Abstract

Aims

Novel therapies are needed for recurrent pericarditis, particularly when corticosteroid dependent and colchicine resistant. Based on limited data, interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra may be beneficial. The aim of this multicentre registry was to evaluate the broader effectiveness and safety of anakinra in a ‘real world’ population.

Methods and results

This registry enrolled consecutive patients with recurrent pericarditis who were corticosteroid dependent and colchicine resistant and treated with anakinra. The primary outcome was the pericarditis recurrence rate after treatment. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, hospitalisations, corticosteroid use and adverse events. Among 224 patients (46 ± 14 years old, 63% women, 75% idiopathic), the median duration of disease was 17 months (interquartile range 9–33). Most patients had elevated C-reactive protein (91%) and pericardial effusion (88%). After a median treatment of 6 months (3–12), pericarditis recurrences were reduced six-fold (2.33–0.39 per patient per year), emergency department admissions were reduced 11-fold (1.08–0.10 per patient per year), hospitalisations were reduced seven-fold (0.99–0.13 per patient per year). Corticosteroid use was decreased by anakinra (respectively from 80% to 27%; P < 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred; adverse events consisted mostly of transient skin reactions (38%) at the injection site. Adverse events led to discontinuation in 3%. A full-dose treatment duration of over 3 months followed by a tapering period of over 3 months were the therapeutic schemes associated with a lower risk of recurrence.

Conclusion

In patients with recurrent pericarditis, anakinra appears efficacious and safe in reducing recurrences, emergency department admissions and hospitalisations.

Introduction

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) affects up to 30% of patients after a first episode, and up to 50% of patients with recurrences if not treated with colchicine.15

Some patients may have an inadequate response to standard therapy with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), colchicine and corticosteroids, typically with unsuccessful attempts to taper corticosteroids. These patients with corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant refractory RP may have a severely impaired quality of life due to an inability to control symptoms and severe side effects from chronic glucocorticoid therapy.5,6

Although the pathogenesis has not been fully elucidated, a putative hypothesis in recurrent idiopathic pericarditis is an amplified and self-sustained autoinflammatory and/or autoimmune response following exogenous or endogenous triggers.711 Interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra is of particular interest because it may interfere with this self-sustained pathway and dramatically reduce recurrences.1114 However, the published literature on anakinra in refractory RP is limited to case reports,12,1524 small case series2528 and a single randomised controlled trial including 21 patients.29

Due to the single-centre nature of observational studies and the narrowly defined patient population in the small randomised controlled trial, the generalisability of these data is unknown. This international, all-comers, multicentre registry was consequently designed to address this deficit in external validity, and the specific aim of the current study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anakinra in a ‘real-world’ population of patients with refractory RP.

Methods

Study design

The International, all-comers, multicentre Registry of Anakinra for Pericarditis (IRAP) is a multicentre observational cohort study including 14 referral centres for pericardial diseases across six different countries (see Supplementary Appendix A). The present study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and subsequent modifications. The study was approved by the ethics committee or institutional review board at each participating centre. All patients provided written informed consent, or an exemption for individual patient consent was provided by the local ethics committee or institutional review board. Consecutive adult patients (>18 years old), referred for refractory RP at each clinical site between 2014 and 2018, were enrolled at the time of a pericarditis recurrence if they were eligible to receive anakinra according to institutional and international guidelines.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All patients eligible for inclusion had corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant refractory RP, defined as a first episode of acute pericarditis followed by a minimum of two recurrences despite guideline-based traditional medical treatment (NSAIDs, colchicine and/or corticosteroids). Corticosteroid dependence was defined as the inability to taper glucocorticoids without recurrence. The first episode of pericarditis was diagnosed in the presence of at least two of the following criteria: typical pericarditic chest pain (sharp, pleuritic, improved by sitting up and leaning forward), pericardial friction rub, ST-segment elevation or PR-segment depression on electrocardiogram and new or worsening pericardial effusion. A recurrence was diagnosed when pericarditic chest pain reoccurred along with one or more of the following signs: fever, friction rubs, electrocardiographic changes, new or worsening pericardial effusion, or C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation.15

Exclusion criteria were specific contraindications to anakinra treatment including hypersensitivity to the active substance or to Escherichia coli-derived proteins, neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1.5 × 109/L), active tuberculosis and active malignancy.

