Abstract

Fungi were isolated from the roots of 17 plant species from the families Apiaceae, Cunoniaceae, Cyperaceae, Droseraceae, Fabaceae-Mimosoideae, Lomandraceae, Myrtaceae, Pittosporaceae, Proteaceae and Stylidiaceae at a sclerophyll forest site in New South Wales, Australia. Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and sequence comparisons indicated that the isolated fungi had affinities to a range of ascomycetes, basidiomycetes and zygomycetes. Four RFLP types had closest affinities to previously identified Helotiales ericoid mycorrhizal (ERM) or Oidiodendron spp. Isolates representing six RFLP types, which were variously isolated from all 17 plant species, formed ERM coils in hair root epidermal cells of Woollsia pungens (Ericaceae) under gnotobiotic conditions. Three of these isolates formed intercellular hyphae, intracellular hyphae and/or microsclerotia, which are typical of dark septate endophyte infection, in roots of Stylidium productum (Stylidiaceae), indicating an ability to form different types of association with roots of different hosts. Overall the data indicate that a broad range of plant taxa may act as repositories for ERM fungi in sclerophyll forest soil.

Introduction

Numerous Ericaceae taxa form ericoid mycorrhizal (ERM) associations and this is viewed as important to their survival in a diverse array of habitats (Cairney & Meharg, 2003). The associations enhance the fitness of Ericaceae plant hosts in several ways that include enzymatic mobilization of nutrients from organic complexes (Leake & Read, 1997; Cairney & Burke, 1998) and adaptations to high concentrations of toxic metals and metalloids in the edaphic environment (Meharg & Cairney, 2000; Sharples et al., 2000).

Colonization of Ericaceae hair roots by ERM fungi may vary seasonally (e.g. Hutton et al., 1994; Kemp et al., 2003), but up to 90% of hair root length can display ERM colonization under some field conditions (Davies et al., 2003). Root systems of individual Ericaceae plants are typically colonized by multiple ERM fungal taxa simultaneously (Midgley et al., 2004; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a, b); however, the relative importance of different taxa may vary with factors such as plant community structure (Bougoure et al., 2007). The fungi that form ERM associations include ascomycetes of the Rhizoscyphus ericae aggregate (Vrålstad et al., 2002a; Hambleton & Sigler, 2005), Oidiodendron spp. (Rice & Currah, 2006), Capronia-like fungi (Allen et al., 2003) and sterile mycelia that have rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence affinity with several groups of unnamed Helotiales ascomycetes (e.g. Berch et al., 2002; Cairney & Ashford, 2002; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a, b; Bougoure et al., 2007). Several Sebacinales, along with potentially other, basidiomycete taxa, may also form ERM with a range of Ericaceae (Allen et al., 2003; Bougoure et al., 2007; Selosse et al., 2007).

Despite previously being regarded as associating only with Ericaceae roots, there is increasing evidence that ERM ascomycetes may associate with roots of other plant taxa. Helotiales ascomycetes isolated from roots of the grass Deschampsia flexuosa have, for example, been shown to colonize roots and enhance nitrogen uptake by Calluna vulgaris (Ericaceae) seedlings and vice versa (Zijlstra et al., 2005). Although the nature of the infection was not reported in this case, a Helotiales ascomycete isolated from Quercus ilex roots was shown to form typical ERM coils in hair roots of Erica arborea (Ericaceae) (Bergero et al., 2000). Such observations suggest that roots of non-Ericaceae plant taxa may serve as repositories for Helotiales ERM fungi and that the fungi may form a beneficial association with non-Ericaceae hosts. Moreover, the fact that identical genotypes of a Helotiales ascomycete were isolated from roots of Q. ilex and E. arborea at a woodland site raises the possibility that these fungi may form hyphal links between the two plant taxa. This is supported by the observation that an R. ericae complex isolate simultaneously formed ERM with Vaccinium myrtillus (Ericaceae) and an ectomycorrhizal association with Pinus sylvestris under gnotobiotic conditions (Villarreal-Ruiz et al., 2004).

Several Ericaceae taxa, including Woollsia pungens and Epacris pulchella, occur as common understorey shrubs in some south-eastern Australian mixed sclerophyll forests (Robinson, 1991). Previous studies have revealed that these taxa form ERM associations with a range of typical ERM fungi which includes Oidiodendron sp. and unnamed Helotiales ascomycetes (Chambers et al., 2000; Midgley et al., 2004; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a). In order to test the hypothesis that roots of non-Ericaceae plants act as repositories for ERM fungi, we have investigated fungal endophyte communities associated with roots of a broad taxonomic range of plant taxa at a sclerophyll forest site where W. pungens and E. pulchella form an important part of the plant community.

Materials and methods

Plant collection and fungal root endophyte isolation

Juvenile specimens of 17 plant species (including sedges, herbs, small shrubs, large shrubs, small trees and large trees) were collected from a sclerophyll forest at Lovers Jump Creek Reserve, Turramurra, NSW, Australia (33°44′S 151°06′E), between May 2005 and February 2006. Plants comprised species from the families Apiaceae (Xanthosia pilosa, Xanthosia tridentata), Cunoniaceae (Bauera rubioides, Callicoma serratifolia, Ceratopetalum gummiferum), Cyperaceae (Schoenus melanostachys), Droseraceae (Drosera spatulata), Fabaceae-Mimosoideae (Acacia terminalis), Lomandraceae (Lomandra longifolia), Myrtaceae (Leptospermum polygalifolium, Eucalyptus sp., Angophora costata), Pittosporaceae (Pittosporum undulatum), Proteaceae (Banksia spinulosa, Hakea sericea, Grevillea linearifolia) and Stylidiaceae (Stylidium productum). Plants, with adhering soil, were transported to the laboratory where soil was carefully removed by first soaking (if strongly adhered to roots) and then washing under gently running tap water for c. 15 min. Roots were excised from stems and then surface sterilized in 20% bleach (4.5% available chlorine) with 100 μL L−1 of the surfactant polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20, Sigma) for 30 s. Roots were then soaked in a solution containing 70% ethanol with 100 μL L−1 Tween 20 for 30 s. This was followed by 3 × 1 min rinses in sterile distilled water, before sterile roots were cut into 0.5 cm pieces and plated on 2% potato dextrose agar (PDA, Oxoid) containing streptomycin (15 mg L−1, Sigma), gentamycin (15 mg L−1, Sigma) and tetracycline (12 mg L−1, Sigma) (Pearson & Read, 1973) in 90-mm Petri dishes. Petri dishes were incubated at 20 °C in the dark and slow-growing fungi were subcultured on PDA. Cultures were maintained in the dark at 21 °C and were subcultured every 16 weeks. Cultures were grouped on the basis of morphology and a representative from each culture morphotype from each plant was selected for DNA extraction.

