Preamble

Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategies for a typical patient, suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk/benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes for textbooks. The legal implications of medical guidelines have been discussed previously.

A great number of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as well as by other societies and organizations. Because of the impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for the development of guidelines have been established in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents can be found on the ESC website (http://www.escardio.org/knowledge/guidelines/rules).

In brief, experts in the field are selected and undertake a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management and/or prevention of a given condition. Unpublished clinical trial results have not been taken into account. A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is performed including assessment of the risk/benefit ratio. Estimates of expected health outcomes for larger societies are included, where data exist. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendation of particular treatment options are weighed and graded according to predefined scales, as outlined in Tables 1 and 2.

The experts of the writing panels have provided disclosure statements of all relationships they may have which might be perceived as real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. These disclosure forms are kept on file at the European Heart House, headquarters of the ESC. Any changes in conflict of interest that arise during the writing period must be notified to the ESC. The Task Force report was entirely supported financially by the ESC and was developed without any involvement of the industry.

The ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) supervises and coordinates the preparation of new Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents produced by Task Forces, expert groups, or consensus panels. The Committee is also responsible for the endorsement process of these Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents or statements. Once the document has been finalized and approved by all the experts involved in the Task Force, it is submitted to outside specialists for review. The document is revised, and finally approved by the CPG and subsequently published.

After publication, dissemination of the message is of paramount importance. Pocket-sized versions and personal digital assistant (PDA)-downloadable versions are useful at the point of care. Some surveys have shown that the intended end-users are sometimes not aware of the existence of guidelines, or simply do not translate them into practice, so this is why implementation programmes for new guidelines form an important component of the dissemination of knowledge. Meetings are organized by the ESC, and directed towards its member National Societies and key opinion leaders in Europe. Implementation meetings can also be undertaken at national levels, once the guidelines have been endorsed by the ESC member societies, and translated into the national language. Implementation programmes are needed because it has been shown that the outcome of disease may be favourably influenced by the thorough application of clinical recommendations.

Thus, the task of writing Guidelines or Expert Consensus documents covers not only the integration of the most recent research, but also the creation of educational tools and implementation programmes for the recommendations. The loop between clinical research, writing of guidelines, and implementing them in clinical practice can then only be completed if surveys and registries are performed to verify that real-life daily practice is in keeping with what is recommended in the guidelines. Such surveys and registries also make it possible to evaluate the impact of implementation of the guidelines on patient outcomes. Guidelines and recommendations should help the physicians to make decisions in their daily practice; however, the ultimate judgement regarding the care of an individual patient must be made by the physician in charge of his/her care.

Table 1

Classes of recommendations

graphic 
graphic 
Table 2

Levels of evidence

graphic 
graphic 

In order to keep this document surveyable and useful for the practising physician, the results of the studies on which the guidelines are based are not discussed in detail, especially those that have been published some time ago. For details, readers are referred to the publications in the reference list.

It must be recognized that even when excellent clinical trials have been undertaken, their results are open to interpretation, and that treatment options may be limited by resources. The Task Force realizes that the recommended diagnostic examinations and treatment options may not be available or affordable in all countries. Even in rich countries cost-effectiveness is becoming an increasingly important issue when deciding upon therapeutic strategies. As always with guidelines, they are not prescriptive. Patients vary so much from one another that individual care is paramount, and there is still an important place for clinical judgement, experience, and common sense.

When compared with the 2003 guidelines, the most significant changes made in the current document relate to antithrombotic therapies and the choice between mechanical vs. pharmacological reperfusion.

Introduction

The definition of acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction can be defined from a number of different perspectives related to clinical, electrocardiographic (ECG), biochemical, and pathological characteristics.1 The present guidelines pertain to patients presenting with ischaemic symptoms and persistent ST-segment elevation on the ECG (STEMI). The great majority of these patients will show a typical rise of biomarkers of myocardial necrosis and progress to Q-wave myocardial infarction. Separate guidelines2 have been developed by another Task Force of the ESC for patients presenting with ischaemic symptoms but without persistent ST-segment elevation.

The pathogenesis of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

Most cases of STEMI are caused by an occlusion of a major coronary artery. Coronary occlusion and reduction in coronary blood flow are usually due to physical disruption of an atherosclerotic plaque with subsequent formation of an occluding thrombus. Concomitant coronary vasoconstriction and microembolization may be involved to some extent. Less commonly a thrombus may form from a superficial erosion of the endothelial surface.

The risk of plaque disruption depends on plaque composition and vulnerability (plaque type) and degree of stenosis (plaque size).3 As many as three-quarters of all infarct-related thrombi appear to evolve over plaques causing only mild to moderate stenosis. Even portions of the coronary arterial tree that appear normal by angiographic criteria often harbour a substantial burden of atherosclerosis. In particular, plaques with substantial outward remodelling, or ‘compensatory enlargement’, can have thin, fibrous caps and large lipid pools without encroachment of the lumen.4 However, severe stenoses are as likely to undergo plaque events leading to infarction as mild ones.5 There is frequently a delay (up to 2 weeks) between the rupture of a plaque and its clinical consequences.6 Inflammation plays an important role in plaque instability, and therefore in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes. Circulating levels of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 are correlating with the clinical course and outcome of an acute coronary syndrome.7–9

The circadian variation of STEMI with a higher incidence in the early morning hours can be explained by the combination of β-adrenergic stimulation (increased vascular tone and blood pressure), hypercoagulability of the blood, and hyper-reactivity of platelets. Activities associated with increased sympathetic stimulation and vasoconstriction, such as physical or emotional stress, may also trigger plaque disruption and coronary thrombosis.10

Myocardial necrosis caused by complete coronary artery occlusion begins to develop after 15–30 min of severe ischaemia (no forward or collateral flow) and progresses from the subendocardium to the subepicardium in a time-dependent fashion (‘the wave-front phenomenon’). Reperfusion, including recruitment of collaterals, may save myocardium at risk from undergoing necrosis, and subcritical but persistent forward flow may extend the time window for achieving myocardial salvage.

The thrombotic response to plaque disruption is dynamic: thrombosis and clot lysis, often associated with vasospasm, occur simultaneously, and may cause intermittent flow obstruction and distal embolization.11 The absence of complete healing of an ageing plaque (incomplete re-endothelialization) and thrombus formation play an important role in the occurrence of sudden occlusive coronary thrombosis. In ∼25–30% of patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PCI), initial angiography shows a patent infarct-related artery.12 In these patients, it is presumed that spontaneous, endogenous lysis occurred before angiography.

Both platelets and fibrin are involved in the evolution of a persisting coronary thrombus. Whereas platelet adhesion and aggregation initiate mural thrombus formation, fibrin is important for the subsequent stabilization of the early and fragile platelet thrombus.

The natural history of STEMI

The true natural history of STEMI is hard to establish for a number of reasons: the common occurrence of silent infarction, the frequency of sudden death outside the hospital, and the varying methods and definitions used in the diagnosis of the condition. Community studies have consistently shown that the overall case fatality rate of patients with presumed myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome in the first month is ∼50%, and of these deaths about half occur within the first 2 h.13 This high initial mortality seems to have altered little over the last years in contrast to hospital mortality.14 In contrast to community mortality, there has been a profound fall in the fatality of patients treated in hospital. Prior to the introduction of coronary care units in the 1960s, the in-hospital mortality seems to have averaged ∼25–30%. A systematic review of mortality studies in the pre-reperfusion era of the mid-1980s showed an average in-hospital fatality of ∼16%. With the widespread use of coronary interventions, fibrinolytic agents, antithrombotic therapy, and secondary prevention, the overall 1-month mortality has since been reduced to 4–6%, at least in those who participated in the latest randomized large-scale trials and qualified for fibrinolysis and/or coronary interventions.15,16 However, mortality rates in registry studies are much higher, suggesting that the patients included in the randomized studies17 are at a lower risk when compared with those seen in the real world.

First medical contact and emergency care flow

Optimal treatment of STEMI should be based on the implementation of an emergency medical system (EMS) supervising a network between hospitals with various levels of technology, connected by an efficient ambulance (or helicopter) service (Figure 1). The main features of such a network are: clear definition of geographical areas of interest, shared protocols based on risk stratification, and transportation with appropriately equipped and staffed ambulances (or helicopters). The logistics of such a network are discussed in section I. A well-functioning regional system of care based on pre-hospital diagnosis and triage and fast transport to the most appropriate facility is key to the success of the treatment, and significantly improves outcome.18,19

Figure 1

Pre-hospital management. EMS = emergency medical system; STEMI = acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; GP = general practitioner; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention. Thick arrows = preferred patient flow; dotted line = to be avoided.

Figure 1

Pre-hospital management. EMS = emergency medical system; STEMI = acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; GP = general practitioner; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention. Thick arrows = preferred patient flow; dotted line = to be avoided.

For selection of the reperfusion strategy see Figure 2.

Figure 2

Reperfusion strategies. The thick arrow indicates the preferred strategy.

Figure 2

Reperfusion strategies. The thick arrow indicates the preferred strategy.

Initial diagnosis and early risk stratification

Rapid diagnosis and early risk stratification of patients presenting with acute chest pain are important to identify patients in whom early interventions can improve outcome. On the other hand, when the diagnosis of STEMI has been ruled out, attention can be focused on the detection of other cardiac or non-cardiac causes of the presenting symptoms such as aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and pericarditis. A working diagnosis of STEMI must first be made (Table 3). This is usually based on the history of chest pain/discomfort lasting for 10–20 min or more (not responding fully to nitroglycerine). Other locations such as epigastric or interscapular are possible. Important clues are a previous history of coronary artery disease and radiation of the pain to the neck, lower jaw, or left arm. The pain may not be severe and, in the elderly particularly, other presentations such as fatigue, dyspnoea, faintness, or syncope are common. There are no individual physical signs diagnostic of STEMI, but many patients have evidence of autonomic nervous system activation (pallor, sweating) and either hypotension or a narrow pulse pressure. Features may also include irregularities of the pulse, bradycardia or tachycardia, a third heart sound, and basal rales. An ECG should be obtained as soon as possible. Even at an early stage, the ECG is seldom normal. In the case of STEMI or new or presumed new left bundle-branch block, reperfusion therapy needs to be given, and measures to initiate this treatment must be taken as soon as possible. However, the ECG can be equivocal in the early hours, and even in proven infarction it may never show the classical features of ST-segment elevation and new Q-waves. Repeated ECG recordings should be obtained and, when possible, the current ECG should be compared with previous records. Additional recordings of lead V7–V8 or V4R are helpful to make the diagnosis in selected cases (true posterior infarction or right ventricular infarction, respectively). ECG monitoring should be initiated as soon as possible in all patients to detect life-threatening arrhythmias. In patients with slowly evolving or stuttering myocardial infarction, serial ECGs should be taken to detect evolving infarction. Blood sampling for serum markers of necrosis is routinely done in the acute phase, but one should not wait for the results to initiate reperfusion treatment. The finding of elevated markers of necrosis may sometimes be helpful in deciding to perform coronary angiography (e.g. in patients with left bundle-branch block). Two-dimensional echocardiography has become a useful bedside technique in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. Regional wall motion abnormalities occur within seconds after coronary occlusion, well before necrosis. However, wall motion abnormalities are not specific for STEMI and may be due to ischaemia or an old infarction. Two-dimensional echocardiography is of particular value when the diagnosis of STEMI is uncertain, and other causes of chest pain such as acute aortic dissection, pericardial effusion, or pulmonary embolism are being considered. The performance of echocardiography should not delay the initiation of treatment. The absence of wall motion abnormalities excludes major myocardial ischaemia.

Table 3

Initial diagnosis

History of chest pain/discomfort 
Persistent ST-segment elevation or (presumed) new left bundle-branch block. Repeated ECG recordings often needed. 
Elevated markers of myocardial necrosis (CK-MB, troponins). One should not wait for the results to initiate reperfusion treatment. 
2-D echocardiography to rule out major acute myocardial ischaemia or other causes of chest pain/discomfort. 
History of chest pain/discomfort 
Persistent ST-segment elevation or (presumed) new left bundle-branch block. Repeated ECG recordings often needed. 
Elevated markers of myocardial necrosis (CK-MB, troponins). One should not wait for the results to initiate reperfusion treatment. 
2-D echocardiography to rule out major acute myocardial ischaemia or other causes of chest pain/discomfort. 

CK-MB = creatine kinase MB form.

Older age, higher Killip class, elevated heart rate, lower systolic blood pressure, and anterior location of the infarct have been identified as the most important independent predictors of early mortality in clinical trials20 and registries.17,21 These characteristics contain most of the prognostic information in the clinical data available at the time of the first medical contact. Other independent predictors are previous infarction, height, time to treatment, diabetes, weight, and smoking status20.

Relief of pain, breathlessness, and anxiety

Relief of pain is of paramount importance, not only for humane reasons but also because the pain is associated with sympathetic activation, which causes vasoconstriction and increases the workload of the heart. I.v. opioids are the analgesics most commonly used in this context (e.g. 4–8 mg of morphine with additional doses of 2 mg at intervals of 5–15 min until the pain is relieved); intramuscular injections should be avoided (Table 4). Side effects include nausea and vomiting, hypotension with bradycardia, and respiratory depression. Antiemetics (e.g. metoclopramide 5–10 mg i.v.) may be administered concurrently with opioids. The hypotension and bradycardia will usually respond to atropine (0.5–1 mg i.v., up to a total dose of 2 mg), and respiratory depression may require ventilatory support. Oxygen (2–4 L/min by mask or nasal prongs) should be administered to those who are breathless or who have any features of heart failure or shock (see also Table 15). Non-invasive monitoring of blood oxygen saturation greatly helps in deciding on the need for oxygen administration or, in severe cases, ventilatory support. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should not be given for pain relief because of possible prothrombotic effects.

Table 4

Relief of pain, breathlessness, and anxiety

Recommendations Classa Levelb 
I.v. opioids (4–8 mg morphine) with additional doses of 2 mg at 5–15 min intervals 
O2 (2–4 L/min) if breathlessness or other signs of heart failure 
Tranquillizer—in very anxious patients IIa 
Recommendations Classa Levelb 
I.v. opioids (4–8 mg morphine) with additional doses of 2 mg at 5–15 min intervals 
O2 (2–4 L/min) if breathlessness or other signs of heart failure 
Tranquillizer—in very anxious patients IIa 

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

Anxiety is a natural response to the pain and to the circumstances surrounding a heart attack. Reassurance of patients and those closely associated with them is of great importance. If the patient becomes excessively disturbed, it may be appropriate to administer a tranquillizer, but opioids are all that is required in many cases.

Cardiac arrest

Many deaths occur in the very first hours after STEMI due to ventricular fibrillation (VF). The implementation of an organization to cope with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is pivotal to provide prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation, early defibrillation if needed, and effective advanced cardiac life support. Availability of automated external defibrillators is a key factor in increasing survival. Readers are referred to the latest guidelines on cardiopulmonary resuscitation provided by the European Resuscitation Council.22

Pre-hospital or early in-hospital care

Restoring coronary flow and myocardial tissue reperfusion

For patients with the clinical presentation of STEMI within 12 h after symptom onset and with persistent ST-segment elevation or new or presumed new left bundle-branch block, early mechanical (PCI) or pharmacological reperfusion should be performed.

There is general agreement that reperfusion therapy (primary PCI) should be considered if there is clinical and/or electrocardiographic evidence of ongoing ischaemia, even if, according to the patient, symptoms started >12 h before as the exact onset of symptoms is often unclear. However, there is no consensus as to whether PCI is also beneficial in patients presenting >12 h from symptom onset in the absence of clinical and/or electrocardiographic evidence of ongoing ischaemia. In a randomized study in STEMI patients presenting without persisting symptoms between 12 and 48 h after symptom onset (n = 347), PCI was associated with significant myocardial salvage, lending some support to an invasive strategy in these patients, but clinical outcomes were not better.23 In the OAT trial including 2166 stable patients with an occluded infarct-related vessel 3 to 28 calendar days after symptom onset, PCI did not improve clinical outcome,24 including in the subgroup of 331 patients randomized between 24 and 72 h after onset of infarction.25 No firm recommendations can be made given the limited data currently available (Table 5).

Table 5

Reperfusion therapy

Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Reperfusion therapy is indicated in all patients with history of chest pain/discomfort of <12 h and with persistent ST-segment elevation or (presumed) new left bundle-branch block 
Reperfusion therapy should be considered if there is clinical and/or ECG evidence of ongoing ischaemia even if, according to patient, symptoms started >12 h before IIa 
Reperfusion using PCI may be considered in stable patients presenting >12 to 24 h after symptom onset IIb 
PCI of a totally occluded infarct artery >24 h after symptom onset in stable patients without signs of ischaemia III 

 
Primary PCI   
Preferred treatment if performed by an experienced team as soon as possible after FMC 
Time from FMC to balloon inflation should be <2 h in any case and <90 min in patients presenting early (e.g. <2 h) with large infarct and low bleeding risk 
Indicated for patients in shock and those with contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy irrespective of time delay 
Antiplatelet co-therapyc   
  Aspirin 
  NSAID and COX-2 selective inhibitors III 
  Clopidogrel loading dose 
  GPIIb/IIIa antagonist   
    Abciximab IIa 
    Tirofiban IIb 
    Eptifibatide IIb 
Antithrombin therapyc   
  Heparin 
  Bivalirudin IIa 
  Fondaparinux III 
Adjunctive devices   
  Thrombus aspiration IIb 

 
Rescue PCI   
After failed fibrinolysis in patients with large infarcts if performed within 12 h after onset IIa 

 
Fibrinolytic therapyc   
In the absence of contraindications (see Table 7) and if primary PCI cannot be performed within the recommended time (see above and Figure 2
A fibrin-specific agent should be given 
Pre-hospital initiation of fibrinolytic therapy IIa 
Antiplatelet co-therapyc   
  if not already on aspirin oral (soluble or chewable/non-enteric-coated) or i.v. dose of aspirin plus 
  clopidogrel oral loading dose if age ≤75 years 
  if age >75 years start with maintenance dose IIa 
Antithrombin co-therapyc   
  with alteplase, reteplase, and tenecteplase:   
    enoxaparin i.v. bolus followed 15 min later by first s.c. dose; if age >75 years no i.v. bolus and start with reduced    first s.c. dose 
    if enoxaparin is not available: a weight-adjusted bolus of i.v. heparin followed by a weight‐adjusted i.v. infusion    with first aPTT control after 3 h 
  with streptokinase:   
    an i.v. bolus of fondaparinux followed by an s.c. dose 24 h later or IIa 
    enoxaparin i.v. bolus followed 15 min later by first s.c. dose; if age >75 years no i.v. bolus and start with reduced    first s.c. dose IIa 
    or a weight-adjusted dose of i.v. heparin followed by a weight-adjusted infusion IIa 
Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Reperfusion therapy is indicated in all patients with history of chest pain/discomfort of <12 h and with persistent ST-segment elevation or (presumed) new left bundle-branch block 
Reperfusion therapy should be considered if there is clinical and/or ECG evidence of ongoing ischaemia even if, according to patient, symptoms started >12 h before IIa 
Reperfusion using PCI may be considered in stable patients presenting >12 to 24 h after symptom onset IIb 
PCI of a totally occluded infarct artery >24 h after symptom onset in stable patients without signs of ischaemia III 

 
Primary PCI   
Preferred treatment if performed by an experienced team as soon as possible after FMC 
Time from FMC to balloon inflation should be <2 h in any case and <90 min in patients presenting early (e.g. <2 h) with large infarct and low bleeding risk 
Indicated for patients in shock and those with contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy irrespective of time delay 
Antiplatelet co-therapyc   
  Aspirin 
  NSAID and COX-2 selective inhibitors III 
  Clopidogrel loading dose 
  GPIIb/IIIa antagonist   
    Abciximab IIa 
    Tirofiban IIb 
    Eptifibatide IIb 
Antithrombin therapyc   
  Heparin 
  Bivalirudin IIa 
  Fondaparinux III 
Adjunctive devices   
  Thrombus aspiration IIb 

 
Rescue PCI   
After failed fibrinolysis in patients with large infarcts if performed within 12 h after onset IIa 

 
Fibrinolytic therapyc   
In the absence of contraindications (see Table 7) and if primary PCI cannot be performed within the recommended time (see above and Figure 2
A fibrin-specific agent should be given 
Pre-hospital initiation of fibrinolytic therapy IIa 
Antiplatelet co-therapyc   
  if not already on aspirin oral (soluble or chewable/non-enteric-coated) or i.v. dose of aspirin plus 
  clopidogrel oral loading dose if age ≤75 years 
  if age >75 years start with maintenance dose IIa 
Antithrombin co-therapyc   
  with alteplase, reteplase, and tenecteplase:   
    enoxaparin i.v. bolus followed 15 min later by first s.c. dose; if age >75 years no i.v. bolus and start with reduced    first s.c. dose 
    if enoxaparin is not available: a weight-adjusted bolus of i.v. heparin followed by a weight‐adjusted i.v. infusion    with first aPTT control after 3 h 
  with streptokinase:   
    an i.v. bolus of fondaparinux followed by an s.c. dose 24 h later or IIa 
    enoxaparin i.v. bolus followed 15 min later by first s.c. dose; if age >75 years no i.v. bolus and start with reduced    first s.c. dose IIa 
    or a weight-adjusted dose of i.v. heparin followed by a weight-adjusted infusion IIa 

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

cFor doses see Tables 8, 9, and 10.

Different reperfusion strategies are depicted in Figure 2. In this figure the first medical contact is the place (ambulance or hospital) where, at least in principle, reperfusion therapy could be given. The (increasing) time limits for the different reperfusion strategies are also depicted schematically.

Percutaneous coronary interventions

The role of PCIs during the early hours of STEMI can be divided into primary PCI, PCI combined with pharmacological reperfusion therapy (facilitated PCI), and ‘rescue PCI’ after failed pharmacological reperfusion. Separate ESC Guidelines covering all indications for PCI have been published before.26

Primary PCI and delay times

Primary PCI is defined as angioplasty and/or stenting without prior or concomitant fibrinolytic therapy, and is the preferred therapeutic option when it can be performed expeditiously by an experienced team (Table 5). An experienced team includes not only interventional cardiologists but also skilled supporting staff. This means that only hospitals with an established interventional cardiology programme (24 h/7 days) should use primary PCI as a routine treatment option for patients presenting with the symptoms and signs of STEMI. Lower mortality rates among patients undergoing primary PCI are observed in centres with a high volume of PCI procedures.27,28 Primary PCI is effective in securing and maintaining coronary artery patency and avoids some of the bleeding risks of fibrinolysis. Randomized clinical trials comparing timely performed primary PCI with in-hospital fibrinolytic therapy in high-volume, experienced centres have shown more effective restoration of patency, less reocclusion, improved residual left ventricular (LV), function and better clinical outcome with primary PCI.29 Routine coronary stent implantation in patients with STEMI decreases the need for target vessel revascularization but is not associated with significant reductions in death or reinfarction rates30,31 when compared with primary angioplasty. In addition, several randomized clinical trials with medium-term follow-up, including patients with STEMI, have shown that drug-eluting stents reduce the risk of reintervention compared with bare metal stents, without having a significant impact on the risk of stent thrombosis, recurrent myocardial infarction, and death.32–34 As for other clinical presentations of coronary artery disease, long-term data on the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in patients with STEMI are still needed.

