Which effects had the pandemic in migrants’ health and well-being? A mixed-methods approach

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic affected populations’ health, with a disproportionate impact on those most socially vulnerable such as migrants. The way these populations experienced the pandemic lockdowns and its effects on daily life are yet to be known. This study aimed to understand the effects of the pandemic on health and well-being of migrants in Portugal. Methods In a mixed-methods approach, a survey was conducted with a community-based sample of 1126 migrants in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, assessing sociodemographics, migration-related characteristics and the perceived impact of the pandemic on health. In addition, n = 12 migrants purposively recruited were invited to participate in a photovoice study, sharing photographs about their daily life during the lockdowns. Following semi-structured interviews were conducted. Quantitative data were analysed using multivariable analysis and qualitative data were analysed through content analysis. Results A fifth of the participants perceived having worse health condition since the pandemic, which was more likely among women (OR = 1.58, CI95% 1.13-2.20), those >45 years old (OR = 1.78, CI95% 1.02-3.16), with lower education (Basic education: OR = 1.57, CI95% 1.01-2.47) and with lower monthly income (<EUR 650: OR = 1.69, CI95% 1.18-2.44). Two themes emerged from the photovoice: effects of the pandemic lockdowns on daily life (routines, social relations, work) and on health and well-being (eating habits, physical exercise, leisure). Strategies to cope with the adverse effects included social activation and changes in lifestyles. Conclusions The pandemic had disproportionate effects on some migrant groups, intensifying social and health inequalities, with consequences for their well-being. Participatory methods can contribute to further understand migrants’ experiences while involving and empowering them for health promotion. Key messages • The pandemic had adverse effects on migrants’ health and well-being, disproportionately affecting most socially vulnerable migrant groups. • Participatory research methods as photovoice are valuable to gain access to individual experiences and perspectives, while involving and empowering participants.


Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic affected populations' health, with a disproportionate impact on those most socially vulnerable such as migrants. The way these populations experienced the pandemic lockdowns and its effects on daily life are yet to be known. This study aimed to understand the effects of the pandemic on health and well-being of migrants in Portugal.

Methods:
In a mixed-methods approach, a survey was conducted with a community-based sample of 1126 migrants in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, assessing sociodemographics, migrationrelated characteristics and the perceived impact of the pandemic on health. In addition, n = 12 migrants purposively recruited were invited to participate in a photovoice study, sharing photographs about their daily life during the lockdowns. Following semi-structured interviews were conducted. Quantitative data were analysed using multivariable analysis and qualitative data were analysed through content analysis.

Results:
A fifth of the participants perceived having worse health condition since the pandemic, which was more likely among women (OR = 1.58, CI95% 1.13-2.20), those >45 years old (OR = 1.78, CI95% 1.02-3.16), with lower education (Basic education: OR = 1.57, CI95% 1.01-2.47) and with lower monthly income (<EUR 650: OR = 1.69, CI95% 1.18-2.44). Two themes emerged from the photovoice: effects of the pandemic lockdowns on daily life (routines, social relations, work) and on health and well-being (eating habits, physical exercise, leisure). Strategies to cope with the adverse effects included social activation and changes in lifestyles.

Conclusions:
The pandemic had disproportionate effects on some migrant groups, intensifying social and health inequalities, with consequences for their well-being. Participatory methods can contribute to further understand migrants' experiences while involving and empowering them for health promotion. Key messages: The pandemic had adverse effects on migrants' health and well-being, disproportionately affecting most socially vulnerable migrant groups. Participatory research methods as photovoice are valuable to gain access to individual experiences and perspectives, while involving and empowering participants.

Background:
The importance of resilience factors in the positive adaptation of refugee youth is widely recognised. However, their actual mechanism of impact remains under-researched. The aim of this study was therefore to explore protective and promotive resilience mechanisms on both negative and positive mental health outcomes. Promotive resilience is seen as a direct main effect and protective resilience as a moderating effect.

Methods:
Cross-sectional study with 160 Syrian youth aged 13-24 years, who recently resettled in Norway. A multi-dimensional measure for resilience was used to explore the potential impact of resilience factors on pathways between potentially traumatic events from war and flight (PTE), post-migration stress, mental distress and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Analyses included regression, moderation and moderated mediation using the PROCESS macro for SPSS.

Results:
A direct main effect of resilience factors (promotive resilience mechanism) was found for HRQoL and general mental distress, but not for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
No moderating effects of resilience factors (protective resilience mechanism) were found. Post-migration stressors mediated the effects of PTE, and this indirect effect was present at all levels of resilience. Relational and environmental level resilience factors and combined amounts had more impact than individual level factors.

Conclusions:
Despite high risk exposure and mental distress, resilience was also high. The direct main effect of resilience factors and less impact on PTSD, suggests universal resilience building interventions may be beneficial, compared to exclusively targeting groups with high symptom levels. These interventions should target relational and environmental resilience factors as well as individual coping techniques. Additionally, reducing current stress and symptoms could increase the efficacy of resilience factors already present.

Background:
Ethnic health disparities exist in the context of pregnancy and childbirth, suggesting that women of Turkish origin (i.e., they or their parents born in Turkey) in Germany have higher risks for some adverse maternal health and child developmental outcomes. Stress is believed to be a relevant pathway by which migration may be associated with these risks. In this study, we tested associations of Turkish origin with stress biology and psychological stress experiences during pregnancy. Methods: 140 pregnant women (33 of Turkish/26 of other origin) participated in a prospective cohort study that was carried out in Bielefeld and Berlin (Spallek et al., 2020). Inflammatory markers CRP and IL-6 from venous blood samples and diurnal cortisol profiles from salivary cortisol samples were derived and participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale