Abstract

Background

We examined the risk of sepsis within 90 days after discharge from a previous hospital stay by type of antibiotic received during the previous stay.

Methods

We retrospectively identified a cohort of hospitalized patients from the Truven Health MarketScan Hospital Drug Database. We examined the association between the use of certain antibiotics during the initial hospital stay, determined a priori, and the risk of postdischarge sepsis controlling for potential confounding factors in a multivariable logistic regression model. Our primary exposure was receipt of antibiotics more strongly associated with clinically important microbiome disruption. Our primary outcome was a hospital stay within 90 days of the index stay that included an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis (ICD-9-CM code 995.92) or septic shock (785.52).

Results

Among 516 hospitals, we randomly selected a single stay for eligible patients. In 0.17% of these patients, severe sepsis/septic shock developed within 90 days after discharge. The risk of sepsis associated with exposure to our high-risk antibiotics was 65% higher than in those without antibiotic exposure.

Conclusions

Our study identified an increased risk of sepsis within 90 days of discharge among patients with exposure to high-risk antibiotics or increased quantities of antibiotics during hospitalization. Given that a significant proportion of inpatient antimicrobial use may be unnecessary, this study builds on previous evidence suggesting that increased stewardship efforts in hospitals may not only prevent antimicrobial resistance, Clostridium difficile infection, and other adverse effects, but may also reduce unwanted outcomes potentially related to disruption of the microbiota, including sepsis.

Sepsis is a life-threatening clinical syndrome characterized by acute organ dysfunction resulting from infection and a major contributor to excess morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs [1]. Nearly one-quarter of sepsis cases have suspected gastrointestinal or an unknown source of infection [2–4]. In addition, there is a long-recognized role for the middle and lower gastrointestinal tract microbiota in the regulation of the immune response, specifically in sepsis [5–7]. Emerging evidence shows that major disruptive forces, such as antibiotics, can lead to shifts in the microbiota that have greater pathogenic potential [8, 9], possibly leading to bacterial translocation [10, 11], a dysregulated immune response [5], or both.

Antibiotics are essential treatments for many hospitalized patients. More than half of hospitalized patients receive an antibiotic [12, 13], but an estimated 30%–50% of antibiotic use in hospitals is inappropriate [13, 14]. Widespread use of antibiotics not only leads to selection for drug resistance and increases risk for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) but also may increase a patient’s risk for later development of sepsis [15]. Prescott et al [16] observed an increase in sepsis after hospital discharge for patients with either an infection-related hospitalization or hospitalization with CDI, which they suggested may be due to a distortion of the microbiota, at least partially by antibiotics. It is important to understand the association between antibiotic administration and sepsis and, if a causal association exists, accurately estimate the effect size of antibiotics in precipitating sepsis.

In the current study, our objective was to examine the risk of sepsis within 90 days after discharge among a cohort of US hospitalized patients, according to receipt during a previous hospitalization of antibiotics categorized a priori based on their propensity to disrupt the microbiome in a clinically important way.

METHODS

Data Sources

Adult hospital discharge and drug use data was obtained from the Truven Health MarketScan Hospital Drug Database (HDD), which contains individual billing records for all patients from approximately 500 hospitals. The use of this database to estimate US antimicrobial usage has been described elsewhere and been shown to be representative of acute care hospitals in the United States [12, 13, 17]. Because the information required to follow up individuals longitudinally changed from 2010 to 2011, we included hospital admissions for all patients discharged during 2 time periods, from 1 January 2007 through 30 September 2010 and from 1 January 2011 through 30 September 2014. Similar to the procedure used in a previous study [12], for each hospitalization we identified patient demographic and clinical information from the discharge billing data and antibiotic doses administered from the drug utilization data. We also categorized antibiotic doses into 14 classes: aminoglycoside, first- or second-generation cephalosporin, third- or fourth-generation cephalosporin, lincosamide, fluoroquinolone, macrolide, vancomycin, sulfa, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, carbapenem, penicillin, tetracycline, metronidazole, and miscellaneous. We excluded drugs with nonoral, nonparental routes of administration.

Study Settings and Patients

Patients aged ≥18 years with an inpatient stay were included. For patients with multiple hospital stays within the study period, one stay was randomly selected as the index stay for each patient. Patients with previously documented sepsis or sepsis documented during the index stay and who died during the index stay or in the hospital within the 90 days after a nonsepsis outcome were excluded. We excluded childbirth-related inpatient stays (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] codes V30-V39).

Exposures

Antibiotic exposures were identified from the selected index hospital stay and stratified into 3 groups of a priori risk based on published epidemiologic strength of association with CDI, which was considered a marker for intestinal microbiota disruption with demonstrated clinical importance [18, 19]. Because the intrinsic activity of an antibiotic against C. difficile may reduce this association by suppressing C. difficile while the patient is receiving the antibiotic, oral vancomycin was moved to a higher category of risk than would be suggested by its association with CDI, reflecting recent data demonstrating its profound microbiota-disruption potential [20]. High-risk exposures included receipt of third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, lincosamides, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, oral vancomycin, and carbapenems [21, 22]. Low-risk exposures included receipt of first- or second-generation cephalosporins, macrolide, tetracycline, metronidazole, and sulfa without receipt of a high-risk antibiotic. Control exposures included receipt of an aminoglycoside, penicillin or intravenous vancomycin (antibiotics that minimally disrupt gastrointestinal flora), without receipt of intermediate- or high-risk antibiotics. Finally, we compared the risk of sepsis in exposed patients to patients without exposure to any antibiotic, our reference group.

Outcome

Our primary outcome (severe sepsis) was a hospital stay within 90 days of the index stay that included an ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis (ICD-9-CM code 995.92) or septic shock (785.52), identified in any position on the hospital discharge bill. We evaluated a secondary outcome (sepsis), using a published definition for hospital administrative data [23], which requires ICD-9-CM codes for both infection and acute organ dysfunction within the same hospitalization or a sepsis specific diagnosis [23]. This definition was previously validated against chart review with high specificity and sensitivity [24]. For 1 data source within the HDD, admission dates are masked; therefore, instead of within 90 days, stays within the 2 months after the discharge month were identified.

Statistical Analysis

Univariate comparisons of exposure and outcome groups were conducted using a χ2 test for categorical variables. To evaluate the risk of sepsis by exposure group, we conducted a multivariable logistic regression model comparing the odds of sepsis for those with high- and low-risk antibiotic exposures to control antibiotic exposures and those without any antibiotic agent exposures. In addition, we evaluated the dose-response relationship in multivariable logistic models, which included either the total duration of antibiotic therapy (in days) or the number of antibiotic classes the patient received during the index stay as dose-response variables. All models included patient demographic and clinical characteristics from their index stay, including sex, age category, length of stay, primary payer, previous hospitalization, comorbidity score [25], certain chronic conditions, as determined through ICD-9-CM codes (Table 1), diagnosis-related group type, admission from the emergency room, critical care admission, index stay month and year, and hospital characteristics (bed size, urban or rural location, teaching status, and census division). We also conducted a similar analysis that used any readmission within 90 days as the outcome rather than either of the sepsis outcomes.

Table 1.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients by Antibacterial Risk Groupa

