-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Vera Regitz-Zagrosek, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink, Johann Bauersachs, Carina Blomström-Lundqvist, Renata Cífková, Michele De Bonis, Bernard Iung, Mark Richard Johnson, Ulrich Kintscher, Peter Kranke, Irene Marthe Lang, Joao Morais, Petronella G Pieper, Patrizia Presbitero, Susanna Price, Giuseppe M C Rosano, Ute Seeland, Tommaso Simoncini, Lorna Swan, Carole A Warnes, ESC Scientific Document Group , 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: The Task Force for the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Heart Journal, Volume 39, Issue 34, 07 September 2018, Pages 3165–3241, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340
- Share Icon Share
The current background information and detailed discussion of the data can be found in ESC CardioMed - Section 53 Pregnancy and heart disease
Table of Contents
Table of Contents 3166
List of tables 3168
Abbreviations and acronyms 3168
1. Preamble 3169
2. Introduction 3171
2.1 Why do we need new Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases in pregnancy? 3171
2.2 New format of the Guidelines 3171
2.3 Why these Guidelines are important 3171
2.4 Methods 3171
2.5 What is new? 3172
3. General considerations 3173
3.1 Epidemiology 3173
3.2 Physiological adaptations to pregnancy 3174
3.3 Pre-pregnancy counselling 3174
3.3.1 Risk of maternal cardiovascular complications 3174
3.3.2 Risk of obstetric and offspring complications 3174
3.3.3 Pregnancy heart team 3176
3.4 Cardiovascular diagnosis in pregnancy 3176
3.4.1 Electrocardiography 3176
3.4.2 Echocardiography 3176
3.4.3 Exercise testing 3177
3.4.4 Ionizing radiation exposure 3177
3.4.5 Chest radiography and computed tomography 3177
3.4.6 Cardiac catheterization 3177
3.4.7 Magnetic resonance imaging 3177
3.5 Genetic testing and counselling 3177
3.5.1 Pre-natal diagnosis 3178
3.6 Foetal assessment 3178
3.6.1 Screening for congenital heart disease 3178
3.6.2 Assessing foetal wellbeing 3178
3.7 Interventions in the mother during pregnancy 3178
3.7.1 Percutaneous therapy 3178
3.7.2 Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass 3178
3.8 Timing and mode of delivery: risk for mother and child 3179
3.8.1 Timing of delivery 3179
3.8.2 Labour induction 3179
3.8.3 Vaginal or caesarean delivery 3179
3.8.4 Delivery in anticoagulated women (not including mechanical valve; see section 5) 3179
3.8.5 Urgent delivery on therapeutic anticoagulation 3179
3.8.6 Haemodynamic monitoring during delivery 3180
3.8.7 Anaesthesia/analgesia 3180
3.8.8 Labour 3180
3.8.9 Perimortem caesarean section 3180
3.8.10 Post-partum care 3180
3.8.11 Breastfeeding 3180
3.9 Infective endocarditis 3180
3.9.1 Prophylaxis 3180
3.9.2 Diagnosis and risk assessment 3180
3.9.3 Treatment 3180
3.10 Methods of contraception and termination of pregnancy, and in vitro fertilization 3181
3.10.1 Methods of contraception 3181
3.10.2 Sterilization 3181
3.10.3 Methods of termination of pregnancy 3181
3.10.4 In vitro fertilization 3181
3.11 Recommendations 3182
4. Congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension 3182
4.1 Introduction 3182
4.2 Pulmonary hypertension and Eisenmenger’s syndrome 3183
4.2.1 Pulmonary hypertension 3183
4.2.2 Eisenmenger’s syndrome 3183
4.2.3 Cyanotic heart disease without pulmonary hypertension 3184
4.3 Specific congenital heart defects 3184
4.3.1 Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction 3184
4.3.2 Atrial septal defect 3184
4.3.3 Ventricular septal defect 3184
4.3.4 Atrioventricular septal defect 3184
4.3.5 Coarctation of the aorta 3184
4.3.6 Pulmonary valve and right ventricular outflow tract disease 3184
4.3.7 Congenital aortic stenosis 3185
4.3.8 Tetralogy of Fallot 3185
4.3.9 Ebstein’s anomaly 3185
4.3.10 Transposition of the great arteries 3185
4.3.11 Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries 3185
4.3.12 Fontan circulation 3186
4.4 Recommendations 3186
5. Aortic diseases 3186
5.1 Maternal and offspring risk 3187
5.2 Specific syndromes 3187
5.2.1 Marfan syndrome 3187
5.2.2 Bicuspid aortic valve 3187
5.2.3 Vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome 3187
5.2.4 Turner syndrome 3187
5.2.5 Other autosomal dominant aortopathies 3187
5.3 Management 3187
5.3.1 Follow-up and medical therapy 3187
5.3.2 Interventions 3188
5.3.3 Delivery 3188
5.4 Recommendations 3189
6. Valvular heart disease 3190
6.1 Stenotic valve lesions 3190
6.1.1 Mitral stenosis 3190
6.1.2 Valvular aortic stenosis 3190
6.2 Regurgitant lesions 3191
6.2.1 Mitral and aortic regurgitation 3191
6.2.2 Tricuspid regurgitation 3191
6.3 Atrial fibrillation in native heart valve disease 3191
6.4 Prosthetic valves 3191
6.4.1 Choice of valve prosthesis 3191
6.4.2 Pregnancy risk with bioprostheses 3192
6.5 Mechanical prostheses and anticoagulation 3192
6.5.1 Maternal risk 3192
6.5.2 Obstetric and offspring risk 3192
6.5.3 Management 3193
6.6 Recommendations 3195
7. Coronary artery disease 3197
7.1 Aetiology 3197
7.2 Presentation and diagnosis 3197
7.3 Management 3197
7.4 Pharmacotherapy 3197
7.5 Intervention 3197
7.5.1 Stent choice and antiplatelet therapy 3197
7.6 Pre-existing CAD 3198
7.7 Labour and delivery 3198
7.8 Recommendations 3198
8. Cardiomyopathies and heart failure 3198
8.1 Peripartum cardiomyopathy 3198
8.1.1 Diagnosis 3198
8.1.2 Prognosis and counselling 3198
8.2 Dilated cardiomyopathy 3198
8.2.1 Prognosis and counselling 3199
8.3 Management of heart failure during and after pregnancy 3199
8.3.1 Acute/subacute heart failure and cardiogenic shock during or after pregnancy 3199
8.3.2 Bromocriptine and peripartum cardiomyopathy 3201
8.3.3 Devices and transplantation 3201
8.3.4 Anticoagulation 3201
8.3.5 Delivery and breastfeeding 3201
8.4 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 3201
8.4.1 Management 3201
8.4.2 Delivery 3202
8.5 Recommendations 3202
9. Arrhythmias 3203
9.1 Introduction 3203
9.2 Maternal risk 3203
9.3 Obstetric and offspring risk 3203
9.4 Supraventricular tachycardia 3203
9.5 Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter 3203
9.5.1 Anticoagulation 3203
9.6 Ventricular tachycardia 3203
9.7 Bradyarrhythmias 3204
9.7.1 Sinus node dysfunction 3204
9.7.2 Atrioventricular block 3204
9.8 Interventions 3204
9.8.1 Electrical cardioversion 3204
9.8.2 Catheter ablation 3204
9.8.3 Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and pacing 3204
9.9 Recommendations 3206
10. Hypertensive disorders 3207
10.1 Diagnosis and risk assessment 3207
10.1.1 Blood pressure measurement 3207
10.1.2 Laboratory tests 3207
10.2 Definition and classification of hypertension in pregnancy 3207
10.3 Prevention of hypertension and pre-eclampsia 3207
10.4 Management of hypertension in pregnancy 3208
10.4.1 Background 3208
10.4.2 Non-pharmacological management 3208
10.4.3 Pharmacological management 3208
10.5 Delivery 3208
10.6 Prognosis after pregnancy 3209
10.6.1 Blood pressure post-partum 3209
10.6.2 Hypertension and lactation 3209
10.6.3 Risk of recurrence of hypertensive disorders in a subsequent pregnancy 3209
10.6.4 Long-term cardiovascular consequences of gestational hypertension 3209
10.6.5 Fertility treatment 3209
10.7 Recommendations 3209
11. Venous thrombo-embolic disease during pregnancy and the puerperium 3210
11.1 Epidemiology and maternal risk 3210
11.2 Risk factors for pregnancy-related venous thrombo-embolism and risk stratification 3210
11.3 Prevention of venous thrombo-embolism 3210
11.4 Management of acute venous thrombo-embolism 3210
11.4.1 Pulmonary embolism 3210
11.4.2 Acute deep vein thrombosis 3211
11.5 Recommendations 3211
11.5.1 Management of delivery 3211
12. Drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding 3212
12.1 General principles 3212
12.1.1 Pharmacokinetics in pregnancy 3212
12.1.2 Drug classes in pregnancy 3213
12.2 US Food and Drug Administration classification 3214
12.3 Internet databases 3214
12.4 Pharmaceutical industry3214
12.5 Recommendations3214
13. Gaps in the evidence3231
14. Key messages3231
15. ‘What to do’ and ‘what not to do’ messages from the Guidelines3233
16. Appendix3236
References3237
List of tables
Table 1. Classes of recommendation 3170
Table 2. Level of evidence 3171
Table 3. Modified World Health Organization classification of maternal cardiovascular ris k3175
Table 4. Predictors of maternal and neonatal events 3176
Table 5. Aortic diseases 3188
Table 6. Recommended surveillance levels at time of delivery in women with arrhythmias 3205
Table 7. Drugs and safety data 3215
Abbreviations and acronyms
- ABPM
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
- ACE
Angiotensin-converting enzyme
- ACE-I
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor
- ACR
Albumin:creatinine ratio
- ACS
Acute coronary syndromes
- AF
Atrial fibrillation
- AHF
Acute heart failure
- AMI
Acute myocardial infarction
- aPTT
Activated partial thromboplastin time
- ARB
Angiotensin receptor blocker
- ARNI
Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor
- AS
Aortic stenosis
- ASD
Atrial septal defect
- ASI
Aortic size index
- AT
Atrial tachycardia
- AUC
Area under the curve
- AV
Atrioventricular
- BMI
Body mass index
- BP
Blood pressure
- BSA
Body surface area
- CAD
Coronary artery disease
- CARPREG
CARdiac disease in PREGnancy
- CCB
Calcium channel blocker
- CI
Confidence interval
- CO
Cardiac output
- CoA
Coarctation of the aorta
- CPG
Committee for Practice Guidelines
- CT
Computed tomography
- CVD
Cardiovascular disease
- DBP
Diastolic blood pressure
- DCM
Dilated cardiomyopathy
- DES
Drug-eluting stent
- DVT
Deep vein/venous thrombosis
- ECG
Electrocardiogram
- EF
Ejection fraction
- ESC
European Society of Cardiology
- FDA
US Food and Drug Administration
- HCM
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- HF
Heart failure
- HFrEF
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
- 5-HT1A
5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin)
- HTAD
Heritable thoracic aortic disease
- ICD
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- ICU
Intensive care unit
- IE
Infective endocarditis
- INR
International normalized ratio
- i.v.
Intravenous
- KLH
Keyhole limpet haemocyanin
- LMWH
Low molecular weight heparin
- LQTS
Long QT syndrome
- LV
Left ventricular
- LVEF
Left ventricular ejection fraction
- MCS
Mechanical circulatory support
- mGy
Milligray
- MI
Myocardial infarction
- MR
Mitral regurgitation
- MRA
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist
- MRHD
Maximum recommended human dose
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MS
Mitral stenosis
- mWHO
Modified World Health Organization
- NSTE-ACS
Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
- NSTEMI
Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- NT-proBNP
N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide
- NYHA
New York Heart Association
- OAC
Oral anticoagulant
- OHSS
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
- OR
Odds ratio
- PAH
Pulmonary arterial hypertension
- PAP
Pulmonary arterial pressure
- PCI
Percutaneous coronary intervention
- PE
Pulmonary embolism
- PGE
Prostaglandin E
- PH
Pulmonary hypertension
- PLLR
Pregnancy and Lactation Labelling Rule
- PPCM
Peripartum cardiomyopathy
- PS
Pulmonary (valve) stenosis
- P-SCAD
Pregnancy-related spontaneous coronary artery dissection
- PSVT
Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia
- RAAS
Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system
- RHD
Recommended human dose
- ROPAC
Registry Of Pregnancy And Cardiac disease
- RV
Right ventricular
- SBP
Systolic blood pressure
- SCD
Sudden cardiac death
- SD
Standard deviation
- sFlt1
Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1
- STEMI
ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- SVT
Supraventricular tachycardia
- TAPSE
Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
- TdP
Torsade de pointes
- TGA
Transposition of the great arteries
- TR
Tricuspid regurgitation
- UFH
Unfractionated heparin
- UPA
Ulipristal acetate
- VKA
Vitamin K antagonist
- VSD
Ventricular septal defect
- VT
Ventricular tachycardia
- VTE
Venous thrombo-embolism
- WCD
Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator
- WPW
Wolff–Parkinson–White
1. Preamble
Guidelines summarize and evaluate available evidence with the aim of assisting health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition. Guidelines and their recommendations should facilitate decision making of health professionals in their daily practice. However, the final decisions concerning an individual patient must be made by the responsible health professional(s) in consultation with the patient and caregiver as appropriate.
A great number of guidelines have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), as well as by other societies and organisations. Because of the impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for the development of guidelines have been established in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines can be found on the ESC website (http://www.escardio.org/Guidelines-&-Education/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines/Guidelines-development/Writing-ESC-Guidelines). ESC Guidelines represent the official position of the ESC on a given topic and are regularly updated.
Members of this Task Force were selected by the ESC, including representation from its relevant ESC sub-specialty groups, in order to represent professionals involved with the medical care of patients with this pathology. Selected experts in the field undertook a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management of a given condition according to ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) policy. A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures was performed, including assessment of the risk–benefit ratio. The level of evidence and the strength of the recommendation of particular management options were weighed and graded according to predefined scales, as outlined in Tables 1 and 2.
The experts of the writing and reviewing panels provided declaration of interest forms for all relationships that might be perceived as real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. These forms were compiled into one file and can be found on the ESC website (http://www.escardio.org/guidelines). Any changes in declarations of interest that arise during the writing period were notified to the ESC and updated. The Task Force received its entire financial support from the ESC without any involvement from the healthcare industry.
The ESC CPG supervises and coordinates the preparation of new Guidelines. The Committee is also responsible for the endorsement process of these Guidelines. The ESC Guidelines undergo extensive review by the CPG and external experts. After appropriate revisions the Guidelines are approved by all the experts involved in the Task Force. The finalized document is approved by the CPG for publication in the European Heart Journal. The Guidelines were developed after careful consideration of the scientific and medical knowledge and the evidence available at the time of their dating.
The task of developing ESC Guidelines also includes the creation of educational tools and implementation programmes for the recommendations including condensed pocket guideline versions, summary slides, booklets with essential messages, summary cards for non-specialists and an electronic version for digital applications (smartphones, etc.). These versions are abridged and thus, if needed, one should always refer to the full text version, which is freely available via the ESC website and hosted on the EHJ website. The National Societies of the ESC are encouraged to endorse, translate and implement all ESC Guidelines. Implementation programmes are needed because it has been shown that the outcome of disease may be favourably influenced by the thorough application of clinical recommendations.
Surveys and registries are needed to verify that real-life daily practice is in keeping with what is recommended in the guidelines, thus completing the loop between clinical research, writing of guidelines, disseminating them and implementing them into clinical practice.
Health professionals are encouraged to take the ESC Guidelines fully into account when exercising their clinical judgment, as well as in the determination and the implementation of preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic medical strategies. However, the ESC Guidelines do not override in any way whatsoever the individual responsibility of health professionals to make appropriate and accurate decisions in consideration of each patient's health condition and in consultation with that patient or the patient's caregiver where appropriate and/or necessary. It is also the health professional's responsibility to verify the rules and regulations applicable to drugs and devices at the time of prescription.
2. Introduction
2.1 Why do we need new Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases in pregnancy?
Since the previous version of these Guidelines was published in 2012, new evidence has accumulated, particularly on diagnostic techniques, risk assessment, and the use of cardiovascular drugs. This made a revision of the recommendations necessary.
2.2 New format of the Guidelines
The new Guidelines have been adapted to facilitate their use in clinical practice and to meet readers’ demands by focusing on condensed, clearly presented recommendations. At the end of each section, ‘recommendations’ summarize the essentials. ‘Gaps in the evidence’ are listed in section 13 to propose topics for future research. The Guidelines document is harmonized with the simultaneously published chapter on the management of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in pregnancy of the ESC Textbook of Cardiology (http://oxfordmedicine.com/view/10.1093/med/9780199566990.001.0001/med-9780199566990-chapter-33). Background information and a detailed discussion of the data that have provided the basis for the recommendations can be found in the relevant book chapter.
2.3 Why these Guidelines are important
Pregnancy is complicated by maternal disease in 1–4% of cases. New data about the prevalence and incidence of pregnancy-related heart disease are limited from most parts of the world. Sudden adult death syndrome, peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), aortic dissection, and myocardial infarction (MI) were the most common causes of maternal death in the UK over the period 2006–08.1–5 Knowledge of the risks associated with CVDs during pregnancy and their management in pregnant women who suffer from serious pre-existing conditions is of pivotal importance for advising patients before pregnancy.6 Since all measures concern not only the mother but the foetus as well, the optimum treatment of both must be targeted. A therapy favourable for the mother can be associated with potential harm to the developing child and, in extreme cases, treatment measures that protect the survival of the mother can cause the death of the foetus. On the other hand, therapies to protect the child may lead to a suboptimal outcome for the mother. Because prospective or randomized studies are frequently absent, recommendations in these Guidelines mostly correspond to evidence level C. Therefore, registries and prospective studies are urgently needed to improve current knowledge.4,7 At the European level, the Registry Of Pregnancy And Cardiac disease (ROPAC) registry of the ESC and the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies network are providing data on epidemiology and drug exposure in pregnancy.4,8
2.4 Methods
The current Guidelines are based on the previously published ESC Guidelines on the management of CVDs during pregnancy,9 the literature found in a systematic search from 2011–16 in the National Institutes of Health database (PubMed), and on recent publications and recommendations from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology.10 Furthermore, we considered related Guidelines of the ESC published in 2012–15 on the topics of congenital heart disease, aortic disease, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathies and heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, pericardial diseases, pulmonary hypertension (PH), infective endocarditis (IE), ventricular arrhythmias, and acute coronary syndromes, and on the topics of cancer treatment and cardiovascular toxicity, dyslipidaemias, atrial fibrillation (AF), and CVD prevention published in 2016 (https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines/Clinical-Practice-Guidelineshomepage).
2.5 What is new in the 2018 CVD in Pregnancy Guidelines? (Figure 1)
Selected revised and new recommendations.
3. General considerations
3.1 Epidemiology
In the western world, the risk of CVD in pregnancy has increased due to increasing age at first pregnancy. According to World Atlas,27 the 10 countries where mean age at first birth is highest record a mean age between 28.8–31.2 years. The mild increase in maternal age does not justify an increase in CVD during pregnancy because of maternal age. However, pregnancies in the late reproductive years (or between ages of 40–50 years) are more frequently associated with an increasing prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, especially diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. Additionally, an increasing number of women with congenital heart disease reach childbearing age.5 In western countries, maternal heart disease is the major cause of maternal death during pregnancy.2,28 The current background information and detailed discussion of the data for the following section of these Guidelines can be found in ESC CardioMed 53.1a General considerations, 53.1b Pregnancy risk assessment and 53.2 Gynaecological, obstetric, and neonatological aspects.
Hypertensive disorders are the most frequent cardiovascular disorders during pregnancy, occurring in 5–10% of all pregnancies (see section 10). Among the other disease conditions, congenital heart disease is the most frequent CVD present during pregnancy in the western world (75–82%).29,30 Rheumatic valvular disease dominates in non-western countries, comprising 56–89% of all CVDs in pregnancy.29,31
Peripartum intensive care unit (ICU) admissions are increasing in frequency, with affected women―who suffer from serious pre-existing conditions, are older, and present with multiple comorbidities and also congenital heart disease―being more frequently admitted than in previous years.6 The admission rate to ICUs was 6.4 per 1000 deliveries, corresponding to 1 admission per 156 deliveries, in Vienna, Austria during the period 2011–14. A 5% mortality rate was also observed in the study and is considered as appropriate in comparison to the literature.6
Cardiomyopathies are rare, but represent severe causes of cardiovascular complications in pregnancy.32
3.2 Physiological adaptations to pregnancy
Pregnancy induces changes in the cardiovascular system to meet the increased metabolic demands of the mother and foetus. Plasma volume and cardiac output (CO) reach a maximum of 40–50% above baseline at 32 weeks of gestation, while 75% of this increase has occurred by the end of the first trimester. The increase in CO is achieved by an increase in stroke volume in the first-half of pregnancy and a gradual increase in heart rate thereafter. Atrial and ventricular diameters increase while ventricular function is preserved. In women with heart disease, left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) adaptation to pregnancy can be suboptimal.33–36 Maternal cardiac dysfunction is related to impaired uteroplacental flow and suboptimal foetal outcome.35–37 Systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances decrease during pregnancy.
Pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state associated with increased risk of thrombo-embolism. Increased activity of liver enzyme systems, glomerular filtration rate, and plasma volume, protein binding changes, and decreased serum albumin levels contribute to changes in the pharmacokinetics of many drugs.36,38 Uterine contractions, positioning (left lateral vs. supine), pain, anxiety, exertion, haemorrhage, and uterine involution cause significant haemodynamic changes during labour and post-partum. Anaesthesia, haemorrhage, and infection may induce additional cardiovascular stress. Blood pressure (BP) and CO increase during labour and post-partum. In conclusion, the physiological adaptations to pregnancy influence the evaluation and interpretation of cardiac function and clinical status.
3.3 Pre-pregnancy counselling
All women with known cardiac or aortic disease who wish to embark on pregnancy require timely pre-pregnancy counselling.39 Informed maternal decision-making is crucial and there is a clear need for individualized care, taking into account not only the medical condition but also the emotional and cultural context, psychological issues, and ethical challenges. Especially in patients with a high-risk or possible contraindication for pregnancy, the risk of pregnancy and the necessity of careful planning of pregnancy should be discussed at a young age. However, it is also important to explain that many women can go through pregnancy with low-risks.
For risk estimation, as a minimum, an electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, and an exercise test should be performed. In case of aortic pathology, complete aortic imaging by computed tomography (CT) scanning or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is necessary for appropriate pre-conception counselling. Peak heart rate and peak oxygen uptake are both known to be predictive of maternal cardiac events in pregnancy.40 A pregnancy exercise capacity >80% is associated with a favourable pregnancy outcome.
Several aspects must be discussed, including long-term prognosis, fertility and miscarriage rates, risk of recurrence of congenital disease, drug therapy, estimated maternal risk and outcome, expected foetal outcomes, and plans for pregnancy care and delivery. A multidisciplinary management plan should be constructed and discussed with the patient. In addition, attention to unhealthy habits including being overweight, smoking, and consuming alcohol is important, as these can have a clear impact on maternal and foetal outcomes. Pregnancy is a very suitable time for recommending a healthy lifestyle, including smoking cessation.
3.3.1 Risk of maternal cardiovascular complications
The risk of complications in pregnancy depends on the underlying cardiac diagnosis, ventricular and valvular function, functional class, presence of cyanosis, pulmonary artery pressures, and other factors. Comorbidities, including for example rheumatoid and musculoskeletal diseases as well as mental disorders, should also be taken into account. Therefore, risk estimation should be individualized.
To assess the maternal risk of cardiac complications during pregnancy, the condition of the woman should be assessed, taking into account medical history, functional class, oxygen saturation, natriuretic peptide levels, echocardiographic assessment of ventricular and valvular function, intrapulmonary pressures and aortic diameters, exercise capacity, and arrhythmias. Disease-specific risk should be assessed using the modified World Health Organization (mWHO) classification (Table 3) and as described in the respective sections dealing with specific diseases in these Guidelines. Risk estimation should be further refined by taking into account predictors that have been identified in studies that included large populations with various diseases, such as the CARPREG (CARdiac disease in PREGnancy), ZAHARA, and ROPAC (Registry Of Pregnancy And Cardiac disease) studies (Table 4).29,41–43
Modified World Health Organization classification of maternal cardiovascular risk
mWHO I | mWHO II | mWHO II–III | mWHO III | mWHO IV | |
Diagnosis (if otherwise well and uncomplicated) |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk | No detectable increased risk of maternal mortality and no/mild increased risk in morbidity | Small increased risk of maternal mortality or moderate increase in morbidity | Intermediate increased risk of maternal mortality or moderate to severe increase in morbidity | Significantly increased risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity | Extremely high risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity |
Maternal cardiac event rate | 2.5–5% | 5.7–10.5% | 10–19% | 19–27% | 40–100% |
Counselling | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes: expert counselling required | Yes: pregnancy contraindicated: if pregnancy occurs, termination should be discussed |
Care during pregnancy | Local hospital | Local hospital | Referral hospital | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease |
Minimal follow-up visits during pregnancy | Once or twice | Once per trimester | Bimonthly | Monthly or bimonthly | Monthly |
Location of delivery | Local hospital | Local hospital | Referral hospital | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease |
mWHO I | mWHO II | mWHO II–III | mWHO III | mWHO IV | |
Diagnosis (if otherwise well and uncomplicated) |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk | No detectable increased risk of maternal mortality and no/mild increased risk in morbidity | Small increased risk of maternal mortality or moderate increase in morbidity | Intermediate increased risk of maternal mortality or moderate to severe increase in morbidity | Significantly increased risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity | Extremely high risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity |
Maternal cardiac event rate | 2.5–5% | 5.7–10.5% | 10–19% | 19–27% | 40–100% |
Counselling | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes: expert counselling required | Yes: pregnancy contraindicated: if pregnancy occurs, termination should be discussed |
Care during pregnancy | Local hospital | Local hospital | Referral hospital | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease |
Minimal follow-up visits during pregnancy | Once or twice | Once per trimester | Bimonthly | Monthly or bimonthly | Monthly |
Location of delivery | Local hospital | Local hospital | Referral hospital | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease |
ASI = aortic size index; EF = ejection fraction; HTAD = heritable thoracic aortic disease; mWHO = modified World Health Organization classification; NYHA = New York Heart Association; WHO = World Health Organization.
Modified World Health Organization classification of maternal cardiovascular risk
mWHO I | mWHO II | mWHO II–III | mWHO III | mWHO IV | |
Diagnosis (if otherwise well and uncomplicated) |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk | No detectable increased risk of maternal mortality and no/mild increased risk in morbidity | Small increased risk of maternal mortality or moderate increase in morbidity | Intermediate increased risk of maternal mortality or moderate to severe increase in morbidity | Significantly increased risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity | Extremely high risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity |
Maternal cardiac event rate | 2.5–5% | 5.7–10.5% | 10–19% | 19–27% | 40–100% |
Counselling | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes: expert counselling required | Yes: pregnancy contraindicated: if pregnancy occurs, termination should be discussed |
Care during pregnancy | Local hospital | Local hospital | Referral hospital | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease |
Minimal follow-up visits during pregnancy | Once or twice | Once per trimester | Bimonthly | Monthly or bimonthly | Monthly |
Location of delivery | Local hospital | Local hospital | Referral hospital | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease |
mWHO I | mWHO II | mWHO II–III | mWHO III | mWHO IV | |
Diagnosis (if otherwise well and uncomplicated) |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk | No detectable increased risk of maternal mortality and no/mild increased risk in morbidity | Small increased risk of maternal mortality or moderate increase in morbidity | Intermediate increased risk of maternal mortality or moderate to severe increase in morbidity | Significantly increased risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity | Extremely high risk of maternal mortality or severe morbidity |
Maternal cardiac event rate | 2.5–5% | 5.7–10.5% | 10–19% | 19–27% | 40–100% |
Counselling | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes: expert counselling required | Yes: pregnancy contraindicated: if pregnancy occurs, termination should be discussed |
Care during pregnancy | Local hospital | Local hospital | Referral hospital | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease |
Minimal follow-up visits during pregnancy | Once or twice | Once per trimester | Bimonthly | Monthly or bimonthly | Monthly |
Location of delivery | Local hospital | Local hospital | Referral hospital | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease | Expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease |
ASI = aortic size index; EF = ejection fraction; HTAD = heritable thoracic aortic disease; mWHO = modified World Health Organization classification; NYHA = New York Heart Association; WHO = World Health Organization.
