety, six in total from three replications) were harvested and rinsed with distilled water twice. Samples were then dried at 70 °C for >48 h, separated into leaf blades and leaf sheaths, and used for the measurement of the concentrations of Na+ and Cl according to Neang et al. (2019). Na+ and Cl concentrations are presented on a unit dry weight basis. The sheath:blade ratio of Na+ and Cl was calculated according to the formula: concentration in leaf sheath/concentration in leaf blade, as described in Neang et al. (2019). Data from two plants from each variety were used to calculate the average for each replication. The average of each variety was calculated using the average of all three replications and then used for GWAS analysis.

Standard evaluation score for salt tolerance

Salt tolerance screening of the rice diversity panel was done at the IRRI phytotron facility with day/night temperatures controlled at 29/21 °C and 70 % relative humidity. For check varieties, we used FL 478 as the salt-tolerant check and IR 29 as the salt-sensitive check. Plants were hydroponically grown as described above. Salt treatment was done by salinizing the hydroponic solution to EC = 12 dS m–1 as described above. After 2 weeks in EC 12 dS m–1, the visible reactions of plants to salt stress were evaluated using the SES for salt tolerance (where 1 = very tolerant, and 9 = very susceptible) (IRRI, 1996).

Genome-wide association study

The GWAS was performed on the Na+ sheath:blade ratio and Na+ and Cl concentrations in leaf blades of 296 diverse rice accessions using a linear-mixed model implemented in the efficient mixed-model association (EMMA) by the R package of the Genome Association and Prediction Integrated Tool package (GAPIT) (Zhang et al., 2010; Lipka et al., 2012). For the genotypic dataset, a 44 K SNP chip was used for the association with phenotypic traits, which can be found on www.ricediversity.org/44kgwas. SNP calling was performed using the program ALCHEMY as described in Wright et al., 2010. A total of 36 901 high-density SNPs that showed a call rate >70 % and a minor allele frequency >0.01 were selected to use for all analyses. SNPs that showed a low call rate and allele frequency across all samples were discarded from the dataset (Zhao et al., 2011). The genome-wide significance threshold was determined using the strict Bonferroni correction method (P-value = 0.01/number of SNPs) (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995).

Identification and analysis of candidate genes

To determine candidate genes that are associated with salt removal ability in leaf sheaths, bioinformatic servers such as the IRRI Galaxy (http://galaxy.irri.org/) and the Rice Genome Annotation Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu), and SNP data (the most significant SNPs with the lowest P-value) were used. Significantly associated SNPs from the indica sub-population for the Na+ sheath:blade ratio were selected for candidate gene analysis. Candidate genes were searched within 200 kb genomic regions (Zhao et al., 2011; Patishtan et al., 2018) of selected significant SNPs using IRRI Galaxy. Then, the classification and annotation of candidate genes was done using the Rice Genome Annotation Project. Among all the candidate genes, the genes categorized in expressed protein, hypothetical protein, retrotransposon and transposon were discarded.

RNA-seq analysis

For RNA-seq analysis, a salt-tolerant variety FL 478 whose Na+ sheath:blade ratio (9.9) was close to the average of all 296 rice varieties (9.0) was used. FL 478 was hydroponically grown using Yoshida solution (Yoshida et al., 1976) in a growth chamber with a light/dark cycle of 12/12 h at 30/25 °C and 70 % relative humidity as described in Neang et al. (2019). After 2 weeks, the seedlings were treated with 50 mm NaCl for 2 d followed by 100 mm NaCl for 1 d (3 d in total). The fifth leaf sheaths of FL 478 treated or not with NaCl were used to make cross-sections. Then, central and peripheral parts of the leaf sheath were immediately dissected from each cross-section under a stereo microscope. After that, the central and peripheral parts of leaf sheaths were collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Plant mini kit (Qiagen). The quality of RNA was determined using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies) and all samples showed an RNA integrity number (RIN) >8.5. After processing RNA samples using a TruSeq stranded mRNA sample prep kit (Illumina), a cDNA library was prepared using a TruSeq stranded mRNA library prep kit (Illumina). Single-end 50 bp reads were generated with the Illumina Novaseq 6000. The sequences were mapped to the IRGSP-1.0 reference genome sequence using STAR v2.6.0a. Duplicated reads were checked using Picard v2.18.25. The expression level of each transcript was expressed as the reads per kilobase per million reads (RPKM) value, which was calculated based on the number of mapped reads. The data have been deposited into the DDBJ Sequence Read Archive (DRA) (accession no. DRA009377).

Statistical analysis

A randomized complete block design with three replications was used. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons using general linear hypothesis test (GLHT) were performed for phenotypic comparison between sub-populations using R software. Relationships among phenotypic traits were analysed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Phenotype variation for salt removal-related traits among rice accessions

Table 1 shows the phenotype variations in the rice diversity panel under NaCl-treated conditions. The Na+ and Cl sheath:blade ratios, indicators of the salt removal ability in leaf sheaths, showed a large phenotypic variation among rice accessions. The Na+ sheath:blade ratio ranged from 1.90 to 50.20, while the Cl sheath:blade ratio ranged from 0.83 to 10.93. Regarding the SES which indicates the whole-plant salt tolerance, the score varied from 2.30 (highly salt tolerant) to 8.11 (highly salt susceptible) (Table 1).

Table 1.

All phenotypic traits related to salt removal ability used for GWAS analysis

Trait nameMinMax
Na+ concentration in leaf sheaths (mg g–1 d. wt)1.5141.77
Cl concentration in leaf sheaths (mg g–1 d. wt)22.26162.76
Na+ concentration in leaf blades (mg g–1 d. wt)0.1718.82
Cl concentration in leaf blades (mg g–1 d. wt)14.80110.05
Na+ sheath:blade ratio1.9050.20
Cl sheath:blade ratio0.8310.93
SES of salinity tolerance 2.308.11
Trait nameMinMax
Na+ concentration in leaf sheaths (mg g–1 d. wt)1.5141.77
Cl concentration in leaf sheaths (mg g–1 d. wt)22.26162.76
Na+ concentration in leaf blades (mg g–1 d. wt)0.1718.82
Cl concentration in leaf blades (mg g–1 d. wt)14.80110.05
Na+ sheath:blade ratio1.9050.20
Cl sheath:blade ratio0.8310.93
SES of salinity tolerance 2.308.11
Table 1.

