1-20 of 11492
Image
Exemplar Results that Illustrate Benchmarks 7, 9, 11, and 15. Note...
Published: 10 March 2025
Fig. 3.
Exemplar Results that Illustrate Benchmarks 7, 9, 11, and 15. Note . Panel a) Adapted from results reported in Andrade and Donaldson (2007) for Experiment 2 (mean percent correct scores + standard deviations). Panel b) Figure adapted from recognition testing results reported in Annett et al. (19
Image
Summary of Systematic Review Results for 21 WM Benchmarks. Note. S...
Published: 10 March 2025
Fig. 4.
Summary of Systematic Review Results for 21 WM Benchmarks. Note. Summary of results from an evaluation of the 21 “A” WM benchmarks outlined by Oberauer et al. (2018a) with the olfactory literature, numbered as detailed in the text. Supported benchmarks are coded in black, and unsupported benchma
Journal Article
A cognitive nose? Evaluating working memory benchmarks in the olfactory domain
Chemical Senses, Volume 50, 2025, bjaf008, https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaf008
Published: 10 March 2025
Image
Flowchart of search and article screening procedure.
Published: 10 March 2025
Fig. 1.
Flowchart of search and article screening procedure.
Image
Exemplar results that illustrate benchmarks 1, 3, 4, and 5. Note. ...
Published: 10 March 2025
Fig. 2.
Exemplar results that illustrate benchmarks 1, 3, 4, and 5. Note . a) Set-size effects on accuracy (adapted from Jones et al. 1978 ). b) Verbal WM performance, as reported by Peterson and Peterson (1959) , with additional data points reflecting OWM performance in Wenzel et al. (2021) . c) Result
Image
Color-coded T-maps of ROI activation per odor condition compared with REST,...
Published: 18 February 2025
Fig. 5.
Color-coded T-maps of ROI activation per odor condition compared with REST, overlaid onto the mean anatomical image at T = 3.45 ( P = 0.001). Named ROIs denote significant clusters (qFDR < 0.05). Signification activations (indicated in yellow) for all odors were found in the SMA. Significant d
Image
Overview of fMRI trial. A trial started with a cue that the odor would be r...
Published: 18 February 2025
Fig. 2.
Overview of fMRI trial. A trial started with a cue that the odor would be released, followed by the odor presentation. In some of the trials, participants were asked to rate intensity or liking of the odor stimuli, in all trials there was a waiting period.
Journal Article
Perceptual differences in olfactory fat discrimination are not detected in neural activation
Chemical Senses, Volume 50, 2025, bjaf007, https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaf007
Published: 18 February 2025
Image
Study design overview. First, participants underwent screening and training...
Published: 18 February 2025
Fig. 1.
Study design overview. First, participants underwent screening and training, along with discrimination testing aimed at assessing their orthonasal fat content discrimination ability. The fMRI session was aimed at measuring brain responses resulting from orthonasal exposure to the three milk samples.
Image
Boxplots of R-index analysis results. Dashed line indicates the discriminat...
Published: 18 February 2025
Fig. 3.
Boxplots of R-index analysis results. Dashed line indicates the discrimination cutoff at P < 0.001. L-M = low fat compared with medium fat samples; L-H = low fat compared with high fat samples; M-H = medium fat compared with high fat samples. All 3 odors could be discriminated from each other.
Image
Boxplots of odor intensity (left) and liking ratings (right) for the 3 odor...
Published: 18 February 2025
Fig. 4.
Boxplots of odor intensity (left) and liking ratings (right) for the 3 odors. Asterisks denote statistically significant ( P < 0.05) differences between means (L = low fat, M = medium fat, H = high fat). Intensity of the L odor was rated significantly lower than that of the M odor, but not than
Image
Boxplots of parameter estimates associated with ROI brain activation per od...
Published: 18 February 2025
Fig. 6.
Boxplots of parameter estimates associated with ROI brain activation per odor condition compared with REST. Yellow colored boxes indicate positive parameter estimates (i.e. activation vs. rest); blue boxes indicate negative parameter estimates (i.e. deactivation vs. rest).
Journal Article
Innate liking and disgust reactions elicited by intraoral capsaicin in male mice Get access
Chemical Senses, Volume 50, 2025, bjaf006, https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaf006
Published: 15 February 2025
Image
Capsaicin of low and medium concentrations elicits liking reactions. (A) R... Get access
Published: 15 February 2025
Figure 1.
Capsaicin of low and medium concentrations elicits liking reactions. (A) Representative time-lapse sequences of tongue protrusion during the intraoral infusion of capsaicin. The numbers at the bottom of each panel indicate the elapsed time (milliseconds). Scale bar, 5 mm. (B) Relationship between
Image
The mechanistic relationship between liking reactions and disgust reactions... Get access
Published: 15 February 2025
Figure 3.
The mechanistic relationship between liking reactions and disgust reactions is dynamically regulated depending on the solution concentration. (A) Relationship between liking reaction scores (red) and disgust reactions (black) during intraoral infusion of capsaicin (circles) and citric acid (triangl
Image
Various reactions consisting capsaicin-induced disgust reactions show a sim... Get access
Published: 15 February 2025
Figure 4.
Various reactions consisting capsaicin-induced disgust reactions show a similar direction of change as the increase of capsaicin concentration. (A, B) Diagrams explaining that multiple orofacial and somatic reactions that comprise each of the liking (A) and disgust (B) reactions should show a simil
Image
Increase of capsaicin-induced disgust reactions accompanies with decrease o... Get access
Published: 15 February 2025
Figure 5.
Increase of capsaicin-induced disgust reactions accompanies with decrease or constant of liking reactions and neutral reactions. (A, B) Diagrams explaining that when the liking reaction ( A ) or disgust reaction ( B ) increases, another reaction and a neutral reaction should remain unchanged or cha
Image
Capsaicin induces various disgust reactions in a concentration-dependent ma... Get access
Published: 15 February 2025
Figure 6.
Capsaicin induces various disgust reactions in a concentration-dependent manner. (A-E) The ratio of gape ( A ), chin rub ( B ), head shake ( C ), face wash ( D ), and forelimb flail ( E ) among all disgust reactions induced by capsaicin ( n = 8 mice from 6 independent experiments), quinine ( n =
Image
Capsaicin of increasing concentration elicits more disgust reactions. (A) ... Get access
Published: 15 February 2025
Figure 2.
Capsaicin of increasing concentration elicits more disgust reactions. (A) Representative time-lapse sequences of disgust reactions during the intraoral infusion of capsaicin. The numbers at the bottom of each panel indicate the elapsed time (milliseconds). G, gape; HS, head shake; FW, face wash; CR
Journal Article
Functional characterization of Type IV basal cells in rat fungiform taste buds Get access
Chemical Senses, Volume 50, 2025, bjaf005, https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaf005
Published: 14 February 2025
