Abstract

Species of Cryphonectria include some of the world's most important and devastating tree pathogens. Largely through the application of DNA sequence phylogenies, the taxonomy of these fungi has undergone major changes in recent years. Cryphonectria, including the chestnut blight pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica, has been restricted to species that have semi-immersed stromata, orange and pulvinate conidiomata, and one-septate ascospores. Other species of Cryphonectria with different morphological characteristics have been transferred to new genera that are strongly supported by phylogenetic data. This review represents a summary of the taxonomic changes to species of Cryphonectria sensu lato, and we discuss the impact that these changes might have on the understanding of their ecology, pathology and worldwide distribution.

Introduction

Species in Cryphonectria (Diaporthales) are easily recognized on the bark of trees by their large and conspicuous orange stromata (Shear et al., 1917; Barr, 1978). These stromata (Fig. 1a–c) are semi-immersed and erumpent; conidiomata are also orange, pulvinate and stromatic. Species are further identified based on their fusoid to ellipsoid, one-septate ascospores and aseptate, cylindrical conidia (Myburg et al., 2004a). Cryphonectria spp. occur on a wide variety of woody hosts and they have a worldwide distribution (Table 1), which included the tropics as well as more temperate areas in the past (Shear et al., 1917; Kobayashi, 1970; Roane, 1986a). Many species in this group are economically significant and include some of the world's most serious tree pathogens.

1

Fruiting structures of Cryphonectria and related genera. (a) Ascostroma of Cryphonectria. (b) Longitudinal section through ascostroma of Cryphonectria. (c) Conidioma of Cryphonectria. (d) Ascostromata of Chrysoporthe. (e) Perithecial neck of Chrysoporthe (arrow) with brown surrounding tissue. (f) Conidioma of Chrysoporthe. (g) Conidioma of Amphilogia. (h) Conidioma of Rostraureum. (i) Conidiomata of Aurapex. Scale bars: a–h=100 μm, i=200 μm.

1

Fruiting structures of Cryphonectria and related genera. (a) Ascostroma of Cryphonectria. (b) Longitudinal section through ascostroma of Cryphonectria. (c) Conidioma of Cryphonectria. (d) Ascostromata of Chrysoporthe. (e) Perithecial neck of Chrysoporthe (arrow) with brown surrounding tissue. (f) Conidioma of Chrysoporthe. (g) Conidioma of Amphilogia. (h) Conidioma of Rostraureum. (i) Conidiomata of Aurapex. Scale bars: a–h=100 μm, i=200 μm.

1

Hosts, distribution, representative isolates (ex-type isolates in bold) and representative sequences of Cryphonectria spp. and related genera

