-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Le Thi Lien, Nguyen Thi Tho, Do Minh Ha, Pham Luong Hang, Phan Tuan Nghia, Nguyen Dinh Thang, Influence of phytochemicals in piper betle linn leaf extract on wound healing, Burns & Trauma, Volume 3, 2015, s41038–015–0023–7, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-015-0023-7
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Wound healing has being extensively investigated over the world. Healing impairment is caused by many reasons including increasing of free-radicals-mediated damage, delaying in granulation tissue formation, reducing in angiogenesis and decreasing in collagen reorganization. These facts consequently lead to chronic wound healing. Piper betle Linn (Betle) leaves have been folklore used as an ingredient of drugs for cutaneous wound treatment. However, the effect of betle leaf on wound healing is not yet well elucidated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the healing efficacy of methanol leaf extract of Piper betle Linn on proliferation of fibroblast NIH3T3 cells as well as full-thickness burn and excision wounds in swiss mice.
Scratch wound healing assays were conducted to examine the effects of betle leaf extract on healing activity of fibroblast cells. Burn and excision wounds on swiss mouse skins were created for investigating the wound healing progress caused by the betle leaf extract. Malondialdehyde (MDA) was also evaluated to examine the products of lipid hydroperoxide (LPO) under conditions of with or without betle leaf extract treatment.
The results of this study showed that Piper betle Linn leaf extract in methanol increased proliferation of NIH3T3 cells and promoted wound healing in vitro and in vivo with both burn wound and excision wound models. In addition, this extract significant decreased level of malondialdehyde (MDA) in liver of treated-mice compared with that in non-treated mice.
Our results suggest that Piper betle Linn can be used as an ingredient in developing natural origin drugs for treatment of cutaneous wounds.
Le Thi Lien and Nguyen Thi Tho contributed equally to this work.
Background
The skin is one of the largest organs and plays important biological roles in the body. Skin contributes in maintaining the fluid homeostasis, regulating the thermo effects, sending sensory signals to the brain, and metabolizing various substances [1, 2]. The skin is also the first barrier to protect the body against the infections from the environment. Any damage of this physical barrier may lead to attacks of pathogens and consequently cause infection in the body [1, 2]. Healing impairment is caused by many reasons including increasing in free-radicals-mediated damage, delaying in granulation tissue formation, reducing in angiogenesis and decreasing in collagen reorganization. These facts consequently led to chronic wound healing [3, 4].
Several plants and their products are used in folk medicine to treat wounds [4–8]. Piper betle Linn is a member of Piperaceae family and to be cultivated in most of South and Southeast Asia including Vietnam. It could be used as an ingredient in drugs because of its medicinal properties. Betle leaves contain main chemical components such as betal-phenol, chavicol and other phenolic compounds. These components might give strong potentials in anti-fungi, anti-bacteria properties of betle [9]. Betle leaf also has been reported that it exhibit potentials in wound healing treatment and other diseases [10–16]. However, the effect of betle leaf on wound healing is not yet well examined.
Topical anti-bacterial agents and disinfectants are good in protecting against infection; however these agents may cause the allergic reactions and skin irritations and result in the rate of skin regeneration and increases the recovery time [17, 18]. Although there are modern methods such as recombinant growth factors and tissue-engineered wound dressings used for wound treatments, they are so expensive for patients in the low-income countries. Therefore, in developing countries, many drugs originated from medicinal plants are being used as alternative and complementary systems of medicines to treat wounds and several wound healing processing diseases [4–8].
Hence, the present study was undertaken to examine the influence of methanol betle leaf extract on proliferation of fibroblast NIH3T3 cells and healing of burn and excision wounds in swiss mice.
