Abstract

Meiotic or mitotic chromosomes of seven Alstroemeria taxa, native in Argentina and Chile and with Andean distribution were studied: A. andina ssp. venustula, A. hookeri ssp. cummingiana, A. hookeri ssp. recumbens, A. pallida, A. patagonica, A. pseudospathulata and A. pygmaea. All were diploid with 2n = 16. Karyotypes of A. andina ssp. venustula and A. pygmaea were analysed, revealing similarity to previously analysed species. Thus, to all existing arguments for not retaining Schickendantzia as a separate genus, we can add another one which merges A. pygmaea with other Alstroemeria species, and does not support its taxonomic uniqueness. In general, the meiotic behaviour was normal, with regular formation of eight bivalents except in A. hookeri ssp. cummingiana, in one plant of which meiotic irregularities at various stages were observed. At the tetrad stage a large percentage of the cells presented micronuclei. The presence of 0–2 supernumerary chromosomes in A. hookeri ssp. recumbens is recorded. The karyotype asymmetry presented by most Alstroemeria species is discussed.

INTRODUCTION

Alstroemeria L. is an exclusively South American genus comprising about 50 species that occur from Venezuela to Argentina, from sea level to 4500 m altitude. However, the number of species will be considerably increased when the revision of the Brazilian species by Marta Camargo (University of Saõ Paulo) is finished. Because of their showy flowers, these herbaceous plants have been successfully introduced into cultivation and are used as vase flowers. Many other wild taxa, that are scarcely known so far, are also of potential use in breeding programmes.

Within the framework of biosystematic research in the family Alstroemeriaceae (Sanso & Xifreda, 1995; Sanso, 1996; Aagesen & Sanso, 1998; Sanso & Xifreda, 1998, 2001), chromosome studies in Alstroemeria were carried out. In the present contribution, seven native taxa from the Andes were investigated: Alstroemeria andina Phil. ssp. venustula (Phil.) Ehr. Bayer, A. hookeri Lodd. ssp. cummingiana (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer, A. hookeri Lodd. ssp. recumbens (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer, A. pallida Graham, A. patagonica Phil., A. pseudospathulata Ehr. Bayer and A. pygmaea Herb.

Alstroemeria pygmaea is a small herb growing at 3500–4400 m in the Andean mountains, in Perú, Bolivia and north-west Argentina (Sanso & Xifreda 1999). The taxonomic position of this taxon has long been under debate. Many authors have treated A. pygmaea as a distinct genus, Schickendantzia Pax (Dahlgren et al., 1985; Kosenko, 1994; Stevenson & Loconte, 1995; Bayer, 1998). Its chromosomes and karyotype have not been investigated previously.

Alstroemeria andina ssp. venustula is also a small herb, 5–16 cm tall, occurring at 2800–3700 m in Argentina and Chile (Sanso, 1996).

Alstroemeria patagonica and A. pseudospathulata, two other trans-Andean species of Argentina and Chile, inhabit the Patagonian meseta in Argentina: A. patagonica from Neuquén to Santa Cruz and Tierra del Fuego and A. pseudospathulata in Calmuco Valley, Mendoza, and on the Limay River, bordering the area between the Neuquén and the Río Negro provinces (Sanso, 1996).

A. hookeri ssp. cummingiana, A. hookeri ssp. recumbens (both at less than 500 m) and A. pallida (1500–2800 m) are native in central Chile, between 32° and 34°S (Bayer 1987).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PLANT MATERIAL

Flower buds of Argentine origin were collected from wild populations between 1995 and 1997 and those of Chilean source were obtained from plants cultivated at Copenhagen Botanical Garden (Denmark) in 1999. The origin of the accessions studied is shown in Table 1. Voucher specimens are deposited in the Herbarium of Instituto Darwinion (SI).

Table 1.