Genus Species Distribution Best known host genera Representative isolates Representative sequences 
Cryphonectria C. parasitica Japan, China, North America, Europe, Turkey Castanea, Quercus (Fagaceae, FagalesCMW7048=ATCC48198 AF368330, AF273076, AF273470 
    CMW13749=MAFF410158 AY697927, AY697943, AY697944 
C. nitschkei Japan, China, Russia Quercus, Castanea, Castanopsis (Fagaceae, Fagales), Betula, Carpinus (Betulaceae, Fagales), Pyrus, Prunus (Rosaceae, Rosales), Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, Myrtales), Rhus (Anacardiaceae, Sapindales) and Larix (Pinaceae, PinalesCMW13742=MAFF410570 AY697936, AY697961, AY697962 
    CMW13747=MAFF410569 AY697937, AY697963, AY697964 
C. macrospora Japan Castanopsis (Fagaceae, Fagales) CMW10463=CBS112920 AF368331, AF368351, AF368350 
    CMW10914=TFM: FPH E55 AY697942, AY697973, AY697974 
C. radicalis sensu lato Japan, Greece, Italy, Switzerland, France, Portugal Quercus, Castanea (Fagaceae, Fagales), Carpinus (Betulaceae, FagalesCMW10455=CBS238.54 AF452113, AF525705, AF525712 
    CMW10477=CBS240.54 AF368328, AF368347, AF368346 
    CMW10436=CBS165.30 AF452117, AF525703, AF525710 
    CMW10484=CBS112918 AF368327, AF368349, AF368349 
C. havanensis Cuba Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, Myrtales), Spondias, Mangifera indica (Anacardiaceae, Sapindales), Persea gratissima (Lauraceae, Lauralesn/a n/a 
C. coccolobae Bermuda, Florida (USA) Coccoloba (Polygonaceae, Polygonalesn/a n/a 
C. eucalypti Australia, South Africa Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, MyrtalesCMW7036 AF232878, AF368341, AF368340 
    CMW7037 AF232880, AF368343, AF368342 
Endothia E. gyrosa USA Quercus, Fagus (Fagaceae, Fagales), Liquidambar (Hamamelidaceae, Saxifragales), Acer (Aceraceae, Sapindales), Ilex (Aquifoliaceae, Celastrales), Vitis (Vitaceae, Rhamnales), Prunus (Rosaceae, RosalesCMW2091=ATCC48192 AF046905, AF368337, AF368336 
    CMW10442=CBS118850 AF368326, AF368339, AF368338 
E. singularis Colorado (USA) Quercus (Fagaceae, Fagalesn/a n/a 
Amphilogia A. gyrosa Sri Lanka, New Zealand Elaeocarpus (Elaeocarpaceae, OxalidalesCMW10469=CBS112922 AF452111, AF525707, AF525714 
    CMW10740=CBS112923 AF452112, AF525708, AF525715 
A. major New Zealand Elaeocarpus (Elaeocarpaceae, Oxalidalesn/a n/a 
Chrysoporthe Chr. cubensis South & Central America, Hawaii, Florida (USA), South East Asia, Australia, Central Africa Eucalyptus, Syzygium (Myrtaceae, Myrtales), Miconia (Melastomataceae, MyrtalesCMW10639=CBS115747 AY263419, AY263420, AY263421 
    CMW10669=CBS115751 AF535122, AF535124, AF535126 
    CMW8651=CBS115718 AY084002, AY084014, AY084026 
    CMW11290=CBS115738 AY214304, AY214232, AY214268 
Chr. austroafricana South Africa Eucalyptus, Syzygium (Myrtaceae, Myrtales), Tibouchina (Melastomataceae, MyrtalesCMW2113=CBS112916 AF046892, AF273067, AF273462 
    CMW9327=CBS115843 AF273473, AF273060, AF273455 
Chr. doradensis Ecuador Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, MyrtalesCMW11286=CBS115734 AY214289, AY214217, AY214253 
    CMW11287=CBS115735 AY214290, AY214218, AY214254 
Chrysoporthella hodgesiana Colombia Tibouchina, Miconia (Melastomataceae, MyrtalesCMW10625=CBS115744 AY956970, AY956979, AY956980 
    CMW10641=CBS115854 AY692322, AY692326, AY692325 
Rostraureum R. tropicale Ecuador Terminalia (Combretaceae, MyrtalesCMW9971=CBS115725 AY167425, AY167430, AY167435 
    CMW10796=CBS115757 AY167428, AY167433, AY167438 
R. longirostris Puerto Rico, Trinidad & Tabago Unknown hosts, dead wood n/a n/a 
Aurapex A. penicillata Colombia Miconia, Tibouchina (Melastomataceae, Myrtales), Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, MyrtalesCMW10030=CBS115740 AY214311, AY214239, AY214275 
    CMW10035=CBS115742 AY214313, AY214241, AY214277 
Genus Species Distribution Best known host genera Representative isolates Representative sequences 
Cryphonectria C. parasitica Japan, China, North America, Europe, Turkey Castanea, Quercus (Fagaceae, FagalesCMW7048=ATCC48198 AF368330, AF273076, AF273470 
    CMW13749=MAFF410158 AY697927, AY697943, AY697944 
C. nitschkei Japan, China, Russia Quercus, Castanea, Castanopsis (Fagaceae, Fagales), Betula, Carpinus (Betulaceae, Fagales), Pyrus, Prunus (Rosaceae, Rosales), Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, Myrtales), Rhus (Anacardiaceae, Sapindales) and Larix (Pinaceae, PinalesCMW13742=MAFF410570 AY697936, AY697961, AY697962 
    CMW13747=MAFF410569 AY697937, AY697963, AY697964 
C. macrospora Japan Castanopsis (Fagaceae, Fagales) CMW10463=CBS112920 AF368331, AF368351, AF368350 
    CMW10914=TFM: FPH E55 AY697942, AY697973, AY697974 
C. radicalis sensu lato Japan, Greece, Italy, Switzerland, France, Portugal Quercus, Castanea (Fagaceae, Fagales), Carpinus (Betulaceae, FagalesCMW10455=CBS238.54 AF452113, AF525705, AF525712 
    CMW10477=CBS240.54 AF368328, AF368347, AF368346 
    CMW10436=CBS165.30 AF452117, AF525703, AF525710 
    CMW10484=CBS112918 AF368327, AF368349, AF368349 
C. havanensis Cuba Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, Myrtales), Spondias, Mangifera indica (Anacardiaceae, Sapindales), Persea gratissima (Lauraceae, Lauralesn/a n/a 
C. coccolobae Bermuda, Florida (USA) Coccoloba (Polygonaceae, Polygonalesn/a n/a 
C. eucalypti Australia, South Africa Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, MyrtalesCMW7036 AF232878, AF368341, AF368340 
    CMW7037 AF232880, AF368343, AF368342 
Endothia E. gyrosa USA Quercus, Fagus (Fagaceae, Fagales), Liquidambar (Hamamelidaceae, Saxifragales), Acer (Aceraceae, Sapindales), Ilex (Aquifoliaceae, Celastrales), Vitis (Vitaceae, Rhamnales), Prunus (Rosaceae, RosalesCMW2091=ATCC48192 AF046905, AF368337, AF368336 
    CMW10442=CBS118850 AF368326, AF368339, AF368338 
E. singularis Colorado (USA) Quercus (Fagaceae, Fagalesn/a n/a 
Amphilogia A. gyrosa Sri Lanka, New Zealand Elaeocarpus (Elaeocarpaceae, OxalidalesCMW10469=CBS112922 AF452111, AF525707, AF525714 
    CMW10740=CBS112923 AF452112, AF525708, AF525715 
A. major New Zealand Elaeocarpus (Elaeocarpaceae, Oxalidalesn/a n/a 
Chrysoporthe Chr. cubensis South & Central America, Hawaii, Florida (USA), South East Asia, Australia, Central Africa Eucalyptus, Syzygium (Myrtaceae, Myrtales), Miconia (Melastomataceae, MyrtalesCMW10639=CBS115747 AY263419, AY263420, AY263421 
    CMW10669=CBS115751 AF535122, AF535124, AF535126 
    CMW8651=CBS115718 AY084002, AY084014, AY084026 
    CMW11290=CBS115738 AY214304, AY214232, AY214268 
Chr. austroafricana South Africa Eucalyptus, Syzygium (Myrtaceae, Myrtales), Tibouchina (Melastomataceae, MyrtalesCMW2113=CBS112916 AF046892, AF273067, AF273462 
    CMW9327=CBS115843 AF273473, AF273060, AF273455 
Chr. doradensis Ecuador Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, MyrtalesCMW11286=CBS115734 AY214289, AY214217, AY214253 
    CMW11287=CBS115735 AY214290, AY214218, AY214254 
Chrysoporthella hodgesiana Colombia Tibouchina, Miconia (Melastomataceae, MyrtalesCMW10625=CBS115744 AY956970, AY956979, AY956980 
    CMW10641=CBS115854 AY692322, AY692326, AY692325 
Rostraureum R. tropicale Ecuador Terminalia (Combretaceae, MyrtalesCMW9971=CBS115725 AY167425, AY167430, AY167435 
    CMW10796=CBS115757 AY167428, AY167433, AY167438 
R. longirostris Puerto Rico, Trinidad & Tabago Unknown hosts, dead wood n/a n/a 
Aurapex A. penicillata Colombia Miconia, Tibouchina (Melastomataceae, Myrtales), Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, MyrtalesCMW10030=CBS115740 AY214311, AY214239, AY214275 
    CMW10035=CBS115742 AY214313, AY214241, AY214277 