Both randomized studies and registries have indicated that long delay times to primary PCI are associated with a worse clinical outcome.35,36 Several delay times can be defined: time from symptom onset to first medical contact (FMC), time from FMC to arrival in cath lab, time from FMC to sheath insertion, time from FMC to balloon inflation. The ‘PCI-related delay time’ is the theoretical difference between the time of FMC to balloon inflation minus the time from FMC to start of fibrinolytic therapy (= ‘door-to-balloon’ minus ‘door-to-needle’). The extent to which the PCI-related time delay diminishes the advantages of PCI over fibrinolysis has been the subject of many analyses and debates. Because no specifically designed study has addressed this issue, caution is needed when interpreting the results of these post hoc analyses. From randomized trials it was calculated that the PCI-related time delay that may mitigate the benefit of the mechanical intervention varies between 6037 and 110 min38 depending on the fibrinolytic used.39 In another analysis of these trials, a benefit of primary PCI over fibrinolytic therapy up to a PCI-related delay of 120 min was calculated.40 In 192 509 patients included in the NRMI 2-4 registry,41 the mean PCI-related time delay where mortality rates of the two reperfusion strategies were equal was calculated at 114 min. This study also indicated that this time delay varied considerably according to age, symptom duration, and infarct location: from <1 h for an anterior infarction in a patient <65 years presenting <2 h after symptom onset, to almost 3 h for a non-anterior infarction in a patient >65 years presenting >2 h after symptom onset. Although these results were derived from a post hoc analysis of a registry and reported delay times are sometimes inaccurate, this study suggests that an individualized rather than a uniform approach for selecting the optimal reperfusion modality could be more appropriate when PCI cannot be performed within a short delay. Taking into account the studies and registries mentioned above, primary PCI (balloon inflation) should be performed within 2 h after FMC in all cases. In patients presenting early with a large amount of myocardium at risk, the delay should be shorter. Although no specific studies have been performed, a maximum delay of only 90 min after FMC seems to be a reasonable recommendation in these patients.

Patients with contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy have a higher morbidity and mortality than those eligible for this therapy. Primary PCI can be performed with success in these patients.42 Primary PCI is the preferred treatment for patients in shock.43 Except for patients in cardiogenic shock, only the culprit lesion should be dilated in the acute setting. Complete revascularization of the non-culprit lesions may be performed at a later time point depending on the remaining ischaemia.

Facilitated PCI

Facilitated PCI is defined as a pharmacological reperfusion treatment delivered prior to a planned PCI, in order to bridge the PCI-related time delay. Full-dose lytic therapy, half-dose lytic therapy with a glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa inhibitor and GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor alone have been tested for this indication. There is no evidence of a significant clinical benefit with any of these agents.16,12,44,45 In spite of the fact that pre-PCI patency rates were higher with lytic-based treatments, no mortality benefit but more bleeding complications were observed. The pre-PCI patency rates with upfront abciximab or high-bolus dose tirofiban alone were not higher than with placebo. Facilitated PCI as it has been tested in these trials cannot be recommended.

Rescue PCI

Rescue PCI is defined as PCI performed on a coronary artery which remains occluded despite fibrinolytic therapy. The non-invasive identification of failed fibrinolysis remains a challenging issue, but <50% ST-segment resolution in the lead(s) with the highest ST-segment elevations 60–90 min after start of fibrinolytic therapy has increasingly been used as a surrogate. Rescue PCI has been shown to be feasible and relatively safe. In a randomized study of 427 patients (REACT), the event-free survival at 6 months after failed fibrinolysis was significantly higher with rescue PCI than with repeated administration of a fibrinolytic agent or conservative treatment.46 A recent meta-analysis, including REACT, showed that rescue PCI is associated with a significant reduction in heart failure and reinfarction and a trend towards lower all-cause mortality when compared with a conservative strategy, at the cost, however, of an increased risk of stroke and bleeding complications.47 Rescue PCI should be considered when there is evidence of failed fibrinolysis based on clinical signs and insufficient ST-segment resolution (<50%), if there is clinical or ECG evidence of a large infarct, and if the procedure can be performed within a reasonable time delay (up to 12 h after onset of symptoms).

Adjunctive antithrombotic treatment and devices (Tables 6 and 9)
Table 6

Antithrombotic treatment without reperfusion therapy

Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Antiplatelet co-therapyc   
If not already on aspirin oral (soluble or chewable/non-enteric-coated) or i.v. dose of aspirin if oral ingestion is not feasible 
Oral dose of clopidogrel 

 
Antithrombin co-therapy   
I.v. bolus of fondaparinux followed 24 h later by an s.c. dose 
If fondaparinux is not available: enoxaparin i.v. bolus followed 15 min later by first s.c. dose; if age >75 years no i.v. bolus and start with reduced s.c. dose or 
I.v. heparin followed by a weight-adjusted i.v. infusion with first aPTT control after 3 h 
Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Antiplatelet co-therapyc   
If not already on aspirin oral (soluble or chewable/non-enteric-coated) or i.v. dose of aspirin if oral ingestion is not feasible 
Oral dose of clopidogrel 

 
Antithrombin co-therapy   
I.v. bolus of fondaparinux followed 24 h later by an s.c. dose 
If fondaparinux is not available: enoxaparin i.v. bolus followed 15 min later by first s.c. dose; if age >75 years no i.v. bolus and start with reduced s.c. dose or 
I.v. heparin followed by a weight-adjusted i.v. infusion with first aPTT control after 3 h 

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

cFor doses see Tables 9 and 10.

Aspirin, NSAID, COX-2 inhibitors

Aspirin should be given to all patients with a STEMI as soon as possible after the diagnosis is deemed probable. There are few contraindications to the use of aspirin, but it should not be given to those with a known hypersensitivity, active gastrointestinal bleeding, known clotting disorders, or severe hepatic disease. Aspirin may occasionally trigger bronchospasm in asthmatic patients. Aspirin should be started at a dose of 150–325 mg in a chewable form (enteric-coated aspirin should not be given because of slow onset of action). An alternative approach, especially if oral ingestion is not possible, is i.v. administration of aspirin at a dose of 250–500 mg, although no specific data are available on the relative merits of this strategy. A lower dose (75–160 mg) is given orally daily thereafter for life.

NSAIDs (apart from aspirin) and selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors have been demonstrated to increase the risk of death, reinfarction, cardiac rupture, and other complications in STEMI patients: discontinuation of these drugs is indicated at the time of STEMI.48,49

Clopidogrel

Although clopidogrel is less studied in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI, there is abundant evidence on its usefulness as an adjunctive antiplatelet therapy on top of aspirin in patients undergoing PCI.50–52 Based on these data, clopidogrel should be given as soon as possible to all patients with STEMI undergoing PCI. It is started with a loading dose of at least 300 mg, but a 600 mg loading dose achieves a more rapid and stronger inhibition of platelet aggregation.53,54 This should be followed by a daily dose of 75 mg.

GPIIb/IIIa antagonists

Platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors block the final pathway of platelet aggregation. Most of the studies on the role of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists in STEMI have focused on abciximab rather than on the other two members of the family, tirofiban and eptifibatide. Several randomized trials have assessed the value of periprocedural administration of i.v. abciximab in addition to aspirin and heparin in this setting. A systematic review of these trials showed that abciximab reduced 30-day mortality by 32% without affecting the risk of haemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding.55 Abciximab did not have a significant impact on the patency of infarct-related vessels, and its administration upstream of a planned PCI procedure did not offer advantages compared with the administration in the cath lab.44 Abciximab is given i.v. as a bolus of 0.25 mg/kg bolus, 0.125 µg/kg/min infusion (maximum 10 µg/min for 12 h). However, it remains to be elucidated whether abciximab provides an additional benefit to STEMI patients who receive an optimal clopidogrel treatment prior to PCI. In the On-TIME 2 trial (n = 984) pre-hospital initiation of high-bolus dose tirofiban in association with aspirin, clopidogrel (600 mg), and heparin improved ST-segment resolution but was not associated with more patency of the infarct vessel or a significant net clinical benefit when compared with placebo.45

Heparin

Heparin is standard anticoagulant therapy during PCI. The lack of randomized clinical trials of heparin vs. placebo during PCI in STEMI is due to the strong belief that anticoagulation therapy is a requirement during the procedure. Heparin is given as an i.v. bolus at a usual starting dose of 100 U/kg weight (60 U/kg if GPIIb/IIIa antagonists are used). It is recommended to perform the procedure under activated clotting time (ACT) guidance: heparin should be given at a dose able to maintain an ACT of 250–350 s (200–250 s if GPIIb/IIIa antagonists are used).

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been studied in a limited number of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Thus, there is little evidence to support their use instead of heparin in this setting.

Bivalirudin

The direct thrombin inhibitor, bivalirudin, has been investigated as an adjunct antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing PCI. In the Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial, 3602 patients undergoing PCI were randomly assigned in an unblinded fashion to receive either bivalirudin with provisional use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor or heparin (or enoxaparin) plus a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor.56 The primary end-point, the composite of 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events or major bleeding, was significantly reduced by bivalirudin due to a 40% reduction in major bleeding (P <0.001). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 1% lower (P <0.0047), but acute stent thrombosis occurred more frequently (P <0.001). Bivalirudin is given as an i.v. bolus of 0.75 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 1.75 mg/kg/h not titrated to ACT and usually terminated at the end of the procedure.

Fondaparinux

Fondaparinux, a factor Xa inhibitor, has been compared with heparin or placebo in 12 092 STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic agents or PCI, or no reperfusion therapy.57 In the PCI subset, fondaparinux was associated with a non-significant 1% higher incidence of death or recurrent infarction at 30 days. These findings together with the occurrence of catheter thrombosis do not lend support to the use of fondaparinux as the sole anticoagulant in patients undergoing primary PCI.

Adjunctive devices

Adjunctive devices aiming at the prevention of distal embolization have been investigated in several randomized studies. Formal meta-analyses of these studies show heterogeneous results with no overall clinical benefit despite a lower rate of distal embolization angiographically.58 In a recent randomized study in 1071 patients, aspiration of thrombus prior to PCI was associated with improved tissue reperfusion [myocardial blush grades (MBGs)] and improved survival at 1 year when compared with conventional PCI.59,60 See also section D.1.d. and Table 13.

Fibrinolytic treatment

The evidence for benefit

The benefit of fibrinolytic therapy is well established:61 approximately 30 early deaths are prevented per 1000 patients treated, with 20 deaths prevented per 1000 patients treated between 7 and 12 h after symptom onset. Overall, the largest absolute benefit is seen among patients with the highest risk, even though the proportional benefit may be similar. In a subgroup of 3300 patients over the age of 75 presenting within 12 h of symptom onset and with either STEMI or bundle-branch block, mortality rates were significantly reduced by fibrinolytic therapy.62

Time to treatment

Analysis of studies in which >6000 patients were randomized to pre-hospital or in-hospital fibrinolysis has shown a significant reduction (17%) in early mortality with pre-hospital treatment.63 In a meta-analysis of 22 trials,64 a much larger mortality reduction was found in patients treated within the first 2 h than in those treated later. These data support pre-hospital initiation of fibrinolytic treatment if this reperfusion strategy is indicated. More recent post hoc analyses of several randomized trials and data from registries have confirmed the clinical usefulness of pre-hospital fibrinolysis.16,65–67 Most of these studies reported outcome data similar to those of primary PCI, provided early angiography and PCI were performed in those who needed intervention. However, whether pre-hospital fibrinolysis is associated with a similar or better clinical outcome than primary PCI in early presenting patients has not been studied prospectively in an adequately sized randomized fashion.

Hazards of fibrinolysis

Fibrinolytic therapy is associated with a small but significant excess of strokes,61 with all of the excess hazard appearing on the first day after treatment. The early strokes are largely attributable to cerebral haemorrhage; later strokes are more frequently thrombotic or embolic. Advanced age, lower weight, female gender, prior cerebrovascular disease, and systolic and diastolic hypertension on admission are significant predictors of intracranial haemorrhage.68 In the latest trials, intracranial bleeding occurred in 0.9–1.0% of the total population studied.69,70 Major non-cerebral bleeds (bleeding complications requiring blood transfusion or that are life-threatening) can occur in 4–13% of the patients treated.69,71 The most common sources of bleeding are procedure related. Independent predictors of non-cerebral bleeding are older age, lower weight, and female gender, also in patients not undergoing PCI.

Administration of streptokinase may be associated with hypotension, but severe allergic reactions are rare. Routine administration of hydrocortisone is not indicated. When hypotension occurs, it should be managed by temporarily halting the infusion, laying the patient flat and, elevating the feet. Occasionally atropine or intravascular volume expansion may be required. Streptokinase should never be readministered because of antibodies which can impair its activity and because of the risk of allergic reactions.

Comparison of fibrinolytic agents

In the GUSTO Trial,72 an accelerated infusion of the fibrin-specific agent t-PA (tissue plasminogen activator; alteplase) with concomitant aPTT- (activated partial thromboplastin time) adjusted i.v. heparin resulted in 10 fewer deaths per 1000 patients treated when compared with streptokinase, at the cost of three additional strokes. In assessing the net clinical benefit of t-PA (survival without a neurological deficit), one must take into account that only one of these additional strokes survived with a residual neurological deficit. Several variants of t-PA have been studied. Double-bolus r-PA (reteplase) does not offer any advantage over accelerated t-PA except for its ease of administration.70 Single-bolus weight-adjusted TNK-tPA (tenecteplase) is equivalent to accelerated t-PA for 30-day mortality and associated with a significantly lower rate of non-cerebral bleedings and less need for blood transfusion.69 Bolus fibrinolytic therapy is easier to use in the pre-hospital setting.

Clinical implications

Where appropriate facilities exist, with trained medical or paramedical staff able to analyse on-site or to transmit the ECG to the hospital for supervision, pre-hospital fibrinolysis is recommended provided that fibrinolytic therapy is the most appropriate reperfusion strategy. The aim is to start fibrinolytic therapy within 30 min of arrival of the ambulance (Table 5). For patients arriving at the hospital, a realistic aim is to initiate fibrinolysis within 30 min (door-to-needle time).

Contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy (Table 7)

Absolute and relative contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy are shown in Table7. Diabetes (more particularly diabetic retinopathy) and successful resuscitation are no contraindication to fibrinolytic therapy. Fibrinolytic therapy should not be given to patients refractory to resuscitation.73

Table 7

Contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy

Absolute contraindications 
Haemorrhagic stroke or stroke of unknown origin at any time 
Ischaemic stroke in preceding 6 months 
Central nervous system trauma or neoplasms 
Recent major trauma/surgery/head injury (within preceding 3 weeks) 
Gastrointestinal bleeding within the last month 
Known bleeding disorder 
Aortic dissection 
Non-compressible punctures (e.g. liver biopsy, lumbar puncture) 

 
Relative contraindications 
Transient ischaemic attack in preceding 6 months 
Oral anticoagulant therapy 
Pregnancy or within 1 week post-partum 
Refractory hypertension (systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg) 
Advanced liver disease 
Infective endocarditis 
Active peptic ulcer 
Refractory resuscitation 
Absolute contraindications 
Haemorrhagic stroke or stroke of unknown origin at any time 
Ischaemic stroke in preceding 6 months 
Central nervous system trauma or neoplasms 
Recent major trauma/surgery/head injury (within preceding 3 weeks) 
Gastrointestinal bleeding within the last month 
Known bleeding disorder 
Aortic dissection 
Non-compressible punctures (e.g. liver biopsy, lumbar puncture) 

 
Relative contraindications 
Transient ischaemic attack in preceding 6 months 
Oral anticoagulant therapy 
Pregnancy or within 1 week post-partum 
Refractory hypertension (systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg) 
Advanced liver disease 
Infective endocarditis 
Active peptic ulcer 
Refractory resuscitation 
Readministration of a fibrinolytic agent

If there is evidence of persistent occlusion, re-occlusion, or reinfarction with recurrence of ST-segment elevation the patient should be immediately transferred to a hospital with PCI capabilities. If rescue PCI is not available, a second administration of a non-immunogenic fibrinolytic agent may be considered, if there is a large infarct and if the risk of bleeding is not high,74 although in the REACT trial readministration of a fibrinolytic agent was not better than a conservative therapy.46

Fibrinolytic regimens (Tables 8, 9 and 10)
Table 8

Doses of fibrinolytic agents

 Initial treatment Specific contraindications 
Streptokinase (SK) 1.5 million units over 30–60 min i.v. Prior SK or anistreplase 
Alteplase (t-PA) 15 mg i.v. bolus  
 0.75 mg/kg over 30 min then 0.5 mg/kg over 60 min i.v. Total dosage not to exceed 100 mg  
Reteplase (r-PA) 10 U + 10 U i.v. bolus given 30 min apart  
Tenecteplase (TNK-tPA) Single i.v. bolus  
 30 mg if <60 kg  
 35 mg if 60 to <70 kg  
 40 mg if 70 to <80 kg  
 45 mg if 80 to <90 kg  
 50 mg if ≥90 kg  
 Initial treatment Specific contraindications 
Streptokinase (SK) 1.5 million units over 30–60 min i.v. Prior SK or anistreplase 
Alteplase (t-PA) 15 mg i.v. bolus  
 0.75 mg/kg over 30 min then 0.5 mg/kg over 60 min i.v. Total dosage not to exceed 100 mg  
Reteplase (r-PA) 10 U + 10 U i.v. bolus given 30 min apart  
Tenecteplase (TNK-tPA) Single i.v. bolus  
 30 mg if <60 kg  
 35 mg if 60 to <70 kg  
 40 mg if 70 to <80 kg  
 45 mg if 80 to <90 kg  
 50 mg if ≥90 kg  
Table 9

Doses of antiplatelet co-therapies

With primary PCI 
Aspirin Oral dose of 150–325 mg or i.v. dose of 250–500 mg if oral ingestion is not possible 
Clopidogrel Oral loading dose of at least 300 mg, preferably 600 mg 
GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors Abciximab: i.v. bolus of 0.25 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.125 µg/kg per min infusion (maximum 10 µg/min for 12 h) 

 
With fibrinolytic treatment 
Aspirin Oral dose of 150–325 mg or i.v. dose of 250 mg if oral ingestion is not possible 
Clopidogrel Loading dose of 300 mg if age ≤75 years; 75 mg if age >75 

 
Without reperfusion therapy 
Aspirin Oral dose of 150–325 mg 
Clopidogrel Oral dose of 75 mg 
With primary PCI 
Aspirin Oral dose of 150–325 mg or i.v. dose of 250–500 mg if oral ingestion is not possible 
Clopidogrel Oral loading dose of at least 300 mg, preferably 600 mg 
GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors Abciximab: i.v. bolus of 0.25 mg/kg bolus followed by 0.125 µg/kg per min infusion (maximum 10 µg/min for 12 h) 

 
With fibrinolytic treatment 
Aspirin Oral dose of 150–325 mg or i.v. dose of 250 mg if oral ingestion is not possible 
Clopidogrel Loading dose of 300 mg if age ≤75 years; 75 mg if age >75 

 
Without reperfusion therapy 
Aspirin Oral dose of 150–325 mg 
Clopidogrel Oral dose of 75 mg 
Table 10

Doses of antithrombin co-therapies

With primary PCI 
Heparin I.v. bolus at a usual starting dose of 100 U/kg weight (60 U/kg if GPIIb/IIIa antagonists are used). If the procedure is being performed under activated clotting time (ACT) guidance, heparin is given at a dose able to maintain an ACT of 250–350 s (200–250 s if GPIIb/IIIa antagonists are used). Infusion should be stopped at the end of the procedure. 
Bivalirudin I.v. bolus of 0.75 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 1.75 mg/kg/h not titrated to ACT and usually terminated at the end of the procedure. 

 
With fibrinolytic treatment 
Enoxaparin In patients <75 years and creatinine levels ≤2.5 mg/mL or 221 µmol/L (men) or ≤2 mg/mL or 177 µmol/L (women): i.v. bolus of 30 mg followed 15 min later by s.c. dose of 1 mg/kg every 12 h until hospital discharge for a maximum of 8 days. The first two s.c. doses should not exceed 100 mg. 
 In patients >75 years: no i.v. bolus; start with first s.c. dose of 0.75 mg/kg with a maximum of 75 mg for the first two s.c. doses. In patients with creatinine clearance of <30 mL/min, regardless of age, the s.c. doses are repeated every 24 h 
Heparin I.v. bolus of 60 U/kg with a maximum of 4000 U followed by an i.v. infusion of 12 U/kg with a maximum of 1000 U/h for 24–48 h. Target aPTT: 50–70 s to be monitored at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h 
Fondaparinux 2.5 mg i.v. bolus followed by an s.c. dose of 2.5 mg once daily up to 8 days or hospital discharge if creatinine ≤3 mg/mL or 265 µmol/L 

 
Without reperfusion therapy 
Fondaparinux Same dose as with fibrinolytics 
Enoxaparin Same dose as with fibrinolytics 
Heparin Same dose as with fibrinolytics 
With primary PCI 
Heparin I.v. bolus at a usual starting dose of 100 U/kg weight (60 U/kg if GPIIb/IIIa antagonists are used). If the procedure is being performed under activated clotting time (ACT) guidance, heparin is given at a dose able to maintain an ACT of 250–350 s (200–250 s if GPIIb/IIIa antagonists are used). Infusion should be stopped at the end of the procedure. 
Bivalirudin I.v. bolus of 0.75 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 1.75 mg/kg/h not titrated to ACT and usually terminated at the end of the procedure. 

 
With fibrinolytic treatment 
Enoxaparin In patients <75 years and creatinine levels ≤2.5 mg/mL or 221 µmol/L (men) or ≤2 mg/mL or 177 µmol/L (women): i.v. bolus of 30 mg followed 15 min later by s.c. dose of 1 mg/kg every 12 h until hospital discharge for a maximum of 8 days. The first two s.c. doses should not exceed 100 mg. 
 In patients >75 years: no i.v. bolus; start with first s.c. dose of 0.75 mg/kg with a maximum of 75 mg for the first two s.c. doses. In patients with creatinine clearance of <30 mL/min, regardless of age, the s.c. doses are repeated every 24 h 
Heparin I.v. bolus of 60 U/kg with a maximum of 4000 U followed by an i.v. infusion of 12 U/kg with a maximum of 1000 U/h for 24–48 h. Target aPTT: 50–70 s to be monitored at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h 
Fondaparinux 2.5 mg i.v. bolus followed by an s.c. dose of 2.5 mg once daily up to 8 days or hospital discharge if creatinine ≤3 mg/mL or 265 µmol/L 

 
Without reperfusion therapy 
Fondaparinux Same dose as with fibrinolytics 
Enoxaparin Same dose as with fibrinolytics 
Heparin Same dose as with fibrinolytics 
Angiography after fibrinolytic therapy (Table 11)

If it is likely that fibrinolysis was successful (ST-segment resolution of >50% at 60–90 min, typical reperfusion arrhythmia, disappearance of chest pain) angiography is recommended if there are no contraindications. In the CARESS trial, a more conservative strategy with sending patients for angiography only in the case of failed fibrinolysis was associated with a worse clinical outcome when compared with a strategy of referring all patients for angiography and (if indicated) PCI.75 In order to avoid an early PCI during the prothrombotic period following fibrinolysis, on the one hand, and to minimize the risk of reocclusion, on the other hand, a time window of 3–24 h following successful fibrinolysis is recommended.16,76–78

Table 11

Angiography during hospital stay after fibrinolytic therapy and in patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy

Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Evidence of failed fibrinolysis or uncertainty about success: immediate IIa 
Recurrent ischaemia, reocclusion after initial successful fibrinolysis: immediate 
Evidence of successful fibrinolysis: within 3–24 h after start of fibrinolytic therapy IIa 
In unstable patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy: immediate 
In stable patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy: before discharge IIb 
Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Evidence of failed fibrinolysis or uncertainty about success: immediate IIa 
Recurrent ischaemia, reocclusion after initial successful fibrinolysis: immediate 
Evidence of successful fibrinolysis: within 3–24 h after start of fibrinolytic therapy IIa 
In unstable patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy: immediate 
In stable patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy: before discharge IIb 

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

Adjunctive anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy (Tables 5, 9 and 10)

Convincing evidence of the effectiveness of aspirin was demonstrated by the ISIS-2 trial,79 in which the benefits of aspirin and streptokinase were additive. The first dose of 150–325 mg should be chewed (no enteric-coated aspirin because of slow onset of action) and a lower dose (75–100 mg) given orally daily thereafter. If oral ingestion is not possible, aspirin can be given i.v. (250–500 mg). In the CLARITY trial, patients ≤75 years were treated with a standard fibrinolytic regimen and randomized to 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose followed by 75 mg per day or placebo on top of aspirin up to and including the day of angiography with a maximum of 8 days (mean duration 3 days). By 30 days, clopidogrel therapy reduced the odds of the composite end-point of death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, or recurrent ischaemia, leading to a reduction of the need for urgent revascularization of 20%. The rates of major bleeding and intracranial haemorrhage were similar in the two groups.52 In the COMMIT study,80 45 852 Chinese patients of any age (but <1000 patients >75 years) with suspected myocardial infarction (93% with STEMI) were randomized to clopidogrel 75 mg (no loading dose) or placebo in addition to aspirin. Clopidogrel significantly reduced the odds of the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, corresponding to nine fewer events per 1000 patients treated for ∼2 weeks. Accordingly, there is a good case for the routine use of clopidogrel in the acute phase.

