(Un)safety of LGBT+ asylum seekers in asylum accommodations in Germany

Abstract   LGBT+ asylum seekers face multiple challenges in their countries of origin as well as in their host countries. Violence and structural discrimination against this community are common and affect their whole asylum process. Violence and structural discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity stress the needs of LGBT+ asylum seekers in particular in regards to reception accommodations. In this study we investigated factors that contribute to the (un)safety of reception accommodations for LGBT+ asylum seekers in Germany. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 participants from two groups, namely, professionals, and former and current LGBT+ asylum seekers. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data and revealed multiple factors influencing the safety of LGBT+ asylum seekers in accommodations. These were clustered according to the used frameworks in the categories individual level, physical and social environment, and policies. The factors for (un) safety included amongst others interpersonal violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity, gender-neutral sanitary areas or lockable rooms, community support, and policies that govern where asylum seekers are accommodated, and which protection measures are set up in accommodations. Applying an intersectional lens, transgender asylum seekers were described as more vulnerable than other LGBT+ individuals. The analysis concluded that binding policies are necessary to guarantee safer accommodations for LGBT+ asylum seekers in Germany. Besides, the social cisheteronormative structures that manifest in discrimination of LGBT+ asylum seekers must be structurally deconstructed by, among others, training staff on LGBT+ needs and increase inclusivity among the asylum seeker community and in the host country. Key messages In Germany, the European country with the highest number of refugees, LGBT+ asylum seekers face many challenges related to their sexual orientation and gender identity. Several factors interplay in the (un)safety of accommodations for LGBT+ asylum seekers.

LGBT+ asylum seekers face multiple challenges in their countries of origin as well as in their host countries. Violence and structural discrimination against this community are common and affect their whole asylum process. Violence and structural discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity stress the needs of LGBT+ asylum seekers in particular in regards to reception accommodations. In this study we investigated factors that contribute to the (un)safety of reception accommodations for LGBT+ asylum seekers in Germany. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 participants from two groups, namely, professionals, and former and current LGBT+ asylum seekers. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data and revealed multiple factors influencing the safety of LGBT+ asylum seekers in accommodations. These were clustered according to the used frameworks in the categories individual level, physical and social environment, and policies. The factors for (un) safety included amongst others interpersonal violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity, gender-neutral sanitary areas or lockable rooms, community support, and policies that govern where asylum seekers are accommodated, and which protection measures are set up in accommodations. Applying an intersectional lens, transgender asylum seekers were described as more vulnerable than other LGBT+ individuals. The analysis concluded that binding policies are necessary to guarantee safer accommodations for LGBT+ asylum seekers in Germany. Besides, the social cisheteronormative structures that manifest in discrimination of LGBT+ asylum seekers must be structurally deconstructed by, among others, training staff on LGBT+ needs and increase inclusivity among the asylum seeker community and in the host country.

Key messages:
In Germany, the European country with the highest number of refugees, LGBT+ asylum seekers face many challenges related to their sexual orientation and gender identity. Several factors interplay in the (un)safety of accommodations for LGBT+ asylum seekers.

Background:
Wales is working toward being a Nation of Sanctuary for asylum-seekers and refugees and has resettled between 6,000 and 10,000 refugees since 2001. Uprooted social support networks during the period of asylum-seeking process predispose this population to poverty. The aim of this research was to explore the role of social support among asylum-seekers and refugees in alleviating poverty and its adverse impact on their health and wellbeing. Understanding the importance of social support in promoting the health and wellbeing of asylum-seekers and refugees is a critical factor for informing public health interventions and policies to improve outcomes for tackling poverty among this population in Wales.

Methods:
A qualitative research method, based on social support framework, was adopted. Semi-structured interviews were utilised to collect data from a purposive sample of 8 participants. All the participants were recruited through a refugee support organisation in Cardiff, Wales and were interviewed in the community hub of this organisation. The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).

Results:
Results show two formal (government, charities) and three informal (family, friends, and peers) sources of social support as the potential pathways that alleviate the impact of poverty on the health and wellbeing of asylum-seekers and refugees. These sources provide access to language courses, education, employment, housing, food, and sense of belonging in the new communities of resettlement.

Conclusions:
Enhancing access to formal and informal sources of social support is of vital importance to tackling the pernicious impact of poverty on the health and wellbeing of asylumseekers and refugees. Providing social support for this population should be given uttermost consideration for public health interventions and policy decisions in an effort to protect and promote their health and wellbeing.

Key messages:
Public health interventions and policies should consider access to social support resources by asylum-seekers and refugees. Access to, and quality of, social support resources will alleviate the impact of poverty and improve the health and wellbeing of asylum-seekers and refugees in the host country.

Methods:
The observation period was from January 2021 to January 2022. COVID-19 tests used were molecular and antigenic. Positive cases detected both at the arrival and during the quarantine period, have been registered on an ad hoc INMP online platform. Migrants' SARS-CoV-2 incidence rate (per 1,000) -with 95% CI -was therefore calculated. The Incidence Ratio (IR) was used to compare the migrants' incidence rate with that of the resident population in Italy, in the same period and corresponding age group.