CMW, Forestry & Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria; ATCC, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, USA; CBS, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, the Netherlands; TFM:FPH, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Danchi-Nai, Ibaraki, Japan (E or Ep refers to an isolate); MAFF, Microorganisms Section, MAFF GENEBANK, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Ibaraki, Japan; ITS, internal transcribed spacer; n/a, not available.

*

Accession numbers given as sequences from the ITS region, and two regions from the β-tubulin genes amplified with primers 1a/1b and 2a/2b, respectively.

One of the best known species in Cryphonectria is Cryphonectria parasitica (Murrill) M. E. Barr (Fig. 2). It was introduced into North America where it devastated the American chestnut (Castanea dentata, Fagaceae, Fagales) throughout its natural range (Anagnostakis, 1987; Heiniger & Rigling, 1994). Cryphonectria parasitica was also introduced into Europe, where it resulted in a serious canker disease on Castanea sativa or the European chestnut (Heiniger & Rigling, 1994). Damage caused by this pathogen in Europe has, however, been much less severe than in North America due to reduced virulence imparted by a hypovirus (Heiniger & Rigling, 1994). The fungus and its associated viruses have been widely studied due to the significance of C. parasitica and the success of the biocontrol brought about by the hypoviruses (Nuss, 1992; Hillman & Suzuki, 2004; Milgroom & Cortesi, 2004).

2

Disease symptoms of chestnut blight caused by Cryphonectria parasitica. (a) A relic Castanea dentata tree still standing long after being killed by chestnut blight after its introduction into the USA. (b) Diffuse canker on Castanea dentata. (c) Die-back of branches with dead leaves still attached. (d) Sunken canker on Castanea dentata with fruiting structures visible. (e) Numerous stump sprouts from Castanea dentata roots of tree killed earlier by chestnut blight. (f) Multiple cankers on stump sprouts. (g) One of the few large and surviving specimens of Castanea dentata in the USA today.

2

Disease symptoms of chestnut blight caused by Cryphonectria parasitica. (a) A relic Castanea dentata tree still standing long after being killed by chestnut blight after its introduction into the USA. (b) Diffuse canker on Castanea dentata. (c) Die-back of branches with dead leaves still attached. (d) Sunken canker on Castanea dentata with fruiting structures visible. (e) Numerous stump sprouts from Castanea dentata roots of tree killed earlier by chestnut blight. (f) Multiple cankers on stump sprouts. (g) One of the few large and surviving specimens of Castanea dentata in the USA today.

Cryphonectria represents a relatively small genus of fungi. Until recently, the genus included only 10 species. Besides C. parasitica, these included C. gyrosa (Berk. & Broome) Sacc., which was the type species, C. radicalis (Schwein.: Fr.) M. E. Barr, C. nitschkei (G. H. Otth) M. E. Barr, C. macrospora (Tak. Kobay. & Kaz. Itô) M. E. Barr, C. havanensis (Bruner) M. E. Barr, C. longirostris (Earle) Micales & Stipes, C. coccolobae (Vizioli) Micales & Stipes, C. cubensis (Bruner) Hodges (Micales & Stipes, 1987) and C. eucalypti M. Venter & M. J. Wingf. (Venter et al., 2002). Other than C. parasitica, species such as C. cubensis (Fig. 3) and C. eucalypti are serious canker pathogens of trees (Old et al., 1986; Gryzenhout et al., 2003; Wingfield, 2003), but the majority of the species are saprophytes on wood (Roane, 1986b).

3

Disease symptoms of Chrysoporthe canker caused by various Chrysoporthe species. (a and b) Cankers on the trunks and bases of Eucalyptus trees. (c) Cross section of canker showing killed vascular tissue. (d) Stem breakage due to girdling cankers. (e) Die-back of Tibouchina spp. (f).

3

Disease symptoms of Chrysoporthe canker caused by various Chrysoporthe species. (a and b) Cankers on the trunks and bases of Eucalyptus trees. (c) Cross section of canker showing killed vascular tissue. (d) Stem breakage due to girdling cankers. (e) Die-back of Tibouchina spp. (f).

Species of Endothia (Diaporthales) have commonly been confused with Cryphonectria. This is due to their similar orange fruiting structures and a shared anamorph genus, Endothiella (Barr, 1978). Members of Cryphonectria and Endothia have also been recorded to share the same hosts and to occur in the same countries. For example, E. gyrosa (Schwein.: Fr.) Fr., E. singularis (Syd. & P. Syd.) Shear & N. E. Stevens, C. parasitica and C. radicalis all occur in North America (Table 1) on members of the Fagaceae (Roane, 1986a). Cryphonectria has also been treated as a synonym of Endothia for a large portion of its taxonomic history (Shear et al., 1917; Kobayashi, 1970; Barr, 1978; Roane, 1986a).

