-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Antonio Pelliccia, Sanjay Sharma, Sabiha Gati, Maria Bäck, Mats Börjesson, Stefano Caselli, Jean-Philippe Collet, Domenico Corrado, Jonathan A Drezner, Martin Halle, Dominique Hansen, Hein Heidbuchel, Jonathan Myers, Josef Niebauer, Michael Papadakis, Massimo Francesco Piepoli, Eva Prescott, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink, A Graham Stuart, Rod S Taylor, Paul D Thompson, Monica Tiberi, Luc Vanhees, Matthias Wilhelm, ESC Scientific Document Group , 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease: The Task Force on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Heart Journal, Volume 42, Issue 1, 1 January 2021, Pages 17–96, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa605
- Share Icon Share
The disclosure forms of all experts involved in the development of these Guidelines are available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines
For the Supplementary Data which include background information and detailed discussion of the data that have provided the basis for the Guidelines see European Heart Journal online.
Click here to access the corresponding chapter in ESC CardioMed - section 55 - Sports and heart disease
Table of Contents
Abbreviations and acronyms 21
1 Preamble 22
2 Introduction 24
3 Identification of cardiovascular disease and risk stratification in individuals participating in recreational and competitive sports 25
3.1 Introduction 25
3.2 Definitions of recreational and competitive athletes 25
3.3 Exercise-related major adverse cardiovascular events 25
3.4 Incidence of sudden cardiac death in athletes 26
3.5 Aetiology of sudden cardiac death during exercise 26
3.6 Screening modalities for cardiovascular disease in young athletes 26
3.7 Screening for cardiovascular disease in older athletes 26
4 Physical activity, leisure exercise, and competitive sports participation 27
4.1 General introduction 27
4.1.1 Definition and characteristics of exercise interventions 27
4.1.1.1 Type of exercise 27
4.1.1.2 Exercise frequency 28
4.1.1.3 Exercise intensity 28
4.1.1.4 Training volume 28
4.1.1.5 Type of training 28
4.1.2 Classification of exercise and sports 29
4.2 Exercise recommendations in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors 30
4.2.1 General introduction 30
4.2.2 Obesity 34
4.2.3 Hypertension 35
4.2.4 Dyslipidaemia 35
4.2.5 Diabetes mellitus 36
4.2.5.1 Effect of exercise on diabetic control, risk factors and outcomes 36
4.2.5.2 Recommendations for participation in exercise in individuals with diabetes mellitus 36
4.2.5.3 Cardiac evaluation before exercise in individuals with diabetes mellitus 36
4.3 Exercise and sports in ageing 37
4.3.1 Introduction 37
4.3.2 Risk stratification, inclusion/exclusion criteria 37
4.3.3 Exercise modalities and recommendations for exercise and sport in the elderly 37
5 Exercise in clinical settings 38
5.1 Exercise programmes for leisure-time and competitive sport participation in chronic coronary syndrome 38
5.1.1 Individuals at risk of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease and asymptomatic individuals in whom coronary artery disease is detected at screening 39
5.1.1.1 Recommendations for sports participation 39
5.1.2 Established (long-standing) chronic coronary syndrome 40
5.1.2.1 Antithrombotic treatment 42
5.1.3 Myocardial ischaemia without obstructive disease in the epicardial coronary artery 42
5.1.4 Return to sport after acute coronary syndrome 42
5.1.4.1 Competitive athletes 42
5.1.4.2 Recreational athletes 42
5.1.5 Anomalous origin of coronary arteries 42
5.1.5.1 Background 42
5.1.5.2 Eligibility for sports 42
5.1.6 Myocardial bridging 44
5.1.6.1 Background 44
5.1.6.2 Eligibility 44
5.2 Exercise recommendations in individuals with chronic heart failure 44
5.2.1 Background: rationale for exercise in chronic heart failure 44
5.2.2 Risk stratification and preliminary evaluation 44
5.2.3 Exercise modalities and sports participation in heart failure 45
5.2.3.1 Aerobic/endurance exercise 45
5.2.3.2 Resistance exercise 45
5.2.3.3 Respiratory exercise 45
5.2.3.4 Aquatic exercise 45
5.2.4 Sports participation and return to sports 46
5.2.4.1 Competitive sports 46
5.2.4.2 Recreational sports 46
5.2.5 Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction 47
5.2.5.1 Exercise modalities and sports participation 47
5.2.6 Exercise in individuals after heart transplantation 47
5.2.6.1 Exercise modalities and sports participation 47
5.3 Exercise recommendations in individuals with valvular heart disease 48
5.3.1 Introduction 48
5.3.1.1 General principles in assessment and risk stratification of individuals with valvular heart disease prior to leisure exercise or competitive sports 48
5.3.1.2 Surveillance 48
5.3.2 Aortic valve stenosis 48
5.3.3 Aortic valve regurgitation 49
5.3.4 Bicuspid aortic valve 50
5.3.5 Primary mitral regurgitation 51
5.3.5.1 Mitral valve prolapse 52
5.3.6 Mitral stenosis 52
5.3.7 Tricuspid regurgitation 53
5.4 Exercise recommendations in individuals with aortopathy 53
5.4.1 Introduction 53
5.4.2 Risk of dissection 54
5.4.3 Sporting disciplines 54
5.4.4 Effect on aortic diameter and wall stress 54
5.4.5 Recommendations 55
5.5 Exercise recommendations in individuals with cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, and pericarditis 55
5.5.1 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 55
5.5.1.1 Risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 55
5.5.1.2 Baseline assessment of patients with HCM 55
5.5.1.3 History 55
5.5.1.4 Resting and ambulatory ECG 56
5.5.1.5 Echocardiography 56
5.5.1.6 Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 56
5.5.1.7 Exercise testing 56
5.5.1.8 Genetic testing 56
5.5.1.9 ESC risk score in HCM 56
5.5.1.10 Exercise recommendation 56
5.5.1.11 Special considerations 56
5.5.1.12 Follow-up 56
5.5.2 Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy 57
5.5.2.1 Risk stratification in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy 57
5.5.2.2 Baseline assessment of patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy 57
5.5.2.3 History 58
5.5.2.4 Resting and ambulatory ECG 58
5.5.2.5 Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 58
5.5.2.6 Exercise testing 58
5.5.2.7 Genetic testing 58
5.5.2.8 Exercise recommendations 58
5.5.2.9 Special considerations 58
5.5.2.10 Follow-up 58
5.5.3 Exercise recommendations in individuals with left ventricular non-compaction 59
5.5.3.1 Risk stratification 59
5.5.3.2 Follow-up 59
5.5.4 Exercise recommendations in individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy 59
5.5.4.1 Baseline assessment of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy 60
5.5.4.2 Special considerations 60
5.5.5 Exercise recommendations in individuals with myocarditis and pericarditis 60
5.5.5.1 Myocarditis 60
5.5.5.2 Diagnosis 61
5.5.5.3 Risk stratification 61
5.5.5.4 Exercise recommendations for individuals with myocarditis 61
5.5.6 Pericarditis 61
5.5.6.1 Diagnosis 61
5.5.6.2 Risk stratification 61
5.5.6.3 Exercise recommendations for individuals with pericarditis 62
5.6 Exercise recommendations in individuals with arrhythmias and channelopathies 62
5.6.1 A general management framework 62
5.6.2 Atrial fibrillation 62
5.6.2.1 Patients without atrial fibrillation 62
5.6.2.2 Prognostic and symptomatic relevance of AF during sports 63
5.6.2.3 Impact of continuing sport on the natural progression of atrial fibrillation after ablation 63
5.6.3 Supraventricular tachycardia and Wolff-Parkinson- White syndrome 64
5.6.3.1 Prognostic and symptomatic relevance of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia without pre-excitation 64
5.6.3.2 Prognostic and symptomatic relevance of pre-excitation 64
5.6.4 Premature ventricular contractions and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia 65
5.6.4.1 Relation between number of premature ventricular contractions and risk 65
5.6.4.2 Morphology of premature ventricular contractions 65
5.6.4.3 Premature ventricular contractions: response to exercise 65
5.6.4.4 Practical management of cardiac patients with premature ventricular contractions or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia who want to engage in sports 66
5.6.5 Long QT syndrome 66
5.6.6 Brugada syndrome 67
5.6.7 Following device implantation 68
5.6.7.1 Pacemakers 68
5.6.7.2 Implantable cardioverter defibrillators 68
5.7 Exercise recommendations in individuals with adult congenital heart disease 69
5.7.1 Introduction 69
5.7.2 The increasing numbers of athletes with congenital heart disease 69
5.7.3 Non-cardiac abnormalities in congenital heart disease and Paralympic sport 69
5.7.4 General considerations in the congenital heart disease athlete 69
5.7.5 Sudden death during sport 70
5.7.6 Exercise in athletes with congenital heart disease: current guidelines and recommendations 70
5.7.7 Assessment of the athlete with congenital heart disease 70
6 Key messages 72
7 Gaps in evidence 73
8 Sex differences 74
9 ‘What to do’ and ‘what not to do’ messages from the Guidelines 75
10 Supplementary data 78
11 Appendix 78
12 References 80
List of tables
Table 1 Classes of recommendations 23
Table 2 Levels of evidence 23
Table 3 Characteristics of exercise 28
Table 4 Indices of exercise intensity for endurance sports from maximal exercise testing and training zones 30
Table 5 Cardiovascular risk categories 33
Table 6 Potential risks for older people during exercise 38
Table 7 Exercise prescription in the elderly 38
Table 8 Exercise activities for older people according to exercise type and intensity 38
Table 9 Borderline or uninterpretable ECG findings 39
Table 10 Factors determining risk of adverse events during intensive exercise and competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with long-standing coronary artery disease 40
Table 11 High-risk features for exercise-induced adverse cardiac events in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease 40
Table 12 Optimal exercise training dose for patients with chronic heart failure 45
Table 13 Factors influencing decreased exercise capacity (peak VO2) and reduced cardiac output in individuals with heart transplants 47
Table 14 Classification of risk to perform sports in patients with aortic pathology 54
Table 15 Findings during an invasive electrophysiological study (with the use of isoprenaline) indicating an accessory pathway with increased risk of sudden death 48
Table 16 Baseline parameters for assessment in congenital heart disease 55
List of figures
Figure Central illustration Moderate physical activity should be promoted in all individuals with cardiovascular disease 24
Figure 1 Components for expression of physical fitness 27
Figure 2 Sporting discipline in relation to the predominant component (skill, power, mixed and endurance) and intensity of exercise. Intensity of exercise must be individualized after maximal exercise testing, field testing and/or after muscular strength testing 29
Figure 3a and 3b SCORE charts for European populations of countries at HIGH and LOW cardiovascular disease risk 31
Figure 4 Proposed algorithm for cardiovascular assessment in asymptomatic individuals with risk factors for and possible subclinical chronic coronary syndrome before engaging in sports for individuals aged >35 years 34
Figure 5 Clinical evaluation and recommendations for sports participation in individuals with established coronary artery disease 41
Figure 6 Schematic representation of the most frequent anomalous origin of coronary arteries and associated risk of sudden cardiac death 43
Figure 7 Schematic representation of a myocardial bridge 44
Figure 8 Specific markers of increased risk of sudden cardiac death with mitral valve prolapse 52
Figure 9 Pre-participation assessment of individuals with congenital heart disease. 55
Tables of recommendations
General recommendations for exercise and sports in healthy individuals 33
Recommendations for cardiovascular evaluation and regular exercise in healthy individuals aged >35 years 34
Special considerations for individuals with obesity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, or diabetes 37
Recommendations for exercise in ageing individuals 38
Recommendations for exercise in individuals at risk of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease and asymptomatic individuals in whom coronary artery disease is detected at screening 40
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with long-standing chronic coronary syndrome 41
Recommendations for return to exercise after acute coronary syndrome 42
Recommendations for exercise in young individuals/athletes with anomalous origins of coronary arteries 43
Recommendations for exercise/sports in individuals with myocardial bridging 44
Recommendations for exercise prescription in heart failure with reduced or mid-range ejection fraction 46
Recommendations for participation in sports in heart failure 46
Recommendations for exercise and participation in sport in individuals with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction 47
Recommendations for exercise and participation in sport in heart transplant recipients 48
Recommendations for exercise and participation in recreational/ leisure-time sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic stenosis 49
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic stenosis 49
Recommendations for participation in recreational/leisure-time sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic regurgitation 50
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic regurgitation 50
Recommendations for participation in recreational/leisure-time sports in asymptomatic individuals with mitral regurgitation 51
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with mitral regurgitation 51
Recommendations for participation in recreational/leisure-time sports in individuals with mitral stenosis 53
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with mitral stenosis 53
Recommendations for exercise and participation in sports in individuals with aortic pathology 55
Recommendations for exercise and sports participation in individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 57
Recommendations for exercise and sports participation in individuals with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy 58
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy 59
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy 60
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with myocarditis 62
Recommendations for exercise and sports participation in individuals with pericarditis 62
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with atrial fibrillation 63
Recommendations for exercise and sports participation in individuals with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and pre-excitation 65
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with premature ventricular contractions or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia 66
Recommendations for exercise in long QT syndrome 67
Recommendations for exercise in Brugada syndrome 67
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators 69
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with congenital heart disease 72
Abbreviations and acronyms
- ACE
Angiotensin-converting enzyme
- ACHD
Adults with congenital heart disease
- ACM
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
- ACS
Acute coronary syndromes
- AED
Automatic external defibrillator
- AHA
American Heart Association
- AF
Atrial fibrillation
- AFL
Atrial flutter
- AMI
Acute myocardial infarction
- AN-SUD
Autopsy-negative sudden unexplained death
- AP
Accessory pathway
- AOCA
Anomalous origin of coronary arteries
- AR
Aortic valve regurgitation
- ARVC
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
- AS
Aortic valve stenosis
- ASI
Aortic size index
- AVNRT
Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia
- AVRT
Atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia
- BAV
Bicuspid aortic valve
- BMI
Body mass index
- BP
Blood pressure
- BrS
Brugada syndrome
- CAC
Coronary artery calcium
- CAD
Coronary artery disease
- CCS
Chronic coronary syndrome
- CCTA
Coronary computed tomography angiography
- CHD
Congenital heart disease
- CKD
Chronic kidney disease
- CMD
Coronary microvascular dysfunction
- CMR
Cardiac magnetic resonance
- CPET
Cardiopulmonary exercise test
- CPR
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- CT
Computed tomography
- CV
Cardiovascular
- CVA
Cerebrovascular accident
- CVD
Cardiovascular disease
- DBP
Diastolic blood pressure
- DCM
Dilated cardiomyopathy
- EACPR
European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation
- EAPC
European Association of Preventive Cardiology
- ECV
Extracellular volume
- ECG
Electrocardiogram
- EDS
Ehlers Danlos syndrome
- EF
Ejection fraction
- EP
Electrophysiological
- ESC
European Society of Cardiology
- Ex-R
Exercise-related
- exCR
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation
- FFR
Fractional flow reserve
- FITT
Frequency, intensity, time, and type
- HCM
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- HDL
High-density lipoprotein
- HF
Heart failure
- HIIT
High-intensity interval training
- HR
Heart rate
- HFmrEF
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction
- HFpEF
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
- HFrEF
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
- HRmax
Maximal heart rate
- HRR
Heart rate reserve
- HTAD
Hereditary thoracic aortic disease
- HTx
Heart transplant
- ICD
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
- IMT
Intima–media thickness
- INOCA
Ischaemic and non-obstructive coronary artery disease
- LBBB
Left bundle branch block
- LDL
Low-density lipoprotein
- LEAD
Lower extremity artery disease
- LGE
Late gadolinium enhancement
- LV
Left ventricular
- LVEDD
Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter
- LVEF
Left ventricular ejection fraction
- LVNC
Left ventricular non-compaction
- LVOT
Left ventricular outflow tract
- LQTS
Long QT syndrome
- MACE
Major adverse cardiovascular events
- MB
Myocardial bridge/bridging
- MCE
Moderate continuous exercise
- MET
Metabolic equivalent
- MFS
Marfan syndrome
- MI
Myocardial infarction
- MR
Mitral regurgitation
- MS
Mitral stenosis
- MVA
Mitral valve area
- MVP
Mitral valve prolapse
- NSVT
Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia
- NYHA
New York Heart Association
- OAC
Oral anticoagulants
- PA
Physical activity
- PAD
Peripheral arterial disease
- PAP
Pulmonary artery pressure
- PCI
Percutaneous coronary intervention
- PCSK-9
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9
- PET
Positron emission tomography
- PH
Pulmonary hypertension
- PM
Pacemaker
- PSVT
Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia
- PVC
Premature ventricular contraction
- PVI
Pulmonary vein isolation
- RBBB
Right bundle branch block
- RM
Repetition maximum
- RPE
Rating of perceived exertion
- RT-PCR
Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
- RV
Right ventricular
- RVOT
Right ventricular outflow tract
- SBP
Systolic blood pressure
- SCA
Sudden cardiac arrest
- SCAD
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection
- SCD
Sudden cardiac death
- SCORE
Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation
- sPAP
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure
- SPECT
Single-photon emission computed tomography
- TIA
Transient ischaemic attack
- TR
Tricuspid regurgitation
- T2DM
Type II diabetes mellitus
- US
United States
- VA
Ventricular arrhythmia
- VAD
Ventricular assist device
- VF
Ventricular fibrillation
- VT
Ventricular tachycardia
- VO2
Oxygen consumption
- VO2max
Maximum oxygen consumption
- VO2peak
Peak oxygen consumption
- WADA
World Anti-Doping Agency
- WPW
Wolff-Parkinson-White
1. Preamble
Guidelines summarize and evaluate available evidence with the aim of assisting health professionals in proposing the best management strategies for an individual patient with a given condition. Guidelines and their recommendations should facilitate decision making of health professionals in their daily practice. However, the final decisions concerning an individual patient must be made by the responsible health professional(s) in consultation with the patient and caregiver as appropriate.
A great number of Guidelines have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), as well as by other societies and organizations. Because of their impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for the development of guidelines have been established in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines can be found on the ESC website (http://www.escardio.org/Guidelines-&-Education/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines/Guidelines-development/Writing-ESC-Guidelines). The ESC Guidelines represent the official position of the ESC on a given topic and are regularly updated.
In addition to the publication of Clinical Practice Guidelines, the ESC carries out the EurObservational Research Programme of international registries of cardiovascular diseases and interventions which are essential to assess, diagnostic/therapeutic processes, use of resources and adherence to Guidelines. These registries aim at providing a better understanding of medical practice in Europe and around the world, based on high-quality data collected during routine clinical practice.
Furthermore, the ESC has developed and embedded, in some of its guidelines, a set of quality indicators (QIs) which are tools to evaluate the level of implementation of the Guidelines and may be used by the ESC, hospitals, healthcare providers and professionals to measure clinical practice as well as used in educational programmes, alongside the key messages from the Guidelines, to improve quality of care and clinical outcomes.
The Members of this Task Force were selected by the ESC, including representation from its relevant ESC sub-specialty groups, in order to represent professionals involved with the medical care of patients with this pathology. Selected experts in the field undertook a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management of a given condition according to ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) policy. A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures was performed, including assessment of the risk–benefit ratio. The level of evidence and the strength of the recommendation of particular management options were weighed and graded according to predefined scales, as outlined below.
The experts of the writing and reviewing panels provided declaration of interest forms for all relationships that might be perceived as real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. Their declarations of interest were reviewed according to the ESC declaration of interest rules and can be found on the ESC website (http://www.escardio.org/guidelines). This process ensures transparency and prevents potential biases in the development and review processes. Any changes in declarations of interest that arise during the writing period were notified to the ESC and updated. The Task Force received its entire financial support from the ESC without any involvement from the healthcare industry.
The ESC CPG supervises and coordinates the preparation of new Guidelines. The Committee is also responsible for the endorsement process of these Guidelines. The ESC Guidelines undergo extensive review by the CPG and external experts. After appropriate revisions the Guidelines are approved by all the experts involved in the Task Force. The finalized document is approved by the CPG for publication in the European Heart Journal. The Guidelines were developed after careful consideration of the scientific and medical knowledge and the evidence available at the time of their dating.
The task of developing ESC Guidelines also includes the creation of educational tools and implementation programmes for the recommendations including condensed pocket guideline versions, summary slides, booklets with essential messages, summary cards for non-specialists and an electronic version for digital applications (smartphones, etc.). These versions are abridged and thus, for more detailed information, the user should always access to the full text version of the Guidelines, which is freely available via the ESC website and hosted on the EHJ website. The National Cardiac Societies of the ESC are encouraged to endorse, adopt, translate and implement all ESC Guidelines. Implementation programmes are needed because it has been shown that the outcome of disease may be favourably influenced by the thorough application of clinical recommendations.
Health professionals are encouraged to take the ESC Guidelines fully into account when exercising their clinical judgment, as well as in the determination and the implementation of preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic medical strategies. However, the ESC Guidelines do not override in any way whatsoever the individual responsibility of health professionals to make appropriate and accurate decisions in consideration of each patient's health condition and in consultation with that patient or the patient's caregiver where appropriate and/or necessary. It is also the health professional's responsibility to verify the rules and regulations applicable in each country to drugs and devices at the time of prescription.
2. Introduction
Exercise recommendations and eligibility criteria for sports participation in competitive athletes with cardiovascular disease (CVD) were originally published by the Sports Cardiology Section of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in 20051 and some aspects were subsequently updated in 2018 and 2019.2,3 The overarching aim of these recommendations was to minimize the risk of adverse events in highly trained athletes. It is important to recognize, however, that most of the exercising population engages in leisure sport and solo recreational exercise and, unlike elite athletes, these individuals have a higher prevalence of risk factors for atherosclerosis and established CVD.
Regular physical activity (PA), including systematic exercise, is an important component of therapy for most CVDs and is associated with reduced cardiovascular (CV) and all-cause mortality. In an era where there is an increasing trend towards a sedentary lifestyle and a rising prevalence of obesity and associated CVDs, the promotion of PA and regular exercise is more crucial than ever and at the forefront of priorities for all scientific CV societies. Even during routine consultations for other considerations, physicians are encouraged to promote exercise in all patients.
Although proportionately scarce, exercise may paradoxically trigger sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in individuals with CVD, particularly those who were previously sedentary or have advanced CVD.4,5 In parallel with the drive to promote exercise in all individuals,6 it is anticipated that physicians will be confronted with an increasing number of enquiries from individuals with established risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) or established CVDs about participation in exercise programmes and recreational sports activities. Such consultations need to strike a balance between the multiple benefits of exercise, the small risk of sudden death, and the patient’s goals for cardiorespiratory fitness and ongoing participation in relatively strenuous exercise following a CV diagnosis.
The current Guidelines for exercise and sports participation in individuals with CVD are the first of a kind by the ESC. Sports cardiology is a relatively novel and emerging sub-speciality, therefore the evidence base for the natural history of disease progression or risk of death during intensive exercise and competitive sport among individuals with CVD is relatively sparse. This is reflected by the fact that a disproportionately large number of recommendations are reliant on the wisdom and vast experience of the consensus group rather than on large prospective studies. We acknowledge the inherent difficulties in formulating recommendations for all scenarios in a heterogeneous population with a diverse spectrum of CVDs in light of the limited availability of evidence. Therefore, these recommendations should not be considered as legally binding and should not discourage individual physicians from practising outside the remit of this document, based on their clinical experience in sports cardiology.
Where possible, the Guidelines have included the most up-to-date research in exercising individuals with CVD. The current Guidelines also draw upon existing ESC Guidelines for the investigation, risk assessment, and management of individuals with CVDs to aid physicians when prescribing exercise programmes or providing advice for sports participation. We hope that the document will serve as a useful clinical guide but also as an incentive for future research to challenge established wisdom.
In line with good clinical practice, the present document encourages shared decision making with the athlete patient and respects the autonomy of the individual after provision of detailed information about the impact of sports and the potential risks of complications and/or adverse events (Central illustration). Similarly, all exercise prescription and related discussions between the individual and the physician should be documented in the medical report.

Moderate physical activity should be promoted in all individuals with cardiovascular disease. Appropriate risk stratification and optimal therapy are essential for providing exercise prescription for more vigorous activity. Individuals should be involved in the decision making process and a record of the discussion and exercise plan should be documented in the medical records.
3. Identification of cardiovascular disease and risk stratification in individuals participating in recreational and competitive sports
3.1 Introduction
Higher levels of PA and fitness are associated with lower all-cause mortality, lower rates of CVD, and lower prevalence of several known malignancies.7–16 Despite the substantial health benefits provided by regular PA, intense exercise may paradoxically act as a trigger for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in the presence of underlying CVD. Indeed, sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of sports and exercise-related mortality in athletes.17–19 CV safety during sports participation for individuals at all levels and ages is imperative to avoid catastrophic and often preventable SCD and has become a common goal among medical and sports governing organizations.20–24
Pre-participation CV screening aimed at the detection of disorders associated with SCD is universally supported by major medical societies.20–22,25,26 However, the best method for CV screening of young competitive athletes (<35 years old) remains controversial, and limited data are available to guide recommendations in master athletes (≥35 years old)
Screening strategies must be tailored to the target population and the specific disorders with highest risk. SCD in young athletes is caused by a variety of structural and electrical disorders of the heart, including cardiomyopathies, ion channel disorders, coronary anomalies, and acquired cardiac conditions.17,27,28 In adult and senior athletes, atherosclerotic CAD is the primary condition leading to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).28,29
3.2 Definitions of recreational and competitive athletes
The ESC defines an athlete as ‘an individual of young or adult age, either amateur or professional, who is engaged in regular exercise training and participates in official sports competition’.1,30 Similarly, the American Heart Association (AHA) and others define a competitive athlete as an individual involved in regular (usually intense) training in organized individual or team sports, with an emphasis on competition and performance.31,32 Athletes involved in competitive sports span the age spectrum and can compete at the youth, high school, academy, university, semi-professional, professional, national, international, and Olympic levels. As a distinction, a recreational athlete engages in sports for pleasure and leisure-time activity, whereas a competitive athlete is highly trained with a greater emphasis on performance and winning. In a proposed classification of athletes based on the minimum volume of exercise, ‘elite’ athletes (i.e. national team, Olympians, and professional athletes) generally exercise ≥10 h/week; ‘competitive’ athletes [i.e. high school, college, and older (master) club level athletes] exercise ≥6 h/week; and ‘recreational’ athletes exercise ≥4 h/week.33 This distinction is somewhat arbitrary since some recreational athletes, such as long-distance cyclists and runners, engage in exercise at higher volumes than some professional athletes participating in skill sports.
