Sexual orientation and mental health disparities in US pre-teens: A longitudinal mediation study

Abstract Background Sexual minority children are at increased risk for psychopathology compared to their heterosexual peers, but longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether sexual minority identification precedes (rather than co-occurs with) mental health disparities and what may drive these disparities during childhood. The current study examined the longitudinal associations between sexual orientation and mental health over two years in a cohort of U.S. pre-teens with two potential mediators (increased social problems and decreased perceived school safety). Methods We used data from Waves 1-3 (2016-2020) of the U.S. Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. Multiple linear regression and auto-regressive cross-lagged mediation models were used to examine longitudinal associations and mediation. Analyses accounted for customized sampling weights to correct for attrition and missing data. Results The analytic sample included 5,574 children (46.0% assigned female at birth, 55.1% non-Hispanic White). Across waves, beginning to identify as gay/bisexual (0.6-2.7% of sample) was associated with increased internalizing and externalizing problems, and consistently identifying as gay/bisexual (3.4-5.0% of sample) with increased internalizing problems, compared to consistently identifying as heterosexual. For those who consistently identified as gay/bisexual, the widening disparities in internalizing problems were partially explained by increased social problems and decreased perceived school safety. Conclusions The health disparities affecting sexual minority children include internalizing and externalizing problems, and are partially explained by increased social problems and decreased perceived school safety. These findings demonstrate that sexual minority identification precedes increases in mental health problems relative to heterosexual children, driven by peer difficulties and feelings of unsafety at school experienced by sexual minority children.

Research from across the globe has consistently shown that young sexual and gender minority individuals (e.g., those identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and/or transgender [LGBT+]) are at a higher risk for depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts and behaviors when compared to heterosexual youth, including during early childhood and later adolescence. A sizeable body of research has attributed the elevated risk to increased exposure to specific social stressors related to navigating a stigmatized minority identity, including stressors such as victimization and other interpersonal and social difficulties in, for example, the school environment. Yet, relatively less is known about the early developmental timing of such disparities in childhood and how LGBT+ youth navigate school climates. As a sensitive developmental period, childhood and adolescence may be a particularly challenging time for sexual and gender minority youth to navigate cisnormative and heteronormative school contexts. Exposure to oppressive norms, particularly in school environments, has only recently become the subject of research. Additionally, research has been limited on how supportive school climates may be protective but stigmatizing school environments may drive LGBT+ trajectories towards suicidal behaviors and shape how they may navigate self-disclosure of cooccurring identities and mental health status in school settings, particularly when such stigmas may prevalently intersect. This workshop aims to further explore these novel aspects around developmental and school-based risk and protective factors shaping the mental health of sexual and gender minority children and adolescents. This workshop includes five empirical presentations that span from examining the developmental timing of mental health disparities, the role school-based experiences play in shaping and driving these disparities, to how sexual and gender minority youth may navigate their school context and how supportive climates may be protective for mental health. First, Arjan van der Star will present longitudinal evidence on how sexual identity formation precedes the onset of sexual orientation-based mental health disparities and the role that peer difficulties play in driving these as early as pre-teen years. Next, Niolyne Jasmin Bomolo will present findings from a qualitative study that unravel how school-based experiences shape individual trajectories toward suicidal attempts among LGBT+ adolescents. Third, Wouter Kiekens will explore how normative cultures in school environments may drive sexual attraction-based mental health disparities among a large sample of adolescents. Fourth, Lourdes Cantarero Arévalo will present findings on how LGBT+ adolescents living with mental conditions navigate self-disclosure in school environments. Finally, Sandra Sevic will present results on how supportive school environments may be protective for gender minority mental health.

Key messages:
Negative school-based experiences put sexual and gender minority youth at elevated risk for adverse mental health as early as middle childhood.
Intersecting stigmas around minority identities and mental health problems may further complicate how sexual and gender minority children and adolescents navigate their school environments.

Background:
Sexual minority children are at increased risk for psychopathology compared to their heterosexual peers, but longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether sexual minority identification precedes (rather than co-occurs with) mental health disparities and what may drive these disparities during childhood. The current study examined the longitudinal associations between sexual orientation and mental health over two years in a cohort of U.S. pre-teens with two potential mediators (increased social problems and decreased perceived school safety).

Methods:
We used data from Waves 1-3 (2016-2020) of the U.S. Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. Multiple linear regression and auto-regressive cross-lagged mediation models were used to examine longitudinal associations and mediation. Analyses accounted for customized sampling weights to correct for attrition and missing data.

