-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Olaf M Dekkers, Why not to (over)emphasize statistical significance, European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 181, Issue 3, Sep 2019, Pages E1–E2, https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-19-0531
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
P values should not merely be used to categorize results into significant and non-significant. This practice disregards clinical relevance, confounds non-significance with no effect and underestimates the likelihood of false-positive results. Better than to use the P value as a dichotomizing instrument, the P values and the confidence intervals around effect estimates can be used to put research findings in a context, thereby taking clinical relevance but also uncertainty genuinely into account.
© 2019 European Society of Endocrinology
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
Issue Section:
Methodological Editorial
You do not currently have access to this article.