ABSTRACT

Rhizobia form nodules on the roots of legumes and fix atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia, thus supplying it to host legumes. In return, plants supply photosynthetic products to maintain rhizobial activities. In most cases, rhizobial Nod factors (NFs) and their leguminous receptors (NFRs) are essential for the establishment of symbiosis. However, recent studies have discovered a novel symbiotic pathway in which rhizobia utilize the type III effectors (T3Es) similar to the pathogenic bacteria to induce nodulation. The T3Es of rhizobia are thought to be evolved from the pathogen, but they have a unique structure distinct from the pathogen, suggesting that it might be customized for symbiotic purposes. This review will focus on the recent findings from the study of rhizobial T3Es, discussing their features on a symbiont and pathogen, and the future perspectives on the role of rhizobial T3Es in symbiosis control technology.

Legume-rhizobium symbiosis involves molecular interaction between the two partners. Besides the Nod factor, rhizobial type III effectors can activate the symbiotic signaling.
Graphical Abstract

Legume-rhizobium symbiosis involves molecular interaction between the two partners. Besides the Nod factor, rhizobial type III effectors can activate the symbiotic signaling.

Rhizobia are nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria that have a symbiotic relationship with legumes via the formation of root nodules on host roots. In nodules, rhizobia live as bacteroides (pleomorphic forms) and fix the atmospheric nitrogen (N2) to ammonia (NH4+), thus rendering it suitable for host nutrition. In exchange, plants supply carbon sources and other nutrients to support bacterial activities. This interaction substantially contributes to the agronomic importance and global nitrogen cycle (Soumare et al.2020). For the establishment of symbiosis, rhizobia release specific nodulation signals called Nod factors (NFs) that are recognized by legume receptors (NFRs), leading to nodule organogenesis and bacterial infection (Figure 1). The nodulation program has been considered to be (almost) exclusively controlled by NFs signaling (Oldroyd et al.2011). However, rhizobia have gained alternative tools to promote infection or survival in legume nodules. For example, surface polysaccharides include lipopolysaccharide (LPS), exopolysaccharide (EPS), or K-antigen polysaccharide (KPS) that serve as a protective barrier or effector proteins via type III (T3SS), type IV (T4SS), or type VI (T6SS) secretion systems that modulate host cellular functions, have been shown to affect symbiosis (Fraysse et al. 2003; Nelson and Sadowsky 2015). Of these, T3SS has been recognized as a central player in the interaction of bacteria with diverse host legumes.

Model of NF signaling and the function of rhizobial T3 effectors triggering NF-independent nodulation (modified from Ratu et al.2021a). Leguminous root-derived flavonoids induce the production of Nod factors (NFs) in rhizobia. Recognition of NFs by NF receptors triggers a signaling cascade leading to nodulation. The flavonoids also induce rhizobia to produce and inject effector proteins into legume root cells. Rhizobial effectors (ErnA and Bel2-5) can directly activate the nodulation signaling in an NF-independent manner. Both effectors localize in the plant nucleus. ErnA is likely to be associated with nucleic acids, while Bel2-5 may function as SUMO protease to regulate symbiosis with their respective hosts. Information shown is based on studies by Teulet et al.2019; Ratu et al.2021a.
Figure 1.

Model of NF signaling and the function of rhizobial T3 effectors triggering NF-independent nodulation (modified from Ratu et al.2021a). Leguminous root-derived flavonoids induce the production of Nod factors (NFs) in rhizobia. Recognition of NFs by NF receptors triggers a signaling cascade leading to nodulation. The flavonoids also induce rhizobia to produce and inject effector proteins into legume root cells. Rhizobial effectors (ErnA and Bel2-5) can directly activate the nodulation signaling in an NF-independent manner. Both effectors localize in the plant nucleus. ErnA is likely to be associated with nucleic acids, while Bel2-5 may function as SUMO protease to regulate symbiosis with their respective hosts. Information shown is based on studies by Teulet et al.2019; Ratu et al.2021a.

Many but not all rhizobia possess T3SS, which was previously thought to be an attribute of pathogenic bacteria to deliver “effector proteins (T3Es)” for suppressing host immunity and promoting pathogen infections. In most legume-rhizobium symbioses, T3SS in rhizobia is dispensable, however, it favors or impedes nodule formation on legumes depending on host genotypes (Deakin and Broughton 2009; Miwa and Okazaki 2017).

T3SS is a complex secretory machinery that forms a needle-like structure and serves as a transport channel for delivering bacterial effectors into the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells. Bacterial pathogens heavily rely on a functional T3SS for their virulence, whereas in rhizobia, the system can promote symbiosis and expand its role beyond virulence (Tampakaki 2014; Staehelin and Krishnan 2015). Comparative genomics studies between animal/phytopathogens and rhizobia provide many similarities and variations of the T3SSs.

Rhizobial T3SS gene clusters are designated tts (type three secretion) and are generally located either in symbiotic plasmids or in chromosomal symbiotic islands on which nodulation and nitrogen fixation genes are encoded. Rhizobial T3SS is divided into four sub-groups rhizobia conserved (rhc) based on T3E core components, annotated as α-rhcI to α-rhcIII, and ß-rhc. This rhc-T3SS is similar to phytopathogenic hypersensitive reaction and pathogenicity (hrp), which is classified as hrp/hrc1, and hrp/hrc2. Expression of rhizobial T3SS and TE3s is under the control of host-derived flavonoids and a transcriptional regulator TtsI (Figure 1). Upon delivery, rhizobial T3Es directly alter plant cell functions and facilitate host specificity (Tampakaki 2014; Staehelin and Krishnan 2015; Miwa and Okazaki 2017). In this review, we provide a current overview of T3Es in legume-rhizobium symbioses and compare their features as symbiont and pathogen factors (Table 1).

Table 1.