Study protocol

All enrolled patients received anakinra 100 mg once daily by subcutaneous (sc) injection. Concomitant medical treatment for pericarditis (NSAIDs, colchicine, corticosteroids) was maintained, tapered, or discontinued according to clinical evaluation. Clinical, laboratory testing, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic assessments were performed in all patients at the time of enrollment, according to local practice and in accordance with established guidelines.5

Study end-points

The primary end-point was pericarditis recurrence after the initiation of anakinra. The secondary end-points included emergency department (ED) admissions, hospitalisations and corticosteroid use after initiation of anakinra. The occurrence of any adverse event (AE) and AE-related drug discontinuation were assessed as safety end-points.

Statistical analysis

Blinded and independent analysis of data was performed in the Coordinating Centre (Torino, Italy). This cohort study followed the recommendations of the STROBE statement.30 A minimum sample size of 24 patients was estimated to be sufficient to detect a difference in recurrence rate from 80% before anakinra to 10% after anakinra, based on previous evidence in the literature, with a power of 90% at a confidence level of 95%.10,29 Due to the observational real-world purpose of the registry, a greater number of patients were subsequently included during the enrollment phase. Continuous variables, presented as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile range, were compared by non-parametric tests: Mann–Whitney’s test was used for independent data and Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test was usedfor paired data (pre-post evaluations). Categorical variables, presented as counts and percentages, were compared using the chi-square test with Yates’ correction or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. The survival probability and the freedom from AEs were evaluated with Kaplan–Meier curves, compared by the Mantel–Cox test. A time varying covariate analysis was performed to evaluate recurrences according to treatment duration. Cox proportional hazard models were also used to establish independent associations with recurrence. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and a two-sided significance level less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Population characteristics

A total of 224 patients was included in the present registry. Enrollment ranged from one to 53 patients, based on centre volume and local practice (see Supplementary Appendix A). Each centre enrolled consecutive patients in order to reproduce real-life practice and minimise selection bias. Baseline population characteristics are reported in Table 1.

Table 1.

Participant characteristics at enrollment.

Characteristics at enrollmentPopulation (n = 224)
Age, years46 ± 14
Female gender140 (63%)
Pericardial disease duration, months17 (9–33)
Previous pericarditis recurrences4 (3–6)
Previous ED admissions2 (1–3)
Previous hospitalisations2 (1–3)
Aetiology
 Idiopathic167 (75%)
 Post-cardiac injury syndrome28 (13%)
 Autoimmune diseasea21 (9%)
 Autoinflammatory disease5 (2%)
 Radiation2 (0.7%)
 Traumatic1 (0.3%)
CRP elevation
 Pericardial effusion203 (91%)
 Mild196 (88%)
 Moderate101 (45%)
 Severe48 (21%)
 Tamponade23 (10%)
 Therapy24 (11%)
 NSAIDs170 (76%)
 Colchicine198 (88%)
 Corticosteroids180 (80%)
 Triple therapy (NSAIDs +   colchicine + corticosteroids)141 (63%)
 Follow-up observation after anakinra  initiation, months13 (7–25)
Characteristics at enrollmentPopulation (n = 224)
Age, years46 ± 14
Female gender140 (63%)
Pericardial disease duration, months17 (9–33)
Previous pericarditis recurrences4 (3–6)
Previous ED admissions2 (1–3)
Previous hospitalisations2 (1–3)
Aetiology
 Idiopathic167 (75%)
 Post-cardiac injury syndrome28 (13%)
 Autoimmune diseasea21 (9%)
 Autoinflammatory disease5 (2%)
 Radiation2 (0.7%)
 Traumatic1 (0.3%)
CRP elevation
 Pericardial effusion203 (91%)
 Mild196 (88%)
 Moderate101 (45%)
 Severe48 (21%)
 Tamponade23 (10%)
 Therapy24 (11%)
 NSAIDs170 (76%)
 Colchicine198 (88%)
 Corticosteroids180 (80%)
 Triple therapy (NSAIDs +   colchicine + corticosteroids)141 (63%)
 Follow-up observation after anakinra  initiation, months13 (7–25)

Values are presented as no. (%) or mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range).

a

Presumed in patients with a defined diagnosis of: systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthropathy, Behcet syndrome, Sjogren syndrome, sarcoidosis.

ED: emergency department; NSAIDs: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; CRP: C-reactive protein.

Table 1.

Participant characteristics at enrollment.