A combination of half-dose fibrinolytic therapy and full-dose abciximab did not reduce mortality but was associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications, especially in elderly patients when compared with full dosis lytic therapy in two large randomized trials.81,82

Heparin has been extensively used during and after fibrinolysis, especially with alteplase. Heparin does not improve immediate clot lysis, but coronary patency evaluated in the hours or days following fibrinolytic therapy with alteplase appears to be better with i.v. heparin.83 No difference in patency was apparent in patients treated with either s.c. or i.v. heparin and streptokinase.84 I.v. heparin administration until discharge has not been shown to prevent reocclusion after angiographically proven successful coronary fibrinolysis.85 Heparin infusion after fibrinolytic therapy may be discontinued after 24–48 h. Close monitoring of i.v. heparin therapy is mandatory; aPTT values >70 are associated with higher likelihood of mortality, bleeding, and reinfarction.86 A full weight adjustment of the heparin dose may decrease the risk of non-cerebral bleeding complications.82

In the ASSENT-3 trial (n = 6095), a standard dose of the LMWH enoxaparin given in association with tenecteplase for a maximum of 7 days82 reduced the risk of in-hospital reinfarction or in-hospital refractory ischaemia when compared with heparin. However, in the ASSENT-3 PLUS (n = 1639) trial,87 pre-hospital administration of the same dose of enoxaparin resulted in a significant increase in intracranial haemorrhage rate in elderly patients. In the large ExTRACT trial (n = 20 506), a lower dose of enoxaparin was given to patients >75 years and to those with impaired renal function (estimated creatinine clearance <30 mL/min). Enoxaparin treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death and reinfarction at 30 days when compared with a weight-adjusted heparin dose, however at the cost of a significant increase in non-cerebral bleeding complications. The net clinical benefit (absence of death, non-fatal infarction, or intracranial haemorrhage) favoured enoxaparin. Benefit was observed regardless of the type of fibrinolytic agent and the age of the patient.88,89

In the large OASIS-6 trial, a low dose of fondaparinux, a synthetic indirect anti-Xa agent, was superior to placebo or heparin in preventing death and reinfarction in 5436 patients who received fibrinolytic therapy.57 In the subgroup of 1021 patients in whom concomitant heparin was felt to be indicated, fondaparinux was not superior to heparin in preventing death, reinfarction, or major bleeding complications.90

In a large trial with streptokinase,91 no mortality reduction at 30 days but significantly fewer reinfarctions were seen with a direct antithrombin, bivalirudin, given for 48 h, as compared with heparin, however at the cost of a modest and non-significant increase in non-cerebral bleeding complications. Bivalirudin has not been studied with fibrin-specific agents. Direct thrombin inhibitors are not recommended as an adjunct to fibrinolysis.

Antithrombotic therapy without reperfusion therapy

In patients presenting within 12 h after symptom onset and in whom reperfusion therapy was not given, or in patients presenting after 12 h aspirin, clopidogrel80 and an antithrombin agent (heparin, enoxaparin, or fondaparinux) should be given as soon as possible92–94 (Table 8). In OASIS-6, fondaparinux was superior to heparin in a subgroup of 1641 patients and might be the preferred antithrombin for this indication.95 If coronary angiography/PCI is needed in a patient on fondaparinux. an i.v. bolus of 5000 U of heparin is recommended to avoid catheter thrombosis.

Recommended doses are given in Tables 9 and 10.

In most patients who did not receive reperfusion therapy, angiography before hospital discharge is recommended, similar to patients after successful fibrinolysis (Table 11) if no contraindications are present.

Prevention and treatment of microvascular obstruction and reperfusion injury

The ‘no-reflow’ phenomenon in STEMI patients is characterized by inadequate myocardial reperfusion after successful re-opening of the epicardial infarct-related artery.

Depending on the technique used, 10–40% of patients undergoing reperfusion therapy for STEMI may show evidence of no-reflow.96–99

No-reflow may occur as a consequence of downstream microvascular embolization of thrombotic or atheromatous (lipid-rich) debris, reperfusion injury, microvascular disruption, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and myocardial oedema.100,101

No-reflow can cause prolonged myocardial ischaemia, may result in severe arrhythmia and critical haemodynamic deterioration, and is associated with a significantly increased risk of clinical complications.97,102 Reversing no-reflow is associated with a favourable effect on LV remodelling even in the absence of significant improvement in regional contractile function.103

Diagnostic techniques104 to detect ‘no-reflow’ after PCI include grading of flow in the infarct vessel and of ‘myocardial blush’ by angiography (see Table 12), and coronary flow velocity measurement with a Doppler wire105 (rapid deceleration of diastolic flow velocity). Non-invasive techniques that have been used are ST-segment resolution analysis, contrast echocardiography, single-photon emission tomography, positron emission tomography (PET), and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The diagnosis of no-reflow is usually made when post-procedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow is <3 or in the case of a TIMI flow 3 when MBG is 0 or 1 or when ST resolution within 4 h of the procedure is <70%.10213

Table 12

Grading of coronary flow and myocardial blush

TIMI 0 There is no antegrade flow beyond the point of occlusion. 
TIMI 1 The contrast material passes beyond the area of obstruction, but ‘hangs up’ and fails to opacify the entire coronary bed distal to the obstruction for duration of the cine run. 
TIMI 2 The contrast material passes across the obstruction and opacifies the coronary bed distal to the obstruction. However, the rate of entry of contrast material into the vessel distal to the obstruction or its rate of clearance from the distal bed (or both) are perceptibly slower than its entry into or clearance from comparable areas not perfused by the previously occluded vessel, e.g. the opposite coronary artery or the coronary bed proximal to the obstruction. 
TIMI 3 Antegrade flow into the bed distal to the obstruction occurs as promptly as antegrade flow into the bed proximal to the obstruction, and clearance of contrast material from the involved bed is as rapid as clearance from an uninvolved bed in the same vessel or the opposite artery. 
MBG 0 No myocardial blush or staining of blush (due to leakage of dye into the extravascular space) 
MBG 1 Minimal myocardial blush 
MBG 2 Moderate myocardial blush, less than that obtained during angiography of a contralateral or ipsilateral non-infarct-related artery 
MBG 3 Normal myocardial blush, comparable with that obtained during angiography of a contralateral or ipsilateral non-infarct-related artery 
TIMI 0 There is no antegrade flow beyond the point of occlusion. 
TIMI 1 The contrast material passes beyond the area of obstruction, but ‘hangs up’ and fails to opacify the entire coronary bed distal to the obstruction for duration of the cine run. 
TIMI 2 The contrast material passes across the obstruction and opacifies the coronary bed distal to the obstruction. However, the rate of entry of contrast material into the vessel distal to the obstruction or its rate of clearance from the distal bed (or both) are perceptibly slower than its entry into or clearance from comparable areas not perfused by the previously occluded vessel, e.g. the opposite coronary artery or the coronary bed proximal to the obstruction. 
TIMI 3 Antegrade flow into the bed distal to the obstruction occurs as promptly as antegrade flow into the bed proximal to the obstruction, and clearance of contrast material from the involved bed is as rapid as clearance from an uninvolved bed in the same vessel or the opposite artery. 
MBG 0 No myocardial blush or staining of blush (due to leakage of dye into the extravascular space) 
MBG 1 Minimal myocardial blush 
MBG 2 Moderate myocardial blush, less than that obtained during angiography of a contralateral or ipsilateral non-infarct-related artery 
MBG 3 Normal myocardial blush, comparable with that obtained during angiography of a contralateral or ipsilateral non-infarct-related artery 

Flow grades in the infarct-related vessel by the TIMI group.106

Myocardial blush grade (MBG) is a densitometric, semi-quantitative parameter which depends on the tissue phase of myocardial perfusion that appears as a ‘blush’ or a ‘ground-glass’ after a sufficiently long, 25 frames/s, X-ray acquisition. MBG is measured on patients with TIMI 3 flow and is based on the principle that a functionally preserved microvascular bed allows the injected contrast to pass easily from the arterial to the venous side of coronary circulation, showing an appreciable ‘blush’ at the myocardial level.107

Table 13

Recommendations for prevention and treatment of no-reflow

Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Prevention   
Thrombus aspiration IIa 
Abciximab 0.25 mg/kg bolus and 0.125 µg/kg/min infusion for 12–24 h IIa 

 
Treatment   
Adenosine: 70 µg/kg/min i.v. over 3 h during and after PCI IIb 
Adenosine: intracoronary bolus of 30–60 µg during PCI IIb 
Verapamil: intracoronary bolus of 0.5–1 mg during PCI IIb 
Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Prevention   
Thrombus aspiration IIa 
Abciximab 0.25 mg/kg bolus and 0.125 µg/kg/min infusion for 12–24 h IIa 

 
Treatment   
Adenosine: 70 µg/kg/min i.v. over 3 h during and after PCI IIb 
Adenosine: intracoronary bolus of 30–60 µg during PCI IIb 
Verapamil: intracoronary bolus of 0.5–1 mg during PCI IIb 

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

Intracoronary administration of vasodilators such as adenosine, verapamil, nicorandil, papaverine, and nitroprusside during and after primary PCI has been shown to improve flow in the infarct-related coronary artery and myocardial perfusion, and/or to reduce infarct size, but large prospective randomized trials with hard clinical outcomes are missing.104,108 High-dose i.v. infusion of adenosine was also associated with a reduction in infarct size, but clinical outcomes were not significantly improved (Table 13).109

The GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab was found to improve tissue perfusion110,111 and is recommended as antithrombotic co-therapy with primary PCI (see section D.1.a.). The use of adjunctive devices for preventing distal embolization is discussed in section D.1.d.

Coronary bypass surgery

The number of patients who need a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in the acute phase is limited, but CABG may be indicated after failed PCI, coronary occlusion not amenable for PCI, presence of refractory symptoms after PCI, cardiogenic shock, or mechanical complications such as ventricular rupture, acute mitral regurgitation, or ventricular septal defect.112,113

If a patient requires emergency stenting of a culprit lesion in the setting of a STEMI but further surgical revascularization is already predictable in the near future, the use of bare metal stents instead of drug-eluting stents should be recommended to avoid the problem of acute perioperative stent thrombosis. In patients with an indication for CABG, e.g. multivessel disease, it is recommended to treat the infarct-related lesion by PCI and to perform CABG later in more stable conditions.

Pump failure and shock

Clinical features

Heart failure is usually due to myocardial damage but may also be the consequence of arrhythmia or mechanical complications such as mitral regurgitation or ventricular septal defect. Heart failure during the acute phase of STEMI is associated with a poor short‐ and long-term prognosis.114 The clinical features are those of breathlessness, sinus tachycardia, a third heart sound, and pulmonary rales, which are basal, but may extend throughout both lung fields. The degree of failure may be categorized according to the Killip classification: class 1, no rales or third heart sound; class 2, pulmonary congestion with rales over <50% of the lung fields or third heart sound; class 3, pulmonary oedema with rales over 50% of the lung fields; class 4, shock. Haemodynamic states that can occur after STEMI are given in Table 14.

Table 14

Haemodynamic states

Normal Normal blood pressure, heart and respiration rates, good peripheral circulation 

 
Hyperdynamic state Tachycardia, loud heart sounds, good peripheral circulation 

 
Hypotension  
Bradycardia ‘Warm hypotension’, bradycardia, venodilatation, normal jugular venous pressure, decreased tissue perfusion. Usually in inferior infarction, but may be provoked by opiates. Responds to atropine or pacing 
Right ventricular infarction High jugular venous pressure, poor tissue perfusion or shock, bradycardia, hypotension 
Hypovolaemia Venoconstriction, low jugular venous pressure, poor tissue perfusion. Responds to fluid infusion 

 
Pump failure  
Pulmonary congestion Tachycardia, tachypnoea, basal rales 
Pulmonary oedema Tachycardia, tachypnoea, rales over 50% of lung fields 

 
Cardiogenic shock Clinical signs of poor tissue perfusion (oliguria, decreased mentation), hypotension, small pulse pressure, tachycardia, pulmonary oedema 
Normal Normal blood pressure, heart and respiration rates, good peripheral circulation 

 
Hyperdynamic state Tachycardia, loud heart sounds, good peripheral circulation 

 
Hypotension  
Bradycardia ‘Warm hypotension’, bradycardia, venodilatation, normal jugular venous pressure, decreased tissue perfusion. Usually in inferior infarction, but may be provoked by opiates. Responds to atropine or pacing 
Right ventricular infarction High jugular venous pressure, poor tissue perfusion or shock, bradycardia, hypotension 
Hypovolaemia Venoconstriction, low jugular venous pressure, poor tissue perfusion. Responds to fluid infusion 

 
Pump failure  
Pulmonary congestion Tachycardia, tachypnoea, basal rales 
Pulmonary oedema Tachycardia, tachypnoea, rales over 50% of lung fields 

 
Cardiogenic shock Clinical signs of poor tissue perfusion (oliguria, decreased mentation), hypotension, small pulse pressure, tachycardia, pulmonary oedema 

General measures include monitoring for arrhythmias, checking for electrolyte abnormalities and for the presence of concomitant conditions such as valvular dysfunction or pulmonary disease. Pulmonary congestion can be assessed by portable chest X-rays. Echocardiography is the key diagnostic tool and should be performed to assess the extent of myocardial damage and possible complications, such as mitral regurgitation and ventricular septal defect.

Mild heart failure (Killip class II)

Oxygen should be administered early by mask or intranasally, but caution is necessary in the presence of chronic pulmonary disease. Monitoring blood oxygen saturation is indicated.

Minor degrees of failure often respond quickly to nitrates and diuretics, such as furosemide 20–40 mg given slowly i.v., repeated at 1–4 hourly intervals, if necessary. Higher doses may be required in patients with renal failure or chronic use of diuretics. If there is no hypotension, i.v. nitrates are indicated. The dose of nitrates should be titrated while monitoring blood pressure to avoid hypotension. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors [or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) if ACE‐inhibitors are not tolerated] should be initiated within 24 h in the absence of hypotension, hypovolaemia, or significant renal failure (Table 15). See also section D.5.

Severe heart failure and shock (Killip class III and IV)

Oxygen should be administered and pulse oximetry is indicated for monitoring of oxygen saturation. Blood gases should be checked regularly, and continuous positive airway pressure or endotracheal intubation with ventilatory support may be required. Non-invasive ventilation should be considered as early as possible in every patient with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Intubation and mechanical ventilation should be restricted to patients in whom oxygenation is not adequate by oxygen mask or non-invasive ventilation and to patients with respiratory exhaustion as assessed by hypercapnia.115

Unless the patient is hypotensive, i.v. nitroglycerine should be given, starting with 0.25 µg/kg/min, and increasing every 5 min until a fall in systolic blood pressure of ≥30 mmHg is observed or until the systolic blood pressure falls to <90 mmHg. Inotropic agents may be of value if there is hypotension. Dopamine is preferred when the blood pressure is very low in a dosage of 5–15 µg/kg/min. If signs of renal hypoperfusion are present, dopamine in a dosage <3.0 µg/kg/min may be considered. Evidence from clinical trials is limited (Table 15).

Pulmonary artery catheterization may be considered in patients not responding to treatment.

Patients with acute heart failure may have stunned (reperfused but with delayed contractile recovery) or hypoperfused, viable myocardium. Identification of viable myocardium followed by revascularization can lead to improved LV function.

Cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock is a clinical state of hypoperfusion characterized by a systolic pressure <90 mmHg and a central filling pressure (wedge pressure) >20 mmHg, or a cardiac index <1.8 L/min/m2 and caused by extensive loss of viable myocardial tissue. Shock is also considered present if i.v. inotropes and/or an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) are needed to maintain a systolic blood pressure >90 mmHg and a cardiac index of >1.8 L/min/m2.

The diagnosis of cardiogenic shock should be made when other causes of hypotension have been excluded, such as hypovolaemia, vasovagal reactions, electrolyte disturbances, pharmacological side effects, tamponade, or arrhythmias. It is usually associated with extensive LV damage, but may occur in right ventricular infarction (see above). LV function and associated mechanical complications should be evaluated urgently by two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography. Haemodynamic assessment with a balloon floating catheter should be considered. A filling pressure (pulmonary wedge) of at least 15 mmHg should be aimed for, with a cardiac index of >2 L/kg/min. In some cases of cardiogenic shock, inotropic agents may stabilize patients at risk of progressive haemodynamic collapse or serve as a life-sustaining bridge to more definitive therapy. Dopamine <3 µg/kg/min may be given to improve renal function. Dopamine at higher doses or dobutamine 5–20 µg/kg/min may be given to improve or stabilize the haemodynamic state.

Supportive treatment with a balloon pump is recommended as a bridge to mechanical interventions.

Emergency PCI or surgery may be life-saving and should be considered at an early stage.43,116 If neither of these are available or can only be provided after a long delay, fibrinolytic therapy should be given.

LV assist devices have been used in patients not responding to standard treatment including IABP and as a bridge to transplantation but the experience is limited.117–119

Mechanical complications: cardiac rupture and mitral regurgitation

Cardiac rupture

Acute free wall rupture

This is characterized by cardiovascular collapse with electromechanical dissociation, i.e. continuing electrical activity with a loss of cardiac output and pulse. It is usually fatal within a few minutes, and does not respond to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Only very rarely is there time to bring the patient to surgery.

Subacute free wall rupture

In ∼25% of cases the presentation is subacute (thrombus or adhesions seal the rupture), giving time for intervention. The clinical picture may simulate reinfarction because of the recurrence of pain and re-elevation of ST-segments, but more frequently there is sudden haemodynamic deterioration with transient or sustained hypotension. The classical signs of cardiac tamponade occur and can be confirmed by echocardiography. Although echocardiography is not always able to show the site of rupture, it can demonstrate pericardial fluid with or without signs of tamponade. The presence of pericardial fluid alone is not sufficient to diagnose a subacute free wall rupture, because it is relatively common after acute myocardial infarction. The typical finding is an echo-dense mass in the pericardial space consistent with clot (haemopericardium). Immediate surgery should be considered.

Ventricular septal rupture

The diagnosis of ventricular septal rupture, first suspected because of sudden severe clinical deterioration, is confirmed by the occurrence of a loud systolic murmur, by echocardiography and/or by detecting an oxygen step-up in the right ventricle. Echocardiography reveals the location and size of the ventricular septal defect; the left-to-right shunt can be depicted by colour Doppler and further quantified by pulsed Doppler technique. Pharmacological treatment with vasodilators, such as i.v. nitroglycerine, may produce some improvement if there is no cardiogenic shock, but intra-aortic balloon counter pulsation is the most effective method of providing circulatory support while preparing for surgery. Urgent surgery offers the only chance of survival for large post-infarction ventricular septal defect with cardiogenic shock.120,121 Even if there is no haemodynamic instability, early surgery is usually indicated, also because the defect may increase.122 However, there is still no consensus on the optimal timing of surgery as early surgical repair is difficult because of friable necrotic tissue. Successful percutaneous closure of the defect has been reported, but more experience is needed before it can be recommended.

Mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation is common and it occurs usually after 2–7 days. There are three mechanisms of acute mitral regurgitation in this setting: (i) mitral valve annulus dilatation due to LV dilatation and dysfunction; (ii) papillary muscle dysfunction usually due to inferior myocardial infarction; and (iii) rupture of the trunk or tip of the papillary muscle. In most patients, acute mitral regurgitation is secondary to papillary muscle dysfunction rather than rupture. The most frequent cause of partial or total papillary muscle rupture is a small infarct of the posteromedial papillary muscle in the right or circumflex coronary artery distribution.123 Papillary muscle rupture typically presents as a sudden haemodynamic deterioration. Due to the abrupt and severe elevation of left atrial pressure, the murmur is often of low intensity. Chest radiography shows pulmonary congestion (this may be unilateral). The presence and severity of mitral regurgitation are best assessed by colour Doppler-echocardiography. Initially, a hyperdynamic left ventricle can be found. The left atrium is usually of normal size or slightly enlarged. In some patients, transoesophageal echocardiography may be necessary to establish the diagnosis clearly. A pulmonary artery catheter can be used to guide patient management; the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure tracing may show large V-waves.

Most patients with acute mitral regurgitation should be operated early because they may deteriorate suddenly. Cardiogenic shock and pulmonary oedema with severe mitral regurgitation require emergency surgery. Most patients need IABP placement during preparation for coronary angiography and surgery.

Valve replacement is the procedure of choice for rupture of the papillary muscle, although repair can be attempted in selected cases.124

Arrhythmias and conduction disturbances in the acute phase

A life-threatening arrhythmia, such as ventricular tachycardia (VT), VF, and total atrio-ventricular (AV) block, may be the first manifestation of ischaemia and requires immediate correction. These arrhythmias may cause many of the reported sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) in patients with acute ischaemic syndromes. VF or sustained VT has been reported in up to 20% of patients who present with STEMI.125

The mechanisms of arrhythmias during acute ischaemia may be different from those seen in chronic stable ischaemic heart disease. Often arrhythmias are a manifestation of a serious underlying disorder, such as continuing ischaemia, pump failure, or endogenous factors such as abnormal potassium levels, autonomic imbalances, hypoxia, and acid–base disturbances, that may require corrective measures. The necessity for arrhythmia treatment and its urgency depend mainly upon the haemodynamic consequences of the rhythm disorder. Recommendations are given in Tables 16 and 17.

Ventricular arrhythmias

The incidence of VF occurring within 48 h of the onset of STEMI may be decreasing owing to increased use of reperfusion treatment and β-blockers.126 VF occurring early after STEMI has been associated with an increase in in-hospital mortality, but not with increased long-term mortality. The major determinants of risk of sudden death are related more to the severity of the cardiac disease and less to the frequency or classification of ventricular arrhythmias.127,128

Use of prophylactic β-blockers in the setting of STEMI reduces the incidence of VF.129 Similarly, correction of hypomagnesaemia and hypokalaemia is encouraged because of the potential contribution of electrolyte disturbances to VF. Prophylaxis with lidocaine may reduce the incidence of VF but appears to be associated with increased mortality probably owing to bradycardia and asystole, and has therefore been abandoned. In general, treatment is indicated to prevent potential morbidity or reduce the risk of sudden death. There is no reason to treat asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in the absence of such potential benefit.

Ventricular ectopic rhythms

Ventricular ectopic beats are common during the initial phase. Irrespective of their complexity (multiform QRS complex beats, short runs of ventricular beats, or the R-on-T phenomenon) their value as predictors of VF is questionable. No specific therapy is required.15

Table 15

Treatment of pump failure and cardiogenic shock

Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Treatment of mild heart failure (Killip class II)   
O2 
Loop diuretics, i.e. furosemide: 20–40 mg i.v. repeated at 1–4 hourly intervals if necessary 
Nitrates if no hypotension 
ACE‐inhibitor in the absence of hypotension, hypovolaemia or renal failure 
ARB (valsartan) if ACE‐inhibitor is not tolerated 

 
Treatment of severe heart failure (Killip class III)   
O2 
Ventilatory support according to blood gasses 
Furosemide: see above 
Nitrates if no hypotension 
Inotropic agents: dopamine IIb 
 and/or dobutamine IIa 
Haemodynamic assessment with balloon floating catheter IIb 
Early revascularization 

 
Treatment of shock (Killip class IV)   
O2 
Mechanical ventilatory support according to blood gasses 
Haemodynamic assessment with balloon floating catheter IIb 
Inotropic agents: dopamine IIb 
 and dobutamine IIa 
Intra-aortic balloon pump 
LV assist devices IIa 
Early revascularization 
Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Treatment of mild heart failure (Killip class II)   
O2 
Loop diuretics, i.e. furosemide: 20–40 mg i.v. repeated at 1–4 hourly intervals if necessary 
Nitrates if no hypotension 
ACE‐inhibitor in the absence of hypotension, hypovolaemia or renal failure 
ARB (valsartan) if ACE‐inhibitor is not tolerated 

 
Treatment of severe heart failure (Killip class III)   
O2 
Ventilatory support according to blood gasses 
Furosemide: see above 
Nitrates if no hypotension 
Inotropic agents: dopamine IIb 
 and/or dobutamine IIa 
Haemodynamic assessment with balloon floating catheter IIb 
Early revascularization 

 
Treatment of shock (Killip class IV)   
O2 
Mechanical ventilatory support according to blood gasses 
Haemodynamic assessment with balloon floating catheter IIb 
Inotropic agents: dopamine IIb 
 and dobutamine IIa 
Intra-aortic balloon pump 
LV assist devices IIa 
Early revascularization 

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

Ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation

Neither non-sustained VT (lasting <30 s) nor accelerated idioventricular rhythm (usually a harmless consequence of reperfusion with a ventricular rate <120 bpm) occurring in the setting of STEMI serves as a reliably predictive marker of early VF. As such, these arrhythmias do not require prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy. Sustained and/or haemodynamically compromising VT (occurring in ∼3%) requires suppressive therapy, summarized in Table 16 and outlined in the guidelines for ventricular arrhythmias.130 Pulseless VT and VF should be managed according to the resuscitation guidelines.22 Prophylactic drug infusion with amiodarone plus a β-blocker may be continued after resuscitation.

