This editorial refers to ‘Are we using cardiovascular medications and coronary angiography appropriately in men and women with chest pain?’, by N. Johnston et al., on page 1331and‘Factors influencing underutilization of evidence-based therapies in women’, by R. Bugiardini et al., on page 1337

More women than men die annually from ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in the developed world. This represents a reversal of fortune from previous decades and places women firmly as the new majority now impacted.1 Notably, the adverse IHD gender gap is the widest in relatively young women, where myocardial infarction (MI) mortality is 2-fold higher in women under 50 years compared with age-matched men.2 While it is now clear that there are many gender differences in IHD outcomes, including more frequent angina diagnosis, more office visits, more avoidable hospitalizations, higher MI mortality, and higher rates of heart failure in women compared with men,1 the aetiologies contributing to these differences are less clear.

A number of paradoxes are evident with regard to sex differences in IHD.2 First, women have a higher prevalence of angina compared with men, yet have an overall lower prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Secondly, symptomatic women undergoing coronary angiography have less extensive and severe obstructive CAD, despite being older with a higher risk factor burden compared with men. Thirdly, despite relatively less obstructive CAD, women have a more adverse prognosis compared with men. We have hypothesized an alternative, female-specific pattern of IHD due to the relatively high frequency of microvascular coronary dysfunction (MCD) in symptomatic women with and without obstructive CAD35 which we have linked with symptoms, ischaemia, and adverse outcomes.6,7 This alternative ‘female pattern’ of IHD is not easily recognized, given our male-pattern strategies aimed at detection and treatment of obstructive CAD.8

What relevance does this have to the adverse gender gaps for IHD in women? The literature suggests that when women look like men (with ‘male-pattern’ obstructive CAD), they are more likely to be diagnosed and treated like men. As characterized by the ‘Yentl syndrome’ depicted in the Barbra Streisand movie of the same name, Dr Bernadine Healy used this term in 2001 to call attention to the paradox of adverse outcomes of women with IHD, as well as the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of women.9

Two new analyses suggest that the Yentl syndrome is alive and well 10 years later. Johnson and colleagues10 compare utilization of medication and diagnostic coronary angiography in 12,200 women and men with stable signs and symptoms of IHD and 2 year outcomes in Sweden between 2006 and 2008. Bugiardini and colleagues11 summarize 6558 women and men with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with 1 year outcomes from the Canadian ACS Registry I and II between 1999 and 2003. Both studies add insight into aetiologies contributing to the IHD gender gap. Both studies demonstrate medical undertreatment of women, including lower rates of aspirin and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor use in stable women compared with men, and lower rates of ACE inhibitor, β-blocker, and statin medication in women with ACS compared with men. Both studies also show gender differences in use of procedures, where interestingly stable women undergo more repeat angiography, while women with ACS undergo fewer angiograms, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), and coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) compared with their male counterparts. The adverse outcomes described in these new works are consistent with earlier literature—both studies demonstrate adverse gender differences for women whereby stable women have more MIs, and women with ACS have higher death rates compared with men.

Is there evidence of progress in closing these gender gaps and improving IHD outcomes for women over the last 10 years? Potentially—the Swedish data are more contemporary, and report equivalent use of the four life-saving medication strategies (ACE inhibitors, β-blockers, aspirin, and statins) among the stable women and men after angiographic diagnosis of obstructive CAD.10 Importantly, this appropriate medication utilization was accompanied by equivalent mortality between the sexes, although event rates were predictably lower in this stable lower risk population and therefore the sensitivity to detect differences is more limited compared with an ACS population. The large Swedish sample size, however, argues somewhat reassuringly for similar outcomes in stable obstructive CAD patients treated similarly with guideline therapy. While previous work has shown an improvement of prognosis in women over time,12 nevertheless, other contemporary data demonstrate persistently more adverse outcomes for women compared with men.13 The Canadian Registry analysis adds to the accumulated literature that women with ACS remain less likely than men to receive the indicated diagnostic tests, medication, and procedures and then suffer the not unexpected higher rates of adverse outcomes.11

So why are women less likely to receive appropriate IHD guideline therapy? Both studies provide a similar clue—the Canadian Registry data demonstrate that female sex, despite adjustment for multiple associated variables, independently remains associated with underutilization of guideline therapy for ACS patients.11 The Swedish data demonstrate that while before diagnostic coronary angiography there are relatively large differences in treatment between women and men, these differences for guideline medication vanished following demonstration of obstructive CAD at angiography.10 These consistent findings argue against cultural ‘gender-based’ factors including misogyny and sexism as a driving force for drug underutilization in women, and suggest alternatively that biological ‘sex-based’ differences are key contributors. We can conclude from these and other studies that the presence or absence of obstructive CAD, e.g. ‘male-pattern’ IHD, remains a key decision point for medication prescribing for practising physicians. Because higher proportions of women with IHD present without obstructive CAD14 or undergo less coronary angiography,11,12 relatively fewer women will be treated, including those with evident ACS (for which guideline medication is not related to angiography), resulting in relatively more female deaths (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

The Yentl syndrome is alive and well as depicted for treatment selection and the outcomes acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and angina by sex. Among symptomatic women graphic and men graphic (top), a subset of relatively more men are chosen to undergo coronary angiography which reveals a majority of men with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (upper middle left angiogram), compared with relatively more women with microvascular coronary dysfunction (upper middle right angiogram). Medical therapy (RX) selection for aspirin (ASA), β-blocker (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), and statin therapy follows according to male- (lower middle left photo) and female-pattern (lower middle right photo) disease, whereby women and men with male-pattern disease receive treatment compared with a minority of women and men with female-pattern disease. This produces undertreatment of at-risk women and results in a higher death/myocardial infarction (MI) rate in women compared with men (DEATH/MI FOLLOW-UP).