Predictors of maternal cardiovascular events . | Predictors of neonatal events . |
---|---|
Prior cardiac event (heart failure, transient ischaemic attack, stroke, arrhythmia)4,28,43,47,48 | NYHA class III/IV or cyanosis during baseline pre-natal visit |
NYHA class III/IV29,42,43,48,49 | Maternal left heart obstruction |
Left heart obstruction (moderate to severe)29,42 | Smoking during pregnancy |
Reduced systemic ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction <40%)29,43,49 | Low maternal oxygen saturation (<90%) |
Reduced subpulmonary ventricular function47,50(TAPSE <16 mm)49,51 | Multiple gestations Use of anticoagulants throughout pregnancy |
Systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation (moderate to severe)42 | Cardiac medication before pregnancy ‘At birth’ cyanotic heart disease |
Pulmonary atrioventricular valve regurgitation (moderate to severe)42 | Mechanical valve prosthesis |
Pulmonary arterial hypertension43,48,49 | Maternal cardiac event during pregnancy |
Cardiac medication before pregnancy42,46 | Maternal decline in cardiac output during pregnancy |
Cyanosis (O2 saturation <90%)29,49 | Abnormal uteroplacental Doppler flow |
Natriuretic peptide levels (NT-proBNP >128 pg/mL at 20 weeks predictive of event later in pregnancy)42,46 | |
Smoking history51 | |
Mechanical valve prosthesis42,47 | |
Repaired or unrepaired cyanotic heart disease42 |
Predictors of maternal cardiovascular events . | Predictors of neonatal events . |
---|---|
Prior cardiac event (heart failure, transient ischaemic attack, stroke, arrhythmia)4,28,43,47,48 | NYHA class III/IV or cyanosis during baseline pre-natal visit |
NYHA class III/IV29,42,43,48,49 | Maternal left heart obstruction |
Left heart obstruction (moderate to severe)29,42 | Smoking during pregnancy |
Reduced systemic ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction <40%)29,43,49 | Low maternal oxygen saturation (<90%) |
Reduced subpulmonary ventricular function47,50(TAPSE <16 mm)49,51 | Multiple gestations Use of anticoagulants throughout pregnancy |
Systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation (moderate to severe)42 | Cardiac medication before pregnancy ‘At birth’ cyanotic heart disease |
Pulmonary atrioventricular valve regurgitation (moderate to severe)42 | Mechanical valve prosthesis |
Pulmonary arterial hypertension43,48,49 | Maternal cardiac event during pregnancy |
Cardiac medication before pregnancy42,46 | Maternal decline in cardiac output during pregnancy |
Cyanosis (O2 saturation <90%)29,49 | Abnormal uteroplacental Doppler flow |
Natriuretic peptide levels (NT-proBNP >128 pg/mL at 20 weeks predictive of event later in pregnancy)42,46 | |
Smoking history51 | |
Mechanical valve prosthesis42,47 | |
Repaired or unrepaired cyanotic heart disease42 |
Predictors of maternal cardiovascular events . | Predictors of neonatal events . |
---|---|
Prior cardiac event (heart failure, transient ischaemic attack, stroke, arrhythmia)4,28,43,47,48 | NYHA class III/IV or cyanosis during baseline pre-natal visit |
NYHA class III/IV29,42,43,48,49 | Maternal left heart obstruction |
Left heart obstruction (moderate to severe)29,42 | Smoking during pregnancy |
Reduced systemic ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction <40%)29,43,49 | Low maternal oxygen saturation (<90%) |
Reduced subpulmonary ventricular function47,50(TAPSE <16 mm)49,51 | Multiple gestations Use of anticoagulants throughout pregnancy |
Systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation (moderate to severe)42 | Cardiac medication before pregnancy ‘At birth’ cyanotic heart disease |
Pulmonary atrioventricular valve regurgitation (moderate to severe)42 | Mechanical valve prosthesis |
Pulmonary arterial hypertension43,48,49 | Maternal cardiac event during pregnancy |
Cardiac medication before pregnancy42,46 | Maternal decline in cardiac output during pregnancy |
Cyanosis (O2 saturation <90%)29,49 | Abnormal uteroplacental Doppler flow |
Natriuretic peptide levels (NT-proBNP >128 pg/mL at 20 weeks predictive of event later in pregnancy)42,46 | |
Smoking history51 | |
Mechanical valve prosthesis42,47 | |
Repaired or unrepaired cyanotic heart disease42 |
Predictors of maternal cardiovascular events . | Predictors of neonatal events . |
---|---|
Prior cardiac event (heart failure, transient ischaemic attack, stroke, arrhythmia)4,28,43,47,48 | NYHA class III/IV or cyanosis during baseline pre-natal visit |
NYHA class III/IV29,42,43,48,49 | Maternal left heart obstruction |
Left heart obstruction (moderate to severe)29,42 | Smoking during pregnancy |
Reduced systemic ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction <40%)29,43,49 | Low maternal oxygen saturation (<90%) |
Reduced subpulmonary ventricular function47,50(TAPSE <16 mm)49,51 | Multiple gestations Use of anticoagulants throughout pregnancy |
Systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation (moderate to severe)42 | Cardiac medication before pregnancy ‘At birth’ cyanotic heart disease |
Pulmonary atrioventricular valve regurgitation (moderate to severe)42 | Mechanical valve prosthesis |
Pulmonary arterial hypertension43,48,49 | Maternal cardiac event during pregnancy |
Cardiac medication before pregnancy42,46 | Maternal decline in cardiac output during pregnancy |
Cyanosis (O2 saturation <90%)29,49 | Abnormal uteroplacental Doppler flow |
Natriuretic peptide levels (NT-proBNP >128 pg/mL at 20 weeks predictive of event later in pregnancy)42,46 | |
Smoking history51 | |
Mechanical valve prosthesis42,47 | |
Repaired or unrepaired cyanotic heart disease42 |
The mWHO classification is currently the most accurate system of risk assessment, although it is probably more appropriate for developed, rather than developing, countries.4,11,44 The general principles of this classification, and follow-up and management during pregnancy according to this mWHO classification, are presented in Table 3. Indications for intervention (surgical or catheter) do not differ in women who contemplate pregnancy compared with other patients. The few exceptions to this rule are women with at least moderate mitral stenosis and women with aortic dilatation. See also the disease-specific sections of these Guidelines. Fertility treatment is contraindicated in women with mWHO class IV, and should be carefully considered in those who have mWHO class III disease or who are anticoagulated.45
The risk estimation needs to be re-evaluated during each pre-pregnancy visit, because the risk of complications may change over time. Natriuretic peptide levels are associated with the occurrence of cardiac events, with N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) >128 pg/mL at 20 weeks pregnancy being predictive of events later in the pregnancy.46,47 Pre-eclampsia is associated with HF in women with heart disease.43
3.3.2 Risk of obstetric and offspring complications
Women with cardiac disease have an increased risk of obstetric complications, including premature labour, pre-eclampsia, and post-partum haemorrhage.
Offspring complications occur in 18–30% of patients with heart disease, with neonatal mortality between 1–4%.29 Maternal and offspring events are highly correlated.29,42,43 Though predictors of offspring complications have been identified (Table 4), there are no validated prediction models.4
3.3.3 Pregnancy heart team
In women with a moderate or high-risk of complications during pregnancy (mWHO II–III, III, and IV), pre-pregnancy counselling and management during pregnancy and around delivery should be conducted in an expert centre by a multidisciplinary team: the pregnancy heart team. The minimum team requirements are a cardiologist, obstetrician, and anaesthetist, all with expertise in the management of high-risk pregnancies in women with heart disease. Additional experts that may be involved, depending on the individual situation, are a geneticist, cardiothoracic surgeon, paediatric cardiologist, foetal medicine specialist, neonatologist, haematologist, nurse specialist, pulmonary specialist, and others where appropriate. In this team patients from other centres can also be discussed, so not every hospital needs to have its own pregnancy heart team. The conclusions and recommendations should be filed and made available 24 h per day.
3.4 Cardiovascular diagnosis in pregnancy
During pregnancy it can be more difficult to diagnose HF, for example, because the physiological changes that occur during pregnancy (section 3.2) may mimic CVD. However, many disorders can be identified by taking a careful history and a thorough physical examination. When disproportionate or unexplained dyspnoea occurs during pregnancy and/or when a new pathological murmur (all audible diastolic murmurs are abnormal) is heard, echocardiography is indicated. BP should be measured using a standardized method (section 10). Proteinuria should be sought, especially with a history or family history of hypertension or pre-eclampsia. Oximetry should be performed in patients with congenital heart disease.
3.4.1 Electrocardiography
In most pregnant patients, the heart rotates to the left with a 15–20° leftward axis deviation on the ECG. Common additional findings include transient ST/T wave changes, a Q wave and inverted T waves in lead III, an attenuated Q wave in lead aVF, and inverted T waves in V1, V2, and occasionally V3. Changes may mimic LV hypertrophy and other structural heart diseases. Holter monitoring should be performed in patients with known previous paroxysmal/persistent arrhythmia [ventricular tachycardia (VT), AF, or atrial flutter] or reporting palpitations.
3.4.2 Echocardiography
Transthoracic echocardiography is the preferred imaging method in pregnancy. This reproducible, widely available, relatively cheap diagnostic modality can be used both in the outpatient clinic and at the cardiology ward, and also at the emergency department, ICU, and obstetric ward, and should be used with a low threshold. During pregnancy, some changes in echo parameters are expected, such as mild dilatation of the chambers, a change in LV wall thickness, and an increase in valve gradient.34,52 Transoesophageal echocardiography is relatively safe; however, the risk of vomiting/aspiration and sudden increases in intra-abdominal pressure should be considered, and foetal monitoring performed.
3.4.3 Exercise testing
Physiological exercise testing is an integral part of follow-up in adult congenital heart disease and valve disease,29,53 and should be performed in patients with known heart disease who plan pregnancy. This Task Force recommends submaximal exercise testing (80% of predicted maximal heart rate) in asymptomatic patients with suspected heart disease if already pregnant. There is no evidence that it increases the risk of spontaneous miscarriage.30 Stress echocardiography using bicycle ergometry may improve diagnostic specificity.54 Dobutamine stress is rarely indicated during pregnancy and, because pregnancy in itself is a stress test, its use should be avoided when other options are available.
3.4.4 Ionizing radiation exposure
The potential risks of ionizing radiation exposure to the foetus depend on the stage of pregnancy and the absorbed dose. Risks are highest during organogenesis and the early foetal period, less in the second trimester, and least in the third trimester.55 Malformations are typically associated with the central nervous system. Early in pregnancy (including 0–8 days pre-implantation), the high incidence of spontaneous abortion makes the evaluation of radiation-induced pre-natal death difficult, although it occurs at other stages of gestation with doses >250 mGy. Observed radiation-induced abnormalities (typically at doses of 100–200 mGy) include growth restriction, intellectual disability, malignancies, and neurological effects.56,57 The periods of greatest vulnerability include growth retardation at 8–56 days, microcephaly at 14–105 days, and intellectual deficit/seizures/severe mental impairment at 56–105 days.58 An increased risk of childhood cancer with in utero doses of approximately 20 mGy has been reported, with an estimated 1–2 cases of childhood cancer occurring per 3000 children exposed to 10 mGy of radiation in utero.59 If possible, procedures should be delayed until at least the completion of the period of major organogenesis (>12 weeks after menses).
All medical radiation doses must be kept ‘as low as reasonably achievable’. If ionizing radiation is required, risks and benefits should be communicated to the mother, and informed consent obtained. The radiation dose to the foetus should be kept as low as possible (preferably <50 mGy) with clear documentation, particularly if the foetus is in the field of view (see section 3.7.1).
3.4.5 Chest radiography and computed tomography
Although the foetal dose from chest radiography is <0.01 mGy, it should only be performed if other methods fail to clarify the cause of symptoms. Lung ultrasound is a promising alternative imaging modality, although its use in pregnancy has yet to be clarified. CT is usually not necessary for cardiac disease during pregnancy and is not recommended, except for the diagnosis or exclusion of pulmonary embolism (PE) or aortic pathology where other diagnostic tools are insufficient (section 10), and where low radiation CT with 0.01–0.66 mGy can be used.53,60
3.4.6 Cardiac catheterization
Cardiac catheterization is seldom needed for diagnostic purposes, but can be necessary to guide interventional procedures.
The mean radiation exposure to the unshielded abdomen is 1.5 mGy, and <20% of this reaches the foetus. For example, successful closure of a patent foramen ovale was achieved with the Helex device in three patients in the second trimester. Radiation doses, as assessed by dose area product, were 260, 58, and 19 cGy/cm2, with estimated uterine (foetal) doses of <0.005, <0.001, and <0.0005 mGy, respectively.61 The radial approach by an experienced operator is preferable. Most electrophysiological studies should only be performed if arrhythmias are medically refractory and cause haemodynamic compromise. Electroanatomical mapping systems should be used to reduce the radiation dose (section 3).
3.4.7 Magnetic resonance imaging
MRI is advised if other non-invasive diagnostic measures are not sufficient for definitive diagnosis, and is preferred to ionizing radiation-based imaging modalities when possible.53,55 Evidence regarding gadolinium-based contrast in pregnancy is controversial and its use should be avoided if possible, especially in the first trimester. Excretion of gadolinium-based agents into breast milk is limited [<0.04% of an intravenous (i.v.) dose within the first 24 h, with 1–2% absorption].62 Data suggest that it is safe to continue breastfeeding after the administration of such agents.
3.5 Genetic testing and counselling
The risk of inheriting cardiac defects is raised significantly in comparison with parents without CVD, where the risk is approximately 1%.63,64 Heritability varies between 3 and 50% depending on the type of parental heart disease.
Children of parents with an autosomal dominant condition [e.g. Marfan syndrome, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), or long QT syndrome (LQTS)] have an inheritance risk of 50%.
The final phenotype will also be determined by incomplete penetrance and pleiotropic effects, and may vary significantly.65 For defects that are inherited in a polygenic manner, recurrence risk is less clearly defined. Genetic testing in cardiomyopathies is not appropriate for pre-natal diagnosis in dilated cardiomyopathies, except for selected disorders or high-risk situations in the setting of expert teams after detailed clinical and family assessment.66
In patients with venous thrombo-embolism (VTE), genetic testing is considered to be justified only for relatives of probands with a deficiency of natural anticoagulants or after recurrent VTEs.67
Genetic counselling by an expert in the specific genetic disorder is highly recommended for patients and their family members in the situations below, and has the rationale of identifying at-risk asymptomatic or disease-free relatives and guiding clinical surveillance for disease onset.68–70 It is advocated in patients with known genetic disorders, especially if treatment options are available.68
Genetic counselling and parental testing may be useful:
In cases of known carrier status of hereditary pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or pulmonary veno-occlusive disease71
In cardiomyopathies and channelopathies (e.g. LQTS)72
In congenital heart disease that is known to be associated with genetic abnormalities (e.g. conotruncal defects or bicuspid valve), when the patient has dysmorphic features, developmental delay/mental retardation, or when other non-cardiac congenital abnormalities are present in syndromes such as in Marfan or other heritable thoracic aortic disease (HTAD), 22q11 deletion, Williams–Beuren, Alagille, Noonan, and Holt–Oram syndromes68
In thoracic aortic pathology
When other family members are affected.
3.5.1 Pre-natal diagnosis
Presently, options for pre-natal genetic testing are increasingly available for those patients with an identified genetic defect (either chromosomal defects such as insertions/deletions/translocations or single-gene defects). This includes (i) pre-gestational diagnosis or (ii) pre-natal diagnosis, chorionic villus sampling, or amniocentesis. Counselling should be provided by an experienced centre with an interdisciplinary expert team.
An individualized approach to each family is required to ensure autonomous choice and informed consent regarding pre-natal diagnostic testing within the local ethical and legal framework.73
3.6 Foetal assessment
3.6.1 Screening for congenital heart disease
Measurement of nuchal fold thickness around the 12th week of pregnancy to screen for chromosome abnormalities also screens for foetal congenital heart disease.74 For major congenital heart disease, a 12-week ultrasound has a sensitivity and specificity of 85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 78–90%] and 99% (95% CI 98–100%), respectively. The incidence of congenital heart disease with normal nuchal fold thickness is about 1/1000.75 The earlier diagnosis of a major malformation allows parents to consider all options, including termination of pregnancy.76
All women with congenital heart disease should be offered foetal echocardiography in the 19th–22nd weeks of pregnancy, with 45% of all congenital cardiac malformations identified.77,78 Foetal echocardiography should be performed by experienced specialists.79,80
When a foetal cardiac anomaly is suspected, it is mandatory to obtain the following:
Full foetal echocardiography
Detailed scanning to identify associated anomalies (digits and bones)
Family history
Maternal medical history: medical disorders, viral illness, or teratogenic medication
Foetal karyotype (e.g. deletion in 22q11.2 with conotruncal anomalies)
Referral to a foetal medicine specialist, paediatric cardiologist, geneticist, and neonatologist
Delivery at an institution that can provide neonatal cardiac care.
3.6.2 Assessing foetal wellbeing
In the context of foetal growth restriction, the aim is to determine the optimal time for delivery, balancing foetal and neonatal risks. The chance of disability-free survival increases by ∼2% per day between 24 and 28 weeks, and 1% per day thereafter until 32 weeks. Delivery should be determined by umbilical artery and ductus venosus blood flow patterns.81–83
3.7 Interventions in the mother during pregnancy
3.7.1 Percutaneous therapy
If an intervention is absolutely necessary, the best time is after the 4th month in the second trimester. By this time, organogenesis is complete, the foetal thyroid is still inactive, and the uterine volume is still small, so there is a greater distance between the foetus and the chest than in later months. ST-elevation MI (STEMI) management in pregnancy mainly relies on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Thrombolysis may be a bailout, just as in non-pregnant patients, and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator does not cross the placenta but may induce bleeding complications (subplacental bleeding). Procedures should follow the ‘as low as reasonably achievable’ principle. Manoeuvres to minimize radiation are: (i) use echo guidance when possible; (ii) place the source as distant as possible from the patient and the receiver as close as possible to the patient; (ii) use only low-dose fluoroscopy; (iv) favour anteroposterior projections; (v) avoid direct radiation of the abdominal region; (vi) collimate as tightly as possible to the area of interest; (vii) minimize fluoroscopy time; and (viii) utilize an experienced cardiologist.84,85 Abdominal shielding lowers the radiation dose to the foetus to some degree; however, the presence of lead in the field of the primary beam may on the other hand increase scattered radiation. As the benefit of shielding is limited, it should not interfere with an optimal intervention. Monitoring and recording of radiation exposure facilitates the future assessment of possible effects on the foetus. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has to be given at 40–70 U/kg i.v., targeting an activated clotting time of 250 s (200–300 s) or an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) two times that which is normal.
3.7.2 Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass
Maternal mortality during cardiopulmonary bypass is now similar to that in non-pregnant women. However, foetal mortality remains high (∼20%).86 Cardiac surgery is recommended only when medical therapy or interventional procedures fail and the mother’s life is threatened. The best period for surgery is between the 13th and 28th weeks. With full maternal and foetal monitoring and attention to cardiopulmonary bypass, particularly the use of pulsatile perfusion, the risks to both the mother and the foetus can be minimized. Gestational age has a large impact on neonatal outcome.87,88 Caesarean delivery may be considered before cardiopulmonary bypass if gestational age is >26 weeks.86 Whether or not delivery is advantageous for the baby at this gestational age depends on gender, estimated weight, prior administration of corticosteroids before delivery, and the outcome statistics of the neonatal unit concerned. When gestational age is ≥28 weeks, delivery before surgery should be considered. Before surgery, a full course (two doses of betamethasone 12 mg intramuscularly 12 h apart) of corticosteroids should be administered to the mother, whenever possible. During cardiopulmonary bypass, foetal heart rate and uterine tone should be monitored, and cardiopulmonary bypass time should be minimized for better foetal outcomes.89,90
3.8 Timing and mode of delivery: risk for mother and child
A delivery plan should be made with details of induction, management of labour, delivery, and post-partum surveillance. The emotional context, psychological care, and ethical challenges should also be taken into account. This delivery plan should be widely disseminated and placed in the patient’s hand-held notes. Specific expertise and collaborative management by a pregnancy heart team in specialist centres is mandatory for all moderate- and high-risk patients.
3.8.1 Timing of delivery
Induction of labour should be considered at 40 weeks of gestation in all women with cardiac disease; this reduces the risk of emergency caesarean section by 12% and the risk of stillbirth by 50% in women without heart disease, and the benefit is likely to be greater for women with heart disease91 who have higher rates of obstetric complications.92 Timing of induction will depend on cardiac status, obstetric evaluation including cervical assessment, foetal well-being, and foetal lung maturity.
3.8.2 Labour induction
Both misoprostol [25 µg, prostaglandin E1 (PGE1)] or dinoprostone [1–3 mg or slow-release formulation of 10 mg (PGE2)] can be used safely to induce labour. Reassuringly, in women without heart disease, high-dose (600 µg) misoprostol has no effect on cardiac parameters,93 although there remains a theoretical risk of coronary vasospasm and arrhythmias. Dinoprostone may cause profound hypotension, but only when injected blindly into the myometrium,94 and this route of administration should be avoided. Mechanical methods such as a cervical ripening balloon might be preferable in patients where a drop in systemic vascular resistance would be detrimental.95 Artificial rupture of membranes and infusion of oxytocin can be used safely in women with heart disease.
3.8.3 Vaginal or caesarean delivery
The ROPAC data show that elective caesarean section carries no maternal benefit and results in earlier delivery and lower birth weight.96 Vaginal delivery is associated with less blood loss and lower risk of infection, venous thrombosis, and embolism, and should be advised for most women. Caesarean section should be considered for obstetric indications and for patients presenting in labour on oral anticoagulants (OACs), with aggressive aortic pathology, and in acute intractable HF. Caesarean section is advised in severe forms of PH (including Eisenmenger’s syndrome).
3.8.4 Delivery in anticoagulated women (not including mechanical valve; see section 5)
For women with a planned caesarean section, therapeutic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) dosing can be simply omitted for 24 h prior to surgery. If delivery has to be performed earlier, then anti-Xa activity can guide the timing of the procedure. In high-risk women, therapeutic UFH can be restarted at 6 h post-delivery. In women at moderate or low-risk, a single prophylactic dose of LMWH―for example, in the case of enoxaparin, 20 mg if weight is <50 kg, 40 mg if 50–90 kg, and for women with a raised body mass index (BMI) 0.5 mg/kg―can be given at 6 h post-delivery, before restarting therapeutic LMWH 12 h later.
If vaginal delivery is planned, moderate- and high-risk patients can be converted to an infusion of UFH with regular checks of aPTT to optimize control, and the infusion stopped at least 4–6 hours prior to insertion of regional anaesthesia or anticipated delivery. For women at low-risk, therapeutic LMWH can be omitted for 24 h prior to anticipated delivery. Anticoagulation can be restarted as above.
3.8.5 Urgent delivery on therapeutic anticoagulation
Delivery in a patient taking therapeutic anticoagulation carries a high-risk of maternal haemorrhage. For UFH, protamine sulfate should be given, the exact dose depending on the mode of administration and time since the last dose of UFH (please refer to the European Medicines Agency statement: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/8). In the case of LMWH, protamine sulfate should be given; however, not only may antifactor Xa activity remain prolonged and bleeding tendency persist,97 but the half-life of LMWH is longer and absorption after subcutaneous injection is prolonged, such that repeated doses or an infusion of protamine sulfate may be required. If the patient is on OACs, caesarean section is preferred to reduce the risk of foetal intracranial haemorrhage.
Reversal of anticoagulation is better with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate, best given as an individualized dose dependent on maternal weight, initial international normalized ratio (INR), and target INR98 than fresh frozen plasma (12–15 mL/kg),99 and should be given prior to caesarean delivery to achieve an INR ≤1.5; however, none of the available algorithms have been validated in pregnant women. Vitamin K (5–10 mg i.v.) may also be given, but may take up to 8–12 h to reverse the INR and has a persistent effect making re-anticoagulation more difficult. The foetus may remain anticoagulated for 8–10 days after discontinuation of maternal OACs, and may need to be given fresh frozen plasma as well as vitamin K.
3.8.6 Haemodynamic monitoring during delivery
Maternal BP and heart rate should be monitored in all patients with cardiac disease. In women with more severe heart disease, an arterial line provides more accurate data. Pulse oximetry and continuous ECG monitoring are advised to detect early signs of decompensation, and to identify those in whom delivery should be expedited. A Swan-Ganz catheter is of uncertain benefit, is associated with complications, and should be avoided in most cases.100 In some high-risk patients (PH), right atrial pressure monitoring may be considered.
3.8.7 Anaesthesia/analgesia
Epidural analgesia reduces labour pain and can be used to provide anaesthesia for caesarean section if necessary. However, it can cause systemic hypotension (10%) and must be carefully titrated, especially in patients with obstructive valve lesions or diminished ventricular function who may benefit from invasive BP monitoring. All i.v. fluids need to be used carefully.101
3.8.8 Labour
Mobilization may facilitate foetal head descent and a lateral decubitus position can attenuate the haemodynamic impact of cava compression by the gravid uterus.102 The active phase of the second stage should be delayed for 2 h to allow maximal descent of the foetal head, as this will shorten the active phase of the second stage.103,104 Assisted delivery with forceps or a ventouse may be used to further reduce maternal effort, as indicated by the underlying cardiac lesion. Continuous electronic foetal heart rate monitoring is recommended.
3.8.9 Perimortem caesarean section
In the case of an acute life-threatening maternal event, immediate delivery should be considered. The aim of delivery is to improve the chance of successfully resuscitating the mother and, only secondarily, of improving foetal survival. It should be considered from 24 weeks of gestation, as prior to this time the degree of uterine vena cava compression is limited and the baby is not considered to be viable. The delivery should be performed within 4 min of the cardiac arrest.
3.8.10 Post-partum care
A slow i.v. infusion of oxytocin (2 U of oxytocin given over 10 min immediately after birth, followed by 12 mU/min for 4 h) reduces the risk of post-partum haemorrhage and has a minimal impact on cardiovascular parameters.105 PGE106 analogues [sulprostone (100–500 µg/h) and misoprostol (200–1000 µg)] can be used to treat post-partum haemorrhage; however, ergometrine and prostaglandin F analogues should be avoided.107,108 Sulprostone should be used with caution, given its association with cardiovascular or respiratory symptoms. Meticulous leg care, elastic support stockings, and early ambulation are important to reduce the risk of thrombo-embolism. The post-partum period is associated with significant haemodynamic changes and fluid shifts, particularly in the first 24–48 h after delivery, which may precipitate HF. Haemodynamic monitoring should therefore be continued for at least 24–48 h in those at risk.43 With preceding beta-blockade, infant monitoring for 48 h is recommended.109
3.8.11 Breastfeeding
Lactation is associated with a low-risk of bacteraemia secondary to mastitis and should be encouraged in patients with heart disease whenever possible. Any specific concerns or contraindications are discussed in the disease section (i.e. section 8). Most drugs used in patients enter the milk and could thus contraindicate breastfeeding (see Table 7 for details of drugs and safety data). If needed, inhibition of lactation can be obtained with standard doses of cabergoline (0.25 mg every 12 h for 2 days), or bromocriptine (2.5 mg on the day of delivery, followed by 2.5 mg twice daily for 14 days) if cabergoline is not available.
