## Abstract

As a consequence of improved technology, there is growing clinical interest in the use of multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) for non-invasive coronary angiography. Indeed, the accuracy of MDCT to detect or exclude coronary artery stenoses has been high in many published studies. This report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT (WG 5) of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology summarizes the present state of cardiac CT technology, as well as the currently available data concerning its accuracy and applicability in certain clinical situations. Besides coronary CT angiography, the use of CT for the assessment of cardiac morphology and function, evaluation of perfusion and viability, and analysis of heart valves is discussed. In addition, recommendations for clinical applications of cardiac CT imaging are given and limitations of the technique are described.

## Introduction

The introduction of multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) in 1999 led to a significant improvement in the temporal and spatial resolution of CT, which permitted substantial expansion of potential indications for CT imaging. Small and rapidly moving anatomic structures could be visualized with good image quality, and early experience with the initial four-slice scanners demonstrated the potential of MDCT to visualize the coronary arteries.

The possibility to perform cardiac and coronary imaging was a major driving force behind an ongoing, rapid evolution of scanner technology, accompanied by improvements of software and post-processing tools. The most recent generations of MDCT with the ability to acquire 64 slices simultaneously allow relatively robust morphological and functional imaging of the heart. Although initially, clinical applications were restricted to the detection of coronary calcium, visualization of the coronary artery lumen (non-invasive coronary angiography) has now become the major focus of cardiac MDCT. In addition, the assessment of non-stenotic coronary atherosclerotic plaques, coronary stents, or bypass grafts has become possible in selected situations, as well as the evaluation of left and right ventricular function, valvular function, coronary and pulmonary veins, and general morphology of the heart and great vessels.

The present manuscript summarizes the current state of technology and clinical applications of cardiac CT, with a special emphasis on coronary CT angiography. It does not constitute a meta-analysis of published literature, but merely reflects an expert consensus on the current status and limitations of cardiac CT imaging, as well as potential clinical indications.

## Technical background and data acquisition

The first commercially available CT technology that allowed ECG-gated cardiac CT imaging was electron beam CT (EBCT), which had been used for non-invasive coronary imaging since the early 1990s.1 The system provided a very high temporal resolution (100 ms per image), but had substantial limitations concerning spatial resolution and image noise, which negatively affected image quality.2

The introduction of MDCT3,4 provided the technical requirements to perform cardiac imaging with CT systems that followed the traditional design of a rotating X-ray tube and detectors.5 Multiple detector rows permit high-resolution imaging with short overall data acquisition time, and the increased gantry rotation speed, together with dedicated ECG-gated image reconstruction algorithms, provides for high temporal resolution and the ability to obtain phase-correlated image data sets. ECG-gated four-slice MDCT, introduced around the year 2000,6–8 provided the first evidence that mechanical CT scanning of the heart and coronary arteries is feasible, but was burdened with a high rate of unevaluable studies, mostly due to insufficient temporal resolution. Currently, 64-slice CT is considered state-of-the-art for cardiac CT imaging, whereas 256-slice systems are being developed.

Although ‘sequential’ imaging (so-called ‘step-and-shoot’ mode) is used in some instances, cardiac CT is usually based on continuous spiral scanning of the heart with a very low pitch (table feed/gantry rotation) in order to achieve oversampling of information across different phases of the cardiac cycle and in some cases even across several consecutive cardiac cycles. Simultaneous recording of the ECG permits retrospective reconstruction of images at any desired phase of the cardiac cycle, which in turn provides for the identification of the time instant in which the cardiac structures show the least residual motion. In addition, the ability to reconstruct data sets at multiple time instants during the cardiac cycle allows for ‘dynamic’ imaging and analysis of function.

Coronary artery visualization requires the acquisition of CT data with the highest temporal and spatial resolution. With current 64-slice CT systems, data acquisition is performed within a single breath-hold of about 5–10 s. Synchronization of data acquisition and contrast enhancement can be achieved by calculating the veno-arterial transit time, using a small bolus of contrast agent and retrospective analysis of the enhancement pattern over time (so-called ‘test bolus’ technique), or by real-time monitoring of the arrival of the bolus, for example, in the ascending aorta (so-called ‘bolus tracking’ technique). Typically, the amount of contrast material required for coronary CT angiography is about 60–100 mL depending on scanner type, patient size, heart rate, and body mass index. The contrast agent should be of high iodine concentration. Usually, the flow rate is 5 mL/s, but especially in obese patients, increasing the flow rate may be advantageous.

After acquisition of the raw data, retrospectively ECG-gated image data sets are generated. These data sets usually consist of 200–300 thin (0.5–0.75 mm) and overlapping slices in transaxial orientation. Especially for coronary artery imaging, it is important to carefully identify the time instant in the cardiac cycle which shows least cardiac motion. For lower heart rates, the best time instant is usually in the mid- to end-diastolic phase, whereas for higher heart rates, reconstruction in end-systole may yield superior results.9–11 The average heart rate and heart rate variability have been shown to substantially influence image quality. As the most important predictor for diagnostic image quality, low (<60 b.p.m.) and regular heart rates (ΔHR <±2 b.p.m.) have been identified.12–16 For this reason, beta blockers are frequently administered prior to the CT scan in order to lower heart rate and to obtain robust image quality.17 Nitroglycerin can be administered sublingually to achieve vasodilatation with optimal opacification and visualization of the coronary arteries.18

The effective radiation dose of a contrast-enhanced cardiac CT scan is ∼5–20 mSv.19–33 Numerous factors influence radiation dose. Reductions in radiation dose can be achieved by obvious and straightforward measures, such as keeping the length of the scan volume as short and tube current as low as possible. Another effective way of reducing radiation dose is the use of ECG-correlated tube current modulation,34 in which full tube current is limited to a short-time period in diastole, resulting in the reduction of radiation dose by 30–40%.35 Tube current modulation is particularly effective in low heart rates. Furthermore, reducing tube voltage to 100 kV instead of the commonly used 120 kV results in a substantial further reduction of radiation exposure36 and should be considered in patients with a low-to-moderate body mass. Recently, an image-acquisition protocol using a ‘step-and-shoot’ approach has been introduced for coronary artery imaging by MDCT. This is a non-spiral mode, with the table remaining stationary while the X-ray tube rotates around the patient. When data acquisition is completed for one location, the table is advanced to the next location for the subsequent scan. Initial reports indicate substantial reductions in radiation dose.37

While the radiation dose of a cardiac CT scan is in the same order of magnitude as other diagnostic tests used in cardiology, such as nuclear perfusion scans (with a typical dose of 8–25 mSv38,39), all possible measures should be taken to keep the dose as low as possible, and considerations as to clinical indications for cardiac CT must always take radiation exposure into account.39,40

## Coronary artery imaging

### Detection of coronary artery stenoses

The opportunity to non-invasively visualize coronary anatomy is the major reason for the current interest in cardiac MDCT. In the year 2000, four-slice CT systems, for the first time, allowed coronary artery imaging with spiral CT, but limited spatial and temporal resolution, as well as long scan times (up to 35 s) limited their clinical value for coronary artery visualization. Only the proximal parts of the coronary arteries were interpretable, and up to 25% of coronary segments could not be evaluated due to insufficient image quality.6,8 With the introduction of 16- and 64-slice MDCT systems, improved temporal and spatial resolution as well as substantially shorter scan times led to improved image quality throughout the entire coronary tree41(Figure 1). A recent meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in the accuracy for the detection of coronary artery stenoses for 64-slice CT when compared with previous scanner generations. The weighted mean sensitivity for the detection of coronary artery stenoses increased from 84% for four-slice CT and 83% for 16-slice CT to 93% for 64-slice CT, whereas the respective specificities were 93, 96, and 96%.42

Figure 1

Coronary artery stenosis detection with multi-detector row computed tomography. High-grade stenosis of the mid-right coronary artery in a 55-year-old man with atypical chest pain. (A) A maximum intensity projection, with a high-grade luminal reduction distal to a calcified segment. (B) A curved multiplanar reconstruction. (C) A three-dimensional rendering of the heart and right coronary artery. (D) shows the corresponding coronary angiogram.

Figure 1

Coronary artery stenosis detection with multi-detector row computed tomography. High-grade stenosis of the mid-right coronary artery in a 55-year-old man with atypical chest pain. (A) A maximum intensity projection, with a high-grade luminal reduction distal to a calcified segment. (B) A curved multiplanar reconstruction. (C) A three-dimensional rendering of the heart and right coronary artery. (D) shows the corresponding coronary angiogram.

The results of recent studies that analysed the accuracy of 64-slice CT and dual-source CT for the detection of coronary artery stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.43–53 Pooling the data of more than 800 patients yields a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 87–90) with a specificity of 96% (95% CI 96–97) and a positive and negative predictive value of 78% (95% CI 76–80) and 98% (95% CI 98–99), respectively. On average, 4.5% of segments (mainly distal segments or very small side branches) could not be evaluated. Importantly, the negative predictive value was consistently high in all studies, indicating that the technique may be most suitable as a non-invasive tool to rule out significant CAD and avoid further imaging or invasive angiography.

Table 1

Diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography and dual-source computed tomography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis (luminal diameter >50%) on a per-segment basis

Author Number of patients Not evaluable (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
Leschka et al.53 67 0 (0/1005) 94 (165/176) 97 (805/829) 87 (165/189) 99 (805/816)
Leber et al.44 55 0 (0/732) 76 (57/75) 97 (638/657) 75 (57/76) 97 (638/656)
Raff et al.49 70 12 (130/1065) 86 (79/92) 95 (802/843) 66 (79/120) 98 (802/815)
Mollet et al.46 51 0 (0/725) 99 (93/94) 95 (601/631) 76 (93/123) 99 (601/602)
Ropers et al.50 81 4 (45/1128) 93 (39/42) 97 (1010/1041) 56 (39/70) 100 (1010/1013)
Schuijf et al.51 60 1.4 (12/854) 85 (62/73) 98 (755/769) 82 (62/76) 99 (755/766)
Ong et al.48 134 9.7 (143/1474) 82 (177/217) 96 (1067/1114) 79 (177/224) 96 (1067/1107)
Ehara et al.43 69 8 (82/966) 90 (275/304) 94 (545/580) 89 (275/310) 95 (545/574)
Nikolaou et al.47 72 9.5 (97/1020) 82 (97/118) 95 (762/805) 69 (97/140) 97 (762/789)
Weustink et al.52 77 0 (0/1489) 95 (208/220) 95 (1200/1269) 75 (208/277) 99 (1200/1212)
Leber et al.45 88 1.3 (16/1232) 94 (38/42) 99 (1165/1174) 81 (38/47) 99 (1165/1169)
Total 824 4.5 (525/11690) (95% CI 4.1−4.9) 89 (1290/1453) (95% CI 87−90) 96 (9350/9712) (95% CI 96−97) 78 (1290/1652) (95% CI 76−80) 98 (6350/9513) (95% CI 98−99)
Author Number of patients Not evaluable (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
Leschka et al.53 67 0 (0/1005) 94 (165/176) 97 (805/829) 87 (165/189) 99 (805/816)
Leber et al.44 55 0 (0/732) 76 (57/75) 97 (638/657) 75 (57/76) 97 (638/656)
Raff et al.49 70 12 (130/1065) 86 (79/92) 95 (802/843) 66 (79/120) 98 (802/815)
Mollet et al.46 51 0 (0/725) 99 (93/94) 95 (601/631) 76 (93/123) 99 (601/602)
Ropers et al.50 81 4 (45/1128) 93 (39/42) 97 (1010/1041) 56 (39/70) 100 (1010/1013)
Schuijf et al.51 60 1.4 (12/854) 85 (62/73) 98 (755/769) 82 (62/76) 99 (755/766)
Ong et al.48 134 9.7 (143/1474) 82 (177/217) 96 (1067/1114) 79 (177/224) 96 (1067/1107)
Ehara et al.43 69 8 (82/966) 90 (275/304) 94 (545/580) 89 (275/310) 95 (545/574)
Nikolaou et al.47 72 9.5 (97/1020) 82 (97/118) 95 (762/805) 69 (97/140) 97 (762/789)
Weustink et al.52 77 0 (0/1489) 95 (208/220) 95 (1200/1269) 75 (208/277) 99 (1200/1212)
Leber et al.45 88 1.3 (16/1232) 94 (38/42) 99 (1165/1174) 81 (38/47) 99 (1165/1169)
Total 824 4.5 (525/11690) (95% CI 4.1−4.9) 89 (1290/1453) (95% CI 87−90) 96 (9350/9712) (95% CI 96−97) 78 (1290/1652) (95% CI 76−80) 98 (6350/9513) (95% CI 98−99)

All values are expressed as per cent with absolute numbers in parentheses. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated only for evaluable segments.

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

Table 2

Diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography and dual-source computed tomography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis (luminal diameter >50%) on a per-patient basis

Author Number of patients Not evaluable (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
Leschka et al.53 67 100 (47/47) 100 (20/20) 100 (47/47) 100 (20/20)
Leber et al.44 59a 23.7 (14/59) 88 (22/25) 85 (17/20) 88 (22/25) 85 (17/20)
Raff et al.49 70 95 (38/40) 90 (27/30) 93 (38/41) 93 (27/29)
Mollet et al.46 52 1.9 (1/52) 100 (38/38) 92 (12/13) 97 (38/39) 100 (12/12)
Ropers et al.50 84 3.6 (3/84) 96 (25/26) 91 (50/55) 83 (25/30) 98 (50/51)
Schuijf et al.51 61 1.6 (1/61) 94 (29/31) 97 (28/29) 97(29/30) 93 (27/29)
Ehara et al.43 69 2.9 (2/69) 98 (59/60) 86 (6/7) 98 (59/60) 86 (6/7)
Nikolaou et al.47 72 5.6 (4/72) 97 (38/39) 79 (23/29) 86 (38/44) 96 (23/24)
Weustink et al.52 77 99 (76/77) 87 (20/23) 96 (76/79) 95 (20/21)
Leber et al.45 90 2.2 (2/90) 95 (20/21) 90 (60/67) 74 (20/27) 99 (60/61)
Total 701 3.8 (27/701) (95% CI 2.6−5.6) 98 (394/404) (95% CI 95−99) 90 (263/293) (95% CI 86−93] 93 (394/424) (95% CI 90−95) 95 (263/273) (95% CI 93−98)
Author Number of patients Not evaluable (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
Leschka et al.53 67 100 (47/47) 100 (20/20) 100 (47/47) 100 (20/20)
Leber et al.44 59a 23.7 (14/59) 88 (22/25) 85 (17/20) 88 (22/25) 85 (17/20)
Raff et al.49 70 95 (38/40) 90 (27/30) 93 (38/41) 93 (27/29)
Mollet et al.46 52 1.9 (1/52) 100 (38/38) 92 (12/13) 97 (38/39) 100 (12/12)
Ropers et al.50 84 3.6 (3/84) 96 (25/26) 91 (50/55) 83 (25/30) 98 (50/51)
Schuijf et al.51 61 1.6 (1/61) 94 (29/31) 97 (28/29) 97(29/30) 93 (27/29)
Ehara et al.43 69 2.9 (2/69) 98 (59/60) 86 (6/7) 98 (59/60) 86 (6/7)
Nikolaou et al.47 72 5.6 (4/72) 97 (38/39) 79 (23/29) 86 (38/44) 96 (23/24)
Weustink et al.52 77 99 (76/77) 87 (20/23) 96 (76/79) 95 (20/21)
Leber et al.45 90 2.2 (2/90) 95 (20/21) 90 (60/67) 74 (20/27) 99 (60/61)
Total 701 3.8 (27/701) (95% CI 2.6−5.6) 98 (394/404) (95% CI 95−99) 90 (263/293) (95% CI 86−93] 93 (394/424) (95% CI 90−95) 95 (263/273) (95% CI 93−98)

All values are expressed as per cent with absolute numbers in parentheses.

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

aExclusion of patients with stents.

