Abstract

Small cells dominate photosynthetic biomass and primary production in many marine ecosystems. Traditionally, picoplankton refers to cells ≤2 μm. Here we extend the size range of the organisms considered to 3 μm, a threshold often used operationally in field studies. While the prokaryotic component of picophytoplankton is dominated by two genera, Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus , the eukaryotic fraction is much more diverse. Since the discovery of the ubiquitous Micromonas pusilla in the early 1950s, just over 70 species that can be <3 μm have been described. In fact, most algal classes contain such species. Less than a decade ago, culture-independent approaches (in particular, cloning and sequencing, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, FISH) have demonstrated that the diversity of eukaryotic picoplankton is much more extensive than could be assumed from described taxa alone. These approaches revealed the importance of certain classes such as the Prasinophyceae but also unearthed novel divisions such as the recently described picobiliphytes. In the last couple of years, the first genomes of photosynthetic picoplankton have become available, providing key information on their physiological capabilities. In this paper, we discuss the range of methods that can be used to assess small phytoplankton diversity, present the species described to date, review the existing molecular data obtained on field populations, and end up by looking at the promises offered by genomics.

Introduction

The presence of tiny cells in the ocean had been suspected long before the term picoplankton was established. More than 150 years ago, Nägeli (1849) described the tiny green alga Stichococcus bacillaris . At the beginning of the 20th century, Lohmann (1908 , 1911) realized that organisms still smaller than what was caught with plankton nets were present in the oceans. One of the first descriptions of a ‘pico’ cyanobacterium, Synechocystis salina , appeared in 1924 ( Wislough, 1924 ). In the early 1930s, the importance of very small cells in the food chain was realized when Gaarder (1932) found small green algae (1–3 μm) to be the main food source of oyster larvae on the West Coast of Norway. In 1938, Ruinen described the heterotrophic Cafeteria minuta and in 1952, Butcher described the ubiquitous Micromonas pusilla . Knight-Jones (1951) calculated the abundance of ultra and nanoplankton in British coastal waters using the serial dilution method and found that picoplankton species like Micromonas pusilla and Hillea marina could be present in large numbers.

However, it was only in the late 1970s that the use of epifluorescence microscopy ( Hobbie, 1977 ) led to the realization of the abundance of bacteria in all marine systems. This was soon followed by the discovery of very small primary producers ( Johnson & Sieburth, 1979 , 1982 ; Waterbury, 1979 ), leading to the conceptualization of the microbial loop ( Azam, 1983 ), which changed our view of marine ecosystems and shifted the scientific emphasis from the larger to the smaller sized organisms. At that time, picoplankton was formally defined as those cells whose size lies between 0.2 and 2 μm ( Sieburth, 1978 ), while ultraplankton was defined as cells <5 μm ( Murphy & Haugen, 1985 ). Since then, numerous scientific papers have demonstrated the importance of these small cells in terms of biomass and production, in particular for its photosynthetic component (e.g. Li, 1994 ; Worden, 2004 ).

A key advance with respect to picoplankton diversity was constituted by the landmark paper of Giovannoni (1990) . The use of molecular techniques to directly analyze gene sequences in natural samples led to the realization that our image of the diversity of these organisms obtained previously from cultivation approaches was heavily biased. This led to a flurry of studies analyzing the diversity of all components of the microbial loop (prokaryotes, viruses, and eukaryotes), leading to the discovery of many new taxonomic groups for which cultures were (and often still are) unavailable. However, gene sequences provide little information on the actual nature and role of the organisms they originate from and it is critical to obtain cultures to advance further. This is illustrated by the isolation of the key marine bacterial species ‘ Pelagibacter ubique ’ ( Rappé, 2002 ), 12 years after its sequence was determined as SAR11 ( Giovannoni, 1990 ).

A new era is opening now with the development of genomics not only to sequence the genome of important marine small organisms that can be cultivated such as Prochlorococcus ( Dufresne, 2003 ; Rocap, 2003 ) but also to determine directly fragments of the genome of natural populations ( Béjà, 2000 ; Venter, 2004 ). Clearly, this creates new avenues to analyze the diversity of the microbial loop components.

However, in almost 30 years of development of the field of marine microbiology, small eukaryotes have received much less attention than prokaryotes. In fact, no taxonomic overview of marine eukaryotic picoplankton has been published since the work of Thomsen (1986) , more than 20 years ago. With respect to molecular tools, 11 years elapsed between the paper of Giovannoni (1990) and the widespread application of similar approaches to picoeukaryotes ( Díez, 2001b ; López-García, 2001 ; Moon-van der Staay, 2001 ). One reason for this lack of attention is probably due to the fact that eukaryotes are perceived as possessing morphological features that allow identification. However, molecular approaches have revealed that the extent of the diversity of eukaryotes is probably as wide as that of bacteria and that many groups do not correspond to established taxa and are not available in culture.

In this review, we focus on the diversity of small eukaryotic marine phytoplankton without considering broader questions concerning its ecology or physiology. We extend the size range of the organisms considered to 3 μm, i.e. beyond that formerly assigned to picoplankton (≤2 μm), because recent field studies have often used 3-μm filters to separate small plankton from larger cells (e.g. Moon-van der Staay, 2001 ).

Approaches to assess the diversity of small eukaryotic phytoplankton

Cultures vs. natural samples

A first strategy that can be used to examine the diversity of small eukaryotic plankton involves establishing cultures favoring smaller organisms. One of the most classical techniques is the dilution culture, which consists in transferring in a repeated fashion a subvolume of a culture (1/10) to fresh medium (9/10) to obtain statistically one cell per tube at the end of the series ( Knight-Jones, 1951 ; Throndsen, 1978 ). This approach, which allowed the first cultivation of a true eukaryotic picoplankton species, Micromonas pusilla ( Butcher, 1952 ), is still one of the most easily applicable to establish novel cultures or to follow the presence of a specific organism in the environment ( Throndsen & Kristiansen, 1991 ; Zingone, 1999b ). However, the dilution approach will always favor the most abundant organisms, because the rarer ones will be diluted away before being separated from the more abundant ones. In order to facilitate the growth of small cells, samples can be prefiltered through two overlapping 3-μm filters or even 0.6-μm filters ( Vaulot, 2004 ). Other techniques for isolation include micropipette isolation (quite challenging for very small cells), flow cytometry sorting, and growth on solid medium ( Andersen & Kawachi, 2005 ; Sieracki, 2005 ). Culturing can be performed on enrichment cultures, field samples brought back to the laboratory, or even on board ships ( Le Gall, 2008 ). Isolated strains can be found in many algal collections but some facilities have a higher proportion of picoplanktonic species, in particular the Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton (CCMP, http://ccmp.bigelow.org/ ) in the USA, the Marine Biotechnology Institute Culture collection (MBIC, now transferred at National Institute of Technology and Evaluation, http://www.nbrc.nite.go.jp/ ) in Japan, and the Roscoff Culture Collection (RCC, http://www.sb-roscoff.fr/Phyto/RCC/ ) in France.

A second strategy consists in physically separating small cells from the rest of the community in natural samples. This is most easily done with filters. Many of the filters used in the early studies (e.g. glass–fiber filters) had a very variable mesh size. It is only with the development of nuclear bombardment that more uniformly pore-sized filters became widely available (Nuclepore filters). Quite various filtration thresholds have been used: 0.6, 0.8, 1, 2, 3, or 5 μm. The use of these filters led in the early 1980s to the recognition of picoplankton as a major component of the photosynthetic community in open ocean waters ( Herbland & Voituriez, 1979 ; Li, 1983 ). Filter thresholds are, however, somewhat theoretical and, depending on their shape and plasticity, cells may squeeze through pores that are smaller than their actual size ( Li, 1990 ). Another way to separate cells is flow cytometry sorting (see Flow cytometry ), but this has rarely been used for picoeukaryotes ( Li, 1994 ).

Culturing and physical separation strategies have distinct advantages but both produce biases that should always be taken into account when interpreting the resulting data. It is now well known that culture methods favor fast-growing ‘weed’ species. Yet many of the important picoplankton groups such as the Prasinophyceae, the Pelagophyceae or the Bolidophyceae have been discovered through this approach. Conversely, size-separated field samples can suffer from cell loss due to breakage during filtration ( Fahnenstiel, 1994 ) or may not really reflect the picoplankton community as larger cells may be forced through the filters because of too strong filtration pressure or because they are extremely thin and elongated (e.g. long diatoms such as Cylindrotheca closterium ).

Microscopy

For many years, light microscopy has been the only way to observe and describe phytoplankton cells. However, it has very limited use to assess picoplankton diversity in the field. In contrast, for cultures, it can provide valuable information on the size and shape of the cells, the number of chloroplasts, or the swimming behavior, allowing identification of species. Specific fixatives, such as lugol or osmium vapors, can make certain cellular features, in particular flagella ( Fig. 1 ), more easy to observe.

Figure 1

(a–f) Light micrographs of some small phytoplankton species. (a) Imantonia rotunda . Cell with two chloroplasts and two flagella. Fixed in osmium tetroxide vapor. (b) Micromonas pusilla . Cells with flagellum (arrow and arrowhead), only proximal part (arrowhead) clearly visible, extension barely discernable (arrow). Fixed with Lugol's solution. (c) RCC 391 (Mamiellales). Cell with two unequal flagella. Fixed in osmium tetroxide vapor. (d) Florenciella parvula . Cell with heterokont flagella, short smooth (arrow), and long flagellum bearing nonvisible hairs. Fixed in osmium tetroxide vapour. (e) RCC 287 (Prasinophyceae clade VII). Spherical and nonmotile live cell. (f) Bathycoccus prasinos . Comma-shaped and nonmotile live cell.

Figure 1

(a–f) Light micrographs of some small phytoplankton species. (a) Imantonia rotunda . Cell with two chloroplasts and two flagella. Fixed in osmium tetroxide vapor. (b) Micromonas pusilla . Cells with flagellum (arrow and arrowhead), only proximal part (arrowhead) clearly visible, extension barely discernable (arrow). Fixed with Lugol's solution. (c) RCC 391 (Mamiellales). Cell with two unequal flagella. Fixed in osmium tetroxide vapor. (d) Florenciella parvula . Cell with heterokont flagella, short smooth (arrow), and long flagellum bearing nonvisible hairs. Fixed in osmium tetroxide vapour. (e) RCC 287 (Prasinophyceae clade VII). Spherical and nonmotile live cell. (f) Bathycoccus prasinos . Comma-shaped and nonmotile live cell.

It is the development of electron microscopy in the 1960s that really allowed visualization of important diagnostic features in small phytoplankton cells. Whole-cell mounts with proper shadow cast or uranyl acetate contrasting can reveal important features (e.g. Andersen, 1993 ; Eikrem & Edvardsen, 1999 ), such as the presence and shape of flagellar hairs or body scales ( Fig. 2f, h, i and k ). In fact, the ornamentation of body scales allows unambiguous determination of picoplanktonic species such as Bathycoccus prasinos ( Eikrem & Throndsen, 1990 ) or Imantonia rotunda ( Fig. 2h and i ). Thin sections are critical to establish chloroplast organization ( Fig. 2a and e ), membrane configuration, and the presence of storage products such as starch ( Ral, 2004 ). Flagellar insertion features ( Fig. 2a ) and flagellar root three-dimensional architecture, a key for phylogenetic analysis, require serial sections (e.g. Moestrup & Sengco, 2001 ). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which probes only the cell surface ( Fig. 2c and d ), has, in contrast, been much less useful because many small species lack body ornamentation such as organic, calcified, or silicified scales and for those that have such surface features, SEM resolution was until recently not sufficient to resolve scale details. However, the newly developed field emission SEM ( Fig. 2d ) offers a much better resolution ( Probert, 2007 ).

Figure 2

Electron micrographs (SEM, TEM) of some small phytoplankton species. (a–c) Micromonas pusilla . (a) TEM of section through cell revealing the chloroplast (chl), nucleus (n), mitochondrion (m), and flagellum (f). (b) TEM of longitudinal section through the flagellum showing the mucronate extension (arrowhead). (c) SEM of cell with flagellum and its mucronate extension (arrowhead). (d–e) RCC 287 (Prasinophyceae clade VII). (d) Field emission SEM of whole cell. (e) TEM of section showing the single chloroplast (chl), mitochondrion (m), nucleus (n), and vesicles (v). (f–g) TEM whole mounts of RCC 391 (Mamiellales). (f) Scales and hair-scale (arrow) stained with uranyl acetate. (g) Whole cell with unequal flagella shadow-cast with gold-palladium. (h–i) Imantonia rotunda . TEM of whole mounts shadowed with chromium. (h) Inner layer scale. (i) Outer layer scale. (j–k) Phaeocystis pouchetii . (j) Uranyl acetate stained whole mount of ejected extrusome. (k) TEM of section through scaly covering.

Figure 2

Electron micrographs (SEM, TEM) of some small phytoplankton species. (a–c) Micromonas pusilla . (a) TEM of section through cell revealing the chloroplast (chl), nucleus (n), mitochondrion (m), and flagellum (f). (b) TEM of longitudinal section through the flagellum showing the mucronate extension (arrowhead). (c) SEM of cell with flagellum and its mucronate extension (arrowhead). (d–e) RCC 287 (Prasinophyceae clade VII). (d) Field emission SEM of whole cell. (e) TEM of section showing the single chloroplast (chl), mitochondrion (m), nucleus (n), and vesicles (v). (f–g) TEM whole mounts of RCC 391 (Mamiellales). (f) Scales and hair-scale (arrow) stained with uranyl acetate. (g) Whole cell with unequal flagella shadow-cast with gold-palladium. (h–i) Imantonia rotunda . TEM of whole mounts shadowed with chromium. (h) Inner layer scale. (i) Outer layer scale. (j–k) Phaeocystis pouchetii . (j) Uranyl acetate stained whole mount of ejected extrusome. (k) TEM of section through scaly covering.

Widespread use of electron microscopy on field samples is restricted by some key limitations. Cells need to be fixed and concentrated before embedding or mounting, which often results in the loss of the smallest and most delicate forms. Still, some early landmark papers have relied on electron microscopy of thin sections to establish the widespread occurrence of picophytoplankton ( Johnson & Sieburth, 1982 ). A good technique for making whole mounts of live samples is concentration by gravity filtering combined with gentle centrifugation, followed by fixation on a grid using osmic vapor (e.g. Thomsen, 1980 ). Later electron microscopy studies have established the importance of certain groups, such as Pelagophyceae, in oligotrophic waters ( Andersen, 1996 ). Moreover, some picophytoplankton species in particular in the order Parmales (see Described species) are only known from the analysis of field samples by SEM. Fixing agents (like glutaraldehyde and Lugol's solution) and air drying shrink cells and caution should be exercised when measuring cell size from such preparations. Many of the scale-bearing species are described from whole mounts alone and their live size may be underestimated (e.g. Estep, 1984 ).

Epifluorescence microscopy relies on the emission of light by cellular compounds (e.g. pigments such as chlorophyll) or by stains specific for certain components such as DNA. This technique was key to establish a widespread importance of picophytoplankton ( Murphy & Haugen, 1985 ) and was initially widely used to enumerate different types of cells discriminated on the basis of their pigment content (e.g. phycoerythrin is present in cyanobacteria and cryptophytes and makes them to fluoresce orange) or the number and shape of their chloroplasts ( Thomsen, 1994 ). In addition, staining with chemicals such as 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindol (DAPI), specific of DNA, or primulin ( Caron, 1983 ) that stains mainly phospholipids, may reveal features, such as flagella and scale outline, that are critical for the identification of many taxa. Despite its replacement by flow cytometry (see Flow cytometry ), epifluorescence microscopy is still widely used in conjunction with cell labeling by antibodies and molecular probes (see Immunological approaches and Molecular approaches ). Moreover, automation, such as solid-phase cytometry ( West, 2006 ) or image analysis software, can speed up analysis.

Flow cytometry

In flow cytometry, samples are directly injected into a fluid stream, forcing cells to align in front of a light source (usually laser). Light scattered by each individual cell (a function of cell size and refractive index) and fluorescence from pigments such as chlorophyll or phycoerythrin are recorded in real time ( Marie, 1999 ). Major advantages of flow cytometry include speed, accuracy, and absence of sample preparation, at least to analyze photosynthetic pigments. Since its first application in oceanography ( Olson, 1985 ), flow cytometry has been the method of choice to estimate picoplankton abundance in oceanic waters ( Collier, 2000 ). In fact, the use of flow cytometry led to the discovery of very important picoplanktonic organisms such as Prochlorococcus ( Chisholm, 1988 ) and Ostreococcus ( Courties, 1994 ). Still, scattering and fluorescence properties are not sufficient to discriminate taxa within picoeukaryotes, with the exception of cryptophytes that contain phycoerythrin ( Li & Dickie, 2001 ). Therefore, potential applications of flow cytometry are considerably enhanced when samples are stained with fluorescent markers binding to specific cell compounds. For example the use of DNA stains allows an estimation of genome size and therefore permits to separate species or strains with closely related cell properties ( Simon, 1994 ). Some other stains can separate live from dead cells ( Veldhuis, 2001 ). As for epifluorescence, flow cytometry can be used in conjunction with antibodies and molecular probes (see Immunological approaches and Molecular approaches ), but applications are still limited ( Simon, 1995 ; Biegala, 2003 ). Flow cytometry also provides the capacity to sort cells of interest physically, allowing one to obtain pure cultures from natural assemblages ( Moore, 1998 ) or to perform further measurements on specific groups ( Li, 1994 ).