Table 16

Management of arrhythmias and conduction disturbances in the acute phase

Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Haemodynamically unstable VT and VF   
DC cardioversion 

 
Haemodynamically unstable, sustained monomorphic VT refractory to DC cardioversion   
I.v. amiodarone IIa 
I.v. lidocaine or sotalol* IIa 
Transvenous catheter pace termination if refractory to cardioversion or frequently recurrent despite antiarrhythmic medication IIa 

 
Repetitive symptomatic salvoes of non-sustained monomorphic VT   
I.v. amiodarone, sotalol* or other β‐blocker* IIa 

 
Polymorphic VT   
If baseline QT is normal   
 I.v. sotalol* or other β‐blocker*, amiodarone or lidocaine 
If baseline QT is prolonged   
 Correct electrolytes, consider magnesium, overdrive pacing, isoproterenol, or lidocaine 
 Urgent angiography should be considered 

 
Rate control of atrial fibrillation   
I.v. β-blockers or non-dihydropyridine, calcium antagonists (e.g. diltiazem, verapamil)#. If no clinical signs of heart failure, bronchospasm (only for β-blockers), or AV block 
I.v. amiodarone to slow a rapid ventricular response and improve LV function 
I.v. digitalis if severe LV dysfunction and/or heart failure IIb 
Electrical cardioversion if severe haemodynamic compromise or intractable ischaemia, or when adequate rate control cannot be achieved with pharmacological agents 

 
Anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation   
I.v. administration of a therapeutic dose of heparin or a LMWH 

 
Sinus bradycardia associated with hypotension   
I.v. atropine 
Temporary pacing if failed response to atropine 

 
AV block II (Mobitz 2) or AV block III with bradycardia that causes hypotension or heart failure   
I.v. atropine 
Temporary pacing if atropine fails 
Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Haemodynamically unstable VT and VF   
DC cardioversion 

 
Haemodynamically unstable, sustained monomorphic VT refractory to DC cardioversion   
I.v. amiodarone IIa 
I.v. lidocaine or sotalol* IIa 
Transvenous catheter pace termination if refractory to cardioversion or frequently recurrent despite antiarrhythmic medication IIa 

 
Repetitive symptomatic salvoes of non-sustained monomorphic VT   
I.v. amiodarone, sotalol* or other β‐blocker* IIa 

 
Polymorphic VT   
If baseline QT is normal   
 I.v. sotalol* or other β‐blocker*, amiodarone or lidocaine 
If baseline QT is prolonged   
 Correct electrolytes, consider magnesium, overdrive pacing, isoproterenol, or lidocaine 
 Urgent angiography should be considered 

 
Rate control of atrial fibrillation   
I.v. β-blockers or non-dihydropyridine, calcium antagonists (e.g. diltiazem, verapamil)#. If no clinical signs of heart failure, bronchospasm (only for β-blockers), or AV block 
I.v. amiodarone to slow a rapid ventricular response and improve LV function 
I.v. digitalis if severe LV dysfunction and/or heart failure IIb 
Electrical cardioversion if severe haemodynamic compromise or intractable ischaemia, or when adequate rate control cannot be achieved with pharmacological agents 

 
Anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation   
I.v. administration of a therapeutic dose of heparin or a LMWH 

 
Sinus bradycardia associated with hypotension   
I.v. atropine 
Temporary pacing if failed response to atropine 

 
AV block II (Mobitz 2) or AV block III with bradycardia that causes hypotension or heart failure   
I.v. atropine 
Temporary pacing if atropine fails 

Recommended doses of antiarrhythmic agents are given in Table 17.

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

*I.v. sotalol or other β‐blockers should not be given if EF is low.

#These calcium antagonists should be used cautiously or avoided in patients with heart failure because of their negative inotropic effects.

AV = atrio-ventricular; DC = direct current; i.v. = intravenous; LMWH = low-molecular-weight heparin; LV = left ventricular; VT = ventricular tachycardia.

Supraventricular arrhythmias

Atrial fibrillation (AF), which complicates 10–20% of STEMIs, is more prevalent in older patients and in those with severe LV damage and heart failure. Stroke rates are higher in patients with STEMI and AF compared with those without AF. AF is associated with increased in-hospital mortality.131 Specific recommendations for management of patients with AF in the setting of STEMI are based primarily on consensus.132

In many cases the arrhythmia is well tolerated and no treatment is required. In other instances, the fast rate contributes to heart failure and prompt treatment is needed (Table 16). Class IC antiarrhythmic drugs should not be used. Administration of an anticoagulant is indicated if the patient is not already on such therapy.

Other supraventricular tachycardias are rare and usually self-limited. They may respond to carotid sinus pressure. β-Blockers may be effective, if not contraindicated. I.v. adenosine may be considered if the haemodynamic status is stable; the ECG should be monitored during administration.

Sinus bradycardia and heart block

Sinus bradycardia

Sinus bradycardia is common (9–25%) in the first hour, especially in inferior infarction.133 In some cases, opioids are responsible. If associated with hemodynamic compromise it should be treated (Table 16)171819202122.

Table 17

Intravenous doses of recommended antiarrhythmic/antibradycardia medications

Drug Bolus Maintenance infusion 
Amiodarone 150 mg over 10 min. Supplemental boluses of 150 mg may be given over 10–30 min for recurrent arrhythmias, but limited to 6–8 supplemental boluses in any 24-h period 1 mg/min for 6 h and then 0.5 mg/min may be necessary after initial bolus dose 
Esmolol 500 µg/kg over 1 min, followed by 50 µg/kg/min over 4 min 60–200 µg/kg/min 
Metoprolol 2.5–5 mg over 2 min; up to three doses – 
Atenolol 5–10 mg (1 mg/min) – 
Propranolol 0.15 mg/kg – 
Digoxin 0.25 mg each 2 h, up to 1.5 mg – 
Lidocaine 0.5–0.75 mg/kg – 
Sotalol 20–120 mg over 10 min (0.5–1.5 mg/kg). May be repeated after 6 h (maximum 640 mg/24 h) – 
Verapamil 0.075–0.15 mg/kg over 2 min – 
Diltiazem 0.25 mg/kg over 2 min – 
Atropine Rapid bolus of at least 0.5 mg, repeated up to a total dose of 1.5–2.0 mg (0.04 mg/kg) – 
Isoproterenol 0.05–0.1 µg/kg/min, up to 2 µg/kg/min. Dosage adjusted to heart rate and rhythm – 
Drug Bolus Maintenance infusion 
Amiodarone 150 mg over 10 min. Supplemental boluses of 150 mg may be given over 10–30 min for recurrent arrhythmias, but limited to 6–8 supplemental boluses in any 24-h period 1 mg/min for 6 h and then 0.5 mg/min may be necessary after initial bolus dose 
Esmolol 500 µg/kg over 1 min, followed by 50 µg/kg/min over 4 min 60–200 µg/kg/min 
Metoprolol 2.5–5 mg over 2 min; up to three doses – 
Atenolol 5–10 mg (1 mg/min) – 
Propranolol 0.15 mg/kg – 
Digoxin 0.25 mg each 2 h, up to 1.5 mg – 
Lidocaine 0.5–0.75 mg/kg – 
Sotalol 20–120 mg over 10 min (0.5–1.5 mg/kg). May be repeated after 6 h (maximum 640 mg/24 h) – 
Verapamil 0.075–0.15 mg/kg over 2 min – 
Diltiazem 0.25 mg/kg over 2 min – 
Atropine Rapid bolus of at least 0.5 mg, repeated up to a total dose of 1.5–2.0 mg (0.04 mg/kg) – 
Isoproterenol 0.05–0.1 µg/kg/min, up to 2 µg/kg/min. Dosage adjusted to heart rate and rhythm – 
Table 18

Routine prophylactic therapies in the acute phase of STEMI

Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Aspirin: maintenance dose of 75–100 mg 
Clopidogrel: maintenance dose of 75 mg 
Non-selective and selective COX-2 agents III 
I.v. β-blocker IIb 
Oral β-blocker 
ACE‐inhibitor: oral formulation on first day   
 for all patients in whom it is not contraindicated IIa 
 for high-risk patients 
Nitrates IIb 
Calcium antagonists III 
Magnesium III 
Lidocaine III 
Glucose–insulin–potassium infusion III 
Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Aspirin: maintenance dose of 75–100 mg 
Clopidogrel: maintenance dose of 75 mg 
Non-selective and selective COX-2 agents III 
I.v. β-blocker IIb 
Oral β-blocker 
ACE‐inhibitor: oral formulation on first day   
 for all patients in whom it is not contraindicated IIa 
 for high-risk patients 
Nitrates IIb 
Calcium antagonists III 
Magnesium III 
Lidocaine III 
Glucose–insulin–potassium infusion III 

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

Table 19

Dosages of inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system in trials after myocardial infarction

 Initial dosage Target dosage 
GISSI-3143 lisinopril 5 mg initially Up to 10 mg daily 
ISIS-4144 captopril 6.25 mg initially, 12.5 mg in 2 h, 25 mg at 10–12 h Up to 50 mg b.i.d. 
CHINESE146 captopril 6.25 mg initially, 12.5 mg 2 h later if tolerated Up to 12.5 mg t.i.d. 
SMILE214 zofenopril 7.5 mg initially, repeated after 12 h and repeatedly doubled if tolerated Up to 30 mg b.i.d. 
AIRE213 ramipril 2.5 mg b.i.d. increased to 5 mg b.i.d. if tolerated Up to 5 mg b.i.d. 
SAVE212 captopril Test of 6.25 mg, increased if tolerated to 25 mg t.i.d. Up to 50 mg t.i.d. 
TRACE215 trandolapril Test of 0.5 mg Up to 4 mg daily 
VALIANT221 valsartan 20 mg initially uptitrated in four steps Up to 160 mg b.i.d. 
OPTIMAAL220 losartan 12.5 mg Up to 50 mg daily 
EPHESUS222 eplerone 25 mg intially Up to 50 mg daily 
 Initial dosage Target dosage 
GISSI-3143 lisinopril 5 mg initially Up to 10 mg daily 
ISIS-4144 captopril 6.25 mg initially, 12.5 mg in 2 h, 25 mg at 10–12 h Up to 50 mg b.i.d. 
CHINESE146 captopril 6.25 mg initially, 12.5 mg 2 h later if tolerated Up to 12.5 mg t.i.d. 
SMILE214 zofenopril 7.5 mg initially, repeated after 12 h and repeatedly doubled if tolerated Up to 30 mg b.i.d. 
AIRE213 ramipril 2.5 mg b.i.d. increased to 5 mg b.i.d. if tolerated Up to 5 mg b.i.d. 
SAVE212 captopril Test of 6.25 mg, increased if tolerated to 25 mg t.i.d. Up to 50 mg t.i.d. 
TRACE215 trandolapril Test of 0.5 mg Up to 4 mg daily 
VALIANT221 valsartan 20 mg initially uptitrated in four steps Up to 160 mg b.i.d. 
OPTIMAAL220 losartan 12.5 mg Up to 50 mg daily 
EPHESUS222 eplerone 25 mg intially Up to 50 mg daily 

b.i.d = twice daily; t.i.d = three times daily.

Table 20

Imaging modalities: timing and usefulness

 At presentation Within 48 h Before or after discharge 
Echo at rest If required for diagnosis For LV function and presence of thrombus For LV function, heart failure, shock, or new murmur 
Stress ECG   For ischaemia 
Stress perfusion SPECT   For viability and ischaemia, infarct size 
Stress echo   For viability and ischaemia 
PET (rest)   For viability 
MRI (rest, stress, contrast-enhanced)   For LV function, infarct size, viability, and ischaemia 
 At presentation Within 48 h Before or after discharge 
Echo at rest If required for diagnosis For LV function and presence of thrombus For LV function, heart failure, shock, or new murmur 
Stress ECG   For ischaemia 
Stress perfusion SPECT   For viability and ischaemia, infarct size 
Stress echo   For viability and ischaemia 
PET (rest)   For viability 
MRI (rest, stress, contrast-enhanced)   For LV function, infarct size, viability, and ischaemia 

Echo = transthoracic echocardiography or transoesophageal if required; LV = left ventricular; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PET = positron emission tomography; SPECT = single‐photon emission computed tomography.

Table 21

Long-term medical treatment after STEMI

Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Antiplatelets/anticoagulants   
Aspirin for ever (75–100 mg daily) in all patients without allergy 
Clopidogrel (75 mg daily) for 12 months in all patients irrespective of the acute treatment IIa 
Clopidogrel (75 mg daily) in all patients with contraindication to aspirin 
Oral anticoagulant at INR 2–3 in patients who do not tolerate aspirin and clopidogrel IIa 
Oral anticoagulant at recommended INR when clinically indicated (e.g. atrial fibrillation, LV thrombus, mechanical valve) 
Oral anticoagulant (at INR 2–3) in addition to low‐dose aspirin (75–100 mg) in patients at high risk of thromboembolic events IIa 
Oral anticoagulant in addition to aspirin and clopidogrel (recent stent placement plus indication for oral anticoagulation)c IIb 
Oral anticoagulant in addition to clopidogrel or aspirin (recent stent placement plus indication for oral anticoagulation and increased risk of bleeding) IIb 

 
β-Blockers   
Oral β-blockers in all patients who tolerate these medications and without contraindications, regardless of blood pressure or LV function 

 
ACE‐inhibitor and ARB   
ACE‐inhibitor should be considered in all patients without contraindications, regardless of blood pressure or LV function IIa 
ARB in all patients without contraindications who do not tolerate ACE‐inhibitors, regardless of blood pressure or LV function IIa 

 
Statins   
Statins in all patients, in the absence of contraindications, irrespective of cholesterol levels, initiated as soon as possible to achieve LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dL (2.5 mmol/L) (see also Table 22

 
Influenza immunization 
In all patients 
Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Antiplatelets/anticoagulants   
Aspirin for ever (75–100 mg daily) in all patients without allergy 
Clopidogrel (75 mg daily) for 12 months in all patients irrespective of the acute treatment IIa 
Clopidogrel (75 mg daily) in all patients with contraindication to aspirin 
Oral anticoagulant at INR 2–3 in patients who do not tolerate aspirin and clopidogrel IIa 
Oral anticoagulant at recommended INR when clinically indicated (e.g. atrial fibrillation, LV thrombus, mechanical valve) 
Oral anticoagulant (at INR 2–3) in addition to low‐dose aspirin (75–100 mg) in patients at high risk of thromboembolic events IIa 
Oral anticoagulant in addition to aspirin and clopidogrel (recent stent placement plus indication for oral anticoagulation)c IIb 
Oral anticoagulant in addition to clopidogrel or aspirin (recent stent placement plus indication for oral anticoagulation and increased risk of bleeding) IIb 

 
β-Blockers   
Oral β-blockers in all patients who tolerate these medications and without contraindications, regardless of blood pressure or LV function 

 
ACE‐inhibitor and ARB   
ACE‐inhibitor should be considered in all patients without contraindications, regardless of blood pressure or LV function IIa 
ARB in all patients without contraindications who do not tolerate ACE‐inhibitors, regardless of blood pressure or LV function IIa 

 
Statins   
Statins in all patients, in the absence of contraindications, irrespective of cholesterol levels, initiated as soon as possible to achieve LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dL (2.5 mmol/L) (see also Table 22

 
Influenza immunization 
In all patients 

aClass of recommendation.

b Level of evidence.

cIf long-term oral anticoagulation is required, use of a bare metal stent rather than a drug-eluting stent will expose the patient to a shorter duration of triple therapy and hence a lower bleeding risk.

Table 22

Long-term management of specific coronary risk factors and LV dysfunction

Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Smoking cessation   
Assess smoking status and advise to quit and to avoid passive smoking at each visit 
Bupropione and nicotine treatment in patients who keep smoking at follow-up 
Antidepressants IIa 

 
Physical activity   
Exercise test-guided moderate intensity aerobic exercise at least five times per week 
Medically supervised rehabilitation programmes for high‐risk patients 

 
Diabetes management   
Lifestyle changes and pharmacotherapy to achieve HbA1c <6.5% 
Intensive modification of other risk factors (hypertension, obesity, dyslipidaemia) 
Coordination with a physician specialized in diabetes 

 
Diet and weight reduction   
Weight reduction is recommended when BMI is ≥30 kg/m2 and when waist circumference is >102/88 cm (men/women) 
Diet based on low intake of salt and saturated fats, and regular intake of fruit, vegetables, and fish 
Increased consumption of omega-3 fatty acid (oily fish) IIb 
Supplementation with 1 g of fish oil in patients with a low intake of oily fish IIa 
Moderate alcohol consumption should not be discouraged 

 
Blood pressure control   
Lifestyle changes and pharmacotherapy to achieve BP <130/80 mmHg 

 
Lipid management   
Statins in all patients, in the absence of contraindications, irrespective of cholesterol levels, initiated as soon as possible to achieve LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dL (2.5 mmol/L) 
Further reduction of LDL cholesterol to achieve <80 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) should be considered in high‐risk patients IIa 
Lifestyle change emphasized if TG >150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) and/or HDL cholesterol <40 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L) 
Fibrates and omega-3 supplements should be considered in patients who do not tolerate statins, especially if TG >150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) and/or HDL cholesterol <40 mg/ dL (1.0 mmol/L) IIa 

 
Management of heart failure or LV dysfunction   
Oral β-blockers in all patients without contraindications 
ACE‐inhibitors in all patients without contraindications 
ARB (valsartan) in all patients without contraindications who do not tolerate ACE‐inhibitors 
Aldosterone antagonists if EF ≤40% and signs of heart failure or diabetes if creatinine is <2.5 mg/dL in men and <2.0 mg/dL in women and potassium is <5.0 mmol/L 
CRT in patients with EF ≤35% and QRS duration of ≥120 ms who remain in NYHA class III–VI in spite of optimal medical therapy if stunning can be excluded 

 
Prevention of sudden death 
ICD if EF ≤30–40% and NYHA ≥II or III at least 40 days after STEMI 
ICD if EF ≤30–35% and NYHA I at least 40 days after STEMI IIa 
Recommendations Classa Levelb 
Smoking cessation   
Assess smoking status and advise to quit and to avoid passive smoking at each visit 
Bupropione and nicotine treatment in patients who keep smoking at follow-up 
Antidepressants IIa 

 
Physical activity   
Exercise test-guided moderate intensity aerobic exercise at least five times per week 
Medically supervised rehabilitation programmes for high‐risk patients 

 
Diabetes management   
Lifestyle changes and pharmacotherapy to achieve HbA1c <6.5% 
Intensive modification of other risk factors (hypertension, obesity, dyslipidaemia) 
Coordination with a physician specialized in diabetes 

 
Diet and weight reduction   
Weight reduction is recommended when BMI is ≥30 kg/m2 and when waist circumference is >102/88 cm (men/women) 
Diet based on low intake of salt and saturated fats, and regular intake of fruit, vegetables, and fish 
Increased consumption of omega-3 fatty acid (oily fish) IIb 
Supplementation with 1 g of fish oil in patients with a low intake of oily fish IIa 
Moderate alcohol consumption should not be discouraged 

 
Blood pressure control   
Lifestyle changes and pharmacotherapy to achieve BP <130/80 mmHg 

 
Lipid management   
Statins in all patients, in the absence of contraindications, irrespective of cholesterol levels, initiated as soon as possible to achieve LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dL (2.5 mmol/L) 
Further reduction of LDL cholesterol to achieve <80 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) should be considered in high‐risk patients IIa 
Lifestyle change emphasized if TG >150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) and/or HDL cholesterol <40 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L) 
Fibrates and omega-3 supplements should be considered in patients who do not tolerate statins, especially if TG >150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L) and/or HDL cholesterol <40 mg/ dL (1.0 mmol/L) IIa 

 
Management of heart failure or LV dysfunction   
Oral β-blockers in all patients without contraindications 
ACE‐inhibitors in all patients without contraindications 
ARB (valsartan) in all patients without contraindications who do not tolerate ACE‐inhibitors 
Aldosterone antagonists if EF ≤40% and signs of heart failure or diabetes if creatinine is <2.5 mg/dL in men and <2.0 mg/dL in women and potassium is <5.0 mmol/L 
CRT in patients with EF ≤35% and QRS duration of ≥120 ms who remain in NYHA class III–VI in spite of optimal medical therapy if stunning can be excluded 

 
Prevention of sudden death 
ICD if EF ≤30–40% and NYHA ≥II or III at least 40 days after STEMI 
ICD if EF ≤30–35% and NYHA I at least 40 days after STEMI IIa 

aClass of recommendation.

bLevel of evidence.

TG = triglyceride.

AV block

Data from four large, randomized trials suggest that AV block occurs in almost 7%134 and persistent bundle-branch block in up to 5.3% of cases of STEMI.135 Patients with peri-infarction AV block have a higher in-hospital and late mortality than those with preserved AV conduction.134 The increased mortality is related to the extensive myocardial damage required to develop heart block rather than to the heart block itself.

While pacing has not been shown to increase long-term survival, it may still be indicated in symptomatic bradyarrhythmias associated with STEMI.136

First-degree AV block needs no treatment. AV block associated with inferior wall infarction is usually transient, with a narrow QRS escape rhythm above 40 bpm and low mortality, whereas AV block related to anterior wall infarction is more often located below the AV node and associated with an unstable, wide QRS escape rhythm due to the extensive myocardial necrosis.

A new left bundle-branch block usually indicates extensive anterior infarction with a high likelihood for developing complete AV block and pump failure. The preventive placement of a temporary pacing electrode may be warranted. The subclavian route should be avoided following fibrinolysis or in the presence of antithrombin therapy.

Recommendations for permanent cardiac pacing for persistent conduction disturbances (≥14 days) due to STEMI are outlined in the ESC Guidelines for cardiac pacing.137

Routine prophylactic therapies in the acute phase

Recommendations are summarized in Table 18.

Antithrombotic agents: aspirin, clopidogrel, and antithrombins

See reperfusion treatments (Table 5).

Antiarrhythmic drugs

Routine prophylactic use is not justified.

β-Blockers

The benefit of long-term β-blockers after STEMI is well established (see below); the role of routine early i.v. administration is less firmly established. Two randomized trials of i.v. β-blockade in patients receiving fibrinolysis138,139 were too small to allow conclusions to be drawn. A post hoc analysis of the use of atenolol in the GUSTO-I trial and a systematic review did not support the routine early i.v. use of β-blockers.140,141

In the COMMIT CCS 2 trial, i.v. metoprolol followed by oral administration until discharge or up to 4 weeks in 45 852 patients with suspected infarction142 did not improve survival when compared with placebo. Fewer patients had reinfarction or VF with metoprolol, but this was counterbalanced by a significant increase in cardiogenic shock. Early i.v. use of β-blockers is clearly contraindicated in patients with clinical signs of hypotension or congestive heart failure. Early use may be associated with a modest benefit in low-risk, haemodynamically stable patients. In most patients, however, it is prudent to wait for the patient to stabilize before starting an oral β-blocker.

