Preamble

Guidelines and Expert Consensus documents aim to present all the relevant evidence on a particular issue in order to help physicians to weigh the benefits and risks of a particular diagnostic or therapeutic procedure. They should be helpful in everyday clinical decision-making.

A great number of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents have been issued in recent years by different organisations, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and by other related societies. By means of links to web sites of National Societies several hundred guidelines are available. This profusion can put at stake the authority and validity of guidelines, which can only be guaranteed if they have been developed by an unquestionable decision-making process. This is one of the reasons why the ESC and others have issued recommendations for formulating and issuing Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents.

In spite of the fact that standards for issuing good quality Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents are well defined, recent surveys of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents published in peer-reviewed journals between 1985 and 1998 have shown that methodological standards were not complied within the vast majority of cases. It is therefore of great importance that guidelines and recommendations are presented in formats that are easily interpreted. Subsequently, their implementation programmes must also be well conducted. Attempts have been made to determine whether guidelines improve the quality of clinical practice and the utilisation of health resources.

The ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) supervises and coordinates the preparation of new Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents produced by Task Forces, expert groups or consensus panels. The Committee is also responsible for the endorsement of these Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents or statements.

Introduction

The strength of evidence related to a particular diagnostic or treatment option depends on the available data: (1) level of evidence A: multiple randomised clinical trials or meta-analyses; (2) level of evidence B: a single randomised trial or non-randomised studies; and (3) level of evidence C: consensus opinion of the experts. Indications for various tests and procedures were ranked in three classes:

  • Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is useful and effective.

  • Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment.

    • Weight of evidence/opinion is in favour of usefulness/efficacy.

    • Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion.

    • Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful.

Aetiology and classification of pericardial disease

The spectrum of pericardial diseases consists of congenital defects, pericarditis (dry, effusive, effusive-constrictive, and constrictive), neoplasm, and cysts. The aetiological classification comprises: infectious pericarditis, pericarditis in systemic autoimmune diseases, type 2 (auto) immune process, postmyocardial infarction syndrome, and auto-reactive (chronic) pericarditis (Table 1).1–3

Table 1

Review of aetiology, incidence and pathogenesis of pericarditis1–3


Aetiology
 

Incidence (%)
 

Pathogenesis
 
Infectious pericarditis  Multiplication and spread of the causative agent and release of toxic substances in pericardial tissue cause serous, serofibrinous or haemorrhagic (bacterial, viral, tuberculous, fungal) or purulent inflammation (bacterial) 
Viral (Coxsackie A9, B1-4, Echo 8, Mumps, EBV, CMV, Varicella, Rubella, HIV, Parvo B19, etc.) 30–50a  
Bacterial (Pneumo-, Meningo-, Gonococcosis, Hemophilus, Treponema pallidum, Borreliosis, Chlamydia, Tuberculosis, etc.) 5–10a  
Fungal (Candida, Histoplasma, etc.) Rare  
Parasitary (Entameba histolytica, Echinococcus, Toxoplasma…) Rare  
   
Pericarditis in systemic autoimmune diseases  Cardiac manifestations of the basic disease, often clinically mild or silent 
Systemic lupus erythematosus 30b  
Rheumatoid arthritis 30b  
Spondylitis ankylosans 1b  
Systemic sclerosis 
\(>\)
50b 
 
Dermatomyositis Rare  
Periarteritis nodosa Rare  
Reiter's syndrome ∼2b  
Familial Mediterranean fever 0.7b  
   
Type 2 (auto)immune process  Secondary, after infection/surgery 
Rheumatic fever 20–50b Mostly in acute phase 
Postcardiotomy syndrome ∼20b 10–14 days after surgery 
Postmyocardial infarction syndrome 1–5b DDg P. epistenocardica 
Autoreactive (chronic) pericarditis 23.1a Common form 
   
Pericarditis and pericardial effusion in diseases of surrounding organs   
Acute MI (P. epistenocardica) 5–20b 1–5 days after transmural MI 
Myocarditis 30b Accompanying epimyocarditis 
Aortic aneurysm Rare Dissection: haemorrhagic PE 
Lung infarction Rare  
Pneumonia Rare  
Oesophageal diseases Rare  
Hydropericardium in CHF Rare  
Paraneoplastic pericarditis Frequent No direct neoplastic infiltrate 
   
Pericarditis in metabolic disorders   
Renal insufficiency (uraemia) Frequent Viral/toxic/autoimmune 
Myxedema 30b Serous, cholesterol rich PE 
Addison's disease Rare Membranous leak? 
Diabetic ketoacidosis Rare  
Cholesterol pericarditis Very rare Transudation of cholesterol (sterile serofibrinous PE) 
Pregnancy Rare  
   
Traumatic pericarditis   
Direct injury (penetrating thoracic injury, oesophageal perforation, foreign bodies) Rare  
Indirect injury (Non-penetrating thoracic injury, mediastinal irradiation) Rare Less frequent after introduction of topical convergent irradiation 
   
Neoplastic pericardial disease 35a  
Primary tumours Rare  
Secondary metastatic tumours Frequent  
Lung carcinoma 40c Serous or fibrinous, frequently haemorrhagic effusion 
Breast carcinoma 22c Accompanying disease during the infiltration of malignant cells 
Gastric and colon 3c  
Other carcinoma 6c  
Leukemia and lymphoma 15c  
Melanoma 3c  
Sarcoma 4c  
Other tumours 7c  
Idiopathic
 
3.5a, in other series
\(>\)
50a
 
Serous, fibrinous, sometimes haemorrhagic PE with suspect viral or autoimmune secondary immunopathogenesis
 

Aetiology
 

Incidence (%)
 

Pathogenesis
 
Infectious pericarditis  Multiplication and spread of the causative agent and release of toxic substances in pericardial tissue cause serous, serofibrinous or haemorrhagic (bacterial, viral, tuberculous, fungal) or purulent inflammation (bacterial) 
Viral (Coxsackie A9, B1-4, Echo 8, Mumps, EBV, CMV, Varicella, Rubella, HIV, Parvo B19, etc.) 30–50a  
Bacterial (Pneumo-, Meningo-, Gonococcosis, Hemophilus, Treponema pallidum, Borreliosis, Chlamydia, Tuberculosis, etc.) 5–10a  
Fungal (Candida, Histoplasma, etc.) Rare  
Parasitary (Entameba histolytica, Echinococcus, Toxoplasma…) Rare  
   
Pericarditis in systemic autoimmune diseases  Cardiac manifestations of the basic disease, often clinically mild or silent 
Systemic lupus erythematosus 30b  
Rheumatoid arthritis 30b  
Spondylitis ankylosans 1b  
Systemic sclerosis 
\(>\)
50b 
 
Dermatomyositis Rare  
Periarteritis nodosa Rare  
Reiter's syndrome ∼2b  
Familial Mediterranean fever 0.7b  
   
Type 2 (auto)immune process  Secondary, after infection/surgery 
Rheumatic fever 20–50b Mostly in acute phase 
Postcardiotomy syndrome ∼20b 10–14 days after surgery 
Postmyocardial infarction syndrome 1–5b DDg P. epistenocardica 
Autoreactive (chronic) pericarditis 23.1a Common form 
   
Pericarditis and pericardial effusion in diseases of surrounding organs   
Acute MI (P. epistenocardica) 5–20b 1–5 days after transmural MI 
Myocarditis 30b Accompanying epimyocarditis 
Aortic aneurysm Rare Dissection: haemorrhagic PE 
Lung infarction Rare  
Pneumonia Rare  
Oesophageal diseases Rare  
Hydropericardium in CHF Rare  
Paraneoplastic pericarditis Frequent No direct neoplastic infiltrate 
   
Pericarditis in metabolic disorders   
Renal insufficiency (uraemia) Frequent Viral/toxic/autoimmune 
Myxedema 30b Serous, cholesterol rich PE 
Addison's disease Rare Membranous leak? 
Diabetic ketoacidosis Rare  
Cholesterol pericarditis Very rare Transudation of cholesterol (sterile serofibrinous PE) 
Pregnancy Rare  
   
Traumatic pericarditis   
Direct injury (penetrating thoracic injury, oesophageal perforation, foreign bodies) Rare  
Indirect injury (Non-penetrating thoracic injury, mediastinal irradiation) Rare Less frequent after introduction of topical convergent irradiation 
   
Neoplastic pericardial disease 35a  
Primary tumours Rare  
Secondary metastatic tumours Frequent  
Lung carcinoma 40c Serous or fibrinous, frequently haemorrhagic effusion 
Breast carcinoma 22c Accompanying disease during the infiltration of malignant cells 
Gastric and colon 3c  
Other carcinoma 6c  
Leukemia and lymphoma 15c  
Melanoma 3c  
Sarcoma 4c  
Other tumours 7c  
Idiopathic
 
3.5a, in other series
\(>\)
50a
 
Serous, fibrinous, sometimes haemorrhagic PE with suspect viral or autoimmune secondary immunopathogenesis
 

CHF, congestive heart failure; DDg, differential diagnosis; MI, myocardial infarction; P., pericarditis; PE, pericardial effusion.

a

Percentage related to the population of 260 subsequent patients undergoing pericardiocentesis, pericardioscopy and epicardial biopsy (Marburg pericarditis registry 1988–2001).1

b

Percentage related to the incidence of pericarditis in the specific population of patients (e.g., with systemic lupus erythematosus).

c

Percentage related to the population of patients with neoplastic pericarditis.

Pericardial syndromes

Congenital defects of the pericardium

Congenital defects of the pericardium (1/10.000 autopsies) comprise partial left (70%), right (17%) or total bilateral (rare) pericardial absence. Additional congenital abnormalities occur in ∼30% of patients.4 Most patients with a total pericardial absence are asymptomatic. Homolateral cardiac displacement and augmented heart mobility impose an increased risk for traumatic aortic dissection.5 Partial left side defects can be complicated by herniation and strangulation of the heart through the defect (chest pain, shortness of breath, syncope or sudden death). Surgical pericardioplasty (Dacron, Gore-tex, or bovine pericardium) is indicated for imminent strangulation.6

Acute pericarditis

Acute pericarditis is dry, fibrinous or effusive, independent from its aetiology. The diagnostic algorithm can be derived from Table 2.8–18 A prodrome of fever, malaise, and myalgia is common, but elderly patients may not be febrile. Major symptoms are retrosternal or left precordialchest pain (radiates to the trapezius ridge, can be pleuritic or simulate ischemia, and varies with posture) and shortness of breath. The pericardial friction rub can be transient, mono-, bi- or triphasic. Pleural effusion may be present. Heart rate is usually rapid and regular. Microvoltage and electrical alternans are reversible after effusion drainage.19 Echocardiography is essential to detect effusion, concomitant heart or paracardial disease.11,12

Table 2

Diagnostic pathway and sequence of performance in acute pericarditis (level of evidence B for all procedures)


Technique
 

Characteristic findings
 

Reference
 
Obligatory (indication class I)   
Auscultation Pericardial rub (mono-, bi-, or triphasic) 7 
   
ECGa Stage I: anterior and inferior concave ST segment elevation. PR segment deviations opposite to P polarity. 7,19 
 Early stage II: ST junctions return to the baseline, PR deviated.  
 Late stage II: T waves progressively flatten and invert  
 Stage III: generalised T wave inversions  
 Stage IV: ECG returns to prepericarditis state.  
   
Echocardiography Effusion types B–D (Horowitz) (Fig. 19,10 
 Signs of tamponade (see Section Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponde)  
   
Blood analyses (a) ESR, CRP, LDH, leukocytes (inflammation markers) 11 
 (b) Troponin I, CK-MB (markers of myocardial lesion)b  
   
Chest X-ray Ranging from normal to “water bottle” heart shadow. Revealing additional pulmonary/mediastinal pathology. 12 
   
Mandatory in tamponade (indication class I), optional in large/recurrent effusions or if previous tests inconclusive (indication class IIa) in small: effusions (indication class IIb)   
Pericardiocentesis and drainage PCR and histochemistry for aetiopathogenetic classification of infection or neoplasia 2,8,13 
   
Optional or if previous tests inconclusive (indication class IIa)   
CT Effusions, peri-, and epicardium 14 
MRI Effusions, peri-, and epicardium 14 
Pericardioscopy, pericardial biopsy
 
Establishing the specific aetiology
 
2,8,15,16
 

Technique
 

Characteristic findings
 

Reference
 
Obligatory (indication class I)   
Auscultation Pericardial rub (mono-, bi-, or triphasic) 7 
   
ECGa Stage I: anterior and inferior concave ST segment elevation. PR segment deviations opposite to P polarity. 7,19 
 Early stage II: ST junctions return to the baseline, PR deviated.  
 Late stage II: T waves progressively flatten and invert  
 Stage III: generalised T wave inversions  
 Stage IV: ECG returns to prepericarditis state.  
   
Echocardiography Effusion types B–D (Horowitz) (Fig. 19,10 
 Signs of tamponade (see Section Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponde)  
   
Blood analyses (a) ESR, CRP, LDH, leukocytes (inflammation markers) 11 
 (b) Troponin I, CK-MB (markers of myocardial lesion)b  
   
Chest X-ray Ranging from normal to “water bottle” heart shadow. Revealing additional pulmonary/mediastinal pathology. 12 
   
Mandatory in tamponade (indication class I), optional in large/recurrent effusions or if previous tests inconclusive (indication class IIa) in small: effusions (indication class IIb)   
Pericardiocentesis and drainage PCR and histochemistry for aetiopathogenetic classification of infection or neoplasia 2,8,13 
   
Optional or if previous tests inconclusive (indication class IIa)   
CT Effusions, peri-, and epicardium 14 
MRI Effusions, peri-, and epicardium 14 
Pericardioscopy, pericardial biopsy
 
Establishing the specific aetiology
 
2,8,15,16
 
a

Typical lead involvement: I, II, aVL, aVF, and V3-V6. The ST segment is always depressed in aVR, frequently in V1, and occasionally in V2. Occasionally, stage IV does not occur and there are permanent T wave inversions and flattenings. If ECG is first recorded in stage III, pericarditis cannot be differentiated by ECG from diffuse myocardial injury, “biventricular strain,” or myocarditis. ECG in Early repolarization is very similar to stage I. Unlike stage I, this ECG does not acutely evolve and J-point elevations are usually accompanied by a slur, oscillation, or notch at the end of the QRS just before and including the J point (best seen with tall R and T waves – large in early repolarisation pattern). Pericarditis is likely if in lead V6 the J point is

\(>\)
25% of the height of the T wave apex (using the PR segment as a baseline).

b

Cardiac troponin I was detectable in 49% and

\(>\)
1.5 ng/ml in 22% of 69 patients with acute pericarditis (only in those with ST elevation in ECG) investigated by Bonnefoy et al.17 In another study18 troponin I was detected in 10/14 patients with a median peak concentration of 21.4 mg/ml (range 0.5 to
\(>\)
50 ng/ml). CK-MB was elevated in 8/14 patients with the median peak of 21 U/l (range 13–43), corresponding to the relative index of 10.2% of the total CK activity.

Perimyocarditis is evidenced by global or regional myocardial dysfunction, elevations of troponins I and T, MB creatine-kinase, myoglobin and tumour necrosis factor. Auscultation of a new S3 heart sound, convexly elevated J-ST segment in the ECG, fixation of Indium-111-labelled antimyosin antibodies, and structural changes in MRI are indicative, but only endomyocardial/epimyocardial biopsy is diagnostic.7,8

Hospitalisation is warranted to determine the aetiology and observe for tamponade as well as the effect of treatment. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are the mainstay (level of evidence B, class I). Indomethacine should be avoided in elderly patients due to its flow reduction in the coronaries. Ibuprofen is preferred for its rare side-effects, favourable impact on the coronary flow, and the large dose range.7 Depending on severity and response, 300–800 mg every 6–8 hours may be initially required and can be continued for days or weeks, best until the effusion has disappeared. Gastrointestinal protection must be provided. Colchicine (0.5 mg bid) added to an NSAID or as monotherapy also appears to be effective for the initial attack and the prevention of recurrences (level of evidence B, class IIa indication).20 It is well tolerated with fewer side effects than NSAIDs. Systemic corticosteroid therapy should be restricted to connective tissue diseases, autoreactive or uremic pericarditis. Intrapericardial application avoids systemic side effects and is highly effective (level of evidence B, class IIa indication).2 For tapering of prednisone, ibuprofen or colchicine should be introduced early.20 Indications for pericardiocentesis are listed in Focus box 1.7,21–30 Recovered patients should be observed for recurrences or constriction.

Chronic pericarditis

Chronic (

\(>\)
3 months) pericarditis includes effusive (inflammatory or hydropericardium in heart failure), adhesive, and constrictive forms.7 Symptoms are usually mild (chest pain, palpitations, fatigue), related to the degree of cardiac compression and pericardial inflammation. The diagnostic algorithm is similar as in acute pericarditis (Table 2). The detection of the curable causes (e.g., tuberculosis, toxoplasmosis, myxedema, autoimmune, and systemic diseases) allows successful specific therapy. Symptomatic treatment and indications for pericardiocentesis are as in acute pericarditis. For frequent and symptomatic recurrences balloon pericardiotomy or pericardiectomy should be considered (level of evidence B, indication IIb).23,31

Recurrent pericarditis

The term recurrent pericarditis encompasses (1) the intermittent type (symptom free intervals without therapy) and (2) the incessant type (discontinuation of anti-inflammatory therapy ensures a relapse). Massive pericardial effusion, overt tamponade or constriction are rare. Evidence for an immunopathological process include: (1) the latent period lasting for months; (2) the presence of anti-heart antibodies; (3) the quick response to steroid treatment and the similarity and co-existence of recurrent pericarditis with other autoimmune conditions (lupus, serum sickness, polyserositis, postpericardiotomy/postmyocardial infarction syndrome, celiac disease, dermatitis herpetiformis, frequent arthralgias, eosinophilia, allergic drug reaction, and history of allergy). Potential underlying genetic disorders were also reported: autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance32 and sex-linked inheritance (recurrent pericarditis associated with ocular hypertension).33

Symptomatic management relies on exercise restriction and the regimen used in acute pericarditis. Colchicine was effective when NSAIDs and corticosteroids failed to prevent relapses.20,34–35 During 1004 months of colchicine treatment, only 13.7% new recurrences occurred.20 During the 2333 months of follow-up, 60.7% of the patients remained recurrence-free. The recommended dose is 2 mg/day for one or two days, followed by 1 mg/day (level of evidence B, indication I). Corticosteroids should be used only in patients with poor general condition or in frequent crises7 (level of evidence C, indication IIa). A common mistake is to use a dose too low to be effective or to taper the dose too rapidly. The recommended regimen is: prednisone 1–1.5 mg/kg, for at least one month. If patients do not respond adequately, azathioprine (75–100 mg/day) or cyclophosphamide can be added.36 Corticoids should be tapered over a three-month period. If symptoms still recur, return to the last dose that suppressed the manifestations, maintain that dose for 2–3 weeks and then recommence tapering. Towards the end of the taper, introduce anti-inflammatory treatment with colchicine or NSAID. Renewed treatment should continue for at least three months. Pericardiectomy is indicated only in frequent and highly symptomatic recurrences resistant to medical treatment (level of evidence B, indication IIa).37 Before pericardiectomy, the patient should be on a steroid-free regimen for several weeks. Post pericardiectomy recurrences were also demonstrated, possibly due to incomplete resection of the pericardium.

Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade

Pericardial effusion may appear as transudate (hydropericardium), exudate, pyopericardium or haemopericardium. Large effusions are common with neoplastic, tuberculous, cholesterol, uremic pericarditis, myxedema, and parasitoses.38 Effusions that develop slowly can be remarkably asymptomatic, while rapidly accumulating smaller effusions can present with tamponade. Loculated effusions are more common when scarring has supervened (e.g., postsurgical, posttrauma, purulent pericarditis). Massive chronic pericardial effusions are rare (2–3.5% of all large effusions).39Cardiac tamponade is the decompensated phase of cardiac compression caused by effusion accumulation and the increased intrapericardial pressure. In “surgical” tamponade intrapericardial pressure is rising rapidly, in the matter of minutes to hours (i.e. haemorrhage), whereas a low-intensity inflammatory process is developing days to weeks before cardiac compression occurs (“medical” tamponade). Heart sounds are distant. Orthopnoea, cough and dysphagia, occasionally with episodes of unconsciousness can be observed. Insidiously developing tamponade may present with the signs of its complications (renal failure, abdominal plethora, shock liver and mesenteric ischemia). In 60% of the patients, the cause of pericardial effusion may be a known medical condition.40 Tamponade without two or more inflammatory signs (typical pain, pericardial friction rub, fever, diffuse ST segment elevation) is usually associated with a malignant effusion (likelihood ratio 2.9). Electrocardiography may demonstrate diminished QRS and T-wave voltages, PR-segment depression, ST-T changes, bundle branch block, and electrical alternans (rarely seen in the absence of tamponade).7 In chest radiography large effusions are depicted as globular cardiomegaly with sharp margins (“water bottle” silhouette).12 On well-penetrated lateral radiographies, or cine films, pericardial fluid is suggested by lucent lines within the cardiopericardial shadow (epicardial halo).12,41,42 This sign is useful for the fluoroscopic guidance of pericardiocentesis.27 The separation of pericardial layers can be detected in echocardiography, when the pericardial fluid exceeds 15–35 ml (Fig. 1).43 The size of effusions can be graded as: (1) small (echo-free space in diastole

\({<}\)
10 mm), (2) moderate (10–20 mm), (3) large (⩾20 mm), or (4) very large (⩾20 mm and compression of the heart). In the parasternal long-axis view pericardial fluid reflects at the posterior atrioventricular groove, while pleural fluid continues under the left atrium, posterior to the descending aorta. In large pericardial effusions, the heart may move freely within the pericardial cavity (“swinging heart”) inducing pseudo-prolapse and pseudosystolic anterior motion of the mitral valve, paradoxical motion of the interventricular septum, and midsystolic aortic valve closure.44 Importantly, large effusions generally indicate more serious disease.7 Intrapericardial bands, combined with a thick visceral or parietal pericardium are often found after radiation of the chest.45 Rarely tumour masses, sometimes cauliflower-like, are found within or adjacent to the pericardium46 and may even masquerade tamponade.47 Other diagnostic pitfalls are: small loculated effusions,48,49 haematoma, cysts, foramen of Morgagni hernia, hiatus hernia, lipodystrophia with paracardial fat, inferior left pulmonary vein, left pleural effusion, mitral annulus calcification, giant left atrium, epicardial fat (best differentiated in CT), and left ventricular pseudoaneurysm.46 When bleeding into the pericardium occurs and thrombosis develops the typical echolucent areas may disappear, so that cardiac tamponade may be overlooked. Transesophageal echocardiography is here particularly useful58 as well as in identifying metastases and pericardial thickening.59 CT, spin-echo and cine MRI can also be used to assess the size and extent of simple and complex pericardial effusions.51 Effusions measured by CT/MRI tend to be larger than in echocardiography.24,60 Up to one-third of patients with asymptomatic large pericardial chronic effusion develop unexpected cardiac tamponade.23 Triggers for tamponade include hypovolemia, paroxysmal tachyarrhythmia and intercurrent acute pericarditis. Diagnostic criteria for cardiac tamponade are listed in Table 352–60 and Focus box 2.61,62

Fig. 1

Horowitz classification of pericardial effusions.43 Type A: No effusion; Type B: Separation of epicardium and pericardium (3–16 ml); Type C 1: Systolic and diastolic separation of epicardium and pericardium (small effusion

\(>\)
16 ml); Type C 2: Systolic and diastolic separation of epicardium and pericardium with attenuated pericardial motion; Type D: Pronounced separation of epicardium and pericardium with large echo-free space; Type E: Pericardial thickening (
\(>\)
4 mm). Copyrights American Heart Association.

Fig. 1

Horowitz classification of pericardial effusions.43 Type A: No effusion; Type B: Separation of epicardium and pericardium (3–16 ml); Type C 1: Systolic and diastolic separation of epicardium and pericardium (small effusion

\(>\)
16 ml); Type C 2: Systolic and diastolic separation of epicardium and pericardium with attenuated pericardial motion; Type D: Pronounced separation of epicardium and pericardium with large echo-free space; Type E: Pericardial thickening (
\(>\)
4 mm). Copyrights American Heart Association.

Table 3

Diagnosis of cardiac tamponade


Clinical presentation 

Elevated systemic venous pressurea, hypotensionb, pulsus paradoxusc, tachycardiad, dyspnoea or tachypnoea with clear lungs 
Precipitating factors Drugs (cyclosporine, anticoagulants, thrombolytics, etc.), recent cardiac surgery, indwelling instrumentation, blunt chest trauma, malignancies, connective tissue disease, renal failure, septicaemiae 
ECG Can be normal or non-specifically changed (ST-T wave), electrical alternans (QRS, rarely T), bradycardi (end-stage), Electromechanical dissociation (agonal phase) 
Chest X-ray Enlarged cardiac silhouette with clear lungs. 
M mode/2D echocardiogram Diastolic collapse of the (1) anterior RV free wall52f, RA collapse53, LA54 and very rarely LV55 collapse, increased LV diastolic wall thickness “pseudohypertrophy”56, VCI dilatation (no collapse in inspirium), “swinging heart”57 
  
Doppler Tricuspid flow increases and mitral flow decreases during inspiration (reverse in expiration) 
 Systolic and diastolic flows are reduced in systemic veins in expirium and reverse flow with atrial contraction is increased58 
  
M-mode colour Doppler Large respiratory fluctuations in mitral/tricuspid flows59 
  
Cardiac catheterisation (1) Confirmation of the diagnosis and quantification of the haemodynamic compromise60 
 RA pressure is elevated (preserved systolic x descent and absent or diminished diastolic y descent) 
 Intrapericardial pressure is also elevated and virtually identical to RA pressure (both pressures fall in inspiration) 
 RV mid-diastolic pressure elevated and equal to the RA and pericardial pressures (no dip-and-plateau configuration) 
 Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure is slightly elevated and may correspond to the RV pressure. 
 Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure is also elevated and nearly equal to intrapericardial and right atrial pressure. 
 LV systolic and aortic pressures may be normal or reduced. 
 (2) Documenting that pericardial aspiration is followed by haemodynamic improvementg 
 (3) Detection of the coexisting haemodynamic abnormalities (LV failure, constriction, pulmonary hypertension) 
 (4) Detection of associated cardiovascular diseases (cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease) 
  
RV/LV angiography Atrial collapse and small hyperactive ventricular chambers. 
Coronary angiography Coronary compression in diastole. 
Computer tomography
 
No visualisation of subepicardial fat along both ventricles, which show tube-like configuration and anteriorly drawn atrias
 

Clinical presentation 

Elevated systemic venous pressurea, hypotensionb, pulsus paradoxusc, tachycardiad, dyspnoea or tachypnoea with clear lungs 
Precipitating factors Drugs (cyclosporine, anticoagulants, thrombolytics, etc.), recent cardiac surgery, indwelling instrumentation, blunt chest trauma, malignancies, connective tissue disease, renal failure, septicaemiae 
ECG Can be normal or non-specifically changed (ST-T wave), electrical alternans (QRS, rarely T), bradycardi (end-stage), Electromechanical dissociation (agonal phase) 
Chest X-ray Enlarged cardiac silhouette with clear lungs. 
M mode/2D echocardiogram Diastolic collapse of the (1) anterior RV free wall52f, RA collapse53, LA54 and very rarely LV55 collapse, increased LV diastolic wall thickness “pseudohypertrophy”56, VCI dilatation (no collapse in inspirium), “swinging heart”57 
  
Doppler Tricuspid flow increases and mitral flow decreases during inspiration (reverse in expiration) 
 Systolic and diastolic flows are reduced in systemic veins in expirium and reverse flow with atrial contraction is increased58 
  
M-mode colour Doppler Large respiratory fluctuations in mitral/tricuspid flows59 
  
Cardiac catheterisation (1) Confirmation of the diagnosis and quantification of the haemodynamic compromise60 
 RA pressure is elevated (preserved systolic x descent and absent or diminished diastolic y descent) 
 Intrapericardial pressure is also elevated and virtually identical to RA pressure (both pressures fall in inspiration) 
 RV mid-diastolic pressure elevated and equal to the RA and pericardial pressures (no dip-and-plateau configuration) 
 Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure is slightly elevated and may correspond to the RV pressure. 
 Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure is also elevated and nearly equal to intrapericardial and right atrial pressure. 
 LV systolic and aortic pressures may be normal or reduced. 
 (2) Documenting that pericardial aspiration is followed by haemodynamic improvementg 
 (3) Detection of the coexisting haemodynamic abnormalities (LV failure, constriction, pulmonary hypertension) 
 (4) Detection of associated cardiovascular diseases (cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease) 
  
RV/LV angiography Atrial collapse and small hyperactive ventricular chambers. 
Coronary angiography Coronary compression in diastole. 
Computer tomography
 
No visualisation of subepicardial fat along both ventricles, which show tube-like configuration and anteriorly drawn atrias
 

LA, left atrium, LV, left ventricle, RA, right atrium, RV, right ventricle, VCI, inferior vena cava.

a

Jugular venous distension is less notable in hypovolemic patients or in “surgical tamponade”. An inspiratory increase or lack of fall of the pressure in the neck veins (Kussmaul sign), when verified with tamponade, or after pericardial drainage, indicates effusive-constrictive disease.

b

Heart rate is usually >100 beats/min, but may be lower in hypothyroidism and in uremic patients.

c

Pulsus paradoxus is absent in tamponade complicating atrial septal defect61 and in patients with significant aortic regurgitation.

d

Occasional patients are hypertensive especially if they have pre-existing hypertension.62

e

Febrile tamponade may be misdiagnosed as septic shock.

f

Right ventricular collapse can be absent in elevated right ventricular pressure and right ventricular hypertrophy63 or in right ventricular infarction.

g

If after drainage of pericardial effusion intrapericardial pressure does not fall below atrial pressure, the effusive-constrictive disease should be considered.

Pericardiocentesis is not necessary when the diagnosis can be made otherwise or the effusions are small or resolving under anti-inflammatory treatment. Haemodynamic compromise and cardiac tamponade is an absolute indication for drainage (Focus box 1). Patients with dehydration and hypovolemia may temporarily improve with intravenous fluids. Whenever possible, treatment should be aimed at the underlying aetiology. Even in idiopathic effusions extended pericardial catheter drainage (3±2 days, range 1–13 days) was associated with a lower recurrence rates (6% vs. 23%) than in those without catheter drainage during the follow-up of 3.8±4.3 years.25 Resistant neoplastic processes require intrapericardial treatment,63 percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy31 or rarely pericardiectomy. Surgical approach is recommended only in patients with very large chronic effusion in whom repeated pericardiocentesis and/or intrapericardial therapy were not successful.64

Constrictive pericarditis

Constrictive pericarditis is a rare but severely disabling consequence of the chronic inflammation of the pericardium, leading to an impaired filling of the ventricles and reduced ventricular function. Until recently, increased pericardial thickness has been considered an essential diagnostic feature of constrictive pericarditis. However, in the large surgical series from the Mayo clinic constriction was present in 18% of the patients with normal pericardial thickness.65 Tuberculosis, mediastinal irradiation, and previous cardiac surgical procedures are frequent causes of the disease, which can present in several pathoanatomical forms66 (Fig. 2). Constrictive pericarditis may rarely develop only in the epicardial layer in patients with previously removed parietal pericardium.67 Transient constrictive pericarditis is uncommon but important entity, since these patients are not indicated for pericardiectomy.68 Patients complain about fatigue, peripheral oedema, breathlessness, and abdominal swelling, which may be aggravated by a protein-loosing enteropathy. Typically, there is a long delay between the initial pericardial inflammation and the onset of constriction. In decompensated patients venous congestion, hepatomegaly, pleural effusions, and ascites may occur. Haemodynamic impairment of the patient can be additionally aggravated by a systolic dysfunction due to myocardial fibrosis or atrophy. Clinical, echocardiographic, and haemodynamic parameters can be derived from Table 4.50,65,66,69–71 Differential diagnosis has to include acute dilatation of the heart, pulmonary embolism, right ventricular infarction, pleural effusion, chronic obstructive lung diseases72 and restrictive cardiomyopathy. The best way to distinguish constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy is the analysis of respiratory changes with or without changes of preload by Doppler and/or tissue Doppler echocardiography,73 but physical findings, ECG, chest radiography, CT and MRI, haemodynamics, and endomyocardial biopsy may be helpful as well.7

Fig. 2

Pathoanatomical forms of constrictive pericarditis vs. restrictive cardiomyopathy. (a) Annular form of pericardial constriction with bilateral thickening of the pericardium along the atrial ventricular grooves with normal configuration of both ventricles and enlargement of both atria. (b) Left sided form of pericardial constriction with thickened pericardium along the left ventricle and right sided bending of the interventricular septum with tube-like configuration of mainly left ventricle and enlargement of both atria. (lateral sternotomy and partial pericardiectomy is indicated). (c) Right sided form of pericardial constriction with thickened pericardium along the right ventricle and left sided bending of the interventricular septum with tube-like configuration of mainly right ventricle and enlargement of both atria (median sternotomy and partial pericardiectomy is indicated). (d) Myocardial atrophy and global form of pericardial constriction with bilateral thickening of the pericardium along both ventricles separated from the right myocardial wall by a thin layer of subepicardial fat. Tube-like configuration of both ventricles and enlargement of both atria, however, thinning of the interventricular septum and posterolateral wall of the left ventricle below 1 cm is suggesting myocardial atrophy (pericardiectomy is contraindicated). (e) Perimyocardial fibrosis and global form of pericardial constriction with bilateral thickening of the pericardium along both ventricles, however, the right sided thickened pericardium cannot be separated from the wave-like thin form of right sided ventricular wall suggesting perimyocardial fibrosis (pericardiectomy is contraindicated). (f) Global form of pericardial constriction with bilateral thickening of the pericardium along both ventricles separated from the right myocardial wall by a thin layer of subepicardial fat. Tube-like configuration of both ventricles and enlargement of both atria (median sternotomy and pericardiectomy is indicated). (g) Restrictive cardiomyopathy with normal thin pericardium along both ventricles that show normal configuration and with enlargement of both atria.

Fig. 2

Pathoanatomical forms of constrictive pericarditis vs. restrictive cardiomyopathy. (a) Annular form of pericardial constriction with bilateral thickening of the pericardium along the atrial ventricular grooves with normal configuration of both ventricles and enlargement of both atria. (b) Left sided form of pericardial constriction with thickened pericardium along the left ventricle and right sided bending of the interventricular septum with tube-like configuration of mainly left ventricle and enlargement of both atria. (lateral sternotomy and partial pericardiectomy is indicated). (c) Right sided form of pericardial constriction with thickened pericardium along the right ventricle and left sided bending of the interventricular septum with tube-like configuration of mainly right ventricle and enlargement of both atria (median sternotomy and partial pericardiectomy is indicated). (d) Myocardial atrophy and global form of pericardial constriction with bilateral thickening of the pericardium along both ventricles separated from the right myocardial wall by a thin layer of subepicardial fat. Tube-like configuration of both ventricles and enlargement of both atria, however, thinning of the interventricular septum and posterolateral wall of the left ventricle below 1 cm is suggesting myocardial atrophy (pericardiectomy is contraindicated). (e) Perimyocardial fibrosis and global form of pericardial constriction with bilateral thickening of the pericardium along both ventricles, however, the right sided thickened pericardium cannot be separated from the wave-like thin form of right sided ventricular wall suggesting perimyocardial fibrosis (pericardiectomy is contraindicated). (f) Global form of pericardial constriction with bilateral thickening of the pericardium along both ventricles separated from the right myocardial wall by a thin layer of subepicardial fat. Tube-like configuration of both ventricles and enlargement of both atria (median sternotomy and pericardiectomy is indicated). (g) Restrictive cardiomyopathy with normal thin pericardium along both ventricles that show normal configuration and with enlargement of both atria.

