Abstract

The transcription initiation landscape of eukaryotic genes is complex and highly dynamic. In eukaryotes, genes can generate multiple transcript variants that differ in 5′ boundaries due to usages of alternative transcription start sites (TSSs), and the abundance of transcript isoforms are highly variable. Due to a large number and complexity of the TSSs, it is not feasible to depict details of transcript initiation landscape of all genes using text-format genome annotation files. Therefore, it is necessary to provide data visualization of TSSs to represent quantitative TSS maps and the core promoters (CPs). In addition, the selection and activity of TSSs are influenced by various factors, such as transcription factors, chromatin remodeling and histone modifications. Thus, integration and visualization of functional genomic data related to these features could provide a better understanding of the gene promoter architecture and regulatory mechanism of transcription initiation. Yeast species play important roles for the research and human society, yet no database provides visualization and integration of functional genomic data in yeast. Here, we generated quantitative TSS maps for 12 important yeast species, inferred their CPs and built a public database, YeasTSS (www.yeastss.org). YeasTSS was designed as a central portal for visualization and integration of the TSS maps, CPs and functional genomic data related to transcription initiation in yeast. YeasTSS is expected to benefit the research community and public education for improving genome annotation, studies of promoter structure, regulated control of transcription initiation and inferring gene regulatory network.

Introduction

Transcription initiation is the first and probably the most important step in gene expression, as it integrates the actions of key factors involved in transcription regulation (1). The short stretch of DNA immediately flanks the transcription start sites (TSSs), which is usually considered as the gene’s core promoter (CP), contain various sequence elements that accurately direct transcription initiation by the RNA polymerase II machinery (1). The accurate locations of TSSs and their transcriptional activities at a genome scale are invaluable for many studies. For examples, they can be used for precisely determining 5’ boundary and the 5’untranslated region (5’UTR) of protein-coding genes, improving genome annotation, inference the locations of CPs, identification of novel genes, CP elements and other motifs associated with transcription (2). In addition, because most genes have multiple CPs that have distinct activities in response to environmental cues or in different types of cells (2–5), quantitative TSS maps obtained from various growth conditions in a species are important for studying regulated control of transcription initiation and inferring gene regulatory network.

Many techniques have been applied to generate genome-wide TSS maps, such as microarray (6–8), serial analysis of gene expression (9), sequencing of full-length cDNA clones (10), RNA sequencing (11, 12), cap analysis gene expression (CAGE) technique (13, 14), transcript isoform sequencing (TIF-seq) (15) and transcription start site sequencing (TSS-seq) (16). Some of these techniques, such as CAGE, TIF-seq and TSS-seq, utilize `cap-trapping’ technology to pull down the 5′-complete cDNAs reversely transcribed from the captured transcripts. Through a massive parallel sequencing of the 5′ end of cDNA and analysis of the sequenced tags, the genome-wide TSSs can be identified at a single-nucleotide resolution (14). In addition, the number of mapped tags also provides a quantitative measure of transcript production from each TSS (14). CAGE is probably the most popular TSS interrogation technique and has been used to profile the locations and activities of TSSs in human (17), mouse, fruit fly and zebrafish (4, 13, 18) and the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2).

The high-resolution quantitative TSS maps in many organisms significantly improve our understanding of the complex and highly dynamic nature of transcription initiation landscape in eukaryotes (2–5). These studies revealed that most eukaryotic genes contain multiple CPs that are differentially used among different tissues or developmental stages or in response to environmental cues (2, 3, 5, 17). The selection and activity of different CPs of a gene are precisely regulated to ensure that a correct transcript is produced at an appropriate level in different tissues, developmental stages or growth conditions. It has been shown that misregulation of transcription initiation can cause a broad range of human diseases, such as breast cancer, diabetes, kidney failure and Alzheimer’s disease (19–23). For instance, the tumor repressor gene BRCA1 has two TSSs, which produce longer and shorter transcripts. The longer BRCA1 transcript is only present in breast cancer tissues, resulted in significantly reduced production of protein products due to 10-fold less of translation efficiency than the shorter transcript (22). Unlike the translational process, which starts at the same methionine codon AUG, transcriptions are initiated from many nearby nucleotide positions in most CPs. The transcription activities of different TSSs within a CP could be very different. Based on the distributions of TSS activities, the CPs can be classified to different shape groups, which have been shown to be related to different regulatory activities (3). In addition, it was found that transcription initiation is pervasive, and it can be initiated from unconventional sites, such as exons (2, 3), which generate transcripts that truncate or eliminate the predicted protein product.

Transcription initiation of eukaryotic genes is a complex and highly regulated process. Transcription of protein-coding genes is carried out by RNA polymerase II (Pol II). The recruitment of eukaryotic Pol II to a CP is facilitated by general transcription factors. The most extensively studied CP element in eukaryotes is TATA box, which is mostly found 25–30 bps upstream from the TSS in mammals. However, the location of TATA box in S. cerevisiae promoter was found located in a wide range of 40–120 bp upstream of TSS (24). Gene-specific transcription factors may function as activators and repressors to further increase or reduce the transcription level by binding to gene-specific transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs). TFBSs are highly enriched around 115 bp upstream of the TSS in S. cerevisiae (25). The presence of nucleosome in the promoter regions may be an obstacle for transcription initiation. Transcription initiation typically occurs near the boundaries of nucleosome-free regions (NFRs) (8). Several studies have found that genes with different expression profiles are associated with distinct nucleosome occupancy (NO) patterns in the promoter regions (26, 27). The promoters of constantly expressed genes usually contain a nucleosome-depleted region (NDR) where most TFBs are located (28, 29). In contrast, conditionally expressed genes, such as stress-response genes, are associated with nucleosome-occupied promoters (27). The activation of transcription is also accompanied by alteration of chromatin structure, such as ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding (30, 31) or histone modifications (HMs) (32). Methylation of lysine residues in histone H3 could increase transcription by weakening chemical attractions between histone and DNA and enable the DNA to uncoil from nucleosomes (32).

Table 1.

Yeast species, genome assembly and CAGE data

SpeciesStrainAssemblyCAGE readsNo. of TSS
(>0.1 TPM)
No. of CPs
C. albicansSC5314ASM18296v362 917 157354 13527 068
Kluyveromyces lactisNRRL Y-1140ASM251v159 908 113377 66523 163
Lachancea waltiiNCYC 2644ASM16711v147 907 986312 91824 069
Lachancea kluyveriNRRL Y-12651ASM14922v136 988 291220 87917 732
Naumovozyma castelliiCBS 4309ASM23734v158 897 449276 99019 382
Saccharomyces bayanus623-6CASM16703v130 739 852288 19819 617
S. cerevisiaeS288cR64–2-1 (SacCer3)37 200 564324 13324 033
Saccharomyces mikataeIFO 1815ASM16697v163 468 342246 30817 109
S. paradoxusCBS432ASM207905v145 578 830427 80130 419
Schizosaccharomyces japonicusyFS275SJ552 907 395318 95125 536
Sch. pombe972 h-ASM294v260 584 140264 00724 093
Yarrowia lipolyticaCLIB122ASM252v148 428 838356 72228 307
SpeciesStrainAssemblyCAGE readsNo. of TSS
(>0.1 TPM)
No. of CPs
C. albicansSC5314ASM18296v362 917 157354 13527 068
Kluyveromyces lactisNRRL Y-1140ASM251v159 908 113377 66523 163
Lachancea waltiiNCYC 2644ASM16711v147 907 986312 91824 069
Lachancea kluyveriNRRL Y-12651ASM14922v136 988 291220 87917 732
Naumovozyma castelliiCBS 4309ASM23734v158 897 449276 99019 382
Saccharomyces bayanus623-6CASM16703v130 739 852288 19819 617
S. cerevisiaeS288cR64–2-1 (SacCer3)37 200 564324 13324 033
Saccharomyces mikataeIFO 1815ASM16697v163 468 342246 30817 109
S. paradoxusCBS432ASM207905v145 578 830427 80130 419
Schizosaccharomyces japonicusyFS275SJ552 907 395318 95125 536
Sch. pombe972 h-ASM294v260 584 140264 00724 093
Yarrowia lipolyticaCLIB122ASM252v148 428 838356 72228 307
Table 1.

