1-20 of 79684
Sort by
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Logan Blair and others
Published: 18 April 2025
Journal Article
Lauren M McIntyre
Genetics, Volume 229, Issue 4, April 2025, iyaf046, https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf046
Published: 17 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Sophia C Tintori and others
Published: 16 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Jennifer Blanc and Jeremy J Berg
Published: 15 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Nicole S Arnold and others
Published: 11 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Chinmaya Jena and others
Published: 10 April 2025
Journal Article
Eric Lieberman Greer and others
Published: 09 April 2025
Image
Published: 09 April 2025
Fig. 1. Summary of the chromatin factors shown to regulate lifespan. Many chromatin-modifying enzymes and chromatin-binding proteins have been shown to regulate longevity in C. elegans. Those demonstrated to extend lifespan when mutated or overexpressed are highlighted. Proteins shown in circles have been
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Filip Thor and Carl Nettelblad
Published: 07 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Joseph Oberlitner and others
Published: 07 April 2025
Journal Article
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Emily L Spaulding and Dustin L Updike
Published: 07 April 2025
Journal Article
Ignacy Misztal and Gopal Gowane
Published: 05 April 2025
Image
Published: 05 April 2025
Fig. 1. Heritability estimates for a simulated production trait by generation based on true breeding values (realized), genomic Gibbs sampling (G-Gibbs), and predictivity.
Image
Published: 05 April 2025
Fig. 3. Genetic correlation estimates by generation based on true breeding values (realized), genomic Gibbs sampling (G-Gibbs), predictivity of production phenotype by fitness GEBV (Pred-PF), and predictivity of fitness genotype by production GEBV (Pred-FP).
Image
Published: 05 April 2025
Fig. 2. Heritability estimates for a simulated fitness trait by generation based on true breeding values (realized), genomic Gibbs sampling (G-Gibbs), and predictivity.
Journal Article
Ruoyu Chen and others
Genetics, Volume 229, Issue 4, April 2025, iyae217, https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyae217
Published: 04 April 2025
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Fig. 2. Oskar structure and functions in germ granule assembly and translational regulation. a) Domain diagram of Oskar protein. Long and short isoforms use two different start codons: M1 and M139, respectively. Individual functional domains and their functions are shown. b) The function of Long Oskar in th
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Fig. 3. Establishing germline-soma dichotomy. Three mechanisms contribute to germ cell program. Left: GCL degrades somatic signaling pathways. Middle: Nanos blocks translation of soma-promoting RNAs. Right: Pgc inhibits transcription in pole cells. Images adapted from Martinho et al . (2004) and Cinalli
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Fig. 4. Long Oskar function in mitochondrial localization. a) The N-terminal region that is unique to the Long Oskar isoform represses the function of Short Oskar, for example, forming germ granules. The structural domains of Oskar protein is shown in the schematics. b) Long Oskar concentrates actin and rec
Image
Published: 04 April 2025
Fig. 6. The maternal-to-zygotic transition in germ cells. Red gradient depicts transcriptional repression, while green gradient represents the gradual transition from the maternal RNA pool provided to the oocyte to zygotic transcription in the embryo. Pgc, Ovo, Nanos, Osa, and Su(var)3-3 contribute to trans