Photosynthetic pigments

Photosynthetic pigments are key taxonomic diagnostic features for microalgae. At the simplest level, pigment composition allows distinguishing green, brown, and red algae characterized by chlorophyll b , chlorophyll c , and phycobiliproteins, respectively. HPLC pigment signature is often indicative of the class (e.g. prasinoxanthin is only present in prasinophytes), but in general cannot resolve lower taxonomic levels. Several classes may share the same suite of pigments (e.g. diatoms and bolidophytes, Guillou, 1999b ) and a given class may contain several pigment signatures (e.g. prasinophytes, Latasa, 2004 ). Pigment analyses are now a standard requirement for the description of novel phytoplankton species ( Guillou, 1999a ) and can be used to distinguish ecotypes within a given species ( Rodríguez, 2005 ). Relative pigment ratios in filter fractionated samples allow estimating dominant picophytoplankton groups in specific oceanic areas ( Brunet, 2006 ) based on algorithms such as CHEMTAX ( Mackey, 1996 ).

Immunological approaches

Soon after the discovery of picoplankton, it was realized that sensitive methods were needed to determine the abundance of specific eukaryotic taxa that could not be distinguished using fluorescence methods (see Microscopy and Flow cytometry ). Fluorescent antibodies combine a strong signal and a relatively low cost. Initial applications involved polyclonal antibodies raised against whole cells ( Shapiro, 1989 ). However, their exact specificity can be difficult to determine and more recently, monoclonal antibodies have been used to detect economically important species such as Aureococcus anophagefferens ( Caron, 2003 ) that causes brown tides in coastal environments. Detection of labeled cells can be made more rapid and quantitative by flow cytometry ( Vrieling, 1996 ) or solid-phase cytometry ( West, 2006 ), although these techniques have not yet been applied for antibody detection in eukaryotic picophytoplankton.

Molecular approaches

In recent years, the introduction of molecular biology approaches making use of genetic information directly obtained from environmental samples provided a new way to analyze the genetic diversity of the picoplankton. Among the different genetic markers that have been used, the most popular by far is the nuclear-encoded small subunit rRNA gene (18S rRNA gene) that is present in all eukaryotes. Its rate of evolution is sufficiently slow to allow assessment of evolutionary relationships between distantly related organisms, and there is no evidence for lateral transfer that could introduce incongruent phylogenies. This gene presents both well-conserved and rapidly evolving regions allowing discrimination of organisms at many different taxonomic levels from the phylum to the species level. Another advantage of this gene is that its transcribed product (rRNA) is a building block of ribosomes, and is therefore very abundant inside individual cells (typically more than 1000 copies in prokaryotes, Amann & Kuhl, 1998 ), making it amenable to direct detection by probes even in small cells. In contrast, a major problem for PCR-based approaches using the 18S rRNA gene is the presence of several copies of the rRNA operon ( Prokopowich, 2003 ; Zhu, 2005 ) that may not be all identical and therefore may introduce some spurious organism diversity. However, such artifacts are probably minimal for picoplankton because of their small genome sizes and therefore limited rRNA gene copy numbers. For example, Ostreococcus tauri has only four copies ( Derelle, 2006 ), all identical.

For discrimination at lower taxonomical levels, e.g. subspecies or ecotypes, the rRNA operon internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) are preferred ( Rodríguez, 2005 ). Plastid genes offer the advantage of targeting only photosynthetic plankton, in contrast to rRNA genes that target both autotrophs and heterotrophs. rbcL , coding for a large subunit of the ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO), which is involved in CO 2 fixation ( Paul, 2000 ), psbA , coding for a major protein of photosystem II reaction center ( Zeidner, 2003 ), and plastid 16S rRNA gene ( Rappé, 1997 ; Fuller, 2006a ) have all been used successfully on natural populations. However, in contrast to 18S, some of these genes such as rbcL are subject to horizontal transfer ( Delwiche & Palmer, 1996 ).

When applied to field populations, techniques making use of these genetic markers fall into two categories: qualitative and quantitative. The former approaches (clone libraries, DGGE, etc.) allow assessment of the diversity and composition of the overall community. The latter [FISH, quantitative PCR (QPCR), etc.] can be used to quantify the abundance of specific groups.

In qualitative approaches, the first step consists in amplifying the gene of interest by the PCR using either universal primers ( Moon-van der Staay, 2001 ) or primers specific to a taxonomic group ( Berglund, 2005 ). Once the gene has been amplified, several approaches can be used to assess the sequence diversity within a sample. Generally, PCR products are cloned and a given number of clones (typically 100) are sequenced. Partial sequences from variable regions of the 18S rRNA gene are often sufficient to assign a clone to a taxonomic group, usually down to the genus level, while full-length sequences are necessary to narrow affiliation down to the species level and for phylogeny reconstruction. Alternative techniques, such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TTGE), single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) ( van Hannen, 1998 ; Díez, 2001a ; Marie, 2006 ; Medlin, 2006 ), can be used to compare rapidly community structure from different samples based on a band pattern without the need for cloning and sequencing. However, supplementary steps (extraction and sequencing) are required for the taxonomic affiliation of the bands.

The major advantage of the environmental gene sequencing approach is that it allows for the discovery of new groups and that the data obtained contribute to the growth of gene sequence databases, allowing global distribution studies. This is particularly important for novel uncultivated groups in which reality is reinforced if they are observed at different locations by different research groups (e.g. uncultivated alveolates, López-García, 2001 ; Moon-van der Staay, 2001 ). However, gene sequencing approaches have several drawbacks ( von Wintzingerode, 1997 ) such as biases and errors in PCR amplification ( Acinas, 1997 ) and production of chimerical sequences ( Berney, 2004 ). Software tools can now be used to detect the latter ( Ashelford, 2006 ). The diversity image obtained is often biased by the fact that certain groups are better amplified than others. In particular, photosynthetic groups are often underrepresented in clone libraries despite the fact that small eukaryotic plankton is dominated by phototrophs ( Not, 2004 ; Romari & Vaulot, 2004 ). Such biases can be counteracted by using multiple sets of primers ( Stoeck, 2006 ) or primers that are specific for certain phylogenetic groups ( Bass & Cavalier-Smith, 2004 ). However, thorough methodological studies investigating possible biases are clearly lacking. In particular, it would be interesting to apply the cloning approach to complex mixtures of cultures to determine how representative the sequences obtained are.

For quantifying specific taxonomic groups, oligonucleotide probes targeting the 18S rRNA gene ( DeLong, 1989 ) were seen quite early as a key technique. When detected by FISH, they allow determination of the identity and abundance of the very small eukaryotes that are part of picophytoplankton ( Simon, 1995 ). However, it is only with the improvement of FISH with catalyzed reporter deposition (CARD), such as tyramide signal amplification (TSA, Not, 2002 ) that it became possible to estimate taxa abundance easily by epifluorescence microscopy in field samples ( Not, 2004 ). TSA–FISH has been coupled with flow cytometry ( Biegala, 2003 ), but protocols are quite complex and analysis is not as amenable to routine counting as microscopy. Another approach involves the use of probes hybridizing to PCR-amplified products ( Moon-van der Staay, 2000 ; Fuller, 2006b ). In recent years, QPCR approaches have been developing rapidly in plankton ecology ( Suzuki, 2000 ). Application of QPCR to eukaryotic picophytoplankton has allowed to map key groups and species spatially and temporally ( Countway & Caron, 2006 ; Marie, 2006 ). However, calibration of probes targeting wide groups appears to be difficult because of the wide variation of the number of 18S rRNA gene copies among species of different sizes ( Zhu, 2005 ), while probes targeting specific species or genera displaying a narrow size range are more promising ( Countway & Caron, 2006 ). DNA chips harboring phylogenetic probes have begun to be used but still appear to be qualitative ( Medlin, 2006 ).

Described species of small eukaryotic marine phytoplankton

Table 1 presents the 71 photosynthetic species described to date that have a minimum size of 3 μm or less. Among these, over 30 qualify as picoplanktonic (minimum size ≤2 μm). The smallest marine eukaryote is the Prasinophyceae Ostreococcus tauri , which, with a minimum size at 0.8 μm, can be quite undistinguishable from prokaryotes. It should be emphasized that size is a parameter that is quite difficult to measure and displays environmental and physiological variability. The maximum size of some species included in Table 1 can be considerably >3 μm, e.g. some of the Skeletonema species. Size remains uncertain for species that are not available in cultures and therefore only described from field material. First, in many cases when the species is described, the size of only a few individuals is measured. Second, it is often difficult to assess size variability, because the species is often described from a single or, at best, a small number of samples. Third, techniques such as whole-mount electron microscopy induce severe cell shrinking, leading to drastic underestimates of cell size.

Table 1

List of described small marine eukaryotic phytoplankton species, modified and expanded from Vaulot (2004)

Division Class Genus Species Authority Year Basionym Min. size (μm) Max. size (μm) Hydrography 
Picoplankton (Minimum size ≤2 μm)  
Chlorophyta Pedinophyceae Resultor micron (Throndsen) Moestrup 1969 1.5 2.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Bathycoccus prasinos Eikrem et Throndsen 1990 1.5 2.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Micromonas pusilla (Butcher) Manton et Parke 1952 1.0 3.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Ostreococcus tauri Courties et Chrétiennot-Dinet 1995 0.8 1.1 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Picocystis salinarum Lewin 2001 2.0 3.0 Hypersaline 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Pycnococcus provasolii Guillard 1991 1.5 4.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Chlorella nana  Andreoli et al. 1978 1.5 3.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Picochlorum atomus  (Butcher) Henley et al. 1952 2.0 3.0 Brackish 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Picochlorum oklahomensis  Henley et al. 2004 2.0 2.0 Hypersaline 
Cryptophyta Cryptophyceae Hillea marina Butcher 1952 2.0 2.5 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Chrysochromulina tenuisquama  Estep et al. 1984 2.0 5.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Imantonia rotunda Reynolds 1974 2.0 4.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Trigonaspis minutissima Thomsen 1980 2.0 3.6 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Arcocellulus cornucervis  Hasle et al. 1983 1.0 17.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Chaetoceros minimus  (Levander) Marino et al. 1991 2.0 7.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Chaetoceros throndsenii  (Marino et al. ) Marino et al. 1991 1.5 5.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minidiscus comicus Takano 1981 2.0 7.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minutocellus polymorphus  (Hargraves et Guillard) Hasle et al. 1983 2.0 30.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Skeletonema grethae Zingone et Sarno 2005 2.0 10.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Skeletonema japonicum Zingone et Sarno 2005 2.0 10.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Skeletonema marinoi Sarno et Zingone 2005 2.0 12.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Skeletonema menzelii  Guillard et al. 1974 2.0 7.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Skeletonema pseudocostatum Medlin 1991 2.0 9.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiosira bulbosa Syvertsen 1984 2.0 16.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiosira mala Takano 1965 2.0 10.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiosira proschkinae Makarova 1979 2.0 11.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bolidophyceae Bolidomonas mediterranea Guillou et Chrétiennot-Dinet 1999 1.0 1.7 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bolidophyceae Bolidomonas pacifica Guillou et Chrétiennot-Dinet 1999 1.0 1.7 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Eustigmatophyceae Nannochloropsis granulata Karlson et Potter 1996 2.0 4.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Pelagophyceae Aureococcus anophagefferens Hargraves et Sieburth 1988 1.5 2.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Pelagophyceae Pelagomonas calceolata Andersen et Saunders 1993 2.0 3.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Pinguiophyceae Pinguiochrysis pyriformis Kawachi 2002 1.0 3.0 Marine 
Other small species (Minimum size ≤3 μm)  
Chlorophyta Pedinophyceae Marsupiomonas pelliculata  Jones et al. 1994 3.0 3.0 Brackish, marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Crustomastix stigmatica Zingone 2002 3.0 5.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Dolichomastix eurylepidea Manton 1977 3.0 3.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Dolichomastix lepidota Manton 1977 2.5 2.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Dolichomastix tenuilepis Throndsen et Zingone 1997 3.0 4.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Mantoniella squamata (Manton et Parke) Desikachary 1960 3.0 5.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Prasinococcus capsulatus Miyashita et Chihara 1993 3.0 5.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Prasinoderma coloniale Hasegawa et Chihara 1996 2.5 5.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Pseudoscourfieldia marina (Throndsen) Manton 1969 3.0 3.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Pyramimonas virginica Pennick 1977 2.7 3.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Chlorella spärckii Ålvik 1934 2.8 7.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Picochlorum eukaryotum  (Wilhelm et al. ) Henley et al. 1982 3.0 3.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Picochlorum maculatus  (Butcher) Henley et al. 1952 3.0 3.0 Brackish 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Stichococcus bacillaris Nägeli 1849 3.0 4.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Chrysochromulina apheles Moestrup et Thomsen 1986 3.0 4.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Chrysochromulina minor Parke et Manton 1955 2.5 7.5 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Chrysochromulina planisquama  Hu et al. 2005 3.0 6.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Dicrateria inornata Parke 1949 3.0 5.5 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Ericiolus spiculiger Thomsen 1995 3.0 3.8 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Phaeocystis cordata Zingone 1999 3.0 4.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Phaeocystis pouchetii (Hariot) Lagerheim 1892 3.0 8.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minidiscus chilensis Rivera 1984 3.0 7.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minidiscus spinulosus  Gao et al. 1992 3.0 5.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minidiscus trioculatus (F.J.R. Taylor) Hasle 1967 2.5 3.8 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minutocellus scriptus  Hasle et al. 1983 3.0 36.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiosira oceanica Hasle 1983 3.0 12.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiosira pseudonana Hasle et Heimdal 1970 2.3 5.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Ollicola vangoorii (Conrad) Vørs 1938 3.0 5.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Tetraparma insecta Bravo-Sierra et Hernández-Becerril 2003 2.8 3.8 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Tetraparma pelagica Booth et Marchant 1987 2.2 2.8 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Triparma columacea Booth 1981 2.3 4.7 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Triparma laevis Booth 1981 2.2 3.1 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Triparma retinervis Booth 1981 2.7 4.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Dictyochophyceae Florenciella parvula Eikrem 2004 3.0 6.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Eustigmatophyceae Nannochloropsis oceanica Suda et Miyashita 2002 3.0 5.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Eustigmatophyceae Nannochloropsis salina (Bourrelly) Hibberd 1958 3.0 4.0 Brackish 
Heterokontophyta Pelagophyceae Aureoumbra lagunensis  Stockwell et al. 1997 2.5 5.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Pelagophyceae Pelagococcus subviridis Norris 1977 2.5 5.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Pinguiophyceae Pinguiococcus pyrenoidosus  Andersen et al. 2002 3.0 8.0 Marine 
Division Class Genus Species Authority Year Basionym Min. size (μm) Max. size (μm) Hydrography 
Picoplankton (Minimum size ≤2 μm)  
Chlorophyta Pedinophyceae Resultor micron (Throndsen) Moestrup 1969 1.5 2.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Bathycoccus prasinos Eikrem et Throndsen 1990 1.5 2.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Micromonas pusilla (Butcher) Manton et Parke 1952 1.0 3.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Ostreococcus tauri Courties et Chrétiennot-Dinet 1995 0.8 1.1 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Picocystis salinarum Lewin 2001 2.0 3.0 Hypersaline 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Pycnococcus provasolii Guillard 1991 1.5 4.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Chlorella nana  Andreoli et al. 1978 1.5 3.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Picochlorum atomus  (Butcher) Henley et al. 1952 2.0 3.0 Brackish 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Picochlorum oklahomensis  Henley et al. 2004 2.0 2.0 Hypersaline 
Cryptophyta Cryptophyceae Hillea marina Butcher 1952 2.0 2.5 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Chrysochromulina tenuisquama  Estep et al. 1984 2.0 5.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Imantonia rotunda Reynolds 1974 2.0 4.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Trigonaspis minutissima Thomsen 1980 2.0 3.6 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Arcocellulus cornucervis  Hasle et al. 1983 1.0 17.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Chaetoceros minimus  (Levander) Marino et al. 1991 2.0 7.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Chaetoceros throndsenii  (Marino et al. ) Marino et al. 1991 1.5 5.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minidiscus comicus Takano 1981 2.0 7.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minutocellus polymorphus  (Hargraves et Guillard) Hasle et al. 1983 2.0 30.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Skeletonema grethae Zingone et Sarno 2005 2.0 10.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Skeletonema japonicum Zingone et Sarno 2005 2.0 10.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Skeletonema marinoi Sarno et Zingone 2005 2.0 12.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Skeletonema menzelii  Guillard et al. 1974 2.0 7.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Skeletonema pseudocostatum Medlin 1991 2.0 9.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiosira bulbosa Syvertsen 1984 2.0 16.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiosira mala Takano 1965 2.0 10.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiosira proschkinae Makarova 1979 2.0 11.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bolidophyceae Bolidomonas mediterranea Guillou et Chrétiennot-Dinet 1999 1.0 1.7 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bolidophyceae Bolidomonas pacifica Guillou et Chrétiennot-Dinet 1999 1.0 1.7 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Eustigmatophyceae Nannochloropsis granulata Karlson et Potter 1996 2.0 4.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Pelagophyceae Aureococcus anophagefferens Hargraves et Sieburth 1988 1.5 2.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Pelagophyceae Pelagomonas calceolata Andersen et Saunders 1993 2.0 3.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Pinguiophyceae Pinguiochrysis pyriformis Kawachi 2002 1.0 3.0 Marine 
Other small species (Minimum size ≤3 μm)  
Chlorophyta Pedinophyceae Marsupiomonas pelliculata  Jones et al. 1994 3.0 3.0 Brackish, marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Crustomastix stigmatica Zingone 2002 3.0 5.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Dolichomastix eurylepidea Manton 1977 3.0 3.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Dolichomastix lepidota Manton 1977 2.5 2.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Dolichomastix tenuilepis Throndsen et Zingone 1997 3.0 4.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Mantoniella squamata (Manton et Parke) Desikachary 1960 3.0 5.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Prasinococcus capsulatus Miyashita et Chihara 1993 3.0 5.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Prasinoderma coloniale Hasegawa et Chihara 1996 2.5 5.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Pseudoscourfieldia marina (Throndsen) Manton 1969 3.0 3.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae Pyramimonas virginica Pennick 1977 2.7 3.5 Marine 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Chlorella spärckii Ålvik 1934 2.8 7.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Picochlorum eukaryotum  (Wilhelm et al. ) Henley et al. 1982 3.0 3.0 Marine 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Picochlorum maculatus  (Butcher) Henley et al. 1952 3.0 3.0 Brackish 
Chlorophyta Trebouxiophyceae Stichococcus bacillaris Nägeli 1849 3.0 4.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Chrysochromulina apheles Moestrup et Thomsen 1986 3.0 4.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Chrysochromulina minor Parke et Manton 1955 2.5 7.5 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Chrysochromulina planisquama  Hu et al. 2005 3.0 6.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Dicrateria inornata Parke 1949 3.0 5.5 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Ericiolus spiculiger Thomsen 1995 3.0 3.8 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Phaeocystis cordata Zingone 1999 3.0 4.0 Marine 
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae Phaeocystis pouchetii (Hariot) Lagerheim 1892 3.0 8.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minidiscus chilensis Rivera 1984 3.0 7.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minidiscus spinulosus  Gao et al. 1992 3.0 5.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minidiscus trioculatus (F.J.R. Taylor) Hasle 1967 2.5 3.8 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Minutocellus scriptus  Hasle et al. 1983 3.0 36.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiosira oceanica Hasle 1983 3.0 12.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiosira pseudonana Hasle et Heimdal 1970 2.3 5.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Ollicola vangoorii (Conrad) Vørs 1938 3.0 5.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Tetraparma insecta Bravo-Sierra et Hernández-Becerril 2003 2.8 3.8 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Tetraparma pelagica Booth et Marchant 1987 2.2 2.8 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Triparma columacea Booth 1981 2.3 4.7 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Triparma laevis Booth 1981 2.2 3.1 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Chrysophyceae Triparma retinervis Booth 1981 2.7 4.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Dictyochophyceae Florenciella parvula Eikrem 2004 3.0 6.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Eustigmatophyceae Nannochloropsis oceanica Suda et Miyashita 2002 3.0 5.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Eustigmatophyceae Nannochloropsis salina (Bourrelly) Hibberd 1958 3.0 4.0 Brackish 
Heterokontophyta Pelagophyceae Aureoumbra lagunensis  Stockwell et al. 1997 2.5 5.0 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Pelagophyceae Pelagococcus subviridis Norris 1977 2.5 5.5 Marine 
Heterokontophyta Pinguiophyceae Pinguiococcus pyrenoidosus  Andersen et al. 2002 3.0 8.0 Marine 