All phenotypic traits related to salt removal ability used for GWAS analysis

Trait nameMinMax
Na+ concentration in leaf sheaths (mg g–1 d. wt)1.5141.77
Cl concentration in leaf sheaths (mg g–1 d. wt)22.26162.76
Na+ concentration in leaf blades (mg g–1 d. wt)0.1718.82
Cl concentration in leaf blades (mg g–1 d. wt)14.80110.05
Na+ sheath:blade ratio1.9050.20
Cl sheath:blade ratio0.8310.93
SES of salinity tolerance 2.308.11
Trait nameMinMax
Na+ concentration in leaf sheaths (mg g–1 d. wt)1.5141.77
Cl concentration in leaf sheaths (mg g–1 d. wt)22.26162.76
Na+ concentration in leaf blades (mg g–1 d. wt)0.1718.82
Cl concentration in leaf blades (mg g–1 d. wt)14.80110.05
Na+ sheath:blade ratio1.9050.20
Cl sheath:blade ratio0.8310.93
SES of salinity tolerance 2.308.11

Relationships of all phenotypic traits under saline conditions

To examine the contribution of salt removal ability in the leaf sheath to the salt accumulation in the leaf blade and salt tolerance, Pearson correlation analysis was conducted across all the rice diversity accessions (Table 2). The Na+ sheath:blade ratio showed significantly negative correlations with Na+ of the leaf blade and a positive correlation with the SES of salt tolerance. The Cl sheath:blade ratio showed significantly negative correlations with Cl concentration in the leaf blade but no correlation with the SES of salt tolerance. The Na+ sheath:blade ratio and Cl sheath:blade ratio showed a significantly positive correlation. The Na+ and Cl concentration in leaf blades showed significantly positive correlations with the SES of salt tolerance.

Table 2.

Phenotypic correlations of all salt removal-related traits in all rice varieties under salt stress

Traits[Na+] leaf bladesNa+ sheath:blade ratio[Cl] leaf bladesCl sheath:blade ratioSES
[Na+] leaf blades1.000
Na+ sheath:blade ratio–0.819*1.000
[Cl] leaf blades 0.762*–0.638*1.000
Cl sheath:blade ratio–0.0890.251*–0.384*1.000
SES0.268*–0.195*0.148–0.0961.000
Traits[Na+] leaf bladesNa+ sheath:blade ratio[Cl] leaf bladesCl sheath:blade ratioSES
[Na+] leaf blades1.000
Na+ sheath:blade ratio–0.819*1.000
[Cl] leaf blades 0.762*–0.638*1.000
Cl sheath:blade ratio–0.0890.251*–0.384*1.000
SES0.268*–0.195*0.148–0.0961.000

Abbreviations: [Na+], Na+ concentration; [Cl], Cl concentration.

*Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).

Table 2.

Phenotypic correlations of all salt removal-related traits in all rice varieties under salt stress

Traits[Na+] leaf bladesNa+ sheath:blade ratio[Cl] leaf bladesCl sheath:blade ratioSES
[Na+] leaf blades1.000
Na+ sheath:blade ratio–0.819*1.000
[Cl] leaf blades 0.762*–0.638*1.000
Cl sheath:blade ratio–0.0890.251*–0.384*1.000
SES0.268*–0.195*0.148–0.0961.000
Traits[Na+] leaf bladesNa+ sheath:blade ratio[Cl] leaf bladesCl sheath:blade ratioSES
[Na+] leaf blades1.000
Na+ sheath:blade ratio–0.819*1.000
[Cl] leaf blades 0.762*–0.638*1.000
Cl sheath:blade ratio–0.0890.251*–0.384*1.000
SES0.268*–0.195*0.148–0.0961.000

Abbreviations: [Na+], Na+ concentration; [Cl], Cl concentration.

*Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).

Phenotypic distribution and GWAS for the Na+ sheath:blade ratio

Comparisons between each of the sub-populations showed a significant difference for the Na+ sheath:blade ratio (Fig. 1B). In the rice diversity panel, aromatic and aus accessions had the longest mean Na+ sheath:blade ratio, indica and temperate japonica accessions had an intermediate Na+ sheath:blade ratio, and admixed and tropical japonica accessions had the shortest (Fig. 1B).

Phenotype distribution for the Na+ and Cl– sheath:blade ratio. (A) Histogram of the Na+ sheath:blade ratio in all rice accessions. (B) Boxplot showing the differences in the Na+ sheath:blade ratio among sub-populations. (C) Histogram of the Cl– sheath:blade ratio in all rice accessions. (D) Boxplot showing the differences in the Cl– sheath:blade ratio among sub-populations. Different letters indicate significant differences among sub-populations at P < 0.05 [multiple comparisons using general linear hypothesis test (GLHT)].
Fig. 1.

Phenotype distribution for the Na+ and Cl sheath:blade ratio. (A) Histogram of the Na+ sheath:blade ratio in all rice accessions. (B) Boxplot showing the differences in the Na+ sheath:blade ratio among sub-populations. (C) Histogram of the Cl sheath:blade ratio in all rice accessions. (D) Boxplot showing the differences in the Cl sheath:blade ratio among sub-populations. Different letters indicate significant differences among sub-populations at P < 0.05 [multiple comparisons using general linear hypothesis test (GLHT)].

When the rice diversity panel was analysed as a whole, no significant associated SNPs were observed in any chromosomes (Supplementary data Fig. S2). When rice sub-populations were analysed individually, significant associated SNPs were seen in the indica sub-population on chromosome 5 (Fig. 2) but not in other sub-populations (Supplementary data Fig. S2). The region that showed significantly strong association in indica sub-population contained 11 SNPs (Supplementary data Table S2), which were used to identify candidate genes responsible for the Na+ sheath:blade ratio.

Genome-wide association for the Na+ sheath:blade ratio. Manhattan plot (A) and quantile–quantile plot (B) showing the association signal of GWAS analysis using the Na+ sheath:blade ratio of the indica sub-population as phenotypic data. The x-axis indicates the SNP positions across the 12 rice chromosomes. The y-axis shows the P-value for the association test at each locus on a log scale. The horizontal green line represents the significance threshold. Coloured dots indicate SNPs.
Fig. 2.

Genome-wide association for the Na+ sheath:blade ratio. Manhattan plot (A) and quantile–quantile plot (B) showing the association signal of GWAS analysis using the Na+ sheath:blade ratio of the indica sub-population as phenotypic data. The x-axis indicates the SNP positions across the 12 rice chromosomes. The y-axis shows the P-value for the association test at each locus on a log scale. The horizontal green line represents the significance threshold. Coloured dots indicate SNPs.

Phenotypic distribution and GWAS for the Cl sheath:blade ratio,and Na+ and Cl concentrations in leaf blades

With regards to the Cl sheath:blade ratio, a small variation among rice genotypes and sub-populations was observed compared with the Na+ sheath:blade ratio (Fig. 1). Furthermore, all sub-populations showed comparable mean Cl sheath:blade ratios (Fig. 1D). Therefore, GWAS on the Cl sheath:blade ratio was not analysed due to the small genetic variation of the Cl sheath:blade ratio among rice accessions and sub-populations.

Next, since the concentrations of Na+ and Cl in leaf blades significantly correlated with the SES of salt tolerance (Table 2), we performed GWAS analysis of these two parameters as salt tolerance-related traits. The Na+ concentration in leaf blades showed genetic variation among rice genotypes and sub-populations (Supplementary data Fig. S3A, B). The tropical japonica sub-population had the highest mean Na+ concentration in leaf blades followed by the admixed sub-population compared with other sub-populations (Supplementary data Fig. S3B). The aus, aromatic, indica and temperate japonica sub-populations showed the lowest mean Na+ concentration in leaf blades (Supplementary data Fig. S3B). However, no significant associated SNPs for Na+ concentration in leaf blades were observed in any chromosomes when analysing using the whole rice diversity panel as well as individual rice sub-populations (Supplementary data Fig. S4).