However, it is important to realize that patient selection may still heavily influence results, with substantially impaired image quality in patients with higher heart rates or arrhythmias.15 Image quality may also be degraded in patients with severe CAD due to the presence of extensive calcifications which potentially limit precise assessment of the stenosis severity.48 Improvements can be expected from the introduction of dual-source CT systems,54 which provide higher temporal resolution by employing two rotating X-ray tubes rather than one.55 Preliminary studies using this technique showed that up to 98% of all coronary segments could be visualized without motion artefacts, even without lowering the heart rate by administration of beta blockers.10,45,56 Moreover, even in patients without stable sinus rhythm, a high accuracy could be obtained, and an initial, small study reported a high accuracy for stenosis detection in patients with advanced CAD.57 In addition, 256-slice MDCT systems, whose large coverage along the z-axis (patient’s longitudinal axis) may allow imaging of the entire heart in a single cardiac cycle and will make coronary CT angiography less susceptible to arrhythmias or heart rate variability, will become available in the near future.58

### Lesion severity and functional relevance

The limited temporal and spatial resolution of CT may create difficulties in accurately assessing the severity of coronary artery stenoses. There is a tendency to overestimate the degree of luminal narrowing by CT when compared with invasive angiography,59 and pronounced calcification of a vessel segment can make lesion assessment particularly difficult. Usually, calcification will lead to overestimation, rather than underestimation of lesion severity.60 Furthermore, coronary CT angiography is limited to the anatomic visualization of stenoses and does not provide information as to the functional relevance of a lesion. In a recent head-to-head comparison of MDCT and nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT in 114 patients with intermediate likelihood of CAD,61 only 45% of patients with an abnormal MDCT had abnormal perfusion on SPECT. Even in patients with obstructive lesions on MDCT, 50% still had a normal SPECT. These findings are in agreement with other preliminary reports62–64 which showed that only a fraction of patients with obstructive coronary lesions demonstrate ischaemia on SPECT and positron emission tomography (PET) perfusion imaging. For this reason, although 64-slice MDCT is a reliable tool to rule out functionally relevant CAD in a non-selected population with an intermediate pre-test likelihood of disease, an abnormal coronary CT angiogram does not necessarily predict ischaemia. In fact, since coronary CT angiography and perfusion imaging provide different and complementary information, their sequential use or hybrid imaging may provide useful incremental information (Figure 2). In a recent study, hybrid PET/CT65 was evaluated in patients with suspected CAD, which yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 90 and 98%, respectively, for the detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary lesions. Rispler et al.66 compared an experimental SPECT/MDCT hybrid imaging device for the assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion in 56 patients with angina pectoris. The ability of fused SPECT/MDCT images to diagnose physiologically significant lesions showing >50% stenosis and reversible perfusion defects in the same territory was determined and compared with stand-alone MDCT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values for MDCT were 96, 63, 31, and 99%, respectively, compared with 96, 95, 77, and 99%, respectively, for the combined SPECT/MDCT examination. The authors concluded that hybrid imaging led to an improvement of diagnostic accuracy.

Figure 2

Hybrid imaging by positron emission tomography–computed tomography. Hybrid imaging of multi-detector row computed tomography coronary angiography and positron emission tomography perfusion during adenosine stress. A three-dimensionally rendered image of the anterior view of the heart (positron emission tomography image) as well as the coronary tree visualized by multi-detector row computed tomography is shown. On multi-detector row computed tomography, obstructive plaques were detected in the proximal segment of left anterior descending coronary artery and in the first diagonal branch (white arrow). However, only in the myocardial region supplied by the diagonal branch myocardial perfusion was reduced (blue arrow), whereas in other regions, preserved perfusion was detected.

Figure 2

Hybrid imaging by positron emission tomography–computed tomography. Hybrid imaging of multi-detector row computed tomography coronary angiography and positron emission tomography perfusion during adenosine stress. A three-dimensionally rendered image of the anterior view of the heart (positron emission tomography image) as well as the coronary tree visualized by multi-detector row computed tomography is shown. On multi-detector row computed tomography, obstructive plaques were detected in the proximal segment of left anterior descending coronary artery and in the first diagonal branch (white arrow). However, only in the myocardial region supplied by the diagonal branch myocardial perfusion was reduced (blue arrow), whereas in other regions, preserved perfusion was detected.

#### Clinical implications and recommendations

Most of the accuracy data that are currently available concerning the detection of coronary stenoses by CT angiography have been obtained in patient groups with suspected CAD and stable symptoms. The consistently high negative predictive value in all studies suggests that CT angiography will be clinically useful to rule out coronary stenoses in this patient group. In patients with a very high pre-test likelihood of disease, the use of CT angiography will most likely not result in a ‘negative’ scan that would help avoid invasive angiography. Therefore, the use of CT angiography should be restricted to patients with an intermediate pre-test likelihood of CAD.

Several studies have evaluated the accuracy of CT angiography in specific clinical scenarios. Meijboom et al.67 studied the diagnostic performance of 64-slice MDCT in patients referred for valve surgery and reported a sensitivity of 100% with a specificity of 92% and positive and negative predictive values of 82 and 100%, respectively, to identify patients with at least one significant stenosis. Other clinical scenarios included patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (sensitivity 99%, specificity 96%, positive and negative predictive values 81 and 99%.)68 and patients with left bundle branch block (sensitivity 97%, specificity 95%, positive and negative predictive values 93 and 97%).12 Another clinically relevant group of patients who often have a rather low likelihood of CAD but who must undergo diagnostic stratification are those presenting with acute chest pain. Hoffmann et al.69 conducted a blinded, prospective study in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department to rule out an acute coronary syndrome in the absence of ischaemic ECG changes and negative initial biomarkers. Among 103 consecutive patients studied by 64-slice CT, 14 patients were diagnosed clinically to have an acute coronary syndrome. Both the absence of significant coronary artery stenosis (73 of 103 patients) and non-stenotic coronary atherosclerotic plaque (41 of 103 patients) accurately predicted the absence of an acute coronary syndrome (negative predictive value 100%). The positive predictive value was rather low, indicating false-positive results in a considerable number of scans (47% for the detection of significant stenoses, 14/30 positive scans), and only a small percentage of patients with acute chest pain were actually included in the study (103 of 305 initially screened patients). Goldstein et al.26 randomized 197 patients with low-risk acute chest pain to an immediate 64-slice CT scan or ‘standard of care’ evaluation. CT was found to be safe, with no missed diagnosis of an acute coronary syndrome, faster (3.4 vs. 15 h until establishing the definitive diagnosis), and had lower cost (1586 vs. 1872) compared with ‘standard of care’. However, CT imaging did not completely eliminate the need for additional testing. In fact, stress testing was performed in 24 of 99 patients who underwent cardiac CT. In summary, the clinical application of coronary CT angiography to detect or rule out coronary artery stenoses seems most beneficial and, according to current data, can be recommended in patients with intermediate risk of CAD in whom the clinical presentation—stable or with acute symptoms—mandates the evaluation of possible underlying CAD. A similar conclusion was reached in an expert consensus document on ‘appropriate’ indications for cardiac CT and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging which was published in October 2006 (Table 3).70 The use of coronary CT angiography should be restricted to patients in whom diagnostic image quality can be expected (e.g. absence of arrhythmias), and scans need to be expertly performed and interpreted. Table 3 Appropriate clinical indications for the use of computed tomography coronary angiography and cardiac computed tomography imaging according to an expert consensus document endorsed by several professional societies and published in 200670  Detection of CAD with prior test results—evaluation of chest pain syndrome (use of CT angiogram) • Uninterpretable or equivocal stress test (exercise, perfusion, or stress echo) • Intermediate pre-test probability of CAD ECG uninterpretable or unable to exercise Detection of CAD: symptomatic—acute chest pain (use of CT angiogram) • Intermediate pre-test probability of CAD No ECG changes and serial enzymes negative Detection of CAD: symptomatic—evaluation of intra-cardiac structures (use of CT angiogram) • Evaluation of suspected coronary anomalies Structure and function—morphology (use of CT angiogram) • Assessment of complex congenital heart disease including anomalies of coronary circulation, great vessels, and cardiac chambers and valves • Evaluation of coronary arteries in patients with new onset heart failure to assess aetiology Structure and function—evaluation of intra- and extra-cardiac structures (use of cardiac CT) • Evaluation of cardiac mass (suspected tumour or thrombus) Patients with technically limited images from echocardiogram, MRI, or TEE • Evaluation of pericardial conditions (pericardial mass, constrictive pericarditis, or complications of cardiac surgery) Patients with technically limited images from echocardiogram, MRI, or TEE • Evaluation of pulmonary vein anatomy prior to invasive radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation • Non-invasive coronary vein mapping prior to placement of biventricular pacemaker • Non-invasive coronary arterial mapping, including internal mammary artery prior to repeat cardiac surgical revascularization Structure and function—evaluation of aortic and pulmonary disease (use of CT angiograma) • Evaluation of suspected aortic dissection or thoracic aortic aneurysm • Evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism  Detection of CAD with prior test results—evaluation of chest pain syndrome (use of CT angiogram) • Uninterpretable or equivocal stress test (exercise, perfusion, or stress echo) • Intermediate pre-test probability of CAD ECG uninterpretable or unable to exercise Detection of CAD: symptomatic—acute chest pain (use of CT angiogram) • Intermediate pre-test probability of CAD No ECG changes and serial enzymes negative Detection of CAD: symptomatic—evaluation of intra-cardiac structures (use of CT angiogram) • Evaluation of suspected coronary anomalies Structure and function—morphology (use of CT angiogram) • Assessment of complex congenital heart disease including anomalies of coronary circulation, great vessels, and cardiac chambers and valves • Evaluation of coronary arteries in patients with new onset heart failure to assess aetiology Structure and function—evaluation of intra- and extra-cardiac structures (use of cardiac CT) • Evaluation of cardiac mass (suspected tumour or thrombus) Patients with technically limited images from echocardiogram, MRI, or TEE • Evaluation of pericardial conditions (pericardial mass, constrictive pericarditis, or complications of cardiac surgery) Patients with technically limited images from echocardiogram, MRI, or TEE • Evaluation of pulmonary vein anatomy prior to invasive radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation • Non-invasive coronary vein mapping prior to placement of biventricular pacemaker • Non-invasive coronary arterial mapping, including internal mammary artery prior to repeat cardiac surgical revascularization Structure and function—evaluation of aortic and pulmonary disease (use of CT angiograma) • Evaluation of suspected aortic dissection or thoracic aortic aneurysm • Evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism aNon-gated CT angiogram which has a sufficiently large field of view for these specific indications. ### Coronary stent imaging Visualization of the lumen of coronary artery stents remains a challenge for MDCT due to metal artefacts caused by stent struts (Figure 3).71,72 High rates of unevaluable stents have been reported in studies using 16-slice systems, ranging from 5–49%.73,74 With the more recently available 64-slice systems, in combination with dedicated reconstruction algorithms, a larger percentage of stents may be eligible for evaluation (Table 4).23,75–79 Six studies (with 482 patients and 682 stents) that have compared 64-slice CT and dual-source CT with invasive angiography for the detection of in-stent stenosis are currently available. On average, 88% of stents were interpretable. Interpretable stents could be evaluated with fairly high diagnostic accuracy; weighted mean sensitivities and specificities were 91% (95% CI 85–96) and 94% (95% CI 91–95), respectively. While the negative predictive value was uniformly high [90–99%, mean 98% (95% CI 96–99)], positive predictive values were as low as 63% [in mean 76% (95% CI 68–83)]. For all scanner generations, the stent diameter has been identified as a major predictor of stent evaluability, with particularly low rates of evaluable stents for diameters ≤3.0 mm.79 Patient weight, which determines image noise, and heart rate may also influence stent assessability. Figure 3 Assessment of coronary artery stents by multi-detector row computed tomography angiography. Example of a stent placed in the proximal part of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Image quality is good and the coronary artery lumen within the stent can be assessed. multi-detector row computed tomography shows absence of significant in-stent-stenosis. (A) Longitudinal view; (B) axial orientation; (C) curved multiplanar reconstruction. Figure 3 Assessment of coronary artery stents by multi-detector row computed tomography angiography. Example of a stent placed in the proximal part of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Image quality is good and the coronary artery lumen within the stent can be assessed. multi-detector row computed tomography shows absence of significant in-stent-stenosis. (A) Longitudinal view; (B) axial orientation; (C) curved multiplanar reconstruction. Table 4 Diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography and dual-source computed tomography for the detection of in-stent restenosis Author Number of patients/stents Not evaluable (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Rixe et al.79 64/102 42 (43/192) 86 (6/7) 98 (51/52) 86 (6/7) 98 (51/52) Rist et al.78 25/46 2 (1/46) 75 (6/8) 92 (34/37) 67 (6/9) 94 (34/36) Oncel et al.76 30/39 0 (0/39) 89 (17/19) 95 (19/20) 94 (17/18) 90 (19/21) Ehara et al.23 81/125 12 (15/125) 91 (20/22) 93 (82/88) 77 (20/26) 98 (82/84) Cademartiri et al.75 182/192 7 (14/192) 95 (19/20) 93 (147/158) 63 (19/30) 99 (147/148) Pugliese et al.77 100/178 5 (9/178) 94 (37/39) 92 (128/139) 77 (37/48) 98 (128/130) Total 482/682 12 (82/682) (95% CI 9.7−15) 91 (105/115) (95% CI 85−96) 93 (461/494) (95% CI 91−95) 76 (105/138) (95% CI 68−83) 98 (461/471) (95% CI 96−99) Author Number of patients/stents Not evaluable (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Rixe et al.79 64/102 42 (43/192) 86 (6/7) 98 (51/52) 86 (6/7) 98 (51/52) Rist et al.78 25/46 2 (1/46) 75 (6/8) 92 (34/37) 67 (6/9) 94 (34/36) Oncel et al.76 30/39 0 (0/39) 89 (17/19) 95 (19/20) 94 (17/18) 90 (19/21) Ehara et al.23 81/125 12 (15/125) 91 (20/22) 93 (82/88) 77 (20/26) 98 (82/84) Cademartiri et al.75 182/192 7 (14/192) 95 (19/20) 93 (147/158) 63 (19/30) 99 (147/148) Pugliese et al.77 100/178 5 (9/178) 94 (37/39) 92 (128/139) 77 (37/48) 98 (128/130) Total 482/682 12 (82/682) (95% CI 9.7−15) 91 (105/115) (95% CI 85−96) 93 (461/494) (95% CI 91−95) 76 (105/138) (95% CI 68−83) 98 (461/471) (95% CI 96−99) All values are expressed as per cent with absolute numbers in parentheses. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated only for evaluable stents. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value. #### Clinical implications and recommendations Although in single, carefully selected cases (e.g. large diameter stents in a proximal vessel segment, low and stable heart rate, and absence of excessive image noise) coronary CT angiography may be a possibility to rule out in-stent restenosis, routine application of CT to assess patients with coronary stents can currently not be recommended. Visualization of the stent lumen is often affected by artefacts, and especially the positive predictive value is low. ### Coronary artery bypass grafts Coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) move less rapidly and particularly venous grafts have relatively large diameters compared with native coronary arteries (Figure 4). Occluded grafts and stenoses in the body of bypass conduits can therefore be detected with very high diagnostic accuracy (Table 5), although surgical metal clips may lead to artefacts that impair accurate visualization in some cases. Clinically, it is important to consider that, in most cases, it will not be sufficient to assess only the grafts themselves, but rather the distal run off, as well as the non-grafted coronary arteries must be included in the evaluation. However, accurate assessment of the native coronary arteries by cardiac CT in patients after CABG is often challenging and image quality impaired because of advanced CAD and pronounced coronary calcifications. Consequently, the studies that have investigated the accuracy of CT angiography to evaluate the native arteries in patients with bypass grafts have reported low accuracies. Although sensitivity for the detection of stenoses in the native vessels ranged from 79–100% [mean value 95% (95% CI 93–97)], specificity was uniformly lower [59–89%, mean value 75% (95% CI 72–78), negative predictive value 97% (95% CI 95–98)], and consequently, the positive predictive value was as low as 67% (95% CI 64–71)] (Table 5).30,80–84 This severely limits the clinical utility of CT imaging in patients after bypass surgery.30 Figure 4 Coronary artery bypass graft imaging with multi-detector row computed tomography. Cardiac computed tomography evaluation of the heart in an 82-year-old man 9 years after coronary artery bypass surgery. The curved multiplanar reconstruction (left panel) of the venous graft to the first obtuse marginal branch demonstrates a significant lesion in the proximal part (arrow), which is confirmed by invasive angiography (right panel). Figure 4 Coronary artery bypass graft imaging with multi-detector row computed tomography. Cardiac computed tomography evaluation of the heart in an 82-year-old man 9 years after coronary artery bypass surgery. The curved multiplanar reconstruction (left panel) of the venous graft to the first obtuse marginal branch demonstrates a significant lesion in the proximal part (arrow), which is confirmed by invasive angiography (right panel). Table 5 Diagnostic accuracy of 16- and 64-slice computed tomography multi-detector row computed tomography for the evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery Author Number of patients/grafts Evaluation of Not evaluable Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Nieman et al.82 24/60a Graft occlusion 0 (0/60) O 1: 100 (17/17) 100 (42/42) 94 (17/18) 100 (42/42) 5 (3/60) O 2: 100 (17/17) 98 (39/40) 94 (17/18) 100 (39/39) Graft stenosis 10 (4/42) O 1: 60 (3/5) 88 (29/33) 43 (3/7) 94 (29/31) 5 (2/39) O 2: 83 (5/6) 90 (28/31) 63 (5/8) 97 (28/29) Native arteries 34 (65/211) O 1: 90 (71/79) 75 (50/67) 81 71/88) 86 (50/58) 31 (61/211) O 2: 79 (54/68) 72 (52/72) 73 (54/74) 79 (52/66) Stauder et al.84 20/50 Graft occlusion 0 (0/50) 100 (17/17) 100 (229/229) 100 (17/17) 100 (229/229) Graft stenosis 12 (31/240) 99 (92/94) 94 (128/130) 92 (92/94) 99 (128/130) Native arteries 31 (81/260) 92 (105/114) 77 (50/65) 88 (105/120) 85 (50/59) Burgstahler et al.80 13/43 Graft occlusion 0 (0/43) 100 (16/16) 100 (27/27) 100 (16/16) 100 (27/27) Graft stenosis 5 (2/43) 100 (1/1) 93 (25/27) 33 (1/3) 100 (25/25) Native arteries 32 (54/169) 83 (90/108) 59 (36/61) 78 (90/115) 67 (36/54) Salm et al.83 25/67 Graft occlusion 0 (0/67) 100 (25/25) 100 (57/57) 100 (25/25) 100 (57/57) Graft Stenosis NA 100 (3/3) 94 (51/54) 50 (3/6) 100 (51/51) Native arteriesb 8 (17/225) 100 (11/11) 89 (16/18) 85(11/13) 100 (16/16) Malagutti et al.81 52/109 Graft stenosisc 0 (0/109) 100 (49/49) 98 (59/60) 98 (49/50) 100 (59/59) Native arteries NA 97 (62/64) 86 (50/74) 66 (62/94) 99 (192/194) Ropers et al.30 50/138 Graft occlusion 0 (0/138) 100 (38/38) 100 (100/100) 100 (38/38) 100 (100/100) Graft stenosis 0 (0/138) 100 (31/31) 94 (17/19) 92 (31/33) 100 (17/17) Native arteries 9 (55/621) 86 (87/101) 76 (354/456) 44 (87/189) 96 (354/368) Total Graft occlusion 0.7 (3/418) (95% CI 0.15−2.1) 100 (130/130) (95% CI 97−100) 100 (494/495) (95% CI 99−100) 99 (130/131) (95% CI 96−100) 100 (494/494) (95% CI 99−100) Graft stenosis 6.4 (39/611) (95% CI 4.6−8.6) 97 (184/1889) (95% CI 94−99) 95 (337/354) (95% CI 92−97) 92 (184/201) (95% CI 87−95) 99 (337/342) (95% CI 97−100) Native arteries 19.6 (333/1697) (95% CI 18−22) 95 (524/545) (95% CI 93−97) 75 (608/813) (95% CI 72−78) 67 (424/629) (95% CI 64−71) 97 (608/629) (95% CI 95−98) Author Number of patients/grafts Evaluation of Not evaluable Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Nieman et al.82 24/60a Graft occlusion 0 (0/60) O 1: 100 (17/17) 100 (42/42) 94 (17/18) 100 (42/42) 5 (3/60) O 2: 100 (17/17) 98 (39/40) 94 (17/18) 100 (39/39) Graft stenosis 10 (4/42) O 1: 60 (3/5) 88 (29/33) 43 (3/7) 94 (29/31) 5 (2/39) O 2: 83 (5/6) 90 (28/31) 63 (5/8) 97 (28/29) Native arteries 34 (65/211) O 1: 90 (71/79) 75 (50/67) 81 71/88) 86 (50/58) 31 (61/211) O 2: 79 (54/68) 72 (52/72) 73 (54/74) 79 (52/66) Stauder et al.84 20/50 Graft occlusion 0 (0/50) 100 (17/17) 100 (229/229) 100 (17/17) 100 (229/229) Graft stenosis 12 (31/240) 99 (92/94) 94 (128/130) 92 (92/94) 99 (128/130) Native arteries 31 (81/260) 92 (105/114) 77 (50/65) 88 (105/120) 85 (50/59) Burgstahler et al.80 13/43 Graft occlusion 0 (0/43) 100 (16/16) 100 (27/27) 100 (16/16) 100 (27/27) Graft stenosis 5 (2/43) 100 (1/1) 93 (25/27) 33 (1/3) 100 (25/25) Native arteries 32 (54/169) 83 (90/108) 59 (36/61) 78 (90/115) 67 (36/54) Salm et al.83 25/67 Graft occlusion 0 (0/67) 100 (25/25) 100 (57/57) 100 (25/25) 100 (57/57) Graft Stenosis NA 100 (3/3) 94 (51/54) 50 (3/6) 100 (51/51) Native arteriesb 8 (17/225) 100 (11/11) 89 (16/18) 85(11/13) 100 (16/16) Malagutti et al.81 52/109 Graft stenosisc 0 (0/109) 100 (49/49) 98 (59/60) 98 (49/50) 100 (59/59) Native arteries NA 97 (62/64) 86 (50/74) 66 (62/94) 99 (192/194) Ropers et al.30 50/138 Graft occlusion 0 (0/138) 100 (38/38) 100 (100/100) 100 (38/38) 100 (100/100) Graft stenosis 0 (0/138) 100 (31/31) 94 (17/19) 92 (31/33) 100 (17/17) Native arteries 9 (55/621) 86 (87/101) 76 (354/456) 44 (87/189) 96 (354/368) Total Graft occlusion 0.7 (3/418) (95% CI 0.15−2.1) 100 (130/130) (95% CI 97−100) 100 (494/495) (95% CI 99−100) 99 (130/131) (95% CI 96−100) 100 (494/494) (95% CI 99−100) Graft stenosis 6.4 (39/611) (95% CI 4.6−8.6) 97 (184/1889) (95% CI 94−99) 95 (337/354) (95% CI 92−97) 92 (184/201) (95% CI 87−95) 99 (337/342) (95% CI 97−100) Native arteries 19.6 (333/1697) (95% CI 18−22) 95 (524/545) (95% CI 93−97) 75 (608/813) (95% CI 72−78) 67 (424/629) (95% CI 64−71) 97 (608/629) (95% CI 95−98) All values are expressed as per cent with absolute numbers in parentheses. Sensitivities and specificities are calculated only for evaluable bypass grafts and native arteries. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NA, not applicable; NPV, negative predictive value; O 1/O 2, observer 1 and observer 2 where applicable; PPV, positive predictive value. aVenous grafts only. bEvaluation was restricted to non-grafted vessels only. cDefined as significant graft stenosis and/or occlusion. #### Clinical implications and recommendations Although the clinical application of CT angiography may be useful in very selected patients in whom only bypass graft assessment is necessary (e.g. failed visualization of a graft in invasive angiography), the inability to reliably visualize the native coronary arteries in patients post-CABG poses severe restrictions to the general use of CT angiography in post-bypass patients. ### Coronary artery anomalies Although coronary anomalies are rare conditions, possible consequences include myocardial infarction and sudden death.85 In young athletes, coronary artery anomalies are the second most common cause of sudden death due to structural heart disease.86 The identification of the origin and course of aberrant coronary arteries by invasive angiography can be difficult.87 Because of the three-dimensional nature of the data set, MDCT is very well suited to detect and define the anatomic course of coronary artery anomalies and their relationship to other cardiac and non-cardiac structures (Figure 5). Numerous case reports and several research papers have demonstrated that the CT analysis of coronary anatomy in these patients is straightforward and very reliable with an accuracy close to 100%.88–91 Figure 5 Imaging of coronary anomalies by multi-detector row computed tomography. (A) Three-dimensional multi-detector row computed tomography reconstruction of a right-sided single coronary artery with a pre-pulmonary course of the left main stem in a 42-year-old man. The left main coronary artery (black arrows) is originating from the proximal part of the right coronary artery (black arrowheads; left panel) than following a pre-pulmonary course to the anterior interventricular groove, where the left main coronary artery splits in the left anterior descending coronary angiography (LAD), an intermediate branch (RIM), and the circumflex coronary artery (RCX, right panel). Ao, ascending aorta; PA, pulmonary artery. (B) Transaxial multi-detector row computed tomography image of a right-sided single coronary artery with an interarterial path of the left main stem in a 64-year-old man. The left main coronary artery (white arrowheads) originates from the proximal part of the right coronary artery (black arrow) than following an interarterial path between the ascending aorta and the pulmonary trunk. The white arrows indicate the mid part of the circumflex coronary artery. Ao, ascending aorta; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle. Figure 5 Imaging of coronary anomalies by multi-detector row computed tomography. (A) Three-dimensional multi-detector row computed tomography reconstruction of a right-sided single coronary artery with a pre-pulmonary course of the left main stem in a 42-year-old man. The left main coronary artery (black arrows) is originating from the proximal part of the right coronary artery (black arrowheads; left panel) than following a pre-pulmonary course to the anterior interventricular groove, where the left main coronary artery splits in the left anterior descending coronary angiography (LAD), an intermediate branch (RIM), and the circumflex coronary artery (RCX, right panel). Ao, ascending aorta; PA, pulmonary artery. (B) Transaxial multi-detector row computed tomography image of a right-sided single coronary artery with an interarterial path of the left main stem in a 64-year-old man. The left main coronary artery (white arrowheads) originates from the proximal part of the right coronary artery (black arrow) than following an interarterial path between the ascending aorta and the pulmonary trunk. The white arrows indicate the mid part of the circumflex coronary artery. Ao, ascending aorta; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle. #### Clinical implications and recommendations The robust visualization and classification of anomalous coronary arteries make CT angiography a first-choice imaging modality for the investigation of known or suspected coronary artery anomalies. Radiation dose must be considered often in the young patients, and measures to keep dose as low as possible must be employed. ## Coronary plaque imaging ### Calcium scoring Coronary calcium is a surrogate marker for the presence and amount of coronary atherosclerotic plaque.92,93 Both EBCT and MDCT permit accurate detection and quantification of coronary artery calcium.93,94 The radiation dose for a calcium scan is in the range of 1–2 mSv.95,96 The so-called ‘Agatston Score’, which takes into account the area and the CT density of calcified lesions, is most frequently used to quantify the amount of coronary calcium in CT, and large population reference databases are available. With the exception of patients with renal failure, calcifications occur exclusively in the context of atherosclerotic lesions.92,93,97 The amount of coronary calcium correlates moderately closely to the overall atherosclerotic plaque burden.98 On the other hand, not every atherosclerotic coronary plaque is calcified, and calcification is a sign of neither stability nor instability of an individual plaque.99 Clinically, coronary calcium is detectable in the vast majority of patients with acute coronary syndromes, and the amount of calcium in these patients is substantially greater than in matched control subjects without CAD.100–103 In several trials, the absence of coronary calcium ruled out the presence of significant coronary artery stenoses with high predictive value.97,98 However, even pronounced coronary calcification is not necessarily associated with haemodynamically relevant luminal narrowing. Therefore, even the detection of large amounts of calcium does not indicate the presence of significant stenoses and it should not prompt invasive coronary angiography in otherwise asymptomatic individuals. Numerous prospective trials have demonstrated that the presence of coronary calcium in asymptomatic individuals is a prognostic parameter with strong predictive power for future hard cardiac events.97,98,104–108 Still, patient management approaches based on calcium assessment have not been prospectively investigated. A beneficial contribution of coronary calcium assessment to risk stratification can most likely be expected in individuals who seem to be at intermediate risk for coronary events (1.0–2.0% annual risk) on the basis of traditional risk factor analysis. Unselected ‘screening’ or patient self-referral is not recommended,97,98,109 and the value of calcium scoring in individuals with very low (<1.0% annual risk) or very high risk (>2.0% annual risk) is discussed controversially.97,110 Although the coronary calcium score has been found to be progressive over time, only very preliminary studies are available that have linked progression of coronary calcium to cardiac event rates.111 Results concerning the influence of lipid-lowering therapy on the progression of coronary calcium have been inhomogeneous.97,104,112–114 In addition, the variability of coronary calcification measurements is high. Therefore, there is no current indication for repeated coronary calcium score measurements.97,98,109 #### Clinical implications and recommendations The use of coronary calcium measurements by CT seems most beneficial in patients who, based on prior assessment of standard risk factors, seem to be at intermediate risk for future CAD events and in whom more information is needed to make a decision on intensifying risk factor modification (e.g. initiation of lipid-lowering therapy). Patients at high risk do not need further stratification, and in patients at obviously low risk, the likelihood of finding coronary atherosclerosis is too low to warrant CT imaging. Usually, ‘intermediate risk’ patients in whom the use of coronary calcium is assumed to provide incremental information are those with a 10-year PROCAM or Framingham Risk between 10 and 20%.97,98 ### Non-calcified plaque There is growing interest concerning the ability of contrast-enhanced CT coronary angiography to detect (and possibly to quantify and to further characterize) non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque115 (Figure 6). Data on the accuracy of CT angiography to detect non-calcified plaque are limited to a small number of studies that have compared CT angiography with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Sensitivities for the detection of coronary segments with plaque were found to be ∼80–90% (which, however, was mostly based on the detection of calcified plaque).116–119 Correlation of plaque area (r = 0.55) and plaque volume (r = 0.83) between CT angiography and IVUS was found to be moderate, and interobserver variability is high.118,120 It has been shown that the extent of remodelling of coronary atherosclerotic lesions can be assessed by CT.121 Some data are available concerning plaque characterization by CT. On average, the CT attenuation within ‘fibrous’ plaques is higher than within ‘lipid-rich’ plaques (mean attenuation values of 91–116 vs. 47–71 HU),117,118,122–128 but there is large variability of these measurements, which currently prevents accurate classification of non-calcified ‘plaque types’ by CT.127 Figure 6 Imaging of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row computed tomography. The contrast-enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography data set shows a non-calcified plaque in the proximal right coronary artery with substantial positive remodelling and only a mild associated reduction of the coronary lumen. Figure 6 