Based on DNA sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analyses, species of Endothia can be distinguished (Fig. 4) from those in Cryphonectria (Venter et al., 2002; Myburg et al., 2004a). This is strongly supported by morphological differences such as the aseptate ascospores and superficial stromata, which are characteristic in Endothia but not in Cryphonectria (Myburg et al., 2004a). Currently, Endothia includes only two species, E. gyrosa (type) and E. singularis (Myburg et al., 2004a). A third species with green stromata, E. viridistroma Wehm., most likely resides in a genus other than Endothia (Myburg et al., 2004a).

4

A phylogenetic tree showing the grouping of Cryphonectria and related genera. The tree was obtained from a combined DNA sequence data set of the ITS1, 5.8S rRNA gene and ITS2 regions of the ribosomal operon, and β-tubulin genes, respectively. Alignment was obtained using the web interface (http://timpani.genome.ad.jp/%7Emafft/server/) of the alignment program MAFFT ver. 5.667 (Katoh et al., 2002). Distance analyses using the Tamura–Nei model, which was shown by Modeltest to be the appropriate model, were employed. The following parameters were used: G=0.2301, freqA=0.1936, freqC=0.3312, freqG=0.2287, freqT=0.2465; rate matrix 1, 3.1964, 1, 1, 3.8818, 1. Bootstrap confidence levels (>70%, 1000 replicates) are indicated on the branches. Diaporthe ambigua, another species in the Diaporthales, was used as an outgroup taxon.

4

A phylogenetic tree showing the grouping of Cryphonectria and related genera. The tree was obtained from a combined DNA sequence data set of the ITS1, 5.8S rRNA gene and ITS2 regions of the ribosomal operon, and β-tubulin genes, respectively. Alignment was obtained using the web interface (http://timpani.genome.ad.jp/%7Emafft/server/) of the alignment program MAFFT ver. 5.667 (Katoh et al., 2002). Distance analyses using the Tamura–Nei model, which was shown by Modeltest to be the appropriate model, were employed. The following parameters were used: G=0.2301, freqA=0.1936, freqC=0.3312, freqG=0.2287, freqT=0.2465; rate matrix 1, 3.1964, 1, 1, 3.8818, 1. Bootstrap confidence levels (>70%, 1000 replicates) are indicated on the branches. Diaporthe ambigua, another species in the Diaporthales, was used as an outgroup taxon.

The application of DNA sequence comparisons revealed the fact that the taxonomy of Cryphonectria required revision. For example, Cryphonectria was shown not to be monophyletic (Fig. 4), but consisting of many species residing in newly recognized genera (Myburg et al., 2004a; Gryzenhout et al., 2005a). These newly recognized groups were supported by morphological features that were inordinantly diverse (Fig. 1) to warrant retaining these taxa in a single genus (Myburg et al., 2004a; Gryzenhout et al., 2005a). The primary aim of this review is to provide a summary of the recent changes to the taxonomy of species in Cryphonectria sensu lato, and to re-evaluate the host range, ecology and distribution of Cryphonectria species.

Revised taxonomy

Cryphonectria

Phylogenetic comparisons have revealed that isolates labeled as Cryphonectria havanensis in Japan are identical to those of C. nitschkei (Myburg et al., 2004b). It has, furthermore, been confirmed (Myburg et al., 2004b) that C. nitschkei has a wide host range including five plant orders (Table 1). This fungus is restricted to the Far East and is known to occur in Japan, China (Myburg et al., 2004b) and Siberia, Russia (Vasilyeva, 1998).

European isolates originally labeled as C. radicalis represent two different species of Cryphonectria (Myburg et al., 2004a, b). This was determined independently based on morphology and DNA sequence comparisons (Fig. 4). Cryphonectria radicalis, defined by the type specimen from North America, corresponds morphologically to a phylogenetic group containing isolates from Greece, Italy, Switzerland and Japan (Myburg et al., 2004b). This has not been confirmed using phylogenetic analyses, because isolates that can be linked to C. radicalis in North America, do not exist. The other species has ascospores longer than those of C. radicalis sensu stricto, but specimens had also previously been labeled as C. radicalis (Myburg et al., 2004b). This species could possibly be linked to a second phylogenetic group consisting of isolates labeled as C. radicalis from Italy, France and Portugal, but this is also speculative as there are no isolates linked to herbarium specimens for this species. As the results of the DNA sequence-based and morphological comparisons cannot be linked, this species has not yet been described as a unique taxon.

Additional collections of C. radicalis sensu lato are clearly needed to resolve questions regarding its taxonomy. The phylogenetic placement of North American C. radicalis isolates has yet to be determined. It is also possible that another species of Cryphonectria, similar to C. radicalis sensu lato and referred to as E. radicalis mississippiensis Shear and N. E. Stevens (Shear et al., 1917), occurs in North America (Myburg et al., 2004b). Additional collections from Japan will also be required to determine whether the other, undescribed subclade encompassing isolates labelled as C. radicalis coexists with C. radicalis in Japan. This question arose because only a single isolate of C. radicalis from Japan, which was grouped in the subclade representing C. radicalis sensu stricto, has been available for study (Myburg et al., 2004b). Isolates of C. radicalis sensu lato will, however, be difficult to detect in nature because they are possibly displaced by or their occurrence is masked by C. parasitica, especially in Europe and North America (Hoegger et al., 2002).