CharacteristicPatients, No. (%)
No AntibacterialHigh-Risk AntibacterialLow-Risk AntibacterialControl Antibacterial
All patients5443331 (42.8)3571964 (28.1)3037618 (23.9)653610 (5.1)
Severe sepsis/septic shockb6220 (0.1)11510 (0.3)2863 (0.1)517 (0.1)
Sepsisc30114 (0.6)46509 (1.3)12884 (0.4)2381 (0.4)
Sexd
 Male2200860 (40.4)1513291 (42.4)1079404 (35.5)125154 (19.1)
 Female3242471 (59.6)2058673 (57.6)1958214 (64.5)528456 (80.9)
Age, yd
 18–452124939 (39.0)962866 (27.0)1150774 (37.9)436453 (66.8)
 45–55804304 (14.8)540402 (15.1)441473 (14.5)44241 (6.8)
 55–65792920 (14.6)585951 (16.4)493663 (16.3)54316 (8.3)
 65–75708661 (13.0)577380 (16.2)485401 (16.0)55991 (8.6)
 75–85654360 (12.0)558486 (15.6)343580 (11.3)45671 (7.0)
 ≥85358147 (6.6)346879 (9.7)122727 (4.0)16938 (2.6)
Length of stay, dd
 1–33962918 (72.8)1680801 (47.1)2010098 (66.2)513705 (78.6)
 4–6980109 (18.0)1032770 (28.9)697238 (23.0)93555 (14.3)
 7–10317700 (5.8)489645 (13.7)221196 (7.3)30099 (4.6)
 ≥11182604 (3.4)368748 (10.3)109086 (3.6)16251 (2.5)
Duration of therapy, dd
 05443331 (100)000
 1–20818936 (22.9)1999401 (65.8)490392 (75.0)
 3–601421841 (39.8)891584 (29.4)141357 (21.6)
 7–130914789 (25.6)123828 (4.1)18606 (2.9)
 ≥140416398 (11.7)22805 (0.8)3255 (0.5)
Comorbidity scored
 Missing1646636 (30.3)795458 (22.3)1203561 (39.6)397237 (60.8)
 0629472 (11.6)423018 (11.8)338376 (11.1)38112 (5.8)
 11142711 (21.0)757460 (21.2)533573 (17.6)92480 (14.2)
 2561470 (10.3)433523 (12.1)200985 (6.6)30276 (4.6)
 3307751 (5.7)280385 (7.9)108209 (3.6)17547 (2.7)
 4177527 (3.3)180496 (5.1)62073 (2.0)10377 (1.6)
 ≥5309425 (5.7)338113 (9.4)121260 (4.0)17126 (2.6)
 <0668339 (12.3)363511 (10.2)469581 (15.5)50455 (7.7)
Critical care duration, dd
 05143787 (94.5)3234679 (90.6)2804869 (92.3)626966 (95.9)
 1–4283559 (5.2)248025 (6.9)207910 (6.8)23888 (3.7)
 5–813039 (0.2)50361 (1.4)19604 (0.7)2133 (0.3)
 ≥92946 (0.1)38899 (1.1)5235 (0.2)623 (0.1)
Previous visits in past 90 d, No.d
 05043450 (92.7)3251389 (91.0)2889772 (95.1)621829 (95.1)
 1335442 (6.2)268041 (7.5)130638 (4.3)27486 (4.2)
 ≥264439 (1.2)52534 (1.5)17208 (0.6)4295 (0.7)
Chronic conditionsd
 Metastatic disease97138 (1.8)122258 (3.4)60398 (2.0)4643 (0.7)
 Congestive heart failure525770 (9.7)435818 (12.2)171177 (5.6)31166 (4.8)
 Dementia98348 (1.8)95488 (2.7)24452 (0.8)3303 (0.5)
 Renal failure363606 (6.7)275064 (7.7)124797 (4.1)23734 (3.6)
 Weight loss60871 (1.1)136950 (3.8)24924 (0.8)3951 (0.6)
 Hemiplegia68670 (1.3)56366 (1.6)19101 (0.6)3445 (0.5)
 Alcohol abuse110518 (2.0)42127 (1.2)18763 (0.6)2434 (0.4)
 Any tumor74126 (1.4)91766 (2.6)61029 (2.0)4772 (0.7)
 Arrhythmia717807 (13.2)489748 (13.7)282338 (9.3)44430 (6.8)
 Pulmonary disease673730 (12.4)829731 (23.2)379966 (12.5)56521 (8.7)
 Coagulopathy125395 (2.3)80564 (2.3)61966 (2.0)10438 (1.6)
 Complicated diabetes124829 (2.3)117080 (3.3)46541 (1.5)9283 (1.4)
 Anemia493951 (9.1)466309 (13.1)283187 (9.3)55380 (8.5)
 Fluid and electrolyte disorders793661 (14.6)900042 (25.2)255241 (8.4)36739 (5.6)
 Liver disease114774 (2.1)107250 (3.0)36770 (1.2)5577 (0.9)
 Peripheral vascular disorder211656 (3.9)184949 (5.2)132250 (4.4)16758 (2.6)
 Psychosis585436 (10.8)157763 (4.4)81167 (2.7)14681 (2.3)
 Pulmonary circulatory disorders95414 (1.8)82525 (2.3)31191 (1.0)5239 (0.8)
 HIV/AIDS10992 (0.2)24722 (0.7)9170 (0.3)880 (0.1)
 Hypertension2079013 (38.2)1462200 (40.9)1122538 (37.0)129930 (19.9)
 Obesity424144 (7.8)355440 (10.0)316854 (10.4)41423 (6.3)
 Hyperlipidemia1152995 (21.2)642845 (18.0)476396 (15.7)60169 (9.2)
 Uncomplicated diabetes762020 (14.0)558242 (15.6)376413 (12.4)49085 (7.5)
 Ischemic heart disease96773 (1.8)50710 (1.4)38531 (1.3)7209 (1.1)
 Atrial fibrillation474208 (8.7)33160 (9.3)177456 (5.8)28288 (4.3)
 Ventricular fibrillation7819 (0.1)5482 (0.2)3957 (0.1)854 (0.1)
DRG type
 Medical4312907 (79.2)2234137 (62.6)644113 (21.2)445452 (68.2)
 Surgical778517 (14.3)1153118 (32.3)2258226 (74.3)188693 (28.9)
 Other351907 (6.5)184709 (5.2)135279 (4.5)19465 (3.0)
Admission through emergency roomd2337488 (42.9)1769377 (49.5)532129 (17.5)85763 (13.1)
Primary payerd
 Medicare1677801 (30.8)1437289 (40.2)888556 (29.3)119557 (18.3)
 Medicaid761141 (14.0)356802 (10.0)348551 (11.5)160066 (24.5)
 Blue Cross757561 (13.9)455286 (12.8)550557 (18.1)107452 (16.4)
 Other Insurance1104014 (20.3)586823 (16.4)590583 (19.4)128696 (19.7)
 HMO649407 (11.9)416726 (11.7)426392 (14.0)94544 (14.5)
 Other493407 (9.1)319038 (8.9)232979 (7.7)43295 (6.6)
CharacteristicPatients, No. (%)
No AntibacterialHigh-Risk AntibacterialLow-Risk AntibacterialControl Antibacterial
All patients5443331 (42.8)3571964 (28.1)3037618 (23.9)653610 (5.1)
Severe sepsis/septic shockb6220 (0.1)11510 (0.3)2863 (0.1)517 (0.1)
Sepsisc30114 (0.6)46509 (1.3)12884 (0.4)2381 (0.4)
Sexd
 Male2200860 (40.4)1513291 (42.4)1079404 (35.5)125154 (19.1)
 Female3242471 (59.6)2058673 (57.6)1958214 (64.5)528456 (80.9)
Age, yd
 18–452124939 (39.0)962866 (27.0)1150774 (37.9)436453 (66.8)
 45–55804304 (14.8)540402 (15.1)441473 (14.5)44241 (6.8)
 55–65792920 (14.6)585951 (16.4)493663 (16.3)54316 (8.3)
 65–75708661 (13.0)577380 (16.2)485401 (16.0)55991 (8.6)
 75–85654360 (12.0)558486 (15.6)343580 (11.3)45671 (7.0)
 ≥85358147 (6.6)346879 (9.7)122727 (4.0)16938 (2.6)
Length of stay, dd
 1–33962918 (72.8)1680801 (47.1)2010098 (66.2)513705 (78.6)
 4–6980109 (18.0)1032770 (28.9)697238 (23.0)93555 (14.3)
 7–10317700 (5.8)489645 (13.7)221196 (7.3)30099 (4.6)
 ≥11182604 (3.4)368748 (10.3)109086 (3.6)16251 (2.5)
Duration of therapy, dd
 05443331 (100)000
 1–20818936 (22.9)1999401 (65.8)490392 (75.0)
 3–601421841 (39.8)891584 (29.4)141357 (21.6)
 7–130914789 (25.6)123828 (4.1)18606 (2.9)
 ≥140416398 (11.7)22805 (0.8)3255 (0.5)
Comorbidity scored
 Missing1646636 (30.3)795458 (22.3)1203561 (39.6)397237 (60.8)
 0629472 (11.6)423018 (11.8)338376 (11.1)38112 (5.8)
 11142711 (21.0)757460 (21.2)533573 (17.6)92480 (14.2)
 2561470 (10.3)433523 (12.1)200985 (6.6)30276 (4.6)
 3307751 (5.7)280385 (7.9)108209 (3.6)17547 (2.7)
 4177527 (3.3)180496 (5.1)62073 (2.0)10377 (1.6)
 ≥5309425 (5.7)338113 (9.4)121260 (4.0)17126 (2.6)
 <0668339 (12.3)363511 (10.2)469581 (15.5)50455 (7.7)
Critical care duration, dd
 05143787 (94.5)3234679 (90.6)2804869 (92.3)626966 (95.9)
 1–4283559 (5.2)248025 (6.9)207910 (6.8)23888 (3.7)
 5–813039 (0.2)50361 (1.4)19604 (0.7)2133 (0.3)
 ≥92946 (0.1)38899 (1.1)5235 (0.2)623 (0.1)
Previous visits in past 90 d, No.d
 05043450 (92.7)3251389 (91.0)2889772 (95.1)621829 (95.1)
 1335442 (6.2)268041 (7.5)130638 (4.3)27486 (4.2)
 ≥264439 (1.2)52534 (1.5)17208 (0.6)4295 (0.7)
Chronic conditionsd
 Metastatic disease97138 (1.8)122258 (3.4)60398 (2.0)4643 (0.7)
 Congestive heart failure525770 (9.7)435818 (12.2)171177 (5.6)31166 (4.8)
 Dementia98348 (1.8)95488 (2.7)24452 (0.8)3303 (0.5)
 Renal failure363606 (6.7)275064 (7.7)124797 (4.1)23734 (3.6)
 Weight loss60871 (1.1)136950 (3.8)24924 (0.8)3951 (0.6)
 Hemiplegia68670 (1.3)56366 (1.6)19101 (0.6)3445 (0.5)
 Alcohol abuse110518 (2.0)42127 (1.2)18763 (0.6)2434 (0.4)
 Any tumor74126 (1.4)91766 (2.6)61029 (2.0)4772 (0.7)
 Arrhythmia717807 (13.2)489748 (13.7)282338 (9.3)44430 (6.8)
 Pulmonary disease673730 (12.4)829731 (23.2)379966 (12.5)56521 (8.7)
 Coagulopathy125395 (2.3)80564 (2.3)61966 (2.0)10438 (1.6)
 Complicated diabetes124829 (2.3)117080 (3.3)46541 (1.5)9283 (1.4)
 Anemia493951 (9.1)466309 (13.1)283187 (9.3)55380 (8.5)
 Fluid and electrolyte disorders793661 (14.6)900042 (25.2)255241 (8.4)36739 (5.6)
 Liver disease114774 (2.1)107250 (3.0)36770 (1.2)5577 (0.9)
 Peripheral vascular disorder211656 (3.9)184949 (5.2)132250 (4.4)16758 (2.6)
 Psychosis585436 (10.8)157763 (4.4)81167 (2.7)14681 (2.3)
 Pulmonary circulatory disorders95414 (1.8)82525 (2.3)31191 (1.0)5239 (0.8)
 HIV/AIDS10992 (0.2)24722 (0.7)9170 (0.3)880 (0.1)
 Hypertension2079013 (38.2)1462200 (40.9)1122538 (37.0)129930 (19.9)
 Obesity424144 (7.8)355440 (10.0)316854 (10.4)41423 (6.3)
 Hyperlipidemia1152995 (21.2)642845 (18.0)476396 (15.7)60169 (9.2)
 Uncomplicated diabetes762020 (14.0)558242 (15.6)376413 (12.4)49085 (7.5)
 Ischemic heart disease96773 (1.8)50710 (1.4)38531 (1.3)7209 (1.1)
 Atrial fibrillation474208 (8.7)33160 (9.3)177456 (5.8)28288 (4.3)
 Ventricular fibrillation7819 (0.1)5482 (0.2)3957 (0.1)854 (0.1)
DRG type
 Medical4312907 (79.2)2234137 (62.6)644113 (21.2)445452 (68.2)
 Surgical778517 (14.3)1153118 (32.3)2258226 (74.3)188693 (28.9)
 Other351907 (6.5)184709 (5.2)135279 (4.5)19465 (3.0)
Admission through emergency roomd2337488 (42.9)1769377 (49.5)532129 (17.5)85763 (13.1)
Primary payerd
 Medicare1677801 (30.8)1437289 (40.2)888556 (29.3)119557 (18.3)
 Medicaid761141 (14.0)356802 (10.0)348551 (11.5)160066 (24.5)
 Blue Cross757561 (13.9)455286 (12.8)550557 (18.1)107452 (16.4)
 Other Insurance1104014 (20.3)586823 (16.4)590583 (19.4)128696 (19.7)
 HMO649407 (11.9)416726 (11.7)426392 (14.0)94544 (14.5)
 Other493407 (9.1)319038 (8.9)232979 (7.7)43295 (6.6)

Abbreviations: DRG, diagnosis-related group; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HMO, health maintenance organization.

aTable 1 does not include 39576 (0.3%) patients whose antibiotic exposure did not meet the criteria for the predefined exposure groups.

bSevere sepsis/septic shock was defined as a hospital stay within 90 days of the index stay that included an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis (ICD-9-CM code 995.92) or septic shock (785.52), identified in any position on the hospital discharge bill.

cSecondary outcome, sepsis used a published definition for hospital administrative data, the “Angus definition,” which requires ICD-9-CM codes for both infection and acute organ dysfunction within the same hospitalization or a sepsis-specific diagnosis [23].

dCharacteristic based on information in the record for the index stay.