DNA extraction, ITS-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and sequence analysis

DNA was extracted from cultures using the FastDNA®Kit (Bio 101) following the manufacturer's instructions. The ITS region of DNA obtained from fungal endophyte cultures was amplified using 25 pmol of each of the primers ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al., 1990) in 50-μL reaction volumes following the protocol of Anderson (1998). Cycling parameters were 30 cycles of 94 °C for one min, 50 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min followed by a final 10 min extension. Amplification products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light.

Approximately 1.0 μg of each PCR product was digested with the restriction enzymes HinfI, HaeIII or RsaI (Promega) at 37 °C for 3 h. Digestion products were electrophoresed on 3% agarose gels and visualized as above. Isolates were grouped based on their restriction digest patterns for all three enzymes. Representative isolates from each RFLP group were then chosen for sequencing. Direct sequencing of PCR products was conducted using the primer ITS1 or ITS4. PCR products were purified using the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-up System (Promega) and sequenced using an ABI3730XL DNA analyzer using single primer extension. Sequencing was conducted under BigDye terminator cycling conditions. Sequences were analysed using the blastn program (Altschul et al., 1997) on the NCBI site (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/). Putative taxonomic affinities were assigned conservatively to RFLP types based on blastn expected values and identities of the closest several sequence matches obtained from the blastn searches as described by Bougoure & Cairney (2005a), as well as the blast distance tree of results.

Investigation of fungus : plant interactions under gnotobiotic conditions

Interactions between selected fungi and roots of W. pungens (Ericaceae) and S. productum (Stylidiaceae) were investigated under gnotobiotic conditions. Woollsia pungens was selected as a model Ericaceae host as it occurs commonly at the Lovers Jump Creek Reserve site, can be propagated under sterile conditions (D.S. Bougoure and J.W.G. Cairney, unpublished observations) and the fungi associated with its roots have been studied previously (Chambers et al., 2000; Midgley et al., 2002, 2004). Stylidium productum was selected as a non-Ericaceae plant with which to investigate infection by putative ERM fungi as it is a common herb at the Lovers Jump Creek Reserve site and can readily be propagated under sterile conditions.

Seeds of W. pungens and S. productum were collected from the Lovers Jump Creek Reserve site, surface sterilized for 1 min in a 20% bleach solution (4% available chlorine) containing Tween 20® and rinsed 3 × in sterile distilled water, before being soaked overnight in sterile distilled water. Seeds were then plated out in 9.0-cm-diameter Petri dishes on sterile, moist filter paper. Seeds were incubated at 22 °C for 16 h day : 8 h night period, and W. pungens seed started to germinate after c. 6 weeks, while S. productum seed germinated after 2 weeks. Seedlings were transferred to 70-mL polycarbonate vials containing c. 20 g peat/sand mixture (80% dry/wet sand, 20% dry/wet peat) and kept moist with sterile distilled water. Seedlings were incubated as above.

In preparation for seedling inoculation, plugs of fungus taken from the actively growing edges of cultures on 2% PDA were placed in liquid modified Melin Norkrans medium (MMN) (Marx & Bryan, 1975) in 9.0-cm-diameter Petri dishes and incubated in the dark at 22 °C for c. 4 weeks. Fungal mycelium was then rinsed in sterile MilliQ water and placed in screw-topped tubes containing Lysing matrix C (Bio 101), before being placed in a bead beater and shaken for 5 s at 4 m s−1. Macerated fungal mycelium (0.5 mL) was then inoculated into the root systems of 2–5-cm-tall W. pungens or S. productum plants in sterile peat/sand. Woollsia pungens seedlings were inoculated with a representative isolate of each RFLP type and S. productum seedlings with a representative isolate RFLP type that had closest sequence matches to fungi previously shown to form ERM associations with Ericaceae hosts (RFLP types 1, 3, 7, 14 and 22), along with RFLP types 11 and 23 that formed ERM coils with W. pungens roots in the gnotobiotic infection experiment.

Inoculated plants were incubated as above for 3 months before harvesting. Soil was washed from roots that were then cleared and stained following a method modified from McLean & Lawrie (1996). Roots were cleared in 10% KOH for 30 min at 90 °C, stained in 1.0% Trypan Blue (Sigma) at 90 °C for 90 min and then destained in a 1 : 1 : 1 mixture of lactic acid, glycerol and deionized water at room temperature for 25 min (Hutton et al., 1994). Roots were mounted in glycerol on slides and infection was assessed using a Leica DMRBE light microscope with spot advanced 3.4 software (Diagnostic Instruments Inc.).