Characteristics at enrollmentPopulation (n = 224)
Age, years46 ± 14
Female gender140 (63%)
Pericardial disease duration, months17 (9–33)
Previous pericarditis recurrences4 (3–6)
Previous ED admissions2 (1–3)
Previous hospitalisations2 (1–3)
Aetiology
 Idiopathic167 (75%)
 Post-cardiac injury syndrome28 (13%)
 Autoimmune diseasea21 (9%)
 Autoinflammatory disease5 (2%)
 Radiation2 (0.7%)
 Traumatic1 (0.3%)
CRP elevation
 Pericardial effusion203 (91%)
 Mild196 (88%)
 Moderate101 (45%)
 Severe48 (21%)
 Tamponade23 (10%)
 Therapy24 (11%)
 NSAIDs170 (76%)
 Colchicine198 (88%)
 Corticosteroids180 (80%)
 Triple therapy (NSAIDs +   colchicine + corticosteroids)141 (63%)
 Follow-up observation after anakinra  initiation, months13 (7–25)
Characteristics at enrollmentPopulation (n = 224)
Age, years46 ± 14
Female gender140 (63%)
Pericardial disease duration, months17 (9–33)
Previous pericarditis recurrences4 (3–6)
Previous ED admissions2 (1–3)
Previous hospitalisations2 (1–3)
Aetiology
 Idiopathic167 (75%)
 Post-cardiac injury syndrome28 (13%)
 Autoimmune diseasea21 (9%)
 Autoinflammatory disease5 (2%)
 Radiation2 (0.7%)
 Traumatic1 (0.3%)
CRP elevation
 Pericardial effusion203 (91%)
 Mild196 (88%)
 Moderate101 (45%)
 Severe48 (21%)
 Tamponade23 (10%)
 Therapy24 (11%)
 NSAIDs170 (76%)
 Colchicine198 (88%)
 Corticosteroids180 (80%)
 Triple therapy (NSAIDs +   colchicine + corticosteroids)141 (63%)
 Follow-up observation after anakinra  initiation, months13 (7–25)

Values are presented as no. (%) or mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range).

a

Presumed in patients with a defined diagnosis of: systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthropathy, Behcet syndrome, Sjogren syndrome, sarcoidosis.

ED: emergency department; NSAIDs: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; CRP: C-reactive protein.

Patients had a mean age of 46 years (range 18–84) and 140 (63%) were women. At baseline, the median duration of disease was 17 months (interquartile range (IQR) 9–33) with a median of four prior recurrences (IQR 3–6), two prior ED admissions (IQR 1–3) and two prior hospitalisations (IQR 1–3). Before initiating anakinra, the recurrence rate was 2.33 flares per patient per year, a mean of one recurrence every 157 days (Figure 1). Likewise, the prior ED admission rate was 1.08 admissions per patient per year with 0.99 hospitalisations per patient per year. All patients were diagnosed with recurrent pericarditis at the time of enrollment. Most patients had idiopathic aetiology (167 patients, 75%), CRP elevation (203 patients, 91%) and echocardiographic evidence of pericardial effusion (196 patients, 88%). At the time of enrollment, medical treatment included NSAIDs in 170 patients (76%), colchicine in 198 patients (88%) and corticosteroids in 180 patients (80%). Forty-four patients (20%) previously on corticosteroids were not on treatment at the time of enrollment because of drug intolerance or drug tapering and discontinuation shortly before the index recurrence.

Recurrences, emergency department admissions, hospital admissions before and after anakinra (number of events/year per patient and in the population of the registry). Corticosteroid use before and after anakinra.
Figure 1.

Recurrences, emergency department admissions, hospital admissions before and after anakinra (number of events/year per patient and in the population of the registry). Corticosteroid use before and after anakinra.

Pericarditis recurrences after anakinra

During a follow-up of 3889 patient-months, one or more pericarditis recurrences were observed in 78 patients, with a median flare-free time of 10 months (IQR 5–18). Multiple recurrences were observed in 26 patients.

After treatment with anakinra, a median of zero recurrences (IQR 0–1) with a mean of 0.6 ± 1 per patient occurred. The recurrence rate after starting anakinra was 0.39 flares per patient per year, implying a mean of one recurrence every 939 days. Overall, a 83% reduction in recurrence rate was observed (P < 0.001, rate ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14–0.20), equivalent to 1.94 fewer flares per patient per year.

At 36 months after anakinra initiation, 72% patients experienced none or at most one recurrence: respectively, 43% patients were in stable remission, while 29% patients had a single recurrence over a period of 36 months. The remaining 28% patients had two or more recurrences during the follow-up (ranging from a minimum of two to a maximum of seven).