Taxa, origins, chromosome numbers and type of studied chromosomes

Taxon Place of collection and voucher 2n Chromosomes 
Alstroemeria andina Phil. ssp. venustula (Phil.) Ehr. Bayer Argentina. Prov. San Juan. Dpto. Calingasta. Puesto de Gendarmería, Las Juntas. 29-I-1997. Fortunato & Kiesling 5630 (SI) 16 Mitotic 
A. hookeri Lodd. ssp. cummingiana (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5011 (SI). Origin: Chile. IV Región of Coquimbo. Prov. Choapa. Pan Am N 250 km 16 Meiotic 
A. hookeri Lodd. ssp. recumbens (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5010 (SI). Origin: Chile. V Región of Valparaíso. Prov. Aconcagua. Longotoma, 225 msm 16 Meiotic 
A. pallida Graham Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5035 (SI). Origin: Chile. Región Metropolitana of Santiago. Santiago. Lagunillas, 2000–2700 msm 16 Meiotic 
A. patagonica Phil. Argentina. Prov. Neuquén. Dpto. Zapala. Parque Nac. Laguna Blanca. 16-XII-1997. Xifreda & Sanso 2035 (SI) 16 Meiotic 
A. pseudospathulata Ehr. Bayer Argentina. Prov. Neuquén. Dpto. Chos- Malal. 14 km from Chos-Malal road to Andacollo. 12-XII-1997. Xifreda & Sanso 2004 (SI) 16 Meiotic 
A. pygmaea Herb. Argentina. Prov. Tucumán. Dpto. Trancas. Hualinchay. Near Rodeo Largo. c. 3500 msm. 15-XII-1995. Sanso & Pereyra 8 (SI) 16 Mitotic 
Taxon Place of collection and voucher 2n Chromosomes 
Alstroemeria andina Phil. ssp. venustula (Phil.) Ehr. Bayer Argentina. Prov. San Juan. Dpto. Calingasta. Puesto de Gendarmería, Las Juntas. 29-I-1997. Fortunato & Kiesling 5630 (SI) 16 Mitotic 
A. hookeri Lodd. ssp. cummingiana (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5011 (SI). Origin: Chile. IV Región of Coquimbo. Prov. Choapa. Pan Am N 250 km 16 Meiotic 
A. hookeri Lodd. ssp. recumbens (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5010 (SI). Origin: Chile. V Región of Valparaíso. Prov. Aconcagua. Longotoma, 225 msm 16 Meiotic 
A. pallida Graham Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5035 (SI). Origin: Chile. Región Metropolitana of Santiago. Santiago. Lagunillas, 2000–2700 msm 16 Meiotic 
A. patagonica Phil. Argentina. Prov. Neuquén. Dpto. Zapala. Parque Nac. Laguna Blanca. 16-XII-1997. Xifreda & Sanso 2035 (SI) 16 Meiotic 
A. pseudospathulata Ehr. Bayer Argentina. Prov. Neuquén. Dpto. Chos- Malal. 14 km from Chos-Malal road to Andacollo. 12-XII-1997. Xifreda & Sanso 2004 (SI) 16 Meiotic 
A. pygmaea Herb. Argentina. Prov. Tucumán. Dpto. Trancas. Hualinchay. Near Rodeo Largo. c. 3500 msm. 15-XII-1995. Sanso & Pereyra 8 (SI) 16 Mitotic 
Table 1.

Taxa, origins, chromosome numbers and type of studied chromosomes

Taxon Place of collection and voucher 2n Chromosomes 
Alstroemeria andina Phil. ssp. venustula (Phil.) Ehr. Bayer Argentina. Prov. San Juan. Dpto. Calingasta. Puesto de Gendarmería, Las Juntas. 29-I-1997. Fortunato & Kiesling 5630 (SI) 16 Mitotic 
A. hookeri Lodd. ssp. cummingiana (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5011 (SI). Origin: Chile. IV Región of Coquimbo. Prov. Choapa. Pan Am N 250 km 16 Meiotic 
A. hookeri Lodd. ssp. recumbens (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5010 (SI). Origin: Chile. V Región of Valparaíso. Prov. Aconcagua. Longotoma, 225 msm 16 Meiotic 
A. pallida Graham Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5035 (SI). Origin: Chile. Región Metropolitana of Santiago. Santiago. Lagunillas, 2000–2700 msm 16 Meiotic 
A. patagonica Phil. Argentina. Prov. Neuquén. Dpto. Zapala. Parque Nac. Laguna Blanca. 16-XII-1997. Xifreda & Sanso 2035 (SI) 16 Meiotic 
A. pseudospathulata Ehr. Bayer Argentina. Prov. Neuquén. Dpto. Chos- Malal. 14 km from Chos-Malal road to Andacollo. 12-XII-1997. Xifreda & Sanso 2004 (SI) 16 Meiotic 
A. pygmaea Herb. Argentina. Prov. Tucumán. Dpto. Trancas. Hualinchay. Near Rodeo Largo. c. 3500 msm. 15-XII-1995. Sanso & Pereyra 8 (SI) 16 Mitotic 
Taxon Place of collection and voucher 2n Chromosomes 
Alstroemeria andina Phil. ssp. venustula (Phil.) Ehr. Bayer Argentina. Prov. San Juan. Dpto. Calingasta. Puesto de Gendarmería, Las Juntas. 29-I-1997. Fortunato & Kiesling 5630 (SI) 16 Mitotic 
A. hookeri Lodd. ssp. cummingiana (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5011 (SI). Origin: Chile. IV Región of Coquimbo. Prov. Choapa. Pan Am N 250 km 16 Meiotic 
A. hookeri Lodd. ssp. recumbens (Herb.) Ehr. Bayer Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5010 (SI). Origin: Chile. V Región of Valparaíso. Prov. Aconcagua. Longotoma, 225 msm 16 Meiotic 
A. pallida Graham Cult. Copenhagen Botanical Garden P1995-5035 (SI). Origin: Chile. Región Metropolitana of Santiago. Santiago. Lagunillas, 2000–2700 msm 16 Meiotic 
A. patagonica Phil. Argentina. Prov. Neuquén. Dpto. Zapala. Parque Nac. Laguna Blanca. 16-XII-1997. Xifreda & Sanso 2035 (SI) 16 Meiotic 
A. pseudospathulata Ehr. Bayer Argentina. Prov. Neuquén. Dpto. Chos- Malal. 14 km from Chos-Malal road to Andacollo. 12-XII-1997. Xifreda & Sanso 2004 (SI) 16 Meiotic 
A. pygmaea Herb. Argentina. Prov. Tucumán. Dpto. Trancas. Hualinchay. Near Rodeo Largo. c. 3500 msm. 15-XII-1995. Sanso & Pereyra 8 (SI) 16 Mitotic 

