Skip to Main Content

Methodology Editorials

What is the research question? Estimands explained
Rolf H H Groenwold and others
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 192, Issue 3, March 2025, Pages E5–E7, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvaf048
Although many papers of medical research report on a treatment effect, it is not always clear what is exactly meant by that effect. An estimand is a precise definition of a treatment effect and includes 5 attributes: population, treatment, (outcome) variable, intercurrent events, and summary ...
When selection becomes selection bias
Kristina Laugesen and others
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 192, Issue 2, February 2025, Pages E1–E3, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvaf014
Selection in clinical research does not necessarily result in selection bias . To understand when selection leads to bias, we discuss collider-conditioning bias, which is a common and often self-inflicted type of selection bias. Collider-conditioning bias may be difficult to recognize, and paying ...
The power of sample size calculations
Marieke S Jansen and others
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 191, Issue 5, November 2024, Pages E5–E9, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvae129
Researchers frequently come across sample size calculations in the scientific literature they read, in projects undertaken by their peers, and likely within their own work. However, despite its ubiquity, calculating a sample size is often perceived as a hurdle and not fully understood. This paper ...
Ten things to remember about propensity scores
Rolf H H Groenwold and others
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 191, Issue 1, July 2024, Pages E1–E4, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvae067
Propensity score methods are popular to control for confounding in observational biomedical studies of risk factors or medical treatments. This paper focused on aspects of propensity score methods that often remain undiscussed, including unmeasured confounding, missing data, variable selection, ...
Directed acyclic graphs in clinical research
Olaf M Dekkers and others
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 190, Issue 4, April 2024, Pages E5–E7, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvae032
Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), or causal diagrams, are graphical representations of causal structures that can be used in medical research to understand and illustrate potential bias, including bias arising from confounding, selection, and misclassification. Further, they provide guidance for ...
Dependent observations in clinical research
Rolf H H Groenwold and Olaf M Dekkers
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 190, Issue 2, February 2024, Pages E1–E3, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvae014
For many statistical methods that are commonly used in medical research, it is assumed that observations are independent. However, when this assumption is violated, alternative methods may be needed. In this paper, we describe why an analysis that ignores the dependencies within the data may ...
Look left, look right: censoring in clinical research
Rolf H H Groenwold and Olaf M Dekkers
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 189, Issue 5, November 2023, Pages E5–E7, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvad152
In this methodology editorial, the problem of censored survival (or time-to-event) data in clinical research is discussed. In case of censored observations, part of the observation time for some participants in a study is unobserved, which means that measures such as an average survival time cannot ...
Is it a risk factor, a predictor, or even both? The multiple faces of multivariable regression analysis
Rolf H H Groenwold and Olaf M Dekkers
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 188, Issue 1, January 2023, Pages E1–E4, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvac012
The medical research literature is abundant with regression analyses that include multiple covariates, so-called multivariable regression models. Despite their common application, the interpretation of their results is not always clear or claimed interpretations are not justified. To outline the ...
Using electronic health record data for clinical research: a quick guide
Sophie H Bots and others
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 186, Issue 4, Apr 2022, Pages E1–E6, https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-1088
Electronic health record (EHR) data not only offer many exciting research opportunities but also come with their own inherent limitations. Researchers may not always realise the challenges associated with the use of EHR data for research, or the fact that using large datasets of ‘real-world data’ ...
Correlation or regression, that's the question
Saskia le Cessie and others
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 184, Issue 6, Jun 2021, Pages E15–E18, https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0251
There are different ways to quantify the relation between two or more continuous variables. Some researchers use correlation coefficients; others will apply regression methods such as linear regression. In this paper, we show that the choice between correlation and regression is not purely a ...
Multiple testing: when is many too much?
Rolf H H Groenwold and others
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 184, Issue 3, Mar 2021, Pages E11–E14, https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-1375
In almost all medical research, more than a single hypothesis is being tested or more than a single relation is being estimated. Testing multiple hypotheses increases the risk of drawing a false-positive conclusion. We briefly discuss this phenomenon, which is often called multiple testing. Also, ...
Introduction to diagnostic test accuracy studies
Alice J Sitch and others
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 184, Issue 2, Feb 2021, Pages E5–E9, https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-1239
Diagnostic accuracy studies are fundamental for the assessment of diagnostic tests. Researchers need to understand the implications of their chosen design, opting for comparative designs where possible. Researchers should analyse test accuracy studies using the appropriate methods, acknowledging ...
When observational studies can give wrong answers: the potential of immortal time bias
Olaf M Dekkers and Rolf H H Groenwold
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 184, Issue 1, Jan 2021, Pages E1–E4, https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-1124
Immortal time bias should always be considered in an observational study if exposure status is determined based on a measurement or event that occurs after baseline. This bias can lead to an overestimation of an effect, but also to an underestimation, which is explained. Several approaches are ...
Study design: what's in a name?
Olaf M Dekkers and Rolf H H Groenwold
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 183, Issue 6, Dec 2020, Pages E11–E13, https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-0873
The name of the study should properly reflect the actual conduct and analysis of the study. This short paper provides guidance on how to properly name the study design. The first distinction is between a trial (intervention given to patients to study its effect) and an observational study. For ...
Missing data: the impact of what is not there
Rolf H H Groenwold and Olaf M Dekkers
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 183, Issue 4, Oct 2020, Pages E7–E9, https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-0732
The validity of clinical research is potentially threatened by missing data. Any variable measured in a study can have missing values, including the exposure, the outcome, and confounders. When missing values are ignored in the analysis, only those subjects with complete records will be included in ...
Measurement error in clinical research, yes it matters
Rolf H H Groenwold and Olaf M Dekkers
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 183, Issue 3, Sep 2020, Pages E3–E5, https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-0550
The validity of any biomedical study is potentially affected by measurement error or misclassification. It can affect different variables included in a statistical analysis, such as the exposure, the outcome, and confounders, and can result in an overestimation as well as in an underestimation of ...
METHODOLOGY FOR THE ENDOCRINOLOGIST: Basic aspects of confounding adjustment
Rolf H H Groenwold and Olaf M Dekkers
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 182, Issue 5, May 2020, Pages E5–E7, https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-0075
The results of observational studies of causal effects are potentially biased due to confounding. Various methods have been proposed to control for confounding in observational studies. Eight basic aspects of confounding adjustment are described, with a focus on correction for confounding through ...
Who is afraid of non-normal data? Choosing between parametric and non-parametric tests
Saskia le Cessie and others
European Journal of Endocrinology, Volume 182, Issue 2, Mar 2020, Pages E1–E3, https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-19-0922
When statistically comparing outcomes between two groups, researchers have to decide whether to use parametric methods, such as the t -test, or non-parametric methods, like the Mann–Whitney test. In endocrinology, for example, many studies compare hormone levels between groups, or at different ...
Close
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

View Article Abstract & Purchase Options

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Close