Picoplankton species are defined as those for which minimum cell size is ≤2 μm. Other small species for which the minimum cell size is ≤3 μm are also listed.

Historically, some species that can be <3 μm, such as Stichococcus bacillaris or Phaeocystis pouchetii , were described as early as the 19th century ( Fig. 3 ). However, the real breakthrough took place with the paper of Butcher (1952) in which he described several species in the 2–3 μm range including Chromulina pusilla , later renamed Micromonas pusilla , which proved to be one of the most widespread species in temperate latitudes. A clear impetus for the discovery of novel picoplanktonic species from coastal waters was provided by the application of electron microscopy, especially at the hand of Irene Manton and Mary Parke from England in the early 1960s ( Fig. 3 ). A second wave of descriptions emerged when it was realized that picoplankton was dominating biomass and primary production in many oceanic areas, leading to an effort to isolate representative cultures in particular through the efforts of Bob Guillard in Woods Hole, which led to the creation of the CCMP ( Andersen, 1997 ), which constitutes to date the reference collection for picoplankton cultures. Finally, a new impetus emerged in the late 1990s with the widespread application of molecular phylogeny methods that allowed placing unambiguously some of the small planktonic species lacking diagnostic morphologically features. In fact, this led to recognition of the existence of novel algal classes, some of which were erected based on picoplanktonic species such as the Pelagophyceae ( Andersen, 1993 ) or the Bolidophyceae ( Guillou, 1999a ).

Figure 3

Number of described small phytoplankton species (minimum size ≤3 μm) as a function of their year of publication.

Figure 3

Number of described small phytoplankton species (minimum size ≤3 μm) as a function of their year of publication.

Small plankton species are found in most algal classes ( Fig. 4 ). The largest number of small photosynthetic eukaryotic species described to date ( Table 2 ) belongs to the Heterokontophyta (also called heterokonts or stramenopiles, characterized by the presence of two flagella of differing morphology and function), followed by Chlorophyta (green algae) in particular from the class Prasinophyceae. Other groups represented include the Haptophyta (characterized by the presence of a third appendage called the haptonema) and Cryptophyta (containing phycobiliproteins besides chlorophyll and carotenoids).

Figure 4

Tree presenting all available sequences for described small phytoplankton species (closed circles) along with environmental sequences from ≤3 μm filtered samples (open circles) or total samples (open triangles) closely related to described species or belonging to taxonomic groups suspected to be photosynthetic and for which no species has been described yet (e.g. picobiliphytes). Phylogeny based on 113 full-length 18S rRNA gene sequences and 1353 total characters. The tree shown was inferred by the maximum likelihood (ML) method based on a TrN ( Tamura & Nei, 1993 ) model of DNA substitutions with the following parameters: proportion of invariable sites (I)=0.3341, gamma distribution shape parameter=0.6293, and substitution models of R(a) [A–C]=1.5090, R(b) [A–G]=2.9589, R(e) [C–T]=4.9420 and 1.0 for the remaining substitution rates. Total number of rearrangements tried=113 703. Bootstrap values are indicated above internodes and correspond to neighbor joining (NJ) and maximum parsimony (MP), respectively. Only bootstrap values higher than 60% are reported and a 100/100 bootstrap value is represented by an asterisk ( * ). The scale bar indicates 0.02 substitution per site.

Figure 4

Tree presenting all available sequences for described small phytoplankton species (closed circles) along with environmental sequences from ≤3 μm filtered samples (open circles) or total samples (open triangles) closely related to described species or belonging to taxonomic groups suspected to be photosynthetic and for which no species has been described yet (e.g. picobiliphytes). Phylogeny based on 113 full-length 18S rRNA gene sequences and 1353 total characters. The tree shown was inferred by the maximum likelihood (ML) method based on a TrN ( Tamura & Nei, 1993 ) model of DNA substitutions with the following parameters: proportion of invariable sites (I)=0.3341, gamma distribution shape parameter=0.6293, and substitution models of R(a) [A–C]=1.5090, R(b) [A–G]=2.9589, R(e) [C–T]=4.9420 and 1.0 for the remaining substitution rates. Total number of rearrangements tried=113 703. Bootstrap values are indicated above internodes and correspond to neighbor joining (NJ) and maximum parsimony (MP), respectively. Only bootstrap values higher than 60% are reported and a 100/100 bootstrap value is represented by an asterisk ( * ). The scale bar indicates 0.02 substitution per site.

Table 2

Number of described small marine eukaryotic phytoplankton species by taxonomic group, tabulated from Table 1

Division Class Species # per class Species # per phylum 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae 20 37 
 Chrysophyceae  
 Pelagophyceae  
 Eustigmatophyceae  
 Bolidophyceae  
 Pinguiophyceae  
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae 14 23 
 Pedinophyceae  
 Trebouxiophyceae  
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae 10 10 
Cryptophyta Cryptophyceae 
Division Class Species # per class Species # per phylum 
Heterokontophyta Bacillariophyceae 20 37 
 Chrysophyceae  
 Pelagophyceae  
 Eustigmatophyceae  
 Bolidophyceae  
 Pinguiophyceae  
Chlorophyta Prasinophyceae 14 23 
 Pedinophyceae  
 Trebouxiophyceae  
Haptophyta Prymnesiophyceae 10 10 
Cryptophyta Cryptophyceae 

Chlorophyta

Prasinophyceae

One of the first truly picoplanktonic species to have been described, Micromonas pusilla , belongs to the green lineage, more specifically to the Prasinophyceae, a class that regroups taxa at the base of the Chlorophyta. A recent analysis ( Guillou, 2004 ) of the 18S rRNA gene sequences available both for cultured strains and environmental sequences clearly established that this class is polyphyletic and led to the delineation of seven different clades ( Fig. 4 ), some corresponding to known orders such as Mamiellales, some not yet formerly described. All these clades will probably be described as separate classes in the future.

Mamiellales

In contrast to many other phylogenetic groups that harbor both picoplanktonic and larger species, the order Mamiellales contains mostly small-sized species ( Fig. 1b, c and f ).

Micromonas pusilla ( Fig. 1b and 2a–c ) is characterized by an easily recognizable swimming pattern and a single peculiar flagellum. The proximal part of the flagellum consists of the regular 9+2 microtubules, but only the two central microtubules extend into the distal part ( Fig. 2b and c ). Several studies have pointed out its ubiquity in coastal temperate and near-polar waters, based on culture isolation by serial dilution ( Manton & Parke, 1960 ; Throndsen & Kristiansen, 1991 ) and frequency of species-specific viruses ( Cottrell & Suttle, 1991 ; Zingone, 1999b ). More recently, the availability of fluorescent probe targeting Micromonas 18S rRNA gene and detected by FISH has allowed establishing that this species can account on average for 45% of the picoeukaryotes in English Channel coastal waters ( Not, 2004 ) and for 32% in late summer arctic waters off Spitsbergen ( Not, 2005 ) with maximum concentrations of up to 10 000 cell mL −1 . In contrast, Micromonas appears to be absent from more oligotrophic waters such as the central Mediterranean Sea ( Marie, 2006 ) or the Gulf of Mexico ( Cottrell & Suttle, 1991 ), although it has been reported in the South East Pacific ( Throndsen, 1973 ) and south of Japan ( Throndsen, 1983 ). Micromonas pusilla appears to be quite diverse genetically and at least three clades ( Fig. 4 ) can be identified on the basis of 18S rRNA gene sequences ( Guillou, 2004 ) and up to five if additional genes are taken into account ( Slapeta, 2006 ). However, it is not clear whether each clade corresponds to a specific bio-geographical or ecotypic distribution or to a well-defined phenotype ( Slapeta, 2006 ).

Bathycoccus prasinos is a very small coccoid organism ( Fig. 1f ) that is covered by spider-web-like scales. Initially isolated from the bottom of the euphotic zone in the Mediterranean Sea ( Eikrem & Throndsen, 1990 ), it has been observed with FISH to be present and sometimes quite abundant (up to 5000 cell mL −1 ) in surface coastal waters in the Mediterranean Sea and Atlantic Ocean ( Not, 2004 , 2005 ; Zhu, 2005 ).

A third emblematic Mamiellales species is Ostreococcus tauri . It is the smallest free-living eukaryote known to date with an average size of 0.8 μm ( Courties, 1994 ). Initially isolated from a coastal eutrophic lagoon on the French Mediterranean Sea coast, it has since been cultivated from a wide variety of oceanic environments including coastal and open ocean sites. Phylogenetic analyses of the 18S rRNA gene and intergenic spacers (ITS) led to the delineation of four clades ( Guillou, 2004 ; Rodríguez, 2005 ). It is possible to make a correspondence between these clades and specific environments: clade C contains only the original strain isolated from Thau lagoon, while clade B regroups strains isolated from the bottom of the euphotic zone (90–120 m) from the Atlantic Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea, and the Red Sea. Interestingly, all B strains possess a specific chlorophyll-like pigment (Chl CS-170), not observed in the other clades. Despite the fact that Ostreococcus has been isolated from many oceanic locations, it seems to occur usually at very low concentrations, typically of the order of 100 cell mL −1 , as established by FISH in the Mediterranean Sea and Atlantic Ocean ( Not, 2004 , 2005 ; Zhu, 2005 ). In contrast, it can reach sporadically very high concentrations (10 5 cell mL −1 ) within the near shore deep chlorophyll maximum ( Countway & Caron, 2006 ) and in confined coastal environments ( O'Kelly, 2003 ).

Three other Mamiellales genera, Mantoniella, Crustomastix , and Dolichomastix , contain small species. Among these, Mantoniella squamata , characterized by two unequal flagella, has been recorded in many different locations ranging from polar to subtropical waters, with an estimated abundance of up to 1000 cell mL −1 ( Hallegraeff, 1983 ; Thomsen & Buck, 1998 ). Species belonging to the two other genera have been observed sporadically, in particular in the Mediterranean Sea ( Throndsen & Zingone, 1997 ; Zingone, 2002 ), but precise abundance data are not available. A nondescribed culture belonging to this order ( Figs 1c and 2f and g ) has been isolated from the Mediterranean Sea ( Guillou, 2004 ).

Pseudoscourfieldiales

The small coccoid species Pycnococcus provasolii was one of the first picoplanktonic eukaryotic species to be repeatedly isolated from the open ocean ( Guillard, 1991 ), in particular from below the mixed layer (i.e. below the pycnocline, hence its name). Quite surprisingly, its 18S rRNA gene sequence is almost 100% similar to that of another small planktonic flagellate, Pseudoscourfieldia marina ( Fawley, 1999 ), leading to the speculation that these two species could be alternate life-cycle stages ( Guillou, 2004 ). In fact, flagellate stages were already reported in the original description of P. provasolii ( Guillard, 1991 ). Pseudoscourfieldia marina has been reported off Denmark and South Africa ( Manton, 1975 ) and appears to be quite common in the Skagerrak area based on serial dilution culture data with estimated densities up to 170 cell mL −1 (W. Eikrem & J. Throndsen, unpublished data). An 18S rRNA probe targeting this clade ( Pseudoscourfieldiales ) only detected a very small number of cells (<100 cell mL −1 ) in temperate English Channel coastal waters ( Not, 2004 ). Antibodies directed against P. provasolii detected few cells in the Gulf of Maine but much higher concentrations off Hawaii, especially at the chlorophyll maximum, where it accounted for up to 23% of eukaryotes ( Campbell, 1994b ).

Prasinococcales

The two species Prasinococcus capsulatus and Prasinoderma coloniale that belong to clade VI (‘Prasinococcales’), as defined in Guillou (2004) , are characterized by small cells embedded in a gelatinous matrix. They are quite often isolated from oceanic samples ( Sieburth, 1999 ; Fuller, 2006a ) and the use of FISH probes has shown that the concentration of members of this order is highly variable but can reach up to 1000 cell mL −1 in coastal waters.

Clade VII

One group of Prasinophyceae (clade VII following Guillou 2004 ) is composed of picoplankton-sized strains that have been isolated from open ocean areas (e.g. CCMP 1205 or RCC 287, Fig. 2d and e ) but have not been formally described as yet. Within this clade, Picocystis salinarum is a species found in hypersaline environments such as Mono Lake (USA) where it can reach extremely high concentrations in excess of 4 × 10 5 cell mL −1 ( Roesler, 2002 ). Despite the fact that it can grow at much lower salinities ( Roesler, 2002 ), there is no evidence that it occurs in marine environments.

Pyramimonadales

Pyramimonas virginica is very small and has been recorded sporadically in several coastal environments ranging from New Zealand to Denmark and Greenland, through Thailand ( Thomsen, 1986 ; Hori, 1995 ). In view of the diversity of the genus Pyramimonas (more than 40 species described to date), it is likely that other small planktonic Pyramimonas species do exist.

Pedinophyceae

The two species Resultor mikron and Marsupiomonas pelliculata , characterized by a single flagellum and the absence of scales, belong to the Pedinophyceae, a class with only three genera whose relationship with the other Chlorophyta classes awaits molecular phylogenetic analysis. Resultor mikron has been recorded in particular in the Atlantic Ocean ( Estep, 1984 ), while M. pelliculata was isolated into culture and described from a salt marsh in Great Britain ( Jones, 1994 ) and may be restricted to this specific environment, because it has not been recorded since.