The Argentine Alstroemeria species were identified according to Sanso (1996) and those of Chile following Bayer (1987).

MEIOTIC STUDIES

For meiotic studies, flower buds were fixed in either ethanol–chloroform–glacial acetic acid (6 : 3 : 1), or in acetic acid–ethanol (1 : 3) for at least 24 h, and then transferred into 70% ethanol and stored at 4–5 °C until required. Immature anthers were squashed directly in propionic acid haematoxylin (2%) using ferric citrate as a mordant (Sáez, 1960). Meiosis was studied using a minimum of 25 pollen mother cells per plant.

Pollen stainability was studied with Alexander's differential staining (Alexander, 1969).

KARYOTYPE ANALYSIS

Karyotypes of A. pygmaea were obtained from mitosis of ovules and those of A. andina ssp. venustula from mitosis of anthers, both without pretreatment. Immature flower buds were fixed in ethanol–chloroform–glacial acetic acid (6 : 3 : 1), placed in 70% alcohol, and stored at 4–5 °C until required. Immature ovules were stained and squashed using propionic acid haematoxylin (2%).

The determination of karyotype parameters was carried out from enlarged photomicrographs of selected cells. Measurements were made on five cells, but the karyotype of A. pygmaea was described from ten mid-metaphases. As only one cell was considered for A. andina ssp. venustula karyotype data, standard errors in that case are not given. The mean chromosome length (CL) and centromeric index (CI) were calculated for each chromosome pair. The nomenclature and abbreviations used for the description of the chromosome morphology is that proposed by Levan et al. (1964). Chromosome pairs were aligned and numbered in order of their decreasing length. For each cell, values of CL were added to give the total chromosome length (TCL). The chromosome length percentage of TCL for each chromosome type (RL) was then calculated.

Intrachromosome asymmetry index, A1, and interchromosome asymmetry index, A2, two numerical parameters for the estimation of karyotype asymmetry, were calculated according to Romero Zarco (1986).

RESULTS

CHROMOSOME NUMBERS

All Alstroemeria plants studied were diploid with 2n = 2x = 16 chromosomes (Table 1), but some meiotic cells of A. hookeri ssp. cummingiana presented as many as two B chromosomes, either as univalents or forming a bivalent.

KARYOTYPE ANALYSES

The karyotype of Alstroemeria andina ssp. venustula is given in Figure 1A. Its formula is 3 m pairs, 1 sm pair and 4 t (1 t-st) with microsatellites observed on pairs n°3 and n°6 (Table 2). Chromosome lengths are from 5.55 μm to 22.78 μm. Pair n°1 constitutes about 29% of the total length of the chromosome complement and pairs n°1 and 2 are about 45% of it (Table 2). The sampled individual was apparently heterozygous for pair n°3, in relation to its length.

Figure 1.

Karyograms. A. Alstroemeria andina ssp. venustula (Fortunato & Kiesling 5630), from anther without pretreatment. B. Alstroemeria pygmaea Herb. (Sanso & Pereyra 8), from ovule without pretreatment. One of the first chromasome pairs was lost (from the cell analysed, but this absence is not typical of the whole plant).

Figure 1.

Karyograms. A. Alstroemeria andina ssp. venustula (Fortunato & Kiesling 5630), from anther without pretreatment. B. Alstroemeria pygmaea Herb. (Sanso & Pereyra 8), from ovule without pretreatment. One of the first chromasome pairs was lost (from the cell analysed, but this absence is not typical of the whole plant).