Results:
The analytic sample included 5,574 children (46.0% assigned female at birth, 55.1% non-Hispanic White). Across waves, beginning to identify as gay/bisexual (0.6-2.7% of sample) was associated with increased internalizing and externalizing problems, and consistently identifying as gay/bisexual (3.4-5.0% of sample) with increased internalizing problems, compared to consistently identifying as heterosexual. For those who consistently identified as gay/bisexual, the widening disparities in internalizing problems were partially explained by increased social problems and decreased perceived school safety.

Conclusions:
The health disparities affecting sexual minority children include internalizing and externalizing problems, and are partially explained by increased social problems and decreased perceived school safety. These findings demonstrate that sexual minority identification precedes increases in mental health problems relative to heterosexual children, driven by peer difficulties and feelings of unsafety at school experienced by sexual minority children.

Background:
Studies show that the LGBTQ+ population is particularly vulnerable to suicidal thoughts and behavior. This vulnerability is even more pronounced in the younger population. However, in Switzerland, qualitative studies on this topic are missing. Our study investigates the processual dynamics and background of suicide attempts of LGBTQ+ youths while looking into their subjective meaning. Here, behaviors of helpseeking are also from interest. In addition, the burdens and resources associated with being LGBTQ+ are explored. By better understanding the process of suicide attempts, we can identify relevant contexts of the respondents' experiences and illustrate how to enhance suicide prevention strategies. We are referring here to the school context.

Methods:
From 2021 until 2024, we interview LGBTQ+ youths in the German-and French-speaking parts of Switzerland who have tried to end their lives between the ages of 14 to 25 (max. three attempts). Applying a multi-perspective approach, we interview persons from their social environment if agreed. Recruitment is based on 'theoretical sampling'. Data collection and analysis follow the grounded theory methodology. As of July 2022, the sample consists of 18 persons: 3 bisexual women, 1 lesbian woman, 2 gay men, 7 transgender persons, and 5 persons with fluid identities.

Results:
Through preliminary analysis, the school context could be identified as one relevant burdening context in the respondents' experience and suicide attempt process. In this respect, respondents experienced complicated social relationships: e.g., bullying, social exclusion, and pressure to conform. Moreover, the school environment was experienced by some as LGBTQ+ hostile.

Conclusions:
Our current findings support the necessity to integrate schools as important stakeholders in suicide prevention but highlight a need for LGBTQ-specific and LGBTQ-sensitive orientations to suicide prevention strategies.
Abstract citation ID: ckac129.677 Sexual attraction-based disparities in adolescent mental health: The role of school norms

Purpose:
Few researchers have explained disparities in mental health between sexual minority and heterosexual adolescents by focusing on structural forms of stigma as, for instance, heterosexist school or classroom norms. Addressing this gap, our paper aimed to study disparities in life satisfaction, psychosomatic complaints, and emotional problems between sexual minority and heterosexual adolescents and examine the moderating role of heterosexist norms in the classroom and school.

Methods:
We used data from the 2013 and 2017 Dutch Health and Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study (N = 12,756; M age = 14.02; SD = 1.54). Separate multilevel analyses for life satisfaction, psychosomatic complaints, and emotional problems were conducted in which cross-level interaction effects between sexual attraction and school and classroom-level heterosexist norms were estimated.

Results:
Same-sex attracted, both-sex attracted, and adolescents unsure about their sexual attraction reported lower life satisfaction, more psychosomatic complaints (not for unsure adolescents), and more emotional problems than their other-sex attracted peers. Stronger school-level heterosexist norms were associated with higher life satisfaction and fewer psychosomatic complaints and fewer emotional problems. Stronger classroomlevel heterosexist norms were associated with less emotional problems. Few moderating effects of classroom and schoollevel heterosexist norms were found. Contrary to expectations, disparities in life satisfaction between same-sex attracted and other-sex attracted adolescents decreased when classroom-level heterosexist norms were stronger.

Conclusions:
Although our findings suggest pressing health disparities between heterosexual and sexual minority adolescents, heterosexist norms at the school-and classroom-level hardly contributed to these health disparities.

Background:
LGBTQ+ adolescents living with mental conditions are affected by stigma based on their health status, sexual orientation, and/or gender identity/expression (SOGIE), especially when navigating their learning environments. Our aim is to gain detailed insights into how LGBTQ+ adolescents living with mental conditions vision their learning environments so that they can feel safe and supported enough to freely disclose their SOGIE and health status, and hence thrive.