Motivation: The application of microarray chip technology has led to an explosion of data concerning the expression levels of the genes in an organism under a plethora of conditions. One of the major challenges of systems biology today is to devise generally applicable methods of interpreting this data in a way that will shed light on the complex relationships between multiple genes and their products. The importance of such information is clear, not only as an aid to areas of research like drug design, but also as a contribution to our understanding of the mechanisms behind an organism's ability to react to its environment.
Results: We detail one computational approach for using gene expression data to identify response networks in an organism. The method is based on the construction of biological networks given different sets of interaction information and the reduction of the said networks to important response sub-networks via the integration of the gene expression data. As an application, the expression data of known stress responders and DNA repair genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is used to construct a generic stress response sub-network. This is compared to similar networks constructed from data obtained from subjecting M.tuberculosis to various drugs; we are thus able to distinguish between generic stress response and specific drug response. We anticipate that this approach will be able to accelerate target identification and drug development for tuberculosis in the future.
Supplementary information: Supplementary Figures 1 through 6 on drug response networks and differential network analyses on cerulenin, chlorpromazine, ethionamide, ofloxacin, thiolactomycin and triclosan. Supplementary Tables 1 to 3 on predicted protein interactions. http://www.santafe.edu/~chris/DifferentialNW
One of the most important challenges for researchers in the post-genomic era is to move toward a new view of biology—a systems level approach. The surprisingly low estimate of 30 000–40 000 genes in the human genome strongly indicates that functional complexity may originate in locations and processes beyond the identification of particular genes. The highly successful approach of biology for the past thirty years has been to investigate individual genes or proteins, but Systems Biology moves beyond looking at such elements in isolation. Rather, it examines the behavior and relationships of all of the elements in a biological system in an attempt to model and, ultimately, to control its dynamical behavior.
One particular goal within systems biology is to develop the capability for analyzing biological interaction networks as they respond to different external conditions. Groundwork with respect to this goal has been laid in seminal contributions from Ideker et al. (2001,2002) and Zien et al. (2000). This capability is of great importance for the understanding of system behavior and finally the prevention of infection from bacterial pathogens, i.e., Mycobacterium tuberculosis and others.
The paper will present a new method for analyzing biological response data, such as those from gene expression arrays, by combining it with computationally derived network information. It will further provide predictions of particular response sub-networks in the M.tuberculosis network after treatment with unspecific stress-inducers and comparison with specific antibacterial drugs. The impact of these studies will be the identification of response networks that could present potential drug-targets for novel antibiotics.
2 SYSTEMS AND METHODS
The method and analysis section is comprised of various steps, including, (i) M.tuberculosis network construction by computational methods, (ii) network filtering and response network identification by superimposing experimental gene expression data upon the computationally derived M.tuberculosis network and (iii) differential network expression analysis.
2.1 Graphs and networks
In the following we describe basic graph-theoretical properties and different network representations.
A ‘typical’ graph
Populating a graph Γ with biological information yields a biological network N as follows.
In the case of biological networks, depending on the particular network representation, node properties can include gene, protein or chemical names, and edge properties may refer to specific interactions, such as binding or catalysis.
We define a generalized reaction graph (GRG), as a triple
This definition is a simplification of the definition of Petri-Nets (Reisig, 1985), where transitions are actually represented by abstract nodes. In our definition, we consider transitions to be associated with components and thus simplify the strict Petri-Net definition.
Analogous to the network defined in Definition 2, we expand the GRG and define a generalized reaction network (GRN)
A GRG can easily be simplified into a node graph where places are translated into nodes, and transitions are contracted to edges, as well as into an edge graph, where transitions are converted to nodes, and places are contracted to edges.