Figure 1.

The Yentl syndrome is alive and well as depicted for treatment selection and the outcomes acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and angina by sex. Among symptomatic women graphic and men graphic (top), a subset of relatively more men are chosen to undergo coronary angiography which reveals a majority of men with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (upper middle left angiogram), compared with relatively more women with microvascular coronary dysfunction (upper middle right angiogram). Medical therapy (RX) selection for aspirin (ASA), β-blocker (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), and statin therapy follows according to male- (lower middle left photo) and female-pattern (lower middle right photo) disease, whereby women and men with male-pattern disease receive treatment compared with a minority of women and men with female-pattern disease. This produces undertreatment of at-risk women and results in a higher death/myocardial infarction (MI) rate in women compared with men (DEATH/MI FOLLOW-UP).

How can we incorporate this new knowledge to improve IHD outcomes for women? Our group has estimated the prevalence of signs and symptoms of IHD in the absence of obstructive CAD using the US NCDR database to be 2–3 million women,1 placing it as a larger healthcare threat to women than breast cancer, and comparable with the highly prevalent 6 million women with clinically documented obstructive CAD in the USA alone. Accordingly, two US guidelines now specify strategies for women, i.e. the AHA/ACC Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women15 and the AHA/ACC Management of Patients with Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.16 Moreover, IHD strategies that provide guideline-driven infrastructure support to physicians, such as the AHA ‘Get With The Guidelines’ and the ACC ‘Guidelines Applied in Practice’,17 appear to have the largest impact on closing therapeutic gender gaps that disadvantage women.18

Do we have a sufficient fund of knowledge to close the persistent gender gap in IHD and vanquish the Yentl syndrome to history? While increasing knowledge exists regarding pathophysiological mechanistic pathways for ‘female-pattern IHD’, translational studies aimed at developing practical diagnosis and therapeutics with both traditional and novel treatments are needed. Further closure of knowledge gaps related to the paradox and the pathophysiology of IHD in women is one of our highest priorities to improve the health of the 51% of the population that is female and represent currently the majority of deaths.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by contracts from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes, nos N01-HV-68161, N01-HV-68162, N01-HV-68163, N01-HV-68164, RO1-HL-073412-01, grants U0164829,U01 HL649141, U01 HL649241, and grants from the Gustavus and Louis Pfeiffer Research Foundation, Danville, New Jersey, The Women's Guild of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, The Ladies Hospital Aid Society of Western Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, QMED, Inc., Laurence Harbor, New Jersey, the Edythe L. Broad Endowment, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, and the Barbra Streisand Women's Cardiovascular Research and Education Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

