-
PDF
- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Habib Jmii, Aymen Halouani, Firas Elmastour, Eseoghene Ifie, Sarah J Richardson, Famara Sane, Moncef Mokni, Mahjoub Aouni, Didier Hober, Hela Jaïdane, Central nervous system infection following vertical transmission of Coxsackievirus B4 in mice, Pathogens and Disease, Volume 74, Issue 8, November 2016, ftw096, https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftw096
Close - Share Icon Share
Coxsackie B viruses (CV-B) are important pathogens associated with several central nervous system (CNS) disorders. CV-B are mainly transmitted by the faecalâÂÂoral route, but there is also evidence for vertical transmission. The outcome of in utero CV-B infections on offspring's CNS is poorly explored. The aim of this study was to investigate vertical transmission of CV-B to the CNS. For this purpose, pregnant Swiss albino mice were intraperitoneally inoculated with CV-B4 E2 at gestational days 10G or 17G. Different CNS compartments were collected and analysed for virus infection and histopathological changes. Using plaque assays, we demonstrated CV-B4 E2 vertical transmission to offspring's CNS. Viral RNA persisted in the CNS up to 60 days after birth, as evidenced by a sensitive semi-nested(sn) reverse transcription (RT)-PCR method. This was despite infectious particles becoming undetectable at later time points. Persistence was associated with inflammatory lesions, lymphocyte infiltration and viral dsRNA detected by immunohistochemistry. Offspring born to dams mock- or virus-infected at day 17G were challenged by the same virus at day 21 after birth (âÂÂ+ and ++ groups, respectively). sn-RT-PCR and histology results, compared between both ++ and âÂÂ+ groups, show that in utero infection did not enhance CNS infection during challenge of the offspring with the same virus.
INTRODUCTION
Type B Coxsackieviruses (CV-B) are small non-enveloped positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses, belonging to the species Enterovirus B, from the Enterovirus genus of the Picornaviridae family (Adams et al. 2013; Knowles et al. 2012). They encompass six serotypes (CV-B1âÂÂ6) that have been distinguished from CV-A on the basis of the pathology induced when inoculated to newborn mice (Crowell and Landau 1997).
Coxsackie B viruses can cause a wide range of human diseases such as myocarditis (Klingel et al. 1992), pancreatitis (Ramsingh 2008) or chronic inflammatory myopathy (Tam and Messner 1999). They are also known to be responsible for numerous central nervous system (CNS) clinical manifestations, especially among newborns and children. CV-B infections mainly cause meningitis and encephalitis in infants (Kamei et al. 1990; Michos et al. 2007; Kumar et al. 2012) but have been also linked to other neurological manifestations such as limb paralysis (Yui and Gledhill 1991), acute transverse myelitis (Minami et al. 2004) and encephalitis lethargica (Cree et al. 2003). Several studies have reported that CV-B infections during childhood increase the risk of the later development of some neuropathologies like schizophrenia (Rantakallio et al. 1997) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Woodall and Graham 2004).
Coxsackie B viruses are generally transmitted by faecalâÂÂoral contamination or by respiratory droplets (Muehlenbachs, Bhatnagar and Zaki 2015) but they can be also vertically transmitted (Evans and Brown 1963; Kaplan et al. 1983; Modlin and Rotbart 1997; Bendig et al. 2003; Ouellet et al. 2004). CV-B infections during pregnancy have been well described (Euscher et al. 2001; Bendig et al. 2003; Ornoy and Tenenbaum 2006). Foetuses and neonates are susceptible to CV-B infections, where their CNS is frequently targeted (Hunt et al. 2012). Such infections can cause foetal damage leading to abortions and stillbirth (Wright, Okuyama and Mcallister 1963; Frisk and Diderholm 1992; Axelsson et al. 1993; Hunt et al. 2012) or severe neonatal morbidity (Euscher et al. 2001; Ouellet et al. 2004; Satosar et al. 2004).
The association between congenital CV-B infections and CNS complications is well described. A study conducted by Kibrick (1961) showed that 27% of newborns with CV-B infections exhibited CNS lesions. Euscher et al. (2001) have demonstrated the placental transmission of CV-B during pregnancy and that such infections can lead to severe CNS sequels, with neurodevelopmental abnormalities and mental retardation. In addition, Konstantinidou et al. (2007) have described a case of foetal morbidity following intrauterine transplacental transmission of CV-B3. Histological analysis showed villitis, interstitial pneumonitis and necrotising meningoencephalitis.
Despite the numerous clinical studies describing CV-B infections in pregnancy where complications lead to foetal or neonatal death or live birth with serious abnormalities, to date, only few experimental studies have been carried out in mouse models to investigate the pathogenic mechanisms of CV-B infection during pregnancy (Modlin and Crumpacker 1982; Marosova et al. 2011; Bopegamage et al. 2012; Hwang et al. 2014).
The studies mentioned above did not thoroughly explore the effects of CV-B vertical transmission on the CNS. The current study was undertaken to investigate the effect of an in utero CV-B infection on offspring's CNS, and the ability of such an infection to enhance viral persistence and infection following subsequent challenge of young offspring with the same virus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Virus and cell line
Virus stock: the CV-B4 E2 strain used in these experiments (isolated from the pancreas of a 10-year-old boy died from diabetic ketoacidiosis (Yoon et al. 1979), and kindly provided by J.W. Yoon, Julia MC Farlane Diabetes Research Centre, Calagary, Alberta, Canada) was propagated in HEp-2 cells (BioWhittaker, Verviers, Belgium) in Eagle's Minimal Essential Medium (MEM; Gibco BRL, Cergy Pontoise, France) supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% L-Glutamine, 50 üg streptomycin mlâÂÂ1 and 50 U penicillin mlâÂÂ1. Supernatants were collected three days post-inoculation (p.i.) and then clarified at 2000 g for 10 min. Virus titre was determined as TCID50 on HEp-2 cells by the method of Reed and Muench (1938) and stored in aliquots at âÂÂ80ðC until required.
Mice
Adult Swiss albino mice (purchased from Pasteur institute, Tunis, Tunisia) were handled in accordance with the standards of general ethics guidelines and used for all experiments. For planned gestation, three females per male were caged under specific pathogen-free conditions with unlimited access to food and water. Successful fertilisation was checked by vaginal plugs formation which corresponds to the first day of pregnancy.
Virus inoculation of timed-pregnant mice and pups
Pregnant mice were inoculated intraperitoneally at two different time points, either at day 10 or 17 of gestation (day 10G or 17G), with 200 ül of CV-B4 E2 at a dose of 1.4 à105 p.f.u. Control animals were inoculated with 200 ül of sterile MEM.