2.2 Biological network construction
In order to construct the M.tuberculosis network, we identified three type of interactions relevant for such a network (and disregarded other potential sources of interaction information, such as protein–DNA binding or multi-state protein phosphorylation by kinases during signaling, due to insufficient information): (i) protein interaction, (ii) metabolic reactions and (iii) co-expression in regulons. For protein interaction data, we used identified component genes involved in fusion events according to Enright et al. (1999); Enright and Ouzounis (2001). This method for recognizing possible interacting proteins is called the Rosetta Stone approach (Enright and Ouzounis, 2001; Marcotte, 2000); it is based on the observation that individual genes in one organism that are fused into a single chain in another organism are likely to interact physically with each other. Employing the Rosetta Stone method using about 80 completely sequenced and published microbial genomes, we observed 113 interacting proteins. Between these 113 proteins we identified 257 interactions. In the graph, the proteins are represented as vertices, and edges connect interacting proteins. Each edge is assigned a Z-score z which is a statistical measure of similarity for the pair of components at its endpoints (Enright et al., 1999; Enright and Ouzounis, 2001). We used a conservative cut-off value of |z| ≤ 2 yielding 106 proteins and 233 interactions that we used for the construction of the M.tuberculosis protein interaction network (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). The remaining protein pairs with Z-scores above the threshold involving 24 interactions were disregarded (Supplementary Table 3).
We combined the protein interaction network with the metabolic reaction data of M.tuberculosis from the BioCyc (http://biocyc.org) and KEGG (Ogata et al., 1999) databases. The enzymes and substrates in the metabolic reactions are denoted as places and transitions. Our goal was to use metabolic reactions that would assemble into textbook-style metabolic pathways, without additional links introduced through ubiquitous chemicals. Since co-factors such as ATP and substrates such as water are ubiquitous in the metabolic reactions, we deleted the substrates and edges associated with those nodes; specifically, substrates with the number of interactions higher than 100 were removed from the network. A list with a number of ubiquitous substrates is shown in Table 1. The reaction graph was then constructed by contracting the substrate edges, i.e., by connecting enzymes that shared at least one common substrate by an edge and then deleting all the substrate vertices from the graph. The regulon (or coordinately regulated operon) data of M.tuberculosis were obtained from Escherichia coli by homology (McGuire and Church, 2000). We added the proteins as vertices to the graph and connected any co-regulated genes with new edges.
2.3 Experimental data
Through a separate study by Boshoff et al. (2004) gene expression information from M.tuberculosis (H37Rv) was obtained after its growth in Middlebrook 7H9 supplemented with albumin/dextrose/NaCl/glycerol, Dubos medium or defined minimal medium, as previously described (Schnappinger et al., 2003). Cultures were grown before adding either drug or solvent, and RNA was isolated at selected intervals thereafter. For each drug-treated culture, a parallel culture was treated with an equivalent amount of solvent [DMSO (dimethylsulphoxide), ethanol or water] for the same amount of time. RNA from the latter culture was used as the reference sample to which the drug-treated sample was compared. Each treatment condition and each drug concentration was repeated a minimum of two independent times.
The gene expression data has been made available by Helena Boshoff and is accessible through the Gene Expression Omnibus at NCBI (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) with GEO platform accession number GPL1396.
3 ALGORITHM AND IMPLEMENTATION
The algorithm is implemented as follows. After the large biological network (the M.tuberculosis network, Section 2.2) is constructed, it is stored as a Petri-Net, converted into a node graph (Section 2.1), stripped of ubiquitous chemicals according to a maximal permissible node degree (Section 2.2) and loaded with gene expression values (Sections 2.3 and 3.3). In addition, input parameters such as the k-value for k-shortest path calculation and the maximal path-length l are set. In the next step, the network is filtered according to the parameters and a set of seed nodes (Section 3.2). The core of the algorithm is the component that scores particular sub-networks, yielding a sub-network with optimal score. Further components of the algorithm include a statistical analysis routine for sub-network score validation (Section 3.4) and a network algebra component for differential network analysis (Section 3.5). A flow diagram of the corresponding processes is shown in Figure 1.
In the course of this paper we use the node graph to represent and to describe the biological network N. However, all algorithms are sufficiently general to be applied to GRNs. In the case of different implementations for different network representations, references are being made.