Yeast species, genome assembly and CAGE data

SpeciesStrainAssemblyCAGE readsNo. of TSS
(>0.1 TPM)
No. of CPs
C. albicansSC5314ASM18296v362 917 157354 13527 068
Kluyveromyces lactisNRRL Y-1140ASM251v159 908 113377 66523 163
Lachancea waltiiNCYC 2644ASM16711v147 907 986312 91824 069
Lachancea kluyveriNRRL Y-12651ASM14922v136 988 291220 87917 732
Naumovozyma castelliiCBS 4309ASM23734v158 897 449276 99019 382
Saccharomyces bayanus623-6CASM16703v130 739 852288 19819 617
S. cerevisiaeS288cR64–2-1 (SacCer3)37 200 564324 13324 033
Saccharomyces mikataeIFO 1815ASM16697v163 468 342246 30817 109
S. paradoxusCBS432ASM207905v145 578 830427 80130 419
Schizosaccharomyces japonicusyFS275SJ552 907 395318 95125 536
Sch. pombe972 h-ASM294v260 584 140264 00724 093
Yarrowia lipolyticaCLIB122ASM252v148 428 838356 72228 307
SpeciesStrainAssemblyCAGE readsNo. of TSS
(>0.1 TPM)
No. of CPs
C. albicansSC5314ASM18296v362 917 157354 13527 068
Kluyveromyces lactisNRRL Y-1140ASM251v159 908 113377 66523 163
Lachancea waltiiNCYC 2644ASM16711v147 907 986312 91824 069
Lachancea kluyveriNRRL Y-12651ASM14922v136 988 291220 87917 732
Naumovozyma castelliiCBS 4309ASM23734v158 897 449276 99019 382
Saccharomyces bayanus623-6CASM16703v130 739 852288 19819 617
S. cerevisiaeS288cR64–2-1 (SacCer3)37 200 564324 13324 033
Saccharomyces mikataeIFO 1815ASM16697v163 468 342246 30817 109
S. paradoxusCBS432ASM207905v145 578 830427 80130 419
Schizosaccharomyces japonicusyFS275SJ552 907 395318 95125 536
Sch. pombe972 h-ASM294v260 584 140264 00724 093
Yarrowia lipolyticaCLIB122ASM252v148 428 838356 72228 307
Table 2.

Resources and databases used for compilation and curation of data in YeasTSS

Data typeData trackSpeciesData descriptionData formatData source
TSSYPDAll speciesTSS maps produced by nAnT-iCAGE grown in YPDBWThis study
Cell arrest; DNA damage; diauxic shift; glactose (2%); glucose (16%); H2O2; heat shock; NaClS. cerevisiaeTSS maps produced by nAnT-iCAGE from cells growth in eight other conditions(2)
Pelechano_2013_YPD; Pelechano_2013_GalactoseS. cerevisiaeTSS map generated by TIF-seq from cells grown in YPD and GalactoseBW(15)
Malabat_2015_YPDS. cerevisiaeTSS map generated by transcription start site sequencing in wild type yeast cells grown in YPDBW(16)
Arribere_2013_YPD_Plus; Arribere_2013_YPD_MinusS. cerevisiaeTSS identified by TL-seqBW(41)
Doris_2018_TSS-seqS. cerevisiaeTSS maps obtained by TSS-seq from wild-type and spt6 mutant strainBW(42)
Li_2015_CAGESch. pombeTSS identified by CAGE in YPDBW(44)
Thodberg_2019_CAGESch. pombeTSS maps by CAGE from different grown environmentsBW(45)
CPYPDAll speciesCPs inferred based on nAnT-iCAGE TSS maps from cells grown in YPDBEDThis study
Consensus; cell arrest; DNA damage; diauxic shift; galactose (2%); glucose (16%); H2O2; heat shock; NaClS. cerevisiaeCPs inferred from nAnT-iCAGE TSS maps from cells growth in eight other conditionsBW(2)
TATA-boxRhee_2012S. cerevisiaeTATA-box or TATA-like elements identified based on ChIP-exo dataGFF3(52)
TFBSsVenters_2011_25°C; Venters_2011_37°CS. cerevisiaeTFBS based on ChIP-chip data with a 5% FDR threshold for cells grown at 25°C and at 37°CGFF3(50)
MacIsaac_2006S. cerevisiaeRefined TFBS map based on re-analysis ChIP-chip assaysGFF3(48)
Wood_2012Sch. pombePredicted TFBS by PombaseBED(51)
RNA polymerase II bindingGhavi-Helm_2008_WT_RNA_PolII_YPD_16°C; Ghavi-Helm_2008_WT_RNA_PolII_YPD_30°C;S. cerevisiaeGenome-wide location of RNA Pol II based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(53)
HMsKirmizis_2007_H3K4me1; Kirmizis_2007_H3K4me2; Kirmizis_2007_H3R2me2a; Kirmizis_2007_H3K4me3S. cerevisiaeH3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3R2me2a, H3K4me3 based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(55)
Pokholok_2005_H3K14ac_vs_H3_H2O2; Pokholok_2005_H3K14ac_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K36me3_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me1_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me2_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me3_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K9ac_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H4ac_vs_H3_H2O2; Pokholok_2005_H4ac_vs_H3_YPD;S. cerevisiaeThe distribution of methylated and acetylated histones based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(56)
NOField_2009_YPD; Field_2009_GALS. cerevisiaeIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for S. cerevisiae cells grown in YPD and galactoseBW(46)
Field_2009C. albicansIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for C. albicans cells grown in YPDBW(46)
Lantermann_2010Sch. pombeIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for Sch. pombe cells grown in YPDBW(47)
DS featuresZhou_2013S. cerevisiaeComputation of DS features including minor groove width, roll, propeller twists and helix twistsBW(54)
TBsWaern_2013_AlphaFactor; Waern_2013_Benomyl; Waern_2013_Calcofluor; Waern_2013_CongoRed; Waern_2013_DNADamage; Waern_2013_GrapeJuice; Waern_2013_HeatShock; Waern_2013_HighCalcium; Waern_2013_Hydroxyurea; Waern_2013_LowNitrogen; Waern_2013_LowPhosphate; Waern_2013_OxidativeStress; Waern_2013_Salt; Waern_2013_ScGlycerolMedia; Waern_2013_ScMedia; Waern_2013_Sorbitol; Waern_2013_StationaryPhaseS. cerevisiaeTranscript coordination obtained in 18 growth conditions based on RNA-seqGFF3(12)
Data typeData trackSpeciesData descriptionData formatData source
TSSYPDAll speciesTSS maps produced by nAnT-iCAGE grown in YPDBWThis study
Cell arrest; DNA damage; diauxic shift; glactose (2%); glucose (16%); H2O2; heat shock; NaClS. cerevisiaeTSS maps produced by nAnT-iCAGE from cells growth in eight other conditions(2)
Pelechano_2013_YPD; Pelechano_2013_GalactoseS. cerevisiaeTSS map generated by TIF-seq from cells grown in YPD and GalactoseBW(15)
Malabat_2015_YPDS. cerevisiaeTSS map generated by transcription start site sequencing in wild type yeast cells grown in YPDBW(16)
Arribere_2013_YPD_Plus; Arribere_2013_YPD_MinusS. cerevisiaeTSS identified by TL-seqBW(41)
Doris_2018_TSS-seqS. cerevisiaeTSS maps obtained by TSS-seq from wild-type and spt6 mutant strainBW(42)
Li_2015_CAGESch. pombeTSS identified by CAGE in YPDBW(44)
Thodberg_2019_CAGESch. pombeTSS maps by CAGE from different grown environmentsBW(45)
CPYPDAll speciesCPs inferred based on nAnT-iCAGE TSS maps from cells grown in YPDBEDThis study
Consensus; cell arrest; DNA damage; diauxic shift; galactose (2%); glucose (16%); H2O2; heat shock; NaClS. cerevisiaeCPs inferred from nAnT-iCAGE TSS maps from cells growth in eight other conditionsBW(2)
TATA-boxRhee_2012S. cerevisiaeTATA-box or TATA-like elements identified based on ChIP-exo dataGFF3(52)
TFBSsVenters_2011_25°C; Venters_2011_37°CS. cerevisiaeTFBS based on ChIP-chip data with a 5% FDR threshold for cells grown at 25°C and at 37°CGFF3(50)
MacIsaac_2006S. cerevisiaeRefined TFBS map based on re-analysis ChIP-chip assaysGFF3(48)
Wood_2012Sch. pombePredicted TFBS by PombaseBED(51)
RNA polymerase II bindingGhavi-Helm_2008_WT_RNA_PolII_YPD_16°C; Ghavi-Helm_2008_WT_RNA_PolII_YPD_30°C;S. cerevisiaeGenome-wide location of RNA Pol II based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(53)
HMsKirmizis_2007_H3K4me1; Kirmizis_2007_H3K4me2; Kirmizis_2007_H3R2me2a; Kirmizis_2007_H3K4me3S. cerevisiaeH3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3R2me2a, H3K4me3 based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(55)
Pokholok_2005_H3K14ac_vs_H3_H2O2; Pokholok_2005_H3K14ac_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K36me3_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me1_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me2_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me3_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K9ac_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H4ac_vs_H3_H2O2; Pokholok_2005_H4ac_vs_H3_YPD;S. cerevisiaeThe distribution of methylated and acetylated histones based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(56)
NOField_2009_YPD; Field_2009_GALS. cerevisiaeIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for S. cerevisiae cells grown in YPD and galactoseBW(46)
Field_2009C. albicansIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for C. albicans cells grown in YPDBW(46)
Lantermann_2010Sch. pombeIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for Sch. pombe cells grown in YPDBW(47)
DS featuresZhou_2013S. cerevisiaeComputation of DS features including minor groove width, roll, propeller twists and helix twistsBW(54)
TBsWaern_2013_AlphaFactor; Waern_2013_Benomyl; Waern_2013_Calcofluor; Waern_2013_CongoRed; Waern_2013_DNADamage; Waern_2013_GrapeJuice; Waern_2013_HeatShock; Waern_2013_HighCalcium; Waern_2013_Hydroxyurea; Waern_2013_LowNitrogen; Waern_2013_LowPhosphate; Waern_2013_OxidativeStress; Waern_2013_Salt; Waern_2013_ScGlycerolMedia; Waern_2013_ScMedia; Waern_2013_Sorbitol; Waern_2013_StationaryPhaseS. cerevisiaeTranscript coordination obtained in 18 growth conditions based on RNA-seqGFF3(12)
Table 2.