Methods
Plant material
Piper betle Linn (Betle) leaves were collected from Vietnam Pharmacy Institute in September 2013 and identified at the Department of Biochemistry and Plant physiology, Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Preparation of leaf extract

The scheme of leaf extraction procedure with three types of organic solvents including n-hexane, EtOAc and Methanol
Consecutive extraction efficiency of phytochemicals from Polygonum multiflorum in three different solvents including n-Hexane, EtOAc and MeOH
Name . | Total wet weight (gram) . | Total dry weight (gram) . | Dry extract weight (gram)/10g dry weight . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n-Hexane . | EtOAc . | MeOH . | |||
Piper betle L. | 400 | 77.6 | 1.07 | 2.89 | 1.40 |
Name . | Total wet weight (gram) . | Total dry weight (gram) . | Dry extract weight (gram)/10g dry weight . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n-Hexane . | EtOAc . | MeOH . | |||
Piper betle L. | 400 | 77.6 | 1.07 | 2.89 | 1.40 |
Consecutive extraction efficiency of phytochemicals from Polygonum multiflorum in three different solvents including n-Hexane, EtOAc and MeOH
Name . | Total wet weight (gram) . | Total dry weight (gram) . | Dry extract weight (gram)/10g dry weight . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n-Hexane . | EtOAc . | MeOH . | |||
Piper betle L. | 400 | 77.6 | 1.07 | 2.89 | 1.40 |
Name . | Total wet weight (gram) . | Total dry weight (gram) . | Dry extract weight (gram)/10g dry weight . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n-Hexane . | EtOAc . | MeOH . | |||
Piper betle L. | 400 | 77.6 | 1.07 | 2.89 | 1.40 |
Drug formulations
Drug formulation was prepared from methanol extract. For topical administration, 5 g of the methanol extracts was separately incorporated with 100 g of 2 % sodium alginate to get 5 % w/w gel. The drug formulation was prepared every fourth day. The drug was daily administered on mice.
Cell culture
Fibroblasts (NIH3T3) (Riken Bioresource Center, Japan) was cultured in DMEM with 10 % FBS supplemented with 10 % Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and 1 % Penicillin/Streptomycin at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 on collagen-coated dishes [19].
Crystal violet assay
Crystal violet assay was performed using the method previously described in our reports [20, 21]. Briefly, cells (3 × 104 cells) were plated in six-well plates and cultured for 24 h. Cells were then treated with or without methanol extract of betle and cultured for further 3 days. The viable adherent cells were fixed with 10 % formalin and stained with 0.1 % crystal violet. Absorbance at 595 nm in the stained cells solubilized with 0.1 % SDS was measured using a microplate reader.
Scratch wounding assay
Cell wound healing was performed as described previously studies [20, 22]. Six-well plates were incubated overnight in 1 mL of RPMI 1640 media containing collagen at 40 μg/ml. Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (10 % FBS) in the collagen-coated plate until the cell confluence reached to more than 90 %. Scratch wounds were created in confluent monolayers using a sterile p200 pipette tip. After that, cell plate was washed three times with PBS to remove the suspended cells. Then, the wounded monolayers were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium. After incubation for 24 h, repopulations of the wounded areas were observed under microscope (OLYMPUS). The migration distances of cells into the scratching areas were measured and calculated.
Animals
Swiss mice weighing 15–20 g were purchased from Vietnam National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi and maintained at standard housing conditions. The animals were fed with a commercial diet [23] (also from the Vietnam National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology) and water. The Vietnam National University Ethical Committee permitted the study.
Evaluation of wound healing activity
For the assessment of the wound-healing activity, burn and excision wound models were used [24, 25]. Three groups, each containing five animals, including control group (group I), burn wound group (group II) and excision wound group (group III) were used. Fifty milligrams (50 mg) of the formulated drug was topically applied for each animal once a day. The Group I animals were treated by topical applications of 5 % w/w gel, while the Groups II and III animals were treated with ethanol extracts. The animals were anesthetized as described by Morton and Malone [24] using diethylether (C2H5OC2H5). For the excision wound model, the skin of the impressed area of mouse was excised to full thickness to obtain a wound area of about 120 mm2 [24]. For burn wound model, full-thickness burn wound was created by using an aluminum metal rod (diameter 120 mm × 100 mm) heated to 90 °C. Hot rod was exposed on the shaved area in the skin of mouse for 20 s. The drug was topically applied once a day till complete epithelialization, starting from the day of the operation. Then, wound areas and wound epithelizations were measured at regular intervals of time to see the percentage of wound closure and formation of new epithelial tissues. The percentages of wound closure were recorded on days 2, 4, 6 and 3, 7, 15 for burn wounds and excision wounds, respectively.
MDA analysis
After wounds were totally healed, mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine and sacrificed. Liver and soft leg tissues were collected and stored as frozen tissues in liquid nitrogen for biochemically MDA analysis. Tissue samples (300 mg for each) were homogenized in ice-cold tamponade containing 150 mM KCl for determination of MDA. MDA levels were assayed for products of lipid hydroperoxide (LPO). MDA was measured with thiobarbituric acid at 532 nm using a spectrofluorometer, as described previously [26, 27].
Statistical analysis
In this study, all experiments were repeated three times and collected data were statistical analysis with suitable methods. To compare two groups, Mann–Whitney U-test was used in case of non-parametric and Student’s t-test was used for parametric. To compare multi groups with control group, one-way ANOVA analysis and Dunnett post-hoc test were used. To assess the combination effect of two factors, two-way ANOVA with replication analysis and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test were used. The significant differences were set at three levels with P < 0.05 [20].
