Abstract

Aims

To investigate the association between long-term β-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes in patients without heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Method and results

Between 2010 and 2015, a total of 28 970 patients who underwent coronary revascularization for AMI with β-blocker prescription at hospital discharge and were event-free from death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), or HF for 1 year were enrolled from Korean nationwide medical insurance data. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The secondary outcomes were recurrent MI, hospitalization for new HF, and a composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new HF. Outcomes were compared between β-blocker therapy for ≥1 year (N = 22 707) and β-blocker therapy for <1 year (N = 6263) using landmark analysis at 1 year after index MI. Compared with patients receiving β-blocker therapy for <1 year, those receiving β-blocker therapy for ≥1 year had significantly lower risks of all-cause death [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–0.91] and composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new HF (adjusted HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.75–0.89), but not the risks of recurrent MI or hospitalization for new HF. The lower risk of all-cause death associated with persistent β-blocker therapy was observed beyond 2 years (adjusted HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.75–0.99) but not beyond 3 years (adjusted HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.73–1.03) after MI.

Conclusion

In this nationwide cohort, β-blocker therapy for ≥1 year after MI was associated with reduced all-cause death among patients with AMI without HF.

See page 3530 for the editorial comment on this article (doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa436)

Introduction

In the pre-reperfusion era, β-blockers reduced mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).1 Unfortunately, evidence supporting routine β-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) is lacking in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)2. The results of observational studies on the association between β-blocker therapy at discharge and 1-year clinical outcomes were inconsistent.3–5 However, β-blockers have anti-ischaemic, antiarrhythmic, and antiadrenergic properties.6 Early use of β-blockers reduces myocardial damage and is associated with improved clinical outcomes even in patients undergoing primary PCI.7  ,  8 Current major guidelines recommend that β-blockers should be continued during and after hospitalization for all patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and with no contraindications to their use.9  ,  10 In real-world practice, β-blockers are frequently prescribed in the early period (up to 1 year) after MI unless patients have contraindications. In observational studies, the proportion of patients receiving β-blockers at 1 year after MI ranged from 72% to 89%.3  ,  11

An important but difficult decision on β-blocker therapy after MI is to determine the duration of β-blocker therapy after discharge in patients without specific indications such as heart failure (HF) or left ventricular systolic dysfunction. However, few observational studies3  ,  11  ,  12 and a randomized trial13 with relatively small sample size and potential selection bias are inadequate for definite conclusion for long-term β-blocker therapy. Therefore, in the present study, we sought to investigate the association between long-term (≥1 year) β-blocker therapy and mortality after acute MI in patients without HF using recent nationwide medical insurance data of Korean population.

Methods

Study population

Korea has a single-payer national health system. The National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) maintains records of all covered inpatient and outpatient visits, procedures, and prescriptions. This is a population-based retrospective cohort study built using the NHIS data.14–16

This study included all men and women over 18 years old who underwent revascularization [PCI or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)] for MI between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015 (n = 54 195). Patients were followed until 31 December 2016.

We excluded patients who had history of HF (I110, I130, I132, I255, I420, I425–I429, I43, I50, I971) (n = 5569), MI (I21–I23, I252), or revascularization before index MI (n = 5319); who had been prescribed β-blockers within 6 months before index MI (n = 11 300); who had had contraindications for β-blockers including asthma or chronic obstructive lung disease (J43–J46) within 6 months before index MI (n = 2994), or conduction abnormality (pacemaker, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block; I441, I442, I495, Z950) before index MI (n = 68). Since our objective was to compare clinical outcomes between long-term β-blocker therapy for ≥1 year and β-blocker therapy for <1 year after AMI, we excluded patients who had not been prescribed any β-blockers within 3 months after hospital discharge (n = 2453) to minimize difference in baseline characteristics between the groups. Finally, we excluded patients who had developed death, recurrent MI, or HF within 1 year after index MI (n = 8557) to control immortal time bias.17 The Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center approved this study (2018-03-046) and informed consent was waived as we used de-identified administrative data.

Measurements

NHIS claims for inpatient and outpatient visits, procedures, and prescriptions were coded using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.18 As the NHIS routinely audits the claims, such data are considered reliable and used in numerous peer-reviewed publications.14  ,  15 In regard to diagnosis of MI, the validation study in 2013 showed the value of 92%.19

β-Blocker use was identified by prescription data with Korean Drug and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Codes. If β-blocker prescription had been continued for 1 year from hospital discharge, we considered that the patient was a long-term β-blocker user. If a new prescription had been redeemed within 180 days after expiration of prior prescription, β-blocker therapy was considered to be continued.

Outcomes and definitions

The primary outcome was all-cause death. Vital status and cause of death were obtained from death certification collected by Statistics Korea at the Ministry of Strategy and Finance of South Korea.14 The secondary outcomes were recurrent MI, hospitalization for new HF, and a composite of each secondary outcome and all-cause death.

Comorbidities were summarized using Charlson index. In addition, we included hypertension (I10–I13, I15), atrial fibrillation or flutter (I48), hyperlipidaemia (E78), gout (M10), depression (F32, F33), and valve disorder (I05–I08, I34–I37, Z952–Z954). We identified medications of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, calcium channel blocker, statin, aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor or prasugrel, and anticoagulant (Supplementary material online, Table S1).

Statistical analysis

Clinical outcomes were compared between patients receiving β-blocker for ≥1 year and those receiving β-blocker for <1 year using landmark analysis at 1 year after index MI. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyse the cumulative incidence of events over time, whereas log-rank tests were applied to evaluate differences between the groups. Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were used to compare the clinical outcomes. We adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, atrial fibrillation of flutter, hyperlipidaemia, gout, depression, valve disorder, Charlson comorbidities, and medications at 1 year after index MI. We used multivariable mixed-effects Cox regression analysis including an admitted hospital as a random intercept to adjust hospital effect. Clinical outcomes according to type of β-blocker were also compared.

To identify long-term beneficial effects of persistent β-blocker therapy, we conducted same analysis at 2 years and 3 years after index MI. The analyses were also conducted based on landmark analysis in patients who were event-free from death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new HF at 2 years (n = 22 769) or 3 years (n = 17 009) after index MI. These landmark analyses were adjusted for comorbidities and medications at 2 years or 3 years after index MI, respectively.