Rhizobial T3Es and their functions in nitrogen-fixing nodulation

NoSecreted NopsRhizobial strains—host speciesPutative functionHomologs in pathogensLocalization compartmentPutative Associated- Host genes/Host targetEffect on nodulationReferences
(a) Rhizobial TE3s that conserved in both rhizobia and pathogenic bacteria
1Bel2-5Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant, Rj4 soybeansCysteine protease (C48)XopD (Xanthomonas campestris)NucleusTriggers NF-independent nodulation on nfr1 mutant, but restricts nodule formation on Rj4 soybeansFaruque et al.2015; Ratu et al.2021a, 2021b
2NopDBradyrhizobium sp. XS1105–Tephrosia vogeliiCysteine protease (C48)XopD (Xanthomonas campestris)NucleusSuppresses nodules formation on T. vogeliiXiang et al.2020
Sinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine maxSoybean F-Box/LRR-repeat (FBD/LRR) (Glyma.19g068600) and protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C) (Glyma.19g069200)*Regulates nodulation either positively or negatively on 10 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisWang et al.2020
3NopFBradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Lotus spp.Acyl-CoA N-acyltransferaseHopBG1 (Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326)Triggers the inhibition of USDA61 infection in Lotus spp.Kusakabe et al.2020
4NopJRhizobium sp. NGR234–Crotalaria junceaCysteine protease (C55)YopJ (Yersinia pestis) AvrRxv (Xanthomonas pv. vesicatoria)Minor negative effect on the nodulation of C. junceaKambara et al.2009
5NopMRhizobium sp. NGR234–Lablab purpureus or Lotus japonicusE3 ubiquitin ligaseIpaH9.8, IpaH1.4 (Shigella flexneri), SspH1, SspH2, SlrP (Salomonella enterica), HpX29 (Ralstonia solanacearum)Plasma membraneMAPK signaling pathwayPromotes nodulation on L. purpureus, whereas reduce nodule formation of Lotus japonicusXin et al.2012; Xu et al.2018
Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indicaPositively promotes nodulation on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Lotus spp.Induces ETI-like response, thereby nodule early senescence in Lotus spp.Kusakabe et al.2020
6NopTRhizobium sp. NGR234 –Phaseolus vulgaris, Tephrosia vogelii, Crotalaria juncea, and C. pallidaCysteine protease (C58)AvrPphB (Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola) YopT (Yersinia pestis)Affects nodulation positively on P. vulgaris, T. vogelii, and suppresses nodulation of C. juncea and C. pallidaDai et al.2008; Kambara et al.2009
Sinorhizobium fredii USDA257 (expressing NopT of NGR234)—Glycine maxPlasma membraneAssociated with soybean protein kinases, GmPBS1-1 (Glycine max AvrPphB Susceptible 1)Impairs nodulation in G. max cv. Nenfeng 15Khan et al. 2022
Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii HH103–Glycine maxAssociated with peroxidase superfamily protein (Glyma.02G135100) and aspartyl protease family protein 2 (Glyma.02G100800)*Regulates nodulation either positively, negatively or with no effects on 30 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisLiu Y et al.2021
Mesorhizobium amphore CCNWGS0123–Robinia pseudoacaciaPlasma membrane and nucleusATP-citrate synthase alpha chain protein 2 (ATP-CSACP2) and hypersensitive-induced response protein (HIRP)Minor positive effect on the nodulation of R. pseudoacaciaLuo et al.2020
Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indica or Vigna spp.Promotes nodule formation V. mungo and V. unguiculata and plays lesser role on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019; Songwattana et al.2021
(b) Rhizobial-specific T3Es
7ErnABradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indicaRhizobium-specificNucleusTriggers NF-independent nodulation and cell-division on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant soybeanPositively affects nodulation on nfr1 mutant soybeanRatu et al.2021a
8InnBBradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Vigna spp.UnknownRhizobium-specificRestricts nodulation on KPS1, but promotes nodulation on V. mungoNguyen et al.2018
9NopAASinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine max, Vigna unguiculataGlycoside hydrolase 12 (GH12)Rhizobium-specificGmARP (Glyma.19g074200)*;Promotes rhizobial infection on soybean, but has a detrimental effect on V. unguiculata cv. Red CaloonaJiménez-Guerrero et al.2019; Dorival et al.2020; Wang et al.2022
10NopABBradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indica or Vigna spp.UnknownRhizobium-specificPromotes nodules formation on V. mungo and V. unguiculata and plays lesser role on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019; Songwattana et al.2021
11NopCSinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine max, Vigna unguiculata, Lotus japonicus GIFUUnknownRhizobium-specificPositively affects nodulation on G. max cv. William 82 and Vigna unguiculata, but blocks nodulation on Lotus japonicus GIFUJiménez-Guerrero et al.2015, 2020
12NopEBradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110–Vigna spp. Glycine max. Macroptilium atropurpureumCalcium binding proteinRhizobium-specificPromotes nodulation on G. max, M. atropurpureum, and V. radiata cv. KPS1, but has negative effect on V. radiata cv. KPS2 via SA-mediated ETI-responsesWenzel et al.2010; Piromyou et al.2021
13NopLSinorhizobium fredii NGR234–Phaseolus vulgaris, Flemingia congestaProtein phosphorylationRhizobium-specificNucleusMAP KinaseSuppresses the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins on L. japonicus, inhibits P. vulgaris nodule-senescence, promotes nodulation of F. congestaMarie et al.2003; Bartsev et al.2004; Zhang et al.2011;
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant soybeanPositively affects nodulation on nfr1 mutant soybeanRatu et al.2021a
14NopPRhizobium sp. NGR234–Vigna unguiculata, Flemingia congesta, Tephrosia vogeliiProtein phosphorylationRhizobium-specificPromotes nodulation on F. congesta and T. vogelii but inhibits nodulation on V. unguiculataAusmees et al.2004; Skorpil et al.2005
Bradyrhizobium USDA110–Glycine maxEndoplasmic reticulum (ER)GmNNL1Inhibits root hair infection on soybean carrying GmNNL1Zhang et al.2021
Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA122–Glycine maxSeverely restricts nodulation with Rj2-soybean via ETI-like responsesSugawara et al.2018
Sinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine maxAssociated with pathogenesis-related 5 (PR5) family (Glyma.12g031200) and mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 (MAPK3) (Glyma.12g073000)*Regulates nodulation either positively or negatively on 10 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisWang et al.2018
Mesorhizobium amorphae—Robinia pseudoacaciaPlasma membraneTrafficking protein particle complex subunit 13–like protein (TRAPPC13)Plays roles at the early stage of M. amorphae infection. Minor positive effect on nodule biomass, but significantly promotes N-fixing activity of M. amorphae on R. pseudoacaciaLiu D et al.2021
NoSecreted NopsRhizobial strains—host speciesPutative functionHomologs in pathogensLocalization compartmentPutative Associated- Host genes/Host targetEffect on nodulationReferences
(a) Rhizobial TE3s that conserved in both rhizobia and pathogenic bacteria
1Bel2-5Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant, Rj4 soybeansCysteine protease (C48)XopD (Xanthomonas campestris)NucleusTriggers NF-independent nodulation on nfr1 mutant, but restricts nodule formation on Rj4 soybeansFaruque et al.2015; Ratu et al.2021a, 2021b
2NopDBradyrhizobium sp. XS1105–Tephrosia vogeliiCysteine protease (C48)XopD (Xanthomonas campestris)NucleusSuppresses nodules formation on T. vogeliiXiang et al.2020
Sinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine maxSoybean F-Box/LRR-repeat (FBD/LRR) (Glyma.19g068600) and protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C) (Glyma.19g069200)*Regulates nodulation either positively or negatively on 10 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisWang et al.2020
3NopFBradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Lotus spp.Acyl-CoA N-acyltransferaseHopBG1 (Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326)Triggers the inhibition of USDA61 infection in Lotus spp.Kusakabe et al.2020
4NopJRhizobium sp. NGR234–Crotalaria junceaCysteine protease (C55)YopJ (Yersinia pestis) AvrRxv (Xanthomonas pv. vesicatoria)Minor negative effect on the nodulation of C. junceaKambara et al.2009
5NopMRhizobium sp. NGR234–Lablab purpureus or Lotus japonicusE3 ubiquitin ligaseIpaH9.8, IpaH1.4 (Shigella flexneri), SspH1, SspH2, SlrP (Salomonella enterica), HpX29 (Ralstonia solanacearum)Plasma membraneMAPK signaling pathwayPromotes nodulation on L. purpureus, whereas reduce nodule formation of Lotus japonicusXin et al.2012; Xu et al.2018
Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indicaPositively promotes nodulation on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Lotus spp.Induces ETI-like response, thereby nodule early senescence in Lotus spp.Kusakabe et al.2020
6NopTRhizobium sp. NGR234 –Phaseolus vulgaris, Tephrosia vogelii, Crotalaria juncea, and C. pallidaCysteine protease (C58)AvrPphB (Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola) YopT (Yersinia pestis)Affects nodulation positively on P. vulgaris, T. vogelii, and suppresses nodulation of C. juncea and C. pallidaDai et al.2008; Kambara et al.2009
Sinorhizobium fredii USDA257 (expressing NopT of NGR234)—Glycine maxPlasma membraneAssociated with soybean protein kinases, GmPBS1-1 (Glycine max AvrPphB Susceptible 1)Impairs nodulation in G. max cv. Nenfeng 15Khan et al. 2022
Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii HH103–Glycine maxAssociated with peroxidase superfamily protein (Glyma.02G135100) and aspartyl protease family protein 2 (Glyma.02G100800)*Regulates nodulation either positively, negatively or with no effects on 30 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisLiu Y et al.2021
Mesorhizobium amphore CCNWGS0123–Robinia pseudoacaciaPlasma membrane and nucleusATP-citrate synthase alpha chain protein 2 (ATP-CSACP2) and hypersensitive-induced response protein (HIRP)Minor positive effect on the nodulation of R. pseudoacaciaLuo et al.2020
Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indica or Vigna spp.Promotes nodule formation V. mungo and V. unguiculata and plays lesser role on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019; Songwattana et al.2021
(b) Rhizobial-specific T3Es
7ErnABradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indicaRhizobium-specificNucleusTriggers NF-independent nodulation and cell-division on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant soybeanPositively affects nodulation on nfr1 mutant soybeanRatu et al.2021a
8InnBBradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Vigna spp.UnknownRhizobium-specificRestricts nodulation on KPS1, but promotes nodulation on V. mungoNguyen et al.2018
9NopAASinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine max, Vigna unguiculataGlycoside hydrolase 12 (GH12)Rhizobium-specificGmARP (Glyma.19g074200)*;Promotes rhizobial infection on soybean, but has a detrimental effect on V. unguiculata cv. Red CaloonaJiménez-Guerrero et al.2019; Dorival et al.2020; Wang et al.2022
10NopABBradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indica or Vigna spp.UnknownRhizobium-specificPromotes nodules formation on V. mungo and V. unguiculata and plays lesser role on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019; Songwattana et al.2021
11NopCSinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine max, Vigna unguiculata, Lotus japonicus GIFUUnknownRhizobium-specificPositively affects nodulation on G. max cv. William 82 and Vigna unguiculata, but blocks nodulation on Lotus japonicus GIFUJiménez-Guerrero et al.2015, 2020
12NopEBradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110–Vigna spp. Glycine max. Macroptilium atropurpureumCalcium binding proteinRhizobium-specificPromotes nodulation on G. max, M. atropurpureum, and V. radiata cv. KPS1, but has negative effect on V. radiata cv. KPS2 via SA-mediated ETI-responsesWenzel et al.2010; Piromyou et al.2021
13NopLSinorhizobium fredii NGR234–Phaseolus vulgaris, Flemingia congestaProtein phosphorylationRhizobium-specificNucleusMAP KinaseSuppresses the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins on L. japonicus, inhibits P. vulgaris nodule-senescence, promotes nodulation of F. congestaMarie et al.2003; Bartsev et al.2004; Zhang et al.2011;
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant soybeanPositively affects nodulation on nfr1 mutant soybeanRatu et al.2021a
14NopPRhizobium sp. NGR234–Vigna unguiculata, Flemingia congesta, Tephrosia vogeliiProtein phosphorylationRhizobium-specificPromotes nodulation on F. congesta and T. vogelii but inhibits nodulation on V. unguiculataAusmees et al.2004; Skorpil et al.2005
Bradyrhizobium USDA110–Glycine maxEndoplasmic reticulum (ER)GmNNL1Inhibits root hair infection on soybean carrying GmNNL1Zhang et al.2021
Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA122–Glycine maxSeverely restricts nodulation with Rj2-soybean via ETI-like responsesSugawara et al.2018
Sinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine maxAssociated with pathogenesis-related 5 (PR5) family (Glyma.12g031200) and mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 (MAPK3) (Glyma.12g073000)*Regulates nodulation either positively or negatively on 10 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisWang et al.2018
Mesorhizobium amorphae—Robinia pseudoacaciaPlasma membraneTrafficking protein particle complex subunit 13–like protein (TRAPPC13)Plays roles at the early stage of M. amorphae infection. Minor positive effect on nodule biomass, but significantly promotes N-fixing activity of M. amorphae on R. pseudoacaciaLiu D et al.2021