Table 4

Diagnostic approach in constrictive pericarditis


Clinical presentation 

Severe chronic systemic venous congestion associated with low cardiac output, including jugular venous distension, hypotension with a low pulse pressure, abdominal distension, oedema and muscle wasting 
  
ECG Can be normal, or reveal low QRS voltage, generalized T-wave inversion/flattening, LA abnormalities, atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular block, intraventricular conduction defects, or rarely pseudoinfarction pattern 
  
Chest X-ray Pericardial calcifications, pleural effusions 
  
M mode/2D echocardiogram Pericardial thickening and calcificationsa as well as the indirect signs of constriction: 
 RA&LA enlargement with normal appearance of the ventricles, and normal systolic function 
 Early pathological outward and inward movement of the interventricular septum (“dip-plateau phenomenon”)72 
 Flattering waves at the LV posterior wall 
 LV diameter is not increasing after the early rapid filling phase 
 VCI and the hepatic veins are dilated with restricted respiratory fluctuationsb 
  
Doppler Restricted filling of both ventricles with respiratory variation
\(>\)
25% over the AV-valves)69c 
  
TEE Measurement of the pericardial thickness50 
  
CT/MRI Thickened and/or calcified pericardium, tube-like configuration of one or both ventricles, narrowing of one or both atrio-ventricular grooves, congestion of the caval veins66 enlargement of one or both atria 
  
Cardiac catheterisation “Dip and plateau” or “square route” sign in the pressure curve of the right and/or left ventricle 
 Equalisation of LV/RV end-diastolic pressures in the range of 5 mmHg or less72d 
  
RV/LV angiography The reduction of RV&LV size and increase of RA&LA size 
 During diastole a rapid early filling with stop of further enlargement (“dip-plateau”) 
  
Coronary angiography
 
In all patients over 35 years and in patients with a history of mediastinal irradiation, regardless of the age
 

Clinical presentation 

Severe chronic systemic venous congestion associated with low cardiac output, including jugular venous distension, hypotension with a low pulse pressure, abdominal distension, oedema and muscle wasting 
  
ECG Can be normal, or reveal low QRS voltage, generalized T-wave inversion/flattening, LA abnormalities, atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular block, intraventricular conduction defects, or rarely pseudoinfarction pattern 
  
Chest X-ray Pericardial calcifications, pleural effusions 
  
M mode/2D echocardiogram Pericardial thickening and calcificationsa as well as the indirect signs of constriction: 
 RA&LA enlargement with normal appearance of the ventricles, and normal systolic function 
 Early pathological outward and inward movement of the interventricular septum (“dip-plateau phenomenon”)72 
 Flattering waves at the LV posterior wall 
 LV diameter is not increasing after the early rapid filling phase 
 VCI and the hepatic veins are dilated with restricted respiratory fluctuationsb 
  
Doppler Restricted filling of both ventricles with respiratory variation
\(>\)
25% over the AV-valves)69c 
  
TEE Measurement of the pericardial thickness50 
  
CT/MRI Thickened and/or calcified pericardium, tube-like configuration of one or both ventricles, narrowing of one or both atrio-ventricular grooves, congestion of the caval veins66 enlargement of one or both atria 
  
Cardiac catheterisation “Dip and plateau” or “square route” sign in the pressure curve of the right and/or left ventricle 
 Equalisation of LV/RV end-diastolic pressures in the range of 5 mmHg or less72d 
  
RV/LV angiography The reduction of RV&LV size and increase of RA&LA size 
 During diastole a rapid early filling with stop of further enlargement (“dip-plateau”) 
  
Coronary angiography
 
In all patients over 35 years and in patients with a history of mediastinal irradiation, regardless of the age
 

LA, left atrium, LV, left ventricle, RA, right atrium, RV, right ventricle, VCI, inferior vena cava, TEE – transoesophageal echocardiography

e In chronic obstructive lung disease mitral in-flow velocity will decrease nearly 100% during inspiration and increase during expiration. The mitral E-velocity is highest at the end of expiration (in constrictive pericarditis mitral E-velocity is highest immediately after start of expiration).71 In addition, superior vena cava flow increases with inspiration in chronic obstructive lung disease, whereas it does not change significantly with respiration in constrictive pericarditis.

a

Thickening of the pericardium is not always equal to constriction (absent in 18% of 143 surgically proven cases). When clinical, echocardiographic, or invasive haemodynamic features indicate constriction, pericardiectomy should not be denied on the basis of normal pericardial thickness.65

b

Diagnosis is difficult in atrial fibrillation. Hepatic diastolic vein flow reversal in expirium is observed even when the flow velocity pattern is inconclusive.69

c

Patients with increased atrial pressures or mixed constriction and restriction demonstrate <25% respiratory changes.72 A provocation test with head-up tilting or sitting position with decrease of preload may unmask the constrictive pericarditis.70

d

In the early stage or in the occult form, these signs may not be present and the rapid infusion of 1–2 l of normal saline may be necessary to establish the diagnosis. Constrictive haemodynamics may be masked or complicated by valvular- and coronary artery disease.

Pericardiectomy is the only treatment for permanent constriction. The indications are based upon clinical symptoms, echocardiography findings, CT/MRI, and heart catheterisation. There are two standard approaches, both aiming at resecting the diseased pericardium as far as possible:74–77 (1) The antero-lateral thoracotomy (fifth intercostal space) and (2) median sternotomy (faster access to the aorta and right atrium for extracorporeal circulation). A primary installation of cardiopulmonary bypass is not recommended (diffuse bleeding following systemic heparinisation). If severe calcified adhesions between peri- and epicardium or a general affection of the epicardium (“outer porcelain heart”) are present surgery carries a high risk of either incomplete success or severe myocardial damage. An alternative approach in such cases may be a “laser shaving” using an Excimer laser.75 Areas of strong calcification or dense scaring may be left as islands to avoid major bleeding. Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis has a mortality rate of 6–12%.75,77 The complete normalization of cardiac haemodynamics is reported in only 60% of the patients.74,76 The deceleration time (DT) may remain prolonged78 and postoperative respiratory variations of mitral/tricuspid flow are found in 9–25%.76,79 Left ventricular ejection fraction can increase due to a better ventricular filling.76,78 Major complications include acute perioperative cardiac insufficiency and ventricular wall rupture.80 Cardiac mortality and morbidity at pericardiectomy is mainly caused by the pre-surgically unrecognised presence of myocardial atrophy or myocardial fibrosis (Fig. 2).66 Exclusion of patients with extensive myocardial fibrosis and/or atrophy reduced the mortality rate for pericardiectomy to 5%. Postoperative low cardiac output80 should be treated by fluid substitution and catecholamines, high doses of digitalis, and intraaortic balloon pump in most severe cases. If indication for surgery was established early, long-term survival after pericardiectomy corresponds to that of the general population.75,76 However, if severe clinical symptoms were present for a longer period before surgery, even a complete pericardiectomy may not achieve a total restitution.

Pericardial cysts

Congenital pericardial cysts are uncommon; they may be unilocular or multilocular, with the diameter from 1–5 cm.81Inflammatory cysts comprise pseudocysts as well as encapsulated and loculated pericardial effusions, caused by rheumatic pericarditis, bacterial infection, particularly tuberculosis, trauma and cardiac surgery. Echinococcal cysts usually originate from ruptured hydatid cysts in the liver and lungs. Most patients are asymptomatic and cysts are detected incidentally on chest roentgenograms as an oval, homogeneous radiodense lesion, usually at the right cardiophrenic angle.82 However, the patients can also present with chest discomfort, dyspnoea, cough or palpitations, due to the compression of the heart. Echocardiography is useful, but additional imaging by computed tomography (density readings) or magnetic resonance is often needed.83 The treatment for congenital and inflammatory cysts is percutaneous aspiration and ethanol sclerosis.84,85 If this is not feasible, video assisted thoracotomy or surgical resection may be necessary. The surgical excision of ecchinococcal cysts is not recommended. Percutanous aspiration and instillation of ethanol or silver nitrate after pre-treatment with Albendazole (800 mg/day 4 weeks) is safe and effective.85

Specific forms of pericarditis

Viral pericarditis

Viral pericarditis is the most common infection of the pericardium. Inflammatory abnormalities are due to direct viral attack, the immune response (antiviral or anticardiac), or both.3,86 Early viral replication in pericardial and epimyocardial tissue elicits cellular and humoral immune responses against the virus and/or cardiac tissue. Viral genomic fragments in pericardial tissue may not necessarily replicate, yet they serve as a source of antigen to stimulate immune responses. Deposits of IgM, IgG, and occasionally IgA, can be found in the pericardium and myocardium for years.86 Various viruses cause pericarditis (entero-, echo-, adeno-, cytomegalo-, Ebstein Barr-, herpes simplex-, influenza, parvo B19, hepatitis C, HIV, etc). Attacks of enteroviral pericarditis follow the seasonal epidemics of Coxsackie virus A+B and Echovirus infections.87 Cytomegalovirus pericarditis has an increased incidence in immunocompromised and HIV infected hosts.88 Infectious mononucleosis may also present with pericarditis. The diagnosis of viral pericarditis is not possible without the evaluation of pericardial effusion and/or pericardial/epicardial tissue, preferably by PCR or in-situ hybridisation (level of evidence B, class IIa indication) (Focus boxes 3–4). A four-fold rise in serum antibody levels is suggestive but not diagnostic for viral pericarditis (level of evidence B, class IIb indication).

Treatment of viral pericarditis is directed to resolve symptoms (see acute pericarditis), prevent complications, and eradicate the virus. In patients with chronic or recurrent symptomatic pericardial effusion and confirmed viral infection the following specific treatment is under investigation: (1) CMV pericarditis: hyperimmunoglobulin - 1 time per day 4 ml/kg on day 0, 4, and 8; 2 ml/kg on day 12 and 16; (2) Coxsackie B pericarditis: Interferon alpha or beta 2,5 Mio. IU/m2 surface area s.c. 3×per week; (3) adenovirus and parvovirus B19 perimyocarditis: immunoglobulin treatment: 10 g intravenously at day 1 and 3 for 6–8 hours.113

Pericardial manifestation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection can be due to infective, non-infective and neoplastic diseases (Kaposi sarcoma and/or lymphoma). Infective (myo)pericarditis results from the local HIV infection and/or from the other viral (cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex), bacterial (S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, M. avium, and M. tuberculosis) and fungal coinfections (Cryptococcus neoformans).114 In progressive disease the incidence of echocardiographically detected pericardial effusion is up to 40%.115 Cardiac tamponade is rare.116 During the treatment with retroviral compounds, lipodystrophy can develop (best demonstrated by MRI) with intense paracardial fat deposition leading to heart failure. Treatment is symptomatic, while in large effusions and cardiac tamponade pericardiocentesis is necessary. The use of corticoid therapy is contraindicated except in patients with secondary tuberculous pericarditis, as an adjunct to tuberculostatic treatment (level of evidence A, indication I).117

Bacterial pericarditis

Purulent pericarditis in adults is rare (Table 5), but always fatal if untreated.118–121 Mortality rate in treated patients is 40%, mostly due to cardiac tamponade, toxicity, and constriction. It is usually a complication of an infection originating elsewhere in the body, arising by contiguous spread or haematogenous dissemination.131 Predisposing conditions are pericardial effusion, immunosuppression, chronic diseases (alcohol abuse, rheumatoid arthritis, etc), cardiac surgery and chest trauma. The disease appears as an acute, fulminant infectious illness with short duration. Percutaneous pericardiocentesis must be promptly performed. Obtained pericardial fluid should undergo urgent Gram, acid-fast and fungal staining, followed by cultures of the pericardial and body fluids (level of evidence B, indication I). Rinsing of the pericardial cavity, combined with effective systemic antibiotic therapy is mandatory (antistaphylococcal antibiotic plus aminoglycoside, followed by tailored antibiotic therapy according to pericardial fluid and blood cultures).119 Intrapericardial instillation of antibiotics (e.g., gentamycin) is useful but not sufficient. Frequent irrigation of the pericardial cavity with urokinase or streptokinase, using large catheters, may liquefy the purulent exudate,120,121 but open surgical drainage through subxiphoid pericardiotomy is preferable.118 Pericardiectomy is required in patients with dense adhesions, loculated and thick purulent effusion, recurrence of tamponade, persistent infection, and progression to constriction.119 Surgical mortality is up to 8%.

Table 5

Differential diagnosis of the specific forms of pericarditis118–130



 

Viral
 

Bacterial
 

Tuberculous
 

Autoreactive
 
Cardiotropic microbial agents Entero-, echo-, adeno-, cytomegalo, Ebstein Barr, herpes simplex, influenza, parvo B19, hepatitis A,B,C virus, HIV Staphylococci, pneumococci, streptococci, Neisseria, proteus, gram negative rods, Legionella Mycobacterium tuberculosis Autoimmune process in the absence of viral and bacterial agents 
Etiological evidence by PCR or in situ hybridisation (evidence level B, indication IIa) Gram-stain, bacterial culture, PCR for Borrelia and chlamydia pneumoniae (evidence level B, indication I) Ziehl-Neelsen, auramin 0 stain, culture, PCR (evidence level B, indication I) Ig-binding to peri- and epicardium, negative PCR for cardiotropic agents, epicarditis (evidence level B, indication IIa) 
Incidence (%) Western countries 30 5–10 5 per 100,000 patients 
\({<}\)
4 (much more in Africa and South America) 
20–30 
Male: female ratio 3:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 
Predisposition Unknown Chronic alcohol abuse, immuno-suppression, Alcohol abuse, HIV infection Association to autoimmune disorders 
Clinical features Identical to acute pericarditis, often subfebrile Spiking fever, fulminant, tachycardia, pericardial rubs Subfebrile, chronic Subfebrile, chronic 
Effusion size Variable, mostly small Variable Variable, mostly large Variable 
Tamponade Infrequent 80% Frequent Infrequent 
Spontan. Remission Frequent None None Rare 
Recurrence rate 30–50% Rare Frequent Frequent;
\(>\)
25% 
Aspect of PE Serous/serosanginous Purulent Serosanginous Serous 
Protein content 
\(>\)
3 g/dL 
High High/intermediate Intermediate 
Leukocyte count (PE) 
\(>\)
5000/ml 
≫10000/ml Intermediate
\(>\)
8000 
Intermediate <5000 
Pericardial fluid analyses Activated lymphocytes and macrophages (sparse) Adenosindeaminase (ADA)- negative Granulocytes and macrophages (massive) ADA-negative Granulocytes and macrophages (intermediate) ADA positive (
\(>\)
40 U/ml) 
Activated lymphocytes and macrophages (sparse) ADA-negative 
Peri- and epicardial biopsy Lymphocytic peri-/epicarditis, PCR positive for cardiotropic virus Leukocytic epicarditis Caseous granuloma, PCR Lymphocytic peri-/epicarditis, PCR negative 
Mortality if untreated Depending on agent and tamponade 100% 85% In untreated tamponade 
Intrapericardial treatment Drainage, if needed, no intrapercardial corticoids Drainage and rinsing (saline) gentamycin 80 mg i.p., Drainage, if needed Drainage, i.p. triamcinolon (evidence B, indication IIa) 
Pericardiotomy/pericardiectomy Rarely needed Promptly needed (evidence level B, indication I) Rarely needed Rarely needed 
Systemic treatment I.V. immunoglobulins, IFN (in enteroviral pericarditis) s.c. I.V. antibiotics Tuberculostatic+prednisone NSAIDs, Colchicine, prednisolone/azathioprin 
Constriction
 
Rare
 
Frequent
 
Frequent (30–50%)
 
Rare
 


 

Viral
 

Bacterial
 

Tuberculous
 

Autoreactive
 
Cardiotropic microbial agents Entero-, echo-, adeno-, cytomegalo, Ebstein Barr, herpes simplex, influenza, parvo B19, hepatitis A,B,C virus, HIV Staphylococci, pneumococci, streptococci, Neisseria, proteus, gram negative rods, Legionella Mycobacterium tuberculosis Autoimmune process in the absence of viral and bacterial agents 
Etiological evidence by PCR or in situ hybridisation (evidence level B, indication IIa) Gram-stain, bacterial culture, PCR for Borrelia and chlamydia pneumoniae (evidence level B, indication I) Ziehl-Neelsen, auramin 0 stain, culture, PCR (evidence level B, indication I) Ig-binding to peri- and epicardium, negative PCR for cardiotropic agents, epicarditis (evidence level B, indication IIa) 
Incidence (%) Western countries 30 5–10 5 per 100,000 patients 
\({<}\)
4 (much more in Africa and South America) 
20–30 
Male: female ratio 3:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 
Predisposition Unknown Chronic alcohol abuse, immuno-suppression, Alcohol abuse, HIV infection Association to autoimmune disorders 
Clinical features Identical to acute pericarditis, often subfebrile Spiking fever, fulminant, tachycardia, pericardial rubs Subfebrile, chronic Subfebrile, chronic 
Effusion size Variable, mostly small Variable Variable, mostly large Variable 
Tamponade Infrequent 80% Frequent Infrequent 
Spontan. Remission Frequent None None Rare 
Recurrence rate 30–50% Rare Frequent Frequent;
\(>\)
25% 
Aspect of PE Serous/serosanginous Purulent Serosanginous Serous 
Protein content 
\(>\)
3 g/dL 
High High/intermediate Intermediate 
Leukocyte count (PE) 
\(>\)
5000/ml 
≫10000/ml Intermediate
\(>\)
8000 
Intermediate <5000 
Pericardial fluid analyses Activated lymphocytes and macrophages (sparse) Adenosindeaminase (ADA)- negative Granulocytes and macrophages (massive) ADA-negative Granulocytes and macrophages (intermediate) ADA positive (
\(>\)
40 U/ml) 
Activated lymphocytes and macrophages (sparse) ADA-negative 
Peri- and epicardial biopsy Lymphocytic peri-/epicarditis, PCR positive for cardiotropic virus Leukocytic epicarditis Caseous granuloma, PCR Lymphocytic peri-/epicarditis, PCR negative 
Mortality if untreated Depending on agent and tamponade 100% 85% In untreated tamponade 
Intrapericardial treatment Drainage, if needed, no intrapercardial corticoids Drainage and rinsing (saline) gentamycin 80 mg i.p., Drainage, if needed Drainage, i.p. triamcinolon (evidence B, indication IIa) 
Pericardiotomy/pericardiectomy Rarely needed Promptly needed (evidence level B, indication I) Rarely needed Rarely needed 
Systemic treatment I.V. immunoglobulins, IFN (in enteroviral pericarditis) s.c. I.V. antibiotics Tuberculostatic+prednisone NSAIDs, Colchicine, prednisolone/azathioprin 
Constriction
 
Rare
 
Frequent
 
Frequent (30–50%)
 
Rare
 

Tuberculous pericarditis

In the last decade TBC pericarditis in the developed countries has been primarily seen in immunocompromised patients (AIDS).123 The mortality rate in untreated acute effusive TBC pericarditis approaches 85%. Pericardial constriction occurs in 30–50%.122,125 The clinical presentation is variable: acute pericarditis with or without effusion; cardiac tamponade, silent, often large pericardial effusion with a relapsing course, toxic symptoms with persistent fever, acute constrictive pericarditis, subacute constriction, effusive-constrictive, or chronic constrictive pericarditis, and pericardial calcifications.3,89 The diagnosis is made by the identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the pericardial fluid or tissue, and/or the presence of caseous granulomas in the pericardium.3,123 Importantly, PCR can identify DNA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis rapidly from only 1 μL of pericardial fluid.127,128 High adenosine deaminase activity and interferon gamma concentration in pericardial effusion are also diagnostic, with a high sensitivity and specificity (Focus box 3): Both pericardioscopy and pericardial biopsy have also improved the diagnostic accuracy for TBC pericarditis.15 Pericardial biopsy enables rapid diagnosis with better sensitivity than pericardiocentesis (100 vs. 33%).