References

1
Shaw
LJ
Bairey Merz
CN
Pepine
CJ
Reis
SE
Bittner
V
Kelsey
SF
Olson
M
Johnson
BD
Mankad
S
Sharaf
BL
Rogers
WJ
Wessel
TR
Arant
CB
Pohost
GM
Lerman
A
Quyyumi
AA
Sopko
G
Insights from the NHLBI-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: Part I: gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2006
, vol. 
47
 (pg. 
S4
-
S20
)
2
Bairey Merz
CN
Shaw
LJ
Reis
SE
Bittner
V
Kelsey
SF
Olson
M
Johnson
BD
Pepine
CJ
Mankad
S
Sharaf
BL
Rogers
WJ
Pohost
GM
Lerman
A
Quyyumi
AA
Sopko
G
Insights from the NHLBI-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: Part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2006
, vol. 
47
 (pg. 
S21
-
29
)
3
Merz
CN
Kelsey
SF
Pepine
CJ
Reichek
N
Reis
SE
Rogers
WJ
Sharaf
BL
Sopko
G
The Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: protocol design, methodology and feasibility report
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
1999
, vol. 
33
 (pg. 
1453
-
1461
)
4
Reis
SE
Holubkov
R
Lee
JS
Sharaf
B
Reichek
N
Rogers
WJ
Walsh
EG
Fuisz
AR
Kerensky
R
Detre
KM
Sopko
G
Pepine
CJ
Coronary flow velocity response to adenosine characterizes coronary microvascular function in women with chest pain and no obstructive coronary disease. Results from the pilot phase of the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
1999
, vol. 
33
 (pg. 
1469
-
1475
)
5
Wessel
TR
Arant
CB
McGorray
SP
Sharaf
BL
Reis
SE
Kerensky
RA
von Mering
GO
Smith
KM
Pauly
DF
Handberg
EM
Mankad
S
Olson
MB
Johnson
BD
Merz
CN
Sopko
G
Pepine
CJ
Coronary microvascular reactivity is only partially predicted by atherosclerosis risk factors or coronary artery disease in women evaluated for suspected ischemia: results from the NHLBI Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISEe)
Clin Cardiol
 , 
2007
, vol. 
30
 (pg. 
69
-
74
)
6
Gulati
M
Cooper-DeHoff
RM
McClure
C
Johnson
BD
Shaw
LJ
Handberg
EM
Zineh
I
Kelsey
SF
Arnsdorf
MF
Black
HR
Pepine
CJ
Merz
CN
Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation study and the St James Women Take Heart project
Arch Intern Med
 , 
2009
, vol. 
169
 (pg. 
843
-
850
)
7
Pepine
CJ
Anderson
RD
Sharaf
BL
Reis
SE
Smith
KM
Handberg
EM
Johnson
BD
Sopko
G
Bairey Merz
CN
Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the national heart, lung and blood institute WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2010
, vol. 
55
 (pg. 
2825
-
2832
)
8
Shaw
LJ
Bugiardini
R
Merz
CN
Women and ischemic heart disease: evolving knowledge
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2009
, vol. 
54
 (pg. 
1561
-
1575
)
9
Healy
B
The Yentl syndrome
N Engl J Med
 , 
1991
, vol. 
325
 (pg. 
274
-
276
)
10
Johnston
N
Schenck-Gustafsson
K
Lagerqvist
B
Are we using cardiovascular medications and coronary angiography appropriately in men and women with chest pain?
Eur Heart J
 , 
2011
, vol. 
32
 (pg. 
1331
-
1336
First published on 10 February 2011. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr009
11
Bugiardini
R
Yan
AT
Yan
RT
Fitchett
D
Langer
A
Manfrini
O
Goodman
SG
Factors influencing underutilization of evidence-based therapies in women on behalf of the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry I and II Investigators
Eur Heart J
 , 
2011
, vol. 
32
 (pg. 
1337
-
1344
First published on 7 March 2011. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr027.
12
Berger
JS
Bairey-Merz
CN
Redberg
RF
Douglas
PS
Improving the quality of care for women with cardiovascular disease: report of a DCRI Think Tank, March 8 to 9
Am Heart J
 , 
2007
, vol. 
156
 (pg. 
816
-
825
825 e811 2008
13
Rosamond
W
Flegal
K
Friday
G
Furie
K
Go
A
Greenlund
K
Haase
N
Ho
M
Howard
V
Kissela
B
Kittner
S
Lloyd-Jones
D
McDermott
M
Meigs
J
Moy
C
Nichol
G
O'Donnell
CJ
Roger
V
Rumsfeld
J
Sorlie
P
Steinberger
J
Thom
T
Wasserthiel-Smoller
S
Hong
Y
Heart disease and stroke statistics—
Circulation
 , 
2007
, vol. 
115
 (pg. 
e69
-
171
update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee, 2007
14
Bugiardini
R
Bairey Merz
CN
Angina with ‘normal’coronary arteries: a changing philosophy
JAMA
 , 
2005
, vol. 
293
 (pg. 
477
-
484
)
15
Mosca
L
Banka
CL
Benjamin
EJ
Berra
K
Bushnell
C
Dolor
RJ
Ganiats
TG
Gomes
AS
Gornik
HL
Gracia
C
Gulati
M
Haan
CK
Judelson
DR
Keenan
N
Kelepouris
E
Michos
ED
Newby
LK
Oparil
S
Ouyang
P
Oz
MC
Petitti
D
Pinn
VW
Redberg
RF
Scott
R
Sherif
K
Smith
SC
Jr
Sopko
G
Steinhorn
RH
Stone
NJ
Taubert
KA
Todd
BA
Urbina
E
Wenger
NK
Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women: 2007 update
Circulation
 , 
2007
, vol. 
115
 (pg. 
1481
-
1501
)
16
Kushner
FG
Hand
M
Smith
SC
Jr
King
SB
3rd
Anderson
JL
Antman
EM
Bailey
SR
Bates
ER
Blankenship
JC
Casey
DE
Jr.
Green
LA
Hochman
JS
Jacobs
AK
Krumholz
HM
Morrison
DA
Ornato
JP
Pearle
DL
Peterson
ED
Sloan
MA
Whitlow
PL
Williams
DO
focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report of the Mmerican College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
J Am Coll Cardiol
 , 
2009
, vol. 
54
 (pg. 
2205
-
2241
2009
17
LaBresh
KAeA
Get With The Guidelines improves cardiovascular care in hospitalized patients with CAD. (Abstract).
Circulation
 , 
2003
, vol. 
107
 (pg. 
IV
-
722
)
18
Novack
V
Cutlip
DE
Jotkowitz
A
Lieberman
N
Porath
A
Reduction in sex-based mortality difference with implementation of new cardiology guidelines
Am J Med
 , 
2008
, vol. 
121
 (pg. 
597
-
603
e591

Author notes

The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Heart Journal or of the European Society of Cardiology.
doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr009
doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr027

Comments

0 Comments