-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Ryan J Lu, Emily K Wang, Bérénice A Benayoun, Functional genomics of inflamm-aging and immunosenescence, Briefings in Functional Genomics, Volume 21, Issue 1, January 2022, Pages 43–55, https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elab009
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
The aging population is at a higher risk for age-related diseases and infections. This observation could be due to immunosenescence: the decline in immune efficacy of both the innate and the adaptive immune systems. Age-related immune decline also links to the concept of ‘inflamm-aging,’ whereby aging is accompanied by sterile chronic inflammation. Along with a decline in immune function, aging is accompanied by a widespread of ‘omics’ remodeling. Transcriptional landscape changes linked to key pathways of immune function have been identified across studies, such as macrophages having decreased expression of genes associated to phagocytosis, a major function of macrophages. Therefore, a key mechanism underlying innate immune cell dysfunction during aging may stem from dysregulation of youthful genomic networks. In this review, we discuss both molecular and cellular phenotypes of innate immune cells that contribute to age-related inflammation.
Introduction
The human population is aging, which has led to the rise in prevalence of many so-called age-related diseases. Not only is the aging population much more susceptible to age-related diseases, they are also more susceptible to infections. For example, elderly individuals are at a higher risk of developing severe COVID-19 or complications from influenza infections [1,2]. This increased chance of infection can be due to the decline of the function of the immune system, a phenomenon called ‘immunosenescence’ [3]. Age-related changes in the function of the immune system are also accompanied by a chronic sterile inflammation, a mechanism dubbed ‘inflamm-aging,’ which is thought to promote age-related disease and functional decline [4]. Inflamm-aging is associated with many different factors, most typically encompassing increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNFa], interleukin 1 beta [IL1b] and interleukin 6 [IL6] [5]. Although these cytokines are involved in normal immune function, persistent levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines can lead to tissue damage, contributing to increased prevalence of chronic diseases (e.g. Alzheimer’s disease (AD), cancer, etc.) [6].
An important source of inflammatory signals in aged organisms is thought to be the accumulation of senescent cells across tissues [5,7]. Indeed, accumulating evidence has shown that senescent cells are characterized by a senescence-associated secretory phenotype [8–10], which includes a panoply of pro-inflammatory cytokines, proteases, growth factors and metabolites [10,11]. The impact of senescent cells on age-related inflammation, and their potential role as a target for pro-longevity therapies (i.e. senolytic drugs) have been extensively reviewed elsewhere [12–15], but remain somewhat uncertain. Aberrant immune activation with age could also stem from increased permeability of the intestinal mucosa (i.e. ‘leaky gut’) [16,17] related to changes to the gut microbiota [18,19], which may directly contribute to increased systemic inflammation. Age-related increase in genomic instability may itself also drive aspects of inflammaging. Indeed, re-activation of LINE-1 transposable elements during aging and in senescent cells has been proposed to drive an interferon response, thus contributing to sterile inflammation [20–22]. In addition, chronic DNA-damage signaling itself, for instance in aged lymphocytes, may also render them more activation-prone through innate receptors even in the absence of infection [23].
Generally, overall immune dysfunction is a hallmark of aging, with functional decline impacting both innate immunity and adaptative immunity [3,24,25]. Age-related deficiencies in hematopoietic stem cells [HSCs], which reside in the bone marrow and differentiate throughout life to give rise to mature cells of the innate and adaptive immune systems, are thought to underlie at least partly dysfunction of mature immune cells [26]. For instance, aged HSCs from mice show large epigenomic and transcriptomic differences compared to youthful HSCs which are likely to adversely impact their differentiation capacity [27,28]. In addition, aged HSCs tend to produce higher numbers of innate cells from the myeloid lineage, a phenomenon called ‘myeloid bias’ [26,28,29]. Interestingly, a recent study using heterochronic bone marrow transplant has shown that at least part of the inflammatory milieu of aged animals directly stems from the activity of bone marrow hematopoietic progenitors [30]. Conversely, HSC function can be directly remodeled by inflammatory signals, such as those observed during normal aging [31]. Downstream of HSCs and of special relevance to ‘inflamm-aging’ are cells of the innate immune system, which constitute the first line of defense against pathogens. Key cell populations of the innate immune system include monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, natural killer cells and dendritic cells (DCs) [32].
Importantly, a key mechanism underlying innate immune cell dysfunction during aging may stem from dysregulation of youthful genomic networks. Indeed, aging is accompanied by widespread remodeling of transcriptional landscapes across tissues and cell types (reviewed in [33]). In addition, age-related inflammatory signatures at the transcriptional levels have been observed across species and tissues, suggesting that such ‘omic’ remodeling is a conserved aging response [34,35].
In this review, we will focus on how innate immune cells act as key contributors to age-related inflammation (Figure 1). We will discuss both molecular and cellular phenotypes which have been described in the aging innate immune system, and how they could relate to the phenomenon of inflamm-aging and immunosenescence.

Functional genomics insights into inflamm-aging and immunosenescence through the lens of the innate immune system. (A) Aging results in a widespread of molecular changes to terminally differentiated immune cells. These changes can be partially rescued through different interventions. (B) Possible contributors to age-related changes in macrophage function that will ultimately result in immunosenescence and inflamm-aging.
Macrophages
Macrophages are a central hub or ‘one stop shop’ in the adult innate immune system. Macrophages accomplish a variety of key tasks, such as phagocytosis, cytokine production, antigen presentation and assist in wound healing [36]. Far from being a homogenous cell type, macrophages have various embryonic primordium origins (i.e. fetal liver/yolk sac versus bone marrow stem cells), broadly corresponding to macrophages classified as ‘tissue resident’ (as old as the individual; e.g. microglia, peritoneal macrophages) versus ‘de novo’ (continuously produced throughput life; e.g. monocyte-derived) [37]. These different populations of macrophages show clear epigenomic and transcriptional differences (at least in mouse) [38–41], which are partially shaped by exposure to niche signals [38,39]. Such molecular differences can lead to differential abilities of macrophages subtypes to respond to challenges, or sense pathogen-associated molecular patterns [PAMPs].