ED admissions and hospitalisations after anakinra

During follow-up, a median of zero ED admissions (IQR 0–0) with a mean of 0.1 ± 0.5 per patient and a median of zero hospitalisations (IQR 0–0) with a mean of 0.2 ± 0.5 per patient occurred, corresponding to 0.10 ED admissions per patient per year and 0.14 hospitalisations per patient per year, respectively (Figure 1). Compared to the period prior to anakinra treatment, there was a reduction of 91% for ED admissions (P < 0.001, rate ratio 0.09, 95% CI 0.06–0.13) and 86% for hospitalisations (P < 0.001, rate ratio 0.14, 95% CI 0.11–0.19).

During follow-up, after 10 ± 9 months (range 1.8–38), 20 patients (8.9%) were admitted and underwent pericardectomy with subsequent discontinuation of anakinra.

Corticosteroid dependence after anakinra

Although all patients had been corticosteroid dependent, at the time of enrollment 180 patients (80%) were still on active treatment with glucocorticoids. After treatment with anakinra, corticosteroids were successfully tapered in most patients without recurrence. In fact, only 61 patients (27%) remained on glucocorticoid therapy (Figure 1).

Similarly, NSAIDs were discontinued in most patients. Only 54 patients (24%) remained on NSAIDs. Conversely, the majority of patients continued on colchicine. During follow-up, 131 patients (58%) remained on colchicine.

Adverse events

AEs were observed in 99 patients (44%), as described in Table 2. The most frequent AE was a transient skin reaction at the injection site (associated with erythema, pruritus and/or pain), which occurred in 86 patients (38%), 13 ± 16 days after the beginning of treatment. Three patients (1.3%) required permanent drug discontinuation because of intolerable injection-site reactions. Arthralgias and myalgias were reported by 13 patients (6%) during the treatment, and one of these patients (0.4%) required drug withdrawal. Seven patients (3%) had a mild transient transaminase elevations. A transient neutropenia was observed in three patients (1%), not associated with clinical events, with subsequent resolution. Other AEs, with questionable association with anakinra treatment, were reported by single patients, including hypereosinophilia, mild fever, hot flushes and sweating, perforated diverticulitis and optic neuritis.

Table 2.

Adverse events.

Adverse eventsPopulation (n = 224)
Occurrence of one or more AE99 (44%)
 Skin reaction at injection site86 (38%)
 Arthralgias and myalgias13 (6%)
 Transaminase elevation7 (3%)
 Infections6 (3%)
 Neutropenia (<1.5 × 109/L)3 (1%)
 Hypereosinophilia1 (0.4%)
 Mild evening fever1 (0.4%)
 Hot flushes and sweating1 (0.4%)
 Perforated diverticulitis1 (0.4%)
 Optic Neuritis1 (0.4%)
AE requiring permanent anakinra discontinuation7 (3%)
Skin reaction3
Infection (skin abscess)1
Perforated diverticulitis1
Arthralgias and myalgias1
Multiple side effects (skin reaction, arthralgias and myalgias, transaminases elevation, neutropenia)1
Adverse eventsPopulation (n = 224)
Occurrence of one or more AE99 (44%)
 Skin reaction at injection site86 (38%)
 Arthralgias and myalgias13 (6%)
 Transaminase elevation7 (3%)
 Infections6 (3%)
 Neutropenia (<1.5 × 109/L)3 (1%)
 Hypereosinophilia1 (0.4%)
 Mild evening fever1 (0.4%)
 Hot flushes and sweating1 (0.4%)
 Perforated diverticulitis1 (0.4%)
 Optic Neuritis1 (0.4%)
AE requiring permanent anakinra discontinuation7 (3%)
Skin reaction3
Infection (skin abscess)1
Perforated diverticulitis1
Arthralgias and myalgias1
Multiple side effects (skin reaction, arthralgias and myalgias, transaminases elevation, neutropenia)1

Values are presented as no. (%).

AE: adverse event.

Table 2.

Adverse events.