Table 1.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients by Antibacterial Risk Groupa

CharacteristicPatients, No. (%)
No AntibacterialHigh-Risk AntibacterialLow-Risk AntibacterialControl Antibacterial
All patients5443331 (42.8)3571964 (28.1)3037618 (23.9)653610 (5.1)
Severe sepsis/septic shockb6220 (0.1)11510 (0.3)2863 (0.1)517 (0.1)
Sepsisc30114 (0.6)46509 (1.3)12884 (0.4)2381 (0.4)
Sexd
 Male2200860 (40.4)1513291 (42.4)1079404 (35.5)125154 (19.1)
 Female3242471 (59.6)2058673 (57.6)1958214 (64.5)528456 (80.9)
Age, yd
 18–452124939 (39.0)962866 (27.0)1150774 (37.9)436453 (66.8)
 45–55804304 (14.8)540402 (15.1)441473 (14.5)44241 (6.8)
 55–65792920 (14.6)585951 (16.4)493663 (16.3)54316 (8.3)
 65–75708661 (13.0)577380 (16.2)485401 (16.0)55991 (8.6)
 75–85654360 (12.0)558486 (15.6)343580 (11.3)45671 (7.0)
 ≥85358147 (6.6)346879 (9.7)122727 (4.0)16938 (2.6)
Length of stay, dd
 1–33962918 (72.8)1680801 (47.1)2010098 (66.2)513705 (78.6)
 4–6980109 (18.0)1032770 (28.9)697238 (23.0)93555 (14.3)
 7–10317700 (5.8)489645 (13.7)221196 (7.3)30099 (4.6)
 ≥11182604 (3.4)368748 (10.3)109086 (3.6)16251 (2.5)
Duration of therapy, dd
 05443331 (100)000
 1–20818936 (22.9)1999401 (65.8)490392 (75.0)
 3–601421841 (39.8)891584 (29.4)141357 (21.6)
 7–130914789 (25.6)123828 (4.1)18606 (2.9)
 ≥140416398 (11.7)22805 (0.8)3255 (0.5)
Comorbidity scored
 Missing1646636 (30.3)795458 (22.3)1203561 (39.6)397237 (60.8)
 0629472 (11.6)423018 (11.8)338376 (11.1)38112 (5.8)
 11142711 (21.0)757460 (21.2)533573 (17.6)92480 (14.2)
 2561470 (10.3)433523 (12.1)200985 (6.6)30276 (4.6)
 3307751 (5.7)280385 (7.9)108209 (3.6)17547 (2.7)
 4177527 (3.3)180496 (5.1)62073 (2.0)10377 (1.6)
 ≥5309425 (5.7)338113 (9.4)121260 (4.0)17126 (2.6)
 <0668339 (12.3)363511 (10.2)469581 (15.5)50455 (7.7)
Critical care duration, dd
 05143787 (94.5)3234679 (90.6)2804869 (92.3)626966 (95.9)
 1–4283559 (5.2)248025 (6.9)207910 (6.8)23888 (3.7)
 5–813039 (0.2)50361 (1.4)19604 (0.7)2133 (0.3)
 ≥92946 (0.1)38899 (1.1)5235 (0.2)623 (0.1)
Previous visits in past 90 d, No.d
 05043450 (92.7)3251389 (91.0)2889772 (95.1)621829 (95.1)
 1335442 (6.2)268041 (7.5)130638 (4.3)27486 (4.2)
 ≥264439 (1.2)52534 (1.5)17208 (0.6)4295 (0.7)
Chronic conditionsd
 Metastatic disease97138 (1.8)122258 (3.4)60398 (2.0)4643 (0.7)
 Congestive heart failure525770 (9.7)435818 (12.2)171177 (5.6)31166 (4.8)
 Dementia98348 (1.8)95488 (2.7)24452 (0.8)3303 (0.5)
 Renal failure363606 (6.7)275064 (7.7)124797 (4.1)23734 (3.6)
 Weight loss60871 (1.1)136950 (3.8)24924 (0.8)3951 (0.6)
 Hemiplegia68670 (1.3)56366 (1.6)19101 (0.6)3445 (0.5)
 Alcohol abuse110518 (2.0)42127 (1.2)18763 (0.6)2434 (0.4)
 Any tumor74126 (1.4)91766 (2.6)61029 (2.0)4772 (0.7)
 Arrhythmia717807 (13.2)489748 (13.7)282338 (9.3)44430 (6.8)
 Pulmonary disease673730 (12.4)829731 (23.2)379966 (12.5)56521 (8.7)
 Coagulopathy125395 (2.3)80564 (2.3)61966 (2.0)10438 (1.6)
 Complicated diabetes124829 (2.3)117080 (3.3)46541 (1.5)9283 (1.4)
 Anemia493951 (9.1)466309 (13.1)283187 (9.3)55380 (8.5)
 Fluid and electrolyte disorders793661 (14.6)900042 (25.2)255241 (8.4)36739 (5.6)
 Liver disease114774 (2.1)107250 (3.0)36770 (1.2)5577 (0.9)
 Peripheral vascular disorder211656 (3.9)184949 (5.2)132250 (4.4)16758 (2.6)
 Psychosis585436 (10.8)157763 (4.4)81167 (2.7)14681 (2.3)
 Pulmonary circulatory disorders95414 (1.8)82525 (2.3)31191 (1.0)5239 (0.8)
 HIV/AIDS10992 (0.2)24722 (0.7)9170 (0.3)880 (0.1)
 Hypertension2079013 (38.2)1462200 (40.9)1122538 (37.0)129930 (19.9)
 Obesity424144 (7.8)355440 (10.0)316854 (10.4)41423 (6.3)
 Hyperlipidemia1152995 (21.2)642845 (18.0)476396 (15.7)60169 (9.2)
 Uncomplicated diabetes762020 (14.0)558242 (15.6)376413 (12.4)49085 (7.5)
 Ischemic heart disease96773 (1.8)50710 (1.4)38531 (1.3)7209 (1.1)
 Atrial fibrillation474208 (8.7)33160 (9.3)177456 (5.8)28288 (4.3)
 Ventricular fibrillation7819 (0.1)5482 (0.2)3957 (0.1)854 (0.1)
DRG type
 Medical4312907 (79.2)2234137 (62.6)644113 (21.2)445452 (68.2)
 Surgical778517 (14.3)1153118 (32.3)2258226 (74.3)188693 (28.9)
 Other351907 (6.5)184709 (5.2)135279 (4.5)19465 (3.0)
Admission through emergency roomd2337488 (42.9)1769377 (49.5)532129 (17.5)85763 (13.1)
Primary payerd
 Medicare1677801 (30.8)1437289 (40.2)888556 (29.3)119557 (18.3)
 Medicaid761141 (14.0)356802 (10.0)348551 (11.5)160066 (24.5)
 Blue Cross757561 (13.9)455286 (12.8)550557 (18.1)107452 (16.4)
 Other Insurance1104014 (20.3)586823 (16.4)590583 (19.4)128696 (19.7)
 HMO649407 (11.9)416726 (11.7)426392 (14.0)94544 (14.5)
 Other493407 (9.1)319038 (8.9)232979 (7.7)43295 (6.6)
CharacteristicPatients, No. (%)
No AntibacterialHigh-Risk AntibacterialLow-Risk AntibacterialControl Antibacterial
All patients5443331 (42.8)3571964 (28.1)3037618 (23.9)653610 (5.1)
Severe sepsis/septic shockb6220 (0.1)11510 (0.3)2863 (0.1)517 (0.1)
Sepsisc30114 (0.6)46509 (1.3)12884 (0.4)2381 (0.4)
Sexd
 Male2200860 (40.4)1513291 (42.4)1079404 (35.5)125154 (19.1)
 Female3242471 (59.6)2058673 (57.6)1958214 (64.5)528456 (80.9)
Age, yd
 18–452124939 (39.0)962866 (27.0)1150774 (37.9)436453 (66.8)
 45–55804304 (14.8)540402 (15.1)441473 (14.5)44241 (6.8)
 55–65792920 (14.6)585951 (16.4)493663 (16.3)54316 (8.3)
 65–75708661 (13.0)577380 (16.2)485401 (16.0)55991 (8.6)
 75–85654360 (12.0)558486 (15.6)343580 (11.3)45671 (7.0)
 ≥85358147 (6.6)346879 (9.7)122727 (4.0)16938 (2.6)
Length of stay, dd
 1–33962918 (72.8)1680801 (47.1)2010098 (66.2)513705 (78.6)
 4–6980109 (18.0)1032770 (28.9)697238 (23.0)93555 (14.3)
 7–10317700 (5.8)489645 (13.7)221196 (7.3)30099 (4.6)
 ≥11182604 (3.4)368748 (10.3)109086 (3.6)16251 (2.5)
Duration of therapy, dd
 05443331 (100)000
 1–20818936 (22.9)1999401 (65.8)490392 (75.0)
 3–601421841 (39.8)891584 (29.4)141357 (21.6)
 7–130914789 (25.6)123828 (4.1)18606 (2.9)
 ≥140416398 (11.7)22805 (0.8)3255 (0.5)
Comorbidity scored
 Missing1646636 (30.3)795458 (22.3)1203561 (39.6)397237 (60.8)
 0629472 (11.6)423018 (11.8)338376 (11.1)38112 (5.8)
 11142711 (21.0)757460 (21.2)533573 (17.6)92480 (14.2)
 2561470 (10.3)433523 (12.1)200985 (6.6)30276 (4.6)
 3307751 (5.7)280385 (7.9)108209 (3.6)17547 (2.7)
 4177527 (3.3)180496 (5.1)62073 (2.0)10377 (1.6)
 ≥5309425 (5.7)338113 (9.4)121260 (4.0)17126 (2.6)
 <0668339 (12.3)363511 (10.2)469581 (15.5)50455 (7.7)
Critical care duration, dd
 05143787 (94.5)3234679 (90.6)2804869 (92.3)626966 (95.9)
 1–4283559 (5.2)248025 (6.9)207910 (6.8)23888 (3.7)
 5–813039 (0.2)50361 (1.4)19604 (0.7)2133 (0.3)
 ≥92946 (0.1)38899 (1.1)5235 (0.2)623 (0.1)
Previous visits in past 90 d, No.d
 05043450 (92.7)3251389 (91.0)2889772 (95.1)621829 (95.1)
 1335442 (6.2)268041 (7.5)130638 (4.3)27486 (4.2)
 ≥264439 (1.2)52534 (1.5)17208 (0.6)4295 (0.7)
Chronic conditionsd
 Metastatic disease97138 (1.8)122258 (3.4)60398 (2.0)4643 (0.7)
 Congestive heart failure525770 (9.7)435818 (12.2)171177 (5.6)31166 (4.8)
 Dementia98348 (1.8)95488 (2.7)24452 (0.8)3303 (0.5)
 Renal failure363606 (6.7)275064 (7.7)124797 (4.1)23734 (3.6)
 Weight loss60871 (1.1)136950 (3.8)24924 (0.8)3951 (0.6)
 Hemiplegia68670 (1.3)56366 (1.6)19101 (0.6)3445 (0.5)
 Alcohol abuse110518 (2.0)42127 (1.2)18763 (0.6)2434 (0.4)
 Any tumor74126 (1.4)91766 (2.6)61029 (2.0)4772 (0.7)
 Arrhythmia717807 (13.2)489748 (13.7)282338 (9.3)44430 (6.8)
 Pulmonary disease673730 (12.4)829731 (23.2)379966 (12.5)56521 (8.7)
 Coagulopathy125395 (2.3)80564 (2.3)61966 (2.0)10438 (1.6)
 Complicated diabetes124829 (2.3)117080 (3.3)46541 (1.5)9283 (1.4)
 Anemia493951 (9.1)466309 (13.1)283187 (9.3)55380 (8.5)
 Fluid and electrolyte disorders793661 (14.6)900042 (25.2)255241 (8.4)36739 (5.6)
 Liver disease114774 (2.1)107250 (3.0)36770 (1.2)5577 (0.9)
 Peripheral vascular disorder211656 (3.9)184949 (5.2)132250 (4.4)16758 (2.6)
 Psychosis585436 (10.8)157763 (4.4)81167 (2.7)14681 (2.3)
 Pulmonary circulatory disorders95414 (1.8)82525 (2.3)31191 (1.0)5239 (0.8)
 HIV/AIDS10992 (0.2)24722 (0.7)9170 (0.3)880 (0.1)
 Hypertension2079013 (38.2)1462200 (40.9)1122538 (37.0)129930 (19.9)
 Obesity424144 (7.8)355440 (10.0)316854 (10.4)41423 (6.3)
 Hyperlipidemia1152995 (21.2)642845 (18.0)476396 (15.7)60169 (9.2)
 Uncomplicated diabetes762020 (14.0)558242 (15.6)376413 (12.4)49085 (7.5)
 Ischemic heart disease96773 (1.8)50710 (1.4)38531 (1.3)7209 (1.1)
 Atrial fibrillation474208 (8.7)33160 (9.3)177456 (5.8)28288 (4.3)
 Ventricular fibrillation7819 (0.1)5482 (0.2)3957 (0.1)854 (0.1)
DRG type
 Medical4312907 (79.2)2234137 (62.6)644113 (21.2)445452 (68.2)
 Surgical778517 (14.3)1153118 (32.3)2258226 (74.3)188693 (28.9)
 Other351907 (6.5)184709 (5.2)135279 (4.5)19465 (3.0)
Admission through emergency roomd2337488 (42.9)1769377 (49.5)532129 (17.5)85763 (13.1)
Primary payerd
 Medicare1677801 (30.8)1437289 (40.2)888556 (29.3)119557 (18.3)
 Medicaid761141 (14.0)356802 (10.0)348551 (11.5)160066 (24.5)
 Blue Cross757561 (13.9)455286 (12.8)550557 (18.1)107452 (16.4)
 Other Insurance1104014 (20.3)586823 (16.4)590583 (19.4)128696 (19.7)
 HMO649407 (11.9)416726 (11.7)426392 (14.0)94544 (14.5)
 Other493407 (9.1)319038 (8.9)232979 (7.7)43295 (6.6)