For the Cl concentration in leaf blades, genetic variation was shown among rice genotypes and sub-populations (Supplementary data Fig. S3C, D). The tropical japonica sub-population showed the highest level among all sub-populations, while other sub-populations showed a comparable level of Cl concentration in leaf blades (Supplementary data Fig. S3D). There were no significant associated SNPs detected regarding Cl concentration in leaf blades (Supplementary data Fig. S5).

Candidate genes associated with salt removal ability

Candidate genes were identified using SNP data derived from GWAS results and bioinformatic servers (IRRI Galaxy and Rice Genome Annotation Project). In the indica sub-population, 25 candidate genes derived from many functional classes were determined in the region of significant SNPs associated with the Na+ sheath:blade ratio (Table 3).

Table 3.

List of candidate genes associated with the Na+ sheath:blade ratio in the indica sub-population

GO nameLocusPutative function
BindingLOC_Os05g25180Zinc finger, C3HC4-type family protein, expressed
Catalytic activityLOC_Os05g23880Lipoxygenase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g24500Terpene synthase, N-terminal domain-containing protein, expressed
LOC_Os05g24880Dehydrogenase, putative, expressed
Endoplasmic reticulumLOC_Os05g24770Reticulon domain-containing protein, putative, expressed
Enzyme regulator activityLOC_Os05g23860Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha, putative, expressed
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g23830Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g23924Glycosyl hydrolase family 10 protein, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g24550Papain family cysteine protease domain-containing protein, expressed
IntracellularLOC_Os05g24970LSM domain-containing protein, expressed
Kinase activityLOC_Os05g24010Receptor protein kinase-like, putative, expressed
Post-embryonic developmentLOC_Os05g25060PPR repeat domain-containing protein, putative, expressed
Protein bindingLOC_Os05g24780OsCML21 – calmodulin-related calcium sensor protein, expressed
Protein metabolic processLOC_Os05g23740DnaK family protein, putative, expressed
Response to stressLOC_Os05g23990Rp3 protein, putative, expressed
Sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor activityLOC_Os05g23780OsMADS70 – MADS-box family gene with M-alpha type-box, expressed
LOC_Os05g23910Histone-like transcription factor and archaeal histone, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g25260AP2 domain-containing protein, expressed
Transferase activityLOC_Os05g23950TRAF-type zinc finger family protein, expressed
LOC_Os05g24660IPP transferase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g25150Transferase family protein, putative, expressed
Translation factor activity, nucleic acid bindingLOC_Os05g23800RNA recognition motif-containing protein, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g23940Transcription initiation factor IIB, putative, expressed
TransportLOC_Os05g24601Coatomer subunit delta, putative, expressed
Transporter activity LOC_Os05g25194Metal cation transporter, putative, expressed
GO nameLocusPutative function
BindingLOC_Os05g25180Zinc finger, C3HC4-type family protein, expressed
Catalytic activityLOC_Os05g23880Lipoxygenase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g24500Terpene synthase, N-terminal domain-containing protein, expressed
LOC_Os05g24880Dehydrogenase, putative, expressed
Endoplasmic reticulumLOC_Os05g24770Reticulon domain-containing protein, putative, expressed
Enzyme regulator activityLOC_Os05g23860Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha, putative, expressed
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g23830Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g23924Glycosyl hydrolase family 10 protein, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g24550Papain family cysteine protease domain-containing protein, expressed
IntracellularLOC_Os05g24970LSM domain-containing protein, expressed
Kinase activityLOC_Os05g24010Receptor protein kinase-like, putative, expressed
Post-embryonic developmentLOC_Os05g25060PPR repeat domain-containing protein, putative, expressed
Protein bindingLOC_Os05g24780OsCML21 – calmodulin-related calcium sensor protein, expressed
Protein metabolic processLOC_Os05g23740DnaK family protein, putative, expressed
Response to stressLOC_Os05g23990Rp3 protein, putative, expressed
Sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor activityLOC_Os05g23780OsMADS70 – MADS-box family gene with M-alpha type-box, expressed
LOC_Os05g23910Histone-like transcription factor and archaeal histone, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g25260AP2 domain-containing protein, expressed
Transferase activityLOC_Os05g23950TRAF-type zinc finger family protein, expressed
LOC_Os05g24660IPP transferase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g25150Transferase family protein, putative, expressed
Translation factor activity, nucleic acid bindingLOC_Os05g23800RNA recognition motif-containing protein, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g23940Transcription initiation factor IIB, putative, expressed
TransportLOC_Os05g24601Coatomer subunit delta, putative, expressed
Transporter activity LOC_Os05g25194Metal cation transporter, putative, expressed
Table 3.

List of candidate genes associated with the Na+ sheath:blade ratio in the indica sub-population

GO nameLocusPutative function
BindingLOC_Os05g25180Zinc finger, C3HC4-type family protein, expressed
Catalytic activityLOC_Os05g23880Lipoxygenase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g24500Terpene synthase, N-terminal domain-containing protein, expressed
LOC_Os05g24880Dehydrogenase, putative, expressed
Endoplasmic reticulumLOC_Os05g24770Reticulon domain-containing protein, putative, expressed
Enzyme regulator activityLOC_Os05g23860Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha, putative, expressed
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g23830Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g23924Glycosyl hydrolase family 10 protein, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g24550Papain family cysteine protease domain-containing protein, expressed
IntracellularLOC_Os05g24970LSM domain-containing protein, expressed
Kinase activityLOC_Os05g24010Receptor protein kinase-like, putative, expressed
Post-embryonic developmentLOC_Os05g25060PPR repeat domain-containing protein, putative, expressed
Protein bindingLOC_Os05g24780OsCML21 – calmodulin-related calcium sensor protein, expressed
Protein metabolic processLOC_Os05g23740DnaK family protein, putative, expressed
Response to stressLOC_Os05g23990Rp3 protein, putative, expressed
Sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor activityLOC_Os05g23780OsMADS70 – MADS-box family gene with M-alpha type-box, expressed
LOC_Os05g23910Histone-like transcription factor and archaeal histone, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g25260AP2 domain-containing protein, expressed
Transferase activityLOC_Os05g23950TRAF-type zinc finger family protein, expressed
LOC_Os05g24660IPP transferase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g25150Transferase family protein, putative, expressed
Translation factor activity, nucleic acid bindingLOC_Os05g23800RNA recognition motif-containing protein, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g23940Transcription initiation factor IIB, putative, expressed
TransportLOC_Os05g24601Coatomer subunit delta, putative, expressed
Transporter activity LOC_Os05g25194Metal cation transporter, putative, expressed
GO nameLocusPutative function
BindingLOC_Os05g25180Zinc finger, C3HC4-type family protein, expressed
Catalytic activityLOC_Os05g23880Lipoxygenase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g24500Terpene synthase, N-terminal domain-containing protein, expressed
LOC_Os05g24880Dehydrogenase, putative, expressed
Endoplasmic reticulumLOC_Os05g24770Reticulon domain-containing protein, putative, expressed
Enzyme regulator activityLOC_Os05g23860Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha, putative, expressed
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g23830Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g23924Glycosyl hydrolase family 10 protein, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g24550Papain family cysteine protease domain-containing protein, expressed
IntracellularLOC_Os05g24970LSM domain-containing protein, expressed
Kinase activityLOC_Os05g24010Receptor protein kinase-like, putative, expressed
Post-embryonic developmentLOC_Os05g25060PPR repeat domain-containing protein, putative, expressed
Protein bindingLOC_Os05g24780OsCML21 – calmodulin-related calcium sensor protein, expressed
Protein metabolic processLOC_Os05g23740DnaK family protein, putative, expressed
Response to stressLOC_Os05g23990Rp3 protein, putative, expressed
Sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor activityLOC_Os05g23780OsMADS70 – MADS-box family gene with M-alpha type-box, expressed
LOC_Os05g23910Histone-like transcription factor and archaeal histone, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g25260AP2 domain-containing protein, expressed
Transferase activityLOC_Os05g23950TRAF-type zinc finger family protein, expressed
LOC_Os05g24660IPP transferase, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g25150Transferase family protein, putative, expressed
Translation factor activity, nucleic acid bindingLOC_Os05g23800RNA recognition motif-containing protein, putative, expressed
LOC_Os05g23940Transcription initiation factor IIB, putative, expressed
TransportLOC_Os05g24601Coatomer subunit delta, putative, expressed
Transporter activity LOC_Os05g25194Metal cation transporter, putative, expressed