Table 2.

Centromere position, chromosome length (CL) and chromosome length percentage relative to TCL for each chromosome type (RL) of Alstroemeria andina ssp. venustula (A.a.v) and Alstroemeria pygmaea (A.p) haploid genomes. Average values (CL) and standard error (S.E., only for A. pygmaea) are presented

  CL (μm)
 
RL (%)
 
Chromosome pair Centromere position A.a.v. A.p. A.a.v A.p. 
22.78 28.67 ± 1.15 28.98 26.00 
m (A.a.v), sm (A.p12.50 19.33 ± 0.58 15.90 17.26 
t – with microsatellite 9.17 14.17 ± 0.29 11.67 12.65 
8.61 11.83 ± 0.29 10.95 10.56 
t (st) (A.a.v), t – with microsatellite (A.p8.05 10.33 ± 1.26 10.24 9.22 
t – with microsatellite 6.39 9.83 ± 0.29 8.13 8.78 
5.55 9.33 ± 0.58 7.06 8.33 
sm (A.a.v), sm-st (A.p5.55 8.50 ± 0.50 7.06 7.59 
  CL (μm)
 
RL (%)
 
Chromosome pair Centromere position A.a.v. A.p. A.a.v A.p. 
22.78 28.67 ± 1.15 28.98 26.00 
m (A.a.v), sm (A.p12.50 19.33 ± 0.58 15.90 17.26 
t – with microsatellite 9.17 14.17 ± 0.29 11.67 12.65 
8.61 11.83 ± 0.29 10.95 10.56 
t (st) (A.a.v), t – with microsatellite (A.p8.05 10.33 ± 1.26 10.24 9.22 
t – with microsatellite 6.39 9.83 ± 0.29 8.13 8.78 
5.55 9.33 ± 0.58 7.06 8.33 
sm (A.a.v), sm-st (A.p5.55 8.50 ± 0.50 7.06 7.59 
Table 2.

Centromere position, chromosome length (CL) and chromosome length percentage relative to TCL for each chromosome type (RL) of Alstroemeria andina ssp. venustula (A.a.v) and Alstroemeria pygmaea (A.p) haploid genomes. Average values (CL) and standard error (S.E., only for A. pygmaea) are presented

  CL (μm)
 
RL (%)
 
Chromosome pair Centromere position A.a.v. A.p. A.a.v A.p. 
22.78 28.67 ± 1.15 28.98 26.00 
m (A.a.v), sm (A.p12.50 19.33 ± 0.58 15.90 17.26 
t – with microsatellite 9.17 14.17 ± 0.29 11.67 12.65 
8.61 11.83 ± 0.29 10.95 10.56 
t (st) (A.a.v), t – with microsatellite (A.p8.05 10.33 ± 1.26 10.24 9.22 
t – with microsatellite 6.39 9.83 ± 0.29 8.13 8.78 
5.55 9.33 ± 0.58 7.06 8.33 
sm (A.a.v), sm-st (A.p5.55 8.50 ± 0.50 7.06 7.59 
  CL (μm)
 
RL (%)
 
Chromosome pair Centromere position A.a.v. A.p. A.a.v A.p. 
22.78 28.67 ± 1.15 28.98 26.00 
m (A.a.v), sm (A.p12.50 19.33 ± 0.58 15.90 17.26 
t – with microsatellite 9.17 14.17 ± 0.29 11.67 12.65 
8.61 11.83 ± 0.29 10.95 10.56 
t (st) (A.a.v), t – with microsatellite (A.p8.05 10.33 ± 1.26 10.24 9.22 
t – with microsatellite 6.39 9.83 ± 0.29 8.13 8.78 
5.55 9.33 ± 0.58 7.06 8.33 
sm (A.a.v), sm-st (A.p5.55 8.50 ± 0.50 7.06 7.59 

The karyotype of Alstroemeria pygmaea does not differ much from the above (Fig. 1B). It consists of two pairs of chromosomes with their centromeres in the median region (m), one with centromeres in the submedian region (sm), one with centromeres in the submedian-subterminal region (sm-st) and four with centromeres in the terminal region (t) (Table 2). Three of the t-chromosome pairs bear microsatellites on the short arm, pairs n°3, 5 and 6.