Adverse eventsPopulation (n = 224)
Occurrence of one or more AE99 (44%)
 Skin reaction at injection site86 (38%)
 Arthralgias and myalgias13 (6%)
 Transaminase elevation7 (3%)
 Infections6 (3%)
 Neutropenia (<1.5 × 109/L)3 (1%)
 Hypereosinophilia1 (0.4%)
 Mild evening fever1 (0.4%)
 Hot flushes and sweating1 (0.4%)
 Perforated diverticulitis1 (0.4%)
 Optic Neuritis1 (0.4%)
AE requiring permanent anakinra discontinuation7 (3%)
Skin reaction3
Infection (skin abscess)1
Perforated diverticulitis1
Arthralgias and myalgias1
Multiple side effects (skin reaction, arthralgias and myalgias, transaminases elevation, neutropenia)1
Adverse eventsPopulation (n = 224)
Occurrence of one or more AE99 (44%)
 Skin reaction at injection site86 (38%)
 Arthralgias and myalgias13 (6%)
 Transaminase elevation7 (3%)
 Infections6 (3%)
 Neutropenia (<1.5 × 109/L)3 (1%)
 Hypereosinophilia1 (0.4%)
 Mild evening fever1 (0.4%)
 Hot flushes and sweating1 (0.4%)
 Perforated diverticulitis1 (0.4%)
 Optic Neuritis1 (0.4%)
AE requiring permanent anakinra discontinuation7 (3%)
Skin reaction3
Infection (skin abscess)1
Perforated diverticulitis1
Arthralgias and myalgias1
Multiple side effects (skin reaction, arthralgias and myalgias, transaminases elevation, neutropenia)1

Values are presented as no. (%).

AE: adverse event.

Infections were observed in six patients (3%) during follow-up: two respiratory infections (bronchopneumonia), as well as four skin and soft-tissue infections (skin abscess, Cryptococcus neoformans necrotising cellulitis, lymphocele infection and pelvic cyst infections). In three cases, anakinra was temporarily suspended, and one patient permanently discontinued therapy (patient with skin abscess). In all patients, infections successfully resolved with appropriate treatment. Overall, as mentioned, seven patients (3%) permanently discontinued anakinra due to an AE.

Treatment duration and tapering

Patients were treated with full-dose anakinra for a median duration of 6 months (IQR 3–12), followed by a tapering period with a median duration of 3 months (IQR 0–6). Patients who received a full-dose treatment for more than 3 months had a greater freedom from recurrences at 36 months (46% vs. 26%, P = 0.002; Figure 2). A time varying covariate analysis confirmed that a full dose treatment for more than 3 months was independently associated with a lower risk of recurrences (hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.94–0.99).

Recurrences according to treatment duration (36-month Kaplan–Meier survival analysis).
Figure 2.

Recurrences according to treatment duration (36-month Kaplan–Meier survival analysis).

A further analysis was performed on the subgroup of 135 patients (60%) who permanently discontinued the active treatment with anakinra. At 18 months after discontinuation, 74% patients were still free from recurrences. Among patients who discontinued anakinra, 87 (64%) gradually suspended the active treatment, while the other 36% of patients stopped it abruptly. Among patients in whom anakinra was gradually withdrawn, those treated with a reduced dose regimen for at least 3 months before discontinuation had a greater freedom from recurrence at 18 months after drug interruption (89% vs. 50%, P = 0.002). A lower freedom from recurrence was observed in patients undergoing a more rapid drug withdrawal (3 months or less) or those in whom anakinra was abruptly discontinued (Figure 3).

Recurrences according to tapering duration (18-month Kaplan–Meier survival analysis).
Figure 3.

Recurrences according to tapering duration (18-month Kaplan–Meier survival analysis).

Baseline and treatment factors associated with pericarditis recurrence

In order to investigate further the association of baseline clinical data and treatment-related variables with pericarditis recurrence, a logistic regression analysis was performed, showing that: pericardial effusion at baseline, permanent discontinuation of anakinra, full-dose treatment duration and tapering duration were significantly correlated with the risk of recurrence.

In a Cox regression model (Table 3), a longer full-dose treatment (HR 0.96 per one-month increase, P = 0.023) and a longer tapering were both associated with lower recurrence (HR 0.84 per one-month increase, P < 0.001).

Table 3.

Cox regression analysis of factors associated with pericarditis recurrence during a 36-month follow-up of patients treated with anakinra.

FactorsP valueHR95% CI
Pericardial effusion at anakinra start0.2971.750.61–4.98
Permanent discontinuation of anakinra treatment (for any reason, included treatment completion)0.3620.500.11–2.21
Full-dose treatment (per one-month increase)0.0230.960.93–0.99
Tapering duration (per one-month increase)<0.0010.840.77–0.91
FactorsP valueHR95% CI
Pericardial effusion at anakinra start0.2971.750.61–4.98
Permanent discontinuation of anakinra treatment (for any reason, included treatment completion)0.3620.500.11–2.21
Full-dose treatment (per one-month increase)0.0230.960.93–0.99
Tapering duration (per one-month increase)<0.0010.840.77–0.91

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Table 3.

Cox regression analysis of factors associated with pericarditis recurrence during a 36-month follow-up of patients treated with anakinra.