Nitrates

The GISSI-3143 trial tested a strategy of routine transdermal use of nitrates vs. selected administration because of ongoing ischaemia in 19 394 patients. No significant reduction in mortality was observed with the routine administration. The ISIS-4 trial,144 in which oral mononitrate was administered acutely and continued for 1 month, also failed to show a benefit. The routine use of nitrates in the initial phase of a STEMI has not been shown convincingly to be of value and is, therefore, not recommended.

Calcium antagonists

A meta-analysis of trials involving calcium antagonists early in the course of a STEMI showed a non-significant adverse trend.145 There is no case for using calcium antagonists for prophylactic purposes in the acute phase.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers

It is now well established that ACE‐inhibitors should be given to patients who have an impaired ejection fraction (EF; ≤40%) or who have experienced heart failure in the early phase. The GISSI-3,143 ISIS-4,144 and the Chinese Study146 have shown that ACE‐inhibitors started on the first day reduce mortality in the succeeding 4–6 weeks by a small but significant amount. A systematic overview of trials of ACE‐inhibition early in STEMI indicated that this therapy is safe, well tolerated, and associated with a small but significant reduction in 30-day mortality, with most of the benefit observed in the first week.144 ACE‐inhibitors should be started in the first 24 h if no contraindications are present.147 Opinions still differ as to whether to give ACE‐inhibitors to all patients or to high-risk patients only. Patients who do not tolerate an ACE‐inhibitor should be given an ARB (see Section H). Dosages are given in Table 19.

Magnesium

The large ISIS-4 trial144 does not support the use of magnesium, although it has been argued that the magnesium regimen was not optimal. The large MAGIC trial confirmed that there is no indication for the routine administration of i.v. magnesium in patients with STEMI.148

Glucose–insulin–potassium

Although smaller studies have shown a favourable effect on the metabolism of the ischaemic myocardium, a high-dose glucose–insulin–potassium infusion had a neutral effect on mortality, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock in >20 000 patients studied in the CREATE-ECLA trial.94 Therefore, there is no indication for this therapy in STEMI.

Management of specific types of infarction

Right ventricular infarction

The recognition of right ventricular infarction is important because it may manifest itself as cardiogenic shock, but the appropriate treatment strategy is quite different from that for shock due to severe LV dysfunction.

Right ventricular infarction may be suspected by the specific, but insensitive, clinical triad of hypotension, clear lung fields, and raised jugular venous pressure in a patient with inferior STEMI. ST-segment elevation in V4R is very suggestive of the diagnosis; this lead should certainly be recorded in all cases of inferior STEMI and shock, if not done as a routine. Q-waves and ST-segment elevation in V1–3 also suggest right ventricular infarction. Echocardiography may confirm the diagnosis. Various degrees of right ventricular involvement in inferior STEMI can be found.

When right ventricular infarction can be implicated in hypotension or shock, it is important to maintain right ventricular preload. It is desirable to avoid (if possible) vasodilator drugs such as the opioids, nitrates, diuretics, and ACE-inhibitors/ARBs. I.v. fluid loading is effective in many cases: initially, it should be administered rapidly. Careful haemodynamic monitoring is required during i.v. fluid loading. Right ventricular infarction is often complicated by AF. This should be corrected promptly as the atrial contribution to right ventricular filling is important in this context. Likewise, if heart block develops, dual chamber pacing should be undertaken. Direct PCI should be performed as soon as possible as it may result in rapid haemodynamic improvement.149 There has been some question of the effectiveness of fibrinolytic therapy in right ventricular infarction,150 but it certainly seems appropriate in the hypotensive patient if PCI is not available.

Myocardial infarction in diabetic patients

Up to 20% of all patients with an infarction have diabetes, and this figure is expected to increase.151–153 Importantly, patients with diabetes may present with atypical symptoms, and heart failure is a common complication. Diabetic patients who sustain a STEMI still have doubled mortality compared with non-diabetic patients.154,155 Despite this, patients with diabetes do not receive the same extensive treatment as non-diabetic patients. This has been shown to be associated with poorer outcome, and is presumably triggered by fear of treatment-related complications.156,157 Fibrinolysis should not be withheld in patients with diabetes when indicated, even in the presence of retinopathy.158 Furthermore, treatment with statins, β-blockers, and ACE‐inhibitors seems to be at least as effective and safe in diabetic patients as in non-diabetic patients.157,159–161

Deterioration of the glucometabolic state of diabetic patients at the time of admission for an acute coronary event, reflecting an acute stress response to sudden impairment of LV function, appears to have an effect on outcome. Higher glucose levels on admission are indeed associated with increased mortality rates in diabetic patients presenting with STEMI.162,163 Strict attention to the glycaemic control by use of insulin infusion followed by multiple-dose insulin treatment has been shown to reduce long-term mortality as compared with routine oral antidiabetic therapy in diabetic patients.164–166 In the more recent DIGAMI-2 study (n = 1253 patients), however, mortality did not differ significantly between diabetic patients randomized to either acute insulin infusion followed by insulin-based long-term glucose control, insulin infusion followed by standard glucose control, or standard glucometabolic management, probably reflecting a lack of difference in glucose control among the three groups,167 Because hyperglycaemia remained one of the most important predictors of outcome in this study, however, it appears to be reasonable to keep glucose levels within normal ranges in diabetic patients. Target glucose levels between 90 and 140 mg/dL (5 and 7.8 mmol/L) have been suggested.168 Care needs to be taken to avoid blood glucose levels below 80–90 mg/dL (4.4–5 mmol/L), however, as hypoglycaemia-induced ischaemia might also affect outcome in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes.169

Patients with renal dysfunction

The 2-year mortality rate among STEMI patients with end-stage renal disease (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min) is much higher than in the general population,170 which might be explained on the one hand by a higher proportion of cardiovascular risk factors and on the other hand by the fact that acute reperfusion strategies are offered to these patients less frequently because of fear of higher bleeding rates and contrast medium-induced renal failure.171,172

Although recommendations for STEMI patients with renal dysfunction are essentially the same as for patients without renal disease, the risk of a further detoriation of renal function must be taken into account when administering contrast dye during primary PCI and prescribing drugs such as ACE‐inhibitors, ARBs, and diuretics.

Management of the later in-hospital course

Management of the later in-hospital phase will be determined by the amount of myocardial necrosis, the demographic characteristics of the patients, and the presence or absence of co-morbidity. While the patient who has become asymptomatic and with minimum myocardial damage may go home after a few days, particularly after a successful PCI, patients with significant LV dysfunction or those who are at risk of new events may require a longer hospitalization.

Ambulation

Patients with significant LV damage should rest in bed for the first 12–24 h, by which time it will be apparent whether the infarction is going to be complicated. In uncomplicated cases, the patient can sit out of bed late on the first day, be allowed to use a commode, and undertake self-care and self-feeding. Ambulation can start the next day, and such patients can be walking up to 200 m on the flat, and walking up stairs within a few days. Those who have experienced heart failure, shock, or serious arrhythmias should be kept in bed longer, and their physical activity increased slowly, dependent upon their symptoms and the extent of myocardial damage.

Management of specific in-hospital complications

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

These complications are now relatively uncommon after infarction, except in patients kept in bed because of heart failure. In such patients, they can be prevented by prophylactic doses of a LMWH and the application of compression stockings. When they occur, they should be treated with therapeutic doses of a LMWH, followed by oral anticoagulation for 3–6 months.

Intraventricular thrombus and systemic emboli

Echocardiography may reveal intraventricular thrombi, especially in patients with large anterior infarctions. If the thrombi are mobile or protuberant, they should be treated initially with i.v. unfractionated heparin or LMWH, and subsequently with oral anticoagulants for at least 3–6 months.

Pericarditis

Acute pericarditis may complicate STEMI with transmural necrosis. It gives rise to chest pain that may be misinterpreted as recurrent infarction or angina. The pain is, however, distinguished by its sharp nature, and its relationship to posture and respiration. The diagnosis may be confirmed by a pericardial rub. If the pain is troublesome, it may be treated by high-dose i.v. aspirin (1000 mg/24 h) or NSAIDs. A haemorrhagic effusion with tamponade is uncommon and is particularly associated with antithrombin treatment. It can usually be recognized echocardiographically. Treatment is by pericardiocentesis if haemodynamic compromise occurs. Antithrombin therapy must be interrupted unless there is an absolute indication for its continuous use.

Late ventricular arrhythmias

VT and VF occurring during the first 24–48 h have a low predictive value for recurring risk of arrhythmias over time. Arrhythmias developing later are liable to recur and are associated with an increased risk of sudden death.173

Aggressive attempts should be made to treat heart failure and to search for and correct myocardial ischaemia in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Myocardial revascularization should be performed, when appropriate, to reduce the risk of sudden death in patients experiencing VF or polymorphic VT.130 No controlled trials, however, have evaluated the effects of myocardial revascularization on VT or VF after STEMI. Observational studies suggest that revascularization is unlikely to prevent recurrent cardiac arrest in patients with markedly abnormal LV function or sustained monomorphic VT, even if the original arrhythmia appeared to result from transient ischaemia.174,175

Several prospective multicentre clinical trials have documented improved survival with implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) therapy in high-risk patients with LV dysfunction (EF <40%) due to prior infarction.176–178 Compared with conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy, ICD therapy was associated with mortality reductions from 23 to 55% depending on the risk group studied. The ICD is therefore the primary therapy to reduce mortality in patients with significant LV dysfunction, who present with haemodynamically unstable sustained VT or who are resuscitated from VF that does not occur within the first 24–48 h.130 Electrophysiological testing with catheter ablation may occasionally be of benefit if curable arrhythmias, such as bundle-branch re-entry, are revealed.

Patients with sustained monomorphic VT without haemodynamic instability are usually, but not always, at relatively low risk for sudden death (2% yearly).179 If episodes are relatively infrequent, the ICD alone may be the most appropriate initial therapy, in order to avoid the relative ineffectiveness and adverse complications of drug therapy. ICD implantation is in this context also reasonable for treatment of recurrent sustained VT in patients with normal or near normal LV function. Electrophysiologically guided drug testing for assessing antiarrhythmic drug efficacy has largely been abandoned.

Since there is no evidence that suppression of asymptomatic non-sustained VT prolongs life there is no indication to treat non-sustained VT, unless it is associated with haemodynamic instability. Sotalol or amiodarone would then be most appropriate if symptomatic non-sustained VT is unresponsive to β-adrenergic blocking agents.

With the exception of β-blockers, antiarrhythmic drugs have not been shown in randomized clinical trials to be effective in the primary management of patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias or in the prevention of sudden death, and should not be used as primary therapy for such purpose. Amiodarone therapy may be considered in special situations. The SCD-HeFT study showed no benefit of amiodarone in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II heart failure and potential harm in patients with NYHA functional class III heart failure and EF ≤35%.176

Post-infarction angina and ischaemia

Angina or recurrent ischaemia or reinfarction in the early post-infarction phase following either successful fibrinolysis or PCI is an absolute indication for urgent (repeated) coronary angiography and, if indicated, (repeated) PCI or CABG.

Although analyses from several trials have identified a patent infarct-related vessel as a marker for good long-term outcome, it has not been shown that late PCI with the sole aim of restoring patency is beneficial. In the OAT trial, PCI of the occluded infarct-related artery 3–28 calendar days after the acute event in 2166 stable patients (no chest pain or signs of ongoing ischaemia) did not reduce death, reinfarction, or heart failure, and was associated with an excess reinfarction during 4 years of follow-up.24

Coronary artery bypass surgery may be indicated if symptoms are not controlled by other means or if coronary angiography demonstrates lesions, such as left main stenosis or three-vessel disease with poor LV function.

Risk assessment

Indications and timing

Several risk scores have been developed based on readily identifiable parameters in the acute phase before reperfusion.21,20,180 After reperfusion treatment it is important to identify patients at high risk of further events such as reinfarction or death, and hopefully to intervene in order to prevent these events. Because the risk of events decreases with time, early risk assessment is indicated. If not performed by LV angiography in the acute phase, assessment of infarct size and resting LV function by echocardiography will be undertaken within the first 24–48 h. The timing of further investigations will depend on local facilities and on whether or not angiography and PCI have been performed. With the increasing use of primary PCI, risk assessment before discharge has become less important since it can be assumed that the infarct-related coronary lesion has been treated and the presence or absence of significant lesions in other arteries has been assessed.

If in spite of angiography performed in the acute phase at the time of PCI there are concerns about inducible ischaemia in the infarct or non-infarct area, outpatient exercise testing (bicycle or treadmill) or stress imaging (using scintigraphy, echocardiography, or MRI) within 4–6 weeks is appropriate (Table 20). The relative advantages or disadvantages of these stress tests in a post-STEMI population are not well established. If the main concern is arrhythmia, additional electrophysiological testing may be needed before discharge (see below).

All patients should have their metabolic risk markers measured including total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, fasting triglyceride, and plasma glucose, as well as renal function. It has been shown that mean lipid levels vary little in the 4 days after an acute coronary syndrome and can be used for clinical decisions about further therapy.181

Assessment of myocardial viability

LV dysfunction after STEMI may be due to necrosis, to stunning of viable myocardium remaining in the infarct territory, to hibernation of viable myocardium, or to a combination of all three.181b Simple stunning should usually recover within 2 weeks of the acute ischaemic insult if reperfusion has been established, but, if ischaemic episodes persist, recurrent stunning may become hibernation and requires revascularization for recovery of function. These concepts are of most relevance in the patient with severely impaired LV function after STEMI when the need for revascularization to improve function is considered.

Several diagnostic techniques can detect myocardial viability. Of these, conventional myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (with thallium-201- or technetium-99 m-labelled agents) or stress echocardiography (usually with dobutamine) are most widely available, whereas MRI and PET are less available.

Evaluation of risk of arrhythmia for prevention of sudden death

Primary prevention (prophylaxis) refers to treatment of subjects who are at at risk but have not yet had a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia or SCD episode.

Patients without symptomatic arrhythmias and those with EF ≥40% are at such low risk of SCD that further testing or prophylactic therapy is not indicated.

Factors that in addition to reduced EF have been demonstrated to contribute to the risk for SCD include the presence of non-sustained VT, symptomatic heart failure, and sustained monomorphic VT inducible by electrophysiological testing. It is important to stress that the clinician's ability to stratify patients using risk markers other than the ones mentioned is limited related to the lack of large prospective studies. Although T-wave alternans182 and other ECG techniques (heart rate variability/turbulence, QT dispersion, baroreflex sensitivity, and signal-averaged ECG) may be useful, additional studies are needed to further clarify their role in assessing the risk of SCD in differing clinical settings.

Rehabilitation and pre-discharge advice

Rehabilitation is aimed at restoring the patient to as full a life as possible, including return to work. It must take into account physical, psychological, and socio-economic factors. Rehabilitation should be offered to all patients after STEMI. The process should start as soon as possible after hospital admission, and be continued in the succeeding weeks and months. Rehabilitation programmes should be multidisciplinary and aimed at reducing risk factors for coronary artery disease (see also Section H183). Home- and hospital-based rehabilitation seem to be similarly beneficial.184 The details of the rehabilitation programmes are dealt with in the position paper of the Working Group on cardiac rehabilitation and exercise physiology of the ESC.185

Psychological and socio-economic aspects

Anxiety is almost inevitable, in both patients and their associates, so that reassurance and explanation of the nature of the illness is of great importance and must be handled sensitively. It is also necessary to warn of the frequent occurrence of depression and irritability that more frequently occurs after return home. It must also be recognized that denial is common; while this may have a protective effect in the acute stage, it may make subsequent acceptance of the diagnosis more difficult. Large studies suggest a role for psychosocial factors as prognostic factors in cardiovascular disease,186 with the strongest evidence for depression as a negative factor in post-infarction patients. However, whether depression is an independent risk (after adjustment for conventional risk factors) is still unclear and there is, so far, little evidence that any intervention targeting these factors improves prognosis.187,188

The question of return to work and resuming other activities should be discussed prior to hospital discharge.

Lifestyle advice

The possible causes of coronary disease should be discussed with patients and their partners during hospitalization, and individualized advice on a healthy diet, weight control, smoking, and exercise given (see Section H).183

Physical activity

All patients should be given advice with regard to physical activity based upon their recovery from the acute event, taking into account their age, their pre-infarction level of activity, and their physical limitations. In selected cases assessment is aided by a pre-discharge exercise test, which not only provides useful clinical information but can be reassuring to the overanxious patient. A meta-analysis of rehabilitation programmes performed in the pre-reperfusion era which included exercise suggested a significant reduction in mortality,189 findings recently confirmed in another meta-analysis updated with studies conducted until 2003.190

Secondary prevention

Coronary heart disease is a chronic condition, and patients who have recovered from a STEMI are at high risk for new events and premature death. Eight to 10% of post-infarction patients have a recurrent infarction within a year after discharge,191 and mortality after discharge remains much higher than in the general population.

Several evidence-based interventions can improve prognosis. Even though long-term management of this large group of patients will be the responsibility of the general practitioner, these interventions will have a higher chance of being implemented if initiated during hospital stay. In addition, lifestyle changes should be explained and proposed to the patient before discharge. However, habits of a lifetime are not easily changed, and the implementation and follow-up of these changes are a long-term undertaking. In this regard, a close collaboration between the cardiologist and the general practitioner is critically important. Recommendations are given in Tables 21 and 22.

Smoking cessation

Unselected acute coronary syndrome patients who are smokers are twice as likely to present as STEMI, compared with non-smokers,192 indicating a strong prothrombotic effect of smoking. Evidence from observational studies shows that those who stop smoking reduce their mortality in the succeeding years by at least one-third compared with those who continue to smoke.193 Stopping smoking is potentially the most effective of all secondary prevention measures, and much effort should be devoted to this end. Patients do not smoke during the acute phase of a STEMI, and the convalescent period is ideal for health professionals to help smokers to quit. However, resumption of smoking is common after returning home, and continued support and advice is needed during rehabilitation. Nicotine replacement, buproprione, and antidepressants may be useful.183 Nicotine patches have been demonstrated to be safe in acute coronary syndrome patients.194 A randomized study has also demonstrated the effectiveness of a nurse-directed programme.195 A smoking cessation protocol should be adopted by each hospital.

Diet, dietary supplements, and weight control

Evidence from systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials on food and nutrition in secondary prevention has recently been published.196 Current guidelines on prevention183 recommend (i) to eat a wide variety of foods; (ii) adjustment of calorie intake to avoid overweight; (iii) increased consumption of fruit and vegetables, along with wholegrain cereals and bread, fish (especially oily), lean meat, and low-fat dairy products; (iv) to replace saturated and trans fats with monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats from vegetable and marine sources and to reduce total fats to <30% of total calorie intake, of which less than one-third should be saturated; and (v) to reduce salt intake if blood pressure is raised. Many processed and prepared foods are high in salt, and in fat of doubtful quality.

There is no evidence for the use of antioxidant supplements of antioxidants, low glycaemic index diets, or homocysteine-lowering therapies post-STEMI. The role of omega-3 fatty acid supplements for secondary prevention is unclear.183 In the only (open‐label) randomized study in patients post-myocardial infarction, the GISSI prevenzione trial, 1 g daily of fish oil on top of a Mediterranean diet significantly reduced total and cardiovascular mortality.197 However a meta-analysis, including GISSI prevenzione, showed no effect on mortality or cardiovascular events198 and no evidence that the source or dose affect outcome. Obesity is an increasing problem in patients with STEMI. At least one-third of European women and one in four men with acute coronary syndromes below the age of 65 have a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m2.199 Current ESC Guidelines183 define a BMI <25 kg/m2 as optimal and recommend weight reduction when BMI is 30 kg/m2, or more, and when waist circumference is >102/88 cm (men/women) because weight loss can improve many obesity-related risk factors. However, it has not been established that weight reduction per se reduces mortality.

Physical activity

Exercise therapy has long been used for rehabilitation purposes following STEMI, and the benefit of regular physical exercise in stable coronary artery disease patients is also well established. Four mechanisms are considered to be important mediators of a reduced cardiac event rate: (i) improvement of endothelial function; (ii) reduced progression of coronary lesions; (iii) reduced thrombogenic risk; and (iv) improved collateralization. In a large meta-analysis, exercise training as part of coronary rehabilitation programmes was associated with a 26% reduction in cardiac mortality rate in patients with coronary artery disease.200 It should be appreciated that apart from its influence on mortality, exercise rehabilitation can have other beneficial effects. Exercise capacity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and perception of well-being have also been reported to improve, at least during the actual training period, even in elderly patients. Thirty minutes of moderate intensity aerobic exercise at least five times per week is recommended.183 Each single-stage increase in physical work capacity is associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality risk in the range of 8–14%.

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment

The Antiplatelet Trialists Collaboration201 meta-analysis demonstrated about a 25% reduction in reinfarction and death in post-infarction patients. In the trials analysed, aspirin dosages ranged from 75 to 325 mg daily. There is evidence that the lower dosages are effective, with fewer side effects.201 Clinical trials undertaken before the widespread use of aspirin showed that oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists) are effective in preventing reinfarction and death in infarct survivors.202,203 Aspirin can be replaced by oral anticoagulants at the recommended international normalized ratio (INR) if there is an indication for oral anticoagulation (e.g. atrial fibrillation, LV thrombus, mechanical valves). In a large meta-analysis of patients with acute coronary syndromes followed for up to 5 years (including >10 000 patients with infarction), the combination of aspirin and oral anticoagulation at INR 2–3 prevented three major adverse events and caused one major bleed per 100 patients treated compared with aspirin alone.204 This combination therefore seems to be a reasonable treatment in STEMI survivors who have a high risk of thromboembolic events. In some patients, there is an indication for dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulation (e.g. stent placement and AF). In the absence of prospective randomized studies, no firm recommendations can be given.205–207 Triple therapy seems to have an acceptable risk–benefit ratio provided clopidogrel co-therapy is kept short and the bleeding risk is low.205,206 Oral anticoagulants plus a short course of clopidogrel might be an alternative in patients with a higher risk of bleeding.205 Most importantly, drug-eluting stents should be avoided in patients who need oral anticoagulation. Oral anticoagulants may also be considered in patients who do not tolerate aspirin or clopidogrel.

Clopidogrel (given on top of aspirin for 3–12 months, median 9 months) has been studied for secondary prevention in 12 562 patients after an acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST-segment elevation.208 There was a relative risk reduction of 20% in the composite end-point of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or stroke at 12 months. However, there were significantly more patients with major bleeding in the clopidogrel group although episodes of life-threatening bleeding or haemorrhagic strokes were similar in the two groups. The use of clopidogrel for primary PCI and in conjunction with fibrinolytic therapy has been described above (see reperfusion therapy section D.1.). The optimal duration of clopidogrel treatment after STEMI has not been determined. Considering the long-term effect of clopidogrel in patients after a non-ST-segment acute coronary syndrome in the CURE trial and taking into account the current recommendation for non-STEMI patients,2 a treatment duration of 12 months is recommended whether or not a stent has been placed.50,208 Patients who received a drug-eluting stent might need a longer duration of thienopyridine therapy, although this issue is still not resolved by specific studies.

