Abstract

Amphicarpic plants produce both above-ground and below-ground seeds. Because below-ground seeds are protected in the soil and may maintain viability when above-ground conditions are stressful, they were proposed as an adaptation to recolonize a site after disturbance. However, whether below-ground seeds are the main colonizers after a disturbance remains unknown. Our goal was to understand whether recolonization by an amphicarpic species after fire was accomplished primarily through germination of seeds produced above-ground or below-ground. We investigated Polygala lewtonii, an amphicarpic, perennial species endemic to fire-prone Florida sandhill and scrub, where fire kills plants but subsequently increases recruitment and population sizes. Polygala lewtonii produces three flower types: above-ground chasmogamous flowers and above-ground and below-ground cleistogamous flowers, with previous research demonstrating chasmogamous flowers produce a much greater proportion of seeds than cleistogamous flowers. We quantified outcrossing in seeds produced by chasmogamous flowers to determine whether it differed from the 100 % self-fertilized below-ground seeds. Approximately 25 % of seeds from chasmogamous flowers showed evidence of cross-pollination. Assuming that chasmogamous flowers produce the majority of the above-ground seeds, as was shown previously, this indicates it is possible to differentiate between germination by above-ground versus below-ground seeds in post-fire colonization. We next compared genetic diversity, admixture, inbreeding and population genetic structure pre- and post-fire. If fire promoted germination of chasmogamous seeds, heterozygosity and admixture would increase, and genetic structure and inbreeding would decrease. Instead, inbreeding and genetic structure increased and admixture decreased, suggesting that the below-ground selfed seeds (with limited dispersal ability) increased their contribution to the population after fire, possibly because fire reduced above-ground seed viability. Additionally, new alleles not found previously in range-wide analyses emerged from the seed bank post-fire. These results suggest that amphicarpy is a powerful adaptation to preserve genetic variation, maintain adaptive potential and promote rapid post-fire colonization.

Introduction

Understanding how reproductive strategies evolve in disturbance-maintained ecosystems connects basic evolutionary theory to conservation applications. Episodic mortality from regular disturbance tends to reduce population genetic variation and increase inbreeding (Dolan et al. 2008; Davies et al. 2016) while selecting for life history traits that maintain reproductive potential (Lytle 2001). Adaptive reproductive strategies may promote reproductive assurance while constraining genetic variation and dispersal to the point of increasing extinction risk (Goldberg and Igić 2012; Vamosi et al. 2018). However, seed dormancy and banking in the soil may provide a reservoir for genetic diversity (Vandvik et al. 2016). Effective conservation management of species endemic to disturbance-maintained ecosystems requires special attention to connections between disturbance, demography, mating system and genetic diversity.

A relatively common reproductive strategy among plant species in disturbance-prone habitats is mixed mating. Mixed mating is characterized by both self- and cross-fertilization and a proportion of selfing between 0.2 < t ≤ 0.8 (Goodwillie et al. 2005). Mixed mating systems are hypothesized to be an adaptation to ecosystems that regularly experience disturbance, providing reproductive assurance through self-fertilization when pollinators or conspecifics are absent (Cheplick 1987; Symonides 1988). However, reliance on self-fertilization may lead to inbreeding depression (i.e. decreased fitness of individuals from increased homozygosity for recessive deleterious alleles), although purging of deleterious alleles through selection may mitigate this effect in heavily selfing lineages (Holsinger 1988).

A second, less common life history trait proposed to be an adaptation to frequent disturbance is amphicarpy, a form of dimorphism where both aerial and subterranean flowers and seeds are produced on the same individual (Cheplick 1987). Amphicarpic plants often exhibit seed polymorphism (Symonides 1988), with below-ground, obligately selfing or cleistogamous (CL) flowers producing larger seeds with limited dispersal potential, and above-ground, open-pollinated or chasmogamous (CH) flowers producing smaller seeds suitable for dispersal across larger distances (Cheplick 1987; Kaul et al. 2000; Zhang et al. 2020). Below-ground seeds may be an adaptation to disturbance-prone habitats; they remain below the soil surface, are protected from disturbances such as fire and may be able to quickly recolonize a site, provided that they maintain viability and dormancy until stimulated by disturbance (Cheplick and Quinn 1987, 1988). Although previous studies of one amphicarpic annual species found that seeds buried below-ground showed greater germination than surface-sown seeds after a fire (Cheplick and Quinn 1987, 1988), to our knowledge, no study has quantified whether seeds produced by below-ground CL flowers of amphicarpic species are the predominant mechanism to recolonize sites after a disturbance.

Polygala lewtonii (Polygalaceae) is a federally endangered (USFWS 1999), amphicarpic perennial plant species endemic to fire-prone Florida sandhill and scrub. Previous studies found that P. lewtonii is adapted to fire; although plants are killed by fire and they do not re-sprout after fire except in rare cases (i.e. very low-intensity fire), smoke stimulated seed germination (Lindon and Menges 2008) and population sizes increased dramatically after burning (Weekley and Menges 2012). Polygala lewtonii is one of few species exhibiting mixed mating and amphicarpy via three types of flowers: (i) CH flowers, (ii) above-ground CL flowers and (iii) below-ground CL flowers. In P. lewtonii, open-pollinated CH flowers also have a delayed selfing mechanism (Weekley and Brothers 2006), which was proposed to provide reproductive assurance in the absence of pollinators (Cheplick 1987; Symonides 1988). Although P. lewtonii matures both above-ground and below-ground fruits, flowers vary in abundance and rates of fruit production, with CH flowers producing a median of 26 fruits per plant, above-ground CL flowers producing 2 fruits per plant and below-ground CL flowers producing 1.5 fruits per plant (Koontz et al. 2017). Thus, CH flowers produced over seven times the number of fruits produced by above- and below-ground CL flowers combined (Koontz et al. 2017). All seeds produce an elaiosome, a fleshy appendage that attracts ants for seed dispersal (Zomlefer 1989). Ants collect the above-ground seeds (USFWS 1999; Weekley and Menges 2003) and may disperse them up to several meters. Ants do not access nor disperse the below-ground CL seeds (Weekley and Brothers 2006), meaning below-ground dispersal is likely limited to the length of the rhizomes (<1 m).

Although P. lewtonii was the subject of a previous fine-scale population genetic analysis to understand its predominant mating system and patterns of population genetic structure (Swift et al. 2016), it is unknown how these characteristics are affected by fire. Genetic results indicated that reproduction in P. lewtonii occurred predominantly via inbreeding, outcrossing rates were low and genetic variation was structured at a very fine scale (Swift et al. 2016). The low outcrossing rate was unexpected because the showy, open-pollinated CH flowers produce most seeds in P. lewtonii (Koontz et al. 2017), and pollinator exclusion reduced seed set by almost 90 % (Weekley and Brothers 2006). This indicates that only a small proportion of fruits were produced via delayed selfing. Swift et al. (2016) hypothesized that fire may be necessary to stimulate germination of above-ground seed, and that the low outcrossing rate may be due to a lack of recent fire. If fire stimulates the germination of above-ground seed, we would expect increased heterozygosity and decreased inbreeding and genetic structure after a fire, assuming both that CH flowers produce the majority of above-ground seed, as was shown previously (Koontz et al. 2017), and that a moderate proportion of those seeds are produced via outcrossing. Conversely, other authors suggested that fire may decrease the survival rates of above-ground seeds and seedlings, such that below-ground CL flowers and seeds of amphicarpic species may predominantly recolonize a site after a disturbance (Cheplick and Quinn 1987, 1988). In this case, because below-ground CL seeds are 100 % selfed and can disperse only the length of the rhizome, we would expect increased inbreeding and genetic structure after a fire.