One of the fungi associated with cankers on Eucalyptus that has come into consideration during taxonomic studies of Cryphonectria is C. eucalypti. This fungus was previously known as Endothia gyrosa, which is a well-known associate of stem and branch cankers on native tree species in the United States (Stipes & Phipps, 1971; Roane et al., 1974). Rather unusually, it is also a name that was applied to the causal agent of stem cankers on Eucalyptus in Australia (Walker et al., 1985; Old et al., 1986) and South Africa (Van der Westhuizen et al., 1993). One of the reasons that the fungus on Eucalyptus was treated as E. gyrosa is that it has orange stromata and aseptate ascospores, which made it similar to Endothia spp. (Walker et al., 1985). Phylogenetic and morphological studies of isolates from Eucalyptus and those of E. gyrosa from the USA (Venter et al., 2001, 2002) showed that these fungi are not the same, and that the fungi from Eucalyptus are more closely related to Cryphonectria. This led to a name being provided for the fungus on Eucalyptus in Cryphonectria as C. eucalypti (Venter et al., 2002).

Although phylogenetic studies have grouped C. eucalypti closely with Cryphonectria, the fungus is unlike other species of Cryphonectria, which all have single septate ascospores (Venter et al., 2002; Myburg et al., 2004a). Cryphonectria eucalypti has aseptate ascospores, and, thus, based on morphological characteristics, has been suspected to represent a distinct genus (Myburg et al., 2004a). This hypothesis is confirmed in the new phylogenetic tree presented in the present study (Fig. 4), showing that C. eucalypti groups separately from species in Cryphonectria sensu stricto, and a new genus should thus be erected for this species.

New type for Cryphonectria

A group of isolates from Elaeocarpus spp. in New Zealand, labeled as C. gyrosa and C. radicalis, was shown in DNA sequence-based phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 4) to group separately from other Cryphonectria spp. (Myburg et al., 2004a). Their distinct grouping was defined morphologically by the one- to three-septate ascospores, conical and superficial conidiomata (Fig. 1g), and conidia of variable size (Myburg et al., 2004a; Gryzenhout et al., 2005b). These isolates are also unique in being associated with root cankers on Elaeocarpus spp. in New Zealand (Pennycook, 1989).

In resolving the identity of the fungus defined by the isolates from New Zealand, it was realized that the fungus shared the same morphology as specimens of C. gyrosa from Sri Lanka (Myburg et al., 2004a; Gryzenhout et al., 2005b, c). Because C. gyrosa was commonly recognized as the type of Cryphonectria (Barr, 1978), this implied that isolates residing in the new clade from New Zealand should have had the name Cryphonectria, rather than those of the clade defining currently known Cryphonectria spp., including C. parasitica (ICBN, Art. 7.2, Greuter et al., 2000).

Studies on the type status of C. gyrosa showed that C. gyrosa was erroneously cited as the type of Cryphonectria (Gryzenhout et al., 2005c). The error arose because C. gyrosa was mechanically selected as type at the time, while the species included in the original sub-genus Cryphonectria, namely C. abscondita Sacc. and C. variicolor Fuckel, were ignored as choice for type (Gryzenhout et al., 2005c). This erroneous lectotypification of C. gyrosa and the separate grouping of the isolates similar to C. gyrosa from Cryphonectria spp. prompted a proposal to conserve the name Cryphonectria against a new type (Gryzenhout et al., 2005c). The proposal was accepted by the International Association of Plant Taxonomists (IAPT) Nomenclature Committee for Fungi (Gams, 2005). The original species C. variicolor and C. abscondita were not suitable as new types and C. parasitica was chosen as the type for the genus. This was justified largely because of its importance as a pathogen and the viruses that have been characterized from it (Gryzenhout et al., 2005c).

The clade containing C. gyrosa and the isolates from New Zealand could thus be described as a distinct genus with the new name Amphilogia (Gryzenhout et al., 2005b). Amphilogia gyrosa (Berk. & Broome) Gryzenh. & M. J. Wingf. occurs on Elaeocarpus spp. in both New Zealand and Sri Lanka. This genus includes a second species, A. major Gryzenh. & M. J. Wingf., which also occurs on Elaeocarpus spp., but is currently known only from the South Island of New Zealand (Gryzenhout et al., 2005b).

New genera for Cryphonectria spp.

Only C. parasitica, C. radicalis sensu lato, C. nitschkei and C. macrospora group in the well-supported clade that represents Cryphonectria (Fig. 4), and they all have the morphological characteristics that define Cryphonectria (Myburg et al., 2004a, b). The taxonomic position of C. havanensis and C. coccolobae remains confused because no isolates exist for these species that can be used in phylogenetic studies based on DNA sequence comparisons (Myburg et al., 2004a). The remaining species described in Cryphonectria have, however, now been transferred to newly described genera, or will be transferred soon. These new genera have largely been recognized based on DNA sequence data (Fig. 4). Robust morphological characters also support the phylogenetic grouping of these new genera (Fig. 1).

Chrysoporthe is a new genus that has been described to house isolates of C. cubensis from various parts of the world (Gryzenhout et al., 2004). The fungi previously collectively known as C. cubensis are some of the most serious canker pathogens (Wingfield, 2003) of commercially grown Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae, Myrtales), and they are also pathogenic to other plant genera in the Myrtales (Fig. 3; Table 1). Species in Chrysoporthe are all characterized by limited ascostromatic tissue covering the perithecial bases, long perithecial necks covered in black stromatic tissue, and superficial, generally pyriform and fuscous black conidiomata (Fig. 1d–f; Gryzenhout et al., 2004; Myburg et al., 2004a). The anamorph genus Chrysoporthella has been described for asexual structures of Chrysoporthe (Gryzenhout et al., 2004).