* means putative associated-host gene/host target of effector was identified by the Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis on the respective host

Table 1.

Rhizobial T3Es and their functions in nitrogen-fixing nodulation

NoSecreted NopsRhizobial strains—host speciesPutative functionHomologs in pathogensLocalization compartmentPutative Associated- Host genes/Host targetEffect on nodulationReferences
(a) Rhizobial TE3s that conserved in both rhizobia and pathogenic bacteria
1Bel2-5Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant, Rj4 soybeansCysteine protease (C48)XopD (Xanthomonas campestris)NucleusTriggers NF-independent nodulation on nfr1 mutant, but restricts nodule formation on Rj4 soybeansFaruque et al.2015; Ratu et al.2021a, 2021b
2NopDBradyrhizobium sp. XS1105–Tephrosia vogeliiCysteine protease (C48)XopD (Xanthomonas campestris)NucleusSuppresses nodules formation on T. vogeliiXiang et al.2020
Sinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine maxSoybean F-Box/LRR-repeat (FBD/LRR) (Glyma.19g068600) and protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C) (Glyma.19g069200)*Regulates nodulation either positively or negatively on 10 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisWang et al.2020
3NopFBradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Lotus spp.Acyl-CoA N-acyltransferaseHopBG1 (Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326)Triggers the inhibition of USDA61 infection in Lotus spp.Kusakabe et al.2020
4NopJRhizobium sp. NGR234–Crotalaria junceaCysteine protease (C55)YopJ (Yersinia pestis) AvrRxv (Xanthomonas pv. vesicatoria)Minor negative effect on the nodulation of C. junceaKambara et al.2009
5NopMRhizobium sp. NGR234–Lablab purpureus or Lotus japonicusE3 ubiquitin ligaseIpaH9.8, IpaH1.4 (Shigella flexneri), SspH1, SspH2, SlrP (Salomonella enterica), HpX29 (Ralstonia solanacearum)Plasma membraneMAPK signaling pathwayPromotes nodulation on L. purpureus, whereas reduce nodule formation of Lotus japonicusXin et al.2012; Xu et al.2018
Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indicaPositively promotes nodulation on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Lotus spp.Induces ETI-like response, thereby nodule early senescence in Lotus spp.Kusakabe et al.2020
6NopTRhizobium sp. NGR234 –Phaseolus vulgaris, Tephrosia vogelii, Crotalaria juncea, and C. pallidaCysteine protease (C58)AvrPphB (Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola) YopT (Yersinia pestis)Affects nodulation positively on P. vulgaris, T. vogelii, and suppresses nodulation of C. juncea and C. pallidaDai et al.2008; Kambara et al.2009
Sinorhizobium fredii USDA257 (expressing NopT of NGR234)—Glycine maxPlasma membraneAssociated with soybean protein kinases, GmPBS1-1 (Glycine max AvrPphB Susceptible 1)Impairs nodulation in G. max cv. Nenfeng 15Khan et al. 2022
Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii HH103–Glycine maxAssociated with peroxidase superfamily protein (Glyma.02G135100) and aspartyl protease family protein 2 (Glyma.02G100800)*Regulates nodulation either positively, negatively or with no effects on 30 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisLiu Y et al.2021
Mesorhizobium amphore CCNWGS0123–Robinia pseudoacaciaPlasma membrane and nucleusATP-citrate synthase alpha chain protein 2 (ATP-CSACP2) and hypersensitive-induced response protein (HIRP)Minor positive effect on the nodulation of R. pseudoacaciaLuo et al.2020
Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indica or Vigna spp.Promotes nodule formation V. mungo and V. unguiculata and plays lesser role on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019; Songwattana et al.2021
(b) Rhizobial-specific T3Es
7ErnABradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indicaRhizobium-specificNucleusTriggers NF-independent nodulation and cell-division on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant soybeanPositively affects nodulation on nfr1 mutant soybeanRatu et al.2021a
8InnBBradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Vigna spp.UnknownRhizobium-specificRestricts nodulation on KPS1, but promotes nodulation on V. mungoNguyen et al.2018
9NopAASinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine max, Vigna unguiculataGlycoside hydrolase 12 (GH12)Rhizobium-specificGmARP (Glyma.19g074200)*;Promotes rhizobial infection on soybean, but has a detrimental effect on V. unguiculata cv. Red CaloonaJiménez-Guerrero et al.2019; Dorival et al.2020; Wang et al.2022
10NopABBradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indica or Vigna spp.UnknownRhizobium-specificPromotes nodules formation on V. mungo and V. unguiculata and plays lesser role on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019; Songwattana et al.2021
11NopCSinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine max, Vigna unguiculata, Lotus japonicus GIFUUnknownRhizobium-specificPositively affects nodulation on G. max cv. William 82 and Vigna unguiculata, but blocks nodulation on Lotus japonicus GIFUJiménez-Guerrero et al.2015, 2020
12NopEBradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110–Vigna spp. Glycine max. Macroptilium atropurpureumCalcium binding proteinRhizobium-specificPromotes nodulation on G. max, M. atropurpureum, and V. radiata cv. KPS1, but has negative effect on V. radiata cv. KPS2 via SA-mediated ETI-responsesWenzel et al.2010; Piromyou et al.2021
13NopLSinorhizobium fredii NGR234–Phaseolus vulgaris, Flemingia congestaProtein phosphorylationRhizobium-specificNucleusMAP KinaseSuppresses the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins on L. japonicus, inhibits P. vulgaris nodule-senescence, promotes nodulation of F. congestaMarie et al.2003; Bartsev et al.2004; Zhang et al.2011;
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant soybeanPositively affects nodulation on nfr1 mutant soybeanRatu et al.2021a
14NopPRhizobium sp. NGR234–Vigna unguiculata, Flemingia congesta, Tephrosia vogeliiProtein phosphorylationRhizobium-specificPromotes nodulation on F. congesta and T. vogelii but inhibits nodulation on V. unguiculataAusmees et al.2004; Skorpil et al.2005
Bradyrhizobium USDA110–Glycine maxEndoplasmic reticulum (ER)GmNNL1Inhibits root hair infection on soybean carrying GmNNL1Zhang et al.2021
Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA122–Glycine maxSeverely restricts nodulation with Rj2-soybean via ETI-like responsesSugawara et al.2018
Sinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine maxAssociated with pathogenesis-related 5 (PR5) family (Glyma.12g031200) and mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 (MAPK3) (Glyma.12g073000)*Regulates nodulation either positively or negatively on 10 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisWang et al.2018
Mesorhizobium amorphae—Robinia pseudoacaciaPlasma membraneTrafficking protein particle complex subunit 13–like protein (TRAPPC13)Plays roles at the early stage of M. amorphae infection. Minor positive effect on nodule biomass, but significantly promotes N-fixing activity of M. amorphae on R. pseudoacaciaLiu D et al.2021