FactorsP valueHR95% CI
Pericardial effusion at anakinra start0.2971.750.61–4.98
Permanent discontinuation of anakinra treatment (for any reason, included treatment completion)0.3620.500.11–2.21
Full-dose treatment (per one-month increase)0.0230.960.93–0.99
Tapering duration (per one-month increase)<0.0010.840.77–0.91
FactorsP valueHR95% CI
Pericardial effusion at anakinra start0.2971.750.61–4.98
Permanent discontinuation of anakinra treatment (for any reason, included treatment completion)0.3620.500.11–2.21
Full-dose treatment (per one-month increase)0.0230.960.93–0.99
Tapering duration (per one-month increase)<0.0010.840.77–0.91

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Discussion

This is the first international registry on the use of anakinra in patients with corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant refractory RP.

The main findings of this registry are that anakinra dramatically decreased pericarditis recurrence rate (six-fold reduction, from 2.33 flares per patient per year to 0.39 flares per patient per year), ED admissions (11-fold reduction, from 1.08 admissions per patient per year to 0.10 admissions per patient per year), hospitalisations (seven-fold reduction, from 0.99 hospitalisations per patient per year to 0.13 hospitalisations per patient per year) and corticosteroid dependence. This observation is particularly important because side effects from corticosteroids can be severe and affect up to 25% of chronically treated patients.6

Overall, our results correspond to a reduced pericarditis recurrence burden from once every 157 days to once every 939 days. Moreover, during follow-up of this high-risk population, 43% of patients were in stable remission without recurrence, and another 29% had only a single recurrence. Compared with the AIRTRIP trial, results are similar with an incidence rate of 0.11 flares per patient per year in the AIRTRIP and 0.39 flares per patient per year in this real-world registry.

The safety profile of anakinra is also reassuring in this registry. Indeed, despite a high incidence of AEs (44%), there were no life-threatening AEs. Most AEs were mild, predominantly related to transient (some weeks) local skin reactions. Skin reactions had an incidence (38%) similar to previous studies (44%).12,29 They can be treated with oral and/or topical antihistamines and local corticosteroids. Furthermore, their occurrence can be decreased by changing the injection site every time and warming the anakinra syringe to room temperature before use, along with the application of a cold pack to the area of injection for some minutes before and after drug administration.31 Patients should be informed in advance about the potential for such reactions to prevent drug discontinuation. Other AEs included arthralgias and myalgias (6%), transaminase elevations (3%) and neutropenia (1%). These two latter AEs had previously been reported in the literature with an incidence of, respectively, 14% and 1.5%.29 Significant infections during treatment with IL-1 antagonists do occur, but are rare. In a review of clinical trials,32 significant infections occurred in 1.7% of patients, mostly respiratory and soft-tissue infections. In our registry, we observed six infections (3%), predominantly involving the respiratory system and soft tissues, all of which resolved with proper treatment.

Chronic inflammation underlying recurrent pericarditis is likely to be determined by an amplified and self-sustained autoinflammatory and/or autoimmune response following different exogenous or endogenous triggers; autoinflammatory and autoimmune mechanisms are not alternative, because they are often in overlap in most immune-mediated diseases. Anakinra, a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist which inhibits IL-1 action, has recently shown promise in recurrent pericarditis, but has been used for more than 15 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and various monogenic and polygenic systemic autoinflammatory disease (such as cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, familial Mediterranean fever and Still’s disease).8,9 Our results support the hypothesis that IL-1 plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of refractory RP.

Recent reviews investigated the current evidence and future challenges with anakinra treatment for refractory RP, and emphasised that the main unresolved issues relate to the duration of initial treatment and the tapering protocol.8,9,12 To address this issue, the analysis of this registry showed that both a full-dose treatment duration of at least 3 months as well as a cautious tapering of at least 3 months were associated with a lower risk of recurrence. A longer full-dose treatment (HR 0.97 per one-month increase) and a longer tapering were both associated with lower recurrence (HR 0.84 per one-month increase).

A limitation of this study, that reports data from an international registry, is the observational design and inclusion of patients only treated with anakinra, lacking a control group. Our results provide evidence for larger randomised controlled trials of anakira in patients with refractory RP. Even though refractory RP without baseline CRP elevation and without idiopathic aetiology is relatively rare as shown in this registry, further studies specifically targeted at the assessment of anti-IL-1 efficacy in these subgroups of patients could be useful to identify the most appropriate treatment for each patient.