Abbreviations: DRG, diagnosis-related group; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HMO, health maintenance organization.

aTable 1 does not include 39576 (0.3%) patients whose antibiotic exposure did not meet the criteria for the predefined exposure groups.

bSevere sepsis/septic shock was defined as a hospital stay within 90 days of the index stay that included an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis (ICD-9-CM code 995.92) or septic shock (785.52), identified in any position on the hospital discharge bill.

cSecondary outcome, sepsis used a published definition for hospital administrative data, the “Angus definition,” which requires ICD-9-CM codes for both infection and acute organ dysfunction within the same hospitalization or a sepsis-specific diagnosis [23].

dCharacteristic based on information in the record for the index stay.

Because both facility-level and patient-level data in the HDD are nonidentifiable, it was determined this work did not constitute research involving human subjects. All data were analyzed using SAS software, version 9.3 (SAS Institute).

RESULTS

Among 516 hospitals, we identified 14120553 randomly selected index stays among adults. Of those patients, 1205226 (8.5%) experienced sepsis either during or before the index stay, and 305428 (2.2%) died during the index stay or within 90 days of discharge; these patients were excluded. Of the remaining 12746135 patients with index stays, 21247 (0.17%) had severe sepsis or septic shock identified within 90 days of their index stay using our primary outcome, and 92467 (0.7%) had sepsis identified within 90 days using our secondary outcome (Table 1).

Patients with severe sepsis within 90 days of an index stay had a mean length of stay of 13.1 days for their sepsis stay, 38% died during their hospitalization for sepsis, and unspecified septicemia (038.9) was the most common primary diagnosis code listed for that stay (Table 2). Pneumonia was the most common primary ICD-9-CM diagnosis code listed for the index stay.

Table 2.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock Within 90 Days After Discharge

CharacteristicPatients With Postdischarge Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock, No. (%)a (n = 21247)
Characteristics of severe sepsis/septic shock stay
 Length of stay, mean, d13.1
 Death during stay8019 (37.7)
Index stay characteristics
 Sex
  Male10810 (50.9)
  Female10437 (49.1)
 Age, y
  18–451408 (6.6)
  45–552135 (10.1)
  55–653642 (17.1)
  65–754818 (22.7)
  75–855668 (26.7)
  ≥853567 (16.8)
 Length of stay, d
  1–36357 (29.9)
  4–66398 (30.1))
  7–104392 (20.7)
  ≥114100 (19.3)
 Mean length of stay, d7.4
 Duration of therapy, d
  06220 (29.3)
  1–23135 (14.8)
  3–64618 (21.7)
  7–134044 (19.0)
  ≥143230 (15.2)
Critical care duration, d
  018589 (87.5)
  1–41892 (8.9)
  5–8449 (2.1)
  ≥9317 (1.5)
 10 Most frequent primary diagnosis codes
  486: Pneumonia, organism unspecified690 (3.3)
  428.0: Congestive heart failure, unspecified460 (2.2)
  038.9: Unspecified septicemia455 (2.1)
  599.0: Urinary tract infection, site not specified427 (2.0)
  491.21: Obstructive chronic bronchitis with acute exacerbation416 (2.0)
  584.9: Acute kidney failure, unspecified398 (1.9)
  507.0: Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food or vomitus349 (1.6)
  434.91: Cerebral artery occlusion, unspecified with cerebral infarction322 (1.5)
  410.71: Subendocardial infarction, initial episode of care306 (1.4)
  518.81: Acute respiratory failure304 (1.4)
CharacteristicPatients With Postdischarge Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock, No. (%)a (n = 21247)
Characteristics of severe sepsis/septic shock stay
 Length of stay, mean, d13.1
 Death during stay8019 (37.7)
Index stay characteristics
 Sex
  Male10810 (50.9)
  Female10437 (49.1)
 Age, y
  18–451408 (6.6)
  45–552135 (10.1)
  55–653642 (17.1)
  65–754818 (22.7)
  75–855668 (26.7)
  ≥853567 (16.8)
 Length of stay, d
  1–36357 (29.9)
  4–66398 (30.1))
  7–104392 (20.7)
  ≥114100 (19.3)
 Mean length of stay, d7.4
 Duration of therapy, d
  06220 (29.3)
  1–23135 (14.8)
  3–64618 (21.7)
  7–134044 (19.0)
  ≥143230 (15.2)
Critical care duration, d
  018589 (87.5)
  1–41892 (8.9)
  5–8449 (2.1)
  ≥9317 (1.5)
 10 Most frequent primary diagnosis codes
  486: Pneumonia, organism unspecified690 (3.3)
  428.0: Congestive heart failure, unspecified460 (2.2)
  038.9: Unspecified septicemia455 (2.1)
  599.0: Urinary tract infection, site not specified427 (2.0)
  491.21: Obstructive chronic bronchitis with acute exacerbation416 (2.0)
  584.9: Acute kidney failure, unspecified398 (1.9)
  507.0: Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food or vomitus349 (1.6)
  434.91: Cerebral artery occlusion, unspecified with cerebral infarction322 (1.5)
  410.71: Subendocardial infarction, initial episode of care306 (1.4)
  518.81: Acute respiratory failure304 (1.4)

aData represent No. (%) of patients unless otherwise specified. Severe sepsis/septic shock was defined as a hospital stay within 90 days of the index stay that included an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis (ICD-9-CM code 995.92) or septic shock (785.52), identified in any position on the hospital discharge bill.