3.2 Sub-network filtering
A first-pass analysis in the iterative process of Network Scoring is performed during sub-network filtering. Here, particular nodes are tagged as seed nodes, and shortest pathways between them are identified by Dijkstra's algorithm (Dijkstra, 1959). Successively longer pathways are identified by Yen's algorithm for the k-shortest simple paths problem, using an implementation by Hershberger et al. (2003). Yen's algorithm, despite being over thirty years old, is still the best known for the k-shortest simple paths problem with respect to its worst-case running time, i.e., O(kn(m + nlogn)) time for a graph with m nodes and n edges. For the purposes of sub-network filtering, an additional constraint is built into the pathfinding algorithm: if the length of a (weighted) path exceeds a particular, pre-specified length l, then the path is disregarded and not included in the sub-network.
Seed nodes are either provided by the user or are extracted by machine learning techniques such as genetic algorithms or singular value decomposition to cluster expression data. With a given set of seed nodes, which may change during the iterative process between sub-network filtering and network scoring (Section 3.3), sub-networks are identified that are spanned by the seed nodes. Thus, if vs ∈ N is a seed node in network N, then vs ∈ ∂N, with ∂N denoting the boundary of N.
The algorithm performs the following functions: (i) compilation of a list of seed nodes, (ii) computation of all possible pairs of seed nodes from this list, (iii) calculation of shortest and k-shortest paths (with maximal path-length l) between each pair of seed nodes using Dijkstra's and Yen's algorithms, (iv) recording of all nodes and edges on identified paths, (v) filtering (deletion, hiding) of all other nodes and edges that are not on the selected paths, (vi) sub-network scoring, (vii) reiteration.
By mathematical means, the above procedure extracts a sub-network from the large biological network that is spanned by the seed nodes. The pathways between each pair of seed nodes hold the desired properties of being k-shortest paths with maximal path length l. Thus, by scoring a particular network with given seed nodes, the last step of reiteration is not necessary. Only for the identification of the optimally scored network and for the refinement of seed nodes is reiteration required (see Sections 3.3 and 3.4).
3.3 Network scoring
Network scoring uses expression values as metrics for weighted edges in the network. In a node graph, as we are using, genes, proteins and other cellular components are coded as nodes which are connected by edges in the biological network. Because the sub-network filtering step assumes weights on edges for scoring, such edge weights must be calculated from node scores, i.e., gene expression levels.
On the other hand, if the biological network is represented as an edge graph, then edges represent genes, proteins and other cellular components, and nodes refer to interactions. Then edges can be weighted by gene expression values directly.
We use the Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org) modules in combination with the R package to analyze the gene expression data and to extract p-values pm for each expressed gene m. Following Ideker et al. (2002) we convert the pm into a z-score zm = Φ−1(1 − pm), where Φ−1 denotes the inverse normal distribution function.
For the edge scores, we use either the product probability pi·pj or the correlation coefficient ρij for an edge m with origin node i and terminus j, yielding for example zm = Φ−1(1 − pi · pj).
Given a particular set of seed nodes, the shortest path approach already guarantees a best scored sub-network, but to obtain an optimized set of seed nodes for a better scoring sub-network, we have to search through the network. We reduce this problem by finding the best scoring pathways between pairs of randomly selected seed nodes out of a list ordered by, for example, fold change after gene expression analysis. We choose pairs of nodes by a rank-weighted random distribution. The shortest pathway between these nodes is identified, sN [Equation (2)] calculated and the node pair recorded. After convergence to highest scoring pathways, a sub-network score is computed using nodes with the highest pathway score.
Although the alternating calculation of node pairs yielding best scoring pathways and sub-network filtering is a heuristic approach, it is advantageous to the network optimization method due to its speed. Particular combinations of node pairs may assemble into a suboptimal sub-network [e.g. node a1 in node pair (a1,a2) is distant from node b1 in pair (b1,b2)]. However, such a suboptimal seed node combination will be detected in the next sub-network filtering by the path-length restrictions. Long and poorly scored pathways will disrupt the network in unconnected components. Only seed nodes within the giant component will be included in the next round of pathway optimization.