Subgroup analyses were conducted by age (age <65 vs. ≥65), sex, type of revascularization (PCI vs. CABG), hypertension, diabetes, Charlson comorbidity index (<3 vs. ≥3), use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, or statin, and type of hospital (tertiary hospital vs. others). All P-values were two-sided, and a P-value of <0.05 was considered as significant. Analyses were performed with the use of SAS® Visual Analytics (SAS Institute Inc., USA) and STATA version 14 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Clinical characteristics

Among 28 970 patients who underwent revascularization for AMI, 22 707 (78.4%) were prescribed β-blocker for ≥1 year (median 1146 days) (Figure 1). The annual rates of patients receiving β-blocker therapy for ≥1 year are shown in Supplementary material online, Figure S1. The most frequently prescribed β-blocker was carvedilol (52.9%), followed by bisoprolol (33.0%) and nebivolol (5.8%) (Supplementary material online, Table S2). At the index MI, patients receiving β-blocker for ≥1 year were younger (60.2 vs. 62.4 years; P < 0.001) and more likely to be men (79.6% vs. 78.3%; P = 0.03), be treated at tertiary hospital (51.2% vs. 48.1%; P < 0.001) and have hyperlipidaemia (5.6% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.002) compared with those receiving β-blocker for <1 year (Table 1).

Study population. CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 1

Study population. CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Table1

Baseline characteristics at index MI and at 1 year after index MI

At MI
At 1 year after MI
β-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)P-valueβ-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)P-value
Age (years), mean (SD)60.2 (12.1)62.4 (13.1)<0.001
Sex0.03
 Male18 074 (79.6)4904 (78.3)
 Female4633 (20.4)1359 (21.7)
Tertiary hospital11 628 (51.2)3010 (48.1)<0.001
Hypertension6866 (30.2)1595 (25.5)<0.0018091 (35.6)1996 (31.9)<0.001
Atrial fibrillation or flutter67 (0.3)19 (0.3)0.92138 (0.6)57 (0.9)0.01
Charlson index, mean (SD)0.7 (1.0)0.7 (1.1)<0.0011.9 (1.2)2.0 (1.2)<0.001
Charlson comorbiditya
 Peripheral vascular disease298 (1.3)112 (1.8)0.005458 (2.0)163 (2.6)0.005
 Cerebrovascular disease1177 (5.2)451 (7.2)<0.0011394 (6.1)577 (9.2)<0.001
 Dementia226 (1.0)149 (2.4)<0.001403 (1.8)266 (4.2)<0.001
 Chronic pulmonary disease2147 (9.5)600 (9.6)0.772934 (12.9)812 (13)0.63
 Peptic ulcer disease1741 (7.7)517 (8.3)0.131372 (6.0)392 (6.3)0.53
 Liver disease780 (3.4)223 (3.6)0.63804 (3.5)230 (3.7)0.62
 Diabetes4246 (18.7)1169 (18.7)0.954702 (20.7)1280 (20.4)0.64
 Paraplegia and hemiplegia47 (0.2)27 (0.4)0.002114 (0.5)75 (1.2)<0.001
 Renal disease244 (1.1)119 (1.9)<0.001484 (2.1)196 (3.1)<0.001
 Cancer634 (2.8)188 (3.0)0.38697 (3.1)234 (3.7)0.008
 AIDS/HIV7 (0.0)3 (0.0)0.467 (0.0)3 (0.0)0.46
 Hyperlipidaemia1264 (5.6)287 (4.6)0.0022149 (9.5)524 (8.4)0.008
 Gout458 (2.0)120 (1.9)0.613686 (3.0)175 (2.8)0.349
 Depression288 (1.3)93 (1.5)0.183490 (2.2)166 (2.7)0.02
 Valve disorder5 (0)3 (0)0.382290 (1.3)9 (0.1)0.218
Medications
 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor12 788 (56.3)3126 (49.9)<0.0016456 (28.4)882 (14.1)<0.001
 Angiotensin receptor blocker6782 (29.9)2076 (33.1)<0.00110 505 (46.3)2287 (36.5)<0.001
 Calcium channel blocker5526 (24.3)1812 (28.9)<0.0014536 (20.0)1787 (28.5)<0.001
 Statin21 006 (92.5)5720 (91.3)0.00221 623 (95.2)4298 (68.6)<0.001
 Aspirin22 237 (97.9)6102 (97.4)0.0221 542 (94.9)4364 (69.7)<0.001
 Clopidogrel16 192 (71.3)4397 (70.2)0.0915 730 (69.3)3175 (50.7)<0.001
 Ticagrelor or prasugrel5650 (24.9)1597 (25.5)0.323282 (14.5)555 (8.9)<0.001
  DAPT21 391 (94.2)5839 (93.2)0.004
  Duration of DAPT, median (IQR)434 (351–778)344 (93–550)<0.001
 Anticoagulant420 (1.8)144 (2.3)0.02323 (1.4)98 (1.6)0.41
Duration of β-blocker therapy, median (IQR)1146 (722–1723)72 (12–194)<0.001
At MI
At 1 year after MI
β-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)P-valueβ-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)P-value
Age (years), mean (SD)60.2 (12.1)62.4 (13.1)<0.001
Sex0.03
 Male18 074 (79.6)4904 (78.3)
 Female4633 (20.4)1359 (21.7)
Tertiary hospital11 628 (51.2)3010 (48.1)<0.001
Hypertension6866 (30.2)1595 (25.5)<0.0018091 (35.6)1996 (31.9)<0.001
Atrial fibrillation or flutter67 (0.3)19 (0.3)0.92138 (0.6)57 (0.9)0.01
Charlson index, mean (SD)0.7 (1.0)0.7 (1.1)<0.0011.9 (1.2)2.0 (1.2)<0.001
Charlson comorbiditya
 Peripheral vascular disease298 (1.3)112 (1.8)0.005458 (2.0)163 (2.6)0.005
 Cerebrovascular disease1177 (5.2)451 (7.2)<0.0011394 (6.1)577 (9.2)<0.001
 Dementia226 (1.0)149 (2.4)<0.001403 (1.8)266 (4.2)<0.001
 Chronic pulmonary disease2147 (9.5)600 (9.6)0.772934 (12.9)812 (13)0.63
 Peptic ulcer disease1741 (7.7)517 (8.3)0.131372 (6.0)392 (6.3)0.53
 Liver disease780 (3.4)223 (3.6)0.63804 (3.5)230 (3.7)0.62
 Diabetes4246 (18.7)1169 (18.7)0.954702 (20.7)1280 (20.4)0.64
 Paraplegia and hemiplegia47 (0.2)27 (0.4)0.002114 (0.5)75 (1.2)<0.001
 Renal disease244 (1.1)119 (1.9)<0.001484 (2.1)196 (3.1)<0.001
 Cancer634 (2.8)188 (3.0)0.38697 (3.1)234 (3.7)0.008
 AIDS/HIV7 (0.0)3 (0.0)0.467 (0.0)3 (0.0)0.46
 Hyperlipidaemia1264 (5.6)287 (4.6)0.0022149 (9.5)524 (8.4)0.008
 Gout458 (2.0)120 (1.9)0.613686 (3.0)175 (2.8)0.349
 Depression288 (1.3)93 (1.5)0.183490 (2.2)166 (2.7)0.02
 Valve disorder5 (0)3 (0)0.382290 (1.3)9 (0.1)0.218
Medications
 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor12 788 (56.3)3126 (49.9)<0.0016456 (28.4)882 (14.1)<0.001
 Angiotensin receptor blocker6782 (29.9)2076 (33.1)<0.00110 505 (46.3)2287 (36.5)<0.001
 Calcium channel blocker5526 (24.3)1812 (28.9)<0.0014536 (20.0)1787 (28.5)<0.001
 Statin21 006 (92.5)5720 (91.3)0.00221 623 (95.2)4298 (68.6)<0.001
 Aspirin22 237 (97.9)6102 (97.4)0.0221 542 (94.9)4364 (69.7)<0.001
 Clopidogrel16 192 (71.3)4397 (70.2)0.0915 730 (69.3)3175 (50.7)<0.001
 Ticagrelor or prasugrel5650 (24.9)1597 (25.5)0.323282 (14.5)555 (8.9)<0.001
  DAPT21 391 (94.2)5839 (93.2)0.004
  Duration of DAPT, median (IQR)434 (351–778)344 (93–550)<0.001
 Anticoagulant420 (1.8)144 (2.3)0.02323 (1.4)98 (1.6)0.41
Duration of β-blocker therapy, median (IQR)1146 (722–1723)72 (12–194)<0.001