We utilized a population genetic approach to analyse the dynamics of recolonization of the amphicarpic species P. lewtonii after fire. Our analyses were two-pronged. We first tested whether we could differentiate among seed types in post-fire recolonization. We quantified the outcrossing rate in seeds produced by CH flowers by comparing their genotypes to those of their maternal parents; we then tested whether they deviated from the patterns expected for 100 % selfing of below-ground CL seeds. Because CH flowers exhibited low fruit set when pollinators were limited (Weekley and Brothers 2006), we hypothesized that most CH flowers would be the product of outcrossing. Specifically, we expected to encounter non-maternal alleles that could not be the product of selfing in a majority of seeds and heterozygosity that significantly exceeded the 50 % reduction expected for a single generation of pure selfing.

Second, we compared the genetic diversity and structure of populations before and after fire. We tested how heterozygosity, inbreeding coefficients, genetic diversity, number of private alleles and genetic structure changed after a prescribed burn in a natural population of P. lewtonii. If burning stimulated germination of seed from above-ground flowers, then we would expect increased heterozygosity and admixture and decreased inbreeding and spatial population genetic structure post-fire. This assumes that CH flowers produce a moderate proportion of seed through outcrossing and a much greater proportion of seed than above-ground CL flowers (Koontz et al. 2017). Conversely, if burning reduced the viability of above-ground seeds and stimulated germination of seed produced by below-ground flowers, which are obligately selfing and disperse >1 m, then we would expect to find decreased heterozygosity and admixture and increased inbreeding and among-group spatial population genetic structure post-fire. The results of these experiments have important consequences for the conservation of P. lewtonii and more broadly for our understanding of the function of amphicarpy.

Materials and Methods

Study species

Polygala lewtonii (Polygalaceae) is a short-lived (2–10 years) perennial, reaching ~20 cm tall (Weekley and Brothers 2006). The plant bears clusters of leaves that overlap on the glabrous stem like shingles (Small 1933; USFWS 1999). Chasmogamous flowers are deep pink to purple, occur on densely flowered terminal racemes (Weekley and Brothers 2006) and are visited by a variety of insect species, including sulfur butterflies and bee flies (Weekley and Brothers 2006). Rarely, solitary, pale pink above-ground CL flowers occur in the axils of the above-ground leaves on short leafless branches (Weekley and Brothers 2006; Wunderlin et al. 2021). Below-ground, white CL flowers occur sparsely on the rhizomes. Given that the P. lewtonii shows no evidence of clonal reproduction and only rarely re-sprouts after fire, the primary function of the rhizomes is to promote sexual reproduction by bearing the below-ground CL flowers and facilitating the dispersal of seeds produced by below-ground CL flowers. Polygala lewtonii flowers throughout the year, with CH flowers present from January to May, aerial CL flowers present from June to January and below-ground CL flowers present from July to February (Koontz et al. 2017). Fruits are oblong, ca. 3–4 mm long (Wunderlin et al. 2021), dehiscent and two-seeded (Zomlefer 1989). The ellipsoid-cylindric seeds (Wunderlin et al. 2021) bear stiff hairs and two elaiosomes, aril-like outgrowths at the micropyle that attract ants that disperse the above-ground seeds (Zomlefer 1989; Weekley and Brothers 2006). The seeds produced by CL flowers are generally larger but much less numerous than those produced by CH flowers (Koontz et al. 2017).

Polygala lewtonii is endemic to six counties in central peninsular Florida (Brevard, Highlands, Lake, Marion, Polk, and Osceola counties; Wunderlin et al. 2021), occurring only in sandhill and scrub habitats on the Lake Wales and the Mount Dora Ridges (Menges et al. 2007). These xeric ecosystems experience fire as their dominant mode of ecological disturbance (Menges 2007), with more intense fires in scrub and more frequent fires in sandhill. In scrub, fire increases bare ground, decreases canopy cover (Menges and Hawkes 1998) and increases the frequency and abundance of scrub herbs because of post-burn reductions in shrubs, litter and lichens (Weekley and Menges 2003). Fire positively effects populations of rare, endemic scrub plants by increasing flowering and seedling recruitment (Slapcinsky et al. 2010). In sandhill, fire promotes species diversity and temporarily reduces cover (Heuberger and Putz 2003; Reinhart and Menges 2004). Frequent fires in sandhill can increase the cover of grasses and reduce shrub cover (Reinhart and Menges 2004). These xeric uplands in central Florida have suffered from habitat loss and fragmentation (Weekley et al. 2008), as well as anthropogenic alteration of disturbance regimes, including longer fire-return intervals and limited use of prescribed fires in land management (USFWS 1999). Fire suppression is one of the most common and serious threats to both sandhill and scrub (Menges 2007). Notably, P. lewtonii is fire-maintained and shows population declines with increasing time since fire (Weekley and Menges 2012).

Sample collection

To understand the outcrossing rate in CH flowers, 5 seeds per plant were collected from the open-pollinated flowers of 10 maternal plants at the Carter Creek Tract of the Lake Wales Ridge Wildlife and Environmental Area (LWRWEA) in the spring of 2017 (see Fig. 1). We also sampled leaf tissue from the maternal plants for comparison with seed samples. To avoid oversampling in a single locality, these individuals were sampled outside the study plots used to understand the dynamics of recolonization after fire (see below). Seeds were stored in paper envelopes and leaf tissue was stored in silica gel desiccant until DNA extraction.

Plots (points) and blocks (circled) at Carter Creek Lake Wales Ridge National Wildlife Refuge in Central Florida. Only plots that were burned and re-sampled are shown.
Figure 1.

Plots (points) and blocks (circled) at Carter Creek Lake Wales Ridge National Wildlife Refuge in Central Florida. Only plots that were burned and re-sampled are shown.

To understand the dynamics of recolonization after fire, individuals were initially sampled from the Carter Creek Tract of the LWRWEA in 2014, as described in Swift et al. (2016). The study area was defined in 2014 by compiling all known locations (GPS points) for P. lewtonii within the site, yielding an estimated area of ~0.28 km2. Within this study area, four blocks were created, and within each block, eight collection plots were established that ranged from 1 to 4 m in radius containing a minimum of nine P. lewtonii individuals, with a minimum of 10 m separating plots in the same block. The closest plots in neighbouring blocks were separated by larger distances (mean = 350 m, range 140–630 m between neighbouring blocks). By design, plots were placed at a very fine spatial scale to understand how genotypes and genetic clusters were distributed spatially, with the goal of providing insight into the patterns of reproduction and the dispersal of selfed versus outcrossed seeds. In the 2014 sampling, leaves were collected from nine individuals per plot in each of eight plots per block, totalling 72 individuals per block, or 288 individuals total across the four blocks. A prescribed fire the following year (2 May 2015) burned and killed all plants in the blocks and plots except block 1 (plots 1–8 of Swift et al. 2016) and plots 17, 19, 20 and 24. In spring of 2017 (the first season the new germinants flowered), we re-sampled the 20 fully burned plots, collecting leaf tissue from individuals germinating after the fire (Table 1). After fire, we increased sampling to 12 individuals per plot, totalling 240 individuals (Table 1; Fig. 1). To ensure that the pre- and post-fire data sets were comparable, only the pre-fire data from the 20 plots that were completely burned in blocks 2–4 (Fig. 1) were included in the present study, such that the pre-fire data set contained 180 individuals.

Table 1.

The block name, collection location (plot), year and latitude/longitude for pre- and post-fire sampling of Polygala lewtonii. Latitude/longitude has been truncated to three decimal places to protect the plant populations.

Collection localityPlots includedBlock abbreviationCollection yearLat, long
Carter Creek-Block 29–16CC2-Pre201427.510, −81.401
CC2-Post2017
Carter Creek-Block 318, 21–23CC3-Pre201427.513, −81.401
CC3-Post2017
Carter Creek-Block 425–32CC4-Pre201427.520, −81.403
CC4-Post2017
Collection localityPlots includedBlock abbreviationCollection yearLat, long
Carter Creek-Block 29–16CC2-Pre201427.510, −81.401
CC2-Post2017
Carter Creek-Block 318, 21–23CC3-Pre201427.513, −81.401
CC3-Post2017
Carter Creek-Block 425–32CC4-Pre201427.520, −81.403
CC4-Post2017
Table 1.