3.9 Infective endocarditis
IE is rare, with an overall annual incidence estimated at 1 per 1000 in patients with congenital heart disease,110,111 and between 3 and 12 per 1000 in patients with prosthetic valves.112
3.9.1 Prophylaxis
The same measures apply as in non-pregnant patients.112 During delivery, the indication for prophylaxis has been controversial and, given the lack of convincing evidence, antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended during vaginal or caesarean delivery. Non-specific hygiene and asepsis measures are also important to prevent endocarditis.112
3.9.2 Diagnosis and risk assessment
The diagnosis of IE during pregnancy involves the same criteria as in the non-pregnant patient.112 The scarcity of data accounts for wide ranges in estimations of maternal and foetal mortality of 11–33 and 14–29%, respectively.111,113,114
Unlike chronic valvular regurgitations, acute regurgitations due to IE are poorly tolerated and often cause severe HF. Cerebral and peripheral embolisms are also frequent.111 Every pregnant patient with IE should be discussed by an endocarditis team.
3.9.3 Treatment
IE should be treated in the same way as in the non-pregnant patient.112 Antibiotics should be given according to guidelines, guided by culture and antibiotic sensitivity results, considering the potential foetotoxic effects of antibiotics (see Table 7 for details of drugs and safety data).115 Antibiotics that can be given during all trimesters of pregnancy are penicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, daptomycin, erythromycin, mezlocillin, oxacillin, and cephalosporins. There is a definite risk to the foetus in all trimesters of pregnancy with aminoglycosides and tetracyclines, and they should therefore only be used for vital indications.115
Given the inherent foetal risk, decision-making for valve surgery during pregnancy is particularly difficult.112 Urgent surgery is mandatory in cardiogenic shock or refractory HF due to acute regurgitation. When surgery is indicated for uncontrolled infection or prevention of embolism, an individual approach should weigh the foetal risk of surgery and the risk of maternal complications under medical therapy alone. A viable foetus should be delivered prior to surgery where possible. These patients should be managed in tertiary centres, and the endocarditis and pregnancy teams should interact closely.
3.10 Methods of contraception and termination of pregnancy, and in vitro fertilization
3.10.1 Methods of contraception
The risk of using a particular type of contraception needs to be balanced against the risk of pregnancy, estimated using the modified WHO classification (see above),116 which assesses the risk with each method for a given medical condition.117 Advice is best provided by cardiologists with appropriate training or obstetricians, and should be given from the time of menarche since an unplanned pregnancy has to be avoided. The average age of first intercourse in the UK is 17 years, with ≤30% before 15 years,118 regardless of the presence of heart disease.119 The key issues are reliability and the potential for complications, with thrombosis and infection being the most important. Hormonal contraception can have important non-contraceptive benefits, including the control of menstruation, prevention of anaemia, reduction of dysmenorrhoea, and of hyperandrogenism.120
Ethinyloestradiol-containing contraceptives have the greatest risk of thrombosis121,122 and are not advised in women with high-risk of thrombo-embolic disease; they also increase BP and are contraindicated in pre-existing hypertension.117 Progestin-only contraceptives are an alternative, since they have little (implant or depot injection) or no (levonorgestrel-loaded intrauterine device or oral desogestrel) effect on coagulation factors, BP, and lipid levels.123 Oral desogestrel inhibits ovulation, which could be an advantage for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis, or dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
Levonorgestrel-based long-acting reversible contraception implants or intrauterine devices are the safest and most effective contraceptives. However, intrauterine device insertion may cause a vasovagal response; consequently, this should be performed in a hospital setting, particularly for Fontan and Eisenmenger’s syndrome patients. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device reduces periods, causing amenorrhoea in ≤60% of women, in contrast to copper intrauterine devices, which cause heavier periods. The newer, smaller levonorgestrel-based intrauterine devices are easier to insert, reducing the risk of pain and therefore vasovagal response.
Barrier methods are unreliable but reduce the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. A good approach is the combination of barrier methods and long-acting reversible contraception (levonorgestrel-based long-acting reversible contraception, progestin-releasing implant, or progestin-releasing intrauterine devices).
For emergency contraception, a copper intrauterine device is most effective and additionally provides ongoing contraception. Alternatively, a single dose of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel is effective if taken within 72 h after unprotected sex (1.1% failure rate),124 with no evidence of increased rates of thrombosis.125 The progesterone receptor modulator ulipristal acetate (UPA) has been shown to be more effective than levonorgestrel. UPA is not associated with an increased risk of thrombosis.126,127
3.10.2 Sterilization
Sterilization by tubal ligation is not unreasonable if pregnancy is contraindicated or the family is complete. Laparoscopy is not without risks in patients with PAH, cyanosis, and a Fontan circulation, and the risks are probably lower with the hysteroscopic method performed under regional anaesthesia.128 Vasectomy is an effective option.
3.10.3 Methods of termination of pregnancy
Pregnancy termination should be discussed if there is a high-risk of maternal morbidity or mortality, and/or of foetal abnormality. Both medical and surgical methods are effective with similar rates of major complications, but the greater need for unanticipated operative evacuation (2.1 vs. 0.6%) favours the surgical approach in this group of women.129 High-risk patients should be managed in an experienced centre with on-site cardiac surgery. Antibiotics are given to reduce the risk of endometritis and these should be modified to provide endocarditis prophylaxis. Medical terminations can be considered up to 9 weeks of gestation using a reduced misoprostol dose of 100 µg.
3.10.4 In vitro fertilization
The rates of subfertility in most women with heart disease are likely to those of the general population,130 but their management is more complex. Hysteroscopy and laparoscopy can be life-threatening procedures in women with some forms of heart disease (PH and Fontan), and should be undertaken in an experienced centre with appropriate support. Assisted reproduction has added risks above those of pregnancy alone; superovulation is pro-thrombotic and can be complicated by ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), with marked fluid shifts and an even greater risk of thrombosis. The risk of OHSS can be reduced by careful cycle monitoring, using low-dose follicle-stimulating hormone in combination with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, freezing all embryos, or only transferring a single embryo.131 The last option is strongly advised in women with heart disease, since conceiving a multiple pregnancy is associated with greater cardiovascular changes132 and more maternal and foetal complications.133 Pregnancy, and consequently fertility treatment, is contraindicated in women with mWHO class IV. In women with mWHO class III or those who are anticoagulated, the risk of superovulation is very high and the alternative of natural cycle in vitro fertilization should be considered.
3.11 Recommendations
4. Congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension
4.1 Introduction
Congenital heart disease is present in 0.8–0.9% of live births.63,136 Lesions vary in severity, but even patients with complex lesions now survive to childbearing years.137 In large international surveys of pregnancy and heart disease, two-thirds of cases have congenital heart disease and 5% have PH.92,138 However, congenital heart disease and PH are rare causes of maternal death.3 The current background information and detailed discussion of the data for the following section of these Guidelines can be found in ESC CardioMed.
In most women with congenital heart disease, pregnancy is well tolerated. The risk of pregnancy depends on the underlying heart defect as well as on additional factors such as ventricular function, functional class, and cyanosis. Maternal cardiac complications are present in ∼10% of completed pregnancies and are more frequent in mothers with complex disease. Patients who experience complications during pregnancy may also be at higher risk of late cardiac events after pregnancy.139 Obstetric complications such as (pre-) eclampsia are more often encountered. Offspring complications, including miscarriage, prematurity, and neonatal death, are increased.
Diagnosis
In most cases, congenital heart disease is diagnosed well before pregnancy, giving the opportunity for a full pre-pregnancy risk assessment. The mWHO classes (Table 3) outline the broad risk categories.
4.2 Pulmonary hypertension and Eisenmenger’s syndrome
4.2.1 Pulmonary hypertension
4.2.1.1 Introduction
PH has many causes and is defined by an elevation in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) ≥25 mmHg at right heart catheterization. The term PAH describes a subset of PH characterized by an LV filling pressure ≤15 mmHg and a pulmonary vascular resistance >3 Wood Units.23 Untreated, idiopathic PH results in death within a median of 2.8 years. PAH is frequently encountered in females and the first clinical manifestations may be seen in pregnancy.140
4.2.1.2 Maternal risk
Maternal outcome, which varies according to the PH subset, has improved with the availability of new targeted therapies and the use of a team-based, multidisciplinary approach.141–143 While pregnancy appears safer today, mortality remains high in women with PAH (16–30% maternal mortality).137,138 Therefore, the recommendation to avoid pregnancy remains and, when pregnancy occurs, termination should be discussed. The greatest period of risk is the puerperium and early post-partum. These women should be managed by a multidisciplinary team, with a PH expert included, in an expert centre for pregnancy and cardiac disease. Pulmonary hypertensive crisis, pulmonary thrombosis, and right HF are the most common causes of death. This may occur even in patients with few symptoms prior to pregnancy. Risk factors for maternal death are: severity of PH, late hospitalization, and perhaps the use of general anaesthesia.144 Even moderate forms of pulmonary vascular disease can worsen during pregnancy.138 Although there is no safe cut-off for elevated PAP risk, it is thought to be less in those with only mildly increased pressure.138
4.2.1.3 Obstetric and offspring risk
There is increased foetal and neonatal (0–30%) mortality, particularly if there is preterm delivery, reduced maternal CO, and/or hypoxaemia.
4.2.1.4 Management
The usual diagnostic algorithm of PH should be followed when a pregnant patient presents with new PH. Echocardiography is key and other diagnostic steps, in keeping with the PH guideline, are planned individually. Invasive right heart catheterization is recommended if there is diagnostic uncertainty and to assist important therapeutic decisions. If this is required, it should be performed in a specialist centre. Genetic counselling is appropriate in familial cases.
A multidisciplinary team is required to care for the pregnant PH patient. This should be tailored to the patient, but will require very regular follow-up (often weekly in the third trimester). A full assessment, including oxygen saturation and assessment of RV function, should occur at each visit. Bed rest may be required in symptomatic patients and additional risk factors (such as air travel) avoided.
Thrombo-embolism is a major risk and anticoagulation should be considered (see section 11). Diuretics may be needed in patients with HF and iron deficiency should be treated.
Pregnancy in PAH patients is a high-risk condition and a proactive approach should be taken to commencing advanced therapies. Risk stratification should be performed as in non-pregnant patients. There is no evidence of benefit comparing a stepwise approach vs. early combination therapy in pregnant patients, although the latter is often favoured, as per our Guidelines. Bosentan and other endothelin receptor antagonists are associated with embryopathy, and should be discontinued unless doing so would greatly increase maternal risk. An individualized approach is required and many units start therapy with oral sildenafil. The subset of patients with true vasodilator responsiveness who are well controlled on calcium channel blocker (CCB) therapy may be at lower risk and this therapy should be continued, as should all i.v. therapies. Section 12 discusses specific medications, including potential interactions with contraceptive drugs and anticoagulants.
4.2.1.5 Delivery
A detailed delivery plan, including the optimal mode and timing of delivery, should be decided by the pregnancy heart team. This should include the post-partum need for intensive care and mechanical support. Regional anaesthesia is usually favoured over general anaesthesia.145 Meticulous fluid balance and optimization of RV function are important determinants of a good outcome. Patients remain at high-risk for many months post-delivery, and individualized counselling is needed to discuss the need for ongoing therapies and the avoidance of future pregnancies. Therapies should not be discontinued in the early post-delivery period.
4.2.2 Eisenmenger’s syndrome
4.2.2.1 Maternal risk
Eisenmenger patients require special consideration because of the additional complications of cyanosis, right-to-left shunting, and paradoxical embolism. During pregnancy, systemic vasodilatation increases the right-to-left shunt and decreases pulmonary flow, leading to increased cyanosis and a low CO. Maternal mortality is high (20–50%) and termination of pregnancy should be discussed.146 However, termination also carries a risk.
4.2.2.2 Foetal risk
Foetal and neonatal risks are increased and relate to maternal CO and cyanosis. Miscarriage is common. Maternal hypoxaemia is the most important predictor of outcome.
4.2.2.3 Management
Many of the principles of caring for non-Eisenmenger PAH apply. However, patients with Eisenmenger’s syndrome are at increased risk of thrombocytopenia, deficiencies in vitamin K-dependent clotting factors, and bleeding. Caution is therefore needed if prescribing antiplatelet therapy or LMWH. The evidence base for using advanced therapies is less developed. However, sildenafil (and other phosphodiesterase inhibitors such as tadalafil and vardenafil) is often prescribed, with the addition of prostanoids in patients who remain symptomatic.147 Care should be exercised if prescribing drugs that may lead to sudden systemic vasodilation or a risk of paradoxical air embolism (i.v. therapies). Advanced therapies for Eisenmenger patients should only be prescribed by experienced pregnancy heart teams including a PH expert. The principles guiding delivery are as per other forms of PH as above.
4.2.3 Cyanotic heart disease without pulmonary hypertension
4.2.3.1 Maternal risk
Cyanotic congenital heart disease is usually repaired before pregnancy, but some balanced, inoperable, or palliated cases do reach childbearing age.148 Maternal complications (HF, thrombosis, arrhythmias, and endocarditis) occur in ≥15% of cyanotic pregnant patients. Maternal outcome will be determined by the underlying condition and the ventricular function rather than the saturation level.
4.2.3.2 Foetal risk
If oxygen saturation is >90%, then there is usually a better foetal outcome (10% foetal loss). If oxygen saturation is <85%, foetal growth restriction, prematurity, and foetal death are common and pregnancy should be discouraged (live birth rate of only 12%).149
4.3 Specific congenital heart defects
4.3.1 Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
The principles for managing supravalvular or subvalvular LV outflow tract obstruction are the same as those for valvular aortic stenosis (AS) (section 5). However, balloon valvuloplasty is not a therapeutic option.
4.3.2 Atrial septal defect
4.3.2.1 Maternal risk
Pregnancy is well tolerated by most women with repaired atrial septal defect (ASD) (WHO risk class I). In unrepaired ASDs, thrombo-embolic complications have been described (5%). Atrial arrhythmias occur, especially when the ASD is unrepaired or closed at an older age.150
4.3.2.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
In women with unrepaired ASD, pre-eclampsia and growth restriction may occur more frequently.
4.3.2.3 Management
For a secundum defect, catheter device closure can be performed during pregnancy but is rarely indicated. If device closure is performed, antiplatelet therapy will be required. Closure for the prevention of paradoxical emboli is not indicated. In women with a residual shunt, prevention of venous stasis (compression stockings and minimizing bed rest) is important and extra care should be taken to avoid air in i.v. lines.
4.3.3 Ventricular septal defect
4.3.3.1 Maternal risk
Small or repaired ventricular septal defects (VSDs) (without left heart dilatation or ventricular dysfunction) have a low-risk of complications during pregnancy (mWHO I and II).
4.3.3.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
There is no evidence of increased obstetric risks.
4.3.3.3 Management
Patients should usually be reviewed once or twice during pregnancy with surveillance for PH.
4.3.4 Atrioventricular septal defect
4.3.4.1 Maternal risk
After ASD repair, pregnancy is usually well tolerated (WHO risk class II–III). However, arrhythmias and worsening atrioventricular (AV) valve regurgitation have been described. The risk of HF is low, and only exists in women with severe regurgitation or impaired ventricular function.
4.3.4.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
Offspring mortality has been reported in 6% of cases, primarily due to the recurrence of congenital heart disease.
4.3.4.3 Management
Follow-up is advisable at least once each trimester. This should be increased to monthly or bimonthly in patients with significant valve regurgitation or impaired ventricular function.
4.3.5 Coarctation of the aorta
4.3.5.1 Maternal risk
Pregnancy is often well tolerated in women after repair of coarctation of the aorta (CoA) (WHO risk class II). In women with unrepaired CoA and those repaired who have systemic hypertension, residual CoA or aortic aneurysms have an increased risk of complications including dissection. Other risk factors include aortic dilatation and bicuspid aortic valve.
4.3.5.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
An excess of hypertensive disorders, including pre-eclampsia and miscarriages, has been reported.
4.3.5.3 Management
Close surveillance of BP is warranted and follow-up, at least every trimester, is indicated. Hypertension should be treated and care should be taken to avoid placental hypoperfusion in those with residual coarctation. Percutaneous intervention for re-CoA (using a covered stent) is possible during pregnancy, but should only be performed for refractory hypertension or maternal or foetal compromise.
4.3.6 Pulmonary valve and right ventricular outflow tract disease
4.3.6.1 Maternal risk
Pulmonary (valve) stenosis (PS) is generally well tolerated. However, severe stenosis may result in complications including RV failure and arrhythmias. Severe pulmonary regurgitation has been identified as an independent predictor of maternal complications, especially in patients with impaired RV function.
4.3.6.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
There is no evidence of increased obstetric risks.
4.3.6.3 Management
Mild and moderate PS are low-risk lesions (WHO risk classes I and II) and two or three follow-up sessions are sufficient. In patients with severe PS, monthly or bimonthly cardiac evaluations are advised, focusing on RV function. In severely symptomatic PS, which is unresponsive to medical therapy and bed rest, percutaneous valvuloplasty can be appropriate.
4.3.7 Congenital aortic stenosis
AS, aortic dilatation, and bicuspid aortic disease are discussed in sections 5 and 6.
4.3.8 Tetralogy of Fallot
4.3.8.1 Maternal risk
Women with repaired tetralogy of Fallot usually tolerate pregnancy well (WHO risk class II). Cardiac complications have been reported in 8% of repaired patients, especially in those taking cardiac medication prior to pregnancy.151 Arrhythmias and HF are the most common complications. Thrombo-embolism and endocarditis are rarer. Dysfunction of the RV and/or moderate to severe pulmonary regurgitation are risk factors. Previous pregnancy may be associated with a persisting increase in RV size and long-term cardiac events.
4.3.8.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
The risk of offspring complications is increased, in particular foetal growth restriction.152 Maternal screening for 22q11 deletion should be undertaken prior to pregnancy.
4.3.8.3 Management
Follow-up every trimester is sufficient in most patients. In women with severe pulmonary regurgitation, monthly or bimonthly cardiac evaluation is indicated. If RV failure occurs during pregnancy, treatment with diuretics should be started and bed rest advised. Early delivery or, rarely, transcatheter valve implantation could be considered in those who do not respond to conservative treatment.
4.3.9 Ebstein’s anomaly
4.3.9.1 Maternal risk
In women with uncomplicated Ebstein’s anomaly, pregnancy is often tolerated well (WHO risk class II). Symptomatic patients with cyanosis and/or HF should be counselled against pregnancy. The haemodynamic problems seen largely depend on the severity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and on RV function. Cyanosis (due to ASD/patent foramen ovale) and arrhythmias due to accessory pathways are common. There is also an increased risk of HF and pre-term delivery.153
4.3.9.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
Foetal and neonatal outcomes are related to maternal oxygen saturation and CO.
4.3.9.3 Management
Even severe TR with HF can usually be managed medically during pregnancy. Women with interatrial shunting can develop progressive cyanosis during pregnancy and be at increased risk of paradoxical emboli, and these should be assessed at each visit.
4.3.10 Transposition of the great arteries
4.3.10.1 Maternal risk
In patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA), the risks associated with pregnancy are mainly attributable to women with a previous atrial (Senning and Mustard) switch, not an arterial switch. Though many women with an atrial switch operation tolerate pregnancy relatively well, there is an increased risk of developing arrhythmias (sometimes life-threatening) and HF (WHO risk class III). An irreversible decline in RV function and worsening TR are also described.154,155 Patients with more than moderate impairment of RV function or greater than moderate TR should be advised against pregnancy.
4.3.10.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
The risk of low birth weight and pre-term delivery is 38%.
4.3.10.3 Management
Monthly or bimonthly review focusing on systemic RV function and arrhythmia is required. Diuretics and other HF therapies may be required.
4.3.10.4 Arterial switch operation
The risk of pregnancy seems low in these patients with good clinical condition pre-pregnancy and preserved ventricular function. Women with a dilated neo-aorta will require closer surveillance. Although this is now the most common operation for TGA, few data are available on pregnancy outcomes.
4.3.11 Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries
4.3.11.1 Maternal risk
In patients with congenitally corrected TGA (also called AV and ventriculoarterial discordance) risk depends on functional status, ventricular function, and the presence of arrhythmias and associated lesions (such as a VSD and pulmonary valve stenosis). Complications include arrhythmias and HF (WHO risk class III). These patients are also predisposed to developing AV block. Some 10% of patients have an irreversible decline in RV function.148,156 Patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes III or IV, with ventricular dysfunction [ejection fraction (EF) <40%], or severe TR should be counselled against pregnancy.
4.3.11.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
The rate of foetal loss is increased, especially if there is cyanosis.
4.3.11.3 Management
For follow-up, it is recommended that patients have frequent echo surveillance of systemic RV function (every 4–8 weeks) and assessment of symptoms and rhythm.
4.3.12 Fontan circulation
4.3.12.1 Maternal risk
Patients with a Fontan circulation have an increased risk of fertility issues, but successful pregnancy can occur. However, these are high- to very high-risk pregnancies (WHO risk class III or IV). Atrial arrhythmias and NYHA class deterioration are not uncommon. Patients with saturations <85%, depressed ventricular function, moderate to severe AV regurgitation, refractory arrhythmia, or protein-losing enteropathy should be counselled against pregnancy (mWHO IV).
4.3.12.2. Obstetric and offspring risk
Fontan patients have a high-risk of miscarriage (30%).157 Antenatal and peripartum bleeding is common.158 There is an increased risk of premature birth, small for gestational age, and neonatal death.159
4.3.12.3 Management
It is recommended that Fontan patients have frequent surveillance during pregnancy (monthly) and in the first weeks after delivery. Fontan patients are at risk of thrombo-embolic complications and therapeutic anticoagulation should be considered (balanced with the risk of bleeding). Atrial arrhythmias should be treated promptly and this often requires electrical cardioversion.
4.4 Recommendations
5. Aortic diseases
Several heritable disorders affect the thoracic aorta, predisposing patients to both aneurysm formation and aortic dissection. These include HTAD and either syndromic (Marfan syndrome, Loeys–Dietz syndrome, osteoaneurysm syndrome, and vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome) or non-syndromic HTAD (i.e. only aortic aneurysm). New genes are regularly discovered. Other forms of congenital heart disease (e.g. tetralogy of Fallot and CoA) may also be accompanied by aortic dilatation, and finally non-heritable aortic pathology may occur.160 Risk factors for aortic dilatation are hypertension and advanced maternal age. Pregnancy is a high-risk period for all patients with aortic pathology, which is rare during pregnancy but associated with very high mortality.161,162 Most deaths occur in women not previously known to have an aortopathy. Most of these women will have heritable disease, so autopsy tissue should be saved for DNA analysis and families offered referrals for screening. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease have been published.163,164 The current background information and detailed discussion of the data for the following section of these Guidelines can be found in ESC CardioMed.
5.1 Maternal and offspring risk
Haemodynamic and hormonal changes during pregnancy increase the susceptibility to dissection.165 Dissection occurs most often in the last trimester of pregnancy (50%) or the early post-partum period (33%). All women with a genetically proven syndrome or familial aortic pathology should have counselling on the risk of dissection and the recurrence risk, and have a complete evaluation including imaging of the entire aorta before pregnancy (see section 3). When assessing aortic diameters, body surface area should be considered, especially in women of small stature. Parity seems associated with increased aortic diameter.166 The effect of pregnancy on aortic dilatation is not clear.167,168 The diagnosis of aortic dissection should be considered in all patients with chest pain during pregnancy.
5.2 Specific syndromes
Marfan syndrome is thought to affect 1 in 5000 individuals. Although bicuspid aortic valve is more common (1–2% of the population), associated aortic complications are uncommon, accounting for only 6% of type A dissections during pregnancy.169
5.2.1 Marfan syndrome
The overall risk of a woman with Marfan syndrome having an aortic dissection associated with pregnancy is ∼3%.170 Aortic size is a major determinant of risk, but even women with an aortic root <40 mm have a risk of dissection of 1%.170,171 Although there are limited data, pregnancy should be avoided in Marfan patients with an aortic root diameter >45 mm as there is an increased risk of dissection. When the aorta is 40–45 mm, other factors should be considered, such as family history of dissection and rate of aortic growth.163 Distal aortic dissection and dissection of other vessels are also a risk. For this reason, even after successful aortic root replacement, patients remain at risk of further events.172 Studies focusing on the potential growth during pregnancy in Marfan patients demonstrated contradicting results; some demonstrated no significant growth, while others demonstrated growth ≥3 mm with a partial diameter decrease post-partum.167,168,173
Other important cardiac complications include progressive mitral regurgitation (MR) due to mitral valve prolapse, new arrhythmia, and HF due to ventricular dysfunction.174,175 Obstetric complications are also increased, including premature rupture of membranes.19
5.2.2 Bicuspid aortic valve
Aortic dilatation occurs in ≤50% of patients with a bicuspid aortic valve and can occur even when valve function is normal. The dilatation can be in the distal ascending aorta, which cannot be adequately visualized by echocardiography. If not visible with echocardiography, MRI or CT should be performed pre-pregnancy. The risk of dissection is small. Risk factors are the type of bicuspid aortic valve morphology, aortic dilatation, and CoA.176 Pregnancy should be avoided when the aorta diameter is >50 mm.
5.2.3 Vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome
Serious vascular complications occur almost exclusively in type IV Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (vascular). Maternal mortality is significant, and relates to uterine rupture and dissection of major arteries and veins. Pregnancy is therefore considered as a very high-risk undertaking and not advised.177 These women should be engaged in a shared decision-making process when contemplating pregnancy.
5.2.4 Turner syndrome
Turner syndrome is associated with an increased risk of congenital heart disease, aortic dilatation, hypertension, diabetes, and atherosclerotic events.178 Aortic dissection occurs rarely in Turner syndrome, but it is six times more common at younger ages than in the general population179 Risk factors for aortic dissection include aortic dilation, bicuspid aortic valve, and CoA.20,180 Pregnancy should be avoided when the aortic size index is >25 mm/m2. Also, after aortic root surgery, the patient remains at risk of type B dissection.
Spontaneous pregnancy can occur in mosaic Turner patients (0.5–10%), but pregnancy is now most commonly secondary to assisted fertility techniques. Cardiovascular evaluation is recommended before starting fertility treatment. Good BP control and diabetes management is mandatory for all Turner patients, especially during pregnancy.178
5.2.5 Other autosomal dominant aortopathies
With improved genotyping, a series of new aortopathies are being reported. These includes syndromic and non-syndromic HTAD. These conditions are considered high-risk, especially when the aorta is dilated, and may also have multisystem involvement with additional risks such as uterine rupture.181–184
5.3 Management
5.3.1 Follow-up and medical therapy
Depending on the aortic diameter, patients with aortic pathology should be monitored by echocardiography at regular intervals throughout the pregnancy and 6 months post-partum. In women with a high-risk of dissection or an already severely dilated aorta, monitoring every month is warranted, while in low-risk women with only a mildly dilated aorta, monitoring every 12 weeks seems reasonable. When needed, cardiac MRI without contrast can be used. Pregnancy should be supervised by a cardiologist and obstetrician who are alert to the possible complications. Strict BP control is advised, and antihypertensive treatment that is safe for the foetus should be initiated if necessary.185 In women with HTAD, beta-blocker therapy throughout pregnancy should be considered. In patients with Ehlers–Danlos syndrome type IV, celiprolol is recommended (also in normotensive women) because of the very high-risk of dissections and the benefit demonstrated in non-pregnant patients.186 Foetal growth should be monitored when the mother is taking beta-blockers.
5.3.2 Interventions
When progressive dilatation occurs during pregnancy, before the foetus is viable, surgical treatment with the foetus in utero should be considered. When the foetus is viable, caesarean delivery followed directly by aortic surgery is recommended (section 3). Caesarean section should be performed in a hospital in which cardiothoracic surgery and neonatal intensive care facilities are available.
In patients with acute aortic complications during pregnancy, management includes medical therapy where appropriate, and surgical or catheter-based interventions where needed.
Stanford type A aortic dissection occurring during pregnancy is a surgical emergency. Experienced cardiothoracic, cardiology, obstetric, and cardio-anaesthetic physicians must act rapidly to deliver the foetus (if viable) by caesarean section in a specialized cardiothoracic centre and proceed directly to repair of the dissection. If the baby is not viable, aortic surgery with the foetus in place should be performed. Although maternal outcome is good, foetal mortality is 20–30%.187
In the case of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection, conservative treatment with strict BP control using medication allowed during pregnancy is recommended.188
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has recently been proposed as a new approach for complicated type B aortic dissection. Promising mid-term outcomes have been reported.189 However, the outcome of thoracic endovascular aortic repair during pregnancy is only described in a few cases,190 and it is not recommended in the case of genetic aortopathy.191–193
5.3.3 Delivery
The primary aim of intrapartum management in patients with ascending aorta enlargement is to reduce the cardiovascular stress of labour and delivery. If the woman is taking beta-blockers during pregnancy, they should be continued in the peripartum period.