NoSecreted NopsRhizobial strains—host speciesPutative functionHomologs in pathogensLocalization compartmentPutative Associated- Host genes/Host targetEffect on nodulationReferences
(a) Rhizobial TE3s that conserved in both rhizobia and pathogenic bacteria
1Bel2-5Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant, Rj4 soybeansCysteine protease (C48)XopD (Xanthomonas campestris)NucleusTriggers NF-independent nodulation on nfr1 mutant, but restricts nodule formation on Rj4 soybeansFaruque et al.2015; Ratu et al.2021a, 2021b
2NopDBradyrhizobium sp. XS1105–Tephrosia vogeliiCysteine protease (C48)XopD (Xanthomonas campestris)NucleusSuppresses nodules formation on T. vogeliiXiang et al.2020
Sinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine maxSoybean F-Box/LRR-repeat (FBD/LRR) (Glyma.19g068600) and protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C) (Glyma.19g069200)*Regulates nodulation either positively or negatively on 10 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisWang et al.2020
3NopFBradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Lotus spp.Acyl-CoA N-acyltransferaseHopBG1 (Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326)Triggers the inhibition of USDA61 infection in Lotus spp.Kusakabe et al.2020
4NopJRhizobium sp. NGR234–Crotalaria junceaCysteine protease (C55)YopJ (Yersinia pestis) AvrRxv (Xanthomonas pv. vesicatoria)Minor negative effect on the nodulation of C. junceaKambara et al.2009
5NopMRhizobium sp. NGR234–Lablab purpureus or Lotus japonicusE3 ubiquitin ligaseIpaH9.8, IpaH1.4 (Shigella flexneri), SspH1, SspH2, SlrP (Salomonella enterica), HpX29 (Ralstonia solanacearum)Plasma membraneMAPK signaling pathwayPromotes nodulation on L. purpureus, whereas reduce nodule formation of Lotus japonicusXin et al.2012; Xu et al.2018
Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indicaPositively promotes nodulation on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Lotus spp.Induces ETI-like response, thereby nodule early senescence in Lotus spp.Kusakabe et al.2020
6NopTRhizobium sp. NGR234 –Phaseolus vulgaris, Tephrosia vogelii, Crotalaria juncea, and C. pallidaCysteine protease (C58)AvrPphB (Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola) YopT (Yersinia pestis)Affects nodulation positively on P. vulgaris, T. vogelii, and suppresses nodulation of C. juncea and C. pallidaDai et al.2008; Kambara et al.2009
Sinorhizobium fredii USDA257 (expressing NopT of NGR234)—Glycine maxPlasma membraneAssociated with soybean protein kinases, GmPBS1-1 (Glycine max AvrPphB Susceptible 1)Impairs nodulation in G. max cv. Nenfeng 15Khan et al. 2022
Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii HH103–Glycine maxAssociated with peroxidase superfamily protein (Glyma.02G135100) and aspartyl protease family protein 2 (Glyma.02G100800)*Regulates nodulation either positively, negatively or with no effects on 30 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisLiu Y et al.2021
Mesorhizobium amphore CCNWGS0123–Robinia pseudoacaciaPlasma membrane and nucleusATP-citrate synthase alpha chain protein 2 (ATP-CSACP2) and hypersensitive-induced response protein (HIRP)Minor positive effect on the nodulation of R. pseudoacaciaLuo et al.2020
Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indica or Vigna spp.Promotes nodule formation V. mungo and V. unguiculata and plays lesser role on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019; Songwattana et al.2021
(b) Rhizobial-specific T3Es
7ErnABradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indicaRhizobium-specificNucleusTriggers NF-independent nodulation and cell-division on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant soybeanPositively affects nodulation on nfr1 mutant soybeanRatu et al.2021a
8InnBBradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–Vigna spp.UnknownRhizobium-specificRestricts nodulation on KPS1, but promotes nodulation on V. mungoNguyen et al.2018
9NopAASinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine max, Vigna unguiculataGlycoside hydrolase 12 (GH12)Rhizobium-specificGmARP (Glyma.19g074200)*;Promotes rhizobial infection on soybean, but has a detrimental effect on V. unguiculata cv. Red CaloonaJiménez-Guerrero et al.2019; Dorival et al.2020; Wang et al.2022
10NopABBradyrhizobium sp. ORS3257–Aeschynomene indica or Vigna spp.UnknownRhizobium-specificPromotes nodules formation on V. mungo and V. unguiculata and plays lesser role on A. indicaTeulet et al.2019; Songwattana et al.2021
11NopCSinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine max, Vigna unguiculata, Lotus japonicus GIFUUnknownRhizobium-specificPositively affects nodulation on G. max cv. William 82 and Vigna unguiculata, but blocks nodulation on Lotus japonicus GIFUJiménez-Guerrero et al.2015, 2020
12NopEBradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110–Vigna spp. Glycine max. Macroptilium atropurpureumCalcium binding proteinRhizobium-specificPromotes nodulation on G. max, M. atropurpureum, and V. radiata cv. KPS1, but has negative effect on V. radiata cv. KPS2 via SA-mediated ETI-responsesWenzel et al.2010; Piromyou et al.2021
13NopLSinorhizobium fredii NGR234–Phaseolus vulgaris, Flemingia congestaProtein phosphorylationRhizobium-specificNucleusMAP KinaseSuppresses the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins on L. japonicus, inhibits P. vulgaris nodule-senescence, promotes nodulation of F. congestaMarie et al.2003; Bartsev et al.2004; Zhang et al.2011;
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61–nfr1 mutant soybeanPositively affects nodulation on nfr1 mutant soybeanRatu et al.2021a
14NopPRhizobium sp. NGR234–Vigna unguiculata, Flemingia congesta, Tephrosia vogeliiProtein phosphorylationRhizobium-specificPromotes nodulation on F. congesta and T. vogelii but inhibits nodulation on V. unguiculataAusmees et al.2004; Skorpil et al.2005
Bradyrhizobium USDA110–Glycine maxEndoplasmic reticulum (ER)GmNNL1Inhibits root hair infection on soybean carrying GmNNL1Zhang et al.2021
Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA122–Glycine maxSeverely restricts nodulation with Rj2-soybean via ETI-like responsesSugawara et al.2018
Sinorhizobium fredii HH103–Glycine maxAssociated with pathogenesis-related 5 (PR5) family (Glyma.12g031200) and mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 (MAPK3) (Glyma.12g073000)*Regulates nodulation either positively or negatively on 10 soybean germplasms tested in QTL analysisWang et al.2018
Mesorhizobium amorphae—Robinia pseudoacaciaPlasma membraneTrafficking protein particle complex subunit 13–like protein (TRAPPC13)Plays roles at the early stage of M. amorphae infection. Minor positive effect on nodule biomass, but significantly promotes N-fixing activity of M. amorphae on R. pseudoacaciaLiu D et al.2021