The block name, collection location (plot), year and latitude/longitude for pre- and post-fire sampling of Polygala lewtonii. Latitude/longitude has been truncated to three decimal places to protect the plant populations.

Collection localityPlots includedBlock abbreviationCollection yearLat, long
Carter Creek-Block 29–16CC2-Pre201427.510, −81.401
CC2-Post2017
Carter Creek-Block 318, 21–23CC3-Pre201427.513, −81.401
CC3-Post2017
Carter Creek-Block 425–32CC4-Pre201427.520, −81.403
CC4-Post2017
Collection localityPlots includedBlock abbreviationCollection yearLat, long
Carter Creek-Block 29–16CC2-Pre201427.510, −81.401
CC2-Post2017
Carter Creek-Block 318, 21–23CC3-Pre201427.513, −81.401
CC3-Post2017
Carter Creek-Block 425–32CC4-Pre201427.520, −81.403
CC4-Post2017

Microsatellite analysis

DNA extractions were performed using a CTAB DNA Extraction Protocol (Doyle and Doyle 1987) modified by using smaller volumes, a smaller initial sample of plant tissue and an additional wash step with cold 95 % ethanol. The seed and leaf tissue samples were genotyped using 11 microsatellite loci as described in Swift et al. (2016). Individuals with >50 % missing data were removed from the analysis, resulting in the removal of 10 % of the individuals in the seed data set and ~2 % of individuals in the pre- and post-fire analysis.

Data analysis of seed samples and simulation of mating system

The seed genotype data were compared to that of the maternal tissue to identify genotyping error. If the seed contained no alleles from the maternal plant at a locus, it was removed from the analysis (see Results section). To analyse whether seeds produced by CH flowers were derived from inbreeding versus outcrossing, we counted the number of non-maternal alleles in the offspring, which were presumably contributed by the pollen donor. Seeds were placed into three categories: individuals having zero non-maternal alleles, those having only one non-maternal allele and those having more than one non-maternal allele. Individuals with zero non-maternal alleles were products of either selfing or biparental inbreeding involving highly genetically similar individuals. Individuals with one non-maternal allele were either the product of cross-pollination between close relatives or genotyping error. Individuals with multiple non-maternal alleles were likely products of outcrossing.

For seed data, we compared the heterozygosity of seeds from CH flowers to that expected under pure selfing by conducting a simulation of pure inbreeding in R version 3.4.1 (R Core Team 2013). For each parent plant, we randomly sampled 10 alleles from each locus that we assembled into five multilocus selfed-seed genotypes. We then repeated the simulation of pure selfing 1000 times. For each simulated seed data set, we calculated five different indices of individual heterozygosity using the function GENHET (Coulon 2010), including PHt, the proportion of heterozygous loci; Hs-observed and Hs-expected, which are standardized measures of observed and expected heterozygosity; IR, or internal relatedness, which weighs shared rare alleles more highly than shared common alleles; and HL, homozygosity by locus, which is expected to follow the opposite pattern of the other four metrics. The script used for this analysis is presented in Supporting Information—Appendix S1. We identified significant evidence for outcrossing when the heterozygosity observed in the seed data set fell outside the 95 % quantile of metrics calculated for data sets simulating pure inbreeding (Fig. 2).

Observed values of heterozygosity in the seeds of CH flowers differ significantly from complete selfing simulations. Distribution of heterozygosity values measured by IR under simulated complete selfing (grey distribution) versus the observed range of heterozygosity in seed samples (red line).
Figure 2.

Observed values of heterozygosity in the seeds of CH flowers differ significantly from complete selfing simulations. Distribution of heterozygosity values measured by IR under simulated complete selfing (grey distribution) versus the observed range of heterozygosity in seed samples (red line).

Analysis of changes in genetic diversity and inbreeding after fire

For each block both pre- and post-fire, we used GenAlEx version 6.503 (Peakall and Smouse 2012) to calculate the average number of alleles per locus (A) and number of private alleles per population (AP). We used FSTAT v. 2.94 (Goudet 2002) to calculate allelic richness using rarefaction. We also placed individuals into groups containing all pre-fire or post-fire individuals and used GenAlEx to calculate the number of private alleles; emergence of new private alleles after fire reflects seed bank contributions by individuals not sampled during the original survey. We used GenAlEx to calculate observed and expected heterozygosity (HO and HE); if HO increased post-fire, it would indicate that a greater proportion of outcrossed seeds from CH flowers preferentially germinated in response to fire. If HO decreased or remained at pre-fire levels (the species previously showed very low HO values), it would indicate that seeds that germinated were predominantly produced by selfing or biparental inbreeding.

To detect whether fire stimulated germination of selfed versus outcrossed seeds, we also used GenAlEx to measure the inbreeding coefficient (F). Because technical artefacts such as genotyping errors and null alleles (i.e. undetected alleles resulting from amplification failure during polymerase chain reactions) inflate inbreeding coefficients, we used INEST version 2 (Chybicki and Burczyk 2009) to simultaneously measure the frequency of null alleles at each locus and calculate an alternative inbreeding coefficient for each population that takes null alleles and genotyping errors into account (FB). We used the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach with 5 000 000 iterations, a burn-in of 500 000, sampling every 250th iteration. If F and FB increased post-fire, this would indicate that fire stimulated the germination of seeds produced by inbreeding, whereas a decrease would indicate that a greater proportion of outcrossed seed germinated post-fire.

Analysis of changes in genetic structure before and after fire

To understand how hierarchical partitioning of genetic variation within and among populations changed in response to fire, we conducted analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) analyses as implemented in GenAlEx version 6.5 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010). Analyses were conducted separately for pre-fire and post-fire samples, with samples divided into plots nested within blocks. If below-ground seeds predominantly germinated after fire, then we would expect increased among-block and among-plot variance after a fire and decreased within-plot variance, because below-ground seeds are obligately selfing and can disperse only across the length of a rhizome (~1 m). If above-ground seed preferentially germinated, then we would expect among-block and among-plot variation to decrease and within-plot variation to increase because of migration among groups (through both cross-pollination and seed dispersal). This assumes that the 100 % selfed seeds arising from above-ground CL flowers contribute only a small proportion of the total above-ground seed set and that some outcrossing occurs in CH flowers.

To estimate genetic structure independently of a priori population designations, we utilized InStruct version 1.0 (Gao et al. 2007), which was specifically designed to measure genetic structure in highly inbreeding species. It differs from STRUCTURE (Pritchard et al. 2000) by eliminating the assumption of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium within genetic clusters and jointly estimating the selfing rate and population structure. We analysed a data set composed of both the pre- and post-fire data using the default settings in InStruct, except we varied the number of groups, K, from 1 to 15, employed 10 independent chains of the MCMC algorithm for each K, used a burn-in of 500 000 iterations and a run length of 1 000 000 iterations for each chain, following the recommendations of Gilbert et al. (2012). To ensure convergence and repeatability, we examined the groupings across all runs at each K in CLUMPAK (Kopelman et al. 2015). To determine the optimal value of K, we plotted the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) and the −ln likelihood values from InStruct and selected the value where they plateaued and showed clear patterns of genetic structure.

To quantify how admixture and genetic structure changed after a fire, we identified the predominant genetic cluster to which individuals were assigned, then calculated the percentage of individuals in each plot both pre- and post-fire that showed their greatest assignment to the predominant cluster. We also calculated average admixture proportions at the predominant InStruct cluster across all individuals in a plot, both pre- and post-fire. If below-ground selfed seed predominantly germinated after a fire, then we would expect post-fire plots to have more individuals and greater average admixture proportions assigned to the predominant genetic cluster. If above-ground seeds preferentially germinated after a fire, then because these seeds are capable of dispersal, we would expect post-fire plots to show fewer individuals assigned to a predominant genetic cluster. Provided that above-ground seeds showed some outcrossing, we would also expect lower average admixture proportions assigned to the predominant genetic cluster.

Finally, we repeated analyses described above with individuals grouped into the predominant genetic cluster assigned by INSTRUCT. Analyses included estimates of genetic diversity, AMOVA and average admixture proportions at the majority cluster.

Results

Outcrossing rate in CH flowers

Seeds produced by CH flowers showed evidence of limited outcrossing. After removing 10 seeds from the analysis because of genotyping failure or genotyping errors, the final data set contained 40 seeds from nine maternal individuals, of which 30 out of 40 (75 %) had only maternal alleles present, 4 of 40 (10 %) differed from their mother by only one allele and 6 of 40 (15 %) differed from their mother by three or more alleles. When comparing observed inbreeding metrics to those simulated under 100 % selfing, the IR among seeds from open-pollinated flowers (0.718) was well below the range of values simulated for pure selfing (0.900–0.985; Fig. 2). Heterozygosity (PHt, HL, Hs-observed and Hs-expected) was significantly outside the range expected under simulated selfing [seeSupporting Information—Table S1].

Genetic diversity before and after fire

Burning had modest effects on genetic diversity. The mean number of alleles per population and allelic richness showed slight increases after fire (mean APre = 3.00, mean APost = 3.303; mean AR-Pre = 2.71, mean AR-Post = 2.79; seeSupporting Information—Table S2). When grouped into blocks, the mean number of private alleles per block was 3.0 pre-fire and was 1.33 post-fire. When comparing private alleles between all pre-fire versus all post-fire samples, seven alleles were unique pre-fire and eight were unique post-fire [seeSupporting Information—Table S1]. All eight post-fire private alleles were not observed in the previous range-wide study (Swift et al. 2016). All private alleles were present at low frequencies (range = 0.004–0.031 %, mean = 0.01 %; seeSupporting Information—Table S2), but together, alleles unique to one sampling time accounted for ~17 % of the total alleles.

Expected heterozygosity (HE), observed heterozygosity (HO) and inbreeding coefficients increased slightly after fire. The mean pre-fire HE averaged across loci was 0.311, whereas it was 0.322 post-fire (Table 2). Values of HO also increased somewhat after burning (pre-fire mean = 0.039, post-fire mean = 0.047; Table 2). As found previously, all HO values were much lower than HE, such that inbreeding coefficients (F) reached values close to one. Inbreeding coefficients increased slightly from pre-fire values (Table 2) from a mean of 0.795 in pre-fire populations to a mean of 0.811 post-fire (Table 2). After correction for null alleles using INEST, FB remained high and increased from a mean of 0.815 in pre-fire blocks to a mean of 0.845 in post-fire blocks (Table 2).

Table 2.

The effects of fire on genetic diversity in Polygala lewtonii. Parameters include N, number of samples, HO, observed heterozygosity, HE, expected heterozygosity, A, average number of alleles per locus, AR allelic richness based on a minimum sample size of 21 individuals, AP, number of private alleles, F, inbreeding coefficient and FB, the inbreeding coefficient taking null alleles into account. See Table 1 for block abbreviations.

BlockNHOHEAARAPFFB
CC2-Pre680.060.333.092.7220.800.74
CC3-Pre330.020.352.552.6110.930.90
CC4-Pre700.030.253.362.8040.660.81
Mean-Pre0.040.313.002.7130.790.81
CC2-Post960.080.343.732.6130.730.77
CC3-Post480.030.372.912.9910.950.93
CC4-Post960.040.263.272.7700.760.85
Mean-Post0.050.323.302.791.330.810.85
BlockNHOHEAARAPFFB
CC2-Pre680.060.333.092.7220.800.74
CC3-Pre330.020.352.552.6110.930.90
CC4-Pre700.030.253.362.8040.660.81
Mean-Pre0.040.313.002.7130.790.81
CC2-Post960.080.343.732.6130.730.77
CC3-Post480.030.372.912.9910.950.93
CC4-Post960.040.263.272.7700.760.85
Mean-Post0.050.323.302.791.330.810.85
Table 2.

The effects of fire on genetic diversity in Polygala lewtonii. Parameters include N, number of samples, HO, observed heterozygosity, HE, expected heterozygosity, A, average number of alleles per locus, AR allelic richness based on a minimum sample size of 21 individuals, AP, number of private alleles, F, inbreeding coefficient and FB, the inbreeding coefficient taking null alleles into account. See Table 1 for block abbreviations.

BlockNHOHEAARAPFFB
CC2-Pre680.060.333.092.7220.800.74
CC3-Pre330.020.352.552.6110.930.90
CC4-Pre700.030.253.362.8040.660.81
Mean-Pre0.040.313.002.7130.790.81
CC2-Post960.080.343.732.6130.730.77
CC3-Post480.030.372.912.9910.950.93
CC4-Post960.040.263.272.7700.760.85
Mean-Post0.050.323.302.791.330.810.85
BlockNHOHEAARAPFFB
CC2-Pre680.060.333.092.7220.800.74
CC3-Pre330.020.352.552.6110.930.90
CC4-Pre700.030.253.362.8040.660.81
Mean-Pre0.040.313.002.7130.790.81
CC2-Post960.080.343.732.6130.730.77
CC3-Post480.030.372.912.9910.950.93
CC4-Post960.040.263.272.7700.760.85
Mean-Post0.050.323.302.791.330.810.85

Patterns of genetic structure among blocks before and after fire

Burning changed the hierarchical partitioning of genetic variation, with greater variation partitioned among blocks and plots and less variation found among individuals within plots after fire. Pre-fire samples had 22 % of the variation partitioned among blocks, 28 % among plots, 43 % among individuals within plots and 7 % within individuals (Table 3). Post-fire, 28 % of the variation was found among blocks, 34 % among plots, 28 % was found among individuals within plots and 10 % within individuals (Table 3). F-statistics derived from AMOVA show a pattern of increased FRT, FSR and FST and decreased FIS and FIT after fire (Table 3).

Table 3.

The effects of fire on the hierarchical partitioning of genetic variation in Polygala lewtonii using AMOVA analysis. Analyses were conducted before and after the 2015 fire, with individuals grouped by plots nested within blocks.

Degrees of freedomSums of squaresEstimated varianceMean squaresPercent variationF-statistics
Pre-fire
 Among blocks2184.50392.2520.68222 %FRT = 0.219
 Among plots17305.38717.9640.88028 %FSR = 0.361
 Among individuals151438.9202.9071.35143 %FST = 0.501
 Within individuals17135.0000.2050.2057 %FIS = 0.868
 Total341963.8103.119100 %FIT = 0.934
Post-fire
 Among blocks2282.939141.4690.76328 %FRT = 0.277
 Among plots17413.92224.3480.93934 %FSR = 0.472
 Among individuals220400.9171.8220.77128 %FST = 0.618
 Within individuals24067.5000.2810.28110 %FIS = 0.733
 Total4791165.2772.753100 %FIT = 0.898
Degrees of freedomSums of squaresEstimated varianceMean squaresPercent variationF-statistics
Pre-fire
 Among blocks2184.50392.2520.68222 %FRT = 0.219
 Among plots17305.38717.9640.88028 %FSR = 0.361
 Among individuals151438.9202.9071.35143 %FST = 0.501
 Within individuals17135.0000.2050.2057 %FIS = 0.868
 Total341963.8103.119100 %FIT = 0.934
Post-fire
 Among blocks2282.939141.4690.76328 %FRT = 0.277
 Among plots17413.92224.3480.93934 %FSR = 0.472
 Among individuals220400.9171.8220.77128 %FST = 0.618
 Within individuals24067.5000.2810.28110 %FIS = 0.733
 Total4791165.2772.753100 %FIT = 0.898
Table 3.