Results

Following grouping of morphologically identical isolates, a total of 197 culture morphotypes were obtained from roots of the 17 plant species, with 34 distinct RFLP types identified after ITS-RFLP and sequence analysis (Table 1). Most RFLP types (15) were identified as present from roots of only 1 plant species, whereas 12 were identified from roots of two or three plant species. The remaining eight RFLP types were obtained from the roots of six or more plant taxa, with RFLP type 1 being isolated from 15 of the 17 plant species studied (Table 1). Three to 12 RFLP types were obtained from the roots of each plant species, with the largest number being identified from roots of H. sericea (11 RFLP types) and Bauera rubioides (nine RFLP types). Fewest RFLP types (three) were obtained from roots of D. spatulata and G. linearifolia (Table 1).

1

Details of the plant species from which the 34 fungal RFLP types were isolated

RFLP舲Type Plant species 
B. rubioides, C. serratifolia, C. gummiferum, L. longifolia, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, L. polygalifolium, Eucalyptus sp., A. costata. B. spinulosa, H. sericea, G. linearifolia, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum, S. productum 
B. rubioides, D. spatulata, H. sericea 
C. serratifolia, L. longifolia, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, S. productum, A. terminalis 
L. longifolia, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, L.polygalifolium, H. sericea, G. linearifolia, S. productum, A. terminalis 
C. serratifolia, C. gummiferum, L. longifolia, X. tridentata, Eucalyptus sp., B. spinulosa, H. sericea, G. linearifolia, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum, S. productum, A. terminalis 
L. longifolia, S. melanostachys, A. terminalis 
C. serratifolia, C. gummiferum, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, L. polygalifolium, Eucalyptus sp., H. sericea, S. melanostachys, S. productum 
C. gummiferum, X. pilosa 
B. rubioides, Eucalyptus sp., A. costata 
10 B. rubioides 
11 B. rubioides, S. melanostachys 
12 B. rubioides, C. serratifolia, Eucalyptus sp., A. costata. B. spinulosa, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum 
13 B. rubioides 
14 B. rubioides, C. serratifolia, D. spatulata, L. longifolia, X. tridentata, L. polygalifolium, H. sericea, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum, S. productum, A. terminalis 
15 B. rubioides 
16 D. spatulata, X. tridentata 
17 X. tridentata, H. sericea 
18 L. polygalifolium 
19 L. polygalifolium 
20 A. terminalis 
21 A. terminalis 
22 B. spinulosa 
23 A. costata, B. spinulosa 
24 B. spinulosa 
25 B. spinulosa 
26 C. serratifolia, B. spinulosa 
27 C. serratifolia 
28 Eucalyptus sp., H. sericea 
29 A. costata, S. productum 
30 A. costata, H. sericea 
31 C. gummiferum 
32 H. sericea 
33 H. sericea 
34 S. productum 
RFLP舲Type Plant species 
B. rubioides, C. serratifolia, C. gummiferum, L. longifolia, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, L. polygalifolium, Eucalyptus sp., A. costata. B. spinulosa, H. sericea, G. linearifolia, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum, S. productum 
B. rubioides, D. spatulata, H. sericea 
C. serratifolia, L. longifolia, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, S. productum, A. terminalis 
L. longifolia, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, L.polygalifolium, H. sericea, G. linearifolia, S. productum, A. terminalis 
C. serratifolia, C. gummiferum, L. longifolia, X. tridentata, Eucalyptus sp., B. spinulosa, H. sericea, G. linearifolia, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum, S. productum, A. terminalis 
L. longifolia, S. melanostachys, A. terminalis 
C. serratifolia, C. gummiferum, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, L. polygalifolium, Eucalyptus sp., H. sericea, S. melanostachys, S. productum 
C. gummiferum, X. pilosa 
B. rubioides, Eucalyptus sp., A. costata 
10 B. rubioides 
11 B. rubioides, S. melanostachys 
12 B. rubioides, C. serratifolia, Eucalyptus sp., A. costata. B. spinulosa, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum 
13 B. rubioides 
14 B. rubioides, C. serratifolia, D. spatulata, L. longifolia, X. tridentata, L. polygalifolium, H. sericea, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum, S. productum, A. terminalis 
15 B. rubioides 
16 D. spatulata, X. tridentata 
17 X. tridentata, H. sericea 
18 L. polygalifolium 
19 L. polygalifolium 
20 A. terminalis 
21 A. terminalis 
22 B. spinulosa 
23 A. costata, B. spinulosa 
24 B. spinulosa 
25 B. spinulosa 
26 C. serratifolia, B. spinulosa 
27 C. serratifolia 
28 Eucalyptus sp., H. sericea 
29 A. costata, S. productum 
30 A. costata, H. sericea 
31 C. gummiferum 
32 H. sericea 
33 H. sericea 
34 S. productum 

Sequence comparisons indicated that the 34 RFLP types had closest ITS sequence affinity to a broad range of ascomycetes, basidiomycetes and zygomycetes (Table 2). Four RFLP types (1, 7, 11 and 22) had closest affinities to previously identified Helotiales ERM endophytes, while RFLP type 3 was most similar to Oidiodendron spp. and RFLP type 12 to Cryptosporiopsis spp. Several RFLP types had closest ITS sequence identities to a variety of ascomycetes that have been isolated from roots of Australian Ericaceae, but for which the nature of the association with the plant host remains unclear (Table 2). Five RFLP types had closest affinity, albeit with low affinity, to basidiomycetes including ectomycorrhizal (Cortinarius sp.), saprotrophic (Panellus sp.) or pathogenic (Inonotus sp.) taxa (Table 2).