* means putative associated-host gene/host target of effector was identified by the Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis on the respective host

The roles of T3Es that are conserved in both rhizobia and pathogenic bacteria

Certain rhizobial T3Es have homologs in animal/phytopathogens and function similarly in dampening host immunity to promote bacterial infection (Table 1a). However, these pathogenic-like effectors can also severely restrict nodulation on certain legumes. The restriction of nodulation is most likely caused by direct or indirect recognition by host resistance (R) genes (eg Rj2, Rj4, and Rfg1), followed by the induction of effector-triggered immunity (ETI)-like plant defense responses (Yang et al.2010; Yasuda et al.2016). This ETI often results in a hypersensitive response (HR) to halt pathogen invasion and disease development in the infected host (Jones and Dangl 2006). We discuss the features and functions of several T3Es below:

The NopD is a rhizobial T3E with a putative small ubiquitin related-modifier (SUMO) protease domain of the C48 peptidase [ubiquitin-like protease (Ulp)] similar to the Xanthomonas spp. XopD effector. The NopD of Bradyrhizobium sp. XS1150 induces ETI-like responses, thus negatively affecting Tephrosia vogelii nodulation (Xiang et al.2020). Sinorhizobium fredii HH103 NopD interferes with soybean F-Box/LRR-repeat (FBD/LRR) and protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C) to promote rhizobial infection (Wang et al.2020). The NopD and XopD have been shown to have a similar substrate preference for plant SUMOs, indicating that they may interact with proteins that are sumoylated in a similar manner (Xiang et al.2020).

NopF carries a putative Acyl-CoA N-acyltransferase that is identical to the HopBG1 effector of the phytopathogen P. syringae pv. maculicola ES4326. NopF inhibits Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61 crack entry infection in Lotus japonicus GIFU via ETI-like responses at an early stage of symbiosis (Kusakabe et al.2020).

NopJ is a homolog of YopJ/AvrRxv C55 peptidases found in many T3SS-possessing pathogens. YopJ was shown to target small SUMO-conjugated proteins to alter mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kB) signaling pathways via acetyltransferase activity (Sweet et al.2007). NopJ of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 negatively affects the nodulation of Crotalaria juncea (Kambara et al.2009).

NopM belongs to IpaH (invasion-plasmid antigen H) family effector that is present in various human pathogens. NopM exploits the host ubiquitination pathway via its C-terminus E3 ubiquitin ligase (NEL) domains and its variable N-terminal containing leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain to interfere with the MAPK signaling pathway (Xin et al.2012; Xu et al.2018). In Lotus spp., USDA61 NopM induces ETI-like responses, thus mediating early nodule senescence and/or restricting nodule formation (Kusakabe et al. 2020). The NopM of ORS3257 and NGR234 promote nodulation in Aeschynomene indica and Lablab purpureus, respectively (Xin et al.2012; Xu et al.2018; Teulet et al.2019).

NopT belongs to the C58 cysteine family found in Pseudomonas syringae AvrPphB and Yersina YopT effectors. The N-terminus of NopT is predicted to be myristoylated and palmitoylated in plant cells (Dai et al.2008). Rhizobial NopT localizes to the plasma membrane and/or nucleus of the host cell, thus targeting various host genes depending on the legume plants. Host genes-associated NopT appears to be involved in plant-related resistance signaling that may facilitate rhizobial infection (Luo et al.2020; Liu Y et al.2021; Khan et al.2022). NopT of some rhizobia positively regulates nodulation on A. indica, Vigna spp., Phaseolus vulgaris, and T. vogelii, or negatively on C. juncea and C. pallida (Dai et al.2008; Kambara et al.2009; Teulet et al.2019; Songwattana et al.2021; Khan et al.2022).

The roles of rhizobium-specific T3Es in nodulation

Certain rhizobia specifically produce T3Es that are distinct from pathogen effectors, possibly for symbiotic purposes (Table 1b). For instance, NopAA (GunA) of Sinorhizobium fredii belongs to glycoside hydrolase family 12 (GH12) and exhibits cellulose-xyloglucan activity necessary for the breakdown of soybean cell walls to promote rhizobial infections, however, it is detrimental for symbiosis with cowpea (Jiménez-Guerrero et al.2019; Dorival et al.2020). In soybean, NopAA is associated with GmARP, which positively regulates nodulation (Wang et al.2022). The phosphorylated effectors of NGR234 NopL, and NopP positively affect nodulation of T. vogelii, Flemingia congesta, P. vulgaris, and V. unguiculata, respectively (Marie et al.2003; Ausmees et al.2004; Bartsev et al.2004; Skorpil et al.2005; Zhang et al.2011). NopL favors nodulation by mimicking a substrate of MAP kinases, thereby downregulating the expression of host defense genes (Zhang et al.2011; Ge et al.2016). Ectopic expression of nopL blocks the expression of chitinases in L. japonicus (Bartsev et al.2004). Recently, NopL of USDA61 has been shown to play a minor role in the nodulation of the nfr1 mutant soybean (Ratu et al.2021a). In the case of NopP, the transgenic expression of an effector promotes the hairy root transformation of L. japonicus, presumably by suppressing stress-related plant reactions (Wang et al.2021). The HH103 NopP putatively targets a pathogenesis-related protein and a MAPK of soybean, while NopP of Mesorhizobium amorphae interacts with the trafficking protein TRAPPC13 of Robinia pseudoacacia (Wang et al.2018; Liu D et al.2021). Intriguingly, specific NopP variants cause nodulation blockage depending on the soybean genotypes, including GmNNL1 and Rj2 (Rfg1) via early-induced ETI-like responses (Sugawara et al.2018; Zhang et al.2021).

NopAB, NopC, NopE, and InnB are also rhizobium-specific effectors. NopAB of ORS3257 is a major effector that determines nodule efficiency in V. mungo and unguiculata, while playing a lesser role in symbiosis with A. indica (Teulet et al. 2019; Songwattana et al. 2021). NopC of HH103 strain exerts a positive effect on symbiosis with soybean and V. unguiculata, but is responsible for the nodulation-blocking phenotype in L. japonicus GIFU at an early stage of interaction (Jiménez-Guerrero et al.2015, 2020). B. diazoefficiens USDA110 secretes a NopE effector that positively and negatively affects nodulation of various legumes. In V. radiata, NopE reduces the salicylic acid (SA)-mediated ETI-response for an efficient nodule organogenesis (Piromyou et al. 2021). NopE1 carries two EF hand-like motifs and might be transported as a preprotein into the plant cytosol, thus exhibiting self-cleavage in the presence of calcium at its two autoproteolytic sites (Wenzel et al. 2010). A novel effector of USDA61 strain, InnB is an incompatible factor in symbiosis with KPS1, but it promotes nodulation in V. mungo cultivar. USDA61 carrying InnB failed to form root hair curling and weakly infected via ITs on KPS1 roots; however, a small number of active nodules occasionally formed at the base of lateral roots, implying that USDA61 infection may occur via the crack entry mode at lateral roots emergence sites (Nguyen et al. 2018).