3.3 Exercise-related major adverse cardiovascular events
Exercise-related MACE include SCA and SCD; acute coronary syndromes (ACS) such as myocardial ischaemia and myocardial infarction (MI); transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA); and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.
SCA is defined as an unexpected collapse due to a cardiac cause in which cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and/or defibrillation is provided in an individual regardless of the survival outcome.17,27,32 SCD is defined as a sudden unexpected death due to a cardiac cause, or a sudden death in a structurally normal heart at autopsy with no other explanation for death and a history consistent with cardiac-related death (i.e. requiring cardiac resuscitation).17,27,32 In order to compare previously reported data on SCA and SCD using variable definitions, the timing of the event should be categorized as occurring during the episode, within the first hour post-exercise, or between 1 to 24 h post-exercise.30 The activity at the time of the event can be further characterized as occurring during training or competition, at rest, or during sleep.30
Exercise-induced ACS are most likely to affect adult and senior athletes and result from atherosclerotic plaque disruption and coronary thrombosis in most cases.34,35 More than 50% of patients who experience acute MI (AMI) and SCA do not have pre-existing symptoms or a known history of CAD.36,37 In long-term endurance athletes, SCA and myocardial ischaemia can also occur from ‘demand’ ischaemia due to an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand resulting from stable calcified plaque and a fixed stenosis.38 In a study of United States (US) marathon and half-marathon races, none of the runners with SCA with serious (>80% coronary artery stenosis in a proximal left coronary artery or three-vessel disease) coronary atherosclerosis had angiographic evidence of acute plaque rupture or thrombus.38
3.4 Incidence of sudden cardiac death in athletes
Current estimates of the incidence of SCD in competitive athletes range from almost 1 in a million to 1 in 5000 athletes per year.17,39,40 Differences in current estimates are largely due to inconsistent study methodology and heterogeneous population comparisons.
Because reporting of SCD in athletes is not mandatory in most countries, studies risk underestimating the true incidence due to incomplete case ascertainment. For instance, studies using media reports as their main source to detect incidents of SCD identify only 5 − 56% of cases, even in high-profile competitive athletes.41–44 Similarly, use of catastrophic insurance claims as the only method for case identification missed 83% of SCD cases and 92% of all SCA cases in Minnesota high school athletes.40,45
The athlete population being studied also needs to be precisely defined. Census population statistics, cross-sectional surveys, and self-reported athlete participation data all produce less reliable calculations. Other study details should also be considered. Does the study include all cases of SCA (survivors plus deaths) or only SCD? Does the study include cases occurring at any time (i.e. during exercise, rest, or sleep), or only those that occur during sports? Studies indicate that 56 − 80% of SCA in young athletes occurs during exercise with the remainder non-exertional.17,18,46
Evidence supports that some athletes display a higher risk for SCA based on sex, race, or sport.17,40,41,45–50 Incidence rates are consistently higher in male athletes than in female athletes, with a relative risk ranging from 3: 1 to 9: 1 (male: female).17,45,47–49,51,52 Black athletes of African Caribbean descent also have a higher risk than white athletes. In US college athletes, males had a higher risk than females (1 in 38 000 vs. 1 in 122 000), and black athletes had a 3.2 times higher risk than white athletes (1 in 21 000 vs. 1 in 68 000).17 Male basketball players had the highest annual risk of SCD (1 in 9000), and male black basketball players had a risk of 1 in 5300.17 Based on available studies and a systematic review of the literature, a generally accepted annual incidence of all SCA is approximately 1 in 80 000 in high school-aged athletes and 1 in 50 000 in college-aged athletes.50 Male athletes, black athletes, basketball (US) and soccer (Europe) athletes represent higher risk groups. Limited estimates are available for youth, professional, and master athletes.
3.5 Aetiology of sudden cardiac death during exercise
SCD in young athletes is usually caused by a genetic or congenital structural cardiac disorder.17–19,42,53,54 However, autopsy-negative sudden unexplained death (AN-SUD), also referred to as sudden arrhythmic death syndrome, is reported on post-mortem examination in up to 44% of presumed SCD cases depending on the study population.17,28,42,53–56 In apparently healthy young athletes the prevalence of cardiac disorders associated with SCD is approximately 0.3%, and this figure is supported by multiple studies using non-invasive evaluation tools to detect cardiac disorders at elevated risk of SCD.20,57–65
In athletes >35 years of age, more than 80% of all SCD is due to atherosclerotic CAD, and vigorous physical exertion is associated with an increased risk of AMI and SCD.34,66–70 The athletes at greatest risk are those with little or no background in systematic training.
3.6 Screening modalities for cardiovascular disease in young athletes
Most experts believe that early detection of potentially lethal disorders in athletes can decrease CV morbidity and mortality through risk stratification, disease-specific interventions, and/or exercise modifications.22,57,58,71 CV screening by history and physical examination or by electrocardiogram (ECG) presents unique challenges and limitations. Several studies have documented the low sensitivity and high positive response rate of pre-participation history questionnaires.64,65,72–75 In CV screening studies in which experienced clinicians use contemporary ECG interpretation standards, ECG screening outperforms history and physical examination in all statistical measures of performance.58,59,62,64,65,74,76
While echocardiography may identify additional structural disorders, there is insufficient evidence to recommend an echocardiogram for routine screening.77
3.7 Screening for cardiovascular disease in older athletes
The recommendations and evidence base for CV screening in athletes >35 years of age are limited. CV screening in adult and senior athletes must target the higher prevalence of atherosclerotic CAD. However, routine screening for ischaemia with exercise testing in asymptomatic adults has a low positive predictive value and a high number of false-positive tests and is not recommended.78–80
A screening ECG may still discover undiagnosed cardiomyopathies and primary electrical disorders in older athletes, and risk factor assessment for CVD may identify higher risk individuals who warrant additional testing. Thus, consistent with a 2017 ESC position paper on pre-participation CV screening, exercise ECG testing should be reserved for symptomatic athletes or those deemed at high risk of CAD based on the ESC Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) system (see chapters 4 and 5).6,81
Exercise testing may also be useful to evaluate the blood pressure (BP) response to exercise, the occurrence of exercise-induced arrhythmias, and to assess symptoms or physical performance and its relation to exercise training.81 In adult and elderly individuals, especially those naïve to moderate to vigorous PA, exercise testing or cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a useful means to assess overall CV health and performance, allowing individualized recommendations regarding sports and exercise type and intensity, as will be discussed in subsequent sections.82
4. Physical activity, leisure exercise, and competitive sports participation
4.1 General introduction
Recommendations for prescription of exercise require a basic knowledge of physiological responses to exercise, along with an understanding of concepts and characteristics of PA, exercise interventions, and their implications for sports participation. Although exercise and PA are often used interchangeably, it is important to recognize that these terms differ. PA is defined as any bodily movement produced by the skeletal muscle that results in energy expenditure. Exercise or exercise training, on the other hand, by definition, is PA that is structured, repetitive, and purposeful to improve or maintain one or more components of physical fitness.83
Physical fitness may be expressed by five major components (Figure 1):83 a morphological component (body mass relative to height, body composition, subcutaneous fat distribution, abdominal visceral fat, bone density, and flexibility);84 a muscular component (power or explosive strength, isometric strength, muscular endurance);85 a motor component (agility, balance, coordination, speed of movement);85 a cardiorespiratory component (endurance or submaximal exercise capacity, maximal aerobic power, heart function, lung function, BP); and a metabolic component (glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, substrate oxidation characteristics).86

4.1.1 Definition and characteristics of exercise interventions
The basic tenets of exercise prescription have been described using the ‘FITT’ concept (frequency, intensity, time, and type). The mode of exercise (Table 3) is also an important characteristic. The following sections will describe each of these components related to aerobic exercise followed by components of strength exercise.
![]() |
![]() |
HR = heart rate; HRR = heart rate reserve; RM = repetition maximum; VO2 = oxygen consumption; VO2peak = peak oxygen consumption.
![]() |
![]() |
HR = heart rate; HRR = heart rate reserve; RM = repetition maximum; VO2 = oxygen consumption; VO2peak = peak oxygen consumption.
4.1.1.1 Type of exercise
Traditionally, different forms of exercise are classified in binary terms as endurance or resistance (strength) exercise. However, this classification is somewhat oversimplified. Further classifications of exercise are metabolically related (aerobic vs. anaerobic exercise) or those related to the type of muscle contraction: isotonic [contraction against resistance in which the length of the muscle shortens (concentric) or lengthens (eccentric)] and isometric (static or without change in length of the muscle).
Aerobic exercise refers to activity performed at an intensity that allows metabolism of stored energy to occur mainly through aerobic glycolysis. Besides the glycolytic pathway, fat metabolism (β-oxidation) is also involved during aerobic exercise. Aerobic exercise involves large muscle groups performing dynamic activities, resulting in substantial increases in heart rate and energy expenditure. Examples of aerobic exercise include cycling, running, and swimming performed at low to moderate intensity.84 In contrast, anaerobic exercise refers to movement performed at high intensity unsustainable by oxygen delivery alone and requiring metabolism of stored energy to be processed largely by anaerobic glycolysis. A sustained isometric muscle action that is not working maximally but does not necessarily depend entirely upon oxygen during the muscle contraction is an example of anaerobic exercise. Another example of anaerobic exercise is intermittent high-intensity exercise.85
4.1.1.2 Exercise frequency
Exercise frequency is usually expressed as the number of times an individual engages in exercise per week. Guidelines suggest that moderate exercise should be performed most days of the week, amounting to a minimum of 150 min/week.
4.1.1.3 Exercise intensity
Of all the basic elements of exercise prescription, exercise intensity is generally considered to be the most critical for achieving aerobic fitness and to have the most favourable impact on risk factors.86,87 Absolute intensity refers to the rate of energy expenditure during exercise and is usually expressed in kcal/min or metabolic equivalents (METs).84,88 Relative exercise intensity refers to a fraction of an individual’s maximal power (load) that is maintained during exercise and is usually prescribed as a percentage of maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max) on the basis of a CPET.88 Training intensity can also be expressed as a percentage of maximal heart rate (HRmax) recorded during an exercise test89 or predicted on the basis of the equation [HRmax = 220 − age].90 The use of prediction equations for HRmax is not recommended, because there is a large standard deviation around the regression line between age and HRmax.91 Alternatively, exercise intensity can be expressed relative to a percentage of a person’s HR reserve (HRR), which uses a percentage of the difference between HRmax and resting HR and adds it to the resting HR (Karvonen formula).92 There are caveats to the use of HR for prescribing and evaluating exercise intensity in persons using beta-blockers.93 Ideally, the HR derived for training should only be used if functional capacity was determined (an exercise test was performed) while taking the medication. Intensity is also commonly monitored using the rate of perceived exertion scale (e.g. 12 − 14 on the Borg 6 − 20 scale) or ‘talk test’, e.g. ‘to be able to talk while exercising’.91,94 General zones for various exercise intensities are shown in Table 4.
Indices of exercise intensity for endurance sports from maximal exercise testing and training zones
![]() |
![]() |
HRmax = maximum heart rate; HRR = heart rate reserve; RPE = rate of perceived exertion; VO2max = maximum oxygen consumption.
Adapted from refs 84,85 using training zones related to aerobic and anaerobic thresholds. Low-intensity exercise is below the aerobic threshold; moderate is above the aerobic threshold but not reaching the anaerobic zone; high intensity is close to the anaerobic zone; and very intense exercise is above the anaerobic threshold. The duration of exercise will also largely influence this division in intensity.
Indices of exercise intensity for endurance sports from maximal exercise testing and training zones
![]() |
![]() |
HRmax = maximum heart rate; HRR = heart rate reserve; RPE = rate of perceived exertion; VO2max = maximum oxygen consumption.
Adapted from refs 84,85 using training zones related to aerobic and anaerobic thresholds. Low-intensity exercise is below the aerobic threshold; moderate is above the aerobic threshold but not reaching the anaerobic zone; high intensity is close to the anaerobic zone; and very intense exercise is above the anaerobic threshold. The duration of exercise will also largely influence this division in intensity.
4.1.1.4 Training volume
Exercise intensity is inversely related to exercise time. Their product (in kcal or kJ) defines the volume of each training unit, which in turn multiplied by frequency provides an estimate of the energy expenditure of the training bout or session. The frequency of training sessions and the duration of the training period provide total energy expenditure of a training programme. Meeting the minimal activity guidelines equates to approximately 1000 kcal/week or about 10 MET/h/week (the product of MET level and duration in hours per week). Training volume should increase weekly either by 2.5% in intensity95 or 2 mins’ duration,95 although the rate of progression should be individualized according to the biological adaptation of the individual. Training adaptation is also influenced by age, genetics,96 fitness, and environmental factors, such as hydration, heat, cold, and altitude.97
4.1.1.5 Type of training
Aerobic training
Aerobic exercise training can either be continuous or interval based. There is a plethora of evidence and many guidelines on continuous aerobic exercise, but there is also strong evidence emerging about the benefits of interval-type training. The interval design involves the completion of short bouts of exercise at high intensities, interspersed with recovery periods. When compared with continuous training, this approach provides a greater challenge to the cardiopulmonary, peripheral, and metabolic systems and results in a more efficient training effect.98 Interval training has been reported to be motivating, since the traditional continuous training can often be tedious. Interval training should be employed only in stable cardiac patients because it places a higher stress on the CV system.99 Since intermittent training exposes subjects to near maximal effort, rest intervals of appropriate duration, preferably active ones, are recommended.100 The exercise to rest ratio varies.101 There are a number of different approaches used, which should be individualized according to fitness and comorbidities.
Resistance training
Exercise intensity: The intensity of resistance exercise is typically prescribed in terms of one repetition maximum (1 RM). One RM is defined as the maximum amount of weight a person can lift throughout a range of motion with one repetition. Even though the performance of 1 RM appears to be a safe approach for evaluating strength102 and no significant CV events have been reported using this approach,103 for convenience and compliance reasons the use of multiple (usually five) repetitions (5 RM) is suggested. Five RM is the maximum amount of weight that can be performed five times. It has been reported that 1 RM can be accurately estimated from multiple repetitions and that 5 RM is an appropriate reflection of maximal strength.104
Exercise training zones: Resistance training using less than 20% 1 RM is generally considered aerobic endurance training. With more than 20% 1 RM, the muscular capillaries become compressed during muscle contraction resulting in a hypoxic stimulus responsible for training effects. The number of repetitions should be inversely related to the training intensity. A moderate training intensity of 30–50% 1 RM with 15–30 repetitions is considered muscular endurance training. Higher training intensities of 50–70% 1 RM with 8–15 repetitions are optimal for strength gains.
Training volume: Optimal strength gains occur when resistance training is performed 2–3 times per week. Approaches to resistance training often follow either a station or a circuit approach. In the former approach, individuals typically complete all of the sets for a given exercise per muscle group before moving to another exercise and muscle group. In the latter approach, individuals typically perform one set of a given muscle group and then rotate to another exercise and muscle group until the full set of exercises in completed per muscle group. One to three sets of 8–15 repetitions should be performed including flexion and extension of each muscle group. Multiple sets are superior to a single set.105 A variety of 8–10 resistance exercises should be prescribed to cover most of the muscular groups.88 Muscular power is best maintained when 3–5 min rest intervals are used instead of short rest intervals (<1 min).106
Mode of training: Resistance training can either be isometric (i.e. unchanged muscle length without joint movement) or dynamic (contraction with change in length of the muscle and movement of the joint throughout a range of motion). Isometric (static) muscle actions may induce a Valsalva manoeuvre at moderate to high loads, if it is not intentionally prevented by regular breathing, and may lead to an unnecessary fluctuation of BP. Dynamic training may include constant or variable resistance through the range of motion using either free weights or weight machines. In both of these modes, the type of contraction and the velocity of movement vary throughout the range of motion. This type of muscle activity mirrors muscle loading faced in daily activity. Muscles can contract in a concentric fashion, in which muscle shortening is exhibited during the movement, or eccentric fashion, in which a lengthening of the muscle occurs. Resistance training is an advanced application in which participants carry out a series of rapid concentric and eccentric muscle actions often at a relatively high load.
4.1.2 Classification of exercise and sports
A precise classification of sports by using the different components of FITT is difficult because of the differences in the type of muscular work, the mode, and the volume and intensity of exercise. Moreover, most sports consist of an isotonic and isometric muscular component. For example, resistance activities can be performed in a predominantly dynamic manner or a predominantly static manner. Some sports require a high motor control component and level of skill, whereas other sports are performed at a low, moderate, high, or very high intensity. These intensities can vary depending upon the type of sport or the professional, amateur, or recreational level of performing the sports.
When providing advice regarding an exercise programme or sports participation, the physician should indicate: (i) the type of sport; (ii) frequency and duration of the exercise programme; and (iii) the intensity that appears most appropriate to the individual.
Regarding the choice of the most convenient sport, the physician may indicate the type of sport as illustrated in Figure 2 (skill, power, mixed, or endurance), with specification of the frequency, duration, and intensity of muscular work to be preferentially maintained during the exercise programme.
In order to adequately prescribe the individual intensity of an endurance or mixed type of exercise or sports, the individual should perform a maximal exercise test with 12-lead ECG recording or preferentially, if possible, with simultaneous measurement of respiratory gas exchange (CPET).

Sporting discipline in relation to the predominant component (skill, power, mixed, and endurance) and intensity of exercise. Intensity of exercise must be individualized after maximal exercise testing, field testing and/or after muscular strength testing (Table 2).
Knowing a person’s maximal exercise capacity allows the health professional to determine a personally tailored exercise programme that is safe and most likely to be effective. The exercise test permits the formulation of the appropriate exercise prescription based on well-recognized indices including heart rate reserve (HRR = HRmax − HRrest), VO2 reserve, the ventilatory threshold, or percentage of work rate for a given individual.
The exercise test also permits an assessment of any abnormal CV responses that might not otherwise be apparent during usual daily activities (including symptoms, ECG abnormalities, arrhythmias, or abnormal BP response). Based on the exercise testing results, the physician may indicate the intensity, mode, and duration of exercise that appears most suitable to the individual patient (see Table 4).
For power sports or resistance training, additionally maximal muscular testing is warranted in order to determine 1 RM or 5 RM. Percentage of these values, number of repetitions, and number of series will enable determination of the CV and muscular demand. Additionally, field tests will facilitate appropriate prescriptions, mainly for team sports.
When prescribing power sports for individuals with CVD, one should also consider the type of muscular work: isometric (static) or isotonic (dynamic) strength exercises. Additionally, the type and amount of exercise training, when preparing for a sport, is very important. The amount of exercise work should be adapted gradually according to the subject’s actual exercise tolerance and to the anticipated level of performance.
4.2 Exercise recommendations in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors
4.2.1 General introduction
Exercise has a positive effect on several risk factors for atherosclerosis.6 Regular exercise reduces the risk of many adverse health outcomes irrespective of age, sex, ethnicity, or the presence of comorbidities. Indeed, there is a dose–effect relationship between exercise and CV and all-cause mortality, with a 20–30% reduction in adverse events compared with sedentary individuals.107,108 Consequently, European Guidelines recommend that healthy adults of all ages should perform a minimum of 150 min of moderate-intensity endurance exercise training over 5 days or 75 min of vigorous exercise per week over 3 days, with additional benefit derived by doubling the amount to 300 min of moderate-intensity or 150 min of vigorous-intensity aerobic PA per week.6
While exercise is also beneficial in patients with established CVD, the risk associated with vigorous exercise and sports in these individuals is increased. Importantly, CVD may be subclinical and unrecognized; therefore, consideration should be given to pre-participation assessment of risk in individuals with a higher likelihood of CVD. Individuals with multiple risk factors are more likely to develop CVD. Assessment of the individual likelihood of subclinical CVD may be performed by calculating the accumulated risk through established risk scores such as the SCORE risk charts (Figure 3) and considering individual risk factors such as very high total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), diabetes mellitus, or a strong family history of CVD.6 Based on this assessment the individual CV risk can be categorized from low to very high risk (Table 5).

SCORE charts for European populations at high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk109. The 10-year risk of fatal CVD in populations at high CVD risk is based on the following risk factors: age, gender, smoking, systolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol. To convert the risk of fatal CVD to risk of total (fatal + non-fatal) CVD, multiply by 3 in men and 4 in women, and slightly less in older people. Note: the SCORE chart is for use in people without overt CVD, diabetes (type 1 and 2), chronic kidney disease, familial hypercholesterolaemia, or very high levels of individual risk factors because such people are already at high risk and need intensive risk factor advice. Cholesterol: 1 mmol/L = 38.67 mg/dL. The SCORE risk charts presented above differ slightly from those in the 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias and the 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice, in that: (i) age has been extended from 65 to 70 years; (ii) the interaction between age and each of the other risk factors has been incorporated, thus reducing the overestimation of risk in older persons in the original SCORE charts; (iii) the cholesterol band of 8 mmol/L has been removed since such persons will qualify for further evaluation in any event. SCORE = Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation.

SCORE chart for European populations at low cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The 10-year risk of fatal CVD in populations at low CVD risk is based on the following risk factors: age, gender, smoking, systolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol. To convert the risk of fatal CVD to risk of total (fatal + non-fatal) CVD, multiply by 3 in men and 4 in women, and slightly less in older people. Note: the SCORE chart is for use in people without overt CVD, diabetes (type 1 and 2), chronic kidney disease, familial hypercholesterolaemia, or very high levels of individual risk factors because such people are already at high risk and need intensive risk factor advice. Cholesterol: 1 mmol/L = 38.67 mg/dL. The SCORE risk charts presented above differ slightly from those in the 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias and 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice, in that: (i) age has been extended from 65 to 70 years; (ii) the interaction between age and each of the other risk factors has been incorporated, thus reducing the overestimation of risk in older persons in the original SCORE charts; (iii) the cholesterol band of 8 mmol/L has been removed since such persons will qualify for further evaluation in any event. SCORE = Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation.
Preliminary evaluation should consist of a self-assessment relating to symptoms and calculation of SCORE. Individuals who are habitually active and at low or moderate risk should not have any restrictions for exercise including competitive sports. Sedentary individuals and individuals at high or very high risk may engage in low-intensity exercise without further evaluation. Sedentary individuals and/or those at high or very high risk planning to undertake high-intensity exercise as well as selected individuals planning to undertake moderate-intensity exercise should undergo a physical examination, 12-lead ECG, and exercise stress test. The aim of the exercise test is to identify prognostically important CAD and to assess the presence of exercise-induced arrhythmias. Individuals with symptoms, abnormal findings on physical examination, abnormal ECG, or abnormal exercise test should be investigated further according to current ESC Guidelines for chronic coronary syndromes.110 Following normal investigations, there should be no restrictions to sports participation. All individuals should, however, be thoroughly informed that development of symptoms during exercise should prompt reassessment.
While a normal exercise test and a high exercise capacity is associated with a good prognosis, the test has limited sensitivity in diagnosing mild to moderate obstructive CAD.111,112 Currently there is no evidence for incorporating routine cardiac imaging in pre-participation screening among asymptomatic individuals aged >35 years old with a normal exercise stress test. However, in asymptomatic adults considered to be at high risk or very high risk (diabetes, strong family history of CAD, previous risk assessment suggesting high risk for CAD) a functional imaging test or coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) should be considered in the risk assessment (Figure 4).110 Identification of atherosclerotic CAD should prompt aggressive management of risk factors and preventive medical treatment. Among individuals with proven obstructive CAD, further assessment and treatment is indicated.

Proposed algorithm for cardiovascular assessment in asymptomatic individuals aged >35-years-old with risk factors for cardiovascular disease and possible subclinical chronic coronary syndrome before engaging in sports. *Consider functional test or CCTA if exercise stress test is equivocal or the ECG is uninterpretable. aSee text for examples of functional imaging. bSingle-photon emission computed tomography: area of ischaemia ≥10% of the left ventricular myocardium; stress echocardiography: ≥3 of 16 segments with stress-induced hypokinesia or akinesia; stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance: ≥2 of 16 segments with stress perfusion defects or ≥3 dobutamine-induced dysfunctional segments; coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA): three-vessel disease with proximal stenoses; left main disease; proximal left anterior descending disease.110 CVD = cardiovascular disease; ECG = electrocardiogram; SCORE = Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation.
