Abstract

Background

Heart failure (HF) hospitalizations are associated with poor patient outcomes and generate a large burden on healthcare systems. Mitigation is a priority. Among HF patients with CIEDs, existing HF algorithm-based management solutions are manufacturer and device-specific, which imposes limitations. The SignalHF universal algorithm was developed to democratize access to HF management solutions by enabling prediction of HF decompensation based on CIED sensors data agnostic to manufacturer.

Objective

FORESEE-HF study aims to validate the SignalHF machine learning score and alerting system by matching alerts generated by SignalHF from CIED-related stored data in a universal platform (Implicity™) with HF events available in the French national health database containing medico-administrative data on patients’ characteristics, hospitalizations and deaths across 10 years.

Methods

The study cohort consisted of 19,013 patients (pacemaker (PM) 7,711, ICD 6,022, CRT-D 4,367 and CRT-P 913; age 70.0 ± 13.3, male 70.7%). Co-primary endpoints were sensitivity of HF hospitalizations detection with HF as primary diagnosis, the unexplained alert rate per patient-year defined as alert states not followed within 30 days by a hospitalization with HF as primary or secondary diagnosis (UAR PPY), and the lower quartile on alerting time defined as the lower bound on the time-to-event of 75% of true alert states (see Table 1).

Results

SignalHF for ICD/CRT-Ds demonstrated a sensitivity of 60%, a UAR PPY of 0.66 and a lower quartile on alerting time of 35 days. For PM/CRT-Ps, SignalHF demonstrated a sensitivity of 46%, a UAR PPY of 0.47 and a lower quartile on alerting time of 37 days.

Conclusion
FORESEE-HF demonstrates that SignalHF is an improvement over existing HF monitors for ICD/CRT-Ds, while also providing the same capability for PM/CRT-Ps. Being an algorithm that can be easily activated through a universal CIED remote monitoring platform, SignalHF widens the pool of patients that can benefit from HF monitoring solutions.
Study coprimary endpoints
Table 1:

Study coprimary endpoints

Study results per device type
Table 2:

Study results per device type

This content is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

Funding Acknowledgements: Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Implicity

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].