Trebouxiophyceae

Several species of Trebouxiophyceae may qualify as picoplanktonic. The newly established genus Picochlorum regroups species included previously into genus Nannochloris that are halotolerant, including Picochlorum oklahomensis isolated from hyper-saline inland waters ( Henley, 2004 ). The different species described to date lack obvious morphological features and probably many species do exist that would need to be defined based on molecular markers such as 18S rRNA gene or ITS. These species are easily isolated from marine environments (e.g. more than 25 strains are available from the CCMP – http://ccmp.bigelow.org/ ) but no data are available on their actual abundance in marine waters. Three small Trebouxiophyceae ( Chlorella nana, Stichococcus bacillaris , and Stichococcus cylindricus , the latter two being probable synonyms) have been mentioned very rarely in the scientific literature since their initial description ( Nägeli, 1849 ; Butcher, 1952 ; George, 1957 ; Throndsen, 1969 ; Andreoli, 1978 ) and their exact taxonomical position would probably need to be re-evaluated. In fact, the genus Stichococcus is limited to terrestrial habitats, with the exception of S. cylindricus/S. bacillaris .

Heterokontophyta

Although Heterokontophyta are dominated by macroalgae species (Phaeophyceae), many classes contain small planktonic representatives ( Fig. 4 ).

Pelagophyceae

Pelagomonas calceolata is a very small flagellate initially isolated from the North Pacific gyre. Its pigment and some ultrastructural features were typical of heterokonts. However, some of its morphological features (single basal body, bipartite flagellar hairs) as well as its 18S rRNA gene sequence did not allow easy inclusion in existing classes. As a consequence, Andersen (1993) created a new class, the Pelagophyceae, to accommodate Pelagomonas . Later, three other small planktonic species were classified into the Pelagophyceae based on their 18S rRNA gene sequence. All these species possess the carotenoid 19′ butanoyloxyfucoxanthin. Pelagococcus subviridis is a coccoid organism also isolated from several locations in the Pacific and initially classified into the Chrysophyceae ( Lewin, 1977 ). It has also been recorded from the Norwegian Sea (Haltenbanken) using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) thin sections and whole mounts as well as SEM ( Throndsen & Kristiansen, 1982 ). Aureococcus anophagefferens and Aureoumbra lagunensis are two brown tide organisms that can reach very high densities (up to 10 6 cell mL −1 ). The former occurs in coastal embayments and lagoons of the East Coast of the USA ( Caron, 2003 ), while the latter has, in recent years, formed quasi-persistent blooms in Texas hypersaline environments such as the Laguna Madre ( Buskey, 2001 ). The extent of the distribution of the pelagic species P. calceolata and P. subviridis in the marine environment has not been investigated in detail although these species have been isolated from several oceanic locations in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans ( Andersen, 2007 ; Le Gall, 2008 ). Antibodies directed against P. subviridis detected very few cells (<0.1% of eukaryotes in general) in the Gulf of Maine and off Hawaii, although in one sample at the latter location its abundance reached 25% of eukaryotic cells ( Campbell, 1994b ). However, a FISH probe targeting all Pelagophyceae recognized up to 5000 cell mL −1 in English Channel coastal waters ( Biegala, 2003 ).

Bolidophyceae

The isolation of two very small heterokont flagellates in the Pacific Ocean ( Bolidomonas pacifica ) and in the Mediterranean Sea ( Bolidomonas mediterranea ) with pigment content (fucoxanthin as the major carotenoid) and 18S rRNA gene sequences closely related to those of diatoms led to the erection of a novel class: the Bolidophyceae ( Guillou, 1999a ). Probe dot-blot analysis indicated that Bolidophyceae were very minor contributors to the picoplankton communities in the areas from which they were isolated ( Guillou, 1999b ). However, a FISH probe targeting Bolidophyceae could detect up to almost 500 cell mL −1 in English Channel coastal waters (F. Not, unpublished data).

Eustigmatophyceae

The genus Nannochloropsis is characterized by small coccoid cells that lack distinct morphological features, often requiring molecular analyses to establish phylogeny ( Andersen, 1998 ). Some strains are a valuable source of polyunsaturated fatty acids and pigments such as astaxanthin (e.g. Lubian, 2000 ). Three small marine planktonic species have been described to date: Nannochloropsis salina , Nannochloropsis granulata , and Nannochloropsis oceanica ( Suda, 2002 ), but their oceanic distribution remains unknown.

Chrysophyceae

The Parmales ( Booth & Marchant, 1987 ) constitute quite a mysterious group that encompasses very small cells with a silicified cell wall. At least five described species belonging to the genera Triparma and Tetraparma can be <3 μm in size. However, because these cells are only known from field observations, mostly by SEM ( Bravo-Sierra & Hernandez-Becerril, 2003 ), and have never been isolated in culture, their exact taxonomic affiliation remains mysterious, although they have been provisionally classified into the Chrysophyceae. The mixotrophic species Ollicolla vangoorii is another marine Chrysophyceae that possesses a lorica and that has been reported from temperate and polar waters (see Novarino, 2002 and references therein).

Bacillariophyceae

Paradoxically, despite the fact that diatoms are usually considered as prominent members of the microplankton (i.e. with cell size in excess of 20 μm), almost 20 species of Bacillariophyceae can have one of their cell dimensions below 3 μm. This is the case in particular of the genera Minidiscus and Minutocellus ( Ake Castillo, 2001 ). The species Minidiscus chilensis can be important in antarctic waters as it is found at a high concentration in sediment traps ( Kang, 2003 ), while Minutocellus polymorphus has been shown to bloom to above 100 000 cell mL −1 in a Mediterranean lagoon ( Sarno, 1993 ). Five species belonging to the genus Skeletonema , some of which have been created following the revision of the taxonomy of the ubiquitous species Skeletonema costatum , can also have a small cell size. However, because they usually occur in chains, they are unlikely to be retained by a 2- or 3-μm filter ( Sarno, 2005 ; Zingone, 2005 ). Finally, Thalassiosira pseudonana is the first eukaryotic phytoplankton species for which the genome has been sequenced ( Armbrust, 2004 ).

Dictyochophyceae and Pinguiophyceae

Two other heterokont classes, the Dictyochophyceae and the Pinguiophyceae, harbor small species. The flagellate Florenciella parvula ( Fig. 1d ) was initially isolated from European coastal waters ( Eikrem, 2004 ) and a second strain has been obtained recently from the South Pacific Ocean ( Le Gall, 2008 ). Florenciella is phylogenetically related to the mildly toxic genus Pseudochattonella ( Edvardsen, 2007 ; Eikrem, 2008 ) and, more distantly, to the genus Dictyocha , whose characteristic spiny skeleton is often found in marine phytoplankton samples. The Pinguiophyceae constitute a novel class characterized by cells containing an unusually high amount of polyunsaturated acids ( Kawachi, 2002b ). Pinguiochrysis pyriformis , a nonmotile picoplanktonic species with a pyriform shape and a high concentration of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), has been isolated from the surface of the tropical Pacific Ocean ( Kawachi, 2002a ).

Haptophyta

Among the Haptophyta, four Chrysochromulina species can be <3 μm. This highly diversified genus contains over 60 species, some of which are toxic, some of which can form blooms, and some of which are mixotrophic. The difficulty in distinguishing species by optical microscopy has prevented accurate estimates of individual species but the genus can be abundant in coastal waters ( Dahl, 2005 ). Phaeocystis is a very widespread genus and several of its species can form large mucous colonies leading to accumulation of visible foam in coastal waters. Two species, the non-colony-forming Phaeocystis cordata described from the Mediterranean Sea ( Zingone, 1999a ) and the colonial Phaeocystis pouchetii that is restricted to cold northern hemisphere waters ( Schoemann, 2005 ), may have cells as small as 3 μm ( Fig. 2j and k ). Imantonia rotunda ( Fig. 1a and 2h and i ) and Dicrateria inornata are two rather similar species characterized by the absence of visible haptonema and short flagella, the latter lacking body scales, that are easily isolated from coastal waters ( Backe Hansen & Throndsen, 2002 ). Trigonaspis minutissima and Ericiolus spiculiger have both been described from field observations in north temperate and arctic waters ( Thomsen, 1980 ; Thomsen, 1995 ) and do not seem to have been recorded since then.

Cryptophyta

A single cryptophyte species may qualify as picoplanktonic: Hillea marina . It was described in the early 1950s ( Butcher, 1952 ) and has been observed to be quite abundant in some coastal waters ( Chang, 1983 ).

Environmental diversity of small eukaryotic phytoplankton

It is quite paradoxical that although small planktonic eukaryotes are present in very diverse ecosystems and may represent a large fraction of the biomass and production in many ecosystems ( Campbell, 1994a ; Worden, 2004 ), very few species have been described, in particular in comparison with other microplankton groups such as diatoms. This contradiction has led in recent years to the increased use of molecular approaches based on direct gene amplification and sequencing from natural samples (see section above). This approach has now been applied to many different ecosystems including hydrothermal vents, sediments, and anoxic waters ( López-García, 2003 ; Stoeck & Epstein, 2003 ). Most studies have been focused on the 18S rRNA gene as a taxonomic marker although other genes such as those coding for the large subunit of Rubisco ( rbcL ) and plastidial 16S RNA gene have also been considered ( Rappé, 1995 ; Paul, 2000 ).

We have compiled 3561 18S rRNA gene sequences (either full length or partial, but always longer than 350 bp) originating from 18 published data sets ( Table 3 ). These sequences have been obtained only from water column marine plankton samples (i.e. ignoring sediments as well as fresh water environments). This set is somewhat biased towards coastal waters with fewer studies from more open ocean regions, in particular in tropical or polar regions ( Table 3 ). A large subset of the samples have been filter fractionated to <3 μm and therefore correspond to the small plankton size range considered in this review. In the analysis below we concentrate on this size fraction, while mentioning sequences recovered from total samples when they are closely related to the species listed in Table 1 . These sequences have been compared by a basic local alignment search tool ( blast ) with those available in GenBank (September 2007), allowing the placement of each sequence into a taxonomic group. Further analyses have been performed with the arb software ( Ludwig, 2004 ) using the Silva database ( Pruesse, 2007 ) containing more than 30 000 eukaryotic 18S rRNA gene sequences.

Table 3

Sets of marine samples analyzed in this paper for which eukaryotic environmental 18S rRNA gene sequences have been determined using either cloning, DGGE or TTGE

Sample set Type Filtration Ecosystem Region Cruise References Number of sequences 
Antarctic, Diez Cruise <1.6 μm Oceanic Antarctic E-DOVETAIL Díez (2001a) 51 
Drake Passage, López-García Cruise <5 μm Oceanic Antarctic DHARMA 98 López-García (2001) , López-García (2003) 49 
Arctic, Lovejoy Cruise <3 μm Oceanic Arctic Ocean Three cruises Lovejoy (2006) 267 
North Atlantic, Diez Cruise <2 μm Oceanic North Atlantic ACSOE NAE Díez (2001a) 16 
Sargasso Sea, Countway Cruise  Oceanic Sargasso Sea; Gulf Stream Endeavor 2000 Countway (2007) 896 
Sargasso Sea, Not Cruise <2 μm Oceanic Sargasso Sea Endeavor 2001 Not (2007a) 229 
Mediterranean Sea, Diez Cruise <5 μm Oceanic Mediterranean Sea MATER Díez (2001a) 31 
Mediterranean Sea, Marie Cruise <3 μm Oceanic Mediterranean Sea PROSOPE Marie et al. (2006) 119 
Nansha islands, Yuan Cruise  Oceanic South China Sea  Yuan (2004) 63 
Equatorial Pacific, Moon Cruise <3 μm Oceanic Equatorial Pacific OLIPAC Guillou (1999a) , Moon-van der Staay (2000) , Moon-van der Staay (2001) 51 
Cariaco Basin, Stoeck Cruise  Oceanic Carribean Sea CARIACO Stoeck & Epstein (2003) , Stoeck (2006) 233 
Framvaren, Behnke Cruise  Coastal anoxic Norway fjord Nordstranda Behnke (2006) 182 
Pacific Ocean, Short Coastal station  Coastal Pacific Ocean  Short & Suttle (2003) 19 
Helgoland, Medlin Time series <3 μm Coastal North Sea; North Atlantic  Medlin (2006) 290 
Roscoff, Romari Time series <3 μm Coastal English Channel  Romari & Vaulot (2004) 383 
Blanes, Massana Time series <3 μm Coastal Mediterranean Sea  Massana (2004) 148 
Scripps Pier, Worden Time series <2 μm Coastal Pacific Ocean  Worden (2006) 72 
Atlantic enrichment, Countway Experiment  Coastal North West Atlantic  Countway (2005) 462 
      Total 3561 
Sample set Type Filtration Ecosystem Region Cruise References Number of sequences 
Antarctic, Diez Cruise <1.6 μm Oceanic Antarctic E-DOVETAIL Díez (2001a) 51 
Drake Passage, López-García Cruise <5 μm Oceanic Antarctic DHARMA 98 López-García (2001) , López-García (2003) 49 
Arctic, Lovejoy Cruise <3 μm Oceanic Arctic Ocean Three cruises Lovejoy (2006) 267 
North Atlantic, Diez Cruise <2 μm Oceanic North Atlantic ACSOE NAE Díez (2001a) 16 
Sargasso Sea, Countway Cruise  Oceanic Sargasso Sea; Gulf Stream Endeavor 2000 Countway (2007) 896 
Sargasso Sea, Not Cruise <2 μm Oceanic Sargasso Sea Endeavor 2001 Not (2007a) 229 
Mediterranean Sea, Diez Cruise <5 μm Oceanic Mediterranean Sea MATER Díez (2001a) 31 
Mediterranean Sea, Marie Cruise <3 μm Oceanic Mediterranean Sea PROSOPE Marie et al. (2006) 119 
Nansha islands, Yuan Cruise  Oceanic South China Sea  Yuan (2004) 63 
Equatorial Pacific, Moon Cruise <3 μm Oceanic Equatorial Pacific OLIPAC Guillou (1999a) , Moon-van der Staay (2000) , Moon-van der Staay (2001) 51 
Cariaco Basin, Stoeck Cruise  Oceanic Carribean Sea CARIACO Stoeck & Epstein (2003) , Stoeck (2006) 233 
Framvaren, Behnke Cruise  Coastal anoxic Norway fjord Nordstranda Behnke (2006) 182 
Pacific Ocean, Short Coastal station  Coastal Pacific Ocean  Short & Suttle (2003) 19 
Helgoland, Medlin Time series <3 μm Coastal North Sea; North Atlantic  Medlin (2006) 290 
Roscoff, Romari Time series <3 μm Coastal English Channel  Romari & Vaulot (2004) 383 
Blanes, Massana Time series <3 μm Coastal Mediterranean Sea  Massana (2004) 148 
Scripps Pier, Worden Time series <2 μm Coastal Pacific Ocean  Worden (2006) 72 
Atlantic enrichment, Countway Experiment  Coastal North West Atlantic  Countway (2005) 462 
      Total 3561 

Among the 3561 18S rRNA gene sequences analyzed, about 30% are affiliated to taxonomic groups known to harbor photosynthetic organisms. The remaining sequences correspond to heterotrophic groups in particular Alveolata and stramenopiles, but also to Metazoa, likely to originate from gametes, especially when samples are unfiltered ( Countway, 2005 ). Among the most abundant photosynthetic divisions ( Fig. 5 ) are green algae, more specifically Prasinophyceae, followed by dinoflagellates, cryptophytes, haptophytes, and stramenopiles. The relative frequency of these groups depends on many factors including depth, degree of oligotrophy, as well as season ( Massana, 2004 ; Romari & Vaulot, 2004 ).

Figure 5

Relative percentage of 18S rRNA gene sequences in each photosynthetic class from clone libraries and DGGE for sample sets listed in Table 3 . Sequences from ≤3 μm filtered samples (‘small plankton’) and from the total data set are differentiated (groups labeled with a star contain a significant fraction of heterotrophic species).

Figure 5

Relative percentage of 18S rRNA gene sequences in each photosynthetic class from clone libraries and DGGE for sample sets listed in Table 3 . Sequences from ≤3 μm filtered samples (‘small plankton’) and from the total data set are differentiated (groups labeled with a star contain a significant fraction of heterotrophic species).