Chromosome pairs of A. pygmaea are very long, ranging from 8.50 ± 0.50 μm to 28.67 ± 1.15 μm in length (Table 2). The large size of chromosome pair n°1 is a striking peculiarity in all Alstroemeria species. Comparing it to the shortest pair, it was about 3.4 times longer than pair n°8. It was about one-and-a-half times the length of chromosome pair n°2, being about 9 μm longer. Values of chromosome asymmetry indexes were calculated: A1 = 0.59 and A2 = 0.47 (Table 3). The total chromosome length of A. andina ssp. venustula is smaller (157.2 μm) than in A. pygmaea (224 μm) but the interchromosome asymmetry is higher (A2 = 0.54) than that of A. pygmaea (Table 3).

Table 3.

Karyotype characteristics of Alstroemeria andina ssp. venustula and A. pygmaea. TCL: total chromosome length (2n); CL: average chromosome length; A1: intrachromosome asymmetry index; A2: interchromosome asymmetry index. Averages are indicated and SE only for A. pygmaea

Taxon A. andina ssp. venustula A. pygmaea 
2n 16 16 
Karyotype formulae 3 m + 1 sm + 3 t + 1 t (st) 2 m + 1 sm + 1 sm-st + 4 t 
Number of satellites observed 
TCL (μm) 157.2 224 ± 2.00 
CL (μm) 9.82 14 ± 0.25 
A1 Asymmetry Index 0.56 0.59 ± 0.02 
A2 Asymmetry Index 0.54 0.47 ± 0.02 
Length longest pair /Length shortest pair 4.10 3.45 ± 0.32 
Length pair n°1- Length pair n°2 (μm) 10.28 9.33 ± 1.53 
Taxon A. andina ssp. venustula A. pygmaea 
2n 16 16 
Karyotype formulae 3 m + 1 sm + 3 t + 1 t (st) 2 m + 1 sm + 1 sm-st + 4 t 
Number of satellites observed 
TCL (μm) 157.2 224 ± 2.00 
CL (μm) 9.82 14 ± 0.25 
A1 Asymmetry Index 0.56 0.59 ± 0.02 
A2 Asymmetry Index 0.54 0.47 ± 0.02 
Length longest pair /Length shortest pair 4.10 3.45 ± 0.32 
Length pair n°1- Length pair n°2 (μm) 10.28 9.33 ± 1.53 
Table 3.

Karyotype characteristics of Alstroemeria andina ssp. venustula and A. pygmaea. TCL: total chromosome length (2n); CL: average chromosome length; A1: intrachromosome asymmetry index; A2: interchromosome asymmetry index. Averages are indicated and SE only for A. pygmaea

Taxon A. andina ssp. venustula A. pygmaea 
2n 16 16 
Karyotype formulae 3 m + 1 sm + 3 t + 1 t (st) 2 m + 1 sm + 1 sm-st + 4 t 
Number of satellites observed 
TCL (μm) 157.2 224 ± 2.00 
CL (μm) 9.82 14 ± 0.25 
A1 Asymmetry Index 0.56 0.59 ± 0.02 
A2 Asymmetry Index 0.54 0.47 ± 0.02 
Length longest pair /Length shortest pair 4.10 3.45 ± 0.32 
Length pair n°1- Length pair n°2 (μm) 10.28 9.33 ± 1.53 
Taxon A. andina ssp. venustula A. pygmaea 
2n 16 16 
Karyotype formulae 3 m + 1 sm + 3 t + 1 t (st) 2 m + 1 sm + 1 sm-st + 4 t 
Number of satellites observed 
TCL (μm) 157.2 224 ± 2.00 
CL (μm) 9.82 14 ± 0.25 
A1 Asymmetry Index 0.56 0.59 ± 0.02 
A2 Asymmetry Index 0.54 0.47 ± 0.02 
Length longest pair /Length shortest pair 4.10 3.45 ± 0.32 
Length pair n°1- Length pair n°2 (μm) 10.28 9.33 ± 1.53 

MEIOSIS

Both Alstroemeria pseudospathulata (Figs 2–5) and A. patagonica (Figs 6,7) showed normal male meiotic behaviour, with eight bivalents of different morphologies at diakinesis and metaphase I, two of them easily discernable because of their notably larger size. These pairs usually form close bivalents, the largest one with three or more chiasmata. Bivalents present proximal, interstitial and terminal chiasmata.

Figures 2–7.

Meiotic chromosomes. Figs 2–5. Alstroemeria pseudospathulata (Xifreda & Sanso 2004). Figs 6,7. Alstroemeria patagonica (Xifreda & Sanso 2035). In all cases 8 II are seen, except in Fig. 5, which shows 7 II + 2 I. Figs 2,7. Metaphase I; the rest, diakinesis. Scale bar = 10 μm. All figures to same scale.

Figures 2–7.