General recommendations for exercise and sports in healthy individuals
![]() |
![]() |
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
General recommendations for exercise and sports in healthy individuals
![]() |
![]() |
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for cardiovascular evaluation and regular exercise in healthy individuals aged >35 years
![]() |
![]() |
CCTA = coronary computed tomography angiography; CV = cardiovascular; CVD = cardiovascular disease; SCORE = Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for cardiovascular evaluation and regular exercise in healthy individuals aged >35 years
![]() |
![]() |
CCTA = coronary computed tomography angiography; CV = cardiovascular; CVD = cardiovascular disease; SCORE = Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
4.2.2 Obesity
A person with a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2 or (preferentially) a waist circumference >94 cm for males and >80 cm for females (both for European Caucasians) is considered obese.120,121
European guidelines for obese individuals recommend that a minimum of 150 min/week of moderate-intensity endurance exercise training should be combined with three weekly sessions of resistance exercise.121 Such intervention leads to a reduction in intra-abdominal fat mass, increments in muscle and bone mass, attenuation in the weight loss-induced decline of resting energy expenditure, reduction in BP and chronic inflammation, and improvement in glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, lipid profile, and physical fitness.121,122 There is also a positive influence on the long-term maintenance of weight reduction, general well-being and self-esteem, and reduction in anxiety and depression.121 The impact of exercise intervention alone on fat mass is modest.123 According to a series of large randomized controlled trials a high endurance-type exercise volume, >225 min/week, is required to maximize fat mass loss in obese individuals.124
A pre-participation CV assessment is warranted in obese individuals who intend to engage in high-intensity exercise (Figure 4), due to associated comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and CV and respiratory diseases.121 Obese individuals with a normal CV assessment should not have any restrictions on exercise. There is evidence from healthy, non-obese and non-athletic individuals that running, and abrupt increases in training volume, contribute to musculoskeletal injuries.125–127 Therefore, it may be reasonable to consider that obese individuals should limit high-volume weight-bearing exercises on a hard surface (i.e. <2 h/day) until a considerable reduction in body weight is achieved. Moreover, if high-volume exercise (>2 h/day) is desired, a sufficient recovery time should be allowed for between periods of exercise (optimally 48 h). It is important to emphasize that good physical and muscular fitness and neuromuscular coordination may protect obese individuals from musculoskeletal injuries, hence non-weight-bearing exercises such as cycling or swimming128 may be beneficial. Finally, there is no compelling evidence that resistance training, when executed properly, will increase the risk for musculoskeletal injuries or provoke musculoskeletal symptoms in obese individuals.129
4.2.3 Hypertension
A person with a persistent systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg is considered hypertensive.130,131 Hypertensive individuals should participate in at least 30 min of moderate-intense dynamic aerobic exercise (walking, jogging, cycling, or swimming) for 5–7 days per week.132 Such exercise intervention is associated with a mean reduction in SBP of 7 mmHg and DBP of 5 mmHg.133 Additional resistance training is highly effective in reducing BP further and resistance training 2–3 days per week is also advised.132 Indeed, the BP-lowering effect of resistance and isometric exercise may be comparable to, or even greater than, that of aerobic exercise.134
If high-intensity sports participation is desired, a pre-participation CV assessment is warranted to identify athletes with exercise-induced symptoms, excessive BP response to exercise130, and the presence of end organ damage. Individuals with symptoms suggestive of CAD require further assessment and optimization of medical therapy before participation in sports. If arterial hypertension is poorly controlled (resting SBP > 160 mmHg), a maximal exercise test should be postponed until the BP is controlled.
Non-pharmacological measures should be considered as the first step in the management of hypertension in athletes, including: restriction of salt intake and alcohol consumption, weight reduction if applicable, balanced diet (e.g. Mediterranean diet), and cessation of smoking. Aerobic exercise programmes should herein complement the individual’s training schedule.131 If such lifestyle changes do not lower BP after 3 months, antihypertensive drugs should be commenced if SBP remains >140 mmHg. Antihypertensive therapy alongside lifestyle intervention should be considered in all individuals aged >65 years but <80 years, provided it is well tolerated.131,132 It is important to consider that beta-blockers are prohibited in certain competitive skill sports such as shooting [see World Anti-Doping Association (WADA) for complete list135], and can induce bradycardia and/or lower aerobic exercise capacity.131 Diuretics are prohibited in all competitive sports.135Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and calcium antagonists are the preferred drugs of choice in exercising individuals. It is noteworthy that the use of non-selective non-steroidal inflammatory drugs for musculoskeletal pain may contribute to raised BP.136
When BP is uncontrolled, temporary restriction from competitive sports is recommended, with the possible exception of skill sports.131 In individuals with a high-risk profile, including those with end organ damage [left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, ultrasound evidence of arterial wall thickening or atherosclerotic plaque, hypertensive retinopathy, increased serum creatinine (men 1.3–1.5 mg/dL, women 1.2–1.4 mg/dL), and/or microalbuminuria] in whom BP is controlled, participation in all competitive sports is possible, with the exception of the most intensive power disciplines such as discus/javelin throwing, shot-putting, and weightlifting (see section 4.1).131
During sports participation, regular follow-up is recommended depending on the severity of hypertension and the category of risk. In individuals with borderline BP readings, regular ambulatory assessment of BP should be considered. In individuals with low or moderate CV risk and well-controlled BP, there should be no restrictions to sports participation, however, intensive heavy weightlifting, especially when this includes substantial isometric (static) muscle work, can have a marked pressor effect and should be avoided. In this context, avoiding the Valsalva manoeuvre in particular is warranted because breath holding during muscular contraction is associated with a greater elevation in SBP and DBP.135 When executed correctly, high-intense dynamic resistance training (up to 80% of 1 RM), with a low number of repetitions (n < 10) does not induce greater increments in BP compared with low-intense dynamic resistance training (<50% of 1 RM) with a high number of repetitions (n ≥ 20).137–142
Some individuals who are normotensive at rest will have an exaggerated BP response to exercise. An exaggerated BP response to exercise increases the risk for incident hypertension in highly trained and normotensive athletes over a middle-term period.143 If SBP rises to >200 mmHg at a workload of 100 W during exercise testing,144 antihypertensive medical therapy should be optimized and clinical evaluation, including ECG and echocardiography, should be considered, even if the athlete is normotensive at rest.131 Moreover, in young Olympic athletes a peak SBP of >220 mmHg in males and >200 mmHg in females measured during cycle ergometry are beyond the 95th percentile.131
4.2.4 Dyslipidaemia
Physical activity has favourable effects on lipid metabolism by reducing serum triglycerides by up to 50% and increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 5–10%.85,145 Exercise may also reduce LDL cholesterol by up to 5% and shift the more atherogenic small, dense LDL fraction towards larger LDL particles in a dose-dependent fashion.146 These metabolic improvements can be achieved through 3.5 − 7 h of moderately vigorous PA per week or 30 − 60 min of exercise on most days.
In individuals with hypertriglyceridaemia or hypercholesterolaemia, a higher intensity of exercise is recommended, as this may improve the lipid profile and reduce CV risk. Before embarking on high-intensity exercise, a clinical assessment should be performed including symptomatic status, and a maximal exercise stress test, functional imaging test, or CCTA may be considered in the risk assessment110 (Figure 4), particularly in individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Among athletes with hypercholesterolaemia, regular exercise will rarely reduce LDL cholesterol to normal or near-normal values; therefore, guidelines on pharmacological treatment in primary and secondary prevention should be followed strictly. Individuals with dyslipidaemia should be assessed at least every 2–5 years for primary prevention and annually for secondary prevention.
Pharmacological intervention, particularly with statins, is superior to exercise and lifestyle intervention alone for reducing LDL cholesterol and improving prognosis.147 Despite the minor effects of endurance exercise on serum LDL cholesterol, the clinically beneficial relationship between increased physical fitness and reduced CV events remains beyond the effects of statins.147,148
Physically active individuals with dyslipidaemia may experience muscle pain and soreness or tendinopathy accompanied by elevated muscle enzymes.149 In these cases, measures such as stopping medication temporarily followed by repeat challenge with another statin drug, with or without an alternate day regimen, or introducing other lipid-lowering agents such as ezetimibe or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors should be considered.109 Individuals who develop rhabdomyolysis due to a statin should be prescribed an alternative lipid-lowering agent.
4.2.5 Diabetes mellitus
Physical inactivity is a major cause of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).150 The risk of developing T2DM is 50–80% higher in individuals who are physically inactive compared to their active counterparts. However, exercise does not entirely compensate for the effect of obesity.151–154 Diabetes is also independently associated with an accelerated decline in muscular strength and, partly because of hyperglycaemia, may lead to reduced joint mobility.
4.2.5.1 Effect of exercise on diabetic control, risk factors and outcomes
Aerobic exercise in patients with T2DM improves glycaemic control and reduces visceral fat and insulin resistance. Exercise also has beneficial effects on BP and lipid profile, and leads to modest weight loss.155,156 Both aerobic and resistance training promote prolonged adaptations in skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and the liver associated with enhanced insulin action.157 Observational studies have shown lower mortality with exercise in both type 1 diabetes mellitus and T2DM.158
In patients with pre-diabetes or metabolic syndrome, both aerobic and resistance exercise may prevent the development of overt diabetes.159–162 Intensity of exercise seems to be of greater importance than the volume of exercise; individuals who exercise at moderate or high intensity have a lower risk of developing metabolic impairment compared with those who have a similar energy expenditure at a lower intensity.160,163
The effects on muscle insulin sensitivity are observed with a relatively low volume of exercise (400 kcal/week) in previously sedentary adults, but increase with higher volumes of exercise.164 The optimal combination of duration and intensity is not well established. High-intensity interval training may be superior to moderate aerobic training in achieving metabolic effects and improvement in exercise capacity; however, whether long-term results are superior is unknown.165,166
Diabetes is a cause of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), which is associated with lower exercise capacity and adverse outcomes167,168 and can be improved by exercise training.162,169–171 Large randomized trials have confirmed the beneficial effect of exercise intervention on glycaemic control and risk factors, but this has not translated into a significant improvement in survival, partly because of suboptimal long-term maintenance of lifestyle changes.172
During an acute bout of exercise, glucose uptake in the muscles is increased for up to 2 h afterwards through mechanisms that are independent of insulin. The exercise-induced hypoglycaemic effect can be diminished by performing resistance training or interval training in patients with type 1 diabetes.173 There is a dose–response relationship between intensity and volume of exercise and duration of glucose uptake by skeletal muscle that may last up to 48 h after exercise. These factors must be considered in individuals with diabetes who are undertaking intensive exercise or competitive sports in order to avoid hypoglycaemia.
4.2.5.2 Recommendations for participation in exercise in individuals with diabetes mellitus
Both aerobic and resistance training are effective for glycaemic control, BP reduction, weight loss, peak exercise capacity, and dyslipidemia.174 A programme combining aerobic and resistance training has been shown to be superior in terms of glycaemic control, whereas the effect on other outcomes is unproven.174–176
The ideal exercise programme to achieve the full potential of benefits in patients with diabetes is daily exercise of at least moderate intensity, e.g. brisk walking, for at least 30 min, resistance training for 15 min on most days, and lighter-intensity activities (standing, walking) every 30 min. This can be supplemented by flexibility and balance exercise, particularly in older individuals or patients with microvascular complications due to their diabetes.
4.2.5.3 Cardiac evaluation before exercise participation in individuals with diabetes mellitus
Individuals with diabetes have a priori a higher likelihood of subclinical CAD; therefore, all individuals with diabetes should undergo CV assessment as outlined in Figure 4 before taking up an exercise programme of high intensity. This should be supplemented by an evaluation of glycaemic status, including risk factors for hypoglycaemia, history of hypoglycaemic episodes, presence of autonomic neuropathy, and antidiabetic treatment.177
Asymptomatic individuals with diabetes mellitus and a normal CV assessment and maximal exercise test may engage in all sports but should be warned about the potential risk of iatrogenic hypoglycaemia in the event of inadequate caloric intake. Importantly, all patients with diabetes should be aware of warning symptoms and attention should be given to chest discomfort or unusual breathlessness during exercise as this may be indicative of CAD.
Special considerations for individuals with obesity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, or diabetes
![]() |
![]() |
CVD = cardiovascular disease; SBP = systolic blood pressure.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Special considerations for individuals with obesity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, or diabetes
![]() |
![]() |
CVD = cardiovascular disease; SBP = systolic blood pressure.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
4.3 Exercise and sports in ageing
4.3.1 Introduction
The elderly are defined as adults aged above 65 years. Similar to the general population, higher exercise capacity in this age group is also associated with reduced mortality.179 A physically active lifestyle maintained through middle and older age translates into better health180 and longevity.181–185 Commencing a new exercise regimen among sedentary elderly individuals has shown significant health improvements180,186 including cognitive capacity.187–190 Moreover, regular exercise exerts beneficial effects in reducing the risk of developing CV and metabolic disease through improved control of CV risk factors,191,192 also preserving cognitive function.187–190 Importantly, exercise helps to preserve neuromuscular competence,193,194 thus maintaining balance and coordination, which reduces the risk of falling.195,196
4.3.2 Risk stratification, inclusion/exclusion criteria
Moderate-intensity exercise is generally safe for older healthy people and medical consultation before starting or progressing the level of exercise programme is not usually required.81,197 The general recommendation for exercise implementation for the general population also applies to healthy elderly people.
Nevertheless, due to potential risks of exercising among the elderly (Table 6), the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) recommends self-assessment by a brief questionnaire81 to determine the need for advice from health professionals, but this approach has not been tested prospectively.
Community-dwelling frail or sedentary older adults may have a slightly increased risk of falls during exercise; however, there is no evidence of serious adverse outcomes, injury, or CV events.195,196,198,199 Exercise interventions to improve balance in those diagnosed with dementia bring numerous benefits without an increased risk of adverse outcomes.200 Resistance exercise in older adults is rarely associated with adverse events.201,202 No major risks have been reported in older individuals performing low- and moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, and even more intense aerobic activities are associated with a relatively small risk.203–205 CV events during intense exercise occur at a rate of around 1 event per 100 years of vigorous activity.206 Risks are highest during the first few weeks of beginning vigorous exercise; therefore both exercise intensity and duration should be increased gently (for example, every 4 weeks).81,197,207–210 Among older individuals who are well prepared and accustomed to intense exercise, participation in competitive vigorous sports does not confer higher risk compared with younger adults.38,211
4.3.3 Exercise modalities and recommendations for exercise and sport in the elderly
The physical exercises for elderly persons should be designed according to their biological age, exercise experience, functional capacity, safety, ageing trajectories, comorbidity, lifestyle habits, and previous experience of exercise.
Elderly people should perform endurance and strength exercise, and specific exercises for flexibility and balance (Table 7).201,212,213 Endurance exercise exerts beneficial effects on the cardiorespiratory system and resistance exercise prevents the decrease in muscle mass and sarcopenia.192 Achieving >150 min/week moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (i.e. walking or other moderate intensity aerobics-type activities) is associated with at least 30% lower risk of morbidity, mortality, disability, frailty, and dementia compared with being inactive.212,214,215 The strength exercises for the major muscle groups should be performed at least twice a week (8–10 different exercises, 10–15 repetitions).
Accustomed senior athletes should continue performing exercise and sports activities, without any predetermined age limit.38,211,216 Sports activities for older people according to exercise type and intensity are reported in Table 8. Annual clinical assessment including a maximal exercise test (preferably with simultaneous CPET) is recommended in master athletes performing a high level of sports and exercise programmes.217
Recommendations for exercise in ageing individuals
![]() |
![]() |
CV = cardiovascular.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in ageing individuals
![]() |
![]() |
CV = cardiovascular.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Exercise activities for older people according to exercise type and intensity
![]() |
![]() |
Exercise activities for older people according to exercise type and intensity
![]() |
![]() |
5. Exercise in clinical settings
5.1 Exercise programmes for leisure-time and competitive sport participation in chronic coronary syndrome
Atherosclerotic CAD is the predominant cause of exercise-related (Ex-R) cardiac events including ACS, AMI, and SCA in individuals with established chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), or SCD as a primary presentation in individuals >35 years of age.218 In addition to atherosclerotic CAD, other entities, including an anomalous origin of a coronary artery (AOCA),219 myocardial bridge (MB),220 and spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD),221 are also associated with myocardial ischaemia, and potentially with Ex-R SCD.
Physical inactivity is a risk factor for CAD, but somewhat paradoxically, vigorous physical exertion transiently increases the risk for AMI66 and SCD.216 Overall, the benefits of regular exercise greatly outweigh the Ex-R risk, even in individuals with CCS. Moderate- to vigorous-intensity exercise is strongly associated with a reduced incidence of adverse outcomes from CAD, but prolonged, high-intensity endurance exercise has been associated with increased coronary artery calcium (CAC), a marker of atherosclerosis,58,222 and coronary plaques58 but without an increase in mortality112 in the medium term. Importantly, the diagnosis of myocardial injury is also more complex in athletes because intense exercise may increase serologic markers of myocardial injury, including cardiac troponin I and T.223,224
5.1.1 Individuals at risk of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease and asymptomatic individuals in whom coronary artery disease is detected at screening
Athletes or individuals participating in sports or regular exercise training may have risk factors for CAD and/or subclinical CCS.225 Such individuals may be identified by routine pre-participation screening as recommended by the ESC21 or by pre-evaluation of master athletes, as suggested by the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR) 2011207 and the AHA.226
In addition to the SCORE risk stratification described earlier (Table 5), the increasing use of cardiac imaging techniques allows the identification of a greater number of individuals with asymptomatic CCS,227 including competitive master athletes.227
Newer predictive measures, such as high-sensitive C-reactive protein and carotid intima–media thickness (IMT) add little to the traditional risk factors.110 The exception is CAC, which provides additional predictive information in individuals with a moderate-risk profile,228 dividing them into low- or high-risk individuals. The most prudent and cost-effective method of utilizing CAC may thus be additive to the traditional risk factors,229 as suggested by the EAPC.230
Clinical evaluation of asymptomatic individuals with possible subclinical CCS should include (Figure 4):112
Consideration of intensity of intended exercise programme
Clinical evaluation, including maximal exercise stress test
Further diagnostic testing in selected individuals.
Many middle-aged individuals in the general population can be expected to have some level of subclinical CCS as assessed with imaging techniques. Anatomical coronary imaging alone does not provide information relating to the coronary flow and reserve, which is important in assessing the risk of Ex-R ischaemia or SCD/SCA; therefore functional evaluation is necessary. Several methods of stress testing (e.g. cycle ergometry or treadmill testing), stress echocardiography, adenosine or dobutamine stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), or positron emission tomography (PET)/single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), can be used to detect inducible myocardial ischaemia231. Exercise stress-echo is preferred in athletes because it is free from radiation and does not involve administration of drugs.
Exercise testing is the most widely available functional test, and provides information on exercise capacity, heart rate, and BP response, and detection of exercise-induced arrhythmias,2 but has a lower specificity for myocardial ischaemia than other functional tests, especially in asymptomatic and low-risk individuals. It is recommended that a truly maximal exercise test232 (with or without CPET) should be performed when evaluating individuals with possible subclinical (or clinical) CCS who intend to or are participating in systematic exercise including recreational or competitive sports. Whether the initial exercise test includes imaging or not depends on factors such as the baseline ECG (Table 9) and feasibility of performing functional imaging tests in a given institute.
If the clinical assessment, including a maximal exercise test is normal, the presence of ‘relevant CAD’ is assumed to be unlikely (Figure 4).
In the event of a borderline or uninterpretable exercise test result, it is recommended that a more specific imaging stress test is performed such as stress-echocardiography, CMR perfusion imaging, or SPECT. Maximal exercise SPECT and exercise echocardiography or nuclear perfusion techniques utilizing exercise rather than pharmacological stress may preferentially be used, depending on availability and local expertise.
If the exercise test is positive, an invasive coronary angiogram should be performed to confirm the presence, extent, and severity of CAD (Figure 4).
5.1.1.1 Recommendations for sports participation
Individuals at risk of CAD and asymptomatic individuals in whom CAD is detected at screening should have aggressive management of risk factors for atherosclerosis.6,131,132,202 Considering the benefits of exercise on primary and secondary prevention of CCS,6,234 individuals with risk factors should be restricted from competitive sport only when there is substantial risk of an adverse event, as indicated by functional tests, or when there is evidence of disease progression during serial evaluations.233 Exercise recommendations should be individually tailored based on the intensity of the exercise and the sporting discipline. Participation in competitive endurance, power, and mixed disciplines (see sections 4.2 and 5.1.3) generally requires vigorous effort and is more likely to induce myocardial ischaemia, whereas leisure sports or intentional recreational exercise allows for greater control of physical effort. Individuals with a high risk of atherosclerotic CAD and asymptomatic individuals in whom CAD is detected at screening who participate in intensive exercise should be assessed with a maximal exercise test or functional imaging test on an annual basis.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals at risk of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease and asymptomatic individuals in whom coronary artery disease is detected at screening
![]() |
![]() |
CAD = coronary artery disease; CCS = chronic coronary syndrome.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals at risk of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease and asymptomatic individuals in whom coronary artery disease is detected at screening
![]() |
![]() |
CAD = coronary artery disease; CCS = chronic coronary syndrome.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.1.2 Established (long-standing) chronic coronary syndrome
All individuals with established (long-standing) CCS should be encouraged to perform the minimal PA recommendations for general and CV health.235 This applies to individuals with stable angina, asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals stabilized <1 year after ACS, or individuals with recent revascularization, and asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals >1 year after initial diagnosis or revascularization.110 Advice on intensive exercise and participation in most competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with long-standing CCS should be based on several factors, which are determined through clinical history, exercise stress testing, or functional imaging and echocardiography (Table 10).
Factors determining risk of adverse events during intensive exercise and competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with long-standing coronary artery disease
![]() |
![]() |
Factors determining risk of adverse events during intensive exercise and competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with long-standing coronary artery disease
![]() |
![]() |
Individuals with long-standing CCS who do not show any abnormalities on a maximal exercise test or functional imaging test, or have unimpaired LV function, may be considered as low risk for an exercise-induced adverse event236–238 (Table 11). Such individuals may engage in all competitive sports on an individual basis (Figure 5). Some restrictions may apply for high-intensity power, mixed, and endurance sports (see Figure 2, section 4.1.2) for older patients (>60 years old) with CCS. This is due to the fact that age is an additional, strong predictor of adverse events during exercise. There are no restrictions in low-risk patients for skills sports regardless of age (Figure 2).
High-risk features for exercise-induced adverse cardiac events in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease233
![]() |
![]() |
ACS = acute coronary syndrome; FFR = fractional flow reserve; iFR = instant flow reserve; NSVT = non-sustained ventricular tachycardia; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.
High-risk features for exercise-induced adverse cardiac events in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease233
![]() |
![]() |
ACS = acute coronary syndrome; FFR = fractional flow reserve; iFR = instant flow reserve; NSVT = non-sustained ventricular tachycardia; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.

Clinical evaluation and recommendations for sports participation in individuals with established coronary artery disease. CCS = chronic coronary syndrome; LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; LM = left main coronary artery; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction. *With documented ischaemia or a haemodynamically relevant lesion defined by FFR <0.8 or iFR <0.9.
Individuals with inducible ischaemia during functional testing, despite adequate treatment, should undergo coronary angiography; those with high-risk lesions on coronary angiography (Table 11) should have revascularization prior to considering high-intensity exercise programmes or competitive sport (Figure 5). Individuals with high-risk coronary features may gradually return to sport 3–6 months after successful revascularization pending a normal maximal exercise or functional imaging test.
When ischaemia cannot be treated despite adequate therapy, including revascularization, the individual should be restricted from competitive sports, with the possible exception of individually recommended low-intensity skill sports. Such individuals may engage in regular recreational exercise of low and moderate intensity provided risk factors and symptoms are treated adequately and there is regular clinical surveillance. These individuals may also participate in leisure sports, 2–3 times/week, in selected cases, if the intended activity is below (around 10 beats) the ischaemic threshold and below the level of arrhythmias.231
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with long-standing chronic coronary syndrome
![]() |
![]() |
CAD = coronary artery disease; CCS = chronic coronary syndrome; CV = cardiovascular.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with long-standing chronic coronary syndrome
![]() |
![]() |
CAD = coronary artery disease; CCS = chronic coronary syndrome; CV = cardiovascular.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.1.2.1 Antithrombotic treatment
Individuals with CAD should receive conventional antithrombotic treatment for secondary prevention, according to published guidelines for the general population.233,239,240 Individuals taking dual antiplatelet agents should avoid sports with bodily collision, especially when they are combined with oral anticoagulants, due to the risk of haemorrhage.241
5.1.3 Myocardial ischaemia without obstructive disease in the epicardial coronary artery
Ischaemia and non-obstructive CAD (INOCA) is an under-recognized entity associated with increased risk of adverse events242 that is usually detected during evaluation of anginal symptoms. Stress CMR and PET can detect abnormal coronary flow reserve and suggest coronary microvascular dysfunction with non-critical lesions. There are no established treatments for microvascular angina. However, the panel suggests adhering to the same exercise recommendations as for long-standing CCS.
5.1.4 Return to sport after acute coronary syndrome
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (exCR) reduces cardiac mortality, hospital readmission,234 234 and anxiety.243 Individuals who have experienced an ACS, cardiac surgery, or percutaneous intervention should be referred to an early exCR programme,235,242 soon after the discharge,6,235,244 for 8–12 weeks after the cardiac event.235,244 Every week that exercise is delayed requires an additional month of exercise to accomplish the same level of benefit.245
Exercising individuals with CAD may start performing low- to moderate-intensity recreational sporting activities in parallel with participation in the structured progressive exercise programmes. All types of sports activities may be considered, at an appropriate intensity level; however, careful attention should be paid to the development of new symptoms.218
In general, structured outpatient exercise programmes, for 3–6 months, are required to achieve the appropriate level of activity for sports participation in patients with CAD. In individuals with non-ST segment elevation MI or CCS who have had complete revascularization and do not have residual ischaemia, exercise training can be progressed at a faster pace until the recommended exercise level is reached.
5.1.4.1 Competitive athletes
Careful individual evaluation is required before starting high-intensity competitive sports. In competitive athletes, an echocardiogram, maximal exercise test with 12-lead ECG recording or CPET is recommended for risk stratification before return to sports (see section 5.1.2). CPET specifically adds information on aerobic and anaerobic thresholds, guiding exercise intensity prescription and progression (see section 4.2).