The effects of fire on the hierarchical partitioning of genetic variation in Polygala lewtonii using AMOVA analysis. Analyses were conducted before and after the 2015 fire, with individuals grouped by plots nested within blocks.

Degrees of freedomSums of squaresEstimated varianceMean squaresPercent variationF-statistics
Pre-fire
 Among blocks2184.50392.2520.68222 %FRT = 0.219
 Among plots17305.38717.9640.88028 %FSR = 0.361
 Among individuals151438.9202.9071.35143 %FST = 0.501
 Within individuals17135.0000.2050.2057 %FIS = 0.868
 Total341963.8103.119100 %FIT = 0.934
Post-fire
 Among blocks2282.939141.4690.76328 %FRT = 0.277
 Among plots17413.92224.3480.93934 %FSR = 0.472
 Among individuals220400.9171.8220.77128 %FST = 0.618
 Within individuals24067.5000.2810.28110 %FIS = 0.733
 Total4791165.2772.753100 %FIT = 0.898
Degrees of freedomSums of squaresEstimated varianceMean squaresPercent variationF-statistics
Pre-fire
 Among blocks2184.50392.2520.68222 %FRT = 0.219
 Among plots17305.38717.9640.88028 %FSR = 0.361
 Among individuals151438.9202.9071.35143 %FST = 0.501
 Within individuals17135.0000.2050.2057 %FIS = 0.868
 Total341963.8103.119100 %FIT = 0.934
Post-fire
 Among blocks2282.939141.4690.76328 %FRT = 0.277
 Among plots17413.92224.3480.93934 %FSR = 0.472
 Among individuals220400.9171.8220.77128 %FST = 0.618
 Within individuals24067.5000.2810.28110 %FIS = 0.733
 Total4791165.2772.753100 %FIT = 0.898

InStruct analyses revealed increased genetic structure and decreased admixture after burning. The DIC and −ln likelihood values plateaued between K = 4 and 6 [seeSupporting Information—Fig. S1], but we present K = 5 in Fig. 3 because it had the clearest assignment to clusters and was consistent with the results of Swift et al. (2016). Generally, more individuals were assigned to the most common genetic cluster in each plot or block, and individuals showed greater average assignments to the predominant cluster, indicating less admixture post-fire (Table 4). In 8 of 20 total plots (such as plots 15, 18, 25 and 28; Fig. 3), the number of individuals assigned to the most common InStruct cluster increased post-fire, whereas cluster assignment remained at 100 % for eight plots, and decreased in only two plots. The proportion of admixture accounted for by the majority cluster also increased in all but two plots, indicating individuals were less admixed between InStruct clusters (Table 4). These results indicate that genetically similar individuals were more tightly spatially clustered after a fire and showed less admixture among plots.

Table 4.

The effects of fire on genetic structure and admixture in Polygala lewtonii. Results show the proportion of individuals assigned to a majority cluster in InStruct pre- and post-fire, and the average admixture proportions of assignment to the predominant cluster in plots before and after fire.

PlotBlockPre-fire % individuals assigned to predominant clusterPost-fire % individuals assigned to predominant clusterPre-fire average admixture proportion for predominant clusterPost-fire average admixture proportion for predominant cluster
92100 %100 %0.9040.941
10265.5 %66.7 %0.5030.624
112100 %100 %0.5930.637
12262.5 %91.7 %0.4660.655
13266.7 %58.3 %0.4260.434
14275.0 %83.3 %0.5920.665
152100 %100 %0.9160.962
16288.9 %100 %0.6690.773
183100 %100 %0.7460.776
213100 %83.3 %0.9520.802
22342.9 %50 %0.3260.352
233100 %100 %0.9200.951
25477.8 %100 %0.7640.863
26462.5 %66.7 %0.7130.708
27466.7 %100 %0.5760.829
284100 %100 %0.8750.903
294100 %100 %0.8620.868
30462.5 %75 %0.6490.706
314100 %100 %0.7740.761
324100 %100 %0.8770.749
Average across plots84 %89 %0.7050.748
PlotBlockPre-fire % individuals assigned to predominant clusterPost-fire % individuals assigned to predominant clusterPre-fire average admixture proportion for predominant clusterPost-fire average admixture proportion for predominant cluster
92100 %100 %0.9040.941
10265.5 %66.7 %0.5030.624
112100 %100 %0.5930.637
12262.5 %91.7 %0.4660.655
13266.7 %58.3 %0.4260.434
14275.0 %83.3 %0.5920.665
152100 %100 %0.9160.962
16288.9 %100 %0.6690.773
183100 %100 %0.7460.776
213100 %83.3 %0.9520.802
22342.9 %50 %0.3260.352
233100 %100 %0.9200.951
25477.8 %100 %0.7640.863
26462.5 %66.7 %0.7130.708
27466.7 %100 %0.5760.829
284100 %100 %0.8750.903
294100 %100 %0.8620.868
30462.5 %75 %0.6490.706
314100 %100 %0.7740.761
324100 %100 %0.8770.749
Average across plots84 %89 %0.7050.748
Table 4.

The effects of fire on genetic structure and admixture in Polygala lewtonii. Results show the proportion of individuals assigned to a majority cluster in InStruct pre- and post-fire, and the average admixture proportions of assignment to the predominant cluster in plots before and after fire.

PlotBlockPre-fire % individuals assigned to predominant clusterPost-fire % individuals assigned to predominant clusterPre-fire average admixture proportion for predominant clusterPost-fire average admixture proportion for predominant cluster
92100 %100 %0.9040.941
10265.5 %66.7 %0.5030.624
112100 %100 %0.5930.637
12262.5 %91.7 %0.4660.655
13266.7 %58.3 %0.4260.434
14275.0 %83.3 %0.5920.665
152100 %100 %0.9160.962
16288.9 %100 %0.6690.773
183100 %100 %0.7460.776
213100 %83.3 %0.9520.802
22342.9 %50 %0.3260.352
233100 %100 %0.9200.951
25477.8 %100 %0.7640.863
26462.5 %66.7 %0.7130.708
27466.7 %100 %0.5760.829
284100 %100 %0.8750.903
294100 %100 %0.8620.868
30462.5 %75 %0.6490.706
314100 %100 %0.7740.761
324100 %100 %0.8770.749
Average across plots84 %89 %0.7050.748
PlotBlockPre-fire % individuals assigned to predominant clusterPost-fire % individuals assigned to predominant clusterPre-fire average admixture proportion for predominant clusterPost-fire average admixture proportion for predominant cluster
92100 %100 %0.9040.941
10265.5 %66.7 %0.5030.624
112100 %100 %0.5930.637
12262.5 %91.7 %0.4660.655
13266.7 %58.3 %0.4260.434
14275.0 %83.3 %0.5920.665
152100 %100 %0.9160.962
16288.9 %100 %0.6690.773
183100 %100 %0.7460.776
213100 %83.3 %0.9520.802
22342.9 %50 %0.3260.352
233100 %100 %0.9200.951
25477.8 %100 %0.7640.863
26462.5 %66.7 %0.7130.708
27466.7 %100 %0.5760.829
284100 %100 %0.8750.903
294100 %100 %0.8620.868
30462.5 %75 %0.6490.706
314100 %100 %0.7740.761
324100 %100 %0.8770.749
Average across plots84 %89 %0.7050.748
Patterns of genetic structure from pre- (blocks 2, 3 and 4) and post-fire (blocks 2a, 3a and 4a) populations show a decline in admixture as a result of fire. InStruct graph and maps show population structure for pre- and post-fire, and corresponding pie charts. These cluster assignment proportions are also shown as pie charts superimposed on their respective sampling plots. The pie charts in the centre (plots 16, 25, 27 and 10) are highlighted as they show examples of reduced post-fire admixture.
Figure 3.