Pericarditis in a patient with proven extracardiac tuberculosis is strongly suggestive of TBC aetiology (several sputum cultures should be taken).3,126 The tuberculin skin test may be false negative in 25–33% of tests122 and false positive in 30–40% of patients.123 More accurate enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) test detects T-cells specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen.132 Perimyocardial TBC involvement is also associated with high serum titres of antimyolemmal and antimyosin antibodies.133 The diagnostic yield of pericardiocentesis in TBC pericarditis ranges from 30–76% according to the methods applied for the analyses of pericardial effusion.122,127 Pericardial fluid demonstrates high specific gravity, high protein levels, and high white-cell count (from 0.7–54×109/l).123

Various antituberculous drug combinations of different lengths (6, 9, 12 months) have been applied.94,122,123,126 However, only patients with proven or very likely TBC pericarditis should be treated. Prevention of constriction in chronic pericardial effusion of undetermined aetiology by “ex iuvantibus” antitubercular treatment was not successful.134 The use of steroids remains controversial.126,130,135–137 A meta analysis of patients with effusive and constrictive TBC pericarditis136,137 suggested that tuberculostatic treatment combined with steroids might be associated with fewer deaths, less frequent need for pericardiocentesis or pericardiectomy (level of evidence A, indication IIb).126,129 If given, prednisone should be administered in relatively high doses (1–2 mg/kg per day) since rifampicin induces its liver metabolism.7 This dose is maintained for 5–7 days and is progressively reduced to discontinuation in 6–8 weeks. If, in spite of combination therapy, constriction develops pericardiectomy is indicated (level of evidence B, class I indication).

Pericarditis in renal failure

Renal failure is a common cause of pericardial disease, producing large pericardial effusions in up to 20% of patients.138 Two forms have been described: (1) Uremic pericarditis – in 6–10% of patients with advanced renal failure (acute or chronic) before dialysis has been instituted or shortly thereafter.139 It results from inflammation of the visceral and parietal pericardium and correlates with the degree of azotemia (BUN

\(>\)
60 mg/dl). (2) Dialysis-associated pericarditis – in up to 13% of patients on maintenance haemodialysis,140 and occasionally with chronic peritoneal dialysis due to inadequate dialysis and/or fluid overload.141 Pathologic examination of the pericardium shows adhesions between the thickened pericardial membranes (“bread and butter” appearance). The clinical features may include fever and pleuritic chest pain but many patients are asymptomatic. Pericardial rubs may persist even in large effusions or may be transient. Due to autonomic impairment in uremic patients, heart rate may remain slow (60–80 beats/min) during tamponade, despite fever and hypotension. Anaemia, due to induced resistance to erythropoetin142 may worsen the clinical picture. The ECG does not show the typical diffuse ST/T wave elevations observed with other causes of acute pericarditis due to the lack of the myocardial inflammation.143 If the ECG is typical of acute pericarditis, intercurrent infection must be suspected.

Most patients with uremic pericarditis respond rapidly to haemo- or peritoneal dialysis with resolution of chest pain and pericardial effusion. To avoid haemopericardium heparin-free haemodialysis should be used. Hypokalemia and hypophosphatemia should be prevented by supplementing the dialysis solution when appropriate.144 Intensified dialysis usually leads to resolution of the pericarditis within 1–2 weeks.145 Peritoneal dialysis, which does not require heparinisation, may be therapeutic in pericarditis resistant to haemodialysis, or if heparin-free haemodialysis cannot be performed. NSAIDs and systemic corticosteroids have limited success when intensive dialysis is ineffective.146 Cardiac tamponade and large chronic effusions resistant to dialysis must be treated with pericardiocentesis. (level of evidence B, class IIa indication). Large, non-resolving symptomatic effusions should be treated with intrapericardial instillation of corticosteroids after pericardiocentesis or subxiphoid pericardiotomy (triamcinolone hexacetonide 50 mg every 6 h for 2–3 days).140,147 Pericardiectomy is indicated only in refractory, severely symptomatic patients due to its potential morbidity and mortality. After renal transplantation, pericarditis has also been reported in 2.4% of patients, within two months.148 Uraemia or infection (CMV) may be the causes.

Autoreactive pericarditis and pericardial involvement in systemic autoimmune diseases

The diagnosis of autoreactive pericarditis is established using the following criteria:2 (1) increased number of lymphocytes and mononuclear cells

\(>\)
5000/mm3 (autoreactive lymphocytic), or the presence of antibodies against heart muscle tissue (antisarcolemmal) in the pericardial fluid (autoreactive antibody-mediated); (2) inflammation in epicardial/endomyocardial biopsies by ⩾14 cells/mm2; (3) exclusion of active viral infection both in pericardial effusion and endomyocardial/epimyocardial biopsies (no virus isolation, no IgM-titer against cardiotropic viruses in pericardial effusion, and negative PCR for major cardiotropic viruses); (4) tuberculosis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and other bacterial infection excluded by PCR and/or cultures; (5) neoplastic infiltration absent in pericardial effusion and biopsy samples; (6) exclusion of systemic, metabolic disorders, and uraemia. Intrapericardial treatment with triamcinolone is highly efficient with rare side effects.2

Pericarditis occurs in systemic autoimmune diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, progressive systemic sclerosis, polymyositis/ dermatomyositis, mixed connective tissue disease, seronegative spondyloarthropathies, systemic and hypersensitivity vasculitides, Behçet syndrome, Wegener granulomatosis, and sarcoidosis.7 Intensified treatment of the underlying disease and symptomatic management are indicated (evidence level B, indication I).

The post-cardiac injury syndrome: postpericardiotomy syndrome

Post-cardiac injury syndrome develops within days to months after cardiac, pericardial injury or both.7,149 It resembles the post-myocardial infarction syndrome, both appearing to be variants of a common immunopathic process. Unlike post-myocardial infarction syndrome, post-cardiac injury syndrome acutely provokes a greater antiheart antibody response (antisarcolemmal and antifibrillary), probably related to more extensive release of antigenic material.149,150 Pericardial effusion also occurs after orthotopic heart transplantation (21%). It is more frequent in patients receiving aminocaproic acid during the operation.151 Cardiac tamponade after open heart surgery is more common following valve surgery than coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone and may be related to the preoperative use of anticoagulants.152 Constrictive pericarditis may also occur after cardiac surgery. Warfarin administration in patients with early postoperative pericardial effusion imposes the greatest risk, particularly in those who did not undergo pericardiocentesis and drainage of the effusion.153 Symptomatic treatment is as in acute pericarditis (NSAIDs or colchicine for several weeks or months, even after disappearance of effusion).154 Long term (3–6 months) oral corticoids or preferably pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial instillation of triamcinolone (300 mg/m2) are therapeutic options in refractory forms. Redo surgery and pericardiectomy are very rarely needed. Primary prevention of postperiocardiotomy syndrome using short-term perioperative steroid treatment or colchicine is under investigation.155

Postinfarction pericarditis

Two forms of postinfarction pericarditis can be distinguished: an “early” form (pericarditis epistenocardica) and a “delayed” form (Dressler's syndrome).156Epistenocardiac pericarditis, caused by direct exudation, occurs in 5–20% of transmural myocardial infarctions but is clinically discovered rarely. Dressler's syndrome occurs from one week to several months after clinical onset of myocardial infarction with symptoms and manifestations similar to the post-cardiac injury syndrome. It does not require transmural infarction157 and can also appear as an extension of epistenocardiac pericarditis. Its incidence is 0.5–5%158 and is still lower in patients treated with thrombolytics (

\({<}\)
0.5%),159 but was more frequent in cases of pericardial bleeding after antithrombotic treatment.156,160 Of note, ECG changes are often overshadowed by myocardial infarction changes. Stage I ECG changes are uncommon and suggest “early” post-myocardial infarction syndrome whereas failure to evolve or “resurrection” of previously inverted T waves strongly suggest myocardial infarction pericarditis.161,162 Postinfarction pericardial effusion
\(>\)
10 mm is most frequently associated with haemopericardium, and two thirds of these patients may develop tamponade/free wall rupture.163 Urgent surgical treatment is life saving. However, if the immediate surgery is not available or contraindicated pericardiocentesis an intrapericardial fibrin-glue instillation could be an alternative in subacute tamponade.163,164

Hospitalisation to observe for tamponade, differential diagnosis, and adjustments of treatment is needed. Ibuprofen, which increases coronary flow, is the agent of choice.165 Aspirin, up to 650 mg every 4 hours for 2 to 5 days has also been successfully applied. Other nonsteroidal agents risk thinning the infarction zone.164,166 Corticosteroid therapy can be used for refractory symptoms only but could delay myocardial infarction healing (level of evidence B, class IIa indication).7

Traumatic pericardial effusion and haemopericardium in aortic dissection

Direct pericardial injury can be induced by accidents or iatrogenic wounds.7,167–170 Blood loss, vasoconstriction, and haematothorax leading to severe hypotension and shock may mask pulses paradoxus.170 Thoracotomy and surgical repair should be performed.

Iatrogenic tamponade occurs most frequently in percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty, during or after transseptal puncture, particularly, if no biplane catheterisation laboratory is available and a small left atrium is present. Whereas the puncture of the interatrial septum is asymptomatic, the passage of the free wall induces chest-pain immediately. If high-pressure containing structures are punctured, rapid deterioration occurs. However, if only the atrial wall is passed, the onset of symptoms and the tamponade may be delayed for 4 to 6 hours. Rescue pericardiocentesis is successful in 95–100% with a

\({<}\)
1% mortality29 (Table 6).

Table 6

Traumatic pericardial effusion167–194


Effusion due to
 

Incidence (%)
 

Mortality (%)
 

Management
 

Comment/Reference
 
Iatrogenic     
Transseptal puncture 1–3 
\({<}\)
1% 
Rescue pericardiocentesis, if needed Use biplane angio-graphy171 
Coronary artery perforation during PTCA (guidewire only) Not infrequent Not available Watchful waiting by withdrawal of guidewire Reverse anticoagulation 
Coronary artery transsection during PTCA 0.3–3.2 Not available Sealing by graft stents (best) or perfusion catheters with balloon occlusion of perforated vessel, if pericardial puncture is need reinfusion of recovered blood in vein avoids anaemia. Surgery only if
\(>\)
30% of myocardium at stake or bleeding cannot be stopped172,173 
Rotablation 0.1–3 Not available See above See above172,173 
Transluminal extraction atherectomy (atherocath) 0–2 % Not available See above See above 
Excimer laser angioplasty 1.7–3% Not available See above See above173 
High pressure stenting 
\({<}\)
2% (?) 
Not available See above See above173 
Mitral valvuloplasty 1–3% <1%  171,179 
Left ventricular biopsy (LV-EMB) 0.1–3.3% 0% Routine echocardiography post EMB, pericardiocentesis, if needed; reverse anticoagulation 180,181,194 
Right ventricular biopsy (RV-EMB) 0.3–5% 0–0.05% Routine echocardiography post EMB, pericardiocentesis, if needed; reverse anticoagulation 180,181,194 
Pacemaker leads 0–3–3.1% 0.1% Routine echocardiography post implantation, pericardiocentesis, if needed Pericardial effusion with/without tamponade190,191, postpericardiotomy syndrome192, constrictive pericarditis193 
     
Other causes     
Injury (direct: e.g., stabbing indirect: compression, closed chest massage) Not available Often lethal Direct: surgery (see text) Indirect: pericardiocentesis or surgery  
Aortic dissection
 
48% post mortem, 17–45% in clinical series
 
Lethal if not operated
 
Transoesophageal echo, CT or MRI, immediate surgery
 
Particularly in De- Bakey I + II=Stanford type A184–189
 

Effusion due to
 

Incidence (%)
 

Mortality (%)
 

Management
 

Comment/Reference
 
Iatrogenic     
Transseptal puncture 1–3 
\({<}\)
1% 
Rescue pericardiocentesis, if needed Use biplane angio-graphy171 
Coronary artery perforation during PTCA (guidewire only) Not infrequent Not available Watchful waiting by withdrawal of guidewire Reverse anticoagulation 
Coronary artery transsection during PTCA 0.3–3.2 Not available Sealing by graft stents (best) or perfusion catheters with balloon occlusion of perforated vessel, if pericardial puncture is need reinfusion of recovered blood in vein avoids anaemia. Surgery only if
\(>\)
30% of myocardium at stake or bleeding cannot be stopped172,173 
Rotablation 0.1–3 Not available See above See above172,173 
Transluminal extraction atherectomy (atherocath) 0–2 % Not available See above See above 
Excimer laser angioplasty 1.7–3% Not available See above See above173 
High pressure stenting 
\({<}\)
2% (?) 
Not available See above See above173 
Mitral valvuloplasty 1–3% <1%  171,179 
Left ventricular biopsy (LV-EMB) 0.1–3.3% 0% Routine echocardiography post EMB, pericardiocentesis, if needed; reverse anticoagulation 180,181,194 
Right ventricular biopsy (RV-EMB) 0.3–5% 0–0.05% Routine echocardiography post EMB, pericardiocentesis, if needed; reverse anticoagulation 180,181,194 
Pacemaker leads 0–3–3.1% 0.1% Routine echocardiography post implantation, pericardiocentesis, if needed Pericardial effusion with/without tamponade190,191, postpericardiotomy syndrome192, constrictive pericarditis193 
     
Other causes     
Injury (direct: e.g., stabbing indirect: compression, closed chest massage) Not available Often lethal Direct: surgery (see text) Indirect: pericardiocentesis or surgery  
Aortic dissection
 
48% post mortem, 17–45% in clinical series
 
Lethal if not operated
 
Transoesophageal echo, CT or MRI, immediate surgery
 
Particularly in De- Bakey I + II=Stanford type A184–189
 

Transsection of the coronary artery and acute or subacute cardiac tamponade may occur during percutaneous coronary interventions.172,173 A breakthrough in the treatment of coronary perforation is membrane-covered graft stents.177,178 Perforation of the coronary artery by a guidewire is not infrequent and causes very rarely a relevant pericardial haemorrhage.

During right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy, due to the low stiffness of the myocardium, the catheter may pass the myocardium, particularly, when the bioptome has not been opened before reaching the endocardial border. The rate of perforation is reported to be in the range of 0.3–5%, leading to tamponade and circulatory collapse in less than half of the cases.180,181,194 The incidence of pericardial haemorrhage in left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy is lower (0.1–3.3%). Frank cardiac perforations seem to be accompanied by sudden bradycardia and hypotension.180 Severe complications, leading to procedure related mortality were reported in only 0.05% in a worldwide survey of more than 6000 cases181 and in none of the 2537 patients from the registry of an experienced reference centre.194

Pacemaker leads penetrating the right ventricle or epicardial electrodes may cause pericarditis with tamponade, adhesions, or constriction.190–193 A right bundle brand block instead of a usually induced left bundle branch block is a clue.

Blunt chest trauma is the major risk of car accidence. The deceleration force can lead to myocardial contusion with intrapericardial haemorrhage, cardiac rupture, pericardial rupture, or herniation. Transesophageal echocardiography in the emergency room183 or immediate computed tomography should be performed. Pericardial laceration and partial extrusion of the heart into the mediastinum and pleural space may also occur after injury.168

In dissection of the ascending aorta (pericardial effusion can be found in 17–45% of the patients and in 48% of the autopsy cases (Table 6).184 In a clinical series of aortic dissection, pericardial tamponade was found by CT,185 MRI,186 or echocardiography187 in 17–33% of patients with type I dissection and 18–45% in type II dissection and 6% in type III dissection.185 Pericardiocentesis is contraindicated, due to the risk of intensified bleeding and extension of the dissection.188,195 Surgery should be performed immediately (evidence level B, indication I).

Neoplastic pericarditis

Primary tumours of the pericardium are 40 times less common than the metastatic ones.7 Mesothelioma, the most common of the primary tumours, is almost always incurable. The most common secondary malignant tumours are lung cancer, breast cancer, malignant melanoma, lymphomas, and leukemias. Effusions may be small or large with an imminent tamponade (frequent recurrences) or constriction. It even may be the initial sign of malignant disease.196 With small malignant effusions most patients are asymptomatic. The onset of dyspnoea, cough, chest pain, tachycardia, jugular venous distension is observed when the volume of fluid exceeds 500 ml. Pulsus paradoxus, hypotension, cardiogenic shock and paradoxical movement of the jugular venous pulse are important signs of cardiac tamponade. The diagnosis is based on the confirmation of the malignant infiltration within the pericardium. Of note, in almost 2/3 of the patients with documented malignancy pericardial effusion is caused by non-malignant diseases, e.g., radiation pericarditis, or opportunistic infections.102,103 The chest roentgenogram, CT, and MRI may reveal mediastinal widening, hilar masses, and pleural effusion.7 The analyses of pericardial fluid, pericardial or epicardial biopsy are essential for the confirmation of malignant pericardial disease (level of evidence B, indication I) (Focus boxes 3–4).