5.1.4.2 Recreational athletes
For individuals intending to participate in non-competitive, recreational sports and leisure-time activity, similar principles apply regarding risk stratification. A symptom-limited/maximal exercise test should precede the return to sports. Higher-risk patients with CCS (Table 11) are not eligible for competitive sports (see section 5.1.2); however, low-intensity skill sports, such as golf, may be considered, at intensities below the angina threshold. If aerobic exercise is not tolerated, predominantly strength-related sports with a small amount of muscular work are recommended (Figure 2, section 4.1.2).
Recommendations for return to exercise after acute coronary syndrome
![]() |
![]() |
CAD = coronary artery disease; CCS = chronic coronary syndrome.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for return to exercise after acute coronary syndrome
![]() |
![]() |
CAD = coronary artery disease; CCS = chronic coronary syndrome.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.1.5 Anomalous origin of coronary arteries
5.1.5.1 Background
The prevalence of AOCA (left and right coronary artery) is 0.44% in the general population of adolescents.246 AOCA is considered to be a common cause of SCD in young athletes17,18,247,248 but is rarely implicated in individuals >40 years of age.249,250
Chest pain, exertional syncope and SCD may be the first manifestation of AOCA,251 however, over two thirds of patients are asymptomatic.252 Mechanisms leading to SCD likely include repeated bursts of ischaemia with consequent increase in myocardial fibrosis and a proclivity to develop VAs during exercise. Ischaemia may result from the compression of the anomalous vessel coursing between the aorta and the pulmonary artery and/or from the acute angled take-off from the aorta and/or the proximal intramural course of the anomalous vessel (Figure 6).253 Both left and right anomalous coronary origins have been implicated in Ex-R SCD, although the risk has traditionally been thought to be considerably higher with an anomalous left coronary artery origin.252 Exercise testing rarely reveals myocardial ischaemia and multi-slice contrast-enhanced CT, CCTA, or CMR are the mainstay of diagnosis.

Schematic representation of the most frequent anomalous origin of coronary arteries and associated risk of sudden cardiac death. RCA = right coronary artery; LMCA = left main coronary artery; LAD = left anterior descending artery; LCCA = left circumflex coronary artery.
5.1.5.2 Eligibility for sports
Eligibility for competitive sports is based on the anatomical type of AOCA and on the presence of ischaemia. A highly positive inotropic and positive chronotropic exercise stress test is the best approach to demonstrate or rule out ischaemia. AOCA with acute angled take-off from the aorta resulting in a slit-like orifice with reduced lumen and anomalous coursing between the aorta and the pulmonary artery is associated with the greatest risk for SCA/SCD whether or not the anomalous artery originates from the left or right sinus of Valsalva, and strong consideration should be given to surgical correction of such an anomaly in symptomatic individuals. Prior to successful correction, participation in sports, other than low-intensity skill sports, is discouraged regardless of symptoms. We are unable to provide exercise or sport recommendations for older patients (>40 years) with AOCA, due to the paucity of studies. However, recreational exercise of moderate intensity seems reasonable, but a cautious approach is advised to more vigorous exercise.
Recommendations for exercise in young individuals/athletes with anomalous origins of coronary arteries
![]() |
![]() |
AOCA = anomalous origin of coronary arteries.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
This recommendation applies whether the anomaly is identified as a consequence of symptoms or discovered incidentally, and in individuals <40 years of age.
Recommendations for exercise in young individuals/athletes with anomalous origins of coronary arteries
![]() |
![]() |
AOCA = anomalous origin of coronary arteries.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
This recommendation applies whether the anomaly is identified as a consequence of symptoms or discovered incidentally, and in individuals <40 years of age.
5.1.6 Myocardial bridging
5.1.6.1 Background
Myocardial bridging (MB) refers to a condition when some of the myocardium overlies a segment of an epicardial coronary artery (referred to as a tunnelled artery) and most commonly affects the left anterior descending artery (Figure 7). The prevalence of MB varies from 0.5–12% and up to 5–75% according to diagnostic angiography or CT scan series.254 MBs are traditionally considered as benign; however, the association between myocardial ischaemia and MBs has increased their clinical relevance. MB may be discovered at imaging after an abnormal exercise ECG and should also be suspected in individuals who present with exertional angina or syncope. Coronary artery compression together with a Venturi (suction) effect are the potential underlying mechanisms for exercise-induced ischaemia.248

Schematic representation of a myocardial bridge. LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery.
Evaluation of individuals with MB aims primarily at assessing the morphologic characteristics of the anatomical anomaly (i.e. number of MB, depth and overall length of the tunnelled vessel) and the presence of inducible ischaemia. A positive inotropic and positive chronotropic stress test is the best approach to demonstrate myocardial ischaemia. MB without other underlying associated diseases [e.g. hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)] and with no evidence of inducible myocardial ischaemia has a good prognosis.255 However, in adult/senior individuals, it has been shown that the arterial compression in MB may be directly related to the atherosclerotic burden, proximal to the MB.256 These individuals should be considered in the same category as individuals with CAD and treated appropriately if necessary, although the vast majority of MB is clinically silent. Beta-blockers should be used when patients are symptomatic or myocardial ischaemia is established. Surgical repair may be considered, while coronary stenting is discouraged.255
5.1.6.2 Eligibility
Patients with MB and evidence of ischaemia should be restricted from participation in competitive sports and should receive appropriate advice regarding leisure-time activities.
Recommendations for exercise/sports in individuals with myocardial bridging
![]() |
![]() |
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise/sports in individuals with myocardial bridging
![]() |
![]() |
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.2 Exercise recommendations in individuals with chronic heart failure
5.2.1 Background: rationale for exercise in chronic heart failure
Most of the evidence regarding exercise in chronic heart failure (HF) is derived from studies implementing exercise training programmes that are considered safe and highly recommended in stable patients on optimal medical therapy.257–260Meta-analyses of these studies have demonstrated a significant improvement in exercise tolerance and quality of life and a modest effect on all-cause and HF-specific mortality and hospitalization.261–267
5.2.2 Risk stratification and preliminary evaluation
Exercise intervention should only be initiated in a clinically stable individual after medical therapy for HF has been optimized. Key components before commencing an exercise programme and sports participation include:
Exclusion of contraindications to exercise: Contraindications to initiating an exercise programme in chronic HF include hypotension or hypertension at rest or during exercise, unstable cardiac disease, deteriorating symptoms of HF, myocardial ischaemia despite therapy (exercise may be permitted up to ischaemic threshold), or severe and suboptimally treated pulmonary disease.258
Performing a baseline assessment: A thorough cardiological evaluation is required, including assessment of comorbidities and HF severity (e.g. by assessment of blood natriuretic peptides and echocardiography). A maximal exercise test (preferably CPET) is important to assess functional capacity, exercise-induced arrhythmias or haemodynamic abnormalities and for prescription of exercise intensity, based on VO2peak, or on resting and maximal heart rate during exercise [e.g. HRR or Borg’s rating of perceived exertion (RPE)].265,266
Optimizing medical therapy: All individuals with HF should be treated according to current Guidelines,257 including device implantation when required.267
The exercise session should be individually tailored for several weeks, according to symptoms and objective findings during exercise testing such as maximal exercise capacity, heart rate response, or arrhythmias. In atrial fibrillation (AF), exercise can only be monitored by power or Borg’s RPE.
High-risk patients should be counselled more frequently during the initial phases. Ideally exercise should be supervised through an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programme while non-supervised home-based sessions should be gradually added.260 When all these measures are followed, the overall risk of exercise is low, even during higher-intensity exercises and in patients with more severe HF.268,269
Follow-up examinations for exercise recommendations should be scheduled at least every 3–6 months. Intervals between examinations should depend on disease severity and comorbidities, setting of the sessions (supervised vs. home-based), patient’s age and adherence.
5.2.3 Exercise modalities and sports participation in heart failure
Following risk factor control and therapy optimization, the individual with HF should be encouraged to start exercise programmes without delay.242,244,270 Initially home-based exercise programmes may also be prescribed and monitored.270,271
In uncomplicated cases low to moderate-intensity recreational sporting activities may be considered in parallel to the structured exercise programme. When prescribed, maximal exercise intensities should be monitored, for example, by heart rate monitors. If monitoring does not reveal any exercise-induced arrhythmias or other abnormalities, then all types of recreational sports activities are permitted (see Figure 2, section 4.1.2).
5.2.3.1 Aerobic/endurance exercise
Aerobic exercise is recommended for stable patients [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I–III], because of its well-demonstrated efficacy and safety.260 Recommendations on optimal exercise dose have been previously described in ESC and AHA Guidelines.242,270–272 The most commonly evaluated exercise mode is moderate continuous exercise (MCE).242,270–272 In patients in NYHA functional class III, exercise intensity should be maintained at a lower intensity (<40% of VO2peak), according to perceived symptoms and clinical status during the first 1–2 weeks. This should be followed by a gradual increase in intensity to 50–70% VO2peak, and if tolerated, up to 85% VO2peak as the primary aim.270,271
Recently, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) programmes have been considered as an alternative exercise modality for low-risk patients.269 The most recent meta-analysis showed that HIIT was superior to MCE in improving VO2peak in individuals with HF with reduced (<40%) ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the short term.273 However, this superiority disappeared in subgroup analysis of isocaloric protocols. HITT programmes may be recommended initially to prepare low risk patients with stable HF who want to return to high intensity aerobic and mixed endurance sports (Figure 2, section 4.1.2).
5.2.3.2 Resistance exercise
Resistance exercise training may complement, but not substitute, aerobic exercise training because it reverses skeletal muscle mass loss and deconditioning without excessive stress on the heart.270,274 The training intensity can preferably be set at the level of resistance at which the patient can perform 10–15 repetitions at 15 on Borg’s RPE scale (Table 12).242,270 In patients with altered skeletal muscle function and muscle wasting, exercise training should focus initially on increasing muscle mass by using resistance programmes.275,276
![]() |
![]() |
1 RM = one repetition maximum; RPE = rating of perceived exertion; VO2peak = peak oxygen consumption.
![]() |
![]() |
1 RM = one repetition maximum; RPE = rating of perceived exertion; VO2peak = peak oxygen consumption.
Resistance programmes may specifically be considered for low-risk stable patients, who want to return to strength-related power sports, e.g. weightlifting (Figure 2, section 4.1.2). A meta-analysis showed that resistance exercise as a single intervention has the capacity to increase muscle strength, aerobic capacity, and quality of life in HFrEF patients who are unable to participate in aerobic exercise programmes.277 Also, in advanced HF or in patients with very low exercise tolerance, resistance exercise can be safely applied if small muscle groups are trained.270,277,278
5.2.3.3 Respiratory exercise
Inspiratory muscle training improves VO2peak, dyspnoea, and muscle strength,279–282 and it typically involves several sessions per week with intensity ranging from 30% to 60% of maximal inspiratory pressure, and duration from 15–30 min for an average of 10–12 weeks.279 This training modality should be recommended to the most severely deconditioned individuals as an initial alternative who may then transition to conventional exercise training and sports participation, to optimize cardiopulmonary benefits.280
5.2.3.4 Aquatic exercise
Aquatic exercise has not been recommended for individuals with HF, due to concerns that the increase in central blood volume and cardiac preload as a consequence of hydrostatic pressure may not be tolerated.283 However, a recent meta-analysis has shown that aquatic exercise training may be safe and clinically effective.284
5.2.4 Sports participation and return to sports
In addition to risk stratification (section 5.2.3), the evaluation for participation in sports includes intensity and type of sports (competitive vs. recreational), and determining the individual fitness level.
5.2.4.1 Competitive sports
Participation in competitive sports may be considered in a group of selected low-risk individuals. A thorough individual evaluation using a maximal exercise test (or preferably CPET) is recommended before returning to sports, particularly before starting moderate- to high-intensity sports, mixed and power sports (Figure 2, section 4.1.2).
Asymptomatic individuals with preserved (≥50%) EF (HFpEF) or with mid-range (≥40–59%) EF (HFmrEF) who are optimally treated may be eligible to participate in some competitive sports in the absence of exercise-induced arrhythmias or exercise-induced hypotension. In such cases, a progressive increase in exercise dose is recommended. The duration of this process is dependent upon the functional capacity and perceived symptoms. Some restrictions may apply to high-intensity endurance, mixed and power sports with high demands, especially in older patients. No restrictions should apply for skill-related sports.
Asymptomatic patients with HFrEF who are optimally treated may only be considered safe to perform specific low-intensity skill sports at a competitive level (Figure 2). Higher-risk patients including those who are suboptimally treated, those that remain in NYHA II or III despite optimal therapy, and those with exercise-induced arrhythmias or exercise-induced hypotension should not participate in competitive sports, particularly those sports with moderate to high cardiopulmonary strain during training or competition.
5.2.4.2 Recreational sports
For patients intending to participate in recreational sports and leisure-time activity, similar principles apply regarding risk stratification. A progressive increase in exercise dose is recommended. Low- to moderate-intensity skill, power, mixed, and endurance sports may be considered in all asymptomatic individuals.
As with competitive sports, high-intensity recreational sports should only be considered in asymptomatic individuals with HFmrEF (EF 40–49%) who do not have exercise-induced arrhythmias or exercise-induced hypotension. Asymptomatic individuals with HFrEF who are optimally treated may engage in low- to moderate-intensity skill-related recreational sports, and selectively in low-intensity endurance sports (Figure 2).
In patients with HFrEF with very low exercise tolerance, frequent decompensation, or patients with LV assist devices (see Supplementary Data), participation in low-intensity skill-related sports is possible, if tolerated. Regular low-intensity endurance activities, e.g. walking or cycling, should generally be recommended to improve basic exercise capacity.
Recommendations for exercise prescription in heart failure with reduced or mid-range ejection fraction
![]() |
![]() |
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise prescription in heart failure with reduced or mid-range ejection fraction
![]() |
![]() |
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for participation in sports in heart failure
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
HFmrEF = heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; HFrEF = heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; NYHA = New York Heart Association.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for participation in sports in heart failure
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
HFmrEF = heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction; HFrEF = heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; NYHA = New York Heart Association.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.2.5 Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes are a cornerstone in the holistic prevention and management of HFpEF.260,285 Exercise intervention for 12–24 weeks increases functional capacity and quality of life.286–292 The beneficial effects seem to be mediated by improvement in oxidative muscle metabolism and vascular function.293 In obese patients, weight reduction has been shown to have similar effects to exercise alone,288 therefore a stable weight reduction of 10% over 2–4 years is recommended.294
5.2.5.1 Exercise modalities and sports participation
Higher endurance intensities such as HIIT (4 × 4 min at 85–90% peak heart rate, with 3 min active recovery) have revealed positive effects on myocardial function, but data are limited to a small group of patients with diabetes.295 HIIT performed over 4 weeks significantly improved VO2peak and LV diastolic function.296 Higher-intensity exercise should be limited to stable patients and could be gradually introduced after 4 weeks of MCE.
Exercise sessions should start with short phases of 10 min of endurance and 10 min of resistance exercises, which should gradually be extended in time over a period of 4 weeks. The final aim should be at least 30–45 min for ≥3 days per week. Depending on the patient’s symptomatic status and functional capacity, intervals of higher intensity may be introduced.
Duration of intervention seems to be important for inducing functional and structural CV changes in HFpEF. Interventions over 2 years in healthy individuals reversed early signs of diastolic dysfunction.297,298 Regarding sports participation refer to section 5.2.3.
Recommendations for exercise and participation in sport in individuals with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
![]() |
![]() |
Recommendations for exercise and participation in sport in individuals with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
![]() |
![]() |
5.2.6 Exercise in individuals after heart transplantation
The exercise capacity in heart transplantation (HTx) recipients is reduced by 50–60% compared with healthy age and sex-matched individuals in the general population,300–302 due to several factors (Table 13).303 Exercise reduces CV risk induced by post-transplantation immunosuppressive medical therapy,304 and increases physical performance,305 enabling HTx patients to achieve levels comparable to age-matched controls.306 HTx recipients participating in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes reveal a favourable outcome with respect to hospital readmission and long-term survival.305,307,308
Factors influencing decreased exercise capacity (peak VO2) and reduced cardiac output in individuals with heart transplants
![]() |
![]() |
Factors influencing decreased exercise capacity (peak VO2) and reduced cardiac output in individuals with heart transplants
![]() |
![]() |
Improvements in exercise capacity are primarily dependent on the volume of exercise. Increased functional capacity is primarily due to peripheral adaptations in the skeletal muscle including increased oxidative capacity and capillary conductance. Cardiac allograft neural reinnervation also contributes to improved functional capacity in the first year.304,309,310 If these occur, training can be performed at high levels, enabling selected HTx patients to perform marathon runs or triathlons.304,309,310
5.2.6.1 Exercise modalities and sports participation
A combination of endurance and resistance exercise is considered to be the preferred exercise programme. Mean endurance exercise intensity should start at a moderate intensity (60% VO2peak), which can later be increased to 80% of VO2peak, a regimen level applied in the majority of exercise intervention studies in HTx.305 In uncomplicated cases these intensities can be increased to maximum levels.
It is recommended that individuals should perform up to five bouts of 30 min of exercise per week; however, exercise duration and frequency have ranged from 30 min to 90 min for 2 to 5 times per week, in previous HTx studies.305,311 Both endurance and resistance training is included in these training sessions; however, an additional 2–3 sessions of resistance training may be performed each week.
Resistance exercise should focus on large muscle groups using own body weight exercises or exercises on weight machines. Upper body resistance exercise should start at least 3 months after surgery, and intensity should gradually increase from low to moderate but can also be performed up to submaximal intensities, in case of uncomplicated disease (see section 4.1.1).
A major limitation of endurance exercise is the reduced chronotropic response to exercise because of allograft denervation. Apart from chronotropic incompetence, other pathophysiological changes present after HTx should also be considered when prescribing and conducting an exercise programme (Table 13). Exercise-induced ischaemia from cardiac allograft vasculopathy should be considered, particularly when performing higher-intensity exercise, which has been advocated to have some superior effects on improving exercise capacity in these patients.311,312
Feasibility and safety of sports participation in stable asymptomatic HTx patients, after therapy optimization, has been reported. Therefore, participation in competitive sports, avoiding high-intensity power and endurance disciplines, may be considered in selected individuals.
Recommendations for exercise and participation in sport in heart transplant recipients
![]() |
![]() |
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise and participation in sport in heart transplant recipients
![]() |
![]() |
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.3 Exercise recommendations in individuals with valvular heart disease
5.3.1 Introduction
Valvular heart disease affects approximately 1–2% of young exercising individuals in the general population. Reports on the natural history of valvular heart disease in athletes are sparse; however, there is a theoretical possibility that a large stroke volume, coupled with vigorous mechanical contractions of the heart, and an increased chronotropic state induced by exercise may accelerate valve dysfunction. The ensuing effects on chronic stenotic or regurgitant lesions may cause compensatory cardiac hypertrophy, impaired ventricular function, myocardial ischaemia, cardiac arrhythmias, and possibly SCD.
5.3.1.1 General principles in assessment and risk stratification of individuals with valvular heart disease prior to leisure exercise or competitive sports
There are no prospective studies examining the impact of exercise on the progression of valvular disease; therefore, general guidance presented in this section is based on consensus opinions and long-term follow-up studies from non-athletic populations. Most individuals with valvular heart disease are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic and some may aspire to engage in regular exercise programmes including leisure and competitive sports. The management of these individuals requires assessment of the symptomatic status, functional capacity, the nature of the valvular lesion, and impact of the resulting loading conditions on cardiac structure and function. All individuals should be assessed with a clinical history, physical examination, ECG, echocardiography, and exercise stress test. The clinical history should enquire about cardiac symptoms and functional capacity. Echocardiography should focus on the valve morphology and function with particular attention to the severity and the impact of cardiac chamber size and function. Exercise testing should resemble the intensity of the sport being engaged in and should focus on inducibility of symptoms, arrhythmias, myocardial ischaemia, and the haemodynamic (BP) response to exercise. Some individuals may require exercise echocardiography to assess the severity of the valve defect.
Asymptomatic individuals with mild to moderate valvular dysfunction who have preserved ventricular function and show good functional capacity without exercise-inducible myocardial ischaemia, abnormal haemodynamic response, or arrhythmias are considered to be at low risk and may participate in all sports. Indeed, mild valvular regurgitation (mostly tricuspid and pulmonary) are common among trained athletes and likely represent a feature of the athlete’s heart. Conversely, individuals with exertional symptoms, moderate or severe valvular dysfunction, left or right ventricular dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, and exercise-induced cardiac arrhythmias or abnormal haemodynamic response are considered to be at high risk and should be considered for invasive intervention.
5.3.1.2 Surveillance
All individuals with valvular heart disease should be assessed on a regular basis. The frequency of the assessment may vary from 6 monthly to 2 yearly depending on symptomatic status and the severity of valve dysfunction.
5.3.2 Aortic valve stenosis
Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is most frequently the result of an age-dependent degenerative process causing progressive thickening, calcification, and reduced mobility of the cusps.313 AS causes an increase in transvalvular pressure gradient and LV workload, with consequent LV hypertrophy, fibrosis, and increased myocardial oxygen demand. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is usually preserved. Affected individuals may have a normal cardiac output at rest and even during exercise, therefore, some individuals with AS are capable of good exercise performance. Nonetheless, severe AS is associated with increased risk of heart failure and SCD from mechanical outflow obstruction, malignant VAs, or coronary hypoperfusion.18,314
The diagnosis and grading of AS during echocardiography is based on well-established criteria.315 Specifically, severe AS is defined by: (i) a transvalvular Doppler velocity ≥4.0 m/s; (ii) a mean gradient ≥40 mmHg; and (iii) a calculated aortic valve area <1.0 cm2 or an indexed area (recommended in athletes) <0.6 cm2/m2.315 In cases with a low gradient (<40 mmHg) and calculated valve area <1.0 cm2, with EF < 50% and stroke volume index <35 mL/m2, low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography is recommended to identify pseudo-severe AS or true severe AS.315,316 Assessment of the aortic valve calcium score with CT can be useful in borderline cases where the severity of AS remains unclear.313,316
Exercise testing is particularly important to assess the haemodynamic response in AS and to serve as a guide to exercise prescription in cases of asymptomatic moderate and severe AS. A progressive drop in SBP with exercise, or failure to increase SBP by at least 20 mmHg, identifies subjects at higher risk.317Exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia should also be considered a criterion for exercise restrictions.
Asymptomatic individuals with mild AS may participate in all sports. Asymptomatic athletes with severe AS should not participate in any competitive or leisure sports with the exception of low-intensity skill sports. However, low-intensity aerobic exercise could be encouraged in asymptomatic individuals to improve functional capacity and general well-being.
Individuals with symptomatic AS should not participate in any competitive sport or recreational sport/exercise and valve replacement is recommended. Mild exercise, that does not provoke symptoms, may be considered in these individuals for general health benefits.
Recommendations for exercise and participation in recreational/leisure-time sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic stenosis
![]() |
![]() |
BP = blood pressure; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant lesion (stenotic or regurgitant) should be followed.
Recommendations for exercise and participation in recreational/leisure-time sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic stenosis
![]() |
![]() |
BP = blood pressure; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant lesion (stenotic or regurgitant) should be followed.
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic stenosis
![]() |
![]() |
BP = blood pressure; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant lesion should be followed.
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic stenosis
![]() |
![]() |
BP = blood pressure; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant lesion should be followed.
5.3.3 Aortic valve regurgitation
Aortic valve regurgitation (AR) is usually caused by a congenitally abnormal valve (i.e. bicuspid valve), degeneration of a tricuspid valve, or loss of coaptation due to aortic root enlargement.313,318 Less common causes of AR include infective endocarditis or aortic dissection.
The haemodynamic consequence of chronic AR is characterized by a pressure and volume overload that typically leads to a dilated and hypertrophied LV. To accommodate the concomitant forward flow from the mitral valve and the backward flow from the aortic valve during diastole, the LV progressively increases in size and mass. This remodelling may occasionally be difficult to distinguish from cardiac adaptation in athletes, especially in males with a large body size who engage in endurance activities, and therefore LV size should be interpreted in the context of the sport participated in, and the gender and body surface area of the individual.319 Males with a LV end-diastolic diameter >35 mm/m2 or a LV end-systolic diameter >50 mm, and females with a LV end-diastolic diameter >40 mm/m2 or a LV end-systolic diameter >40 mm, should be considered to have pathological LV enlargement, irrespective of the level of physical training. These individuals should be closely monitored for a progressive increase in LV end-systolic diameter.
In individuals with suboptimal echocardiographic images, CMR has the advantages of providing an accurate assessment of LV volume and EF, flow calculations and detecting the presence of myocardial scar,319 in individuals with severe AR. Furthermore, the whole thoracic aorta can be visualized during the same examination.
Asymptomatic individuals with mild and moderate AR may participate in all sports. Asymptomatic individuals with severe AR, moderately dilated LV, and good LV systolic function may participate in sports involving low and moderate intensity and may be considered for more intensive exercise on an individual basis. Such individuals require more frequent surveillance on a 6-monthly basis to assess LV function. In asymptomatic individuals with severe AR and reduced LVEF, surgical valve replacement/repair is indicated, and they should not participate in competitive sports but may participate in leisure sports involving only low-intensity exercise. Surgery is recommended in symptomatic individuals with severe AR. These individuals should not participate in competitive or leisure sports; however, low-intensity aerobic exercise activity is encouraged to improve functional capacity and general well-being.
Recommendations for participation in recreational/leisure-time sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic regurgitation
![]() |
![]() |
LV = left ventricle; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant lesion should be followed.
Recommendations for participation in recreational/leisure-time sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic regurgitation
![]() |
![]() |
LV = left ventricle; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant lesion should be followed.
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic regurgitation
![]() |
![]() |
AR = aortic regurgitation; LV = left ventricle; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant lesion should be followed.
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with aortic regurgitation
![]() |
![]() |
AR = aortic regurgitation; LV = left ventricle; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant lesion should be followed.