3.4 Statistical analysis
We perform a statistical analysis to validate the significance of the identified sub-graph compared to other sub-networks. Through a Monte Carlo approach, we compare zN for a particular sub-network to a set of randomly sampled reference sub-networks of size m (using the same expression profile but different seed nodes). The sub-network scores are corrected in the standard fashion:
3.5 Differential network expression analysis
In principle, graph comparison is an NP-hard problem which typically can only be addressed by exhaustive enumeration techniques. On the other hand, methods for comparative network analysis for biological systems have been developed in the past. Such methods have been proven powerful in a number of applications including for metabolic (Dandekar et al., 1999; Forst and Schulten, 1999, 2001; Ogata et al., 2000) and protein interaction networks (Kelley et al., 2003) as well as for correlation of protein interaction networks with gene expression (Nakaya et al., 2001).
Here we present two approaches: a simple approach utilizing node and edge labels of the given biological network, i.e., using only matching components for the graph comparison; and a correlation-based approach taking into account the commonality of how sub-networks have been generated by our method. With respect to the simple approach we can define the following network algebra terms.
In plain words, we take the intersection between all
In addition to the general network algebraic operations, we have also implemented a correlation-based graph comparison technique that takes advantage of the common method by which sub-networks are generated. Specifically, we are given a set of networks N1, N2,…,Nn, each of which was generated from a large biological network by sub-network filtering over different gene expression profiles. We create a ‘correlated intersection’ Ic [with vertex set
First line drugs used for therapy against tuberculosis infection include ethambutol, pyrazinamide and isoniazid (INH). Isoniazid is known to inhibit the biosynthesis of mycolic acid, disrupting the FAS-II fatty acid synthesis pathway that M.tuberculosis utilizes to construct lipids used in its cell wall (Wilson et al., 1999). We examined the drug response network of M.tuberculosis induced by the chemical INH and compared it to a generic stress response network induced by exposure to hydrogen-peroxide (H2O2). We also examined other drugs targeting fatty acid biosynthesis in the bacterial pathogen, as well as certain drugs with completely different mechanisms.
Isoniazid specifically interferes with the FAS-II subsystem of the cell that extends fatty acids from 26 to ∼56 carbon atoms for the biosynthesis of mycolic acid. Isoniazid itself is a pro-drug: it is modified to its biologically active form inside the pathogen by the mycobacterial catalase-peroxidase enzyme katG. In the presence of katG or Mn2+ ions, INH forms a complex with NAD, an INH–NAD adduct. This adduct has been shown to act as a slow, tight-binding competitive inhibitor of InhA, an enoyl reductase that catalyzes the NADH-dependent reduction of long chain trans-2-enoyl-acyl carrier proteins (ACPs). Experimental results by Rawat et al. (2003) indicate a mechanism of at least two steps in which an initial enzyme-inhibitor complex is rapidly formed and then slowly changed to a final inhibited complex. However, a second target of INH has been proposed by Barry and co-workers (1998). KasA, one of three ketoacyl synthases in the FAS-II pathway, has been identified to be inhibited by the activated INH complex.
Although INH has been the most effective and widely used drug for the treatment of tuberculosis since the 1950s, it requires activation by katG. Thus, a substantial fraction of all M.tuberculosis isolates that are resistant to INH show katG mutations. Consequently, compounds that inhibit the ultimate molecular target(s) of INH but do not require activation by katG have tremendous promise as novel drugs for combating multi-drug resistant M.tuberculosis.