If the ascending aorta diameter is 40–45 mm, vaginal delivery with expedited second-stage and regional anaesthesia should be considered to prevent BP peaks, which may induce dissection. Caesarean delivery may also be considered in these patients, based on the individual situation. Caesarean delivery should be considered when the aortic diameter exceeds 45 mm, and is recommended in patients with vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome type IV or acute or chronic aortic dissection.
Table 5 provides an overview of the specific aortic disease syndromes.
Marfan19,175 | Bicuspid aortic valve176 | Loeys–Dietz182-184 | Turner178,179 | Vascular Ehlers−Danlos26 | |
Location of aneurysm/dissection | Everywhere (sinus of Valsalva) | Ascending aorta | Everywhere | Ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta | Everywhere |
Risk of dissection | High: 1–10% | Low: <1% | High:1–10% | High: 1–10% | High: 1–10% |
Comorbidity |
| Aortic stenosis or regurgitation |
|
|
|
Advise not to become pregnant | Ascending aorta >45 mm (or >40 mm in family history of dissection or sudden death) | Ascending aorta >50 mm | Ascending aorta >45 mm (or >40 mm in family history of dissection or sudden death) | ASI >25 mm/m2 | All patients |
Marfan19,175 | Bicuspid aortic valve176 | Loeys–Dietz182-184 | Turner178,179 | Vascular Ehlers−Danlos26 | |
Location of aneurysm/dissection | Everywhere (sinus of Valsalva) | Ascending aorta | Everywhere | Ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta | Everywhere |
Risk of dissection | High: 1–10% | Low: <1% | High:1–10% | High: 1–10% | High: 1–10% |
Comorbidity |
| Aortic stenosis or regurgitation |
|
|
|
Advise not to become pregnant | Ascending aorta >45 mm (or >40 mm in family history of dissection or sudden death) | Ascending aorta >50 mm | Ascending aorta >45 mm (or >40 mm in family history of dissection or sudden death) | ASI >25 mm/m2 | All patients |
ASI = aortic size index.
Marfan19,175 | Bicuspid aortic valve176 | Loeys–Dietz182-184 | Turner178,179 | Vascular Ehlers−Danlos26 | |
Location of aneurysm/dissection | Everywhere (sinus of Valsalva) | Ascending aorta | Everywhere | Ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta | Everywhere |
Risk of dissection | High: 1–10% | Low: <1% | High:1–10% | High: 1–10% | High: 1–10% |
Comorbidity |
| Aortic stenosis or regurgitation |
|
|
|
Advise not to become pregnant | Ascending aorta >45 mm (or >40 mm in family history of dissection or sudden death) | Ascending aorta >50 mm | Ascending aorta >45 mm (or >40 mm in family history of dissection or sudden death) | ASI >25 mm/m2 | All patients |
Marfan19,175 | Bicuspid aortic valve176 | Loeys–Dietz182-184 | Turner178,179 | Vascular Ehlers−Danlos26 | |
Location of aneurysm/dissection | Everywhere (sinus of Valsalva) | Ascending aorta | Everywhere | Ascending aorta, arch and descending aorta | Everywhere |
Risk of dissection | High: 1–10% | Low: <1% | High:1–10% | High: 1–10% | High: 1–10% |
Comorbidity |
| Aortic stenosis or regurgitation |
|
|
|
Advise not to become pregnant | Ascending aorta >45 mm (or >40 mm in family history of dissection or sudden death) | Ascending aorta >50 mm | Ascending aorta >45 mm (or >40 mm in family history of dissection or sudden death) | ASI >25 mm/m2 | All patients |
ASI = aortic size index.
5.4 Recommendations
6. Valvular heart disease
At childbearing age, valvular heart disease is often due to rheumatic heart disease, particularly in low–middle-income countries. Mechanical valve prostheses raise specific problems during pregnancy.92,195,196 Risk assessment and management need to consider the resources available in high- and low–middle-income countries. The current background information and detailed discussion of the data for the following section of these Guidelines can be found in ESC CardioMed.
6.1 Stenotic valve lesions
In stenotic valve diseases, increased CO causes an increase in transvalvular gradient of ∼50%, mainly between the first and second trimesters,197 which increases the risk of maternal and foetal complications.29,42,198
6.1.1 Mitral stenosis
6.1.1.1 Maternal risk
Mild mitral stenosis (MS) is generally well tolerated.198,199 HF occurs in one-third of pregnant women with a valve area ≤1.0 cm2 and in one-half of those with a valve area ≤1.5 cm2,199 most often during the second trimester, even in the absence of symptoms before pregnancy.198 Sustained AF, although rare (<10%), may precipitate HF and thrombo-embolic events.199,200 Mortality is between 0–3% in western countries198–200 and higher in low–middle-income countries.201,202 NYHA class ≥ II, systolic PAP >30 mmHg, severe stenosis, and older age are associated with maternal complications.199
6.1.1.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
The risk of acute HF peripartum depends on symptoms and PAP.194 Prematurity rates are 20–30%, intrauterine growth retardation 5–20%, and foetal death 1–5%.198–200,203 Offspring risk is higher in women in NYHA class III/IV during pregnancy.29,194
6.1.1.3 Management
Diagnosis
MS is considered clinically significant if valve area is ≤1.5 cm2.204,205 The reference measurement of MS severity is planimetry; Doppler-derived pressure half-time is less reliable but can be used during pregnancy.204,205 Mean gradient and PAP assess haemodynamic consequences and prognosis.204,205 The assessment of mitral anatomy and associated regurgitation is important when percutaneous mitral commissurotomy is considered.204,205 Before pregnancy, exercise testing is useful to assess objective exercise tolerance and exercise echocardiography may provide additional information.
Medical therapy
When symptoms or clinically significant PH (echocardiographically estimated systolic PAP ≥50 mmHg) develop, activity should be restricted and beta-1-selective blockers (preferably metoprolol or bisoprolol) commenced.5 Diuretics may be used if symptoms persist, avoiding high doses (see table ‘Recommendations for drug use in pregnancy’).5 Anticoagulation using UFH, LMWH, or vitamin K antagonist (VKA), according to the context and term, is recommended in the case of paroxysmal or permanent AF, left atrial thrombosis, or prior embolism.5 Anticoagulation should be considered in women in sinus rhythm with significant MS and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in the left atrium, large left atrium (≥ 60 mL/m2), or congestive HF.
Interventions
All patients with significant MS should be counselled against pregnancy and intervention should be considered pre-pregnancy, favouring percutaneous intervention, even if asymptomatic, and even more so if the valve area is <1.0 cm2.198,204
During pregnancy, percutaneous mitral commissurotomy is preferably performed after 20 weeks of gestation. It should only be considered in women with NYHA class III/IV and/or systolic PAP ≥50 mmHg, despite optimal medical treatment in the absence of contraindications (see table ‘General Recommendations’).204 Closed commissurotomy remains an alternative in low–middle-income countries. Due to foetal risk, open-heart surgery should be reserved for cases in which all other measures have failed and the mother’s life is threatened.206
Follow-up during pregnancy
Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up is indicated monthly or bimonthly depending on haemodynamic tolerance. In mild MS, evaluation is recommended every trimester and prior to delivery.
Labour and delivery
Vaginal delivery should be favoured in patients with mild MS, and in patients with significant MS in NYHA class I/II without PH. Caesarean section is generally considered in patients who are in NYHA class III/IV or have PH, or in whom percutaneous mitral commissurotomy cannot be performed or has failed.
Follow-up and prognosis after delivery
Close monitoring is needed in the days following delivery. Late prognosis depends mainly on the risk of stenosis progression or re-stenosis after commissurotomy, and justifies regular follow-up.204
6.1.2 Valvular aortic stenosis
The main cause of AS is bicuspid aortic valve followed by rheumatic heart disease.
6.1.2.1 Maternal risk
Cardiac morbidity is related to the baseline severity of AS and symptoms.207 HF is rare (<10%) in women with moderate AS and in those who were asymptomatic before pregnancy, while it occurs in one out of four symptomatic patients.207 Even in patients with severe AS, pregnancy is often well tolerated if prior exercise tolerance was normal. Mortality is now rare if careful management is provided.194,198,207–209 Arrhythmias are rare.206 Women with bicuspid aortic valve have a low-risk of aortic dissection if the aortic diameter is <50 mm (section 5.2).
6.1.2.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
Obstetric complications may be increased in patients with severe AS.207,209 Pre-term birth, intrauterine growth retardation, and low birth weight occur in 20–25% of the offspring of mothers with moderate and severe AS, and are increased in severe AS.207 Miscarriages and foetal death rates are <5%. The risk of genetic transmission of LV outflow tract malformations justifies the performance of foetal echocardiography in AS due to bicuspid aortic valve.5
6.1.2.3 Management
Diagnosis
The severity of AS is assessed by combining flow-dependent indices and valve area.204,205 Exercise testing is recommended in asymptomatic patients before pregnancy to evaluate exercise tolerance, BP response, and arrhythmias, and exercise echocardiography may provide additional information. In women with bicuspid aortic valve, aortic diameters should be assessed before and during pregnancy.
Medical therapy
Medical treatment and restricted activities are indicated if HF occurs during pregnancy. Diuretics can be administered for congestive symptoms.
Interventions
All symptomatic patients with severe AS or asymptomatic patients with impaired LV function or a pathological exercise test should be counselled against pregnancy, and surgery should be performed pre-pregnancy.10,204 Pregnancy should not be discouraged in asymptomatic patients, even with severe AS, when LV size and function and the exercise test are normal (see table ‘General Recommendations’). There should also be no recent progression of AS.
During pregnancy in patients who are severely symptomatic despite medical therapy, percutaneous valvuloplasty can be undertaken by an experienced operator.207 If this is not possible and patients have life-threatening symptoms, valve replacement should be considered after early delivery by caesarean section if this is an option (see table ‘General Recommendations’). Given the foetal risk of surgery, transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a promising alternative, but experience during pregnancy is very limited.
Follow-up during pregnancy
Regular follow-up is required by an experienced team. In severe AS, monthly or bimonthly cardiac evaluations including echocardiography are advised.
Labour and delivery
In severe symptomatic AS, caesarean delivery should be preferred. An individual approach is recommended for asymptomatic severe AS. In non-severe AS, vaginal delivery is favoured.
Follow-up and prognosis after delivery
Disease progression is frequent after delivery and requires close follow-up.204,208,210
6.2 Regurgitant lesions
6.2.1 Mitral and aortic regurgitation
Mitral and aortic regurgitation can be of rheumatic, congenital, or degenerative origin.92,199
6.2.1.1 Maternal risk
Women with severe regurgitation and symptoms or compromised LV function are at high-risk of HF.194,199 HF occurs in 20–25% of women with moderate or severe rheumatic MR.199 Acute severe regurgitation is poorly tolerated. In women with congenital heart disease, significant left AV valve regurgitation is associated with cardiac complications during pregnancy. A persistent worsening of regurgitation may occur.42
6.2.1.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
No increased risk of obstetric complications has been reported. Intrauterine growth retardation occurs in 5–10%, and other offspring complications in <5%, of women with moderate or severe MR.199
6.2.1.3 Management
Diagnosis
Evaluation, preferably pre-conception, should include the assessment of symptoms and comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation of regurgitation severity, LV dimensions, and function.204
Ascending aortic diameters should be measured in women with aortic regurgitation, especially in those with bicuspid valves.
Medical therapy
Symptoms of fluid overload can usually be managed medically.
Interventions
Pre-pregnancy surgery favouring valve repair should be performed according to guidelines.204
In acute severe regurgitation with therapy-refractory HF, surgery is sometimes unavoidable during pregnancy. If the foetus is sufficiently mature, delivery should be undertaken prior to cardiac surgery (see table ‘General Recommendations’).
Follow-up during pregnancy
Follow-up is required every trimester in mild/moderate regurgitation, and more often in severe regurgitation.
Labour and delivery
Vaginal delivery with epidural anaesthesia and shortened second stage is advisable.
Follow-up and prognosis after delivery
The prognosis depends on the regurgitation severity and its consequences on symptoms, LV size, and function.
6.2.2 Tricuspid regurgitation
Secondary TR is more frequent than primary TR, which may be due to endocarditis or Ebstein’s anomaly.
Maternal risk is usually determined by left-sided valve disease or PH. However, maternal risk can be increased in severe symptomatic TR or in women with RV dysfunction.50 In women with congenital heart disease, moderate/severe AV valve regurgitation may be associated with maternal cardiac complications, which are mainly arrhythmias.42
Even severe TR with HF can usually be managed conservatively during pregnancy (see table ‘General Recommendations’). When surgery is necessary for left-sided valve lesions, additional tricuspid repair is indicated in severe TR and should be considered in moderate TR with annular dilatation (≥ 40 mm).204 In severe symptomatic TR, repair should be considered pre-pregnancy.
6.3 Atrial fibrillation in native heart valve disease
A high thrombo-embolic risk is associated with AF, particularly in clinically significant MS. Immediate anticoagulation is required, using LMWH at therapeutic doses in the first and last trimesters, and VKAs with the usual target INRs or LMWH for the second trimester. Non-VKA OACs are contraindicated throughout pregnancy. The choice between cardioversion and rate control using digoxin or beta-blockers depends on the severity of the underlying valve disease and the tolerance (see section 12).
6.4 Prosthetic valves
6.4.1 Choice of valve prosthesis
When implantation of a prosthetic valve is unavoidable in a woman who wants to become pregnant in the future, valve selection is challenging. Mechanical valves offer excellent haemodynamic performance and long-term durability, but the need for anticoagulation increases maternal and foetal mortality and morbidity, and the risk of major cardiac events during pregnancy is much higher than with bioprosthetic valves.196,211,212 However, bioprosthetic valves in young women are associated with a high-risk of structural valve deterioration resulting in the risk of going through pregnancy with a dysfunctional valve, and eventually in the inevitable need for re-operation. Transcatheter valve implantation (currently especially in pulmonary valves) and the Ross procedure in aortic valve disease (pulmonary autograft in the aortic position and pulmonary homograft) are alternative options to be considered.5 Data on pregnancy after a Ross procedure are scarce but indicate low-risk in the absence of aortic dilatation.213 A desire for pregnancy is a class IIa indication for a biological valve.204 In young women who wish to become pregnant in the future, the pregnancy heart team should be involved in the choice of a specific prosthesis. The final choice should be made after extensive sharing of information and discussion with the patient.
6.4.2 Pregnancy risk with bioprostheses
The risk of maternal cardiovascular complications in women with a bioprosthesis is low in those with no or minimal bioprosthesis dysfunction and uncompromised ventricular function. When significant bioprosthesis dysfunction is present, the risk of complications can be significant. Pre-pregnancy assessment and counselling, as well as follow-up, medical treatment, and indications for intervention, are comparable with those for pregnancies with native valve dysfunction.
6.5 Mechanical prostheses and anticoagulation
In women with mechanical valves, pregnancy is associated with a very high-risk of complications (WHO risk classification III). In the ROPAC registry, the chances of an event-free pregnancy with a live birth were 58% for women with a mechanical valve, compared with 79% for women with a bioprosthesis and 78% for women with heart disease but no valve prosthesis.196 A recent study from the UK reported a favourable outcome for mother and baby in only 28% of cases.214 The main risks are related to the need for anticoagulation therapy (valve thrombosis and haemorrhagic complications). Additional risks are related to ventricular and valvular dysfunction.
6.5.1 Maternal risk
The risk of valve thrombosis is markedly increased during pregnancy. The risk is lower with adequate dosing of anticoagulant therapy, and depends on the type and position of the mechanical valve, and on additional patient-related risk factors.204 In the ROPAC registry, valve thrombosis occurred in 4.7% of 202 pregnancies and mortality was 20%.196 In the UK study, maternal mortality related to thrombotic complications or valve dysfunction occurred in 9% and severe morbidity in 41% (16% thrombo-embolic complications).214 The risk of valve thrombosis is relatively low with VKAs throughout pregnancy (0–4%).196,215–219 Scarce evidence concerning UFH in the first trimester or throughout pregnancy indicates a high-risk of valve thrombosis (9–33%); additional risks are thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis.215,218,219 LMWH is also associated with the risk of valve thrombosis.196,214,215,219–222 Because the dose requirement markedly increases due to increased renal clearance, monitoring of anti-Xa levels with dose adjustment decreases the risk. LMWH throughout pregnancy with anti-Xa monitoring and dose adjustment according to peak levels carries a valve thrombosis risk of 4.4–8.7%.219,223 Suboptimal target anti-Xa levels or poor compliance often contribute to valve thrombosis, but several valve thromboses occured with peak anti-Xa levels within the target range of 1.0–1.2 IU/mL.221,222 Valve thrombosis occurs in 5.8–7.4% when LMWH is used in the first trimester only, which is similar to using LMWH throughout pregnancy.196,215,219,223 However, the high-risk of valve thrombosis in the UK study was mainly related to the use of LMWH throughout pregnancy. The occurrence of valve thrombosis with adequate peak anti-Xa levels has raised concerns about the safety of this approach. Fast renal clearance can result in subtherapeutic trough (pre-dose) anti-Xa levels despite adequate peak levels, but data on pregnancies with LMWH dosing according to trough and peak anti-Xa levels are limited to case reports.5,224–226 In conclusion, there are unresolved questions concerning LMWH in pregnant women with mechanical valves, including optimal anti-Xa levels, the importance of peak vs. trough levels, the best time intervals for anti-Xa monitoring, and the duration of use.
Current evidence (lacking adequate randomized studies) indicates that the use of VKAs throughout pregnancy, under strict INR control, is the safest regimen to prevent valve thrombosis.196,215–219 LMWH is possibly superior to UFH for preventing valve thrombosis.196,219,223
6.5.2 Obstetric and offspring risk
All anticoagulation regimens carry an increased risk of miscarriage and haemorrhagic complications, including post-partum haemorrhage and retroplacental bleeding leading to premature birth and foetal death.196,216,218,220,221 ROPAC shows that VKAs during the first trimester are associated with an increased risk of miscarriage compared with LMWH or UFH (28.6% vs. 9.2%), and the live birth rate is lower, in line with other literature.196 Two systematic reviews concluded that the risk of foetal loss is dose-related (foetal loss rate with low-dose VKA is 13.4–19.2%, total foetal loss rate with VKA is 32.5%). Foetal loss rate with a combined heparin/VKA regimen is 22.7%,and with LMWH throughout pregnancy is 12.2%.217,219 Comparison between studies is hampered by reporting differences, and conclusions concerning the safety of low-dose VKA are controversial.5,196,217,219,223,227 VKA use in the first trimester results in embryopathy (limb defects, nasal hypoplasia) in 0.6–10% of cases.216,218,219,228 UFH and LMWH do not cross the placenta, therefore substitution of VKA with UFH or LMWH in weeks 6–12 almost eliminates the risk of embryopathy. The embryopathy risk is also dose-dependent (0.45–0.9% with low-dose warfarin).217,219 Additionally, there is 0.7–2% risk of foetopathy (e.g. ocular and central nervous system abnormalities, intracranial haemorrhage) with VKAs in the second and third trimester.216,219,223,228–230 Foetopathy has been described with UFH but not with LMWH throughout pregnancy.219,223 Vaginal delivery while the mother is on VKAs is contra-indicated because of the risk of foetal intracranial bleeding.228 Haemorrhagic complications in the mother occur with all regimens, but the incidence is lower with VKA throughout pregnancy than with LMWH/UFH throughout pregnancy.219 Addition of low-dose aspirin to VKA or heparin has no proven advantage in preventing valve thrombosis but is associated with significantly more maternal bleeding complications, including fatal events.196,219,222
6.5.3 Management
Pre-pregnancy evaluation should include the assessment of symptoms and echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular function, as well as prosthetic and native valve function. The type and position of valve(s), as well as the history of valve thrombosis, should be taken into account. The option to avoid pregnancy should be discussed with the mother.
6.5.3.1 Medical therapy
The advantages and disadvantages of different anticoagulation regimen should be discussed extensively before pregnancy. The mother must understand that the use of VKAs is the most effective regimen to prevent valve thrombosis, and therefore the safest regimen for her, and that risks to the mother also jeopardize the baby. However, the increased risks of embryopathy, foetopathy, foetal loss, and foetal haemorrhage associated with the use of VKAs need to be discussed while considering the VKA dose. The higher risk of valve thrombosis and lower foetal risks associated with LMWH should be discussed. Compliance with prior anticoagulant therapy should be considered. The mother should understand that whatever anticoagulation regime is chosen, her strict compliance is crucial for a successful outcome of the pregnancy.
VKAs should be continued until pregnancy is achieved. Continuation of VKAs throughout pregnancy should be considered when the VKA dose is low (see Table 7). Because of the low risks of embryopathy, foetopathy (<2%), and foetal loss (<20%), VKAs are the most effective regimen to prevent valve thrombosis.215,218,219 The target INR should be chosen according to current guidelines,204 with INR monitoring weekly or every 2 weeks. Self-monitoring of INR in suitable patients is recommended. Alternatively, a switch to LMWH from weeks 6–12 under strict monitoring may be considered in patients with a low dose requirement, after full information has been given to the mother. When a higher dose of VKAs is required, discontinuation of VKAs between weeks 6 and 12, and replacement with adjusted-dose i.v. UFH or LMWH twice daily with dose adjustment according to peak anti-Xa levels, should be considered. See table ‘Recommendations for the management of prosthetic heart valves’ and Figures 2–4 for details of dosing and monitoring. Alternatively, continuation of VKAs may be considered in these patients after fully informed consent. In addition to monitoring peak anti-Xa levels, monitoring of the trough (pre-dose) anti-Xa level and dose-adjustment to maintain this trough level at ≥0.6 IU/mL may be considered based on theoretical grounds, despite limited evidence.5,224,225 The starting dose for LMWH is 1 mg/kg body weight for enoxaparin and 100 IU/kg for dalteparin, twice daily subcutaneously. The dose should be adjusted daily according to peak (or peak and trough) anti-Xa levels and weekly when the target anti-Xa level is achieved.5,224,225 The routine addition of acetylsalicylic acid is not recommended.196,219,222 When UFH is used, after a stable aPTT has been achieved, UFH should be monitored weekly using aPTT, with a prolongation of ≥2 times the control. During the second and third trimester, VKAs are the favoured therapy. For details on management see Figures 2–4.

Flowchart on anticoagulation in mechanical valves and high-dose VKA aweeks 6–12 bmonitoring LMWH: - starting dose for LMWH is 1 mg/kg body weight for enoxaparin and 100 IU/kg for dalteparin, twice daily subcutaneously; -in-hospital daily anti-Xa levels until target, then weekly (I); -target anti-Xa levels: 1.0–1.2 U/ml (mitral and right sided valves) or 0.8–1.2 U/ml (aortic valves) 46 hours post-dose (I); -pre-dose anti-Xa levels >0.6 U/ml (IIb). aPTT = activated partial thromboplastic time; INR = international normalized ratio; i.v. = intravenous; LMWH = low molecular weight heparin; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; UFH = unfractionated heparin; VKA = vitamin K antagonist.

Flowchart on anticoagulation in mechanical valves and low-dose VKA aweeks 6–12 bmonitoring LMWH: - starting dose for LMWH is 1 mg/kg body weight for enoxaparin and 100 IU/kg for dalteparin, twice daily subcutaneously; -in-hospital daily anti-Xa levels until target, then weekly (I); -target anti-Xa levels: 1.0–1.2 U/ml (mitral and right sided valves) or 0.8–1.2 U/ml (aortic valves) 4–6 hours post-dose (I); -pre-dose anti-Xa levels >0.6 U/ml (IIb). aPTT = activated partial thromboplastic time; INR = international normalized ratio; i.v. = intravenous; LMWH = low molecular weight heparin; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; UFH = unfractionated heparin; VKA = vitamin K antagonist.

Flowchart on anticoagulation in mechanical valves and target international normalized ratio for mechanical prostheses (modified from Baumgartner et al.204). INR = international normalized ratio; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction. aMitral or tricuspid valve replacement, previous thrombo-embolism, atrial fibrillation, mitral stenosis of any degree, or LVEF <35%. bCarbomedics, Medtronic Hall, ATS, or Medtronic Open-Pivot, St Jude Medical, On-X, or Sorin Bicarbon. cOther bileaflet valves with insufficient data. dLillehei-Kaster, Omniscience, Starr-Edwards (ball-cage), Björk-Shiley and other tilting-disc valves; any pulmonary valve prosthesis.
6.5.3.2 Surveillance during pregnancy
These high-risk pregnancies should be managed by a pregnancy heart team in an expert centre. The effectiveness of the anticoagulation regimen should be monitored weekly or every 2 weeks depending on the anticoagulation regimen (see Table 7), and clinical follow-up including echocardiography should be performed monthly.
6.5.3.3 Diagnosis and management of valve thrombosis
Dyspnoea and/or an embolic event are reasons for immediate transthoracic echocardiography to search for valve thrombosis, usually followed by transoesophageal echocardiography. Additionally, fluoroscopy can be performed with limited foetal risk. Management of valve thrombosis is comparable with management in non-pregnant patients. This includes optimizing anticoagulation with i.v. UFH and the resumption of oral anticoagulation in non-critically ill patients with recent subtherapeutic anticoagulation, and surgery when anticoagulation fails and for critically ill patients with obstructive thrombosis.204 A molecular weight >1000 Da prevents most fibrinolytic items from easily crossing the placenta, though small amounts of streptokinase and fragments of urokinase may pass into the foetal circulation. Alteplase (a recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) has the highest molecular weight and does not cross the placenta. However, the risk of embolization (10%) and subplacental bleeding is a concern, and experience in pregnancy is limited. Fibrinolysis should be applied in critically ill patients when surgery is not immediately available, and it should be considered when the risk of surgery is high.204 Because foetal loss is high (30%) with surgery, fibrinolysis may be considered instead of surgery in non-critically ill patients when anticoagulation fails.231 Fibrinolysis is the therapy of choice in right-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis.204 The mother should be informed about the risks.
6.5.3.4 Delivery
Planned delivery is necessary. Vaginal delivery requires a prior switch to i.v. heparin. The use of epidural anaesthesia requires a prolonged interruption of anticoagulant therapy, which may contraindicate its use in women with a mechanical prosthesis. A planned caesarean section may therefore be considered as an alternative, especially in patients with a high-risk of valve thrombosis, to keep the time without VKAs as short as possible. Caesarean section should be performed if labour onset occurs while the patient is still on VKAs.
6.6 Recommendations
7. Coronary artery disease
The incidence of CAD in women of childbearing age is unclear and varies between countries.232 Although acute MI (AMI)/acute coronary syndromes (ACS) complicating pregnancy is relatively uncommon (1.7–6.2/100 000 deliveries),233–235 CAD accounts for >20% of all maternal cardiac deaths.3 The current background information and detailed discussion of the data for the following section of these Guidelines can be found in ESC CardioMed.
7.1 Aetiology
Pregnancy is associated with a three- to four-fold increase in AMI risk compared with age-matched non-pregnant women.232,234,236,237 Risk factors include smoking,238 maternal age, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidaemia.233,234,237,239,240 Additional risk factors include (pre-)eclampsia, thrombophilia, transfusion, post-partum infection, cocaine use, multiparity, and post-partum haemorrhage.233,234 As the birth rate in women >40 years increases, ACS complicating pregnancy will become more common, as for every year increase in maternal age there is a 20% increase in MI risk.235 The aetiology of CAD in pregnancy differs from the general population; the majority of CAD has non-atherosclerotic mechanisms, including pregnancy-related spontaneous coronary artery dissection (P-SCAD) (43%), angiographically normal coronary arteries (18%), and coronary thrombosis (17%).239,241
P-SCAD-related AMI occurs most commonly in late pregnancy/early post-partum, and predominantly involves the left-sided coronaries, frequently with multivessel involvement.237,239 Potential pregnancy-related precipitating factors include fluctuating oestrogen/progesterone levels resulting in structural changes in coronary vasculature, in background of fibromuscular dysplasia or connective tissue disease, and increased coronary shear stresses associated with labour.242–244
The mechanisms of AMI with angiographically normal coronary arteries remains unclear and include transient coronary spasm (increased vascular reactivity and/or use of ergot derivatives),237,245 rather reflecting the limitations of this diagnostic technique.246,247 Coronary thrombosis in the absence of atherosclerosis is most likely due to the hypercoagulability of pregnancy248 and can result from paradoxical embolization.