Treatment of cardiac tamponade is a class I indication for pericardiocentesis. The following steps are recommended in suspected neoplastic pericardial effusion without tamponade: (1) systemic antineoplastic treatment as baseline therapy which can prevent recurrences in up to 67% of cases196 (level of evidence B, class I indication); (2) pericardiocentesis to relieve symptoms and establish diagnosis (level of evidence B, class IIa indication); (3) intrapericardial instillation of cytostatic/sclerosing agent (level of evidence B, class IIa indication). Pericardial drainage is recommended, in all patients with large effusions because of the high recurrence rate (40–70%)(level of evidence B, indication I).197–203 Prevention of recurrences may be achieved by intrapericardial instillation of sclerosing, cytotoxic agents, or immunomodulators. Intrapericardial treatment tailored to the type of the tumour indicates that administration of cisplatin is most effective in secondary lung cancer and intrapericardial instillation of thiotepa was more effective in breast cancer pericardial metastases.204–206 No patient showed signs of constrictive pericarditis (for both agents level of evidence B, indication IIa). Tetracyclines as sclerosing agents also control the malignant pericardial effusion in around 85% of cases, but side effects and complications are quite frequent: fever (19%), chest pain (20%), and atrial arrhythmias (10%) (level of evidence B, indication IIb).196,202,203 Although classic sclerotherapy after intrapericardial instillation of tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline and bleomycin is an effective procedure, constrictive pericarditis secondary to fibrosis remains a severe problem in long-term survivors.203

Although intrapericardial administration of radionuclides has yielded very good results, it is not widely accepted because of the logistic problems connected with their radioactivity207 (level of evidence B, indication IIa). Radiation therapy is very effective (93%) in controlling malignant pericardial effusion (level of evidence B, indication IIa) in patients with radiosensitive tumours such as lymphomas and leukemias. However, radiotherapy of the heart can cause myocarditis and pericarditis by itself.196 Subxyphoid pericardiotomy is indicated when pericardiocentesis cannot be performed (level of evidence B, indication IIb).208 The procedure can be carried out in local anaesthesia, but complications include myocardial laceration, pneumothorax, and mortality.196,209–213 Pleuropericardiotomy allows drainage of malignant pericardial fluid into the pleural space (level of evidence C, indication IIb). It is associated with a higher complications rate and offers no advantage over pericardiocentesis or subxyphoid pericardiotomy. Pericardiectomy is rarely indicated, mainly for pericardial constriction or complications of previous procedures.196

Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy creates a pleuro-pericardial direct communication, which allows fluid drainage into the pleural space (level of evidence B, indication IIa). In large malignant pericardial effusions and recurrent tamponade, it seems to be effective (90–97%) and safe.31,214

Rare forms of pericardial disease

Fungal pericarditis

Fungal pericarditis occurs mainly in immunocompromised patients or in the course of endemic-acquired fungal infections.215 The clinical picture comprises the full spectrum of pericardial diseases including fungal myocarditis.3 Fungal pericarditis is mainly due to endemic fungi (Histoplasma, Coccidioides), or nonendemic – opportunistic fungi (Candida, Aspergillus, Blastomyces) and semifungi (Nocardia, Actinomyces).216–218 Diagnosis is obtained by staining and culturing pericardial fluid or tissue. Antifungal antibodies in serum are also helpful in establishing the diagnosis of fungal infection.3 Antifungal treatment with fluconazole, ketoconasole, itraconasole, amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B or amphotericin B lipid complex is indicated (level of evidence B, indication I). Corticosteroids and NSAIDs can support the treatment with antifungal drugs (level of evidence C, indication IIa). Patients with pericarditis in the course of histoplasmosis do not need antifungal therapy, but respond to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs given during 2–12 weeks. Sulfonamides are the drugs of choice for a nocardiosis infection. Combination of three antibiotics including penicillin should be given for actinomycosis (level of evidence C, indication I). Pericardiocentesis or surgical treatment is indicated for haemodynamic impairment. Pericardiectomy is indicated in fungal constrictive pericarditis (evidence level C, indication I).

Radiation pericarditis

The probability to develop radiation-induced pericarditis is influenced by the applied source, dose, its fractionation, duration, radiation exposed volume, form of mantel field therapy, and the age of the patients.219 Radiation induced pericarditis may occur already during the therapy or months and years later – with latency of up to 15–20 years. The effusion may be serous or haemorrhagic, later on with fibrinous adhesions or constriction, typically without tissue calcification. The symptoms may be masked by the underlying disease or the applied chemotherapy. Imaging should start with echocardiography, followed by cardiac CT or MRI if necessary. Pericarditis without tamponade may be treated conservatively or by pericardiocentesis for diagnostic purposes or if haemodynamic compromise/tamponade occurs. Pericardial constriction may happen in up to 20% of patients, requiring pericardiectomy. The operative mortality is high (21%) and the postoperative five years survival rate is very low (1%)220 mostly due to myocardial fibrosis.

Chylopericardium

Chylopericardium refers to a communication between the pericardial sac and the thoracic duct, as a result of trauma, congenital anomalies, or as a complication of open-heart surgery,221 mediastinal lymphangiomas, lymphangiomatous hamartomas, lymphangiectasis, and obstruction or anomalies of the thoracic duct.222 Infection, tamponade or constriction may aggravate the prognosis.223 The pericardial fluid is sterile, odourless, and opalescent with a milky white appearance and the microscopic finding of fat droplets. The chylous nature of the fluid is confirmed by its alkaline reaction, specific gravity between 1010 and 1021,224,225 Sudan III stain for fat, the high concentrations of triglycerides (5–50 g/l) and protein (22–60 g/l). Enhanced computed tomography,226 alone or combined with lymphography, can identify not only the location of the thoracic duct but also its lymphatic connection to the pericardium.227 Treatment depends on the aetiology and the amount of chylous accumulation.228 Chylopericardium after thoracic or cardiac operation is preferably treated by pericardiocentesis and diet (medium chain triglycerides).229,230 If further production of chylous effusion continues, surgical treatment is mandatory (level of evidence B, indication I). When conservative treatment and pericardiocentesis fail, pericardio-peritoneal window is a reasonable option.231,232 Alternatively, when the course of the thoracic duct was precisely identified, its ligation and resection just above the diaphragm is the most effective treatment.233 In secondary chylopericardium the underlying disease should be treated.

Drug- and toxin-related pericarditis

Pericardial reactions to drugs are rare. However, several medications and toxic substances can induce pericarditis, tamponade, adhesions, fibrosis, or constriction (Table 7).7,234 Mechanisms include drug induced lupus reactions, idiosyncrasy, “serum sickness”, foreign substance reactions, and immunopathy. Management is based on the discontinuation of the causative agent and symptomatic treatment.

Table 7

Drug- and toxin-related pericardial disease7,234


A. Drug-induced lupus erythematosus 
  
Procainamide Methyldopa Isoniazid 
Tocainide Mesalazine Hydantoins 
Hydralazine Reserpine  
   
B. Hypersensitivity reaction   
Penicillins Tryptophan Cromolyn sodium 
   
C. Idiosyncratic reaction or hypersensitivity   
Methysergide Amiodarone Cyclophosphamide 
Minoxidil Streptokinase Cyclosporine 
Practolol p-Aminosalicylic acid Mesalazine 
Bromocriptine Thiazides 5-Fluorouracil 
Psicofuranine Streptomycin Vaccines (Smallpox, Yellow fever) 
Polymer fume inhalation Thiouracils GM-CSF 
Cytarabine Sulfa drugs  
Phenylbutazone   
   
D. Anthracycline derivatives   
Doxorubicin Daunorubicin  
   
E. Serum sickness   
Foreign antisera (e.g., antitetanus) Blood products  
   
F. Venom   
Scorpion fish sting   
   
G. Foreign-substance reactions (direct pericardial application)   
Talc (Mg silicate) Tetracycline/other sclerosants Iron in β-thalasssemia 
Silicones Asbestos  
   
H. Secondary pericardial bleeding/haemopericardium   
Anticoagulants Thrombolytic agents  
I. Polymer fume fever – inhalation of the burning fumes of polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon)
 

 

 

A. Drug-induced lupus erythematosus 
  
Procainamide Methyldopa Isoniazid 
Tocainide Mesalazine Hydantoins 
Hydralazine Reserpine  
   
B. Hypersensitivity reaction   
Penicillins Tryptophan Cromolyn sodium 
   
C. Idiosyncratic reaction or hypersensitivity   
Methysergide Amiodarone Cyclophosphamide 
Minoxidil Streptokinase Cyclosporine 
Practolol p-Aminosalicylic acid Mesalazine 
Bromocriptine Thiazides 5-Fluorouracil 
Psicofuranine Streptomycin Vaccines (Smallpox, Yellow fever) 
Polymer fume inhalation Thiouracils GM-CSF 
Cytarabine Sulfa drugs  
Phenylbutazone   
   
D. Anthracycline derivatives   
Doxorubicin Daunorubicin  
   
E. Serum sickness   
Foreign antisera (e.g., antitetanus) Blood products  
   
F. Venom   
Scorpion fish sting   
   
G. Foreign-substance reactions (direct pericardial application)   
Talc (Mg silicate) Tetracycline/other sclerosants Iron in β-thalasssemia 
Silicones Asbestos  
   
H. Secondary pericardial bleeding/haemopericardium   
Anticoagulants Thrombolytic agents  
I. Polymer fume fever – inhalation of the burning fumes of polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon)
 

 

 

Pericardial effusion in thyroid disorders

Pericardial effusion occurs in 5–30% of patients with hypothyroidism.7 Fluid accumulates slowly and tamponade occurs rarely. In some cases cholesterol pericarditis may be observed. The diagnosis of hypothyroidism is based on serum levels of thyroxin and thyroid stimulating hormone. Bradycardia, low-voltage of the QRS and T wave inversion or flattening in the ECG, cardiomegaly in the roentgenogram and pericardial effusion in echocardiography, as well as a history of radiation induced thyroid dysfunction,235 myopathy, ascites, pleural effusion and uveal oedema may be observed.235–239 Therapy with thyroid hormone decreases pericardial effusion (level of evidence B, indication I).

Pericardial effusion in pregnancy

There is no evidence that pregnancy affects susceptibility to pericardial disease. However, many pregnant women develop a minimal to moderate clinically silent hydropericardium by the third trimester. Cardiac compression is rare.240 ECG changes of acute pericarditis in pregnancy should be distinguished from the slight ST-segment depressions and T-wave changes seen in normal pregnancy.240–241 Occult constriction becomes manifest in pregnancy due to the increased blood volume.241 Most pericardial disorders are managed as in nonpregnant.242,243 Caution is necessary while high-dose aspirin may prematurely close the ductus arteriosus, and colchicine is contraindicated in pregnancy. Pericardiotomy and pericardiectomy can be safely performed if necessary and do not impose a risk for subsequent pregnancies.243,244 Foetal pericardial fluid can be detected by echocardiography after 20 weeks' gestation and is normally 2 mm or less in depth. More fluid should raise questions of hydrops foetalis, Rh disease, hypoalbuminemia, and immunopathy or maternally transmitted mycoplasmal or other infections, and neoplasia.245

Focus box 1
Pericardiocentesis

Pericardiocentesis is life saving in cardiac tamponade (level of evidence B, class I indication) and indicated in effusions

\(>\)
20 mm in echocardiography (diastole)23 but also in smaller effusions for diagnostic purposes (pericardial fluid and tissue analyses, pericardioscopy, and epicardial/pericardial biopsy)(level of evidence B, class IIa indication).2 Aortic dissection is a major contraindication.22 Relative contraindications include uncorrected coagulopathy, anticoagulant therapy, thrombocytopenia
\({<}\)
50000/mm3, small, posterior, and loculated effusions. Surgical drainage is preferred in traumatic haemopericardium and purulent pericarditis.7

Pericardiocentesis guided by fluoroscopy is performed in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory with ECG monitoring. Direct ECG monitoring from the puncturing needle is not an adequate safeguard. Right-heart catheterisation can be performed simultaneously, allowing exclusion of constriction. It is prudent to drain the fluid in

\({<}\)
1 l steps to avoid the acute right-ventricular dilatation.24 The subxiphoid approach has been used most commonly, with a long needle with a mandrel (Tuohy or thin-walled 18-gauge) directed towards the left shoulder at a 30° angle to the skin. This route is extrapleural and avoids the coronary, pericardial, and internal mammary arteries. The operator intermittently attempts to aspirate fluid and injects small amounts of contrast. If haemorrhagic fluid is freely aspirated a few millilitres of contrast medium may be injected under fluoroscopic observation (sluggish layering inferiorly indicates that the needle is correctly positioned). A soft J-tip guidewire is introduced and after dilatation exchanged for a multi-holed pigtail catheter. It is essential to check the position of the guidewire in at least two angiographic projections before insertion of the dilator and drainage catheter.

Echocardiographic guidance of pericardiocentesis is technically less demanding and can be performed at the bedside.13 Echocardiography should identify the shortest route where the pericardium can be entered intercostally (usually in the sixth or seventh rib space in the anterior axillary line). Prolonged pericardial drainage is performed until the volume of effusion obtained by intermittent pericardial aspiration (every 4–6 h) fall to

\({<}\)
25 ml per day.25 The feasibility is high (93%) in patients with anterior effusion ≥10 mm while the rate of success is only 58% with small, posteriorly located effusions. Fluoroscopic and haemodynamic monitoring improve feasibility (93.1% vs. 73.3%) in comparison to emergency pericardial puncture with no imaging control.26 The tangential approach using the epicardial halo phenomenon in the lateral view27 significantly increased the feasibility of fluoroscopically guided pericardiocentesis in patients with small effusions (200–300 ml)(92.6% vs. 84.9%) and very small effusions (<200 ml)(89.3% vs. 76.7%). Pericardiocentesis with echocardiography guidance was feasible in 96% of loculated pericardial effusions.28 Rescue pericardiocentesis guided by echocardiography relieved tamponade after cardiac perforation in 99% of 88 patients, and was the definitive therapy in 82%.29

The most serious complications of pericardiocentesis are laceration and perforation of the myocardium and the coronary vessels. In addition, patients can experience air embolism, pneumothorax, arrhythmias (usually vasovagal bradycardia), and puncture of the peritoneal cavity or abdominal viscera.26 Internal mammary artery fistulas, acute pulmonary oedema, and purulent pericarditis were rarely reported. The safety was improved with echocardiographic or fluoroscopic guidance. Recent large echocardiographic series reported an incidence of major complications of 1.3–1.6%.13 In fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pericardiocenteses30 cardiac perforations occurred in 0.9%, serious arrhythmias in 0.6%, arterial bleeding in 1.1%, pneumothorax in 0.6%, infection in 0.3%, and a major vagal reaction in 0.3%. Incidence of major complications was further reduced by utilizing the epicardial halo phenomenon for fluoroscopic guidance.27

Focus box 2
Determination of pulsus paradoxus

Pulsus paradoxus is defined as a drop in systolic blood pressure

\(>\)
10 mmHg during inspiration whereas diastolic blood pressure remains unchanged. It is easily detected by feeling the pulse.61 During inspiration, the pulse may disappear or its volume diminishes significantly. Clinically significant pulsus paradoxus is apparent when the patient is breathing normally. When present only in deep inspiration it should be interpreted with caution. The magnitude of pulsus paradoxus is evaluated by sphygmomanometry. If the pulsus paradoxus is present, the first Korotkoff sound is heard only during expiration. The blood pressure cuff is therefore inflated above the patient's systolic pressure. During deflation, the first Korotkoff sound is intermittent. Correlation with the patient's respiratory cycle identifies a point at which the sound is audible during expiration, but disappears in inspiration. As the cuff pressure drops, another point is reached when the first blood pressure sound is audible throughout the respiratory cycle. The difference is the measure of pulsus paradoxus.

Focus box 3
Analyses of pericardial effusion

Analyses of pericardial effusion can establish the diagnosis of viral, bacterial, tuberculous, fungal, cholesterol, and malignant pericarditis.7 It should be ordered according to the clinical presentation. Cytology and tumour markers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-feto protein (AFP), carbohydrate antigens CA 125, CA 72-4, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CD-30, CD-25, etc.) should be performed in suspected malignant disease. In suspected tuberculosis acid-fast bacilli staining, mycobacterium culture or radiometric growth detection (e.g., BACTEC-460), adenosine deaminase (ADA), interferon (IFN)-gamma, pericardial lysozyme, and as well as PCR analyses for tuberculosis should be performed (indication I, level of evidence B).11 Differentiation of tuberculous and neoplastic effusion is virtually absolute with low levels of ADA and high levels of CEA.94 In addition, very high ADA levels have prognostic value for pericardial constriction.95 However, it should be noted that PCR is as sensitive (75% vs. 83%), but more specific (100% vs. 78%) than ADA estimation for tuberculous pericarditis.99 In suspected bacterial infection at least three cultures of pericardial fluid for aerobes and anaerobes as well as the blood cultures are mandatory (level of evidence B, indication I). PCR analyses for cardiotropic viruses discriminate viral from autoreactive pericarditis (indication IIa, level of evidence B).2 Analyses of the pericardial fluid specific gravity (

\(>\)
1015), protein level (
\(>\)
3.0 g/dl; fluid/serum ratio
\(>\)
0.5), LDH (
\(>\)
200 mg/dL; serum/fluid
\(>\)
0.6), and glucose (exudates vs. transudates=77.9±41.9 vs. 96.1±50.7 mg/dl) can separate exudates from transudates but are not directly diagnostic (class IIb).14 However, purulent effusions with positive cultures have significantly lower fluid glucose levels (47.3±25.3 vs. 102.5±35.6 mg/dl) and fluid to serum ratios (0.28±0.14 vs. 0.84±0.23 mg/dl), than non-infectious effusions.11 White cell count (WBC) is highest in inflammatory diseases, particularly of bacterial and rheumatologic origin. A very low WBC count is found in myxedema. Monocyte count is highest in malignant effusions and hypothyroidisms (79±27% and 74±26%), while rheumatoid and bacterial effusions have the highest proportions of neutrophils (78±20% and 69±23%). Compared with controls, both bacterial and malignant pericardial fluids have higher cholesterol levels (49±18 vs. 121±20 and 117±33 mg/dl).11

Gram's stains in pericardial fluid have a specificity of 99%, but a sensitivity of only 38% for exclusion of the infection in comparison to bacterial cultures.14 Combination of epithelial membrane antigen, CEA and vimentin immunocytochemical staining can be useful to distinguish reactive mesothelial and adenocarcinoma cells.101

Focus box 4
Pericardioscopy and epicardial/pericardial biopsy

Introduction of pericardioscopy and contemporary pathology, virology, and molecular biology techniques have improved the diagnostic value of epicardial/pericardial biopsy.2 Pericardioscopy makes possible to inspect pericardial surface, select the biopsy site, and take numerous samples safely.16 Targeted pericardial/epicardial biopsy during pericardioscopy was particularly useful in the diagnosis of neoplastic pericarditis.15 No major complications occurred in any of the flexible pericardioscopy studies. Mortality reported in the studies with rigid endoscopes was 2.1%,15 and 3.5%103 due to induction of anaesthesia in patients with very large pericardial effusions.