2

Putative taxonomic affinities of sequence types from root systems of 17 plant species inferred from blastn searches of ITS sequences in the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases

RFLP舲type Accession舲code Isolate closest match Putative taxonomic affinity Identity舲(%) Overlap舲(bp) 
EU113182 Epacris pulchella root-associated fungus EP50 (AY627812) Helotiales 99 494/495 
EU113183 cf. Pseudocladosporium sp. CBS 115144 (DQ008141Mitosporic Ascomycota 96 524/542 
EU113184 E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP 15 (AY627817) Oidiodendron 99 514/517 
EU113185 E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP20 (AY627824Helotiales 99 536/541 
EU113186 Uncultured soil fungus isolate RFLP56 (AF461617Mucoromycotina 99 576/578 
EU113187 Hemlock mycorrhizal fungal sp. pkc01e (AY394920Coniochaetaceae 99 521/525 
EU113188 Woollsia mycorrhizal fungus VI (AY230776) Helotiales 99 520/523 
EU113189 E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP23 Hyaloscyphaceae 96 500/518 
EU113190 Rhododendron lochiae root-associated fungus R47 (AY699691Mitosporic Ascomycota 99 519/520 
10 EU113191 cf. Pseudocladosporium sp. CBS 115144 (DQ008141Mitosporic Ascomycota 93 513/546 
11 EU113192 E. microphylla root-associated fungus 4 (AY268188) Ascomycota 96 508/525 
12 EU113193 Ascomycete sp. 51058 (DQ015709Cryptosporiopsis sp. 98 515/522 
13 EU113194 E. microphylla root-associated fungus 8 (AY268192Xylariales 97 550/570 
14 EU113195 E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP22 (AY627826Helotiales 98 508/514 
15 EU113196 Tricholoma unifactum strainCBS296.64 (AF241514Atheliales 79 345/433 
16 EU113197 Foliar fungal endophyte isolate 9171 (EF419903Xylariales 95 526/551 
17 EU113198 Uncultured soil fungus clone N3_OTU126 (EF434036Dermataceae 94 544/578 
18 EU113199 Unidentified Basidiomycota sp. 12:2-27 (AF241323Basidiomycota 82 609/741 
19 EU113200 Phaeoacremonium sp. JD-115.1 (EF152422Phaeoacremonium sp. 99 554/559 
20 EU113201 Cortinarius nanceiensis var. bulbodius (AY669520Basidiomycota 75 326/432 
21 EU113202 E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP27 (AY627830Mitosporic Mycosphaerellaceae 99 499/500 
22 EU113203 Woollsia pungens ericoid mycorrhizal sp. D33 (AF072303) Ascomycota 99 522/525 
23 EU113204 Uncultured western hemlock ectomycorrhizal fungus clone SWUBC618 (DQ497943Ascomycota 97 513/527 
24 EU113205 Chryosporium carmichaelii (AB219227Unidentified 87 473/538 
25 EU113206 Dermea viburni (AF141163Dermataceae 95 478/500 
26 EU113207 Panellus stypticus#9029 (AF289067Agaricales 88 594/668 
27 EU113208 Unidentified Basidiomycota sp. 12:2-27 (AF241323Basidiomycota 78 582/743 
28 EU113209 R. lochiae fungal sp. R39 (AY699682Chaetosphaeriales 99 517/519 
29 EU113210 Xylaria sp. IP-38 (DQ780447Xylaria sp. 99 489/490 
30 EU113211 Uncultured fungus from Acaulospora colossica spore IVB.17 (AF133778Mucorales 99 603/609 
31 EU113212 Uncultured Helotiaceae clone 1S2.02.F05 (EF19696Helotiales 100 508/508 
32 EU113213 E. microphylla root-associated fungus 10 (AY268194Ascomycota 99 488/492 
33 EU113214 Uncultured E. pulchella fungus clone EP47 (AY627801Basidiomycota 98 634/643 
34 EU113215 Inonotus hispida (AY251309Basidiomycota 73 527/719 
RFLP舲type Accession舲code Isolate closest match Putative taxonomic affinity Identity舲(%) Overlap舲(bp) 
EU113182 Epacris pulchella root-associated fungus EP50 (AY627812) Helotiales 99 494/495 
EU113183 cf. Pseudocladosporium sp. CBS 115144 (DQ008141Mitosporic Ascomycota 96 524/542 
EU113184 E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP 15 (AY627817) Oidiodendron 99 514/517 
EU113185 E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP20 (AY627824Helotiales 99 536/541 
EU113186 Uncultured soil fungus isolate RFLP56 (AF461617Mucoromycotina 99 576/578 
EU113187 Hemlock mycorrhizal fungal sp. pkc01e (AY394920Coniochaetaceae 99 521/525 
EU113188 Woollsia mycorrhizal fungus VI (AY230776) Helotiales 99 520/523 
EU113189 E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP23 Hyaloscyphaceae 96 500/518 
EU113190 Rhododendron lochiae root-associated fungus R47 (AY699691Mitosporic Ascomycota 99 519/520 
10 EU113191 cf. Pseudocladosporium sp. CBS 115144 (DQ008141Mitosporic Ascomycota 93 513/546 
11 EU113192 E. microphylla root-associated fungus 4 (AY268188) Ascomycota 96 508/525 
12 EU113193 Ascomycete sp. 51058 (DQ015709Cryptosporiopsis sp. 98 515/522 
13 EU113194 E. microphylla root-associated fungus 8 (AY268192Xylariales 97 550/570 
14 EU113195 E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP22 (AY627826Helotiales 98 508/514 
15 EU113196 Tricholoma unifactum strainCBS296.64 (AF241514Atheliales 79 345/433 
16 EU113197 Foliar fungal endophyte isolate 9171 (EF419903Xylariales 95 526/551 
17 EU113198 Uncultured soil fungus clone N3_OTU126 (EF434036Dermataceae 94 544/578 
18 EU113199 Unidentified Basidiomycota sp. 12:2-27 (AF241323Basidiomycota 82 609/741 
19 EU113200 Phaeoacremonium sp. JD-115.1 (EF152422Phaeoacremonium sp. 99 554/559 
20 EU113201 Cortinarius nanceiensis var. bulbodius (AY669520Basidiomycota 75 326/432 
21 EU113202 E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP27 (AY627830Mitosporic Mycosphaerellaceae 99 499/500 
22 EU113203 Woollsia pungens ericoid mycorrhizal sp. D33 (AF072303) Ascomycota 99 522/525 
23 EU113204 Uncultured western hemlock ectomycorrhizal fungus clone SWUBC618 (DQ497943Ascomycota 97 513/527 
24 EU113205 Chryosporium carmichaelii (AB219227Unidentified 87 473/538 
25 EU113206 Dermea viburni (AF141163Dermataceae 95 478/500 
26 EU113207 Panellus stypticus#9029 (AF289067Agaricales 88 594/668 
27 EU113208 Unidentified Basidiomycota sp. 12:2-27 (AF241323Basidiomycota 78 582/743 
28 EU113209 R. lochiae fungal sp. R39 (AY699682Chaetosphaeriales 99 517/519 
29 EU113210 Xylaria sp. IP-38 (DQ780447Xylaria sp. 99 489/490 
30 EU113211 Uncultured fungus from Acaulospora colossica spore IVB.17 (AF133778Mucorales 99 603/609 
31 EU113212 Uncultured Helotiaceae clone 1S2.02.F05 (EF19696Helotiales 100 508/508 
32 EU113213 E. microphylla root-associated fungus 10 (AY268194Ascomycota 99 488/492 
33 EU113214 Uncultured E. pulchella fungus clone EP47 (AY627801Basidiomycota 98 634/643 
34 EU113215 Inonotus hispida (AY251309Basidiomycota 73 527/719 
*