Meiotic chromosomes. Figs 2–5. Alstroemeria pseudospathulata (Xifreda & Sanso 2004). Figs 6,7. Alstroemeria patagonica (Xifreda & Sanso 2035). In all cases 8 II are seen, except in Fig. 5, which shows 7 II + 2 I. Figs 2,7. Metaphase I; the rest, diakinesis. Scale bar = 10 μm. All figures to same scale.

The presence of supernumerary chromosomes is remarkable in A. hookeri ssp. recumbens (Figs 8,9), in which one or two B chromosomes could be detected in most of the cells of the accession studied. When two B chromosomes were observed, they could be seen as univalents (Fig. 9) or forming a bivalent. They are smaller (1.5–2.5 μm) than the A-chromosomes and at metaphase I they tended to be non-congressed.

Figures 8–15.

Meiotic chromosomes. Figs 8,9. Alstroemeria hookeri ssp. recumbens (P1995-5010). Fig. 8. 8 II, without B chromosomes. Fig. 9. 8 II + 2 B chromosomes (arrowheads). Figs 10–13. Alstroemeria pallida (P1995-5035). Figs 10–12. 8 II. Fig. 13. 7 II + 2 I. Figs 14,15. Alstroemeria hookeri ssp.cummingiana (P1995-5011). Fig. 14. Telophase I, bridge. Fig. 15. Tetrad with a micronucleus (arrowhead). Scale bar = 10 μm in Fig. 8. All figures to same scale.

Figures 8–15.

Meiotic chromosomes. Figs 8,9. Alstroemeria hookeri ssp. recumbens (P1995-5010). Fig. 8. 8 II, without B chromosomes. Fig. 9. 8 II + 2 B chromosomes (arrowheads). Figs 10–13. Alstroemeria pallida (P1995-5035). Figs 10–12. 8 II. Fig. 13. 7 II + 2 I. Figs 14,15. Alstroemeria hookeri ssp.cummingiana (P1995-5011). Fig. 14. Telophase I, bridge. Fig. 15. Tetrad with a micronucleus (arrowhead). Scale bar = 10 μm in Fig. 8. All figures to same scale.

The meiotic behaviour of A. pallida was fairly normal (Figs 10–13), but in a few cells 7 II + 2 I were observed (Fig. 13).

Meiotic irregularities at various stages were observed in A. hookeri ssp. cummingiana (Figs 14,15). Occasionally, at metaphase I, one or more bivalents were observed to be non-congressed. At telophase I, presence of bridges (Fig. 14), fragments and lagging chromosomes were relatively common. At the tetrad stage, a considerable percentage (11%) presented micronuclei (1–4, Table 4; Fig. 15); also some dyads showed micronuclei.

Table 4.

Numbers and percentage of tetrads with and without micronuclei in Alstroemeria hookeri ssp. cummingiana

Micronuclei number Total 
Tetrads number 696 69 16 783 
 – 79.31% 18.39% 1.15% 1.15%  
Percentage 88.89% 11.11% 100% 
Micronuclei number Total 
Tetrads number 696 69 16 783 
 – 79.31% 18.39% 1.15% 1.15%  
Percentage 88.89% 11.11% 100% 
Table 4.

Numbers and percentage of tetrads with and without micronuclei in Alstroemeria hookeri ssp. cummingiana

Micronuclei number Total 
Tetrads number 696 69 16 783 
 – 79.31% 18.39% 1.15% 1.15%  
Percentage 88.89% 11.11% 100% 
Micronuclei number Total 
Tetrads number 696 69 16 783 
 – 79.31% 18.39% 1.15% 1.15%  
Percentage 88.89% 11.11% 100% 

POLLEN STAINABILITY

The frequency of pollen grain stainability in the species that could be analysed was high, ranging from 87% (A. hookeri ssp. recumbens) to 94% (A. pseudospathulata), with intermediate values in A. pallida and A. patagonica (92%). Pollen stainability in Alstroemeria hookeri ssp. cummingiana was expected to be low because of the irregularities observed at male meiosis. Unfortunately, it could not be evaluated.

DISCUSSION

Chromosome data for all the taxa considered are given here for the first time. There is a previous record for A. hookeri (Tsuchiya & Hang 1989), but the authors did not indicate the provenance of the material studied or mention the existence of a voucher for it.

Alstroemeria may be considered chromosomally stable with a constancy of the chromosome number (2n = 16) and an asymmetrical complement. Alstroemeria pygmaea and A. andina ssp. venustula karyotypes are also asymmetrical, with large chromosomes as in the species studied previously: A. angustifolia ssp. angustifolia, A. aurea, A. brasiliensis, A. chilensis, A. haemantha, A. isabellana, A. magnifica ssp. magnifica, A. pelegrina, A. philippii and A. psittacina (Tsuchiya & Hang, 1989; Stephens et al., 1993; Buitendijk & Ramanna, 1996, Sanso & Hunziker, 1998). The only exception to the uniform basic karyotype structure is A. ligtu ssp. ligtu, which has a relatively symmetrical complement and an exceptional, large, metacentric chromosome 6 (Buitendijk & Ramanna, 1996).