For each experimental condition, six mice (three offspring born to each of two dams) were sacrificed (using isoflurane) at different p.i. times. Brain, cerebellum, brain stem and spinal cord were removed and rinsed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). One part was snap frozen at âÂÂ80ðC for virus titration and molecular biology assays, and the other one was fixed in 4% formalin for histological analysis.
To study the effect of an infection during pregnancy on a subsequent challenge of the young offspring, pups from dams inoculated at day 17G were separated from their mothers 3 weeks after birth (day 21), and four groups of pups were formed (Fig. 1): a first group of pups born to infected mothers and intraperitoneally challenged with 200 ül of CV-B4 E2 at a dose of 1.4 à105 p.f.u. 3 weeks after birth (at day 21) (group ++). A second group of pups born to mock-infected mothers and intraperitoneally challenged with the same virus dose at the age of 21 days (group âÂÂ+). A third group of pups born to infected dams and that remained unchallenged (group +âÂÂ). Finally, a fourth group containing pups born to mock-infected mothers and that remained unchallenged (group âÂÂ). The same procedure of sampling and analysis was followed for those four groups and results were compared, especially between ++ and âÂÂ+ groups.
Schematic representation of the experimental design adopted to explore the effect of in utero CV-B4 infection on a subsequent challenge of young offspring by the same virus.
Virus titration by plaque assay
Snap-frozen tissues were weighed and crushed using a tissue ruptor (Qiagen) in 1% penicillin/streptomycin PBS, and then centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 min at 4ðC. Supernatants were diluted 10-fold in MEM with 2% foetal calf serum (FCS), and then inoculated onto confluent HEp-2 cells (3 à106 cells/well) in 6-well culture plates. After 4 h of incubation, medium containing virus dilutions was removed, cells were washed with PBS, 3 ml of medium (9 vol.) supplemented with 4% agarose solution (1 vol.) was then added to each well. Cultures were incubated at 37ðC in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 and examined daily for CV-B4 cytopathic effect up to 7 days p.i. Cells were then fixed with 1 ml of 10% formaldehyde and stained with crystal violet for 30 min. Finally, wells were rinsed with water and plaques were counted for the highest dilution showing cytopathic effect. Results were expressed as means of p.f.u. mgâÂÂ1 of tissue +SDs.
RNA extraction and sn-RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA extraction from snap-frozen tissues was performed using Tri-reagent (Sigma, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) as described previously (Chomczynski and Sacchi 1987). Extracted RNA was subsequently dissolved in 50 ül of nuclease-free water (Promega, Charbonnières-les-Bains, France), quantified with the Quant-iT Ribogreen RNA assay kit (Molecular probes, Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France) according to manufacturer's instructions, and diluted to be used in reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assays. Genome amplification was performed using a single-tube method with Superscript One Step RT-PCR with Platinium Taq Kit (Invitrogen), as previously described (Jaïdane et al. 2006). Primer sense EV1 (5â²-CAAGCACTTCTGTTTCCCCGG-3â²) and antisense EV2 (5â²-ATTGTCACCATAAGCAGCCA-3â²) were selected within the 5â² non-translated region (NTR) of the enteroviral genome generating a 435-bp fragment (Leparc, Aymard and Fuchs 1994). The reaction was performed in a total volume of 50 ül containing 10 ül (100 ng) of RNA, 0.4 üM each EV1 and EV2 primers, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 1.2 mM MgSO4 and 1 ül of reverse transcriptase enzyme/Platinum Taq mix. Samples were subjected to a first step of RT for 30 min at 50ðC, followed by 2 min of denaturation at 94ðC; 40 cycles consisting of denaturation for 30 s at 94ðC, annealing for 45 s at 55ðC and extension for 45 s at 72ðC, and then a final extension step for 10 min at 72ðC. All samples we attempted to increase the sensitivity of our approach by submitting RT-PCR products to a second round of amplification through sn-PCR, in which primer sense EV1 was used with internal primer antisense EV3 (5â²-CTTGCGCGTTACGAC-3â²) and the Jump Start Accu Taq LA DNA Polymerase Mix (Sigma), to generate a 362-bp fragment within the 5â² NTR, as described previously (Jaïdane et al. 2012). The reaction was carried out with 5àül of amplified DNA samples and 0.4 üM of each primers EV1 and EV3 in a total volume of 50 ül containing 1 U of JumpStart Accu Taq LA DNA polymerase, 0.2 mM each dNTP, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM Tris-HCl, 15 mM ammonium sulphate (pH 9.3) and 1% Tween 20. Samples were subjected to 3 min of denaturation at 94ðC, followed by 35 cycles consisting of denaturation for 30 s at 94ðC, annealing for 30 s at 52ðC and extension for 30 s at 72ðC, followed by a final extension step for 7 min at 72ðC. RNA extracted from CV-B4 E2-infected HEp-2 cells was reverse transcribed and amplified according to the procedure described above, and served as a positive control. A negative control (no RNA) was also included in each reaction. All reactions were performed by using a preheated thermocycler (Mastercycler Gradient Eppendorf). Amplification results were revealed by using the Gel Doc 2000 system (Bio-Rad) following a âÂÂDNA gradeâ (Type 5, Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France) agarose gel electrophoresis. A 100-bp DNA ladder (Invitrogen) was used as a molecular mass marker. For samples that were negative, beta-actin mRNA was amplified as described above and used as an internal control to ensure the integrity of extracted RNA and the absence of RT-PCR inhibitors.
Histological analysis
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were cut into 4-üm-thick sections. The slices were deparaffinised twice in xylene for 10 min, then rehydrated through sequential concentrations of alcohol (100, 95, 70 and 50ð) and finally with double distilled water. Sections were then stained with haematoxylin for 15 min, washed in running water, differentiated with 1% HCl/ethanol and incubated in water for 5 min. For cytoplasm staining, sections were then immersed in 0.5% eosin solution for 3 min and washed in water for 10 min. Sections were dehydrated again through sequential concentrations of alcohol (50, 70, 95 and 100ð). Finally, slides were mounted and observed under a light microscope.
Immunohistochemistry
The detection of viral dsRNA in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded CNS tissue sections was performed using a standard immunoperoxidase approach, as described previously (Richardson et al. 2010). Briefly, following dewaxing and rehydration, samples were incubated with proteinase K (Dako, Ely, Cambs, UK) for 4 min. Following a block with 0.2 M glycine/PBS and then 10% normal goat serum, the sections were incubated with an isotype control or dsRNA-J2 antibody (Scicons, Budapest, Hungary; 1/100, overnight at 4ðC) that had been biotinylated by Capra Science (Angelholm, Sweden). This antibody detects dsRNA >50 bp in length and so is unlikely to detect endogenous cellular dsRNA species (Richardson et al. 2010). Following washes and peroxidase blocking, the sections were treated with the Vector Elite ABC Kit (Vector Labs, Peterborough, UK) optimised for biotinylated antibodies, as per the manufacturer's instructions. Staining was visualised with 3,3â²-Diaminobenzidine (Dako). Sections were counterstained with haematoxylin (Dako), dehydrated and mounted in distrene, plasticiser, xylene. Images were captured under a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope (Nikon, Guildford, Surrey, UK).
Statistical analysis
The Student test was performed, using GraphPad Prizm 5 software, to determine if means of viral titres, at days 0 and 5, among offspring of mice that were infected at day 10G or 17G are significantly different. The same test was performed to determine if means of viral titres, at day 26 and 30, between pups challenged at the age of 21 days and born to dams either infected or not during pregnancy, are significantly different. The two-tailed Fisher's exact test was also performed to examine the significance of the difference between mock-infected and virus-infected mice in terms of the presence of staining signal for viral dsRNA. In all cases, differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
RESULTS
Infectious particles were isolated from different compartments of the CNS of offspring born to CV-B4 E2-inoculated dams
Using the plaque assay method, infectious particles were detected and viral titres were determined at different time points in different zones of the CNS (brain, cerebellum and brainstem) of, respectively, 16/18 (88.88%) and 11/18 (61.11%) offspring of dams inoculated with CV-B4 E2 either at day 10G or 17G (Table 1). These data prove that CV-B4 E2 was vertically transmitted in our mouse model and reached the CNS in the course of this in utero infection. No infectious particles were however detected in the spinal cord.
Viral load for individual samples taken from different compartments of the CNS of offspring born to dams inoculated either at day 10 or 17 of gestation.
| . | . | Day 17G . | Day 0 . | Day 5 . | Day 21 . | . | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inoculation | Brain | 5 | 0 | 21.73 | 166.6 | 174.9 | 83.33 | 22.35 | 11.39 | 0 | Litter 1 | |||
| at day 10G | 45.23 | 23.9 | 11.48 | 11.22 | 0 | 0 | 4.23 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||||
| Cerebellum | 20.2 | 31.25 | 50 | 337.3 | 166.6 | 0 | 0.99 | 4.77 | 1.95 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 54.23 | 25.32 | 0 | 12.34 | 0 | 0 | 0.28 | 52.63 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Brainstem | 0 | 142.8 | 0 | 56.81 | 514.7 | 0 | 21.51 | 21.92 | 100.2 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 73.65 | 67.34 | 0 | 0 | 23.33 | 0 | 35.71 | 14.28 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Inoculation | Brain | 0 | 0 | 16.33 | 26.3 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |||
| at day 17G | 6.9 | 0 | 0 | 6.72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.76 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||||
| Cerebellum | 0 | 57.14 | 0 | 13.88 | 0 | 17.24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.94 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Brainstem | 250 | 0 | 229.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 8.33 | 0 | 0 | 20.83 | 178.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup2 | pup3 | |||
| . | . | Day 17G . | Day 0 . | Day 5 . | Day 21 . | . | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inoculation | Brain | 5 | 0 | 21.73 | 166.6 | 174.9 | 83.33 | 22.35 | 11.39 | 0 | Litter 1 | |||
| at day 10G | 45.23 | 23.9 | 11.48 | 11.22 | 0 | 0 | 4.23 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||||
| Cerebellum | 20.2 | 31.25 | 50 | 337.3 | 166.6 | 0 | 0.99 | 4.77 | 1.95 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 54.23 | 25.32 | 0 | 12.34 | 0 | 0 | 0.28 | 52.63 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Brainstem | 0 | 142.8 | 0 | 56.81 | 514.7 | 0 | 21.51 | 21.92 | 100.2 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 73.65 | 67.34 | 0 | 0 | 23.33 | 0 | 35.71 | 14.28 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Inoculation | Brain | 0 | 0 | 16.33 | 26.3 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |||
| at day 17G | 6.9 | 0 | 0 | 6.72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.76 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||||
| Cerebellum | 0 | 57.14 | 0 | 13.88 | 0 | 17.24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.94 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Brainstem | 250 | 0 | 229.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 8.33 | 0 | 0 | 20.83 | 178.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup2 | pup3 | |||
CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brainstem and spinal cord) of each of six offspring (each three born to one different dam) were tested by plaque assay, for viral progeny, each time p.i. (day 17G, and days 0 and 5 after birth for mice inoculated at day 10G, and days 0, 5 and 21 after birth for those inoculated at day 17G). Results are expressed in p.f.u. mgâÂÂ1 of tissue for each sample.
Viral load for individual samples taken from different compartments of the CNS of offspring born to dams inoculated either at day 10 or 17 of gestation.
| . | . | Day 17G . | Day 0 . | Day 5 . | Day 21 . | . | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inoculation | Brain | 5 | 0 | 21.73 | 166.6 | 174.9 | 83.33 | 22.35 | 11.39 | 0 | Litter 1 | |||
| at day 10G | 45.23 | 23.9 | 11.48 | 11.22 | 0 | 0 | 4.23 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||||
| Cerebellum | 20.2 | 31.25 | 50 | 337.3 | 166.6 | 0 | 0.99 | 4.77 | 1.95 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 54.23 | 25.32 | 0 | 12.34 | 0 | 0 | 0.28 | 52.63 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Brainstem | 0 | 142.8 | 0 | 56.81 | 514.7 | 0 | 21.51 | 21.92 | 100.2 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 73.65 | 67.34 | 0 | 0 | 23.33 | 0 | 35.71 | 14.28 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Inoculation | Brain | 0 | 0 | 16.33 | 26.3 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |||
| at day 17G | 6.9 | 0 | 0 | 6.72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.76 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||||
| Cerebellum | 0 | 57.14 | 0 | 13.88 | 0 | 17.24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.94 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Brainstem | 250 | 0 | 229.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 8.33 | 0 | 0 | 20.83 | 178.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup2 | pup3 | |||
| . | . | Day 17G . | Day 0 . | Day 5 . | Day 21 . | . | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inoculation | Brain | 5 | 0 | 21.73 | 166.6 | 174.9 | 83.33 | 22.35 | 11.39 | 0 | Litter 1 | |||
| at day 10G | 45.23 | 23.9 | 11.48 | 11.22 | 0 | 0 | 4.23 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||||
| Cerebellum | 20.2 | 31.25 | 50 | 337.3 | 166.6 | 0 | 0.99 | 4.77 | 1.95 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 54.23 | 25.32 | 0 | 12.34 | 0 | 0 | 0.28 | 52.63 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Brainstem | 0 | 142.8 | 0 | 56.81 | 514.7 | 0 | 21.51 | 21.92 | 100.2 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 73.65 | 67.34 | 0 | 0 | 23.33 | 0 | 35.71 | 14.28 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Inoculation | Brain | 0 | 0 | 16.33 | 26.3 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |||
| at day 17G | 6.9 | 0 | 0 | 6.72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.76 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||||
| Cerebellum | 0 | 57.14 | 0 | 13.88 | 0 | 17.24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.94 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Brainstem | 250 | 0 | 229.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 8.33 | 0 | 0 | 20.83 | 178.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | ||||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | |||||
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup2 | pup3 | |||
CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brainstem and spinal cord) of each of six offspring (each three born to one different dam) were tested by plaque assay, for viral progeny, each time p.i. (day 17G, and days 0 and 5 after birth for mice inoculated at day 10G, and days 0, 5 and 21 after birth for those inoculated at day 17G). Results are expressed in p.f.u. mgâÂÂ1 of tissue for each sample.