In addition, our registry provided ‘real world’ data regarding the efficacy and safety of anakinra.

Conclusions

Anakinra appears to be a safe and efficacious option for corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant refractory RP despite optimal anti-inflammatory therapy (NSAIDs, colchicine and corticosteroids), allowing not only a dramatic reduction of recurrences but also of corticosteroid use. A full-dose treatment duration of at least 3 months followed by a tapering period of at least 3 months were the therapeutic approaches associated with a lower risk of recurrences.

Author contributions

MI and AA: study conception and design, data acquisition and analysis, manuscript drafting, critical revision. AK, AB and YA: study conception and design, data acquisition, critical revision. AA and EP: statistical analysis. GMDF, PC, VM, SM, SAL, GL, GE, DL, RM, GL, MDB, LC, LD, ACC, BV, LB, ET, FI, DP, ALC, DV, DT, GDL, CG, MR and JO: data acquisition, critical revision. All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: MI, PC, AK, AB, SAL and LD have participated as advisory board members for SOBI (Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB, Stockholm, Sweden). LD received institutional research grants from SOBI. SAL has received consulting fees from SOBI.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

1

Imazio
M
,
Brucato
A
,
Cemin
R
, et al.  
ICAP Investigators
.
A randomized trial of colchicine for acute pericarditis
.
N Engl J Med
 
2013
;
369
:
1522
1528
.

2

Imazio
M
,
Belli
R
,
Brucato
A
, et al.  
Efficacy and safety of colchicine for treatment of multiple recurrences of pericarditis (CORP-2): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial
.
Lancet
 
2014
;
383
:
2232
2237
.

3

Imazio
M
,
Brucato
A
,
Cemin
R
, et al.  
CORP (COlchicine for Recurrent Pericarditis) Investigators
.
Colchicine for recurrent pericarditis (CORP): a randomized trial
.
Ann Intern Med
 
2011
;
155
:
409
414
.

4

LeWinter
MM
.
Clinical practice. Acute pericarditis
.
N Engl J Med
 
2014
;
371
:
2410
2416
.

5

Adler
Y
,
Charron
P
,
Imazio
M
, et al.  
ESC Scientific Document Group
.
2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases
.
Eur Heart J
 
2015
;
36
:
2921
2964
.

6

Imazio
M
,
Brucato
A
,
Cumetti
D
, et al.  
Corticosteroids for recurrent pericarditis: high versus low doses: a nonrandomized observation
.
Circulation
 
2008
;
118
:
667
671
.

7

Imazio
M
,
Brucato
A
,
Mayosi
BM
, et al.  
Medical therapy of pericardial diseases: part I: idiopathic and infectious pericarditis
.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)
 
2010
;
11
:
712
722
.

8

Brucato
A
,
Emmi
G
,
Cantarini
L
, et al.  
Management of idiopathic recurrent pericarditis in adults and in children: a role for IL-1 receptor antagonism
.
Intern Emerg Med
 
2018
;
13
:
475
489
.

9

Brucato
A
,
Imazio
M
,
Cremer
PC
, et al.  
Recurrent pericarditis: still idiopathic? The pros and cons of a well-honoured term
.
Intern Emerg Med
 
2018
;
13
:
839
844
.

10

Caforio
ALP
,
Brucato
A
,
Doria
A
, et al.  
Anti-heart and anti-intercalated disk autoantibodies: evidence for autoimmunity in idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis
.
Heart
 
2010
;
96
:
779
784
.

11

Buckley
LF
,
Abbate
A
.
Interleukin-1 blockade in cardiovascular diseases: a clinical update
.
Eur Heart J
 
2018
;
39
:
2063
2069
.

12

Lazaros
G
,
Imazio
M
,
Brucato
A
, et al.  
Anakinra: an emerging option for refractory idiopathic recurrent pericarditis: a systematic review of published evidence
.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)
 
2016
;
17
:
256
262
.

13

Buckley
LF
,
Abbate
A
.
Interleukin-1 blockade in cardiovascular diseases: from bench to bedside
.
BioDrugs
 
2018
;
32
:
111
118
.

14

Abbate
A
,
Dinarello
CA
.
Anti-inflammatory therapies in acute coronary syndromes: is IL-1 blockade a solution?
 
Eur Heart J
 
2015
;
36
:
337
339
.

15

Vassilopoulos
D
,
Lazaros
G
,
Tsioufis
C
, et al.  
Successful treatment of adult patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis with an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra)
.
Int J Cardiol
 
2012
;
160
:
66
68
.