β-Blockers

Several trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated that β-blockers reduce mortality and reinfarction by 20–25% in those who have recovered from an infarction. Most of these trials have been performed in the pre-reperfusion era. A meta-analysis of 82 randomized trials provides strong evidence for long-term use of β-blockers to reduce morbidity and mortality after STEMI even if ACE‐inhibitors are co-administered.141 The significant mortality reductions observed with β-blockers in heart failure in general further support the use of these agents after STEMI. Evidence from all available studies suggests that β-blockers should be used indefinitely in all patients who recovered from a STEMI and do not have a contraindication.141

Calcium antagonists

Trials with verapamil209 and diltiazem210 have suggested that they may prevent reinfarction and death. In a trial in 874 patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolytic agents but without heart failure, the 6-month use of diltiazem (300 mg daily) reduced the rate of coronary interventions.211 The use of verapamil and diltiazem may be appropriate when β-blockers are contraindicated, especially in obstructive airways disease. Caution must be exercised in the presence of impaired LV function. Trials with dihydropyridines have failed to show a benefit in terms of improved prognosis; they should, therefore, only be prescribed for clear clinical indications such as hypertension or angina.145

Nitrates

There is no evidence that oral or transdermal nitrates improve prognosis. The ISIS-4144 and GISSI-3143 trials failed to show a benefit at 4–6 weeks after the event. Nitrates continue to be first-line therapy for angina pectoris.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers

Several trials have established that ACE‐inhibitors reduce mortality after STEMI with reduced residual LV function (<40%).212–215 There is a strong case for administering ACE‐inhibitors to patients who have experienced heart failure in the acute phase, even if no features of this persist, who have an EF of ≤40%, or a wall motion index of ≥1.2, provided there are no contraindications. As discussed above, there is also a case for administering ACE‐inhibitors to all patients with STEMI from admission, provided there are no contraindications.143,144,216 Against such a policy is the increased incidence of hypotension and renal failure in those receiving ACE‐inhibitors in the acute phase, and the small benefit in those at relatively low risk, such as patients with small inferior infarctions. In favour are observations from studies in populations with stable cardiovascular disease but without LV dysfunction showing beneficial effects, including a reduction in mortality and stroke.217–219 Use of ACE‐inhibitors should be considered in all patients with atherosclerosis, but, given the relatively modest effect, their long-term use cannot be considered to be mandatory in post-STEMI patients who are normotensive, without heart failure or compromised systolic LV function.

Two trials have evaluated ARBs in the context of STEMI as alternatives to ACE‐inhibitors: the OPTIMAAL trial with losartan (50 mg) failed to show superiority or non-inferiority over captopril (50 mg three times daily).220 Conversely, the VALIANT trial compared valsartan alone (160 mg twice daily), full‐dose captopril (50 mg three times daily), or both (80 mg twice daily and 50 mg three times daily). Mortality was similar in the three groups, but discontinuations were more frequent in the groups receiving captopril.221 Therefore, valsartan in dosages as used in the trial represents an alternative to ACE‐inhibitors in patients who do not tolerate ACE‐inhibitors and have clinical signs of heart failure and/or an EF ≤40%.

Aldosterone blockade

The EPHESUS trial randomized 6642 post-STEMI patients with LV dysfunction (EF ≤40%) and heart failure or diabetes to eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, or placebo. After a mean follow-up of 16 months, there was a 15% relative reduction in total mortality and a 13% reduction in the composite of death and hospitalization for cardiovascular events.222 However, serious hyperkalaemia was more frequent in the group receiving eplerenone. The results suggest that aldosterone blockade may be considered for post-STEMI patients with an EF <40% and heart failure or diabetes provided that creatinine is <2.5 mg/dL in men and 2.0 mg/dL in women, and potassium is ≤5.0 mEq/L. Routine monitoring of serum potassium is warranted and should be particularly careful when other potential potassium-sparing agents are used.

Blood pressure control

According to the ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension the goal is to achieve a blood pressure <130/80 mmHg in patients with stroke, myocardial infarction, renal disease, and diabetes.223 Pharmacotherapy recommended post-STEMI (β-blockers, ACE‐inhibitors, or ARBs) will help to achieve these goals, in addition to lifestyle modification with respect to physical activity and weight loss. Additional pharmacotherapy may be needed.

Management of diabetes

Glucometabolic disturbances are common in patients with coronary disease and should be actively searched for. Since an abnormal glucose tolerance test is a significant risk factor for future cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction,224 it seems meaningful to perform such a test before or shortly after discharge.225

In patients with established diabetes, the aim is to achieve HbA1c levels ≤6.5%. This calls for intensive modification of lifestyle (diet, physical activity, weight reduction), usually in addition to pharmacotherapy. Coordination with a physician specialized in diabetes is advisable. In patients with impaired fasting glucose level or impaired glucose tolerance, only lifestyle changes are currently recommended.225

Interventions on lipid profile

Several trials have unequivocally demonstrated the benefits of long-term use of statins in the prevention of new ischaemic events and mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. The targets established by the Fourth Joint Task Force of the ESC and other societies in patients after infarction are: for total cholesterol, 175 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L) with an option of 155 mg/dL (4.0 mmol/L) if feasible, and for lower LDL cholesterol 100 mg/dL (2.5 mmol/L) with an option of 80 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) if feasible.183 Although pharmacological treatment is highly efficient in treating dyslipidaemia in heart disease, diet remains a basic requirement for all patients with coronary heart disease. The most recent controversy on lipid-lowering treatment has been focused on intensive, vs. standard lipid-lowering therapy. A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared different intensities of statin therapy identified a total of seven trials, with a total of 29 395 patients with coronary artery disease.226 Compared with less intensive statin regimens, more intensive regimens further reduced LDL cholesterol levels and reduced the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. Although there was no effect on mortality among patients with chronic coronary artery disease [odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80–1.14], all-cause mortality was reduced among patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with more intensive statin regimens (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61–0.93). All seven trials reported events by randomization arm rather than by LDL cholesterol level achieved. About half of the patients treated with more intensive statin therapy did not achieve an LDL cholesterol level of <80 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L), and none of the trials tested combination therapies. The analysis supports the use of more intensive statin regimens in patients with established coronary artery disease. There is insufficient evidence to advocate treating to particular LDL cholesterol targets, using combination lipid-lowering therapy to achieve these targets.

In patients who do not tolerate statins, or who have contraindications, other lipid-lowering therapy may be warranted. In a study with gemfibrozil (a fibrate),227 patients with HDL cholesterol levels ≤40 mg/dL (1.04 mmol/L) but LDL cholesterol levels ≤140 mg/dL (3.6 mmol/L) and triglycerides ≤300 mg/dL (7.7 mmol/L), and with a previous infarction benefited from gemfibrozil, with a 24% reduction in the combined end-point of death from coronary artery disease, non-fatal infarction, and stroke. In the BIP study, bezafibrate given to patients with a previous infarction or stable angina and with low [≤45 mg/dL (1.2 mmol/L)] HDL cholesterol levels was associated with a non-significant 7.3% reduction in the incidence of fatal or non-fatal (re)infarction or sudden death. A larger benefit was seen for this end-point in patients with high triglycerides at baseline.228

Ezetimibe, a compound which reduces cholesterol uptake from the intestine, decreases LDL cholesterol (and CRP), but there are no clinical data to support its current use in STEMI survivors.

Influenza vaccination

Influenza immunization is indicated in all patients with coronary artery disease and thus also in those surviving a STEMI.229,230

Cardiac resynchronization therapy

In heart failure patients who remain symptomatic in NYHA classes III–IV despite optimal medical therapy, with an EF ≤35%, LV dilatation, normal sinus rhythm, and wide QRS complex (120 ms), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an acceptable treatment option for patients who are expected to survive in a reasonable functional state for >1 year.137 Patients may be evaluated for CRT treatment whenever stunning of viable myocardium can be excluded.

Prophylactic implantation of an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator

The ICD is the only specific antiarrhythmic treatment proved consistently effective to reduce the risk of both sudden death and total mortality. Primary preventive ICD therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of sudden death in two patient groups: (i) patients whose EF is ≤40% and who have spontaneous non-sustained VT and sustained monomorphic VT inducible by electrophysiological testing;231 and (ii) patients whose EF is ≤30% as a result of an infarction that occurred at least 40 days earlier when heart failure (NYHA functional class II or III symptoms) is present. 176,232–234 In view of the above, ICD therapy after STEMI is reasonable in patients with an EF ≤30% to 35%, and who are in NYHA functional class I on chronic optimal medical therapy. In general, ICD implantation should be deferred until at least 40 days after the acute event. Evaluation of the need for an ICD and implantation should be deferred until at least 3 months after revascularization procedures to allow adequate time for recovery of LV function. Prophylactic antiarrhythmic drug therapy is not indicated to reduce mortality.

Logistics of care

Pre-hospital care

Patient delay

The most critical time of a STEMI is the very early phase, during which the patient is often in severe pain and liable to cardiac arrest. Furthermore, the earlier that some treatments, notably reperfusion therapy, are given, the greater the beneficial effect (‘time is muscle’). Yet, it is often an hour or more after the onset of symptoms before medical aid is requested. Older patients, female, diabetic, and congestive heart failure patients are more likely to delay seeking care.

It should be a normal part of the care of patients with known coronary heart disease to inform their partners and family about the symptoms of a heart attack and how to respond to it. The benefit of education of the general public for reducing delay times is uncertain. The public must at least be aware of how to call the EMS.

Emergency medical system

An EMS with a well-known unique telephone number for medical emergencies only is important to avoid further delays.235 Dispatchers have variable degrees of medical training. A tele-consultation with a reference cardiological centre is ideal but available in a limited number of countries only. An updated and shared written management protocol is critically important.236 Although the use of an EMS decreases delay time,237 it is underutilized238 in many countries.

Public education in cardiopulmonary resuscitation

The techniques of basic life support should be part of the school curriculum. Those most likely to encounter cardiac arrest while at work, such as the police and fire service personnel, should be proficient in advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

The ambulance service

The ambulance (helicopter) service has a critical role in the management of a STEMI,239 and should be considered not only a mode of transport but a place for initial diagnosis, triage, and treatment.240 Ambulances should be able to reach the great majority of chest pain patients within 15 min of the call. The quality of the care given depends on the training of the staff concerned. At the most simple level, all ambulance personnel should be trained to recognize the symptoms of a STEMI, administer oxygen, relieve pain, and provide basic life support. All emergency ambulances (helicopters) should be equipped with 12-lead ECG recorders and defibrillators, and at least one person on board should be trained in advanced life support.

Ambulance staff should be able to record an ECG for diagnostic purposes and either interpret it or transmit it so that it can be reviewed by experienced staff in an Intensive Cardiac Care Unit (ICCU) or elsewhere. The recording of an ECG prior to hospital admission can greatly accelerate in-hospital management241,242 and increase the probability of reperfusion therapy.243,244

Physician-manned ambulances, available in only a few countries, can provide more advanced diagnostic and therapeutic services, including administration of opioids and fibrinolytic drugs. Since pre-hospital administration of fibrinolytic therapy is the most effective way to shorten delay times for this type of reperfusion therapy,245 training of paramedics to undertake these functions is recommended.246 In specific regions, air ambulance systems further improve transportation delays and outcomes.247

Networks

As indicated above, the implementation of a network of hospitals connected by an efficient ambulance (helicopter) service and using a common protocol is key for an optimal management of patients with STEMI.

With such a network in place, target delay times should be: <10 min for ECG transmission; ≤5 min for tele-consultation; <30 min for ambulance arrival to start fibrinolytic therapy; and ≤120 min for ambulance arrival to first balloon inflation. Quality of care, appropriateness of reperfusion therapy, delay times, and patient outcomes should be measured and compared at regular times, and appropriate measures for improvement should be taken.

General practitioners

In many countries, general practitioners still play a major role in the early care of STEMI. In these countries they are often the first to be called by patients. If they respond quickly, they can be very effective since they usually know the individual patient and can take and interpret the ECG, are able to administer opioids, to call the ambulance service, and undertake defibrillation if needed.242,248 In other circumstances, consultation with a general practitioner is one of the reasons for an increased pre-hospital delay.249,250

Admission procedures

The processing of patients once they arrive in hospital must be speedy, particularly with regard to the diagnosis and administration of fibrinolytic agents or the performance of a primary PCI, if indicated. Candidates for primary PCI must be admitted directly to the cath lab, bypassing the emergency room and/or ICCU, while patients candidate for fibrinolysis must be treated directly in the emergency room.251

The Intensive Cardiac Care Unit

STEMI patients should be admitted to ICCUs after the initial reperfusion therapy, which is given in the ambulance, in the emergency room, or in the cath lab. ICCUs should be equipped adequately and staffed with dedicated and properly trained physicians and nurses, due to the increased complexity of older and sicker patients.

Non-invasive monitoring

ECG monitoring for arrhythmias and ST-segment deviations should be started immediately in any patient suspected of having sustained a STEMI. This should be continued for at least 24 h. Further ECG monitoring for arrhythmias is dependent upon the perceived risk and upon the equipment available. When a patient leaves the ICCU, monitoring of rhythm may be continued, if necessary, by telemetry. A more prolonged stay at the ICCU is appropriate for those who have sustained heart failure, shock, or serious arrhythmias in the acute phase, as the risk of further events is high.

Invasive monitoring

All ICCUs should have the skills and equipment to undertake invasive monitoring of the arterial and pulmonary artery pressures. Arterial pressure monitoring should be undertaken in patients with cardiogenic shock. Pulmonary artery catheters have been used for a long time in ICCUs in haemodynamically unstable patients. However, recent studies252–254 did not show a benefit of a routine use of these procedures on mortality or on the length of the hospital stay. A restricted use is recommended.

The post-discharge period

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation services should be available, and follow-up of the secondary prevention programme should be organized before discharge.

Gaps in evidence

There is limited experience with PCI in STEMI patients presenting more than 12 h after onset of symptoms. Transporting patients from a community to a PCI-capable hospital for primary PCI remains a challenge. Even in the best networks many patients are treated with PCI outside the recommended time window. It is unknown whether pre-hospital fibrinolysis during transport to a PCI-capable hospital in patients presenting early to the EMS is beneficial if the intervention cannot be performed within the recommended time window. Cardiologists in community hospitals are still uncertain which pharmacological treatment to start before transport. A number of patients need oral anticoagulation after primary PCI with stenting. Whether aspirin and/or an ADP antagonist added to coumarins are effective and safe in all patients is unknown as is the optimal duration of this antithrombotic regimen. Randomized studies in patients with mechanical complications are lacking.

Procedures of the Task Force

This Task Force was created by the ESC in 2006. Individual members were invited to update sections of the 2003 guidelines in their area of expertise. These were discussed at meetings in Frankfurt on March 16, 2007 and January 8, 2008. After several revisions, the final document was submitted to the Committee for Practice Guidelines for approval on August 19, 2008. Invaluable assistance in processing the document was provided by Veronica Dean, Karine Piellard (ESC), Krista Bogaert, Anita Meuris, and Roos Struyven (University of Leuven). The guidelines were developed without any involvement of the industry.

Recommendations of guidelines have often not been implemented in practice, and treatments which have been shown to be of little or no value continue to be used widely. For instance, large registries have demonstrated that ∼30% of all STEMI patients did not receive reperfusion therapy.255–257 There is a great need both for continuing medical education and for ongoing audit to ensure the implementation of guidelines. Task Forces should play an active role in this effort.

The electronic version of this document is available on the website of the European Society of Cardiology: www.escardio.org in the section ‘Scientific information’, Guidelines.

The CME text ‘Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation’ is accredited by the European Board for Accreditation in Cardiology (EBAC) for ‘5’ hours of External CME credits. Each participant should claim only those hours of credit that have actually been spent in the educational activity. EBAC works in cooperation with the European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME), which is an institution of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). In compliance with EBAC/EACCME guidelines, all authors participating in this programme have disclosed potential conflicts of interest that might cause a bias in the article. The Organizing Committee is responsible for ensuring that all potential conflicts of interest relevant to the programme are declared to the participants prior to the CME activities. CME questions for this article are available at the web sites of the European Heart Journal (http://cme.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/hierarchy/oupcme_node;ehj) and the European Society of Cardiology (http://www.escardio.org/knowledge/guidelines).

Abbreviations

  • ACE

    angiotensin-converting enzyme

  • ACT

    activated clotting time

  • AF

    atrial fibrillation

  • APTT

    activated partial prothrombin time

  • ARB

    angiotensin receptor blocker

  • AV

    atrio-ventricular

  • BMI

    body mass index

  • bpm

    beats per minute

  • CABG

    coronary artery bypass graft

  • CI

    confidence interval

  • COX

    cyclo-oxygenase

  • CPG

    Committee for Practice Guidelines

  • CRP

    C-reactive protein

  • CRT

    cardiac resynchronization therapy

  • ECG

    electrocardiographic/electrocardiogram

  • EF

    ejection fraction

  • EMS

    emergency medical system

  • ESC

    European Society of Cardiology

  • FMC

    first medical contact

  • GP

    glycoprotein

  • h

    hour

  • HDL

    high-density lipoprotein

  • IABP

    intra-aortic balloon pump

  • ICCU

    Intensive Cardiac Care Unit

  • ICD

    implantable cardioverter–defibrillator

  • INR

    international normalized ratio

  • i.v.

    intravenous

  • LDL

    low-density lipoprotein

  • LMWH

    low-molecular-weight heparin

  • LV

    left ventricular

  • min

    minute

  • MBG

    myocardial blush grade

  • MRI

    magnetic resonance imaging

  • NSAID

    non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

  • NYHA

    New York Heart Association

  • OR

    odds ratio

  • PCI

    percutaneous coronary intervention

  • PDA

    personal digital assistant

  • PET

    positron emission tomography

  • s

    seconds

  • s.c.

    subcutaneous

  • SCD

    sudden cardiac death

  • SPECT

    single-photon emission computed tomography

  • STEMI

    acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

  • TIMI

    thrombolysis in myocardial infarction

  • t-PA

    tissue plasminogen activator

  • VF

    ventricular fibrillation

  • VT

    ventricular tachycardia

L. References

1
Thygesen
K
Alpert
JS
White
HD
Universal definition of myocardial infarction
Eur Heart J
 , 
2007
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
2525
-
2538
)
2
Bassand
JP
Hamm
CW
Ardissino
D
Boersma
E
Budaj
A
Fernandez-Aviles
F
Fox
KA
Hasdai
D
Ohman
EM
Wallentin
L
Wijns
W
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
Eur Heart J
 , 
2007
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
1598
-
1660
)
3
Fuster
V
Moreno
PR
Fayad
ZA
Corti
R
Badimon
JJ
Atherothrombosis and high-risk plaque: part I: evolving concepts
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2005
, vol. 
46
 (pg. 
937
-
954
)
4
Rodriguez-Granillo
GA
Garcia-Garcia
HM
Valgimigli
M
Vaina
S
van Mieghem
C
van Geuns
RJ
van der Ent
M
Regar
E
de Jaegere
P
van der Giessen
W
de Feyter
P
Serruys
PW
Global characterization of coronary plaque rupture phenotype using three-vessel intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis
Eur Heart J
 , 
2006
, vol. 
27
 (pg. 
1921
-
1927
)
5
Detrano
R
Guerci
AD
Carr
JJ
Bild
DE
Burke
G
Folsom
AR
Liu
K
Shea
S
Szklo
M
Bluemke
DA
O'Leary
DH
Tracy
R
Watson
K
Wong
ND
Kronmal
RA
Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups
N Engl J Med
 , 
2008
, vol. 
358
 (pg. 
1336
-
1345
)
6
Rittersma
SZ
van der Wal
AC
Koch
KT
Piek
JJ
Henriques
JP
Mulder
KJ
Ploegmakers
JP
Meesterman
M
de Winter
RJ
Plaque instability frequently occurs days or weeks before occlusive coronary thrombosis: a pathological thrombectomy study in primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Circulation
 , 
2005
, vol. 
111
 (pg. 
1160
-
1165
)
7
Hansson
GK
Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease
N Engl J Med
 , 
2005
, vol. 
352
 (pg. 
1685
-
1695
)
8
Libby
P
Theroux
P
Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease
Circulation
 , 
2005
, vol. 
111
 (pg. 
3481
-
3488
)
9
Lee
KW
Lip
GY
Tayebjee
M
Foster
W
Blann
AD
Circulating endothelial cells, von Willebrand factor, interleukin-6, and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Blood
 , 
2005
, vol. 
105
 (pg. 
526
-
532
)
10
Stone
PH
Triggering myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
2004
, vol. 
351
 (pg. 
1716
-
1718
)
11
Davies
MJ
The pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes
Heart
 , 
2000
, vol. 
83
 (pg. 
361
-
366
)
12
Keeley
EC
Boura
JA
Grines
CL
Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials
Lancet
 , 
2006
, vol. 
367
 (pg. 
579
-
588
)
13
Tunstall-Pedoe
H
Kuulasmaa
K
Mähönen
M
Tolonen
H
Ruokokoski
E
Amouyel
P
Contribution of trends in survival and coronary-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA project populations. Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease
Lancet
 , 
1999
, vol. 
353
 (pg. 
1547
-
1557
)
14
Goldberg
RJ
Glatfelter
K
Burbank-Schmidt
E
Lessard
D
Gore
JM
Trends in community mortality due to coronary heart disease
Am Heart J
 , 
2006
, vol. 
151
 (pg. 
501
-
507
)
15
Armstrong
PW
Granger
CB
Adams
PX
Hamm
C
Holmes
D
Jr
O'Neill
WW
Todaro
TG
Vahanian
A
Van de Werf
F
Pexelizumab for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial
JAMA
 , 
2007
, vol. 
297
 (pg. 
43
-
51
)
16
Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial
Lancet
 , 
2006
, vol. 
367
 (pg. 
569
-
578
)
17
Fox
KA
Dabbous
OH
Goldberg
RJ
Pieper
KS
Eagle
KA
Van de Werf
F
Avezum
A
Goodman
SG
Flather
MD
Anderson
FA
Jr
Granger
CB
Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE)
BMJ
 , 
2006
, vol. 
333
 (pg. 
1091
-
1094
)
18
Le May
MR
So
DY
Dionne
R
Glover
CA
Froeschl
MP
Wells
GA
Davies
RF
Sherrard
HL
Maloney
J
Marquis
JF
O'Brien
ER
Trickett
J
Poirier
P
Ryan
SC
Ha
A
Joseph
PG
Labinaz
M
A citywide protocol for primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
2008
, vol. 
358
 (pg. 
231
-
240
)
19
Bassand
JP
Danchin
N
Filippatos
G
Gitt
A
Hamm
C
Silber
S
Tubaro
M
Weidinger
F
Implementation of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. A policy statement from the European Society of Cardiology
Eur Heart J
 , 
2005
, vol. 
26
 (pg. 
2733
-
2741
)
20
Lee
KL
Woodlief
LH
Topol
EJ
Weaver
WD
Betriu
A
Col
J
Simoons
M
Aylward
P
Van de Werf
F
Califf
RM
Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Results from an international trial of 41,021 patients. GUSTO-I Investigators
Circulation
 , 
1995
, vol. 
91
 (pg. 
1659
-
1668
)
21
Morrow
DA
Antman
EM
Charlesworth
A
Cairns
R
Murphy
SA
de Lemos
JA
Giugliano
RP
McCabe
CH
Braunwald
E
TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation: an intravenous nPA for treatment of infarcting myocardium early II trial substudy
Circulation
 , 
2000
, vol. 
102
 (pg. 
2031
-
2037
)
22
European Resuscitation Council
European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005
Resuscitation
 , 
2005
, vol. 
67
 