Analyses of DNA sequence data have shown that isolates labeled as Chr. cubensis from different parts of the world group in five distinct subclades (Fig. 4) of Chrysoporthe (Gryzenhout et al., 2004, 2005d). These taxa are all pathogens of trees (Fig. 3). Four species (Table 1) could be described based on obvious morphological and ecological characteristics. These species include Chr. cubensis (Bruner) Gryzenh. & M. J. Wingf. for the Eucalyptus pathogen in South America, South East Asia, Australia and Central Africa (Gryzenhout et al., 2004). This species is also able to infect Syzygium aromaticum or clove (Hodges et al., 1986; Myburg et al., 2003) and Miconia spp. (Rodas et al., 2005). Chr. austroafricana Gryzenh. & M. J. Wingf. (Gryzenhout et al., 2004) causes cankers on Eucalyptus (Wingfield et al., 1989), Tibouchina (Fig 3e, f, Myburg et al., 2002) and Syzygium spp. (Heath et al., 2006) in South Africa. Chr. doradensis Gryzenh. & M. J. Wingf. is a newly described species (Gryzenhout et al., 2005d) that is pathogenic to Eucalyptus spp. in Ecuador. Chrysoporthella hodgesiana Gryzenh. & M. J. Wingf., for which the teleomorph has not yet been found (Gryzenhout et al., 2004), infects native Tibouchina spp. (Wingfield et al., 2001; Gryzenhout et al., 2004) and Miconia spp. (Rodas et al., 2005) in Colombia.

Chrysoporthe cubensis isolates reside in two distinct phylogenetic subclades (Fig. 4, Gryzenhout et al., 2004). One subclade consists of isolates from South and Central America, and Eastern Africa (Gryzenhout et al., 2004), while the other subclade includes isolates from South East Asian countries, Australia, Tanzania and Hawaii (Myburg et al., 2003). Fungi in these two subclades are indistinguishable from each other morphologically, although they represent two geographically distinct groups (Gryzenhout et al., 2004). Population-level techniques will most likely be required to determine whether fungi in these two subclades represent distinct species.

A fungus pathogenic to Terminalia ivorensis and Terminalia superba (Combretaceae, Myrtales) in Ecuador has recently been discovered and characterized (Fig. 4). This fungus has been described in the new genus Rostraureum and it is referred to as R. tropicale Gryzenh. & M. J. Wingf. (Gryzenhout et al., 2005a). Rostraureum (Fig. 1h) is characterized by superficial, orange, rostrate conidiomata with long necks, and semi-immersed ascostromata with little stromatic tissue, except for a white sheath of tissue around the perithecial necks. Cryphonectria longirostris also has these characteristics, but can be distinguished from R. tropicale based on conidial size (Gryzenhout et al., 2005a). For these reasons, C. longirostris has been transferred to Rostraureum (Gryzenhout et al., 2005a). In contrast to R. tropicale, there is no evidence to suggest that R. longirostris (Earle) Gryzenh. & M. J. Wingf. is pathogenic (Earle, 1901).

A newly discovered genus related to Cryphonectria and Chrysoporthe

Extensive sampling of fungi similar to Chrysoporthe and Cryphonectria has led to the discovery of a new fungus, Aurapex penicillata Gryzenh. & M. J. Wingf nom. prov., from Colombia. This fungus is associated with canker and die-back symptoms on native Melastomataceae (Tibouchina, Miconia) and Eucalyptus trees (Gryzenhout et al., 2006). Morphologically, this fungus is similar to Chrysoporthella, with black, superficial and pyriform conidiomata (Fig. 1I). It can, however, be distinguished from Chrysoporthella based on the different tissue organizations in the two fungi and because the tips of the conidiomatal necks are orange as opposed to necks that are uniformly black in Chrysoporthella (Fig. 1f). Phylogenetically, the fungus groups alone but close to Cryphonectria and allied genera (Fig. 4). No teleomorph has been found for A. penicillata, and it was thus described as the mitotic genus Aurapex nom. prov. residing in the Diaporthales.

Position of Cryphonectria and allied genera in the Diaporthales

Large subunit DNA sequence comparisons of an extensive collection of genera in the Diaporthales have revealed that species of Cryphonectria, Endothia and Chrysoporthe form a well-supported and distinct clade in the order (Castlebury et al., 2002). This clade has been referred to as the CryphonectriaEndothia complex. Castlebury (2002) proposed that the unique grouping of these isolates in the Diaporthales is supported by morphological features such as stromatic tissue that is orange at some stage in the life cycle of the fungus, and the tissue that turns purple in 3% KOH and yellow in lactic acid. The unique grouping and morphological characteristics of these genera suggest that Cryphonectria and related genera most likely represent a new family in the Diaporthales.

Conclusions

Recent taxonomic revisions have restricted the name Cryphonectria to only seven species. Other species related to Cryphonectria now reside in the three genera Chrysoporthe, Rostraureum and Amphilogia. The species conclusively shown to belong in Cryphonectria include C. parasitica, which is now also recognized as the type of the genus, C. nitschkei, C. radicalis sensu lato and C. macrospora. In DNA sequence comparisons, these species reside in a distinct clade representing Cryphonectria sensu stricto. Of these Cryphonectria species, only C. parasitica is a serious and primary plant pathogen (Anagnostakis, 1987).

Cryphonectria havanensis, C. coccolobae and C. eucalypti currently retain their position in Cryphonectria. However, the taxonomic relationship of C. havanensis and C. coccolobae with species in the Cryphonectria clade must still be clarified. Likewise, C. eucalypti should reside in a taxon apart from Cryphonectria because of its distinct ascospore morphology (Myburg et al., 2004a) and phylogenetic data presented for the first time in this study.