Results
Betle promoted proliferation of fibroblast NIH3T3 cells

Effect of methanol leaf extract at various concentrations on proliferation of NIH3T3 cells were presented in photos (a) and a graph (b). Leaf extract concentration tested including: 0.25 μg/mL (lane 1), 0.5 μg/mL (lane 2), 1.0 μg/mL (lane 3), 2.5 μg/mL (lane 4), 5.0 μg/mL (lane 5), 10.0 μg/mL (lane 6), 20.0 μg/mL (lane7). * and **Significantly different (p < 0.05, and 0.01, respectively) from the control by the one-way ANOVA analysis and Dunett post-hoc test
Betle increased healing rate of scratch wound in vitro

Effect of methanol leaf extract on scratch wound healing of NIH3T3 cells were presented in photos (a) and a graph (b). Leaf extract concentration tested including: 0.0 μg/mL, and 5.0 μg/mL. * and **Significantly different (p < 0.05, and 0.01, respectively) from the control by the Mann–Whitney U-test
Betle increased healing rate of burn wounds in swiss mice

Effects of methanol leaf extract (5 % w/w gel) on burn wound healing were presented in photos (a) and a graph (b). ** and ***Significantly different (p < 0.01, and 0.001, respectively) from the control by two-way ANOVA with replication analysis and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test
Betle increased healing rate of excision wounds in swiss mice

Effects of methanol leaf extract (5 % w/w gel) on excision wound healing were presented in photos (a, c) and a graph (b). ***, Significantly different (p < 0.001) from the control by two-way ANOVA with replication analysis and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test
Betle decreased activity of MDA

Effects of leaf extract (5 % w/w gel) on concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA) in liver tissues (a) and leg soft tissues (b) of non-treated (NC) and betle-treated mices were examined by MDA analysis. **, Significantly different (p < 0.01) from the control by Student’s t-test
Discussion
In this study, we consecutively used three organic solvents with gradually increase in polarity including n-hexane, ethylacetate and methanol to extract phytochemicals in the betle. In generally, the two first solvents of n-hexane and ethylacetate are used to eliminate of substances which have non- or low- biological activities from the samples before extracting in methanol to collect substances which have biological activities. And then, we had tried to investigate the effects of not only methanol extract but also n-hexane and ethylacetate extracts on NIH3T3 cells, however, it was not showed the impressive effects of n-hexane and ethylacetate extracts on the cells (data not shown).
However, our in vitro results of this study showed that at the concentrations of 2.5-5 μg/mL betle leaf extract in methanol had positive effects on proliferation of NIH3T3 cells. Basing on this, we chose the concentration of 5 % (v/v) of drug gel for in vivo experiments but not perform a real dose-dependent curve to obtain EC50 and EC05. Because our methanol extract used in this study was still in crude form (i.e., there may have many substances in the extract). It was not so important to determine the very precise concentration of the crude extract; however this kind of experiment should be done in case of using single substance. Therefore, we followed the previous reports [1, 2, 5, 6] to select the concentration of extract for in vivo experiments as about 10 times higher than that used for in vitro experiments (5 % V/V).
Our in vivo experiments revealed that betle leaf extract gel significantly increased healing rates of burn wounds and excision wounds in swiss mice. Moreover, statistical results by two-way Anova with replication analysis and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test showed that burn wound healing were affected by both leaf extract and treatment time and there were interaction between these two factors in both cases of burn wound (Fig. 4) and excision wound (Fig. 5). In the case of burn wound, it was also indicated that betle leaf extract had the strongest effect on wound healing in the period of 2–4 days post wound making (PWM), followed by periods of 0–2 days PWM the smallest effect in the period of 4–6 days PWM with significant differences (Table 2). In the case of excision wound, in the period of 0–3 days PWM, there was no difference in wound healing rate between control groups and treated groups; however, at the period of 3–7 days PWM, the effect of betle leaf extract was strongest and followed by period of 7–15 days PWM with significant differences (Table 3). These statistic results may suggest a hint that we can screen various leaf extracts on wound healing activities and determine the wound healing effects of these extracts at different periods during treatment times to develop an optimum clinical protocol by changing or combining of these various leaf extracts.