Increasing survival in Kawasaki disease (in the USA it is predicted that by 2030, one in every 1600 adults will have suffered from Kawasaki disease) presents an additional challenge.249 Relevant Kawasaki disease manifestations include aneurysms, coronary blood flow alteration, coronary stenoses, myocardial ischaemia/fibrosis, congestive cardiac failure, and valvular abnormalities.249
Coronary thrombosis in the absence of atherosclerosis is most likely due to the hypercoagulability of pregnancy248 and can result from paradoxical embolization.
7.2 Presentation and diagnosis
Development of pregnancy-related ACS/AMI is most common during the third trimester [STEMI 25% and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) 32%] or post-partum (STEMI 45% and NSTEMI 55%). Clinical presentation is the same as in the non-pregnant population.250,251 ECG interpretation can be challenging, with inverted T waves in the absence of coronary ischaemia, and anaesthesia induction for caesarean section associated with ST-segment depression.237 A serum troponin rise should suggest myocardial ischaemia, even in pre-eclampsia.252,253 Where the ECG is non-diagnostic, echocardiography may be helpful.254 The main differential diagnoses include PE, aortic dissection, and pre-eclampsia. Potential complications include HF/cardiogenic shock (38%), arrhythmias (12%), recurrent angina/AMI (20%), maternal mortality (7%), and foetal death (7%).239
7.3 Management
AMI management in pregnancy is similar to that in the general population, including revascularization techniques. In P-SCAD, enhanced vascular vulnerability should be considered when applying revascularization strategies.241,255 Management should be multidisciplinary, including emergency, obstetric, and cardiovascular teams, and any revascularization should be undertaken by the most experienced operator due to the attendant risks associated with coronary intervention in this patient population. In cardiogenic shock, there should be facilities for emergency mechanical circulatory support. Close monitoring of the mother and foetus is required, with a delivery strategy in place in case there is sudden maternal or foetal deterioration. In the event of maternal cardiac arrest, resuscitation (and delivery) should be performed according to existing guidelines.256
7.4 Pharmacotherapy
There is little information regarding the foetal safety of guideline-recommended drug therapy in AMI.257 Low-dose aspirin appears to be safe, but there is little information regarding P2Y12 inhibitors. Clopidogrel should be used only when strictly necessary and for the shortest duration.239 In the absence of data regarding glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors―bivalirudin, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, their use is not recommended. Beta-blockade may be beneficial in reducing shear stress in P-SCAD. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator does not cross the placenta but may induce bleeding complications (subplacental bleeding). The benefits of short-term heparinization during PCI probably outweigh the risk of bleeding complications.
7.5 Intervention
The effects of ionizing radiation should not prevent primary PCI in pregnant patients with standard indications for revascularization in AMI. However, the radiation dose must be minimized. In stable, low-risk NSTEMI, a non-invasive approach should be considered.258 Although CT coronary angiography provides an alternative diagnostic method,259 it requires radiation, potentially high-dose beta-blockade, and may fail to demonstrate limited P-SCAD.
7.5.1 Stent choice and antiplatelet therapy
The majority of reports regarding STEMI in pregnancy relate to bare-metal stents. However, new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are recommended according to the 2017 AMI STEMI Guidelines.251 Because no complications have been reported in stented pregnant patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin, and because pregnancy is a high bleeding-risk situation, use of a more potent P2Y12 inhibitor should be considered with caution. The duration of dual antiplatelet therapy with a second/third-generation DES can be shortened, particularly in the absence of great thrombotic burden. Bioabsorbable stent usage has been reported in spontaneous coronary artery dissection; however, there is currently no evidence to recommend them in pregnancy.
7.6 Pre-existing CAD
Women with pre-established CAD or ACS/MI are at risk of serious adverse cardiac events during pregnancy, the highest risk of which is seen in atherosclerotic coronary disease260 with reported maternal mortality between 0–23%.92,261,262 Adverse obstetric outcomes occur in ≤16%, with 30% of pregnancies complicated by an adverse foetal/neonatal event, most commonly in coronary atherosclerosis (50%).260
Pregnancy may be considered in patients with known CAD in the absence of residual ischaemia and clinical signs of LV dysfunction. There are no high-quality data defining how long pregnancy should be delayed post-AMI/ACS. However, recommending 12 months seems reasonable, individualized according to comorbidities, cardiovascular status, and the requirement for medical therapy. There is no definitive evidence that previous P-SCAD increases recurrence risk. However, avoidance of further pregnancy is advised258 and, if the patient chooses to proceed, close monitoring is recommended.
7.7 Labour and delivery
Timing of delivery must be individualized. However, treatment of STEMI/NSTEMI should not be delayed for delivery. Delivery should be postponed (if possible) for at least 2 weeks post-AMI to facilitate maternal management.237 Vaginal delivery is preferable (see section 3).
7.8 Recommendations
8. Cardiomyopathies and heart failure
The aetiology of pregnancy-associated cardiomyopathy includes acquired and inherited diseases, such PPCM, toxic cardiomyopathies, HCM, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and storage diseases. Although rare, they may cause severe complications in pregnancy.263 HF with preserved EF, an important cause of HF in older patients, does not appear to be a major clinical problem in pregnancy; however, it may be underdiagnosed. The current background information and detailed discussion of the data for the following section of these Guidelines can be found in ESC CardioMed.
8.1 Peripartum cardiomyopathy
PPCM has recently been reviewed32,263,264 and the EURObservational Research Programme international PPCM registry will provide fundamental data on this condition.265,266 Important predisposing factors include multiparity, African ethnicity, smoking, diabetes, pre-eclampsia, malnutrition, advanced age, and teenage pregnancy.32,263 The cause is uncertain, but potential aetiologies include inflammation and angiogenic imbalance, inducing vascular damage.267–270 The biologically active 16 kDa prolactin and other factors, such as soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1), may initiate and drive PPCM.268,271,272
8.1.1 Diagnosis
PPCM presents with HF secondary to LV systolic dysfunction towards the end of pregnancy and in the months following delivery, with the majority diagnosed post-partum. Careful history taking is necessary to identify and exclude other causes of HF.273–276 The LV may be non-dilated, but the EF is usually <45%.32,263,270 Symptoms and signs are often typical for HF with numerous phenotypes reported. Patients frequently present with acute HF, but also with ventricular arrhythmias and/or cardiac arrest.277–280 Echocardiography is the imaging modality of choice. Initial LVEF <30%, marked LV dilatation (LV end-diastolic diameter ≥6.0 cm), and RV involvement are associated with adverse outcomes.278,281,282
8.1.2 Prognosis and counselling
Prospective larger cohort studies have mainly focused on 6 month outcomes, reporting a mortality ranging from 2.0% in Germany277 to 12.6% in a large cohort of 206 patients with PPCM from South Africa.283 A prospective study over 24 months from Turkey reported a 24% mortality.284 When the EF has not recovered to >50–55%, subsequent pregnancy should be discouraged. Even with normalized EF, counselling is required due to potential recurrence. With expert interdisciplinary management and immediate bromocriptine treatment post-delivery, successful subsequent pregnancies, especially in patients with recovered EF, have been reported.285
8.2 Dilated cardiomyopathy
DCM encompasses a number of conditions resulting in LV dilatation and dysfunction including prior viral infection, drugs, and ischaemia. Some 50% of cases are idiopathic, of which 20–35% are hereditary.276 Around 40% of the genetic causes of DCM have been identified, with >50 gene mutations described.286 The prevalence of idiopathic DCM is 1:2500; however, this is likely an underestimate.287
Patients may already be known to have DCM, or may present de novo during pregnancy. Distinguishing symptoms and signs of normal pregnancy from HF demands careful attention. Although PPCM and DCM are distinct disease entities, patients may share a genetic predisposition, and differentiation during pregnancy may be impossible.273–276,287
8.2.1 Prognosis and counselling
Pregnancy is poorly tolerated in some women with pre-existing DCM, with the potential for significant deterioration in LV function.29 Predictors of maternal mortality are NYHA class III/IV and EF <40%.288 Highly adverse risk factors include EF <20%, MR, RV failure, AF, and/or hypotension. All patients with DCM planning pregnancy require appropriate counselling and joint multidisciplinary care, as there is a high-risk of irreversible deterioration in ventricular function, maternal mortality, and foetal loss.
Pre-pregnancy management includes the modification of existing HF medications to avoid foetal harm. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and ivabradine are contraindicated and should be stopped prior to conception, with close clinical and echocardiographic monitoring. However, beta-blockers should be continued and switched to beta-1-selective blockers (see section 12). If EF falls, then further discussion should occur, reconsidering the safety of pregnancy. If contraindicated drugs have been inadvertently taken during the first trimester, they should be stopped, and the patient monitored closely with maternal echocardiography and foetal ultrasound.
8.3 Management of heart failure during and after pregnancy
Assessment and management of pregnant patients with DCM or PPCM depends upon the clinical setting. However, all require joint cardiac and obstetric care, serial echocardiograms, serum B-type natriuretic peptide, and foetal ultrasound.46
8.3.1 Acute/subacute heart failure and cardiogenic shock during or after pregnancy
HF in DCM or PPCM can develop rapidly and Guidelines for the management of acute HF and cardiogenic shock apply.286,289 For rapid diagnosis and decision-making, a pre-specified management algorithm and expert interdisciplinary team are crucial (Figures 5 and 6).279,290

Management of acute heart failure during pregnancy: rapid interdisciplinary workup and treatment of mother and foetus (modified from Bauersachs et al.280). AHF = acute heart failure; HF = heart failure.

Management of acute heart failure during/after pregnancy (modified from Bauersachs et al.280). aDiuretics have to be used with caution due to potential reduction in placental blood flow. ACE-I = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; AHF = acute heart failure; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; ECG = electrocardiogram; HF = heart failure; HR = heart rate; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; MCS = mechanical circulatory support; MR = mineralocorticoid receptor; NIV = non-invasive ventilation; PDA = Peridural analgesia; PPCM = peripartum cardiomyopathy; RR = respiratory rate; SBP = systolic blood pressure; ScvO2 = central venous oxygen saturation; SpO2 = peripheral oxygen saturation; WCD = wearable cardioverter-defibrillator.
8.3.1.1 Haemodynamic instability and cardiogenic shock
If a patient is in cardiogenic shock or dependent on inotropes or vasopressors, she should be transferred early to a facility where mechanical circulatory support teams are available.279,289 Urgent delivery by caesarean section (irrespective of gestation) should be considered with mechanical circulatory support immediately available. PPCM patients are sensitive to the toxic effects of beta-adrenergic agonists, which should be avoided whenever possible. Levosimendan may be the preferred inotrope.279,291,292
8.3.1.2 Acute/subacute heart failure
Patients with symptoms and signs of acute HF should be evaluated according to acute HF Guidelines.289 Differential diagnoses include uncomplicated pregnancy, pulmonary oedema (pre-eclampsia/eclampsia), PE, pneumonia, and MI, all of which should be diagnosed or excluded using standard algorithms.
Management goals are similar to non-pregnant acute HF, while avoiding foetotoxic agents (ACE inhibitors, ARB, ARNI, MRA, and atenolol). HF with pulmonary congestion is treated with loop diuretics and thiazides if required; however, diuretics should be avoided in the absence of pulmonary congestion, due to the potential reduction in placental blood flow.290 Hydralazine and nitrates appear safe in pregnancy, although with less evidence for benefit than ACE inhibitors, and should only be used in the presence of hypertension, severe LV dysfunction, and/or evidence of congestion in decompensated HF. Beta-blockers should be initiated cautiously and gradually uptitrated to the maximum tolerated dose266,286 (details in section 12). High resting heart rate is a predictor of adverse outcome in PPCM, and treatment with ivabradine may be useful if the patient is not pregnant or breastfeeding.283,293 Relapse of PPCM has been observed after rapid tapering of HF therapies, and therefore treatment should continue for at least 6 months after full recovery of LV function followed by gradual tapering.264
8.3.2 Bromocriptine and peripartum cardiomyopathy
Addition of bromocriptine to standard HF therapy may improve LV recovery and clinical outcome in women with acute severe PPCM.24,25,277,278,294 Bromocriptine (2.5 mg once daily) for at least 1 week may be considered in uncomplicated cases, whereas prolonged treatment (2.5 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, then 2.5 mg once daily for 6 weeks) may be considered in patients with EF <25% and/or cardiogenic shock. Bromocriptine treatment must always be accompanied by anticoagulation with heparin (LMWH or UFH), at least in prophylactic dosages.25,294,295 The essential therapies for patients with acute PPCM have been summarized under the BOARD label: Bromocriptine, Oral heart failure therapies, Anticoagulants, vasoRelaxing agents, and Diuretics.296
8.3.3 Devices and transplantation
Given the high rate of improvement of LV function during optimal HF drug therapy, early implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in patients with newly diagnosed PPCM or DCM is not appropriate. A wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) may prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD) during the first 3–6 months after diagnosis, especially in patients with EF <35%, allowing protected recovery from severe LV impairment.279,297 In severe LV dysfunction during the 6–12 months following first presentation despite optimal medical therapy, implantation of an ICD and cardiac resynchronization therapy (for patients with left bundle branch block and QRS >130ms) are recommended.286,298 However, mortality reduction in those with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy is uncertain.299
Cardiac transplantation is reserved for patients where mechanical circulatory support is not possible or desirable, or for patients who do not recover after 6–12 months. Patients with PPCM have higher rates of graft failure and death after heart transplantation.300
8.3.3.1 Pregnancy post-cardiac transplantation
Despite successful pregnancies post-cardiac transplantation, data are limited. Multidisciplinary team management is required relating to the timing and management of pregnancy.301 Pre-conception counselling includes the risks of graft rejection and dysfunction, infection, and the teratogenicity of immunosuppressive agents. Some centres recommend human leucocyte antigen testing prior to conception. If the donated heart and father have the same human leucocyte antigen, and the recipient has donor-specific antigens, the risk of autograft rejection is high.302 PPCM recurrence rates in transplanted patients are unknown. However, as rejection risk in these patients is higher in the first year post-transplant and graft survival is shorter, many advise against pregnancy in such patients.303
Pregnancy should be avoided for at least 1 year post-transplantation, and discouraged in patients at high-risk of rejection and/or with poor baseline graft function before pregnancy.303–305 Besides graft rejection or dysfunction and infection, hypertension is the most common maternal complication. Additional increased risks include hyperemesis and thrombo-embolic disease.301 All immunosuppressive medications enter the foetal circulation, thus the management of immunosuppression in the pregnant post-transplant recipient is highly specialized.301 As all immunosuppressive agents are excreted into breast milk with unknown long-term effects, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation currently recommends against breastfeeding.303
8.3.4 Anticoagulation
Standard indications for anticoagulation in PPCM and DCM apply during and after pregnancy. The choice of anticoagulant agent depends upon the stage of pregnancy and patient preference (see section 12 and Table 7).9,306 In PPCM patients with very low EF, prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered.263
8.3.5 Delivery and breastfeeding
Urgent delivery irrespective of gestation duration should be considered in women with advanced HF and haemodynamic instability despite treatment.279 Caesarean section is recommended with central neuraxial anaesthesia. To prevent abrupt pressure or volume changes, epidural anaesthesia might be the method of choice but should be carefully titrated, guided by an expert anaesthetic team.279,290 In stable congestive HF, vaginal delivery is preferred with spinal/epidural analgesia.
In HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), breastfeeding is discouraged in more severe cases (e.g. NYHA III/IV). Stopping lactation reduces the high metabolic demand and enables early optimal HF treatment.24 For drug treatment during breastfeeding see section 12.
8.4 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
The true prevalence of HCM in different populations is a topic of debate, but a number of methodologically diverse studies in North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa have reported a prevalence of unexplained increase in LV thickness in the range of 0.02–0.23% in adults.65 The observed incidence of HCM in pregnancy is <1:1000.65,307
Women with HCM usually tolerate pregnancy well. In a recent meta-analysis, maternal mortality was 0.5%, and complication or worsening of symptoms occurred in 29% of cases. Foetal mortality by spontaneous abortion (15%), therapeutic abortion (5%), or stillbirth (2%) is comparable to the general population; however, the risk of premature birth is increased (26%).308,309 Risk is increased where women are symptomatic pre-pregnancy or exhibit a high-risk profile, including diastolic dysfunction, severe LV outflow tract obstruction, and arrhythmia.310,311 Medication in the pre-pregnancy period, and a CARPREG or ZAHARA score ≥1, are risk factors for pregnancy/post-partum cardiac events.312 Symptoms are typical for HF with pulmonary congestion and echocardiography is usually diagnostic.
8.4.1 Management
Women in WHO class II should be assessed each trimester, and those in class III assessed monthly or bimonthly.9 Beta-blockers should be continued if they are already being taken (see section 12). They should be started when new symptoms occur, for rate control in AF, and to suppress ventricular arrhythmias, with verapamil as second choices when beta-blockers are not tolerated (with foetal monitoring for AV block).65,313
Cardioversion should be considered for poorly tolerated persistent AF.314 Therapeutic anticoagulation is recommended for those with paroxysmal or persistent arrhythmias. Hypovolaemia is poorly tolerated. Patients with a past history or family history of sudden death need close surveillance with prompt investigation if they develop symptoms of palpitations or presyncope. When indicated, a device should be implanted 315,316
8.4.2 Delivery
Low-risk cases may have a spontaneous labour and vaginal delivery. Caesarean section should be considered in patients with severe LV outflow tract obstruction, pre-term labour while on OACs, or severe HF.9 Epidural and spinal anaesthesia must be applied cautiously, especially with severe LV outflow tract obstruction, because of potential hypovolaemia, and single-shot spinal anaesthesia avoided. During delivery, monitoring of heart rate and rhythm should be considered in patients with a high-risk of developing arrhythmias. Oxytocin should be given as a slow infusion and any i.v. fluids given judiciously.9,317
8.5 Recommendations
9. Arrhythmias
9.1 Introduction
Tachyarrhythmias, particularly AF,318,319 may manifest for the first time and become more frequent during pregnancy, especially in older women318,320 and in women with congenital heart disease.41,321 AF (27/100 000) and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) (22 − 24/100 000) are, apart from premature beats, the most frequent arrhythmias.318 Symptomatic exacerbations of PSVT322 are usually benign and can be medically treated effectively.12 Life-threatening VT and ventricular fibrillation are very rare during pregnancy,318 as are bradyarrhythmias and conduction disturbances. The current background information and detailed discussion of the data for the following section of these Guidelines can be found in ESC CardioMed.
9.2 Maternal risk
AF is associated with an increased mortality risk318 [odds ratio (OR) 13.13, 95% CI 7.77–22.21; P <0.0001], and a rapid ventricular response can lead to serious haemodynamic consequences for both the mother and the foetus. Diagnosis and treatment of underlying conditions are the first priorities. Patients with a known history of any symptomatic supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) or VT should be considered for catheter ablation prior to pregnancy.
SCD is recognized as an increasing risk factor in pregnancy and therefore cascade screening for channelopathies with genetic counselling2,3,72 is important. Women with congenital LQTS are at substantial risk of cardiac events during the post-partum period.323 New-onset VT warrants the exclusion of underlying structural heart disease,324 as it is associated with increased risk of SCD for the mother (OR 40.89, 95% CI 26.08–64.1; P <0.0001).318
Bradyarrhythmias and conduction disturbances usually have a favourable outcome in the absence of underlying heart disease.
9.3 Obstetric and offspring risk
Pregnant PSVT subjects have worse obstetric and foetal outcomes, with higher adjusted ORs (1.54–3.52) for severe maternal morbidity, caesarean delivery, low birth weight, pre-term labour, foetal stress, and foetal abnormalities than those without PSVT.325 Women with congenital heart disease are more likely to die during admission for delivery than those without (OR 6.7), arrhythmia being the most frequent cardiovascular event.321 Recommendations for optimal surveillance levels during delivery for women with arrhythmias are outlined in ‘Recommendations for the management of arrhythmias’.
9.4 Supraventricular tachycardia
Recommendations for acute termination of PSVT (AV nodal re-entry tachycardia and AV re-entry tachycardia)326 are outlined in ‘Recommendations for the management of arrhythmias’ below. The i.v. administration of adenosine is recommended as the first drug of choice for acute conversion of PSVT (see table ‘Recommendations for the management of arrhythmias’).
For the prevention of PSVT, beta-blockers (except atenolol) or verapamil are first-line agents, except for patients with Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome (see section 12).12,32,327,328 The use of preventive drug therapy should be related to the severity of symptoms and haemodynamic compromise during tachycardia.
Focal atrial tachycardia (AT) can be associated with drug resistance and tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. Adenosine may aid in diagnosis and terminates focal AT in 30% of cases. AV nodal blocking drugs are recommended for long-term rate control. Flecainide, propafenone (in the absence of ischaemic heart disease), or sotalol should be considered for rhythm control if these agents fail (see Table 7).12
9.5 Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter
Electrical cardioversion is recommended whenever ongoing AF is haemodynamically unstable or a considerable risk for the mother or the foetus.306 Delivery of i.v. butilide or flecainide may be considered for the termination of atrial flutter and AF in stable patients with structurally normal hearts.12,329 Cardioversion should generally be preceded by anticoagulation (see below).306 The use of i.v. beta-blockers is recommended for rate control.
Rhythm control should be considered as the preferred treatment strategy during pregnancy, starting with a beta-blocker as the first option.306 In the case of a rate control strategy, an oral beta-blocker is recommended (see Table 7).
Episodes of atrial flutter are usually not well tolerated in patients with congenital heart disease and electrical cardioversion should therefore be performed to restore sinus rhythm.12 Beta-blockers, class I antiarrhythmic drugs, and sotalol should be used with caution if systemic ventricular function is impaired (see section 8).
9.5.1 Anticoagulation
The same rules for stroke risk stratification should be used as in non-pregnant patients.306 Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulation drugs are prohibited during pregnancy (see Table 7).
9.6 Ventricular tachycardia
Inherited arrhythmogenic disorders should always be looked for with appropriate diagnostic tests during or after pregnancy.72 PPCM should be ruled out in the case of new-onset VT during the last 6 weeks of pregnancy or in the early post-partum period.266
Recommendations for acute termination of VT72 are outlined in ‘Recommendations for the management of arrhythmias’.
The choice of prophylactic antiarrhythmic drug therapy relates to the presence of underlying structural heart disease and LV function (see table ‘Recommendations for the management of arrhythmias’). Idiopathic RV outflow tract tachycardia is the most frequent VT type and may require prophylactic treatment with a beta-blocker, verapamil, or other antiarrhythmic drugs, and even catheter ablation if drug treatment fails.
ICD implantation is recommended if an indication emerges during pregnancy (see table ‘Recommendations for the management of arrhythmias’).72,330,331 Implantation of an ICD in PPCM patients with VT or low EF should follow ESC Guidelines,72 considering the relatively high rate (50%) of spontaneous recovery after delivery. Non-selective beta-blockers should be continued throughout pregnancy and during the post-partum period (at least 40 weeks after delivery)323 in patients with congenital LQTS332 and those with catecholaminergic polymorphic VT.72,333 Exceptions may be LQTS patients without prior syncope or torsade de pointes (TdP), or any other risk profile, for whom a selective beta-blocker may be chosen. Management of cardiac arrest in pregnancy is described elsewhere.256
9.7 Bradyarrhythmias
9.7.1 Sinus node dysfunction
Rare cases of sinus bradycardia may be related to the supine hypotensive syndrome of pregnancy. Symptomatic bradycardia should be managed by changing the position of the mother to a left lateral decubitus position. For persistent symptoms, a temporary pacemaker may be necessary.
9.7.2 Atrioventricular block
Isolated congenital complete heart block in the mother has a favourable outcome during pregnancy, especially when the escape rhythm has a narrow QRS complex.334,335 Temporary ventricular pacing during delivery is unnecessary in stable patients with complete heart block,334 but recommended in selected women with symptoms due to the risk of bradycardia and syncope.
9.8 Interventions
9.8.1 Electrical cardioversion
Cardioversion seems safe in all phases of pregnancy as it does not compromise foetal blood flow,336 and the risk of inducing foetal arrhythmias or initiating pre-term labour seems small.337,338 The foetal heart rate should routinely be controlled after cardioversion.339
9.8.2 Catheter ablation
Catheter ablation should be postponed to the second trimester if possible, and performed at an experienced centre using non-fluoroscopic electroanatomical mapping and catheter navigation systems.15,16 Catheter ablation of recurrent drug-refractory AV nodal re-entry tachycardia, AV re-entrant tachycardia, focal ATs, cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter, and certain benign right-sided VTs may be considered for ablation to avoid potentially harmful medications during pregnancy (see table ‘Recommendations for the management of arrhythmias’),12,15,17 but has no role for other macroreentry tachycardias or AF.15,17
9.8.3 Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and pacing
The implantation of an ICD should be considered prior to pregnancy in patients with high-risk factors for SCD.72,340 Treatment with an ICD during pregnancy does not cause an increased risk of major ICD-related complications and is recommended if an indication emerges (see table ‘Recommendations for the management of arrhythmias’).330,340 Safety considerations regarding radiation during ICD implantation are similar to those discussed for catheter ablation. Subcutaneous ICD is limited by a lack of pacing capability and a higher risk of inappropriate shock, which may warrant ICD inactivation during delivery.341,342 The use of WDCs in PPCM patients is limited343 and deserves further study as it has not undergone clinical testing in pregnant patients. Routine ICD interrogation and advice is recommended prior to delivery.
Implantations, for ICD preferably one chamber, can be performed safely, especially if the foetus is beyond 8 weeks of gestation. Echocardiographic guidance or electroanatomical mapping may be helpful.344
Recommended surveillance levels at time of delivery in women with arrhythmias
![]() |
![]() |
This table has been developed by expert consensus.
AF = atrial fibrillation; ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; LQTS = long QT syndrome; PSVT = paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; SVT = supraventricular tachycardia; TdP = torsade de pointes; VT = ventricular tachycardia; WPW = Wolfe-Parkinson-White.
The risk stratification should follow published Guidelines for the particular disease.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommended surveillance levels at time of delivery in women with arrhythmias
![]() |
![]() |
This table has been developed by expert consensus.
AF = atrial fibrillation; ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; LQTS = long QT syndrome; PSVT = paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; SVT = supraventricular tachycardia; TdP = torsade de pointes; VT = ventricular tachycardia; WPW = Wolfe-Parkinson-White.
The risk stratification should follow published Guidelines for the particular disease.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
9.9 Recommendations
10. Hypertensive disorders
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are the most common medical complications, affecting 5–10% of pregnancies worldwide. They remain a major cause of maternal, foetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Maternal risks include placental abruption, stroke, multiple organ failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. The foetus is at high-risk of intrauterine growth retardation (25% of cases of pre-eclampsia), pre-maturity (27% of cases of pre-eclampsia), and intrauterine death (4% of cases of pre-eclampsia).345 The current background information and detailed discussion of the data for the following section of these Guidelines can be found in ESC CardioMed.
10.1 Diagnosis and risk assessment
Repeated BP readings should be performed, preferably on two occasions,346 ≥15 min apart in severe hypertension (i.e. ≥160/110 mmHg in the obstetric literature).9,347,348
10.1.1 Blood pressure measurement
BP in pregnancy should be measured in the sitting position (or the left lateral recumbent during labour) with an appropriately-sized arm cuff at heart level and using Korotkoff V for diastolic BP (DBP). Mercury sphygmomanometers are still the gold standard for BP measurement in pregnancy. Automatic devices tend to under-record the true BP and are unreliable in severe pre-eclampsia. Therefore, only devices validated according to recognized protocols should be used in pregnancy.349,350
The diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) is superior to routine BP measurement for the prediction of pregnancy outcome.351,352 The devices used for ABPM are technically more accurate than those used for office or home BP measurement. ABPM avoids unnecessary treatment of white-coat hypertension, and is useful in the management of high-risk pregnant women with hypertension and those with diabetic or hypertensive nephropathy.
10.1.2 Laboratory tests
Basic laboratory investigations recommended for monitoring pregnant hypertensive patients include urinalysis, blood count, haematocrit, liver enzymes, serum creatinine, and serum uric acid (increased in clinically evident pre-eclampsia, hyperuricaemia in hypertensive pregnancies identifies women at increased risk of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes).353
All pregnant women should be assessed for proteinuria in early pregnancy to detect pre-existing renal disease and, in the second half of pregnancy, to screen for pre-eclampsia. A dipstick test of ≥1+ should prompt further investigations, including an albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR),354 which can be quickly determined in a single spot urine sample. A value <30 mg/mmol can reliably rule out proteinuria in pregnancy,355 but a positive test should possibly be followed by a 24 h urine collection. In cases of proteinuria >2 g/day, close monitoring is warranted. However, the result of a 24 h urine collection is often inaccurate356 and delays the diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. Consequently, an ACR cut-off of 30 mg/mmol can be used to identify significant proteinuria.
In addition to basic laboratory tests, the following investigations may be considered:
Ultrasound investigation of the adrenals, and plasma and urinary fractionated metanephrine assays in hypertensive pregnant women with a suggestive clinical presentation of pheochromocytoma in particular.
Doppler ultrasound of uterine arteries (performed after 20 weeks of gestation) is useful to detect those at higher risk of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and intrauterine growth retardation.357
An sFlt1 to placental growth factor (sFlt1:PIGF) ratio ≤38 can be used to exclude the development of pre-eclampsia in the next week when suspected clinically.358,359
10.2 Definition and classification of hypertension in pregnancy
The definition of hypertension in pregnancy is based only on office (or in-hospital) BP values [systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥90 mmHg]360–362 and distinguishes mildly (140–159/90–109 mmHg) or severely (≥ 160/110 mmHg) elevated BP, in contrast to the grades used by the joint ESC/ESH Hypertension Guidelines.348
Hypertension in pregnancy is not a single entity but comprises:9
Pre-existing hypertension: precedes pregnancy or develops before 20 weeks of gestation. It usually persists for more than 42 days post-partum and may be associated with proteinuria.
Gestational hypertension: develops after 20 weeks of gestation and usually resolves within 42 days post-partum.
Pre-eclampsia: gestational hypertension with significant proteinuria (>0.3 g/24 h or ACR ≥30 mg/mmol). It occurs more frequently during the first pregnancy, in multiple pregnancy, in hydatidiform mole, in antiphospholipid syndrome, or with pre-existing hypertension, renal disease, or diabetes. It is often associated with foetal growth restriction due to placental insufficiency and is a common cause of prematurity. The only cure is delivery.363 As proteinuria may be a late manifestation of pre-eclampsia, it should be suspected when de novo hypertension is accompanied by headache, visual disturbances, abdominal pain, or abnormal laboratory tests, specifically low platelets and/or abnormal liver function.
Pre-existing hypertension plus superimposed gestational hypertension with proteinuria.
Antenatally unclassifiable hypertension: this term is used when BP is first recorded after 20 weeks of gestation and hypertension is diagnosed; re-assessment is necessary after 42 days post-partum.
10.3 Prevention of hypertension and pre-eclampsia
Women at high or moderate risk of pre-eclampsia should be advised to take 100–150 mg of aspirin daily from week 12 to weeks 36–37.364,365
High risk of pre-eclampsia includes any of the following:
hypertensive disease during a previous pregnancy
chronic kidney disease
autoimmune disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus or antiphospholipid syndrome
type 1 or type 2 diabetes
chronic hypertension.
Moderate risk of pre-eclampsia includes more than one of the following risk factors:
first pregnancy
age 40 years or older
pregnancy interval of more than 10 years
BMI of ≥35 kg/m2 at first visit
family history of pre-eclampsia
multiple pregnancy.
Calcium supplementation (1.5–2 g/day, orally) is recommended for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in women with low dietary intake of calcium (<600 mg/day),366 to be commenced at the first antenatal clinic.
Vitamins C and E do not decrease pre-eclampsia risk; on the contrary, they are more frequently associated with a birth weight <2.5 kg and adverse perinatal outcomes.367–370
10.4 Management of hypertension in pregnancy
10.4.1 Background
Management of hypertension in pregnancy depends on the BP, gestational age, and the presence of associated maternal and foetal risk factors.
Most women with pre-existing hypertension and normal renal function have non-severe hypertension (140–159/90–109 mmHg) and are at low-risk for cardiovascular complications. Some are able to withdraw their medication in the first half of pregnancy because of the physiological fall in BP.
Evidence-based data regarding treatment of hypertension in pregnancy are lacking. The only trial of treatment of hypertension in pregnancy with adequate infant follow-up (7.5 years) was performed 40 years ago with α-methyldopa.371,372
In terms of treatment benefit, tight vs. less-tight control of hypertension in pregnancy in the Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study was associated with less severe maternal hypertension, but no difference in the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes and overall serious maternal complications.373 However, a secondary analysis of the data showed that women developing severe hypertension had higher rates of adverse maternal (pre-eclampsia, platelets <100 × 109/L, elevated liver enzymes with symptoms, and maternal length of hospital stay ≥10 days) and perinatal outcomes (perinatal death, high-level neonatal care for >48 h, birth weight <10th percentile, pre-eclampsia, and pre-term delivery).374 Thus, there is no evidence currently supporting target BP values in pregnancy.373,375
10.4.2 Non-pharmacological management
Non-pharmacological management of hypertension during pregnancy has a limited role to play, with randomized studies of dietary and lifestyle interventions showing minimal effects on pregnancy outcome.376 Regular exercise might be continued with caution and obese women (≥30 kg/m2) are advised to avoid a weight gain of more than 6.8 kg.377
10.4.3 Pharmacological management
While the goal of treating hypertension is to reduce maternal risk, the agents selected must be effective and safe for the foetus.
10.4.3.1 Treatment of severe hypertension
There is no agreed definition of severe hypertension, with values ranging between 160–180 mmHg to >110 mmHg. This Task Force recommends considering an SBP ≥170 mmHg or DBP ≥110 mmHg in a pregnant woman an emergency, and hospitalization is indicated. The selection of the antihypertensive drug and its route of administration depend on the expected time of delivery. ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors are strictly contraindicated (see section 12). Pharmacological treatment with i.v. labetalol, oral methyldopa, or nifedipine should be initiated; i.v. hydralazine is no longer the drug of choice as its use is associated with more perinatal adverse effects than other drugs.378 However, hydralazine is still commonly used when other treatment regimens have failed to achieve adequate BP control as most obstetricians find its side effect profile acceptable.379 Use of i.v. urapidil can also be considered. Sodium nitroprusside should only be used as the drug of last choice since prolonged treatment is associated with an increased risk of foetal cyanide poisoning.51 The drug of choice when pre-eclampsia is associated with pulmonary oedema is nitroglycerin (glyceryl trinitrate), given as an i.v. infusion of 5 μg/min, and gradually increased every 3–5 min to a maximum dose of 100 μg/min.
10.4.3.2 Treatment of mild–moderate hypertension
Despite a lack of evidence, the European Guidelines9,348,375 recommend the initiation of drug treatment in all women with persistent elevation of BP ≥150/95 mmHg and at values >140/90 mmHg in women with:
gestational hypertension (with or without proteinuria)
pre-existing hypertension with the superimposition of gestational hypertension
hypertension with subclinical organ damage or symptoms at any time during pregnancy.
Methyldopa, beta-blockers (most data available for labetalol), and calcium antagonists (most data available for nifedipine) are the drugs of choice.380,381 Beta-blockers appear to be less effective than calcium antagonists and may induce foetal bradycardia, growth retardation, and hypoglycaemia; consequently, their type and dose should be carefully selected, with atenolol best avoided (see section 12 and Table 7). Women with pre-existing hypertension may continue their current antihypertensive medication unless on ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors, which are contraindicated due to adverse foetal and neonatal outcomes. The plasma volume is reduced in pre-eclampsia, therefore diuretic therapy is best avoided unless in the context of oliguria, when low-dose furosemide may be considered. Delivery of i.v. magnesium sulfate is recommended for the prevention of eclampsia and treatment of seizures, but should not be given concomitantly with CCBs (there is a risk of hypotension due to potential synergism).382
Drugs | Classification (Vaughan Williams for antiarrhythmic drugs) | Former FDA category | Placenta permeable | Transfer to breast milk (foetal dose) | Pre-clinical/clinical safety data |
Abciximab | Monoclonal antibody with antiplatelet effects | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human studies
|
Animal data:
| |||||
ACE inhibitorsa | ACE inhibitor | D | Yes | Yesb (maximum of 1.6%) | Contraindicated
|
Acenocoumarol | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (no adverse effects reported) | Embryopathy (mainly first trimester), bleeding (see discussion in section 5) |
Acetylsalicylic acid (low dose) | Antiplatelet drug | B | Yes | Well tolerated | No teratogenic effects
|
Adenosinec | Antiarrhythmic | C | No | No | No foetal adverse effects reported (limited human data) |
Alirocumab | Lipid-lowering drug (monoclonal antibody) | - | Yes | Unknown | No human data: not recommended |
Animal data:
| |||||
Aliskiren | Renin inhibitor | D | Unknown | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | No use in first trimester; contraindicated in second and third trimesters
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ambrisentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Unknown (contraindicated during breastfeeding) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Amiloride | Diuretic (potassium-sparing) | B | Yes | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Amiodarone | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | `D | Yes | Yes | Thyroid insufficiency (9%), hyperthyroidism, goitre, bradycardia, growth retardation, premature birth |
ARB (sartans) | ARB | D | Unknown | Unknown | Contraindicated
|
Penicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, erythromycin, mezlocillin, cephalosporins | Antibiotics | B | Yes | Yes | No foetal adverse effects reported |
Vancomycin, imipenem, rifampicin, teicoplanin | Antibiotics | C | Unknown | Unknown | Limited data |
Aminoglycosides, quinolones tetracyclines | Antibiotics | D | Unknown | Unknown | Foetal risk: use only when benefit outweighs risk |
Apixaban | Anticoagulant | - | Transplacental passage in ex vivo studies of placental transfer | Extensive secretion into rat milk with the parent drug as the major component | No human data: not recommended |
Animal data:
| |||||
Atenolold | Beta-blocker (Class II) | D | Yes | Yes | Hypospadias (first trimester), birth defects, low birth weight, bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus (second and third trimesters) |
Beraprost | Prostacyclin analogue | - | Unknown | Unknown | No human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Bendroflumethiazide | Diuretic (thiazide) | C | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data |
Bisoprolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yes | Foetal bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Bosentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Unknown | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Bumetanide | Diuretic (loop) | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Cangrelor | Antiplatelet drug | C | Unknown | Unknown | No human data
|
Carvedilol | Αλπηα/βετα-blocker | C | Yes (data from rats; no human data available) | Yes
| No adequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Clopidogrel | Antiplatelet drug | B | Unknown | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | No adequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Colestipol, cholestyramine | Lipid-lowering drugs | C | Unknown | Yes (lowering fat-soluble vitamins) | May impair absorption of fat-soluble vitamins, e.g. vitamin K → cerebral bleeding (neonatal) |
Dabigatran | Anticoagulant | - | Transplacental passage in ex vivo studies of placental transfer | Unknown | No human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Danaparoid | Anticoagulant | B | No | No | Limited human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Digoxine | Cardiac glycoside | C | Yes | Yesb | Serum levels unreliable, safe |
Dihydralazine | Vasodilator | – | Unknown | Yes | Maternal side effects: reflex tachycardia, headache, tachyphylaxis
|
Diltiazem | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | No | Yesb |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Disopyramide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yesb | Uterine contractions
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Dronedarone | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | - | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Not recommended: limited human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Edoxaban | Anticoagulant | - | Unknown | Animal studies show excretion in breast milk; contraindicated in breastfeeding | Contraindicated:
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Enoximone | Phosphodiesterase inhibitor | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human studies
|
Eplerenone | Aldosterone antagonist | B | Unknown | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Epoprostenol | Prostacyclin analogue | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Evolocumab | Lipid-lowering drug (monoclonal antibody) | - | Yes (data in monkeys; no human data available) | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ezetemibe | Lipid-lowering drug | - | Yes (data in rats and rabbits; no human data available) | Unknown (increased plasma concentration in nursing rat pups) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Fenofibrate | Lipid-lowering drug | C | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Flecainide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IC) | C | Yes | Yesb | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Fondaparinux | Anticoagulant | - | Yes (maximum of 10%) | Yes (excreted in rat milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Furosemide | Diuretic (loop) | C | Yes | Well tolerated; milk production can be reduced | Oligohydramnios
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Gemfibrozil | Lipid-lowering drug | C | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Glyceryl trinitrate | Nitrate | C | Unknown | Unknown | Bradycardia, tocolytic |
Animal data:
| |||||
Heparin (low molecular weight) | Anticoagulant | B | No | No |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Heparin (unfractionated) | Anticoagulant | B | No | No | Long-term use: less osteoporosis and thrombocytopenia than UFH, increased risk of maternal bleeding (see further discussion in section 3 for use during pregnancy) |
Hydralazine | Vasodilator | C | Yes | Yes (1%)b |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Hydrochlorothiazide | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Yes; milk production can be reduced | Oligohydramnios
|
Iloprost | Prostacyclin analogue | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:- rats: shortened digits of the thoracic extremity in foetuses and pups at a dosage of 0.01 mg/kg/day in Han-Wistar rats (these alterations are considered to be haemodynamic alterations in the fetoplacental unit and not teratogenic) | |||||
No such digital anomalies or other gross structural abnormalities in Sprague-Dawley rats or monkeys In Sprague-Dawley rats, iloprost clathrate (13% iloprost) significantly increased the number of non-viable foetuses at a maternally toxic oral dosage of 250 mg/kg/day, and in Han-Wistar rats it was found to be embryolethal in 15 of 44 litters at an i.v. dosage of 1 mg/kg/day | |||||
Indapamide | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Isosorbide dinitrate | Nitrate | B | Unknown | Unknown | Bradycardia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Isradipine | Calcium channel blocker | C | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ivabradine | If-channel blocker | - | Yes (transferred to placenta in rats) | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk; contraindicated in breastfeeding) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Labetalol | α/β-blocker | C | Yes | Yesb | Animal data:
|
Levosimendan | Calcium sensitizer | - | Unknown | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Lidocaine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IB) | C | Yes | Yesb | Foetal bradycardia, acidosis, central nervous system toxicity |
Animal data:
| |||||
Macitentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Methyldopa | Central alpha-agonist | B | Yes | Yesb | Mild neonatal hypotension
|
Animal data
| |||||
Metolazone | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Metoprolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus |
Animal data:
| |||||
Mexiletine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IB) | C | Yes | Yesb | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Milrinone | Phosphodiesterase inhibitor | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data
| |||||
Nadolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Unknown | Yes | Foetal bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Nesiritide | Recombinant B-type natriuretic peptide | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Nifedipine | Calcium channel blocker | C | Yes | Yesb (maximum of 1.8%) | Tocolytic; sublingual application and potential synergism with magnesium sulfate may induce hypotension (mother) and foetal hypoxia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Nitroprusside | Vasodilator | C | Yes (animal studies in ewes, crosses the placental barrier) | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Phenprocoumon | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (maximum of 10%), well tolerated as inactive metabolite | Coumarin embryopathy, bleeding (see discussions in sections 3 and 5) |
Prasugrel | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (studies in rats have shown excretion in breast milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Procainamide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yes |
|
Propafenone | Antiarrhythmic (Class IC) | C | Yes | Unknown | Unknown (limited experience) |
Animal data:
| |||||
Propranolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus |
Animal data:
| |||||
Quinidine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yesb | Thrombocytopenia, premature birth, eighth nerve toxicity |
Ranolazine | INa-channel blocker | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Riociguat | Guanylate cyclase stimulator | - | Unknown | Yes (present in rat milk) | Contraindicated |
Animal data:
| |||||
Rivaroxaban | Anticoagulant | - | Yes | Yes (data from animals indicate secretion in milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Sacubitril/valsartan | Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor | - | Unknown | Yes (excreted in the milk of lactating rats) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Selexipag | IP-receptor agonist | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Sildenafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Sotalol | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | B | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Spironolactone | Aldosterone antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (1.2%); milk production can be reduced | Antiandrogenic effects, oral clefts (first trimester)
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Statinsf | Lipid-lowering drugs | X | Yes | Unknown | Congenital anomalies |
Tadalafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Yes (in rats) | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Ticagrelor | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (excretion shown in rat milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ticlopidine | Antiplatelet | C | Unknown | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Torasemide | Diuretic (loop) | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Treprostinil | Prostacyclin analogue | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Triamterene | Diuretic (potassium-sparing) | C | Yes | Yes (excretion shown in animal milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data
| |||||
Urapidil | Aλπηα-1-blocker/5-HT1A agonist | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Vardenafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Unknown | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Verapamil oral | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | Yes | Yesb | Well tolerated |
Animal data:- rabbits (oral, 1.5× RHD): no teratogenicity; rats (oral, 6× RHD): no teratogenicity, but embryocidal, retarded foetal growth and development, and hypotension | |||||
Verapamil i.v. | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | Yes | Yesb | i.v. use is associated with a greater risk of hypotension and subsequent foetal hypoperfusion
|
Vernakalant | Antiarrhythmic | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Vorapaxar | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (excretion shown in rat milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Warfarin | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (maximum of 10%), well tolerated as inactive metabolite | Coumarin embryopathy, bleeding (see discussion in sections 3 and 5 for use during pregnancy) |
Drugs | Classification (Vaughan Williams for antiarrhythmic drugs) | Former FDA category | Placenta permeable | Transfer to breast milk (foetal dose) | Pre-clinical/clinical safety data |
Abciximab | Monoclonal antibody with antiplatelet effects | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human studies
|
Animal data:
| |||||
ACE inhibitorsa | ACE inhibitor | D | Yes | Yesb (maximum of 1.6%) | Contraindicated
|
Acenocoumarol | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (no adverse effects reported) | Embryopathy (mainly first trimester), bleeding (see discussion in section 5) |
Acetylsalicylic acid (low dose) | Antiplatelet drug | B | Yes | Well tolerated | No teratogenic effects
|
Adenosinec | Antiarrhythmic | C | No | No | No foetal adverse effects reported (limited human data) |
Alirocumab | Lipid-lowering drug (monoclonal antibody) | - | Yes | Unknown | No human data: not recommended |
Animal data:
| |||||
Aliskiren | Renin inhibitor | D | Unknown | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | No use in first trimester; contraindicated in second and third trimesters
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ambrisentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Unknown (contraindicated during breastfeeding) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Amiloride | Diuretic (potassium-sparing) | B | Yes | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Amiodarone | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | `D | Yes | Yes | Thyroid insufficiency (9%), hyperthyroidism, goitre, bradycardia, growth retardation, premature birth |
ARB (sartans) | ARB | D | Unknown | Unknown | Contraindicated
|
Penicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, erythromycin, mezlocillin, cephalosporins | Antibiotics | B | Yes | Yes | No foetal adverse effects reported |
Vancomycin, imipenem, rifampicin, teicoplanin | Antibiotics | C | Unknown | Unknown | Limited data |
Aminoglycosides, quinolones tetracyclines | Antibiotics | D | Unknown | Unknown | Foetal risk: use only when benefit outweighs risk |
Apixaban | Anticoagulant | - | Transplacental passage in ex vivo studies of placental transfer | Extensive secretion into rat milk with the parent drug as the major component | No human data: not recommended |
Animal data:
| |||||
Atenolold | Beta-blocker (Class II) | D | Yes | Yes | Hypospadias (first trimester), birth defects, low birth weight, bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus (second and third trimesters) |
Beraprost | Prostacyclin analogue | - | Unknown | Unknown | No human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Bendroflumethiazide | Diuretic (thiazide) | C | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data |
Bisoprolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yes | Foetal bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Bosentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Unknown | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Bumetanide | Diuretic (loop) | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Cangrelor | Antiplatelet drug | C | Unknown | Unknown | No human data
|
Carvedilol | Αλπηα/βετα-blocker | C | Yes (data from rats; no human data available) | Yes
| No adequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Clopidogrel | Antiplatelet drug | B | Unknown | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | No adequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Colestipol, cholestyramine | Lipid-lowering drugs | C | Unknown | Yes (lowering fat-soluble vitamins) | May impair absorption of fat-soluble vitamins, e.g. vitamin K → cerebral bleeding (neonatal) |
Dabigatran | Anticoagulant | - | Transplacental passage in ex vivo studies of placental transfer | Unknown | No human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Danaparoid | Anticoagulant | B | No | No | Limited human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Digoxine | Cardiac glycoside | C | Yes | Yesb | Serum levels unreliable, safe |
Dihydralazine | Vasodilator | – | Unknown | Yes | Maternal side effects: reflex tachycardia, headache, tachyphylaxis
|
Diltiazem | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | No | Yesb |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Disopyramide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yesb | Uterine contractions
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Dronedarone | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | - | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Not recommended: limited human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Edoxaban | Anticoagulant | - | Unknown | Animal studies show excretion in breast milk; contraindicated in breastfeeding | Contraindicated:
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Enoximone | Phosphodiesterase inhibitor | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human studies
|
Eplerenone | Aldosterone antagonist | B | Unknown | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Epoprostenol | Prostacyclin analogue | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Evolocumab | Lipid-lowering drug (monoclonal antibody) | - | Yes (data in monkeys; no human data available) | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ezetemibe | Lipid-lowering drug | - | Yes (data in rats and rabbits; no human data available) | Unknown (increased plasma concentration in nursing rat pups) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Fenofibrate | Lipid-lowering drug | C | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Flecainide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IC) | C | Yes | Yesb | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Fondaparinux | Anticoagulant | - | Yes (maximum of 10%) | Yes (excreted in rat milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Furosemide | Diuretic (loop) | C | Yes | Well tolerated; milk production can be reduced | Oligohydramnios
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Gemfibrozil | Lipid-lowering drug | C | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Glyceryl trinitrate | Nitrate | C | Unknown | Unknown | Bradycardia, tocolytic |
Animal data:
| |||||
Heparin (low molecular weight) | Anticoagulant | B | No | No |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Heparin (unfractionated) | Anticoagulant | B | No | No | Long-term use: less osteoporosis and thrombocytopenia than UFH, increased risk of maternal bleeding (see further discussion in section 3 for use during pregnancy) |
Hydralazine | Vasodilator | C | Yes | Yes (1%)b |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Hydrochlorothiazide | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Yes; milk production can be reduced | Oligohydramnios
|
Iloprost | Prostacyclin analogue | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:- rats: shortened digits of the thoracic extremity in foetuses and pups at a dosage of 0.01 mg/kg/day in Han-Wistar rats (these alterations are considered to be haemodynamic alterations in the fetoplacental unit and not teratogenic) | |||||
No such digital anomalies or other gross structural abnormalities in Sprague-Dawley rats or monkeys In Sprague-Dawley rats, iloprost clathrate (13% iloprost) significantly increased the number of non-viable foetuses at a maternally toxic oral dosage of 250 mg/kg/day, and in Han-Wistar rats it was found to be embryolethal in 15 of 44 litters at an i.v. dosage of 1 mg/kg/day | |||||
Indapamide | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Isosorbide dinitrate | Nitrate | B | Unknown | Unknown | Bradycardia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Isradipine | Calcium channel blocker | C | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ivabradine | If-channel blocker | - | Yes (transferred to placenta in rats) | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk; contraindicated in breastfeeding) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Labetalol | α/β-blocker | C | Yes | Yesb | Animal data:
|
Levosimendan | Calcium sensitizer | - | Unknown | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Lidocaine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IB) | C | Yes | Yesb | Foetal bradycardia, acidosis, central nervous system toxicity |
Animal data:
| |||||
Macitentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Methyldopa | Central alpha-agonist | B | Yes | Yesb | Mild neonatal hypotension
|
Animal data
| |||||
Metolazone | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Metoprolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus |
Animal data:
| |||||
Mexiletine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IB) | C | Yes | Yesb | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Milrinone | Phosphodiesterase inhibitor | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data
| |||||
Nadolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Unknown | Yes | Foetal bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Nesiritide | Recombinant B-type natriuretic peptide | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Nifedipine | Calcium channel blocker | C | Yes | Yesb (maximum of 1.8%) | Tocolytic; sublingual application and potential synergism with magnesium sulfate may induce hypotension (mother) and foetal hypoxia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Nitroprusside | Vasodilator | C | Yes (animal studies in ewes, crosses the placental barrier) | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Phenprocoumon | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (maximum of 10%), well tolerated as inactive metabolite | Coumarin embryopathy, bleeding (see discussions in sections 3 and 5) |
Prasugrel | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (studies in rats have shown excretion in breast milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Procainamide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yes |
|
Propafenone | Antiarrhythmic (Class IC) | C | Yes | Unknown | Unknown (limited experience) |
Animal data:
| |||||
Propranolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus |
Animal data:
| |||||
Quinidine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yesb | Thrombocytopenia, premature birth, eighth nerve toxicity |
Ranolazine | INa-channel blocker | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Riociguat | Guanylate cyclase stimulator | - | Unknown | Yes (present in rat milk) | Contraindicated |
Animal data:
| |||||
Rivaroxaban | Anticoagulant | - | Yes | Yes (data from animals indicate secretion in milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Sacubitril/valsartan | Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor | - | Unknown | Yes (excreted in the milk of lactating rats) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Selexipag | IP-receptor agonist | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Sildenafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Sotalol | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | B | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Spironolactone | Aldosterone antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (1.2%); milk production can be reduced | Antiandrogenic effects, oral clefts (first trimester)
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Statinsf | Lipid-lowering drugs | X | Yes | Unknown | Congenital anomalies |
Tadalafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Yes (in rats) | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Ticagrelor | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (excretion shown in rat milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ticlopidine | Antiplatelet | C | Unknown | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Torasemide | Diuretic (loop) | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Treprostinil | Prostacyclin analogue | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Triamterene | Diuretic (potassium-sparing) | C | Yes | Yes (excretion shown in animal milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data
| |||||
Urapidil | Aλπηα-1-blocker/5-HT1A agonist | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Vardenafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Unknown | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Verapamil oral | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | Yes | Yesb | Well tolerated |
Animal data:- rabbits (oral, 1.5× RHD): no teratogenicity; rats (oral, 6× RHD): no teratogenicity, but embryocidal, retarded foetal growth and development, and hypotension | |||||
Verapamil i.v. | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | Yes | Yesb | i.v. use is associated with a greater risk of hypotension and subsequent foetal hypoperfusion
|
Vernakalant | Antiarrhythmic | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Vorapaxar | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (excretion shown in rat milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Warfarin | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (maximum of 10%), well tolerated as inactive metabolite | Coumarin embryopathy, bleeding (see discussion in sections 3 and 5 for use during pregnancy) |
For older substances, the former FDA classification is given wherever available; for newer substances released after 30 June 2015, the FDA classification has been replaced with detailed information from www.ema.europa.eu/, www.accessdata.fda.gov, http://www.embryotox.de, or from prescription labels provided by manufacturers.
ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; AUC = area under the curve; FDA = US Food and Drug Administration; 5-HT1A = 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin); i.v. = intravenous; KLH = keyhole limpet haemocyanin; MRHD = maximum recommended human dose; RAAS = renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system; RHD = recommended human dose; UFH = unfractionated heparin; VTE = venous thrombo-embolism.
The available data on first trimester use do not strongly support teratogenic potential.435,436 Because ACE inhibitors, ARBs, aldosterone antagonists, and renin inhibitors should be avoided during pregnancy and breastfeeding the risk category is D. Positive outcomes with ACE inhibitors have been described and pregnancy does not have to be terminated if the patient was exposed to these medications, but should be followed-up closely.
Breastfeeding is possible if the mother is treated with the drug.437
Adenosine: Most experiences with this drug are in the second and third trimesters. Its short half-life may prevent it from reaching the foetus.
Digoxin: The experience with digoxin is extensive, and it is considered to be the safest antiarrhythmic drug during pregnancy. A prophylactic antiarrhythmic efficacy has never been demonstrated.
Statins: These should not be prescribed in pregnancy and during breastfeeding since their harmlessness is not proven. There are no expected disadvantages to the mother from a temporary interruption of the therapy during pregnancy.