Based on the differences between location and the effects the microenvironment has on gene expression, many differentially expressed genes are important for specialized functions [40,41]. Driving differences in gene expression, tissue-resident macrophage populations have different transcription factors [TFs] that specifically regulate their gene expression [38,39,42]. For instance in mice, Gata6 is highly expressed in peritoneal macrophages, Bhlhe40 in large peritoneal macrophages, Spic in splenic macrophages, Sall1 in microglia and PPARg in alveolar macrophages, which may drive both specific basal states and age-related changes [42,43]. Disruption of Gata6 in the myeloid lineage leads to defects in mouse peritoneal macrophage homeostatic proliferation and in inflammatory response [44]. Even though tissue-resident macrophages each have a specific TF that regulates their phenotype, PU.1 is thought to regulate many TFs associated to tissue-resident macrophages [38,39,42]. Intriguingly, decreased levels of PU.1 in microglia associate to delayed onset of Alzheimer’s disease in humans, suggesting that differences in tissue-macrophage phenotypes may underlie differences in aging trajectories [45,46]. Further studies will need to be conducted to understand how these TFs are regulated with aging, and how they may generally influence immunosenescence and inflamm-aging.
Aging transcriptome landscape
Accumulating evidence has revealed that de novo and tissue-resident macrophage populations from both rat and mice maintain their specificities throughout life despite undergoing widespread remodeling of their transcriptional landscapes with aging (Table 1). For example, in a study comparing the impact of organismal aging on 2 populations of tissue-resident macrophages from mice (i.e. adipose versus splenic macrophages), Camell et al. [47] showed that both macrophage types maintain their transcriptional specificities throughout life, although they are both affected by aging. Interestingly, age-related differentially expressed genes were quite different between the two types of macrophages, suggesting that there are macrophage population specific responses to aging [47]. Although each transcriptomic study of aging macrophages from both rat and mice identified clear specificities to each type of macrophage (even showing differences between the same macrophage type across studies), a number of recurrent misregulated functional categories stand out, including upregulation of cytokine pathways and downregulation of phagosome/endosome-related pathways (Table 1). However, variability in the reported age-related remodeling of macrophages may stem from true biological differences (e.g. niche-effects on macrophages, or intrinsic differences linked to embryonic origin). In contrast, it is also possible that these differences stem from technical differences (e.g. microarray versus RNA-seq, bioinformatic pipelines), from differences in key biological covariates (e.g. ethnicity/genetic background, circadian time), or, merely from how young and old age groups are defined (e.g. young mice defined as young as 2 months or as old as 6 months old, old mice defined as young as 12 months or as old as 30 months old). Harmonized studies or meta-analyses taking into account these variables will be key to understand general principles of age-related macrophage transcriptional remodeling.
Age-related changes in the transcriptional landscape of different populations of macrophages
Population . | Species . | Strain . | Ages . | Sex . | Upregulated categories (selected) . | Downregulated categories (selected) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aorta macrophages | R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] |
Adipose tissue macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 24 m | M | Cellular ketone Cellular aldehyde Lipid Fatty acid derivative | [47] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2 m versus 20 m | M | Phagocytosis C-type lectin receptors | [127] | ||
R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] | |
Alveolar macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 22–24 m | NA | Inflammatory pathways Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling | Metaphase checkpoint Initiation of mitosis Spindle assembly Chromosome separation | [56] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 23 m | NA | Immune and inflammatory responses Fibrosis | [128] | ||
Bone callus macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 24 m | NA | Negative regulation of protein processing Cell chemotaxis Complement receptor signaling pathway | Antigen processing and presentation Regulation of immune response Cytokine activity Phagosome en0docytosis | [129] |
Bone marrow macrophages (in vivo) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2-4 m versus 20-30 m | M | Innate immune response Inflammatory response Cytokine-cytokine receptor Toll-like receptor NFkB signaling pathways | [51] | |
H. sapiens | NA | <50 years versus > 50 years | NA | Regulation of immune system process Defense response | [51] | ||
Kidney macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 JN | 1 m versus 3 m versus 18 m versus 21 m versus, 24 m versus 30 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [130] |
Microglia | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 4 m versus 22 m | F | Immune cell adhesion Chemotaxis Cytokine signaling Anti-microbial effector responses Interferon responses | Endocytosis/phagocytosis Cytoskeletal reorganization Antigen processing and presentation | [131] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 22 m | M | Immune system process Response to virus Interferon signaling | [132] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 12 m versus 18 m versus 24 m | M | Lipid biosynthetic process Regulation of signal transduction Intracellular protein transport Positive regulation of endocytosis Microglial cell activation | [133] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 N | 2 m versus 6 m versus 9 m versus 12 m | M | Inflammatory response Innate immune response Cell chemotaxis MHC protein complex Cytokine receptor binding | [134] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 JN | 1 m versus 3 m versus 18 m versus 21 m versus, 24 m versus 30 m | B | Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I genes Interferon responsive or regulatory genes | [130] | ||
Nerve macrophage | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 3 m versus 15 m | F | Organismal death Organization of cytoskeleton Microtubule dynamics | Pro-inflammatory cytokines Retinoic acid receptor Activation Estrogen receptor signaling Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors signaling | [135] |
Skeletal muscle macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 4 m versus 20-24 m | NA | Response to stress Response to interferon beta Negative regulation of macromolecule biosynthesis Negative regulation of cell adhesion | Defense response Response to LPS Cellular homeostasis Regulation of cytokine secretion | [136] |