Up- and downregulated genes in the central and peripheral parts of the internal leaf sheath under salinity

To explore the candidate genes associated with salt distribution in the internal tissues of the leaf sheath, RNA-seq analysis was performed to determine the expression level of candidate genes in the regions associated with Na+ removal in the leaf sheath in the central and peripheral parts of the leaf sheath. The results demonstrated that, of the 25 candidate genes in the region of significant SNPs associated with the Na+ sheath:blade ratio, five genes were upregulated and eight were downregulated in either the central or the peripheral regions of the internal leaf sheath under saline conditions (Table 4).

Table 4.

Candidate genes associated with the Na+ sheath:blade ratio in the indica sub-population, which were up- and down-regulated in the central and peripheral parts of the internal leaf sheath under salinity

GO NameLocusPutative functionExpression level (RPKM)
Central partPeripheral part
ControlSalineControlSaline
Genes upregulated under salinity
Enzyme regulator activityLOC_Os05g23860Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha, putative, expressed39.0 79.9*32.6 68.0*
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g23924Glycosyl hydrolase family 10 protein, putative, expressed0.0 0.1*0.0 0.9*
Protein metabolic processLOC_Os05g23740DnaK family protein, putative, expressed54.9 138.6 84.7 215.9*
Sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activityLOC_Os05g23910Histone-like transcription factor and archaeal histone, putative, expressed0.0 4.3*0.0 19.5*
TransportLOC_Os05g24601Coatomer subunit delta, putative, expressed50.3 53.2 29.1 39.4*
Genes downregulated under salinity
BindingLOC_Os05g25180Zinc finger, C3HC4-type family protein, expressed27.3 22.9*24.2 22.3
Catalytic activityLOC_Os05g23880Lipoxygenase, putative, expressed3.9 2.6 6.7 4.5*
LOC_Os05g24880Dehydrogenase, putative, expressed69.7 36.4*61.2 38.7*
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g24550Papain family cysteine protease domain-containing protein, expressed198.9 102.6*198.6 81.8*
IntracellularLOC_Os05g24970LSM domain-containing protein, expressed73.4 56.6*68.5 61.8
Kinase activityLOC_Os05g24010Receptor protein kinase-like, putative, expressed26.8 14.9*22.0 10.2*
Protein bindingLOC_Os05g24780OsCML21 – calmodulin-related calcium sensor protein, expressed1.7 0.0*1.3 0.1*
Response to stressLOC_Os05g23990Rp3 protein, putative, expressed9.9 5.7*6.9 3.0*
GO NameLocusPutative functionExpression level (RPKM)
Central partPeripheral part
ControlSalineControlSaline
Genes upregulated under salinity
Enzyme regulator activityLOC_Os05g23860Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha, putative, expressed39.0 79.9*32.6 68.0*
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g23924Glycosyl hydrolase family 10 protein, putative, expressed0.0 0.1*0.0 0.9*
Protein metabolic processLOC_Os05g23740DnaK family protein, putative, expressed54.9 138.6 84.7 215.9*
Sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activityLOC_Os05g23910Histone-like transcription factor and archaeal histone, putative, expressed0.0 4.3*0.0 19.5*
TransportLOC_Os05g24601Coatomer subunit delta, putative, expressed50.3 53.2 29.1 39.4*
Genes downregulated under salinity
BindingLOC_Os05g25180Zinc finger, C3HC4-type family protein, expressed27.3 22.9*24.2 22.3
Catalytic activityLOC_Os05g23880Lipoxygenase, putative, expressed3.9 2.6 6.7 4.5*
LOC_Os05g24880Dehydrogenase, putative, expressed69.7 36.4*61.2 38.7*
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g24550Papain family cysteine protease domain-containing protein, expressed198.9 102.6*198.6 81.8*
IntracellularLOC_Os05g24970LSM domain-containing protein, expressed73.4 56.6*68.5 61.8
Kinase activityLOC_Os05g24010Receptor protein kinase-like, putative, expressed26.8 14.9*22.0 10.2*
Protein bindingLOC_Os05g24780OsCML21 – calmodulin-related calcium sensor protein, expressed1.7 0.0*1.3 0.1*
Response to stressLOC_Os05g23990Rp3 protein, putative, expressed9.9 5.7*6.9 3.0*

Abbreviation: RPKM, reads per kilobase million.

*Significant difference at P < 0.05 among conditions.

Table 4.

Candidate genes associated with the Na+ sheath:blade ratio in the indica sub-population, which were up- and down-regulated in the central and peripheral parts of the internal leaf sheath under salinity