5.3.4 Bicuspid aortic valve
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital abnormality with a prevalence of 1–2% in the general population.320 BAV may be associated with AS or AR and increased risk for ascending aortic aneurysm or dissection, and SCD.28,321 Compared with Marfan syndrome, the risk of aortopathy is lower; nonetheless BAV is much more frequent, and the relative risk of aortic dissection has been reported to be eight times greater than with a tricuspid aortic valve.321 BAV may not be identified during physical examination in the absence of valve dysfunction;58,322 however, the outcome of young individuals without valvular dysfunction is good.323,324
It is unclear whether intensive exercise accelerates aortic dilatation in the long term. A previous study comparing athletes with BAV, non-athletes with BAV, and athletes with a normal aortic valve reported that athletes with BAV showed a 0.11 ± 0.59 mm/year increase in aortic size at the sinuses of Valsalva and 0.21 ± 0.44 mm/year for the proximal ascending aorta, which was not dissimilar to non-athletes with a BAV.325 Currently, expert consensus panels advise a cautious approach to sports activities when the ascending aorta is above the normal limits (see section 5.4). In the absence of aortopathy, exercise recommendations for individuals with BAV are identical to those in individuals with tricuspid aortic valve dysfunction.
5.3.5 Primary mitral regurgitation
Most individuals with mitral valve disease have primary mitral regurgitation (MR) from myxomatous disease.326 MR is confirmed and quantified by echocardiography. General recommendations regarding exercise and sports are based on symptomatic status, severity of MR, LV function, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), and the presence or absence of arrhythmias during exercise. Both athletic training and MR may be associated with an enlarged LV cavity; however, an enlarged LV that is disproportionate to the level of exercise may be suggestive of severe MR and an indication to refrain from competitive or leisure sports involving moderate- or high-intensity exercise.
Asymptomatic individuals with mild or moderate MR may compete in all sports if they have good functional capacity, preserved LV function, sPAP < 50 mmHg and absence of complex arrhythmias during exercise. Individuals with symptomatic MR and reduced exercise capacity or individuals with MR with exercise-induced complex arrhythmias should not participate in competitive or leisure sport; however, low-intensity aerobic exercise should be encouraged to improve functional capacity and general well-being. Individuals on long-term anticoagulation therapy for AF should not engage in contact/collision sport.
Recommendations for participation in recreational/leisure-time sports in asymptomatic individuals with mitral regurgitation
![]() |
![]() |
LVEDD = left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; MR = mitral regurgitation; sPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant valve lesion should be followed.
No collision or body contact sports if anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation.
Recommendations for participation in recreational/leisure-time sports in asymptomatic individuals with mitral regurgitation
![]() |
![]() |
LVEDD = left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; MR = mitral regurgitation; sPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant valve lesion should be followed.
No collision or body contact sports if anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation.
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with mitral regurgitation
![]() |
![]() |
LVEDD = left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; MR = mitral regurgitation; sPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant valve lesion should be followed.
No collision or body contact sports if anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation.
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with mitral regurgitation
![]() |
![]() |
LVEDD = left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; MR = mitral regurgitation; sPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant valve lesion should be followed.
No collision or body contact sports if anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation.
5.3.5.1 Mitral valve prolapse
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is characterized by fibro-myxomatous changes of the mitral valve leaflets and has a prevalence of 1–2.4%.328,329 The diagnosis of MVP is defined as >2 mm displacement of one or both leaflets of the mitral valve beyond the annulus within the left atrium in end-systole.330 MVP is generally benign with a 10-year mortality risk of 5%.331 The majority of individuals are identified incidentally during cardiac auscultation, or echocardiography.
The most common complication of MVP is the progression to chronic severe MR, in 5–10% of individuals with MVP. Other complications include HF from chronic MR, pulmonary hypertension, infective endocarditis, supraventricular and VAs, and, occasionally, SCD.313 In the Italian cardiac pathology registry of 650 SCDs in young adults, 7% were attributed to MVP.332 Most decedents showed scarring in the infero-basal wall and papillary muscles and bi-leaflet prolapse. Myocardial scarring, mitral valve annular disjunction (i.e. an abnormal atrial displacement of the mitral valve leaflet hinge point during systole),333 T-wave inversion in the inferior leads and VAs arising from the LV [right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology] were high-risk features for SCD.334 The mechanical strain of MVP on papillary muscles and adjacent myocardium is thought to be responsible for the myocardial scarring, which may be a possible mechanism for life-threatening arrhythmias in some individuals.335,336
In general, exercising individuals with MVP have an excellent prognosis. In a recent Italian study of 7449 young competitive athletes, MVP was identified in 2.9%. During a follow-up period of 8 ± 2 years there were no fatalities.337 Adverse events, including progressive MR with LV dilatation, ischaemic stroke, and AF occurred at a rate of 0.5% per annum and were more common in older athletes with baseline mitral valve disjunction or VAs.
Individuals with MVP should be evaluated with an exercise test and 24-hour ECG. Individuals with inferior T-wave inversion or ventricular premature beats arising from the LV should undergo a CMR imaging scan to check specifically for myocardial fibrosis affecting the infero-basal wall. Other potentially high-risk markers include evidence of mechanical dispersion detected by speckled tracking echocardiography,338 coexisting prolongation of the QT interval and mitral annular disjunction.333
Given the relatively benign nature of MVP, asymptomatic patients with mild or moderate MR can participate in all competitive sports and leisure sports in the absence of the aforementioned risk factors (Figure 8). Asymptomatic patients with severe MR but none of the above high-risk markers may compete in low- to moderate-intensity sports after detailed discussion with their specialist in the presence of LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) <60 mm (or <35.5 mm/m2 in men and <40 mm/m2 in women) with LVEF ≥ 60%, resting sPAP < 50 mmHg, and normal exercise test.

Specific markers of increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) with mitral valve prolapse. LV = left ventricular; MR = mitral regurgitation; MV = mitral valve. Adapted from Gati et al.336
Symptomatic patients with MVP and any of the aforementioned high-risk features (Figure 8) should not participate in recreational or competitive sports; however, low-intensity aerobic exercise should be encouraged to improve functional capacity and general well-being.
5.3.6 Mitral stenosis
Although rheumatic valve disease is uncommon in the western world, the increase in emigration patterns means that cardiologists may encounter individuals with rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) who aspire to exercise. Individuals with advanced MS are usually symptomatic and incapable of engaging in exercise regimens with a high CV demand. The risk stratification of exercising individuals with MS is based largely on a detailed echocardiogram with specific interest in the severity of the lesion and accompanying systolic PAP. In addition, assessment should include a maximal exercise stress test to identify concealed symptoms and functional capacity.
Asymptomatic individuals with mild MS [mitral valve area (MVA) 1.5–2.0 cm2] and moderate MS (MVA 1.0–1.5 cm2) who are in sinus rhythm and demonstrate good functional capacity on exercise testing and a normal sPAP may participate in all competitive and leisure sports. Mildly symptomatic individuals with severe MS (MVA < 1.0 cm2) may only participate in leisure exercise involving physical effort of low intensity. Individuals with symptomatic MS should be referred for intervention and advised to abstain from participation in sports and recreational exercise of moderate or high intensity. Individuals with AF should be anticoagulated and avoid contact/collision sport. In cases of balloon mitral valvuloplasty with good results (i.e. MVA > 2.0 cm2) regular exercise and competitive sport may be considered in asymptomatic individuals with good functional capacity.
Recommendations for participation in recreational/leisure-time sports in individuals with mitral stenosis
![]() |
![]() |
MVA = mitral valve area; sPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant valve lesion should be followed.
No collision or body contact sports if anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation.
Recommendations for participation in recreational/leisure-time sports in individuals with mitral stenosis
![]() |
![]() |
MVA = mitral valve area; sPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant valve lesion should be followed.
No collision or body contact sports if anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation.
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with mitral stenosis
![]() |
![]() |
MVA = mitral valve area; sPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant valve lesion should be followed.
No collision or body contact sports if anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation.
Recommendations for participation in competitive sports in asymptomatic individuals with mitral stenosis
![]() |
![]() |
MVA = mitral valve area; sPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For mixed valvular disease, the recommendation for the predominant valve lesion should be followed.
No collision or body contact sports if anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation.
5.3.7 Tricuspid regurgitation
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is usually secondary to left heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, or right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. In most patients with secondary TR, exercise limitations relate to the underlying pathology.
Mild TR is common in athletes and accompanied by physiological dilatation of the inferior vena cava, which is easily collapsible with inspiration. Severe TR is characterized by increasing tricuspid annular dilatation and RV remodelling that eventually leads to RV dysfunction and a non-reactive inferior vena cava. Individuals with severe TR may also have a reduced exercise capacity due to an impaired cardiac output response with exercise.339 Furthermore, they may experience increased right- and left-sided filling pressures during exercise, the latter being due to diastolic ventricular interaction.340
In general, asymptomatic patients with TR who have good functional capacity, non-dilated right ventricle, preserved ventricular function, sPAP<40 mmHg, and absence of complex arrhythmias may compete in all competitive and recreational sports.
5.4 Exercise recommendations in individuals with aortopathy
5.4.1 Introduction
Thoracic aortic aneurysms are largely asymptomatic until a sudden and catastrophic event, including aortic rupture or dissection, occurs, which can be rapidly fatal. Advanced age, male sex, long-term history of arterial hypertension, and the presence of aortic aneurysm confer the greatest population attributable risk for aortic dissection. However, patients with genetic connective tissue disorders such as Marfan (MFS), Loeys Dietz, Turner, or Ehlers Danlos (EDS) syndromes, and patients with BAV are at increased risk at a much younger age. BAV has a prevalence of about 1–2% in the general population. These patients have a relatively low risk for aortic dissection in comparison with patients with hereditary thoracic aortic disease (HTAD). Having a family history of aortic dissection or sudden death is a risk factor and a larger diameter of the aorta carries a higher risk, although dissection can occur at any diameter and especially in EDS patients there is no clear association with aortic diameter.341–343
A dilated aortic root (>40 mm) is not a feature of athlete’s heart, with only a small minority of young athletes (0.3%) having an enlarged aortic root diameter.344–347 During follow-up no progressive enlargement of the aortic diameter was observed in these athletes, and no aortic events occurred during a 5-year period.347
5.4.2 Risk of dissection
Because of the increase in BP and wall stress associated with intensive exercise and sports, such activities are potentially associated with an enhanced risk of expansion of the aorta and acute aortic dissection. However, daily exercise is important in maintaining an ideal BP, heart rate, and body weight and a sedentary lifestyle is an important modifiable risk factor for CV disease and mortality. Physical activity is advised in all patients with aortic pathology, even when the aorta is dilated.
There are no randomized controlled trials on competitive sports in patients with thoracic aortic disease, or any prospective data regarding the risks of competitive athletics in patients after surgical correction; however, even after aortic root replacement, patients with MFS and other HTAD remain at risk of aortic complications. One small prospective cohort study evaluated the feasibility and effects of a 3-week rehabilitation training programme in 19 MFS patients with a mean age of 47 years. During the 1-year follow-up, there were no adverse events but there was improvement in physical fitness and reduction in psychological distress. These effects were detectable after 3 weeks of rehabilitation, and mostly persisted through the 1-year follow-up. Unfortunately, no information on aortic diameters was provided.348
5.4.3 Sporting disciplines
Exercise-related acute thoracic aortic dissections are described in the literature in a total of 49 case reports. Of these, 42 patients suffered Stanford type A thoracic aortic dissections. In the majority (26/49) weightlifting was associated with aortic dissection.349 Furthermore, a recently published retrospective cohort study of 615 patients with acute type A aortic dissection found that 4.1% cases were related to sports activities. The type of sports most often reported was golf (32%), but this was not corrected for the percentage of participants in the sport and probably reflects that golfers are frequently older with an increased risk of hypertension and hence the potential for dissection.350
5.4.4 Effect on aortic diameter and wall stress
One cross-sectional study, which included 58 competitive athletes with BAV, showed no correlation between aortic dimensions and duration of training.351 Two studies compared athletes and sedentary individuals with BAV and reported no difference in aortic growth rate between the two groups.
Two MFS mouse models investigating the effects of mild-moderate dynamic exercise on the aortic wall showed a reduction in the growth rate of the aortic diameter in mice with MFS that performed mild to moderate dynamic exercise compared to sedentary mice with MFS.352,353 Among exercising mice, the aortic wall became stronger and a larger mechanical stress was required to induce aortic rupture. An optimum protective effect was found at a training intensity level of 55–65% of maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max).
5.4.5 Recommendations
Regular exercise has a well-documented benefit for fitness, psychological well-being, and social interaction, as well as a positive effect on hypertension and concomitant future risk of dissection. Most individuals with aortic pathology benefit from a certain minimal exercise programme and can at least participate in recreational sports (Table 14). Some lesions are not compatible with endurance training and athletic sports, due to their high risk of dissection or rupture. Recommendations for exercise and sports should be individualized and based on the underlying diagnosis, the aortic diameter, family history for dissection or sudden death (risk factor), and the pre-existing fitness and experience. An exercise test with an assessment of blood pressure response is recommended before engaging in sports.
![]() |
![]() |
ASI = aortic size index; BAV = bicuspid aortic valve; HTAD = hereditary thoracic aortic disease; MFS = Marfan syndrome.
![]() |
![]() |
ASI = aortic size index; BAV = bicuspid aortic valve; HTAD = hereditary thoracic aortic disease; MFS = Marfan syndrome.
Recommendations for exercise and participation in sports in individuals with aortic pathology
![]() |
![]() |
CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; CT = computed tomography.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise and participation in sports in individuals with aortic pathology
![]() |
![]() |
CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; CT = computed tomography.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.5 Exercise recommendations in individuals with cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, and pericarditis
Cardiomyopathies are an important cause of SCD/SCA in young individuals and exercise has been implicated as a trigger for fatal arrhythmias.17–19,28 The detection of a cardiomyopathy in an individual has important implications with respect to ongoing participation in exercise. The advent of preventive strategies for SCD has led to a significant expansion in the number of predominantly asymptomatic young patients with cardiomyopathies who aspire to exercise. When advising such individuals, it is essential to strike a balance between protecting patients from the potentially adverse effects of exercise and depriving them of the multiple benefits of exercise.
5.5.1 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
The diagnosis of HCM is based on the presence of unexplained LV hypertrophy, defined as a maximum end-diastolic wall thickness ≥15 mm, in any myocardial segment on echocardiography, CMR, or CT imaging.355 HCM may also be considered in individuals with a lesser degree of LV hypertrophy (wall thickness ≥13 mm) in the context of a family history of definite HCM or a positive genetic test.355
5.5.1.1 Risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Circumstantial evidence and a large systematic collection of young SCDs in sports in the US suggest that exercise increases the risk of SCD/SCA in individuals with HCM.18 Consistently, previous consensus recommendations have restricted all athletes with HCM from competitive sports.1,356,357
More recently, relatively small longitudinal clinical studies indicate that the risk of SCD during exercise may be considerably lower than initially considered. Lampert et al. reported that individuals with HCM who continued participating in sports after implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation did not reveal an increased number of shocks during exercise.358,359 In a cross-sectional study of 187 patients with HCM, vigorous exercise was not associated with the occurrence of VAs.358 Pelliccia et al. reported outcomes in a cohort of 35 athletes with HCM, engaged in training and competitions for 5 to 31 years (mean 15 ± 8). During a 9-year follow-up period, there were no differences in the incidence of symptoms or major events between athletes who ceased exercise (n = 20) compared with athletes who continued competitive sports (n = 15).360 In a post-mortem series, only 23% of 194 deaths from HCM occurred during sport, and affected males with a mean age of 30 years.361 Finally, individuals with HCM who participated in rehabilitation programmes demonstrated a significant improvement in functional capacity without adverse events.362,363
In conclusion, there is limited evidence to indicate that all individuals with HCM are vulnerable to fatal arrhythmias during exercise and sport participation. In this regard, systematic restriction from competitive sports in all affected individuals is probably unjustified and a more liberal approach to sports participation is reasonable in some individuals after careful evaluation.3 This is particularly important for the majority of individuals with HCM who wish to participate in amateur sports or leisure-time exercise to maintain their physical and psychological well-being.
5.5.1.2 Baseline assessment of patients with HCM
A systematic approach is required when assessing an individual with HCM who requests exercise advice. The baseline evaluation should include a comprehensive personal and family history with consideration of the age of the individual and years of exercise prior to diagnosis, assessment of the severity of the HCM phenotype, and the presence of any conventional risk factors for SCD/SCA. In older patients with HCM, the physician should review the presence of cardiac comorbidities such as hypertension and ischaemic heart disease, which may confer a worse prognosis in HCM.364,365
5.5.1.3 History
The presence of symptoms attributed to HCM should prompt more conservative exercise recommendations. Individuals with a history of cardiac arrest or unheralded syncope and individuals with exercise-induced symptoms should be advised to engage in low-intensity recreational sports only.
5.5.1.4 Resting and ambulatory ECG
The resting 12-lead ECG has limited value in risk stratification. Ambulatory ECG monitoring, preferably for 48 h, is important for detecting ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. The monitoring period should include an exercise session. Asymptomatic non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) confers considerable risk of SCD in younger individuals (≤35 years).355 Paroxysmal supraventricular arrhythmias may pose significant implications for functional capacity and, in the case of AF, for stroke prevention.366
5.5.1.5 Echocardiography
In relation to risk stratification for SCD the clinician should assess the following echocardiographic indices: (i) LV wall thickness; (ii) LV outflow tract (LVOT) gradient; and (iii) left atrial diameter.355 All individuals should have the LVOT gradient assessed at rest, during the Valsalva manoeuvre, on standing suddenly, and after light exercise on the spot, such as repeated squats. By convention, LVOT obstruction is defined as a peak pressure gradient ≥30 mmHg at rest or during physiological provocation. A gradient ≥50 mmHg is considered to be haemodynamically important. Exercise stress echocardiography should be considered in individuals with exertional symptoms who have resting systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve leaflets but who do not reveal LVOT obstruction or show only mild to moderate LVOT obstruction with the aforementioned manoeuvres.
5.5.1.6 Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
CMR imaging is increasingly recognized as a necessary tool for confirming diagnosis and to assess risk stratification in individuals with HCM. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), indicative of myocardial fibrosis, may be present in up to 75% of patients with HCM and, by itself, is a poor discriminator of outcomes. However, the presence of extensive (≥15% of LV myocardium) LGE may identify individuals at increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SCD.367–370
5.5.1.7 Exercise testing
Exercise testing (or CPET) should be part of the routine evaluation to assess functional capacity in an individual with HCM who intends to exercise. In addition, an abnormal BP response to exercise (defined as <20 mmHg increase in SBP from baseline, or exercise-induced hypotension)371,372 and the presence of exercise-induced symptoms or arrhythmias are markers of high risk and should result in more conservative exercise recommendations.
5.5.1.8 Genetic testing
Currently genetic testing is reserved for familial cascade screening. It does not inform decisions relating to the risk of SCD/SCA and should not be performed for exercise risk stratification.
5.5.1.9 ESC risk score in HCM
The ESC risk score uses seven variables (age, syncope, family history of SCD from HCM, maximal LV wall thickness, left atrial diameter, LV outflow obstruction, NSVT) to assess the risk of SCD of patients with HCM.355,373 This information can be inserted into an online calculator (https://doc2do.com/hcm/webHCM.html) to estimate individualized 5-year risk to provide guidance on whether a prophylactic ICD is indicated. For the purposes of these Guidelines the risk of SCD is defined as low if <4%, moderate if between ≥4% and <6%, and high if ≥6% in 5 years.
5.5.1.10 Exercise recommendation
On completion of the baseline evaluation, the physician should consider: (i) the presence of symptoms; (ii) ESC risk score; (iii) presence of resting or inducible LVOT obstruction during exercise; (iv) the haemodynamic (BP) response to exercise; and (v) the presence of resting or exercise-induced arrhythmias before recommending the appropriate form and intensity of exercise.
Although these Guidelines advocate for a more liberal approach to sports participation, it is indisputable that even the absence of all major risk factors does not convey immunity to SCD.374 In addition, the ESC risk score relies on evidence derived from predominantly non-athletic cohorts.373 Whereas there are no data to suggest that this approach to risk estimation is less valid in athletic individuals, one has to consider that it may not accurately reflect the risk of SCD in individuals exposed to the haemodynamic and metabolic stresses of high-intensity sports. Therefore, when advising an individual with HCM regarding participation in high-intensity exercise programmes and competitive sports, this consideration should be an integral part of the discussion during the shared decision-making process.
5.5.1.11 Special considerations
The age of an individual may have an impact on risk. The mean age of death in the largest series of SCD from the US was 18 years, with 65% of deaths occurring in athletes ≤17 years.354 Although young age should not exclude an individual from high-intensity exercise in the absence of additional risk factors, it should be considered in the discussion with the individual and the parents or guardians. In addition, specific sports may pose a higher risk for SCD, such as highly dynamic, start–stop sports like basketball and football.17,58
Individuals who have a positive genotype but who do not reveal any phenotypic structural or arrhythmia features of HCM may engage in all sports. Such individuals should be assessed annually for phenotypic features and risk stratification purposes.
5.5.1.12 Follow-up
Annual follow-up is recommended for most individuals with HCM who exercise on a regular basis. More frequent (6-monthly) follow-up should be considered in adolescent individuals and young adults whose phenotype, and therefore risk of SCD, may still be evolving and who are more vulnerable to exercise-related SCD.58,239Follow-up evaluation should focus on assessment of disease progression and risk stratification. New symptoms should prompt interruption of exercise and re-evaluation.
Recommendations for exercise and sports participation in individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
![]() |
![]() |
BP = blood pressure; ESC = European Society of Cardiology; HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVOT = left ventricular outflow tract obstruction cardiomyopathy; SCD = sudden cardiac death.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Markers of increased risk include: (i) cardiac symptoms or history of cardiac arrest or unexplained syncope; (ii) moderate ESC risk score (≥4%) at 5 years; (iii) LVOT gradient at rest >30 mmHg; (iv) abnormal BP response to exercise; (v) exercise-induced arrhythmias.
Refer to Table 4 for different indices of exercise intensity and training zones.
Recommendations for exercise and sports participation in individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
![]() |
![]() |
BP = blood pressure; ESC = European Society of Cardiology; HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVOT = left ventricular outflow tract obstruction cardiomyopathy; SCD = sudden cardiac death.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Markers of increased risk include: (i) cardiac symptoms or history of cardiac arrest or unexplained syncope; (ii) moderate ESC risk score (≥4%) at 5 years; (iii) LVOT gradient at rest >30 mmHg; (iv) abnormal BP response to exercise; (v) exercise-induced arrhythmias.
Refer to Table 4 for different indices of exercise intensity and training zones.
5.5.2 Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is defined pathologically by the presence of fibro-fatty replacement of the right ventricle and clinically by life-threatening VAs. The condition was initially recognized as a predominantly RV disease, and diagnosis is currently based on probabilistic Task Force Criteria that encompass electrophysiological, anatomical, functional, and clinical features of the disease.375 Since its first description, the concept of ARVC has evolved to include concealed or subclinical phenotypes and biventricular disease. It is now well established that both ventricles are affected in most cases.376–378 This has led to the development of a new term, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, that embraces an array of diagnostic terms for different (genetic and acquired) pathologies. Although the definition of ‘arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy’ is yet to be agreed, it can be considered as an umbrella term for a family of diseases that are characterized by biventricular myocardial abnormalities, including fibro-fatty infiltration and scarring, identified by pathological examination and/or cardiac imaging and VA.
The term arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is used throughout these recommendations; however, it is important to recognize that most of the literature on the influence of exercise on disease progression and risk of SCD is derived from cohorts with classical ARVC. This is reflected in the recommendations provided in these Guidelines. It is possible therefore that the recommendations may not accurately reflect predominantly LV disease, which constitutes a small proportion of the disease spectrum where the impact of exercise on disease phenotype and risk is less clarified than the RV variant. Where appropriate, guidance is provided for other conditions that can be reasonably considered under the umbrella of ACM [including subtypes of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM)].
5.5.2.1 Risk stratification in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
ACM accounts for a significant proportion of SCDs in young and athletic individuals.28 Established risk factors for SCD that should prompt consideration for an ICD include aborted SCD, unheralded syncope, ventricular tachycardia, and impaired RV and/or LV systolic function.379 A novel risk prediction model for VAs has recently been proposed but is yet to be validated.380 Regular and high-intensity exercise programmes are associated with acceleration of the disease process and worse outcomes.381–389
In an experimental model of heterozygous plakoglobin-deficient mice, exercise training accelerated RV dysfunction and arrhythmias.382 Similar results have been confirmed in human desmosomal mutation carriers participating in vigorous (>70% VO2max) endurance sports.384 Similar findings were reported in patients with ACM and asymptomatic gene-positive family members, despite a more conservative definition of athletic status (exercise with intensity ≥6 METs for ≥4 h/week for ≥6 years).386 Recently, the results from the North American multidisciplinary study reported that patients engaging in competitive sports were at two-fold increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias or death and earlier presentation of symptoms, compared with patients who participated in recreational sports and sedentary individuals.385 Among patients engaging in competitive sports, early age of sports initiation was associated with premature presentation of symptoms and adverse clinical profile. Reducing exercise intensity was associated with a substantial decrease in the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias or death, to the same level as inactive patients.385 Finally, in a multinational registry of 393 competitive athletes implanted with an ICD who continued to participate in regular competitions, 20% of athletes with ACM received a shock during exertion compared to 10% at rest, during a median follow-up of 44 months. The diagnosis of ACM was the only variable associated with receiving appropriate shocks during competition.359,389
5.5.2.2 Baseline assessment of patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
A systematic approach is required when assessing individuals with ACM who request exercise advice. The baseline evaluation should include a comprehensive history of symptoms and family history of ACM or SCD, assessment of the severity of the ACM phenotype, and the presence of any conventional risk factors for SCD/SCA.