Skin macrophages | R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] |
Thiogallate-induced peritoneal exudate macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 18 m | F | Cholesterol biosynthesis Response to stress Response to stimulus | [137] |
Population . | Species . | Strain . | Ages . | Sex . | Upregulated categories (selected) . | Downregulated categories (selected) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aorta macrophages | R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] |
Adipose tissue macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 24 m | M | Cellular ketone Cellular aldehyde Lipid Fatty acid derivative | [47] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2 m versus 20 m | M | Phagocytosis C-type lectin receptors | [127] | ||
R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] | |
Alveolar macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 22–24 m | NA | Inflammatory pathways Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling | Metaphase checkpoint Initiation of mitosis Spindle assembly Chromosome separation | [56] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 23 m | NA | Immune and inflammatory responses Fibrosis | [128] | ||
Bone callus macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 24 m | NA | Negative regulation of protein processing Cell chemotaxis Complement receptor signaling pathway | Antigen processing and presentation Regulation of immune response Cytokine activity Phagosome en0docytosis | [129] |
Bone marrow macrophages (in vivo) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2-4 m versus 20-30 m | M | Innate immune response Inflammatory response Cytokine-cytokine receptor Toll-like receptor NFkB signaling pathways | [51] | |
H. sapiens | NA | <50 years versus > 50 years | NA | Regulation of immune system process Defense response | [51] | ||
Kidney macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 JN | 1 m versus 3 m versus 18 m versus 21 m versus, 24 m versus 30 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [130] |
Microglia | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 4 m versus 22 m | F | Immune cell adhesion Chemotaxis Cytokine signaling Anti-microbial effector responses Interferon responses | Endocytosis/phagocytosis Cytoskeletal reorganization Antigen processing and presentation | [131] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 22 m | M | Immune system process Response to virus Interferon signaling | [132] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 12 m versus 18 m versus 24 m | M | Lipid biosynthetic process Regulation of signal transduction Intracellular protein transport Positive regulation of endocytosis Microglial cell activation | [133] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 N | 2 m versus 6 m versus 9 m versus 12 m | M | Inflammatory response Innate immune response Cell chemotaxis MHC protein complex Cytokine receptor binding | [134] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 JN | 1 m versus 3 m versus 18 m versus 21 m versus, 24 m versus 30 m | B | Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I genes Interferon responsive or regulatory genes | [130] | ||
Nerve macrophage | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 3 m versus 15 m | F | Organismal death Organization of cytoskeleton Microtubule dynamics | Pro-inflammatory cytokines Retinoic acid receptor Activation Estrogen receptor signaling Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors signaling | [135] |
Skeletal muscle macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 4 m versus 20-24 m | NA | Response to stress Response to interferon beta Negative regulation of macromolecule biosynthesis Negative regulation of cell adhesion | Defense response Response to LPS Cellular homeostasis Regulation of cytokine secretion | [136] |
Skin macrophages | R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] |
Thiogallate-induced peritoneal exudate macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 18 m | F | Cholesterol biosynthesis Response to stress Response to stimulus | [137] |
F: Female; M: Male; B: both sexes; NA: sex not specified in the article; m: months.
Age-related changes in the transcriptional landscape of different populations of macrophages
Population . | Species . | Strain . | Ages . | Sex . | Upregulated categories (selected) . | Downregulated categories (selected) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aorta macrophages | R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] |
Adipose tissue macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 24 m | M | Cellular ketone Cellular aldehyde Lipid Fatty acid derivative | [47] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2 m versus 20 m | M | Phagocytosis C-type lectin receptors | [127] | ||
R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] | |
Alveolar macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 22–24 m | NA | Inflammatory pathways Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling | Metaphase checkpoint Initiation of mitosis Spindle assembly Chromosome separation | [56] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 23 m | NA | Immune and inflammatory responses Fibrosis | [128] | ||
Bone callus macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 24 m | NA | Negative regulation of protein processing Cell chemotaxis Complement receptor signaling pathway | Antigen processing and presentation Regulation of immune response Cytokine activity Phagosome en0docytosis | [129] |
Bone marrow macrophages (in vivo) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2-4 m versus 20-30 m | M | Innate immune response Inflammatory response Cytokine-cytokine receptor Toll-like receptor NFkB signaling pathways | [51] | |
H. sapiens | NA | <50 years versus > 50 years | NA | Regulation of immune system process Defense response | [51] | ||
Kidney macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 JN | 1 m versus 3 m versus 18 m versus 21 m versus, 24 m versus 30 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [130] |
Microglia | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 4 m versus 22 m | F | Immune cell adhesion Chemotaxis Cytokine signaling Anti-microbial effector responses Interferon responses | Endocytosis/phagocytosis Cytoskeletal reorganization Antigen processing and presentation | [131] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 22 m | M | Immune system process Response to virus Interferon signaling | [132] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 12 m versus 18 m versus 24 m | M | Lipid biosynthetic process Regulation of signal transduction Intracellular protein transport Positive regulation of endocytosis Microglial cell activation | [133] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 N | 2 m versus 6 m versus 9 m versus 12 m | M | Inflammatory response Innate immune response Cell chemotaxis MHC protein complex Cytokine receptor binding | [134] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 JN | 1 m versus 3 m versus 18 m versus 21 m versus, 24 m versus 30 m | B | Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I genes Interferon responsive or regulatory genes | [130] | ||
Nerve macrophage | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 3 m versus 15 m | F | Organismal death Organization of cytoskeleton Microtubule dynamics | Pro-inflammatory cytokines Retinoic acid receptor Activation Estrogen receptor signaling Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors signaling | [135] |
Skeletal muscle macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 4 m versus 20-24 m | NA | Response to stress Response to interferon beta Negative regulation of macromolecule biosynthesis Negative regulation of cell adhesion | Defense response Response to LPS Cellular homeostasis Regulation of cytokine secretion | [136] |
Skin macrophages | R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] |
Thiogallate-induced peritoneal exudate macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 18 m | F | Cholesterol biosynthesis Response to stress Response to stimulus | [137] |
Population . | Species . | Strain . | Ages . | Sex . | Upregulated categories (selected) . | Downregulated categories (selected) . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aorta macrophages | R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] |
Adipose tissue macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 24 m | M | Cellular ketone Cellular aldehyde Lipid Fatty acid derivative | [47] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2 m versus 20 m | M | Phagocytosis C-type lectin receptors | [127] | ||
R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] | |
Alveolar macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 22–24 m | NA | Inflammatory pathways Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling | Metaphase checkpoint Initiation of mitosis Spindle assembly Chromosome separation | [56] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 23 m | NA | Immune and inflammatory responses Fibrosis | [128] | ||
Bone callus macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 24 m | NA | Negative regulation of protein processing Cell chemotaxis Complement receptor signaling pathway | Antigen processing and presentation Regulation of immune response Cytokine activity Phagosome en0docytosis | [129] |
Bone marrow macrophages (in vivo) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2-4 m versus 20-30 m | M | Innate immune response Inflammatory response Cytokine-cytokine receptor Toll-like receptor NFkB signaling pathways | [51] | |
H. sapiens | NA | <50 years versus > 50 years | NA | Regulation of immune system process Defense response | [51] | ||
Kidney macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 JN | 1 m versus 3 m versus 18 m versus 21 m versus, 24 m versus 30 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [130] |
Microglia | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 4 m versus 22 m | F | Immune cell adhesion Chemotaxis Cytokine signaling Anti-microbial effector responses Interferon responses | Endocytosis/phagocytosis Cytoskeletal reorganization Antigen processing and presentation | [131] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 22 m | M | Immune system process Response to virus Interferon signaling | [132] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 12 m versus 18 m versus 24 m | M | Lipid biosynthetic process Regulation of signal transduction Intracellular protein transport Positive regulation of endocytosis Microglial cell activation | [133] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 N | 2 m versus 6 m versus 9 m versus 12 m | M | Inflammatory response Innate immune response Cell chemotaxis MHC protein complex Cytokine receptor binding | [134] | ||
M. musculus | C57BL/6 JN | 1 m versus 3 m versus 18 m versus 21 m versus, 24 m versus 30 m | B | Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I genes Interferon responsive or regulatory genes | [130] | ||
Nerve macrophage | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 3 m versus 15 m | F | Organismal death Organization of cytoskeleton Microtubule dynamics | Pro-inflammatory cytokines Retinoic acid receptor Activation Estrogen receptor signaling Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors signaling | [135] |
Skeletal muscle macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 4 m versus 20-24 m | NA | Response to stress Response to interferon beta Negative regulation of macromolecule biosynthesis Negative regulation of cell adhesion | Defense response Response to LPS Cellular homeostasis Regulation of cytokine secretion | [136] |
Skin macrophages | R. norvegicus | Sprague–Dawley | 5 m versus 27 m | B | M1-proinflammatory macrophage signature | M2-macrophage gene signature | [89] |
Thiogallate-induced peritoneal exudate macrophages | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 3 m versus 18 m | F | Cholesterol biosynthesis Response to stress Response to stimulus | [137] |
F: Female; M: Male; B: both sexes; NA: sex not specified in the article; m: months.
Age-related functional decline
Although there was some variability among studies, pathways related to endosome or phagosome biology were found to be generally downregulated with age across transcriptomic studies. Indeed, macrophages are primarily phagocytes, and multiple studies across species have observed defects in this core process with organismal aging (Table 2). Studies evaluating phagocytic capacities of various populations of macrophages from both rat and mice with aging, including peritoneal macrophages, Kupffer cells, alveolar macrophages, bone marrow macrophages and bone marrow-derived macrophages [BMDMs] (i.e. differentiated in vitro from bone marrow progenitors and monocytes), again show contrasting results, consistent with the notion that different macrophage populations may have specific aging trajectories (Table 2). After an infection or in response to tissue damage, macrophages are required to clear up apoptotic cells, senescent cells and cell debris (through a process called ‘efferocytosis’) [48], as well as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [49]. Intriguingly, two distinct populations of mouse macrophages have been shown to be defective in efferocytosis with aging [50,51]. The impact of decreased efferocytotic capacity occurs in normal tissue homeostasis, but also in the ability to resolve inflammation. For instance, in a peritonitis mouse model, efferocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils by peritoneal macrophages was shown to decrease with age, leading to an improper resolution of inflammation [50]. Importantly, a decreased ability to clear senescent cells through efferocytosis could also indirectly drive increased inflammation due to an increasing burden of cells producing SASP factors [52,53]. Thus, overall age-related loss of phagocytic and efferocytic capacity of macrophages may lead to increased susceptibility to infections and/or defects in tissue homeostasis [54–56], ultimately leading to immune dysfunction and increased inflammation.