Viral titres peaked at day 0 (day of birth) in both the pups from dams inoculated at day 10G or 17G, with no significant difference detected between these two. These titres rapidly decreased thereafter but remained detectable at day 5 after birth (Fig. 2A and B), with no significant difference between pups born to dams inoculated at either day 10G or 17G. The highest numbers of infectious particles were detected in the brainstem. Viral progeny was not detected in CNS tissues of offspring from negative control dams.
Kinetics of viral progeny in different compartments of the CNS of offspring born to CV-B4 E2-inoculated dams. Viral titres were determined by plaque assay in CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brainstem and spinal cord) of offspring from dams inoculated with CV-B4 E2 at day 10G (A) or day 17G (B). Tissues of each of six offspring (each three born to one different dam) were tested each time p.i. (day 17G, and days 0 and 5 after birth for mice inoculated at day 10G, and days 0, 5 and 21 after birth for those inoculated at day 17G). Results are plotted as mean p.f.u. mgâÂÂ1 of tissue + SDs, n = 6)
Prolonged detection of viral RNA in different compartments of the CNS of offspring born to CV-B4 E2-inoculated dams
Infectious virus rapidly became undetectable in the CNS compartments of the offspring. To investigate further the infection and eventual persistence, the presence of viral RNA in the CNS of offspring from dams inoculated at day 17G was studied, up to 90 days after birth, using sn-RT-PCR. As shown in Table 2 and Fig. 3, CV-B4 RNA was detected until 60 days of age in 8/18 (44.44%) offspring, in the three zones of the CNS that contained infectious particles detected by plaque assay at birth, namely, the brainstem, the cerebellum and the brain. Viral RNA was not detected in spinal cord which confirms the results obtained by plaque assay. These results suggest that CV-B4 E2 can establish a persistent infection (until the adult stage) of the CNS following an in utero transmission. Viral RNA was not detected in CNS tissues of offspring from control dams.
Viral RNA detection in different compartments of the CNS of offspring born to CV-B4 E2-inoculated dams. CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brainstem and spinal cord) of offspring from dams inoculated with CV-B4 E2 at day 17G were analysed for viral RNA detection by sn-RT-PCR. Six offspring (each three born to one different dam) were tested each time p.i. (days 30, 60 and 90 after birth). Results are illustrated by a representative agarose gel electrophoresis. L: 100 bp DNA ladder; NC: negative control; PC: positive control.
Kinetics of viral RNA detection in different compartments of the CNS of offspring born to CV-B4 E2-inoculated dams at day 17 of gestation.
| . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | Day 90 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain | + | + | â | â | â | â | + | â | â | Litter 1 |
| + | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Cerebellum | + | + | â | + | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Brainstem | + | + | â | -â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup3 | ||
| . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | Day 90 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain | + | + | â | â | â | â | + | â | â | Litter 1 |
| + | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Cerebellum | + | + | â | + | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Brainstem | + | + | â | -â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup3 | ||
CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brainstem and spinal cord) of offspring born to dams inoculated with CV-B4 E2 at day 17G were analysed for viral RNA detection by sn-RT-PCR. Six offspring (each three born to one different dam) were tested each time p.i. (days 30, 60 and 90 after birth). Results are summarised as positive (+) or negative (âÂÂ) for each sample.
Kinetics of viral RNA detection in different compartments of the CNS of offspring born to CV-B4 E2-inoculated dams at day 17 of gestation.
| . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | Day 90 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain | + | + | â | â | â | â | + | â | â | Litter 1 |
| + | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Cerebellum | + | + | â | + | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Brainstem | + | + | â | -â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup3 | ||
| . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | Day 90 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain | + | + | â | â | â | â | + | â | â | Litter 1 |
| + | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Cerebellum | + | + | â | + | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Brainstem | + | + | â | -â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | |
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup3 | ||
CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brainstem and spinal cord) of offspring born to dams inoculated with CV-B4 E2 at day 17G were analysed for viral RNA detection by sn-RT-PCR. Six offspring (each three born to one different dam) were tested each time p.i. (days 30, 60 and 90 after birth). Results are summarised as positive (+) or negative (âÂÂ) for each sample.
Histopathological changes in the CNS of offspring born to CV-B4 E2-inoculated dams
In order to explore the eventual abnormalities caused by an in utero CV-B4 E2 infection of the CNS, we conducted a histological analysis. CNS (brain, cerebellum, brain stem and spinal cord) tissue sections from offspring born to control and CV-B4 E2-inoculated dams (six offspring from each group, each three born to one different dam) were analysed by haematoxylin/eosin staining at different p.i. times. No histopathological changes were observed in pups from dams inoculated at day 10G. However, two cases of inflammatory lesions with evidence of lymphocyte infiltration were detected in offspring infected with CV-B4 E2 on day 17G (group +âÂÂ), in the brain (one case) and brainstem (one case), at day 60 of age (Fig. 4). No anomalies were observed in the cerebellum and the spinal cord, or in CNS tissues from the control group.