Indicates isolates that formed typical ERM structures in Woollsia pungens hair roots under gnotobiotic conditions in the present study.

Closest matches in bold indicate isolates that, in previous studies, produced ERM under gnotobiotic conditions.

While isolates of most RFLP types did not form ERM structures in roots of W. pungens, isolates of six RFLP types (3, 4, 7, 12, 14 and 23) formed typical ERM coils in hair root epidermal cells during three months in gnotobiotic culture with W. pungens seedlings (Table 3). In the case of RFLP type 14, the majority of hair root epidermal cells were infected by ERM coils (Fig. 1) whereas fewer epidermal cells were infected by RFLP types 3, 4, 7 and 23. RFLP type 12 formed coils only in occasional epidermal cells (Fig. 1). No infection of W. pungens hair roots was observed for RFLP types 11 and 22, whereas infection by RFLP type 1 was limited to inter- and intracellular hyphae, with no evidence of ERM coil formation (Table 3).

3

Interactions between isolates of seven RFLP types and Woollsia pungens or Stylidium productum seedlings assessed after 3 months in gnotobiotic culture

RFLP舲type Woollsia pungens Stylidium productum 
Extensive inter- and intracellular hyphae Extensive inter- and intracellular hyphae 
Hyphae on root surface. Inter-and intracellular hyphae. Extensive ERM coils Hyphae on root surface. Intercellular hyphae 
Hyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. ERM coils Not screened 
Extensive intra- and intercellular hyphae. Extensive ERM coils Hyphae on root surface. Extensive inter- and intracellular hyphae. Microsclerotia 
12 Hyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. ERM coils Not screened 
14 Hyphae on root surface. Extensive intracellular and intercellular infection. Extensive ERM coils Hyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. Microsclerotia 
23 Hyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. ERM coils No infection observed 
RFLP舲type Woollsia pungens Stylidium productum 
Extensive inter- and intracellular hyphae Extensive inter- and intracellular hyphae 
Hyphae on root surface. Inter-and intracellular hyphae. Extensive ERM coils Hyphae on root surface. Intercellular hyphae 
Hyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. ERM coils Not screened 
Extensive intra- and intercellular hyphae. Extensive ERM coils Hyphae on root surface. Extensive inter- and intracellular hyphae. Microsclerotia 
12 Hyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. ERM coils Not screened 
14 Hyphae on root surface. Extensive intracellular and intercellular infection. Extensive ERM coils Hyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. Microsclerotia 
23 Hyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. ERM coils No infection observed 
1

Light micrographs of roots of Woollsia pungens (Wp) and Stylidium productum (Sp) after 3 months in gnotobiotic culture with fungal endophyte RFLP types cultured from roots of 17 plant species. Scale bar=25 μm. (a) Extensive ERM infection of Wp root (RFLP type 14). (b) Wp root cell with ERM coil (RFLP type 14). (c) Wp root cell with ERM coil (RFLP type 12). (d) Wp root cells with intracellular hyphae and coil (RFLP type 7). (e) Wp root cells with intra- and intercellular colonization and ERM coil (RFLP type 4). (f) Sp root cell with intracellular hyphae (RFLP type 7). (h) Sp root cell with microsclerotium (RFLP type 7). (i) Sp root cell with microsclerotium (RFLP type 7).

1

Light micrographs of roots of Woollsia pungens (Wp) and Stylidium productum (Sp) after 3 months in gnotobiotic culture with fungal endophyte RFLP types cultured from roots of 17 plant species. Scale bar=25 μm. (a) Extensive ERM infection of Wp root (RFLP type 14). (b) Wp root cell with ERM coil (RFLP type 14). (c) Wp root cell with ERM coil (RFLP type 12). (d) Wp root cells with intracellular hyphae and coil (RFLP type 7). (e) Wp root cells with intra- and intercellular colonization and ERM coil (RFLP type 4). (f) Sp root cell with intracellular hyphae (RFLP type 7). (h) Sp root cell with microsclerotium (RFLP type 7). (i) Sp root cell with microsclerotium (RFLP type 7).

No ERM-like structures were formed in S. productum roots by isolates of the seven RFLP type tested. Hyphae of RFLP types 3, 7 and 14 were observed on root surfaces, whereas production of intercellular hyphae, intracellular hyphae and/or microsclerotia was observed for RFLP types 1, 3, 7 and 14 (Table 3, Fig. 1). No hyphae of RFLP type 23 were observed within S. productum roots or on root surfaces (Table 3).