Population . | Species . | Strain . | Ages . | Sex . | Phagocytosis cargo . | Age-related change . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alveolar macrophages | R. norvegicus | F-344xBN | 6 m versus 12 m versus 18 m | NA | Opsonized K. pneumoniae 43,816 | increase | [138] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2-4 m versus 16 m versus 22–24 m versus 33 m | NA | Alexa Fluor 488 beads | decrease | [56] | |
Bone marrow-derived macrophages (in vitro differentiation) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 18–22 m | F | S. pneumoniae | decrease | [18] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–3 m versus 15–20 m | M | Fluorescent particles | no difference | [139] | |
Bone marrow macrophages (in vivo) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2–4 m versus 20–30 m | M | Senescent neutrophils | decrease | [51] |
Kupffer Cells | R. norvegicus | F344 | ~1 m versus 12 m versus 24–25 m | M | Polystyrene/sucrose microsphere | increase | [140] |
Microglia | M. musculus | C57Bl/6 J | 2–3 m versus 20–22 m | M | Fluoresbrite Yellow Green Carboxylate microsphere (1 μm) | decrease | [141] |
Peritoneal Macrophages | M. musculus | BALB/c | 3 m versus 15 m | B | Latex beads (1.09 μm) | decrease | [142] |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 3–4 m versus 20–23 m | B | Latex beads (1.09 μm) | decrease | [143] | |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 3 m versus 15 m | M | Opsonized Candida albicans Latex beads Latex beads (1.09 μm) | No change | [144] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 18–22 m | F | S. pneumoniae | decrease | [18] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–3 m versus 15–20 m | M | Fluorescent particles | decrease | [139] | |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 2 m versus 20 m | M | Apoptotic neutrophils | decrease | [50] | |
M. musculus | CF-1 | 3 m versus 22 m | M | Carbon uptake | decrease | [145] | |
Thiogallate-induced peritoneal exudate macrophages | M. musculus | B6C3-F1 B6.Gld | 2 m versus 24 m | M | Apoptotic TAMRA/SE-labeled apoptotic Jurkat T cells | decrease | [146] |
Population . | Species . | Strain . | Ages . | Sex . | Phagocytosis cargo . | Age-related change . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alveolar macrophages | R. norvegicus | F-344xBN | 6 m versus 12 m versus 18 m | NA | Opsonized K. pneumoniae 43,816 | increase | [138] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2-4 m versus 16 m versus 22–24 m versus 33 m | NA | Alexa Fluor 488 beads | decrease | [56] | |
Bone marrow-derived macrophages (in vitro differentiation) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 18–22 m | F | S. pneumoniae | decrease | [18] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–3 m versus 15–20 m | M | Fluorescent particles | no difference | [139] | |
Bone marrow macrophages (in vivo) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2–4 m versus 20–30 m | M | Senescent neutrophils | decrease | [51] |
Kupffer Cells | R. norvegicus | F344 | ~1 m versus 12 m versus 24–25 m | M | Polystyrene/sucrose microsphere | increase | [140] |
Microglia | M. musculus | C57Bl/6 J | 2–3 m versus 20–22 m | M | Fluoresbrite Yellow Green Carboxylate microsphere (1 μm) | decrease | [141] |
Peritoneal Macrophages | M. musculus | BALB/c | 3 m versus 15 m | B | Latex beads (1.09 μm) | decrease | [142] |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 3–4 m versus 20–23 m | B | Latex beads (1.09 μm) | decrease | [143] | |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 3 m versus 15 m | M | Opsonized Candida albicans Latex beads Latex beads (1.09 μm) | No change | [144] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 18–22 m | F | S. pneumoniae | decrease | [18] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–3 m versus 15–20 m | M | Fluorescent particles | decrease | [139] | |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 2 m versus 20 m | M | Apoptotic neutrophils | decrease | [50] | |
M. musculus | CF-1 | 3 m versus 22 m | M | Carbon uptake | decrease | [145] | |
Thiogallate-induced peritoneal exudate macrophages | M. musculus | B6C3-F1 B6.Gld | 2 m versus 24 m | M | Apoptotic TAMRA/SE-labeled apoptotic Jurkat T cells | decrease | [146] |
F: Female; M: Male; B: both sexes; NA: sex not specified in the article; m: months.
Population . | Species . | Strain . | Ages . | Sex . | Phagocytosis cargo . | Age-related change . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alveolar macrophages | R. norvegicus | F-344xBN | 6 m versus 12 m versus 18 m | NA | Opsonized K. pneumoniae 43,816 | increase | [138] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2-4 m versus 16 m versus 22–24 m versus 33 m | NA | Alexa Fluor 488 beads | decrease | [56] | |
Bone marrow-derived macrophages (in vitro differentiation) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 18–22 m | F | S. pneumoniae | decrease | [18] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–3 m versus 15–20 m | M | Fluorescent particles | no difference | [139] | |
Bone marrow macrophages (in vivo) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2–4 m versus 20–30 m | M | Senescent neutrophils | decrease | [51] |
Kupffer Cells | R. norvegicus | F344 | ~1 m versus 12 m versus 24–25 m | M | Polystyrene/sucrose microsphere | increase | [140] |
Microglia | M. musculus | C57Bl/6 J | 2–3 m versus 20–22 m | M | Fluoresbrite Yellow Green Carboxylate microsphere (1 μm) | decrease | [141] |
Peritoneal Macrophages | M. musculus | BALB/c | 3 m versus 15 m | B | Latex beads (1.09 μm) | decrease | [142] |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 3–4 m versus 20–23 m | B | Latex beads (1.09 μm) | decrease | [143] | |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 3 m versus 15 m | M | Opsonized Candida albicans Latex beads Latex beads (1.09 μm) | No change | [144] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 18–22 m | F | S. pneumoniae | decrease | [18] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–3 m versus 15–20 m | M | Fluorescent particles | decrease | [139] | |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 2 m versus 20 m | M | Apoptotic neutrophils | decrease | [50] | |
M. musculus | CF-1 | 3 m versus 22 m | M | Carbon uptake | decrease | [145] | |
Thiogallate-induced peritoneal exudate macrophages | M. musculus | B6C3-F1 B6.Gld | 2 m versus 24 m | M | Apoptotic TAMRA/SE-labeled apoptotic Jurkat T cells | decrease | [146] |
Population . | Species . | Strain . | Ages . | Sex . | Phagocytosis cargo . | Age-related change . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alveolar macrophages | R. norvegicus | F-344xBN | 6 m versus 12 m versus 18 m | NA | Opsonized K. pneumoniae 43,816 | increase | [138] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2-4 m versus 16 m versus 22–24 m versus 33 m | NA | Alexa Fluor 488 beads | decrease | [56] | |
Bone marrow-derived macrophages (in vitro differentiation) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 18–22 m | F | S. pneumoniae | decrease | [18] |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–3 m versus 15–20 m | M | Fluorescent particles | no difference | [139] | |
Bone marrow macrophages (in vivo) | M. musculus | C57BL/6 J | 2–4 m versus 20–30 m | M | Senescent neutrophils | decrease | [51] |
Kupffer Cells | R. norvegicus | F344 | ~1 m versus 12 m versus 24–25 m | M | Polystyrene/sucrose microsphere | increase | [140] |
Microglia | M. musculus | C57Bl/6 J | 2–3 m versus 20–22 m | M | Fluoresbrite Yellow Green Carboxylate microsphere (1 μm) | decrease | [141] |
Peritoneal Macrophages | M. musculus | BALB/c | 3 m versus 15 m | B | Latex beads (1.09 μm) | decrease | [142] |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 3–4 m versus 20–23 m | B | Latex beads (1.09 μm) | decrease | [143] | |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 3 m versus 15 m | M | Opsonized Candida albicans Latex beads Latex beads (1.09 μm) | No change | [144] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–4 m versus 18–22 m | F | S. pneumoniae | decrease | [18] | |
M. musculus | C57BL/6 | 2–3 m versus 15–20 m | M | Fluorescent particles | decrease | [139] | |
M. musculus | BALB/c | 2 m versus 20 m | M | Apoptotic neutrophils | decrease | [50] | |
M. musculus | CF-1 | 3 m versus 22 m | M | Carbon uptake | decrease | [145] | |
Thiogallate-induced peritoneal exudate macrophages | M. musculus | B6C3-F1 B6.Gld | 2 m versus 24 m | M | Apoptotic TAMRA/SE-labeled apoptotic Jurkat T cells | decrease | [146] |
F: Female; M: Male; B: both sexes; NA: sex not specified in the article; m: months.