AIDS, acquired immune deficiency syndrome; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IQR, interquartile range; MI, myocardial infarction, SD, standard deviation.

a

Charlson comorbidity were defined as presence of disease within 1 year prior to index MI.

Table1

Baseline characteristics at index MI and at 1 year after index MI

At MI
At 1 year after MI
β-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)P-valueβ-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)P-value
Age (years), mean (SD)60.2 (12.1)62.4 (13.1)<0.001
Sex0.03
 Male18 074 (79.6)4904 (78.3)
 Female4633 (20.4)1359 (21.7)
Tertiary hospital11 628 (51.2)3010 (48.1)<0.001
Hypertension6866 (30.2)1595 (25.5)<0.0018091 (35.6)1996 (31.9)<0.001
Atrial fibrillation or flutter67 (0.3)19 (0.3)0.92138 (0.6)57 (0.9)0.01
Charlson index, mean (SD)0.7 (1.0)0.7 (1.1)<0.0011.9 (1.2)2.0 (1.2)<0.001
Charlson comorbiditya
 Peripheral vascular disease298 (1.3)112 (1.8)0.005458 (2.0)163 (2.6)0.005
 Cerebrovascular disease1177 (5.2)451 (7.2)<0.0011394 (6.1)577 (9.2)<0.001
 Dementia226 (1.0)149 (2.4)<0.001403 (1.8)266 (4.2)<0.001
 Chronic pulmonary disease2147 (9.5)600 (9.6)0.772934 (12.9)812 (13)0.63
 Peptic ulcer disease1741 (7.7)517 (8.3)0.131372 (6.0)392 (6.3)0.53
 Liver disease780 (3.4)223 (3.6)0.63804 (3.5)230 (3.7)0.62
 Diabetes4246 (18.7)1169 (18.7)0.954702 (20.7)1280 (20.4)0.64
 Paraplegia and hemiplegia47 (0.2)27 (0.4)0.002114 (0.5)75 (1.2)<0.001
 Renal disease244 (1.1)119 (1.9)<0.001484 (2.1)196 (3.1)<0.001
 Cancer634 (2.8)188 (3.0)0.38697 (3.1)234 (3.7)0.008
 AIDS/HIV7 (0.0)3 (0.0)0.467 (0.0)3 (0.0)0.46
 Hyperlipidaemia1264 (5.6)287 (4.6)0.0022149 (9.5)524 (8.4)0.008
 Gout458 (2.0)120 (1.9)0.613686 (3.0)175 (2.8)0.349
 Depression288 (1.3)93 (1.5)0.183490 (2.2)166 (2.7)0.02
 Valve disorder5 (0)3 (0)0.382290 (1.3)9 (0.1)0.218
Medications
 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor12 788 (56.3)3126 (49.9)<0.0016456 (28.4)882 (14.1)<0.001
 Angiotensin receptor blocker6782 (29.9)2076 (33.1)<0.00110 505 (46.3)2287 (36.5)<0.001
 Calcium channel blocker5526 (24.3)1812 (28.9)<0.0014536 (20.0)1787 (28.5)<0.001
 Statin21 006 (92.5)5720 (91.3)0.00221 623 (95.2)4298 (68.6)<0.001
 Aspirin22 237 (97.9)6102 (97.4)0.0221 542 (94.9)4364 (69.7)<0.001
 Clopidogrel16 192 (71.3)4397 (70.2)0.0915 730 (69.3)3175 (50.7)<0.001
 Ticagrelor or prasugrel5650 (24.9)1597 (25.5)0.323282 (14.5)555 (8.9)<0.001
  DAPT21 391 (94.2)5839 (93.2)0.004
  Duration of DAPT, median (IQR)434 (351–778)344 (93–550)<0.001
 Anticoagulant420 (1.8)144 (2.3)0.02323 (1.4)98 (1.6)0.41
Duration of β-blocker therapy, median (IQR)1146 (722–1723)72 (12–194)<0.001
At MI
At 1 year after MI
β-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)P-valueβ-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)P-value
Age (years), mean (SD)60.2 (12.1)62.4 (13.1)<0.001
Sex0.03
 Male18 074 (79.6)4904 (78.3)
 Female4633 (20.4)1359 (21.7)
Tertiary hospital11 628 (51.2)3010 (48.1)<0.001
Hypertension6866 (30.2)1595 (25.5)<0.0018091 (35.6)1996 (31.9)<0.001
Atrial fibrillation or flutter67 (0.3)19 (0.3)0.92138 (0.6)57 (0.9)0.01
Charlson index, mean (SD)0.7 (1.0)0.7 (1.1)<0.0011.9 (1.2)2.0 (1.2)<0.001
Charlson comorbiditya
 Peripheral vascular disease298 (1.3)112 (1.8)0.005458 (2.0)163 (2.6)0.005
 Cerebrovascular disease1177 (5.2)451 (7.2)<0.0011394 (6.1)577 (9.2)<0.001
 Dementia226 (1.0)149 (2.4)<0.001403 (1.8)266 (4.2)<0.001
 Chronic pulmonary disease2147 (9.5)600 (9.6)0.772934 (12.9)812 (13)0.63
 Peptic ulcer disease1741 (7.7)517 (8.3)0.131372 (6.0)392 (6.3)0.53
 Liver disease780 (3.4)223 (3.6)0.63804 (3.5)230 (3.7)0.62
 Diabetes4246 (18.7)1169 (18.7)0.954702 (20.7)1280 (20.4)0.64
 Paraplegia and hemiplegia47 (0.2)27 (0.4)0.002114 (0.5)75 (1.2)<0.001
 Renal disease244 (1.1)119 (1.9)<0.001484 (2.1)196 (3.1)<0.001
 Cancer634 (2.8)188 (3.0)0.38697 (3.1)234 (3.7)0.008
 AIDS/HIV7 (0.0)3 (0.0)0.467 (0.0)3 (0.0)0.46
 Hyperlipidaemia1264 (5.6)287 (4.6)0.0022149 (9.5)524 (8.4)0.008
 Gout458 (2.0)120 (1.9)0.613686 (3.0)175 (2.8)0.349
 Depression288 (1.3)93 (1.5)0.183490 (2.2)166 (2.7)0.02
 Valve disorder5 (0)3 (0)0.382290 (1.3)9 (0.1)0.218
Medications
 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor12 788 (56.3)3126 (49.9)<0.0016456 (28.4)882 (14.1)<0.001
 Angiotensin receptor blocker6782 (29.9)2076 (33.1)<0.00110 505 (46.3)2287 (36.5)<0.001
 Calcium channel blocker5526 (24.3)1812 (28.9)<0.0014536 (20.0)1787 (28.5)<0.001
 Statin21 006 (92.5)5720 (91.3)0.00221 623 (95.2)4298 (68.6)<0.001
 Aspirin22 237 (97.9)6102 (97.4)0.0221 542 (94.9)4364 (69.7)<0.001
 Clopidogrel16 192 (71.3)4397 (70.2)0.0915 730 (69.3)3175 (50.7)<0.001
 Ticagrelor or prasugrel5650 (24.9)1597 (25.5)0.323282 (14.5)555 (8.9)<0.001
  DAPT21 391 (94.2)5839 (93.2)0.004
  Duration of DAPT, median (IQR)434 (351–778)344 (93–550)<0.001
 Anticoagulant420 (1.8)144 (2.3)0.02323 (1.4)98 (1.6)0.41
Duration of β-blocker therapy, median (IQR)1146 (722–1723)72 (12–194)<0.001

