P01-11 Economic impact of health-enhancing-physical activity from different settings in France

Abstract Background There is strong evidence of the multiple benefits of physical activity on health in primary, secondary and tertiary prevention (WHO, 2020). However, economic evaluations are still needed to estimate direct and indirect costs that could be saved from various Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA) promotion strategies (Ding et al., 2020). Moreover, these savings might be influenced by specificities of the national health system. The aim of this study is to explore the economic impact of HEPA from different settings in France. Methods A systematic scoping review of grey and scientific literature was conducted. Relevant articles were identified through searching from PubMed, ScienceDirect, SportDiscus databases and from google. Searches were conducted in English and French between January 2000 and December 2020. A data extraction template was used to collect, organize and summarize data regarding the following variables: aim of the study, study population, study settings, methods, and main results. Results A total of 17 studies were included from the grey literature (n = 10) and the scientific peer-reviewed literature (n = 7). Data from each variables of interest were heterogeneous, making comparisons difficult. Studies were categorized in 5 types: studies aiming to estimate the cost of physical inactivity or the cost that could be saved from HEPA promotion in general population (n = 8); studies aiming to evaluate the medico-economic impact of a physical activity adapted program (n = 5); studies aiming to assess the economic benefit of active travel in a city (n = 3); study aiming to estimate the economic impact of physical activity from a company and its employee's perspectives (n = 1). Whatever the methods, the study population or the study setting, several tens of millions of euros to several billions of euros could be saved each year by investing in HEPA promotion. Conclusions HEPA promotion can lead to substantial saving. Methods should be standardized to more precisely estimate its extent in different settings in France. This could help policy-makers in their decision to invest in HEPA promotion, especially in phases of epidemics, where sedentarity and physical inactivity account for major health risks.

prevention (WHO, 2020). However, economic evaluations are still needed to estimate direct and indirect costs that could be saved from various Health-Enhancing Physical Activity (HEPA) promotion strategies (Ding et al., 2020). Moreover, these savings might be influenced by specificities of the national health system. The aim of this study is to explore the economic impact of HEPA from different settings in France. Methods A systematic scoping review of grey and scientific literature was conducted. Relevant articles were identified through searching from PubMed, ScienceDirect, SportDiscus databases and from google. Searches were conducted in English and French between January 2000 and December 2020. A data extraction template was used to collect, organize and summarize data regarding the following variables: aim of the study, study population, study settings, methods, and main results.

Results
A total of 17 studies were included from the grey literature (n = 10) and the scientific peer-reviewed literature (n = 7). Data from each variables of interest were heterogeneous, making comparisons difficult. Studies were categorized in 5 types: studies aiming to estimate the cost of physical inactivity or the cost that could be saved from HEPA promotion in general population (n = 8); studies aiming to evaluate the medico-economic impact of a physical activity adapted program (n = 5); studies aiming to assess the economic benefit of active travel in a city (n = 3); study aiming to estimate the economic impact of physical activity from a company and its employee's perspectives (n = 1). Whatever the methods, the study population or the study setting, several tens of millions of euros to several billions of euros could be saved each year by investing in HEPA promotion. Conclusions HEPA promotion can lead to substantial saving. Methods should be standardized to more precisely estimate its extent in different settings in France. This could help policy-makers in their decision to invest in HEPA promotion, especially in phases of epidemics, where sedentarity and physical inactivity account for major health risks. Keywords: economic evaluation, physical activity, health promotion, chronic diseases, scoping review Abstract citation ID: ckac095.012 P01-12 The Netherlands united by sport: implementtion and monitoring of the national sports agreement in 2019 Wanda Wendel-Vos 1 , Lilian van den Berg 2 , Hugo van der Poel 3 1 Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands 2 Knowledge Centre for Sport & Physical Activity Netherlands, Ede, The Netherlands 3 Mulier Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands Corresponding author: wanda.vos@rivm.nl

Issue/problem
The favorable international position of the Netherlands in terms of sport an physical activity is no reason for those involved in policy to lean back. The motor skills of our children are decreasing, some population groups never engage in sports, respectful behavior in sports needs our attention and the traditional sports clubs are under pressure due to declining numbers of members and volunteers. To tackle these issues, for the first time in history, the Netherlands have a National Sports Agreement (NSA) involving a numerous set of stakeholders besides the national government. Description of the problem Through the NSA, we want to make sport enjoyable for everyone. Now and in the future, without any restrictions and in a safe and healthy environment. The sports infrastructure will be strengthened at every level: locally, regionally and nationally. Policy makers want to involve communities of practice and knowledge from monitoring and science in order to be able to adjust policy on the short term and create a 'selflearning' policy process.

Results
Local and regional stakeholders were invited to strengthen and start collaboration and compose local and regional sports agreements in line with the NSA which has six main ambitions: inclusive sport, sustainable sports facilities, vital providers, positive sports culture, enjoying exercise from an early age and elite sport inspires. As registered on 08-11-2019, 339 out of the 355 municipalities in the Netherlands have started work on a local sports agreement. Thirty nine local agreements were already in place covering 45 municipalities. From the national level, vouchers are made available for local stakeholders to facilitate implementation of particular interventions within a certain ambition on the local level. A consortium of national knowledge institutes provided local policy makers with training sessions facilitating them to incorporate local data, facts and figures in the local sports agreements. Twice a year,

Background
Global research shows a strong link between physical activity and risk of developing non-communicable diseases. To increase physical activity levels, governments must design and implement a comprehensive set of policy actions across a range of areas. To aid governments in this process, the MOVING benchmarking tool was developed to assess the design and strength of countries' policies in promoting physical activity, as well as gaps in policy action.

Methods
The MOVING benchmarking tool was developed using a consultative process that reviewed evidence on physical activity policy design, existing benchmarking tools and built on the policy areas of the MOVING framework. The tool values the strength of policy design based on policy attributes that are evidence-based and aspirational -regardless of whether any countries have implemented them. The tool was applied to a set of physical activity policies from five countries participating in? CO-CREATE?, a European Commission-funded project: Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal and UK. Physical activity policies that are currently implemented in these countries were identified based on a comprehensive country scan, with a set methodology. A set of policies from each country corresponding to benchmarks on access to quality public open space and green spaces and community and mass participation initiatives were analysed. The policies were assessed by applying the benchmark corresponding to the relevant policy area Results The benchmarking tools easily identified the strengths and weaknesses in the design of each policy. Thus, the benchmarking tool identified where there was scope for improvement in specific policy area for each country, such as walking and cycling infrastructure and active transport. It also allowed comparisons between countries for specific policy areas. Further, by allowing a fast assessment of many physical activity policies, the benchmarking tool enabled an analysis of the interplay of single policies and draw