Suppl 1
(pg. 
S3
-
S189
)
23
Schomig
A
Mehilli
J
Antoniucci
D
Ndrepepa
G
Markwardt
C
Di Pede
F
Nekolla
SG
Schlotterbeck
K
Schühlen
H
Pache
J
Seyfarth
M
Martinoff
S
Benzer
W
Schmitt
C
Dirschinger
J
Schwaiger
M
Kastrati
A
Beyond 12 h Reperfusion AlternatiVe Evaluation (BRAVE-2) Trial Investigators
Mechanical reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting more than 12 hours from symptom onset: a randomized controlled trial
JAMA
 , 
2005
, vol. 
293
 (pg. 
2865
-
2872
)
24
Hochman
JS
Lamas
GA
Buller
CE
Dzavik
V
Reynolds
HR
Abramsky
SJ
Forman
S
Ruzyllo
W
Maggioni
AP
White
H
Sadowski
Z
Carvalho
AC
Rankin
JM
Renkin
JP
Steg
PG
Mascette
AM
Sopko
G
Pfisterer
ME
Leor
J
Fridrich
V
Mark
DB
Knatterud
GL
Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
2006
, vol. 
355
 (pg. 
2395
-
2407
)
25
Menon
V
Pearte
CA
Buller
CE
Steg
PG
Forman
SA
White
HD
Marino
P
Katritsis
DG
Caramori
P
Lasevitch
R
Loboz-Grudzien
K
Zurakowski
A
Lamas
GA
Hochman
JS
Lack of benefit from percutaneous intervention of persistently occluded infarct arteries after the acute phase of myocardial infarction is time independent: insights from Occluded Artery Trial
Eur Heart J
 , 
2008
 
in press
26
Silber
S
Albertsson
P
Avilés
FF
Camici
PG
Colombo
A
Hamm
C
Jørgensen
E
Marco
J
Nordrehaug
JE
Ruzyllo
W
Urban
P
Stone
GW
Wijns
W
Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology
Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur Heart J
 , 
2005
, vol. 
26
 (pg. 
804
-
647
)
27
Canto
JG
Every
NR
Magid
DJ
Rogers
WJ
Malmgren
JA
Frederick
PD
French
WJ
Tiefenbrunn
AJ
Misra
VK
Kiefe
CI
Barron
HV
The volume of primary angioplasty procedures and survival after acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators
N Engl J Med
 , 
2000
, vol. 
342
 (pg. 
1573
-
1580
)
28
Spaulding
C
Morice
MC
Lancelin
B
El Haddad
S
Lepage
E
Bataille
S
Tresca
JP
Mouranche
X
Fosse
S
Monchi
M
de Vernejoul
N
Is the volume-outcome relation still an issue in the era of PCI with systematic stenting? Results of the greater Paris area PCI registry
Eur Heart J
 , 
2006
, vol. 
27
 (pg. 
1054
-
1060
)
29
Keeley
EC
Boura
JA
Grines
CL
Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials
Lancet
 , 
2003
, vol. 
361
 (pg. 
13
-
20
)
30
Grines
CL
Cox
DA
Stone
GW
Garcia
E
Mattos
LA
Giambartolomei
A
Brodie
BR
Madonna
O
Eijgelshoven
M
Lansky
AJ
O'Neill
WW
Morice
MC
Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group
N Engl J Med
 , 
1999
, vol. 
341
 (pg. 
1949
-
1956
)
31
Stone
GW
Grines
CL
Cox
DA
Garcia
E
Tcheng
JE
Griffin
JJ
Guagliumi
G
Stuckey
T
Turco
M
Carroll
JD
Rutherford
BD
Lansky
AJ
Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
2002
, vol. 
346
 (pg. 
957
-
966
)
32
Spaulding
C
Henry
P
Teiger
E
Beatt
K
Bramucci
E
Carrie
D
Slama
MS
Merkely
B
Erglis
A
Margheri
M
Varenne
O
Cebrian
A
Stoll
HP
Snead
DB
Bode
C
Sirolimus-eluting versus uncoated stents in acute myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
2006
, vol. 
355
 (pg. 
1093
-
1104
)
33
Laarman
GJ
Suttorp
MJ
Dirksen
MT
van Heerebeek
L
Kiemeneij
F
Slagboom
T
van der Wieken
LR
Tijssen
JG
Rensing
BJ
Patterson
M
Paclitaxel-eluting versus uncoated stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention
N Engl J Med
 , 
2006
, vol. 
355
 (pg. 
1105
-
1113
)
34
Kastrati
A
Dibra
A
Spaulding
C
Laarman
GJ
Menichelli
M
Valgimigli
M
Di Lorenzo
E
Kaiser
C
Tierala
I
Mehilli
J
Seyfarth
M
Varenne
O
Dirksen
MT
Percoco
G
Varricchio
A
Pittl
U
Syvanne
M
Suttorp
MJ
Violini
R
Schomig
A
Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Eur Heart J
 , 
2007
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
2706
-
2713
)
35
De Luca
G
Suryapranata
H
Zijlstra
F
van ‘t Hof
AW
Hoorntje
JC
Gosselink
AT
Dambrink
JH
de Boer
MJ
Symptom-onset-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2003
, vol. 
42
 (pg. 
991
-
997
)
36
Nallamothu
B
Fox
KA
Kennelly
BM
Van de Werf
F
Gore
JM
Steg
PG
Granger
CB
Dabbous
OH
Kline-Rogers
E
Eagle
KA
Relationship of treatment delays and mortality in patients undergoing fibrinolysis and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
Heart
 , 
2007
, vol. 
93
 (pg. 
1552
-
1555
)
37
Nallamothu
BK
Bates
ER
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything?
Am J Cardiol
 , 
2003
, vol. 
92
 (pg. 
824
-
826
)
38
Betriu
A
Masotti
M
Comparison of mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolysis
Am J Cardiol
 , 
2005
, vol. 
95
 (pg. 
100
-
101
)
39
Nallamothu
BK
Antman
EM
Bates
ER
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: does the choice of fibrinolytic agent impact on the importance of time-to-treatment?
Am J Cardiol
 , 
2004
, vol. 
94
 (pg. 
772
-
774
)
40
Boersma
E
Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients
Eur Heart J
 , 
2006
, vol. 
27
 (pg. 
779
-
788
)
41
Pinto
DS
Kirtane
AJ
Nallamothu
BK
Murphy
SA
Cohen
DJ
Laham
RJ
Cutlip
DE
Bates
ER
Frederick
PD
Miller
DP
Carrozza
JP
Jr
Antman
EM
Cannon
CP
Gibson
CM
Hospital delays in reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: implications when selecting a reperfusion strategy
Circulation
 , 
2006
, vol. 
114
 (pg. 
2019
-
2025
)
42
Kastrati
A
Mehilli
J
Nekolla
S
Bollwein
H
Martinoff
S
Pache
J
Schuhlen
H
Seyfarth
M
Gawaz
M
Neumann
FJ
Dirschinger
J
Schwaiger
M
Schomig
A
A randomized trial comparing myocardial salvage achieved by coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction considered ineligible for reperfusion therapy
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2004
, vol. 
43
 (pg. 
734
-
741
)
43
Hochman
JS
Sleeper
LA
Webb
JG
Sanborn
TA
White
HD
Talley
JD
Buller
CE
Jacobs
AK
Slater
JN
Col
J
McKinlay
SM
LeJemtel
TH
Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock
N Engl J Med
 , 
1999
, vol. 
341
 (pg. 
625
-
634
)
44
Ellis
SG
Tendera
M
de Belder
MA
van Boven
AJ
Widimsky
P
Janssens
L
Andersen
HR
Betriu
A
Savonitto
S
Adamus
J
Peruga
JZ
Kosmider
M
Katz
O
Neunteufl
T
Jorgova
J
Dorobantu
M
Grinfeld
L
Armstrong
P
Brodie
BR
Herrmann
HC
Montalescot
G
Neumann
FJ
Effron
MB
Barnathan
ES
Topol
EJ
FINESSE Investigators
Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
2008
, vol. 
358
 (pg. 
2205
-
2217
)
45
Van't Hof
AW
Ten Berg
J
Heestermans
T
Dill
T
Funck
RC
van Werkum
W
Dambrink
JH
Suryapranata
H
van Houwelingen
G
Ottervanger
JP
Stella
P
Giannitsis
E
Hamm
C
Ongoing Tirofiban In Myocardial infarction Evaluation (On-TIME) 2 study group
Prehospital initiation of tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty (On-TIME 2): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial
Lancet
 , 
2008
, vol. 
372
 (pg. 
537
-
546
)
46
Gershlick
AH
Stephens-Lloyd
A
Hughes
S
Abrams
KR
Stevens
SE
Uren
NG
de Belder
A
Davis
J
Pitt
M
Banning
A
Baumbach
A
Shiu
MF
Schofield
P
Dawkins
KD
Henderson
RA
Oldroyd
KG
Wilcox
R
Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
2005
, vol. 
353
 (pg. 
2758
-
2768
)
47
Wijeysundera
HC
Vijayaraghavan
R
Nallamothu
BK
Foody
JM
Krumholz
HM
Phillips
CO
Kashani
A
You
JJ
Tu
JV
Ko
DT
Rescue angioplasty or repeat fibrinolysis after failed fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2007
, vol. 
49
 (pg. 
422
-
430
)
48
Gislason
GH
Jacobsen
S
Rasmussen
JN
Rasmussen
S
Buch
P
Friberg
J
Schramm
TK
Abildstrom
SZ
Kober
L
Madsen
M
Torp-Pedersen
C
Risk of death or reinfarction associated with the use of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and nonselective nosteroidal antiinflammatory drugs after acute myocardial infarction
Circulation
 , 
2006
, vol. 
113
 (pg. 
2906
-
2913
)
49
Antman
EM
Bennett
JS
Daugherty
A
Furberg
C
Roberts
H
Taubert
KA
Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: an update for clinicians. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association
Circulation
 , 
2007
, vol. 
115
 (pg. 
326
-
332
)
50
Fox
KA
Mehta
SR
Peters
R
Zhao
F
Lakkis
N
Gersh
BJ
Yusuf
S
Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) Trial
Circulation
 , 
2004
, vol. 
110
 (pg. 
1202
-
1208
)
51
Beinart
SC
Kolm
P
Veledar
E
Zhang
Z
Mahoney
EM
Bouin
O
Gabriel
S
Jackson
J
Chen
R
Caro
J
Steinhubl
S
Topol
E
Weintraub
WS
Long-term cost effectiveness of early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel given for up to one year after percutaneous coronary intervention results: from the Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2005
, vol. 
46
 (pg. 
761
-
769
)
52
Sabatine
MS
Cannon
CP
Gibson
CM
Lopez-Sendon
JL
Montalescot
G
Theroux
P
Claeys
MJ
Cools
F
Hill
KA
Skene
AM
McCabe
CH
Braunwald
E
Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation
N Engl J Med
 , 
2005
, vol. 
352
 (pg. 
1179
-
1189
)
53
von Beckerath
N
Taubert
D
Pogatsa-Murray
G
Schomig
E
Kastrati
A
Schomig
A
Absorption, metabolization, and antiplatelet effects of 300-, 600-, and 900-mg loading doses of clopidogrel: results of the ISAR-CHOICE (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Choose Between 3 High Oral Doses for Immediate Clopidogrel Effect) Trial
Circulation
 , 
2005
, vol. 
112
 (pg. 
2946
-
2950
)
54
Montalescot
G
Sideris
G
Meuleman
C
Bal-dit-Sollier
C
Lellouche
N
Steg
PG
Slama
M
Milleron
O
Collet
JP
Henry
P
Beygui
F
Drouet
L
A randomized comparison of high clopidogrel loading doses in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the ALBION (Assessment of the Best Loading Dose of Clopidogrel to Blunt Platelet Activation, Inflammation and Ongoing Necrosis) trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2006
, vol. 
48
 (pg. 
931
-
938
)
55
De Luca
G
Suryapranata
H
Stone
GW
Antoniucci
D
Tcheng
JE
Neumann
FJ
Van de Werf
F
Antman
EM
Topol
EJ
Abciximab as adjunctive therapy to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
JAMA
 , 
2005
, vol. 
293
 (pg. 
1759
-
1765
)
56
Stone
GW
Witzenbichler
B
Guagliumi
G
Peruga
JZ
Brodie
BR
Dudek
D
Kornowski
R
Hartmann
F
Gersh
BJ
Pocock
SJ
Dangas
G
Wong
SC
Kirtane
AJ
Parise
H
Mehran
R
HORIZONS-AMI Trial Investigators
Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
2008
, vol. 
358
 (pg. 
2218
-
2230
)
57
Yusuf
S
Mehta
SR
Chrolavicius
S
Afzal
R
Pogue
J
Granger
CB
Budaj
A
Peters
RJ
Bassand
JP
Wallentin
L
Joyner
C
Fox
KA
Effects of fondaparinux on mortality and reinfarction in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the OASIS-6 randomized trial
JAMA
 , 
2006
, vol. 
295
 (pg. 
1519
-
1530
)
58
Burzotta
F
Testa
L
Giannico
F
Biondi-Zoccai
GG
Trani
C
Romagnoli
E
Mazzari
M
Mongiardo
R
Siviglia
M
Niccoli
G
De Vita
M
Porto
I
Schiavoni
G
Crea
F
Adjunctive devices in primary or rescue PCI: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
Int J Cardiol
 , 
2008
, vol. 
123
 (pg. 
313
-
321
)
59
Svilaas
T
Vlaar
PJ
van der Horst
IC
Diercks
GF
de Smet
BJ
van den Heuvel
AF
Anthonio
RL
Jessurun
GA
Tan
ES
Suurmeijer
AJ
Zijlstra
F
Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention
N Engl J Med
 , 
2008
, vol. 
358
 (pg. 
557
-
67
)
60
Vlaar
PJ
Svilaas
T
van der Horst
IC
Diercks
GF
Fokkema
ML
de Smet
BJ
van den Heuvel
AF
Anthonio
RL
Jessurun
GA
Tan
ES
Suurmeijer
AJ
Zijlstra
F
Cardiac death and reinfarction after 1 year in the Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS): a 1-year follow-up study
Lancet
 , 
2008
, vol. 
371
 (pg. 
1915
-
20
)
61
Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group
Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients
Lancet
 , 
1994
, vol. 
343
 (pg. 
311
-
322
)
62
White
H
Thrombolytic therapy in the elderly
Lancet
 , 
2000
, vol. 
356
 (pg. 
2028
-
2030
)
63
Morrison
LJ
Verbeek
PR
McDonald
AC
Sawadsky
BV
Cook
DJ
Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis
JAMA
 , 
2000
, vol. 
283
 (pg. 
2686
-
2692
)
64
Boersma
H
Maas
AC
Deckers
JW
Simoons
ML
Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour
Lancet
 , 
1996
, vol. 
348
 (pg. 
771
-
775
)
65
Steg
PG
Bonnefoy
E
Chabaud
S
Lapostolle
F
Dubien
PY
Cristofini
P
Leizorovicz
A
Touboul
P
Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty: data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial
Circulation
 , 
2003
, vol. 
108
 (pg. 
2851
-
2856
)
66
Danchin
N
Coste
P
Ferrières
J
Steg
P-G
Cottin
Y
Blanchard
D
Belle
L
Ritz
B
Kirkorian
G
Angioi
M
Sans
P
Charbonnier
B
Eltchaninoff
H
Guéret
P
Khalife
K
Asseman
P
Puel
J
Goldstein
P
Cambou
J-P
Simon
T
the FAST-MI Investigators
Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the French Registry on Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI)
Circulation
 , 
2008
, vol. 
118
 (pg. 
268
-
276
)
67
Kalla
K
Christ
G
Karnik
R
Malzer
R
Norman
G
Prachar
H
Schreiber
W
Unger
G
Glogar
HD
Kaff
A
Laggner
AN
Maurer
G
Mlczoch
J
Slany
J
Weber
HS
Huber
K
Implementation of guidelines improves the standard of care: the Viennese registry on reperfusion strategies in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Vienna STEMI registry)
Circulation
 , 
2006
, vol. 
113
 (pg. 
2398
-
2405
)
68
Gore
JM
Granger
CB
Simoons
ML
Sloan
MA
Weaver
WD
White
HD
Barbash
GI
Van de Werf
F
Aylward
PE
Topol
EJ
Califf
RM
Stroke after thrombolysis. Mortality and functional outcomes in the GUSTO-I trial. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries
Circulation
 , 
1995
, vol. 
92
 (pg. 
2811
-
2818
)
69
Van de Werf
F
Adgey
J
Ardissino
D
Armstrong
PW
Aylward
P
Barbash
G
Betriu
A
Binbrek
AS
Califf
R
Diaz
R
Fanebust
R
Fox
K
Granger
C
Heikkilä
J
Husted
S
Jansky
P
Langer
A
Lupi
E
Maseri
A
Meyer
J
Mlczoch
J
Mocceti
D
Myburgh
D
Oto
A
Paolasso
E
Pehrsson
K
Seabra-Gomes
R
Soares-Piegas
L
Sùgrue
D
Tendera
M
Topol
E
Toutouzas
P
Vahanian
A
Verheugt
F
Wallentin
L
White
H
Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic (ASSENT-2) Investigators
Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial
Lancet
 , 
1999
, vol. 
354
 (pg. 
716
-
722
)
70
The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO III) Investigators
A comparsion of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
1997
, vol. 
337
 (pg. 
1118
-
1123
)
71
Berkowitz
SD
Granger
CB
Pieper
KS
Lee
KL
Gore
JM
Simoons
M
Armstrong
PW
Topol
EJ
Califf
RM
Incidence and predictors of bleeding after contemporary thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction. The Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen activator for Occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO) I Investigators
Circulation
 , 
1997
, vol. 
95
 (pg. 
2508
-
2516
)
72
The GUSTO Investigators
An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
1993
, vol. 
329
 (pg. 
673
-
682
)
73
Böttiger
BW
Arntz
HR
Chamberlain
DA
Bluhmki
E
Belmans
A
Danays
T
Carli
PA
Adgey
JA
Bode
C
Wenzel
V
for the Thrombolysis in Cardiac Arrest (TROICA)-Investigators and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Study Group
Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
N Engl J Med
 , 
2008
 
in press
74
Barbash
GI
Birnbaum
Y
Bogaerts
K
Hudson
MP
Lesaffre
E
Fu
Y
Goodman
S
Houbracken
K
Munsters
K
Granger
CB
Pieper
KS
Califf
RM
Topol
EJ
Van de Werf
F
Treatment of reinfarction after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: an analysis of outcome and treatment choices in the global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO I) and assessment of the safety of a new thrombolytic (ASSENT 2) studies
Circulation
 , 
2001
, vol. 
103
 (pg. 
954
-
960
)
75
Di Mario
C
Dudek
D
Piscione
F
Mielecki
W
Savonitto
S
Murena
E
Dimopoulos
K
Manari
A
Gaspardone
A
Ochala
A
Zmudka
K
Bolognese
L
Steg
PG
Flather
M
Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI): an open, prospective, randomised, multicentre trial
Lancet
 , 
2008
, vol. 
371
 (pg. 
559
-
568
)
76
Fernandez-Aviles
F
Alonso
JJ
Pena
G
Blanco
J
Alonso-Briales
J
Lopez-Mesa
J
Fernandez-Vazquez
F
Moreu
J
Hernandez
RA
Castro-Beiras
A
Gabriel
R
Gibson
CM
Sanchez
PL
Primary angioplasty vs. early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: the GRACIA-2 non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial
Eur Heart J
 , 
2007
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
949
-
960
)
77
Le May
MR
Wells
GA
Labinaz
M
Davies
RF
Turek
M
Leddy
D
Maloney
J
McKibbin
T
Quinn
B
Beanlands
RS
Glover
C
Marquis
JF
O'Brien
ER
Williams
WL
Higginson
LA
Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study)
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2005
, vol. 
46
 (pg. 
417
-
424
)
78
Fernandez-Aviles
F
Alonso
JJ
Castro-Beiras
A
Vazquez
N
Blanco
J
Alonso-Briales
J
Lopez-Mesa
J
Fernandez-Vazquez
F
Calvo
I
Martinez-Elbal
L
San Roman
JA
Ramos
B
Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial
Lancet
 , 
2004
, vol. 
364
 (pg. 
1045
-
1053
)
79
ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group
Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2
Lancet
 , 
1988
, vol. 
ii
 (pg. 
349
-
360
)
80
COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group
Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45 852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial
Lancet
 , 
2005
, vol. 
366
 (pg. 
1607
-
1621
)
81
Topol EJ for The GUSTO V investigators
Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction with fibrinolytic therapy or combination reduced fibrinolytic therapy and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition: the GUSTO V randomised trial
Lancet
 , 
2001
, vol. 
357
 (pg. 
1905
-
1914
)
82
The Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 Investigators
Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: the ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction
Lancet
 , 
2001
, vol. 
358
 (pg. 
605
-
613
)
83
de Bono
D
Simoons
ML
Tijssen
J
Arnold
AE
Betriu
A
Burgersdijk
C
López Bescos
L
Mueller
E
Pfisterer
M
Van de Werf
F
Effect of early intravenous heparin on coronary patency, infarct size, and bleeding complications after alteplase thrombolysis: results of a randomized double blind European Cooperative Study Group trial
Br Heart J
 , 
1992
, vol. 
67
 (pg. 
122
-
128
)
84
The GUSTO Angiographic Investigators
The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary artery patency, ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
1993
, vol. 
329
 (pg. 
1615
-
1622
)
85
Thompson
PL
Aylward
PE
Federman
J
Giles
RW
Harris
PJ
Hodge
RL
Nelson
GI
Thomson
A
Tonkin
AM
Walsh
WF
A randomized comparison of intravenous heparin with oral aspirin and dipyridamole 24 h after recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. National Heart Foundation of Australia Coronary Thrombolysis Group
Circulation
 , 
1991
, vol. 
83
 (pg. 
1534
-
1542
)
86
Granger
CB
Hirsch
J
Califf
RM
Col
J
White
HD
Betriu
A
Woodlief
LH
Lee
KL
Bovill
EG
Simes
RJ
Topol
EJ
Activated partial thromboplastin time and outcome after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the GUSTO-I trial
Circulation
 , 
1996
, vol. 
93
 (pg. 
870
-
878
)
87
Wallentin
L
Goldstein
P
Armstrong
PW
Granger
CB
Adgey
AA
Arntz
HR
Bogaerts
K
Danays
T
Lindahl
B
Makijarvi
M
Verheugt
F
Van de Werf
F
Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in the prehospital setting: the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 PLUS randomized trial in acute myocardial infarction
Circulation
 , 
2003
, vol. 
108
 (pg. 
135
-
142
)
88
Giraldez
RR
Nicolau
JC
Corbalan
R
Gurfinkel
EP
Juarez
U
Lopez-Sendon
J
Parkhomenko
A
Molhoek
P
Mohanavelu
S
Morrow
DA
Antman
EM
Enoxaparin is superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing fibrinolysis regardless of the choice of lytic: an ExTRACT-TIMI 25 analysis
Eur Heart J
 , 
2007
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
1566
-
1573
)
89
White
HD
Braunwald
E
Murphy
SA
Jacob
AJ
Gotcheva
N
Polonetsky
L
Antman
EM
Enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in elderly and younger patients: results from ExTRACT-TIMI 25
Eur Heart J
 , 
2007
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
1066
-
1071
)
90
Peters
RJ
Joyner
C
Bassand
JP
Afzal
R
Chrolavicius
S
Mehta
SR
Oldgren
J
Wallentin
L
Budaj
A
Fox
KA
Yusuf
S
for the OASIS-6 Investigators
The role of fondaparinux as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: a subgroup analysis of the OASIS-6 trial
Eur Heart J
 , 
2008
, vol. 
29
 (pg. 
324
-
331
)
91
The Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 Trial Investigators
Thrombin-specific anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus heparin in patients receiving flbrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: the HERO-2 randomised trial
Lancet
 , 
2001
, vol. 
358
 (pg. 
1855
-
1863
)
92
Cohen
M
Gensini
GF
Maritz
F
Gurfinkel
EP
Huber
K
Timerman
A
Krzeminska-Pakula
M
Danchin
N
White
HD
Santopinto
J
Bigonzi
F
Hecquet
C
Vittori
L
The safety and efficacy of subcutaneous enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin and tirofiban versus placebo in the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients ineligible for reperfusion (TETAMI): a randomized trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2003
, vol. 
42
 (pg. 
1348
-
1356
)
93
Oldgren
J
Wallentin
L
Afzal
R
Bassand
JP
Budaj
A
Chrolavicius
S
Fox
KA
Granger
CB
Mehta
SR
Pais
P
Peters
RJ
Xavier
D
Zhu
J
Yusuf
S
Effects of fondaparinux in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction not receiving reperfusion treatment
Eur Heart J
 , 
2007
, vol. 
29
 (pg. 
315
-
323
)
94
Mehta
SR
Yusuf
S
Diaz
R
Zhu
J
Pais
P
Xavier
D
Paolasso
E
Ahmed
R
Xie
C
Kazmi
K
Tai
J
Orlandini
A
Pogue
J
Liu
L
Effect of glucose–insulin–potassium infusion on mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the CREATE-ECLA randomized controlled trial
JAMA
 , 
2005
, vol. 
293
 (pg. 
437
-
446
)
95
Oldgren
J
Wallentin
L
Afzal
R
Bassand
JP
Budaj
A
Chrolavicius
S
Fox
KA
Granger
CB
Mehta
SR
Pais
P
Peters
RJ
Xavier
D
Zhu
J
Yusuf
S
for the OASIS-6 Investigators
Effects of fondaparinux in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction not receiving reperfusion treatment
Eur Heart J
 , 
2008
, vol. 
29
 (pg. 
315
-
323
)
96
Ito
H
Tomooka
T
Sakai
N
Yu
H
Higashino
Y
Fujii
K
Masuyama
T
Kitabatake
A
Minamino
T
Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis. A predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction
Circulation
 , 
1992
, vol. 
85
 (pg. 
1699
-
1705
)
97
Ito
H
Maruyama
A
Iwakura
K
Takiuchi
S
Masuyama
T
Hori
M
Higashino
Y
Fujii
K
Minamino
T
Clinical implications of the ‘no reflow’ phenomenon. A predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction
Circulation
 , 
1996
, vol. 
93
 (pg. 
223
-
228
)
98
Kelly
RV
Cohen
MG
Runge
MS
Stouffer
GA
The no-reflow phenomenon in coronary arteries
J Thromb Haemost
 , 
2004
, vol. 
2
 (pg. 
1903
-
1907
)
99
Maes
A
Van de Werf
F
Nuyts
J
Bormans
G
Desmet
W
Mortelmans
L
Impaired myocardial tissue perfusion early after successful thrombolysis. Impact on myocardial flow, metabolism, and function at late follow-up
Circulation
 , 
1995
, vol. 
92
 (pg. 
2072
-
2078
)
100
Kaul
S
Ito
H
Microvasculature in acute myocardial ischemia: part II: evolving concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment
Circulation
 , 
2004
, vol. 
109
 (pg. 
310
-
315
)
101
Yellon
DM
Hausenloy
DJ
Myocardial reperfusion injury
N Engl J Med
 , 
2007
, vol. 
357
 (pg. 
1121
-
1135
)
102
Sorajja
P
Gersh
BJ
Costantini
C
McLaughlin
MG
Zimetbaum
P
Cox
DA
Garcia
E
Tcheng
JE
Mehran
R
Lansky
AJ
Kandzari
DE
Grines
CL
Stone
GW
Combined prognostic utility of ST-segment recovery and myocardial blush after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
Eur Heart J
 , 
2005
, vol. 
26
 (pg. 
667
-
674
)
103
Galiuto
L
Barchetta
S
Paladini
S
Lanza
G
Rebuzzi
AG
Marzilli
M
Crea
F
Functional and structural correlates of persistent ST elevation after acute myocardial infarction successfully treated by percutaneous coronary intervention
Heart
 , 
2007
, vol. 
93
 (pg. 
1376
-
1380
)
104
Ito
H
No-reflow phenomenon and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovas Med
 , 
2006
, vol. 
3
 (pg. 
499
-
506
)
105
Iwakura
K
Ito
H
Takiuchi
S
Taniyama
Y
Nakatsuchi
Y
Negoro
S
Higashino
Y
Okamura
A
Masuyama
T
Hori
M
Fujii
K
Minamino
T
Alternation in the coronary blood flow velocity pattern in patients with no reflow and reperfused acute myocardial infarction
Circulation
 , 
1996
, vol. 
94
 (pg. 
1269
-
1275
)
106
Sheehan
FH
Braunwald
E
Canner
P
Dodge
HT
Gore
J
Van Natta
P
Passamani
ER
Williams
DO
Zaret
B
The effect of intravenous thrombolytic therapy on left ventricular function: a report on tissue-type plasminogen activator and streptokinase from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI Phase I) trial
Circulation
 , 
1987
, vol. 
75
 (pg. 
817
-
829
)
107
van ‘t Hof
AW
Liem
A
Suryapranata
H
Hoorntje
JC
de Boer
MJ
Zijlstra
F
Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group
Circulation
 , 
1998
, vol. 
97
 (pg. 
2302
-
2306
)
108
Eeckhout
E
Kern
MJ
The coronary no-reflow phenomenon: a review of mechanisms and therapies
Eur Heart J
 , 
2001
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
729
-
739
)
109
Ross
AM
Gibbons
RJ
Stone
GW
Kloner
RA
Alexander
RW
A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of adenosine as an adjunct to reperfusion in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMISTAD-II)
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2005
, vol. 
45
 (pg. 
1775
-
1780
)
110
de Lemos
JA
Antman
EM
Gibson
CM
McCabe
CH
Giugliano
RP
Murphy
SA
Coulter
SA
Anderson
K
Scherer
J
Frey
MJ
Van Der Wieken
R
Van de Werf
F
Braunwald
E
Abciximab improves both epicardial flow and myocardial reperfusion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Observations from the TIMI 14 trial
Circulation
 , 
2000
, vol. 
101
 (pg. 
239
-
243
)
111
Petronio
AS
Rovai
D
Musumeci
G
Baglini
R
Nardi
C
Limbruno
U
Palagi
C
Volterrani
D
Mariani
M
Effects of abciximab on microvascular integrity and left ventricular functional recovery in patients with acute infarction treated by primary coronary angioplasty
Eur Heart J
 , 
2003
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
67
-
76
)
112
Thielmann
M
Massoudy
P
Neuhauser
M
Tsagakis
K
Marggraf
G
Kamler
M
Mann
K
Erbel
R
Jakob
H
Prognostic value of preoperative cardiac troponin I in patients undergoing emergency coronary artery bypass surgery with non-ST-elevation or ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes
Circulation
 , 
2006
, vol. 
114
 
