Abstract

Background

High psychological resilience is associated with improved functional outcomes for older adults recovering from hip fracture. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with increased psychological resilience in older women after hip fracture.

Methods

129 women aged ≥65 years with recent surgically-repaired hip fracture were enrolled in a trial of exercise and testosterone therapy. The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) measured baseline resilience, and was categorized as low (BRS<4) or high (BRS≥4). Sociodemographic (e.g., education), medical, and neuropsychological factors (e.g., cognition by Short Blessed Test, mental health by a Global Mental Health Score (PROMIS-GMH), and depressive symptoms by Geriatric Depression Score (GDS)) were considered as independent variables. Individual factors were evaluated for their association with resilience using bivariate regression, and those having a significance level of p≤0.10 were entered into age-adjusted multivariate logistic regression models.

Results

57 women (44%) reported high resilience. Neither education nor cognition was significantly associated with resilience. Lower GDS and better PROMIS-GMH scores were associated with high resilience in adjusted models. For every one-point worsening in GDS, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for high vs. low resilience was 0.76 (95% CI 0.61,0.93). In a model with GDS, PROMIS-GMH, and age, positive mental health remained significantly associated with higher resilience (AOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.14,1.58).

Conclusions

In older women after hip fracture, fewer depressive symptoms and better mental health were associated with higher psychological resilience. Addressing overall mental health when recovering from hip fracture could contribute to increasing psychological resilience thereby maximizing recovery potential.

Information Accepted manuscripts
Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.
This content is only available as a PDF.
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
You do not currently have access to this article.