Patterns of genetic structure from pre- (blocks 2, 3 and 4) and post-fire (blocks 2a, 3a and 4a) populations show a decline in admixture as a result of fire. InStruct graph and maps show population structure for pre- and post-fire, and corresponding pie charts. These cluster assignment proportions are also shown as pie charts superimposed on their respective sampling plots. The pie charts in the centre (plots 16, 25, 27 and 10) are highlighted as they show examples of reduced post-fire admixture.

When individuals were grouped by InStruct cluster, the changes in genetic diversity were consistent with those in which individuals were grouped by block or plot. We observed minor changes in genetic diversity after fire [seeSupporting Information—Table S3], an increase in among-group genetic variation and a decrease in within-group and within-individual variation in AMOVA analyses [seeSupporting Information—Table S4], and a decrease in admixture in InStruct [seeSupporting Information—Table S5].

Discussion

The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that one role of the obligately selfing below-ground seeds of an amphicarpic species is to recolonize a site after disturbance (Cheplick and Quinn 1987, 1988), or alternatively, that fire promotes the germination of above-ground seeds (Swift et al. 2016). We tested these hypotheses by analysing how genetic diversity, inbreeding and genetic structure changed after fire in the amphicarpic species, P. lewtonii.

Because we would only be able to detect differential germination post-fire if the outcrossing rate differs among above-ground and below-ground flowers, we first quantified outcrossing rates in CH flowers of P. lewtonii. Overall, 30 of 40 individuals (75 %) had only maternal alleles present, indicative of self-fertilization, biparental inbreeding or geitonogamy. Given the low seed set previously observed in P. lewtonii when pollinators were excluded (Weekley and Brothers 2006), the latter two may be more plausible mechanisms for inbreeding in CH flowers. The high inbreeding rate in CH flowers also helps explain the low observed heterozygosity and high inbreeding coefficients previously observed in P. lewtonii (Swift et al. 2016). Although Swift et al. (2016) proposed that the high inbreeding rate could be due to unsuitable environmental conditions causing poor germination of outcrossed seed, these results indicate that P. lewtonii shows high inbreeding simply because 75 % of the seeds in CH flowers are produced through inbreeding, in addition to the 100 % inbred seeds set by CL flowers. The high inbreeding rate in CH flowers may instead be due to poor pollinator efficiency (Swift et al. 2016), the effects of which may be magnified by the high relatedness of neighbouring individuals, especially those emerging from underground CL seeds.

The remaining 25 % of seeds from CH flowers contained at least one non-maternal allele, indicating reproduction via cross-pollination. Even though the cross-pollination rate was low in CH flowers, simulations showed that it was significantly greater than that of fully selfing flowers. Although the total above-ground seed set is derived from both the CH and CL flowers, because CH flowers produce ~13-fold more seeds than above-ground CL flowers, the above-ground CL flowers likely contribute little to the overall selfing rates of above-ground seed. Thus, the total outcrossing rate for all seed produced above-ground (from both CL and CH flowers) would still be greater than that expected for the 100 % selfed below-ground seed, indicating that it would be possible to detect whether above-ground or below-ground seed predominantly germinated after a fire.

Pre- and post-fire comparisons of genetic diversity, inbreeding coefficients and genetic structure were most consistent with greater post-fire germination of seeds produced by inbreeding. Pre-fire observed heterozygosity levels were very low, and were much smaller than expected heterozygosity, resulting in large positive inbreeding coefficients (F and FB), indicating high rates of selfing or inbreeding. After fire, both observed and expected heterozygosity increased slightly, likely due to a slight increase in allelic diversity post-fire reflecting new alleles emerging from the seed bank. However, post-fire expected heterozygosity increased slightly more than observed heterozygosity, resulting in greater inbreeding coefficients. If seeds produced by above-ground flowers preferentially germinated after a fire, then given the greater seed set of CH flowers (Koontz et al. 2017) and the estimates of outcrossing obtained in the first experiment, we undoubtedly would have observed a post-fire decrease in inbreeding coefficients. The increased inbreeding suggests that the species may rely more strongly on selfed seed in post-fire recolonization.

Genetic structure also increased after fire, which is consistent with the reduced dispersal of below-ground CL seeds. Following fire, AMOVA analyses showed an increase in the proportion of genetic variation attributable to allele frequency differences among a priori population groups at both the block and plot levels. This pattern was consistent with InStruct results, which showed that genetically similar individuals were more tightly spatially clustered and that individuals were less admixed after a fire. Some factors that increase genetic structure are inbreeding between geographically proximal relatives and reduced pollination distances (Loveless and Hamrick 1984). In particular, self-fertilization eliminates pollen movement, reduces effective population sizes and results in strong genetic drift, thereby resulting in strong genetic structure among groups (Nordborg and Donnelly 1997; Wright et al. 2013; Hartfield et al. 2017). Greater among-group variation is also expected when seeds have limited dispersal capability (Hamrick et al. 1993). The changes in the hierarchical partitioning of genetic variation are therefore consistent with an increased post-fire contribution by seeds that dispersed only short distances, a characteristic of below-ground CL flowers. An association between fire and increased production of seed from CL flowers was also found in a recent study of Cologania broussonetii, a perennial re-sprouting herb with both CH and CL flowers, that found that expression of CL flowers was maximized under frequent fires (Carbone et al. 2021).

However, contrary to the results of other analyses of inbreeding (F and FB), the AMOVA-derived FIS decreased after fire. The apparent discrepancy likely reflects differences in how different methods quantify the effects of genetic drift on inbreeding. GenAlex and INest measure inbreeding based on the probability of identity by descent (i.e. inbreeding effective population sizes; Chybicki and Burczyk 2009; Peakall and Smouse 2012), whereas AMOVA measures inbreeding based on changes in the variance in allele frequencies (i.e. variance effective population sizes; Weir and Cockerham 1984; Excoffier et al. 1992). These metrics exhibit different responses to both inbreeding and population size fluctuations (Templeton 2006) that are relevant to how fire influences P. lewtonii. In partially selfing populations, such as this one, inbreeding effective population sizes change less with the number of individuals than do variance effective population sizes (Li 1965). Therefore, changes in F and FB probably represent a change in the mating system due to an increase in the proportion of selfed seeds, whereas FIS also depends on how many plants reproduce. Furthermore, when population sizes fluctuate, the accumulation of inbreeding tends to reflect the parental generation, whereas the variance in allele frequencies tends to reflect variation in the offspring generation (Crow and Kimura 1970). In this system, increases in F and FB likely reflect increased reproductive success of parents that produced below-ground seed by selfing before the fire, whereas the decrease in FIS probably reflects the larger pool of more variable offspring that recruited from the persistent seed bank.

Although the current study is among the first to show that seeds produced by below-ground flowers in an amphicarpic species were important in post-fire colonization, the exact mechanism underlying this phenomenon is unknown. Amphicarpy is hypothesized to be an adaptation to ecological disturbance (Symonides 1988). For amphicarpic species that inhabit fire-maintained ecosystems, below-ground seeds may be over-represented in the seed bank from which the plant population germinates after fire because they occur deeper in the soil and may be less likely to be damaged by fire (Zhang et al. 2020). This may particularly be the case when fires occur during the period of seed production by CH flowers, which was the case in the present study. The possibility that fire may damage above-ground seeds also helps explain why we did not find an increase in outcrossing after a fire, even though CH flowers produce much greater quantities of seed than either type of CL flowers (Koontz et al. 2017). Another possible explanation for why the seeds produced below-ground showed increased contributions to the population after a fire is because they are larger and experienced more favourable ecological conditions for germination than those produced above-ground (e.g. greater moisture below the soil surface), which is supported by previous studies that found that seeds of one amphicarpic grass species buried below-ground often showed greater germination and survival after a fire (Cheplick and Quinn 1987, 1988).