Chlorophyta

Prasinophyceae constitute the dominant photosynthetic group among small plankton 18S rRNA gene sequences ( Fig. 5 ). This fits quite well with the fact that this group is the one for which most small species have been described to date. Prasinophyceae sequences are, however, mostly restricted to the euphotic zone, suggesting that this group is not transferred to deeper layers through sedimentation. Among Prasinophyceae ( Fig. 4 ), most sequences recovered belong to the order Mamiellales. The three picoplanktonic genera Micromonas , Ostreococcus , and Bathycoccus represent more than 90% of the available sequences and are especially found in temperate coastal waters ( Massana, 2004 ; Romari & Vaulot, 2004 ; Medlin, 2006 ; Worden, 2006 ). Moreover, Micromonas sequences have been recovered in temperate and polar oceanic waters ( Díez, 2001b ; Lovejoy, 2006 ), Bathycoccus sequences have been found throughout an extensive range from polar ( Lovejoy, 2006 ) to oligotropic stations in the Mediterranean Sea ( Marie, 2006 ) or Sargasso Sea ( Countway, 2007 ), often at depth, while Ostreococcus sequences have only been observed sporadically in Mediterranean Sea waters ( Marie, 2006 ). Such trends agree with data from FISH ( Not, 2004 ) and QPCR ( Marie, 2006 ), which show that while Micromonas is, for example, the most abundant genus in English Channel waters, it completely disappears in the central Mediterranean Sea, where, in contrast, the two other genera occur sporadically at specific stations and depths. Other Mamiellales sequences have been recovered presenting similarities to the genera Crustomastix , Mantoniella , and Mamiella , the former two genera containing small plankton species (see Table 1 ). Mamiellales-related sequences have also been recovered using other genes such as plastid 16S rRNA gene ( Fuller, 2006a ), rbcL ( Paul, 2000 ; Wawrik & Paul, 2004 ), and psbA ( Zeidner, 2003 ). Other sequences are closely related to the diversified genera Tetraselmis and Pyramimonas . The most interesting sequences correspond to clade VII (following the nomenclature of Guillou, 2004 ) for which no truly marine species has been described yet, although culture isolates are available. Sequences belonging to this clade are found in very different environments: oligotrophic surface waters of the Pacific Ocean ( Moon-van der Staay, 2001 ) and Sargasso Sea ( Countway, 2007 ), coastal waters of the English Channel ( Romari & Vaulot, 2004 ), but also deep (900 m) anoxic waters of the Cariaco Basin ( Stoeck & Epstein, 2003 ). Two novel clades without cultured representatives have been discovered very recently using Chlorophyta-biased primers ( Viprey, 2008 ). Paradoxically, no 18S rRNA gene sequences related to Prasinococcales and Pseudoscourfieldiales have been recovered using general primers. This is surprising in view of the importance in culture collections of genera belonging to these orders (e.g. Prasinococcus , Pycnococcus ) and of the detection of Pycnococcus in the field by antibody labeling ( Campbell, 1994b ). This suggests that they probably occur under specific conditions not sampled in surveys available to date. In fact, rbcL sequences related to Prasinococcus have been recovered from marine waters ( Wawrik & Paul, 2004 ).

In contrast to Prasinophyceae, the other Chlorophyta classes are very little represented in environmental samples, with only a few sequences related to the Trebouxiophyceae genus Nannochloris / Picochlorum found mostly in coastal samples (e.g. Medlin, 2006 ).

Alveolates (Dinophyceae)

Despite the fact that no dinoflagellate species of minimum size below 3 μm has been described yet, this group comes second in abundance among sequences from samples filtered through 3 μm ( Fig. 5 ). It should be noted that a significant fraction of these sequences may originate from heterotrophic species that constitute half of the described taxa ( Larsen & Sournia, 1991 ). Still, their relative abundance in euphotic zone samples suggests that some of them are autotrophic. Among filtered sample sequences, similarity to known species ranges from 100% to <92%. A large fraction of sequences fall into the order Gymnodiniales, some into the Prorocentrales, a few into the Peridiniales, with the rest of unclear affiliation. Clearly, the Gymnodiniales probably harbors many small and hard to distinguish species that remain to be described. Moreover, dinoflagellate cells may be flexible enough to squeeze through pores smaller than their actual size. Interestingly, some sequences are closely related to Lepidodinium viride ( Watanabe, 1990 ), a dinoflagellate with prasinophyte-like scales and containing chlorophyll b as its major accessory pigment, which could contribute to the pigment signature of ≤3 μm filtered samples. Recently, dinoflagellate sequences have also been recovered from picoplankton samples using dinoflagellate-biased primers ( Lin, 2006 ).

Stramenopiles

Within photosynthetic stramenopiles, diatoms are paradoxically the most abundant group among the sequences from the ≤3 μm fraction, although of course they provide an even higher contribution when both filtered and unfiltered samples are considered ( Fig. 5 ). Diatom sequences are relatively more important in the aphotic zone than higher in the water column, suggesting that many sequences may originate from sedimenting material ( Kang, 2003 ). In nonpolar waters, all diatom sequences found in ≤3 μm filtered samples are related to centric diatoms, with the exception of a few sequences, such as one in the Mediterranean Sea that is close to the toxic genus Pseudo-nitzschia ( Massana, 2004 ). In the Canadian Arctic Basin ( Lovejoy, 2006 ), in contrast, most sequences are related to pennate diatoms, especially to Fragilariopsis , a key genus in these waters ( Kang & Fryxell, 1992 ). These sequences may either come from yet undescribed small diatoms, from diatoms passing through filter pores (e.g. for pennates), or alternatively from male gametes of larger diatoms ( Davidovich & Bates, 1998 ).

Bolidophyceae, a small class closely related to diatoms, contains only two picoplanktonic species, both isolated from oligotrophic environments. Quite surprisingly, the only Bolidophyceae sequences detected in oligotrophic waters were recovered after screening clones with a specific probe, suggesting that this group may be insignificant in these environments ( Guillou, 1999b ). More recently, however, sequences with high similarities to Bolidophyceae (up to 99.6%) have been obtained from the Arctic and the North Sea ( Lovejoy, 2006 ; Medlin, 2006 ). Moreover, Bolidophyceae plastid 16S rRNA gene and rbcL sequences have also been recovered in the ocean ( Wawrik & Paul, 2004 ; Fuller, 2006a ).

The second most abundant stramenopile group within small plankton sequences is constituted by dictyochophytes, which were not considered as an important group until recently. Sequences have been recovered from size-fractionated samples in quite diverse oceanic waters (North Atlantic, Equatorial Pacific, Sargasso, and Mediterranean Seas, Arctic). Interestingly, most of these sequences are closely related to the newly described species Florenciella parvula ( Eikrem, 2004 ) while one sequence from the Pacific Ocean has some similarity to the amoeboid species Rhizochromulina marina ( Hibberd & Chrétiennot-Dinet, 1979 ).

Pelagophyceae, a class that contains picoplanktonic species, are paradoxically quite rare in environmental 18S rRNA gene clone libraries (Equatorial Pacific, Mediterranean, and Sargasso Seas, Arctic), with all sequences closely related to Pelagomonas calceolata . Pelagophyte plastid 16S rRNA gene sequences have also been obtained from various marine waters ( Fuller, 2006a ).

Even more surprising is the fact that Eustigmatophyceae sequences are absent from the data set examined while they are often isolated from coastal waters.

A large fraction of environmental Chrysophyceae sequences from coastal samples filtered through 3 μm or less corresponds to the heterotrophic and highly diversified genera Spumella and Paraphysomonas . The former is typically from fresh waters while the latter has been shown to be easily isolated in culture from coastal samples despite its generally low concentration in the water ( Lim, 1999 ). However, the remaining 18S sequences, some originating from coastal waters and some from the Sargasso Sea, form independent clades not related to any known species. Interestingly, a large set of plastid 16S rRNA gene sequences related to chrysophytes have been retrieved from Indian Ocean ≤3 μm filtered samples ( Fuller, 2006a ). Because 16S rRNA gene sequences could not be recovered from any of the several heterotrophic chrysophyte cultures tested such as Paraphysomonas or Picophagus ( Fuller, 2006a ), this would suggest the existence of undescribed groups of autotrophic marine Chrysophyceae.

Cryptophyta and relatives

Very interestingly, all Cryptophyta sequences from ≤3 μm filtered samples but one (from the Sargasso Sea, Not, 2007a ) have been recovered from temperate and polar coastal samples (Mediterranean Sea, English Channel, North Sea, Beaufort Sea), suggesting that this division is probably not adapted to low nutrient conditions. Some of these environmental sequences match almost perfectly those of species available in culture, especially for the genera Teleaulax , Plagioselmis , or Geminigera (clade B following Deane, 2002 ), while others are more distantly related to Hemiselmis (clade D following Deane, 2002 ).

Two other groups related to Cryptophyta are also found in ≤3 μm filtered samples. Sequences from the recently described katablepharids ( Okamoto & Inouye, 2005 ) are observed in temperate waters, some being closely related to Leucocryptos and Katablepharis .

Picobiliphytes ( Not, 2007b ), previously referred to as the env Rosko II group, constitute a new phylogenetic group initially only known from sequences retrieved from temperate and arctic waters ( Romari & Vaulot, 2004 ; Lovejoy, 2006 ; Medlin, 2006 ). Recently, a couple of picobiliphyte sequences have been observed in the Sargasso Sea ( Countway, 2007 ; Not, 2007a ). Use of oligonucleotide probes has allowed visualization of the cells in natural samples. They appear to harbor phycobilin-containing plastids and possibly a nucleomorph ( Not, 2007b ).

Chlorarachniophyta

Sequences from Chlorarachniophyta recovered in ≤3 μm filtered samples display only distant relationships with known species and have been found in the coastal Mediterranean and North Seas, in the Arctic Ocean, as well as in the Sargasso Sea, suggesting that they have a wide distribution.

The next frontier: genomics and metagenomics

Genomics offers a holistic approach to microbial ecology. By sequencing all of the genes from an organism, one expects to gain an insight into the intimate relationship between this organism and its environment ( Coleman, 2006 ). Complete genomes of five unicellular algae have been analyzed so far, two from freshwater species, the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae ( Matsuzaki, 2004 ) and the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii ( Merchant, 2007 ), and three from marine environments, the diatom T. pseudonana ( Armbrust, 2004 ) and the prasinophytes Ostreococcus tauri ( Derelle, 2006 ) and O. lucimarinus nomen nudum ( Palenik, 2007 ), all three belonging to the small plankton (see Table 1 ). The latter three genomes are all small, ranging from about 12 Mb for Ostreococcus to 30–35 Mb for diatoms ( Misumi, 2008 ). Other characteristics, such as the G+C content, are variable and appear to depend on the phylogenetic position of the organism rather than on algal characteristics. Many other micro-algal genome projects are underway ( Table 4 ) and the number of sequenced organisms will certainly increase rapidly.

Table 4

Marine micro-algae for which full nuclear genome sequence is or will be soon available

Class Species Strain Small phytoplankton Status or References Web link 
Prasinophyceae Bathycoccus prasinos Bban7 Pending http://www.cns.fr/externe/English/corps_anglais.html 
 Ostreococcus tauri OTH95 Derelle (2006) http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/genomes/view/Ostreococcus-tauri 
 Ostreococcus lucimarinus nomen nudum CC9901 Palenik (2007) http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Ost9901_3/Ost9901_3.home.html 
 Ostreococcus sp.  RCC809 Annotation http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2006/llostreococcus.html 
 Micromonas pusilla RCC827 Annotation http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/DOEmicrobes2005.html 
 Micromonas pusilla CCMP1545 Annotation http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/DOEmicrobes2005.html 
Chlorophyceae Dunaliella salina   Sequencing http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/DOEmicrobes2006.html 
Bacillariophyceae Thallassiosira pseudonana CCMP1335 Armbrust (2004) http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Thaps3/Thaps3.home.html 
 Phaeodactylum tricornutum CCAP1055/1  Finished http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Phatr2/Phatr2.home.html 
 Pseudo-nitzschia sp.    Sequencing http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/DOEmicrobes2006.html 
 Fragilariopsis cylindrus   Sequencing http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2007/fragilariopsis.html 
Prymnesiophyceae Phaeocystis globosa   Pending http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2008/pglobosa.html 
 Phaeocystis antarctica   Pending http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2008/pantarctica.html 
 Emiliania huxleyi CCMP1516  Annotation http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/DOEmicrobes2003.html 
Cryptophyceae Guillardia theta   Assembly http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2007/guillardia.html 
Chlorarachniophyceae Bigelowiella natans   Sequencing http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2007/guillardia.html 
Class Species Strain Small phytoplankton Status or References Web link 
Prasinophyceae Bathycoccus prasinos Bban7 Pending http://www.cns.fr/externe/English/corps_anglais.html 
 Ostreococcus tauri OTH95 Derelle (2006) http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/genomes/view/Ostreococcus-tauri 
 Ostreococcus lucimarinus nomen nudum CC9901 Palenik (2007) http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Ost9901_3/Ost9901_3.home.html 
 Ostreococcus sp.  RCC809 Annotation http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2006/llostreococcus.html 
 Micromonas pusilla RCC827 Annotation http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/DOEmicrobes2005.html 
 Micromonas pusilla CCMP1545 Annotation http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/DOEmicrobes2005.html 
Chlorophyceae Dunaliella salina   Sequencing http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/DOEmicrobes2006.html 
Bacillariophyceae Thallassiosira pseudonana CCMP1335 Armbrust (2004) http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Thaps3/Thaps3.home.html 
 Phaeodactylum tricornutum CCAP1055/1  Finished http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Phatr2/Phatr2.home.html 
 Pseudo-nitzschia sp.    Sequencing http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/DOEmicrobes2006.html 
 Fragilariopsis cylindrus   Sequencing http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2007/fragilariopsis.html 
Prymnesiophyceae Phaeocystis globosa   Pending http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2008/pglobosa.html 
 Phaeocystis antarctica   Pending http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2008/pantarctica.html 
 Emiliania huxleyi CCMP1516  Annotation http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/DOEmicrobes2003.html 
Cryptophyceae Guillardia theta   Assembly http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2007/guillardia.html 
Chlorarachniophyceae Bigelowiella natans   Sequencing http://www.jgi.doe.gov/sequencing/why/CSP2007/guillardia.html 

Complete genomes yield information that can be used for taxonomic analyses. For example, the two Ostreococcus strains the genomes of which have been published have similar ultrastructural cell morphologies and very similar 18S sequences (99.6% of identity), but the average amino-acid identity between their orthologous genes is only 70%, which represents by far the highest difference known for species belonging to the same genus ( Palenik, 2007 ). This indicates how the genetic diversity of picoeukaryotes, which have usually a very simple morphology, is probably largely underestimated and how genomics can be used to explore this diversity. The availability of complete genomes also provides the possibility to describe new markers of diversity or to study the evolution of a gene family in a lineage or between algae belonging to different phyla (e.g. heat shock proteins, Waters & Rioflorido, 2007 ).

Although the functional analysis of small phytoplankton genomes is still in its infancy, it already provides some interesting clues about the adaptation of these organisms to their environment. For example, several observations suggest that diatoms are not CO 2 -limited under natural oceanic conditions. The analysis of genes potentially involved in CO 2 concentration mechanisms (CCM) such as C 4 -photosynthesis or biophysical CCM leads to new hypotheses that can be tested experimentally. Genes encoding all of the enzymes required for C 4 -photosynthesis have been identified both in the diatoms T. pseudonana and Phaeodactylum tricornutum ( Kroth, 2008 ) and in the two Ostreococcus genomes ( Derelle, 2006 ; Palenik, 2007 ). This raises exciting questions, because, despite its high energetic cost, C4-photosynthesis could confer a critical ecological advantage under CO 2 -limiting conditions, such as in phytoplankton blooms. Furthermore, recent experimental work supports the idea that C 4 -based CO 2 -concentrating mechanisms are widely distributed in diatoms ( McGinn & Morel, 2008 ).

The preparation of complete tiling arrays based on the genome sequence of an organism provides a useful tool for probing global gene expression under various culture conditions. This technology has been used recently for the identification of genes involved in silica metabolism of T. pseudonana ( Mock, 2008 ). Under conditions of limiting silica concentrations, a set of 75 genes showing no similarities to known proteins were induced. Another set of genes was induced when both silica and iron were limiting, showing possible interactions between these two metabolisms or, alternatively, that iron is a required cofactor for silica metabolism. Interestingly, in these experiments, the whole-genome expression profiling identified 3000 new genes that were not annotated previously and included noncoding and antisense RNAs.

Another example of possible environmental adaptations deduced from genome analyses comes from a global survey for selenoenzymes in available complete genomes, including the three small algae described above ( Lobanov, 2007 ). Selenoproteins are known to be more catalytically active than similar enzymes lacking selenium and thus cells having genes coding for these enzymes may require less of that protein and can thereby acquire a selective advantage in some environments. Selenoenzymes are present in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, but the number of pathways in which they are implicated varies enormously between organisms. Interestingly, an unusually high content of selenoprotein-coding genes has been found in both Ostreococcus ( Palenik, 2007 ) and in the diatom T. pseudonana ( Lobanov, 2007 ), whereas the selenoproteomes of terrestrial organisms were reduced or completely lost. This strongly suggests that aquatic life supports selenium utilization, whereas terrestrial habitats lead to reduced use of this trace element due to unknown environmental factors ( Lobanov, 2007 ).

These examples show how genomics can provide important new clues about the adaptation of small algae to their environment, although most hypotheses are still awaiting experimental support. This suggests at least two research directions: one relying on functional studies based on hypotheses emerging from genome analyses and the other supported by the acquisition of new algal genomes ( Table 4 ). For instance, genomes of other prasinophyte strains ( Ostreococcus RCC809, B. prasinos , and M. pusilla ) isolated from different environments ( Rodríguez, 2005 ; Slapeta, 2006 ) are currently being sequenced. Comparison of these genomes will foster new hypotheses for future functional approaches.