Rhizobium T3Es provide an alternative pathway in nodulation

The perception of rhizobial NFs by legume receptors has been believed to be a key factor to initiate nitrogen-fixing nodulation. Intriguingly, in the absence of NF signaling, certain bradyrhizobia can activate the nodulation process in some legume plants that rely on a T3SS-dependent mechanism (Figure 1). The T3SS of ORS3257 and USDA61 strains can form nitrogen-fixing nodules on A. indica and soybean nfr1 mutant, respectively, in an NF-independent manner (Okazaki et al.2013, 2016).

ErnA (effector required for nodulation-A) is a novel ORS3257 effector that induces nodule organogenesis on A. indica, which is nodulated by NF-deficient rhizobia (Table 1b). Ectopic expression of ernA triggered root cell division, resulting in the formation of a nodule-like structure. Homology analysis showed that ErnA is a rhizobium-specific effector broadly dispersed throughout T3SS-carrying bradyrhizobium strains. Introduction of ernA into a strain unable to nodulate A. indica, conferred nodulation ability. ErnA targets the plant nucleus, thus it may associate with nucleic acids to manipulate the host gene expression (Teulet et al. 2019).

Bel2-5 is a USDA61 effector that shows a remarkable role in triggering NF-independent nodulation on nfr1 mutant soybean (Table 1a). The C-terminus of Bel2-5 contains the ULP domain, hence it belongs to the C48 peptidase family along with NopD and XopD (Ratu et al. 2021a). Bel2-5 is located outside of the symbiotic island, suggesting that USDA61 may acquire the bel2-5 gene by an independent horizontal acquisition event or as a result of fragmentation of the acquired symbiotic island. Amino acid sequences of Bel2-5 and ErnA show limited level similarity, thus they may have different symbiotic routes to activate NF-independent nodulation specifically on their respective hosts.

Multiple conserved domains/motifs are shared by rhizobium and pathogen T3Es

Bel2-5 is a pathogenic-like effector containing multiple putative conserved domains/motifs, including two internal repeat domains, two ethylene-responsive element binding factor-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motifs, a nuclear localization sequence (NLS), and a ULP domain (Figure 2). Intriguingly, except for repeat domains, which are unique to rhizobia, other domains/motifs are present in Xcv XopD (Ratu et al. 2021a, 2021b). Following their translocation into plant cells, both Bel2-5 and XopD act as nuclear-localized effectors. Phenotypic analyses showed that domains/motifs possessed by these effector homologs were confirmed to be essential for bacterial activities in controlling either a symbiotic or a pathogenic interaction with their respective hosts (Hotson et al. 2003; Kim et al.2008, 2013; Ratu et al. 2021a, 2021b).

Structural and functional comparison between Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61 Bel2-5 and Xanthomonas campestris str. 85-10 (Xcv) XopD effectors on their respective hosts. Bel2-5 and XopD contain similar putative domains/motifs, including EAR motifs, a NLS motif, and ULP domain, except for repeat domains that are limited to rhizobia. Bel2-5 can trigger soybean nodulation in an NF-independent manner, while XopD delays tomato leaf chlorosis and necrosis to maximal Xcv multiplication. Both effectors can suppress ethylene (ET) production and host immune systems to promote bacterial invasion. However, Bel2-5 expands its role for symbiotic purpose by enhancing cytokinin (CKs) production on soybean roots. Red arrow with represents suppression while blue arrow represents enhancement. Information shown is based on studies by Hoston et al.2003; Kim et al.2008, 2013; Ratu et al.2021a, 2021b.
Figure 2.

Structural and functional comparison between Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61 Bel2-5 and Xanthomonas campestris str. 85-10 (Xcv) XopD effectors on their respective hosts. Bel2-5 and XopD contain similar putative domains/motifs, including EAR motifs, a NLS motif, and ULP domain, except for repeat domains that are limited to rhizobia. Bel2-5 can trigger soybean nodulation in an NF-independent manner, while XopD delays tomato leaf chlorosis and necrosis to maximal Xcv multiplication. Both effectors can suppress ethylene (ET) production and host immune systems to promote bacterial invasion. However, Bel2-5 expands its role for symbiotic purpose by enhancing cytokinin (CKs) production on soybean roots. Red arrow with represents suppression while blue arrow represents enhancement. Information shown is based on studies by Hoston et al.2003; Kim et al.2008, 2013; Ratu et al.2021a, 2021b.

Both the symbiont and the pathogen can interfere with host immune systems via the suppression of defense-related phytohormones/genes to enhance their colonization of plants. In infected tissue, Xcv XopD delays the onset of tomato leaf chlorosis and necrosis in the late infection stage to sustain bacterial growth by targeting ethylene (ET) transcription factor (TF) SIERF4 and substantially suppressing ET production. Defense- and senescence-associated genes (SENU4, SENU5, and Chi17) are also suppressed by XopD (Kim et al.2008, 2013). Another XopD variant delays gibberellin acid (GA)-induced DELLA degradation and promotes disease tolerance (Tan et al. 2014). Intriguingly, the presence of Bel2-5 can suppress the expression of ET-biosynthesis gene/responsive factors (eg ACO1, ERF1b/98) and plant defense response (eg WRKY33/75) in soybean roots, which are most likely to promote rhizobial infection. However, in rhizobia, the Bel2-5 effector expands its roles for symbiotic purposes by inducing the expression of cytokinin (CK)-related biosynthesis genes preferably for nodule organogenesis (Ratu et al. 2021a).

Nodulation test of ULP domain-swapped chimeras between Bel2-5 and XopD suggests that the ULP domain of effectors are partially exchangeable and may function similarly in their respective hosts. However, other features from the respective effector sequences may involve the differentiation of species-specific functions, either symbiotic or pathogenic, on the respective host plants. Yeast carrying only Bel2-5 ULP domain exhibited strong yeast growth inhibitory phenotypes that were comparable to the activity of Bel2-5 full-length, suggesting that the ULP domain of Bel2-5 can possess independent functional activities inside yeast cells (Ratu et al. 2021b). Recently, SUMO protease was found to be one of the major effector families among T3SS-carrying rhizobia, hence it may contribute significantly to nodulation (Teulet et al. 2020).

Two EAR motifs are found within Bel2-5 sequences that differ from Xcv XopD but are similar to that in PopP2, a T3E from phytopathogenic Ralstonia solanacearum (Ratu et al. 2021a, 2021b). The EAR motif was previously described for plant transcriptional regulators (Kazan 2006). Mutation in PopP2 EAR motif caused loss of pathogen stabilization and activities in plant cells (Segonzac et al.2017). In XopD, EAR motifs are required for the repression of SA-related PR1 and jasmonic acid (JA)-related PDF1.2, thus maximizing Xcv growth in tomato leaves (Kim et al. 2008). So far, the involvement of EAR in symbiotic activities remains unknown, however, disruption in EAR motifs of Bel2-5 affected the nodulation efficiency on legumes tested. Intriguingly, the EAR motifs were found in diverse rhizobial effectors, at least in Bel2-5 homologs (Ratu et al. 2021a, 2021b).

The Bel2-5 effector has additional repeat domains that are absent in Xcv XopD, which were later confirmed to be essential for nodulation (Ratu et al. 2021a, 2021b). The biological function of domains in legume–rhizobium symbiosis remains to be elucidated. However, the sequence composition or architecture of the repeat domains is predicted to be intimately linked to the effector's roles during bacterial infections (Mesarich et al. 2015). Although the Xcv XopD effector does not possess a repeat domain, it carries a DNA-binding domain (DBD) that is predicted to be involved in interaction with the host target (Kim, Taylor and Hotson 2013).