Resources and databases used for compilation and curation of data in YeasTSS

Data typeData trackSpeciesData descriptionData formatData source
TSSYPDAll speciesTSS maps produced by nAnT-iCAGE grown in YPDBWThis study
Cell arrest; DNA damage; diauxic shift; glactose (2%); glucose (16%); H2O2; heat shock; NaClS. cerevisiaeTSS maps produced by nAnT-iCAGE from cells growth in eight other conditions(2)
Pelechano_2013_YPD; Pelechano_2013_GalactoseS. cerevisiaeTSS map generated by TIF-seq from cells grown in YPD and GalactoseBW(15)
Malabat_2015_YPDS. cerevisiaeTSS map generated by transcription start site sequencing in wild type yeast cells grown in YPDBW(16)
Arribere_2013_YPD_Plus; Arribere_2013_YPD_MinusS. cerevisiaeTSS identified by TL-seqBW(41)
Doris_2018_TSS-seqS. cerevisiaeTSS maps obtained by TSS-seq from wild-type and spt6 mutant strainBW(42)
Li_2015_CAGESch. pombeTSS identified by CAGE in YPDBW(44)
Thodberg_2019_CAGESch. pombeTSS maps by CAGE from different grown environmentsBW(45)
CPYPDAll speciesCPs inferred based on nAnT-iCAGE TSS maps from cells grown in YPDBEDThis study
Consensus; cell arrest; DNA damage; diauxic shift; galactose (2%); glucose (16%); H2O2; heat shock; NaClS. cerevisiaeCPs inferred from nAnT-iCAGE TSS maps from cells growth in eight other conditionsBW(2)
TATA-boxRhee_2012S. cerevisiaeTATA-box or TATA-like elements identified based on ChIP-exo dataGFF3(52)
TFBSsVenters_2011_25°C; Venters_2011_37°CS. cerevisiaeTFBS based on ChIP-chip data with a 5% FDR threshold for cells grown at 25°C and at 37°CGFF3(50)
MacIsaac_2006S. cerevisiaeRefined TFBS map based on re-analysis ChIP-chip assaysGFF3(48)
Wood_2012Sch. pombePredicted TFBS by PombaseBED(51)
RNA polymerase II bindingGhavi-Helm_2008_WT_RNA_PolII_YPD_16°C; Ghavi-Helm_2008_WT_RNA_PolII_YPD_30°C;S. cerevisiaeGenome-wide location of RNA Pol II based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(53)
HMsKirmizis_2007_H3K4me1; Kirmizis_2007_H3K4me2; Kirmizis_2007_H3R2me2a; Kirmizis_2007_H3K4me3S. cerevisiaeH3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3R2me2a, H3K4me3 based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(55)
Pokholok_2005_H3K14ac_vs_H3_H2O2; Pokholok_2005_H3K14ac_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K36me3_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me1_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me2_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me3_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K9ac_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H4ac_vs_H3_H2O2; Pokholok_2005_H4ac_vs_H3_YPD;S. cerevisiaeThe distribution of methylated and acetylated histones based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(56)
NOField_2009_YPD; Field_2009_GALS. cerevisiaeIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for S. cerevisiae cells grown in YPD and galactoseBW(46)
Field_2009C. albicansIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for C. albicans cells grown in YPDBW(46)
Lantermann_2010Sch. pombeIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for Sch. pombe cells grown in YPDBW(47)
DS featuresZhou_2013S. cerevisiaeComputation of DS features including minor groove width, roll, propeller twists and helix twistsBW(54)
TBsWaern_2013_AlphaFactor; Waern_2013_Benomyl; Waern_2013_Calcofluor; Waern_2013_CongoRed; Waern_2013_DNADamage; Waern_2013_GrapeJuice; Waern_2013_HeatShock; Waern_2013_HighCalcium; Waern_2013_Hydroxyurea; Waern_2013_LowNitrogen; Waern_2013_LowPhosphate; Waern_2013_OxidativeStress; Waern_2013_Salt; Waern_2013_ScGlycerolMedia; Waern_2013_ScMedia; Waern_2013_Sorbitol; Waern_2013_StationaryPhaseS. cerevisiaeTranscript coordination obtained in 18 growth conditions based on RNA-seqGFF3(12)
Data typeData trackSpeciesData descriptionData formatData source
TSSYPDAll speciesTSS maps produced by nAnT-iCAGE grown in YPDBWThis study
Cell arrest; DNA damage; diauxic shift; glactose (2%); glucose (16%); H2O2; heat shock; NaClS. cerevisiaeTSS maps produced by nAnT-iCAGE from cells growth in eight other conditions(2)
Pelechano_2013_YPD; Pelechano_2013_GalactoseS. cerevisiaeTSS map generated by TIF-seq from cells grown in YPD and GalactoseBW(15)
Malabat_2015_YPDS. cerevisiaeTSS map generated by transcription start site sequencing in wild type yeast cells grown in YPDBW(16)
Arribere_2013_YPD_Plus; Arribere_2013_YPD_MinusS. cerevisiaeTSS identified by TL-seqBW(41)
Doris_2018_TSS-seqS. cerevisiaeTSS maps obtained by TSS-seq from wild-type and spt6 mutant strainBW(42)
Li_2015_CAGESch. pombeTSS identified by CAGE in YPDBW(44)
Thodberg_2019_CAGESch. pombeTSS maps by CAGE from different grown environmentsBW(45)
CPYPDAll speciesCPs inferred based on nAnT-iCAGE TSS maps from cells grown in YPDBEDThis study
Consensus; cell arrest; DNA damage; diauxic shift; galactose (2%); glucose (16%); H2O2; heat shock; NaClS. cerevisiaeCPs inferred from nAnT-iCAGE TSS maps from cells growth in eight other conditionsBW(2)
TATA-boxRhee_2012S. cerevisiaeTATA-box or TATA-like elements identified based on ChIP-exo dataGFF3(52)
TFBSsVenters_2011_25°C; Venters_2011_37°CS. cerevisiaeTFBS based on ChIP-chip data with a 5% FDR threshold for cells grown at 25°C and at 37°CGFF3(50)
MacIsaac_2006S. cerevisiaeRefined TFBS map based on re-analysis ChIP-chip assaysGFF3(48)
Wood_2012Sch. pombePredicted TFBS by PombaseBED(51)
RNA polymerase II bindingGhavi-Helm_2008_WT_RNA_PolII_YPD_16°C; Ghavi-Helm_2008_WT_RNA_PolII_YPD_30°C;S. cerevisiaeGenome-wide location of RNA Pol II based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(53)
HMsKirmizis_2007_H3K4me1; Kirmizis_2007_H3K4me2; Kirmizis_2007_H3R2me2a; Kirmizis_2007_H3K4me3S. cerevisiaeH3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3R2me2a, H3K4me3 based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(55)
Pokholok_2005_H3K14ac_vs_H3_H2O2; Pokholok_2005_H3K14ac_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K36me3_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me1_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me2_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K4me3_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H3K9ac_vs_H3_YPD; Pokholok_2005_H4ac_vs_H3_H2O2; Pokholok_2005_H4ac_vs_H3_YPD;S. cerevisiaeThe distribution of methylated and acetylated histones based on ChIP-chip assaysBW(56)
NOField_2009_YPD; Field_2009_GALS. cerevisiaeIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for S. cerevisiae cells grown in YPD and galactoseBW(46)
Field_2009C. albicansIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for C. albicans cells grown in YPDBW(46)
Lantermann_2010Sch. pombeIn vivo nucleosomes occupancy for Sch. pombe cells grown in YPDBW(47)
DS featuresZhou_2013S. cerevisiaeComputation of DS features including minor groove width, roll, propeller twists and helix twistsBW(54)
TBsWaern_2013_AlphaFactor; Waern_2013_Benomyl; Waern_2013_Calcofluor; Waern_2013_CongoRed; Waern_2013_DNADamage; Waern_2013_GrapeJuice; Waern_2013_HeatShock; Waern_2013_HighCalcium; Waern_2013_Hydroxyurea; Waern_2013_LowNitrogen; Waern_2013_LowPhosphate; Waern_2013_OxidativeStress; Waern_2013_Salt; Waern_2013_ScGlycerolMedia; Waern_2013_ScMedia; Waern_2013_Sorbitol; Waern_2013_StationaryPhaseS. cerevisiaeTranscript coordination obtained in 18 growth conditions based on RNA-seqGFF3(12)