These results support a cyclical pattern to the reproduction, genetic diversity and genetic structure in P. lewtonii, which appears to be an adaptation to a fire-maintained ecosystem. After a fire, the seeds from below-ground CL flowers likely predominantly recolonize a site, resulting in high inbreeding coefficients, low admixture and strong patterns of genetic structure. In years that do not experience fire, more seedlings may arise from seeds produced by the more prolific CH flowers (Koontz et al. 2017). Although we found that only 25 % of the reproduction achieved by CH flowers was from outcrossing, several years of reproduction primarily arising from seeds produced by CH flowers would lead to a gradual increase in heterozygosity and a decrease in inbreeding coefficients and population structure, as found in the pre-fire data set. The genetic variation generated by outcrossing in CH flowers may help facilitate adaptation of P. lewtonii to environmental change (Oakley et al. 2007). Although many studies have debated the stability of mixed mating systems (Holsinger 1991; Goodwillie et al. 2005), the mixed mating system and associated amphicarpy in P. lewtonii and other amphicarpic species may be stable because it provides one potential strategy to produce seeds that can germinate in the challenging conditions found in disturbance-prone environments (Hidalgo et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2020).

We also observed a clear shift in alleles present in the population following the fire event, which provides some indication of seed longevity in the soil seed bank. Although some low-frequency alleles were lost after fire, a roughly equal number of new alleles emerged at low frequencies post-fire. None of the alleles that emerged after fire were encountered in previous range-wide population genetic analysis of the species (Swift et al. 2016). Because this population was completely burned, seed dispersal is limited, and these alleles were not detected previously, it is likely that at least some of them were preserved in the soil seed bank and re-emerged after fire. The first sampling occurred in 2014 and new alleles appeared in 2017, indicating that seeds remained viable in the seed bank at least 4 years, but possibly longer, before germination was stimulated by fire. Given that the success of the amphicarpic life history strategy depends on seeds maintaining viability in the soil, this provides further support for the hypothesis of post-disturbance recolonization by below-ground seeds. Seed banks may serve as a buffer against the negative genetic effects of disturbance in fire-prone ecosystems (Dolan et al. 2008), and new alleles emerging from the seed bank may buffer the population from a loss of genetic diversity after disturbance.

In addition to being an integral part of the natural cycle of disturbance and playing an important role in maintaining sandhill and scrub ecosystems (USFWS 1999; Menges 2007), fire has multiple positive effects on P. lewtonii, including increased recruitment and survival of post-burn recruits (Weekley and Menges 2012). This study highlights P. lewtonii’s highly specific adaptations that allow it to thrive in response to fire, underscoring the importance of using fire management to sustain populations of this endangered species (Weekley and Menges 2012). More generally, the results support previous hypotheses about the functional significance of amphicarpy as an adaptation to disturbance-prone environments. Amphicarpy has evolved independently multiple times in species occupying fire-maintained ecosystems (Zhang et al. 2020), emphasizing the importance of fire as a selective force shaping the evolution of plants and the importance of maintaining historical fire regimes to ensure the conservation of biodiversity.

Supporting Information

The following additional information is available in the online version of this article—

Table S1. Measures of individual heterozygosity (PHt, Hs-observed and Hs-expected, internal relatedness [IR] and homozygosity by locus [HL]) from genotyped seeds of Polygala lewtonii and simulated selfing.

Table S2. Alleles unique to either the pre- or post-fire sample of Polygala lewtonii.

Table S3. Genetic diversity in pre- and post-fire populations of Polygala lewtonii grouped by InStruct cluster.

Table S4. Results of analyses of the partitioning of genetic variation in Polygala lewtonii using AMOVA with individuals grouped by InStruct clusters.

Table S5. The average admixture proportions of Polygala lewtonii individuals in InStruct clusters.

Figure S1. Plots of Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) and ln likelihood (ln(K)) curves for InStruct analysis of Polygala lewtonii as presented in Fig. 3 at values of K = 1–10.

Appendix S1. Code for inbreeding simulation.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Plant Industry (grant number 020159), the Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program of National Science Foundation (grant number DBI-1157030), and Phillip and Sima K. Needleman.

Contributions by the Authors

C.E.E., J.F.S., S.A.S. and E.S.M. and conceived of the study. E.S.M. obtained funding for the study. Sample collection was performed by S.A.S. Lab work was conducted by E.M.M. and B.B. Genetic data analysis was performed by E.M.M., J.F.S., and C.E.E. E.M.M. and B.O.O. wrote additional R scripts for the analysis. B.B. created maps. The initial drafts were written by E.M.M. and C.E.E., and B.O.O. assisted with later drafts. All authors contributed to the editing process and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Wendy Applequist, Monica Carlsen and Peter Hoch for organizing the Missouri Botanical Garden Research Experience for Undergraduates program; the DNA analysis facility at Science Hill at Yale University for processing genetic samples; and Carl Weekley, Stephanie Koontz, Jamie Peeler, Devon Picklum, David Zaya, Jennifer Navarra, Sarah Hicks, Lauren Sullivan, John Lowell, Kate Prengaman and David Horton for assistance with field work.

Data Availability

Microsatellite data available via FigShare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16713214.

Populations & Communities. Chief Editor: Jean Burns

Literature Cited

Carbone
LM
,
Cascone
G
,
Aguilar
R
.
2021
.
Fire frequency effects on cleistogamy expression and progeny performance in Cologania broussonetii
.
Plant Biology
23
:
285
292
.

Cheplick
GP
.
1987
.
The ecology of amphicarpic plants
.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
2
:
97
101
.

Cheplick
GP
,
Quinn
JA
.
1987
.
The role of seed depth, litter, and fire in the seedling establishment of amphicarpic peanutgrass (Amphicarpum purshii)
.
Oecologia
73
:
459
464
.

Cheplick
GP
,
Quinn
JA
.
1988
.
Subterranean seed production and population responses to fire in Amphicarpum purshii (Gramineae)
.
Journal of Ecology
76
:
263
273
.

Chybicki
IJ
,
Burczyk
J
.
2009
.
Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients
.
The Journal of Heredity
100
:
106
113
.

Coulon
A
.
2010
.
genhet: an easy-to-use R function to estimate individual heterozygosity
.
Molecular Ecology Resources
10
:
167
169
.

Crow
JF
,
Kimura
M
.
1970
.
An introduction to population genetics theory
.
New York
:
Harper and Row
.

Davies
ID
,
Cary
GJ
,
Landguth
EL
,
Lindenmayer
DB
,
Banks
SC
.
2016
.
Implications of recurrent disturbance for genetic diversity
.
Ecology and Evolution
6
:
1181
1196
.

Dolan
RW
,
Quintana-Ascencio
PF
,
Menges
ES
.
2008
.
Genetic change following fire in populations of a seed-banking perennial plant
.
Oecologia
158
:
355
360
.

Doyle
JJ
,
Doyle
JL
.
1987
.
A rapid isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh tissue
.
Phytochemical Bulletin
19
:
11
15
.

Excoffier
L
,
Lischer
HE
.
2010
.
Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows
.
Molecular Ecology Resources
10
:
564
567
.

Excoffier
L
,
Smouse
PE
,
Quattro
JM
.
1992
.
Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data
.
Genetics
131
:
479
491
.

Gao
H
,
Williamson
S
,
Bustamante
CD
.
2007
.
A Markov chain Monte Carlo approach for joint inference of population structure and inbreeding rates from multilocus genotype data
.
Genetics
176
:
1635
1651
.

Gilbert
KJ
,
Andrew
RL
,
Bock
DG
,
Franklin
MT
,
Kane
NC
,
Moore
JS
,
Moyers
BT
,
Renaut
S
,
Rennison
DJ
,
Veen
T
,
Vines
TH
.
2012
.
Recommendations for utilizing and reporting population genetic analyses: the reproducibility of genetic clustering using the program STRUCTURE
.
Molecular Ecology
21
:
4925
4930
.