5.5.2.3 History
Syncope due to presumed arrhythmia is an important risk marker for SCD/SCA and a predictor of future appropriate ICD therapies.390–394 The presence of symptoms attributed to ACM should reinforce the conservative exercise recommendations. Individuals with a history of cardiac arrest or unheralded syncope and individuals with exercise-induced symptoms should be advised to engage only in low-intensity recreational exercise programmes.
5.5.2.4 Resting and ambulatory ECG
Apart from its diagnostic utility, the 12-lead ECG may provide useful information relating to risk stratification in ACM. The presence of extensive T-wave inversion affecting ≥3 precordial leads or T-wave inversion in two of the three inferior leads confers some additional risk for SCD/SCA.395,396
Ambulatory ECG monitoring is important for detecting VAs. Every effort should be made for the monitoring period to include the proposed exercise session. The presence of NSVT or significant burden of ventricular ectopy (≥1000/24 h), even in asymptomatic individuals, confers an increased risk of fatal arrhythmias.392,393,397
5.5.2.5 Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
In relation to risk stratification for SCD, the clinician should assess the severity of RV and LV involvement in terms of ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction. CMR imaging is more useful than echocardiography for assessing RV wall motion abnormalities and can also quantify the degree of myocardial fat infiltration and/or scar. The more extensive the disease the higher the arrhythmic risk.398,399
5.5.2.6 Exercise testing
Exercise testing should be part of the routine assessment of every individual with ACM who wishes to exercise, as it can provide information regarding functional capacity and risk stratification. Exercise testing in patients with ACM should not be performed during ‘hot phases’. The presence of exercise-induced symptoms or arrhythmias should result in more conservative recommendations.
5.5.2.7 Genetic testing
Genotype may also be of prognostic value. In the ARVC variant, a number of studies have reported that carriers of multiple pathogenic variants in the same desmosomal gene or mutations in ≥2 genes may have an almost four-fold higher arrhythmic risk than those with a single mutation.400 Particular genotypes such as DSP and TMEM43, but also LMNA and FLNC, associated with other ACM phenotypes (see section 5.5.4) have a propensity for high arrhythmic burden that can pre-date the structural phenotype.401,402
5.5.2.8 Exercise recommendations
The overall scientific evidence supports the concept that in patients with ACM participation in high-intensity sports should be discouraged, because it is associated with accelerated disease progression, greater risk of VAs and major events. This recommendation is also applicable to genetic carriers of pathogenic variants for ACM even in the absence of overt disease phenotype.
5.5.2.9 Special considerations
Young age of presentation and male sex are associated with increased risk of malignant arrhythmias in ACM.379 Although young age should not exclude an individual from moderate-intensity exercise in the absence of high-risk features, age should be considered in the discussion with the patient and the parents. In addition, one should consider that specific highly dynamic, start–stop sports, such as basketball and football, may pose a higher risk of SCD particularly in athletes who compete at the highest level.17,365
5.5.2.10 Follow-up
An annual follow-up is recommended for most individuals with ACM who exercise on a regular basis. More frequent (6-monthly) follow-up should be considered for adolescent and young adults whose ACM phenotype, and therefore risk of SCD, may still be evolving, particularly if they engage in moderate- to high-intensity exercise. More frequent follow-up should also be considered in individuals with high arrhythmic risk genotypes such as DSP, TMEM43, and carriers of multiple pathogenic variants. New symptoms should prompt interruption of exercise and re-evaluation.
Recommendations for exercise and sports participation in individuals with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
![]() |
![]() |
ACM = arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; PVC = premature ventricular contraction; SCD = sudden cardiac death; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Refer to Table 4 for different indices of exercise intensity and training zones.
Recommendations for exercise and sports participation in individuals with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
![]() |
![]() |
ACM = arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; PVC = premature ventricular contraction; SCD = sudden cardiac death; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Refer to Table 4 for different indices of exercise intensity and training zones.
5.5.3 Exercise recommendations in individuals with left ventricular non-compaction
LV non-compaction (LVNC) is an unclassified cardiomyopathy characterized by prominent trabeculation and deep recesses that communicate with the LV cavity.403,404 Clinical presentation of LVNC includes progressive LV systolic dysfunction, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and thromboembolic events.404
Athletes often demonstrate LV hypertrabeculation and up to 8% fulfil the echocardiographic criteria for a diagnosis of LVNC.405 It is hypothesized that an increased cardiac preload may unmask LV trabecular morphology.406 Therefore, among athletic individuals, the suspicion of LVNC should only be considered in those who fulfil echocardiographic criteria for LVNC but also have either LV systolic dysfunction (EF < 50%), symptoms suggestive of cardiac disease, or a positive family history of LVNC.407–409 Additional echocardiographic criteria include a very thin compacted epicardial layer (5 mm in end-diastole on CMR, or <8 mm in systole) and abnormal myocardial relaxation (average E’ < 9 cm/s on tissue Doppler imaging).404,405,410,411 Such athletes will require further assessment with CMR, exercise echocardiography, and Holter monitor to assess the presence of LV fibrosis, cardiac thrombi, contractile reserve, and exercise-induced complex arrhythmias.405,406
5.5.3.1 Risk stratification
The clinical outcomes of LVNC are determined by the presence of symptoms, severity of LV dysfunction, and the nature of the VAs. There are no reported adverse cardiac events in the absence of LV dysfunction regardless of the severity of LV trabeculation.405–409
5.5.3.2 Follow-up
Regular follow-up is recommended for individuals with LVNC. New symptoms should prompt interruption of exercise and re-evaluation.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG = electrocardiogram; EF = ejection fraction; LV = left ventricular; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVNC = left ventricular non-compaction; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG = electrocardiogram; EF = ejection fraction; LV = left ventricular; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVNC = left ventricular non-compaction; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.5.4 Exercise recommendations in individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy
DCM is characterized by LV or biventricular systolic dysfunction with or without dilatation that are not explained by abnormal loading conditions or CAD. Possible causes include genetic predisposition, myocarditis, drugs, toxins, peripartum cardiomyopathy, and, in some cases, the cumulative effect of more than one factor.412
The clinical spectrum of disease may range from a mild phenotypic expression characterized by absence of symptoms, isolated LV dilatation and normal or low-normal systolic function, to an overt disease phenotype with limiting symptoms and significant systolic dysfunction. Ventricular arrhythmias are common in DCM, particularly in individuals with previous myocarditis, or with lamin A/C mutations and filamin C mutations.413,414 The risk of SCD in DCM is 2–3% per year and increases with lower EF and higher NYHA class.415 Exercise training improves functional capacity, ventricular function, and quality of life in patients with DCM and should therefore be considered as an integral part of the management of affected individuals.416,417 However, intensive exercise and competitive sports are reported as a cause of SCD in DCM. 28,46,58,413,418
LV cavity enlargement in trained individuals that is not associated with systolic dysfunction and outside the context of a familial disease, represents a benign physiological adaptation if it is consistent with the type of sports participated (usually, endurance sports) and the body size of the athlete. Conversely, a mildly reduced EF (45–50%) in an athlete with an enlarged LV cavity should not merely be considered as a normal adaptation. In such cases assessment of LV function during exercise may provide important diagnostic clues.319 Failure to increase EF at peak exercise by >10% compared with the baseline value may suggest a pathological condition.319,419,420 The presence of diastolic dysfunction or reduced peak oxygen consumption on CPET may also provide supporting information for the differential diagnosis. CMR has emerged as an important tool for the diagnosis and risk stratification of DCM. Specifically, the presence of LGE, with the typical mid-wall distribution, has been associated with increased risk of VAs and SCD.319,419,421–424
5.5.4.1 Baseline assessment of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy
Clinical evaluation of affected individuals who request exercise advice should aim to: (i) ascertain the potential aetiology; (ii) assess the clinical status including exercise history and functional capacity; (iii) review the degree of LV dilatation and dysfunction; (iv) assess the haemodynamic response to exercise; and (v) assess the presence of exercise-induced symptoms or arrhythmias.
In general, symptomatic individuals with DCM should abstain from most competitive and leisure sports or recreational exercise associated with moderate or high exercise intensity. A select group of asymptomatic individuals with DCM who have mildly impaired LV function (LVEF 45–50%) without exercise-induced arrhythmias or significant myocardial fibrosis may participate in most competitive sports.
5.5.4.2 Special considerations
Although the natural history of most pathogenic variants is unknown, it would be reasonable to permit intensive exercise and competitive sports in most individuals with pathogenic variants implicated in DCM in the absence of overt features of DCM. Special consideration, however, should be given to individuals with pathogenic variants that are associated with an increased risk of life-threatening arrhythmias such as lamin A/C or filamin C mutations. There is emerging evidence that exercise may have an adverse effect on cardiac function and risk for potentially fatal arrhythmias in individuals harbouring pathogenic variants in lamin A/C.425–427 Affected individuals should not engage in any competitive sports or recreational exercise of high or very high intensity irrespective of the severity of LV dysfunction and dilatation.428,429
5.5.4.3 Follow-up.
Regular follow-up is recommended for most individuals with DCM. New symptoms should prompt interruption of exercise and re-evaluation
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; DCM = dilated cardiomyopathy; EF = ejection fraction; LGE = late gadolinium enhancement; SCD = sudden cardiac death; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; DCM = dilated cardiomyopathy; EF = ejection fraction; LGE = late gadolinium enhancement; SCD = sudden cardiac death; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.5.5 Exercise recommendations in individuals with myocarditis and pericarditis
5.5.5.1 Myocarditis
Myocarditis is a non-ischaemic inflammatory disease of the myocardium, which may cause cardiac dysfunction and arrhythmias. Myopericarditis is defined as a primary pericarditis with associated myocardial inflammation and biomarker evidence of myocyte necrosis.430,431 The aetiology of myocarditis is heterogenous, but viral infection is the most common cause in the developed world. Enterovirus, Coxsackie B virus, parvovirus B-19, and human herpesvirus 6 are the most frequently responsible infectious pathogens.432,433 In the context of young individuals, toxins such as cocaine and amphetamine-based supplements should also be evaluated in the clinical history.430
The clinical presentation is highly variable and the diagnosis can be challenging. The illness may be proceeded by coryzal symptoms and athletic individuals may present with non-specific features of general malaise, fatigue, or diarrhoea.430,431 At the other extreme, myocarditis may simulate MI or present with symptomatic supraventricular and VAs unexplained by other causes, HF, cardiogenic shock, or SCD.
Approximately 50% of individuals reveal full resolution of LV function within 30 days, 25% show persistent cardiac dysfunction, and 12–25% progress to fulminant HF. LV dysfunction is an important prognostic factor in the long term.28,434
5.5.5.2 Diagnosis
Serum cardiac troponin is usually elevated in myopericarditis and is a sensitive marker of cardiac inflammation-induced myocyte necrosis.435
The ECG has low sensitivity and electrical anomalies are non-specific. ECG patterns vary from non-specific T-wave and ST-changes to ST-segment elevation mimicking MI, left bundle branch block (LBBB), or frequent and/or complex ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, or atrioventricular block, or low QRS voltages in the presence of a pericardial effusion.436
Recognized echocardiographic features of overt myocarditis include a non-dilated LV cavity with increased myocardial wall thickness (when oedema is present), or mildly dilated LV cavity with a thinned myocardial wall, usually with regional wall motion abnormalities.437 The global LV systolic function may range from being almost normal to severely depressed. Regional wall motion abnormalities may be present.438
CMR is the most useful diagnostic tool and has excellent sensitivity for detecting myocardial hyperaemia, inflammation, oedema and/or focal scar.439,440 The Lake Louise Criteria and LGE are now complemented by CMR techniques of T1/T2 mapping and extracellular volume fraction (ECV).440–442 The extent and distribution of LGE with non-ischaemic pattern are independent predictors of CV events during follow-up.439,440,443–447 Namely, a 10% increase of LGE volume conveys a 79% increase in the risk of major CV events.448,449
Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of myocarditis.450,451 A histological diagnosis allows distinction between the different types of inflammatory processes, (i.e. giant cell myocarditis), and guides treatment in life-threatening presentations.430,445,452 The diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsy can be improved by analysing the viral genome through DNA-RNA extraction and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification, which has the advantage of identifying the disease-causing pathogen.445
5.5.5.3 Risk stratification
Case series have established myocarditis as a risk factor for SCD, which accounts for up to 2–20% of sudden death in athletes.17,18,28,430,453,454 Murine models have shown that daily exercise in mice infected with Coxsackie virus is associated with increased viral titres, fulminant myocarditis, and sudden death.455 These animal models provide some insight into the mechanisms of SCD with exercise, which appears to cause an accelerated and progressive inflammatory response.455–458
5.5.5.4 Exercise recommendations for individuals with myocarditis
Athletic individuals with a probable or definitive diagnosis of recent myocarditis should be advised to abstain from competitive sports or leisure sports while active inflammation is present, regardless of age, sex, or extent of LV systolic dysfunction.459,460
The duration of myocardial inflammation can be highly variable and may take several months for full resolution. Both the ESC and AHA recommend abstinence from moderate- to high-intensity exercise for a period of 3–6 months,459,460 although the precise timing for return to competitive or recreational sports involving moderate- or high-intensity exercise may be guided by the presence of inflammation on T2-weighted images and LGE uptake on CMR.3,461
Individuals with myocarditis should have a comprehensive evaluation after complete recovery to assess the risk of exercise-related SCD. Imaging studies, exercise stress test, and Holter monitor provide essential information for risk stratification. Depressed LV function, presence of LGE and complex VAs during exercise or Holter monitoring are recognized risk markers for adverse outcomes.455,462,463
Repeat evaluation should consist of measurement of troponin and biomarkers of inflammation, echocardiography, and prolonged ECG monitoring. Individuals without evidence of ongoing inflammation should undergo an exercise stress test. A CMR should be repeated if myocardial oedema or LGE was present during the acute illness. Return to sporting activities should be considered, in asymptomatic individuals, with normal troponin and biomarkers of inflammation, normal LV systolic function on echocardiography and CMR, no evidence of ongoing inflammation or myocardial fibrosis on CMR, good functional capacity, and absence of complex arrhythmias during exercise on prolonged ECG monitoring .430,434,453,459,460,464
Individuals with previous myocarditis are at risk of recurrence and silent clinical progression, and the presence of LGE during the acute presentation is associated with increased incidence of major adverse cardiac events; therefore, periodic re-evaluation is advised on an annual basis.443,445,454,463
Among individuals with healed myocarditis with persistence of LGE on CMR but no myocardial oedema at 3–6 months, those who are asymptomatic, with normal troponin and biomarkers of inflammation, normal LV systolic function, no evidence of ongoing inflammation on CMR, and absence of complex arrhythmias during exercise on prolonged ECG monitoring (48 h Holter ECG and exercise stress testing), should be evaluated on a case by case basis and may return to competitive sports on an individual basis. In contrast, individuals with extensive myocardial scar (>20% LGE) and persistent LV dysfunction should abstain from exercise programmes and sports activities involving moderate or high physical intensity.
5.5.6 Pericarditis
Pericarditis is defined as an inflammatory disorder of the pericardium,430,465 which may be preceded by upper respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms. As with myocarditis, viral pathogens are the most commonly implicated pathogens in the western world.
5.5.6.1 Diagnosis
The ECG is non-specific but may reveal characteristic concave ST-segment elevation in most leads and/or PQ depression in the acute phase. Echocardiography may reveal a pericardial effusion. CMR should be considered in individuals with raised cardiac troponin levels to assess for concomitant myocardial inflammation. Furthermore, CMR will identify active inflammation of the pericardium, thickened pericardial layers, and any signs of pericardial constriction.
5.5.6.2 Risk stratification
Pericarditis is generally associated with an excellent prognosis.430,465,466 However, there are a subset of patients who may be at greater risk of recurrence and these include individuals with a temperature >38°C at presentation, large pericardial effusion, and those who are resistant to therapy with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.465,466
5.5.6.3 Exercise recommendations for individuals with pericarditis
Exercise should be avoided in individuals during active pericarditis. Individuals can return to exercise after complete resolution of the active disease.467 Individuals with a milder clinical course and rapid resolution can return to sporting activities within 30 days. However, in more severe cases, it may be necessary to wait for a period of 3 months for complete resolution followed by re-evaluation before returning to sports.
Asymptomatic individuals with a small pericardial effusion occasionally detected on echocardiography in the absence of clinical correlates should be monitored with periodic surveillance, but should not be restricted from sports participation. Competitive sports and/or moderate- to high-intensity leisure-time activities should be avoided in individuals with constrictive pericarditis. Individuals with myopericarditis should be managed according to the recommendations for myocarditis.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with myocarditis
![]() |
![]() |
CMR = cardiovascular magnetic resonance; LV = left ventricular; SCD = sudden cardiac death; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with myocarditis
![]() |
![]() |
CMR = cardiovascular magnetic resonance; LV = left ventricular; SCD = sudden cardiac death; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with pericarditis
![]() |
![]() |
LV = left ventricle.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with pericarditis
![]() |
![]() |
LV = left ventricle.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.6 Exercise recommendations in individuals with arrhythmias and channelopathies
5.6.1 A general management framework
When individuals with known arrhythmias or with a potentially arrhythmogenic condition want to engage in sports activity, three principle questions should guide management: (1) is there an increased risk for life-threatening arrhythmias?; (2) how does one control symptoms due to arrhythmias, during sports, but also at rest?; and (3) what is the impact of sports on the natural progression of the arrhythmogenic condition? The general view on the association between sports and arrhythmias is that exercise sets the stage for an arrhythmia in the context of an underlying and pre-existing condition, be it structural, electrical, inherited, or acquired. Moreover, regular exercise programmes may induce or accelerate the progression of ARVC,382,384 even among those without underlying mutations.383,387,468 Conceptually, all the structural and functional cardiac adaptations to regular intensive exercise may contribute to the development of arrhythmias, at the atrial, nodal, and ventricular level.469 This concept explains why recommendations for sports participation in individuals with arrhythmogenic conditions are so complex.
5.6.2 Atrial fibrillation
5.6.2.1 Patients without atrial fibrillation
Moderate, regular PA is a cornerstone in the prevention of AF through modifying many of its predisposing factors.297,470–473 Patients at risk of AF should therefore be motivated to exercise (see section 4.2). Conversely, AF is more prevalent in active and former male master athletes and those performing high-intensity endurance sports, suggesting a U-shaped relationship between habitual exercise and AF.471,474–477 478–481 This association has not been confirmed in women.474
5.6.2.2 Prognostic and symptomatic relevance of AF during sports
Underlying structural heart disease or pre-excitation should always be excluded before advising sports activity in individuals with recognized AF. It is also important to exclude hyperthyroidism, alcohol abuse, and (illicit) drug use. Intensive sports participation should be temporarily stopped until an identified underlying cause is corrected.
Rapid atrioventricular nodal conduction of AF during exercise may lead to symptoms, including dizziness, syncope, fatigue, or impaired physical performance. Therefore, the individual should be instructed to stop PA on the emergence of symptoms and rate control should be optimized. Rapid 1: 1 conduction can occur, especially during atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter (AFL); therefore, if AFL has been documented, prophylactic cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation should be considered. If there is evidence for adequate rate control while in AF through an exercise stress test or ECG monitoring during training or competition, all sports participation is possible in asymptomatic individuals.
Achieving adequate rate control can be difficult, however. Beta-blockers are the logical choice but may not be tolerated due to their impact on physical performance. Calcium-channel blockers and digitalis are usually not potent enough when used alone. Often a combination of individually titrated negatively chronotropic agents is needed, while avoiding sinus bradycardia at rest or chronotropic incompetence during exercise.
Rhythm control is equally complicated. Class III antiarrhythmic drugs are usually insufficient for control (sotalol) or relatively contraindicated in a young population (amiodarone). Although class I drugs may be able to prevent recurrences of AF, they should not be used in monotherapy, since these may increase the propensity to develop AFL (‘class I AFL’), which in the absence of adequate rate control may lead to 1: 1 atrioventricular conduction, high ventricular rates, and very profound intraventricular conduction slowing, with haemodynamic compromise.482,483 Therefore, prophylactic cavo-tricuspid-isthmus ablation should be considered if class I drugs are prescribed in monotherapy in athletes.
In patients with sporadic AF, class I drugs may be considered only for acute cardioversion, i.e. as a ‘pill-in-the-pocket’ approach. These patients should refrain from sports as long as AF persists, and until two half-lives of the antiarrhythmic drug have passed.484
Prescription of oral anticoagulants (OAC) depends on the clinical risk profile (mainly CHA2DS2-VASc score).485 Sports with direct bodily contact or prone to trauma should be avoided in patients on OAC.486
Catheter ablation by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) should be considered if drug therapy fails or as first-line therapy if drug therapy is not desired.487 Several small series have shown that the outcome of PVI in athletes with paroxysmal AF is similar to that in non-athletic patients.488,489
5.6.2.3 Impact of sports continuation on the natural progression of atrial fibrillation after ablation
If there are no recurrences of AF within 1 month of a successful ablation procedure, sports activity may be resumed. It is unknown whether continuation of sports after successful PVI might progress the disease process and lead to recurrence of non-pulmonary vein-dependent AF in the future. Therefore, no firm recommendation can be made about the ‘safe’ dose of sports after ablation.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with atrial fibrillation
![]() |
![]() |
AF = atrial fibrillation; AFL = atrial flutter; ECG = electrocardiogram.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with atrial fibrillation
![]() |
![]() |
AF = atrial fibrillation; AFL = atrial flutter; ECG = electrocardiogram.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.6.3 Supraventricular tachycardia and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
The term paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) includes (i) atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT; most common); (ii) atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT) involving an accessory pathway; or (iii) atrial tachycardia.
Ventricular pre-excitation on the resting ECG is due to an accessory pathway (AP) with antegrade conduction. The prevalence of pre-excitation in the general population varies from 0.1–0.3%.491,492 Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome is defined as the presence of paroxysmal arrhythmias in a patient with pre-excitation.
5.6.3.1 Prognostic and symptomatic relevance of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia without pre-excitation
PSVT without pre-excitation and without associated structural heart disease is not life-threatening, although the arrhythmia may result in dizziness and exhaustion that requires cessation of exercise. Syncope is uncommon. Pre-excitation, however, may be associated with sudden death (see later); therefore, it is important to exclude the presence of latent pre-excitation, by performing carotid sinus massage or an adenosine-test in sinus rhythm.493
Athletes with PSVT should stop exercise in the event of palpitations since rapid heart rates may cause (pre)syncope. Individuals with proven PSVT without pre-excitation should be educated on how to safely perform vagal manoeuvres (such as carotid sinus massage or, preferably, Valsalva manoeuvre) to facilitate termination of the arrhythmia.494 Exercise may be resumed after termination of the arrhythmia. Prophylactic drug treatment with beta-blockers or calcium antagonists with atrioventricular nodal blocking properties can be considered, although it has limited efficacy. Class I drugs have no role in the management of PSVT, since they can cause life-threatening arrhythmias (see earlier).
If competitive athletic activity is desired, curative treatment by ablation should be considered. Ablation outcome is equally safe and has similar acute success rates in athletes and non-athletes.495 If the PSVT is only sporadic and transient and not associated with haemodynamic consequences, even when it develops during exercise, or in cases where ablation is not desired or unsuccessful, sports activity is permissible when there is no increased risk of a fatality from a potential loss of consciousness (such as motorsports drivers, parachute jumpers, divers, and so on).
5.6.3.2 Prognostic and symptomatic relevance of pre-excitation
It has been estimated that one third of patients with WPW syndrome may develop AF and, in such cases, rapid conduction over the AP can lead to ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sudden death. Given the fact that AF is more common in athletes, pre-excitation constitutes a prognostic concern in athletes. The risk for sudden death in patients with pre-excitation varies in population-based studies from 0.15–0.20%, and usually presents during exercise or emotional stress.496
Evaluation of the athlete with ventricular pre-excitation should exclude associated structural cardiac disease, such as HCM or Ebstein anomaly. Minimal or ‘latent’ pre-excitation can be unmasked on a 12-lead ECG during sinus rhythm by vagal manoeuvres or intravenous administration of adenosine. Prolongation of the PR interval without a change in the QRS morphology, or transient atrioventricular block, excludes non-intermittent latent pre-excitation. Pre-excitation may be intermittent, which usually indicates low risk properties of the pathway. However, some accessory pathways may be potentiated by adrenergic stimuli. Therefore, exercise testing excluding pre-excitation at peak exercise is recommended before clearance for sports.
Ablation of the AP is recommended in competitive and recreational athletes with pre-excitation and documented arrhythmias. In the event of transient, infrequent well-tolerated arrhythmia (even during exercise), good anticipation of an ablation procedure with increased risk (e.g. anteroseptal AP), or reluctance of the athlete to undergo ablation, management should be guided by assessment of the antegrade conduction characteristics of the AP using either non-invasive tests or an invasive electrophysiological (EP) study.
Non-invasive investigation examines for intermittent pre-excitation on ECG or Holter, for abrupt disappearance of pre-excitation after administration of a low dose of class I drugs, or for its abrupt disappearance during an exercise test.497 In cases of a long refractory period and hence low risk for sudden death, continuation of sports activity is permitted without ablation on the understanding that sporting activity should be stopped in the event of recurrence of palpitations.
In competitive athletes with asymptomatic pre-excitation an EP study is warranted to evaluate the risk for sudden death. In the event of a high-risk finding (Table 15), ablation of the AP is recommended. For athletes who refuse ablation, or if the procedure is associated with high risk, such as an anteroseptal accessory pathway, participation in competitive sports activities can be discussed on an individual case by case basis including the use of pharmacological therapy, although there are currently no data about its efficacy. Sports in which the potential loss of consciousness could be fatal should be discouraged.
