Integrated system for the proactive analisys of risk infection in patient’s surgical route

Abstract Background The most common hospital safety incidents are Hospital-Acquired-Infections (HAI) and among these Surgical Site Infections (SSIs). Our study proposes the use of a proactive system to manage risk combining the new Risk Identification Framework by WHO (IPCAF), the Lean method and the hospital’s Procedure Analysis. Each of the methods has pros and cons, and there is no existing literature that researches the concurrent use of all three methods. We focused on analysing patients’ surgical route to demonstrate that using an integrated system for preventing SSIs delivers enhanced results and significantly contibutes to a reduction in occurence of SSIs. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study from 18 March 2019 to 20 April 2019 at Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II di Napoli, Italia (Europa). The study is structured in 3 phases: Phase 1- application of proactive risk management tools (18 March- 15 April 2019); Phase 2-integration of results with the elaboration of a single system for proactive risk management (15-20 April 2019); Phase 3- collection of epidemiologic data concerning SSI. We used the incidence of surgical site as efficiency indicator (1-10 March 2022). The endpoints identified were: Primary Endpoint: a reduction of infection occurrence in surgical sites Secondary Endpoint: identification of critical points and control points within the surgical process with relevant corrective measures Results The rate of incidence of SSIs was selected as the efficacy indicator for the system. Our study recorded a 2.40% incidence rate for SSIs in 2020, compared to an incidence rate of 3.80% in 2018 and of 3.5% in 2017. Conclusions Considering the economic impact of the infections, along with the increased incidence of mortality and morbidity, employing all available tools to try and reduce SSIs incidence becomes paramount. A small reduction can produce significant cost savings that can be invested in other prevention programs. Key messages • Integrated system in proactively and promptly identifying risks related to patients’ surgical routes is effectiveness. • The system can be adapted to different healthcare settings, to prevent adverse incidents by employing a risk management strategy, and to further enhance existing strategies.


Background:
People in prison report high rates of drug use and drug-related problems and people who use or inject drugs (PWUD) have higher rates of offending and an increased likelihood of spending part of their lives in prison. They represent a vulnerable population with high burden of diseases, socioeconomic disadvantages and limited access to healthcare. In this study, we aimed to describe the lifetime prevalence (LTP) of heroin use, injected drug use and opioid agonist therapy (OAT) among people living in prison. Methods: Individual data collection was carried out in seven European countries (Czech Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain) between 2014 and 2018 with a model European Questionnaire on Drug use among people in Prison. Risk factors analysis was carried out using multivariate logistic regression model.

Results:
The analysis of EQDP data found that the LTP of heroin use was overall 22.4% (ranged from 7.3% in Poland to 27.5% in Spain). Female, recidivist offenders, individuals aged below 44 and with an history of mental health condition had a higher likelihood of being heroin user (p-value<0.05). The LTP of injected drug use was overall 20.6%(2176/10,587), while the prevalence of injected drug use in prison was 8.1%(745/9273) (with higher prevalence in countries that did not allow OAT initiation in prison: 17.5% in Latvia,22.1% in Lithuania and 26.7% in Czech Republic

Background:
The most common hospital safety incidents are Hospital-Acquired-Infections (HAI) and among these Surgical Site Infections (SSIs). Our study proposes the use of a proactive system to manage risk combining the new Risk Identification Framework by WHO (IPCAF), the Lean method and the hospital's Procedure Analysis. Each of the methods has pros and cons, and there is no existing literature that researches the concurrent use of all three methods. We focused on analysing patients' surgical route to demonstrate that using an integrated system for preventing SSIs delivers enhanced results and significantly contibutes to a reduction in occurence of SSIs.

Methods:
We conducted a retrospective observational study from 18 March 2019 to 20 April 2019 at Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II di Napoli, Italia (Europa). The study is structured in 3 phases: Phase 1-application of proactive risk management tools (18 March-15 April 2019); Phase 2-integration of results with the elaboration of a single system for proactive risk management (15-20 April 2019); Phase 3-collection of epidemiologic data concerning SSI. We used the incidence of surgical site as efficiency indicator (1-10 March 2022).
15th European Public Health Conference 2022 iii579 The endpoints identified were: Primary Endpoint: a reduction of infection occurrence in surgical sites Secondary Endpoint: identification of critical points and control points within the surgical process with relevant corrective measures Results: The rate of incidence of SSIs was selected as the efficacy indicator for the system. Our study recorded a 2.40% incidence rate for SSIs in 2020, compared to an incidence rate of 3.80% in 2018 and of 3.5% in 2017.