When macrophages are exposed to specific stimuli in vitro, they are thought to adopt specific genomic programs by ‘polarization’ towards so-called M1 or M2 phenotype, which secrete different cytokines/chemokines [57–59]. The picture is more complex in vivo, where macrophage activation phenotypes are more spread along a spectrum [60]. Although this dichotomy corresponds to a more nuanced spectrum in vivo, it has been used to determine whether macrophages are more pro-inflammatory or pro-tissue remodeling. With aging, macrophages can become skewed towards one end of the polarization spectrum, and this skewing will create a microenvironment that can be detrimental to surrounding cell types. In the liver and adipose tissue, macrophages tend to skew towards an M1 phenotype, while bone marrow, spleen, lymph nodes, lung and muscle seem to skew more towards an M2 phenotype [61]. For example, mouse Kupffer cells and adipose tissue macrophages were reported to skew towards a Cd38+ M1 phenotype with aging, leading to increased inflammation and consumption of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide [NAD], with detrimental impact on tissue homeostasis [62]. Typically, monocytes recruited to a site of infection tend to be M1-like, while tissue-resident macrophages tend to be more M2-like [63]. However, aging has been associated to increased skewing of both resident and non-resident macrophages to M1-like phenotypes [64,65]. Differential skewing of macrophages with aging may underlie the recurrent upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine-related pathways, which have also been observed at the transcriptional level (Table 1).
Toll-like receptors [TLR] are important for recognition of PAMPs, and thus to trigger cellular activation in response to TLR-associated signals [66]. Studies have shown aging leads to a dysfunctional response to PAMP stimuli, notably resulting in misregulation of cytokine production [67–73]. Macrophages also have the ability to present antigens to lymphocytes, and antigen presentation capacity by macrophages has been reported to decline with age [74]. However, the mechanisms behind this decrease are unclear, as different macrophage populations show opposite trends in regulation of antigen-presenting complex genes (e.g. MHC I and MHC II) and proteins. For instance, MHCII mRNA levels increase with age in rat microglia and mouse bone marrow macrophages [51,75]. In contrast, BMDMs from young and old mice showed decreased expression of MHC class II protein and mRNA [76]. Whether due to increased or decreased production of MHC, dysfunction in the antigen presentation machinery is likely to impact the resolution of inflammation and promote a more inflammatory state.
Similar to transcriptional differences, age-related functional changes in macrophage function are not homogeneous in the literature. There are a few possible explanations behind the apparent inconsistencies One of the possibilities that could explain the differences observed is that the innate immune system can be modulated in response to sex-steroids, including estrogens [77]. Although this has not yet been studied systematically throughout aging, populations of macrophages (e.g. microglia, have been shown to be extremely sex-dimorphic in young animals [78–80]). Since most studies have thus far been conducted in only one sex (Tables 1 and 2), it is likely that differences between studies may partially result from differences in the biological sex of the used animals. Furthermore, contrasting results on phagocytic capacity may also be due to differences in the cargo used to perform the assay, including differential impacts of aging on ‘neutral’ cargo phagocytosis (e.g. latex beads), TLR-mediated phagocytosis (e.g. Zymosan, bacteria), or opsonic versus non-opsonic phagocytosis (Table 2). Finally, another variable that can contribute to the differences observed between the different tissue-resident macrophages is the impact of their niche microenvironment, which shapes many of their phenotypes [38,39], and may be itself driving differences in aging trajectories. Therefore, experimental design choices and differences between studies will greatly impact the final observations.
Neutrophils
Neutrophils or ‘polymorphonuclear cells’ are the most abundant leukocyte among human blood cells, composing 50–70% of white blood cells throughout life [81]. Neutrophils are short-lived cells, with an estimated cellular lifespan ranging from only hours to days upon terminal differentiation, in a process that has been dubbed ‘Neutrophil aging,’ distinct from organismal aging [82–84]. Thus, they are continually generated in the bone marrow and released into circulation to contribute to overall immune surveillance [83,85]. Key processes that neutrophils can undergo upon activation by microbial signals include secretion of antimicrobial granules and release of ‘NETs’ [83,86]. Although neutrophils are essential for immune surveillance as a ‘first line-of-defense,’ they can also contribute to and aggravate inflammatory disease [83,85]. Indeed, emerging evidence suggests that neutrophils play important roles in chronic inflammation [87].