To obtain genes’ TSS or 5’ boundary information, most researchers rely on genome annotation files conforming to the GTF (general transfer format) or GFF (general feature format). Although a few alternative TSSs may be provided in the genome annotation files, it is not feasible for the annotation files to include the detailed information of all TSSs, such as the number and activities of TSSs within and a CP, regulated activities of CPs in different cell types or under different growth conditions and CP shape. Therefore, it is necessary to visualize the TSS maps to obtain a more intuitive, accurate, informative picture of transcription initiation landscape. In addition, due to the complexity of transcription initiation in eukaryotic cells, integration and visualization of functional genomic data related to transcription initiations to the TSS maps provides an intuitive illustration of the relationships between the structural components and functional elements, which could facilitate future studies about regulatory mechanism of transcription initiation. The visualization also serves as useful tools for teaching and public education to demonstrate the complexity and dynamics of transcription initiation of eukaryotic genes.

The human and mouse TSS maps can be visualized through `The FANTOM web resource’ (33) and `ZENBU’ (34). ZENBU also provides data integration, data analysis and visualization system enhanced for RNA-seq, Chip-Seq and other types of high-throughput data (34). The Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) has been a popular resource for yeast research community that provides integration and visualization of various functional genomic data (35). To our knowledge, there is no web resource dedicated for visualization and integration of functional genomics data related to the transcription initiation landscape for the yeast species. Many yeast species have been served as important model organisms, widely used in daily human life, as workhorse for food, brewery and energy industries. Particularly, the budding yeast S. cerevisiae has served as eukaryotic model organisms for many landmark discoveries in gene regulation mechanisms and other cellular processes over the past several decades (36). In this study, we generated high-resolution TSS maps for 12 important yeast species with divergence times ranging from 5 to 300 million years (37). We inferred CPs for each of these species based on the quantitative TSS maps. We built a new web database: YeasTSS (www.yeastss.org), to provide free access, visualization and integration of the TSS maps, predicted CPs, as well as other functional genomic data related to transcription initiation for yeast species. This depth and breadth of this database are valuable for the research community to improve the genome annotation of these yeast species, to study the regulated and evolutionary dynamic of transcription initiation landscape and its underlying genomic changes.

Materials and methods

Generation of TSS maps and inferences of CPs

TSS maps and inferred CPs are the core data of YeasTSS. We generated the TSS maps for the 12 yeast species using a revised CAGE protocol called no-amplification non-tagging CAGE libraries for Illumina sequencers (nAnT-iCAGE) (38). The nAnT-iCAGE protocol does not involve PCR amplification or restriction enzyme digestion (38), which reduced the bias created by the two processes. The cells of each species were inoculated and grown to mid-log phase in yeast extract–peptone–dextrose (YPD) medium at 30°C for total RNA isolation. Two biological replicates of nAnT-iCAGE libraries were generated for each species. All nAnT-iCAGE libraries were sequenced using Illumina NextSeq 500 (single-end, 75 bp reads) at the DNAFORM, Yokohama, Japan. A total number of 838 624 674 reads were generated from the 24 libraries (Table 1). The raw CAGE sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA; Bioproject accession number: PRJNA510689).