Heterozygosity for some chromosome pairs in relation to the length, as in A. andina ssp. venustula, pair n°3, and/or satellite presence has been reported previously (Buitendijk & Ramanna, 1996; Sanso & Hunziker, 1998). Another kind of difference between homologous chromosomes of Alstroemeria is in the amount of heterochromatin (e.g. size and number of C-bands, Buitendijk & Ramanna, 1996)

It is clear that although chromosome sizes in Alstroemeria vary from species to species, they are karyotypically very similar in terms of relative size relationships between the chromosomes. The values obtained for species reported here were not significantly different from the values obtained for the species studied previously (Buitendijk & Ramanna, 1996; Sanso & Hunziker, 1998), with the exception of A. ligtu ssp. ligtu which differs from the other Alstroemeria species (Buitendijk & Ramanna, 1996). The proportion of the total complement occupied by the largest chromosome pair and the two largest ones varies between 21.4% and 36%, respectively, in A. aurea ((Buitendijk & Ramanna, 1996) to 28.98% and 45% in A. andina ssp. venustula (this paper), with the exception of A. ligtu ssp. ligtu (Buitendijk & Ramanna, 1996).

Between species, there is a considerable variation in nuclear DNA content, the amount of C-banded heterochromatin (Buitendijk & Ramanna, 1996; Buitendijk et al., 1997) and the presence or lack of satellites on several pairs of chromosomes. Two species differed by about a factor of two in the total chromosome length; A. magnifica = 116 μm (Buitendijk & Ramanna, 1996) and A. pygmaea = 224 μm (this paper), although this difference is perhaps overestimated because their chromosomes, obtained from anthers and ovules, did not receive pretreatment. However, in Alstroemeria, bimodal karyotypes occur despite these differences in the total chromosome length. It seems that in this group DNA has been added to the complements without altering the karyotype morphology too much.

Alstroemeria has special interest because of its large chromosomes and its asymmetric karyotypes. Bimodality is widespread and may represent a specialized kind of nuclear architecture that is selected for at the level of the genome, independently of genetic status (Kenton et al., 1990). The existence of taxa with similar bimodal karyotypes could be explained by karyotype orthoselection or karyotype conservation (White, 1973). In the first case, structural chromosome mutations occur in a characteristic way, while in the second case there is a lack of structural mutation preserving the existing chromosome morphology. In Alstroemeria, the species maintain their karyotypes’ asymmetry indexes A1 and A2, suggesting that some orthoselection mechanism is in process.

From a morphological-anatomical point of view, A. pygmaea falls clearly within the variation range of Alstroemeria (Sanso, 1996; Sanso & Xifreda, 1999). The karyotype of Alstroemeria pygmaea shares a further interesting similarity to those studied previously. Thus, to all existing arguments for not retaining Schickendantzia as a separate genus, we can add another one which obviously merges A. pygmaea with other Alstroemeria species, and does not further support its taxonomic uniqueness.

Supernumerary or B chromosomes are known to occur in a great number of plant and animal taxa. In Alstroemeria they have been reported previously only in A. angustifolia ssp. angustifolia, by Buitendijk & Ramanna (1996), who observed three at mitosis. B chromosomes have been found to have adaptative effects, conferring a superior fitness in some taxa (Jones & Rees, 1982; Holmes & Bougourd, 1989, 1991). The occurrence of B chromosomes may have played such a role in the colonization of different environments by some members of A. hookeri. Whether they are eventually lost or whether they persist over many generations is unknown. It would be interesting to carry out an extensive survey along the distribution areas of A. hookeri ssp. cummingiana, A. hookeri ssp. hookeri, A. hookeri ssp. maculata and A. hookeri ssp. recumbens in order to estimate the frequency of B chromosomes in the different natural populations of this species.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I am very grateful to Lone Aagesen for providing material cultivated at Copenhagen Botanical Garden (Denmark), Roberto Kiesling for material of Alstroemeria andina from San Juan (Argentina) and Arturo Wulff for his help in many ways. I am also especially grateful to Juan H. Hunziker for supervising the project and helpful suggestions on this manuscript. The financial support of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de Argentina (CONICET: Project PEI 0339/98) and the Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA: Project TW 057) to Juan H. Hunziker are gratefully acknowledged.