Drugs | Classification (Vaughan Williams for antiarrhythmic drugs) | Former FDA category | Placenta permeable | Transfer to breast milk (foetal dose) | Pre-clinical/clinical safety data |
Abciximab | Monoclonal antibody with antiplatelet effects | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human studies
|
Animal data:
| |||||
ACE inhibitorsa | ACE inhibitor | D | Yes | Yesb (maximum of 1.6%) | Contraindicated
|
Acenocoumarol | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (no adverse effects reported) | Embryopathy (mainly first trimester), bleeding (see discussion in section 5) |
Acetylsalicylic acid (low dose) | Antiplatelet drug | B | Yes | Well tolerated | No teratogenic effects
|
Adenosinec | Antiarrhythmic | C | No | No | No foetal adverse effects reported (limited human data) |
Alirocumab | Lipid-lowering drug (monoclonal antibody) | - | Yes | Unknown | No human data: not recommended |
Animal data:
| |||||
Aliskiren | Renin inhibitor | D | Unknown | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | No use in first trimester; contraindicated in second and third trimesters
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ambrisentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Unknown (contraindicated during breastfeeding) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Amiloride | Diuretic (potassium-sparing) | B | Yes | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Amiodarone | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | `D | Yes | Yes | Thyroid insufficiency (9%), hyperthyroidism, goitre, bradycardia, growth retardation, premature birth |
ARB (sartans) | ARB | D | Unknown | Unknown | Contraindicated
|
Penicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, erythromycin, mezlocillin, cephalosporins | Antibiotics | B | Yes | Yes | No foetal adverse effects reported |
Vancomycin, imipenem, rifampicin, teicoplanin | Antibiotics | C | Unknown | Unknown | Limited data |
Aminoglycosides, quinolones tetracyclines | Antibiotics | D | Unknown | Unknown | Foetal risk: use only when benefit outweighs risk |
Apixaban | Anticoagulant | - | Transplacental passage in ex vivo studies of placental transfer | Extensive secretion into rat milk with the parent drug as the major component | No human data: not recommended |
Animal data:
| |||||
Atenolold | Beta-blocker (Class II) | D | Yes | Yes | Hypospadias (first trimester), birth defects, low birth weight, bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus (second and third trimesters) |
Beraprost | Prostacyclin analogue | - | Unknown | Unknown | No human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Bendroflumethiazide | Diuretic (thiazide) | C | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data |
Bisoprolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yes | Foetal bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Bosentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Unknown | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Bumetanide | Diuretic (loop) | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Cangrelor | Antiplatelet drug | C | Unknown | Unknown | No human data
|
Carvedilol | Αλπηα/βετα-blocker | C | Yes (data from rats; no human data available) | Yes
| No adequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Clopidogrel | Antiplatelet drug | B | Unknown | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | No adequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Colestipol, cholestyramine | Lipid-lowering drugs | C | Unknown | Yes (lowering fat-soluble vitamins) | May impair absorption of fat-soluble vitamins, e.g. vitamin K → cerebral bleeding (neonatal) |
Dabigatran | Anticoagulant | - | Transplacental passage in ex vivo studies of placental transfer | Unknown | No human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Danaparoid | Anticoagulant | B | No | No | Limited human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Digoxine | Cardiac glycoside | C | Yes | Yesb | Serum levels unreliable, safe |
Dihydralazine | Vasodilator | – | Unknown | Yes | Maternal side effects: reflex tachycardia, headache, tachyphylaxis
|
Diltiazem | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | No | Yesb |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Disopyramide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yesb | Uterine contractions
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Dronedarone | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | - | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Not recommended: limited human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Edoxaban | Anticoagulant | - | Unknown | Animal studies show excretion in breast milk; contraindicated in breastfeeding | Contraindicated:
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Enoximone | Phosphodiesterase inhibitor | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human studies
|
Eplerenone | Aldosterone antagonist | B | Unknown | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Epoprostenol | Prostacyclin analogue | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Evolocumab | Lipid-lowering drug (monoclonal antibody) | - | Yes (data in monkeys; no human data available) | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ezetemibe | Lipid-lowering drug | - | Yes (data in rats and rabbits; no human data available) | Unknown (increased plasma concentration in nursing rat pups) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Fenofibrate | Lipid-lowering drug | C | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Flecainide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IC) | C | Yes | Yesb | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Fondaparinux | Anticoagulant | - | Yes (maximum of 10%) | Yes (excreted in rat milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Furosemide | Diuretic (loop) | C | Yes | Well tolerated; milk production can be reduced | Oligohydramnios
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Gemfibrozil | Lipid-lowering drug | C | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Glyceryl trinitrate | Nitrate | C | Unknown | Unknown | Bradycardia, tocolytic |
Animal data:
| |||||
Heparin (low molecular weight) | Anticoagulant | B | No | No |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Heparin (unfractionated) | Anticoagulant | B | No | No | Long-term use: less osteoporosis and thrombocytopenia than UFH, increased risk of maternal bleeding (see further discussion in section 3 for use during pregnancy) |
Hydralazine | Vasodilator | C | Yes | Yes (1%)b |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Hydrochlorothiazide | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Yes; milk production can be reduced | Oligohydramnios
|
Iloprost | Prostacyclin analogue | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:- rats: shortened digits of the thoracic extremity in foetuses and pups at a dosage of 0.01 mg/kg/day in Han-Wistar rats (these alterations are considered to be haemodynamic alterations in the fetoplacental unit and not teratogenic) | |||||
No such digital anomalies or other gross structural abnormalities in Sprague-Dawley rats or monkeys In Sprague-Dawley rats, iloprost clathrate (13% iloprost) significantly increased the number of non-viable foetuses at a maternally toxic oral dosage of 250 mg/kg/day, and in Han-Wistar rats it was found to be embryolethal in 15 of 44 litters at an i.v. dosage of 1 mg/kg/day | |||||
Indapamide | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Isosorbide dinitrate | Nitrate | B | Unknown | Unknown | Bradycardia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Isradipine | Calcium channel blocker | C | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ivabradine | If-channel blocker | - | Yes (transferred to placenta in rats) | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk; contraindicated in breastfeeding) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Labetalol | α/β-blocker | C | Yes | Yesb | Animal data:
|
Levosimendan | Calcium sensitizer | - | Unknown | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Lidocaine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IB) | C | Yes | Yesb | Foetal bradycardia, acidosis, central nervous system toxicity |
Animal data:
| |||||
Macitentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Methyldopa | Central alpha-agonist | B | Yes | Yesb | Mild neonatal hypotension
|
Animal data
| |||||
Metolazone | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Metoprolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus |
Animal data:
| |||||
Mexiletine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IB) | C | Yes | Yesb | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Milrinone | Phosphodiesterase inhibitor | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data
| |||||
Nadolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Unknown | Yes | Foetal bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Nesiritide | Recombinant B-type natriuretic peptide | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Nifedipine | Calcium channel blocker | C | Yes | Yesb (maximum of 1.8%) | Tocolytic; sublingual application and potential synergism with magnesium sulfate may induce hypotension (mother) and foetal hypoxia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Nitroprusside | Vasodilator | C | Yes (animal studies in ewes, crosses the placental barrier) | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Phenprocoumon | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (maximum of 10%), well tolerated as inactive metabolite | Coumarin embryopathy, bleeding (see discussions in sections 3 and 5) |
Prasugrel | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (studies in rats have shown excretion in breast milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Procainamide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yes |
|
Propafenone | Antiarrhythmic (Class IC) | C | Yes | Unknown | Unknown (limited experience) |
Animal data:
| |||||
Propranolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus |
Animal data:
| |||||
Quinidine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yesb | Thrombocytopenia, premature birth, eighth nerve toxicity |
Ranolazine | INa-channel blocker | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Riociguat | Guanylate cyclase stimulator | - | Unknown | Yes (present in rat milk) | Contraindicated |
Animal data:
| |||||
Rivaroxaban | Anticoagulant | - | Yes | Yes (data from animals indicate secretion in milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Sacubitril/valsartan | Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor | - | Unknown | Yes (excreted in the milk of lactating rats) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Selexipag | IP-receptor agonist | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Sildenafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Sotalol | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | B | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Spironolactone | Aldosterone antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (1.2%); milk production can be reduced | Antiandrogenic effects, oral clefts (first trimester)
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Statinsf | Lipid-lowering drugs | X | Yes | Unknown | Congenital anomalies |
Tadalafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Yes (in rats) | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Ticagrelor | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (excretion shown in rat milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ticlopidine | Antiplatelet | C | Unknown | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Torasemide | Diuretic (loop) | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Treprostinil | Prostacyclin analogue | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Triamterene | Diuretic (potassium-sparing) | C | Yes | Yes (excretion shown in animal milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data
| |||||
Urapidil | Aλπηα-1-blocker/5-HT1A agonist | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Vardenafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Unknown | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Verapamil oral | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | Yes | Yesb | Well tolerated |
Animal data:- rabbits (oral, 1.5× RHD): no teratogenicity; rats (oral, 6× RHD): no teratogenicity, but embryocidal, retarded foetal growth and development, and hypotension | |||||
Verapamil i.v. | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | Yes | Yesb | i.v. use is associated with a greater risk of hypotension and subsequent foetal hypoperfusion
|
Vernakalant | Antiarrhythmic | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Vorapaxar | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (excretion shown in rat milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Warfarin | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (maximum of 10%), well tolerated as inactive metabolite | Coumarin embryopathy, bleeding (see discussion in sections 3 and 5 for use during pregnancy) |
Drugs | Classification (Vaughan Williams for antiarrhythmic drugs) | Former FDA category | Placenta permeable | Transfer to breast milk (foetal dose) | Pre-clinical/clinical safety data |
Abciximab | Monoclonal antibody with antiplatelet effects | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human studies
|
Animal data:
| |||||
ACE inhibitorsa | ACE inhibitor | D | Yes | Yesb (maximum of 1.6%) | Contraindicated
|
Acenocoumarol | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (no adverse effects reported) | Embryopathy (mainly first trimester), bleeding (see discussion in section 5) |
Acetylsalicylic acid (low dose) | Antiplatelet drug | B | Yes | Well tolerated | No teratogenic effects
|
Adenosinec | Antiarrhythmic | C | No | No | No foetal adverse effects reported (limited human data) |
Alirocumab | Lipid-lowering drug (monoclonal antibody) | - | Yes | Unknown | No human data: not recommended |
Animal data:
| |||||
Aliskiren | Renin inhibitor | D | Unknown | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | No use in first trimester; contraindicated in second and third trimesters
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ambrisentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Unknown (contraindicated during breastfeeding) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Amiloride | Diuretic (potassium-sparing) | B | Yes | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Amiodarone | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | `D | Yes | Yes | Thyroid insufficiency (9%), hyperthyroidism, goitre, bradycardia, growth retardation, premature birth |
ARB (sartans) | ARB | D | Unknown | Unknown | Contraindicated
|
Penicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, erythromycin, mezlocillin, cephalosporins | Antibiotics | B | Yes | Yes | No foetal adverse effects reported |
Vancomycin, imipenem, rifampicin, teicoplanin | Antibiotics | C | Unknown | Unknown | Limited data |
Aminoglycosides, quinolones tetracyclines | Antibiotics | D | Unknown | Unknown | Foetal risk: use only when benefit outweighs risk |
Apixaban | Anticoagulant | - | Transplacental passage in ex vivo studies of placental transfer | Extensive secretion into rat milk with the parent drug as the major component | No human data: not recommended |
Animal data:
| |||||
Atenolold | Beta-blocker (Class II) | D | Yes | Yes | Hypospadias (first trimester), birth defects, low birth weight, bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus (second and third trimesters) |
Beraprost | Prostacyclin analogue | - | Unknown | Unknown | No human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Bendroflumethiazide | Diuretic (thiazide) | C | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data |
Bisoprolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yes | Foetal bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Bosentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Unknown | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Bumetanide | Diuretic (loop) | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Cangrelor | Antiplatelet drug | C | Unknown | Unknown | No human data
|
Carvedilol | Αλπηα/βετα-blocker | C | Yes (data from rats; no human data available) | Yes
| No adequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Clopidogrel | Antiplatelet drug | B | Unknown | Yes (secreted in rat milk) | No adequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Colestipol, cholestyramine | Lipid-lowering drugs | C | Unknown | Yes (lowering fat-soluble vitamins) | May impair absorption of fat-soluble vitamins, e.g. vitamin K → cerebral bleeding (neonatal) |
Dabigatran | Anticoagulant | - | Transplacental passage in ex vivo studies of placental transfer | Unknown | No human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Danaparoid | Anticoagulant | B | No | No | Limited human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Digoxine | Cardiac glycoside | C | Yes | Yesb | Serum levels unreliable, safe |
Dihydralazine | Vasodilator | – | Unknown | Yes | Maternal side effects: reflex tachycardia, headache, tachyphylaxis
|
Diltiazem | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | No | Yesb |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Disopyramide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yesb | Uterine contractions
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Dronedarone | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | - | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Not recommended: limited human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Edoxaban | Anticoagulant | - | Unknown | Animal studies show excretion in breast milk; contraindicated in breastfeeding | Contraindicated:
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Enoximone | Phosphodiesterase inhibitor | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human studies
|
Eplerenone | Aldosterone antagonist | B | Unknown | Yes (data from animals; no human data available) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Epoprostenol | Prostacyclin analogue | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Evolocumab | Lipid-lowering drug (monoclonal antibody) | - | Yes (data in monkeys; no human data available) | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ezetemibe | Lipid-lowering drug | - | Yes (data in rats and rabbits; no human data available) | Unknown (increased plasma concentration in nursing rat pups) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Fenofibrate | Lipid-lowering drug | C | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Flecainide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IC) | C | Yes | Yesb | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Fondaparinux | Anticoagulant | - | Yes (maximum of 10%) | Yes (excreted in rat milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Furosemide | Diuretic (loop) | C | Yes | Well tolerated; milk production can be reduced | Oligohydramnios
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Gemfibrozil | Lipid-lowering drug | C | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Glyceryl trinitrate | Nitrate | C | Unknown | Unknown | Bradycardia, tocolytic |
Animal data:
| |||||
Heparin (low molecular weight) | Anticoagulant | B | No | No |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Heparin (unfractionated) | Anticoagulant | B | No | No | Long-term use: less osteoporosis and thrombocytopenia than UFH, increased risk of maternal bleeding (see further discussion in section 3 for use during pregnancy) |
Hydralazine | Vasodilator | C | Yes | Yes (1%)b |
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Hydrochlorothiazide | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Yes; milk production can be reduced | Oligohydramnios
|
Iloprost | Prostacyclin analogue | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:- rats: shortened digits of the thoracic extremity in foetuses and pups at a dosage of 0.01 mg/kg/day in Han-Wistar rats (these alterations are considered to be haemodynamic alterations in the fetoplacental unit and not teratogenic) | |||||
No such digital anomalies or other gross structural abnormalities in Sprague-Dawley rats or monkeys In Sprague-Dawley rats, iloprost clathrate (13% iloprost) significantly increased the number of non-viable foetuses at a maternally toxic oral dosage of 250 mg/kg/day, and in Han-Wistar rats it was found to be embryolethal in 15 of 44 litters at an i.v. dosage of 1 mg/kg/day | |||||
Indapamide | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Isosorbide dinitrate | Nitrate | B | Unknown | Unknown | Bradycardia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Isradipine | Calcium channel blocker | C | Yes | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ivabradine | If-channel blocker | - | Yes (transferred to placenta in rats) | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk; contraindicated in breastfeeding) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Labetalol | α/β-blocker | C | Yes | Yesb | Animal data:
|
Levosimendan | Calcium sensitizer | - | Unknown | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Lidocaine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IB) | C | Yes | Yesb | Foetal bradycardia, acidosis, central nervous system toxicity |
Animal data:
| |||||
Macitentan | Endothelin receptor antagonist | X | Unknown | Yes (animal studies show excretion in breast milk) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Methyldopa | Central alpha-agonist | B | Yes | Yesb | Mild neonatal hypotension
|
Animal data
| |||||
Metolazone | Diuretic (thiazide) | B | Yes | Yes | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Metoprolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus |
Animal data:
| |||||
Mexiletine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IB) | C | Yes | Yesb | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Milrinone | Phosphodiesterase inhibitor | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data
| |||||
Nadolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Unknown | Yes | Foetal bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Nesiritide | Recombinant B-type natriuretic peptide | C | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Nifedipine | Calcium channel blocker | C | Yes | Yesb (maximum of 1.8%) | Tocolytic; sublingual application and potential synergism with magnesium sulfate may induce hypotension (mother) and foetal hypoxia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Nitroprusside | Vasodilator | C | Yes (animal studies in ewes, crosses the placental barrier) | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Phenprocoumon | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (maximum of 10%), well tolerated as inactive metabolite | Coumarin embryopathy, bleeding (see discussions in sections 3 and 5) |
Prasugrel | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (studies in rats have shown excretion in breast milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Procainamide | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yes |
|
Propafenone | Antiarrhythmic (Class IC) | C | Yes | Unknown | Unknown (limited experience) |
Animal data:
| |||||
Propranolol | Beta-blocker (Class II) | C | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia in foetus |
Animal data:
| |||||
Quinidine | Antiarrhythmic (Class IA) | C | Yes | Yesb | Thrombocytopenia, premature birth, eighth nerve toxicity |
Ranolazine | INa-channel blocker | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Riociguat | Guanylate cyclase stimulator | - | Unknown | Yes (present in rat milk) | Contraindicated |
Animal data:
| |||||
Rivaroxaban | Anticoagulant | - | Yes | Yes (data from animals indicate secretion in milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Sacubitril/valsartan | Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor | - | Unknown | Yes (excreted in the milk of lactating rats) | Contraindicated
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Selexipag | IP-receptor agonist | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Sildenafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Sotalol | Antiarrhythmic (Class III) | B | Yes | Yesb | Bradycardia and hypoglycaemia |
Animal data:
| |||||
Spironolactone | Aldosterone antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (1.2%); milk production can be reduced | Antiandrogenic effects, oral clefts (first trimester)
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Statinsf | Lipid-lowering drugs | X | Yes | Unknown | Congenital anomalies |
Tadalafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Yes (in rats) | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Ticagrelor | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (excretion shown in rat milk) | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Ticlopidine | Antiplatelet | C | Unknown | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Torasemide | Diuretic (loop) | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Treprostinil | Prostacyclin analogue | B | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data
|
Animal data:
| |||||
Triamterene | Diuretic (potassium-sparing) | C | Yes | Yes (excretion shown in animal milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data
| |||||
Urapidil | Aλπηα-1-blocker/5-HT1A agonist | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Vardenafil | Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor | B | Unknown | Yes (in rats) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Verapamil oral | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | Yes | Yesb | Well tolerated |
Animal data:- rabbits (oral, 1.5× RHD): no teratogenicity; rats (oral, 6× RHD): no teratogenicity, but embryocidal, retarded foetal growth and development, and hypotension | |||||
Verapamil i.v. | Calcium channel blocker (Class IV) | C | Yes | Yesb | i.v. use is associated with a greater risk of hypotension and subsequent foetal hypoperfusion
|
Vernakalant | Antiarrhythmic | - | Unknown | Unknown | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Vorapaxar | Antiplatelet drug | - | Unknown | Yes (excretion shown in rat milk) | Inadequate human data |
Animal data:
| |||||
Warfarin | Vitamin K antagonist | D | Yes | Yes (maximum of 10%), well tolerated as inactive metabolite | Coumarin embryopathy, bleeding (see discussion in sections 3 and 5 for use during pregnancy) |
For older substances, the former FDA classification is given wherever available; for newer substances released after 30 June 2015, the FDA classification has been replaced with detailed information from www.ema.europa.eu/, www.accessdata.fda.gov, http://www.embryotox.de, or from prescription labels provided by manufacturers.
ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; AUC = area under the curve; FDA = US Food and Drug Administration; 5-HT1A = 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin); i.v. = intravenous; KLH = keyhole limpet haemocyanin; MRHD = maximum recommended human dose; RAAS = renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system; RHD = recommended human dose; UFH = unfractionated heparin; VTE = venous thrombo-embolism.
The available data on first trimester use do not strongly support teratogenic potential.435,436 Because ACE inhibitors, ARBs, aldosterone antagonists, and renin inhibitors should be avoided during pregnancy and breastfeeding the risk category is D. Positive outcomes with ACE inhibitors have been described and pregnancy does not have to be terminated if the patient was exposed to these medications, but should be followed-up closely.
Breastfeeding is possible if the mother is treated with the drug.437
Adenosine: Most experiences with this drug are in the second and third trimesters. Its short half-life may prevent it from reaching the foetus.
Digoxin: The experience with digoxin is extensive, and it is considered to be the safest antiarrhythmic drug during pregnancy. A prophylactic antiarrhythmic efficacy has never been demonstrated.
Statins: These should not be prescribed in pregnancy and during breastfeeding since their harmlessness is not proven. There are no expected disadvantages to the mother from a temporary interruption of the therapy during pregnancy.
10.5 Delivery
Delivery is indicated in pre-eclampsia with visual disturbances or haemostatic disorders, and at 37 weeks in asymptomatic women.383
10.6 Prognosis after pregnancy
10.6.1 Blood pressure post-partum
Post-partum hypertension is common in the first week. Methyldopa should be avoided because of the risk of post-partum depression.384
10.6.2 Hypertension and lactation
Breastfeeding does not increase BP in the nursing mother. Cabergoline, rather than bromocriptine, is recommended for lactation suppression. However, there is some evidence that bromocriptine might be beneficial in PPCM,264 although it may induce hypertension.
All antihypertensive agents taken by the nursing mother are excreted into breast milk.385 Most of the antihypertensive drugs are present at very low concentrations, except for propranolol and nifedipine, which have breast milk concentrations similar to those in maternal plasma.
10.6.3 Risk of recurrence of hypertensive disorders in a subsequent pregnancy
Women experiencing hypertension in their first pregnancy are at increased risk in a subsequent pregnancy. The earlier the onset of hypertension in the first pregnancy, the higher the risk of recurrence in a subsequent pregnancy.
10.6.4 Long-term cardiovascular consequences of gestational hypertension
Women who develop gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia are at increased risk of hypertension, stroke, and ischaemic heart disease in later adult life.386,387 Lifestyle modifications are primarily indicated to avoid complications in subsequent pregnancies and to reduce maternal cardiovascular risk in the future. Therefore, annual visits to a primary care physician to check BP and metabolic factors are recommended.
10.6.5 Fertility treatment
There is no clear evidence that fertility treatment increases the risk of hypertension or pre-eclampsia.388
10.7 Recommendations
11. Venous thrombo-embolic disease during pregnancy and the puerperium
11.1 Epidemiology and maternal risk
VTE, encompassing PE and deep vein/venous thrombosis (DVT), represents a significant cause of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality. Pregnancy and the puerperium are associated with an increased incidence of VTE occurring in around 0.05–0.20% of all pregnancies,390–393 and rates of PE of around 0.03%.394,395 PE is the most common cause of direct maternal death in the UK, with an incidence of 1.26 deaths per 100 000 pregnancies, and it is the fifth most common cause of maternal death overall.3 The case fatality rate is 3.5%.396 The risk of VTE is highest in the immediate post-partum period with rates of nearly 0.5% reported,394,397 and returns to the non-pregnant level after the sixth week post-partum.390,394,397 In women with previous VTE, recurrence rates are 7.6%, and in a high-risk population rates are 5.5% despite the use of LMWH.398,399 Consequently, a high index of suspicion and a low threshold for investigation must be maintained in pregnant women in general and in high-risk women specifically. The current background information and detailed discussion of the data for the following section of these Guidelines can be found in ESC CardioMed.
11.2 Risk factors for pregnancy-related venous thrombo-embolism and risk stratification
The presence of one risk factor increases the rate of VTE from 0.02 to 0.05%.397,400 Consequently, all women should undergo a documented assessment of risk factors for VTE before pregnancy or in early pregnancy.401 Based on this, women can be classified as being at high, intermediate, or low-risk of VTE and preventative measures applied accordingly.401 Previous unprovoked recurrent VTEs and previous VTE—unprovoked or oestrogen-related—are considered high-risk factors.
11.3 Prevention of venous thrombo-embolism
Prospective, non-randomized studies have shown that in women with risk factors not receiving anticoagulation, the recurrence rate of VTE ranged from 2.4–12.2%, in comparison with 0–5.5% in patients who did receive anticoagulation.399,402 LMWH has become the drug of choice for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pregnant patients.13 It causes less bone loss than UFH, and the osteoporotic fracture rate is lower (0.04% of pregnant women treated with LMWH).13 The initial dose of LMWH for thromboprophylaxis should be based on the booking weight (body weight at the first antenatal appointment with the gynaecologist, e.g. 8–10 weeks of pregnancy) since weight-based LMWH regimens have been shown to achieve prophylactic anti-Xa levels more effectively.403 Consequently, patients at high-risk for VTE should receive prophylactic enoxaparin at 0.5 IU/kg of body weight once daily403 or another LMWH at equivalent doses, according to local practice. In morbidly obese women, weight-based dosing instead of fixed dosing is more appropriate in order to achieve adequate anti-Xa concentrations.404
11.4 Management of acute venous thrombo-embolism
11.4.1 Pulmonary embolism
11.4.1.1 Clinical presentation
The symptoms and signs of PE during pregnancy are the same as in the non-pregnant state (dyspnoea, chest pain, tachycardia, haemoptysis, and collapse). However, subjective clinical assessment of PE is more difficult because dyspnoea and tachycardia are relatively common in normal pregnancy.
11.4.1.2 Diagnosis
Clinical prediction rules for assigning pre-test probabilities of VTE have been validated and diagnostic algorithms established in the non-pregnant patient. These include the use of D-dimer testing, compression ultrasonography, CT pulmonary angiography, and ventilation/perfusion lung scanning.405 This is not the case in pregnant women.406 A high index of suspicion is important, and all pregnant women with signs and symptoms suggestive of VTE should have objective testing performed urgently and receive therapeutic anticoagulation until the diagnosis is established.
D-dimer levels increase physiologically with each trimester. In one study, the mean [standard deviation (SD)] preconception D-dimer concentration was 0.43 (0.49) mg/L, and rose in the first, second, and third trimesters to 0.58 (SD 0.36), 0.83 (SD 0.46), and 1.16 (SD 0.57) mg/L, respectively, indicating a 39% relative increase in D-dimer concentration for each trimester.407 Thus, a positive D-dimer test in pregnancy is not necessarily indicative of VTE and further objective testing is required. A negative D-dimer test helps to exclude VTE outside pregnancy, but normal D-dimer concentrations have been reported in pregnant women with VTE,408 meaning that imaging remains the diagnostic test of choice during pregnancy.409 Currently, the optimal diagnostic approach for the pregnant patient with suspected PE is uncertain.410 A modified Wells score may be useful alone or in combination with D-dimer testing to stratify women into those needing imaging, allowing the remainder to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure,411,412 but this awaits further study.
If the index of suspicion of DVT remains high, then compression ultrasound should be performed, and if this is abnormal then anticoagulation is indicated. If compression ultrasonography is negative, then further testing is required and MRI should be performed. Where PE is suspected and all other investigations are normal, low-dose CT should be undertaken.
1.4.1.3 Treatment
LMWH: LMWH has become the drug of choice for the treatment of VTE in pregnancy and the puerperium. In suspected DVT or PE, therapeutic LMWH should be given until the diagnosis is excluded by objective testing.
Dosage: The recommended therapeutic dose is calculated on early pregnancy body weight (e.g. enoxaparin 1 mg/kg body weight twice daily, dalteparin 100 IU/kg body weight twice daily, or tinzaparin 175 IU/kg), aiming for 4–6 h peak anti-Xa values of 0.6–1.2 IU/mL.413
Monitoring (see section 12)
UFH: Typically, UFH is used in the acute treatment of massive pulmonary emboli. For details on management, see section 12.
Thrombolysis: Thrombolytics should only be used in patients with severe hypotension or shock405 (see section 12). When thrombolysis has been given, the loading dose of UFH should be omitted and an infusion started at a rate of 18 U/kg/h. After stabilization of the patient, UFH can be switched to LMWH.
Fondaparinux: Fondaparinux (7.5 mg once a day in normal-weight pregnant women) can be considered if there is an allergy or adverse response to LMWH (see section 12).