Histology of epicardial/pericardial biopsies can establish the diagnosis in patients with neoplastic pericarditis and tuberculosis.16 Diagnosis of viral pericarditis can be established by PCR techniques with much higher sensitivity and specificity in comparison to viral isolation from fluid and tissue.107 Immunohistochemistry, especially IgG-, IgM- and IgA- and complement fixation contribute significantly to the diagnostic value of epicardial biopsy.2 Specificity of immunoglobulin fixation in autoreactive pericarditis is 100%. Complement fixation was found primarily in patients with the autoreactive form and rarely in patients with neoplastic pericarditis.8 Malignant mesotheliomas can be distinguished from pulmonary adenocarcinomas by immunohistochemical staining for CEA, surfactant apoprotein, Lewis a, and Tn antigen.112

1

Corresponding author. Chairperson: Bernhard Maisch, MD, FESC, FACC, Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Director of the Department of Internal Medicine-Cardiology, Philipps University, Marburg, Baldingerstrasse 1, D-35033 Marburg, Germany. Tel.: +49-6421-286-6462; fax: +49-6421-286-8954, E-mail address: bermaisch@aol.com

Members of the Task Force have the pleasure to acknowledge participation of Prof. Dr. Annalisa Angelini (Padua, I) and Dr. Steffen Lamparter (Marburg, D) in preparation of the sections of the Statement on pericardial pathology and analyses of pericardial effusion as well as the kind technical assistance of Ms. Veronica Dean (European Heart House). Special thanks to Professor Eloïsa Arbustini (Pavia, I) for her significant contribution to the review process of these guidelines.