Discussion

It has previously been demonstrated that ERM fungi occur in roots of ectomycorrhizal trees, with some isolates being capable of forming both ERM and ectomycorrhizal associations with different hosts (Bergero et al., 2000; Vrålstad et al., 2002b; Villarreal-Ruiz et al., 2004). The data presented here indicate that ERM fungi are common root associates of a diverse array of plant taxa across a range of life forms within a plant community. Thus, fungi capable of forming ERM-like structures in epidermal cells of W. pungens were isolated from roots of all 17 plant species examined. These comprised an understorey sedge (Schoenus melanostachys), a rush (L. longifolia), herbs (Stylidium productum and D. spatulata), small shrubs (B. rubioides, X. pilosa, X. tridentata), large shrubs (H. sericea, G. linearifolia, L. polygalifolium, Banksia spinulosa), small trees (A. terminalis, P. undulatum, Ceratopetalum gummiferum and Callicoma serratifolia) and canopy trees (A. costata and Eucalyptus sp.).

Fungi from a broad taxonomic range were isolated from the 17 plant species, with six RFLP types shown to form typical ERM coils in epidermal cells of W. pungens hair roots, suggesting that they probably represent ERM fungi. Of these, three RFLP types (1, 7 and 14) were identified as Helotiales ascomycetes, with strong ITS sequence similarity to fungi that have previously been isolated from the roots of Australian Ericaceae (Midgley et al., 2004; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a). This observation is consistent with previous reports that a range of unnamed Helotiales ascomycetes are common ERM endophytes of Ericaceae worldwide (e.g. Berch et al., 2002; Cairney & Ashford, 2002; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a, b; Bougoure et al., 2007). On the basis of ITS sequence similarity, RFLP type 3 was identified as an Oidiodendron species. Although Oidiodendron spp. appear to exist as saprotrophs, there are numerous reports that they form ERM associations with Ericaceae hosts (see Rice & Currah, 2006). Oidiodendron sp. has also previously been isolated from hair roots of Australian Ericaceae, including W. pungens at the Lovers Jump Creek field site (Chambers et al., 2000; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a, b).

ITS sequence similarity indicated that RFLP type 12 is probably a Cryptosporiopsis species, and an isolate of this RFLP type formed dense ERM-like coils in occasional cells in W. pungens hair roots under gnotobiotic conditions. Cryptosporiopsis spp. are known root-inhabiting fungi, and Cryptosporiopsis rhizophila has been isolated from Ericaceae roots in The Netherlands and shown to colonize Ericaceae roots as an endophyte (Verkley et al., 2003). The nature of the infection was not, however, specified by the authors. Sigler (2005) cultured Cryptosporiopsis ericae and Cryptosporiopsis brunnea from surface-sterilized roots of Canadian Ericaceae, but no ERM structures were formed between these fungi and Ericaceae hosts under gnotobiotic conditions. While more detailed structural investigation of the interaction between RFLP type 12 and W. pungens roots is clearly required, the fact that the fungus formed well-developed ERM-like hyphal coils in epidermal cells strongly suggests that this putative Cryptosporiopsis species has the potential to form an ERM association with this host.

Three of the fungal RFLP types (3, 7 and 14) that formed typical ERM coils in epidermal cells of W. pungens hair roots also formed inter- and/or intracellular infections, along with microsclerotia (RFLP types 7 and 14), in roots of S. productum. These structures are consistent with descriptions of dark septate endophyte (DSE) infection (Jumpponen & Trappe, 1998; Sieber & Grünig, 2006). DSE occur worldwide in a variety of habitats and often coexist with mycorrhizal fungi (Mandyam & Jumpponen, 2005), and have, for example, been identified in roots of a wide range of plants in a single woodland community (Menoyo et al., 2007). They are regarded as forming a continuum of associations with plant hosts that ranges from parasitism to mutualism (Jumpponen, 2001). Understanding the likely nature of their association with S. productum and the other non-Ericaceae plant taxa at the Lovers Jump Creek Reserve will therefore require further investigation.

The data presented here indicate that fungi represented by three RFLP types are capable of forming different types of association with roots of different hosts, viz ERM with W. pungens and DSE with S. productum. Importantly, because at least one of these RFLP types was isolated from each of the 17 plant taxa, fungi with this ability appear to be relatively common at Lovers Jump Creek Reserve. It has previously been reported that some ascomycete isolates from ectomycorrhizal tree roots can form ERM coils in Ericaceae roots (Bergero et al., 2000, 2003; Villarreal-Ruiz et al., 2004), whereas an isolate of the DSE Heteroconium chaetospira formed ERM structures in roots of Rhododendron obtusum (Usuki & Narisawa, 2005). Although the nature of the infection was not described, root endophytes from the grass Deschampsia flexuosa in Dutch heathland/forest were further shown to infect and enhance shoot nitrogen content of Calluna vulgaris and vice versa (Zijlstra et al., 2005).

While some ERM endophytes may persist in soil in habitats that lack ericaceous hosts, possibly as free-living saprotrophs (Bergero et al., 2003; Rice & Currah, 2006), it has been suggested that ectomycorrhizal roots of Q. ilex may act as a source of inoculum for ERM infection of establishing Ericaceae seedlings (Bergero et al., 2000). The observation from the present investigation, that fungi with the ability to form ERM associations with an Ericaceae host were present in roots of all plant taxa examined from a single plant community, indicates that a broad range of plant taxa may act as repositories for ERM fungi in, at least, the sclerophyll forest habitat that we investigated. As suggested by Bergero (2000), this may be of particular importance in establishment of Ericaceae seedlings, especially following a disturbance such as fire in the sclerophyll forest habitat, where fire is a common natural phenomenon and can negatively impact Ericaceae abundance (Morrison, 2002).