The T3SS-dependent NF-independent nodulation is predicted to constitute the ground state of rhizobium–legume interaction, considering the symbiosis lacks root-hair curling or infection–thread formation that is believed to be ancestral to infection pathway. The T3SS-dependent symbiosis likely occurs via cracks in the epidermis or via intercellular invasion between epidermal cells (Okazaki et al. 2013). This rhizobia infection process seems similar to that of phytopathogens, which multiply in the intercellular spaces of the plant tissue and/or the xylem, upon their invasion via natural openings, such as stomata/hydathodes or wounds (Kay and Bonas 2009).

In the initial stage, rhizobia may adopt Bel2-5 to modulate cytokinin signaling and induce nodulation. However, later, plants acquired the R protein to eliminate the infection of pathogenic bacteria carrying Bel2-5-/XopD-like effectors, which subsequently restricts the symbiosis, such as in Rj4 soybean (Faruque et al. 2015; Yasuda et al. 2016). In the second stage of nitrogen-fixing symbiosis, rhizobia gained the NF to overcome nodulation restriction by certain hosts. This secondarily invented NF might overlay the ancient effector-triggered nodulation by acquiring a more sophisticated process for developing fully differentiated root nodule symbiosis. Thus, the discovery of bradyrhizobium T3Es capable of triggering nodulation in a T3SS-dependent manner is a breakthrough toward nitrogen-fixing symbiosis.

Future perspectives

Rhizobia exploit the pathogenic secretion system and thus have developed specific effectors for symbiotic purposes. A comprehensive understanding of T3SS-related structure and function between pathogenic and symbiotic lifestyles is expected to illuminate various aspects related to the evolution of T3SS underlying plant–microbe interactions and beyond. Thanks to the increase in the number of genomes sequenced from T3SS-containing bacteria, an incredible diversity and complexity of T3SSs involved in host-specificity have been unveiled. Although many rhizobial effectors have been identified so far, their function inside host cells largely remains unknown. The challenge is to identify more host targets of rhizobial effectors to understand how nodulation regulatory networks that allow compatible or incompatible interactions depending on host genotypes are affected. The discovery of effectors capable of initiating nodule organogenesis in an NF-independent manner may pave the way for transferring nitrogen-fixing nodulation to nonleguminous plants of agricultural importance. These efforts could be pursued via at least two major categories: (1) introducing effector-triggered nodulation into a broad range of free-living or associative N2-fixing bacteria to improve their colonization on nonleguminous roots, and (2) identifying and engineering nonleguminous crops to carry receptors of effector-triggered nodulation to activate symbiosis signaling.

Funding

This study was supported by the JSPS Kakenhi (19H02860 and 19K22303). This paper is based on results obtained from a project, JPNP18016, commissioned by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

Ausmees
N
,
Kobayashi
H
,
Deakin
WJ
et al.
Characterization of NopP, a type III secreted effector of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234
.
J Bacteriol
2004
;
186
:
4774
-
80
.

Bartsev
AV
,
Deakin
WJ
,
Boukli
NM
et al.
NopL, an effector protein of Rhizobium sp. NGR234, thwarts activation of plant defense reactions
.
Plant Physiol
2004
;
134
:
871
-
9
.

Dai
WJ
,
Zeng
Y
,
Xie
ZP
et al.
Symbiosis-promoting and deleterious effects of NopT, a novel type 3 effector of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234
.
J Bacteriol
2008
;
190
:
5101
-
10
.

Deakin
WJ
,
Broughton
WJ.
Symbiotic use of pathogenic strategies: rhizobial protein secretion systems
.
Nat Rev Microbiol
2009
;
7
:
312
-
20
.

Dorival
J
,
Philys
S
,
Giuntini
E
et al.
Structural and enzymatic characterisation of the type III effector NopAA ( = GunA) from Sinorhizobium fredii USDA257 reveals a Xyloglucan hydrolase activity
.
Sci Rep
2020
;
10
:
1
-
11
.

Faruque
OM
,
Miwa
H
,
Yasuda
M
et al.
Identification of Bradyrhizobium elkanii genes involved in incompatibility with soybean plants carrying the Rj4 allele
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
2015
;
81
:
6710
-
7
.

Fraysse
N
,
Couderc
F
,
Poinsot
V.
Surface polysaccharide involvement in establishing the rhizobium-legume symbiosis
.
Eur J Biochem
2003
;
270
:
1365
-
80
.

Ge
YY
,
Xiang
QW
,
Wagner
C
et al.
The type 3 effector NopL of Sinorhizobium sp. strain NGR234 is a mitogen-activated protein kinase substrate
.
J Exp Bot
2016
;
67
:
2483
-
94
.

Hotson
A
,
Chosed
R
,
Shu
H
et al.
Xanthomonas type III effector XopD targets SUMO-conjugated proteins in planta
.
Mol Microbiol
2003
;
50
:
377
-
89
.

Jiménez-Guerrero
I
,
Acosta-Jurado
S
,
Medina
C
et al.
The Sinorhizobium fredii HH103 type III secretion system effector NopC blocks nodulation with Lotus japonicus gifu
.
J Exp Bot
2020
;
71
:
6043
-
56
.

Jiménez-Guerrero
I
,
Pérez-Montaño
F
,
Medina
C
et al.
NopC is a rhizobium-specific type 3 secretion system effector secreted by Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii HH103
.
PLoS One
2015
;
10
:
1
-
17
.

Jiménez-Guerrero
I
,
Pérez-Montaño
F
,
Zdyb
A
et al.
GunA of Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii HH103 is a T3SS-secreted cellulase that differentially affects symbiosis with cowpea and soybean
.
Plant Soil
2019
;
435
:
15
-
26
.

Jones
JDG
,
Dangl
JL.
The plant immune system
.
Nature
2006
;
444
:
323
-
9
.

Kambara
K
,
Ardissone
S
,
Kobayashi
H
et al.
Rhizobia utilize pathogen-like effector proteins during symbiosis
.
Mol Microbiol
2009
;
71
:
92
-
106
.

Kay
S
,
Bonas
U.
How Xanthomonas type III effectors manipulate the host plant
.
Curr Opin Microbiol
2009
;
12
:
37
-
43
.

Kazan
K.
Negative regulation of defence and stress genes by EAR-motif-containing repressors
.
Trends Plant Sci
2006
;
11
:
109
-
12
.

Khan
A
,
Wadood
SF
,
Chen
M
et al.
Effector-triggered inhibition of nodulation: a rhizobial effector protease targets soybean kinase GmPBS1-1
.
Plant Physiol
2022
;
189
:
1
-
14
.

Kim
JG
,
Stork
W
,
Mudgett
MB.
Xanthomonas type III effector XopD desumoylates tomato transcription factor SIERF4 to suppress ethylene responses and promote pathogen growth
.
Cell Host Microbe
2013
;
13
:
143
-
54
.

Kim
JG
,
Taylor
KW
,
Hotson
A
et al.
XopD SUMO protease affects host transcription, promotes pathogen growth, and delays symptom development in Xanthomonas-infected tomato leaves
.
Plant Cell
2008
;
20
:
1915
-
29
.

Kusakabe
S
,
Higasitani
N
,
Kaneko
T
et al.
Lotus accessions possess multiple checkpoints triggered by different type III secretion system effectors of the wide-host-range symbiont Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61
.
Microbes Environ
.
2020
;
35
.

Liu
D
,
Luo
Y
,
Zheng
X
et al.
TRAPPC13 is a novel target of Mesorhizobium amorphae type III secretion system effector NopP
.
Mol Plant-Microbe Interact
2021
;
34
:
511
-
23
.

Liu
Y
,
Sun
M
,
Chen
Q
et al.
Mapping quantitative trait loci related to nodule number in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) in response to the Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) fredii HH103 NopT type III effector
.
J Plant Interact
2021
;
16
:
126
-
35
.

Luo
Y
,
Liu
D
,
Jiao
S
et al.
Identification of Robinia pseudoacacia target proteins responsive to Mesorhizobium amphore CCNWGS0123 effector protein NopT
.
J Exp Bot
2020
;
71
:
7347
-
63
.