Imaging of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row computed tomography. The contrast-enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography data set shows a non-calcified plaque in the proximal right coronary artery with substantial positive remodelling and only a mild associated reduction of the coronary lumen. Prognostic data that would support clinical applications of plaque imaging by contrast-enhanced CT are scarce.129 As opposed to coronary calcium assessment, no prospective trials have investigated the predictive value of non-calcified plaque in large groups of individuals. Preliminary retrospective, small studies with 23–46 participants have used CT to investigate plaque characteristics in patients after acute coronary syndromes in comparison with patients with stable angina. They reported a higher fraction of non-calcified plaque and more positive remodelling in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in lesions responsible for cardiac events.130–133 One study found a significantly higher prevalence of plaque, with a CT attenuation <30 HU in lesions associated with acute coronary syndromes when compared with stable lesions.134 One analysis of 100 patients who were followed for 16 months after coronary CT angiography demonstrated a higher cardiovascular event rate in patients with non-obstructive plaque detected by MDCT compared with individuals without any plaque.135 Although these initial observations suggest that there may be a potential value of plaque imaging by CT coronary angiography for risk prediction, one must be aware that reliable visualization of coronary plaque requires the highest possible image quality which goes along with substantial expenses in radiation and contrast agent exposure. The use of CT angiography for risk stratification will therefore only be clinically indicated after a substantial advantage over other methods for risk prediction has been clearly demonstrated. #### Clinical implications and recommendations The fact that there is currently a lack of prospective clinical data that would support the use of contrast-enhanced CT angiography for the assessment of non-stenotic plaque does not allow clinical applications in asymptomatic individuals for the purpose of risk stratification. However, the tremendous potential of CT angiography for visualization and characterization of coronary plaques must be recognized and further research is strongly supported. ## Non-coronary imaging ### Left and right ventricular function On commercially available workstations, functional parameters such as left and right ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, stroke volume, ejection fraction, and myocardial mass can be calculated from cardiac CT angiography data sets (Figure 7). Various studies have shown that for these left ventricular functional parameters, MDCT correlated well with magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, or gated SPECT.136–140 Some studies found a systematic over- or underestimation of left ventricular volumes determined by CT compared with the reference method. Most likely, these were due to inaccuracies in defining end-systolic or end-diastolic time instants. The magnitude of these differences was uniformly too small to be of clinical relevance. Figure 7 Assessment of left ventricular function and volumes by multi-detector row computed tomography. By tracing endocardial contours of standardized reformats in end-systolic and end-diastolic short- and long-axis views, left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction can be derived from multi-detector row computed tomography data sets. Figure 7 Assessment of left ventricular function and volumes by multi-detector row computed tomography. By tracing endocardial contours of standardized reformats in end-systolic and end-diastolic short- and long-axis views, left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction can be derived from multi-detector row computed tomography data sets. Assessment of right ventricular function and volumes using MDCT has also been validated and found to be accurate in comparative studies with echocardiography,141 and equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography,142 in patients with various abnormalities including pulmonary embolism,143 congenital heart disease,144 and atrial septal defect.145 #### Clinical implications and recommendations Although CT imaging allows accurate assessment of left and right ventricular function, CT examinations will in most cases not be performed specifically for that purpose. Other diagnostic tests without radiation exposure or the need for contrast injection (i.e. echocardiography) are the methods of choice. However, it should be noted that ventricular function is adjunct information that can be obtained from standard coronary CT angiography investigations without altering the image acquisition protocol, and the ability of CT to provide accurate right ventricular assessment might be useful in several clinical conditions including congenital heart disease, carcinoid heart disease, or prior to lung transplantation. ### Myocardial viability and perfusion Several pre-clinical and clinical studies have documented that MDCT allows assessment of myocardial viability by studying ‘late enhancement’ in a similar fashion as magnetic resonance imaging.146–152 In the setting of acute, subacute, and chronic myocardial infarction, myocardial perfusion defects can be observed during the early phase of the contrast bolus (‘early defect’). Subsequently, 5–15 min following contrast infusion, late hyper-enhancement of infarcts becomes apparent (Figure 8). Lardo et al.151 demonstrated excellent agreement of infarct size in the setting of acute infarction and chronic myocardial scar in pre-clinical animal models of infarction compared with gross pathology.147 Similar results were demonstrated by Gerber et al.149 in 16 and 21 patients with acute and chronic infarction, respectively. Mahnken et al.152 studied 28 patients in the setting of reperfused infarction and demonstrated that compared with magnetic resonance imaging, early defects tend to underestimate infarct size in MDCT, whereas late enhancement shows excellent agreement in infarct size and location. Although these results appear promising, magnetic resonance remains the non-invasive gold standard to assess the size of myocardial scars. Figure 8 Assessment of perfusion and viability by multi-detector row computed tomography. First-pass and delayed enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography myocardial imaging in a porcine model of subacute myocardial infarction. (A) demonstrates an ‘early defect’ in the anterior wall (arrows) during first-pass of the contrast bolus; (B) demonstrates a hyper-enhanced, ‘late defect’ in the anterior myocardial wall (arrows) imaged 10 min following contrast infusion. Figure 8 Assessment of perfusion and viability by multi-detector row computed tomography. First-pass and delayed enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography myocardial imaging in a porcine model of subacute myocardial infarction. (A) demonstrates an ‘early defect’ in the anterior wall (arrows) during first-pass of the contrast bolus; (B) demonstrates a hyper-enhanced, ‘late defect’ in the anterior myocardial wall (arrows) imaged 10 min following contrast infusion. Furthermore, there is pre-clinical and preliminary clinical evidence that contrast-enhanced MDCT can provide assessment of myocardial perfusion. As a complement to the morphological information of CT coronary angiography, the assessment of myocardial perfusion might be of clinical utility. George et al.153 demonstrated in an animal model of coronary stenosis that MDCT angiography protocols, when performed during adenosine infusion, can provide semi-quantitative measures of myocardial perfusion. Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that this same method, when applied to patients at high risk for CAD, may be capable of detecting early perfusion defects in myocardial territories supplied by vessels with obstructive atherosclerosis. The high spatial resolution of MDCT also allows for the assessment of the subendocardial distribution of myocardial ischaemia. #### Clinical implications and recommendations Clinical data are currently too limited to allow clinical recommendations on the use of CT for the assessment of perfusion and viability. ### Valvular disease The assessment of aortic valve stenosis using MDCT is feasible with good diagnostic accuracy154–158 (Figure 9). Rather than relying on gradients, MDCT allows direct planimetry of the aortic valve area. Feuchtner et al.157 compared 16-slice MDCT with transthoracic echocardiography in 30 patients with aortic valve stenosis. The sensitivity of MDCT for the identification of patients with aortic stenosis was 100%, specificity was 93.7%, positive and negative predictive values were 97 and 100%. Planimetry of the aortic valve area by MDCT revealed a good correlation with orifice areas determined from transthoracic echocardiography through the continuity equation (r = 0.89; P < 0.001). Similarly, in 20 patients with aortic valve stenosis, Alkadhi et al.154 reported an excellent correlation between the planimetrically assessed aortic valve areas in CT and transoesophageal echocardiography. Figure 9 Assessment of valve disease by multi-detector row computed tomography. Aortic valve morphology assessed by computed tomography. Upper row: normal aortic valve (left: systolic phase of the heart cycle; right: diastolic phase); lower row: severely calcified aortic valve with aortic stenosis (left: systolic phase of the heart cycle; right: diastolic phase). Figure 9 Assessment of valve disease by multi-detector row computed tomography. Aortic valve morphology assessed by computed tomography. Upper row: normal aortic valve (left: systolic phase of the heart cycle; right: diastolic phase); lower row: severely calcified aortic valve with aortic stenosis (left: systolic phase of the heart cycle; right: diastolic phase). It is important to note that the use of ECG-triggered tube current modulation, which is usually applied in coronary CT angiography to limit overall radiation exposure to the patient, may interfere with reliable assessment of the aortic valve. Tube current modulation reduces the tube current in systole and may thus prohibit high-resolution imaging of the open aortic valve. The accuracy to detect and quantify aortic valve regurgitation in comparison with transthoracic echocardiography has also been investigated by Feuchtner et al.156 When a visible valvular leakage area was considered to be a diagnostic criterion for aortic regurgitation, the overall sensitivity of 16-slice MDCT for the identification of patients with aortic regurgitation was 81%, specificity 91%, positive predictive value 95%, and negative predictive value 70%. However, severe calcifications, which are more common in degenerative valvular disease, limited the diagnostic accuracy. In another study including 64 patients, planimetry of the diastolic regurgitant orifice area using 64-slice MDCT was compared with transthoracic echocardiography.159 In 34 age-matched controls, no regurgitant orifice was found, whereas in all 30 patients, regurgitation was correctly diagnosed. These findings suggest that MDCT permits reliable assessment of aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation. Willmann et al.160 published data from patients with mitral valve disease in whom MDCT was performed. The authors found MDCT helpful for the detection of valvular abnormalities such as thickening of the mitral valve leaflets, presence of mitral annulus calcification, and calcification of the valvular leaflets. Agreement with echocardiography was achieved in 95–100% of cases. Alkadhi et al.161 demonstrated that 16-slice MDCT allowed visualization of a regurgitant orifice in all 19 patients with mitral regurgitation. The mean regurgitant orifice area on MDCT was significantly related to the regurgitation severity (r = 0.81, P < 0.001) on transoesophageal echocardiography. Thus, MDCT seems to have the potential to visualize coaptation defects of the mitral leaflets. #### Clinical implications and recommendations CT imaging may develop into an alternative imaging tool in patients who require exact assessment of the opening or regurgitant orifice of the aortic or mitral valve and in whom other more commonly used methods, such as echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging, fail to provide all relevant information. Currently, available clinical data are too limited to allow identification of specific patient subsets in which CT imaging would be the first-choice diagnostic test. ### Venous anatomy Anatomy of the coronary venous system can be accurately assessed with MDCT.162,163 Recently, Van de Veire et al.164 demonstrated that the variability in venous anatomy may be related to previous infarction with formation of scar tissue. In 34 patients with a history of infarction, the left marginal vein was less frequently observed compared with control patients and patients with CAD (27 vs. 71 and 61%, respectively, P < 0.001). The absence of a left marginal vein in these patients may hamper the positioning of a left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy if necessary. In this respect, MDCT may be a valuable tool for the non-invasive assessment of coronary venous anatomy before the implantation of a left ventricular lead or other interventions that make use of the cardiac veins. #### Clinical implications and recommendations Even though there is currently rather limited data, exact anatomy of the coronary veins cannot be obtained with imaging methods other than cardiac MDCT. If such information is desired, contrast-enhanced MDCT imaging will be a test of choice. ### Left atrial and pulmonary vein anatomy CT imaging allows accurate imaging of the anatomy of both atrial and pulmonary venous return, and in this context, the role of MDCT in performing electrophysiological procedures such as catheter ablation has rapidly expanded over the past few years.165–167 Radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures are performed in an increasing number of patients with drug refractory atrial fibrillation. MDCT can provide a detailed ‘roadmap’ for these ablation procedures by visualizing the highly variable pulmonary vein anatomy with the use of volume-rendered three-dimensional reconstructions and cross-sectional images (Figure 10). Variations in pulmonary vein anatomy include a single insertion or ‘common ostium’ of the pulmonary veins, and an additional pulmonary vein. In 201 patients undergoing MDCT scanning, Marom et al.167 noted a left-sided ‘common ostium’ in 14% of the patients and an additional right-sided pulmonary vein in 28% of the patients. By delineating surrounding structures such as the aorta, coronary arteries, and the oesophagus, MDCT is of great value to avoid complications during the ablation procedure. Figure 10 Imaging of the pulmonary veins by multi-detector row computed tomography. Anatomical variation of the pulmonary veins: a single insertion or ‘common ostium’ of the left-sided pulmonary veins is present. The veins come together before they drain in the left atrium (indicated by the black arrows). This is clearly depicted in the different orthogonal views (A, B, and C) and the volume-rendered reconstruction (D). LA, left atrium; LIPV, left inferior pulmonary vein; LSPV, left superior pulmonary vein. Figure 10 Imaging of the pulmonary veins by multi-detector row computed tomography. Anatomical variation of the pulmonary veins: a single insertion or ‘common ostium’ of the left-sided pulmonary veins is present. The veins come together before they drain in the left atrium (indicated by the black arrows). This is clearly depicted in the different orthogonal views (A, B, and C) and the volume-rendered reconstruction (D). LA, left atrium; LIPV, left inferior pulmonary vein; LSPV, left superior pulmonary vein. Recently it has become feasible to integrate the anatomical information derived from MDCT with the electro-anatomical information from cardiac mapping systems to plan radiofrequency ablation of complex cardiac arrhythmias.168,169 These image integration systems allow the use of ‘real’ anatomy derived from MDCT during the actual ablation procedure (Figure 11). By visualizing the catheter position in relation to the endocardial border, the pulmonary veins, and surrounding structures, performing catheter ablation procedures may be facilitated. Initial data indicate that the use of these image integration systems may enhance safety and improve the outcome of ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation.170 In addition, MDCT is important in the follow-up of patients after catheter ablation procedures. The use of MDCT in the identification of pulmonary vein stenosis after catheter ablation has been described extensively,171–173 and MDCT is an inherent part in the care of these patients. Figure 11 Fusion imaging in electrophysiology using multi-detector row computed tomography and electro-anatomical mapping. Integration of multi-detector row computed tomography and electro-anatomic map for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. With the use of image integration systems, the anatomy of the left atrium and pulmonary veins derived from the multi-detector row computed tomography (upper left panel) can be fused with the electroanatomic map (upper right panel). The ‘real’ anatomy of the left atrium and pulmonary veins can then be used to guide the catheter ablation procedure (lower panel). Figure 11 Fusion imaging in electrophysiology using multi-detector row computed tomography and electro-anatomical mapping. Integration of multi-detector row computed tomography and electro-anatomic map for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. With the use of image integration systems, the anatomy of the left atrium and pulmonary veins derived from the multi-detector row computed tomography (upper left panel) can be fused with the electroanatomic map (upper right panel). The ‘real’ anatomy of the left atrium and pulmonary veins can then be used to guide the catheter ablation procedure (lower panel). #### Clinical implications and recommendations There is growing evidence that MDCT imaging is useful in anatomical imaging of the heart, including pulmonary veins and the coronary venous system, and the adjacent organs, e.g. prior to invasive electrophysiology procedures or in the follow-up after pulmonary vein ablation. ### Congenital heart disease Patients with congenital cardiovascular disease are frequently examined invasively and non-invasively to assess coronary anatomy and morphological as well as functional parameters. Because of the high spatial and temporal resolution, rapid image acquisition, and advanced post-processing tools, MDCT has become an important non-invasive diagnostic examination both in children and in adults with congenital heart disease.174,175 MDCT is a valuable tool in the pre-operative evaluation of cardiac anomalies (such as tetralogy of Fallot) and the follow-up of baffles and shunts. In addition, patients with untreated patent ductus arteriosus or coarctation of the aorta and patients with anomalous pulmonary venous return can be evaluated accurately with MDCT.176 Furthermore, MDCT can depict coronary artery anatomy, which is often anomalous in patients with congenital heart disease. Cook and Raman177 evaluated the MDCT data sets of 85 patients with congenital cardiovascular disease. The relationship of the great vessels, number and location of the coronary ostia, and proximal course of the coronaries could be identified in all cases, and coronary anomalies were detected in 16 of the 85 patients. #### Clinical implications and recommendations Although MDCT provides detailed anatomic information, which is of major importance in the care of patients with congenital heart disease, it has to be taken into account that exposure to radiation during follow-up of these patients mainly stems from CT scans and angiography.178 In particular, when serial evaluation over time is needed, non-ionizing imaging procedures (such as magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography) should be considered. On the other hand, MDCT scanning is not hampered by the presence of pacemakers and metal artefacts and therefore may be indicated in patients with implanted devices if echocardiography does not provide all clinically necessary information. The utility of CT imaging in patients with congenital heart disease may well extend beyond the heart itself, to include structures such as the pulmonary vessels which are often affected in these patients and may be difficult to evaluate by echocardiography. ### Incidental non-cardiac findings When performing a cardiac CT scan, the anatomic status of the adjacent thoracic organs may also be evaluated, requiring an image reconstruction with an extended field of view.179 Several studies have reported a high prevalence of non-cardiac abnormalities in cardiac CT investigations. Hunold et al.180 reported an incidence of pathological non-coronary findings of 53% (953 of 1812) consecutive EBCT scans used for calcium scoring. The vast majority of these findings however were without clinical relevance. Comparable results were published using contrast-enhanced 16-slice CT by Gil et al.181 Of 258 asymptomatic patients, 145 (56.2%) were found to have a significant non-cardiac finding, including pulmonary abnormalities (emphysema, bullae, interstitial lung disease, masses, or nodules), pericardial abnormalities, liver disease, adrenal masses, and bone abnormalities. #### Clinical implications and recommendations Incidental non-cardiac findings are frequent on cardiac CT scans. Dedicated reconstructions are necessary to visualize all structures that were included in the scan range. Although the findings may be of clinical significance in some cases, weighing the risks and benefits associated with ‘screening’ for malignant pulmonary disease is difficult and there is currently no evidence that extending analysis of cardiac CT data sets beyond the heart will be useful to improve the outcomes of cardiac patients.182 ## Performing cardiac computed tomography in clinical practice ### Training Cardiac CT imaging requires competence on many levels. Data acquisition needs to be carefully performed, including necessary pre-medication, and appropriate measures are mandatory to keep radiation exposure within a reasonable range. Image reconstruction and post-processing require knowledge in CT physics, radiology, and cardiac physiology. Finally, competent image interpretation must be based on knowledge and experience in CT angiography, as well as detailed knowledge of cardiac anatomy, normal and variant patterns of the coronary circulation, and a thorough clinical background in CAD assessment. Obviously, conventional training in neither radiology nor cardiology will per se provide a sufficient background to perform and evaluate cardiac CT imaging. Although some speciality fellowship programmes in cardiac imaging and cardiac CT are available in select institutions, most cardiology and radiology training programmes do not incorporate mandatory exposure to cardiac CT at a volume that would suffice to provide competent diagnostic services in cardiac CT. In the USA, guidelines have been issued by professional societies that address minimum requirements in order to obtain competency in cardiac CT imaging.183 In a statement on non-invasive cardiac imaging published by the American College of Radiology in 2005, the qualification of a radiologist who supervises and interprets cardiac CT examinations should include supervision and interpretation of 75 cardiac CT cases within 36 months, excluding cases performed exclusively for calcium scoring.184 In 2006, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association issued a joint statement concerning competency in cardiac CT imaging. Minimum requirements for competency in cardiac CT have been defined for three levels of proficiency (Table 6).183 Briefly, for coronary CT angiography, Level 1 defines a basic knowledge of cardiac CT, which is sufficient for practice of general adult cardiology or general radiology, but not for independent interpretation of patient data sets. It requires 4 weeks of training as well as hands-on interpretation of 50 cases of CT coronary angiography. Level 2 training defines the minimum recommended experience in order to independently perform and interpret CT coronary angiography. Level 2 training requires a cumulative duration of 8 weeks, mentored performance of 50 contrast-enhanced and 50 non-contrast scans, and hands-on interpretation of 150 contrast-enhanced cardiac CT data sets. Level 3 training would qualify an individual to direct an independent cardiac CT programme. It requires 6 months of training, 100 cases performed, and 300 cases interpreted, plus 40 h of Continuing Medical Education. Required exposure to non-coronary cardiovascular pathology is not mentioned in these recommendations, even though such knowledge certainly would need to be acquired to be a competent reader of cardiac CT investigations. Table 6 Requirements for performing and interpreting cardiac computed tomography according to a competency statement issued by the American College of Cardiology and American HeartAssociation183 Cumulative duration of training Minimum number of mentored examinations performed Minimum number of mentored examinations interpreted Level 1 4 weeks — 50 Level 2 (non-contrast) 4 weeks 50 150 Level 2 (contrast) 8 weeks 50 150 Level 3 6 months 100 300 Cumulative duration of training Minimum number of mentored examinations performed Minimum number of mentored examinations interpreted Level 1 4 weeks — 50 Level 2 (non-contrast) 4 weeks 50 150 Level 2 (contrast) 8 weeks 50 150 Level 3 6 months 100 300 No scientific data exist on the required amount of training to achieve a certain level of diagnostic confidence in cardiac CT, and the published recommendations are a consensus-based compromise between what is deemed necessary and possible. Although specific numbers are suggested, some issues remain open, such as the question as to what exactly constitutes a ‘mentored examination’. Taped video documentation of a scanning procedure may be adequate for a certain percentage of these cases, but not for all of them, and many details are up to interpretation. Eventually, similar guidelines will need to be developed for other countries, and ultimately, fellowship training in cardiology will need to incorporate sufficient exposure to cardiac CT, along with appropriate verification of knowledge. ### Cost-effectiveness and reimbursement Data on accuracy, prognostic implications, and cost-effectiveness must form the basis for establishing reimbursement for cardiac CT imaging. Currently, very little data that firmly establish prognostic implications of CT coronary angiography and little data on cost-effectiveness in relation to established diagnostic procedures are available. Initial studies in two of the most promising applications of cardiac CT, the use of CT angiography in patients with stable chest pain and the use of CT in patients who present to the emergency room with chest pain, indicate potential cost advantages for CT imaging over established, conventional diagnostic algorithms. Dewey et al.185 compared the cost of CT angiography, stress magnetic resonance imaging, and traditional diagnostic modalities, which encompassed exercise ECG, stress echocardiography, and conventional angiography. The authors could show that for a pre-test probability up to 50%; CT coronary angiography (with costs of €1469–4435) was most cost-effective. For pre-test likelihoods exceeding 60%, invasive angiography was most cost-effective. Goldstein et al.26 analysed cost-effectiveness in their study of 197 patients admitted to the emergency room for acute chest pain but who were deemed at low risk for CAD. The authors demonstrated that incorporation of CT angiography into the workup was safe and highly accurate. Moreover, a diagnostic algorithm based on CT was more rapid (3.4 vs. 15.0 h, P < 0.001) and less costly (1856 vs. 1872, P < 0.001) than a standard diagnostic algorithm on the basis of repeat ECG and blood testing as well as stress perfusion imaging.