Aging transcriptomic landscape
Although changes in gene expression regulation throughout lifespan have been reported across many tissues and cell types [33,34], how organismal aging (rather than ‘daily’ cellular aging) affects neutrophils is still largely unknown. However, despite their continued turnover, the transcriptional landscape of primary mouse bone-marrow neutrophils seems to be influenced by organismal aging [88], although age-related transcriptional changes are dwarfed by large sex-differences. Differentially expressed genes of neutrophils showed an upregulation of genes associated with immune signaling and autophagy accompanied by the downregulation of chromatin-associated genes [88]. Thus, the upregulated of autoimmunity as well as downregulation of chromatin genes could lead to the mis-regulation of NETs upon microbial signals. Interestingly, a single-cell atlas of rat aging organs showed increased infiltration of neutrophils in adipose tissue, liver and kidney [89]. In addition, neutrophils showed large gene expression differences with aging across tissues in that dataset, although the functional analysis of these differentially expressed genes was not discussed [89]. Although the broader relevance of these findings to other populations of neutrophils, to neutrophils from humans or to neutrophils exposed to priming signals will be required, changes in neutrophil transcriptomes could lead to functional defects with aging.
Age-related functional decline
Although they have yet not been studied as extensively as macrophages, evidence suggests that neutrophils from aged organisms are dysfunctional on many levels [90–95]. Thus, age-related neutrophil dysfunction likely contributes to overall immune dysfunction, with changes in ‘primed’ NETosis [91,92], chemotaxis [93], intracellular granule secretion [93,96], phagocytosis [94,97] and pathogen killing [91,94,95]. Interestingly, neutrophils can be primed by TNFa for increased NETosis [92], and circulating TNFa levels are known to increase with aging [18]. Notably, NETosis capacity with aging has only been reported in a primed state (i.e. TNFa pre-incubation of human circulating blood monocytes [92] or thioglycolate-elicitation of mouse peritoneal neutrophils [91], which is known to mimic TNFa priming [98]), and the ‘naïve’ unprimed state has not yet been investigated. It will be important to determine whether aged naïve neutrophils have increased NETosis capacity, as the aged milieu may itself prime them for unscheduled activation and promote further acceleration of the inflammatory response.
Importantly, age-related dysfunction of macrophages may itself lead to modulation of the pool of neutrophils, by allowing them to survive longer in an impaired state. Indeed, bone-marrow macrophages are responsible for clearing senescent neutrophils by efferocytosis [99], and this process is defective in the bone marrows of aged animals [51]. Since senescent neutrophils are functionally distinct from fresh neutrophils in terms of anti-microbial properties and inflammatory recruitment [100], changes in the efficiency and timing of senescent neutrophil clearing may drive aspects of observed defects in neutrophils from aged organisms.
Dendritic cells
DCs represent the primary antigen-presenting cells of the innate immune system, and are notably responsible for initiating a primary T-lymphocyte response to non-self antigens [101]. They play a major role among innate immune cells as the major link between the innate immune and adaptive immune responses [101]. DCs are, in other words, the surveillance cells of innate immunity, monitoring the presence of antigens, from pathogens or tumors [101]. Generally, DCs can be divided into conventional DCs (cDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) [102]. They are found across tissues, and play key roles in the communication with cells from the adaptive arm of the immune system (e.g. in the thymus or lymphoid organs).
Aging transcriptomic landscape
Upon age-associated thymic involution, gene set-enrichment analysis revealed that mouse thymic DCs show a moderate but significant increase in proinflammatory gene expression programs [103]. However, for both splenic and thymic DCs in mice, transcriptomic studies identified relatively few age-related transcriptional differences in mice [103,104].
A recent study of human peripheral blood cells captured ‘omic’ changes in circulating DCs with human aging, including at the single cell RNA-seq level [105]. DCs from aged individuals showed upregulation of interferon-stimulated genes and pro-inflammatory cytokine, consistent with an increased inflammatory phenotype of DCs with human aging [105]. Overrepresented functional categories linked to upregulation with aging included apoptosis and interferon gamma signaling [105]. Interestingly, genes involved in DC antigen presentation (e.g. CLEC12A, TXNIP), or self-tolerance (e.g. MALAT1, AHR) significantly decreased with aging in circulating DCs [105], consistent with decreased antigen-presenting ability. However, with age, MHCII and costimulatory molecules were downregulated across DCs subtypes [106]. Thus, based on transcriptional profiles, aged human DCs seem to acquire a pro-inflammatory phenotype while losing antigen-presenting ability.
Age-related functional decline
While the numbers and phenotype of DC subsets are broadly unaffected in older subjects, their abilities to migrate and process antigens are thought to be significantly compromised [107]. Accumulating studies have shown age-related changes in cDC and pDC function and often compare the two types. Aged cDCs have a phenotype similar to those from younger subjects, while pDCs seem to acquire decreased TLR 7 and 9 expression [107–109]. Furthermore, cytokine secretion in aged-cDCs shows systematically higher TNF-α and IL-6 secretion and lower activation by PAMPs (e.g. Pam3Cys, flagellin, poly IC, lipoteioic acid) [107]. In contrast, pDCs generally show an age-related decrease in IFN-α production [107,110,111]. The mechanisms delineating cDC–pDC interactions in the aging process will deserve further exploration. DCs have been reported to have a decreased ability to prime CD4+ T cells in older subjects [112]. However, whether or not the issue is due to dysfunctions in (i) antigen presentation, (ii) antigen presentation response or (iii) both remains unclear [112]. Tissue-specific responses may also play a role in shaping DC phenotypes with aging. For instance, while the population of cDC in the lymph nodes and spleen of aged mice remained stable, lung DCs increased in numbers with age [104]. Additionally, reconstitution of cDCs by bone marrow precursors was higher in aged mice compared to young mice [104]. In vitro experiments found that both young and aged DC in general were similarly capable of both direct and cross presentation of antigens [104].
Natural killer cells
Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic innate lymphocytes that also play a crucial part in the innate immune system. They are activated by interferons or cytokines to defend against viruses and potentially tumors [113]. Upon activation, they can then specifically target infected or oncogenic cells for death.