16

Scardapane
A
,
Brucato
A
,
Chiarelli
F
, et al.  
Efficacy of an interleukin-1β receptor antagonist (anakinra) in idiopathic recurrent pericarditis
.
Pediatr Cardiol
 
2013
;
34
:
1989
1991
.

17

Camacho-Lovillo
M
,
Méndez-Santos
A
.
Successful treatment of idiopathic recurrent pericarditis with interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (Anakinra)
.
Pediatr Cardiol
 
2013
;
34
:
1293
1294
.

18

Picco
P
,
Brisca
G
,
Traverso
F
, et al.  
Successful treatment of idiopathic recurrent pericarditis in children with interleukin-1beta receptor antagonist (anakinra): an unrecognized autoinflammatory disease?
 
Arthritis Rheum
 
2009
;
60
:
264
268
.

19

Emmi
G
,
Barnini
T
,
Silvestri
E
, et al.  
A new case of idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis due to R104Q mutation in TNFRSF1A successfully treated with anakinra: expanding the questions
.
Clin Exp Rheumatol
 
2014
;
32
:
297
297
.

20

Cantarini
L
,
Lucherini
OM
,
Cimaz
R
, et al.  
Recurrent pericarditis caused by a rare mutation in the TNFRSF1A gene and with excellent response to anakinra treatment
.
Clin Exp Rheumatol
 
2010
;
28
:
802
802
.

21

Camprubí
D
,
Mitjavila
F
,
Arostegui
JI
, et al.  
Efficacy of anakinra in an adult patient with recurrent pericarditis and cardiac tamponade as initial manifestations of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome due to the R92Q TNFRSF1A variant
.
Int J Rheum Dis
 
2017
;
20
:
510
514
.

22

Insalaco
A
,
Prencipe
G
,
Buonuomo
PS
, et al.  
A novel mutation in the CIAS1/NLRP3 gene associated with an unexpected phenotype of cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes
.
Clin Exp Rheumatol
 
2014
;
32
:
123
125
.

23

Ozturk
K
,
Deveci
M
,
Ekinci
Z
.
Refractory idiopathic recurrent pericarditis: treatment with interleukin-1 receptor antagonist is an option!
.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)
 
2017
;
18
:
731
731
.

24

Scott
IC
,
Hajela
V
,
Hawkins
PN
, et al.  
A case series and systematic literature review of anakinra and immunosuppression in idiopathic recurrent pericarditis
.
J Cardiol Cases
 
2011
;
4
:
e93
e97
.

25

Finetti
M
,
Insalaco
A
,
Cantarini
L
, et al.  
Long-term efficacy of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra) in corticosteroid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis
.
J Pediatr
 
2014
;
164
:
1425
1431
.e1.

26

Lazaros
G
,
Vasileiou
P
,
Koutsianas
C
, et al.  
Anakinra for the management of resistant idiopathic recurrent pericarditis. Initial experience in 10 adult cases
.
Ann Rheum Dis
 
2014
;
73
:
2215
2217
.

27

Jain
S
,
Thongprayoon
C
,
Espinosa
RE
, et al.  
Effectiveness and safety of anakinra for management of refractory pericarditis
.
Am J Cardiol
 
2015
;
116
:
1277
1279
.

28

Imazio
M
,
Brucato
A
,
Pluymaekers
N
, et al.  
Recurrent pericarditis in children and adolescents: a multicentre cohort study
.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)
 
2016
;
17
:
707
712
.

29

Brucato
A
,
Imazio
M
,
Gattorno
M
, et al.  
Effect of anakinra on recurrent pericarditis among patients with colchicine resistance and corticosteroid dependence: the AIRTRIP Randomized Clinical Trial
.
JAMA
 
2016
;
316
:
1906
1912
.

30

von Elm
E
,
Altman
DG
,
Egger
M
, et al.  
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
.
Lancet
 
2007
;
370
:
1453
1457
.

31

Kaiser
C
,
Knight
A
,
Nordström
D
, et al.  
Injection-site reactions upon Kineret (anakinra) administration: experiences and explanations
.
Rheumatol Int
 
2012
;
32
:
295
299
.

32

Salliot
C
,
Dougados
M
,
Gossec
L
.
Risk of serious infections during rituximab, abatacept and anakinra treatments for rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled trials
.
Ann Rheum Dis
 
2009
;
68
:
25
32
.

Author notes

The first two authors contributed equally to this paper

The final four authors contributed equally to this paper as last senior co-authors

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Supplementary data

Comments

0 Comments
Submit a comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.