REFERENCES

Aagesen
L
,
Sanso
AM
1998
.
Phylogeny of the Alstroemeriaceae. Monocots II.
 
Second International Conference on the Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons.
 
Sydney
. Abstract:
61
.
Alexander
MP
1969
.
Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen.
Stain Technology
 
44
:
117
122
.4181665
Bayer
E
1987
.
Die Gattung Alstroemeria in Chile.
Mitteilungen der Botanischen Staatssammlung München
 
24
:
1
362
.
Bayer
E
1998
.
Alstroemeriaceae.
In:
Kubitzki
K
ed.
Families and genera of vascular plants 3.
  pp.
79
82
.
Berlin
:
Springer-Verlag
.
Buitendijk
JH
,
Boon
EJ
,
Ramanna
MS
1997
.
Nuclear DNA content in twelve species of Alstroemeria L. and some of their hybrids.
Annals of Botany
 
79
:
343
353
.
Buitendijk
JH
,
Ramanna
MS
1996
.
Giemsa C-banded karyotypes of eight species of Alstroemeria L. and some of their hybrids.
Annals of Botany
 
78
:
449
457
.
Dahlgren
RMT
,
Clifford
HT
,
Yeo
PF
1985
.
Alstroemeriaceae.
The families of the monocotyledons.
 
224
.
Berlin
:
Springer-Verlag
.
Holmes
DS
,
Bougourd
SM
1989
.
B-chromosome selection in Allium schoenoprasum I. Natural populations.
Heredity
 
63
:
83
87
.
Holmes
DS
,
Bougourd
SM
1991
.
B-chromosome selection in Allium schoenoprasum II. Natural populations.
Heredity
 
67
:
117
122
.
Jones
RN
,
Rees
H
1982
.
B chromosomes.
 
London
:
Academic Press
.
Kenton
A
,
Dickie
JB
,
Langton
DH
,
Bennett
MD
1990
.
Nuclear DNA amount and karyotype symmetry in Cypsella and Hesperoxiphion (Tigridiae; Iridaceae).
Evolutionary Trends in Plants
 
4
:
59
69
.
Kosenko
VN
1994
.
Morfologuia pilts semeistva Alstroemeriaceae.
Botanical Zhurnal
 
79
:
1
8
.
Levan
A
,
Fredga
K
,
Sandberg
AA
1964
.
Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes.
Hereditas
 
52
:
201
220
.
Romero Zarco
C
1986
.
A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry.
Taxon
 
35
:
526
530
.
Sáez
FA
1960
.
El empleo de la hematoxilina acética o propiónica para el estudio de los cromosomas con la técnica del aplastamiento.
 
Comunicación Sociedad Biológica Montevideo.
  Mimeographed.
Sanso
AM
1996
.
El género Alstroemeria (Alstroemeriaceae) en Argentina.
Darwiniana
 
34
:
349
382
.
Sanso
AM
,
Hunziker
JH
1998
.
Karyological studies in Alstroemeria and Bomarea (Alstroemeriaceae).
Hereditas
 
129
:
67
74
.
Sanso
AM
,
Xifreda
CC
1995
.
El género Bomarea (Alstroemeriaceae) en Argentina.
Darwiniana
 
33
:
315
336
.
Sanso
AM
,
Xifreda
CC
1998
.
Comparative foliar anatomy in Alstroemeriaceae. Monocots II.
Second International Conference on the Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons.
 
Sydney
.
Abstract
:
82
.
Sanso
AM
,
Xifreda
CC
1999
.
The synonymy of Schickendantzia with Alstroemeria (Alstroemeriaceae).
Systematics and Geography of Plants
 
68
:
315
323
.
Sanso
AM
,
Xifreda
CC
2001
.
Generic delimitation between Alstroemeria and Bomarea (Alstroemeriaceae).
Annals of Botany
 
88
:
1057
1069
.
Stephens
JL
,
Tsuchiya
T
,
Hughes
H
1993
.
Chromosome studies in Alstroemeria pelegrina L.
International Journal of Plant Sciences
 
154
:
565
571
.DOI: 10.1086/297139
Stevenson
DW
,
Loconte
H
1995
.
Cladistic analysis of monocot families.
In:
Rudall
PJ
,
Cribb
PJ
,
Cutler
DF
,
Humphries
CJ
eds.
Monocotyledons, systematics and evolution 2.
 
London
:
Kew
,
546
.
Tsuchiya
T
,
Hang
A
1989
.
Chromosome studies in genus Alstroemeria.
Herbertia
 
45
:
163
170
.
White
MJD
1973
.
Animal cytology and evolution.
 
Cambridge
:
Cambridge University Press
.