Cryphonectria spp., as they are now recognized, occur in temperate areas of Asia, Europe and North America (Table 1). Only C. havanensis and C. coccolobae occur in the Caribbean area, while C. eucalypti is known from Australia and South Africa (Table 1). C. parasitica, C. radicalis sensu lato, C. nitschkei and C. macrospora occur on a wide range of woody plants residing in five plant orders (Table 1). These species are all known from Japan, and it seems probable that this part of the world represents a centre of origin for these fungi. Only C. radicalis sensu lato occurs naturally in Europe (Myburg et al., 2004b), and additional species remain to be described in this group. Cryphonectria radicalis is also known in the USA, based on herbarium specimens from 1828 (Myburg et al., 2004b), although its presence in that country needs to be confirmed based on fresh specimens and DNA sequence comparisons.

During the course of the last decade, wide-ranging changes have been made to the taxonomy of Cryphonectria and related genera. These have emerged largely from studies on species such as Chr. cubensis that causes a serious canker disease on Eucalyptus and related plants (Wingfield, 2003). These studies commenced during the time when DNA sequence comparisons and the phylogenetic species concept was emerging as a dominant taxonomic approach, and they would not have been possible without them. Taxonomic studies described in this review provide a framework that should lead to a better understanding of the important tree pathogens residing in this group. They are also likely to lead to the discovery of additional species and to promote a more lucid understanding of the global distribution of invasive or potentially invasive tree pathogens.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Scott Enebak who provided us with photographs of chestnut blight. Financial support for the various studies that made this review possible was provided by the National Research Foundation (NRF), members of the Tree Protection Co-operative Programme (TPCP), the THRIP support programme of the Department of Trade and Industry, and the Department of Science and Technology/NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology, South Africa.

References

Anagnostakis
SL
(
1987
)
Chestnut blight: the classical problem of an introduced pathogen
. Mycologia
79
:
23
37
.
Barr
ME
(
1978
)
The Diaporthales in North America with emphasis on Gnomonia and its segregates
.
Mycol Mem
 
7
:
1
232
.
Castlebury
LA
Rossman
AY
Jaklitsch
WJ
Vasilyeva
LN
(
2002
)
A preliminary overview of the Diaporthales based on large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences
.
Mycologia
 
94
:
1017
1031
.
Earle
FS
(
1901
)
Some fungi from Porto Rico
.
Muehlenbergia
 
1
:
10
17
.
Gams
W
(
2005
)
Report of the Committee for Fungi: 13
.
Taxon
 
54
:
828
830
.
Greuter
W
McNeill
J
Barrie
FR
et al
(
2000
)
International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code). XVI International Botanical Congress, St Louis, MO, July–August 2000
 ,
Koeltz Scientific Books
,
Königstein, Germany
.
Gryzenhout
M
Eisenberg
BE
Coutinho
TA
Wingfield
BD
Wingfield
MJ
(
2003
)
Pathogenicity of Cryphonectria eucalypti to Eucalyptus clones in South Africa
.
Forest Ecol Manage
 
176
:
427
437
.
Gryzenhout
M
Myburg
H
Van Der Merwe
NA
Wingfield
BD
Wingfield
MJ
(
2004
)
Chrysoporthe, a new genus to accommodate Cryphonectria cubensis
.
Stud Mycol
 
50
:
119
142
.
Gryzenhout
M
Glen
HF
Wingfield
BD
Wingfield
MJ
(
2005a
)
Amphilogia gen. nov. for Cryphonectria-like fungi from Elaeocarpus spp. in New Zealand and Sri Lanka
.
Taxon
 
54
:
1009
1021
.
Gryzenhout
M
Glen
HF
Wingfield
BD
Wingfield
MJ
(
2005b
)
Proposal to conserve the name Cryphonectria (Diaporthales) with a conserved type
.
Taxon
 
54
:
539
540
.
Gryzenhout
M
Myburg
H
Wingfield
BD
Montenegro
F
Wingfield
MJ
(
2005c
)
Chrysoporthe doradensis sp. nov. pathogenic to Eucalyptus in Ecuador
.
Fung Div
 
20
:
39
57
.
Gryzenhout
M
Myburg
H
Wingfield
BD
Montenegro
F
Wingfield
MJ
(
2005d
)
Rostraureum tropicale gen. sp. nov. (Diaporthales) associated with dying Terminalia ivorensis in Ecuador
.
Mycol Res
 
109
:
1029
1044
.
Gryzenhout
M
Myburg
H
Rodas
CA
Wingfield
BD
Wingfield
MJ
(
2006
)
Aurapex penicillata gen. sp. nov. from native Miconia theaezans and Tibouchina spp. in Colombia
.
Mycologia
 (in press).
Heath
RN
Gryzenhout
M
Roux
J
Wingfield
MJ
(
2006
)
Discovery of the Cryphonectria canker pathogen on native Syzygium species in South Africa
.
Plant Dis
 (in press).
Heiniger
U
Rigling
D
(
1994
)
Biological control of chestnut blight in Europe
.
Annu Rev Phytopathol
 
32
:
581
599
.
Hillman
BI
Suzuki
N
(
2004
)
Viruses of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica
.
Adv Virus Res
 
63
:
423
472
.
Hodges
CS
Alfenas
AC
Cordell
CE
(
1986
)
The conspecificity of Cryphonectria cubensis and Endothia eugeniae
.
Mycologia
 
78
:
334
350
.
Hoegger
PJ
Rigling
D
Holdenrieder
O
Heiniger
U
(
2002
)
Cryphonectria radicalis: rediscovery of a lost fungus
.
Mycologia
 
94
:
105
115
.
Katoh
K
Misawa
K
Kuma
K
Miyata
T
(
2002
)
MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform
.
Nucleic Acids Res
 
30
:
3059
3066
.
Kobayashi
T
(
1970
)
Taxonomic studies of Japanese Diaporthaceae with special reference to their life histories
.
Bull Gov Forest Exp Station
 
226
:
132
147
.
Micales
JA
Stipes
RJ
(
1987
)
A reexamination of the fungal genera Cryphonectria and Endothia
.
Phytopathology
 