Marie
C
,
Deakin
WJ
,
Viprey
V
et al.
Characterization of Nops, nodulation outer proteins, secreted via the type III secretion system of NGR234
.
Mol Plant-Microbe Interact
2003
;
16
:
743
-
51
.

Mesarich
CH
,
Bowen
JK
,
Hamiaux
C
et al.
Repeat-containing protein effectors of plant-associated organisms
.
Front Plant Sci
2015
;
6
.

Miwa
H
,
Okazaki
S.
How effectors promote beneficial interactions
.
Curr Opin Plant Biol
2017
;
38
:
148
-
54
.

Nelson
MS
,
Sadowsky
MJ
.
Secretion systems and signal exchange between nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and legumes
.
Front Plant Sci
2015
;
6
:
1
-
11
.

Nguyen
HP
,
Ratu
STN
,
Yasuda
M
et al.
InnB, a novel type III effector of Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA61, controls symbiosis with Vigna species
.
Front Microbiol
2018
;
9
:
3155
.

Okazaki
S
,
Kaneko
T
,
Sato
S
et al.
Hijacking of leguminous nodulation signaling by the rhizobial type III secretion system
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci
.
2013
;
110
:
17131
-
6
.

Okazaki
S
,
Tittabutr
P
,
Teulet
A
et al.
Rhizobium-legume symbiosis in the absence of Nod factors: two possible scenarios with or without the T3SS
.
ISME J
.
2016
;
10
:
64
-
74
.

Oldroyd
GED
,
Murray
JD
,
Poole
PS
et al.
The rules of engagement in the legume-rhizobial symbiosis
.
Annu Rev Genet
2011
;
45
:
119
-
44
.

Piromyou
P
,
Nguyen
HP
,
Songwattana
P
et al.
The Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens type III effector NopE modulates the regulation of plant hormones towards nodulation in Vigna radiata
.
Sci Rep
2021
;
11
:
1
-
12
.

Ratu
STN
,
Teulet
A
,
Miwa
H
et al.
Rhizobia use a pathogenic-like effector to hijack leguminous nodulation signalling
.
Sci Rep
2021a
;
11
:
1
-
15
.

Ratu
STN
,
Hirata
A
,
Kalaw
CO
et al.
Multiple domains in the rhizobial type III effector bel2-5 determine symbiotic efficiency with soybean
.
Front Plant Sci
2021b
;
12
:
1
-
12
.

Segonzac
C
,
Newman
TE
,
Choi
S
et al.
A conserved EAR motif is required for avirulence and stability of the Ralstonia solanacearum effector PopP2 in planta
.
Front Plant Sci
2017
;
8
:
1330
.

Skorpil
P
,
Saad
MM
,
Boukli
NM
et al.
NopP, a phosphorylated effector of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234, is a major determinant of nodulation of the tropical legumes Flemingia congesta and Tephrosia vogelii
.
Mol Microbiol
2005
;
57
:
1304
-
17
.

Songwattana
P
,
Chaintreuil
C
,
Wongdee
J
et al.
Identification of type III effectors modulating the symbiotic properties of Bradyrhizobium vignae strain ORS3257 with various Vigna species
.
Sci Rep
2021
;
11
:
4874
.

Soumare
A
,
Diedhiou
AG
,
Thuita
M
et al.
Exploiting biological nitrogen fixation: a route towards a sustainable agriculture
.
Plants
2020
;
9
:
1011
.

Staehelin
C
,
Krishnan
HB.
Review article: nodulation outer proteins: Double-edged swords of symbiotic rhizobia
.
Biochem J
2015
;
470
:
263
-
74
.

Sugawara
M
,
Takahashi
S
,
Umehara
Y
et al.
Variation in bradyrhizobial NopP effector determines symbiotic incompatibility with Rj2-soybeans via effector-triggered immunity
.
Nat Commun
2018
;
9
:
3139
.

Sweet
CR
,
Conlon
J
,
Golenbock
DT
et al.
YopJ targets TRAF proteins to inhibit TLR-mediated NF-κB, MAPK and IRF3 signal transduction
.
Cell Microbiol
2007
;
9
:
2700
-
15
.

Tampakaki
AP.
Commonalities and differences of T3SSs in rhizobia and plant pathogenic bacteria.
Front Plant Sci
.
2014
;
5
:
1
-
19
.

Tan
L
,
Rong
W
,
Luo
H
et al.
The Xanthomonas campestris effector protein XopDxcc8004 triggers plant disease tolerance by targeting DELLA proteins
.
New Phytol
.
2014
;
204
:
595
-
608
.

Teulet
A
,
Busset
N
,
Fardoux
J
et al.
The rhizobial type III effector ErnA confers the ability to form nodules in legumes
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci
2019
;
116
:
21758
-
68
.

Teulet
A
,
Gully
D
,
Rouy
Z
et al.
Phylogenetic distribution and evolutionary dynamics of NOD and T3SS genes in the genus bradyrhizobium.
Microbial Genomics
2020
;
6
:
1
-
18
.

Wang
J
,
Ma
C
,
Ma
S
et al.
GmARP is related to the type III effector NopAA to promote nodulation in soybean (Glycine max)
.
Front Genetics
2022
;
13
:
1
-
12
.

Wang
J
,
Wang
J
,
Liu
C
et al.
Identification of soybean genes whose expression is affected by the Ensifer fredii HH103 effector protein NopP
.
Int J Mol Sci
2018
;
19
.

Wang
J
,
Wang
J
,
Ma
C
et al.
QTL mapping and data mining to identify genes associated with the Sinorhizobium fredii HH103 T3SS effector NopD in soybean
.
Front Plant Sci
2020
;
11
:
1
-
16
.

Wang
Y
,
Yang
F
,
Zhu
PF
et al.
Use of the rhizobial type III effector gene NopP to improve Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of Lotus japonicus
.
Plant Methods
2021
;
17
:
1
-
11
.

Wenzel
M
,
Friedrich
L
,
Göttfert
M
et al.
The type III-Secreted protein nopel affects symbiosis and exhibits a calcium-dependent autocleavage activity
.
Mol Plant-Microbe Interact
2010
;
23
:
124
-
9
.

Xiang
QW
,
Bai
J
,
Cai
J
et al.
NopD of Bradyrhizobium sp. XS1150 possesses SUMO protease activity
.
Front Microbiol
2020
;
11
:
1
-
12
.

Xin
DW
,
Liao
S
,
Xie
ZP
et al.
Functional analysis of NopM, a novel E3 ubiquitin ligase (NEL) domain effector of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234
.
PLoS Pathog
.
2012
;
8
:
5
.

Xu
CC
,
Zhang
D
,
Hann
DR
et al.
Biochemical properties and in planta effects of NopM, a rhizobial E3 ubiquitin ligase
.
J Biol Chem
2018
;
293
:
15304
-
15
.

Yang
S
,
Tang
F
,
Gao
M
et al.
R gene-controlled host specificity in the legume-rhizobia symbiosis
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci
2010
;
107
:
18735
-
40
.

Yasuda
M
,
Miwa
H
,
Masuda
S
et al.
Effector-triggered immunity determines host genotype-specific incompatibility in legume-rhizobium symbiosis
.
Plant Cell Physiol
.
2016
;
57
:
1791
-
800
.

Zhang
B
,
Wang
M
,
Sun
Y
et al.
Glycine max NNL1 restricts symbiotic compatibility with widely distributed bradyrhizobia via root hair infection
.
Nature Plants
2021
;
7
:
73
-
86
.

Zhang
L
,
Chen
XJ
,
Lu
HB
et al.
Functional analysis of the type 3 effector nodulation outer protein L (NopL) from Rhizobium sp. NGR234: symbiotic effects, phosphorylation, and interference with mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling
.
J Biol Chem
2011
;
286
:
32178
-
87
.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)