AIDS, acquired immune deficiency syndrome; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IQR, interquartile range; MI, myocardial infarction, SD, standard deviation.

a

Charlson comorbidity were defined as presence of disease within 1 year prior to index MI.

At 1 year after the index MI, patients receiving β-blocker for ≥1 year had lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation or flutter (0.6% vs. 0.9%; P = 0.01) and lower Charlson comorbidity index (1.9 vs. 2.0; P < 0.001) compared with those receiving β-blocker for <1 year. All other medications except anticoagulant were more frequently prescribed in patients receiving β-blocker for ≥1 year.

Outcomes

During a median follow-up of 3.5 years (interquartile range 2.2–5.0 years), a total of 1684 deaths were observed. Patients receiving β-blocker for ≥1 year had a significantly lower risk of all-cause death than those receiving β-blocker for <1 year [13.1 vs. 25.7 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio (HR) 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46–0.55; P < 0.001; Table 2 and Figure 2]. The lower risk of all-cause death in patients receiving β-blocker for ≥1 year remained significant in multivariable analysis (adjusted HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.72–0.91; P < 0.001). Of 2560 events of composite of death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new HF, 1748 cases occurred in patients receiving β-blocker for ≥1 year, and 812 cases occurred in patients receiving β-blocker for <1 year (20.9 vs. 37.0 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.75–0.89; P < 0.001). Patients receiving β-blocker for ≥1 year had a strong trend towards a lower risk of recurrent MI (5.2 vs. 8.2 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.67–1.01; P = 0.06). The association between the β-blocker use for ≥1 year and risk of all-cause death was consistent in various subgroups (Figure 3). The results were similar by type of β-blocker (Supplementary material online, Table S3).

Cumulative incidences of clinical outcomes since 1 year after myocardial infarction. (A) All-cause death, (B) recurrent MI, (C) hospitalization for new heart failure, and (D) a composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new heart failure. MI, myocardial infarction.
Figure 2

Cumulative incidences of clinical outcomes since 1 year after myocardial infarction. (A) All-cause death, (B) recurrent MI, (C) hospitalization for new heart failure, and (D) a composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new heart failure. MI, myocardial infarction.

Subgroup analysis for a risk of all-cause death. ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 3

Subgroup analysis for a risk of all-cause death. ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

Table 2

Clinical outcomes since 1 year after index MI

Outcomesβ-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)
β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)
Number of casesIncidence rate (/1000 person-years)Number of casesIncidence rate (/1000 person-years)Unadjusted
Adjustedb  
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
All-cause death110913.157525.70.50 (0.46–0.55)<0.0010.81 (0.72–0.91)<0.001
Recurrent MI4405.21808.20.66 (0.55–0.79)<0.0010.82 (0.67–1.01)0.06
Hospitalization for new heart failure3333.91215.40.74 (0.59–0.92)0.0070.92 (0.73–1.17)0.51
A composite outcomea174820.981237.00.56 (0.51–0.60)<0.0010.82 (0.75–0.89)<0.001
Outcomesβ-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)
β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)
Number of casesIncidence rate (/1000 person-years)Number of casesIncidence rate (/1000 person-years)Unadjusted
Adjustedb  
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
All-cause death110913.157525.70.50 (0.46–0.55)<0.0010.81 (0.72–0.91)<0.001
Recurrent MI4405.21808.20.66 (0.55–0.79)<0.0010.82 (0.67–1.01)0.06
Hospitalization for new heart failure3333.91215.40.74 (0.59–0.92)0.0070.92 (0.73–1.17)0.51
A composite outcomea174820.981237.00.56 (0.51–0.60)<0.0010.82 (0.75–0.89)<0.001

Landmark analyses were performed among patients who were event-free during 1 year after index MI.

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MI, myocardial infarction.

a

A composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new heart failure.

b

Adjusted for comorbidities and medications at 1 year after index MI.