Histopathological changes in CNS tissues of offspring born to dams inoculated with CV-B4 E2. CNS tissue (brain, cerebellum, brainstem and spinal cord) sections of offspring from control and CV-B4 E2-inoculated dams (six offspring from each group, each three born to one different dam) were analysed by haematoxylin/eosin staining at different p.i. times. Histopathological changes were found only at day 60 after birth in one out of six analysed brains (B) and one out of six analysed brainstem (D) from mice inoculated at day 17G (group +âÂÂ). Inflammatory foci with lymphocyte infiltration are indicated by arrows (B, D). No anomalies were observed in tissues from mice inoculated at day 10G and from control mice. Representative sections of brain (A) and brainstem (C), taken at day 60 of age, from control mice. Gr ÃÂ200.
Effect of a primary infection during foetal life on a subsequent challenge of young offspring
In order to investigate the effect of an in utero infection on a subsequent challenge of young offspring, CNS tissues from pups challenged 21 days after birth, and born to either dams infected or not at day 17G (groups ++ and âÂÂ+, respectively), were subjected to the same analysis by plaque assay, RT-PCR and histological staining, as described above. The results obtained by each procedure were then compared between both groups.
In both the ++ and âÂÂ+ groups, virus titration revealed the presence of infectious particles in 9/18 (50%) offspring, in the brain, cerebellum and brainstem, until at least day 30 of age (9 days post-challenge) but not at day 60 (Table 3). The spinal cord was negative as throughout the course of the in utero infection. No significant differences in the proportion of positive tissues (Table 3) or the mean titres of infectious particles in each tissue at different time points (Fig. 5A and B) were observed between the two groups.
Kinetics of viral progeny in different CNS tissues from pups challenged 21 days after birth and born to either dams infected or not at gestational day 17 (groups ++ and âÂÂ+, respectively). CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brain stem and spinal cord) from six offspring (each three born to one different dam) of each of ++ and âÂÂ+ groups were analysed each time p.i. (days 26, 30 and 60 after birth) for viral progeny. Viral titres in CNS tissues were determined by plaque assay for both ++ (A) and âÂÂ+ (B) groups. Results are plotted as mean p.f.u. mgâÂÂ1 of tissue + SDs, n = 6).
Viral load for individual samples taken from different compartments of the CNS of offspring challenged 21 days after birth and born to dams either infected or not at gestational day 17 (groups ++ and âÂÂ+, respectively).
| . | . | Day 26 . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group ++ | Brain | 10.41 | 57.87 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 28.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 |
| 21.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | 406.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | 303.3 | 0 | 375 | 22.60 | 27.32 | 6.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Group âÂÂ+ | Brain | 0 | 1.06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 1.75 | 0 | 2.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | 25.56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 15.34 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 27.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | 100.4 | 0 | 6.94 | 0 | 42.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | |||
| . | . | Day 26 . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group ++ | Brain | 10.41 | 57.87 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 28.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 |
| 21.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | 406.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | 303.3 | 0 | 375 | 22.60 | 27.32 | 6.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Group âÂÂ+ | Brain | 0 | 1.06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 1.75 | 0 | 2.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | 25.56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 15.34 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 27.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | 100.4 | 0 | 6.94 | 0 | 42.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | |||
CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brain stem and spinal cord) from six offspring (each three born to one different dam) of each of ++ and âÂÂ+ groups were analysed by plaque assay, for viral progeny, each time p.i. (days 30, 60 and 90 after birth). Results are expressed in p.f.u. mgâÂÂ1 of tissue for each sample.
Viral load for individual samples taken from different compartments of the CNS of offspring challenged 21 days after birth and born to dams either infected or not at gestational day 17 (groups ++ and âÂÂ+, respectively).
| . | . | Day 26 . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group ++ | Brain | 10.41 | 57.87 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 28.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 |
| 21.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | 406.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | 303.3 | 0 | 375 | 22.60 | 27.32 | 6.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Group âÂÂ+ | Brain | 0 | 1.06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 1.75 | 0 | 2.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | 25.56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 15.34 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 27.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | 100.4 | 0 | 6.94 | 0 | 42.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | |||
| . | . | Day 26 . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group ++ | Brain | 10.41 | 57.87 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 28.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 |
| 21.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | 406.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | 303.3 | 0 | 375 | 22.60 | 27.32 | 6.75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Group âÂÂ+ | Brain | 0 | 1.06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 1.75 | 0 | 2.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | 25.56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 15.34 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 27.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | 100.4 | 0 | 6.94 | 0 | 42.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 1 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Litter 2 | ||
| pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | pup 1 | pup 2 | pup 3 | |||
CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brain stem and spinal cord) from six offspring (each three born to one different dam) of each of ++ and âÂÂ+ groups were analysed by plaque assay, for viral progeny, each time p.i. (days 30, 60 and 90 after birth). Results are expressed in p.f.u. mgâÂÂ1 of tissue for each sample.
The sn-RT-PCR results revealed that both the ++ and âÂÂ+ groups showed viral RNA in the brain, cerebellum and brain stem, until day 90 (70 days post-challenge). No significant differences were observed in the proportion of positive tissues at the different time points (10/18 and 8/18 infected mice in the ++ and the âÂÂ+ groups, respectively). The viral genome remained undetectable in the spinal cord (Table 4).
Kinetics of viral RNA detection in different compartments of the CNS of offspring challenged 21 days after birth and born to dams either infected or not at gestational day 17 (groups ++ and âÂÂ+, respectively).
| . | . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | Day 90 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group ++ | Brain | â | â | + | â | â | â | + | â | + | Litter 1 |
| â | + | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | â | + | â | â | + | â | â | â | + | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | + | + | + | â | + | â | â | + | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Group âÂÂ+ | Brain | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | + | + | Litter 1 |
| â | + | â | + | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | + | + | + | â | â | â | + | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | â | + | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | + | â | â | â | â | + | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| pup 1 | pup2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup2 | pup3 | |||
| . | . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | Day 90 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group ++ | Brain | â | â | + | â | â | â | + | â | + | Litter 1 |
| â | + | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | â | + | â | â | + | â | â | â | + | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | + | + | + | â | + | â | â | + | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Group âÂÂ+ | Brain | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | + | + | Litter 1 |
| â | + | â | + | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | + | + | + | â | â | â | + | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | â | + | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | + | â | â | â | â | + | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| pup 1 | pup2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup2 | pup3 | |||
CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brain stem and spinal cord) from six offspring (each three born to one different dam) of each of ++ and âÂÂ+ groups were analysed by sn-RT-PCR each time p.i. (days 30, 60 and 90 after birth). Results are summarised as positive (+) or negative (âÂÂ) for each sample.