We identified TSS and infer CP based on the nAnT-iCAGE sequencing reads using a protocol described in (2) with necessary modifications. Briefly, CAGE tags were mapped to the reference genome of each species using HISAT2 (39) with no soft-clipping allowed. If the annotation of rRNA is available, CAGE tags mapped to rRNA were removed using rRNAdust (http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/sstar/Protocols:rRNAdust). Only those uniquely mapped tags, (621401708) were used for TSS identification. CAGE-detected TSS (CTSS) were defined after correcting systematic G nucleotide addition bias at the 5’ end of CAGE tags. To filter background noise, we only considered those CTSSs with a tag per million (TPM) of ≥0.1 for CP identification. A CP defined in this study is a cluster of nearby TSSs in a small genomic region, which reflect the transcriptional activity from the same set of general transcriptional machinery. Specifically, TSSs within 20 bp of each other were clustered as tag clusters (TCs). We then calculated the distribution of CAGE signals within a TC and used the positions of 10% quantiles and positions of 90% quantiles of CAGE signals as the boundaries of this TC. If the boundaries of two TCs are <50 bp, TCs were then aggregated together into a single-set non-overlapping consensus clusters, corresponding putative CPs.

The quantitative TSS maps and CPs of S. cerevisiae in nine growth conditions were obtained from our previous study (2). These condition-specific TSS maps were generated using S. cerevisiae BY4741 strain (MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0).

Sources of genome sequence, annotation and functional genomic data

The reference genome sequence and the annotation files were obtained from the SGD (35), NCBI Genome or Yeast Gene Order Browser (40) (Table 1). In addition to the TSS maps generated in this study, YeasTSS also include 5’ boundary of transcripts data of S. cerevisiae (15, 16, 41–43) and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (44, 45) obtained from other studies. We integrated multiple functional genomics data related to transcription initiation regulation and promoter structures in several well-studied species (Table 2). The in vivo NO data of S. cerevisiae and Candida albicans were downloaded from Field et al. (46). We obtained the in vivo NO data of Sch. pombe from Lantermann et al. (47). The locations of TFBS locations in S. cerevisiae were determined according to the motif-discovery algorithm from MacIsaac et al. (48), which is based on reanalysis of ChIP-chip data (49), and from Venters et al. (50). The TFBS data in Sch. pombe was retrieved from (51). The lists of TATA box motif in S. cerevisiae were obtained from (52). YeasTSS also integrates the genome-wide location information of RNA polymerase II, which were obtained by ChIP-chip assays (53), DNA shape (DS) features (54), HMs (55, 56) and RNA transcript boundaries (TBs) inferred from RNA-seq data (12) in S. cerevisiae. The types of functional genomic data, description of data and their source used in YeasTSS are shown in Table 2.

Data format

BED (Browser Extensible Data) format was used for functional genomic data only requires genomic coordinate information, such as the predicted CPs, TFBS locations, TATA box and TBs. BedGraph is a simple tab-delimited text format that is popular on most genome browser including the University of California Santa Cruz browser (57) for displaying the numerical value of the sequencing data at each position. However, the BedGraph text format is slow for loading and refreshing of a large data set in most genome browsers. BigWig (BW) format is a compressed binary format designed for displaying high-throughput next-generation sequencing data efficiently and effectively in genome browsers (58). We used BW format for data including both genomic coordinates and signal strength, such as quantitative TSS maps, HMs and NO. The `BigWig’ files were converted from `BedGraph’ format to allow fast and efficient remote access to the web browser server from end-users’ computers. The genomic sequence, annotation and functional genomic data in each yeast species were integrated by their genomic coordinates.

Database development, implementation and genome browser configuration

The YeasTSS web resource was built using various computing techniques, such as Amazon Web Service (AWS), Apache web server, JBrowse utilities, PHP, Python and Bootstrap framework. Instead of using a SQL or non-SQL database, we used various data types and in-house programs for retrieving and searching data in fast turn-around time that reduced the burden of data management and save time and costs by migrating data files to the database. The web server was built on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) that is an AWS web service to provide secure and resizable compute capacity in the cloud. The web server stores all data files and relevant programs for the YeasTSS database. Apache HTTP Server (Version 2.4.34) is used as a web server engine. JBrowse (Version 1.14.0), a genome browser being developed as the successor to GBrowse (59), was selected and incorporated into YeasTSS by its fast, scalable and usable advantages. JBrowse provides fast and smooth scrolling and zooming to explore genome and sequencing information. It can scale easily to multi-gigabase genomes and deep-coverage sequencing data. JBrowse also supports various formats of sequencing data including GFF3, BED, FASTA, Wiggle, BigWig, BAM, VCF, REST and more. Especially, BAM, BigWig and VCF data can be displayed directly from the compressed binary file with no conversion or extraction needed. The search functionality of the database uses PHP (Version 7.0.30) to parse the query terms and Python (Version 3.6.5) to retrieve data from the database and returns outputs in a user-friendly format. The Bootstrap (Version 4.1.1), an open source toolkit for developing with HTML, CSS and JavaScript, is used in the YeasTSS web pages.

Results

YeasTSS web interface

YeasTSS (http://www.yeastss.org/) aims to provide visualization, access and integration of quantitation TSS maps, CPs and various functional genomic data related to transcription initiation for important yeast species. YeasTSS provides free access and is not password-protected, and it does not require login or registration. As of December 2018, YeasTSS contains 12 different yeast species (Table 1 and Figure 1), including 10 budding yeast species (such as model organism S. cerevisiae and human pathogen C. albicans) and two fission yeast species (including another model organism Sch. pombe). The evolutionary relationships of these species, which were obtained from previous studies (37, 60), were shown by the phylogenetic tree in Figure 1. The divergence times among these species ranges from a few million years (between S. cerevisiae to Saccharomyces paradoxus) to over 300 million years (between fission yeast and budding yeast) (37). The wide range of divergence times is valuable for studies of the evolutionary dynamic of transcription initiation landscape of promoter structures at different time scales.

Figure 1

The overall design of YeasTSS. (A) Dataset: The dataset used in YeasTSS is illustrated in this central table. Currently, YeasTSS includes 12 yeast species. The evolutionary relationships of these species are demonstrated by the phylogenetic tree on the left side of data table. The clade of 10 budding yeast species is shaded in green, and the clade of 2 fission yeast species is shaded in yellow. The CP and TSS data of each species were generated by this study. NO data are integrated for S. cerevisiae, Sch. pombe and C. albicans. TFBSs are available in S. cerevisiae and Sch. pombe. For S. cerevisiae, several other functional genomic data are also integrated: TATA-box, DS, HMs, Polymerase II binding (PolII) and TBs obtained from 18 different growth conditions. (B) Genome browser: These data are visualized and integrated by dedicated JBrowse genome browser of each species. (C) Search: The `Search’ utility provides search tools in to retrieve TSS and CP information from gene-by-gene analysis or global approaches. (D) Download: The `Download’ utility allows users to download all raw data used in this database through web interface. (E) Help: The `Help’ page provides documentations about of CAGE technique, TSS identification, inferences of CPs and instructions of using genome browsers.

Figure 2

An Example of using YeasTSS Genome Browser to explore transcription initiation landscape. A 1.5 kb region around the CP region of LAS17 on chrXV (674 807–676 348). The available tracks in S. cerevisiae are provided in the left panel of genome browser. Two consensus CPs on the forward strand are present within 1000 bp upstream of LAS17 ORF. The transcription activity of each CP can be visualized by the TSS tracks. Different CP activities can be observed between the YPD and YPGal (galactose 2%) growth conditions in S. cerevisiae. Only a few tracks were selected in this case. These tracks include: (A) Genome annotation from SGD; (B) consensus CPs; (C) TSS map on plus strand under YPD condition; (D) TSS map on plus strand under YPGal (galactose 2%) condition; (E) TSS map on minus strand under YPD condition; (F) TSS map on minus strand under YPGal condition; (G) nucleosome occupancy under YPD condition; (H) Nucleosome occupancy under YPGal condition; (I) TATA box; (J) position weight matrix (PWM) predicted binding sites; (K) histone modification H3K4me1; (L) histone modification H3K4me2.