Table 2

Clinical outcomes since 1 year after index MI

Outcomesβ-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)
β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)
Number of casesIncidence rate (/1000 person-years)Number of casesIncidence rate (/1000 person-years)Unadjusted
Adjustedb  
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
All-cause death110913.157525.70.50 (0.46–0.55)<0.0010.81 (0.72–0.91)<0.001
Recurrent MI4405.21808.20.66 (0.55–0.79)<0.0010.82 (0.67–1.01)0.06
Hospitalization for new heart failure3333.91215.40.74 (0.59–0.92)0.0070.92 (0.73–1.17)0.51
A composite outcomea174820.981237.00.56 (0.51–0.60)<0.0010.82 (0.75–0.89)<0.001
Outcomesβ-blocker ≥1 year (N = 22 707)
β-blocker <1 year (N = 6263)
Number of casesIncidence rate (/1000 person-years)Number of casesIncidence rate (/1000 person-years)Unadjusted
Adjustedb  
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
All-cause death110913.157525.70.50 (0.46–0.55)<0.0010.81 (0.72–0.91)<0.001
Recurrent MI4405.21808.20.66 (0.55–0.79)<0.0010.82 (0.67–1.01)0.06
Hospitalization for new heart failure3333.91215.40.74 (0.59–0.92)0.0070.92 (0.73–1.17)0.51
A composite outcomea174820.981237.00.56 (0.51–0.60)<0.0010.82 (0.75–0.89)<0.001

Landmark analyses were performed among patients who were event-free during 1 year after index MI.

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MI, myocardial infarction.

a

A composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new heart failure.

b

Adjusted for comorbidities and medications at 1 year after index MI.

Long-term β-blocker use beyond 2 years after index myocardial infarction

Figure 4 presents patients with persistent vs. discontinued β-blocker therapy at each time point during follow-up. Among 22 769 patients who were event-free from death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new HF during 2 years after index MI, those receiving persistent β-blocker therapy for ≥2 years had significantly lower risks of all-cause death (adjusted HR 0.86, 0.75 to 0.99; P = 0.04), recurrent MI (adjusted HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.51–0.87; P = 0.003), and composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new HF (adjusted HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.92; P < 0.001) than those receiving β-blocker for <2 years (Table 3).

Persistent β-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes after myocardial infarction. A composite outcome includes all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for new heart failure.
Figure 4

Persistent β-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes after myocardial infarction. A composite outcome includes all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for new heart failure.

Clinical outcomes according to duration of β-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction. CI, confidence interval; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; MI, myocardial infarction.
Take home figure

Clinical outcomes according to duration of β-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction. CI, confidence interval; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; MI, myocardial infarction.

Table 3

Clinical outcomes since 2 years and 3 years after index MI

Landmark time from index MI
At 2 years
At 3 years
Duration of β-blocker therapy
Duration of β-blocker therapy
≥2 years (persistent use) (N = 16 156)<2 year (N = 6613)P-value≥3 years (persistent use) (N = 11 290)<3 year (N = 5719)P-value
All-cause deathIncidence rate9.216.96.612.3
Unadjusted HR0.53 (0.47–0.60)1 (ref)<0.0010.53 (0.45–0.62)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HRa0.86 (0.75–0.99)1 (ref)0.040.87 (0.73–1.03)1 (ref)0.12
Recurrent MIIncidence rate2.85.52.13.9
Unadjusted HR0.51 (0.41–0.64)1 (ref)<0.0010.53 (0.40–0.69)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HR0.66 (0.51–0.87)1 (ref)0.0030.74 (0.53–1.01)1 (ref)0.06
Hospitalization for new heart failureIncidence rate2.43.3
Unadjusted HR0.72 (0.56–0.91)1 (ref)0.0070.76 (0.55–1.04)1 (ref)0.08
Adjusted HR0.95 (0.73–1.24)1 (ref)0.721.04 (0.75–1.46)1 (ref)0.81
A composite outcomebIncidence rate13.624.2
Unadjusted HR0.55 (0.49–0.61)1 (ref)<0.0010.55 (0.48–0.63)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HR0.82 (0.73–0.92)1 (ref)<0.0010.85 (0.74–0.98)1 (ref)0.03
Landmark time from index MI
At 2 years
At 3 years
Duration of β-blocker therapy
Duration of β-blocker therapy
≥2 years (persistent use) (N = 16 156)<2 year (N = 6613)P-value≥3 years (persistent use) (N = 11 290)<3 year (N = 5719)P-value
All-cause deathIncidence rate9.216.96.612.3
Unadjusted HR0.53 (0.47–0.60)1 (ref)<0.0010.53 (0.45–0.62)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HRa0.86 (0.75–0.99)1 (ref)0.040.87 (0.73–1.03)1 (ref)0.12
Recurrent MIIncidence rate2.85.52.13.9
Unadjusted HR0.51 (0.41–0.64)1 (ref)<0.0010.53 (0.40–0.69)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HR0.66 (0.51–0.87)1 (ref)0.0030.74 (0.53–1.01)1 (ref)0.06
Hospitalization for new heart failureIncidence rate2.43.3
Unadjusted HR0.72 (0.56–0.91)1 (ref)0.0070.76 (0.55–1.04)1 (ref)0.08
Adjusted HR0.95 (0.73–1.24)1 (ref)0.721.04 (0.75–1.46)1 (ref)0.81
A composite outcomebIncidence rate13.624.2
Unadjusted HR0.55 (0.49–0.61)1 (ref)<0.0010.55 (0.48–0.63)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HR0.82 (0.73–0.92)1 (ref)<0.0010.85 (0.74–0.98)1 (ref)0.03

Landmark analyses were performed among patients who were event-free for 2 years or 3 years after index MI, respectively. Incidence rates were presented as events per 1000 person-years.

HR, hazard ratio; MI, myocardial infarction; ref, reference.

a

Adjusted for comorbidities and medications at 2 years or 3 years after index MI, respectively.

b

A composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new heart failure.