Table 2.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock Within 90 Days After Discharge

CharacteristicPatients With Postdischarge Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock, No. (%)a (n = 21247)
Characteristics of severe sepsis/septic shock stay
 Length of stay, mean, d13.1
 Death during stay8019 (37.7)
Index stay characteristics
 Sex
  Male10810 (50.9)
  Female10437 (49.1)
 Age, y
  18–451408 (6.6)
  45–552135 (10.1)
  55–653642 (17.1)
  65–754818 (22.7)
  75–855668 (26.7)
  ≥853567 (16.8)
 Length of stay, d
  1–36357 (29.9)
  4–66398 (30.1))
  7–104392 (20.7)
  ≥114100 (19.3)
 Mean length of stay, d7.4
 Duration of therapy, d
  06220 (29.3)
  1–23135 (14.8)
  3–64618 (21.7)
  7–134044 (19.0)
  ≥143230 (15.2)
Critical care duration, d
  018589 (87.5)
  1–41892 (8.9)
  5–8449 (2.1)
  ≥9317 (1.5)
 10 Most frequent primary diagnosis codes
  486: Pneumonia, organism unspecified690 (3.3)
  428.0: Congestive heart failure, unspecified460 (2.2)
  038.9: Unspecified septicemia455 (2.1)
  599.0: Urinary tract infection, site not specified427 (2.0)
  491.21: Obstructive chronic bronchitis with acute exacerbation416 (2.0)
  584.9: Acute kidney failure, unspecified398 (1.9)
  507.0: Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food or vomitus349 (1.6)
  434.91: Cerebral artery occlusion, unspecified with cerebral infarction322 (1.5)
  410.71: Subendocardial infarction, initial episode of care306 (1.4)
  518.81: Acute respiratory failure304 (1.4)
CharacteristicPatients With Postdischarge Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock, No. (%)a (n = 21247)
Characteristics of severe sepsis/septic shock stay
 Length of stay, mean, d13.1
 Death during stay8019 (37.7)
Index stay characteristics
 Sex
  Male10810 (50.9)
  Female10437 (49.1)
 Age, y
  18–451408 (6.6)
  45–552135 (10.1)
  55–653642 (17.1)
  65–754818 (22.7)
  75–855668 (26.7)
  ≥853567 (16.8)
 Length of stay, d
  1–36357 (29.9)
  4–66398 (30.1))
  7–104392 (20.7)
  ≥114100 (19.3)
 Mean length of stay, d7.4
 Duration of therapy, d
  06220 (29.3)
  1–23135 (14.8)
  3–64618 (21.7)
  7–134044 (19.0)
  ≥143230 (15.2)
Critical care duration, d
  018589 (87.5)
  1–41892 (8.9)
  5–8449 (2.1)
  ≥9317 (1.5)
 10 Most frequent primary diagnosis codes
  486: Pneumonia, organism unspecified690 (3.3)
  428.0: Congestive heart failure, unspecified460 (2.2)
  038.9: Unspecified septicemia455 (2.1)
  599.0: Urinary tract infection, site not specified427 (2.0)
  491.21: Obstructive chronic bronchitis with acute exacerbation416 (2.0)
  584.9: Acute kidney failure, unspecified398 (1.9)
  507.0: Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food or vomitus349 (1.6)
  434.91: Cerebral artery occlusion, unspecified with cerebral infarction322 (1.5)
  410.71: Subendocardial infarction, initial episode of care306 (1.4)
  518.81: Acute respiratory failure304 (1.4)

aData represent No. (%) of patients unless otherwise specified. Severe sepsis/septic shock was defined as a hospital stay within 90 days of the index stay that included an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis (ICD-9-CM code 995.92) or septic shock (785.52), identified in any position on the hospital discharge bill.

For patients with an infection or CDI diagnosis for the index stay, the unadjusted proportion of patients with subsequent severe sepsis was higher than that of patients without infection or a CDI diagnosis (0.3% vs 0.13% for infection and 1.0% vs 0.16% for CDI; both P < .001). Among patients with exposure to a high-risk antibiotic agent during the index stay, the proportion of patients with severe sepsis after discharge was 0.3%, compared with just 0.1% for patients without any antibiotic exposure (P < .001). Exposure to low-risk or control antibiotic agents was not associated with an increased risk of sepsis compared with patients not exposed to any antibiotics in the unadjusted analysis (Table 1).

In the multivariable logistic model, exposure to a high-risk antibiotic was associated with a higher risk of severe sepsis within 90 days of discharge than in our referent group (odds ratio [OR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59–1.70). Exposure to low-risk and control antibiotic agents was not as strongly associated with severe sepsis (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02–1.13] and 1.22 [1.12–1.34], respectively) (Table 3). Furthermore, both the number of unique antibiotics classes and total days of antibacterial therapy demonstrated a significant dose-response association with postdischarge severe sepsis. Patients exposed to ≥4 antibiotic classes and those with ≥14 days of antibiotic therapy had more than twice the risk of severe sepsis (OR, 2.23 [95% CI, 2.12–2.36] and 2.17 [2.06–2.29], respectively) than those without antibiotic exposure. Similar results were found for our secondary outcome (Table 3). In contrast, when using any readmission within 90 days as the outcome, the association between a high-risk antibiotic and readmission was close to 1 (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.03–1.04) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Adjusted Odds Ratios for the Association Between Defined Exposures and Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock Within 90 Days After Hospital Discharge in a Cohort of US Hospitalsa

Antibacterial ExposureOR (95% CI)
Primary Outcome: Severe Sepsis/Septic ShockbSecondary Outcome: Sepsisc
High-risk antibacterial agentsd1.65 (1.59–1.70)1.49 (1.47–1.52)
Low-risk antibacterial agentse1.07 (1.02–1.13)1.04 (1.02–1.06)
Control antibacterial agentsf1.22 (1.12–1.34)1.20 (1.15–1.25)
No exposure to antibacterial agentsReferenceReference
Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
 ≥42.23 (2.12–2.36)1.92 (1.86–1.97)
 31.80 (1.72–1.89)1.57 (1.53–1.61)
 21.49 (1.43–1.56)1.36 (1.34–1.39)
 11.30 (1.25–1.35)1.26 (1.24–1.28)
 0ReferenceReference
Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
 ≥142.17 (2.06–2.29)1.89 (1.84–1.94)
 7–131.68 (1.61–1.75)1.52 (1.49–1.55)
 3–61.41 (1.36–1.47)1.34 (1.32–1.37)
 1–21.23 (1.18–1.29)1.16 (1.13–1.18)
 0ReferenceReference
Patients receiving high-risk antibacterial agents
  Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥41.53 (1.44–1.63)1.36 (1.32–1.40)
  31.27 (1.20–1.34)1.14 (1.11–1.17)
  21.08 (1.03–1.14)1.02 (1.00–1.05)
  1ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.61 (1.49–1.74)1.47 (1.41–1.52)
  7–131.28 (1.19–1.37)1.20 (1.16–1.24)
  3–61.15 (1.08–1.23)1.10 (1.07–1.13)
  1–2ReferenceReference
Patients receiving low-risk or control antibacterial agents
 Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥41.20 (.83–1.74)1.72 (1.48–2.01)
  31.13 (.96–1.33)1.08 (1.00–1.17)
  21.03 (.95–1.12)0.99 (.95–1.03)
  1ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.21 (.98–1.50)1.43 (1.29–1.59)
  7–131.11 (.99–1.26)1.20 (1.14–1.28)
  3–60.92 (.85–.99)1.02 (.98–1.06)
  1–2ReferenceReference
Patients with primary infectious diagnosis code
 High-risk antibacterial agents1.53 (1.43–1.64)1.41 (1.37–1.46)
 Low-risk antibacterial agents1.00 (.91–1.11)1.04 (.99–1.09)
 Control antibacterial agents1.07 (.92–1.26)1.06 (.98–1.15)
 No exposure to antibacterial agentsReferenceReference
 Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥42.06 (1.90–2.24)1.79 (1.71–1.86)
  31.65 (1.52–1.79)1.49 (1.43–1.55)
  21.36 (1.26–1.47)1.33 (1.27–1.37)
  11.20 (1.11–1.30)1.17 (1.13–1.22)
  0ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.95 (1.79–2.12)1.76 (1.68–1.83)
  7–131.56 (1.45–1.68)1.44 (1.39–1.50)
  3–61.35 (1.25–1.46)1.30 (1.25–1.35)
  1–21.06 (.96–1.17)1.04 (.99–1.09)
  0ReferenceReference
Model using any readmission within 90 d as model outcome (instead of sepsis)g
 High-risk antibacterial agents1.03 (1.03–1.04)
 Low-risk antibacterial agents0.88 (.88–.89)
 Control antibacterial agents0.90 (.89–.92)
 No exposure to antibacterial agentsReference
Antibacterial ExposureOR (95% CI)
Primary Outcome: Severe Sepsis/Septic ShockbSecondary Outcome: Sepsisc
High-risk antibacterial agentsd1.65 (1.59–1.70)1.49 (1.47–1.52)
Low-risk antibacterial agentse1.07 (1.02–1.13)1.04 (1.02–1.06)
Control antibacterial agentsf1.22 (1.12–1.34)1.20 (1.15–1.25)
No exposure to antibacterial agentsReferenceReference
Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
 ≥42.23 (2.12–2.36)1.92 (1.86–1.97)
 31.80 (1.72–1.89)1.57 (1.53–1.61)
 21.49 (1.43–1.56)1.36 (1.34–1.39)
 11.30 (1.25–1.35)1.26 (1.24–1.28)
 0ReferenceReference
Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
 ≥142.17 (2.06–2.29)1.89 (1.84–1.94)
 7–131.68 (1.61–1.75)1.52 (1.49–1.55)
 3–61.41 (1.36–1.47)1.34 (1.32–1.37)
 1–21.23 (1.18–1.29)1.16 (1.13–1.18)
 0ReferenceReference
Patients receiving high-risk antibacterial agents
  Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥41.53 (1.44–1.63)1.36 (1.32–1.40)
  31.27 (1.20–1.34)1.14 (1.11–1.17)
  21.08 (1.03–1.14)1.02 (1.00–1.05)
  1ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.61 (1.49–1.74)1.47 (1.41–1.52)
  7–131.28 (1.19–1.37)1.20 (1.16–1.24)
  3–61.15 (1.08–1.23)1.10 (1.07–1.13)
  1–2ReferenceReference
Patients receiving low-risk or control antibacterial agents
 Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥41.20 (.83–1.74)1.72 (1.48–2.01)
  31.13 (.96–1.33)1.08 (1.00–1.17)
  21.03 (.95–1.12)0.99 (.95–1.03)
  1ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.21 (.98–1.50)1.43 (1.29–1.59)
  7–131.11 (.99–1.26)1.20 (1.14–1.28)
  3–60.92 (.85–.99)1.02 (.98–1.06)
  1–2ReferenceReference
Patients with primary infectious diagnosis code
 High-risk antibacterial agents1.53 (1.43–1.64)1.41 (1.37–1.46)
 Low-risk antibacterial agents1.00 (.91–1.11)1.04 (.99–1.09)
 Control antibacterial agents1.07 (.92–1.26)1.06 (.98–1.15)
 No exposure to antibacterial agentsReferenceReference
 Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥42.06 (1.90–2.24)1.79 (1.71–1.86)
  31.65 (1.52–1.79)1.49 (1.43–1.55)
  21.36 (1.26–1.47)1.33 (1.27–1.37)
  11.20 (1.11–1.30)1.17 (1.13–1.22)
  0ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.95 (1.79–2.12)1.76 (1.68–1.83)
  7–131.56 (1.45–1.68)1.44 (1.39–1.50)
  3–61.35 (1.25–1.46)1.30 (1.25–1.35)
  1–21.06 (.96–1.17)1.04 (.99–1.09)
  0ReferenceReference
Model using any readmission within 90 d as model outcome (instead of sepsis)g
 High-risk antibacterial agents1.03 (1.03–1.04)
 Low-risk antibacterial agents0.88 (.88–.89)
 Control antibacterial agents0.90 (.89–.92)
 No exposure to antibacterial agentsReference