To understand the interlocked mechanism of INH activation and M.tuberculosis' drug response, we studied the M.tuberculosis response against INH treatment and a generic stress response against H2O2. Gene expression profiles were obtained by our collaborator Helena Boshoff. The INH expression profile was obtained by exposing M.tuberculosis to 0.2 μg/ml INH for 6 h against a reference of M.tuberculosis exposure to ethanol. The H2O2 measurements were performed in a concentration of 4 mM for 2 h. In addition to these treatments, we utilized expression profiles from experiments involving other M.tuberculosis drugs, such as cerulenin, chlorpromazine, ethionamide, thiolactomycin and triclosan. The following experimental conditions for exposing M.tuberculosis to drugs and solvents were used: 0.5 μg/ml cerulenin for 6 h against DMSO, 10 μg/ml chlorpromazine for 6 h against ethanol, 12 μg/ml ethionamide for 6 h against ethanol, 5 μg/ml ofloxacin for 6 h against ethanol, 130 μg/ml thiolactomycin for 6 h against DMSO and 50 μg/ml triclosan for 6 h against ethanol. All experiments were performed in duplicate with no or minimal differences between corresponding response networks.1
The networks generated from this data are shown in Figures 2 and 3; the seed nodes used were the union of the most significant response nodes to INH and H2O2 exposure individually, as determined by gene expression analysis. We note some interesting features of the graphs. Genes known to encode for proteins involved in the classical DNA damage response (recA, uvrA) appeared in the calculated H2O2 response network. A glance at the graph shows that each was up-regulated (Fig. 2), as well as furA–katG, a gene pair central to the oxidative stress response of M.tuberculosis. In the same network motif as recA and uvrA there resides a conserved hypothetical gene Rv2840c that is strongly up-regulated during H2O2 treatment. The network connectivity of Rv2840c with recA and uvrA suggests an involvement with the DNA-repair network of M.tuberculosis. This also applies to infB, the translation initiation factor IF-2 that may also play a role in DNA-repair. Genes that are strongly up-regulated but that are not members of an up-regulated network motif are Rv1464, a member of the NifS-family and the hypothetical protein Rv1831.
On the other hand, the entirety of the FAS-II fatty acid synthase pathway (except acpM, which was not included in the interaction data used to construct the original, whole network) appears in the INH response network (Fig. 3); these include enoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase inhA, 3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthase kasA/B, and mycolytransferase fbpC2. All except inhA show strong up-regulation. Some of these nodes were designated as seed nodes, and such nodes were also observed in the H2O2 response network; nevertheless, it is clear that none of them was under a particular up-regulation there. Furthermore, the specific removal of these genes (kasA, kasB, fabD) from the seed node list did not affect their presence in the INH response sub-network: the newly calculated network continued to contain each of them (data not shown). Furthermore, a similarly recalculated H2O2 response network lacked all of these genes. Also involved in the up-regulated kasA/B network motif are the strongly up-regulated putative 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase Rv2182c and phenolpthiocerol synthase ppsA. 1-Acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase does play a role in lipid bio-synthesis. On the other hand, ppsA is known to be involved in the synthesis of phenolglycolipids, a class of components in the M.tuberculosis membrane that are known to play a role in pathogenicity (Constant et al., 2002).
Interestingly, the up-regulated FAS-II pathway is closely connected to a similarly up-regulated fatty acid degradation pathway assembled by the enoyl-hydratases echA3, echA6 and echA8; by acyl-CoA ligases fadD5, fadD7 and fadD8; as well as by the putative acyl-CoA dehydrogenase fadE24. Other up-regulated pathways include a proposed electron transport/nitrate utilization pathway involving cytochrome oxidase cydB, NADH dehydrogenase ndh and nitrate reductases narG and narJ, as well as the putative oxidoreductase Rv0197, the last putative. Alkylhydroperoxidases ahpC and ahpD are up-regulated in both the H2O2 and the INH response networks.
The picture that the INH response sub-network draws confirms the response of M.tuberculosis after INH treatment. The interference of INH within M.tuberculosis triggers a response both in the FAS-II pathway as well as in the fatty acid degradation pathway. The latter pathway is activated for the degradation of cell-membrane lipids made premature due to the interruption of their biosynthesis by the inactivation of inhA. Up-regulation of ahpC and ahpD for detoxification induces down-regulation of katG. The up-regulation of cydD, ndh and Rv0197 suggests degradation of INH through nitrate and nitrite to ammonia.
The differential response network (Fig. 4) shows the common responses between the generic DNA-damage/stress response introduced by H2O2 and the specific drug response against INH. Up-regulated in both networks are alkylhydroperoxidases ahpC and ahpD. These genes are involved in detoxification and are suspected to play a role in INH resistance by interfering with the katG activity. The latter gene is a member in both networks, together with furA, as part of the DNA-damage pathway. FurA is up-regulated in the H2O2 network and slightly up-regulated in the INH network. The down-regulation of katG in the INH network seems to conform with the interference with ahpC/D. KatG is up-regulated during H2O2 response.