GO NameLocusPutative functionExpression level (RPKM)
Central partPeripheral part
ControlSalineControlSaline
Genes upregulated under salinity
Enzyme regulator activityLOC_Os05g23860Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha, putative, expressed39.0 79.9*32.6 68.0*
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g23924Glycosyl hydrolase family 10 protein, putative, expressed0.0 0.1*0.0 0.9*
Protein metabolic processLOC_Os05g23740DnaK family protein, putative, expressed54.9 138.6 84.7 215.9*
Sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activityLOC_Os05g23910Histone-like transcription factor and archaeal histone, putative, expressed0.0 4.3*0.0 19.5*
TransportLOC_Os05g24601Coatomer subunit delta, putative, expressed50.3 53.2 29.1 39.4*
Genes downregulated under salinity
BindingLOC_Os05g25180Zinc finger, C3HC4-type family protein, expressed27.3 22.9*24.2 22.3
Catalytic activityLOC_Os05g23880Lipoxygenase, putative, expressed3.9 2.6 6.7 4.5*
LOC_Os05g24880Dehydrogenase, putative, expressed69.7 36.4*61.2 38.7*
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g24550Papain family cysteine protease domain-containing protein, expressed198.9 102.6*198.6 81.8*
IntracellularLOC_Os05g24970LSM domain-containing protein, expressed73.4 56.6*68.5 61.8
Kinase activityLOC_Os05g24010Receptor protein kinase-like, putative, expressed26.8 14.9*22.0 10.2*
Protein bindingLOC_Os05g24780OsCML21 – calmodulin-related calcium sensor protein, expressed1.7 0.0*1.3 0.1*
Response to stressLOC_Os05g23990Rp3 protein, putative, expressed9.9 5.7*6.9 3.0*
GO NameLocusPutative functionExpression level (RPKM)
Central partPeripheral part
ControlSalineControlSaline
Genes upregulated under salinity
Enzyme regulator activityLOC_Os05g23860Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha, putative, expressed39.0 79.9*32.6 68.0*
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g23924Glycosyl hydrolase family 10 protein, putative, expressed0.0 0.1*0.0 0.9*
Protein metabolic processLOC_Os05g23740DnaK family protein, putative, expressed54.9 138.6 84.7 215.9*
Sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activityLOC_Os05g23910Histone-like transcription factor and archaeal histone, putative, expressed0.0 4.3*0.0 19.5*
TransportLOC_Os05g24601Coatomer subunit delta, putative, expressed50.3 53.2 29.1 39.4*
Genes downregulated under salinity
BindingLOC_Os05g25180Zinc finger, C3HC4-type family protein, expressed27.3 22.9*24.2 22.3
Catalytic activityLOC_Os05g23880Lipoxygenase, putative, expressed3.9 2.6 6.7 4.5*
LOC_Os05g24880Dehydrogenase, putative, expressed69.7 36.4*61.2 38.7*
Hydrolase activityLOC_Os05g24550Papain family cysteine protease domain-containing protein, expressed198.9 102.6*198.6 81.8*
IntracellularLOC_Os05g24970LSM domain-containing protein, expressed73.4 56.6*68.5 61.8
Kinase activityLOC_Os05g24010Receptor protein kinase-like, putative, expressed26.8 14.9*22.0 10.2*
Protein bindingLOC_Os05g24780OsCML21 – calmodulin-related calcium sensor protein, expressed1.7 0.0*1.3 0.1*
Response to stressLOC_Os05g23990Rp3 protein, putative, expressed9.9 5.7*6.9 3.0*

Abbreviation: RPKM, reads per kilobase million.

*Significant difference at P < 0.05 among conditions.

DISCUSSION

Variations in the salt removal in the leaf sheath among rice genotypes

To our knowledge, this is the first report showing variation in the Na+ and Cl removal ability in rice leaf sheath from diverse rice backgrounds consisting of all variety groups of O. sativa. The rice diversity panel consisting of 296 rice accessions showed a wide range of Na+ sheath:blade ratios (Fig. 1A, B), indicating a wide variation in the Na+ removal ability in leaf sheaths. In addition, correlation analysis results indicated that Na+ removal ability in leaf sheaths may contribute to lowering Na+ accumulation in leaf blades and salt tolerance at the whole-plant level (Table 2). Therefore, it is suggested that Na+ removal in the leaf sheath is a crucial trait to make rice tolerant to salt stress by reducing Na+ concentrations in the leaf blade at the seedling stage. This is well matched to the result of Platten et al. (2013) showing that salt tolerance is well correlated with leaf Na+ concentration across 115 rice accessions including O. sativa and O. glaberrima. Additionally, in the rice diversity panel, aromatic and aus accessions showed the highest Na+ sheath:blade ratio, whereas admixed and tropical japonica accessions showed the lowest (Fig. 1B). Platten et al. (2013) reported that the aromatic allele group had the highest salt exclusion in roots followed by the aus allele groups, whereas japonica had the least. From this it can be inferred that the aromatic and aus sub-variety groups might have a higher tolerance to salt stress.

In contrast, the rice diversity panel showed relatively small variation in the Cl sheath:blade ratio as most were in a small range of 0–3 (Fig. 1C, D), while most Na+ sheath:blade ratios ranged between 0 and 35 (Fig. 1A, B). In addition, all sub-populations showed similar mean Cl sheath:blade ratios (Fig. 1D), suggesting a low genetic variation of Cl removal in the leaf sheath in the rice diversity panel, in comparison with Na+ removal ability. In the correlation analysis, the Cl sheath:blade ratio negatively correlated with the Cl concentration in the leaf blade, whereas it showed no correlation with the SES (Table 2). This result indicates that Cl removal in the leaf sheath contributes to lowering Cl accumulation in leaf blades but not to the salt tolerance at the seedling stage. In rice, Na+ ions primarily cause ion-specific damage more than Cl (Lin and Kao, 2001; Tester and Davenport, 2003), therefore, Na+ removal ability in the leaf sheath correlates with salt tolerance more than Cl removal ability.

Association mapping

In this study, GWAS succeeded in detecting 11 significantly associated SNPs with Na+ removal ability in the leaf sheath from the indica sub-population (Supplementary data Table S2) The positions of SNPs associated with the Na+ sheath:blade ratio in this study have not yet been reported in any publications of QTLs and GWAS for salt tolerance in rice.

Candidate genes in the regions associated with salt removal-related traits

Excluding genes encoding unknown, expressed, hypothetical, retrotransposon and transposon proteins, 25 genes were detected in the significantly associated regions with Na+ removal ability in the leaf sheath (Table 3). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showed that these candidate genes were derived from many functional categories such as transport, enzymes, kinase activity, protein binding and many others, as shown in Table 3. Among these genes, we hypothesized that transporter genes that directly transport Na+, and calcium signalling-related genes and transcription factor genes that indirectly regulate the transport of Na+, may be involved in controlling genotypic variation in the removal ability of Na+ in the leaf sheath. In addition, we hypothesized that the involved genes might be upregulated or at least not downregulated in the peripheral and central parts of the leaf sheath in response to salt treatment. This was because the Na+ removal ability in rice leaf sheath is upregulated by salinity in the salt-tolerant rice variety FL 478 (Neang et al., 2019). Also, the leaf sheath unloads Na+ from xylem vessels in the vasculature in the peripheral part, then preferentially transports Na+ from the peripheral part to the central part, sequestering this ion into the fundamental parenchyma cells in the central part (Neang et al., 2019). Therefore, we speculated that the upregulated genes in the peripheral parts might be related to Na+ unloading, and upregulated genes in the central parts might be involved in Na+ sequestration into the fundamental parenchyma cells under salinity.

There was one gene for Na+ removal ability in the leaf sheath in the GO classification of ‘transporter activity’ (Table 3). For Na+ removal ability, the metal cation transporter (LOC_Os05g25194) was a potential candidate gene (Table 3). This metal cation transporter gene is homologous to genes encoding ZIP (Zn-regulated transporter, Iron-regulated transporter-like Protein) proteins which are involved in the transport of metals such as Zn, Cu, Cd, Fe and Mn (Liu et al., 2019). There is no direct evidence so far as to whether plant ZIP proteins permeate sodium ions, but NaCl inhibits Zn uptake of rice OsZIP3 protein (Ramesh et al., 2003), which indicates the possibility of sodium ion transport by ZIP proteins. However, the expression of this metal cation transporter gene did not respond to NaCl treatment.