Many questions remain regarding relationships between the fungi that form ERM and DSE associations (Girlanda et al., 2006; Schulz, 2006), particularly with regard to the benefits conferred upon plants by DSE infection (Jumpponen, 2001). The ability to infect multiple hosts raises the possibility that ERM structures in Ericaceae roots and DSE structures in non-Ericaceae roots might represent parts of a common mycelial network as has been proposed for ERM and ectomycorrhizal associations in certain forest habitats (Bergero et al., 2000; Bougoure et al., 2007). While direct evidence for such mycelial linkages is currently lacking, if demonstrated, this could influence our understanding of carbon and nutrient cycling in habitats such as the sclerophyll forest at Lovers Jump Creek Reserve, where Ericaceae represent common understorey plants.

Acknowledgements

We thank Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council for granting permission to collect plant specimens and seeds from Lovers Jump Creek Reserve and staff from the Plant Identification Counter at the National Herbarium of NSW for confirmation of plant species identification. This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Projects Grant to J.W.G.C.

References

Allen
TA
Millar
T
Berch
SM
Berbee
ML
(
2003
)
Culturing and direct DNA extraction find different fungi from the same ericoid mycorrhizal roots
.
New Phytol
 
160
:
255
272
.
Altschul
SF
Madden
TL
Schaffer
AA
Zhang
J
Miller
W
Lipman
DJ
(
1997
)
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
.
Nucleic Acids Res
 
25
:
3389
3402
.
Anderson
IC
Chambers
SM
Cairney
JWG
(
1998
)
Molecular determination of genetic variation in Pisolithus isolates from a defined region of New South Wales, Australia
.
New Phytol
 
138
:
151
162
.
Berch
SM
Allen
TR
Berbee
M
(
2002
)
Molecular detection, community structure and phylogeny of ericoid mycorrhizal fungi
.
Plant Soil
 
244
:
55
66
.
Bergero
R
Perotto
S
Girlanda
M
Vidano
G
Luppi
AM
(
2000
)
Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi are common root associates of a Mediterranean ectomycorrhizal plant (Quercus ilex)
.
Mol Ecol
 
9
:
1639
1649
.
Bergero
R
Girlanda
M
Bello
F
Luppi
AM
Perotto
S
(
2003
)
Soil persistence and biodiversity of ericoid mycorrhizal fungi in the absence of the host plant in a Mediterranean ecosystem
.
Mycorrhiza
 
13
:
69
75
.
Bougoure
DS
Cairney
JWG
(
2005a
)
Assemblages of ericoid mycorrhizal and other root-associated fungi from Epacris pulchella (Ericaceae) as determined by culturing and direct DNA extraction from roots
.
Environ Microbiol
 
7
:
819
827
.
Bougoure
DS
Cairney
JWG
(
2005b
)
Fungi associated with hair roots of Rhododendron lochiae (Ericaceae) in an Australian tropical cloud forest revealed by culturing and culture-independent molecular methods
.
Environ Microbiol
 
7
:
1743
1754
.
Bougoure
DS
Parkin
PI
Cairney
JWG
Alexander
IJ
Anderson
IC
(
2007
)
Diversity of fungi in hair roots of Ericaceae varies along a vegetation gradient
.
Mol Ecol
 
16
:
4624
4636
.
Cairney
JWG
Ashford
AE
(
2002
)
Biology of mycorrhizal associations of epacrids (Ericaceae)
.
New Phytol
 
154
:
305
326
.
Cairney
JWG
Burke
RM
(
1998
)
Extracellular enzyme activities of the ericoid mycorrhizal endophyte Hymenoscyphus ericae (Read) Korf & Kernan: their likely roles in decomposition of dead plant tissue in soil
.
Plant Soil
 
205
:
181
192
.
Cairney
JWG
Meharg
AA
(
2003
)
Ericoid mycorrhiza: a partnership that exploits harsh edaphic conditions
.
Eur J Soil Sci
 
54
:
735
740
.
Chambers
SM
Liu
G
Cairney
JWG
(
2000
)
ITS rDNA sequence comparison of ericoid mycorrhizal endophytes from Woollsia pungens
.
Mycol Res
 
104
:
168
174
.
Davies
PW
Mclean
CB
Bell
TL
(
2003
)
Root survey and isolation of fungi from alpine epacrids (Ericaceae)
.
Australas Mycol
 
22
:
4
10
.
Girlanda
M
Perotto
S
Luppi
AM
(
2006
)
Molecular diversity and ecological roles of mycorrhiza-associated sterile fungal endophytes in Mediterranean ecosystems
.
Microbial Root Endophytes
  (
Schulz
B
Boyle
C
Sieber
T
, eds), pp.
207
226
.
Springer
,
Berlin
.
Hambleton
S
Sigler
L
(
2005
)
Meliniomyces, a new anamorph genus for root-associated fungi with phylogenetic affinities to Rhizoscyphus ericae (≡Hymenoscyphus ericae), Leotiomycetes
.
Stud Mycol
 
53
:
1
27
.
Hutton
BJ
Dixon
KW
Sivasithamparam
K
(
1994
)
Ericoid endophytes of Western Australian heaths (Epacridaceae)
.
New Phytol
 
127
:
557
566
.
Jumpponen
A
(
2001
)
Dark septate endophytes – are they mycorrhizal?
Mycorrhiza
 
11
:
207
211
.
Jumpponen
A
Trappe
JM
(
1998
)
Dark-septate root endophytes: a review with special reference to facultative biotrophic symbiosis
.
New Phytol
 
140
:
295
310
.
Kemp
E
Adam
P
Ashford
AE
(
2003
)
Seasonal changes in hair roots and mycorrhizal colonization in Woollsia pungens (Cav.) F. Muell. (Epacridaceae)
.
Plant Soil
 