However, large studies on cost-effectiveness are obviously needed. Importantly, costs will vary significantly from country to country and depend on the local costs of equipment, maintenance, personnel, space, and many other factors in addition to the relative rates of reimbursement in various countries. Reimbursement of cardiac CT is currently inhomogeneous between countries and often even between health insurance carriers within a given country. In most countries, there is no specific reimbursement for cardiac CT procedures. When reimbursement is established, it should be taken into account that performing and evaluating cardiac CT scans, at least with current technology, require more dedicated effort than the majority of standard chest CT examinations (with the need for pre-medication, ECG gating, dedicated reconstructions at various cardiac phases), which should be reflected by the reimbursement structure.

## Summary

The most recent MDCT scanner generations allow for robust morphological and functional imaging of the heart. Clinically, the main focus of cardiac CT is coronary artery imaging. The assessment of coronary anomalies by coronary CT angiography is straightforward and CT is indicated for that purpose. Under certain prerequisites, which include a low and regular heart rate, a carefully performed coronary CT angiography investigation allows for the accurate detection of coronary artery stenoses. Especially, the negative predictive value has uniformly been found to be high, indicating that the technique may be most suitable as a non-invasive tool to rule out the presence of obstructive coronary lesions. On the basis of clinical considerations and initial clinical trials, this may be of particular utility in situations that require to reliably rule out CAD even though the pre-test likelihood for disease is not high, such as in patients with atypical chest pain, patients with equivocal stress test results, patients with acute chest pain in the absence of ECG changes or enzyme elevations, or patients before non-coronary cardiac surgery. In these situations, the rationale for using CT is to achieve more rapid and definitive stratification and to avoid invasive coronary angiography if CT demonstrates the absence of stenoses. In patients with a high pre-test likelihood of disease, however, the use of CT angiography will most likely not result in a ‘negative’ scan that would help to avoid invasive angiography and is therefore not recommendable.

Several situations currently pose challenges for reliable CT imaging: these include patients with arrhythmias, patients with advanced CAD and pronounced coronary calcifications, and patients with coronary artery stents, which are often difficult to evaluate. Similarly, although CABGs can be assessed with very high diagnostic accuracy, detection of stenoses at the site of anastomosis and in the native coronary arteries of patients after CABG has reduced accuracy. Coronary CT angiography is not routinely recommendable in these situations.

Besides the detection of coronary stenoses, cardiac CT has the potential to visualize earlier stages of coronary atherosclerosis. Coronary calcium, a surrogate marker for the presence and amount of coronary atherosclerotic plaque, can be detected and quantified by non-contrast CT. Coronary calcium allows to stratify asymptomatic individuals concerning their future cardiovascular risk with a predictive power that is stronger than and independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Coronary calcium measurements by CT may be useful in patients who, based on prior assessment of standard risk factors, seem to be at intermediate risk for future CAD events and may be appropriate in order to facilitate a decision concerning lipid-lowering therapy or other risk factor modification. Contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography allows the detection and, to a certain degree, the characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque. However, clinical data concerning the accuracy of plaque detection and characterization by contrast-enhanced CT, as well as its prognostic significance, are currently insufficient, so applications for risk stratification can currently not be recommended.

Besides the assessment of the coronary arteries, CT provides for accurate assessment of general cardiac morphology. This can be particularly useful in the context of electrophysiology when detailed anatomic information (e.g. the pulmonary veins and left atrium prior to ablation procedures or coronary veins in CRT for left ventricular lead placement) is needed. Similarly, CT imaging can be useful in patients with congenital heart disease or other structural cardiac disease, especially when echocardiography does not provide sufficient information and magnetic resonance imaging cannot be performed (e.g. in the presence of pacemakers/defibrillators). Although information on flow velocities and intracardiac pressures cannot be obtained by CT, assessment of right and left ventricular function is accurate. Also, the aortic and mitral valve can be depicted throughout the cardiac cycle and their orifice areas can be measured. Early data also indicate that perfusion and infarct imaging of the myocardium are possible. However, for many of these issues, CT imaging will not frequently be used as the first-line diagnostic modality because of the associated contrast agent and radiation exposure.

Although clinical application of cardiac CT is possible today in the situations outlined earlier, it can be expected that technology will continue to evolve rapidly. Spatial and temporal resolution will increase further, current indications as well as cost-effectiveness will be more firmly established by large clinical trials, and new applications will be developed. In addition, it will be necessary to establish adequate training programmes for cardiac CT, and to develop reimbursement structures which, tied to stringent guidelines on specific clinical situations for which cardiac CT is considered appropriate, will be necessary to allow more widespread use of CT in the diagnostic workup of patients with cardiac disease.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

## References

1
Achenbach
S
Moshage
W
Ropers
D
Nossen
J
Daniel
WG
Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions
N Engl J Med
,
1998
, vol.
339
(pg.
1964
-
1971
)
2
Schoepf
UJ
Becker
CR
Ohnesorge
BM
Yucel
EK
CT of coronary artery disease
,
2004
, vol.
232
(pg.
18
-
37
)
3
Liang
Y
Kruger
RA
Dual-slice spiral versus single-slice spiral scanning: comparison of the physical performance of two computed tomography scanners
Med Phys
,
1996
, vol.
23
(pg.
205
-
220
)
4
Weg
N
Scheer
MR
Gabor
MP
Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector-array CT and routine 2.5-mm thin collimation
,
1998
, vol.
209
(pg.
417
-
426
)
5
Ohnesorge
B
Flohr
T
Becker
C
Kopp
AF
Schoepf
UJ
Baum
U
Knez
A
Klingenbeck-Regn
K
Reiser
MF
Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience
,
2000
, vol.
217
(pg.
564
-
571
)
6
Achenbach
S
Giesler
T
Ropers
D
Ulzheimer
S
Derlien
H
Schulte
C
Wenkel
E
Moshage
W
Bautz
W
Daniel
WG
Kalender
WA
Baum
U
Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography
Circulation
,
2001
, vol.
103
(pg.
2535
-
2538
)
7
Flohr
TG
Schaller
S
Stierstorfer
K
Bruder
H
Ohnesorge
BM
Schoepf
UJ
Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques
,
2005
, vol.
235
(pg.
756
-
773
)
8
Kopp
AF
Schroeder
S
Kuettner
A
Baumbach
A
Georg
C
Kuzo
R
Heuschmid
M
Ohnesorge
B
Karsch
KR
Claussen
CD
Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients
Eur Heart J
,
2002
, vol.
23
(pg.
1714
-
1725
)
9
Leschka
S
Husmann
L
Desbiolles
LM
Gaemperli
O
Schepis
T
Koepfli
P
Boehm
T
Marincek
B
Kaufmann
PA
H
Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT
,
2006
, vol.
16
(pg.
1964
-
1972
)
10
Leschka
S
Scheffel
H
Desbiolles
L
Plass
A
Gaemperli
O
Valenta
I
Husmann
L
Flohr
TG
Genoni
M
Marincek
B
Kaufmann
PA
H
Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing
,
2007
, vol.
42
(pg.
543
-
549
)
11
Wintersperger
BJ
Nikolaou
K
von Ziegler
F
Johnson
T
Rist
C
Leber
A
Flohr
T
Knez
A
Reiser
MF
Becker
CR
Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33 sec rotation speed
,
2006
, vol.
41
(pg.
436
-
442
)
12
Ghostine
S
Caussin
C
Daoud
B
Habis
M
Perrier
E
Pesenti-Rossi
D
Sigal-Cinqualbre
A
Angel
CY
Lancelin
B
Capderou
A
Paul
JF
Non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block using 64-slice computed tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
48
(pg.
1929
-
1934
)
13
Herzog
C
Zangos
S
Zwerner
P
Costello
P
Vogl
TJ
Schoepf
UJ
CT of coronary artery disease
J Thorac Imaging
,
2007
, vol.
22
(pg.
40
-
48
)
14
Hoffmann
MH
Shi
H
Schmitz
BL
Schmid
FT
Lieberknecht
M
Schulze
R
Ludwig
B
Kroschel
U
Jahnke
N
Haerer
W
Brambs
HJ
Aschoff
AJ
Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography
JAMA
,
2005
, vol.
293
(pg.
2471
-
2478
)
15
Leschka
S
Wildermuth
S
Boehm
T
Desbiolles
L
Husmann
L
Plass
A
Koepfli
P
Schepis
T
Marincek
B
Kaufmann
PA
H
Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality
,
2006
, vol.
241
(pg.
378
-
385
)
16
Perrier
E
Manen
O
Ghostine
S
Caussin
C
Plotton
C
Carlioz
R
Multislice computed tomography to rule out coronary artery disease in pilots with acquired left bundle-branch block and low cardiac risk
Am Heart J
,
2006
, vol.
152
pg.
e23

17
Brodoefel
H
Reimann
A
Burgstahler
C
Schumacher
F
Herberts
T
Tsiflikas
I
Schroeder
S
Claussen
CD
Kopp
AF
Heuschmid
M
Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy
,
2007