Findings during an invasive electrophysiological study (with the use of isoprenaline) indicating an accessory pathway with increased risk of sudden death
![]() |
![]() |
AF = atrial fibrillation; AVRT = atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia.
Findings during an invasive electrophysiological study (with the use of isoprenaline) indicating an accessory pathway with increased risk of sudden death
![]() |
![]() |
AF = atrial fibrillation; AVRT = atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia.
In recreational athletes with asymptomatic pre-excitation, risk assessment may first be pursued via non-invasive testing.497 The sensitivity of non-invasive screening for AP properties that facilitate a fast ventricular response to AF/AFL is good, but its specificity is low.498
Of note, in children younger than 12 years, the risk of AF-induced VF and sudden death is very low. Generally, a conservative approach is recommended in this age group, although one study499 suggested that prophylactic assessment and ablation reduces the risk of sudden death. There is a knowledge gap in the benefit/risk ratio of this approach and large-scale studies are required to address the issue.
Leisure-time and low- to medium-intensity exercise programmes can generally be resumed 1 week after ablation if there is no particular risk of recurrence of arrhythmia.
Resuming competitive sports is possible after 1–3 months, with further ECG follow-up at 6 months and 1 year (given the very small risk for late recurrence of pre-excitation).
Although there may be an association between (type of) AVNRT and history of sports, there are no data about higher recurrence rate post ablation when sports are resumed or not, and hence no reason to limit exercise programmes for such reason.
Recommendations for exercise and sports participation in individuals with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and pre-excitation
![]() |
![]() |
EP = electrophysiological; PSVT = paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise and sports participation in individuals with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and pre-excitation
![]() |
![]() |
EP = electrophysiological; PSVT = paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.6.4 Premature ventricular contractions and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia
5.6.4.1 Relation between number of premature ventricular contractions and risk
Only a minority of athletes exhibit frequent or complex VA with a prevalence similar to that of their sedentary counterparts.502–505 Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) may be a marker of underlying heart disease, the presence of which would confer an unfavourable prognosis even in asymptomatic individuals. Specific characteristics of the PVCs, including morphology (origin from the apex or free wall of the LV or RV), high burden, complexity (e.g. couplets, triplets, or non-sustained runs), multifocal origin, and/or increasing frequency with exercise should alert to the possibility of electrical, ischaemic, or structural heart disease.505,506
There is no absolute threshold of the number of PVCs that can be used as a cut-off for underlying disease. One study has shown that in asymptomatic athletes with >2000 PVCs per day, there was a 30% chance of finding an underlying structural or cardio-genetic disease.503
5.6.4.2 Morphology of premature ventricular contractions
The morphology of the PVCs may provide important prognostic information since some foci of origin are recognized as benign. The most prevalent entity in this respect are PVCs originating from the right or left ventricular outflow regions (RVOT/LVOT), showing a clear inferior axis with high voltages in the inferior limb leads. Early precordial transition (in V2, and certainly when V1 shows a right bundle branch morphology) suggests a left-sided origin.507 RVOT/LVOT PVCs are thought to be the result of triggered activity, i.e. a local cellular cause, which has no negative prognostic implications. Although these RVOT/LVOT arrhythmias usually occur in structurally normal hearts, they may be the expression of subclinical arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Cardiac imaging tests can help exclude structural heart disease in such athletes.
Less common locations of focal PVCs are around the mitral or tricuspid annulus, most often in a postero-septal location. These have a superior axis with LBBB or RBBB morphology. The PVCs originating from the His-Purkinje system typically have relatively narrow QRS complex with RBBB morphology and either left anterior or left posterior hemi-block. Lastly, intramyocardial foci may occur, often related to the papillary muscles or moderator band.508
PVCs of differing morphologies from the RV (i.e., wide LBBB and superior axis) in individuals with normal LV function should prompt investigations to exclude arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy or sarcoidosis. Similarly, wide RBBB pattern, with superior axis and multifocal PVCs of LV origin should trigger investigations for non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
Very rarely, otherwise ‘benign’ PVCs arising from the Purkinje network may give rise to polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF due to their short coupling interval.509,510 In such patients, the malignant electrical presentation mandates aggressive treatment. Finally, frequent but otherwise benign PVCs (usually defined as >10–15% of the total number of beats per 24 h) can impair LV function over time (PVC-induced cardiomyopathy), which may be reversible with medical treatment or catheter ablation.511,512
5.6.4.3 Premature ventricular contractions: response to exercise
Reduction or resolution of PVCs with increasing exercise load is typical of idiopathic and benign VAs, particularly those with an outflow tract morphology.513,514 PVCs induced by exercise should be considered as a ‘red flag’, because VAs associated with heart diseases are often made worse by adrenergic stimulation.19,502,511,512,515–520 A higher prevalence of myocardial substrates (mainly mid-wall or subepicardial non-ischaemic LV scars) was found in a CMR study among athletes with exercise-induced PVCs compared to those with exercise-suppressed VAs (56% vs. 21%).516
Of note, exercise-induced isolated or repetitive PVCs with multiple morphologies, especially with beat-to-beat alternating morphologies (so-called ‘bi-directional’ pattern), may be the expression of catecholaminergic polymorphic VT, which can degenerate into VF.518,521
5.6.4.4 Practical management of cardiac patients with premature ventricular contractions or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia who want to engage in sports
The most important task in individuals with PVCs or NSVT who want to engage in sports is to exclude underlying structural or familial arrhythmogenic conditions, since sports activity may trigger sustained VT. It has been suggested that the presence of ≥2 PVCs on a baseline ECG (or even ≥1 PVC in the case of high-endurance athletes) should prompt a more thorough evaluation.522Work-up includes a family history, assessment of the number, morphology, and complexity of PVCs by Holter and 12-lead ECG, inducibility by exertion (via exercise test or long-term ECG recording during sports activities), and tailored additional imaging.1 Further diagnostic evaluation with molecular genetic testing may be indicated in selected cases if the suspicion for familial disease is high. Finally, repeat evaluation may be needed after 6 months to 2 years. Recommendations for sports participation of athletes with PVC should be individualized based on evaluation for underlying cardiac conditions as described earlier, and often requires shared decision making.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with premature ventricular contractions or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia
![]() |
![]() |
ECG = electrocardiogram; PVC = premature ventricular contractions; VT = ventricular tachycardia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with premature ventricular contractions or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia
![]() |
![]() |
ECG = electrocardiogram; PVC = premature ventricular contractions; VT = ventricular tachycardia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.6.5 Long QT syndrome
The QT and corrected QTc intervals vary by sex and physical training. Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) should be distinguished from acquired forms, i.e. due to circumstances, which can be reversed and prevented. Once acquired LQTS is established, sports activity should be prohibited until the underlying cause is corrected.
A definitive diagnosis of congenital LQTS is often difficult.523 Congenital LQTS should be suspected on a routine ECG or 4 min into recovery after an exercise stress test,524 if the corrected QTc interval according to Bazett’s formula is ≥470 ms or ≥480 ms in asymptomatic male or female athletes, respectively.525 A QTc of ≥500 ms is diagnostic.526 In the case of a borderline long QTc interval and a negative personal and familial history, subclinical arrhythmias should be excluded by exercise testing and long-term ECG recording.
Since the risk of cardiac events during sports activities is largely gene-specific, genetic testing and cascade screening of family members should be performed following a clinical diagnosis of LQTS. Individuals with LQT1 are at highest risk during stressful exercise.527,528
Symptomatic athletes should not engage in competitive sports. Individuals with LQT1 should not engage in sports that involve diving into cold water since this is associated with increased risk of arrhythmias. General precautions include avoidance of QT-prolonging drugs, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance. Beta-blocker therapy is extremely effective in LQT1 and additional therapies are only needed to control more severe cases or specific genotypes.529
Survivors of SCA (certainly while taking beta-blocker therapy) should be referred for an ICD. Similarly, individuals who have experienced sudden syncope despite beta-blocker therapy should also be referred for an ICD or sympathetic cardiac denervation.530 ICD implantation does not constitute clearance for intensive or competitive sports. Continued sports participation with an ICD is possible, but specific recommendations apply (see section 5.5.6). American guidelines are more lenient with respect to participation in competitive sport (except for LQT1), provided that precautions include the presence of an automatic external defibrillator (AED) ‘as part of the athlete’s personal sports safety gear’.531 We consider such obligation to be impractical (e.g. winter sports, water sports), and it places an added responsibility on clubs or other bystanders, which cannot be justified by a medical recommendation for an individual athlete. Moreover, although LQTS-related cardiac arrest is uncommon, even during competitive sports,527 AED efficacy is not 100% in such cases.532
In asymptomatic LQTS mutation carriers without a prolonged QT interval, i.e. <470 ms in men and <480 ms in women (‘genotype positive/phenotype negative’), shared decision making is required, balancing the risk for arrhythmias with psychological well-being. A negative exercise stress test has no predictive value.
Recommendations for exercise in long QT syndrome
![]() |
![]() |
ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator; LQTS = long QT syndrome.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in long QT syndrome
![]() |
![]() |
ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator; LQTS = long QT syndrome.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.6.6 Brugada syndrome
The Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac ion channel disorder with an elevated risk of VF and SCD in individuals with a structurally normal heart.533,534 Although BrS was initially described as a purely electrical disease, minor structural RV abnormalities have been described,535–538 suggesting that the disease may be the result of early repolarization or delayed depolarization.509 The diagnosis is based on the presence of the type 1 Brugada pattern on the 12-lead ECG (coved-type ST-segment elevation ≥2 mm followed by a negative T-wave in ≥1 mm of the right precordial leads positioned in the fourth, third, or second intercostal space), either spontaneously or following provocation by a sodium ion channel blocker.523,539,540
Most individuals with BrS remain asymptomatic throughout their lives. In the majority of cases, events occur during sleep or rest, during febrile states or, occasionally, from heat stroke.541–549 Patients who have suffered a SCA or an arrhythmic syncope should undergo ICD implantation.247,511 Risk stratification in the asymptomatic population with spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern is more challenging.247,511 There is controversial evidence that exercise testing showing an aggravating phenotype during exercise or early recovery, or EP study, are efficient at detecting individuals at risk of SCD. In asymptomatic patients with only inducible type 1 Brugada ECG pattern, preventive measures are recommended, such as avoidance of triggering drugs (www.brugadadrugs.org), electrolyte imbalance, and increases in core temperature >39°C (e.g. by minimizing immersion in hot tubs, saunas, and steam rooms; by avoiding sports in warm/humid conditions; or by abstaining from prolonged endurance events such as triathlons and marathons). During febrile illness, fever should be treated aggressively.247,511
One could speculate that an enhanced vagal reaction during recovery550 and a predominant vagal tone at rest551 may increase the susceptibility of highly trained individuals to develop arrhythmias during recovery or at rest. However, there are no reports directly linking exercise or sports training to cardiac events and there are no large prospective studies evaluating the effect of exercise and sports in BrS.
Asymptomatic patients with the spontaneous type I BrS ECG pattern may compete in all sports except endurance sports associated with an increase in core temperature >39°C (e.g. marathon running and triathlons). Similar rules apply to asymptomatic genotype-positive/phenotype-negative individuals and those with the concealed form of BrS.
If treated with an ICD, provided precautionary measures are taken and the patient has been asymptomatic for ≥3 months, resumption of all sport, including competitive sport, may be considered, after shared decision making, and also taking into consideration the findings from the ICD registry (see later).
Recommendations for exercise in Brugada syndrome
![]() |
![]() |
BrS = Brugada syndrome; ECG = electrocardiogram; ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator; SCD = sudden cardiac death.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For example, www.brugadadrugs.org.
Recommendations for exercise in Brugada syndrome
![]() |
![]() |
BrS = Brugada syndrome; ECG = electrocardiogram; ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator; SCD = sudden cardiac death.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
For example, www.brugadadrugs.org.
5.6.7 Following device implantation
5.6.7.1 Pacemakers
Pacemaker (PM) implantation is common. Generally, individuals implanted with a PM have less severe disease and comorbidities than patients with an ICD. Moreover, there is less risk of malfunction for a PM than for an ICD during sports.552 For all these reasons, recommendations for sports practice are more liberal in patients with a PM than in patients with an ICD. Patients with a PM may participate in competitive or recreational sports in the absence of structural or other heart disease for which exercise may be prohibited.
In the first weeks after device implantation, sports activities that increase the risk of lead dislocation (e.g. strong upper extremity movements) should be avoided. Exercise testing and/or Holter monitoring during sports may improve individualized programming of the upper sensor and the tracking rate and exclude inappropriate rate acceleration in other circumstances (e.g. horse riding).553
For all patients with cardiac devices (PM, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and ICD), sports activities associated with a risk of chest trauma should be avoided.554–557 Some sports such as soccer, basketball, and baseball may be possible while wearing appropriate padding. It is noteworthy that sports with pronounced arm movements such as volleyball, basketball, tennis, golf, and climbing may increase the risk for late lead damage due to subclavian crush (with insulation or conductor failure).554,558,559 Implantation on the contralateral side of the dominant arm, fixation within the pocket, or submuscular placement may improve durability of the system. It is not known whether subcostal or epicardial implant techniques provide long-term benefit. Electromagnetic interference is unlikely with modern devices, and no cases have been reported, but it should always be suspected and closely evaluated in specific athletic environments with electronic equipment (e.g. fencing). Myopotential inhibition may result in inhibition of pacing, a problem that is more common with unipolar electrodes, although it can usually be corrected with appropriate reprogramming of the device.560,561 Bipolar leads are less sensitive to this problem, but may have a reduced longevity.
5.6.7.2 Implantable cardioverter defibrillators
A large multinational ICD Sports Safety Registry has shown that after a median follow-up of 44 months, there were no deaths or arrhythmia or shock-related physical injury in 440 athletes who continued organized competitive or high-risk sports after ICD implantation.359,389 An additional analysis in 82 non-professional recreational athletes confirmed these reassuring outcomes,562 which is relevant for the many ICD recipients who want to continue recreational sports activities after implantation. Therefore, shared decision making is appropriate when deciding whether or not to continue sports and the level of participation with an ICD.
However, three important considerations come into play. First, if sport is contraindicated because it can contribute to the progression of the underlying disease (such as in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy or lamin A/C mutations),384,425 an ICD cannot be considered as a substitute for sports restriction, and participation in moderate- and high-intensity exercise should be discouraged. Recommendations in such circumstances should have a lifetime perspective and be based on the optimal preservation of structural cardiac integrity. The ICD, however, may allow for light to moderate exercise without concerns about risk of arrhythmia or shocks, and may help individuals to regain autonomy and overcome fears relating to exercising unattended.
The second consideration is that ICD shocks in general, even when appropriate and safe, will have a psychological impact on the athlete; 30–40% of the athletes who experienced shocks in the multinational ICD Sports Safety Registry stopped participation, at least temporarily, out of fear of repeat shocks.389 Moreover, the proportion of athletes with appropriate and inappropriate shocks during exercise was higher in competitive than in recreational sports, emphasizing the known triggering effect of high-intensity exercise.562 Considering that ICD therapy is lifelong, where quality of life is not only dependent on the ability to perform sports activities, but also and mostly on continued trust in the device, physicians should be aware that their own belief in the effectiveness and safety of ICD therapy during sports should not implicitly put pressure on the athlete to continue sports. Again, informed decision making needs to re-evaluate all options of the athlete aftershocks, including continuing, reducing, or stopping sports.563,564
Third, situations where loss of focus or loss of consciousness could cause harm to a third party or the athlete (such as in motor sports, diving, mountain climbing, even cycling) should be avoided.
The athlete must be aware of the programmed detection rate cut-offs to be able to avoid reaching those during exercise. Conversely, detection zones need to be programmed sufficiently high to allow for adequately high heart rates during the desired exercise levels. This practice proved safe and reduced the occurrence of shocks in the ICD Sports Safety Database.565 The most common cause of inappropriate shocks in individuals with an ICD is the occurrence of sinus tachycardia and supraventricular arrhythmias.566,567 Underlying heart disease and endurance sport itself carries a higher risk for developing AF.474,480,568 Implantation of a dual system ICD for the sole reason of atrial arrhythmia detection and discrimination is not warranted because it is usually not effective.565,569–572 Given the fact that many of these athletes are young, there is a higher risk for long-term lead complications when more leads are implanted; therefore, implantation of more complex ICD systems, and their indication, should be weighed in every patient. Routine inclusion of athletes in remote monitoring programmes is highly recommended.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators
![]() |
![]() |
ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Recommendations for exercise in individuals with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators
![]() |
![]() |
ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator; VA = ventricular arrhythmia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
5.7 Exercise recommendations in individuals with adult congenital heart disease
5.7.1 Introduction
Congenital heart disease (CHD) has a prevalence of 8–9 per 1000 live births and is the most common birth defect.573 Most children with CHD survive to adulthood, including over 85% with complex disease. Regular exercise is important for adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) and exercise participation should be discussed at every patient encounter.574 However, CHD represents a spectrum of conditions with widely varying physiological consequences. Individualized assessment is essential before advising on sports participation. This requires detailed understanding of the congenital heart defect, its physiological consequences, and the effect of surgical or transcatheter intervention.
5.7.2 The increasing numbers of athletes with congenital heart disease
Athletes with CHD include those with minor unoperated lesions and palliated and repaired CHD. Some athletes will be diagnosed with CHD for the first time during pre-participation screening. Approximately 1 in 150 adults have a congenital heart defect. This is an increase of over 50% in the last 10 years and reflects improved diagnosis and long-term survival.575 Overall 90% of adults with CHD are in NYHA functional class I or II.576 The number of professional and recreational athletes with CHD is unknown but the elite athlete population is likely to be small. In a study of 2352 Olympian athletes, only nine (0.4%) had a congenital heart defect.577 However, many more CHD patients compete at a recreational level. It is likely that the number of athletes with CHD is increasing due to improved survival, better understanding of the benefits of exercise, and the increased number of professional athletes from countries where poorly developed healthcare systems are associated with under-diagnosis of CHD.573,574
5.7.3 Non-cardiac abnormalities in congenital heart disease and Paralympic sport
CHD has a multifactorial aetiology, but there is a significant genetic component and a recurrence risk of 2–5%.578 The genetic origin may be due to a chromosome anomaly, a heritable syndrome with Mendelian pattern, or sporadic with variable penetrance.578 Approximately 14% of patients with CHD have additional non-cardiac abnormalities.579 Thus, 44% of ACHD patients have lung function abnormalities.580 This can make advising sports participation for the ACHD athlete more difficult. There is no specific classification for CHD in Paralympic sport.
5.7.4 General considerations in the congenital heart disease athlete
There is considerable variation in the haemodynamic consequences and prognosis of different CHD lesions. Furthermore, the consequences of any individual lesion can vary hugely between individuals. Thus, Ebstein’s anomaly may present in infancy with pulmonary hypoplasia due to compression by a giant right atrium or may present in late middle age with supraventricular tachycardia and minimal haemodynamic consequences. Similarly, a ventricular septal defect may be small and asymptomatic, or large presenting with HF in infancy, or may present with extreme cyanosis, reduced exercise capacity, and Eisenmenger syndrome in the adult. Consequently, these recommendations are based on a physiological assessment rather than underlying anatomic diagnosis. An understanding of the range of severity and a lesion-based knowledge of potential complications is essential. The cardiologist should work in conjunction with a CHD specialist. Athletes with CHD who participate in regular training and competitive sports should undergo a comprehensive annual assessment that includes clinical examination, ECG, echocardiogram, and exercise stress test, ideally CPET.
Many athletes with CHD will have undergone corrective or palliative surgery. In young adults with post-surgical CHD, valve incompetence and arrhythmias are common problems, but with increasing age arrhythmias and HF predominate. In master athletes, problems related to previous corrective or palliative surgery become prevalent. These include cardiac arrhythmias, systemic ventricular dysfunction, valvar incompetence, and prosthetic conduit obstruction. Redo valve or conduit surgery and arrhythmia ablation due to re-entry arrhythmias (secondary to surgical scar) are frequent in this age group. In addition, with increasing age, acquired CVD may develop.581,582 This is of particular relevance in the assessment of the master athlete with CHD.
5.7.5 Sudden death during sport
SCD in CHD is rare (<0.1% per year)583 and only 8% of deaths occur during exercise.584 Many complex CHD patients at highest risk of SCD have reduced exercise tolerance and cannot participate in significant athletic activity. However, some diagnostic groups, e.g. post tetralogy of Fallot repair, carry a risk of SCD but can still compete in elite sport.585 Other high-risk congenital lesions such as anomalous coronary origin, mitral valve prolapse, and aortopathy are described in sections 5.1, 5.3, and 5.4, respectively. In a large population-based study of SCD in CHD patients under 35 years, 87% of SCD was due to a presumed arrhythmia and 41% occurred in patients with undiagnosed CHD.586Activity-related SCD was more common in the undiagnosed group (18% vs. 4%), which supports the case for pre-participation athletic screening.586 It is not known whether exercise intensity is a risk factor for SCD in CHD. There is reasonable evidence that moderate to vigorous exercise is safe in most ACHD patients even when symptomatic (NYHA II–III).576,587,588 However, cardiac arrhythmias are a common cause of hospital admission in ACHD and extreme exercise may expose a latent arrhythmic substrate.589,590
5.7.6 Exercise in athletes with congenital heart disease: current guidelines and recommendations
Regular structured exercise is safe and effective therapy for most patients with CHD. This is true for most diagnostic groups, including symptomatic patients, and includes aerobic and strength-based exercise.588,591–596 Exercise intolerance in CHD is a strong predictor of both outcome and SCD.576 Specific precautions are necessary in extreme environments including underwater sports and this is considered below (see Supplementary Data, section 4). This is particularly true if there is a potential for a right to left shunt. Guidelines are available for exercise assessment and prescription in both children and adults with CHD, although these are not specifically designed for the athlete.597,598 The paediatric guidelines are based primarily on the underlying anatomical diagnosis, but the teenage and young adult CHD guidelines have taken a functional approach based on underlying haemodynamics and arrhythmia risk. This latter approach is better suited for assessment of the ACHD athlete (Figure 9).

Pre-participation assessment of individuals with congenital heart disease.598 CPET = cardiopulmonary exercise test; HR = heart rate; MHR = maximum heart rate; RPE = rate of perceived exertion. A–E represent pathways linking static and intensity components for each column. After assessment of CPET and the five variables (Table 16), an individual recommendation can be given (solid arrow). If a higher static level sport is chosen, then a lower intensity level is advised (dotted arrow).
5.7.7 Assessment of the athlete with congenital heart disease
The guidelines for exercise prescription in adolescents and adults with CHD use a structured methodology described by Budts et al.597 This can be modified for use in the assessment of athletes with CHD.
Stage 1. A full history and physical examination are carried out. This should include details of underlying CHD diagnosis, any transcatheter or surgical interventions, current medications and CV symptoms (at rest and on exercise). Attention should be paid to any associated non-cardiac diagnoses including pulmonary dysfunction. A full exercise and sports participation history should be taken including precise details of current training schedule and any dietary supplements. Details of the planned or current sports activity should be established to include an assessment of the static component and intensity as described in section 4.1 (see Figure 2). If necessary, advice should be sought from a sports fitness coach or sports medicine specialist.
Stage 2. The following five baseline parameters should then be evaluated597 (Table 16).
Ventricular function
Assessment of ventricular function can usually be achieved using echocardiography. The aim is to establish whether function is reduced (EF < 55%), and if so, is it mild (45–55%), moderate (30–45%), or severe (<30%). This is used for baseline assessment and subsequent monitoring of the effects of exercise training. Echocardiography can also evaluate inflow and outflow abnormalities, which may become more severe during acute exercise (e.g. LV outflow obstruction or systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation). CMR scanning may be a preferable modality in complex disease. This has the additional benefit of evaluating intracardiac scar, which may inform the assessment of arrhythmia risk.599,600
Pulmonary artery pressure
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is diagnosed when the mean PAP is >20 mmHg.601 PH may occur in the context of a chronic left–right shunt (e.g. atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus) that allows unrestricted volume/pressure overload. Eventually this can result in supra-normal PAP with reversal of shunting and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (Eisenmenger syndrome). An increased RV afterload limits the ability to increase cardiac output by increasing stroke volume and can impair LV function through disruption of normal RV–LV interaction.
Few CHD patients with significant PH will take part in competitive sports due to reduced exercise capacity. However, some athletes with CHD will have mild elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance that may be exacerbated by factors such as altitude training.602 PAP rises during exercise. This rise is accentuated with increasing age and may be exaggerated in CHD athletes due to elevated pulmonary vascular resistance.603 In addition, valvar pulmonary stenosis or distal stenoses in branch pulmonary arteries may cause exercise-related RV hypertension. The non-invasive assessment of PH can be difficult and full assessment guidelines have been published.604,605 Further information can be gained by CPET and a VO2 of >25.2 mL/min/kg makes significant PH unlikely.606 As PH can also be a late postoperative complication after surgical correction of CHD607 the assessment of PAP should be part of every echocardiographic examination in athletes with CHD. Although exercise training is generally regarded as safe in PH, competitive sport is not recommended.1,608
Aortic assessment
Many CHD patients are at risk of aortic dilatation, in particular, patients with tetralogy of Fallot, coarctation of the aorta and certain syndromes such as 22q11 microdeletion and Turner syndrome. However, aortic dissection is very rare in CHD.609 Athletes have mildly increased aortic dimensions in comparison to sedentary controls, but it is not known if this has a cumulative effect in CHD athletes with aortic dilatation.345 The presence of ascending aorta dilatation should lead to assessment for coarctation of the aorta as this can be associated with severe coarctation, which may be missed on clinical assessment but may cause severe exercise-related hypertension.610 Exercise risks in aortopathy are described in detail in section 5.4. Contact sports should be avoided in patients with dilated aortas >5 cm.