Vena cava filters: Indications for vena cava filters are the same as in non-pregnant patients. However, there is limited experience with their use and the risk associated with the procedure may be increased.405,414
Post-partum management: In patients with recent PE, pre-partum heparin treatment should be restarted 6 h after a vaginal birth and 12 h after a caesarean delivery, if no significant bleeding has occurred, with subsequent overlap with VKAs for at least 5 days. VKAs may be started on the second day after delivery and continued for at least 3 months, or for 6 months if PE occurred late in pregnancy. The INR should be between 2 and 3 and needs regular monitoring, ideally every 1–2 weeks. VKAs do not enter the breast milk in active forms and are safe for nursing mothers.
11.4.2 Acute deep vein thrombosis
11.4.2.1 Clinical presentation
Leg swelling is a frequent finding in pregnancy, giving rise to the suspicion of DVT. Since DVT is left-sided in >85% of cases, due to compression of the left iliac vein by the left iliac artery and the gravid uterus, swelling of the left leg is more suspicious. Iliac vein thrombosis may manifest with isolated pain in the buttock, groin, flank, or abdomen. Three clinical variables―left leg presentation, >2 cm calf circumference difference, and first trimester―allowed a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI 95.8–100%) if none of the three variables was present and ultrasound of the legs was negative.415 However, this clinical decision rule needs to be validated in prospective studies.
11.4.2.2 Diagnosis
D-dimer: See section 11.4.1.2.
Compression ultrasound leg vein imaging: Compression ultrasound is the diagnostic imaging procedure of choice for suspected DVT in pregnancy with a high sensitivity and specificity for proximal DVT, but less so for distal and pelvic DVTs. Serial compression ultrasound evaluations at days 0, 3, and 7 in pregnancy give a high negative predictive value of 99.5% (95% CI 97–99%).416 Women with a suspected DVT in pregnancy can be evaluated with D-dimer testing (see above) and compression ultrasonography. If a proximal DVT is detected, treatment should be continued. If the initial compression ultrasound is negative, then magnetic resonance venography may be considered to exclude a pelvic DVT. If the clinical suspicion is high and the initial compression ultrasonography negative, then anticoagulation should be continued and compression ultrasonography repeated on days 3 and 7. If the initial clinical suspicion is low, then anticoagulation can be stopped and compression ultrasonography repeated on days 3 and 7. If compression ultrasonography is persistently negative, a DVT can be excluded.
11.4.2.3 Treatment
In acute DVT, treatment with therapeutic doses of weight adjusted LMWH should be given twice daily (see treatment of PE).
11.5 Recommendations
11.5.1 Management of delivery
In women on therapeutic LMWH, delivery should be planned at around 39 weeks to avoid the risk of spontaneous labour while fully anticoagulated, as LMWH can only be partially reversed with protamine sulfate.
In high-risk women on therapeutic LMWH, LMWH should be converted to UFH at least 36 h prior to delivery and the infusion stopped some 4–6 hours prior to anticipated delivery. A normalized aPTT should guide the use of regional anaesthesia.
In low-risk women on therapeutic LMWH or women on high dose prophylaxis, assuming a typical twice-a-day regimen, the evening LMWH dose should be omitted and induction or caesarean section performed the next morning, with regional anaesthesia started more than 24 h after the last dose of LMWH and if no other drugs with impairment of coagulation are used.
Therapeutic anticoagulation is associated with an increased risk of post-partum haemorrhage, so the third stage of labour should always be actively managed with modified dose oxytocin. Recently, the effect of adding 2 IU oxytocin over 5 min to a standard treatment of low-dose infusion for 4 h [10 U of oxytocin in 500 mL of normal saline given i.v. at 36 mL/h for 4 h (12 mU/min)] was analysed. The addition of 2 IU of oxytocin was not associated with any greater derangement in cardiovascular measures, but with a significantly lower volume of blood loss.105 We would advise using this regimen.
12. Drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding
12.1 General principles
This section summarizes all pertinent drugs and their potential use during pregnancy and breastfeeding. There are no uniform recommendations for the treatment of pregnant women yet. This also concerns the timing of treatment initiation and the selection of medications. Prescribing information for drugs on specific databases for pregnancy and lactation (for internet databases see section 12.3) should be consulted. As drug treatment in pregnancy concerns the mother and the foetus, optimum treatment of both must be targeted. Whether drug treatment is necessary is dependent on the urgency of the indication. The current background information and detailed discussion of the data for the following section of these Guidelines can be found in ESC CardioMed.
In case of emergency, drugs that are not recommended by international agencies for use during pregnancy and breastfeeding should not be withheld from the mother. The potential risk of a drug and the possible benefit of the therapy must be weighed against each other.
12.1.1 Pharmacokinetics in pregnancy
During pregnancy, profound physiological changes occur that potentially change the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs.36 The following list provides a summary of these changes:
Cardiovascular system, lungs and blood:
increases in plasma volume, CO, stroke volume, and heart rate
decreases in serum albumin concentration and serum colloid osmotic pressure
increases in coagulation factors and fibrinogen
compression of the inferior vena cava by the uterus
increase in tidal volume and minute ventilation.
Liver, stomach, and intestines:
changes in oxidative liver enzymes, such as increased activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes e.g. CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 nausea and vomiting
delayed gastric emptying
prolonged small bowel transit time
gastrointestinal reflux.
Kidneys:
increases in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate.
Different sources of evidence can be used for the risk classification of drugs applied during pregnancy.
12.1.2 Drug classes in pregnancy
12.1.2.1 Anticoagulants
VKA and LMWH have advantages and disadvantages during pregnancy, which are also discussed in the sections related to specific indications. However, comparison between studies is hampered by reporting differences, and conclusions concerning the safety of low-dose VKA (warfarin <5 mg daily) in the current literature are controversial.5,196,217,219,223,227 VKAs cross the placenta and their use in the first trimester can result in embryopathy (limb defects and nasal hypoplasia) in 0.6–10% of cases.216,218,219,228 Substitution of a VKA with UFH or LMWH in weeks 6–12 almost eliminates the risk of embryopathy. There is evidence that the embryopathy risk with VKA is also dose-dependent. The risk was 0.45–0.9% in pregnancies with low-dose warfarin according to two recent systematic reviews.217,219 In addition to the risk of embryopathy that is limited to the first trimester, there is a 0.7–2% risk of foetopathy (e.g. ocular and central nervous system abnormalities and intracranial haemorrhage) when VKAs are used in the second and third trimesters.216,219,223,228–230 Foetopathy has also been described with UFH but not with LMWH throughout pregnancy.219,223 Vaginal delivery while the mother is on VKAs is contraindicated because of the risk of foetal intracranial bleeding.228 Haemorrhagic complications in the mother occur with all regimens.219
The efficacy and safety of several LMWH preparations was shown in a review of 2777 pregnant women treated for DVT or PE. The risk of recurrent VTE with therapeutic doses of LMWH was 1.15%. The observed rate of major bleeding was 1.98%. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is markedly lower with LMWH than with UFH, as is heparin-induced osteoporosis (0.04%).13 In clinically suspected DVT or PE, therapeutic LMWH should be given until the diagnosis is excluded by objective testing.
Monitoring is essential in patients treated with LMWH with mechanical valves (see section 6), but the evidence is less clear in patients with VTE. Given the need for dose increase as pregnancy progresses to maintain a certain therapeutic anti-Xa level (peak: 0.7–1.2 U/mL),224,421 it seems reasonable to also determine anti-Xa peak levels during pregnancy in patients with VTE. This appears particularly justified in view of the fact that PE occurred in women receiving prophylactic doses of LMWH.396 As with the use of LMWH in women with mechanical valves, using trough levels and adjusting the dosage frequency may be necessary to achieve adequate anticoagulation.225
UFH does not cross the placenta either, but is associated with more thrombocytopenia (platelet levels should be measured every 2–3 days), osteoporosis, and more frequent dosing when given subcutaneously compared with LMWH. Typically, UFH is used in the acute treatment of massive pulmonary emboli. It is also used around the time of delivery if the maintenance of anticoagulation is critical and when the ability to reverse anticoagulation urgently using protamine is advantageous. In this circumstance, LMWH should be switched to i.v. UFH at least 36 h before the induction of labour or caesarean delivery is planned. UFH should be discontinued 4–6 h before anticipated delivery and restarted 6 h after delivery if there are no bleeding complications.
12.1.2.2 Thrombolytics
Thrombolytics are considered to be relatively contraindicated during pregnancy and peripartum, and should only be used in high-risk patients with severe hypotension or shock.405 The risk of haemorrhage, mostly from the genital tract, is around 8%.422 There are more than 200 reported patients in whom streptokinase was mostly used and, more recently, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (alteplase). Neither of these thrombolytics crosses the placenta in significant amounts. Foetal loss in 6% and pre-term delivery in 6% of cases were reported.414 When thrombolysis is given, the loading dose of UFH should be omitted and an infusion started at a rate of 18 U/kg/h, and carefully adjusted according to the aPTT level. After stabilization of the patient, UFH can be switched to LMWH.
12.1.2.3 Factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors
No adequate, well-controlled studies in pregnant women are available.
Fondaparinux indirectly inhibits factor Xa activity via ATIII binding. There are a few observational studies on the use of fondaparinux in pregnancy, with the largest reporting good outcomes for 65 pregnancies managed with fondaparinux.423 Its use can be considered if there is an allergy or adverse response to LMWH. One study showed minor transplacental passage of fondaparinux,424 and more work is required to assess the risk of congenital malformations.
Rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, crosses the placental barrier and therefore is not recommended in pregnancy. A systematic review of 137 pregnancies with pregnancy outcome data revealed a miscarriage rate of 23% (n = 31), elective terminations in 29% (n = 39) of cases, and possible embryopathy in 2.2% (n = 3) of cases.425
Most cases were on rivaroxaban, and in most pregnancies the duration of use was limited to the first trimester. Rivaroxaban is currently not recommended in pregnant patients. Other direct factor Xa inhibitors—such as apixaban, edoxaban, and the direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran—should not be used in pregnant patients.
12.1.2.4 Beta-adrenergic blocking agents
Beta-adrenergic blocking agents are generally safe in pregnancy, but may be associated with increased rates of foetal growth restriction and also hypoglycaemia. Beta-1-selective drugs are preferred,426 except in TdP (see section 9), as they are less likely to affect uterine contraction and peripheral vasodilation, and they have exhibited lower rates of foetal growth retardation.427 Examples are metoprolol and bisoprolol. Unselective beta-blockers such as atenolol have been associated with higher rates of foetal growth retardation.427,428 Among the alpha/beta-blockers, labetalol is a drug of choice for hypertension in pregnancy380,381, and carvedilol used for HF therapy did not show any association with foetal growth retardation in a recently published small study with 13 patients receiving this drug.427
12.1.2.5 Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors: ACE inhibitors, ARBs, ARNIs, and aldosterone antagonists
ACE inhibitors and ARBs are teratogenic and contraindicated during pregnancy.36 Renal or tubular dysplasia, renal failure, oligohydramnios, growth retardation, ossification disorders of the skull, lung hypoplasia, contractures, large joints, anaemia, and intrauterine foetal death have been described. In a systematic review, 48% of 118 foetuses exposed to ACE inhibitors and 87% of foetuses exposed to ARBs had complications related to the use of these medications.36 These recommendations and data also apply to ARNIs (sacubitril/valsartan), since they contain ARBs.
Spironolactone is not advised in humans during pregnancy.36 Eplerenone has been associated with post-implantation losses at the highest administered doses in rabbits, and should only be used in pregnancy if clearly needed.
12.1.2.6 Calcium channel blockers
CCBs do not seem to be associated with an increased incidence of congenital anomalies in humans.36 In one study with 721 pregnancies exposed to CCBs during the third trimester, an increased risk (relative risk 3.6, 95% CI 1.3–10.4) of neonatal seizures with CCBs was reported.36,429 Diltiazem is teratogenic in animals and only limited data in humans exist; thus, its use is only recommended in pregnancy if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the foetus.36 Verapamil is considered to be fairly safe during pregnancy, and is recommended as a second-line drug for rate control in AF and for the treatment of idiopathic sustained VTs in pregnant women.36
12.1.2.7 Statins
Statins should not be prescribed in pregnancy or during breastfeeding to treat hyperlipidaemia since their harmlessness is not proven. However, in a review published in 2012, no evidence of teratogenicity of statins was found, but a harmful effect could not be ruled out due to small sample sizes.36,430 In a prospective case-control study of 249 foetuses exposed to statins, the rate of birth defects did not differ significantly between cases and controls.36,431
12.2 US Food and Drug Administration classification
On 30 June 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) changed the previously used classification system for the counselling of pregnant women and nursing mothers requiring drug therapy.432 The former A to X categories have been replaced by the Pregnancy and Lactation Labelling Rule (PLLR), which provides a descriptive risk summary and detailed information on animal and clinical data. PLLR applies immediately for prescription drugs approved after 30 June 2015, and the former FDA categories have to be removed for all other drugs until 29 June 2018. However, the former FDA categories will be present in the literature for a longer period of time, therefore Table 7 provides information on both systems. For detailed up-to-date information on drugs used during pregnancy and breast feeding, please see the Supplementary Data/Web version of the guidelines. Detailed information can also be found on www.ema.europa.eu/, www.accessdata.fda.gov, http://www.embryotox.de, or from prescription labels provided by manufacturers.
The previous classification consisted of category A (safest) to X (known danger: do not use!). The following categories were used for drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding, as outlined in the 2011 Guidelines.9
Category A: adequate and well-controlled studies have failed to demonstrate a foetal risk in the first trimester (and there is no evidence of risk in the later trimesters).
Category B: either animal reproduction studies have not demonstrated a foetal risk but there are no controlled studies in pregnant women, or animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect that was not confirmed in controlled studies in women.
Category C: either studies in animals have revealed adverse effects on the foetus and there are no controlled studies in women, or studies in women and animals are not available. Drugs should be given only if potential benefits justify the potential risk to the foetus.
Category D: there is evidence of human foetal risk, but the benefits from use in a pregnant woman may be acceptable despite the risk (e.g. treatment of life-threatening conditions).
Category X: studies in animals or humans have demonstrated foetal abnormalities, there is evidence of foetal risk based on human experience, or both, and the risk of drug use in pregnant women clearly outweighs any possible benefit. The drug is contraindicated in women who are or may become pregnant.
12.3 Internet databases
The authors of the database www.embryotox.de of the Pharmakovigilanz- und Beratungszentrum für Embryonaltoxikologie of the Berliner Betrieb für Zentrale Gesundheitliche Aufgabe base their recommendations on a combination of scientific sources, expert opinion that is mainly based on observational data, and personal experiences of women during pregnancy and breastfeeding.
The English database www.safefetus.com is arranged in a similar fashion to the German database.
12.4 Pharmaceutical industry
Manufacturers’ instructions are mainly based on the fact that drugs are not tested sufficiently during pregnancy and breastfeeding. For this and for legal reasons, drugs are frequently considered prohibited during pregnancy and breastfeeding.
12.5 Recommendations
13. Gaps in evidence
Epidemiological data
European epidemiological (e.g. registers such as ROPAC) data on women with CVDs and their outcomes, and the foetal risk during pregnancy and in the peripartum period, are important sources of information. However, there is also a clear need for randomized controlled trials. In women with specific aortic diseases, the outcome is not well studied and the impact of treatment with beta-blockers during pregnancy is lacking.
The impact of pregnancy in a woman with congenital or aortic disease on the long-term maternal and foetal outcome is not well studied.
The impact of fertility treatment on pregnancy complications and maternal outcomes remains unknown.
Mechanical valve prostheses
In women with mechanical valve prostheses, no prospective studies are available that compare different anticoagulation regimens. There are unresolved questions concerning LMWH, including optimal anti-Xa levels, the importance of peak vs. pre-dose levels, the best time intervals for anti-Xa monitoring, and the duration of use (first trimester or throughout pregnancy).
Coronary artery disease
In women with CAD, the required delay of a subsequent pregnancy following MI is unknown. Furthermore, optimal management and follow-up of patients with P-SCAD is a burning clinical problem. This includes the decision for interventional therapy as well as counselling on the recurrence risk for repeated pregnancies.
Drugs
The safety of antiplatelet agents used after PCI in pregnancy is not well known.
There is a lack of randomized trials on the use of antiarrhythmic drugs and interventions during pregnancy.
Data based on prospective randomized clinical trials in pregnant women to assess drug efficacy and safety are very limited. They will stay limited in some areas due to accepted ethical limitations. However, greater efforts can be made by prospective registries to answer burning treatment questions.
Studies investigating the pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy that modify clinical drug efficacy are required.
Cardiomyopathies
The pathophysiology of PPCM has still to be explored in more detail. PPCM includes LV dysfunction due to several different causes and thus PPCM is not a well-described entity. The potential for recovery is often unclear and the risks of subsequent pregnancies are not well defined. For acute HF in the context of pregnancy there are almost no evidence-based treatments. More research is clearly needed.
Cardiac transplantation
Evidence is also limited for pregnancies in patients post-cardiac transplantation.
Delivery
Trials evaluating the level of surveillance at delivery and the warranted monitoring level after delivery are needed. Furthermore, the optimal mode of delivery is not clear for high-risk situations.
Hypertension
It is still unclear whether mild–moderate hypertension in pregnancy should be pharmacologically treated. The current guidelines are based on expert consensus regarding thresholds to initiate antihypertensive medication. Prospective studies, even observational, in this area are needed.
Diagnostic pathways
More data are needed on diagnostic pathways, specifically the place of D-dimers, in VTE. The value of monitoring anti-Xa values in patients with VTE (treatment) is unknown. Studies are needed on the benefit of using the combination of peak and trough levels. The lack of data regarding the length of anticoagulation after delivery is an unmet need.
14. Key messages
Risk estimation should be individualized depending on the underlying cardiac diagnosis, ventricular and valvular function, functional class, presence of cyanosis, PAPs, and other factors.
Indications for intervention (surgical or catheter) in the majority of patients do not differ in women who consider pregnancy compared with other patients. There are a few exceptions, such as some degree of aortic dilatation and severe asymptomatic MS.
In women with a moderate or high-risk of complications during pregnancy (mWHO II–III, III, and IV), pre-pregnancy counselling and management during pregnancy and around delivery should be performed in an expert centre by a multidisciplinary team: the pregnancy heart team.
All women with congenital or other possibly genetic heart disease should be offered foetal echocardiography in weeks 19–22 of pregnancy.
A delivery plan should be made between 20–30 weeks of pregnancy detailing induction, management of labour, delivery, and post-partum surveillance.
Induction of labour should be considered at 40 weeks of gestation in all women with cardiac disease.
Vaginal delivery is the first choice for the majority of patients.
Indications for caesarean section are:
– pre-term labour in patients on OACs
– aggressive aortic pathology
– acute intractable HF
– severe forms of PH (including Eisenmenger’s syndrome)
Pregnancy termination should be discussed if there is a high-risk of maternal morbidity or mortality, and/or of foetal abnormality.
Pregnancy, and consequently fertility treatment, is contraindicated in women with mWHO class IV.
All patients with known cardiac or aortic disease need investigations and counselling about the risks of pregnancy pre-pregnancy or before assisted reproductive therapy.
The following patients should be counselled against pregnancy:
– with a Fontan operation and additional comorbidities (ventricular dysfunction, arrhythmias, or valve regurgitation)
– with PAH
– severe systemic ventricular dysfunction (EF <30% or NYHA class III–IV).
– severe (re-)coarctation
– systemic right ventricle with moderate or severely decreased ventricular function
– with vascular Ehlers−Danlos
– with severe aortic dilatation or (history of) aortic dissection
– with severe MS (even when asymptomatic)
– Patients with severe AS who are symptomatic, or asymptomatic patients with impaired LV function or a pathological exercise test
– if LVEF does not normalize in women with previous PPCM.
Women with a mechanical valve prosthesis are at high-risk of maternal morbidity (especially valve thrombosis and bleeding) and even mortality, and should be managed by a pregnancy heart team in expert centres.
LMWH should only be used when weekly monitoring of anti-Xa levels with dose adjustment is available.
Women with HF during pregnancy should be treated according to current guidelines for non-pregnant patients, respecting contraindications for some drugs in pregnancy (see table ‘Recommendations for drug use in pregnancy’). When inotropes or more advanced treatment is necessary, transport to an expert centre is recommended.
It is recommended to inform women with DCM and HFrEF about the risk of deterioration of the condition during gestation and peripartum.
In women with PPCM and DCM, subsequent pregnancy is not recommended if LVEF does not normalize.
Patients with congenital LQTS and catecholaminergic polymorphic VT are recommended beta-blockers during pregnancy and post-partum.
Initiation of antihypertensive drug treatment is recommended in all women with persistent elevation of BP ≥150/95 mmHg and at values >140/90 mmHg in women with:
– gestational hypertension (with or without proteinuria)
– pre-existing hypertension with the superimposition of gestational hypertension
– hypertension with subclinical organ damage or symptoms at any time during pregnancy.
Women at high or moderate risk of pre-eclampsia should be advised to take 100–150 mg of acetylsalicylic acid daily from week 12 to week 36–37 in addition to their hypertension treatment.
Methyldopa, labetalol, and calcium antagonists are recommended for the treatment of hypertension in pregnancy.
LMWH is the agent of choice for VTE prophylaxis and treatment.
Thrombolytics to treat thrombo-embolism should only be used in patients with severe hypotension or shock.
In the case of an emergency, drugs that are not recommended by the pharmaceutical industry during pregnancy and breastfeeding should not be withheld from the mother. The potential risk of a drug and the possible benefit of the therapy must be weighed against each other.
15. ‘What to do’ and ‘what not to do’ messages from the Guidelines
Endorsed by: the International Society of Gender Medicine (IGM), the German Institute of Gender in Medicine (DGesGM), the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA), and the European Society of Gynecology (ESG)
The disclosure forms of all experts involved in the development of these Guidelines are available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines
ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) and National Cardiac Societies document reviewers: listed in the Appendix.
ESC entities having participated in the development of this document:
Associations: Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Heart Failure Association (HFA).
Councils: Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions, Council on Cardiovascular Primary Care, Council on Hypertension, Council on Valvular Heart Disease.
Working Groups: Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, Cardiovascular Surgery, Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease, Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases, Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function, Thrombosis.
The content of these European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines has been published for personal and educational use only. No commercial use is authorized. No part of the ESC Guidelines may be translated or reproduced in any form without written permission from the ESC. Permission can be obtained upon submission of a written request to Oxford University Press, the publisher of the European Heart Journal and the party authorized to handle such permissions on behalf of the ESC ([email protected]).
Disclaimer. The ESC Guidelines represent the views of the ESC and were produced after careful consideration of the scientific and medical knowledge and the evidence available at the time of their dating. The ESC is not responsible in the event of any contradiction, discrepancy and/or ambiguity between the ESC Guidelines and any other official recommendations or guidelines issued by the relevant public health authorities, in particular in relation to good use of health care or therapeutic strategies. Health professionals are encouraged to take the ESC Guidelines fully into account when exercising their clinical judgment as well as in the determination and the implementation of preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic medical strategies. However, the ESC Guidelines do not override in any way whatsoever the individual responsibility of health professionals to make appropriate and accurate decisions in consideration of each patient’s health condition and in consultation with that patient and the patient's caregiver where appropriate and/or necessary. Nor do the ESC Guidelines exempt health professionals from taking careful and full consideration of the relevant official updated recommendations or guidelines issued by the competent public health authorities in order to manage each patient’s case in light of the scientifically accepted data pursuant to their respective ethical and professional obligations. It is also the health professional’s responsibility to verify the applicable rules and regulations relating to drugs and medical devices at the time of prescription.
References
Blood Pressure UK. http://www.bloodpressureuk.org.
16. Appendix
ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG): Stephan Windecker (Chairperson) (Switzerland), Victor Aboyans (France), Stefan Agewall (Norway), Emanuele Barbato (Italy), Héctor Bueno (Spain), Antonio Coca (Spain), Jean-Philippe Collet (France), Ioan Mircea Coman (Romania), Veronica Dean (France), Victoria Delgado (The Netherlands), Donna Fitzsimons (UK), Oliver Gaemperli (Switzerland), Gerhard Hindricks (Germany), Bernard Iung (France), Peter Jüni (Canada), Hugo A. Katus (Germany), Juhani Knuuti (Finland), Patrizio Lancellotti (Belgium), Christophe Leclercq (France), Theresa A. McDonagh (UK), Massimo Francesco Piepoli (Italy), Piotr Ponikowski (Poland), Dimitrios J. Richter (Greece), Marco Roffi (Switzerland), Evgeny Shlyakhto (Russia), Iain A. Simpson (UK), Miguel Sousa-Uva (Portugal), Jose Luis Zamorano (Spain).
ESC National Cardiac Societies actively involved in the review process of the 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: Algeria: Algerian Society of Cardiology, Naima Hammoudi; Armenia: Armenian Cardiologists Association, Armen Piruzyan; Austria: Austrian Society of Cardiology, Julia Mascherbauer; Azerbaijan: Azerbaijan Society of Cardiology, Fuad Samadov; Belarus: Belorussian Scientific Society of Cardiologists, Andrei Prystrom; Belgium: Belgian Society of Cardiology, Agnes Pasquet; Bosnia and Herzegovina: Association of Cardiologists of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Jasmin Caluk; Bulgaria: Bulgarian Society of Cardiology, Nina Gotcheva; Croatia: Croatian Cardiac Society, Bosko Skoric; Cyprus: Cyprus Society of Cardiology, Hera Heracleous; Denmark: Danish Society of Cardiology, Niels Vejlstrup; Estonia: Estonian Society of Cardiology, Maarja Maser; Finland: Finnish Cardiac Society, Risto Juhani Kaaja; The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Macedonian FYR Society of Cardiology, Elizabeta Srbinovska-Kostovska; France: French Society of Cardiology, Claire Mounier-Vehier; Georgia: Georgian Society of Cardiology, Tamar Vakhtangadze; Germany: German Cardiac Society, Karin Rybak; Greece: Hellenic Society of Cardiology, George Giannakoulas; Hungary: Hungarian Society of Cardiology, Robert Gabor Kiss; Iceland: Icelandic Society of Cardiology, Inga S. Thrainsdottir; Ireland: Irish Cardiac Society, R John Erwin; Israel: Israel Heart Society, Avital Porter; Italy: Italian Federation of Cardiology, Giovanna Geraci; Kosovo: Kosovo Society of Cardiology, Pranvera Ibrahimi; Kyrgyzstan: Kyrgyz Society of Cardiology, Olga Lunegova; Latvia: Latvian Society of Cardiology, Iveta Mintale; Lebanon: Lebanese Society of Cardiology, Zeina Kadri; Libya: Libyan Cardiac Society, Hisham Benlamin; Lithuania: Lithuanian Society of Cardiology, Jurate Barysiene; Luxembourg: Luxembourg Society of Cardiology, Cristiana A. Banu; Malta: Maltese Cardiac Society, Maryanne Caruana; Moldova: Moldavian Society of Cardiology, Cristina Gratii; Morocco: Moroccan Society of Cardiology, Laila Haddour; The Netherlands: Netherlands Society of Cardiology, Berto J. Bouma; Norway: Norwegian Society of Cardiology, Mette-Elise Estensen; Poland: Polish Cardiac Society, Piotr Hoffman; Romania: Romanian Society of Cardiology, Antoniu Octavian Petris; Russian Federation: Russian Society of Cardiology, Olga Moiseeva; San Marino: San Marino Society of Cardiology, Luca Bertelli; Serbia: Cardiology Society of Serbia, Bosiljka Vujisic Tesic; Slovakia: Slovak Society of Cardiology, Juraj Dubrava; Slovenia: Slovenian Society of Cardiology, Mirta Koželj; Spain: Spanish Society of Cardiology, Raquel Prieto-Arévalo; Sweden: Swedish Society of Cardiology, Eva Furenäs; Switzerland: Swiss Society of Cardiology, Markus Schwerzmann; Tunisia: Tunisian Society of Cardiology and Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Mohamed Sami Mourali; Turkey: Turkish Society of Cardiology, Necla Ozer; Ukraine: Ukrainian Association of Cardiology, Olena Mitchenko; United Kingdom: British Cardiovascular Society, Catherine Nelson-Piercy.