The homepage of YeasTSS provides a brief introduction of the database and navigation to its three major utilities: `Genome Browser’, `Search’ and `Download’ (Fig. 1). These utilities can be accessed from the header bar of the homepage. The header bar is also available at all other pages of the website so users can access and jump to any data set from any page on the website. Under the header bar of the homepage, a phylogenetic tree shows the evolutionary relationships of included yeast species. By clicking the species name in the phylogenetic tree, it will open its own dedicated genome browser page in a new window. Alternatively, the users can click the species name from the dropdown menu from `Genome Browser’ in the header bar to open a new window for its genome browser. A brief description of the YeasTSS is also provided in the homepage. Detailed documentation of YeasTSS is provided by `Help’ webpage, which can be accessed from the link in the header bar. The `Help’ page provides information about of CAGE technique, TSS identification, inferences of CPs and instructions of using genome browsers.

Data visualization and integration using JBrowse genome browser

Graphical web visualization and integration of TSS maps with other functional genomic data are carried out by JBrowse genome browser in YeasTSS. Each species has a dedicated JBrowse genome browser page. Users can open a genome browser for any species in a new window by clicking the species name in the phylogenetic tree at the homepage or by clicking the species name in the dropdown menu of `Genome Browser’ in the header bar. In the genome browser of each species, a user may click the chromosome names to switch the display between different chromosomes and use the left and right arrows to browse different chromosome regions. To visualize the transcription initiation landscape or promoter structure of a gene or a specific genomic region, users can enter the chromosomal coordinate ranges, gene or locus name in the search box of the genome browser. JBrowse includes a `faceted’ track selector, which allows users to interactively search for the tracks they are interested in based on the metadata for each track. By clicking on the features of non-quantitative tracks, such as gene annotation, predicted CP, TFBS or TATA box, users will be brought to the detail description page of the features and its associated nucleotide sequences.

To illustrate how YeasTSS can be used to visualize the complex and dynamic transcription initiation landscape and promoter structure, we demonstrated an example of using YeasTSS JBrowse genome browser to explore the LAS17 (YOR181W) gene in S. cerevisiae gene (Fig. 2). LAS17 encodes an actin-binding protein involved in actin filament organization and polymerization (61). To simplify the illustration, only a few tracks in faceted track selector were selected. As shown in Figure 2, two predicted CPs, which are about 500 bp apart, are present in the upstream of LAS17 ORF, suggesting that two different sets of transcription machinery may be assembled to initiate the transcription of LAS17. Here, we called the CP that is more proximal to the LAS17 ORF as `LAS17-CP1’, while the distal one as `LAS17-CP2’. Transcription from the two CPs generates transcripts isoforms with distinct lengths in the 5′ untranslated region (5’ UTR). The presence of multiple CPs in a gene has been shown to be prevalent in S. cerevisiae (2) as well as in mammals (3).

The detailed transcription activity within a CP is visualized by the TSS track, which is shown as XY-Plot wiggle track. The transcription activity from each TSS is normalized as TPM. The TPM values on the y-axis scale of XY-Plot wiggle track are auto-scaled to the range of TPMs in the displayed window. The TSS signals of the forward (plus) strand and reverse (minus) strand are shown in separate tracks for better visualization effects, considering the TSS signal strengths could be dramatically different between the two strands in some genomic region. The TSS signals of the forward (plus) strand are shown as positive TPM values, while TPM values are negative from the reverse (minus) strand. Within a CP, transcription is initiated from a cluster of nearby TSSs, rather than a single TSS, which generates transcripts with slightly different lengths. A dominant TSS that accounts for the majority of transcriptional activities is found in most CPs. The distributions of TSS activity signals are very different among CPs, forming different promoter shapes, ranging from sharp to broad.

It has been found that CP shapes are associated with distinct regulatory patterns (3, 4). In this case, LAS17-CP1 demonstrates a sharper shape than LAS17-CP2. Interestingly, the transcription activities of LAS17-CP1 are much stronger than that of LAS17-CP2 grown in rich medium (YPD). However, the relative transcription activities from the two CPs have a significant shift if the glucose in the growth medium is replaced by 2% galactose. This phenomenon is called CP shift, which is found prevalent in yeast (2), mammals and fruit fly (62, 63). CP shift generates transcripts with distinct 5’ UTRs or results in usage of alternative translation start codon, which was speculated to have significant impacts on the translation efficiency (64, 65) or mRNA stability (66). According to the in vivo NO measured in yeast cells grown in YPD and galactose, both CPs are located near the 3’ end of NDRs, which is consistent to the genome-wide observations (8). Different H3 methylation patterns are shown near the CP of LAS17. For instance, strong H3K4me1 signals are detected in the entire ORF of LAS17, while H3K4me2 signals are enriched in the 5’ end of ORF. In contrast, H3K4me3 signals are mainly detected upstream of LAS17 ORF, corresponding to the promoter regions, suggesting that different histone methylations might occur at different regions of a gene. In addition, two putative TATA-box motifs are present near 5’ end of LAS17-CP1, while several TFBS motifs are found in the proximal region of LAS17-CP2, suggesting that probably different regulatory mechanisms were involved in the usage of the two CPs.

Search and download utilities of the YeasTSS

The `Search’ utility provides search tools to retrieve TSS and CP information from gene-by-gene analysis or global approaches. The users have two ways to receive the CP and TSS data by using the search utility. First, a user can simply select a species and provide gene name(s) in the search box. A user may define the genomic range by providing specific numbers of base pairs before and after the start position of gene’s ORF (default values: 1000 bp upstream before gene start and 100 bp after gene start). Alternatively, a user can provide a gene list in comma-separated value format that should have a format of gene name, bases before gene start and bases after gene start position. Instead of traditional SQL-based database query, this program-based search is very fast and scalable. The search output includes the genome coordinates, transcription abundance of CPs (TPM) or tag counts of TSS within the defined searched range. A `Quick Search’ panel is also available on the homepage for the users to quickly retrieve the TSS or CP data of given gene name(s) with default parameters. The `Download’ utility allows users to download all raw data used in this database through a web interface. The download page shows a brief description of each data file for users to easily capture the file content. The Download section also provides a download link to a text file that includes detailed gene lists of 7193 orthologous groups in the 12 species. These orthologous groups were inferred using OrthoDB (67), which can be used to study the evolutionary dynamics of TSS landscape among orthologous genes during the evolution of yeast.

Discussion

The YeasTSS database provides a user-friendly interface for users to visualize the transcription initiation landscape and promoter structures in yeast species. YeasTSS has already been demonstrated its usefulness as a tool to support research on transcription initiation processes in yeast. YeasTSS will be periodically updated when new TSS maps or functional genomic data are available. We plan to significantly extend the capabilities of the database to increase its usefulness and functionality. Specifically, we will (i) generate TSS maps using CAGE for more yeast species and for more S. cerevisiae strains, such as wild strains, wine and pathogenic strains; (ii) integrate more functional genomics data from S. cerevisiae as well as other yeast species; and (iii) provide a graph generating tool to produce figures of any genomic region of interest for publication purpose. The data and functionality are valuable for many studies, such as analysis of the regulatory mechanism of core promote usage, the evolutionary dynamic of promoter structures, identification of 5’ end boundaries of genes, improving the accuracy of genome annotation, prediction of novel genes, predictions of TFBSs and inference of gene regulatory network. Therefore, we are confident that YeasTSS will attract a broad audience and will become a popular resource of the research community in the field of genetics, genomics and molecular biology.

Funding

Saint Louis University’s Beaumont Award (to ZL); National Science Foundation (NSF) (CRII-1566292 and 1564894 to T.A.); Saint Louis University President’s Research Fund (to TA).

Conflict of interest. None declared.

Database URL: http://yeastss.org/

References

1.