Arrhythmia assessment
Arrhythmias are responsible for 25% of CHD hospital admissions. Over 80% are atrial but life-threatening VAs can occur.611 Independent risk factors include increasing age, male gender, double outlet right ventricle, atrioventricular septal defect, HF, obstructive sleep apnoea, transposition of the great arteries, congenitally corrected transposition, and tetralogy of Fallot.599 Assessment of the CHD athlete should include a symptom history with evaluation of palpitations, presyncope and syncope, particularly during exercise. Arrhythmias may be the first sign of underlying haemodynamic deterioration and new-onset arrhythmias should lead to a full haemodynamic assessment. Detailed guidelines for the assessment and treatment of arrhythmias in CHD are available.612 In the athlete, arrhythmia therapy may be complicated by the need to minimize the negative chronotropic effects of antiarrhythmic treatment, which may affect performance. If symptomatic arrhythmias are present then an exercise ECG, prolonged ECG monitoring, loop recorder implantation, and even electrophysiology testing might be required. This should be coordinated by an electrophysiologist with expertise in CHD.
Assessment of saturations/lung function
CHD athletes should be assessed for the potential of an underlying intracardiac right to left shunt. This can be assessed using pulse oximetry, but a resting saturation >95% does not exclude exercise-related central cyanosis, and exercise assessment is essential. The potential for a pulmonary cause of cyanosis must be considered and lung function should be assessed as part of a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Even after surgical correction of the cardiac defect there may be residual intracardiac shunting.
Stage 3. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
CPET is invaluable in risk stratifying the adult with CHD and can predict outcome.613,614 It is also extremely useful in the evaluation of the athlete with CHD as it allows an assessment of PAP, respiratory problems, cardiac output, exercise-related haemodynamics, and arrhythmias. This should be used in conjunction with an evaluation of effort such as the Borg scale.615 Normal CPET values are available for non-athlete CHD patients.616 CPET should be carried out in conjunction with a 12-lead ECG to allow detection of arrhythmias and evaluate chronotropic incompetence. Reduced VO2max and peak oxygen pulse may reflect reduced stroke volume and are found in complex CHD as well as in other forms of CHD, including repaired tetralogy of Fallot, aortic regurgitation, and coarctation of the aorta. In CHD, ventilatory anaerobic threshold may be reduced and this impairs gas exchange efficiency in dynamic and endurance sports. This may relate to previous thoracotomy or lung disease. Similarly, there may be an elevated minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2) slope,601 indicating an inadequate pulmonary vascular bed.610,611,613–616 Reduced skeletal muscle mass is common in adults with CHD and can contribute to decreased tissue oxygen uptake. The extent to which this is modified in athletes with CHD has not been evaluated. However, even in complex disease, regular resistance exercise participation improves muscle mass and regular exercise participation is a dominant factor in determining long-term outcome.593,617
Stage 4. Exercise intensity and prescription
An assessment of the athlete’s sports and exercise participation should take place as discussed in the introduction (Table 16). This should include an assessment of the intensity, aerobic and resistance components (isometric and dynamic), and the overall volume of exercise, which should include training and competition. The haemodynamic consequences should be considered in light of an understanding of known lesion-specific consequences and individual athlete-specific changes identified on assessment.
![]() |
![]() |
CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG = electrocardiogram.
![]() |
![]() |
CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG = electrocardiogram.
Stage 5. Follow-up and repeat assessment
In the CHD athlete, serial assessment should be carried out—usually on an annual basis—while participating in sport. This recognizes the age-related changes that occur in the CHD athlete and the potential for onset of degenerative CVD.
Exercise recommendations for individuals with congenital heart disease
![]() |
![]() |
CHD = congenital heart disease; NYHA = New York Heart Association.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
Exercise recommendations for individuals with congenital heart disease
![]() |
![]() |
CHD = congenital heart disease; NYHA = New York Heart Association.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
6. Key messages
CV screening before participation in recreational and competitive sports is aimed at the detection of disorders associated with SCD and has the potential to lower CV risk through disease-specific and individualized patient management.
CV screening in adult and senior athletes should target the higher prevalence of atherosclerotic CAD including an assessment of CVD risk factors and exercise stress test. CAC scoring may be performed in asymptomatic athletes with a moderate atherosclerotic risk profile.
Healthy adults of all ages and individuals with known cardiac disease should exercise on most days, totalling at least 150 min/week of moderate-intensity exercise.
Individuals with CAD, at low risk for exercise-induced adverse events, should be considered eligible for competitive or leisure sports activities, with few exceptions.
Competitive sports are not recommended in individuals with CAD, at high risk of exercise-induced adverse events or those with residual ischaemia, with the exception for individually low-intensity skill sports.
Exercise programmes in HF improve exercise tolerance and quality of life and have a modest effect on all-cause and HF-specific mortality, and all-cause hospitalization and HF-specific hospitalization.
Asymptomatic individuals with mild valvular heart disease may participate in all sporting activities including competitive sports.
A select group of asymptomatic individuals with moderate valve disease who have good functional capacity and no evidence of myocardial ischaemia, complex arrhythmias, or haemodynamic compromise on a maximal exercise stress test may be considered for competitive sports after careful discussion with an expert cardiologist.
Implementation of healthy lifestyle behaviours including sports participation decreases the risk of CV events and mortality in individuals with aortopathies.
Individuals with acute myocarditis or pericarditis should abstain from all sports while active inflammation is present.
Individuals with cardiomyopathy or resolved myocarditis or pericarditis, who wish to participate in regular sports, should undergo comprehensive evaluation, including an exercise test, to assess the risk of exercise-induced arrhythmias.
Individuals who are genotype positive/phenotype negative or have a mild cardiomyopathy phenotype and absence of symptoms or any risk factors, may be able to participate in competitive sports. A notable exception is arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy where high-intensity exercise and competitive sports should be discouraged.
Managing sports participation in individuals with arrhythmogenic conditions is guided by three principles: (i) preventing life-threatening arrhythmias during exercise; (ii) symptom management to allow sports; and (iii) preventing sports-induced progression of the arrhythmogenic condition. In each case, these three basic questions need to be addressed.
Pre-excitation should be excluded in all athletes with PSVT, and ablation of the accessory pathway is recommended if present.
In individuals with PVCs who want to engage in sports, underlying structural or familial arrhythmogenic conditions must be excluded, since sports activity may trigger more malignant arrhythmias if those underlying conditions are present.
Athletes with electrical abnormalities of genetic origin, such as the inherited ion channelopathies, require assessment and shared decision making in which cardiogeneticists are involved, given the complex interplay of genotype, phenotype, potential modifiers, and exercise.
Individuals with pacemakers should not be discouraged from participation in sport because of the device but need to tailor their sports participation according to the underlying disease.
Participation in leisure-time and competitive sport in patients with an ICD may be considered, but requires shared and individualized decision making, based on a higher likelihood of appropriate and inappropriate shocks during sports, and the potential consequences of short episodes of loss of consciousness.
Patients with CHD should be encouraged to exercise and should be given a personalized exercise prescription.
7. Gaps in evidence
Outcomes in exercising individuals with cardiovascular diseases. The natural history and absolute risk of conditions associated with SCD in athletes identified through CV screening is largely unknown, making it difficult to quantify short- and long-term risk. Prospective outcomes data, including the occurrence of major CV events and other CV morbidity, is needed to better guide risk stratification, management, and eligibility recommendations for athletes diagnosed with CVD.
Cardiovascular evaluation in master athletes. Current methods for screening individuals for atherosclerotic CAD are based on symptoms and a maximal exercise test; however, they do not identify individuals with mild to moderate atherosclerotic plaques. More knowledge on the optimal pre-participation screening algorithm for identifying individuals at risk of adverse cardiac events during exercise is required.
Safety of high-intensity exercise in cardiovascular disease. There are limited data on the safety of high-intensity exercise training and sports participation in healthy individuals with a high burden of risk factors; more information can be gained through high-quality prospective studies in the future.
Risk of anomalous origins of the coronary arteries in older individuals. Although AOCA from the opposite sinus of Valsalva are a recognized cause of mortality in young athletes, more knowledge is required on the risk of high-intensity exercise in older individuals (>40 years old), with this congenital abnormality.
Risk of myocardial bridge. The precise significance of MB in causing MI or sudden death during exercise is unknown.
Benefit of regular exercise on survival in chronic heart failure. Although exercise improves functional capacity and quality of life in individuals with HF, strong evidence on the benefit of regular exercise on survival is still lacking.
Role of high-intensity exercise in chronic heart failure. The impact of high-intensity exercise in asymptomatic individuals with HF with reduced and preserved systolic function is unknown and large multicentre studies are required to facilitate exercise prescription in the future.
Initiation of an exercise programme after decompensated heart failure. The start time of an exercise programme of moderate-high intensity and return to sports after an acute event in HF is unknown.
Aquatic exercise in heart failure. The safety of aquatic exercise in HF needs to be confirmed by larger trials.
Effect of exercise on the natural history of valvular heart disease. There is a paucity data on the effects of regular intensive exercise in individuals with valvular heart disease. Large-scale longitudinal studies are required to provide more evidence-based guidelines on exercise prescription in individuals with valvular heart disease.
Effect of exercise on the natural history of aortopathies. There is a lack of knowledge on the impact of sport on progression of aortic disease and risk of dissection or aortic rupture among individuals with aortopathy. The impact of beta-blockers on progression of aortic disease among individuals with aortopathy who participate in regular exercise is unknown and should be investigated in a randomized controlled trial.
Optimal safe exercise dose in cardiomyopathy. With an exception for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, current practice relating to exercise recommendations in individuals with cardiomyopathy or following myopericarditis are largely based on circumstantial evidence. Large, adequately powered randomized prospective studies are necessary to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimal exercise prescription without compromising safety. Such studies should also prove useful for validating current risk stratification protocols derived from a relatively sedentary population.
Exercise and atrial fibrillation. The threshold lifetime sports activity for increasing the risk of developing AF is unknown. It is also unknown whether ongoing participation in vigorous exercise at the same intensity after successful AF ablation is associated with a higher risk of AF recurrence.
Benefit of invasive electrophysiological studies in adolescents with accessory pathways. The benefit/risk ratio of early invasive EP evaluation of AP conduction properties in young athletes with asymptomatic pre-excitation (<12–14 years old), and prophylactic ablation, remains unclear and requires large-scale studies for clarification.
Exercising with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Although an international registry has shown absence of sports-related sudden death or injury in individuals with an ICD who perform competitive, high-intensive recreational or high-risk sports, many data are sparse and have not examined specific athletic populations with reduced LV function, catecholaminergic polymorphic VT. Moreover, the long-term physical and psychological impact of appropriate and inappropriate shocks, which become more frequent with increasing sports intensity, is unknown.
Arrhythmic risk of exercise in adult congenital heart disease. The relationship between intensity of exercise and risk of arrhythmias in individuals with CHD is unknown and further research is needed. Although exercise prescription is recommended in CHD patients, further studies are necessary to identify the optimal method of improving adherence to an exercise prescription.
8. Sex differences
For many years sports participation, especially at the highest echelons, has been dominated by males, but the last four decades have witnessed an increasing number of females participating in a large variety of sporting disciplines at elite level. Females constituted 45% of all athletes at the 2016 Rio Olympics and participated in 26 of the 28 different sporting disciplines including those that were traditionally considered to be ‘male sports’, such as footfall, rugby, and boxing. Although the guidelines in this document are applicable to both sexes, there are some pertinent sex-based differences relative to exercise and sport including: (i) the incidence of SCD during exercise; (ii) quantitative differences in CV adaptation to regular intensive exercise and the overlap with cardiomyopathy; (iii) the predilection of adverse events with specific CVDs in women; and (iv) the additive haemodynamic effects of exercise in pregnant women with a structurally abnormal heart.
Current evidence suggests a significantly lower prevalence of exercise-related SCD in females who represent a small minority of athletes dying suddenly with a male to female ratio ranging from 3 to 10: 1.17,18,46,49,52,620 This disproportionately lower incidence of SCD among young competitive female athletes also holds true for older recreational athletes where deaths in males are 20-fold greater than in females.
Apart from a lower incidence of exercise-related SCD, there appear to be sex differences related to the diseases predisposing to SCD. Unlike males, female athletes rarely succumb to SCD from HCM. In the US National Registry, females comprised only 3% of the 302 individuals who died from HCM.621 Potential determinants of this disproportionate prevalence of death in males may include a lower absolute volume and intensity of training load in females, which could make them less susceptible to ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, it is also plausible that certain protective metabolic or hormonal mechanisms could reduce the arrhythmic risk during intense physical exertion in females with HCM. This observation is relevant to prescription of intensive exercise or competitive sports in HCM, which is relatively conservative, but could be of less concern and more liberal in affected females in the future. The diagnosis of HCM in an athlete is also relevant in this regard, because male athletes, particularly those competing in endurance sports, show quantitatively great structural changes within the heart including LV hypertrophy. Approximately 2% of white male athletes and 13% of black male athletes show a LV wall thickness of 12–15 mm that overlaps with morphologically mild HCM and can pose a diagnostic dilemma. In contrast female athletes rarely reveal a LV wall thickness >12 mm or concentric LV remodelling, hence the diagnosis of HCM is clear-cut.3
In contrast, a different scenario is represented in females with MVP, where recommendation for participation in intensive exercise warrants a more detailed risk stratification. In the Italian pathology registry of 650 SCDs, 7% were attributed to MVP. Of these, the majority (60%) were female who presented a marked elongation of both leaflets due to an extensive myxomatous degeneration.332
It is also noteworthy that the majority of exercise-related SCDs in young females are associated with a structurally normal heart at autopsy. This observation from several registries suggests that genetic electrical diseases (namely, LQTS, Brugada syndrome, or catecholaminergic polymorphic VT) are likely responsible for a significant proportion of these deaths. Differences in cardiac repolarization between men and women have been reported in healthy subjects and in individuals with LQTS.622 Healthy females also have a longer QTc interval compared with males. Therefore, they are more often clinically affected by the syndrome than men, despite the equal sex distribution of the disease genotype. Females are also at a higher risk than males of developing arrhythmias in response to QT-prolonging drugs, and electrolyte disturbances compared with males. Furthermore, female sex is an independent risk factor for cardiac events in LQTS.623 Unfortunately, little is known about the influence of sex hormones on cardiac repolarization, except that androgens may shorten the QTc interval. Based on these considerations, we recommend particular caution when advising competitive sports in women with a probable or definite diagnosis of LQTS.
Pregnancy is associated with a 50% increase in plasma volume and cardiac output. The stresses of exercise in pregnant women with structural heart disease have the potential to cause haemodynamic compromise. Moderate aerobic exercise is generally safe in all women and is associated with a lower prevalence of excessive weight gain, post-partum obesity, gestational diabetes, and pre-eclampsia. Female athletes may continue training intensively during pregnancy, although it is recommended that women do not exceed a heart rate of >90% of the maximum predicted for age to reduce the risk of foetal bradycardia. Pregnant women with known structural heart disease require evaluation before embarking on intensive exercise programmes. Exercise or sports involving forceful physical contact, risk of falling or abdominal trauma, heavy lifting, scuba diving, and exercising at high altitude in an unacclimatized state are not recommended.
Finally, females represent the largest population of obese individuals worldwide and females with T2DM have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular complications and death compared with men. In this regard all women should be incentivized to engage in regular PA and exercise programmes irrespective of age, ethnicity, and CV morbidities.
9. ‘What to do’ and ‘what not to do’ messages from the Guidelines
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
ACM = arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; AF = atrial fibrillation; AOCA = anomalous origin of coronary arteries; BP = blood pressure; BMI = body mass index; BrS = Brugada syndrome; CAD = coronary artery disease; CCS = chronic coronary syndrome; CHD = congenital heart disease; CKD = chronic kidney disease; CMR, cardiovascular magnetic resonance; CT = computed tomography; CV = cardiovascular; CVD= cardiovascular disease; EEG = electrocardiogram; EP = electrophysiological; ESC = European Society of Cardiology; EP = electrophysiological; HF = heart failure; HFrEF = heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator; LEAD = lower extremity artery disease; LQTS = long QT syndrome; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVOT = left ventricular outflow tract; MVA = mitral valve area; NYHA = New York Heart Association; PAD = peripheral arterial disease; PVC = premature ventricular contractions; SCD = sudden cardiac death; SBP = systolic blood pressure; VA = ventricular arrhythmia; VAD = ventricular assist device; VT = ventricular tachycardia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
ACM = arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; AF = atrial fibrillation; AOCA = anomalous origin of coronary arteries; BP = blood pressure; BMI = body mass index; BrS = Brugada syndrome; CAD = coronary artery disease; CCS = chronic coronary syndrome; CHD = congenital heart disease; CKD = chronic kidney disease; CMR, cardiovascular magnetic resonance; CT = computed tomography; CV = cardiovascular; CVD= cardiovascular disease; EEG = electrocardiogram; EP = electrophysiological; ESC = European Society of Cardiology; EP = electrophysiological; HF = heart failure; HFrEF = heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator; LEAD = lower extremity artery disease; LQTS = long QT syndrome; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVOT = left ventricular outflow tract; MVA = mitral valve area; NYHA = New York Heart Association; PAD = peripheral arterial disease; PVC = premature ventricular contractions; SCD = sudden cardiac death; SBP = systolic blood pressure; VA = ventricular arrhythmia; VAD = ventricular assist device; VT = ventricular tachycardia.
Class of recommendation.
Level of evidence.
10. Supplementary data
Supplementary Data with additional Supplementary Figures, Tables, and text complementing the full text are available on the European Heart Journal website and via the ESC website at www.escardio.org/guidelines.
11. Appendix
Author/Task Force Member Affiliations: Sabiha Gati, Faculty of Medicine, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom and Cardiology, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Maria Bäck, Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, and Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Mats Börjesson, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, and Center for Health and Performance, Department of Food, Nutrition and Sports Science, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Stefano Caselli, Cardiovascular Center Zurich, Hirslanden Klinik im Park, Zurich, Switzerland; Jean-Philippe Collet, Sorbonne Université, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (APHP), Paris, France; Domenico Corrado, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Jonathan A. Drezner, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America; Martin Halle, Prevention and Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Dominique Hansen, Hasselt University, BIOMED/REVAL/Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium; Hein Heidbuchel, Cardiology, University Hospital Antwerp and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium; Jonathan Myers, Cardiology Division, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States of America and Cardiology Division, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States of America; Josef Niebauer, University Institute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria; Michael Papadakis, Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, St George’s, University of London, London, United Kingdom; Massimo Francesco Piepoli, Heart Failure Unit, Cardiology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital and University of Parma, Piacenza, Italy; Eva Prescott, Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands; A. Graham Stuart, Congenital Heart Unit, Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom; Rod S. Taylor, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; Paul D. Thompson, Division of Cardiology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, United States of America; Monica Tiberi, Department of Health-Sport Medicine, Azienda Unica Regionale Marche, Area Vasta 1, Pesaro, Italy; Luc Vanhees, Rehabilitation Sciences, Kuleuven, Leuven, Belgium; and Matthias Wilhelm, Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG): Stephan Windecker (Chairperson) (Switzerland), Victor Aboyans (France), Colin Baigent (United Kingdom), Jean-Philippe Collet (France), Veronica Dean (France), Victoria Delgado (Netherlands), Donna Fitzsimons (United Kingdom), Chris P. Gale (United Kingdom), Diederick E. Grobbee (Netherlands), Sigrun Halvorsen (Norway), Gerhard Hindricks (Germany), Bernard Iung (France), Peter Jüni (Canada), Hugo A. Katus (Germany), Ulf Landmesser (Germany), Christophe Leclercq (France), Maddalena Lettino (Italy), Basil S. Lewis (Israel), Béla Merkely (Hungary), Christian Mueller (Switzerland), Steffen E. Petersen (United Kingdom), Anna Sonia Petronio (Italy), Dimitrios J. Richter (Greece), Marco Roffi (Switzerland), Evgeny Shlyakhto (Russian Federation), Iain A. Simpson (United Kingdom), Miguel Sousa-Uva (Portugal), and Rhian M. Touyz (United Kingdom).
ESC National Cardiac Societies actively involved in the review process of the 2020 ESC Guidelines on Sports Cardiology and Exercise in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: Algeria: Algerian Society of Cardiology, Mohamed Tahmi; Armenia: Armenian Cardiologists Association, Parounak H. Zelveian; Austria: Austrian Society of Cardiology, Thomas Berger; Azerbaijan: Azerbaijan Society of Cardiology, Rahima Gabulova; Belarus: Belorussian Scientific Society of Cardiologists, Svetlana Sudzhaeva; Belgium: Belgian Society of Cardiology, Patrizio Lancellotti; Bosnia and Herzegovina: Association of Cardiologists of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Šekib Sokolović; Bulgaria: Bulgarian Society of Cardiology, Ivan Gruev; Croatia: Croatian Cardiac Society, Vedran Velagic; Cyprus: Cyprus Society of Cardiology, Evagoras Nicolaides; Czech Republic: Czech Society of Cardiology, Vladimir Tuka; Denmark: Danish Society of Cardiology, Hanne Rasmusen; Egypt: Egyptian Society of Cardiology, Hazem Khamis; Estonia: Estonian Society of Cardiology, Margus Viigimaa; Finland: Finnish Cardiac Society, Jari A. Laukkanen; France: French Society of Cardiology, Gilles Bosser; Germany: German Cardiac Society, Rainer Hambrecht; Greece: Hellenic Society of Cardiology, Alexandros Kasiakogias; Hungary: Hungarian Society of Cardiology, Béla Merkely; Iceland: Icelandic Society of Cardiology, Gunnar Thor Gunnarsson; Ireland: Irish Cardiac Society, Brendan McAdam; Israel: Israel Heart Society, Andre Keren; Italy: Italian Federation of Cardiology, Pasquale Perrone-Filardi; Kosovo (Republic of): Kosovo Society of Cardiology, Gani Bajraktari; Kyrgyzstan: Kyrgyz Society of Cardiology, Erkin Mirrakhimov; Latvia: Latvian Society of Cardiology, Sandra Rozenštoka; Lithuania: Lithuanian Society of Cardiology, Germanas Marinskis; Luxembourg: Luxembourg Society of Cardiology, Cristiana Banu; Malta: Maltese Cardiac Society, Mark Abela; Moldova (Republic of): Moldavian Society of Cardiology, Eleonora Vataman; Montenegro: Montenegro Society of Cardiology, Natasa Belada; Morocco: Moroccan Society of Cardiology, Hasnaa Belghiti; Netherlands: Netherlands Society of Cardiology, Harald Thune Jorstad; North Macedonia: North Macedonian Society of Cardiology, Elizabeta Srbinovska Kostovska; Norway: Norwegian Society of Cardiology, Kristina Haugaa; Poland: Polish Cardiac Society, Renata Główczyńska; Portugal: Portuguese Society of Cardiology, Helder Dores; Romania: Romanian Society of Cardiology, Florin Mitu; Russian Federation: Russian Society of Cardiology, Andrey Smolensky; San Marino: San Marino Society of Cardiology, Marina Foscoli; Serbia: Cardiology Society of Serbia, Ivana Nedeljkovic; Slovakia: Slovak Society of Cardiology, Stefan Farsky; Slovenia: Slovenian Society of Cardiology, Zlatko Fras; Spain: Spanish Society of Cardiology, Araceli Boraita; Sweden: Swedish Society of Cardiology, Peder Sörenssen; Switzerland: Swiss Society of Cardiology, Christian Schmied; Syrian Arab Republic: Syrian Cardiovascular Association, Walid Bsata; Tunisia: Tunisian Society of Cardiology and Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Lilia Zakhama; Turkey: Turkish Society of Cardiology, Mehmet Uzun; Ukraine: Ukrainian Association of Cardiology, Elena Nesukay; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: British Cardiovascular Society, Dhrubo Rakhit.
ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), National Cardiac Societies document reviewers and Author/Task Force Member affiliations: listed in the Appendix.
ESC entities having participated in the development of this document:
Associations: Association of Cardiovascular Nursing & Allied Professions (ACNAP), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Heart Failure Association (HFA).
Working Groups: Adult Congenital Heart Disease.
The content of these European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines has been published for personal and educational use only. No commercial use is authorized. No part of the ESC Guidelines may be translated or reproduced in any form without written permission from the ESC. Permission can be obtained upon submission of a written request to Oxford University Press, the publisher of the European Heart Journal and the party authorized to handle such permissions on behalf of the ESC ([email protected]).
Disclaimer. The ESC Guidelines represent the views of the ESC and were produced after careful consideration of the scientific and medical knowledge and the evidence available at the time of their publication. The ESC is not responsible in the event of any contradiction, discrepancy and/or ambiguity between the ESC Guidelines and any other official recommendations or guidelines issued by the relevant public health authorities, in particular in relation to good use of healthcare or therapeutic strategies. Health professionals are encouraged to take the ESC Guidelines fully into account when exercising their clinical judgment, as well as in the determination and the implementation of preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic medical strategies; however, the ESC Guidelines do not override, in any way whatsoever, the individual responsibility of health professionals to make appropriate and accurate decisions in consideration of each patient’s health condition and in consultation with that patient and, where appropriate and/or necessary, the patient’s caregiver. Nor do the ESC Guidelines exempt health professionals from taking into full and careful consideration the relevant official updated recommendations or guidelines issued by the competent public health authorities, in order to manage each patient’s case in light of the scientifically accepted data pursuant to their respective ethical and professional obligations. It is also the health professional’s responsibility to verify the applicable rules and regulations relating to drugs and medical devices at the time of prescription.
12. References
Preparticipation Physical Evaluation, 4th Edition [online]. American Academy of Family Physicians et al. ;
The World Anti-Doping Code International Standard,
Author notes
We would like to pay tribute to Professor Galderisi who passed away in March 2020.