Table 3

Clinical outcomes since 2 years and 3 years after index MI

Landmark time from index MI
At 2 years
At 3 years
Duration of β-blocker therapy
Duration of β-blocker therapy
≥2 years (persistent use) (N = 16 156)<2 year (N = 6613)P-value≥3 years (persistent use) (N = 11 290)<3 year (N = 5719)P-value
All-cause deathIncidence rate9.216.96.612.3
Unadjusted HR0.53 (0.47–0.60)1 (ref)<0.0010.53 (0.45–0.62)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HRa0.86 (0.75–0.99)1 (ref)0.040.87 (0.73–1.03)1 (ref)0.12
Recurrent MIIncidence rate2.85.52.13.9
Unadjusted HR0.51 (0.41–0.64)1 (ref)<0.0010.53 (0.40–0.69)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HR0.66 (0.51–0.87)1 (ref)0.0030.74 (0.53–1.01)1 (ref)0.06
Hospitalization for new heart failureIncidence rate2.43.3
Unadjusted HR0.72 (0.56–0.91)1 (ref)0.0070.76 (0.55–1.04)1 (ref)0.08
Adjusted HR0.95 (0.73–1.24)1 (ref)0.721.04 (0.75–1.46)1 (ref)0.81
A composite outcomebIncidence rate13.624.2
Unadjusted HR0.55 (0.49–0.61)1 (ref)<0.0010.55 (0.48–0.63)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HR0.82 (0.73–0.92)1 (ref)<0.0010.85 (0.74–0.98)1 (ref)0.03
Landmark time from index MI
At 2 years
At 3 years
Duration of β-blocker therapy
Duration of β-blocker therapy
≥2 years (persistent use) (N = 16 156)<2 year (N = 6613)P-value≥3 years (persistent use) (N = 11 290)<3 year (N = 5719)P-value
All-cause deathIncidence rate9.216.96.612.3
Unadjusted HR0.53 (0.47–0.60)1 (ref)<0.0010.53 (0.45–0.62)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HRa0.86 (0.75–0.99)1 (ref)0.040.87 (0.73–1.03)1 (ref)0.12
Recurrent MIIncidence rate2.85.52.13.9
Unadjusted HR0.51 (0.41–0.64)1 (ref)<0.0010.53 (0.40–0.69)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HR0.66 (0.51–0.87)1 (ref)0.0030.74 (0.53–1.01)1 (ref)0.06
Hospitalization for new heart failureIncidence rate2.43.3
Unadjusted HR0.72 (0.56–0.91)1 (ref)0.0070.76 (0.55–1.04)1 (ref)0.08
Adjusted HR0.95 (0.73–1.24)1 (ref)0.721.04 (0.75–1.46)1 (ref)0.81
A composite outcomebIncidence rate13.624.2
Unadjusted HR0.55 (0.49–0.61)1 (ref)<0.0010.55 (0.48–0.63)1 (ref)<0.001
Adjusted HR0.82 (0.73–0.92)1 (ref)<0.0010.85 (0.74–0.98)1 (ref)0.03

Landmark analyses were performed among patients who were event-free for 2 years or 3 years after index MI, respectively. Incidence rates were presented as events per 1000 person-years.

HR, hazard ratio; MI, myocardial infarction; ref, reference.

a

Adjusted for comorbidities and medications at 2 years or 3 years after index MI, respectively.

b

A composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new heart failure.

For 17 009 patients who were event-free during 3 years after index MI, the risk of composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, or hospitalization for new HF was significantly lower in patients receiving persistent β-blocker therapy for ≥3 years (adjusted HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74–0.98; P = 0.03) than those who were not.

Discussion

In this nationwide cohort study, β-blocker therapy for ≥1 year was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death compared with β-blocker for <1 year in patients without HF after AMI. The beneficial effects of β-blocker were consistent across various subgroups.

Very limited data are available on the effects of long-term β-blocker therapy on mortality in the reperfusion era. Among 824 and 556 patients who were followed-up at 1 and 3 years after AMI in a single-centre registry,11 the HR for all-cause mortality in patients with β-blocker therapy at 1 and 3 years after AMI were 0.85 (95% CI 0.53–1.36) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.44–1.78), respectively. However, this cohort included patients with HF who might have a worse prognosis despite long-term β-blocker therapy than those without HF not receiving long-term β-blocker therapy. In the FAST-MI registry (Nationwide French registry of Acute ST-and non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction) with data from 1383 patients with AMI and without HF or left ventricular dysfunction alive at 1 year,3 the 5-year mortality in patients who were still taking β-blockers at 1 year was 7.6%, compared with 9.2% in those who were not taking β-blockers at 1 year (adjusted HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.65–2.18). However, there were no data on β-blocker use beyond 1 year after the index MI and status of β-locker therapy from 1 year to 5 years could not be identified. It is known that a substantial number of patients discontinue β-blockers during follow-up,11 and β-blockers could also be restarted due to the development of HF during follow-up. Another study reporting β-blocker therapy beyond 3 years post-MI,12 conducted in patients ≥65 years of age including 21.8% of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and with a single assessment of β-blocker therapy, also found no association of β-blocker therapy with improved outcomes. On the other hand, our study was large enough to reliably estimate clinically relevant associations in a contemporary practice setting. Moreover, we were able to compare clinical outcomes by type of β-blocker, an issue for which there is very limited data available. Most patients in our study received relatively new types of β-blockers recommended by clinical guidelines for HF,20 and we found no significant differences across types of β-blockers.

There are several plausible explanations for the current results. First, a considerable number of AMI patients who were discharged from hospital without HF experience recurrent MI, or hospitalization or death because of HF during follow-up.21  ,  22 Therefore, continuation of β-blocker as a secondary prevention would be beneficial even in patients without HF at the time of hospital discharge. Second, blood pressure might be better controlled in patients receiving long-term β-blocker therapy than those not. The control of blood pressure is an essential part of risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary artery disease,23 and intensive blood pressure control improves cardiovascular outcome in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events.24 Third, β-blocker therapy might slow progression of coronary atherosclerosis, as pooled analysis from intravascular ultrasound trials demonstrated that β-blocker therapy was associated with a regression of atheroma volume in patients with coronary artery disease.25

Limitations

Our study has limitations. First, we could not identify reasons for β-blocker use in this study. Patients receiving long-term β-blocker therapy might have less severe risk profiles to tolerate β-blocker therapy compared with those stopping β-blockers during the follow-up. To overcome this potential bias, we excluded patients who had not started their β-blocker therapy at early stage after AMI, and conducted landmark analysis to avoid immortal time bias. Second, there is a potential selection bias induced by unrecorded confounders. For example, we lacked information on type of AMI and angiographic severity, anthropometric and behavioural factors, and we had only limited information on disease management based on claims. Finally, there was no information in our study about left ventricular ejection fraction. However, the majority of patients experiencing MI in Korea have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.26 Furthermore, since patients with low ejection fraction are likely to receive β-blocker therapy and have poor prognosis, this type of bias is unlikely to explain our findings.

Future directions

The CAPITAL-RCT (Carvedilol Post-Intervention Long-Term Administration in Large-scale Randomized Controlled Trial) was a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of long-term oral beta-blocker therapy in preventing cardiovascular events in STEMI patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function who underwent primary PCI,13 but its sample size was relatively small (801 patients) and the event rate was low. This trial did not provide robust evidence for a definite conclusion. A large randomized clinical trial will be needed to investigate the effect and optimal duration of β-blocker therapy after MI in patients without HF or left ventricular systolic dysfunction who receive current guideline-based treatments.

Conclusions

Among patients with AMI but without HF, β-blocker therapy for ≥1 year after MI was associated with reduced mortality. However, a large randomized clinical trial will be needed to establish the optimal duration of routine β-blocker therapy after AMI.

Data availablity

The data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service are only available to authorized personnel and access to the data is restricted.

Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal online.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

References

1

Norwegian Multicenter Study Group.

Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction
.
N Engl J Med
 
1981
;
304
:
801
807
.

