Abstract

Aims To assess the safety of direct coronary stenting, its influence on costs, duration of the procedure, radiation exposure, clinical outcome and angiographic restenosis.

Methods and Results We randomized 416 patients (446 lesions) to direct stent implant or stent implant following balloon pre-dilation. Patients >75 years old, heavily calcified lesions, bifurcations, total occlusions, left main lesions and very tortuous vessels were excluded. Direct stenting was successful in 217/224 lesions (96·8%). No single loss or embolization of the stent occurred. All stents in the group with pre-dilation were effectively deployed. The immediate post-procedure angiographic results were similar with both techniques. Fluoroscopy and procedural time were significantly lower in direct stenting (6·4±0·3 and 21±0·9min) than in pre-dilated stenting (9·1±0·4 and 27·5±1·1min) (P>0·001). Major adverse cardiac events during hospitalization were one in direct and four in pre-dilated stenting (P=0·05) but there were no significant differences at follow-ups at 1, 6 and 12 months between the two groups. Angiographic revaluation at 6 months was performed in 94% of the cases. Restenosis rate was 16·5% in direct stenting and 14·3% in pre-dilated stenting (P=ns).

Conclusions Direct stenting is as safe as pre-dilated stenting in selected coronary lesions. Acute angiographic results are similar but procedural costs, duration of the procedure and radiation exposure are lower in direct stenting. Overall success rate, mid-term clinical outcome and restenosis are similar with both techniques.

f1
Correspondence: Luis Martı́nez Elbal MD Servicio de Cardiologı́a, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Diego de León 62, 28006 Madrid, Spain.

References

1
Serruys
P
, Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F. A comparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease.
N Engl J Med
 .
1994
;
331
:
489
–495
2
Fischman
DL
, Leon MB, Baim DS. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease.
N Engl J Med
 .
1994
;
331
:
496
–501
3
Macaya
C
, Serruys PW, Ruygrok P. Continued benefit of coronary stenting compared to balloon angioplasty: one-year clinical follow-up of the Benestent trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 .
1996
;
27
:
255
–261
4
Leon
MB
, Popma JJ, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Kent KM. An overview of U.S. coronary stent trials.
Semin Interv Cardiol
 .
1996
;
1
:
247
–254
5
Cohen
DJ
, Krumholz HM, Sukin CA. In-hospital and one-year economic outcomes after coronary stenting or balloon angioplasty: results from a randomized clinical trial: Stent Restenosis Study Investigators.
Circulation
 .
1995
;
92
:
2580
–2587
6
Cohen
DJ
, Breall JA, Ho KKL. Economics of elective coronary revascularization: comparison of costs and charges for conventional angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stenting and bypass surgery.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 .
1993
;
22
:
1052
–1059
7
Wilson
SH
, Berger PB, Mathew V. Immediate and late outcomes after direct stent implantation without balloon predilation.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 .
2000
;
35
:
937
–943
8
Briguori
C
, Sheiban I, De Gregorio J. Direct coronary stenting without predilation.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 .
1999
;
34
:
1910
–1915
9
Figulla
H
, Mudra H, Reifart N, Werner G. Direct coronary stenting without predilation: a new therapeutic approach with a special balloon catheter design.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn
 .
1998
;
43
:
245
–252
10
Hamon
M
, Richardeau Y, Lecluse E. Direct coronary stenting without ballon predilation in acute coronary syndromes.
Am Heart J
 .
1999
;
138
:
55
–59
11
De la Torre
JM
, Riesco JF, Rodriguez F, Figueroa A, Zueco J, Colman T. Stent directo sin predilatación. Experiencia en 300 lesiones.
Rev Esp Cardiol
 .
1999
;
52
:
301
–307
12
Pentousis
D
, Guerin Y, Funck F. Direct stent implantation without predilatation using the MultiLink stent.
Am J Cardiol
 .
1998
;
82
:
1437
–1440
13
Rogers
C
, Parikh S, Seifert P, Edelman E. Endogenous cell seeding. Remnant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair.
Circulation
 .
1996
;
94
:
2909
–2914
14
Soriano, J, Alfonso, F, Cequier, A, Morı́s, C, Registro de actividad de la Sección de Hemodinámica y Cardiologı́a Intervencionista del año, 1999, Rev Esp Cardiol, 2000, 53, 1626, 38
15
Herz
I
, Assali A, Adler Y. Coronary stent deployment without predilatation: prevention of complications of venous graft angioplasty.
Angiology
 .
1998
;
49
:
613
–617
16
Kastrati
A
, Pache J, Dirschinger J. Primary intracoronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up and risk factor analysis.
Am Heart J
 .
2000
;
139
:
208
–216
17
Laarman
G
, Muthusamy TS, Swart H. Direct coronary stent implantation: safety, feasibility and predictors of success of the strategy of direct coronary stent implantation.
Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent
 .
2001
;
52
:
443
–448
18
De la Torre
JM
, Gomez I, Rodrı́guez-Entem F, Zueco J, Figueroa A, Colman T. Evaluation of direct stent implantation without predilatation by intravascular ultrasound.
Am J Cardiol
 .
2000
;
85
:
1028
–1030

Comments

0 Comments