-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Marlies Mulder, Dewi S J M van der Vegt, Bas B Oude Munnink, Corine H GeurtsvanKessel, Jeroen van de Bovenkamp, Reina S Sikkema, Esther M G Jacobs, Marion P G Koopmans, Marjolijn C A Wegdam-Blans, Reinfection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in an Immunocompromised Patient: A Case Report, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 73, Issue 9, 1 November 2021, Pages e2841–e2842, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1538
- Share Icon Share
To the Editor—Knowing the frequency and natural course of reinfections is important for strategies for control of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Recently, To et al published a report of a 33-year-old Hong Kong resident with a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, confirmed by whole-genome sequencing [1]. Here, we report a case of a reinfection in an 89-year-old Dutch woman suffering from Waldenström macroglobulinemia, treated with B-cell–depleting therapy. She presented to the emergency department with fever and severe cough and a lymphocyte count of 0.4 × 109 cells/L. An in-house SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay (E-gen) [2] on a nasopharyngeal swab was positive (cycle quantification value [Cq] = 26.2). She was discharged after 5 days; other than some persisting fatigue, her symptoms subsided completely.
Two days after a new chemotherapy treatment, 59 days after the start of the first coronavirus disease 2019 episode, the patient developed fever, cough, and dyspnea. At admission, her oxygen saturation was 90% with a respiratory rate of 40 breaths per minute. The SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR assay on a nasopharyngeal swab was positive (E-gen; Cq = 25.2). At days 4 and 6, serum was tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 total antibody and the immunoglobulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays; both were negative. At day 8, the condition of the patient deteriorated, and she died 2 weeks later.
The viral genomes of both episodes were compared using SARS-CoV-2–specific multiplex qPCR and Nanopore sequencing [3]. The 2 strains differed at 10 nucleotide positions in the ORF1a (4), ORF 1b (2), Spike (2), ORF3a (1), and M (1) genes (Figure 1) and the sequences did not cluster in the phylogenetic tree (Supplementary Figure 1). Although we did not have PCR-negative samples in between episodes, with an average estimated SARS-CoV-2 mutation rate of 33 nucleotides per year (or 5–6 nucleotides per 2 months) [4], it is likely that the second episode was a reinfection rather than prolonged shedding.

Sequences of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 strains of the first and second coronavirus disease 2019 episodes. The black lines indicate the differences in nucleotides between the 2 strains. The black boxes indicate that these were locations of the genome that could not be determined reliably (1.85% of the genome).
In contrast to the Hong Kong resident, our patient experienced a more severe second episode. This has also been described in a 25-year-old Nevada resident with no underlying comorbidities [5]. Our patient was immunocompromised because of Waldenström macroglobulinemia treated with B-cell–depleting therapy, resulting in a declined humoral immunity [6]. However, it was shown that B-cell–depleting therapy does not necessarily result in life-threatening disease, suggesting that the innate immune response and T-cell immunity can be sufficient to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 [7].
SARS-CoV-2 reinfections are expected to occur once antibody titers decrease and immunity wanes. Although a recent population study in Iceland has shown that antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 did not decline within 4 months after infection [8], reinfections in seasonal coronaviruses, such as human coronaviruses NL63, 229E, OC43, and HKU1, were observed as early as 6 months postinfection. Frequent reinfections were shown from 12 months postinfection [9]. The Hong Kong resident did not have measurable antibodies at the start of the second episode, which occurred 4–5 months after the first. However, the second episode was asymptomatic, indicating sufficient immunological memory. Our patient and the Nevada patient suffered from an early reinfection within 2 months, unfortunately without serum samples in between episodes. The Nevada resident did develop a measurable antibody response after the second episode. Our patient did not have antibodies 6 days after start of the second episode, but seroconversion can take a few days longer.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at Clinical Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.
Note
Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.