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

aMultivariable logistic model adjusted for sex, age, primary payer, previous hospitalizations within 90 days, length of stay, comorbidity score, surgical or medical diagnosis-related group, emergency room visit, critical care stays during index visit, month and year of index visit, hospital size (No. of beds), hospital urban/rural location, hospital teaching status, hospital census division, and various chronic conditions based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM ) discharge codes including: metastatic disease, congestive heart failure, dementia, renal failure, weight loss, hemiplegia, alcohol abuse, any tumor, arrhythmia, pulmonary disease, coagulopathy, complicated diabetes, anemia, fluid and electrolyte disorders, liver disease, peripheral vascular disorder, psychosis, pulmonary circulatory disorders, human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS, hypertension, obesity, hyperlipidemia, uncomplicated diabetes, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular fibrillation.

bSevere sepsis/septic shock was defined as a hospital stay within 90 days of the index stay that included an ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis (ICD-9-CM code 995.92) or septic shock (785.52), identified in any position on the hospital discharge bill.

cThe secondary outcome of sepsis used a published definition for hospital administrative data, the “Angus definition,” which requires ICD-9-CM codes for both infection and acute organ dysfunction within the same hospitalization or a sepsis-specific diagnosis [23].

dHigh-risk antibacterial exposures included any receipt of third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, lincosamides, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, oral vancomycin, or carbapenems.

eLow-risk antibacterial exposures included receipt of first- or second-generation cephalosporins, macrolide, tetracycline, metronidazole, or sulfa without receipt of a high-risk antibiotic.

fControl antibacterial exposures included any receipt of an aminoglycoside, penicillin, or intravenous vancomycin (antibiotics that minimally disrupt gastrointestinal flora) without receipt of intermediate- or high-risk antibiotics.

gWe also used a similar model with the same exposures that used any readmission within 90 days as the outcome, rather than either of the sepsis outcomes.

Table 3.

Adjusted Odds Ratios for the Association Between Defined Exposures and Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock Within 90 Days After Hospital Discharge in a Cohort of US Hospitalsa

Antibacterial ExposureOR (95% CI)
Primary Outcome: Severe Sepsis/Septic ShockbSecondary Outcome: Sepsisc
High-risk antibacterial agentsd1.65 (1.59–1.70)1.49 (1.47–1.52)
Low-risk antibacterial agentse1.07 (1.02–1.13)1.04 (1.02–1.06)
Control antibacterial agentsf1.22 (1.12–1.34)1.20 (1.15–1.25)
No exposure to antibacterial agentsReferenceReference
Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
 ≥42.23 (2.12–2.36)1.92 (1.86–1.97)
 31.80 (1.72–1.89)1.57 (1.53–1.61)
 21.49 (1.43–1.56)1.36 (1.34–1.39)
 11.30 (1.25–1.35)1.26 (1.24–1.28)
 0ReferenceReference
Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
 ≥142.17 (2.06–2.29)1.89 (1.84–1.94)
 7–131.68 (1.61–1.75)1.52 (1.49–1.55)
 3–61.41 (1.36–1.47)1.34 (1.32–1.37)
 1–21.23 (1.18–1.29)1.16 (1.13–1.18)
 0ReferenceReference
Patients receiving high-risk antibacterial agents
  Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥41.53 (1.44–1.63)1.36 (1.32–1.40)
  31.27 (1.20–1.34)1.14 (1.11–1.17)
  21.08 (1.03–1.14)1.02 (1.00–1.05)
  1ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.61 (1.49–1.74)1.47 (1.41–1.52)
  7–131.28 (1.19–1.37)1.20 (1.16–1.24)
  3–61.15 (1.08–1.23)1.10 (1.07–1.13)
  1–2ReferenceReference
Patients receiving low-risk or control antibacterial agents
 Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥41.20 (.83–1.74)1.72 (1.48–2.01)
  31.13 (.96–1.33)1.08 (1.00–1.17)
  21.03 (.95–1.12)0.99 (.95–1.03)
  1ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.21 (.98–1.50)1.43 (1.29–1.59)
  7–131.11 (.99–1.26)1.20 (1.14–1.28)
  3–60.92 (.85–.99)1.02 (.98–1.06)
  1–2ReferenceReference
Patients with primary infectious diagnosis code
 High-risk antibacterial agents1.53 (1.43–1.64)1.41 (1.37–1.46)
 Low-risk antibacterial agents1.00 (.91–1.11)1.04 (.99–1.09)
 Control antibacterial agents1.07 (.92–1.26)1.06 (.98–1.15)
 No exposure to antibacterial agentsReferenceReference
 Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥42.06 (1.90–2.24)1.79 (1.71–1.86)
  31.65 (1.52–1.79)1.49 (1.43–1.55)
  21.36 (1.26–1.47)1.33 (1.27–1.37)
  11.20 (1.11–1.30)1.17 (1.13–1.22)
  0ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.95 (1.79–2.12)1.76 (1.68–1.83)
  7–131.56 (1.45–1.68)1.44 (1.39–1.50)
  3–61.35 (1.25–1.46)1.30 (1.25–1.35)
  1–21.06 (.96–1.17)1.04 (.99–1.09)
  0ReferenceReference
Model using any readmission within 90 d as model outcome (instead of sepsis)g
 High-risk antibacterial agents1.03 (1.03–1.04)
 Low-risk antibacterial agents0.88 (.88–.89)
 Control antibacterial agents0.90 (.89–.92)
 No exposure to antibacterial agentsReference
Antibacterial ExposureOR (95% CI)
Primary Outcome: Severe Sepsis/Septic ShockbSecondary Outcome: Sepsisc
High-risk antibacterial agentsd1.65 (1.59–1.70)1.49 (1.47–1.52)
Low-risk antibacterial agentse1.07 (1.02–1.13)1.04 (1.02–1.06)
Control antibacterial agentsf1.22 (1.12–1.34)1.20 (1.15–1.25)
No exposure to antibacterial agentsReferenceReference
Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
 ≥42.23 (2.12–2.36)1.92 (1.86–1.97)
 31.80 (1.72–1.89)1.57 (1.53–1.61)
 21.49 (1.43–1.56)1.36 (1.34–1.39)
 11.30 (1.25–1.35)1.26 (1.24–1.28)
 0ReferenceReference
Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
 ≥142.17 (2.06–2.29)1.89 (1.84–1.94)
 7–131.68 (1.61–1.75)1.52 (1.49–1.55)
 3–61.41 (1.36–1.47)1.34 (1.32–1.37)
 1–21.23 (1.18–1.29)1.16 (1.13–1.18)
 0ReferenceReference
Patients receiving high-risk antibacterial agents
  Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥41.53 (1.44–1.63)1.36 (1.32–1.40)
  31.27 (1.20–1.34)1.14 (1.11–1.17)
  21.08 (1.03–1.14)1.02 (1.00–1.05)
  1ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.61 (1.49–1.74)1.47 (1.41–1.52)
  7–131.28 (1.19–1.37)1.20 (1.16–1.24)
  3–61.15 (1.08–1.23)1.10 (1.07–1.13)
  1–2ReferenceReference
Patients receiving low-risk or control antibacterial agents
 Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥41.20 (.83–1.74)1.72 (1.48–2.01)
  31.13 (.96–1.33)1.08 (1.00–1.17)
  21.03 (.95–1.12)0.99 (.95–1.03)
  1ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.21 (.98–1.50)1.43 (1.29–1.59)
  7–131.11 (.99–1.26)1.20 (1.14–1.28)
  3–60.92 (.85–.99)1.02 (.98–1.06)
  1–2ReferenceReference
Patients with primary infectious diagnosis code
 High-risk antibacterial agents1.53 (1.43–1.64)1.41 (1.37–1.46)
 Low-risk antibacterial agents1.00 (.91–1.11)1.04 (.99–1.09)
 Control antibacterial agents1.07 (.92–1.26)1.06 (.98–1.15)
 No exposure to antibacterial agentsReferenceReference
 Antibiotic classes exposed to during stay, No.
  ≥42.06 (1.90–2.24)1.79 (1.71–1.86)
  31.65 (1.52–1.79)1.49 (1.43–1.55)
  21.36 (1.26–1.47)1.33 (1.27–1.37)
  11.20 (1.11–1.30)1.17 (1.13–1.22)
  0ReferenceReference
 Duration of antibacterial therapy, d
  ≥141.95 (1.79–2.12)1.76 (1.68–1.83)
  7–131.56 (1.45–1.68)1.44 (1.39–1.50)
  3–61.35 (1.25–1.46)1.30 (1.25–1.35)
  1–21.06 (.96–1.17)1.04 (.99–1.09)
  0ReferenceReference
Model using any readmission within 90 d as model outcome (instead of sepsis)g
 High-risk antibacterial agents1.03 (1.03–1.04)
 Low-risk antibacterial agents0.88 (.88–.89)
 Control antibacterial agents0.90 (.89–.92)
 No exposure to antibacterial agentsReference

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

aMultivariable logistic model adjusted for sex, age, primary payer, previous hospitalizations within 90 days, length of stay, comorbidity score, surgical or medical diagnosis-related group, emergency room visit, critical care stays during index visit, month and year of index visit, hospital size (No. of beds), hospital urban/rural location, hospital teaching status, hospital census division, and various chronic conditions based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM ) discharge codes including: metastatic disease, congestive heart failure, dementia, renal failure, weight loss, hemiplegia, alcohol abuse, any tumor, arrhythmia, pulmonary disease, coagulopathy, complicated diabetes, anemia, fluid and electrolyte disorders, liver disease, peripheral vascular disorder, psychosis, pulmonary circulatory disorders, human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS, hypertension, obesity, hyperlipidemia, uncomplicated diabetes, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular fibrillation.

bSevere sepsis/septic shock was defined as a hospital stay within 90 days of the index stay that included an ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis (ICD-9-CM code 995.92) or septic shock (785.52), identified in any position on the hospital discharge bill.

cThe secondary outcome of sepsis used a published definition for hospital administrative data, the “Angus definition,” which requires ICD-9-CM codes for both infection and acute organ dysfunction within the same hospitalization or a sepsis-specific diagnosis [23].

dHigh-risk antibacterial exposures included any receipt of third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, lincosamides, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, oral vancomycin, or carbapenems.

eLow-risk antibacterial exposures included receipt of first- or second-generation cephalosporins, macrolide, tetracycline, metronidazole, or sulfa without receipt of a high-risk antibiotic.

fControl antibacterial exposures included any receipt of an aminoglycoside, penicillin, or intravenous vancomycin (antibiotics that minimally disrupt gastrointestinal flora) without receipt of intermediate- or high-risk antibiotics.

gWe also used a similar model with the same exposures that used any readmission within 90 days as the outcome, rather than either of the sepsis outcomes.

