-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Daniëlle Bodmer, Wilhelmina van den Hurk, Jan J. M. van Groningen, Marc J. Eleveld, Gerard J. M. Martens, Marian A. J. Weterman, Ad Geurts van Kessel, Understanding familial and non-familial renal cell cancer, Human Molecular Genetics, Volume 11, Issue 20, 1 October 2002, Pages 2489–2498, https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/11.20.2489
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Molecular genetic analysis of familial and non-familial cases of conventional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) revealed a critical role(s) for multiple genes on human chromosome 3. For some of these genes, e.g. VHL, such a role has been firmly established, whereas for others, definite confirmation is still pending. Additionally, a novel role for constitutional chromosome 3 translocations as risk factors for conventional RCC development is rapidly emerging. Also, several candidate loci have been mapped to other chromosomes in both familial and non-familial RCCs of distinct histologic subtypes. The MET gene on chromosome 7, for example, was found to be involved in both forms of papillary RCC. A PRCC–TFE3 fusion gene is typically encountered in t(X;1)-positive non-familial papillary RCCs and results in abrogation of the cell cycle mitotic spindle checkpoint in a dominant-negative fashion, thus leading to RCC. Together, these data turn human RCC into a model system in which different aspects of both familial and non-familial syndromes may act as novel paradigms for cancer development.