Aging transcriptomic landscape
Although NK cells have not been as extensively studied with organism aging, emerging evidence suggests that they undergo significant changes which are consistent with immune dysfunction [105,114]. Through a study of peripheral blood cells in humans throughout aging, Zheng et al. [105] captured ‘omic’ changes in NK cells with human aging at the single cell level. Indeed, they observed age-associated increases in circulating NK cells, together with a reprogrammed immune landscape with age [105]. For example, scRNA-seq analysis of NK cell-status allowed them to distinguish circulating NKs in three distinct immune states: the CD16low CD56bright subset [NK1], the CD16high CD56dim CD57− low-cytotoxic subset [NK2] and the CD16high CD56dim CD57+ late subset [NK3] [105]. Aged healthy adults (>60 years) had decreased numbers of NK1 but expanded NK2 and NK3 compartments compared to their young adult counterparts, suggesting genomic reprogramming of these cells with aging [105]. Interestingly, aged healthy adults exhibited higher expression genes related to apoptotic responses to lipopolysaccharide, apoptotic signaling and lower virus defense responses [105]. Together, with aging, NK cells seem to exhibit a heightened inflammatory state and show impediments in antiviral response and activity [105]. However, further studies of purified NK cells with aging will be needed to understand the factors driving observed dysfunction.
Age-related functional decline
Much of NK cell activity relies on DC activation, as both types of innate cells work in reciprocity across both innate and adaptive immunity in virus control and tumor immunology [115]. Defects of DCs in aged C57BL/6 mice cascades into failure to properly activate NK cells with aging, thus leading to decreased ability to clear tumor cells [115]. NK cells have been shown to demonstrate tissue-specific immune responses associated with age-related changes. For example, in older adults, the cytotoxicity of the CD56low NK population significantly decreases, which is thought to result from age-related defects in perforin mobilization to the immune synapse [116–118]. It is interesting to note however, that the CD56low NK cell population expands as the CD56hi NK cell population [responsible for cytokine production] dwindles during the aging process [118]. To note, these phenomena have been mostly studied with aging in the periodontal region [119]. Overall, the impact of aging on functional phenotypes of NK cells is only starting to be understood and will require further investigation.
Conclusions and perspectives
Accumulating evidence has shown that innate immune cells exhibit remodeling of their transcriptional programs, which is likely to drive aspects of age-related dysfunction in many of their key phenotypes (Figure 1). Immune modulation is a leading candidate in understanding the aging process. Interestingly, naked mole rats, an extremely long-lived rodent model (~30 years compared to ~3 years for laboratory mice) have a unique immune system that is distinct from the mice model [120]. Naked mole rats seem to have a greater emphasis on innate immunity than laboratory mice [120], consistent with the notion that the tuning of innate immunity is key for healthy longevity. Although general themes of age-related changes in innate immune cells ‘omic’ landscapes are consistent with the notion of inflamm-aging, studies have shown relatively little overlap thus far (Tables 1 and 2), which warrants a systematic study including all necessary covariates to understand the impact of aging on the innate immune system.
Accumulating studies have shown that specific interventions (e.g. exercise, dietary restriction, etc.) can exert pro-health and pro-longevity effects. A key question is thus how these pro-longevity interventions might modulate inflamm-aging phenotypes. Interestingly, a recent study which profiled organs at the single cell level in aging rats and in response to dietary restriction [DR] found that DR can rescue dysfunction in macrophage polarization and reverse immune cell infiltration in various organs [89]. Furthermore, DR was associated to downregulation of pathways related to immune response, inflammation and response to stimuli (e.g. LPS, interleukins), and to upregulation of pathways related to regeneration, response to growth factors and extracellular matrix [89]. Whereas aging tends to lead to a pro-inflammatory ‘M1’-like phenotype of adipose tissue macrophages [121,122], a recent study showed that exercise is able to reverse this age-related pro-inflammatory skewing [123]. To note, exercise may both suppress the infiltration of M1-like macrophages and promote reprogramming to a more ‘M2’ phenotype [124]. Both exercise and DR can modulate transduction from nutrient signaling pathways, thus promoting healthy longevity. It will be key to understand how they may influence the development of inflamm-aging and immunosenescence phenotypes.
Finally, although discussed studies have reported age-related changes in innate immune cell processes, there is still little known about how these changes are influenced by biological sex. Indeed, both the adult mammalian immune system [80,125] and the aging process [126] are sex-dimorphic, suggesting that the study of inflamm-aging should be stratified as a function of sex. Indeed, a pioneer study has revealed that peripheral immune cells are differentially regulated with aging in men and women [125]. Thus, to understand the impact of immune decline on aging and to permit the development of broadly applicable therapeutic strategies, it will be key to systematically include sex a biological variable of interest in future functional genomic studies of inflamm-aging.
Immune decline is a hallmark of aging.
Aging associates with a state of chronic sterile inflammation.
Innate immune cells undergo widespread molecular and functional remodeling with aging.
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Benayoun lab for helpful discussions and feedback on the manuscript.
Funding
R.L. is supported by a Diana Jacobs Kalman/AFAR Scholarships for Research in the Biology of Aging. B.A.B. is supported by NIA grants R00 AG049934 and R21 AG063739, Pew Biomedical Scholar award #00034120, an innovator grant from the Rose Hills Foundation, a collaborative grant from the Simon Foundation, a junior scholar award from the Global Consortium for Reproductive Longevity and Equality, a Glenn and AFAR Junior Faculty Award and the Kathleen Gilmore Biology of Aging Research Award.
Ryan J. Lu is a PhD student from the Biology of Aging program at the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology at the University of Southern California. His research focuses on sex-dimorphism in mechanisms driving age-related dysfunction in macrophages and neutrophils.
Emily K. Wang is a student in the Master of Science in Gerontology program at the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology at the University of Southern California. Her research focuses on identifying conserved sex-dimorphic signatures across macrophage populations.
Bérénice A. Benayoun is an assistant professor of Gerontology at the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology at the University of Southern California. Her research focuses on leveraging big data methods to uncover new regulatory mechanisms driving the aging process in vertebrate species.