Kinetics of viral RNA detection in different compartments of the CNS of offspring challenged 21 days after birth and born to dams either infected or not at gestational day 17 (groups ++ and âÂÂ+, respectively).
| . | . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | Day 90 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group ++ | Brain | â | â | + | â | â | â | + | â | + | Litter 1 |
| â | + | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | â | + | â | â | + | â | â | â | + | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | + | + | + | â | + | â | â | + | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Group âÂÂ+ | Brain | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | + | + | Litter 1 |
| â | + | â | + | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | + | + | + | â | â | â | + | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | â | + | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | + | â | â | â | â | + | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| pup 1 | pup2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup2 | pup3 | |||
| . | . | Day 30 . | Day 60 . | Day 90 . | . | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group ++ | Brain | â | â | + | â | â | â | + | â | + | Litter 1 |
| â | + | â | â | + | + | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | â | + | â | â | + | â | â | â | + | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | + | + | + | â | + | â | â | + | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Group âÂÂ+ | Brain | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | + | + | Litter 1 |
| â | + | â | + | + | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Cerebellum | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | + | + | + | â | â | â | + | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Brainstem | â | + | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | + | â | â | â | â | + | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| Spinal cord | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 1 | |
| â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | â | Litter 2 | ||
| pup 1 | pup2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup2 | pup3 | pup1 | pup2 | pup3 | |||
CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brain stem and spinal cord) from six offspring (each three born to one different dam) of each of ++ and âÂÂ+ groups were analysed by sn-RT-PCR each time p.i. (days 30, 60 and 90 after birth). Results are summarised as positive (+) or negative (âÂÂ) for each sample.
Histological analysis revealed anomalies of the brain (five cases, inflammatory lesions with lymphocyte infiltration at day 60 and meningitis at day 90) in both ++ (only one of two cases at day 60 is illustrated) and âÂÂ+ groups (only one of two cases at day 90 is illustrated), and of the brain stem (one case, inflammatory lesions with lymphocyte infiltration at day 90) in the âÂÂ+ group (Fig. 6). No anomalies were observed in the cerebellum, the spinal cord and in CNS tissues from the control group.
Histopathological changes in different CNS tissues from pups challenged 21 days after birth and born to either dams infected or not at gestational day 17 (groups ++ and âÂÂ+, respectively). CNS tissues (brain, cerebellum, brain stem and spinal cord) from six offspring (each three born to one different dam) of each of ++ and âÂÂ+ groups were analysed each time p.i. (days 30, 60 and 90 after birth) by haematoxylin/eosin staining. Histopathological changes (indicated by arrows) were found only in the brain at days 60 and 90 in the group ++, and in the brain and the brainstem at day 90 in the group âÂÂ+. All illustrated sections from infected groups show inflammatory foci with lymphocyte infiltration. Both illustrated sections of brain taken at day 90 show signs of meningitis (D and E). Representative sections of the brain and the brainstem taken, at the same corresponding days, from negative control mice are given in the first column (A, C and F). Gr ÃÂ200.
Viral double-stranded RNA detected in few cells of inflamed and/or persistently infected CNS tissue sections
In an attempt to identify the cause of tissue damage and to understand the molecular mechanisms of CV-B4 persistence in the CNS, dsRNA staining of paraffin-embedded tissue sections from infected (all inflamed and other selected CV-B4 E2 RNA sn-RT-PCR positive tissues) and negative control offspring was carried out using an antibody specifically recognising dsRNA (see Material and methods section). Two sections for each sample were stained and analysed in a blinded manner and the isotype control staining on all sections was negative. Following unblinding, 7 of 14 (50%) infected mice were shown to have evidence of dsRNA positive cells (at most, one or two dsRNA positive cells were present within any of the sections examined). In contrast, no dsRNA positive cells were identified in the seven mock-infected mice (two-tailed Fisher's exact test, P = 0.0468). dsRNA immunolabelling was observed in 5/8 (62.5%) inflamed, 7/12 (58.33%) sn-RT-PCR positive and 5/6 (83.33%) both inflamed and RT-PCR positive tissue sections from infected mice, whereas sn-RT-PCR negative tissues were immunonegative. All control tissue sections from uninfected animals were also negative (Table 5; Fig. 7).
Staining for dsRNA in CNS tissue sections of offspring from dams inoculated with CV-B4 E2 at gestational day 17. Representative illustrations of immunostaining for dsRNA in CNS tissue sections counterstained with hematoxylin: brain from negative control (A) and from infected offspring (D). Cerebellum from negative control (B) and from infected offspring (E). Brainstem from negative control (C) and from infected offspring (F). All samples were taken at 60 days after birth. A faint brown positive signal for viral dsRNA is indicated by arrows. Gr ÃÂ400.
IHC for dsRNA results depending on histopathology and sn-RT-PCR findings in CNS tissue sections of offspring challenged or not at day 21 of age, and born to dams inoculated or not with CV-B4 E2 at gestational day 17.
| Sample . | Histopathology . | sn-RT-PCR for CV-B4 E2 RNA . | IHC for dsRNA . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brain 1, day 60, +â group | + | â | â |
| Brainstem 1, day 60, +â group | + | + | + |
| Brain 1, day 60, ++ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 2, day 60, ++ group | + | â | â |
| Brain 1, day 90, ++ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 1, day 90, âÂÂ+group | + | + | â |
| Brain 2, day 90, âÂÂ+ group | + | + | + |
| Brainstem 1, day 90, âÂÂ+ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Brain 3, day 60, +â group | â | + | + |
| Cerebellum 1, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Cerebellum 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | + |
| Brainstem 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Cerebellum, day 60, ++ group | â | + | â |
| Brain, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Brainstem, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Cerebellum, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Brain1, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Brain 2, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Brainstem, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Cerebellum, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Sample . | Histopathology . | sn-RT-PCR for CV-B4 E2 RNA . | IHC for dsRNA . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brain 1, day 60, +â group | + | â | â |
| Brainstem 1, day 60, +â group | + | + | + |
| Brain 1, day 60, ++ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 2, day 60, ++ group | + | â | â |
| Brain 1, day 90, ++ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 1, day 90, âÂÂ+group | + | + | â |
| Brain 2, day 90, âÂÂ+ group | + | + | + |
| Brainstem 1, day 90, âÂÂ+ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Brain 3, day 60, +â group | â | + | + |
| Cerebellum 1, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Cerebellum 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | + |
| Brainstem 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Cerebellum, day 60, ++ group | â | + | â |
| Brain, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Brainstem, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Cerebellum, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Brain1, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Brain 2, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Brainstem, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Cerebellum, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
Results of IHC for dsRNA detection in selected brain, cerebellum and brainstem samples from infected and control animals, depending on histopathology and sn-RT-PCR findings, are summarised as positive (+) or negative (âÂÂ).
