-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Aditya Wibawa Sakti, Yoshifumi Nishimura, Hiroshi Sato, Hiromi Nakai, Divide-and-Conquer Density-Functional Tight-Binding Molecular Dynamics Study on the Formation of Carbamate Ions during CO2 Chemical Absorption in Aqueous Amine Solution, Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, Volume 91, Issue 2, February 2018, Page 318, https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.20170356
- Share Icon Share
Two corrections to typographic errors in the manuscript titled “Divide-and-Conquer Density-Functional Tight-Binding Molecular Dynamics Study on the Formation of Carbamate Ions during CO2 Chemical Absorption in Aqueous Amine Solution” by A. Sakti, Y. Nishimura, H. Sato, and H. Nakai,
- 1.
Originally, in Table 3, the averaged of k−1 is 4.68 × 10−4 M−1 ps−1. The value should be corrected to 4.68 × 10−3 M−1 ps−1. Thus, Table 3 should be changed as follows.
Entry . k1 [ps−1] . k−1 [M−1 ps−1] . k2 [M−1 ps−1] . k−2 [ps−1] . k3 [M−1 ps−1] . #1 7.18 × 10−8 4.81 × 10−3 8.40 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 3.82 × 10−3 #2 7.18 × 10−8 5.12 × 10−3 9.20 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #3 6.00 × 10−8 5.51 × 10−3 3.72 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #4 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 3.19 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #5 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 6.19 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #6 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 3.31 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 Average 6.39 × 10−8 4.68 × 10−3 5.67 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 4.80 × 10−3 Entry . k1 [ps−1] . k−1 [M−1 ps−1] . k2 [M−1 ps−1] . k−2 [ps−1] . k3 [M−1 ps−1] . #1 7.18 × 10−8 4.81 × 10−3 8.40 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 3.82 × 10−3 #2 7.18 × 10−8 5.12 × 10−3 9.20 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #3 6.00 × 10−8 5.51 × 10−3 3.72 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #4 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 3.19 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #5 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 6.19 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #6 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 3.31 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 Average 6.39 × 10−8 4.68 × 10−3 5.67 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 4.80 × 10−3 Entry . k1 [ps−1] . k−1 [M−1 ps−1] . k2 [M−1 ps−1] . k−2 [ps−1] . k3 [M−1 ps−1] . #1 7.18 × 10−8 4.81 × 10−3 8.40 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 3.82 × 10−3 #2 7.18 × 10−8 5.12 × 10−3 9.20 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #3 6.00 × 10−8 5.51 × 10−3 3.72 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #4 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 3.19 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #5 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 6.19 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #6 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 3.31 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 Average 6.39 × 10−8 4.68 × 10−3 5.67 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 4.80 × 10−3 Entry . k1 [ps−1] . k−1 [M−1 ps−1] . k2 [M−1 ps−1] . k−2 [ps−1] . k3 [M−1 ps−1] . #1 7.18 × 10−8 4.81 × 10−3 8.40 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 3.82 × 10−3 #2 7.18 × 10−8 5.12 × 10−3 9.20 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #3 6.00 × 10−8 5.51 × 10−3 3.72 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #4 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 3.19 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #5 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 6.19 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 #6 6.00 × 10−8 4.21 × 10−3 3.31 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 5.00 × 10−3 Average 6.39 × 10−8 4.68 × 10−3 5.67 × 10−3 1.00 × 10−2 4.80 × 10−3 - 2.
On the right hand column of page 4, line 33–35:
“The backward reaction of this step is considerably faster, with k−1 of 4.68 × 10−4 M−1 ps−1, which corresponds to a weak basicity of MEA.”
should be changed to
“The backward reaction of this step is considerably faster, with k−1 of 4.68 × 10−3 M−1 ps−1, which corresponds to a weak basicity of MEA.”