Nucleomorph, mitochondrial, or chloroplastic genomes of several microalgae have also been sequenced ( Gilson, 2006 ; de Cambiaire, 2007 ; Oudot-Le Secq, 2007 ). These genomes are much smaller than nuclear genomes and yield information on the organism evolution following primary or secondary endosymbiosis events. For small marine autotrophic eukaryotes, the only organelle genomes available are those of the three organisms for which the complete nuclear genome has been sequenced, i.e. O. tauri ( Robbens, 2007 ), O. lucimarinus ( Palenik, 2007 ), and T. pseudonana ( Oudot-Le Secq, 2007 ). These genomes are very compact. The mitochondrial genomes of the two Ostreococcus are the most gene-dense mitochondrial genomes of all Chlorophyta and are characterized by a unique segmental duplication covering 44% of the genome, not observed before in green algae. The chloroplast genomes show a classical circular quadripartite structure with both large and small single copy regions, separated by two inverted repeat sequences. Based on genome size and number of genes, the Ostreococcus chloroplast genomes are the smallest known among the green algae. Thalassiosira pseudonana chloroplast genome is also compact with small intergenic regions and no introns. Gene content is similar to that of both the centric Odontella sinensis and the pennate P. tricornutum diatoms.

Metagenomics approaches, i.e. the direct sequencing of large genome fragments from natural samples, are yielding a tremendous amount of new information on environmental genetic diversity. For example, in the Sargasso Sea study ( Venter, 2004 ), a total of 1045 billion base pairs of nonredundant sequences were generated, originating from an estimate of 1804 different genomic species including 148 new bacterial phylotypes. Although most samples were filtered through 0.8 μm, which strongly biased the acquired data towards prokaryotes, eukaryotic sequences nevertheless represented 4–18% of the estimated prokaryotic diversity, depending on assumptions for the average prokaryote vs. eukaryote genome size ratio. These sequences correspond to species that are broadly dispersed throughout the eukaryotic tree of life ( Piganeau, 2008 ). In particular, at least two new Ostreococcus strains have been identified. Ostreococus scaffolds cover 23% of the complete nuclear genome and 14% of the total number of protein-coding genes in O. tauri ( Piganeau & Moreau, 2007 ). Picoeukaryote sequences have not yet been specifically analyzed in other oceanic metagenomics data sets (e.g. DeLong, 2006 ), but are most probably present.

Concluding remarks

Clearly, the small number of photosynthetic picoplankton species that has been described constitutes the tip of the iceberg because many of the 18S rRNA gene sequences recovered from the environment do not match those from species in culture. In fact, the number of environmental sequences from photosynthetic picoplankton remains quite small in comparison with heterotrophic ones because clone libraries are heavily biased towards the latter. New approaches such as amplification of 18S rRNA gene with primers biased towards certain groups (e.g. Chlorophyta, Viprey, 2008 ), construction of clone libraries for plastid 16S rRNA genes ( Fuller, 2006a ), or from cells sorted by flow cytometry on the basis of chlorophyll fluorescence should help explore the real extent of photosynthetic picoplankton diversity. The genomes of several prasinophytes strains ( Micromonas , Ostreococcus , and Bathycoccus ) are or will soon be available and their comparison should allow fascinating insight linking genetic to functional diversity. Metagenomics approaches will also lead in the near future to the production of a tremendous amount of new data. However, because eukaryote genomes are clearly larger and less gene dense than prokaryote ones, the analysis and exploitation of environmental genomic data for eukaryotes ( Piganeau, 2008 ) at a functional level will require extensive effort drawing from many disciplines in particular bioinformatics, genetics, physiology, and ecology.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the numerous colleagues who have contributed over the years to develop research on eukaryotic picophytoplankton, in particular those of the ‘groupe Plancton’ in Roscoff and especially Nathalie Simon, Laure Guillou, Dominique Marie, Florence Le Gall, Seung Yeo Moon, and Khadidja Romari, who have laid the foundations of our involvement in the field. Our long-time partnership with the laboratories from Dave Scanlan at the University of Warwick and Ramon Massana in Barcelona has helped us to develop many aspects of picoplankton research. Jahn Throndsen at the University of Oslo is warmly acknowledged for sharing his vast knowledge of small algae with us. We are indebted to Nigel Grimsley for helping us to improve the final version. A lot of this research has benefited from generous funding from the European Union (PICODIV FP5 program, Marine Genomics Europe GOCE-CT-2004-505403), the Région Bretagne (PicManche), the GIS Génomique (PicOcéan), and the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (PicoFunPac).

References

Acinas
SG
Rodriguez-Valera
F
Pedrós-Alió
C
(
1997
)
Spatial and temporal variation in marine bacterioplankton diversity as shown by RFLP fingerprinting of PCR amplified 16S rDNA
.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol
 
24
:
27
40
.
Ake Castillo
JA
Hernandez Becerril
DU
Del Castillo
MEM
Bravo Sierra
E
(
2001
)
Species of Minidiscus (Bacillariophyceae) in the Mexican Pacific Ocean
.
Cryptogam Algol
 
22
:
101
107
.
Amann
R
Kuhl
M
(
1998
)
In situ methods for assessment of microorganisms and their activities
.
Curr Opin Microbiol
 
1
:
352
358
.
Andersen
RA
(
2007
) Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton web site ( http://ccmp.bigelow.org/ ).
Andersen
RA
Kawachi
M
(
2005
)
Traditional Microalgae isolation techniques
.
Algal Culturing Techniques
  (
Andersen
RA
, ed), pp.
83
100
.
Elsevier/Academic Press
, Amsterdam.
Andersen
RA
Saunders
GW
Paskind
MP
Sexton
J
(
1993
)
Ultrastructure and 18S rRNA gene sequence for Pelagomonas calceolata gen. and sp. nov. and the description of a new algal class, the Pelagophyceae classis nov
.
J Phycol
 
29
:
701
715
.
Andersen
RA
Bidigare
RR
Keller
MD
Latasa
M
(
1996
)
A comparison of HPLC pigment signatures and electron microscopic observations for oligotrophic waters of the North Atlantic and Pacific Oceans
.
Deep-Sea Res II
 
43
:
517
537
.
Andersen
RA
Morton
SL
Sexton
JP
(
1997
)
CCMP-Provasoli-Guillard national center for culture of marine phytoplankton
.
J Phycol
 
33
:
1
75
.
Andersen
RA
Brett
RW
Potter
D
Sexton
JP
(
1998
)
Phylogeny of the Eustigmatophyceae based upon 18S rDNA, with emphasis on Nannochloropsis
.
Protist
 
149
:
61
74
.
Andreoli
C
Rascio
N
Casador
G
(
1978
)
Chlorella nana sp. nov. (Chlorophyceae)
:
a new marine Chlorella
  . Bot Mar
21
:
253
256
.
Armbrust
EV
Berges
JA
Bowler
C
et al . (
2004
)
The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana
:
ecology, evolution, and metabolism
  . Science
306
:
79
86
.
Ashelford
KE
Chuzhanova
NA
Fry
JC
Jones
AJ
Weightman
AJ
(
2006
)
New screening software shows that most recent large 16S rRNA gene clone libraries contain chimeras
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
72
:
5734
5741
.
Azam
F
Fenchel
T
Field
JG
Gray
JS
Meyer-Reil
LA
Thingstad
F
(
1983
)
The ecological role of water column microbes in the sea
.
Mar Ecol Prog Ser
 
10
:
257
263
.
Backe Hansen
P
Throndsen
J
(
2002
)
Occurrence of pico- and smaller nanoplanktonic flagellates in the inner Oslofjord, eastern Norway, during the breeding season of the blue mussel ( Mytilus edulis L.)
.
Sarsia
 
87
:
65
74
.
Bass
D
Cavalier-Smith
T
(
2004
)
Phylum-specific environmental DNA analysis reveals remarkably high global biodiversity of Cercozoa (Protozoa)
.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol
 
54
:
2393
2404
.
Behnke
A
Bunge
J
Barger
K
Breiner
HW
Alla
V
Stoeck
T
(
2006
)
Microeukaryote community patterns along an O 2 /H 2 S gradient in a supersulfidic anoxic Fjord (Framvaren, Norway)
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
72
:
3626
3636
.
Béjà
O
Aravind
L
Koonin
EV
et al . (
2000
)
Bacterial rhodopsin
:
evidence for a new type of phototrophy in the sea
  . Science
289
:
1902
1906
.
Berglund
J
Jurgens
K
Bruchmuller
I
Wedin
M
Andersson
A
(
2005
)
Use of group-specific PCR primers for identification of chrysophytes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
.
Aquat Microb Ecol
 
39
:
171
182
.
Berney
C
Fahrni
J
Pawlowski
J
(
2004
)
How many novel eukaryotic ‘kingdoms’?
:
pitfalls and limitations of environmental DNA surveys
  . BMC Biol
2
:
13
.
Biegala
IC
Not
F
Vaulot
D
Simon
N
(
2003
)
Quantitative assessment of picoeucaryotes in the natural environment using taxon specific oligonucleotide probes in association with TSA-FISH (tyramide signal amplification-fluorescent in situ hybridization) and flow cytometry
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
69
:
5519
5529
.
Booth
BC
Marchant
HJ
(
1987
)
Parmales, a new order of marine chrysophytes, with desriptions of three new genera and seven new species
.
J Phycol
 
23
:
245
260
.
Bravo-Sierra
E
Hernandez-Becerril
DU
(
2003
)
Parmales (Chrysophyceae) from the Gulf of Tehuantepec, Mexico, including the description of a new species, Tetraparma insecta sp. nov., and a proposal to the taxonomy of the group
.
J Phycol
 
39
:
577
583
.
Brunet
C
Casotti
R
Vantrepotte
V
Corato
F
Conversano
F
(
2006
)
Picophytoplankton diversity and photoacclimation in the Strait of Sicily (Mediterranean Sea) in summer. I. Mesoscale variations
.
Aquat Microb Ecol
 
44
:
127
141
.
Buskey
EJ
Liu
HB
Collumb
C
Bersano
JGF
(
2001
)
The decline and recovery of a persistent Texas brown tide algal bloom in the Laguna Madre (Texas, USA)
.
Estuaries
 
24
:
337
346
.
Butcher
R
(
1952
)
Contributions to our knowledge of the smaller marine algae
.
J Mar Biol Assoc UK
 
31
:
175
191
.
Campbell
L
Nolla
HA
Vaulot
D
(
1994a
)
The importance of Prochlorococcus to community structure in the central North Pacific Ocean
.
Limnol Oceanogr
 
39
:
954
961
.
Campbell
L
Shapiro
LP
Haugen
E
(
1994b
)
Immunochemical characterization of eukaryotic ultraplankton from the Atlantic and Pacific oceans
.
J Plankton Res
 
16
:
35
51
.
Caron
DA
(
1983
)
Technique for enumeration of heterotrophic and phototrophic nanoplankton, using epifluorescence microscopy, and comparison with other procedures
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
46
:
491
498
.
Caron
DA
Dennett
MR
Moran
DM
et al . (
2003
)
Development and application of a monoclonal-antibody technique for counting Aureococcus anophagefferens , an alga causing recurrent brown tides in the Mid-Atlantic United States
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
69
:
5492
5502
.
Chang
FH
(
1983
)
Winter phytoplankton and microzooplankton populations off the coast of Westland, New Zealand, 1979
.
New Zeal J Mar Fresh Res
 
17
:
279
304
.
Chisholm
SW
Olson
RJ
Zettler
ER
Waterbury
J
Goericke
R
Welschmeyer
N
(
1988
)
A novel free-living prochlorophyte occurs at high cell concentrations in the oceanic euphotic zone
.
Nature
 
334
:
340
343
.
Coleman
ML
Sullivan
MB
Martiny
AC
Steglich
C
Barry
K
DeLong
EF
Chisholm
SW
(
2006
)
Genomic islands and the ecology and evolution of Prochlorococcus
.
Science
 
311
:
1768
1770
.
Collier
JL
(
2000
)
Flow cytometry and the single cell in phycology
.
J Phycol
 
36
:
628
644
.
Cottrell
MT
Suttle
CA
(
1991
)
Wide-spread occurence and clonal variation in viruses which cause lysis of a cosmopolitan, eukaryotic marine phytoplankter, Micromonas pusilla
.
Mar Ecol Prog Ser
 
78
:
1
9
.
Countway
PD
Caron
DA
(
2006
)
Abundance and distribution of Ostreococcus sp. in the San Pedro Channel, California, as revealed by quantitative PCR
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
72
:
2496
2506
.
Countway
PD
Gast
RJ
Savai
P
Caron
DA
(
2005
)
Protistan diversity estimates based on 18S rDNA from seawater incubations in the western North Atlantic
.
J Euk Microbiol
 
52
:
95
106
.
Countway
PD
Gast
RJ
Dennett
MR
Savai
P
Rose
JM
Caron
DA
(
2007
)
Distinct protistan assemblages characerize the euphotic zone and deep sea (2500 m) of the western North Atlantic (Sargasso Sea and Gulf Stream)
.
Environ Microbiol
 
9
:
1219
1232
.
Courties
C
Vaquer
A
Trousselier
M
et al . (
1994
)
Smallest eukaryotic organism
.
Nature
 
370
:
255
.
Dahl
E
Bagøien
E
Edvardsen
B
Stenseth
NC
(
2005
)
The dynamics of Chrysochromulina species in the Skagerrak in relation to environmental conditions
.
J Sea Res
 
54
:
15
24
.
Davidovich
NA
Bates
SS
(
1998
)
Sexual reproduction in the pennate diatoms Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries and P. pseudodelicatissima (Bacillariophyceae)
.
J Phycol
 
34
:
126
137
.
Deane
JA
Strachan
IM
Saunders
GW
Hill
DRA
McFadden
GI
(
2002
)
Cryptomonad evolution
:
nuclear 18S rDNA phylogeny versus cell morphology and pigmentation
  . J Phycol
38
:
1236
1244
.
De Cambiaire
JC
Otis
C
Turmel
M
Lemieux
C
(
2007
)
The chloroplast genome sequence of the green alga Leptosira terrestris
:
multiple losses of the inverted repeat and extensive genome rearrangements within the Trebouxiophyceae
  . BMC Genom
8
:
213
.
DeLong
EF
Wickhan
GS
Pace
NR
(
1989
)
Phylogenetic stains
:
ribosomal RNA-based probes for the identification of single cells
  . Science
243
:
1360
1363
.
DeLong
EF
Preston
CM
Mincer
T
et al . (
2006
)
Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean's interior
.
Science
 
311
:
496
503
.
Delwiche
CF
Palmer
JD
(
1996
)
Rampant horizontal transfer and duplication of RubisCO genes in eubacteria and plastids
.
Mol Biol Evol
 
13
:
873
882
.
Derelle
E
Ferraz
C
Rombauts
S
et al . (
2006
)
Genome analysis of the smallest free-living eukaryote Ostreococcus tauri unveils many unique features
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
103
:
11647
11652
.
Díez
B
Pedrós-Alió
C
Marsh
TL
Massana
R
(
2001a
)
Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) to study the diversity of marine picoeukaryotic assemblages and comparison of DGGE with other molecular techniques
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
67
:
2942
2951
.
Díez
B
Pedrós-Alió
C
Massana
R
(
2001b
)
Study of genetic diversity of eukaryotic picoplankton in different oceanic regions by small-subunit rRNA gene cloning and sequencing
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
67
:
2932
2941
.
Dufresne
A
Salanoubat
M
Partensky
F
et al . (
2003
)
Genome sequence of the cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus marinus SS120, a nearly minimal oxyphototrophic genome
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
100
:
10020
10025
.
Edvardsen
B
Eikrem
W
Shalchian-Tabrizi
K
Riisberg
I
Johnsen
G
Naustvoll
L
Throndsen
J
(
2007
)
Verrucophora farcimen gen. et sp. nov. (Dictyochophyceae, Heterokonta) – a bloom-forming ichthyotoxic flagellate from the Skagerrak, Norway
.
J Phycol
 
43
:
1054
1070
.
Eikrem
W
Edvardsen
B
(
1999
)
Chrysochromulina fragaria sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae), a new haptophyte flagellate from Norwegian waters
.
Phycologia
 
38
:
149
155
.
Eikrem
W
Throndsen
J
(
1990
)
The ultrastructure of Bathycoccus gen. nov. and B. prasinos sp. nov., a non-motile picoplanktonic alga (Chlorophyta, Prasinophyceae) from the Mediterranean and Atlantic
.
Phycologia
 
29
:
344
350
.
Eikrem
W
Romari
K
Latasa
M
Le Gall
F
Throndsen
J
Vaulot
D
(
2004
)
Florenciella parvula gen. and sp. nov. (Dictyochophyceae, Heterokontophyta) a small flagellate isolated from the English Channel
.
Phycologia
 