Suppl I
(pg. 
I448
-
I453
)
113
Lee
DC
Oz
MC
Weinberg
AD
Ting
W
Appropriate timing of surgical intervention after transmural acute myocardial infarction
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
 , 
2003
, vol. 
125
 (pg. 
115
-
119
)
114
Nicod
P
Jr.
Gilpin
E
Dittrich
H
Chappuis
F
Ahnve
S
Engler
R
Henning
H
Ross
J
Jr.
Influence on prognosis and morbidity of left ventricular ejection fraction with and without signs of left ventricular failure after acute myocardial infarction
Am J Cardiol
 , 
1988
, vol. 
61
 (pg. 
1165
-
1171
)
115
Dickstein
K
Cohen-Solal
A
Filippatos
G
McMurray
JJV
Ponikowski
P
Poole-Wilson
PA
Strömberg
A
van Veldhuisen
DJ
Atar
D
Hoes
AW
Keren
A
Mebazaa
A
Nieminen
M
Priori
SG
Swedberg
K
ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008
Eur Heart J
 , 
2008
, vol. 
29
 (pg. 
2388
-
2442
)
116
Hochman
JS
Sleeper
LA
White
HD
Dzavik
V
Wong
SC
Menon
V
Webb
JG
Steingart
R
Picard
MH
Menegus
MA
Boland
J
Sanborn
T
Buller
CE
Modur
S
Forman
R
Desvigne-Nickens
P
Jacobs
AK
Slater
JN
LeJemtel
TH
One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock
JAMA
 , 
2001
, vol. 
285
 (pg. 
190
-
192
)
117
Leshnower
BG
Gleason
TG
O'Hara
ML
Pochettino
A
Woo
YJ
Morris
RJ
Gardner
TJ
Acker
MA
Safety and efficacy of left ventricular assist device support in postmyocardial infarction cardiogenic shock
Ann Thorac Surg
 , 
2006
, vol. 
81
 (pg. 
1365
-
1370
discussion 1370–1371.
118
Tayara
W
Starling
RC
Yamani
MH
Wazni
O
Jubran
F
Smedira
N
Improved survival after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with circulatory support and transplantation: comparing aggressive intervention with conservative treatment
J Heart Lung Transplant
 , 
2006
, vol. 
25
 (pg. 
504
-
509
)
119
Thiele
H
Smalling
RW
Schuler
GC
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
Eur Heart J
 , 
2007
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
2057
-
2063
)
120
Cummings
RG
Califf
R
Jones
RN
Reimer
KA
Kong
Y-H
Lowe
JE
Correlates of survival in patients with postinfarction ventricular septal defect
Ann Thorac Surg
 , 
1989
, vol. 
47
 (pg. 
824
-
830
)
121
Lemery
R
Smith
HC
Giuliani
ER
Gersh
BJ
Prognosis in rupture of the ventricular septum after acute myocardial infarction and role of early surgical intervention
Am J Cardiol
 , 
1992
, vol. 
70
 (pg. 
147
-
151
)
122
Topaz
O
Taylor
AL
Interventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction: from pathophysiologic features to the role of invasive and noninvasive diagnostic modalities in current management
Am J Med
 , 
1992
, vol. 
93
 (pg. 
683
-
688
)
123
Chevalier
P
Burri
H
Fahrat
F
Cucherat
M
Jegaden
O
Obadia
JF
Kirkorian
G
Touboul
P
Perioperative outcome and long-term survival of surgery for acute post-infarction mitral regurgitation
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
 , 
2004
, vol. 
26
 (pg. 
330
-
335
)
124
Chen
Q
Darlymple-Hay
MJ
Alexiou
C
Ohri
SK
Haw
MP
Livesey
SA
Monro
JL
Mitral valve surgery for acute papillary muscle rupture following myocardial infarction
Heart Valve Dis
 , 
2002
, vol. 
11
 (pg. 
27
-
31
)
125
Newby
KH
Thompson
T
Stebbins
A
Topol
EJ
Califf
RM
Natale
A
Sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy: incidence and outcomes. The GUSTO Investigators
Circulation
 , 
1998
, vol. 
98
 (pg. 
2567
-
2573
)
126
Henkel
DM
Witt
BJ
Gersh
BJ
Jacobsen
SJ
Weston
SA
Meverden
RA
Roger
VL
Ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction: a 20-year community study
Am Heart J
 , 
2006
, vol. 
151
 (pg. 
806
-
812
)
127
Huikuri
H
Castellanos
A
Myerburg
R
Sudden death due to cardiac arrhythmias
N Engl J Med
 , 
2001
, vol. 
345
 (pg. 
1473
-
1482
)
128
Gardner
RA
Kruyer
WB
Pickard
JS
Celio
PV
Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 193 U.S. military aviators: long-term follow-up
Aviat Space Environ Med
 , 
2000
, vol. 
71
 (pg. 
783
-
790
)
129
Hjalmarson
A
Effects of beta blockade on sudden cardiac death during acute myocardial infarction and the postinfarction period
Am J Cardiol
 , 
1997
, vol. 
80
 (pg. 
35J
-
39J
)
130
Zipes
DP
Camm
AJ
Borggrefe
M
Buxton
AE
Chaitman
B
Fromer
M
Gregoratos
G
Klein
G
Moss
AJ
Myerburg
RJ
Priori
SG
Quinones
MA
Roden
DM
Silka
MJ
Tracy
C
Blanc
JJ
Budaj
A
Dean
V
Deckers
JW
Despres
C
Dickstein
K
Lekakis
J
McGregor
K
Metra
M
Morais
J
Osterspey
A
Tamargo
JL
Zamorano
JL
Smith
SC
Jr
Jacobs
AK
Adams
CD
Antman
EM
Anderson
JL
Hunt
SA
Halperin
JL
Nishimura
R
Ornato
JP
Page
RL
Riegel
B
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death) developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Eur Heart J
 , 
2006
, vol. 
27
 (pg. 
2099
-
2140
)
131
Rathore
SS
Berger
AK
Weinfurt
KP
Schulman
KA
Oetgen
WJ
Gersh
BJ
Solomon
AJ
Acute myocardial infarction complicated by atrial fibrillation in the elderly: prevalence and outcomes
Circulation
 , 
2000
, vol. 
101
 (pg. 
969
-
974
)
132
Fuster
V
Ryden
LE
Cannom
DS
Crijns
HJ
Curtis
AB
Ellenbogen
KA
Halperin
JL
Le Heuzey
JY
Kay
GN
Lowe
JE
Olsson
SB
Prystowsky
EN
Tamargo
JL
Wann
S
Smith
SC
Jr
Jacobs
AK
Adams
CD
Anderson
JL
Antman
EM
Halperin
JL
Hunt
SA
Nishimura
R
Ornato
JP
Page
RL
Riegel
B
Priori
SG
Blanc
JJ
Budaj
A
Camm
AJ
Dean
V
Deckers
JW
Despres
C
Dickstein
K
Lekakis
J
McGregor
K
Metra
M
Morais
J
Osterspey
A
Tamargo
JL
Zamorano
JL
ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society
Circulation
 , 
2006
, vol. 
114
 (pg. 
e257
-
e354
)
133
Goldstein
JA
Lee
DT
Pica
MC
Dixon
SR
O'Neill
WW
Patterns of coronary compromise leading to bradyarrhythmias and hypotension in inferior myocardial infarction
Coron Artery Dis
 , 
2005
, vol. 
16
 (pg. 
265
-
274
)
134
Meine
TJ
Al-Khatib
SM
Alexander
JH
Granger
CB
White
HD
Kilaru
R
Williams
K
Ohman
EM
Topol
E
Califf
RM
Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of high-degree atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy
Am Heart J
 , 
2005
, vol. 
149
 (pg. 
670
-
674
)
135
Newby
KH
Pisano
E
Krucoff
MW
Green
C
Natale
A
Incidence and clinical relevance of the occurrence of bundle-branch block in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy
Circulation
 , 
1996
, vol. 
94
 (pg. 
2424
-
2428
)
136
Gregoratos
G
Jr.
Abrams
J
Epstein
AE
Freedman
RA
Hayes
DL
Hlatky
MA
Kerber
RE
Naccarelli
GV
Schoenfeld
MH
Silka
MJ
Winters
SL
Gibbons
RJ
Antman
EM
Alpert
JS
Gregoratos
G
Hiratzka
LF
Faxon
DP
Jacobs
AK
Fuster
V
Smith
SC
Jr.
ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines)
Circulation
 , 
2002
, vol. 
106
 (pg. 
2145
-
2161
)
137
Vardas
PE
Auricchio
A
Blanc
JJ
Daubert
JC
Drexler
H
Ector
H
Gasparini
M
Linde
C
Morgado
FB
Oto
A
Sutton
R
Trusz-Gluza
M
Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association
Eur Heart J
 , 
2007
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
2256
-
2295
)
138
Roberts
R
Rogers
WJ
Mueller
HS
Lambrew
CT
Diver
DJ
Smith
HC
Willerson
JT
Knatterud
GL
Forman
S
Passamani
E
Zaret
BL
Wackers
FJT
Braunwald
E
for the TIMI Investigators
Immediate versus deferred beta-blockade following thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) II-B Study
Circulation
 , 
1991
, vol. 
83
 (pg. 
422
-
437
)
139
Van de Werf
F
Janssens
L
Brzostek
T
Mortelmans
L
Wackers
FJ
Willems
GM
Heidbuchel
H
Lesaffre
E
Scheys
I
Collen
D
De Geest
H
Short-term effects of early intravenous treatment with a beta-adrenergic blocking agent or a specific bradycardiac agent in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolytic therapy
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
1993
, vol. 
22
 (pg. 
407
-
416
)
140
Pfisterer
M
Cox
JL
Granger
CB
Brener
SJ
Naylor
CD
Califf
RM
Van de Werf
F
Stebbins
AL
Lee
KL
Topol
EJ
Armstrong
PW
Atenolol use and clinical outcomes after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: the GUSTO-I experience. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA (alteplase) for Occluded Coronary Arteries
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
1998
, vol. 
32
 (pg. 
634
-
640
)
141
Freemantle
N
Cleland
J
Young
P
Mason
J
Harrison
J
Beta blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis
BMJ
 , 
1999
, vol. 
318
 (pg. 
1730
-
1737
)
142
COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group
Early intravenous then oral metoprolol in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial
Lancet
 , 
2005
, vol. 
366
 (pg. 
1622
-
1632
)
143
GISSI-3
Effects of lisinopril and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6-week mortality and ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'infarto Miocardico
Lancet
 , 
1994
, vol. 
343
 (pg. 
1115
-
1122
)
144
ISIS-4
A randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group
Lancet
 , 
1995
, vol. 
345
 (pg. 
669
-
685
)
145
Yusuf
S
Held
P
Furberg
C
Update of effects of calcium antagonists in myocardial infarction or angina in light of the second Danish Verapamil Infarction Trial (DAVIT-II) and other recent studies
Am J Cardiol
 , 
1991
, vol. 
67
 (pg. 
1295
-
1297
)
146
Chinese Cardiac Study Collaborative Group
Oral captopril versus placebo among 13,634 patients with suspected myocardial infarction: interim report from the Chinese Cardiac study (CCS-1)
Lancet
 , 
1995
, vol. 
345
 (pg. 
686
-
687
)
147
Pfeffer
MA
Hennekens
CH
When a question has an answer: rationale for our early termination of the HEART trial
Am J Cardiol
 , 
1995
, vol. 
75
 (pg. 
1173
-
1175
)
148
Antman
E
The MAGIC trial
Presented at the XXIVth Scientific Sessions of the European Society of Cardiology in Berlin
September 2002
149
Brodie
BR
Stuckey
TD
Hansen
C
Bradshaw
BH
Downey
WE
Pulsipher
MW
Comparison of late survival in patients with cardiogenic shock due to right ventricular infarction versus left ventricular pump failure following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction
Am J Cardiol
 , 
2007
, vol. 
99
 (pg. 
431
-
435
)
150
Zeymer
U
Neuhaus
KL
Wegscheider
K
Tebbe
U
Molhoek
P
Schroder
R
Effects of thrombolytic therapy in acute inferior myocardial infarction with or without right ventricular involvement. HIT-4 Trial Group. Hirudin for Improvement of Thrombolysis
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
1998
, vol. 
32
 (pg. 
876
-
881
)
151
Donahoe
SM
Stewart
GC
McCabe
CH
Mohanavelu
S
Murphy
SA
Cannon
CP
Antman
EM
Diabetes and mortality following acute coronary syndromes
JAMA
 , 
2007
, vol. 
298
 (pg. 
765
-
775
)
152
Mak
KH
Moliterno
DJ
Granger
CB
Miller
DP
White
HD
Wilcox
RG
Califf
RM
Topol
EJ
Influence of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcome in the thrombolytic era of acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
1997
, vol. 
30
 (pg. 
171
-
179
)
153
McGuire
DK
Emanuelsson
H
Granger
CB
Magnus Ohman
E
Moliterno
DJ
White
HD
Ardissino
D
Box
JW
Califf
RM
Topol
EJ
Influence of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcomes across the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes. Findings from the GUSTO-IIb study. GUSTO IIb Investigators
Eur Heart J
 , 
2000
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
1750
-
1758
)
154
Haffner
SM
Lehto
S
Ronnemaa
T
Pyorala
K
Laakso
M
Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
1998
, vol. 
339
 (pg. 
229
-
234
)
155
Laakso
M
Cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: challenge for treatment and prevention
J Intern Med
 , 
2001
, vol. 
249
 (pg. 
225
-
235
)
156
Roe
MT
Peterson
ED
Newby
LK
Chen
AY
Pollack
CV
Jr
Brindis
RG
Harrington
RA
Christenson
RH
Smith
SC
Jr
Califf
RM
Braunwald
E
Gibler
WB
Ohman
EM
The influence of risk status on guideline adherence for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
Am Heart J
 , 
2006
, vol. 
151
 (pg. 
1205
-
1213
)
157
Norhammar
A
Malmberg
K
Ryden
L
Tornvall
P
Stenestrand
U
Wallentin
L
Under utilisation of evidence-based treatment partially explains the unfavourable prognosis in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction
Eur Heart J
 , 
2003
, vol. 
24
 (pg. 
838
-
844
)
158
Mahaffey
KW
Granger
CB
Toth
CA
White
HD
Stebbins
AL
Barbash
GI
Vahanian
A
Topol
EJ
Califf
RM
Diabetic retinopathy should not be a contraindication to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: review of ocular hemorrhage incidence and location in the GUSTO-I trial. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
1997
, vol. 
30
 (pg. 
1606
-
1610
)
159
Anselmino
M
Bartnik
M
Malmberg
K
Ryden
L
Management of coronary artery disease in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Acute management reasonable but secondary prevention unacceptably poor: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Diabetes and the Heart
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil
 , 
2007
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
28
-
36
)
160
Malmberg
K
Herlitz
J
Hjalmarson
A
Ryden
L
Effects of metoprolol on mortality and late infarction in diabetics with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Retrospective data from two large studies
Eur Heart J
 , 
1989
, vol. 
10
 (pg. 
423
-
428
)
161
Stenestrand
U
Wallentin
L
Early statin treatment following acute myocardial infarction and 1-year survival
JAMA
 , 
2001
, vol. 
285
 (pg. 
430
-
436
)
162
Cao
JJ
Hudson
M
Jankowski
M
Whitehouse
F
Weaver
WD
Relation of chronic and acute glycemic control on mortality in acute myocardial infarction with diabetes mellitus
Am J Cardiol
 , 
2005
, vol. 
96
 (pg. 
183
-
186
)
163
Malmberg
K
Norhammar
A
Wedel
H
Ryden
L
Glycometabolic state at admission: important risk marker of mortality in conventionally treated patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction: long-term results from the Diabetes and Insulin-Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI) study
Circulation
 , 
1999
, vol. 
99
 (pg. 
2626
-
2632
)
164
Malmberg
K
Ryden
L
Efendic
S
Herlitz
J
Nicol
P
Waldenstrom
A
Wedel
H
Welin
L
Randomized trial of insulin–glucose infusion followed by subcutaneous insulin treatment in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (DIGAMI study): effects on mortality at 1 year
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
1995
, vol. 
26
 (pg. 
57
-
65
)
165
Malmberg
K
Ryden
L
Hamsten
A
Herlitz
J
Waldenstrom
A
Wedel
H
Effects of insulin treatment on cause-specific one-year mortality and morbidity in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. DIGAMI Study Group. Diabetes Insulin-Glucose in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Eur Heart J
 , 
1996
, vol. 
17
 (pg. 
1337
-
1344
)
166
Malmberg
K
Prospective randomised study of intensive insulin treatment on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. DIGAMI (Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction) Study Group
BMJ
 , 
1997
, vol. 
314
 (pg. 
1512
-
1515
)
167
Malmberg
K
Ryden
L
Wedel
H
Birkeland
K
Bootsma
A
Dickstein
K
Efendic
S
Fisher
M
Hamsten
A
Herlitz
J
Hildebrandt
P
MacLeod
K
Laakso
M
Torp-Pedersen
C
Waldenstrom
A
Intense metabolic control by means of insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction (DIGAMI 2): effects on mortality and morbidity
Eur Heart J
 , 
2005
, vol. 
26
 (pg. 
650
-
661
)
168
Deedwania
P
Kosiborod
M
Barrett
E
Ceriello
A
Isley
W
Mazzone
T
Raskin
P
Hyperglycemia and acute coronary syndrome. A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Diabetes Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism
Circulation
 , 
2008
, vol. 
117
 (pg. 
1610
-
1619
)
169
Svensson
AM
McGuire
DK
Abrahamsson
P
Dellborg
M
Association between hyper- and hypoglycaemia and 2 year all-cause mortality risk in diabetic patients with acute coronary events
Eur Heart J
 , 
2005
, vol. 
26
 (pg. 
1245
-
1248
)
170
Sarnak
MJ
Levey
AS
Schoolwerth
AC
Coresh
J
Culleton
B
Hamm
LL
McCullough
PA
Kasiske
BL
Kelepouris
E
Klag
MJ
Parfrey
P
Pfeffer
M
Raij
L
Spinosa
DJ
Wilson
PW
Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention
Hypertension
 , 
2003
, vol. 
42
 (pg. 
1050
-
1065
)
171
Anavekar
NS
McMurray
JJ
Velazquez
EJ
Solomon
SD
Kober
L
Rouleau
JL
White
HD
Nordlander
R
Maggioni
A
Dickstein
K
Zelenkofske
S
Leimberger
JD
Califf
RM
Pfeffer
MA
Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction
N Engl J Med
 , 
2004
, vol. 
351
 (pg. 
1285
-
1295
)
172
Assali
AR
Brosh
D
Ben-Dor
I
Solodky
A
Fuchs
S
Teplitsky
I
Kornowski
R
The impact of renal insufficiency on patients’ outcomes in emergent angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
 , 
2007
, vol. 
69
 (pg. 
395
-
400
)