Epub ahead of print 26 June
18
Dewey
M
Rutsch
W
Schnapauff
D
Teige
F
Hamm
B
Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography
,
2007
, vol.
42
(pg.
78
-
84
)
19
Coles
DR
Smail
MA
Negus
IS
Wilde
P
Oberhoff
M
Karsch
KR
Baumbach
A
Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
47
(pg.
1840
-
1845
)
20
Gerber
TC
Stratmann
BP
Kuzo
RS
Kantor
B
Morin
RL
Effect of acquisition technique on radiation dose and image quality in multidetector row computed tomography coronary angiography with submillimeter collimation
,
2005
, vol.
40
(pg.
556
-
563
)
21
Trabold
T
Buchgeister
M
Kuttner
A
Heuschmid
M
Kopp
AF
Schroder
S
Claussen
CD
Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating
Rofo
,
2003
, vol.
175
(pg.
1051
-
1055
)
22
Cordeiro
MA
Miller
JM
Schmidt
A
Lardo
AC
Rosen
BD
Bush
DE
Brinker
JA
Bluemke
DA
Shapiro
EP
Lima
JA
Non-invasive half millimetre 32 detector row computed tomography angiography accurately excludes significant stenoses in patients with advanced coronary artery disease and high calcium scores
Heart
,
2006
, vol.
92
(pg.
589
-
597
)
23
Ehara
M
Kawai
M
Surmely
JF
Matsubara
T
Terashima
M
Tsuchikane
E
Kinoshita
Y
Ito
T
Takeda
Y
Nasu
K
Tanaka
N
Murata
A
Fujita
H
Sato
K
Kodama
A
Katoh
O
Suzuki
T
Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
49
(pg.
951
-
959
)
24
Einstein
AJ
Henzlova
MJ
Rajagopalan
S
Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography
JAMA
,
2007
, vol.
298
(pg.
317
-
323
)
25
Garcia
MJ
Lessick
J
Hoffmann
MH
Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis
JAMA
,
2006
, vol.
296
(pg.
403
-
411
)
26
Goldstein
JA
Gallagher
MJ
O’Neill
WW
Ross
MA
O’Neil
BJ
Raff
GL
A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
49
(pg.
863
-
871
)
27
Meijboom
WB
Mollet
NR
van Mieghem
CA
Weustink
AC
Pugliese
F
van Pelt
N
F
Vourvouri
E
de Jaegere
P
Krestin
GP
De Feyter
PJ
64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
Heart
,
2007
, vol.
93
(pg.
1386
-
1392
)
28
Mollet
NR
F
Van Mieghem
C
Meijboom
B
Pugliese
F
Runza
G
Baks
T
Dikkeboer
J
EP
Freericks
MP
Kerker
JP
Zoet
SK
Boersma
E
Krestin
GP
De Feyter
PJ
Adjunctive value of CT coronary angiography in the diagnostic work-up of patients with typical angina pectoris
Eur Heart J
,
2007
, vol.
28
(pg.
1872
-
1878
)
29
Muhlenbruch
G
Seyfarth
T
Soo
CS
Pregalathan
N
Mahnken
AH
Diagnostic value of 64-slice multi-detector row cardiac CTA in symptomatic patients
,
2007
, vol.
17
(pg.
603
-
609
)
30
Ropers
D
Pohle
FK
Kuettner
A
Pflederer
T
Anders
K
Daniel
WG
Bautz
W
Baum
U
Achenbach
S
Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
114
(pg.
2334
-
2341
)
31
Rubinshtein
R
Halon
DA
Gaspar
T
Schliamser
JE
Yaniv
N
Ammar
R
Flugelman
MY
Peled
N
Lewis
BS
Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic triage of patients with chest pain and negative or nondiagnostic exercise treadmill test result
Am J Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
99
(pg.
925
-
929
)
32
Rubinshtein
R
Halon
DA
Gaspar
T
Jaffe
R
Karkabi
B
Flugelman
MY
Kogan
A
Shapira
R
Peled
N
Lewis
BS
Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin
Circulation
,
2007
, vol.
115
(pg.
1762
-
1768
)
33
Watkins
MW
Hesse
B
Green
CE
Greenberg
NL
Manning
M
Chaudhry
E
Dauerman
HL
Garcia
MJ
Detection of coronary artery stenosis using 40-channel computed tomography with multi-segment reconstruction
Am J Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
99
(pg.
175
-
181
)
34
Herzog
P
Jakobs
TF
Wintersperger
BJ
Nikolaou
K
Becker
CR
Reiser
MF
Radiation dose and dose reduction in multidetector row CT (MDCT)
,
2002
, vol.
42
(pg.
691
-
696
)
35
Jakobs
TF
Becker
CR
Ohnesorge
B
Flohr
T
Suess
C
Schoepf
UJ
Reiser
MF
Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation
,
2002
, vol.
12
(pg.
1081
-
1086
)
36
Hausleiter
J
Meyer
T
M
Huber
E
Zankl
M
Martinoff
S
Kastrati
A
Schomig
A
Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
113
(pg.
1305
-
1310
)
37
Hsieh
J
Londt
J
Vass
M
Li
J
Tang
X
Okerlund
D
Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography
Med Phys
,
2006
, vol.
33
(pg.
4236
-
4248
)
38
Hesse
B
Tagil
K
Cuocolo
A
Anagnostopoulos
C
Bardies
M
Bax
J
Bengel
F
Busemann
SE
Davies
G
Dondi
M
Edenbrandt
L
Franken
P
Kjaer
A
Knuuti
J
Lassmann
M
Ljungberg
M
Marcassa
C
Marie
PY
McKiddie
F
O’Connor
M
Prvulovich
E
Underwood
R
Eck-Smit
B
EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
,
2005
, vol.
32
(pg.
855
-
897
)
39
Einstein
AJ
Moser
KW
Thompson
RC
Cerqueira
MD
Henzlova
MJ
Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging
Circulation
,
2007
, vol.
116
(pg.
1290
-
1305
)
40
Amis
ES
Jr
Butler
PF
Applegate
KE
Birnbaum
SB
Brateman
LF
Hevezi
JM
Mettler
FA
Morin
RL
Pentecost
MJ
Smith
GG
Strauss
KJ
Zeman
RK
,
2007
, vol.
4
(pg.
272
-
284
)
41
Hamon
M
Biondi-Zoccai
GG
Malagutti
P
Agostoni
P
Morello
R
Valgimigli
M
Hamon
M
Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
48
(pg.
1896
-
1910
)
42
Vanhoenacker
PK
Heijenbrok-Kal
MH
Van Heste
R
Decramer
I
Van Hoe
LR
Wijns
W
Hunink
MG
Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis
,
2007
, vol.
244
(pg.
419
-
428
)
43
Ehara
M
Surmely
JF
Kawai
M
Katoh
O
Matsubara
T
Terashima
M
Tsuchikane
E
Kinoshita
Y
Suzuki
T
Ito
T
Takeda
Y
Nasu
K
Tanaka
N
Murata
A
Suzuki
Y
Sato
K
Suzuki
T
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography
Circ J
,
2006
, vol.
70
(pg.
564
-
571
)
44
Leber
AW
Knez
A
von Ziegler
F
Becker
A
Nikolaou
K
Paul
S
Wintersperger
B
Reiser
M
Becker
CR
Steinbeck
G
Boekstegers
P
Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2005
, vol.
46
(pg.
147
-
154
)
45
Leber
AW
Johnson
T
Becker
A
von Ziegler
F
Tittus
J
Nikolaou
K
Reiser
M
Steinbeck
G
Becker
CR
Knez
A
Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease
Eur Heart J
,
2007
, vol.
28
(pg.
2354
-
2360
)
46
Mollet
NR
F
van Mieghem
CA
Runza
G
EP
Baks
T
Serruys
PW
Krestin
GP
De Feyter
PJ
High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography
Circulation
,
2005
, vol.
112
(pg.
2318
-
2323
)
47
Nikolaou
K
Knez
A
Rist
C
Wintersperger
BJ
Leber
A
Johnson
T
Reiser
MF
Becker
CR
Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease
AJR Am J Roentgenol
,
2006
, vol.
187
(pg.
111
-
117
)
48
Ong
TK
Chin
SP
Liew
CK
Chan
WL
Seyfarth
MT
Liew
HB
Rapaee
A
Fong
YY
Ang
CK
Sim
KH
Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification
Am Heart J
,
2006
, vol.
151
(pg.
1323
-
1326
)
49
Raff
GL
Gallagher
MJ
O’Neill
WW
Goldstein
JA
Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2005
, vol.
46
(pg.
552
-
557
)
50
Ropers
D
Rixe
J
Anders
K
Kuttner
A
Baum
U
Bautz
W
Daniel
WG
Achenbach
S
Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- × 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses
Am J Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
97
(pg.
343
-
348
)
51
Schuijf
JD
Pundziute
G
Jukema
JW
Lamb
HJ
van der Hoeven
BL
de Roos
A
van der Wall
EE
Bax
JJ
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease
Am J Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
98
(pg.
145
-
148
)
52
Weustink
AC
Meijboom
WB
Mollet
NR
Otsuka
M
Pugliese
F
Van Mieghem
C
Malago
R
van Pelt
N
Dijkshoorn
ML
F
Krestin
GP
De Feyter
PJ
Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
50
(pg.
786
-
794
)
53
Leschka
S
H
Plass
A
Desbiolles
L
Grunenfelder
J
Marincek
B
Wildermuth
S
Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience
Eur Heart J
,
2005
, vol.
26
(pg.
1482
-
1487
)
54
Reimann
AJ
Rinck
D
Birinci-Aydogan
A
Scheuering
M
Burgstahler
C
Schroeder
S
Brodoefel
H
Tsiflikas
I
Herberts
T
Flohr
T
Claussen
CD
Kopp
AF
Heuschmid
M
Dual-source computed tomography: advances of improved temporal resolution in coronary plaque imaging
,
2007
, vol.
42
(pg.
196
-
203
)
55
Achenbach
S
Ropers
D
Kuettner
A
Flohr
T
Ohnesorge
B
Bruder
H
Theessen
H
Karakaya
M
Daniel
WG
Bautz
W
Kalender
WA
Anders
K
Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography—initial experience
,
2006
, vol.
57
(pg.
331
-
335
)
56
Lell
MM
Panknin
C
Saleh
R
Sayre
JW
Schmidt
B
Dinh
H
Ruehm
SG
Evaluation of coronary stents and stenoses at different heart rates with dual source spiral CT (DSCT)
,
2007
, vol.
42
(pg.
536
-
541
)
57
Scheffel
H
H
Plass
A
Vachenauer
R
Desbiolles
L
Gaemperli
O
Schepis
T
Frauenfelder
T
Schertler
T
Husmann
L
Grunenfelder
J
Genoni
M
Kaufmann
PA
Marincek
B
Leschka
S
Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control
,
2006
, vol.
16
(pg.
2739
-
2747
)
58
Kido
T
Kurata
A
Higashino
H
Sugawara
Y
Okayama
H
Higaki
J
Anno
H
K
Mori
S
S
Endo
M
Mochizuki
T
Cardiac imaging using 256-detector row four-dimensional CT: preliminary clinical report
,
2007
, vol.
25
(pg.
38
-
44
)
59
Hoffmann
MH
Shi
H
Schmitz
BL
Schmid
FT
Lieberknecht
M
Schulze
R
Ludwig
B
Kroschel
U
Jahnke
N
Haerer
W
Brambs
HJ
Aschoff
AJ
Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography
JAMA
,
2005
, vol.
293
(pg.
2471
-
2478
)
60
Hoffmann
U
Moselewski
F
Cury
RC
Ferencik
M
Jang
IK
Diaz
LJ
Abbara
S
TJ
Achenbach
S
Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient- versus segment-based analysis
Circulation
,
2004
, vol.
110
(pg.
2638
-
2643
)
61
Schuijf
JD
Wijns
W
Jukema
JW
Atsma
DE
de Roos
A
Lamb
HJ
Stokkel
MP
Dibbets-Schneider
P
Decramer
I
De Bondt
P
van der Wall
EE
Vanhoenacker
PK
Bax
JJ
Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
48
(pg.
2508
-
2514
)
62
Gaemperli
O
Schepis
T
Koepfli
P
Valenta
I
Soyka
J
Leschka
S
Desbiolles
L
Husmann
L
H
Kaufmann
PA
Accuracy of 64-slice CT angiography for the detection of functionally relevant coronary stenoses as assessed with myocardial perfusion SPECT
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
,
2007
, vol.
34
(pg.
1162
-
1171
)
63
Hong
EC
Kimura-Hayama
ET
Di Carli
MF
Hybrid cardiac imaging: complementary roles of CT angiography and PET in a patient with a history of radiation therapy
J Nucl Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
14
(pg.
617
-
620
)
64
Sampson
UK
Dorbala
S
Limaye
A
Kwong
R
Di Carli
MF
Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
49
(pg.
1052
-
1058
)
65
Namdar
M
Hany
TF
Koepfli
P
Siegrist
PT
Burger
C
Wyss
CA
Luscher
TF
von Schulthess
GK
Kaufmann
PA
Integrated PET/CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a feasibility study
J Nucl Med
,
2005
, vol.
46
(pg.
930
-
935
)
66
Rispler
S
Keidar
Z
Ghersin
E
Roguin
A
Soil
A
Dragu
R
Litmanovich
D
Frenkel
A
Aronson
D
Engel
A
Beyar
R
Israel
O
Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
49
(pg.
1059
-
1067
)
67
Meijboom
WB
Mollet
NR
van Mieghem
CA
Kluin
J
Weustink
AC
Pugliese
F
Vourvouri
E
F
Bogers
AJ
Krestin
GP
De Feyter
PJ
Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
48
(pg.
1658
-
1665
)
68
Andreini
D
Pontone
G
Pepi
M
Ballerini
G
Bartorelli
AL
Magini
A
Quaglia
C
Nobili
E
Agostoni
P
Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
49
(pg.
2044
-
2050
)
69
Hoffmann
U
Nagurney
JT
Moselewski
F
Pena
A
Ferencik
M
Chae
CU
Cury
RC
Butler
J
Abbara
S
Brown
DF
Manini
A
Nichols
JH
Achenbach
S
TJ
Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
114
(pg.
2251
-
2260
)
70
Hendel
RC
Patel
MR
Kramer
CM
Poon
M
Hendel
RC
Carr
JC
NA
Gillam
LD
Hodgson
JM
Kim
RJ
Kramer
CM
Lesser
JR
Martin
ET
Messer
JV
Redberg
RF
Rubin
GD
Rumsfeld
JS
Taylor
AJ
Weigold
WG
Woodard
PK
Brindis
RG
Hendel
RC
Douglas
PS
Peterson
ED
Wolk
MJ
Allen
JM
Patel
MR
ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
48
(pg.
1475
-
1497
)
71
Maintz
D
Juergens
KU
Wichter
T
Grude
M
Heindel
W
Fischbach
R
Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: in vitro evaluation
,
2003
, vol.
13
(pg.
830
-
835
)
72
Maintz
D
Seifarth
H
Raupach
R
Flohr
T
Rink
M
Sommer
T
Ozgun
M
Heindel
W
Fischbach
R
64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents
,
2006
, vol.
16
(pg.
818
-
826
)
73
Schuijf
JD
Bax
JJ
Jukema
JW
Lamb
HJ
Warda
HM
Vliegen
HW
de Roos
A
van der Wall
EE
Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography
Am J Cardiol
,
2004
, vol.
94
(pg.
427
-
430
)
74
van Mieghem
CA
F
Mollet
NR
Malagutti
P
Valgimigli
M
Meijboom
WB
Pugliese
F
EP
Ligthart
J
Runza
G
Bruining
N
Smits
PC
Regar
E
van der Giessen
WJ
Sianos
G
van Domburg
R
de Jaegere
P
Krestin
GP
Serruys
PW
De Feyter
PJ
Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
114
(pg.
645
-
653
)
75
F
Schuijf
JD
Pugliese
F
Mollet
NR
Jukema
JW
Maffei
E
Kroft
LJ
Palumbo
A
Ardissino
D
Serruys
PW
Krestin
GP
van der Wall
EE
De Feyter
PJ
Bax
JJ
Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
49
(pg.
2204
-
2210
)
76
Oncel
D
Oncel
G
Karaca
M
Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography—initial experience
,
2007
, vol.
242
(pg.
403
-
409
)
77
Pugliese
F
Weustink
AC
Van Mieghem
C
Alberghina
F
Otsuka
M
Meijboom
WB
van Pelt
N
Mollet
NR
F
Krestin
GP
Hunink
MG
De Feyter
PJ
Dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis
Heart
,
2007