A calmodulin-like protein-encoding gene (OsCML21; LOC_Os05g24780) was detected in the associated regions with Na+ removal ability in leaf sheaths (Table 3). CML genes are involved in calcium signalling under salinity (Magnan et al., 2008). Calcium signalling regulates sodium homeostasis under salinity via the SOS (salt overly sensitive) pathway (Manishankar et al., 2018). In addition, salt stress increases cytosolic calcium concentrations, which is important to decrease Na+ content in shoots (Rahman et al., 2016). Therefore, this gene may be a potential candidate for further investigation regarding its involvement in Na+ removal ability in leaf sheaths. However, OsCML21 was downregulated in the central and peripheral parts of the internal leaf sheath under salinity (Table 4), indicating that this gene may negatively regulate or not be related to the salt removal ability of the leaf sheath.

Moreover, there were three candidate genes for Na+ removal ability in leaf sheath in the GO classification of ‘sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity’ (Table 3). Within the GO classification of transcription factor activity, one gene (histone-like transcription factor and archaeal histone) for Na+ removal ability in the leaf sheath was upregulated (Table 4), suggesting its involvement in salt removal in the leaf sheath under saline conditions. Transcription factor genes regulate stress-responsive downstream genes and play a role in response to abiotic stress in a number of plant species, including salinity and drought stress in rice plants (Amir Hossain et al., 2010; Ding et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Baillo et al., 2019). Also, transcription factors are involved in regulating sodium homeostasis under salinity (Hichri et al., 2017). Hence, this upregulated transcription factor gene is worth further investigation regarding its involvement in regulating genotypic variation in Na+ removal ability in the leaf sheath.

Conclusions

This study successfully discovered associated SNPs and candidate genes that are closely related to the variation of salt removal in the rice leaf sheath, which is an important trait to reduce salt ions in the active leaf blade, under salt stress conditions. The rice diversity accessions consisting of all sub-populations of O. sativa showed wide phenotypic variations based on ion sheath:blade ratios and the SES under salt stress. In the rice panel, aromatic and aus accessions, compared with other sub-variety groups, seemed to have better ability to remove Na+ from the leaf blade and sequester Na+ in the leaf sheath, and all sub-variety groups might have a similar ability to remove Cl in the leaf sheath. GWAS was applied to identify association signals for salt removal ability in leaf sheaths, which has not been done previously. Our GWAS data implied that rice accessions in the indica variety group are the major source of genes or alleles that mediate Na+ removal in leaf sheaths of rice. RNA-seq performance confirmed the expression level of candidate genes found in the GWAS study and revealed five upregulated and eight downregulated genes in the internal leaf sheath tissues in the presence of salt stress. Furthermore, these findings from GWAS and RNA-seq have provided numerous SNPs and candidate genes that are useful for future studies to explore the deeper role of each candidate gene through transgenic techniques and mutation. This research may enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanism of salt removal ability in the rice leaf sheath under salt stress to improve salt tolerance in rice.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data are available online at https://academic.oup.com/aob and consist of the following. Figure S1: arrangement of the experiment. Figure S2: Manhattan plots and quantile–quantile plots showing the association signals of GWAS analysis using the Na+ sheath:blade ratio as phenotypic data. Figure S3: phenotype distribution for Na+ and Cl concentrations in leaf blades. Figure S4: Manhattan plots and quantile–quantile plots showing the association signals of GWAS analysis using Na+ concentration in leaf blades of all rice varieties and individual sub-populations as phenotypic data. Figure S5: Manhattan plots and quantile–quantile plots showing the association signals of GWAS analysis using Cl concentration in leaf blades of all rice varieties and individual sub-populations as phenotypic data. Table S1: list of the 296 rice accessions used in this study. Table S2: significant associated SNPs for the Na+ sheath:blade ratio.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the genebank at the International Rice Research Institute for providing us with the seeds of all the rice varieities we used in this study. S.N. and S.M. designed the experiments. S.N., M.D.O., J.A.E., M.S. and S.M. performed experiments and analysed the data. J.D.P., A.M.I., Y.S., N.S.S., M.K.N. and A.Y. assisted in experiments and discussed the results. S.N., N.S.S. and S.M. wrote the manuscript.

FUNDING

This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant nos 16K14836, 19H02942 and 16H06279 (PAGS).

LITERATURE CITED

Amir Hossain
 
M
,
Lee
Y
,
Cho
JI
, et al.  
2010
.
The bZIP transcription factor OsABF1 is an ABA responsive element binding factor that enhances abiotic stress signaling in rice
.
Plant Molecular Biology
72
:
557
566
.

Ammar
 
MHM
,
Pandit
A
,
Singh
RK
, et al.  
2009
.
Mapping of QTLs controlling Na+, K+ and Cl ion concentrations in salt tolerant indica rice variety CSR27
.
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology
18
:
139
150
.

An
 
H
,
Liu
K
,
Wang
B
, et al.  
2020
.
Genome-wide association study identifies QTLs conferring salt tolerance in rice
.
Plant Breeding
139
:
73
82
.

Baillo
 
EH
,
Kimotho
RN
,
Zhang
Z
,
Xu
P
.
2019
.
Transcription factors associated with abiotic and biotic stress tolerance and their potential for crops improvement
.
Genes
10
:
771
.

Benjamini
 
Y
,
Hochberg
Y
.
1995
.
Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing
.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological)
57
:
289
300
.

Bonilla
 
P
,
Dvorak
J
,
Mackill
D
,
Deal
K
,
Gregorio
G
.
2002
.
RFLP and SSLP mapping of salinity tolerance genes in chromosome 1 of rice (Oryza sativa L.) using recombinant inbred lines
.
Philippine Agricultural Scientist
65
:
68
76
.

Bouman
 
B
,
Barker
R
,
Humphreys
E
,
Tuong
TP
.
2007
.
Rice: feeding the billions
. In:
Molden
D
, ed.
Water for food, water for life
.
London
:
Earthscan
,
515
549
.

Chen
 
T
,
Zhu
Y
,
Chen
K
, et al.  
2020
.
Identification of new QTL for salt tolerance from rice variety Pokkali
.
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
206
:
202
213
.

Cheng
 
L
,
Wang
Y
,
Meng
L
, et al.  
2012
.
Identification of salt-tolerant QTLs with strong genetic background effect using two sets of reciprocal introgression lines in rice
.
Genome
55
:
45
55
.

Cotsaftis
 
O
,
Plett
D
,
Shirley
N
,
Tester
M
,
Hrmova
M
.
2012
.
A two-staged model of Na+ exclusion in rice explained by 3D modeling of HKT transporters and alternative splicing
.
PLoS One
7
:
e39865
.

Ding
 
ZJ
,
Yan
JY
,
Xu
XY
, et al.  
2014
.
Transcription factor WRKY46 regulates osmotic stress responses and stomatal movement independently in Arabidopsis
.
The Plant Journal
79
:
13
27
.