2

Roffi
 
M
,
Patrono
 
C
,
Collet
 
J-P
,
Mueller
 
C
,
Valgimigli
 
M
,
Andreotti
 
F
,
Bax
 
JJ
,
Borger
 
MA
,
Brotons
 
C
,
Chew
 
DP
,
Gencer
 
B
,
Hasenfuss
 
G
,
Kjeldsen
 
K
,
Lancellotti
 
P
,
Landmesser
 
U
,
Mehilli
 
J
,
Mukherjee
 
D
,
Storey
 
RF
,
Windecker
 
S.
 
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation
.
Eur Heart J
 
2016
;
37
:
267
315
.

3

Puymirat
 
E
,
Riant
 
E
,
Aissaoui
 
N
,
Soria
 
A
,
Ducrocq
 
G
,
Coste
 
P
,
Cottin
 
Y
,
Aupetit
 
JF
,
Bonnefoy
 
E
,
Blanchard
 
D
,
Cattan
 
S
,
Steg
 
G
,
Schiele
 
F
,
Ferrieres
 
J
,
Juilliere
 
Y
,
Simon
 
T
,
Danchin
 
N.
 
beta blockers and mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure: multicentre prospective cohort study
.
BMJ
 
2016
;
354
:
i4801
.

4

Dondo
 
TB
,
Hall
 
M
,
West
 
RM
,
Jernberg
 
T
,
Lindahl
 
B
,
Bueno
 
H
,
Danchin
 
N
,
Deanfield
 
JE
,
Hemingway
 
H
,
Fox
 
KAA
,
Timmis
 
AD
,
Gale
 
CP.
 
Beta-blockers and mortality after acute myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure or ventricular dysfunction
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2017
;
69
:
2710
2720
.

5

Yang
 
JH
,
Hahn
 
JY
,
Song
 
YB
,
Choi
 
SH
,
Choi
 
JH
,
Lee
 
SH
,
Kim
 
JH
,
Ahn
 
YK
,
Jeong
 
MH
,
Choi
 
DJ
,
Park
 
JS
,
Kim
 
YJ
,
Park
 
HS
,
Han
 
KR
,
Rha
 
SW
,
Gwon
 
HC.
 
Association of beta-blocker therapy at discharge with clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
 
2014
;
7
:
592
601
.

6

Olsson
 
G
,
Rehnqvist
 
N.
 
Evaluation of antiarrhythmic effect of metoprolol treatment after acute myocardial infarction: relationship between treatment responses and survival during a 3-year follow-up
.
Eur Heart J
 
1986
;
7
:
312
319
.

7

Ibanez
 
B
,
Macaya
 
C
,
Sánchez-Brunete
 
V
,
Pizarro
 
G
,
Fernández-Friera
 
L
,
Mateos
 
A
,
Fernández-Ortiz
 
A
,
García-Ruiz
 
JM
,
García-Álvarez
 
A
,
Iñiguez
 
A
,
Jiménez-Borreguero
 
J
,
López-Romero
 
P
,
Fernández-Jiménez
 
R
,
Goicolea
 
J
,
Ruiz-Mateos
 
B
,
Bastante
 
T
,
Arias
 
M
,
Iglesias-Vázquez
 
JA
,
Rodriguez
 
MD
,
Escalera
 
N
,
Acebal
 
C
,
Cabrera
 
JA
,
Valenciano
 
J
,
Pérez de Prado
 
A
,
Fernández-Campos
 
MJ
,
Casado
 
I
,
García-Rubira
 
JC
,
García-Prieto
 
J
,
Sanz-Rosa
 
D
,
Cuellas
 
C
,
Hernández-Antolín
 
R
,
Albarrán
 
A
,
Fernández-Vázquez
 
F
,
de la Torre-Hernández
 
JM
,
Pocock
 
S
,
Sanz
 
G
,
Fuster
 
V.
 
Effect of early metoprolol on infarct size in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the effect of metoprolol in cardioprotection during an acute myocardial infarction (METOCARD-CNIC) trial
.
Circulation
 
2013
;
128
:
1495
1503
.

8

Halkin
 
A
,
Grines
 
CL
,
Cox
 
DA
,
Garcia
 
E
,
Mehran
 
R
,
Tcheng
 
JE
,
Griffin
 
JJ
,
Guagliumi
 
G
,
Brodie
 
B
,
Turco
 
M
,
Rutherford
 
BD
,
Aymong
 
E
,
Lansky
 
AJ
,
Stone
 
GW.
 
Impact of intravenous beta-blockade before primary angioplasty on survival in patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2004
;
43
:
1780
1787
.

9

O’Gara
 
PT
,
Kushner
 
FG
,
Ascheim
 
DD
,
Casey
 
DE
 Jr
,
Chung
 
MK
,
de Lemos
 
JA
,
Ettinger
 
SM
,
Fang
 
JC
,
Fesmire
 
FM
,
Franklin
 
BA
,
Granger
 
CB
,
Krumholz
 
HM
,
Linderbaum
 
JA
,
Morrow
 
DA
,
Newby
 
LK
,
Ornato
 
JP
,
Ou
 
N
,
Radford
 
MJ
,
Tamis-Holland
 
JE
,
Tommaso
 
CL
,
Tracy
 
CM
,
Woo
 
YJ
,
Zhao
 
DX
,
Anderson
 
JL
,
Jacobs
 
AK
,
Halperin
 
JL
,
Albert
 
NM
,
Brindis
 
RG
,
Creager
 
MA
,
DeMets
 
D
,
Guyton
 
RA
,
Hochman
 
JS
,
Kovacs
 
RJ
,
Kushner
 
FG
,
Ohman
 
EM
,
Stevenson
 
WG
,
Yancy
 
CW
; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
.
Circulation
 
2013
;
127
:
e362
e425
.

10

Ibanez
 
B
,
James
 
S
,
Agewall
 
S
,
Antunes
 
MJ
,
Bucciarelli-Ducci
 
C
,
Bueno
 
H
,
Caforio
 
ALP
,
Crea
 
F
,
Goudevenos
 
JA
,
Halvorsen
 
S
,
Hindricks
 
G
,
Kastrati
 
A
,
Lenzen
 
MJ
,
Prescott
 
E
,
Roffi
 
M
,
Valgimigli
 
M
,
Varenhorst
 
C
,
Vranckx
 
P
,
Widimský
 
P
; ESC Scientific Document Group.
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC
).
Eur Heart J
 
2018
;
39
:
119
177
.

11

Park
 
JJ
,
Kim
 
SH
,
Kang
 
SH
,
Yoon
 
CH
,
Cho
 
YS
,
Youn
 
TJ
,
Chae
 
IH
,
Choi
 
DJ.
 
Effect of beta-blockers beyond 3 years after acute myocardial infarction
.
J Am Heart Assoc
 
2018
;
7
:
e007567
.