Other commonly up-regulated genes include the beta chain of the tryptophan synthase, trpB, the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase pckA and regX3, a two-component response regulator involved in M.tuberculosis virulence and infection (Parish et al., 2003). The latter, together with the alternative sigma factor sigH, is a member of a network motif that regulates major components of the oxidative and heat stress response, as well as a hypothetical protein, Rv1222. A second commonly up-regulated network motif involves a member of the DNA-repair network, excinuclease ABC subunit A, uvrA and a conserved hypothetical protein, Rv2840c.
Computing the network intersection between the H2O2 and INH response networks yields a sub-network that assembles about 60% of the nodes and a third of the edges of the individual INH and H2O2 networks. Given the large component of commonly up-regulated genes including virulence factors and generic stress response network motifs, we conclude that INH does trigger essential key components that are common to the two networks.
Other drugs known to work against the FAS-II pathway in M.tuberculosis are ethionamide and thiolactomycin. Comparing response networks between INH and these drugs by means of our intersection method yielded networks that clearly reflected the common mode of action (Supplementary Figures 1 and 2). We note the presence of the FAS-II genes kasA, kasB, fabD and fbpC2. Examining the response network generated by cerulenin—a drug that inhibits both the FAS-I and FAS-II pathways—also shows a large number of FAS-II gene expressions being affected in the response of M.tuberculosis (Supplementary Figure 3).
Triclosan has been demonstrated to attack the FAS-II system in vitro too. However, Boshoff et al. suggest that triclosan's primary mode of action in vivo is actually upon respiration (Boshoff et al., 2004). Our results support this conclusion (Supplementary Figure 4): comparison of a triclosan response network to any of the networks generated by the aforementioned drugs that attack the FAS-II system gave sub-networks of rather small sizes (26 nodes instead of a typical 37 nodes on average) lacking the complete lipid biosynthesis pathway that is present in the isoniazid, ethionamide and thiolactomycin response networks. All drug response networks for drugs affecting the FAS-I or FAS-II pathways have in common two network hubs around mycolytransferase fbpC2 and the conserved hypothetical protein Rv1691. Together with fbpA and fbpB, fbpC2 forms the antigen 85 complex that plays a key role in the pathogenesis of M.tuberculosis (Kremer et al., 2002). In addition to its mycolytransferase activity, fbpC2 is also involved in the cell wall metabolism. The function of the second hub Rv1691 is unknown; a BLAST search did not show any hit to other genes with known function.
On the other hand, comparing the triclosan response with that generated by chlorpromazine yielded much more of a correlated intersection (Supplementary Figure 5). Chlorpromazine, among other actions, has been shown to inhibit respiration in M.tuberculosis, and we note in the correlated intersection the presence of genes dealing with respiration and oxidative stress: cydB, appC and nirB. This supports the claim that triclosan does indeed affect respiration in M.tuberculosis.
For an example of a drug that did trigger a DNA-repair response, we examined ofloxacin, one of the class of drugs known as fluoroquinolones. The precise mechanism by which any of the fluoroquinolones interfere with DNA synthesis has not yet been elucidated, but our approach enables us to discern immediately the nature of the action of ofloxacin. We compare the ofloxacin response network with the response of M.tuberculosis to ultraviolet light exposure (Supplementary Figure 6). The resulting correlated intersection clearly exhibits genes associated with the SOS gene repair response (uvrA, uvrB, recA, infB).
We have developed a novel method using k-shortest path algorithms to examine and to interpret expression data in the context of network connectivity. The method is flexible enough to accommodate new information about protein or gene interactions or even to incorporate completely novel connections. The algorithms used scale easily with the size of the network. Although the present M.tuberculosis network has been constructed by computational methods and information acquired from interaction and network databases, interaction information obtained from experimentally derived protein interactions or regulon information can easily be included in the network. In the simplest case, new interaction data from literature information can be added to the network by establishing novel links. To ameliorate existing interactions by experimental data, confidence values similar to Z-scores, as in the case of protein interaction, can be added. All nodes and edges are labeled in the network and have additional properties, such as Z-scores, attached.