43
:
658
668
.
Eikrem
W
Edvardsen
B
Throndsen
J
(
2008
)
Renaming Verrucophora farcimen Eikrem, Edvardsen et Throndsen
.
Phycol Res
  , in press.
Estep
KW
Davis
PG
Hargraves
PE
Sieburth
JM
(
1984
)
Chloroplast containing microflagellates in natural populations of North Atlantic nanoplankton
:
their identification and distribution; including a description of five new species of Chrysochromulina
  . Protistologica
20
:
613
634
.
Fahnenstiel
GL
Redalje
DG
Lohrenz
SE
(
1994
)
Has the importance of photoautotrophic picoplankton been overestimated?
Limnol Oceanogr
 
39
:
432
438
.
Fawley
MW
Qin
MB
Yun
Y
(
1999
)
The relationship between Pseudoscourfieldia marina and Pycnococcus provasolii (Prasinophyceae, Chlorophyta)
:
evidence from 18S rDNA sequence data
  . J Phycol
35
:
838
843
.
Fuller
NJ
Campbell
C
Allen
DJ
Pitt
FD
Le Gall
F
Vaulot
D
Scanlan
DJ
(
2006a
)
Analysis of photosynthetic picoeukaryote diversity at open ocean sites in the Arabian Sea using a PCR biased towards marine algal plastids
.
Aquat Microb Ecol
 
43
:
79
93
.
Fuller
NJ
Tarran
G
Cummings
D
et al . (
2006b
)
Molecular analysis of photosynthetic picoeukaryote community structure along an Arabian Sea transect
.
Limnol Oceanogr
 
51
:
2502
2514
.
Gaarder
T
(
1932
)
Untersuchungen über Produktions und Lebensbedingungen in norwegishen Austern-Pollen
.
Bergen Museums Årbok, Naturvidenskapelig Rekke
 
3
:
1
64
.
George
EA
(
1957
)
A note on Stichococcus bacillaris Naeg. and some species of Chlorella as marine algae
.
J Mar Biol Assoc UK
 
36
:
111
114
.
Gilson
PR
Su
V
Slamovits
CH
Reith
ME
Keeling
PJ
McFadden
GI
(
2006
)
Complete nucleotide sequence of the chlorarachniophyte nucleomorph
:
nature's smallest nucleus
  . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
103
:
9566
9571
.
Giovannoni
SJ
Britschgi
TB
Moyer
CL
Field
KG
(
1990
)
Genetic diversity in Sargasso Sea bacterioplankton
.
Nature
 
345
:
60
63
.
Guillard
RRL
Keller
MD
O'Kelly
CJ
Floyd
GL
(
1991
)
Pycnococcus provasolii gen. et sp. nov., a coccoid prasinoxanthin-containing phytoplankter from the western North Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico
.
J Phycol
 
27
:
39
47
.
Guillou
L
Chrétiennot-Dinet
M-J
Medlin
LK
Claustre
H
Loiseaux-de Goër
S
Vaulot
D
(
1999a
)
Bolidomonas
:
a new genus with two species belonging to a new algal class, the Bolidophyceae (Heterokonta)
  . J Phycol
35
:
368
381
.
Guillou
L
Moon-van der Staay
SY
Claustre
H
Partensky
F
Vaulot
D
(
1999b
)
Diversity and abundance of Bolidophyceae (Heterokonta) in two oceanic regions
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
65
:
4528
4536
.
Guillou
L
Eikrem
W
Chrétiennot-Dinet
M-J
et al . (
2004
)
Diversity of picoplanktonic prasinophytes assessed by direct nuclear SSU rDNA sequencing of environmental samples and novel isolates retrieved from oceanic and coastal marine ecosystems
.
Protist
 
155
:
193
214
.
Hallegraeff
GM
(
1983
)
Scale-bearing and loricate nanoplankton from the East Autralian Current
.
Bot Mar
 
26
:
493
515
.
Henley
WJ
Hironaka
JL
Guillou
L
Buchheim
MA
Buchheim
JA
Fawley
MW
Fawley
KP
(
2004
)
Phylogenetic analysis of the ‘ Nannochloris -like’ algae and diagnoses of Picochlorum oklahomensis gen. et sp. nov. (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta)
.
Phycologia
 
43
:
641
652
.
Herbland
A
Voituriez
B
(
1979
)
Hydrological structure analysis for estimating the primary production in the tropical Atlantic Ocean
.
J Mar Res
 
37
:
87
101
.
Hibberd
DJ
Chrétiennot-Dinet
M-J
(
1979
)
Ultrastructure and taxonomy of Rhizochromulina marina gen et sp. nov., an ameboid marine chrysophyte
.
J Mar Biol Assoc UK
 
59
:
179
193
.
Hobbie
JE
Daley
RJ
Jasper
S
(
1977
)
Use of Nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
33
:
1225
1228
.
Hori
T
Moestrup
Ø
Hoffman
LR
(
1995
)
Fine structural studies on an ultraplanktonic species of Pyramimonas , P. virginica (Prasinophyceae), with a discussion of subgenera within the genus Pyramimonas
.
Eur J Phycol
 
30
:
219
234
.
Johnson
PW
Sieburth
JM
(
1979
)
Chroococcoid cyanobacteria in the sea
:
a ubiquitous and diverse phototrophic biomass
  . Limnol Oceanogr
24
:
928
935
.
Johnson
PW
Sieburth
JM
(
1982
)
In-situ morphology and occurence of eucaryotic phototrophs of bacterial size in the picoplankton of estuarine and oceanic waters
.
J Phycol
 
18
:
318
327
.
Jones
HLJ
Leadbeater
BSC
Green
JC
(
1994
)
An ultrastructral study of Marsupiomonas pelliculata gen. et sp. nov., a new member of the Pedinophyceae
.
Eur J Phycol
 
29
:
171
181
.
Kang
JS
Kang
SH
Kim
D
Kim
DY
(
2003
)
Planktonic centric diatom Minidiscus chilensis dominated sediment trap material in eastern Bransfield Strait, Antarctica
.
Mar Ecol Prog Ser
 
255
:
93
99
.
Kang
S-H
Fryxell
G
(
1992
)
Fragilariopsis cylindrus (Grunow) Krieger: the most abundant diatom in water column assemblages of Antarctic marginal ice-edge zones
.
Polar Biol
 
12
:
609
627
.
Kawachi
M
Atsumi
M
Ikemoto
H
Miyachi
S
(
2002a
)
Pinguiochrysis pyriformis gen. et sp. nov. (Pinguiophyceae), a new picoplanktonic alga isolated from the Pacific Ocean
.
Phycol Res
 
50
:
49
56
.
Kawachi
M
Inouye
I
Honda
D
O'Kelly
CJ
Bailey
JC
Bidigare
RR
Andersen
RA
(
2002b
)
The Pinguiophyceae classis nova , a new class of photosynthetic stramenopiles whose members produce large amounts of omega-3 fatty acids
.
Phycol Res
 
50
:
31
47
.
Knight-Jones
EW
(
1951
)
Preliminary studies of nanoplankton and ultraplankton systematics and abundance by a quantitative culture method
.
Extrait J Conseil Int Exploration
 
17
:
139
155
.
Kroth
PG
Chiovitti
A
Gruber
A
et al . (
2008
)
A model for carbohydrate metabolism in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum deduced from domparative whole genome analysis
.
PLoS ONE
 
3
:
e1426
.
Larsen
J
Sournia
A
(
1991
)
The diversity of heterotrophic dinoflagellates
.
The Biology of Free-Living Heterotrophic Protists
  , Vol.
45
(
Patterson
DJ
Larsen
J
, eds), pp.
313
332
.
Clarendon Press
, Oxford.
Latasa
M
Scharek
R
Le Gall
F
Guillou
L
(
2004
)
Pigment suites and taxonomic groups in Prasinophyceae
.
J Phycol
 
40
:
1149
1155
.
Le Gall
F
Rigaut-Jalabert
F
Marie
D
Garczareck
L
Viprey
M
Godet
A
Vaulot
D
(
2008
)
Picoplankton diversity in the South-East Pacific Ocean from cultures
.
Biogeosciences
 
5
:
203
214
.
Lewin
J
Norris
RE
Jeffrey
SW
Pearson
BE
(
1977
)
An aberrant chrysophycean alga Pelagococcus subviridis gen. nov. et sp. nov. from the north Pacific Ocean
.
J Phycol
 
13
:
259
266
.
Li
WKW
(
1990
)
Particles in “particle-free” seawater
:
growth of ultraphytoplankton and implications for dilution experiments
  . Can J Fish Aquat Sci
47
:
1258
1268
.
Li
WKW
(
1994
)
Primary productivity of prochlorophytes, cyanobacteria, and eucaryotic ultraphytoplankton
:
measurements from flow cytometric sorting
  . Limnol Oceanogr
39
:
169
175
.
Li
WKW
Dickie
PM
(
2001
)
Monitoring phytoplankton, bacterioplankton, and virioplankton in a coastal inlet (Bedford Basin) by flow cytometry
.
Cytometry
 
44
:
236
246
.
Li
WKW
Subba Rao
DV
Harrison
WG
Smith
JC
Cullen
JJ
Irwin
B
Platt
T
(
1983
)
Autotrophic picoplankton in the tropical ocean
.
Science
 
219
:
292
295
.
Lim
EL
Dennett
MR
Caron
DA
(
1999
)
The ecology of Paraphysomonas imperforata based on studies employing oligonucleotide probe identification in coastal water samples and enrichment cultures
.
Limnol Oceanogr
 
44
:
37
51
.
Lin
SJ
Zhang
H
Hou
Y
Miranda
L
Bhattacharya
D
(
2006
)
Development of a dinoflagellate-oriented PCR primer set leads to detection of picoplanktonic dinoflagellates from Long Island Sound
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
72
:
5626
5630
.
Lobanov
AV
Fomenko
DE
Zhang
Y
Sengupta
A
Hatfield
DL
Gladyshev
VN
(
2007
)
Evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic selenoproteomes
:
large selenoproteomes may associate with aquatic life and small with terrestrial life
  . Genome Biol
8
:
R198
.
Lohmann
H
(
1908
)
Üntersuchungen zur Feststellung des vollstandigen Gehaltes des Meeres an Plankton
.
Wiss Meeresunters Abt Kiel
 
10
:
129
370
.
Lohmann
H
(
1911
)
Über das nannoplankton und die Zentrifugierung kleinster Wasserproben zur Gewinnung desselben in lebendem Zustande
.
Int Revue ges Hydrobiol Hydrograph
 
4
:
1
38
.
López-García
P
Rodriguez-Valera
F
Pedrós-Alió
C
Moreira
D
(
2001
)
Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic plankton
.
Nature
 
409
:
603
607
.
López-García
P
Philippe
H
Gail
F
Moreira
D
(
2003
)
Autochthonous eukaryotic diversity in hydrothermal sediment and experimental microcolonizers at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
100
:
697
702
.
Lovejoy
C
Massana
R
Pedrós-Alió
C
(
2006
)
Diversity and distribution of marine microbial eukaryotes in the Arctic Ocean and adjacent seas
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
72
:
3085
3095
.
Lubian
LM
Montero
O
Moreno-Garrido
I
Huertas
IE
Sobrino
C
Gonzalez-del Valle
M
Pares
G
(
2000
)
Nannochloropsis (Eustigmatophyceae) as source of commercially valuable pigments
.
J Appl Phycol
 
12
:
249
255
.
Ludwig
W
Strunk
O
Westram
R
et al . (
2004
)
ARB
:
a software environment for sequence data
  . Nucleic Acids Res
32
:
1363
1371
.
Mackey
MD
Mackey
DJ
Higgins
HW
Wright
SW
(
1996
)
CHEMTAX – a program for estimating class abundances from chemical markers
:
application to HPLC measurements of phytoplankton
  . Mar Ecol Prog Ser
144
:
265
283
.
Manton
I
(
1975
)
Observations on Scourfieldia marina Throndsen and Scourfieldia caeca Belcher et Swale
.
Arch Protistenk
 
117
:
358
368
.
Manton
I
Parke
M
(
1960
)
Further observations on small green flagellates with special reference to possible relatives of Chromulina pusilla Butcher
.
J Mar Biol Assoc UK
 
39
:
275
298
.
Marie
D
Brussaard
CPD
Partensky
F
Vaulot
D
(
1999
)
Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton, bacteria and viruses
.
Current Protocols in Cytometry
  ,
Vol. 11.11
(
Robinson
JP
, ed), pp.
1
15
.
John Wiley & Sons
, New York.
Marie
D
Zhu
F
Balagué
V
Ras
J
Vaulot
D
(
2006
)
Eukaryotic picoplankton communities of the Mediterranean Sea in summer assessed by molecular approaches (DGGE, TTGE, QPCR)
.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol
 
55
:
403
415
.
Massana
R
Balagué
V
Guillou
L
Pedrós-Alió
C
(
2004
)
Picoeukaryotic diversity in an oligotrophic coastal site studied by molecular and culturing approaches
.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol
 
50
:
231
243
.
Matsuzaki
M
Misumi
O
Shin
IT
et al . (
2004
)
Genome sequence of the ultrasmall unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae 10D
.
Nature
 
428
:
653
657
.
McGinn
PJ
Morel
FM
(
2008
)
Expression and inhibition of the carboxylating and decarboxylating enzymes in the photosynthetic C 4 pathway of marine diatoms
.
Plant Physiol
 
146
:
300
309
.
Medlin
LK
Metfies
K
Mehl
H
Wiltshire
KH
Valentin
K
(
2006
)
Picoeukaryotic plankton diversity at the Helgoland Time Series site as assessed by three molecular methods
.
Microb Ecol
 
52
:
53
71
.
Merchant
SS
Prochnik
SE
Vallon
O
et al . (
2007
)
The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions
.
Science
 
318
:
245
251
.
Misumi
O
Yoshida
Y
Nishida
K
et al . (
2008
)
Genome analysis and its significance in four unicellular algae, Cyanidioshyzon merolae , Ostreococcus tauri , Chlamydomonas reinhardtii , and Thalassiosira pseudonana
.
J Plant Res
 
121
:
3
17
.
Mock
T
Samanta
MP
Iverson
V
et al . (
2008
)
Whole-genome expression profiling of the marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana identifies genes involved in silicon bioprocesses
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
105
:
1579
1584
.
Moestrup
Ø
Sengco
M
(
2001
)
Ultrastructural studies on Bigelowiella natans , gen. et sp. nov., a chlorarachniophyte flagellate
.
J Phycol
 
37
:
624
646
.
Moon-van der Staay
SY
Van Der Staay
GWM
Guillou
L
Vaulot
D
Claustre
H
Medlin
LK
(
2000
)
Abundance and diversity of prymnesiophytes in the picoplankton community from the equatorial Pacific Ocean inferred from 18S rDNA sequences
.
Limnol Oceanogr
 
45
:
98
109
.
Moon-van der Staay
SY
De Wachter
R
Vaulot
D
(
2001
)
Oceanic 18S rDNA sequences from picoplankton reveal unsuspected eukaryotic diversity
.
Nature
 
409
:
607
610
.
Moore
LR
Rocap
G
Chisholm
SW
(
1998
)
Physiology and molecular phylogeny of coexisting Prochlorococcus ecotypes
.
Nature
 
393
:
464
467
.
Murphy
LS
Haugen
EM
(
1985
)
The distribution and abundance of phototrophic ultraplankton in the North Atlantic
.
Limnol Oceanogr
 
30
:
47
58
.
Nägeli
C
(
1849
) Gattungen einzelliger Algen physiologish und systematisch bearbeitet . Zürich.
Not
F
Simon
N
Biegala
IC
Vaulot
D
(
2002
)
Application of fluorescent in situ hybridization coupled with tyramide signal amplification (FISH-TSA) to assess eukaryotic picoplankton composition
.
Aquat Microb Ecol
 
28
:
157
166
.
Not
F
Latasa
M
Marie
D
Cariou
T
Vaulot
D
Simon
N
(
2004
)
A single species Micromonas pusilla (Prasinophyceae) dominates the eukaryotic picoplankton in the western English Channel
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
70
:
4064
4072
.
Not
F
Massana
R
Latasa
M
et al . (
2005
)
Late summer community composition and abundance of photosynthetic picoeukaryotes in Norwegian and Barents Seas
.
Limnol Oceanogr
 
50
:
1677
1686
.
Not
F
Gausling
R
Azam
F
Heidelberg
JF
Worden
AZ
(
2007a
)
Vertical distribution of picoeukaryotic diversity in the Sargasso Sea
.
Environ Microbiol
 
9
:
1233
1252
.
Not
F
Valentin
K
Romari
K
et al . (
2007b
)
Picobiliphytes, a new marine picoplanktonic algal group with unknown affinities to other eukaryotes
.
Science
 
315
:
252
254
.
Novarino
G
Oliva
E
Perez Uz
B
(
2002
)
Nanoplankton protists from the western Mediterranean Sea. I. Occurrence, ultrastructure, taxonomy and ecological role of the mixotrophic flagellate Ollicola vangoorii (Chrysomonadidae=Chrysophyceae p.p.)
.
Sci Mar
 