Garcia
 
A
,
Rizzo
CA
,
Ud-Din
J
, et al.  
1997
.
Sodium and potassium transport to the xylem are inherited independently in rice, and the mechanism of sodium:potassium selectivity differs between rice and wheat
.
Plant, Cell & Environment
20
:
1167
1174
.

Ghomi
 
K
,
Rabiei
B
,
Sabouri
H
,
Sabouri
A
.
2013
.
Mapping QTLs for traits related to salinity tolerance at seedling stage of rice (Oryza sativa L.): an agrigenomics study of an Iranian rice population
.
Omics
17
:
242
251
.

Hichri
 
I
,
Muhovski
Y
,
Žižková
E
, et al.  
2017
.
The Solanum lycopersicum WRKY3 transcription factor SlWRKY3 is involved in salt stress tolerance in tomato
.
Frontiers in Plant Science
8
:
1343
.

Horie
 
T
,
Karahara
I
,
Katsuhara
M
.
2012
.
Salinity tolerance mechanisms in glycophytes: an overview with the central focus on rice plants
.
Rice
5
:
11
.

Hossain
 
H
,
Rahman
MA
,
Alam
MS
,
Singh
RK
.
2015
.
Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with reproductive-stage salt tolerance in rice
.
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
201
:
17
31
.

Hu
 
ZL
,
Reecy
JM
,
Wu
XL
.
2012
.
Design database for quantitative trait loci (QTL) data warehouse, data mining, and meta-analysis
.
Methods in Molecular Biology
871
:
121
144
.

IRRI
.
1996
.
Standard evaluation system for rice,
4th edn.
Manila, Philippines
:
International Rice Research Institute
.

Islam
 
MR
,
Salam
MA
,
Hassan
L
,
Collard
BCY
,
Singh
RK
,
Gregorio
GB
.
2011
.
QTL mapping for salinity tolerance at seedling stage in rice
.
Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture
23
:
137
146
.

Jahan
 
N
,
Zhang
Y
,
Lv
Y
, et al.  
2020
.
QTL analysis for rice salinity tolerance and fine mapping of a candidate locus qSL7 for shoot length under salt stress
.
Plant Growth Regulation
90
:
307
319
.

James
 
RA
,
Blake
C
,
Byrt
CS
,
Munns
R
.
2011
.
Major genes for Na+ exclusion, Nax1 and Nax2 (wheat HKT1;4 and HKT1;5), decrease Na+ accumulation in bread wheat leaves under saline and waterlogged conditions
.
Journal of Experimental Botany
62
:
2939
2947
.

James
 
RA
,
Davenport
RJ
,
Munns
R
.
2006
.
Physiological characterization of two genes for Na+ exclusion in durum wheat, Nax1 and Nax2
.
Plant Physiology
142
:
1537
1547
.

Kobayashi
 
NI
,
Yamaji
N
,
Yamamoto
H
, et al.  
2017
.
OsHKT1;5 mediates Na+ exclusion in the vasculature to protect leaf blades and reproductive tissues from salt toxicity in rice
.
The Plant Journal
91
:
657
670
.

Koyama
 
ML
,
Levesley
A
,
Koebner
RM
,
Flowers
TJ
,
Yeo
AR
.
2001
.
Quantitative trait loci for component physiological traits determining salt tolerance in rice
.
Plant Physiology
125
:
406
422
.

Lee
 
SY
,
Ahn
JH
,
Cha
YS
, et al.  
2007
.
Mapping QTLs related to salinity tolerance of rice at the young seedling stage
.
Plant Breeding
126
:
43
46
.

Lekklar
 
C
,
Pongpanich
M
,
Suriya-Arunroj
D
, et al.  
2019
.
Genome-wide association study for salinity tolerance at the flowering stage in a panel of rice accessions from Thailand
.
BMC Genomics
20
:
76
.

Li
 
B
,
Byrt
C
,
Qiu
J
, et al.  
2016
.
Identification of a stelar-localized transport protein that facilitates root-to-shoot transfer of chloride in arabidopsis
.
Plant Physiology
170
:
1014
1029
.

Lin
 
CC
,
Kao
CH
.
2001
.
Relative importance of Na+, Cl, and abscisic acid in NaCl-induced inhibition of root growth of rice seedlings
.
Plant and Soil
237
:
165
171
.

Lin
 
HX
,
Zhu
MZ
,
Yano
M
, et al.  
2004
.
QTLs for Na+ and K+ uptake of the shoots and roots controlling rice salt tolerance
.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
108
:
253
260
.

Lindsay
 
MP
,
Lagudah
ES
,
Hare
RA
,
Munns
R
.
2004
.
A locus for sodium exclusion (Nax1), a trait for salt tolerance, mapped in durum wheat
.
Functional Plant Biology
31
:
1105
1114
.

Lipka
 
AE
,
Tian
F
,
Wang
Q
, et al.  
2012
.
GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool
.
Bioinformatics
28
:
2397
2399
.

Liu
 
XS
,
Feng
SJ
,
Zhang
BQ
, et al.  
2019
.
OsZIP1 functions as a metal efflux transporter limiting excess zinc, copper and cadmium accumulation in rice
.
BMC Plant Biology
19
:
283
.

Lutts
 
S
,
Kinet
JM
,
Bouharmont
J
.
1995
.
Changes in plant response to NaCl during development of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties differing in salinity resistance
.
Journal of Experimental Botany
46
:
1843
1852
.

Maas
 
EV
,
Hoffman
GJ
.
1977
.
Crop salt tolerance – current assessment
.
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
103
:
115
134
.

Magnan
 
F
,
Ranty
B
,
Charpenteau
M
,
Sotta
B
,
Galaud
JP
,
Aldon
D
.
2008
.
Mutations in AtCML9, a calmodulin-like protein from Arabidopsis thaliana, alter plant responses to abiotic stress and abscisic acid
.
The Plant Journal
56
:
575
589
.

Manishankar
 
P
,
Wang
N
,
Köster
P
,
Alatar
AA
,
Kudla
J
.
2018
.
Calcium signaling during salt stress and in the regulation of ion homeostasis
.
Journal of Experimental Botany
69
:
4215
4226
.

Mohammadi
 
R
,
Mendioro
MS
,
Diaz
GQ
,
Gregorio
GB
,
Singh
RK
.
2013
.
Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with yield and yield components under reproductive stage salinity stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.)
.
Journal of Genetics
92
:
433
443
.

Mohammadi-Nejad
 
G
,
Arzani
A
,
Rezai
AM
,
Singh
RK
,
Gregorio
GB
.
2008
.
Assessment of rice genotypes for salt tolerance using microsatellite markers associated with the saltol QTL
.
African Journal of Biotechnology
7
:
730
736
.

Munns
 
R
.
2002
.
Comparative physiology of salt and water stress
.
Plant, Cell & Environment
25
:
239
250
.

Munns
 
R
,
Tester
M
.
2008
.
Mechanisms of salinity tolerance
.
Annual Review of Plant Biology
59
:
651
681
.

