Development and validation of a risk prediction tool for the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in patients presenting in primary care with abdominal symptoms

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) may experience delays in their diagnosis. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction tool for IBD.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using primary care data from 2010 to 2019, including symptomatic patients aged ≥18. UK-based primary care databases linked to hospital records, were utilized for model development and validation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to derive risk equations for IBD, ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn’s disease (CD) in men and women. Candidate predictors included demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, extraintestinal manifestations, and laboratory results. Model performance was evaluated using measures of fit, discrimination, and calibration at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after symptom onset.

Results

2,054,530 patients were included in the derivation cohort and 673,320 in the validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, 0.7% were diagnosed with IBD (66.3% UC and 33.7% CD). Predictors in the final IBD model included age, smoking, body mass index, gastrointestinal symptoms, extraintestinal manifestations, comorbidities, family history of IBD and laboratory investigations. The model demonstrated good discrimination and calibration; C-statistic 0.78 (95%CI 0.77-0.79) in men and 0.78 (95%CI 0.77-0.79) in women. In the validation cohort the model tended to slightly overestimate IBD risk at higher risk thresholds.

Conclusion

A risk model using patient demographics, symptoms, and laboratory results accurately predicted IBD, UC, and CD at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after symptom onset, potentially aiding in prioritizing patients for referral or faecal calprotectin (FC) testing in primary care.

Graphical Abstract

Accepted manuscripts

Accepted manuscripts are PDF versions of the author’s final manuscript, as accepted for publication by the journal but prior to copyediting or typesetting. They can be cited using the author(s), article title, journal title, year of online publication, and DOI. They will be replaced by the final typeset articles, which may therefore contain changes. The DOI will remain the same throughout.

Author notes

Shamil Haroon, Nigel Trudgill and Nicola J Adderley Joint senior authors