Goldberg
EE
,
Igić
B
.
2012
.
Tempo and mode in plant breeding system evolution
.
Evolution
66
:
3701
3709
.

Goodwillie
C
,
Kalisz
S
,
Eckert
CG
.
2005
.
The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence
.
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
,
36
:
47
79
.

Goudet
J
.
2002
.
FSTAT (version 2.9.3.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics
. https://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm (5 November 2021).

Hamrick
JL
,
Murawski
DA
,
Nason
JD
.
1993
.
The influence of seed dispersal mechanisms on the genetic structure of tropical tree populations
.
Vegetatio
108
:
281
297
.

Hartfield
M
,
Bataillon
T
,
Glémin
S
.
2017
.
The evolutionary interplay between adaptation and self-fertilization
.
Trends in Genetics
33
:
420
431
.

Heuberger
KA
,
Putz
FE
.
2003
.
Fire in the suburbs: ecological impacts of prescribed fire in small remnants of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) sandhill
.
Restoration Ecology
11
:
72
81
.

Hidalgo
J
,
Casas
RR
,
Á Muñoz
M
.
2016
.
Environmental unpredictability and inbreeding depression select for mixed dispersal syndromes
.
BMC Evolutionary Biology
16
:
1–12
.

Holsinger
KE
.
1988
.
Inbreeding depression doesn’t matter: the genetic basis of mating-system evolution
.
Evolution
42
:
1235
1244
.

Holsinger
KE
.
1991
.
Mass-action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems
.
The American Naturalist
138
:
606
622
.

Kaul
V
,
Koul
AK
,
Sharma
MC
.
2000
.
The underground flower
.
Current Science
78
:
39
44
.

Koontz
SM
,
Weekley
CW
,
Haller Crate
SJ
,
Menges
ES
.
2017
.
Patterns of chasmogamy and cleistogamy, a mixed-mating strategy in an endangered perennial
.
AoB PLANTS
9
:
plx059
; doi:10.1093/aobpla/plx059.

Kopelman
NM
,
Mayzel
J
,
Jakobsson
M
,
Rosenberg
NA
,
Mayrose
I
.
2015
.
Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K
.
Molecular Ecology Resources
15
:
1179
1191
.

Li
CC
.
1965
.
Population genetics
.
Chicago, IL
:
University of Chicago Press
.

Lindon
HL
,
Menges
E
.
2008
.
Scientific note: effects of smoke on seed germination of twenty species of fire-prone habitats in Florida
.
Castanea
73
:
106
110
.

Loveless
MD
,
Hamrick
JL
.
1984
.
Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations
.
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
15
:
65
95
.

Lytle
DA
.
2001
.
Disturbance regimes and life-history evolution
.
The American Naturalist
157
:
525
536
.

Menges
ES
.
2007
.
Integrating demography and fire management: an example from Florida scrub
.
Australian Journal of Botany
55
:
261
272
.

Menges
ES
,
Hawkes
CV
.
1998
.
Interactive effects of fire and microhabitat on plants of Florida scrub
.
Ecological Applications
8
:
935
946
.

Menges
ES
,
Weekley
CW
,
Hamzé
SI
,
Pickert
RL
.
2007
.
Soil preferences for federally-listed plants on the Lake Wales Ridge in Highlands county, Florida
.
Florida Scientist
70
:
24
39
.

Nordborg
M
,
Donnelly
P
.
1997
.
The coalescent process with selfing
.
Genetics
146
:
1185
1195
.

Oakley
CG
,
Moriuchi
KS
,
Winn
AA
.
2007
.
The maintenance of outcrossing in predominantly selfing species: ideas and evidence from cleistogamous species
.
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
38
:
437
457
.

Peakall
R
,
Smouse
PE
.
2012
.
GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update
.
Bioinformatics
28
:
2537
2539
.

Pritchard
JK
,
Stephens
M
,
Donnelly
P
.
2000
.
Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data
.
Genetics
155
:
945
959
.

R Core Team
.
2013
.
R: a language and environment for statistical computing
. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Reinhart
KO
,
Menges
ES
.
2004
.
Effects of re-introducing fire to a central Florida sandhill community
.
Applied Vegetation Science
7
:
141
150
.

Slapcinsky
JL
,
Gordon
DR
,
Menges
ES
.
2010
.
Responses of rare plant species to fire in Florida’s pyrogenic communities
.
Natural Areas Journal
30
:
4
19, 16
.

Small
JK
.
1933
.
Manual of the Southeastern Flora: being descriptions of the seed plants growing naturally in Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Eastern Louisiana, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia
.
Chapel Hill (NC)
:
The University of North Carolina Press
.

Swift
JF
,
Smith
SA
,
Menges
ES
,
Bassüner
B
,
Edwards
CE
.
2016
.
Analysis of mating system and genetic structure in the endangered, amphicarpic plant, Lewton’s polygala (Polygala lewtonii)
.
Conservation genetics
17
:
1269
1284
.

Symonides
E
.
1988
.
On the ecology and evolution of annual plants in disturbed environments
.
Vegetatio
77
:
21
31
.

Templeton
AR
.
2006
.
Population genetics and microevolutionary theory
.
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
.

USFWS
.
1999
.
South Florida multi-species recovery plan: Florida scrub (including scrubby flatwoods and scrubby high pine)
.
Atlanta, GA
:
USFWS
.

Vamosi
JC
,
Magallón
S
,
Mayrose
I
,
Otto
SP
,
Sauquet
H
.
2018
.
Macroevolutionary patterns of flowering plant speciation and extinction
.
Annual Review of Plant Biology
69
:
685
706
.

Vandvik
V
,
Klanderud
K
,
Meineri
E
,
Måren
IE
,
Töpper
J
.
2016
.
Seed banks are biodiversity reservoirs: species–area relationships above versus below ground
.
Oikos
125
:
218
228
.

Weekley
CW
,
Brothers
A
.
2006
.
Failure of reproductive assurance in the chasmogamous flowers of Polygala lewtonii (Polygalaceae), an endangered sandhill herb
.
American Journal of Botany
93
:
245
253
.

Weekley
CW
,
Menges
ES
.
2003
.
Species and vegetation responses to prescribed fire in a long-unburned, endemic-rich Lake Wales Ridge scrub
.
Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society
130
:
265
282
.

Weekley
CW
,
Menges
ES
.
2012
.
Burning creates contrasting demographic patterns in Polygala lewtonii (Polygalaceae): a cradle-to-grave analysis of multiple cohorts in a perennial herb
.
Australian Journal of Botany
60
:
347
357
.

Weekley
CW
,
Menges
ES
,
Pickert
RL
.
2008
.
An ecological map of Florida’s Lake Wales Ridge: a new boundary delineation and an assessment of post-Columbian habitat loss
.
Florida Scientist
71
:
45
64
.

Weir
BS
,
Cockerham
CC
.
1984
.
Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure
.
Evolution
38
:
1358
1370
.

Wright
SI
,
Kalisz
S
,
Slotte
T
.
2013
.
Evolutionary consequences of self-fertilization in plants
.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
280
:
20130133
.

Wunderlin
RP
,
Hansen
BF
,
Franck
AR
,
Essig
FB
.
2021
.
Atlas of Florida plants
.
Tampa, FL
:
Institute for Systematic Botany, University of South Florida
.

Zhang
K
,
Baskin
JM
,
Baskin
CC
,
Cheplick
GP
,
Yang
X
,
Huang
Z
.
2020
.
Amphicarpic plants: definition, ecology, geographic distribution, systematics, life history, evolution and use in agriculture
.
Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
95
:
1442
1466
.

Zomlefer
WB
.
1989
.
Flowering plants of Florida: a guide to common families
.
Gainesville, FL: Biological Illustrations
.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Associate Editor: Baorong Lu
Baorong Lu
Associate Editor
Search for other works by this author on:

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.