66
:
233
247
.
Okamoto
N
Inouye
I
(
2005
)
The katablepharids are a distant sister group of the Cryptophyta
:
a proposal for Katablepharidophyta divisio nova/Kathablepharida phylum novum based on SSU rDNA and beta-tubulin phylogeny
  . Protist
156
:
163
179
.
O'Kelly
CJ
Sieracki
ME
Thier
EC
Hobson
IC
(
2003
)
A transient bloom of Ostreococcus (Chlorophyta, Prasinophyceae) in West Neck Bay, Long Island, New York
.
J Phycol
 
39
:
850
854
.
Olson
RJ
Vaulot
D
Chisholm
SW
(
1985
)
Marine phytoplankton distributions measured using shipboard flow cytometry
.
Deep – Sea Res A
 
32
:
1273
1280
.
Oudot-Le Secq
MP
Grimwood
J
Shapiro
H
Armbrust
EV
Bowler
C
Green
BR
(
2007
)
Chloroplast genomes of the diatoms Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana
:
comparison with other plastid genomes of the red lineage
  . Mol Genet Genom
277
:
427
439
.
Palenik
B
Grimwood
J
Aerts
A
et al . (
2007
)
The tiny eukaryote Ostreococcus provides genomic insights into the paradox of plankton speciation
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
 
104
:
7705
7710
.
Paul
JH
Alfreider
A
Wawrik
B
(
2000
)
Micro- and macrodiversity in rbcL sequences in ambient phytoplankton populations from the southeastern Gulf of Mexico
.
Mar Ecol Prog Ser
 
198
:
9
18
.
Piganeau
G
Moreau
H
(
2007
)
Screening the Sargasso Sea metagenome for data to investigate genome evolution in Ostreococcus (Prasinophyceae, Chlorophyta)
.
Gene
 
406
:
184
190
.
Piganeau
G
Desdevises
Y
Derelle
E
Moreau
H
(
2008
)
Picoeukaryotic sequences in the Sagasso Sea metagenome
.
Genome Biol
 
9
:
R5
.
Probert
I
Fresnel
J
Billard
C
Geisen
M
Young
JR
(
2007
)
Light and electron microscope observations of Algirosphaera robusta (Prymnesiophyceae)
.
J Phycol
 
43
:
319
332
.
Prokopowich
CD
Gregory
TR
Crease
TJ
(
2003
)
The correlation between rDNA copy number and genome size in eukaryotes
.
Genome
 
46
:
48
50
.
Pruesse
E
Quast
C
Knittel
K
Fuchs
BM
Ludwig
W
Peplies
J
Glockner
FO
(
2007
)
SILVA
:
a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB
  . Nucleic Acids Res
35
:
7188
7196
.
Ral
JP
Derelle
E
Ferraz
C
et al . (
2004
)
Starch division and partitioning. A mechanism for granule propagation and maintenance in the picophytoplanktonic green alga Ostreococcus tauri
.
Plant Physiol
 
136
:
3333
3340
.
Rappé
MS
Kemp
PF
Giovannoni
SJ
(
1995
)
Chromophyte plastid 16S ribosomal RNA genes found in a clone library from Atlantic Ocean seawater
.
J Phycol
 
31
:
979
988
.
Rappé
MS
Kemp
PF
Giovannoni
SJ
(
1997
)
Phylogenetic diversity of marine coastal picoplankton 16S rRNA genes cloned from the continental shelf off Cape Hatteras, North Carolina
.
Limnol Oceanogr
 
42
:
811
826
.
Rappé
MS
Connon
SA
Vergin
KL
Giovannoni
SJ
(
2002
)
Cultivation of the ubiquitous SAR11 marine bacterioplankton clade
.
Nature
 
418
:
630
633
.
Robbens
S
Derelle
E
Ferraz
C
Wuyts
J
Moreau
H
Van de Peer
Y
(
2007
)
The complete chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA sequence of Ostreococcus tauri
:
organelle genomes of the smallest eukaryote are examples of compaction
  . Mol Biol Evol
24
:
956
968
.
Rocap
G
Larimer
FW
Lamerdin
J
et al . (
2003
)
Genome divergence in two Prochlorococcus ecotypes reflects oceanic niche differentiation
.
Nature
 
424
:
1042
1047
.
Rodríguez
F
Derelle
E
Guillou
L
Le Gall
F
Vaulot
D
Moreau
H
(
2005
)
Ecotype diversity in the marine picoeukaryote Ostreococcus (Chlorophyta, Prasinophyceae)
.
Environ Microbiol
 
7
:
853
859
.
Roesler
CS
Culbertson
CW
Etheridge
SM
Goericke
R
Kiene
RP
Miller
LG
Oremland
RS
(
2002
)
Distribution, production, and ecophysiology of Picocystis strain ML in Mono Lake, California
.
Limnol Oceanogr
 
47
:
440
452
.
Romari
K
Vaulot
D
(
2004
)
Composition and temporal variability of picoeukaryote communities at a coastal site of the English Channel from 18S rDNA sequences
.
Limnol Oceanogr
 
49
:
784
798
.
Ruinen
J
(
1938
)
Notizen über Salzflagellaten
.
Arch Protistenk
 
90
:
210
258
.
Sarno
D
Zingone
A
Saggiomo
V
Carrada
GC
(
1993
)
Phytoplankton biomass and species composition in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon
.
Hydrobiologia
 
271
:
27
40
.
Sarno
D
Kooistra
W
Medlin
LK
Percopo
I
Zingone
A
(
2005
)
Diversity in the genus Skeletonema (Bacillariophyceae). II. An assessment of the taxonomy of S. costatum -like species with the description of four new species
.
J Phycol
 
41
:
151
176
.
Schoemann
W
Becquevort
S
Stefels
J
Rousseau
W
Lancelot
C
(
2005
)
Phaeocystis blooms in the global ocean and their controlling mechanisms: a review
.
J Sea Res
 
53
:
43
66
.
Shapiro
LP
Campbell
L
Haugen
EM
(
1989
)
Immunochemical recognition of phytoplankton species
.
Mar Ecol Prog Ser
 
57
:
219
224
.
Short
SM
Suttle
CA
(
2003
)
Temporal dynamics of natural communities of marine algal viruses and eukaryotes
.
Aquat Microb Ecol
 
32
:
107
119
.
Sieburth
JM
Smetacek
V
Lenz
J
(
1978
)
Pelagic ecosystem structure
:
heterotrophic compartments of the plankton and their relationship to plankton size fractions
  . Limnol Oceanogr
23
:
1256
1263
.
Sieburth
JM
Keller
MD
Johnson
PW
Myklestad
SM
(
1999
)
Widespread occurrence of the oceanic ultraplankter, Prasinococcus capsulatus (Prasinophyceae), the diagnostic “Golgi-decapore complex” and the newly described polysaccharide “capsulan”
.
J Phycol
 
35
:
1032
1043
.
Sieracki
M
Poulton
N
Crosbie
N
(
2005
)
Automated isolation techniques for microalgae
.
Algal Culturing Techniques
  (
Andersen
RA
, ed), pp.
101
116
.
Academic Press
, Amsterdam.
Simon
N
Barlow
RG
Marie
D
Partensky
F
Vaulot
D
(
1994
)
Characterization of oceanic photosynthetic picoeukaryotes by flow cytometry analysis
.
J Phycol
 
30
:
922
935
.
Simon
N
Lebot
N
Marie
D
Partensky
F
Vaulot
D
(
1995
)
Fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes to identify small phytoplankton by flow cytometry
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
61
:
2506
2513
.
Slapeta
J
López-García
P
Moreira
D
(
2006
)
Global dispersal and ancient cryptic species in the smallest marine eukaryotes
.
Mol Biol Evol
 
23
:
23
29
.
Stoeck
T
Epstein
S
(
2003
)
Novel eukaryotic lineages inferred from small-subunit rRNA analyses of oxygen-depleted marine environments
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
69
:
2657
2663
.
Stoeck
T
Hayward
B
Taylor
GT
Varela
R
Epstein
SS
(
2006
)
A multiple PCR-primer approach to access the microeukaryotic diversity in environmental samples
.
Protist
 
157
:
31
43
.
Suda
S
Atsumi
M
Miyashita
H
(
2002
)
Taxonomic characterization of a marine Nannochloropsis species, N. oceanica sp. nov. (Eustigmatophyceae)
.
Phycologia
 
41
:
273
279
.
Suzuki
MT
Taylor
LT
DeLong
EF
(
2000
)
Quantitative analysis of small-subunit rRNA genes in mixed microbial populations via 5′-nuclease assays
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
66
:
4605
4614
.
Tamura
K
Nei
M
(
1993
)
Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees
.
Mol Biol Evol
 
10
:
512
526
.
Thomsen
HA
(
1980
)
Two species of Trigonaspis gen. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) from West Greenland
.
Phycologia
 
19
:
218
229
.
Thomsen
HA
(
1986
)
A survey of the smallest eucaryotic organisms of the marine phytoplankton
.
Canad Bull Fish Aquat Sci
 
214
:
121
158
.
Thomsen
HA
Buck
KR
(
1998
)
Nanoflagellates of the central California waters
:
taxonomy, biogeography and abundance of primitive, green flagellates (Pedinophyceae, Prasinophyceae)
  . Deep-Sea Res II
45
:
1687
1707
.
Thomsen
HA
Buck
KR
Chavez
FP
(
1994
)
Haptophytes as component of marine phytoplankton
.
The Haptophyte Algae
  (
Green
JC
Leadbeater
BSC
, eds), pp.
187
208
.
Oxford Science Publications
, Oxford.
Thomsen
HA
Bjørn
PDP
Højlund
L
Olesen
J
Federsen
JB
(
1995
)
Ericiolus gen. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae); a new coccolithophorid genus from polar and temperate regions
.
Eur J Phycol
 
30
:
29
34
.
Throndsen
J
(
1969
)
Flagellates of Norwegian coastal waters
.
Nytt Magasin for Botanikk
 
16
:
161
216
.
Throndsen
J
(
1973
)
Phytoplankton occurence and distribution in stations sampled during the SCOR WG 15 to the Carribbean Sea, Pacific Ocean and Sargasso Sea in May 1970, based on direct cell counts
  , Vol.
21
(
Tyler
JE
, ed), pp.
D1
D28
.
SCRIPPS Institution of Oceanography, University of California
, La Jolla, CA.
Throndsen
J
(
1978
)
The dilution culture method
.
Phytoplankton Manual
  , Vol.
6
(
Sournia
A
, ed), pp.
218
224
.
UNESCO
, Paris.
Throndsen
J
(
1983
)
Ultra- and nannoplankton flagellates from Coastal waters of Southern Honshu and Kyushu, Japan (including some results from the western part of the Kuroshio off Honshu)
.
Working Party on Taxonomy in the Akashiwo Mondai Kenkyukai Fishing Ground Preservation Division, Research Department, Fisheries Agency, Japan
  (
Chihara
M
Haruhiko
I
, eds), pp.
62
.
Gakujutsu Thosho Printing Co. Ltd
, Tokyo, Japan.
Throndsen
J
Kristiansen
S
(
1982
)
Nanoplankton communities in Haltenbanken waters (Norwegian Sea) during an oil spill experiment, July–August 1
.
Sarsia
 
73
:
71
74
.
Throndsen
J
Kristiansen
S
(
1991
)
Micromonas pusilla (Prasinophyceae) as part of pico- and nanoplankton communities of the Barents Sea
.
Polar Res
 
10
:
201
207
.
Throndsen
J
Zingone
A
(
1997
)
Dolichomastix tenuilepis sp. nov., a first insight into the microanatomy of the genus Dolichomastix (Mamiellales, Prasinophyceae, Chlorophyta)
.
Phycologia
 
36
:
244
254
.
Van Hannen
EJ
Van Agterveld
MP
Gons
HJ
Laanbroek
HJ
(
1998
)
Revealing genetic diversity of eukaryotic microorganisms in aquatic environments by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
.
J Phycol
 
34
:
206
213
.
Vaulot
D
Le Gall
F
Marie
D
Guillou
L
Partensky
F
(
2004
)
The Roscoff Culture Collection (RCC)
:
a collection dedicated to marine picoplankton
  . Nova Hedwigia
79
:
49
70
.
Veldhuis
MJW
Kraay
GW
Timmermans
KR
(
2001
)
Cell death in phytoplankton
:
correlation between changes in membrane permeability, photosynthetic activity, pigmentation and growth
  . Eur J Phycol
36
:
167
177
.
Venter
JC
Remington
K
Heidelberg
JF
et al . (
2004
)
Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea
.
Science
 
304
:
66
74
.
Viprey
M
Guillou
L
Férréol
M
Vaulot
D
(
2008
)
Wide genetic diversity of picoplanktonic green algae (Chloroplastida) in the Mediterranean Sea uncovered by a phylum-biaised PCR approach
.
Environ Microbiol
  , in press.
Von Wintzingerode
F
Göbel
UB
Stackebrandt
E
(
1997
)
Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples
:
pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis
  . FEMS Microbiol Rev
21
:
213
229
.
Vrieling
EG
Vriezekolk
G
Gieskes
WWC
Veenhuis
M
Harder
W
(
1996
)
Immuno-flow cytometric identification and enumeration of the ichthyotoxic dinoflagellate Gyrodinium aureolum Hulburt in artificially mixed algal populations
.
J Plankton Res
 
18
:
1503
1512
.
Watanabe
MM
Suda
S
Inouye
I
Sawaguchi
T
Chihara
M
(
1990
)
Lepidodinium viride gen et sp. nov. (Gymnodiniales, Dinophyta), a green dinoflagellate with a chlorophyll a -containing and b -containing endosymbiont
.
J Phycol
 
26
:
741
751
.
Waterbury
JB
Watson
SW
Guillard
RRL
Brand
LE
(
1979
)
Wide-spread occurence of a unicellular, marine planktonic, cyanobacterium
.
Nature
 
277
:
293
294
.
Waters
ER
Rioflorido
I
(
2007
)
Evolutionary analysis of the small heat shock proteins in five complete algal genomes
.
J Mol Evol
 
65
:
162
174
.
Wawrik
B
Paul
JH
(
2004
)
Phytoplankton community structure and productivity along the axis of the Mississippi River plume in oligotrophic Gulf of Mexico waters
.
Aquat Microb Ecol
 
35
:
185
196
.
West
NJ
Bacchieri
R
Hansen
G
Tomas
C
Lebaron
P
Moreau
H
(
2006
)
Rapid quantification of the toxic alga Prymnesium parvum in natural samples by use of a specific monoclonal antibody and solid-phase cytometry
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
 
72
:
860
868
.
Wislough
S
(
1924
)
Pryczynek do biologji i genezy szlanow leczniczych na Krymie
.
Acta Soc Bot Pol
 
2
:
99
129
.
Worden
AZ
(
2006
)
Picoeukaryote diversity in coastal waters of the Pacific Ocean
.
Aquat Microb Ecol
 
43
:
165
175
.
Worden
AZ
Nolan
JK
Palenik
B
(
2004
)
Assessing the dynamics and ecology of marine picophytoplankton
:
the importance of the eukaryotic component
  . Limnol Oceanogr
49
:
168
179
.
Yuan
J
Chen
MY
Shao
P
Zhou
H
Chen
YQ
Qu
LH
(
2004
)
Genetic diversity of small eukaryotes from the coastal waters of Nansha Islands in China
.
FEMS Microbiol Lett
 
240
:
163
170
.
Zeidner
G
Preston
CM
DeLong
EF
Massana
R
Post
AF
Scanlan
DJ
Béjà
O
(
2003
)
Molecular diversity among marine picophytoplankton as revealed by psbA analyses
.
Environ Microbiol
 
5
:
212
216
.
Zhu
F
Massana
R
Not
F
Marie
D
Vaulot
D
(
2005
)
Mapping of picoeucaryotes in marine ecosystems with quantitative PCR of the 18S rRNA gene
.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol
 
52
:
79
92
.
Zingone
A
Chrétiennot-Dinet
M-J
Lange
M
Medlin
LK
(
1999a
)
Morphological and genetic characterization of Phaeocystis cordata and P. jahnii (Prymnesiophyceae), two new species from the Mediterranean Sea
.
J Phycol
 
35
:
1322
1337
.
Zingone
A
Sarno
D
Forlani
G
(
1999b
)
Seasonal dynamics in the abundance of Micromonas pusilla (Prasinophyceae) and its viruses in the Gulf of Naples (Mediterranean Sea)
.
J Plankton Res
 
21
:
2143
2159
.
Zingone
A
Borra
M
Brunet
C
Forlani
G
Kooistra
W
Procaccini
G
(
2002
)
Phylogenetic position of Crustomastix stigmatica sp. nov. and Dolichomastix tenuilepis in relation to the Mamiellales (Prasinophyceae, Chlorophyta)
.
J Phycol
 
38
:
1024
1039
.
Zingone
A
Percopo
I
Sims
PA
Sarno
D
(
2005
)
Diversity in the genus Skeletonema (Bacillariophyceae). I. A reexamination of the type material of S. costatum with the description of S. grevillei sp. nov
.
J Phycol
 
41
:
140
150
.
Editor: Annick Wilmotte