Conclusions:
Considering the economic impact of the infections, along with the increased incidence of mortality and morbidity, employing all available tools to try and reduce SSIs incidence becomes paramount. A small reduction can produce significant cost savings that can be invested in other prevention programs.
Key messages: Integrated system in proactively and promptly identifying risks related to patients' surgical routes is effectiveness.
The system can be adapted to different healthcare settings, to prevent adverse incidents by employing a risk management strategy, and to further enhance existing strategies.

Introduction:
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a significant public health issue globally, and the mortality and morbidity burden is particularly high in low-and middle-income counties (LMICs). The WHO predicts a disproportionately large increase of TBI burden in LMICs. The aim of this study was to identify trends in hospitalization associated with TBI in Georgia from 2015-2020.

Methods:
The study was designed in the framework of the project INITIatE: International Collaboration to Increase TBI Surveillance in Europe, funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH/NINDS R21NS098850). The surveillance database of National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia was used for the study.

Results:
During the study period a total 51 147 patients were admitted in hospitals throughout the country. In 2015-2019 the hospitalization increased and highest number of cases was in 2019 (n = 11779; 23,0%), in 2020 hospitalization decreased in comparison with the previous year (n = 9228; 18,0%). The highest number of burn injuries (n = 22963; 45,0%) occurred in the capital of Georgia (Tbilisi). Among hospitalized patients about 61,0% were males (n = 31162) and 39,0% females (n = 19985), retrospectively with ratio 1,6:1. The modal age of hospitalized patients was 25-44 and the highest hospitalization was in the age group of 15-24. 92,5% of cases were unintentional. The leading cause of Traumatic Brain Injury in all years were falls with some variations (57%-71%), followed by road traffic injuries (12%-25%). The average of LOS was 3 days, the highest LOS was 702 days. 1,6% (n = 805) of patients died. The most common mechanism of fatal injuries were falls.

Conclusions:
The study provide important information about trends in hospitalization, size of the TBI problem, which is crucial for elaborating relevant policy and establishing priorities in order to reduce the burden of Traumatic Brain Injury in Georgia, as well to identify directions for further TBI related research.

Introduction:
Falls are one of the major public health problems and a leading cause of injury-related morbidity and mortality globally. Around of 80% of fall deaths occur in low-and middleincome countries. Falls are the most common cause of hospitalization among the population aged 65 years and older. According the data from Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study in Georgia, DALYs from falls exceed the average in LMICs. The aim of this observational study was to explore epidemiological characteristics of fall-related injury among hospitalized elderly patients in Georgia in 2020.

Methods:
This study was designed in the framework of the project iCREATE: Increasing Capacity for Research in Eastern Europe' funded by the NIH (2D43TW007261). All patients aged 65 and older admitted to hospital settings due fall-related injury in 2020 were identified from the Hospital Registry (included a total of 152 hospitals in the country) of the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health of Georgia.

Results:
A total of 7159 injured patients age 65 and above were admitted to hospitals in Georgia, and among them 4213 were hospitalized due to the falls (60%). Males comprised 30,7% of cases and females -69,3%. The most common source of hospital arrival was ambulance 2791 (65,0%), followed by private/public transport 1432 (33,3%). The highest number of injuries (43,5%) occurred in Tbilisi (capital of Georgia). The leading cause in fall-related hospitalization was fall on same level. Pelvis and the head were the most common body regions injured accounting for 48,0% and 22,9% of cases, respectively. The highest LOS was 2014 (SD 6,161). 111 patients died due to falls related injury during the study period.

Conclusions:
This study indicates that fall-related injury prevention among elderly population should become a key priority area in Georgia. There is a need for elaborating relevant preventive interventions of falls injuries in population aged 65 years and older.
Key messages: Falls are the leading cause of hospitalization of patients 65 years of age and older. Fall risk awareness campaigns should be the first step to fall prevention among elderly.