Epub ahead of print 19 September
78
Rist
C
von Ziegler
F
Nikolaou
K
Kirchin
MA
Wintersperger
BJ
Johnson
TR
Knez
A
Leber
AW
Reiser
MF
Becker
CR
Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography
,
2006
, vol.
13
(pg.
1465
-
1473
)
79
Rixe
J
Achenbach
S
Ropers
D
Baum
U
Kuettner
A
Ropers
U
Bautz
W
Daniel
WG
Anders
K
Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography
Eur Heart J
,
2006
, vol.
27
(pg.
2567
-
2572
)
80
Burgstahler
C
Beck
T
Kuettner
A
Drosch
T
Kopp
AF
Heuschmid
M
Claussen
CD
Schroeder
S
Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-row multi-slice computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution
Int J Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
106
(pg.
244
-
249
)
81
Malagutti
P
Nieman
K
Meijboom
WB
van Mieghem
CA
Pugliese
F
F
Mollet
NR
Boersma
E
de Jaegere
PP
De Feyter
PJ
Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries
Eur Heart J
,
2007
, vol.
28
(pg.
1879
-
1885
)
82
Nieman
K
Pattynama
PM
Rensing
BJ
Van Geuns
RJ
De Feyter
PJ
Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries
,
2003
, vol.
229
(pg.
749
-
756
)
83
Salm
LP
Bax
JJ
Jukema
JW
Schuijf
JD
Vliegen
HW
Lamb
HJ
van der Wall
EE
de Roos
A
Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography
Am Heart J
,
2005
, vol.
150
(pg.
775
-
781
)
84
Stauder
NI
Kuttner
A
Schroder
S
Drosch
T
Beck
T
Stauder
H
Blumenstock
G
Claussen
CD
Kopp
AF
Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment of graft patency and native coronary artery lesions using 16-slice MDCT
,
2006
, vol.
16
(pg.
2512
-
2520
)
85
Angelini
P
Velasco
JA
Flamm
S
Coronary anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical relevance
Circulation
,
2002
, vol.
105
(pg.
2449
-
2454
)
86
Maron
BJ
Sudden death in young athletes
N Engl J Med
,
2003
, vol.
349
(pg.
1064
-
1075
)
87
Ishikawa
T
Brandt
PW
Anomalous origin of the left main coronary artery from the right anterior aortic sinus: angiographic definition of anomalous course
Am J Cardiol
,
1985
, vol.
55
(pg.
770
-
776
)
88
Datta
J
White
CS
Gilkeson
RC
Meyer
CA
Kansal
S
Jani
ML
Arildsen
RC
K
Anomalous coronary arteries in adults: depiction at multi-detector row CT angiography
,
2005
, vol.
235
(pg.
812
-
818
)
89
Duran
C
Kantarci
M
Durur
SI
Gulbaran
M
Sevimli
S
Bayram
E
Eren
S
Karaman
A
Fil
F
Okur
A
Remarkable anatomic anomalies of coronary arteries and their clinical importance: a multidetector computed tomography angiographic study
J Comput Assist Tomogr
,
2006
, vol.
30
(pg.
939
-
948
)
90
Kim
SY
Seo
JB
Do
KH
Heo
JN
Lee
JS
Song
JW
Choe
YH
Kim
TH
Yong
HS
Choi
SI
Song
KS
Lim
TH
Coronary artery anomalies: classification and ECG-gated multi-detector row CT findings with angiographic correlation
,
2006
, vol.
26
(pg.
317
-
333
)
91
Schmid
M
Achenbach
S
Ludwig
J
Baum
U
Anders
K
Pohle
K
Daniel
WG
Ropers
D
Visualization of coronary artery anomalies by contrast-enhanced multi-detector row spiral computed tomography
Int J Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
111
(pg.
430
-
435
)
92
Rumberger
JA
Simons
DB
Fitzpatrick
LA
Sheedy
PF
Schwartz
RS
Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study
Circulation
,
1995
, vol.
92
(pg.
2157
-
2162
)
93
Sangiorgi
G
Rumberger
JA
Severson
A
Edwards
WD
Gregoire
J
Fitzpatrick
LA
Schwartz
RS
Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans: a histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodology
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
1998
, vol.
31
(pg.
126
-
133
)
94
McClelland
RL
Chung
H
Detrano
R
Post
W
Kronmal
RA
Distribution of coronary artery calcium by race, gender, and age: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
113
(pg.
30
-
37
)
95
Hunold
P
Vogt
FM
Schmermund
A
Debatin
JF
Kerkhoff
G
Budde
T
Erbel
R
Ewen
K
Barkhausen
J
Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT
,
2003
, vol.
226
(pg.
145
-
152
)
96
Schlosser
T
Hunold
P
Voigtlander
T
Schmermund
A
Barkhausen
J
Coronary artery calcium scoring: influence of reconstruction interval and reconstruction increment using 64-MDCT
AJR Am J Roentgenol
,
2007
, vol.
188
(pg.
1063
-
1068
)
97
Greenland
P
Bonow
RO
Brundage
BH
Budoff
MJ
Eisenberg
MJ
Grundy
SM
Lauer
MS
Post
WS
Raggi
P
Redberg
RF
Rodgers
GP
Shaw
LJ
Taylor
AJ
Weintraub
WS
Harrington
RA
Abrams
J
Anderson
JL
Bates
ER
Grines
CL
Hlatky
MA
Lichtenberg
RC
Lindner
JR
Pohost
GM
Schofield
RS
Shubrooks
SJ
Jr
Stein
JH
Tracy
CM
Vogel
RA
Wesley
DJ
ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography)
Circulation
,
2007
, vol.
115
(pg.
402
-
426
)
98
Budoff
MJ
Achenbach
S
Blumenthal
RS
Carr
JJ
Goldin
JG
Greenland
P
Guerci
Lima
JA
DJ
Rubin
GD
Shaw
LJ
Wiegers
SE
Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
114
(pg.
1761
-
1791
)
99
Schmermund
A
Erbel
R
Unstable coronary plaque and its relation to coronary calcium
Circulation
,
2001
, vol.
104
(pg.
1682
-
1687
)
100
Bellasi
A
Lacey
C
Taylor
AJ
Raggi
P
Wilson
PW
Budoff
MJ
Vaccarino
V
Shaw
LJ
Comparison of prognostic usefulness of coronary artery calcium in men versus women (results from a meta- and pooled analysis estimating all-cause mortality and coronary heart disease death or myocardial infarction)
Am J Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
100
(pg.
409
-
414
)
101
Pohle
K
Ropers
D
Maffert
R
Geitner
P
Moshage
W
Regenfus
M
Kusus
M
Daniel
WG
Achenbach
S
Coronary calcifications in young patients with first, unheralded myocardial infarction: a risk factor matched analysis by electron beam tomography
Heart
,
2003
, vol.
89
(pg.
625
-
628
)
102
Raggi
P
Callister
TQ
Cooil
B
He
ZX
Lippolis
NJ
Russo
DJ
Zelinger
A
Mahmarian
JJ
Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography
Circulation
,
2000
, vol.
101
(pg.
850
-
855
)
103
Schmermund
A
Schwartz
RS
M
Sangiorgi
G
Pfeifer
EA
Rumberger
JA
Burke
AP
Farb
A
Virmani
R
Coronary atherosclerosis in unheralded sudden coronary death under age 50: histo-pathologic comparison with ‘healthy’ subjects dying out of hospital
Atherosclerosis
,
2001
, vol.
155
(pg.
499
-
508
)
104
Y
LA
Roth
M
Newstein
D
Guerci
Treatment of asymptomatic adults with elevated coronary calcium scores with atorvastatin, vitamin C, and vitamin E: the St. Francis Heart Study randomized clinical trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2005
, vol.
46
(pg.
166
-
172
)
105
Y
Goodman
KJ
Roth
M
Newstein
D
Guerci
Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the St. Francis Heart Study
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2005
, vol.
46
(pg.
158
-
165
)
106
Kronmal
RA
McClelland
RL
Detrano
R
Shea
S
Lima
JA
Cushman
M
Bild
DE
Burke
GL
Risk factors for the progression of coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic subjects: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)
Circulation
,
2007
, vol.
115
(pg.
2722
-
2730
)
107
Mohlenkamp
S
Schmermund
A
Lehmann
N
Roggenbuck
U
Dragano
N
Stang
A
Moebus
S
Beck
EM
Schluter
C
Sack
S
Meinertz
T
Taylor
A
Jockel
KH
Erbel
R
Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis and resting ECG abnormalities in an unselected general population
Atherosclerosis
,
2007

Epub ahead of print 10 March
108
Taylor
AJ
Bindeman
J
Feuerstein
I
Cao
F
Brazaitis
M
O’Malley
PG
Coronary calcium independently predicts incident premature coronary heart disease over measured cardiovascular risk factors: mean three-year outcomes in the Prospective Army Coronary Calcium (PACC) project
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2005
, vol.
46
(pg.
807
-
814
)
109
De Backer
G
Ambrosioni
E
Borch-Johnsen
K
Brotons
C
Cifkova
R
Dallongeville
J
Ebrahim
S
Faergeman
O
Graham
I
Mancia
G
Cats
VM
Orth-Gomer
K
Perk
J
Pyorala
K
Rodicio
JL
Sans
S
Sansoy
V
Sechtem
U
Silber
S
Thomsen
T
Wood
D
European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of eight societies and by invited experts)
Atherosclerosis
,
2004
, vol.
173
(pg.
381
-
391
)
110
Naghavi
M
Falk
E
Hecht
HS
Jamieson
MJ
Kaul
S
Berman
D
Z
Budoff
MJ
Rumberger
J
Naqvi
TZ
Shaw
LJ
Faergeman
O
Cohn
J
Bahr
R
Koenig
W
Demirovic
J
Arking
D
Herrera
VL
J
Goldstein
JA
Rudy
Y
Airaksinen
J
Schwartz
RS
Riley
WA
Mendes
RA
Douglas
P
Shah
PK
From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient—part III: executive summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force report
Am J Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
98
(pg.
2H
-
15H
)
111
Raggi
P
Callister
TQ
Shaw
LJ
Progression of coronary artery calcium and risk of first myocardial infarction in patients receiving cholesterol-lowering therapy
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
,
2004
, vol.
24
(pg.
1272
-
1277
)
112
Achenbach
S
Ropers
D
Pohle
K
Leber
A
Thilo
C
Knez
A
Menendez
T
Maeffert
R
Kusus
M
Regenfus
M
Bickel
A
Haberl
R
Steinbeck
G
Moshage
W
Daniel
WG
Influence of lipid-lowering therapy on the progression of coronary artery calcification: a prospective evaluation
Circulation
,
2002
, vol.
106
(pg.
1077
-
1082
)
113
Raggi
P
Davidson
M
Callister
TQ
Welty
FK
Bachmann
GA
Hecht
H
Rumberger
JA
Aggressive versus moderate lipid-lowering therapy in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women: Beyond Endorsed Lipid Lowering with EBT Scanning (BELLES)
Circulation
,
2005
, vol.
112
(pg.
563
-
571
)
114
Schmermund
A
Achenbach
S
Budde
T
Buziashvili
Y
Forster
A
Friedrich
G
Henein
M
Kerkhoff
G
Knollmann
F
Kukharchuk
V
Lahiri
A
Leischik
R
Moshage
W
Schartl
M
Siffert
W
Steinhagen-Thiessen
E
Sinitsyn
V
Vogt
A
Wiedeking
B
Erbel
R
Effect of intensive versus standard lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin on the progression of calcified coronary atherosclerosis over 12 months: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
113
(pg.
427
-
437
)
115
Schroeder
S
Kopp
AF
Burgstahler
C
Noninvasive plaque imaging using multislice detector spiral computed tomography
Semin Thromb Hemost
,
2007
, vol.
33
(pg.
203
-
209
)
116
Achenbach
S
Moselewski
F
Ropers
D
Ferencik
M
Hoffmann
U
MacNeill
B
Pohle
K
Baum
U
Anders
K
Jang
IK
Daniel
WG
TJ
Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound
Circulation
,
2004
, vol.
109
(pg.
14
-
17
)
117
Leber
AW
Knez
A
Becker
A
Becker
C
von Ziegler
F
Nikolaou
K
Rist
C
Reiser
M
White
C
Steinbeck
G
Boekstegers
P
Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2004
, vol.
43
(pg.
1241
-
1247
)
118
Leber
AW
Becker
A
Knez
A
von Ziegler
F
Sirol
M
Nikolaou
K
Ohnesorge
B
ZA
Becker
CR
Reiser
M
Steinbeck
G
Boekstegers
P
Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
47
(pg.
672
-
677
)
119
Schoenhagen
P
Tuzcu
EM
Stillman
AE
Moliterno
DJ
Halliburton
SS
Kuzmiak
SA
Kasper
JM
Magyar
WA
Lieber
ML
Nissen
SE
White
RD
Non-invasive assessment of plaque morphology and remodeling in mildly stenotic coronary segments: comparison of 16-slice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound
Coron Artery Dis
,
2003
, vol.
14
(pg.
459
-
462
)
120
Moselewski
F
Ropers
D
Pohle
K
Hoffmann
U
Ferencik
M
Chan
RC
Cury
RC
Abbara
S
Jang
IK
TJ
Daniel
WG
Achenbach
S
Comparison of measurement of cross-sectional coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vessel areas by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound
Am J Cardiol
,
2004
, vol.
94
(pg.
1294
-
1297
)
121
Achenbach
S
Ropers
D
Hoffmann
U
MacNeill
B
Baum
U
Pohle
K
TJ
Pomerantsev
E
Ludwig
J
Flachskampf
FA
Wicky
S
Jang
IK
Daniel
WG
Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2004
, vol.
43
(pg.
842
-
847
)
122
Becker
CR
Knez
A
Ohnesorge
B
Schoepf
UJ
Reiser
MF
Imaging of noncalcified coronary plaques using helical CT with retrospective ECG gating
AJR Am J Roentgenol
,
2000
, vol.
175
(pg.
423
-
424
)
123
Carrascosa
PM
Capunay
CM
Garcia-Merletti
P
Carrascosa
J
Garcia
MF
Characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques by multidetector computed tomography
Am J Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
97
(pg.
598
-
602
)
124
Caussin
C
Ohanessian
A
Ghostine
S
Jacq
L
Lancelin
B
Dambrin
G
Sigal-Cinqualbre
A
Angel
CY
Paul
JF
Characterization of vulnerable nonstenotic plaque with 16-slice computed tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound
Am J Cardiol
,
2004
, vol.
94
(pg.
99
-
104
)
125
Pohle
K
Achenbach
S
MacNeill
B
Ropers
D
Ferencik
M
Moselewski
F
Hoffmann
U
TJ
Jang
IK
Daniel
WG
Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT: comparison to IVUS
Atherosclerosis
,
2007
, vol.
190
(pg.
174
-
180
)
126
Schroeder
S
Kopp
AF
Baumbach
A
Meisner
C
Kuettner
A
Georg
C
Ohnesorge
B
Herdeg
C
Claussen
CD
Karsch
KR
Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2001
, vol.
37
(pg.
1430
-
1435
)
127
Schroeder
S
Kuettner
A
Leitritz
M
Janzen
J
Kopp
AF
Herdeg
C
Heuschmid
M
Burgstahler
C
Baumbach
A
Wehrmann
M
Claussen
CD
Reliability of differentiating human coronary plaque morphology using contrast-enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography: a comparison with histology
J Comput Assist Tomogr
,
2004
, vol.
28
(pg.
449
-
454
)
128
Schroeder
S
Kuettner
A
Wojak
T
Janzen
J
Heuschmid
M
Athanasiou
T
Beck
T
Burgstahler
C
Herdeg
C
Claussen
CD
Kopp
AF
Non-invasive evaluation of atherosclerosis with contrast enhanced 16 slice spiral computed tomography: results of ex vivo investigations
Heart
,
2004
, vol.
90
(pg.
1471
-
1475
)
129
Burgstahler
C
Reimann
A
Beck
T
Kuettner
A
Baumann
D
Heuschmid
M
Brodoefel
H
Claussen
CD
Kopp
AF
Schroeder
S
Influence of a lipid-lowering therapy on calcified and noncalcified coronary plaques monitored by multislice detector computed tomography: results of the New Age II Pilot Study
,
2007
, vol.
42
(pg.
189
-
195
)
130
Leber
AW
Knez
A
White
CW
Becker
A
von Ziegler
F
Muehling
O
Becker
C
Reiser
M
Steinbeck
G
Boekstegers
P
Composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction and stable angina pectoris determined by contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography
Am J Cardiol
,
2003
, vol.
91
(pg.
714
-
718
)
131
Inoue
F
Sato
Y
Matsumoto
N
Tani
S
Uchiyama
T
Evaluation of plaque texture by means of multislice computed tomography in patients with acute coronary syndrome and stable angina
Circ J
,
2004
, vol.
68
(pg.
840
-
844
)
132
Hoffmann
U
Moselewski
F
Nieman
K
Jang
IK
Ferencik
M
Rahman
AM
Cury
RC
Abbara
S
Joneidi-Jafari
H
Achenbach
S
TJ
Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
47
(pg.
1655
-
1662
)
133
Schuijf
JD
Beck
T
Burgstahler
C
Jukema
JW
Dirksen
MS
de Roos
A
van der Wall
EE
Schroeder
S
Wijns
W
Bax
JJ
Differences in plaque composition and distribution in stable coronary artery disease versus acute coronary syndromes; non-invasive evaluation with multi-slice computed tomography
Acute Card Care
,
2007
, vol.
9
(pg.
48
-
53
)
134
Motoyama
S
Kondo
T
Sarai
M
Sugiura
A
Harigaya
H
Sato
T
Inoue
K
Okumura
M
Ishii
J
Anno
H
Virmani
R
Ozaki
Y
Hishida
H
Narula
J
Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
50
(pg.
319
-
326
)
135
Pundziute
G
Schuijf
JD
Jukema
JW
Boersma
E
de Roos
A
van der Wall
EE
Bax
JJ
Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
49
(pg.
62
-
70
)
136
Mahnken
AH
Koos
R
Katoh
M
Spuentrup
E
Busch
P
Wildberger
JE
Kuhl
HP
Gunther
RW
Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction
,
2005
, vol.
15
(pg.
714
-
720
)
137
Heuschmid
M
Rothfuss
JK
Schroeder
S
Fenchel
M
Stauder
N
Burgstahler
C
Franow
A
Kuzo
RS
Kuettner
A
Miller
S
Claussen
CD
Kopp
AF
Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography
,
2006
, vol.
16
(pg.
551
-
559
)
138
Juergens
KU
Grude
M
Maintz
D
Fallenberg
EM
Wichter
T
Heindel
W
Fischbach
R
Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience
,
2004
, vol.
230
(pg.
403
-
410
)
139
Dewey
M
Muller
M
Eddicks
S
Schnapauff
D
Teige
F
Rutsch
W
Borges
AC
Hamm
B
Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
48
(pg.
2034
-
2044
)
140
Henneman
MM
Bax
JJ
Schuijf
JD
Jukema
JW
Holman
ER
Stokkel
MP
Lamb
HJ
de Roos
A
van der Wall
EE
Global and regional left ventricular function: a comparison between gated SPECT, 2D echocardiography and multi-slice computed tomography
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
,
2006
, vol.
33
(pg.
1452
-
1460
)
141
Dogan
H
Kroft
LJ
Bax
JJ
Schuijf
JD
van der Geest
RJ
Doornbos
J
de Roos
A
MDCT assessment of right ventricular systolic function
AJR Am J Roentgenol
,
2006
, vol.
186
(pg.
S366
-
S370
)
142
Delhaye
D
Remy-Jardin
M
Teisseire
A
Hossein-Foucher
C
Leroy
S
Duhamel
A
Remy
J
MDCT of right ventricular function: comparison of right ventricular ejection fraction estimation and equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography, part 1
AJR Am J Roentgenol
,
2006
, vol.
187
(pg.
1597
-
1604
)
143
Dogan
H
Kroft
LJ
Huisman
MV
van der Geest
RJ
de Roos
A
Right ventricular function in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: analysis with electrocardiography-synchronized multi-detector row CT
,
2007
, vol.
242
(pg.
78
-
84
)
144
Raman
SV
Cook
SC
McCarthy
B
Ferketich
AK
Usefulness of multidetector row computed tomography to quantify right ventricular size and function in adults with either tetralogy of Fallot or transposition of the great arteries
Am J Cardiol
,
2005
, vol.
95
(pg.
683
-
686
)
145
Berbarie
RF
Anwar
A
Dockery
WD
Grayburn
PA
Hamman
BL
Vallabhan
RC
Schussler
JM
Measurement of right ventricular volumes before and after atrial septal defect closure using multislice computed tomography
Am J Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
99
(pg.
1458
-
1461
)
146
Brodoefel
H
Reimann
A
Klumpp
B
Fenchel
M
Ohmer
M
Miller
S
Schroeder
S
Claussen
C
Scheule
A
Kopp
AF
Assessment of myocardial viability in a reperfused porcine model: evaluation of different MSCT contrast protocols in acute and subacute infarct stages in comparison with MRI
J Comput Assist Tomogr
,
2007
, vol.
31
(pg.
290
-
298
)
147
Brodoefel
H
Klumpp
B
Reimann
A
Fenchel
M
Heuschmid
M
Miller
S
Schroeder
S
Claussen
C
Scheule
AM
Kopp
AF
Sixty-four-MSCT in the characterization of porcine acute and subacute myocardial infarction: determination of transmurality in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology
,
2007
, vol.
62
(pg.
235
-
246
)
148
Brodoefel
H
Klumpp
B
Reimann
A
Ohmer
M
Fenchel
M
Schroeder
S
Miller
S
Claussen
C
Kopp
AF
Scheule
AM
Late myocardial enhancement assessed by 64-MSCT in reperfused porcine myocardial infarction: diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
,
2007
, vol.
17
(pg.
475
-
483
)
149
Gerber
BL
Belge
B
Legros
GJ
Lim
P
Poncelet
A
Pasquet
A
Gisellu
G
Coche
E
Vanoverschelde
JL
Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
113
(pg.
823
-
833
)
150
Kopp
AF
Heuschmid
M
Reimann
A
Kuettner
A
Beck
T
Ohmer
M
Burgstahler
C
Brodoefel
H
Claussen
CD
Schroeder
S
Evaluation of cardiac function and myocardial viability with 16- and 64-slice multidetector computed tomography
,
2005
, vol.
15

Suppl 4
(pg.
D15
-
D20
)
151
Lardo
AC
Cordeiro
MA
Silva
C
LC
George
RT
Saliaris
AP
Schuleri
KH
Fernandes
VR
Zviman
M
Nazarian
S
Halperin
HR
Wu
KC
Hare
JM
Lima
JA
Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
113
(pg.
394
-
404
)
152
Mahnken
AH
Koos
R
Katoh
M
Wildberger
JE
Spuentrup
E
Buecker
A
Gunther
RW
Kuhl
HP
Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2005
, vol.
45
(pg.
2042
-
2047
)
153
George
RT
Silva
C
Cordeiro
MA
DiPaula
A
Thompson
DR
McCarthy
WF
Ichihara
T
Lima
JA
Lardo
AC
Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
48
(pg.
153
-
160
)
154
H
Wildermuth
S
Plass
A
Bettex
D
Baumert
B
Leschka
S
Desbiolles
LM
Marincek
B
Boehm
T
Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography
,
2006
, vol.
240
(pg.
47
-
55
)
155
Feuchtner
GM
Muller
S
Grander
W
Alber
HF
Bartel
T
Friedrich
GJ
Reinthaler
M
Pachinger
O
zur
ND
Dichtl
W
Aortic valve calcification as quantified with multislice computed tomography predicts short-term clinical outcome in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis
J Heart Valve Dis
,
2006
, vol.
15
(pg.
494
-
498
)
156
Feuchtner
GM
Dichtl
W
Schachner
T
Muller
S
Mallouhi
A
Friedrich
GJ
Nedden
DZ
Diagnostic performance of MDCT for detecting aortic valve regurgitation
AJR Am J Roentgenol
,
2006
, vol.
186
(pg.
1676
-
1681
)
157
Feuchtner
GM
Dichtl
W
Friedrich
GJ
Frick
M
Alber
H
Schachner
T
Bonatti
J
Mallouhi
A
Frede
T
Pachinger
O
zur
ND
Muller
S
Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
47
(pg.
1410
-
1417
)
158
Feuchtner
GM
Muller
S
Bonatti
J
Schachner
T
Velik-Salchner
C
Pachinger
O
Dichtl
W
Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area
AJR Am J Roentgenol
,
2007
, vol.
189
(pg.
197
-
203
)
159
Jassal
DS
Shapiro
MD
Neilan
TG
Chaithiraphan
V
Ferencik
M
Teague
SD
TJ
Isselbacher
EM
Cury
RC
64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantification of severity
,
2007
, vol.
42
(pg.
507
-
512
)
160
Willmann
JK
Kobza
R
Roos
JE
Lachat
M
Jenni
R
Hilfiker
PR
Luscher
TF
Marincek
B
Weishaupt
D
ECG-gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of mitral valve disease: initial experience
,
2002
, vol.
12
(pg.
2662
-
2669
)
161
H
Wildermuth
S
Bettex
DA
Plass
A
Baumert
B
Leschka
S
Desbiolles
LM
Marincek
B
Boehm
T
Mitral regurgitation: quantification with 16-detector row CT—initial experience
,
2006
, vol.
238
(pg.
454
-
463
)
162
Jongbloed
MR
Lamb
HJ
Bax
JJ
Schuijf
JD
de Roos
A
van der Wall
EE
Schalij
MJ
Noninvasive visualization of the cardiac venous system using multislice computed tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2005
, vol.
45
(pg.
749
-
753
)
163
Kim
YH
Marom
EM
Herndon
JE
HP
Pulmonary vein diameter, cross-sectional area, and shape: CT analysis
,
2005
, vol.
235
(pg.
43
-
49
)
164
Van de Veire
NR
Schuijf
JD
De Sutter
J
Devos
D
Bleeker
GB
de Roos
A
van der Wall
EE
Schalij
MJ
Bax
JJ
Non-invasive visualization of the cardiac venous system in coronary artery disease patients using 64-slice computed tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
48
(pg.
1832
-
1838
)
165
Jongbloed
MR
Bax
JJ
Lamb
HJ
Dirksen
MS
Zeppenfeld
K
van der Wall
EE
de Roos
A
Schalij
MJ
Multislice computed tomography versus intracardiac echocardiography to evaluate the pulmonary veins before radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a head-to-head comparison
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2005
, vol.
45
(pg.
343
-
350
)
166
Jongbloed
MR
Dirksen
MS
Bax
JJ
Boersma
E
Geleijns
K
Lamb
HJ
van der Wall
EE
de Roos
A
Schalij
MJ
Atrial fibrillation: multi-detector row CT of pulmonary vein anatomy prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation—initial experience
,
2005
, vol.
234
(pg.
702
-
709
)
167
Marom
EM
Herndon
JE
Kim
YH
HP
Variations in pulmonary venous drainage to the left atrium: implications for radiofrequency ablation
,
2004
, vol.
230
(pg.
824
-
829
)
168
Tops
LF
Bax
JJ
Zeppenfeld
K
Jongbloed
MR
Lamb
HJ
van der Wall
EE
Schalij
MJ
Fusion of multislice computed tomography imaging with three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping to guide radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures
Heart Rhythm
,
2005
, vol.
2
(pg.
1076
-
1081
)
169
Dong
J
Calkins
H
Solomon
SB
Lai
S
Dalal
D
Lardo
AC
Brem
E
Preiss
A
Berger
RD
Halperin
H
Dickfeld
T
Integrated electroanatomic mapping with three-dimensional computed tomographic images for real-time guided ablations
Circulation
,
2006
, vol.
113
(pg.
186
-
194
)
170
Kistler
PM
Rajappan
K
Jahngir
M
Earley
MJ
Harris
S
Abrams
D
Gupta
D
Liew
R
Ellis
S
Sporton
SC
Schilling
RJ
The impact of CT image integration into an electroanatomic mapping system on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
,
2006
, vol.
17
(pg.
1093
-
1101
)
171
Burgstahler
C
Trabold
T
Kuettner
A
Kopp
AF
Mewis
C
Kuehlkamp
V
Claussen
CD
Schroeder
S
Visualization of pulmonary vein stenosis after radio frequency ablation using multi-slice computed tomography: initial clinical experience in 33 patients
Int J Cardiol
,
2005
, vol.
102
(pg.
287
-
291
)
172
Perez-Lugones
A
Schvartzman
PR
Schweikert
R
Tchou
PJ
Saliba
W
Marrouche
NF
Castle
LW
White
RD
Natale
A
Three-dimensional reconstruction of pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation and controls: morphological characteristics of different veins
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
,
2003
, vol.
26
(pg.
8
-
15
)
173
Scharf
C
Sneider
M
Case
I
Chugh
A
Lai
SW
Pelosi
F
Jr
Knight
BP
Kazerooni
E
F
Oral
H
Anatomy of the pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation and effects of segmental ostial ablation analyzed by computed tomography
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
,
2003
, vol.
14
(pg.
150
-
155
)
174
Goo
HW
Park
IS
Ko
JK
Kim
YH
Seo
DM
Park
JJ
Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
,
2005
, vol.
21
(pg.
347
-
365
)
175
Ou
P
Celermajer
DS
Calcagni
G
Brunelle
F
Bonnet
D
Sidi
D
Three-dimensional CT scanning: a new diagnostic modality in congenital heart disease
Heart
,
2007
, vol.
93
(pg.
908
-
913
)
176
Woodard
PK
Bhalla
S
C
Gutierrez
FR
Non-coronary cardiac CT imaging
Semin Ultrasound CT MR
,
2006
, vol.
27
(pg.
56
-
75
)
177
Cook
SC
Raman
SV
Unique application of multislice computed tomography in adults with congenital heart disease
Int J Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
119
(pg.
101
-
106
)
178
Hoffmann
A
Engelfriet
P
Mulder
B
Int J Cardiol
,
2007
, vol.
118
(pg.
151
-
153
)
179
Haller
S
Kaiser
C
Buser
P
Bongartz
G
Bremerich
J
Coronary artery imaging with contrast-enhanced MDCT: extracardiac findings
AJR Am J Roentgenol
,
2006
, vol.
187
(pg.
105
-
110
)
180
Hunold
P
Schmermund
A
Seibel
RM
Gronemeyer
DH
Erbel
R
Prevalence and clinical significance of accidental findings in electron-beam tomographic scans for coronary artery calcification
Eur Heart J
,
2001
, vol.
22
(pg.
1748
-
1758
)
181
Gil
BN
Ran
K
Tamar
G
Shmuell
F
Eli
A
Prevalence of significant noncardiac findings on coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography in asymptomatic patients
J Comput Assist Tomogr
,
2007
, vol.
31
(pg.
1
-
4
)
182
Budoff
MJ
Fischer
H
Gopal
A
Incidental findings with cardiac CT evaluation: should we read beyond the heart?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
,
2006
, vol.
68
(pg.
965
-
973
)
183
Budoff
MJ
Achenbach
S
Z
Berman
DS
Poon
M
Taylor
AJ
Uretsky
BF
Williams
KA
Task Force 12: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (computed tomography): endorsed by the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
,
2006
, vol.
47
(pg.
915
-
920
)
184
Weinreb
JC
Larson
PA
Woodard
PK
Stanford
W
Rubin
GD
Stillman
AE
Bluemke
DA
Duerinckx
AJ
Dunnick
NR
Smith
GG
ACR Clinical Statement on Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging
,
2005
, vol.
2
(pg.
471
-
477
)
185
Dewey
M
Hamm
B
Cost effectiveness of coronary angiography and calcium scoring using CT and stress MRI for diagnosis of coronary artery disease
,
2007
, vol.
17
(pg.
1301
-
1309
)