Myles
 
S
,
Peiffer
J
,
Brown
PJ
, et al.  
2009
.
Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design
.
The Plant Cell
21
:
2194
2202
.

Neang
 
S
,
de Ocampo
M
,
Egdane
JA
, et al.  
2019
.
Fundamental parenchyma cells are involved in Na+ and Cl removal ability in rice leaf sheath
.
Functional Plant Biology
46
:
743
755
.

Negrão
 
S
,
Courtois
B
,
Ahmadi
N
,
Abreu
I
,
Saibo
N
,
Oliveira
MM
.
2011
.
Recent updates on salinity stress in rice: from physiological to molecular responses
.
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
30
:
329
377
.

Pandit
 
A
,
Rai
V
,
Bal
S
, et al.  
2010
.
Combining QTL mapping and transcriptome profiling of bulked RILs for identification of functional polymorphism for salt tolerance genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.)
.
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
284
:
121
136
.

Pardo
 
JM
,
Cubero
B
,
Leidi
EO
,
Quintero
FJ
.
2006
.
Alkali cation exchangers: roles in cellular homeostasis and stress tolerance
.
Journal of Experimental Botany
57
:
1181
1199
.

Patishtan
 
J
,
Hartley
TN
,
Fonseca de Carvalho
R
,
Maathuis
FJM
.
2018
.
Genome wide association studies to identify rice salt-tolerance markers
.
Plant, Cell & Environtment
41
:
970
982
.

Pitman
 
MG
,
Läuchli
A
.
2002
.
Global impact of salinity and agricultural ecosystems
. In:
Läuchli
A
,
Lüttge
U
, eds.
Salinity. Environment - plants - molecules
.
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
3
20
.

Platten
 
JD
,
Egdane
JA
,
Ismail
AM
.
2013
.
Salinity tolerance, Na+ exclusion and allele mining of HKT1;5 in Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima: many sources, many genes, one mechanism?
BMC Plant Biology
13
:
32
.

Qiu
 
J
,
Henderson
SW
,
Tester
M
,
Roy
SJ
,
Gilliham
M
.
2016
.
SLAH1, a homologue of the slow type anion channel SLAC1, modulates shoot Cl accumulation and salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Journal of Experimental Botany
67
:
4495
4505
.

Rahman
 
A
,
Nahar
K
,
Hasanuzzaman
M
,
Fujita
M
.
2016
.
Calcium supplementation improves Na+/K+ ratio, antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems in salt-stressed rice seedlings
.
Frontiers in Plant Science
7
:
609
.

Ramesh
 
SA
,
Shin
R
,
Eide
DJ
,
Schachtman
DP
.
2003
.
Differential metal selectivity and gene expression of two zinc transporters from rice
.
Plant Physiology
133
:
126
134
.

Ren
 
ZH
,
Gao
JP
,
Li
LG
, et al.  
2005
.
A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter
.
Nature Genetics
37
:
1141
1146
.

Sabouri
 
H
,
Sabouri
A
.
2008
.
New evidence of QTLs attributed to salinity tolerance in rice
.
African Journal of Biotechnology
7
:
4376
4383
.

Shi
 
Y
,
Gao
L
,
Wu
Z
, et al.  
2017
.
Genome-wide association study of salt tolerance at the seed germination stage in rice
.
BMC Plant Biology
17
:
92
.

Shi
 
Y
,
Wang
Y
,
Flowers
TJ
,
Gong
H
.
2013
.
Silicon decreases chloride transport in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in saline conditions
.
Journal of Plant Physiology
170
:
847
853
.

Tester
 
M
,
Davenport
R
.
2003
.
Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants
.
Annals of Botany
91
:
503
527
.

Thomson
 
MJ
,
de Ocampo
M
,
Egdane
J
, et al.  
2010
.
Characterizing the Saltol quantitative trait locus for salinity tolerance in rice
.
Rice
3
:
148
160
.

Tiwari
 
S
,
Sl
K
,
Kumar
V
, et al.  
2016
.
Mapping QTLs for salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by bulked segregant analysis of recombinant inbred lines using 50K SNP chip
.
PLoS One
11
:
e0153610
.

Todaka
 
D
,
Nakashima
K
,
Shinozaki
K
,
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki
K
.
2012
.
Toward understanding transcriptional regulatory networks in abiotic stress responses and tolerance in rice
.
Rice
5
:
6
.

Turral
 
H
,
Burke
J
,
Faures
JM
,
Faures
JM
.
2011
.
Climate change, water and food security
.
Rome
:
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
.

Virmani
 
SS
,
llyas-Ahmed
M
.
2008
.
Rice breeding for sustainable production
. In:
Kang
M
,
Priyadarshan
PM
, eds.
Breeding major food staples
.
Hoboken, NJ
:
Wiley
,
141
191
.

Wang
 
R
,
Jing
W
,
Xiao
L
,
Jin
Y
,
Shen
L
,
Zhang
W
.
2015
.
The rice high-affinity potassium transporter1;1 is involved in salt tolerance and regulated by an MYB-type transcription factor
.
Plant Physiology
168
:
1076
1090
.

Wright
 
MH
,
Tung
CW
,
Zhao
K
,
Reynolds
A
,
McCouch
SR
,
Bustamante
CD
.
2010
.
ALCHEMY: a reliable method for automated SNP genotype calling for small batch sizes and highly homozygous populations
.
Bioinformatics
26
:
2952
2960
.

Yao
 
M-Z
,
Wang
J-F
,
Chen
H-U
,
Zhai
H-Q
,
Zhang
H-S
.
2005
.
Inheritance and QTL mapping of salt tolerance in rice
.
Rice Science
12
:
25
32
.

Yoshida
 
S
,
Forno
DA
,
Cook
JH
,
Gomes
KA
.
1976
.
Routine procedure for growing rice plants in culture solution
. In:
Yoshida
S
,
Forno
DA
,
Cook
JH
,
Gomez
KA
, eds.
Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice
.
Los Baños, Philippines
:
International Rice Research Institute
,
61
66
.

Yu
 
J
,
Buckler
ES
.
2006
.
Genetic association mapping and genome organization of maize
.
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
17
:
155
160
.

Zeng
 
L
,
Shannon
MC
.
2000
.
Salinity effects on seedling growth and yield components of rice
.
Crop Science
40
:
996
1003
.

Zhang
 
A
,
Liu
D
,
Hua
C
, et al.  
2016
.
The Arabidopsis gene zinc finger protein 3 (ZFP3) is involved in salt stress and osmotic stress response
.
PLloS One
11
:
e0168367
.

Zhang
 
Z
,
Ersoz
E
,
Lai
CQ
, et al.  
2010
.
Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies
.
Nature Genetics
42
:
355
360
.

Zhao
 
K
,
Tung
CW
,
Eizenga
GC
, et al.  
2011
.
Genome-wide association mapping reveals a rich genetic architecture of complex traits in Oryza sativa
.
Nature Communications
2
:
467
.

Zhu
 
JK
.
2003
.
Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress
.
Current Opinion in Plant Biology
6
:
441
445
.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)