References

[1]
Maisch
B
, Ristić AD. The classification of pericardial disease in the age of modern medicine.
Curr. Cardiol. Rep
 .
2002
;
4
(1):
13
–21.
[2]
Maisch
B
, Ristić AD, Pankuweit S. Intrapericardial treatment of autoreactive pericardial effusion with triamcinolone: the way to avoid side effects of systemic corticosteroid therapy.
Eur. Heart J
 .
2002
;
23
:
1503
–1508.
[3]
Spodick
DH
. Infectious pericarditis. Spodick DH. The pericardium: a comprehensive textbook. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997. p. 260–290.
[4]
Cottrill
CM
, Tamaren J, Hall B. Sternal defects associated with congenital pericardial and cardiac defects.
Cardiol. Young
 .
1998
;
8
(1):
100
–104.
[5]
Meunier
JP
, Lopez S, Teboul J et al. Total pericardial defect: risk factor for traumatic aortic type A dissection.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
2002
;
74
(1):
266
.
[6]
Loebe
M
, Meskhishvili V, Weng Y et al. Use of polytetrafluoroetylene surgical membrane as a pericardial substitute in the correction of congenital heart defects.
Tex. Heart Inst. J
 .
1993
;
20
(3):
213
–217.
[7]
Spodick
DH
. Pericardial diseases. Braunwald E, Zippes DP, Libby P. Heart disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia, London, Toronto, Montreal, Sydney, Tokyo: W.B. Saunders; 2001. p. 1823–1876.
[8]
Maisch
B
, Bethge C, Drude L, Hufnagel G, Herzum M, Schönian U. Pericardioscopy and epicardial biopsy: new diagnostic tools in pericardial and perimyocardial diseases.
Eur. Heart J
 .
1994
;
15
(Suppl C):
68
–73.
[9]
Levine
MJ
, Lorell BH, Diver DJ et al. Implications of echocardiographically assisted diagnosis of pericardial tamponade in contemporary medical patients: detection before hemodynamic embarrassment.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1991
;
17
:
59
–65.
[10]
Chuttani
K
, Pandian NG, Mohanty PK et al. Left ventricular diastolic collapse: an echocardiographic sign of regional cardiac tamponade.
Circulation
 .
1991
;
83
:
1999
–2006.
[11]
Meyers
DG
, Meyers RE, Prendergast TW. The usefulness of diagnostic tests on pericardial fluid.
Chest
 .
1997
;
111
(5):
1213
–1221.
[12]
Eisenberg
MJ
, Dunn MM, Kanth N et al. Diagnostic value of chest radiography for pericardial effusion.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1993
;
22
:
588
–593.
[13]
Tsang
TS
, Enriquez-Sarano M, Freeman WK et al. Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years.
Mayo. Clin. Proc
 .
2002
;
77
(5):
429
–436.
[14]
Chiles
C
, Woodard PK, Gutierrez FR et al. Metastatic involvement of the heart and pericardium: CT and MR imaging.
Radiographics
 .
2001
;
21
(2):
439
–449.
[15]
Nugue
O
, Millaire A, Porte H et al. Pericardioscopy in the etiologic diagnosis of pericardial effusion in 141 consecutive patients.
Circulation
 .
1996
;
94
(7):
1635
–1641.
[16]
Seferović
PM
, Ristić AD, Maksimović R et al. Diagnostic value of pericardial biopsy: improvement with extensive sampling enabled by pericardioscopy.
Circulation
 .
2003
;
107
:
978
–983.
[17]
Bonnefoy
E
, Godon P, Kirkorian G, Fatemi M, Chevalier P, Touboul P. Serum cardiac troponin I and ST-segment elevation in patients with acute pericarditis.
Eur. Heart J
 .
2000
;
21
(10):
832
–836.
[18]
Brandt
RR
, Filzmaier K, Hanrath P. Circulating cardiac troponin I in acute pericarditis.
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
2001
;
87
(11):
1326
–1328.
[19]
Bruch
C
, Schmermund A, Dagres N et al. Changes in QRS voltage in cardiac tamponade and pericardial effusion: reversibility after pericardiocentesis and after anti-inflammatory drug treatment.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
2001
;
38
(1):
219
–226.
[20]
Adler
Y
, Finkelstein Y, Guindo J et al. Colchicine treatment for recurrent pericarditis: a decade of experience.
Circulation
 .
1998
;
97
:
2183
–2185.
[21]
Zayas
R
, Anguita M, Torres F et al. Incidence of specific etiology and role of methods for specific etiologic diagnosis of primary acute pericarditis.
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
1995
;
75
:
378
–382.
[22]
Isselbacher
EM
, Cigarroa JE, Eagle KA. Cardiac tamponade complicating proximal aortic dissection: is pericardiocentesis harmful?
Circulation
 .
1994
;
90
:
2375
–2379.
[23]
Sagrista-Sauleda
J
, Angel J, Permanyer-Miralda G et al. Long-term follow-up of idiopathic chronic pericardial effusion.
N. Engl. J. Med
 .
1999
;
341
(27):
2054
–2059.
[24]
Armstrong
WF
, Feigenbaum H, Dillon JC. Acute right ventricular dilation and echocardiographic volume overload following pericardiocentesis for relief of cardiac tamponade.
Am. Heart J
 .
1984
;
107
:
1266
–1270.
[25]
Tsang
TS
, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ et al. Outcomes of clinically significant idiopathic pericardial effusion requiring intervention.
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
2002
;
91
(6):
704
–707.
[26]
Seferović PM, Ristić AD, Maksimović R et al. Therapeutic pericardiocentesis: up-to-date review of indications, efficacy, and risks. In: Seferović PM, Spodick DH, Maisch B, editors, Maksimović R, Ristić AD, assoc. editors. Pericardiology: contemporary answers to continuing challenges, Belgrade, Science 2000;417–26.
[27]
Maisch
B
, Ristić AD. Tangential approach to small pericardial effusions under fluoroscopic guidance in the lateral view: the halo phenomenon [abstract].
Circulation
 .
2001
;
103
(Suppl A):
II-730
.
[28]
Tsang
TS
, Barnes ME, Hayes SN et al. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of significant pericardial effusions following cardiothoracic surgery and outcomes of echo-guided pericardiocentesis for management: Mayo Clinic experience, 1979–1998.
Chest
 .
1999
;
116
(2):
322
–331.
[29]
Tsang
TS
, Freeman WK, Barnes ME et al. Rescue echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis for cardiac perforation complicating catheter-based procedures. The Mayo Clinic experience.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1998
;
32
(5):
1345
–1350.
[30]
Duvernoy
O
, Borowiec J, Helmius G et al. Complications of percutaneous pericardiocentesis under fluoroscopic guidance.
Acta Radiol
 .
1992
;
33
(4):
309
–313.
[31]
Ziskind
AA
, Pearce AC, Lemmon CC et al. Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy for the treatment of cardiac tamponade and large pericardial effusions: description of technique and report of the first 50 cases.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1993
;
21
(1):
1
–5.
[32]
DeLine
JM
, Cable DG. Clustering of recurrent pericarditis with effusion and constriction in a family.
Mayo Clin. Proc
 .
2002
;
77
(1):
39
–43.
[33]
Erdol
C
, Erdol H, Celik S et al. Idiopathic chronic pericarditis associated with ocular hypertension: probably an unknown combination.
Int. J. Cardiol
 .
2003
;
87
(2–3):
293
–295.
[34]
Guindo
J
, Rodriguez de la Serna A, Ramie J et al. Recurrent pericarditis - relief with colchicine.
Circulation
 .
1990
;
82
:
1117
–1120.
[35]
Millaire
A
, de Groote P, De Coulx E, Goullard L, Ducloux G. Treatment of recurrent pericarditis with colchicine.
Eur. Heart J
 .
1994
;
15
:
120
–124.
[36]
Asplen
CH
, Levine HD. Azathioprine therapy of steroid-responsive pericarditis.
Am. Heart J
 .
1970
;
80
:
109
–111.
[37]
Miller
JI
, Mansour KA, Hatcher CR. Pericardiectomy: current indication, concept, and results in a university center.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1982
;
84
:
40
–45.
[38]
Merce
J
, Sagrista-Sauleda J, Permanyer-Miralda G et al. Should pericardial drainage be performed routinely in patients who have a large pericardial effusion without tamponade?
Am. J. Med
 .
1998
;
105
:
106
–109.
[39]
Soler-Soler
J
. Massive chronic pericardial effusion. Soler-Soler J, Permanyer-Miralda G, Sagrista-Sauleda J. Pericardial diseases – old dilemmas and new insights. 6th ed. The Netherlands: Kluwer; 1990. p. 153–165.
[40]
Sagrista-Sauleda
J
, Merce J, Permanyer-Miralda G et al. Clinical clues to the causes of large pericardial effusions.
Am. J. Med
 .
2000
;
109
(2):
95
–101.
[41]
Heinsimer
JA
, Collins GJ, Burkman MH et al. Supine cross-table lateral chest roentgenogram for the detection of pericardial effusion.
JAMA
 .
1987
;
257
(23):
3266
–3268.
[42]
Carsky
EW
, Mauceri RA, Azimi F. The epicardial fat pad sign: analysis of frontal and lateral chest radiographs in patients with pericardial effusion.
Radiology
 .
1980
;
137
(2):
303
–308.
[43]
Horowitz
MS
, Schultz CS, Stinson EB et al. Sensitivity and specificity of echocardiographic diagnosis of pericardial effusion.
Circulation
 .
1974
;
50
:
239
–247.
[44]
DáCruz
IA
, Cohen HC, Prabhu R et al. Diagnosis of cardiac tamponade by echocardiography. Changes in mitral valce motion and ventricular dimensions, with special reference to paradoxical pulse.
Circulation
 .
1975
;
52
:
460
–465.
[45]
Martin
RP
, Bowdan R, Filly K et al. Intrapericardial abnormalities in patients with pericardial effusion: findings by two-dimensional echocardiography.
Circulation
 .
1980
;
61
:
568
–572.
[46]
Come
P
, Riley M, Fortuin N. Echocardiographic mimicry of pericardial effusions.
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
1981
;
47
:
365
–370.
[47]
Almeda
FQ
, Adler S, Rosenson RS. Metastatic tumor infiltration of the pericardium masquerading as pericardial tamponade.
Am. J. Med
 .
2001
;
111
(6):
504
–505.
[48]
Kronzon
I
, Cohen ML, Wines HE. Cardiac tamponade by loculated pericardial hematoma: limitations of M-mode echocardiography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1983
;
3
:
913
–915.
[49]
Berge
K
, Lanier W, Reeder G. Occult cardiac tamponade detected by transesophageal echocardiography.
Mayo Clin. Proc
 .
1992
;
67
:
667
–670.
[50]
Ling
LH
, Oh JK, Tei C, Click RL, Breen JF, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Pericardial thickness measured with transesophageal echocardiography: feasibility and potential clinical usefulness.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1997
;
29
(6):
1317
–1323.
[51]
Mulvagh
SL
, Rokey R, Vick GW et al. Usefulness of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of pericardial effusions, and comparison with two-dimensional echocardiography.
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
1989
;
64
:
1002
–1009.
[52]
Reydel
B
, Spodick DH. Frequency and significance of chamber collapses during cardiac tamponade.
Am. Heart J
 .
1990
;
119
:
1160
–1163.
[53]
Kochar
GS
, Jacobs LE, Kotler MN. Right atrial compression in postoperative cardiac patients: detection by transesophageal echocardiography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1990
;
16
:
511
–516.
[54]
Torelli
J
, Marwick TH, Salcedo EE. Left atrial tamponade: diagnosis by transesophageal echocardiography.
J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr
 .
1991
;
4
:
413
–414.
[55]
Fresman
B
, Schwinger ME, Charney R et al. Isolated collapse of left-sided heart chambers in cardiac tamponade. Demonstration by two-dimensional echocardiography.
Am. Heart J
 .
1991
;
121
:
613
–616.
[56]
Di Segni
E
, Feinberg MS, Sheinowitz M et al. LV pseudohypertrophy in cardiac tamponade: an echocardiographic study in cannine model.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1993
;
21
:
1286
–1294.
[57]
Feigneubaum
H
, Zaky A, Grabham L. Cardiac motion in patients with pericardial effusion: a study using ultrasound cardiography.
Circulation
 .
1966
;
34
:
611
–619.
[58]
Bansal
RC
, Chandrasekaram K. Role of echocardiography in Doppler techniques in evaluation of pericardial effusion.
Echocardiography
 .
1989
;
6
:
313
–316.
[59]
Saxena
RK
, D`Crus IA, Zitaker M. Color flow Doppler observations on mitral valve flow in tamponade.
Echocardiography
 .
1991
;
8
:
517
–521.
[60]
Singh
S
, Wann LS, Schuchard GH et al. Right ventricular and right atrial collapse in patients with cardiac tamponade–a combined echocardiographic and hemodynamic study.
Circulation
 .
1984
;
70
:
966
.
[61]
Shabetai R. Pulsus paradoxus: definition, mechanisms, and clinical association. In: Seferović PM, Spodick DH, Maisch B, editors., Maksimović R, Ristić AD, assoc. editors. Pericardiology: contemporary answers to continuing challenges, Belgrade, Science 2000;53–62.
[62]
Klopfenstein
HS
, Schuchard GH, Wann LS et al. The relative merits of pulsus paradoxus and right ventricular diastolic collapse in the early detection of cardiac tamponade: an experimental echocardiographic study.
Circulation
 .
1985
;
71
:
829
–833.
[63]
Maisch
B
, Ristić AD, Pankuweit S, Neubauer A, Moll R. Neoplastic pericardial effusion: efficacy and safety of intrapericardial treatment with cisplatin.
Eur. Heart J
 .
2002
;
23
:
1625
–1631.
[64]
Piehler
JM
, Pluth JR, Schaff HV et al. Surgical management of effusive pericardial disease. Influence of extent of pericardial resection on clinical course.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg
 .
1985
;
90
:
506
–512.
[65]
Talreja
DR
, Edwards WD, Danielson GK et al. Constrictive pericarditis in 26 patients with histologically normal pericardial thickness.
Circulation
 .
2003
;
108
:
1852
–1857.
[66]
Rienmuller
R
, Gurgan M, Erdmann E et al. CT and MR evaluation of pericardial constriction: a new diagnostic and therapeutic concept.
J. Thorac. Imaging
 .
1993
;
8
(2):
108
–121.
[67]
Byrne
JG
, Karavas AN, Colson YL et al. Cardiac decortication (epicardiectomy) for occult constrictive cardiac physiology after left extrapleural pneumonectomy.
Chest
 .
2002
;
122
:
2256
–2259.
[68]
Haley
JH
, Tajik AJ, Danielson GK et al. Transient constrictive pericarditis: causes and natural history.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 .
2004
;
43
:
271
–275.
[69]
Oh
JK
, Tajik AJ, Seward JB et al. Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1994
;
23
:
154
–162.
[70]
Oh
JK
, Tajik AJ, Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Nishimura RA, Seward JB. Preload reduction to unmask the characteristic Doppler features of constrictive pericarditis: a new observation.
Circulation
 .
1997
;
95
:
796
–799.
[71]
Boonyaratavej
S
, Oh JK, Tajik AJ et al. Comparison of mitral inflow and superior vena cava Doppler velocities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and constrictive pericarditis.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1998
;
32
(7):
2043
–2048.
[72]
Oh
JK
, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. The echo manual. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1999. pp. 181–194.
[73]
Rajagopalan
N
, Garcia MJ, Rodriguez L et al. Comparison of new Doppler echocardiographic methods to differentiate constrictive pericardial heart disease and restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
2001
;
87
(1):
86
–94.
[74]
DeValeria
PA
, Baumgartner WA, Casale AS et al. Current indications, risks, and outcome after pericardiectomy.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1991
;
52
(2):
219
–224.
[75]
Ling
LH
, Oh JK, Schaff HV et al. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy.
Circulation
 .
1999
;
100
(13):
1380
–1386.
[76]
Senni
M
, Redfield MM, Ling LH et al. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after pericardiectomy in patients with constrictive pericarditis: Doppler echocardiographic findings and correlation with clinical status.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1999
;
33
(5):
1182
–1188.
[77]
Ufuk
Y
, Kestelli M, Yilik L et al. Recent surgical experience in chronic constrictive pericarditis.
Tex. Heart Inst. J
 .
2003
;
30
(1):
27
–30.
[78]
Sun
JP
, Abdalla IA, Yang XS et al. Respiratory variation of mitral and pulmonary venous Doppler flow velocities in constrictive pericarditis before and after pericardiectomy.
J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr
 .
2001
;
14
:
119
–126.
[79]
Meijburg
HW
, Visser CA, Gredee JJ, Westerhof PW. Clinical relevance of Doppler pulmonary venous flow characteristics in constrictive pericarditis.
Eur. Heart J
 .
1995
;
16
:
506
–513.
[80]
Sunday
R
, Robinson LA, Bosek V. Low cardiac output complicating pericardiectomy for pericardial tamponade.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1999
;
67
(1):
228
–231.
[81]
Satur
CM
, Hsin MK, Dussek JE. Giant pericardial cysts.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1996
;
61
(1):
208
–210.
[82]
Borges
AC
, Gellert K, Dietel M et al. Acute right-sided heart failure due to hemorrhage into a pericardial cyst.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1997
;
63
(3):
845
–847.
[83]
Wang
ZJ
, Reddy GP, Gotway MB, Yeh BM, Hetts SW, Higgins CB. CT and MRI imaging of pericardial disease.
Radiographics
 .
2003
;
23
(Spec No):
S167
–S180.
[84]
Kinoshita
Y
, Shimada T, Murakami Y et al. Ethanol sclerosis can be a safe and useful treatment for pericardial cyst.
Clin. Cardiol
 .
1996
;
19
(10):
833
–835.
[85]
Simeunović D, Seferović PM, Ristić AD et al. Pericardial cysts: Incidence, clinical presentations and treatment. In: Seferović PM, Spodick DH, Maisch B, editors. Maksimović R, Ristić AD, assoc. editors. Pericardiology: contemporary answers to continuing challenges, Belgrade, Science 2000;203–12.
[86]
Maisch
B
, Outzen H, Roth D et al. Prognostic determinants in conventionally treated myocarditis and perimyocarditis—focus on antimyolemmal antibodies.
Eur. Heart J
 .
1991
;
12
:
81
–87.
[87]
Saatci
U
, Ozen S, Ceyhan M, Secmeer G. Cytomegalovirus disease in a renal transplant recipient manifesting with pericarditis.
Int. Urol. Nephrol
 .
1993
;
25
:
617
–619.
[88]
Campbell
P
, Li J, Wall T et al. Cytomegalovirus pericarditis: a case series and review of the literature.
Am. J. Med. Sci
 .
1995
;
309
:
229
–234.
[89]
Permanyer-Miralda
G
, Sagrista-Sauleda J, Soler-Soler J. Primary acute pericardial disease: A prospective series of 231 consecutive patients.
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
1985
;
56
:
623
–630.
[90]
Garcia
LW
, Ducatman BS, Wang HH. The value of multiple fluid specimens in the cytological diagnosis of malignancy.
Mod. Pathol
 .
1994
;
7
(6):
665
–668.
[91]
Burgess
LJ
, Reuter H, Carstens ME, Taljaard JJ, Doubell AF. The use of adenosine deaminase and interferon-gamma as diagnostic tools for tuberculous pericarditis.
Chest
 .
2002
;
122
(3):
900
–905.
[92]
Seo
T
, Ikeda Y, Onaka H et al. Usefulness of serum CA125 measurement for monitoring pericardial effusion.
Jpn. Circ. J
 .
1993
;
57
(6):
489
–494.
[93]
Fijalkowska
A
, Szturmowicz M, Tomkowski W et al. The value of measuring adenosine deaminase activity in pericardial effusion fluid for diagnosing the etiology of pericardial effusion.
Pneumonol. Alergol. Pol
 .
1996
;
64
(Suppl 2):
174
–179.
[94]
Koh
KK
, Kim EJ, Cho CH et al. Adenosine deaminase and carcinoembryonic antigen in pericardial effusion diagnosis, especially in suspected tuberculous pericarditis.
Circulation
 .
1994
;
89
(6):
2728
–2735.
[95]
Komsuoglu
B
, Goldeli O, Kulan K, Komsuoglu SS. The diagnostic and prognostic value of adenosine deaminase in tuberculous pericarditis.
Eur. Heart J
 .
1995
;
16
:
1126
–1130.
[96]
Aggeli
C
, Pitsavos C, Brili S et al. Relevance of adenosine deaminase and lysozyme measurements in the diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis.
Cardiology
 .
2000
;
94
(2):
81
–85.
[97]
Dogan
R
, Demircin M, Sarigul A, Ciliv G, Bozer AY. Diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase activity in pericardial fluids.
J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino)
 .
1999
;
40
(4):
501
–504.
[98]
Burgess
LJ
, Reuter H, Taljaard JJ, Doubell AF. Role of biochemical tests in the diagnosis of large pericardial effusions.
Chest
 .
2002
;
121
(2):
495
–499.
[99]
Lee
JH
, Lee CW, Lee SG et al. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction with adenosine deaminase activity in pericardial fluid for the diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis.
Am. J. Med
 .
2002
;
113
(6):
519
–521.
[100]
Burgess
LJ
, Reuter H, Carstens ME et al. The use of adenosine deaminase and interferon-gamma as diagnostic tools for tuberculous pericarditis.
Chest
 .
2002
;
122
(3):
900
–905.
[101]
Chen
CJ
, Chang SC, Tseng HH. Assessment of immunocytochemical and histochemical stainings in the distinction between reactive mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma cells in body effusions.
Chung Hua Hsueh Tsa Chih Taipei
 .
1994
;
54
(3):
149
–155.
[102]
Millaire
A
, Wurtz A, de Groote P et al. Malignant pericardial effusions: usefulness of pericardioscopy.
Am. Heart J
 .
1992
;
124
(4):
1030
–1034.
[103]
Porte
HL
, Janecki-Delebecq TJ, Finzi L et al. Pericardioscopy for primary management of pericardial effusion in cancer patients.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg
 .
1999
;
16
(3):
287
–291.
[104]
Fujioka
S
, Koide H, Kitaura Y et al. Molecular detection and differentiation of enteroviruses in endomyocardial biopsies and pericardial effusions from dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis.
Am. Heart J
 .
1996
;
131
(4):
760
–765.
[105]
Cegielski
JP
, Devlin BH, Morris AJ et al. Comparison of PCR, culture, and histopathology for diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis.
J. Clin. Microbiol
 .
1997
;
35
(12):
3254
–3257.
[106]
Pankuweit
S
, Portig I, Eckhardt H et al. Prevalence of viral genome in endomyocardial biopsies from patients with inflammatory heart muscle disease.
Herz
 .
2000
;
25
(3):
221
–226.
[107]
Maisch
B
, Pankuweit S, Brilla C et al. Intrapericardial treatment of inflammatory and neoplastic pericarditis guided by pericardioscopy and epicardial biopsy – results from a pilot study.
Clin. Cardiol
 .
1999
;
22
(Suppl 1):
I17
–I22.
[108]
Maisch
B
, Schonian U, Crombach M et al. Cytomegalovirus associated inflammatory heart muscle disease.
Scand. J. Infect. Dis
 .
1993
;
88
(Suppl 1):
135
–148.
[109]
Levy
R
, Najioullah F, Thouvenot D, Bosshard S, Aymard M, Lina B. Evaluation and comparison of PCR and hybridization methods for rapid detection of cytomegalovirus in clinical samples.
J. Virol. Methods
 .
1996
;
62
(2):
103
–111.
[110]
Satoh
T
. Demonstration of the Epstein-Barr genome by the polymerase chain reaction and in situ hybridisation in a patient with viral pericarditis.
Br. Heart J
 .
1993
;
69
:
563
–564.
[111]
Andreoletti
L
, Hober D, Belaich S, Lobert PE, Dewilde A, Wattre P. Rapid detection of enterovirus in clinical specimens using PCR and microwell capture hybridization assay.
J. Virol. Methods
 .
1996
;
62
(1):
1
–10.
[112]
Noguchi
M
, Nakajima T, Hirohashi S et al. Immunohistochemical distinction of malignant mesothelioma from pulmonary adenocarcinoma with anti-surfactant apoprotein, anti-Lewis a. and anti-Tn antibodies.
Hum. Pathol
 .
1989
;
20
(1):
53
–57.
[113]
Maisch
B
, Ristić AD, Seferović PM. New directions in diagnosis and treatment of pericardial disease: an update by the Taskforce on pericardial disease of the World Heart Federation.
Herz
 .
2000
;
25
(8):
769
–780.
[114]
DeCastro
S
, Migliau G, Silvestri A et al. Heart involvement in AIDS: a prospective study during various stages of the disease.
Eur. Heart J
 .
1992
;
13
:
1452
–1459.
[115]
Chen
Y
, Brennessel D, Walters J et al. Human immunodeficiency virus-associated pericardial effusion: report of 40 cases and review of literature.
Am. Heart J
 .
1999
;
137
:
516
–521.
[116]
Silva-Cardoso
J
