1-20 of 44868
Sort by
Journal Article
Zoi E Sychev and Jesse C Seegmiller
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf041, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf041
Published: 21 April 2025
Image
Published: 18 April 2025
Fig. 5. Extracted progesterone reference intervals or limits segregated using cycle-specific values. Sample sizes are listed in brackets when available. Panel A includes reference intervals or limits from studies reporting cycle nonspecific values. Panel B includes intervals or limits from cycle-specific pu
Image
Published: 18 April 2025
Fig. 1. Extracted estradiol reference intervals or limits segregated using cycle-specific values. Sample sizes are listed in brackets when available. Panel A Includes reference intervals or limits from studies reporting cycle non-specific values. Panel B Includes intervals or limits from cycle-specific publ
Image
Published: 18 April 2025
Fig. 3. Extracted reference intervals for FSH (A) and LH (B) with sample sizes included in brackets. *Indicates a single study reporting data from different instruments.
Journal Article
Dina N Greene and others
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf039, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf039
Published: 18 April 2025
Image
Published: 18 April 2025
Fig. 2. Manufacturer-reported reference intervals (represented as bars) or upper reference limits (represented by a line) for estradiol (A) and progesterone (B). The values in the brackets are the sample sizes for each specified cycle phase. **Indicates that the bars represent the full range of values and n
Image
Published: 18 April 2025
Fig. 4. Manufacturer-reported reference intervals for FSH (A) and LH (B). The values in the brackets are the sample sizes for each specified cycle phase. The definition of cycle phases was only described in the package insert corresponding to the Abbott Alinity instrument. **Indicates that the bars represen
Journal Article
Kyle G Rodino and others
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf018, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf018
Published: 16 April 2025
Journal Article
A Mark Richards
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf019, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf019
Published: 16 April 2025
Journal Article
Adith S Arun and others
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf025, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf025
Published: 16 April 2025
Image
Published: 16 April 2025
Fig. 1. Estimated percent of healthy US adult males with TT less than 300 ng/dL (10.4 nmol/L) based on National Health and Nutritional Examination Surveys data from 2001–2002, 2003–2004, 2011–2012, 2013–2014, and 2015–2016 cycles.
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Fig. 4. TDP concentrations determined using the newly developed method compared with (A) vendor-specified sample concentrations and (B) sample results from LC-MS/MS analysis performed by an external laboratory. (A), Expired proficiency testing (PT) samples ( ); purchased QC samples by vendor ( , ); QC prep
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Fig. 4. TDP concentrations determined using the newly developed method compared with (A) vendor-specified sample concentrations and (B) sample results from LC-MS/MS analysis performed by an external laboratory. (A), Expired proficiency testing (PT) samples ( ); purchased QC samples by vendor ( , ); QC prep
Journal Article
Preejith P Vachali and others
Clinical Chemistry, hvaf029, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf029
Published: 09 April 2025
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Fig. 2. Representative StreamSelect chromatograms. Individual patient samples were injected sequentially on LC1, LC2, LC3, and LC4. Analytical columns are packed from the same lot of sorbent and packaged as a set.
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Fig. 3. Comparison of TDP concentrations in (A) calibrators and (B) controls determined using single-stream and multi-stream analysis. Color figure available at https://academic.oup.com/clinchem
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Fig. 4. TDP concentrations determined using the newly developed method compared with (A) vendor-specified sample concentrations and (B) sample results from LC-MS/MS analysis performed by an external laboratory. (A), Expired proficiency testing (PT) samples ( ); purchased QC samples by vendor ( , ); QC prep
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Fig. 4. TDP concentrations determined using the newly developed method compared with (A) vendor-specified sample concentrations and (B) sample results from LC-MS/MS analysis performed by an external laboratory. (A), Expired proficiency testing (PT) samples ( ); purchased QC samples by vendor ( , ); QC prep
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Fig. 1. Instrumentation schematic. The Agilent StreamSelect was configured in shared-stream mode so that calibrators, controls, and samples were split among the 4 LC streams. Created in BioRender. Vac, P. (2025) https://BioRender.com/c61g801 . Color figure available at https://academic.oup.com/clinchem
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Fig. 4. TDP concentrations determined using the newly developed method compared with (A) vendor-specified sample concentrations and (B) sample results from LC-MS/MS analysis performed by an external laboratory. (A), Expired proficiency testing (PT) samples ( ); purchased QC samples by vendor ( , ); QC prep