Two-way Anova with replication analysis and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test showed combination effects of leaf extract and treatment time on burn wound healing
Day 0 | Day 2 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 120 | 94.8 | −25.2 | 12.4 |
TR | 120 | 82.4 | −37.6 | |
Day 2 | Day 4 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 94.8 | 74.4 | −20.4 | 23.0 |
TR | 82.4 | 39 | −43.4 | |
Day 4 | Day 6 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 74.4 | 67 | −7.4 | 8.4 |
TR | 39 | 23.2 | −15.8 |
Day 0 | Day 2 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 120 | 94.8 | −25.2 | 12.4 |
TR | 120 | 82.4 | −37.6 | |
Day 2 | Day 4 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 94.8 | 74.4 | −20.4 | 23.0 |
TR | 82.4 | 39 | −43.4 | |
Day 4 | Day 6 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 74.4 | 67 | −7.4 | 8.4 |
TR | 39 | 23.2 | −15.8 |
Two-way Anova with replication analysis and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test showed combination effects of leaf extract and treatment time on burn wound healing
Day 0 | Day 2 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 120 | 94.8 | −25.2 | 12.4 |
TR | 120 | 82.4 | −37.6 | |
Day 2 | Day 4 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 94.8 | 74.4 | −20.4 | 23.0 |
TR | 82.4 | 39 | −43.4 | |
Day 4 | Day 6 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 74.4 | 67 | −7.4 | 8.4 |
TR | 39 | 23.2 | −15.8 |
Day 0 | Day 2 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 120 | 94.8 | −25.2 | 12.4 |
TR | 120 | 82.4 | −37.6 | |
Day 2 | Day 4 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 94.8 | 74.4 | −20.4 | 23.0 |
TR | 82.4 | 39 | −43.4 | |
Day 4 | Day 6 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 74.4 | 67 | −7.4 | 8.4 |
TR | 39 | 23.2 | −15.8 |
Two-way Anova with replication analysis and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test showed combination effects of extract and treatment time on excision wound healing
Day 0 | Day 3 | Line segment slope | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 120 | 110 | −10 | 0 |
TR | 120 | 110 | −10 | |
Day 3 | Day 7 | Line segment slope | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 110 | 85.8 | −34.2 | 18.6 |
TR | 110 | 67.2 | −52.8 | |
Day 7 | Day 15 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 85.8 | 22 | −63.8 | 3.8 |
TR | 67.2 | 7.2 | −60 |
Day 0 | Day 3 | Line segment slope | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 120 | 110 | −10 | 0 |
TR | 120 | 110 | −10 | |
Day 3 | Day 7 | Line segment slope | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 110 | 85.8 | −34.2 | 18.6 |
TR | 110 | 67.2 | −52.8 | |
Day 7 | Day 15 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 85.8 | 22 | −63.8 | 3.8 |
TR | 67.2 | 7.2 | −60 |
Two-way Anova with replication analysis and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test showed combination effects of extract and treatment time on excision wound healing
Day 0 | Day 3 | Line segment slope | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 120 | 110 | −10 | 0 |
TR | 120 | 110 | −10 | |
Day 3 | Day 7 | Line segment slope | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 110 | 85.8 | −34.2 | 18.6 |
TR | 110 | 67.2 | −52.8 | |
Day 7 | Day 15 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 85.8 | 22 | −63.8 | 3.8 |
TR | 67.2 | 7.2 | −60 |
Day 0 | Day 3 | Line segment slope | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 120 | 110 | −10 | 0 |
TR | 120 | 110 | −10 | |
Day 3 | Day 7 | Line segment slope | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 110 | 85.8 | −34.2 | 18.6 |
TR | 110 | 67.2 | −52.8 | |
Day 7 | Day 15 | Line segment slopes | Absolute difference between slopes | |
NC | 85.8 | 22 | −63.8 | 3.8 |
TR | 67.2 | 7.2 | −60 |
Conclusions
In this preliminary research, we also found that betle can induce proliferation of fibroblast cells and promote wound healing in swiss mice but not caused to any strange behavior or phenomenon of treated mice. Moreover, it was revealed the fact that betle promoted wound healing progression with lowering levels of MDA in liver and leg soft tissues of treated mice.
Taken together, our results suggest that Piper betle can be used in alternative and complementary systems to improve efficacy of medicines used for cutaneous wound treatment.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research under grant number KLEPT-14-02.
Financial disclosure
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
Rahman SA. Anti-ulcer effects of Piper betel, Solanum nigrum and Zingibercassumunar on ulceration induced by selected ulcerogens in rats. Master’s thesis, University Putra Malaysia. 2009;pp. 4.
Competing interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Authors’ contributions
NDT: conception and experimental design, writing of the manuscript, manuscript revision and funding body. LTL, NTT and DMH: experimental performing, collection and analysis of data. PTN: interpretation of data and preparation of the manuscript. PLH: Help to revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.