Because most patients exposed to ≥4 classes of antibiotics were also in the high-risk antibiotic group, we further evaluated the dose response within the high-risk group alone. We also limited the analysis to those with an infection-related primary discharge code during the index stay. Dose responses were observed when our analysis was limited to one of these groups (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

We found a significant association between antibiotic exposure in the hospital and severe sepsis and septic shock either as the cause of or occurring during a subsequent hospitalization within 90 days of discharge. Exposure to antibiotics such as third- or fourth-generation cephalosporin, lincosamide, fluoroquinolone, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, oral vancomycin, and carbapenem were associated with an increased risk of sepsis. Furthermore, significant dose-response effects were observed for the number of antibiotic classes a patient received during the index hospitalization as well as the total duration of therapy. In contrast, the risk of postdischarge sepsis for exposure to low-risk antibiotics was diminished.

Our findings support, but do not prove, the hypothesis that microbiota disruption is associated with an increased risk of severe sepsis and septic shock within 90 days of discharge from a hospital stay. Prescott et al [16] previously demonstrated that the rate of sepsis 90 days after hospitalization was 3-fold greater than during other observation periods; they also found that hospital events, such as infection or CDI, further increased this rate. Presumably these events, infection and CDI, would disrupt the patient’s microbiota, in part because of antibacterial agents. Our study further supports this hypothesis by showing that increased antibiotic exposure or exposure to specific antibacterial agents more likely to disrupt the microbiota is associated with an increased risk in severe sepsis in the 90 days after hospital discharge. We were able to study a large population of >500 hospitals during a 7-year period. Unlike Prescott et al [16], we were able to include hospital pharmacy data, which was previously shown to be consistent with other estimates of hospital antibiotic usage and a representative sample of hospitals in the US [12].

In addition, we determined a priori the antibiotic exposure categories based on their epidemiologic association with clinically important microbiome disruption (ie, CDI risk). Although the types of antibiotic-mediated disruptions that predispose to sepsis may ultimately be determined to be different from those that predispose to CDI, hypothesis-driven a priori analyses based on a theoretical framework may lessen the risk for unmeasured bias or spurious associations based on chance alone. Our study only identified a significantly large association between sepsis and those antibiotics most likely to disrupt the patient’s microbiota [18–20], whereas low-risk and control antibiotics showed much smaller increases in the risk of sepsis.

In addition, both dose-response variables showed significant trends with increasing amounts of antibiotics, further supporting our hypothesis that disruption of the patient’s microbiota leads to an increased risk of postdischarge sepsis. We were also able to control for a number of demographic and clinical characteristics, including certain chronic conditions likely to be associated with antibiotic use and hospital readmission in our multivariable models. In sensitivity analyses, we found estimates similar to those of Prescott et al [16], comparing infection-related or CDI-related hospitalizations with non–infection-related hospitalizations without adjustment for our antimicrobial exposures. We also eliminated patients with an ICD-9-CM code for CDI during either the index visit or the postdischarge sepsis visit and found consistent results with our primary model, suggesting that our association was not confounded by the well-described relationship between antibiotics and CDI. However, additional epidemiologic and biologic studies may further explore this hypothesis.

Antibiotic-mediated gut microbiota disruptions may increase the risk of sepsis via any one or a combination of 3 broad pathways. The first of these is loss of direct inhibition and competitive nutrient utilization, leading to loss of colonization resistance against more virulent and potentially pathogenic microbiota members [9]. Another pathway emphasizes the loss of immune-regulatory dampening functions of the gut microbiota itself, whereby, at least theoretically, antibiotic effects on the gut microbiota may contribute to a more pronounced septic response from even a non–gut-related site of primary infection [5]. A third pathway is loss of integrity of the gut mucosal barrier function, largely due to loss of short-chain fatty acids normally produced by a healthy microbiota that serve as the main nutrient source for large intestinal enterocytes [26].

Direct adverse drug events, such as allergic reactions and toxic effects like tendon rupture or renal toxicity, as well as the microbiota-mediated effects of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and especially CDI, are long-recognized forms of patient harm resulting from antibiotics [13, 21, 27]. Although the exact mechanisms remain under investigation, there is now a small but increasing body of human observational evidence and animal data suggesting broader detrimental effects on patient outcomes rooted in microbiota disruptions that result from antibiotic use, among other environmental insults [28, 8, 11]. Taur et al [29] showed that, even after controlling for confounders, 3-year mortality rates in bone marrow transplant recipients were associated with gut microbiota diversity at engraftment. Mai et al [30] found that antibiotic-mediated changes in microbiota composition, especially the loss of potentially protective members and “bloom” of proteobacteria, leading up to onset, were associated with late-onset sepsis in human neonates. In adult patients, the population evaluated in our study, poorer outcomes in patients with the systemic inflammatory response are associated with greater microbiota disruption [31].

One hope from our findings is that future innovations focused on restoring or protecting the lower intestinal microbiota from antibiotic-mediated disruption might become a possible approach for preventing sepsis [32]. Recent studies have established fecal microbiota transplantation as a front-line therapy for multiply recurrent CDI [33]. Despite at least 2 case reports of fecal microbiota transplantation apparently used successfully to treat sepsis [34, 35], this remains highly experimental and carries unknown risk. Although animal data suggest that a defined probiotic consortia could be developed to restore the barrier function of the gut and thereby possibly prevent antibiotic-mediated sepsis on that account [36], there are examples where probiotics administered in the throes of severe illness, specifically acute pancreatitis, have increased mortality risk [37]. Recently, a large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of an oral synbiotic preparation given to infants in rural India, observed a 40% reduction in sepsis outcomes [38]. Protecting the lower intestinal microbiota from antibiotic-mediated disruption may be another strategy available soon. Although still under development, methods to inactivate antibiotics that reach the lower intestine, via either enzymatic deactivation (eg, an orally administered β-lactamase [39]) or binding with an absorbent [40], appear promising.

However, another currently available prevention strategy is improved antibiotic stewardship. Although early antibiotic administration is critical for the management of sepsis [41–43], there are many other conditions for which antibiotics are unnecessary and yet often prescribed, thereby needlessly increasing patients’ risk of complications, including future sepsis [13]; for example, treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria or positive cultures from nonsterile body sites where colonization is likely. In addition, recent studies suggest that certain common, serious infections may not need to be treated with broad-spectrum agents or with as many agents [44] or for as long a duration as previously thought [45].

The current study has several limitations. First, administrative data such as the HDD are not collected for research purposes, and misclassification in the pharmacy, clinical, and facility data, including the use of ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes, can lead to bias. However, this bias is probably nondifferential and would typically bias the results toward null values. Moreover, this type of pharmacy charge data was previously validated in small samples, with excellent agreement [46, 47]. In addition, our outcome was based on ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes, but this definition of sepsis was previously validated [24]. Although we controlled for several demographic and clinical characteristics in the multivariable analysis, residual confounding from unknown factors could affect our findings, particularly the presence of underlying conditions or characteristics that increase antibiotic use in the index hospitalization and the risk of subsequent infection. However, in an analysis restricted to patients with no discharge diagnosis codes indicating an infection during the index hospitalization, our findings were similar, suggesting that an underlying predisposition to infection is less likely to confound our observed association.

Furthermore, when we included any readmission within 90 days as our outcome, instead of sepsis, we observed that the OR for our high-risk antibiotic group was reduced to nearly 1, providing additional support for our hypothesis, rather than underlying disease as the explanation for the association. In addition, we could include only postdischarge cases of sepsis in which patients returned to the same hospital, because patients in the HDD cannot be followed longitudinally across different hospitals. As such, our estimate of the proportion of sepsis cases after hospitalization was smaller than that in the previous study, and death outside the same hospital was not detectable [16]. Finally, our study did not include any exposure data from healthcare encounters outside the hospital or antibiotics prescribed at discharge.

In conclusion, our study observed a significant increase in severe sepsis and septic shock within 90 days of discharge for patients exposed in the hospital to antibiotics likely to disrupt the patient’s microbiota. Given that a significant proportion of inpatient antimicrobial use may be unnecessary [14, 48], this study builds on a growing evidence base suggesting that increased stewardship efforts in hospitals may not only prevent antimicrobial resistance, CDI, and other adverse effects, but may also reduce other unwanted outcomes potentially related to disruption of the microbiota, including sepsis.

Notes

Disclaimer. The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Financial support. This work was supported by the CDC. All authors were CDC employees, and the manuscript underwent the CDC clearance process.

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

1.

Angus
DC
,
van der Poll
T
.
Severe sepsis and septic shock
.
N Engl J Med
2013
;
369
:
2063
.

2.

Ranieri
VM
,
Thompson
BT
,
Barie
PS
et al. ;
PROWESS-SHOCK Study Group
.
Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock
.
N Engl J Med
2012
;
366
:
2055
64
.

3.

Vincent
JL
,
Rello
J
,
Marshall
J
et al. ;
EPIC II Group of Investigators
.
International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units
.
JAMA
2009
;
302
:
2323
9
.