77
:
650
654
.
Milgroom
MG
Cortesi
P
(
2004
)
Biological control of chestnut blight with hypovirulence: a critical analysis
.
Annu Rev Phytopathol
 
42
:
311
338
.
Myburg
H
Gryzenhout
M
Heath
RN
Roux
J
Wingfield
BD
Wingfield
MJ
(
2002
)
Cryphonectria canker on Tibouchina in South Africa
.
Mycol Res
 
106
:
1299
1306
.
Myburg
H
Gryzenhout
M
Wingfield
BD
Wingfield
MJ
(
2003
)
Conspecificity of Endothia eugeniae and Cryphonectria cubensis: a re-evaluation based on morphology and DNA sequence data
.
Mycoscience
 
104
:
187
196
.
Myburg
H
Gryzenhout
M
Wingfield
BD
Milgroom
MG
Shigeru
K
Wingfield
MJ
(
2004a
)
DNA sequence data and morphology define Cryphonectria species in Europe, China, and Japan
.
Can J Bot
 
82
:
1730
1743
.
Myburg
H
Gryzenhout
M
Wingfield
BD
Stipes
RJ
Wingfield
MJ
(
2004b
)
Phylogenetic relationships of Cryphonectria and Endothia species, based on DNA sequence data and morphology
.
Mycologia
 
96
:
990
1001
.
Nuss
DL
(
1992
)
Biological control of chestnut blight: an example of virus mediated attenuation of fungal pathogenesis
.
Microbiol Rev
 
56
:
561
576
.
Old
KM
Murray
DIL
Kile
GA
Simpson
J
Malafant
KWJ
(
1986
)
The pathology of fungi isolated from eucalypt cankers in south-eastern Australia
.
Aust For Res
 
16
:
21
36
.
Pennycook
SR
(
1989
)
Part II. Fungal plant diseases. Plant Diseases Recorded in New Zealand 2
 , p. 117.
Plant Diseases Division, DSIR
,
Auckland, New Zealand
.
Roane
MK
(
1986a
)
Taxonomy of the genus Endothia
.
Chestnut Blight, Other Endothia Diseases, and the Genus Endothia
  (
Roane
MK
Griffin
GJ
Elkins
JR
, eds), pp.
28
39
.
APS Press
,
St Paul, MN
.
Roane
MK
(
1986b
)
Other diseases caused by Endothia species
.
Chestnut Blight, Other Endothia Diseases, and the Genus Endothia
  (
Roane
MK
Griffin
GJ
Elkins
JR
, eds), p.
27
.
APS Press
,
St Paul, MN
.
Roane
MK
Stipes
RJ
Phipps
PM
Miller
OK
Jr
(
1974
)
Endothia gyrosa, causal pathogen of pin oak blight
.
Mycologia
 
66
:
1042
1047
.
Robin
C
Heiniger
U
(
2001
)
Chestnut blight in Europe: diversity of Cryphonectriaparasitica, hypovirulence and biocontrol
.
Forest Snow Landscape Res
 
76
:
361
367
.
Rodas
CA
Gryzenhout
M
Myburg
H
Wingfield
BD
Wingfield
MJ
(
2005
)
Discovery of the Eucalyptus canker pathogen Chrysoporthe cubensis on native Miconia (Melastomataceae) in Colombia
.
Plant Pathol
 
54
:
460
470
.
Shear
CL
Stevens
NE
Tiller
RJ
(
1917
)
Endothia parasitica and related species
.
U S Dept Agric Bull
 
380
:
1
82
.
Stipes
RJ
Phipps
PM
(
1971
)
A species of Endothia associated with a canker disease of pin oak (Quercus palustris) in Virginia
.
Plant Dis Rep
 
55
:
467
469
.
Van der Westhuizen
IP
Wingfield
MJ
Kemp
GHJ
Swart
WJ
(
1993
)
First report of the canker pathogen Endothia gyrosa on Eucalyptus in South Africa
.
Plant Pathol
 
42
:
661
663
.
Vasilyeva
LN
(
1998
)
Pyrenomycetidae et Loculoascomycetidae. Plantae non Vasculares, Fungi et Bryopsidae. Orientis extremi Rossica
.
Fungi
 
4
:
1
418
.
Venter
M
Wingfield
MJ
Coutinho
TA
Wingfield
BD
(
2001
)
Molecular characterization of Endothia gyrosa isolates from Eucalyptus in South Africa and Australia
.
Plant Pathol
 
50
:
211
217
.
Venter
M
Myburg
H
Wingfield
BD
Coutinho
TA
Wingfield
MJ
(
2002
)
A new species of Cryphonectria from South Africa and Australia, pathogenic on Eucalyptus
.
Sydowia
 
54
:
98
117
.
Walker
J
Old
KM
Murray
DIL
(
1985
)
Endothia gyrosa on Eucalyptus in Australia with notes on some other species of Endothia and Cryphonectria
.
Mycotaxon
 
23
:
353
370
.
Wingfield
MJ
(
2003
)
Daniel McAlpine Memorial Lecture. Increasing threat of diseases to exotic plantation forests in the Southern Hemisphere: lessons from Cryphonectria canker
.
Aust Plant Pathol
 
23
:
133
139
.
Wingfield
MJ
Swart
WJ
Abear
B
(
1989
)
First record of Cryphonectria canker of Eucalyptus in South Africa
.
Phytophylactica
 
21
:
311
313
.
Wingfield
MJ
Rodas
C
Wright
J
Myburg
H
Venter
M
Wingfield
BD
(
2001
)
First report of Cryphonectria canker on Tibouchina in Colombia
.
Forest Pathol
 
31
:
297
306
.