12

Shavadia
 
JS
,
Holmes
 
DN
,
Thomas
 
L
,
Peterson
 
ED
,
Granger
 
CB
,
Roe
 
MT
,
Wang
 
TY.
 
Comparative effectiveness of beta-blocker use beyond 3 years after myocardial infarction and long-term outcomes among elderly patients
.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
 
2019
;
12
:
e005103
.

13

Watanabe
 
H
,
Ozasa
 
N
,
Morimoto
 
T
,
Shiomi
 
H
,
Bingyuan
 
B
,
Suwa
 
S
,
Nakagawa
 
Y
,
Izumi
 
C
,
Kadota
 
K
,
Ikeguchi
 
S
,
Hibi
 
K
,
Furukawa
 
Y
,
Kaji
 
S
,
Suzuki
 
T
,
Akao
 
M
,
Inada
 
T
,
Hayashi
 
Y
,
Nanasato
 
M
,
Okutsu
 
M
,
Kametani
 
R
,
Sone
 
T
,
Sugimura
 
Y
,
Kawai
 
K
,
Abe
 
M
,
Kaneko
 
H
,
Nakamura
 
S
,
Kimura
 
T
; on behalf of the CAPITAL-RCT investigators.
Long-term use of carvedilol in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention
.
PLoS One
 
2018
;
13
:
e0199347
.

14

Lee
 
J
,
Lee
 
JS
,
Park
 
SH
,
Shin
 
SA
,
Kim
 
K.
 
Cohort profile: the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC), South Korea
.
Int J Epidemiol
 
2017
;
46
:
e15
.

15

Shin
 
DW
,
Cho
 
B
,
Guallar
 
E.
 
Korean National Health Insurance Database
.
JAMA Intern Med
 
2016
;
176
:
138
.

16

Lee
 
SR
,
Lee
 
HJ
,
Choi
 
EK
,
Han
 
KD
,
Jung
 
JH
,
Cha
 
MJ
,
Oh
 
S
,
Lip
 
G.
 
Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver disease
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
 
2019
;
73
:
3295
3308
.

17

Parast
 
L
,
Tian
 
L
,
Cai
 
T.
 
Landmark estimation of survival and treatment effect in a randomized clinical trial
.
J Am Stat Assoc
 
2014
;
109
:
384
394
.

18

Chun
 
CB
,
Kim
 
SY
,
Lee
 
JY
,
Lee
 
SY.
 
Republic of Korea: Health system review
.
Health Systems in Transition
2009;
11
:
1
184
.

19

Park
 
J
, Kwon S, Choi EK, Choi Y, Lee E, Choe W, Lee SR, Cha M, Lim WH, Oh S.
Validation of diagnostic codes of major clinical outcomes in a National Health Insurance database. Int J Arrhythm 2019;20:5
.

20

Ponikowski
 
P
,
Voors
 
AA
,
Anker
 
SD
,
Bueno
 
H
,
Cleland
 
JGF
,
Coats
 
AJS
,
Falk
 
V
,
Gonzalez-Juanatey
 
JR
,
Harjola
 
VP
,
Jankowska
 
EA
,
Jessup
 
M
,
Linde
 
C
,
Nihoyannopoulos
 
P
,
Parissis
 
JT
,
Pieske
 
B
,
Riley
 
JP
,
Rosano
 
GMC
,
Ruilope
 
LM
,
Ruschitzka
 
F
,
Rutten
 
FH
,
van der Meer
 
P.
 
2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC
.
Eur Heart J
 
2016
;
37
:
2129
2200
.

21

Sulo
 
G
,
Igland
 
J
,
Vollset
 
SE
,
Nygard
 
O
,
Ebbing
 
M
,
Sulo
 
E
,
Egeland
 
GM
,
Tell
 
GS.
 
Heart failure complicating acute myocardial infarction; burden and timing of occurrence: a nation-wide analysis including 86 771 patients from the cardiovascular disease in Norway (CVDNOR) project
.
J Am Heart Assoc
 
2016
;
5
:e002667.

22

Smolina
 
K
,
Wright
 
FL
,
Rayner
 
M
,
Goldacre
 
MJ.
 
Long-term survival and recurrence after acute myocardial infarction in England, 2004 to 2010
.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
 
2012
;
5
:
532
540
.

23

Smith
 
SC
 Jr ,
Benjamin
 
EJ
,
Bonow
 
RO
,
Braun
 
LT
,
Creager
 
MA
,
Franklin
 
BA
,
Gibbons
 
RJ
,
Grundy
 
SM
,
Hiratzka
 
LF
,
Jones
 
DW
,
Lloyd-Jones
 
DM
,
Minissian
 
M
,
Mosca
 
L
,
Peterson
 
ED
,
Sacco
 
RL
,
Spertus
 
J
,
Stein
 
JH
,
Taubert
 
KA.
 
AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation
.
Circulation
 
2011
;
124
:
2458
2473
.

24

Wright
 
JT
 Jr ,
Williamson
 
JD
,
Whelton
 
PK
,
Snyder
 
JK
,
Sink
 
KM
,
Rocco
 
MV
,
Reboussin
 
DM
,
Rahman
 
M
,
Oparil
 
S
,
Lewis
 
CE
,
Kimmel
 
PL
,
Johnson
 
KC
,
Goff
 
DC
 Jr
,
Fine
 
LJ
,
Cutler
 
JA
,
Cushman
 
WC
,
Cheung
 
AK
,
Ambrosius
 
WT.
 
A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control
.
N Engl J Med
 
2015
;
373
:
2103
2116
.

25

Sipahi
 
I
,
Tuzcu
 
EM
,
Wolski
 
KE
,
Nicholls
 
SJ
,
Schoenhagen
 
P
,
Hu
 
B
,
Balog
 
C
,
Shishehbor
 
M
,
Magyar
 
WA
,
Crowe
 
TD
,
Kapadia
 
S
,
Nissen
 
SE.
 
Beta-blockers and progression of coronary atherosclerosis: pooled analysis of 4 intravascular ultrasonography trials
.
Ann Intern Med
 
2007
;
147
:
10
18
.

26

Song
 
PS
,
Ryu
 
DR
,
Kim
 
MJ
,
Jeon
 
KH
,
Choi
 
RK
,
Park
 
JS
,
Song
 
YB
,
Hahn
 
JY
,
Gwon
 
HC
,
Ahn
 
Y
,
Jeong
 
MH
,
Choi
 
SH
; Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Investigators.
Risk scoring system to assess outcomes in patients treated with contemporary guideline-adherent optimal therapies after acute myocardial infarction
.
Korean Circ J
 
2018
;
48
:
492
504
.

Author notes

Jihoon Kim and Danbee Kang contributed equally to this work.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Supplementary data