IHC for dsRNA results depending on histopathology and sn-RT-PCR findings in CNS tissue sections of offspring challenged or not at day 21 of age, and born to dams inoculated or not with CV-B4 E2 at gestational day 17.
| Sample . | Histopathology . | sn-RT-PCR for CV-B4 E2 RNA . | IHC for dsRNA . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brain 1, day 60, +â group | + | â | â |
| Brainstem 1, day 60, +â group | + | + | + |
| Brain 1, day 60, ++ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 2, day 60, ++ group | + | â | â |
| Brain 1, day 90, ++ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 1, day 90, âÂÂ+group | + | + | â |
| Brain 2, day 90, âÂÂ+ group | + | + | + |
| Brainstem 1, day 90, âÂÂ+ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Brain 3, day 60, +â group | â | + | + |
| Cerebellum 1, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Cerebellum 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | + |
| Brainstem 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Cerebellum, day 60, ++ group | â | + | â |
| Brain, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Brainstem, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Cerebellum, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Brain1, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Brain 2, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Brainstem, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Cerebellum, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Sample . | Histopathology . | sn-RT-PCR for CV-B4 E2 RNA . | IHC for dsRNA . |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brain 1, day 60, +â group | + | â | â |
| Brainstem 1, day 60, +â group | + | + | + |
| Brain 1, day 60, ++ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 2, day 60, ++ group | + | â | â |
| Brain 1, day 90, ++ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 1, day 90, âÂÂ+group | + | + | â |
| Brain 2, day 90, âÂÂ+ group | + | + | + |
| Brainstem 1, day 90, âÂÂ+ group | + | + | + |
| Brain 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Brain 3, day 60, +â group | â | + | + |
| Cerebellum 1, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Cerebellum 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | + |
| Brainstem 2, day 60, +â group | â | + | â |
| Cerebellum, day 60, ++ group | â | + | â |
| Brain, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Brainstem, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Cerebellum, day 60, â group | â | â | â |
| Brain1, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Brain 2, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Brainstem, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
| Cerebellum, day 90, â group | â | â | â |
Results of IHC for dsRNA detection in selected brain, cerebellum and brainstem samples from infected and control animals, depending on histopathology and sn-RT-PCR findings, are summarised as positive (+) or negative (âÂÂ).
DISCUSSION
Type B Coxsackievirus infections are known to be associated with a range of neurological diseases (Marier et al. 1975; Muir and van Loon 1997; Rhoades et al. 2011). These infections of the CNS are frequently observed in foetuses and newborns, suggesting a role for vertical transmission of CV-B in pathogenesis (Gauntt et al. 1985; Euscher et al. 2001; Hunt et al. 2012; Konstantinidou et al. 2007; Ornoy and Tenenbaum 2006; Romero 2008; Tebruegge and Curtis 2009). The current investigation was conducted in an attempt to better understand the effect of an in utero infection on offspring's CNS. For this purpose, pregnant outbred Swiss albino mice were inoculated with CV-B4 E2 and their offspring's CNS analysed for both virus infection and histopathology at different time points.
Few experimental studies have used animal models to explore CV-B vertical transmission and the issue of CNS infection has not been practically addressed (Modlin and Crumpacker 1982; Marosova et al. 2011; Bopegamage et al. 2012; Larsson et al. 2013; Hwang et al. 2014).
Vertical transmission of CV-B4 has, however, been reported in some studies (Marosova et al. 2011; Bopegamage et al. 2012; Hunt et al. 2012). In a Slovakian study, CV-B4 was revealed as the most prevalent CV-B serotype encountered in pregnant women (Marosova et al. 2011). In addition, vertical transmission of CV-B4 has been linked to neurological disorders (Hunt et al. 2012). Despite the fact that the CV-B4 E2 strain is more commonly known for its pancreotropism and diabetogenicity in susceptible mouse strains (Yoon et al. 1979), there is evidence of neurotropism as shown by the persistence of that strain in the CNS of Swiss albino mice inoculated at 1 week of age (El Hiar et al. 2012). Indeed, this strain used in these studies (AF311939.1), isolated by Yoon, is closely related to the E2 (S76772.1) strain (99% homology in whole genome sequence) of the three plaque-purified variants (E1, E2 and E3) of the CV-B4 Edwards strain isolated from a newborn who died of encephalohepatomyocarditis (Kibrick and Benirschke 1958; Hartig and Webb 1983). Histological analysis of the brain of the newborn revealed inflammation and inflammatory cell infiltration in the cortex and meninges.
The inoculation period during pregnancy could be a determinant for the outcome of the infection on offspring (Lansdown 1975). Our choice for gestational days 10 and 17 arises from recent data reporting that inoculation of CV-B4 at gestational day 10 affects offspring, whereas inoculation at gestational day 17 increases infection of pups challenged with the same virus (Bopegamage et al. 2012).
The detection of viral progeny in foetuses dissected at day 17G is in favour of a transplacental transmission, but a perinatal transmission during delivery cannot be excluded. Contamination of CNS with blood is unlikely since tissues were rinsed three times with PBS. In addition, previous results showed that virus detection in blood is not obvious, since viral RNA is evidenced only transiently during viraemic stages (Jaïdane et al. 2006).
Vertical transmission occurred in dams inoculated at gestational day 10 or 17, with virus replication in offspring's CNS for at least 10 days p.i., but higher virus titres were observed in pups inoculated at foetal day 10, suggesting a greater susceptibility to infection at that developmental stage. This could be explained by the high expression of CAR (Coxsckievirus and Adenovirus receptor) in the foetal CNS, which drops dramatically within days of birth (Honda et al. 2000). It has also been shown that CV-B3 can replicate at high titres, for at least 10 p.i., in the CNS of newborn BALB/c mice, targeting neuronal progenitor cells (which rapidly decreases after birth, as a consequence of differentiation), hence explaining the drastic decrease in susceptibility of newborn pups to CNS infection by 7 days of age in that model (Feuer et al. 2003, 2009). Likewise, El Hiar et al. (2012) demonstrated that the CNS of Swiss albino mice inoculated with CV-B4 E2, 1 week after birth, harboured infectious particles until 15 days p.i. An alternative explanation for the enhanced susceptibility of foetuses, newborn and young mice to CV-B infections could be a lack of immune maturity at that age (Tracy and Gauntt 2008).