4.

Novosad
SA
,
Sapiano
MR
,
Grigg
C
et al.
Vital signs: epidemiology of sepsis: prevalence of health care factors and opportunities for prevention
.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
2016
;
65
:
864
9
.

5.

Mittal
R
,
Coopersmith
CM
.
Redefining the gut as the motor of critical illness
.
Trends Mol Med
2014
;
20
:
214
23
.

6.

Alverdy
JC
,
Chang
EB
.
The re-emerging role of the intestinal microflora in critical illness and inflammation: why the gut hypothesis of sepsis syndrome will not go away
.
J Leukoc Biol
2008
;
83
:
461
6
.

7.

Alverdy
JC
,
Krezalek
MA
.
Collapse of the microbiome, emergence of the pathobiome, and the immunopathology of sepsis
.
Crit Care Med
2017
;
45
:
337
47
.

8.

Modi
SR
,
Collins
JJ
,
Relman
DA
.
Antibiotics and the gut microbiota
.
J Clin Invest
2014
;
124
:
4212
8
.

9.

McKenney
PT
,
Pamer
EG
.
From hype to hope: the gut microbiota in enteric infectious disease
.
Cell
2015
;
163
:
1326
32
.

10.

Knoop
KA
,
McDonald
KG
,
Kulkarni
DH
,
Newberry
RD
.
Antibiotics promote inflammation through the translocation of native commensal colonic bacteria
.
Gut
2016
;
65
:
1100
9
.

11.

Yu
LC
,
Shih
YA
,
Wu
LL
et al.
Enteric dysbiosis promotes antibiotic-resistant bacterial infection: systemic dissemination of resistant and commensal bacteria through epithelial transcytosis
.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
2014
;
307
:
G824
35
.

12.

Baggs
J
,
Fridkin
SK
,
Pollack
LA
,
Srinivasan
A
,
Jernigan
JA
.
Estimating national trends in inpatient antibiotic use among US hospitals from 2006 to 2012
.
JAMA Intern Med
2016
.

13.

Fridkin
S
,
Baggs
J
,
Fagan
R
et al. ;
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
.
Vital signs: improving antibiotic use among hospitalized patients
.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
2014
;
63
:
194
200
.

14.

Dellit
TH
,
Owens
RC
,
McGowan
JE
Jr
et al. ;
Infectious Diseases Society of America; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
.
Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship
.
Clin Infect Dis
2007
;
44
:
159
77
.

15.

Ayres
JS
,
Trinidad
NJ
,
Vance
RE
.
Lethal inflammasome activation by a multidrug-resistant pathobiont upon antibiotic disruption of the microbiota
.
Nat Med
2012
;
18
:
799
806
.

16.

Prescott
HC
,
Dickson
RP
,
Rogers
MA
,
Langa
KM
,
Iwashyna
TJ
.
Hospitalization type and subsequent severe sepsis
.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2015
;
192
:
581
8
.

17.

Yi
SH
,
Jernigan
JA
,
McDonald
LC
.
Prevalence of probiotic use among inpatients: a descriptive study of 145 U.S. hospitals
.
Am J Infect Control
2016
;
44
:
548
53
.

18.

Slimings
C
,
Riley
TV
.
Antibiotics and hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: update of systematic review and meta-analysis
.
J Antimicrob Chemother
2014
;
69
:
881
91
.

19.

Brown
KA
,
Khanafer
N
,
Daneman
N
,
Fisman
DN
.
Meta-analysis of antibiotics and the risk of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection
.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2013
;
57
:
2326
32
.

20.

Isaac
S
,
Scher
JU
,
Djukovic
A
et al.
Short- and long-term effects of oral vancomycin on the human intestinal microbiota
.
J Antimicrob Chemother
2017
;
72
:
128
36
.

21.

Lewis
BB
,
Buffie
CG
,
Carter
RA
et al.
Loss of microbiota-mediated colonization resistance to Clostridium difficile infection with oral vancomycin compared with metronidazole
.
J Infect Dis
2015
;
212
:
1656
65
.

22.

Johnson
S
,
Louie
TJ
,
Gerding
DN
et al. ;
Polymer Alternative for CDI Treatment (PACT) investigators
.
Vancomycin, metronidazole, or tolevamer for Clostridium difficile infection: results from two multinational, randomized, controlled trials
.
Clin Infect Dis
2014
;
59
:
345
54
.

23.

Angus
DC
,
Linde-Zwirble
WT
,
Lidicker
J
,
Clermont
G
,
Carcillo
J
,
Pinsky
MR
.
Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care
.
Crit Care Med
2001
;
29
:
1303
10
.

24.

Iwashyna
TJ
,
Odden
A
,
Rohde
J
et al.
Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the Angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis
.
Med Care
2014
;
52
:
e39
43
.

25.

Gagne
JJ
,
Glynn
RJ
,
Avorn
J
,
Levin
R
,
Schneeweiss
S
.
A combined comorbidity score predicted mortality in elderly patients better than existing scores
.
J Clin Epidemiol
2011
;
64
:
749
59
.

26.

Yamada
T
,
Shimizu
K
,
Ogura
H
et al.
Rapid and sustained long-term decrease of fecal short-chain fatty acids in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome
.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr
2015
;
39
:
569
77
.

27.

Shehab
N
,
Patel
PR
,
Srinivasan
A
,
Budnitz
DS
.
Emergency department visits for antibiotic-associated adverse events
.
Clin Infect Dis
2008
;
47
:
735
43
.

28.

Bajaj
JS
,
Cox
IJ
,
Betrapally
NS
et al.
Systems biology analysis of omeprazole therapy in cirrhosis demonstrates significant shifts in gut microbiota composition and function
.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
2014
;
307
:
G951
7
.

29.

Taur
Y
,
Jenq
RR
,
Perales
MA
et al.
The effects of intestinal tract bacterial diversity on mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
.
Blood
2014
;
124
:
1174
82
.

30.

Mai
V
,
Torrazza
RM
,
Ukhanova
M
et al.
Distortions in development of intestinal microbiota associated with late onset sepsis in preterm infants
.
PLoS One
2013
;
8
:
e52876
.

31.

Shimizu
K
,
Ogura
H
,
Hamasaki
T
et al.
Altered gut flora are associated with septic complications and death in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome
.
Dig Dis Sci
2011
;
56
:
1171
7
.

32.

Tosh
PK
,
McDonald
LC
.
Infection control in the multidrug-resistant era: tending the human microbiome
.
Clin Infect Dis
2012
;
54
:
707
13
.

33.

Drekonja
D
,
Reich
J
,
Gezahegn
S
et al.
Fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review
.
Ann Intern Med
2015
;
162
:
630
8
.

34.

Li
Q
,
Wang
C
,
Tang
C
et al.
Successful treatment of severe sepsis and diarrhea after vagotomy utilizing fecal microbiota transplantation: a case report
.
Crit Care
2015
;
19
:
37
.

35.

Li
Q
,
Wang
C
,
Tang
C
et al.
Therapeutic modulation and reestablishment of the intestinal microbiota with fecal microbiota transplantation resolves sepsis and diarrhea in a patient
.
Am J Gastroenterol
2014
;
109
:
1832
4
.

36.

Li
M
,
Liang
P
,
Li
Z
et al.
Fecal microbiota transplantation and bacterial consortium transplantation have comparable effects on the re-establishment of mucosal barrier function in mice with intestinal dysbiosis
.
Front Microbiol
2015
;
6
:
692
.

37.

Besselink
MG
,
van Santvoort
HC
,
Renooij
W
et al. ;
Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study Group
.
Intestinal barrier dysfunction in a randomized trial of a specific probiotic composition in acute pancreatitis
.
Ann Surg
2009
;
250
:
712
9
.

38.

Panigrahi
P
,
Parida
S
,
Nanda
NC
et al.
A randomized synbiotic trial to prevent sepsis among infants in rural India
.
Nature
2017
;
548
:
407
12
.

39.

Kokai-Kun
JF
,
Bristol
JA
,
Setser
J
,
Schlosser
M
.
Nonclinical safety assessment of SYN-004: an oral β-lactamase for the protection of the gut microbiome from disruption by biliary-excreted, intravenously administered antibiotics
.
Int J Toxicol
2016
;
35
:
309
16
.

40.

de Gunzburg
J
,
Ducher
A
,
Modess
C
et al.
Targeted adsorption of molecules in the colon with the novel adsorbent-based medicinal product, DAV132: a proof of concept study in healthy subjects
.
J Clin Pharmacol
2015
;
55
:
10
6
.

41.

Dellinger
RP
,
Levy
MM
,
Rhodes
A
et al.
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012
.
Crit Care Med
2013
;
41
:
580
637
.

42.

Puskarich
MA
,
Trzeciak
S
,
Shapiro
NI
et al. ;
Emergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMSHOCKNET)
.
Association between timing of antibiotic administration and mortality from septic shock in patients treated with a quantitative resuscitation protocol
.
Crit Care Med
2011
;
39
:
2066
71
.

43.

Sterling
SA
,
Miller
WR
,
Pryor
J
,
Puskarich
MA
,
Jones
AE
.
The impact of timing of antibiotics on outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Crit Care Med
2015
;
43
:
1907
15
.

44.

Postma
DF
,
van Werkhoven
CH
,
van Elden
LJ
et al. ;
CAP-START Study Group
.
Antibiotic treatment strategies for community-acquired pneumonia in adults
.
N Engl J Med
2015
;
372
:
1312
23
.

45.

Sawyer
RG
,
Claridge
JA
,
Nathens
AB
et al.
Trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection
.
N Engl J Med
2015
;
372
:
1996
2005
.

46.

Pakyz
AL
,
MacDougall
C
,
Oinonen
M
,
Polk
RE
.
Trends in antibacterial use in US academic health centers 2002 to 2006
.
Arch Intern Med
2008
;
168
:
2254
60
.

47.

Beus
JM
,
Ross
R
,
Metjian
TA
,
Gerber
JS
.
The performance of administrative data for measurement of antibiotic use varies across antibiotics
. In: IDWeek 2015, 7–11 October 2015.
San Diego, CA
,
2015
. Poster #155.

48.

Hecker
MT
,
Aron
DC
,
Patel
NP
,
Lehmann
MK
,
Donskey
CJ
.
Unnecessary use of antimicrobials in hospitalized patients: current patterns of misuse with an emphasis on the antianaerobic spectrum of activity
.
Arch Intern Med
2003
;
163
:
972
8
.