Butler
,
J.E.
and
Kadonaga
,
J.T.
(
2002
)
The RNA polymerase II core promoter: a key component in the regulation of gene expression
.
Genes Dev.
,
16
,
2583
2592
.

2.

Lu
,
Z.
and
Lin
,
Z.
(
2018
)
Pervasive and Dynamic Transcription Initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
. bioRxiv 450429; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/450429.

3.

Carninci
,
P.
,
Sandelin
,
A.
,
Lenhard
,
B.
et al.  (
2006
)
Genome-wide analysis of mammalian promoter architecture and evolution
.
Nat. Genet.
,
38
,
626
635
.

4.

Hoskins
,
R.A.
,
Landolin
,
J.M.
,
Brown
,
J.B.
et al.  (
2011
)
Genome-wide analysis of promoter architecture in Drosophila melanogaster
.
Genome Res.
,
21
,
182
192
.

5.

Raborn
,
R.T.
,
Spitze
,
K.
,
Brendel
,
V.P.
et al.  (
2016
)
Promoter architecture and sex-specific gene expression in Daphnia pulex
.
Genetics
,
204
,
593
612
.

6.

Hurowitz
,
E.H.
and
Brown
,
P.O.
(
2003
)
Genome-wide analysis of mRNA lengths in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
.
Genome Biol.
,
5
,
R2
.

7.

David
,
L.
,
Huber
,
W.
,
Granovskaia
,
M.
et al.  (
2006
)
A high-resolution map of transcription in the yeast genome
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
,
103
,
5320
5325
.

8.

Xu
,
Z.
,
Wei
,
W.
,
Gagneur
,
J.
et al.  (
2009
)
Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast
.
Nature
,
457
,
1033
1037
.

9.

Zhang
,
Z.
and
Dietrich
,
F.S.
(
2005
)
Mapping of transcription start sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using 5' SAGE
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
33
,
2838
2851
.

10.

Miura
,
F.
,
Kawaguchi
,
N.
,
Sese
,
J.
et al.  (
2006
)
A large-scale full-length cDNA analysis to explore the budding yeast transcriptome
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
,
103
,
17846
17851
.

11.

Nagalakshmi
,
U.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Waern
,
K.
et al.  (
2008
)
The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing
.
Science (New York, N.Y.)
,
320
,
1344
1349
.

12.

Waern
,
K.
and
Snyder
,
M.
(
2013
)
Extensive transcript diversity and novel upstream open reading frame regulation in yeast
.
G3 (Bethesda)
,
3
,
343
352
.

13.

Carninci
,
P.
,
Kasukawa
,
T.
,
Katayama
,
S.
et al.  (
2005
)
The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome
.
Science (New York, N.Y.)
,
309
,
1559
1563
.

14.

Takahashi
,
H.
,
Lassmann
,
T.
,
Murata
,
M.
et al.  (
2012
)
5′ end-centered expression profiling using cap-analysis gene expression and next-generation sequencing
.
Nat Protoc
,
7
,
542
561
.

15.

Pelechano
,
V.
,
Wei
,
W.
and
Steinmetz
,
L.M.
(
2013
)
Extensive transcriptional heterogeneity revealed by isoform profiling
.
Nature
,
497
,
127
131
.

16.

Malabat
,
C.
,
Feuerbach
,
F.
,
Ma
,
L.
et al.  (
2015
)
Quality control of transcription start site selection by nonsense-mediated-mRNA decay
.
eLife
, 2015;
4
:e06722.

17.

FANTOM Consortium and the RIKEN PMI and CLST (DGT)
,
Forrest
,
A.R.
,
Kawaji
,
H.
et al.  (
2014
)
A promoter-level mammalian expression atlas
.
Nature
,
507
,
462
470
.

18.

Haberle
,
V.
,
Li
,
N.
,
Hadzhiev
,
Y.
et al.  (
2014
)
Two independent transcription initiation codes overlap on vertebrate core promoters
.
Nature
,
507
,
381
385
.

19.

Arrick
,
B.A.
,
Lee
,
A.L.
,
Grendell
,
R.L.
et al.  (
1991
)
Inhibition of translation of transforming growth factor-beta 3 mRNA by its 5′ untranslated region
.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
,
11
,
4306
4313
.

20.

Romeo
,
D.S.
,
Park
,
K.
,
Roberts
,
A.B.
et al.  (
1993
)
An element of the transforming growth factor-beta 1 5′-untranslated region represses translation and specifically binds a cytosolic factor
.
Mol. Endocrinol.
,
7
,
759
766
.

21.

Capoulade
,
C.
,
Mir
,
L.M.
,
Carlier
,
K.
et al.  (
2001
)
Apoptosis of tumoral and nontumoral lymphoid cells is induced by both mdm2 and p53 antisense oligodeoxynucleotides
.
Blood
,
97
,
1043
1049
.

22.

Sobczak
,
K.
and
Krzyzosiak
,
W.J.
(
2002
)
Structural determinants of BRCA1 translational regulation
.
J. Biol. Chem.
,
277
,
17349
17358
.

23.

Mihailovich
,
M.
,
Thermann
,
R.
,
Grohovaz
,
F.
et al.  (
2007
)
Complex translational regulation of BACE1 involves upstream AUGs and stimulatory elements within the 5′ untranslated region
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
35
,
2975
2985
.

24.

Smale
,
S.T.
and
Kadonaga
,
J.T.
(
2003
)
The RNA polymerase II core promoter
.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
,
72
,
449
479
.

25.

Lin
,
Z.
,
Wu
,
W.S.
,
Liang
,
H.
et al.  (
2010
)
The spatial distribution of cis regulatory elements in yeast promoters and its implications for transcriptional regulation
.
BMC Genomics
,
11
,
581
.

26.

Jiang
,
C.
and
Pugh
,
B.F.
(
2009
)
Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics
.
Nat. Rev.
,
10
,
161
172
.

27.

Tirosh
,
I.
and
Barkai
,
N.
(
2008
)
Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes
.
Genome Res.
,
18
,
1084
1091
.

28.

Lee
,
W.
,
Tillo
,
D.
,
Bray
,
N.
et al.  (
2007
)
A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast
.
Nat. Genet.
,
39
,
1235
1244
.

29.

Yuan
,
G.C.
,
Liu
,
Y.J.
,
Dion
,
M.F.
et al.  (
2005
)
Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. Cerevisiae
.
Science (New York, N.Y.)
,
309
,
626
630
.

30.

True
,
J.D.
,
Muldoon
,
J.J.
,
Carver
,
M.N.
et al.  (
2016
)
The modifier of transcription 1 (Mot1) ATPase and Spt16 histone chaperone co-regulate transcription through Preinitiation complex assembly and nucleosome organization
.
J. Biol. Chem.
,
291
,
15307
15319
.

31.

Shen
,
X.
,
Mizuguchi
,
G.
,
Hamiche
,
A.
et al.  (
2000
)
A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing
.
Nature
,
406
,
541
544
.

32.

Shilatifard
,
A.
(
2006
)
Chromatin modifications by methylation and ubiquitination: implications in the regulation of gene expression
.
Annu. Review Biochem.
,
75
,
243
269
.

33.

Kawaji
,
H.
,
Severin
,
J.
,
Lizio
,
M.
et al.  (
2009
)
The FANTOM web resource: from mammalian transcriptional landscape to its dynamic regulation
.
Genome Biol.
,
10
,
R40
.

34.

Severin
,
J.
,
Lizio
,
M.
,
Harshbarger
,
J.
et al.  (
2014
)
Interactive visualization and analysis of large-scale sequencing datasets using ZENBU
.
Nat. Biotechnol.
,
32
,
217
219
.

35.

