-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Silvio Waisbord, Why Populism is Troubling for Democratic Communication, Communication, Culture and Critique, Volume 11, Issue 1, March 2018, Pages 21–34, https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcx005
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
In this article, I argue that populism has a troubling relationship with democratic communication. As illustrated by contemporary Latin American cases, populism’s illiberalism is contrary to the existence of the communication commons—a public space characterized by diversity, tolerance, reason, and facts. It is grounded in a binary, agonistic view of politics; an understanding of “the people” as a unified subject; and espousal of post-truth politics. With its brand of divisive politics, populism is unfit to address central communicative challenges of contemporary multicultural democracies. Critical communication scholarship needs to engage both with the rise of populism as well as the challenges for progressive communication amid a toxic atmosphere of intolerance and the balkanization of the public sphere.