250
:
241
248
.
Leake
JR
Read
DJ
(
1997
)
Mycorrhizal fungi in terrestrial habitats
.
The Mycota IV Environmental and Microbial Relationships
  (
Wicklow
D
Söderström
B
, eds), pp.
281
301
.
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
Mandyam
K
Jumpponen
A
(
2005
)
Seeking the elusive function of the root-colonising dark septate endophytic fungi
.
Stud Mycol
 
53
:
173
189
.
Marx
DH
Bryan
WC
(
1975
)
Growth and ectomycorrhizal development of loblolly pine seedlings in fumigated soil infested with the fungal symbiont Pisolithus tinctorius
.
For Sci
 
21
:
245
254
.
McLean
C
Lawrie
AC
(
1996
)
Patterns of root colonization in epacridaceous plants collected from different sites
.
Ann Bot
 
77
:
405
411
.
Meharg
AA
Cairney
JWG
(
2000
)
Co-evolution of mycorrhizal symbionts and their hosts to metal contaminated environments
.
Adv Ecol Res
 
30
:
69
112
.
Menoyo
E
Becerra
AG
Renison
D
(
2007
)
Mycorrhizal associations in Polylepis woodlands of Central Argentina
.
Can J Bot
 
85
:
526
531
.
Midgley
DJ
Chambers
SM
Cairney
JWG
(
2002
)
Spatial distribution of fungal endophyte genotypes in a Woollsia pungens (Ericaceae) root system
.
Aust J Bot
 
50
:
559
565
.
Midgley
DJ
Chambers
SM
Cairney
JWG
(
2004
)
Distribution of ericoid mycorrhizal endophytes and root-associated fungi in neighbouring Ericaceae plants in the field
.
Plant Soil
 
259
:
137
151
.
Morrison
DA
(
2002
)
Effects of fire intensity on plant species composition of sandstone communities in the Sydney region
.
Austral Ecol
 
27
:
433
441
.
Pearson
V
Read
DJ
(
1973
)
The biology of mycorrhizas in the Ericaceae. I. The isolation of the endophyte and synthesis of mycorrhizas in aseptic cultures
.
New Phytol
 
72
:
371
379
.
Rice
AV
Currah
RS
(
2006
)
Oidiodendron maius: saprobe in Sphagnum peat, mutualist in ericaceous roots?
Microbial Root Endophytes
  (
Schulz
B
Boyle
C
Sieber
T
, eds), pp.
227
246
.
Springer
,
Berlin
.
Robinson
L
(
1991
)
Field Guide to Native Plants of Sydney
 .
Kangaroo Press
,
East Roseville
, 448p.
Schulz
B
(
2006
)
Mutualistic interaction with fungal root endophytes
.
Microbial Root Endophytes
  (
Schulz
B
Boyle
C
Sieber
T
, eds), pp.
261
279
.
Springer
,
Berlin
.
Selosse
M-A
Setaro
S
Glatard
F
Richard
F
Urcelay
C
Weiß
M
(
2007
)
Sebacinales are common mycorrhizal associates of Ericaceae
.
New Phytol
 
174
:
864
878
.
Sharples
JM
Meharg
AA
Chambers
SM
Cairney
JWG
(
2000
)
Symbiotic solution to arsenic contamination
.
Nature
 
404
:
951
952
.
Sieber
TN
Grünig
CR
(
2006
)
Biodiversity of fungal root-endophyte communities and populations, in particular of the dark septate endophyte Phialocephala fortinii s.l
.
Microbial Root Endophytes
  (
Schulz
B
Boyle
C
Sieber
T
, eds), pp.
107
132
.
Springer
,
Berlin
.
Sigler
L
Allan
T
Lim
SR
Berch
S
Berbee
M
(
2005
)
Two new Cryptosporiopsis species from roots of ericaceous hosts in western North America
.
Stud Mycol
 
53
:
53
62
.
Usuki
F
Narisawa
K
(
2005
)
Formation of structures resembling ericoid mycorrhizas by the root endophytic fungus Heteroconium chaetospira within roots of Rhododendron obtusum var. kaempferi
.
Mycorrhiza
 
15
:
61
64
.
Verkley
GJM
Zijlstra
JD
Summerbell
RC
Berendse
F
(
2003
)
Phylogeny and taxonomy of root-inhabiting Cryptosporiopsis species, and C. rhizophila sp. nov., a fungus inhabiting roots of several Ericaceae
.
Mycol Res
 
107
:
689
698
.
Villarreal-Ruiz
L
Anderson
IC
Alexander
IJ
(
2004
)
Interaction between an isolate from the Hymenoscyphus ericae aggregate and roots of Pinus and Vaccinium
.
New Phytol
 
164
:
183
192
.
Vrålstad
T
Myhre
E
Schumacher
T
(
2002a
)
Molecular diversity and phylogenetic affinities of symbiotic root-associated ascomycetes of the Helotiales in burnt and metal polluted habitats
.
New Phytol
 
155
:
131
148
.
Vrålstad
T
Schumacher
T
Taylor
AFS
(
2002b
)
Mycorrhizal synthesis between fungal strains of the Hymenoscyphus ericae aggregate and potential ectomycorrhizal and ericoid hosts
.
New Phytol
 
153
:
143
152
.
White
TJ
Bruns
TD
Lee
S
Taylor
J
(
1990
)
Analysis of phylogenetic relationships by amplification and direct sequencing of ribosomal RNA genes
.
PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications
  (
Innes
MA
Gelfland
MA
Sninsky
DH
White
TJ
, eds), pp.
315
322
.
Academic Press
,
New York
.
Zijlstra
JD
Van't Hof
P
Baar
J
Verkley
GJM
Summerbell
RC
Paradi
I
Braakhekke
WG
Berendse
F
(
2005
)
Diversity of symbiotic root endophytes of the Helotiales in ericaceous plants and the grass, Deschampsia flexuosa
.
Stud Mycol
 
53
:
147
162
.

Author notes

Editor: Christoph Tebbe