Comparison of the drug response network induced by INH and the generic stress response network induced by H2O2 revealed features unique to each graph. In particular, we not only detected the presence of such genes as the recA and uvr family or the FAS-II group, but we were able to see how they interacted with other genes in their respective networks. We specifically identified a close connection between the FAS-II network and the fatty acid degradation pathway in the INH network as well as a putative electron-transfer, INH degradation network assembled by cytochromes, nitrate and nitrite reductases.
This approach to constructing response networks enables easy comparison of the generated graphs. This in turn allowed identification of the similarities between the responses of M.tuberculosis to the presence of H2O2 and INH. In particular, in the differential network we identified genes and network components that are relevant for stress response as well as responsible for INH activation, such as the furA/katG pair. Another class of common network responses involved detoxification and virulence networks including ahpC/D, ppsA and regX3.
The analysis of other M.tuberculosis drugs, including cerulenin, chlorpromazine, ethionamide, ofloxacin, thiolactomycin and triclosan, revealed insights into common response among the drugs targeting the FAS-pathways as well as differences from triclosan, chlorpromazine and ofloxacin, which have different targets. As expected, we observed a great deal of correspondence between the response networks of INH, ethionamide and thiolactomycin. Common to all these drugs that inhibit the FAS-pathway are the strongly up-regulated network motifs involving the highly connected hubs fbpC2 and Rv1691. We noted evidence of triclosan's in vivo action with observed activity against the FAS-II pathway but primarily targeting the citric acid (TCA) cycle and respiration. Network comparison with another M.tuberculosis drug, chlorpromazine, identified conserved and highly up-regulated network motifs involving genes of the TCA cycle and cytochromes. With respect to a representative of a third class of M.tuberculosis drugs, ofloxacin, we identified a common network response between this drug and UV radiation, indicating an interference with DNA synthesis by triggering DNA repair response.
The strength of differential network expression analysis lies in the identification of the modes of action of drugs by comparative studies. Similar response networks indicate similar modes of action, as has been shown here in the case of drugs targeting the FAS-pathways. By differential network expression, novel drugs with similar response networks to drugs with known modes of action can be easily identified early in the drug development to prevent repeated and costly clinical trials. On the other hand, response networks by themselves serve as a valuable representation and computational model of physiological responses. Identification of single highly connected genes, such as Rv1464, Rv1691, or Rv2840c or small and strongly expressed network motifs provides information about potential drug targets. Future experiments could specifically target these identified network motifs to either verify the importance of these particular genes and network motifs for M.tuberculosis or refute the prediction.
In summary, differential network expression provides an excellent systems biology tool to identify and analyze systems level responses by a comparative approach. In particular, the case study on the H2O2 and INH response of M.tuberculosis highlighted the interconnectivity of cellular processes. The presented method is sufficiently flexible to accommodate a variety of types of biological network information and experimental data. Initial differential network analysis studies have already been performed in the case of mammalian signaling networks and therapeutic drug responses. Differential network analysis not only offers insights into the mode of action of antimicrobial drugs but also provides information on potential key targets for future drug-development efforts.
1Data available upon request.
|Chemical||Number of interactions|
|Coenzyme A (CoA)||1 400|
|Chemical||Number of interactions|
|Coenzyme A (CoA)||1 400|
This work was supported by grants from the NSF student training program to LC, from Los Alamos National Laboratory (LDRD-20040184ER), and from the Procter & Gamble Corp. by a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA LA01C10461). We gratefully thank Helena Boshoff, NIAID, for providing M.tuberculosis gene expression data and Hyun Park, Carnegie Mellon, for coding the initial program version. We are also indebted to Ivo Hofacker, University of Vienna, Austria and Peter Stadler, University of Leipzig, Germany for essential contribution to the network algebra as well as to Jeff Blanchard, University of Massachusetts, and Robert Küffner, University of Munich, Germany, for numerous and fruitful discussions on pathway scoring.