In our current study, the brainstem was the most infected CNS tissue. Intriguingly, no infectious virus could however be isolated from the spinal cord, which differs from the investigation of El Hiar et al. (2012) who detected infectious particles in the spinal cord of mice inoculated with the same viral strain 1 week after birth.
sn-RT-PCR results demonstrated that CV-B4 E2 infection of offspring's CNS can persist for a relatively long period of time (until day 60 and, in one case, until day 90 from birth) after infectious virus becomes undetectable. Prolonged viral RNA detection despite the lack of infectious virus detection has been described previously. Infectious particles detection is usually restricted to the acute stage of the infection (no longer than 2âÂÂ3 weeks, depending on the study) and infectious virus is no longer detectable in the chronic stage. In theory, virus persists in a low rate replicative form (below the detection limit of standard methods) and/or a defective replication form (equivalent amounts of positive- and negative-stranded RNA) (Tam and Messner 1999; Feuer et al. 2009). The ability of CV-B RNA to persist for months following an initial infection is well established both in humans and experimental studies (Bowles et al. 1989; Tam et al. 1991; See and Tilles 1995; Klingel et al. 1996; Tam and Messner 1999; Reetoo et al. 2000; Harrath et al. 2004; Bopegamage et al. 2005; Feuer et al. 2009; El Hiar et al. 2012). CV-B RNA persistence in the CNS is however only poorly documented. Our results agree with other investigations reporting that CV-B4 E2 and CV-B3 can persist in mouse brain up to 50 and even 90 days p.i. at the RNA level (Reetoo et al. 2000; Feuer et al. 2009; El Hiar etàal. 2012). Intriguingly, in the investigation conducted by Bopegamage et al. (2012), offspring of dams infected with CV-B4 E2 at day 4, 10 or 17G were negative by sn-RT-PCR performed on brain, heart and pancreas collected at day 30 from birth, despite the use of a 10-fold higher viral dose (2 à106 TCID50). This discrepancy may be due to the difference in the route of virus inoculation (oral) and/or in the mouse strain (CD1) used in that study. Indeed, in the study conducted by Precechtelova et al. (2015), CV-B4 E2 RNA was much longer detected in the pancreas of Swiss albino than in CD1 mice. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing CV-B persistence in the CNS following vertical transmission. Persistence of viral material is hypothesised to be a potential mechanism in chronic or delayed neuropathologies such as schizophrenia, encephalitis lethargica and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Rantakallio et al. 1997; Cree et al. 2003; Woodall and Graham 2004). In this context, Feuer et al. (2009) previously suggested an association between CV-B3 RNA persistence in the brain and the chronic inflammation and lesions observed in the hippocampus and cortex of surviving mice for up to 9 months p.i.
In the current study, surviving mice were monitored up to 150 days after birth and no death or apparent anomalies, such as paralysis or unusual behaviour, were observed. Despite these findings, histological analysis revealed two cases of inflammatory foci, lymphocyte infiltrations and meningitis in the brain and brain stem of offspring born to infected dams, at a period in which viral material was still detectable (day 60 of age). Relatively few experimental studies have previously described histological abnormalities in the CNS following CV-B infections (Feuer et al. 2003, 2009; Bopegamage et al. 2012). In the study conducted by Bopegamage et al. (2012), pups born to dams inoculated on the 17th day of gestation and challenged 3 weeks after birth (+/+ group) showed oedema and capillary hyperemia in the brain 5 days post-challenge. Feuer et al. (2003) described extensive cellular damage and condensed nuclei within the olfactory bulb, the temporal and entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus in newborn BALB/c mice, 5 days p.i. by CV-B3.
The fact that some studies have associated enterovirus infections during pregnancy with increased risk of the offspring developing chronic diseases, such as type 1 diabetes (Dahlquist et al. 1995; Elfving et al. 2008), allows one to suggest that maternal infections during pregnancy could play a role in the course of subsequent infections in offspring in agreement with the findings of Bopegamage et al. (2012). Our in utero infection did not enhance CNS infection during subsequent challenge of the offspring with the same virus, despite the fact that the first infection was still evident at the moment of challenge in our model. However, we cannot exclude that the infection could be increased in tissues other than the CNS. Indeed, in the study of Bopegamage et al. (2012), such an effect was evident only in the pancreas which showed more severe histopathological changes than the control groups.
The use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) on CNS tissue sections enabled us to reveal the presence of viral dsRNA at late stages of the infection (day 60) in samples with histopathology and/or positive sn-RT-PCR results for CV-B4 genome. The presence of viral dsRNA could be involved in the delayed histopathological changes observed at that time, and provides a possible mechanism for viral persistence. Indeed, the presence of viral material in the CNS for extended periods of time may contribute to chronic immunopathology (David et al. 1993; Tam and Messner 1999). dsRNA is thought to be formed during persistent enteroviral infections when positive and negative strands are known to be present in equal amounts (Cunningham et al. 1990; Klingel et al. 1992; Tam and Messner 1999). The dsRNA structure may give stability and protect viral RNA from degradation, thus promoting long-term persistence. Similar results were proposed from the ratio of positive- to negative-strand RNA, during the chronic stage, in the muscle and the brain of CV-B3-infected mice (Tam and Messner 1999; Feuer et al. 2009). The low number of cells and the weak intensity of the signal is in agreement with the fact that viral genome is detected only following sn-RT-PCR, but one cannot conclude this is a real form of persistence, or simply a replication intermediate.
In conclusion, using our experimental murine model, we have demonstrated that CV-B4 E2 can be transmitted from dams to their foetusesâ CNS with productive replication in the brain, cerebellum and brainstem until 10 days p.i., whether the virus was inoculated at days 10G or 17G. Viral RNA persists in the above-mentioned tissues until 60 days after birth with evidence of double-stranded complexes. Histopathological changes were observed in only a few cases, and CNS infection during subsequent challenge of pups was not augmented. Further investigations, using this murine model of CV-B4 vertical transmission to the CNS, are needed to determine the long-lasting consequences of CV-B infection during foetal life upon surviving mice.
We are grateful to the members of the Anatomopathology service CHU Farhat Hached Sousse, Tunisia for their technical support.
FUNDING
This work was supported by Ministère de lÂEnseignement Supèrieur et de la Recherche Scientifique (LR99ES27), Tunisia, and Ministère de lÂEducation Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie, Universitè Lille 2 CHRU Lille (UPRES EA3610), France. Financial support for SJR has come from the European Commission 7th Framework Programme PEVNET [FP7/2007-2013] under grant agreement number 261441 and a Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) Career Development Award (5-CDA-2014-221-A-N).
Conflict of interest. None declared.
REFERENCES