, Moura B, Martins L et al. Pericardial involvement in human immunodeficiency virus infection.
Chest
 .
1999
;
115
:
418
–422.
[117]
Hakim
JG
, Ternouth I, Mushangi E et al. Double blind randomised placebo controlled trial of adjunctive prednisolone in the treatment of effusive tuberculous pericarditis in HIV seropositive patients.
Heart
 .
2000
;
84
(2):
183
–188.
[118]
Sagrista-Sauleda
J
, Barrabes JA, Permanyer-Miralda G et al. Purulent pericarditis: review of a 20-year experience in a general hospital.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1993
;
22
:
1661
–1665.
[119]
Goodman
LJ
. Purulent pericarditis.
Curr. Treat. Options Cardiovasc. Med
 .
2000
;
2
(4):
343
–350.
[120]
Defouilloy
C
, Meyer G, Slama M et al. Intrapericardial fibrinolysis: a useful treatment in the management of purulent pericarditis.
Intesive Care Med
 .
1997
;
23
:
117
–118.
[121]
Ustunsoy
H
, Celkan MA, Sivrikoz MC et al. Intrapericardial fibrinolytic therapy in purulent pericarditis.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg
 .
2002
;
22
(3):
373
–376.
[122]
Sagrista-Sauleda
J
, Permanyer-Miralda G, Soler-Soler J. Tuberculous pericarditis: ten year experience with a prospective protocol for diagnosis and treatment.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1988
;
11
(4):
724
–728.
[123]
Fowler
NO
. Tuberculous pericarditis.
JAMA
 .
1991
;
266
(1):
99
–103.
[124]
McCaughan
BC
, Schaff HV, Piehler JM et al. Early and late results of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg
 .
1985
;
89
:
340
–350.
[125]
Long
R
, Younes M, Patton N et al. Tuberculous pericarditis: long-term outcome in patients who received medical therapy alone.
Am. Heart J
 .
1989
;
117
(5):
1133
–1139.
[126]
Strang
JI
, Kakaza HH, Gibson DG et al. Controlled clinical trial of complete open surgical drainage and of prednisolone in treatment of tuberculous pericardial effusion in Transkei.
Lancet
 .
1988
;
2
(8614):
759
–764.
[127]
Godfrey-Faussett
P
. Molecular diagnosis of tuberculosis: the need for new diagnostic tools.
Thorax
 .
1995
;
50
(7):
709
–711.
[128]
Seino
Y
, Ikeda U, Kawaguchi K et al. Tuberculosis pericarditis presumably diagnosed by polymerise chain reaction analysis.
Am. Heart J
 .
1993
;
126
:
249
–251.
[129]
Strang
JI
. Rapid resolution of tuberculous pericardial effusion with high dose prednisone and antituberculous drugs.
J. Infect
 .
1994
;
28
:
251
–254.
[130]
Alzeer
AM
, Fitzgerald JM. Corticosteroids and tuberculosis. Risks and use as adjunct therapy.
Tuberc. Lung. Dis
 .
1993
;
74
:
6
–11.
[131]
Keersmaekers
T
, Elshot SR, Sergeant PT. Primary bacterial pericarditis.
Acta Cardiol
 .
2002
;
57
(5):
387
–389.
[132]
Ewer
K
, Deeks J, Alvarez L et al. Comparison of T-cell-based assay with tuberculin skin test for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in a school tuberculosis outbreak.
Lancet
 .
2003
;
361
(9364):
1168
–1173.
[133]
Maisch
B
, Maisch S, Kochsiek K. Immune reactions in tuberculous and chronic constrictive pericarditis.
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
1982
;
50
:
1007
–1013.
[134]
Dwivedi
SK
, Rastogi P, Saran RK, Narain VS, Puri VK, Hasan M. Antitubercular treatment does not prevent constriction in chronic pericardial effusion of undetermined etiology: a randomized trial.
Indian Heart J
 .
1997
;
49
(4):
411
–414.
[135]
Senderovitz
T
, Viskum K. Corticosteroids and tuberculosis.
Respir. Med
 .
1994
;
88
:
561
–565.
[136]
Mayosi
BM
, Ntsekhe M, Volmink JA et al. Interventions for treating tuberculous pericarditis.
Cochrane Database Syst. Rev
 .
2002
;(4):
CD000526
.
[137]
Ntsekhe
M
, Wiysonge C, Volmink JA, Commerford PJ, Mayosi BM. Adjuvant corticosteroids for tuberculous pericarditis: promising, but not proven.
Q. J. Med
 .
2003
;
96
:
593
–599.
[138]
Colombo
A
, Olson HG, Egan J et al. Etiology and prognostic implications of a large pericardial effusion in men.
Clin Cardiol
 .
1988
;
11
:
389
.
[139]
Rostand
SG
, Rutsky EA. Pericarditis in end-stage renal disease.
Cardiol. Clin
 .
1990
;
8
:
701
–706.
[140]
Rutsky
EA
. Treatment of uremic pericarditis and pericardial effusion.
Am. J. Kidney Dis
 .
1987
;
10
:
2
–7.
[141]
Lundin
AP
. Recurrent uremic pericarditis: a marker of inadequate dialysis.
Semin. Dial
 .
1990
;
3
:
5
–9.
[142]
Tarng
DC
, Huang TP. Uraemic pericarditis: a reversible inflammatory state of resistance to recombinant human erythropoietin in haemodialysis patients.
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant
 .
1997
;
12
:
1051
–1057.
[143]
Gunukula
SR
, Spodick DH. Pericardial disease in renal patients.
Semin. Nephrol
 .
2001
;
21
:
52
–57.
[144]
Emelife-Obi
C
, Chow MT, Qamar-Rohail H et al. Use of a phosphorus-enriched hemodialysate to prevent hypophosphatemia in a patient with renal failure-related pericarditis.
Clin. Nephrol
 .
1998
;
50
:
131
–136.
[145]
Connors
JP
, Kleiger RE, Shaw RC et al. The indications for pericardiectomy in the uremic pericardial effusion.
Surgery
 .
1976
;
80
:
689
–774.
[146]
Spector
D
, Alfred H, Siedlecki M et al. A controlled study of the effect of indomethacin in uremic pericarditis.
Kidney Int
 .
1983
;
24
:
663
–667.
[147]
Wood
JE
, Mahnensmith RL. Pericarditis associated with renal failure: evolution and management.
Semin. Dial
 .
2001
;
14
:
61
–66.
[148]
Sever
MS
, Steinmuller DR, Hayes JM et al. Pericarditis following renal transplantation.
Transplantation
 .
1991
;
51
:
1229
–1234.
[149]
Maisch
B
, Berg PA, Kochsiek K. Clinical significance of immunopathological findings in patients with post-pericardiotomy syndrome. I. Relevance of antibody pattern.
Clin. Exp. Immunol
 .
1979
;
38
:
189
–197.
[150]
Maisch
B
, Schuff-Werner P, Berg PA et al. Clinical significance of immunopathological findings in patients with post-pericardiotomy syndrome. II. The significance of serum inhibition and rosette inhibitory factors.
Clin. Exp. Immunol
 .
1979
;
38
(2):
198
–203.
[151]
Quin
JA
, Tauriainen MP, Huber LM et al. Predictors of pericardial effusion after orthotopic heart transplantation.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg
 .
2002
;
124
(5):
979
–983.
[152]
Kuvin
JT
, Harati NA, Pandian NG et al. Postoperative cardiac tamponade in the modern surgical era.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
2002
;
74
(4):
1148
–1153.
[153]
Matsuyama
K
, Matsumoto M, Sugita T et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with constrictive pericarditis after coronary bypass surgery.
Jpn. Circ. J
 .
2001
;
65
(6):
480
–482.
[154]
Horneffer
PJ
, Miller RH, Pearson TA et al. The effective treatment of postpericardiotomy syndrome after cardiac operations. A randomized placebo-controlled trial.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg
 .
1990
;
100
(2):
292
–296.
[155]
Finkelstein
Y
, Shemesh J, Mahlab K et al. Colchicine for the prevention of postpericardiotomy syndrome.
Herz
 .
2002
;
27
:
791
–794.
[156]
Sugiura
T
, Takehana K, Hatada K et al. Pericardial effusion after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in first Q-wave acute myocardial infarction.
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
1998
;
81
:
1090
–1093.
[157]
Spodick
DH
. Post-myocardial infarction syndrome (Dressler's syndrome).
ACC Curr. J. Rev
 .
1995
;
4
:
35
–37.
[158]
Lichstein
E
. The changing spectrum of post-myocardial infarction pericarditis.
Int. Cardiol
 .
1983
;
4
:
234
–237.
[159]
Shahar
A
, Hod H, Barabash GM et al. Disappearance of a syndrome: Dressler's syndrome in the era of thrombolysis.
Cardiology
 .
1994
;
85
:
255
–258.
[160]
Nagahama
Y
, Sugiura T, Takehana K et al. The role of infarction-associated pericarditis on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation.
Eur. Heart J
 .
1998
;
19
:
287
–292.
[161]
Oliva
PB
, Hammill SC, Edwards WD. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of postinfarction regional pericarditis: ancillary observations regarding the effect of reperfusion on the rapidity and amplitude of T wave inversion after acute myocardial infarction.
Circulation
 .
1993
;
88
:
896
–904.
[162]
Oliva
PB
, Hammill SC, Talano JV. T wave changes consistent with epicardial involvement in acute myocardial infarction: observations in patients with a postinfarction pericardial effusion without clinically recognized postinfarction pericarditis.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol
 .
1994
;
24
:
1073
–1077.
[163]
Figueras
J
, Juncal A, Carballo J et al. Nature and progression of pericardial effusion in patients with a first myocardial infarction: relationship to age and free wall rupture.
Am. Heart J
 .
2002
;
144
(2):
251
–258.
[164]
Joho
S
, Asanoi H, Sakabe M et al. Long-term usefulness of percutaneous intrapericardial fibrin-glue fixation therapy for oozing type of left ventricular free wall rupture: a case report.
Circ. J
 .
2002
;
66
(7):
705
–706.
[165]
Spodick
DH
. Safety of ibuprofen for acute myocardial infarction pericarditis.
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
1986
;
57
(10):
896
.
[166]
Jugdutt
BI
, Basualdo CA. Myocardial infarct expansion during indomethacin or ibuprofen therapy for symptomatic post infarction pericarditis. Influence of other pharmacologic agents during early remodelling.
Can. J. Cardiol
 .
1989
;
5
(4):
211
–221.
[167]
Nagy
KK
, Lohmann C, Kim DO, Barrett J. Role of echocardiography in the diagnosis of occult penetrating cardiac injury.
J. Trauma
 .
1995
;
38
:
859
–862.
[168]
Buckman
RF
, Buckman PD. Vertical deceleration trauma: principles of management.
Surg. Clin. North Am
 .
1991
;
71
:
331
–340.
[169]
Asensio
JA
, Berne JD, Demetriades D et al. Penetrating cardiac injuries: a prospective study of variables predicting outcomes.
J. Am. Coll. Surg
 .
1998
;
186
:
24
–34.
[170]
Narins
CR
, Cunningham MJ, Delehantry JM et al. Nonhemorrhagic cardiac tamponade after penetrating chest trauma.
Am. Heart J
 .
1996
;
132
:
197
–198.
[171]
Morton
MJ
, DeMots HL. Complications of transseptal catheterization and transthoracic left ventricular puncture. Kron J, Morton MJ. Complications of cardiac catheterization and angiography. 2nd ed. New York: Futura; 1989. p. 77–103.
[172]
Jungbluth
A
, Düber C, Rumpelt HJ et al. Koronararterienmorphologie nach perkutaner transluminaler Koronarangioplasatie (PTCA) mit Hämoperikard.
Z. Kardiol
 .
1988
;
77
:
125
–129.
[173]
Liu
F
, Erbel R, Haude M, Ge J. Coronary arterial perforation: prediction, diagnosis, management, and prevention. Ellis SG, Holmes DR. Strategic approaches in coronary intervention. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2000. p. 501–514.
[174]
Nakamura
S
, Colombo A, Gaglione A et al. Intracoronary ultrasound observations during stent implantation.
Circulation
 .
1994
;
89
(5):
2026
–2034.
[175]
Erbel
R
, Clas W, Busch U et al. New balloon catheter for prolonged percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and bypass flow in occluded vessels.
Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn
 .
1986
;
12
:
116
–123.
[176]
Meier
B
. Benign coronary perforation during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
Br. Heart J
 .
1985
;
54
:
33
–35.
[177]
Welge
D
, Haude M, von Birgelen C et al. Versorgung einer Koronarperforation nach perkutaner Ballonangioplastie mit einem neuen Membranstent.
Z. Kardiol
 .
1998
;
87
:
948
–953.
[178]
von Birgelen
C
, Haude M, Herrmann J et al. Early clinical experience with the implantation of a novel synthetic coronary stent graft.
Cathet. Cardiovasc. Interv
 .
1999
;
47
:
496
–503.
[179]
McKay
R
, Grossmann W. Balloon valvuloplasty. Grossmann W, Baim DS. Cardiac catheterization, angiography and interventions. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1991. p. 511–533.
[180]
Levine
MJ
, Baim DS. Endomyocardial biopsy. Grossmann W, Baim DS. Cardiac catheterization, angiography and interventions. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1991. p. 383–395.
[181]
Sekiguchi
M
, Take M. World survey of catheter biopsy of the heart. Clinical, pathological, and theoretical aspects. Sekiguchi M, Olsen EGJ. Cardiomyopathy. 2nd ed. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1980. p. 217–225.
[182]
Bitkover
Cy
, Al-Khalili F, Ribeiro A et al. Surviving resuscitation: successful repair of cardiac rupture.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1996
;
61
:
710
–771.
[183]
Chirillo
F
, Totis O, Cavarzerani A et al. Usefulness of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in recognition and management of cardiovascular injuries after blunt chest trauma.
Heart
 .
1996
;
75
:
301
–306.
[184]
Erbel
R
. Diseases of the aorta.
Heart
 .
2001
;
86
:
227
–234.
[185]
Hausmann
D
, Gulba D, Bargheer K et al. Successful thrombolysis of an aortic arch thrombus in a patient after mesenteric embolism.
N. Engl. J. Med
 .
1992
;
327
:
500
–501.
[186]
Nienaber
CA
, von Kodolitsch Y, Nicolas V et al. The diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection by noninvasive imaging procedures.
N. Engl. J. Med
 .
1993
;
328
:
1
–9.
[187]
Erbel
R
, Engberding R, Daniel W, Roelandt J, Visser CM, Rennollet H. Echocardiography in diagnosis of aortic dissection.
Lancet
 .
1989
;
1
:
457
–461.
[188]
Erbel
R
, Alfonso F, Boileau C et al. Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection.
Eur. Heart J
 .
2001
;
22
(18):
1642
–1681.
[189]
Erbel
R
, Mohr-Kahaly S, Oelert H et al. Diagnostic strategies in suspected aortic dissection: comparison of computed tomography, aortography, and transesophageal echocardiography.
Am. J. Cardiac. Img
 .
1990
;
3
:
157
–172.
[190]
Kiviniemi
MS
, Pirnes MA, Eranen HJ et al. Complications related to permanent pacemaker therapy.
Pacing. Clin. Electrophysiol
 .
1999
;
22
(5):
711
–720.
[191]
Matsuura
Y
, Yamashina H, Higo M, Fujii T. Analysis of complications of permanent transvenous implantable cardiac pacemaker related to operative and postoperative management in 717 consecutive patients.
Hiroshima J. Med. Sci
 .
1990
;
39
(4):
131
–137.
[192]
Spindler
M
, Burrows G, Kowallik P et al. Postpericardiotomy syndrome and cardiac tamponade as a late complication after pacemaker implantation.
Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol
 .
2001
;
24
(9 Pt 1):
1433
–1434.
[193]
Elinav
E
, Leibowitz D. Constrictive pericarditis complicating endovascular pacemaker implantation.
Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol
 .
2002
;
25
(3):
376
–377.
[194]
Maisch
B
. Myokardbiopsien und Perikardioskopien. Hess OM, Simon RWR. Herzkatheter: Einzatz in Diagnostik und Therapie. 2nd ed. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer; 2000. p. 302–349.
[195]
Mellwig
KP
, Vogt J, Schmidt HK et al. Acute aortic dissection (Stanford A) with pericardial tamponade–extension of the dissection after emergency pericardial puncture.
Z. Kardiol
 .
1998
;
87
(6):
482
–486.
[196]
Vaitkus
PT
, Herrmann HC, LeWinter MM. Treatment of malignant pericardial effusion.
JAMA
 .
1994
;
272
:
59
–64.
[197]
Tomkowski
W
, Szturmowicz M, Fijalkowska A et al. New approaches to the management and treatment of malignant pericardial effusion.
Support Care Cancer
 .
1997
;
5
:
64
–66.
[198]
Tsang
TSM
, Seward JB, Barnes ME. Outcomes of primary and secondary treatment of pericardial effusion in patients with malignancy.
Mayo. Clin. Proc
 .
2000
;
75
:
248
–253.
[199]
Susini
G
, Pepi M, Sisillo E et al. Percutaneous pericardiocentesis versus subxyphoid pericardiotomy in cardiac tamponade due to postoperative pericardial effusion.
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesthes
 .
1993
;
7
:
178
–183.
[200]
Fagan
SM
, Chan KI. Pericardiocentesis. Blind no more.
Chest
 .
1999
;
116
:
275
–276.
[201]
Soler-Soler
J
, Merce J, Sagrista-Sauleda J. Should pericardial drainage be performed routinely in patients who have a large pericardial effusion without tamponade?
Am. J. Med
 .
1998
;
105
:
106
–109.
[202]
DeCamp
MM
, Mentzer SJ, Swanson SJ et al. Malignant effusive disease of pleura and pericardium.
Chest
 .
1997
;
112
(Suppl):
291
–295.
[203]
Zwischenberger
JB
, Sanker AB, Lee R. Malignant pericardial effusion. Pass HJ, Mitchell JB, Johnson DH et al. Lung cancer. Principles and practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Wiliams and Wilkins; 2000. p. 1038–1046.
[204]
Bishiniotis
TS
, Antoniadou S, Katseas G et al. Malignant cardiac tamponade in women with breast cancer treated by pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial administration of triethylenethiophosphoramide (thiotepa).
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
2000
;
86
(3):
362
–364.
[205]
Colleoni
M
, Martinelli G, Beretta F et al. Intracavitary chemotherapy with thiotepa in malignant pericardial effusion: an active and well tolerated regimen.
J. Clin. Oncol
 .
1998
;
16
:
2371
–2376.
[206]
Girardi
LN
, Ginsberg RJ, Burt ME. Pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial sclerosis: effective therapy for malignant pericardial effusion.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1997
;
64
:
1422
–1428.
[207]
Dempke
W
, Firusian N. Treatment of malignant pericardial effusion with 32 P-colloid.
Br. J. Cancer
 .
1999
;
80
:
1955
–1957.
[208]
Wilkes
JD
, Fidias P, Vaickus L et al. Malignancy related pericardial effusion: 127 cases from Roswell Park Cancer Institute.
Cancer
 .
1995
;
76
:
1377
–1387.
[209]
Prager
RL
, Wilson GH, Bender HW. The subxyphoid approach to pericardial disease.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1982
;
34
:
6
–9.
[210]
Krause
TJ
, Margiotta M, Chandler JJ. Pericardio-peritoneal window for malignant pericardial effusion.
Surg. Gynecol. Obstet
 .
1991
;
172
:
487
–488.
[211]
Griffin
S
, Fountain W. Pericardio-peritoneal shunt for malignant pericardial effusion.
J. Cardiovasc. Surg
 .
1989
;
98
:
1153
–1154.
[212]
Ready
A
, Black J, Lewis R et al. Laparoscopic pericardial fenestration for malignant pericardial effusion.
Lancet
 .
1992
;
339
:
1609
.
[213]
Shapira
OM
, Aldea GS, Fonger JD et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgical techniques in the diagnosis and management of pericardial effusion in patients with advanced lung cancer.
Chest
 .
1993
;
104
:
1262
–1263.
[214]
Ristić AD, Seferović PM, Maksimović R et al. Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy in neoplastic pericardial effusion. In: Seferović PM, Spodick DH, Maisch B, editors. Maksimović R, Ristić AD, assoc. editors. Pericardiology: contemporary answers to continuing challenges, Belgrade; Science 2000;427–38.
[215]
Canver
CC
, Patel AK, Kosolcharoen P et al. Fungal purulent constrictive pericarditis in heart transplant patient.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1998
;
65
:
1792
–1794.
[216]
Cishek
MB
, Yost B, Schaefer S. Cardiac aspergillosis presenting as myocardial infarction.
Clin. Cardiol
 .
1996
;
19
:
824
–827.
[217]
Wheat
J
. Histoplasmosis: experience during outbreaks in Indianapolis and review of the literature.
Medicine
 .
1997
;
76
:
339
–354.
[218]
Rabinovici
R
, Szewczyk D, Ovadia P et al. Candida pericarditis: clinical profile and treatment.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1997
;
63
:
1200
–1204.
[219]
Kumar
PP
. Pericardial injury from mediastinal irradiation.
J. Natl. Med. Assoc
 .
1980
;
72
(6):
591
–594.
[220]
Karram
T
, Rinkevitch D, Markiewicz W. Poor outcome in radiation-induced constrictive pericarditis.
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
 .
1993
;
25
(2):
329
–331.
[221]
Kentsch
M
, Döring V, Rodemerk U et al. Primary chylopericardium – stepwise diagnosis and therapy of a differential diagnostically important illness.
Z. Kardiol
 .
1997
;
86
:
417
–422.
[222]
Denfield
SW
, Rodriguez A, Miller-Hance WC et al. Management of postoperative chylopericardium in childhood.
Am. J. Cardiol
 .
1989
;
63
:
1416
–1418.
[223]
Morishita
Y
, Taira A, Fuori A et al. Constrictive pericarditis secondary to primary chylopericardium.
Am. Heart J
 .
1985
;
109
(2):
373
–375.
[224]
Akamatsu
H
, Amano J, Sakamoto T, Suzuki A. Primary chylopericardium.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1994
;
58
:
262
–266.
[225]
Bendayan
P
, Glock Y, Galinier M et al. Idiopathic chylopericardium. Apropos of a new case. Review of the literature.
Arch. Mal. Coeur. Vaiss
 .
1991
;
84
:
127
–130.
[226]
Svedjeholm
R
, Jansson K, Olin C. Primary idiopathic chylopericardium – a case report and review of the literature.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg
 .
1997
;
11
:
387
–390.
[227]
Kannagi
T
, Osakada G, Wakabayashi A et al. Primary chylopericardium.
Chest
 .
1982
;
81
:
105
–108.
[228]
Chan
BB
, Murphy MC, Rodgers BM. Management of chylopericardium.
J. Pediatr. Surg
 .
1990
;
25
:
1185
–1189.
[229]
Crosby
IK
, Crouch J, Reed WA. Chylopericardium and chylothorax.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg
 .
1973
;
65
:
935
–939.
[230]
Martinez
GJ
, Marco E, Marin F et al. Chylopericardium after acute pericarditis.
Rev. Esp. Cardiol
 .
1996
;
49
:
226
–228.
[231]
Scholten
C
, Staudacher M, Girsch W et al. A novel therapeutic strategy for the management of idiopathic chylopericardium and chylothorax.
Surgery
 .
1998
;
123
:
369
–370.
[232]
Groves
LK
, Effler DB. Primary chylopericardium.
N. Engl. J. Med
 .
1954
;
250
:
520
–523.
[233]
Furrer
M
, Hopf M, Ris HB. Isolated primary chylopericardium: treatment by thoracoscopic thoracic duct ligation and pericardial fenestration.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg
 .
1996
;
112
:
1120
–1121.
[234]
Spodick
DH
. Drug- and toxin-related pericardial disease. Spodick DH. The pericardium: a comprehensive textbook. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997. p. 411–416.
[235]
Tarbell
NJ
, Thomson L, Mauch P. Thoracic irradiation in Hodgkin's disease: disease control and long-term complications.
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys
 .
1990
;
18
:
275
–281.
[236]
Zimmerman
J
, Yahalom J, Bar-On H. Clinical spectrum of pericardial effusion as the presenting feature of hypothyroidism.
Am. Heart J
 .
1983
;
106
:
770
–771.
[237]
Kerber
RE
, Sherman B. Echocardiographic evaluation of pericardial effusion in myxedema. Incidence and biochemical and clinical correlations.
Circulation
 .
1975
;
52
:
823
–827.
[238]
Hardisty
CA
, Naik RD, Munro DS. Pericardial effusion in hypothyroidism.
Clin. Endocrinol
 .
1980
;
13
:
349
–354.
[239]
Parving
HH
, Hansen JM, Nielsen SV et al. Mechanism of edema formation in myxedema-increased protein extravasation and relatively slow lymphatic drainage.
N. Engl. J. Med
 .
1981
;
301
:
460
–465.
[240]
Enein
M
, Aziz A, Zima A et al. Echocardiography of the pericardium in pregnancy.
Obstet. Gynecol
 .
1987
;
69
:
851
–855.
[241]
Oakley
CM
. Pericardial disease. Oakley CM. Heart disease in pregnancy. 2nd ed. London: BMJ; 1997. p. 226–236.
[242]
Maisch
B
, Ristić AD. Practical aspects of the management of pericardial disease.
Heart
 .
2003
;
89
:
1096
–1103.
[243]
Ristić
AD
, Seferović PM, Ljubić A et al. Pericardial disease in pregnancy.
Herz
 .
2003
;
28
(3):
209
–215.
[244]
Richardson
PM
, Le Roux BT, Rogers NM, Gotsman MS. Pericardiectomy in pregnancy.
Thorax
 .
1970
;
25
(5):
627
–630.
[245]
Tollens
T
, Casselman F, Devlieger H et al. Fetal cardiac tamponade due to an intrapericardial teratoma.
Ann. Thorac. Surg
 .
1998
;
66
:
59
–60.

Comments

0 Comments