Cherry
,
J.M.
,
Hong
,
E.L.
,
Amundsen
,
C.
et al.  (
2012
)
Saccharomyces genome database: the genomics resource of budding yeast
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
40
,
D700
D705
.

36.

Duina
,
A.A.
,
Miller
,
M.E.
and
Keeney
,
J.B.
(
2014
)
Budding yeast for budding geneticists: a primer on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae model system
.
Genetics
,
197
,
33
48
.

37.

Rhind
,
N.
,
Chen
,
Z.
,
Yassour
,
M.
et al.  (
2011
)
Comparative functional genomics of the fission yeasts
.
Science (New York, N.Y.)
,
332
,
930
936
.

38.

Murata
,
M.
,
Nishiyori-Sueki
,
H.
,
Kojima-Ishiyama
,
M.
et al.  (
2014
)
Detecting expressed genes using CAGE
.
Methods Mol. Biol.
,
1164
,
67
85
.

39.

Kim
,
D.
,
Langmead
,
B.
and
Salzberg
,
S.L.
(
2015
)
HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements
.
Nat. Methods
,
12
,
357
360
.

40.

Byrne
,
K.P.
and
Wolfe
,
K.H.
(
2005
)
The yeast gene order browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species
.
Genome Res.
,
15
,
1456
1461
.

41.

Arribere
,
J.A.
and
Gilbert
,
W.V.
(
2013
)
Roles for transcript leaders in translation and mRNA decay revealed by transcript leader sequencing
.
Genome Res.
,
23
,
977
987
.

42.

Doris
,
S.M.
,
Chuang
,
J.
,
Viktorovskaya
,
O.
et al.  (
2018
)
Spt6 is required for the Fidelity of promoter selection
.
Mol. Cell
,
72
,
687
699
.

43.

Pelechano
,
V.
,
Wei
,
W.
,
Jakob
,
P.
et al.  (
2014
)
Genome-wide identification of transcript start and end sites by transcript isoform sequencing
.
Nat. Protoc.
,
9
,
1740
1759
.

44.

Li
,
H.
,
Hou
,
J.
,
Bai
,
L.
et al.  (
2015
)
Genome-wide analysis of core promoter structures in Schizosaccharomyces pombe with DeepCAGE
.
RNA Biol.
,
12
,
525
537
.

45.

Thodberg
,
M.
,
Thieffry
,
A.
,
Bornholdt
,
J.
et al.  (
2019
)
Comprehensive profiling of the fission yeast transcription start site activity during stress and media response
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
47
,
1671
1691
.

46.

Field
,
Y.
,
Fondufe-Mittendorf
,
Y.
,
Moore
,
I.K.
et al.  (
2009
)
Gene expression divergence in yeast is coupled to evolution of DNA-encoded nucleosome organization
.
Nature Genet.
,
41
,
438
445
.

47.

Lantermann
,
A.B.
,
Straub
,
T.
,
Stralfors
,
A.
et al.  (
2010
)
Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome-wide nucleosome mapping reveals positioning mechanisms distinct from those of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.
,
17
,
251
257
.

48.

MacIsaac
,
K.D.
,
Wang
,
T.
,
Gordon
,
D.B.
et al.  (
2006
)
An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae
.
BMC Bioinformatics
,
7
,
113
.

49.

Harbison
,
C.T.
,
Gordon
,
D.B.
,
Lee
,
T.I.
et al.  (
2004
)
Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome
.
Nature
,
431
,
99
104
.

50.

Venters
,
B.J.
,
Wachi
,
S.
,
Mavrich
,
T.N.
et al.  (
2011
)
A comprehensive genomic binding map of gene and chromatin regulatory proteins in saccharomyces
.
Mol. Cell
,
41
,
480
492
.

51.

Wood
,
V.
,
Harris
,
M.A.
,
McDowall
,
M.D.
et al.  (
2012
)
PomBase: a comprehensive online resource for fission yeast
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
40
,
D695
D699
.

52.

Rhee
,
H.S.
and
Pugh
,
B.F.
(
2012
)
Genome-wide structure and organization of eukaryotic pre-initiation complexes
.
Nature
,
483
,
295
301
.

53.

Ghavi-Helm
,
Y.
,
Michaut
,
M.
,
Acker
,
J.
et al.  (
2008
)
Genome-wide location analysis reveals a role of TFIIS in RNA polymerase III transcription
.
Genes Dev.
,
22
,
1934
1947
.

54.

Zhou
,
T.
,
Yang
,
L.
,
Lu
,
Y.
et al.  (
2013
)
DNAshape: a method for the high-throughput prediction of DNA structural features on a genomic scale
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
41
,
W56
W62
.

55.

Kirmizis
,
A.
,
Santos-Rosa
,
H.
,
Penkett
,
C.J.
et al.  (
2007
)
Arginine methylation at histone H3R2 controls deposition of H3K4 trimethylation
.
Nature
,
449
,
928
932
.

56.

Pokholok
,
D.K.
,
Harbison
,
C.T.
,
Levine
,
S.
et al.  (
2005
)
Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast
.
Cell
,
122
,
517
527
.

57.

Karolchik
,
D.
,
Hinrichs
,
A.S.
,
Furey
,
T.S.
et al.  (
2004
)
The UCSC table browser data retrieval tool
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
32
,
D493
D496
.

58.

Kent
,
W.J.
,
Zweig
,
A.S.
,
Barber
,
G.
et al.  (
2010
)
BigWig and BigBed: enabling browsing of large distributed datasets
.
Bioinformatics
,
26
,
2204
2207
.

59.

Skinner
,
M.E.
,
Uzilov
,
A.V.
,
Stein
,
L.D.
et al.  (
2009
)
JBrowse: a next-generation genome browser
.
Genome Res.
,
19
,
1630
1638
.

60.

Shen
,
X.X.
,
Zhou
,
X.
,
Kominek
,
J.
et al.  (
2016
)
Reconstructing the backbone of the Saccharomycotina yeast phylogeny using genome-scale data
.
G3 (Bethesda)
,
6
,
3927
3939
.

61.

Naqvi
,
S.N.
,
Zahn
,
R.
,
Mitchell
,
D.A.
et al.  (
1998
)
The WASp homologue Las17p functions with the WIP homologue End5p/verprolin and is essential for endocytosis in yeast
.
Curr. Biol.
,
8
,
959
962
.

62.

Batut
,
P.
,
Dobin
,
A.
,
Plessy
,
C.
et al.  (
2013
)
High-fidelity promoter profiling reveals widespread alternative promoter usage and transposon-driven developmental gene expression
.
Genome Res.
,
23
,
169
180
.

63.

Davuluri
,
R.V.
,
Suzuki
,
Y.
,
Sugano
,
S.
et al.  (
2008
)
The functional consequences of alternative promoter use in mammalian genomes
.
Trends Genet.
,
24
,
167
177
.

64.

Kudla
,
G.
,
Murray
,
A.W.
,
Tollervey
,
D.
et al.  (
2009
)
Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli
.
Science (New York, N.Y.)
,
324
,
255
258
.

65.

Livingstone
,
M.
,
Atas
,
E.
,
Meller
,
A.
et al.  (
2010
)
Mechanisms governing the control of mRNA translation
.
Phys. Biol.
,
7
,
021001
.

66.

Harigaya
,
Y.
and
Parker
,
R.
(
2016
)
Codon optimality and mRNA decay
.
Cell Res
,
26
,
1269
1270
.

67.

Kriventseva
,
E.V.
,
Tegenfeldt
,
F.
,
Petty
,
T.J.
et al.  (
2014
)
OrthoDB v8: update of the hierarchical catalog of orthologs and the underlying free software
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
43
,
D250
D256
.

Author notes

Jonathan McMillan and Zhaolian Lu contributed equally to this work.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.